ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2014 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Saturday, April 14, 2012

Feminism is failure

Female careers are a fallback plan:
Forget ambition, financial security and that first-class degree. A controversial study has concluded that the real reason women pursue careers is because they fear they are too unattractive to get married. The research team, made up of three women and two men, said that when men are thin on the ground, 'women are more likely to choose briefcase over baby'.

And the plainer a woman is, they claim, the more she is driven to succeed in the workplace.
It's long been observed that the uglier a woman is, the more likely she is to be a feminist. And it was always logical, too, that women who couldn't compete with other women in the traditional manner would seek to change the rules of the game. But now there is some scientific evidence supporting both the logic and the observation, and it could be very useful in helping counteract the feminist propaganda that inundates young women from the time they are girls, encouraging them to waste their youth and fertility in chasing careers rather than families.

The message is a simple and straighforward one: feminism is for female losers in the game of Life.

Labels: ,

125 Comments:

Anonymous daddynichol April 14, 2012 6:52 AM  

In my little social sphere, the prettier the girl/woman is, the more likely she'll be target of the feminist crowd. The only exception are women in show biz (strippers included). If they tout the feminist line, they get a pass. However, most will say the right thing, but act differently when men are around and the feminist are absent.

Anonymous HongKongCharlie April 14, 2012 6:56 AM  

As evidenced by the photo sets one frequently run across on the net. Ya know the ones, Conservative/Republican women versus the feminist/Democrat Helen Thomas type.

HKC

Anonymous Laptop Barbie April 14, 2012 6:59 AM  

I guess it depends on what you think the game is. If the game is having a successful career and knowing more than how to change diapers, then Homemaker Susie is the ultimate loser.

Anonymous jla April 14, 2012 7:06 AM  

You just keep telling yourself that, Barbie.

Blogger W.LindsayWheeler April 14, 2012 7:08 AM  

Not exactly. I have seen quite a number of beautiful women take to the career approach.

Problem with the "Feminism" approach is that many are indoctrinated in the media and in high school and in college. Also magazines which are owned by New York elites which are marketed to teens and young adults push the feminism angle. They are indoctrinated into it. In an atmosphere of indoctrination, there is little room for Free Will and choice in adopting this or that. Social conditioning toward Marxist Feminism is everywhere.

Anonymous HongKongCharlie April 14, 2012 7:16 AM  

Barbie, could you enlighten the ilk on just what it is you do?

HKC (male chauvinist pig)

Blogger Vox April 14, 2012 7:22 AM  

If the game is having a successful career and knowing more than how to change diapers, then Homemaker Susie is the ultimate loser.

As I mentioned, feminists try to change the game because they are losing at it. Perhaps you could simply make the metric "whoever pays more taxes". Then you could feel more like a winner... even though you're quite clearly losing.

Anonymous HerewardMW April 14, 2012 7:26 AM  

11% success rate for scientific studies. Add to that this is the social sciences we're talking about.

It makes sense to me but I distrust "studies show". It's the 21st century version of "It is written".

Anonymous FP April 14, 2012 7:45 AM  

The feminist ugly woman's attitude is writing checks that her body can't cash. They're more delusional than many of the pretty ones and even more than your average nerdy male teen wanting to bag the prom queen. Just go read the average woman's online dating ad, especially the single mothers.

Blogger SarahsDaughter April 14, 2012 7:50 AM  

Quite observably true.

It's irritating to the ugly ones when you're above average intelligence too, and when your husband is hot and successful, you have attractive, smart children that are already anti-feminist, you have an active sex life, contentment with your material possessions, logical discussions and fulfilling relationships. - That, Laptop Barbie, is the game.

You do know we laugh at your "successful career," right?

Anonymous kanguekue ava April 14, 2012 9:01 AM  

It's long been observed that the uglier a woman is, the more likely she is to be a feminist.

Does that make Spacebunny a feminist?

Anonymous Shutterbug April 14, 2012 9:04 AM  

Women not attractive enough to find husbands need to support themselves financially. That's understandable. Where it gets ridiculous is when they justify choosing career over family by telling themselves and everyone else they don't need a man.

Anonymous No_Limit_Bubba April 14, 2012 9:25 AM  

With apologies to George Carlin.... "Have you ever noticed that most feminists are women that you wouldn't want to f**k anyway?"

Anonymous nordicthunder April 14, 2012 9:32 AM  

from SarahsDaughter

"You do know we laugh at your "successful career," right?"

that is funny !

given LB's moniker and tone of comment, I'm thinkin' someone is just stirring the pot

Anonymous Joe April 14, 2012 9:43 AM  

Biology is destiny.

Anonymous Stingray April 14, 2012 9:45 AM  

Since I was little I knew I wanted to be a SAHM. It also grated something fierce hearing men tell boys "You throw like a girl!". So I made sure I could throw like a boy. I also bought into the whole choice thing in that woman can do (mostly) what a man can do so it is my choice. I was pushed toward college just like most kids my age, but I always knew something was not right. These pesky little thoughts would constantly arise in my head that needed to be stamped down, "What I am going to do if I don't meet my husband in college?! If I don't meet him here it will be so much harder to find him." I would not allow the thought to go further than this before I would change it to the standard "No, I am here for myself and for my own life. Blah, blah, blah." Thankfully, my junior year I met my husband. Three years later we were married, had kids, and I have since asked my husband if he minds that after the kids are grown I never go back to work. He was so happy that I asked that. I hope I never have to work another day in my life. Being home is where I belong.

Anonymous Steveo April 14, 2012 9:55 AM  

@ laptop barbie... who wrote: I guess it depends on what you think the game is. If the game is having a successful career and knowing more than how to change diapers, then Homemaker Susie is the ultimate loser.

Your vacuous proposition shows you know little of life.

As I hold my mother's hand as she sleeps, knowing that she forgets our names and the stories of our births; that she doesn't remember the foods she lovingly prepared for many years, even as we feed her the same; that she fears strangers in the house and doesn't know where she is...

I know where she is. She is in the home she taught us to make, where she is loved beyond any comprehension of the cat-loving, lonely, feminist exile. Look ahead to your old age of regrets and know that the vitriol you offered was laughed away by the families you disparage, much as the parent laughs away the mud-pies, but loves the child that made them.

Advice?
Find Jesus. Honor God. Help People. Life more abundantly, is down that road.

Anonymous The Original Arrogant Penguins Fan In Despair April 14, 2012 10:03 AM  

Maybe Mario can recruit a group of thick heeled butches with prescription-pill overdose mustaches for Sunday afternoon in Philly... give them sticks, put black and gold jerseys on them and send forth to the ice?

If it works, I'll be a believer.

This is what it has come to, folks...

Anonymous Stingray April 14, 2012 10:07 AM  

Steveo,

Please watch this video.

It's an easy thing to implement and could make some improvements for your mother. You all will be in my prayers.

Anonymous Michael April 14, 2012 10:19 AM  

Vox says "The message is a simple and straighforward one: feminism is for female losers in the game of Life."

LOL! When Vox makes a point, he makes it so kick-ass-ly!

Anonymous Godfrey April 14, 2012 10:31 AM  

Feminism was NOT a failure. It was a successful CON.

The purpose of feminism was to reduce population levels. Women were conned into the workforce so they wouldn’t be home having and raising children. Women are now corporate serfs just like their male counterparts.

Sitting in cubical and performing tasks for a big corporation is not liberation. Owning a small family business with your spouse IS liberation. However the later would be a threat to the corporate fascist state and the control of the elites thus is discouraged and economically suppressed.

They want women to delay and forego having children during their peak fertility years. Instead they want them to work and pay taxes. It’s pure evil.

Refuse to be manipulated. The greatest happiness in life is family. Don’t let them rob you of it.

Anonymous Mr. Scott April 14, 2012 10:35 AM  

The feminist propaganda doesn't get them all -- every girl I dated in college (late 1990's) intended to be a stay-at-home mom. Education and work were considered ways to support themselves while they sought the best possible husband.
Perhaps after Southern states start seceding from the US, we can make money selling cute, domestically-inclined young women to the rest of you. :)

Anonymous Big Bill April 14, 2012 10:44 AM  

That is so sad, Laptop Barbie. I hope that someday you can find a man you want to make babies with. Although it may be too late in your case. I do hope not.

Anonymous The other skeptic April 14, 2012 10:44 AM  

How do you confront an enemy that deliberately sows chaos?

It could be said that Feminism is the creation of the Holocaustians and that it was created to sow chaos.

Anonymous Godfrey April 14, 2012 10:47 AM  

In the 1970's the cultural elites promoted feminism 24/7.

What's promoted 24/7 today?

Answer: homosexuality. It's merely another con job for the same purpose. The masses are being manipulated. We're being managed like livestock.

Anonymous Steveo April 14, 2012 10:49 AM  

Much thanks Stingray, will certainly start that today!
God Bless and thanks for the prayers too.

Anonymous CrisisEraDynamo April 14, 2012 10:59 AM  

In the Hooking Up Smart forum, I saw an argument that the reduced population levels that come from feminist-dominated society are good because they will lower our collective carbon footprint.

Susan (I think) argued that marriage and children are still important to society because we need children to grow up and pay for everything.

The poster responded that fewer people means less money would be needed total to care for society.

I answered by saying that government services don't only need to pay for new people; they also need to continually pay for everyone already alive, and that there will be too many old people and not enough tax revenues to pay for them all when they need health care or pensions. I cited Greece as an example of what happens when the demographic bill comes due.

I didn't write this at the forum, but I would add that the economy would shrink and society would become poorer.

I know this is very broad-brush, but is this a good way to rebut assertions that feminist-caused low birth rates are a good thing for society?

Anonymous Godfrey April 14, 2012 11:08 AM  

CrisisEraDynamo,

Your answer is summarized in the Jaffe memo.

Anonymous SouthTX April 14, 2012 11:09 AM  

Good point. Married the wife at 20. Three kids. At 43 she still gets hit on. She is old school and anti-femenist.

Anonymous Godfrey April 14, 2012 11:12 AM  

Unlike many here I’m not angry at women. I empathize instead. They’ve been scammed and manipulated just like the rest of us.

Recognize the cultural elites hate you and lie to you and you’ll be less susceptible to the manipulation.

Anonymous RC April 14, 2012 11:24 AM  

Feminism is also subversive and destructive even for many women and families who've made the right choices by constantly planting seeds of doubt regarding those choices and consequent non-choices.

And it works: Even in most SAHM families, small family sizes are the norm which is also feminist at its roots. Even my modest sized family of five children turns heads. "What, are you Catholic?"

Anonymous Godfrey April 14, 2012 11:26 AM  

RC,

Thus the reason RCC is the prime target of the elites.

Anonymous Cryan Ryan April 14, 2012 11:26 AM  

From a stint selling real estate in the 80's, I learned that pretty women can be fairly successful Realtors.

They also tended to ...

1) drink too much
2) cheat on their husbands
3) get divorced repeatedly
4) go through a lot of money foolishly
5) put their kids through hell
6) end up a real mess, alone and in debt

Just my observation.

Anonymous Big Bill April 14, 2012 11:32 AM  

You have to have some sympathy for feminists. When you study the roots of modern feminist thinkers you should show some sympathy for them.

The amount of oppression they had to overcome in their Eastern European Jewish households was awful.

Every nasty inclination of their husbands was blamed on them. They had to shave their heads and wear wigs [sheitel] so they didn't "tempt" their husbands.

Even going to church was/is an opportunity to put them down: they hang a giant sheet [mechitza]right down the middle of the sanctuary between the men and women so the women won't "tempt" the men with their evil inclinations [yetzer hara] and take their minds off God.

And for two weeks a month Jewish women couldn't/can't even touch their husbands--they cannot even HAND them anything--because all women are "unclean" for half their lives [niddah].

Worse, they were/are expected to be baby factories, cranking out some 6-10 kids apiece, AND to do all the work to support them (since their husbands are busy studying Jewish theology all day [kollel]) AND be prevented from getting any education beyond the bare rudiments.

Given all this ugly sexism and repression,
surely you can understand the rage of Jewish feminists.

We have managed to civilize huge numbers of Jews to our eternal credit [Haskala]. Many of them now treat their wives and daughters quite well, thanks to our example: no more forcing them into public baths after menses, no more having a rabbi inspect their kotex, no more sheets in church to keep men safe from evil female sexuality, no more shaved heads, no more burka clothing.

Once you recognize Jewish female rage as the source of late 20th Century feminism, you need to tell your own daughters. Explain to them that while feminism is appropriate for angry Jewish women, it really isn't appropriate for them. They don't have to make enough money to support 6-10 kids AND a husband.

Anonymous Scintan April 14, 2012 11:34 AM  

The war between the sexes has been fought. Women, led by their feminist drill sergeants and officers, won with the help of many traitorous men. All that's happening now is that the radical wing of the women's side is trying to dictate harsh surrender terms.

Anonymous jwshell April 14, 2012 11:38 AM  

"Feminism is affirmative action for ugly chicks"--Rush Limbaugh

Blogger John Regan April 14, 2012 11:46 AM  

Much as I despise feminism, there are some few women who are physically unattractive and it's a fairly cruel fate. If they run to feminism as a coping mechanism I still don't like it, but I'm not devoid of sympathy for the situation. I don't like to pile on.

Anonymous steve g April 14, 2012 11:50 AM  

"There is some scientific
evidence." Pretty thin on the
science from one who abhors most
scientific findings unless done in
a rigorous fashion.

Anonymous Johnny Reb April 14, 2012 12:00 PM  

Which reminds me of my neice - slender, blond, attractive, driven, intelligent, athletic, high school senior.

Wants to be a doctor. Daddy says they don't have the money so she should join the military and let them pay for it. [Sure, up sweety's chances of being sexually molested while saving money yo!] Fritter away her most fertile years persuing a degree and then find out at 30+ "hey I want a family!"

Patriarch of the family he is too. Shame it is as she'd make a most excellent stay at home, home schooling mom. We need more kids raised by women like her. I've had my fill of dating the Ph.D types with the sudden revelations. Bleaahh!!!

I'm thinking to have the opportunity cost conversation with her soon. What the heck, I'm already the black sheep of the family LOL.

Anonymous SouthTX April 14, 2012 12:31 PM  

Johnny Reb April 14, 2012 12:00 PM

Do her a favor and have the conversation. My oldest son's GF sounds like your niece. She originally wanted to be a Doctor too. Now she just wants a 2 year degree so she graduates when my son does. He's 2 years older. No discouragement from her parents. I think her Dad is just thankful that her first boyfriend will most likely be her last.

Anonymous Baseball Savant April 14, 2012 12:52 PM  

Something I've noticed too is that even if a girl is ugly, but works here tail off in the gym, guys still find here pretty hot. So maybe her face isn't all that hot, if her body is incredible, it can make up for A LOT of other deficiencies.

But ugly chicks don't even want to work out. How often have you seen an ugly chick who is also just fat and disgusting? It happens all the time.

And that's the crazy part. is it easier just to put in 2-3 hours a day at the gym or is it easier trying to have a "career"? It's such a bad trade off in my opinion.

If a girl loves to have sex and is a workout junkie, it's not going to matter if she's a 5 or a 10. She'll have plenty of suitors with a 99% chance she'll never work a day in her life.

if we all could be so lucky!

Anonymous NorthernHamlet April 14, 2012 1:00 PM  

There is more than one wave of feminism. Are all of them exactly as described here? My wife self-identifies as a third-wave feminist. Don't ask me specifics on what that means, because I don't know and am not sure I care personally. She is an attractive, God-fearing woman that enjoys wearing dresses, baking very fine cakes and meals, having a great sex life, and turns more than a few heads everywhere she goes. But she also wants a career, and has had one. I've told her she doesn't have to work, but she wants to at this point in her life since we do not yet have children. If she wants to work, great. If not, great. I've heavily reinvested the extra money either way. By all accounts, we are a successful, 'winning' couple; she's a feminist. It would appear social movements can be more nuanced.

Anonymous SouthTX April 14, 2012 1:10 PM  

The oldest son just walked in the gameroom after waking up. I saw drawings on his arms. When I asked him about it, he said his SO wanted to draw a dinosaur on his arms with a crayon. He let her. She's a little dingy, but head over heels in love. I respect his hand.

Anonymous WinstonWebb April 14, 2012 1:11 PM  

Godfrey April 14, 2012 11:12 AM

Unlike many here I’m not angry at women. I empathize instead. They’ve been scammed and manipulated just like the rest of us.

Recognize the cultural elites hate you and lie to you and you’ll be less susceptible to the manipulation.


I agree. Twice in the past week I told a female co-worker something similar. She's married with kids and resents the fact that her children are "being raised by strangers". The first time I casually mentioned that it was the fault of feminist ideology. I was brushed off by her and the others that were listening. I really kinda expected that. Yesterday she was making the same complaint, I gave the same reply, and (I believe because it was JUST her - no other spectators) she wanted to hear me out. I told her some of the things that I've learned here. That some women have always had to work, but not the levels we have now. That feminist ideology pushed more women into the workforce where the law of supply & demand took over and drove down real wages for EVERYONE. Now more women HAVE to work than did before. Her grrl-power rationalization hamster fell off its wheel. She doesn't agree with me yet, but said my points were "valid". I'll take that as a small victory in the fight against blind ideology.

Anonymous DrTorch April 14, 2012 1:24 PM  

The bigger irony is that even though ugly women may be more driven, attractive women succeed more easily in the workforce too.

Anonymous Curlytop April 14, 2012 1:30 PM  

Steveo,

Just completed that long journey with my father just a month ago yesterday. Lifting you up in prayer. Trust me, she knows on some level and the fact that you are caring for her at home- EXCELLENT! It's the way to go.

We took the nutritional route too, Stingray and don't regret it. We sought the expertise of professionals in the research field and the results were amazing. Did it rid the disease? No, once you lose your health, there are no guarantees. However, his doctors were amazed at how well he did. His neurologist said he fared far better than any other patient. My father bucked ALL healthcare professionals expectations straight through to the hospice nurses. We were fortunate. He knew us all the way to the end. Dementia is a complex thing and its origins will determine your success in beating it. We are seeing a new generation of people who survived head injuries that should have died. Short-term recovery look good, but not the long-term effects of surviving gun shot wounds to the head(my father in Vietnam), multiple concussions, etc, are rising to the surface.

Back to the topic:
I saw real quick how the game works in the "workplace" for women when I graduated and worked until I married and got pregnant- a full 8 months! Thank the lord, hubby was quite fertile! Women are fools to whore themselves out to the corporate world.

Anonymous Oregon Mouse April 14, 2012 1:31 PM  

i had the opportunity to make a number of observations when I had one of those big bad corporate career jobs. This was a traditionally male dominated career field and I was managing, almost exclusively, male blue-collar employees over the radio/phone. 1. Most of the "career" women were overweight and unattractive. 2. Most of these women were bitter, gossipy, and divorced at least once. 3. Those women that were married were clearly the dominant one in their homes and spoke demeaningly of their husbands. 4 there was a high proportion of lesbians. 5. Affairs were rampant. 6. women who made it a few more steps up the corporate ladder were notable for their nasty,petty, back-stabbing management style and their proclivity to play favorites.
The worst managers I have worked for in any job have been women regardless of age. I've long since concluded this is because the vast majority of women are out of their element as managers/leaders. They adapt by mimicking men and become more agressive, pushy, bitchy... what is a natural element for most women? I have repeatedly seen my 13 month old pass up her brother's toys, pick up a dolly, hold it to her chest and rock it back and forth. Her brother uses her dolls as projectiles.
Career women are bitter because they aren't doing what's in their nature. My relatives in part-time pink-collar, care-type jobs like nursing seem much happier.

Anonymous Godfrey April 14, 2012 1:33 PM  

WinstonWebb,

Ask her to define "liberation". Is "liberation" sitting in a cubical for 50 plus years performing the tasks of a corporate serf? And actually getting nowhere as half the money you earn is taken in taxes and the remaining half is devalued by the Federal Reserve? Is that "liberation"?

Or is liberation having the time to focus on the joys of family life?

I'd like to know her answer. I know, as a man, what my answer is.

Anonymous JMac April 14, 2012 1:36 PM  

While I absolutely reject the feminist propaganda and agree with some of the comments here, I think that some are greatly oversimplifying the problem.

It's men who designed the industrialized society with little concern for women and children and the healthy development of their families. Women were enslaved, marginalized and put down so men could maintain their proud self-image. While there are exceptions, I would suggest that history shows that male supremacy isn't always conducive safe, healthy, fulfilling homes and lives.

During WWII, many women worked in the war factories and were frustrated by attempts to return to the old attitudes after the war. They, with the help of a society that worshiped so-called science and educators, passed this on to their children - the boomers. In the '60s Hordes of this generation distanced themselves and even physically ran away from homes filled with hypocrisy and tension. They wanted more peaceful lives which they thought included more respect for women in their future families. The church had become either legalistic or impotent and to some degree connected with the horrors of racism in the south so it abdicated any leadership. The feminazis erupted out of (or capitalized on) this shift and came out slugging. From the '70s on, the boomers started using the public schools to indoctrinate the next generations.

Blustering men suppressing women in order to maintain an image of male superiority, women trying to be ruin the family by being "equal" to men and take over homes and remake society according to female proclivities, and the "science" approach that worships at the feet of the human mind have and will all ruin lives and societies.

Of course the foundation of all this is the stubborn insistence that there is no master design, nor any accountability after the body dies. Isn't what's left called hedonism - do whatever you like?

To me it is a logical fallacy that any society or individual can deny the existence of a master designer, tenaciously insist on hedonism and self-righteously pontificate on "right" and "wrong" and then think they have any shred of a basis for the consistent design and enforcement of any law.

Anonymous Kiwi the Geek April 14, 2012 2:02 PM  

On the other hand, if a girl was unattractive, wouldn't it be prudent to advise her to have that fallback plan?

I went to college because I had a scholarship and love learning and it was taken for granted. I wanted to have children and stay home, but had no prospects yet. I wonder if the lack of men's interest in me was the result of the assumption that I was a career woman, or if higher education was the best move because of my appearance. I'm not a great beauty, and given the supply, maybe I couldn't have attracted men regardless.

Anonymous oregon Mouse April 14, 2012 2:04 PM  

"Unlike many here I’m not angry at women. I empathize instead. They’ve been scammed and manipulated just like the rest of us.

Recognize the cultural elites hate you and lie to you and you’ll be less susceptible to the manipulation."

I had a friend years ago who's boyfriend told her that if they married he would never allow her to stay home with their hypothetical children because it wasn't "fair" that he should have to work but not her. The modern man-child doesn't exactly help women escape feminist dogma.

Blogger tz April 14, 2012 2:24 PM  

Another aspect is feminism teaches women to lose their virginity early. As has been pointed out, Men prefer to MARRY "inexperienced" women, so if the less attractive simply wait out their pretty randy hypergamous peers, they will have the advantage.

Feminism is something that allows men to stay immature or the barbarian. Of course they want sex in the short term with the most attractive women, but marriage is different.

But the destruction that wreckreational sex created - that is part of the contraception debate the Catholic Church is going through now - cohabiting, marrying after the children are there, easy divorce... - is still going on.

Chesterton called tradition the democracy of the dead. And they seem to still be voting wisely. Traditional family - marriage and children - is still the happiest form. Your grandparents were unlikely to have divorced, and often married young and stayed that way until the death of one spouse. They would say there were rough times, but overall they seem far happier than those who are following another path.

Anonymous Kiwi the Geek April 14, 2012 2:44 PM  

I believe men want inexperienced women, but there must be something else in this equation. Virginity didn't seem to help me, nor a nice body, for that matter.

Currently there are several young women at my church, in their twenties and early thirties. Half are extremely thin, only one is extremely heavy. They all have hair at least long enough to make a ponytail. I'd be very surprised if any of them have any experience at all. And I've never seen any of them with a man. I'm pretty close to one of these girls, and she's never had any interest. There must be other disqualifying factors.

Blogger R. Bradley Andrews April 14, 2012 3:01 PM  

Don't be put off by all the focus on the "9s and 10s" here and in the Alpha Game blog. Men want a woman dedicated to them more than perfect beauty.

I know that I am more attracted to a thin figure than a perfect face. I am sure many others are out there. I found a dearth of such in the churches I attended when I was younger and single. That might be a better avenue to look, especially if you can learn to like some activities where single men are.

Anonymous PC Geek April 14, 2012 3:24 PM  

@Curlytop

So sorry to hear about your dad - I will keep you and your family in my prayers.

Ditto for the difficulties that Steveo is having with his mom - my grandmother faced similar issues until her passing a few years ago.

Anonymous realmatt April 14, 2012 3:26 PM  

Kiwi, if they're only spending time with church going girly men then it isn't surprising they're alone. There aren't many men to be found in churches.

Anonymous CatDog April 14, 2012 3:48 PM  

@realmatt

Where do you suggest finding manly Christian men then?

Blogger Michael April 14, 2012 4:02 PM  

What is the link to the jaffe memo?

Anonymous daddynichol April 14, 2012 4:03 PM  

NorthernHamlet
"But she also wants a career, and has had one. I've told her she doesn't have to work, but she wants to at this point in her life since we do not yet have children."


The above is the perfect example as to why employers prefer not to hire, provide extensive training or advance young females. They tend to leave the job to raise the family (plus sick time for the kids, family emergencies, paternity leave,etc.), thus the business investment in them goes down the drain.

Anonymous PC Geek April 14, 2012 4:16 PM  

@Catdog

Good question. Manly and church going are unfortunately almost mutually exclusive nowadays.

See the previous discussions we have had on this blog (and on alpha game) about Churchianity vs. Christianity. The church is 99.9999% feminized and is much closer to the heart of Ethel the matronly church lady than the Lion of Judah and the King of Kings. Have you heard most of the stuff they sing at churches nowadays?

I don't know where those manly Christian men are, (trying to be one myself) but the probability of your finding one among the Churchians is vanishingly small.

Anonymous fanofcarolus April 14, 2012 4:55 PM  

Isn't Sarah Palin a member of Feminists for Life?

Anonymous RC April 14, 2012 5:02 PM  

"I don't know where those manly Christian men are, (trying to be one myself) but the probability of your finding one among the Churchians is vanishingly small." - PC Geek

Painting with a broad brush. Men follow leaders stronger than themselves. Find a church with an alpha dog as the lead pastor and you will find other alphas. There may not be many such churches but you can find one in any large metro and you only need one.

My church is alpha-led and filled with strong men - muddy boots, hunters, determined, businessmen, families under control. They are there. Of course, the betas, deltas, and gammas are there too - as they should be.

Hell, go to Nate's church, probably filled with bad ass Christians.

Blogger Dreadpiratk April 14, 2012 5:12 PM  

PC Geek-

I agree totally with your statement (and I like how you said it, I'll steal it if you don't mind) but I'm curious, I've seen feminized worship songs mentioned several times here. Can you give me some examples? Either we don't sing them, or I'm just not understanding what you mean.

Like you I'm trying to change this in my little corner of the Kingdom. Male led churches do exist, though more in small non-denominational form I think. Our church is the only one I know of that owns it's own skeet machine and ends elders meeting by shooting a few rounds. The pastor's the best shot by far, but I'm gaining on him.

Blogger Dreadpiratk April 14, 2012 5:13 PM  

PC Geek-

I agree totally with your statement (and I like how you said it, I'll steal it if you don't mind) but I'm curious, I've seen feminized worship songs mentioned several times here. Can you give me some examples? Either we don't sing them, or I'm just not understanding what you mean.

Like you I'm trying to change this in my little corner of the Kingdom. Male led churches do exist, though more in small non-denominational form I think. Our church is the only one I know of that owns it's own skeet machine and ends elders meeting by shooting a few rounds. The pastor's the best shot by far, but I'm gaining on him.

Anonymous Ryan April 14, 2012 5:42 PM  

Godfrey wrote:

"Feminism was NOT a failure. It was a successful CON.

The purpose of feminism was to reduce population levels. Women were conned into the workforce so they wouldn’t be home having and raising children. Women are now corporate serfs just like their male counterparts.

Sitting in cubical and performing tasks for a big corporation is not liberation. Owning a small family business with your spouse IS liberation. However the later would be a threat to the corporate fascist state and the control of the elites thus is discouraged and economically suppressed.

They want women to delay and forego having children during their peak fertility years. Instead they want them to work and pay taxes. It’s pure evil.

Refuse to be manipulated. The greatest happiness in life is family. Don’t let them rob you of it."


[. . .]

"In the 1970's the cultural elites promoted feminism 24/7.

What's promoted 24/7 today?

Answer: homosexuality. It's merely another con job for the same purpose. The masses are being manipulated. We're being managed like livestock.


Nailed it. Feminism is simply a sub-development, albeit a most potent one, of Egalitarianism in general (its Marxist branch, to be specific).

"Unlike many here I’m not angry at women. I empathize instead. They’ve been scammed and manipulated just like the rest of us.

Recognize the cultural elites hate you and lie to you and you’ll be less susceptible to the manipulation."


I hope, though, that you're not intending to dismiss women of all blame. I'll interpret you charitably, but for what it's worth I'd clarify that women still chose not just to passively tolerate this mess -- they chose to stubbornly embrace it amid cultural opposition. The devious ideological deception from above mitigates their fault, sure, but not entirely. The Marxist elites could never have pulled off the feat were it not the case that women are inclined to shun accountability en masse by a mutually-self-pitying acceptance of any acquirable Victim status, a fact of which the ideological manipulators may well have been aware. There's a reason why Feminism has been by far the most revolutionary achievement of what Hilaire Belloc referred to as "the Modern Attack."

Original Sin is indeed only called "the sin of Adam" and not "the sin of Adam, as well as that equally-responsible wife of his, Eve." Nevertheless, despite being maliciously preyed upon by a demonic liar, Eve did have a complicit hand in the disastrous affair, one for which she was of course justly punished by the Perfect Judge.

P.S.: In case anyone's interested, here's the original publication in full:

http://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:9guz2noGQWsJ:scholar.google.com/+durante+simpson+griskevicius&hl=en&as_sdt=0,44&as_ylo=2012&as_vis=1

Anonymous yukonyon April 14, 2012 5:43 PM  

Lindsay, I think its important to note that aesthetic qualities aren't the only thing that make a woman attractive. They are the most readily observable, but after a while, most men get the message. Unless she is willing to marry down a few notches, and accept the emasculated, delta outcast, even a beauty queen will have a hard time finding a suitable husband if she finds her itch to play the dominant card too irresistible.

Anonymous T14 April 14, 2012 6:06 PM  

Surprising. There is a positive correlation between wealth and attractiveness (take a stroll through walmart then whole foods). Also wealth and education

Anonymous The One April 14, 2012 6:40 PM  

100 dollar face creams and facelifts do work...

Anonymous Makaro April 14, 2012 6:45 PM  

The message is a simple and straighforward one: feminism is for female losers in the game of Life.

Amen to that! Supplement feminism for marxism and female for any other victim and its the same outcome

Anonymous jwshell April 14, 2012 7:08 PM  

@ Dreadpiratk

Pretty much all the 7-11 praise choruses and songs that emphasize emotional states and "relationship" as opposed to the great old hymns of the church that emphasized God's power and redemptive work in Christ...

Anonymous kanguekue ava April 14, 2012 7:19 PM  

Hilaire Belloq? Wasn't he one of the Nazis in the Indiana Jones movies?

Anonymous yukonyon April 14, 2012 7:27 PM  

You raise an interesting point, pcg. Most women looking for a church are looking for pro-familial Weleslians dressed up in Jesus suits. And a lot of church populations are delta and gamma riddled by men who compensate for their inability to "get some" by hiding their small sex lives under sheets of virtue. Some churches, even the Catholic church, allowed for polygyny, so as to not exclude the alpha males. But that was largely socially abolished under western feminism in the 1800's. The final nail in that coffin was the 50-year persecution of the Mormons, with the Morrill Act of 1861, and the Edmonds Act of 1887

Anonymous yukonyon April 14, 2012 7:58 PM  

Of course there's strong leadership in the church. That's why it has disected itself into tens of thousands of denominations. Or maybe we'be reached 100,000; I lost track.

Blogger Matthew April 14, 2012 8:17 PM  

Hell, go to Nate's church, probably filled with bad ass Christians.

Nate even gets Ctrl-F-ed in real life.

Anonymous dnatheman April 14, 2012 8:44 PM  

"I had a friend years ago who's boyfriend told her that if they married he would never allow her to stay home with their hypothetical children because it wasn't "fair" that he should have to work but not her. The modern man-child doesn't exactly help women escape feminist dogma."


The modern man-child IS a feminist. This cancer affects men and women differently.

Anonymous Curlytop April 14, 2012 8:49 PM  

Thanks PC. My father was a good man. I am comforted that he has claimed his reward, but I miss him terribly.

Regarding the topic:

You don't need to look at the ball busting career women. Even those who are in the pink-collar fields are tainted. There's something to be said about having a sour attitude. IT absolutely diminishes the features of an otherwise very attractive woman. I know a woman who is physically B.E.A.U.T.I.F.U.L. I could post her pic and the single Ilk would be all over it. However, she's the perfect example of what feminism has done to attractive women and I know the discerning men here would not pursue her due to her attitude. She's funny and a loyal friend, but hardened by her choices to follow the trends. This is someone whose resting expression is a hostile one. Saddest thing is seeing her continue in her folly because she doesn't recognize the root of her issue. Trying to advise her is futile. Feminism truly is the brainchild of ugly women to get back at their prettier nemesis.

Anonymous SouthTX April 14, 2012 8:50 PM  

My take, for what little it is worth. When you are young find a young sweet girl. Get her parents to like you. Tease her and make her laugh. Mentor all offspring so they succeed. Always realize at the end of the day, you will be judged by the Creator.

Anonymous zen0 April 14, 2012 8:57 PM  

yukonyon April 14, 2012 7:58 PM

Of course there's strong leadership in the church. That's why it has disected itself into tens of thousands of denominations. Or maybe we'be reached 100,000; I lost track.


The word "Babylon" means "confusion, gate of Bel". The Greek mode of spelling what is in the Hebrew is uniformly "Babel".

Babylon = Christendom

And since the kingdoms of the civilized world have submitted to be largely dominated by the influence of the great ecclesiastical systems, especially Papacy, accepting from them the appellation “Christian nations” and “Christendom,” and accepting on their authority the doctrine of the divine right of kings, etc., they also link themselves in with great Babylon, and become part of it, so that, as in the type, the name Babylon applied, not only to the city, but also to the whole empire, here also the symbolic term “Babylon” applies, not only to the great religious organizations, Papal and Protestant, but also, in its widest sense, to all Christendom.

Any wonder, yukonyon?

Anonymous zen0 April 14, 2012 9:08 PM  

My take, for what little it is worth. When you are young find a young sweet girl. Get her parents to like you.

While you do that, check out how her mother acts, because that will be the default position as she ages.

Guaranteed. If you can't stand the mother, better move on.

Anonymous Stilicho April 14, 2012 9:10 PM  

I believe men want inexperienced women, but there must be something else in this equation. Virginity didn't seem to help me, nor a nice body, for that matter.

Currently there are several young women at my church, in their twenties and early thirties. Half are extremely thin, only one is extremely heavy. They all have hair at least long enough to make a ponytail. I'd be very surprised if any of them have any experience at all. And I've never seen any of them with a man. I'm pretty close to one of these girls, and she's never had any interest. There must be other disqualifying factors.


Kiwi, dear, learn to flirt. A flirtatious, feminine woman can always spark interest among men. You then just have to find the type of men you prefer. Church isn't always the best place or even a good place depending on the type of church.

Anonymous SouthTX April 14, 2012 9:18 PM  

The Mother in Law is great. As good as it gets. The older Son's joke about her old school ways, but we Love her to death. Many years ago I went to their house after work on the Mrs. Birthday. The Mother in law got me a plate first. I told her to give it to her Daughter, my Wife. It was her Birthday. She told me no, the Man eat's first.

Anonymous zen0 April 14, 2012 9:27 PM  

Got a keeper.

Anonymous SouthTX April 14, 2012 9:32 PM  

Best advice to women. Find one guy, keep his ball's empty, his stomach full, and you can do all the other stuff you like to do.

Anonymous PC Geek April 14, 2012 9:47 PM  

@RC

Note how I said 99.9999% - your church may well be that .0001% exception. They do exist, they are probably about as rare as intelligent atheists sans aspergers, but they do exist.

@Dreadpiratik

jwshell beat me to it and answered quite well - honestly, the answer that I would have given you had he or she not replied first would have been simply to google for a modern hymnal and pick just about anything at random...

Anonymous Kiwi the Geek April 14, 2012 9:58 PM  

To clarify, the game is long since over for me. I read about it sometimes in hope of understanding better -- maybe I can help somebody else. That was the reason for my original question, up there.

Blogger JD Curtis April 14, 2012 10:19 PM  

Let's face it, sexism's the new fascism

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/opinion/columnists/lindy-mcdowell/lets-face-it-sexisms-the-new-fascism-16143293.html

Anonymous Outaw X April 15, 2012 1:05 AM  

"female losers in the game of Life."

Define "loser", "the game" and "life"!

Bet you can't, if you can prove me wrong.

Anonymous Oregon Mouse April 15, 2012 1:08 AM  

"Best advice to women. Find one guy, keep his ball's empty, his stomach full, and you can do all the other stuff you like to do."

Too, too true. But sex and food are tangible expressions of love within a marriage. Let's not forget that. That's catching flies with honey works.

was just reading the comments to this article on the daily mail. Hilarious. the harpies are out in force! I know im out of the loop but since when did a corporate job become "fulfilling" and gratifying over being with family? Even the men I worked with defined it as a soul-less means to an end.

Anonymous Outlaw X April 15, 2012 1:17 AM  

Vox, I am not disagreeing that feminism is a dangerous thing for humanity, but I think calling it a game is stupid, that's what they do and they have no respect for life and it is a game to them, maybe you were talking in the second person, if so I apologize, but you should clarify.

Anonymous I Endorse Blogspot April 15, 2012 1:20 AM  

Great Post, Great Site!
Would be honored to have you as the newest Join of the (soon-to-be) largest Blogger Members Directory.

~Regards

Blogger Doom April 15, 2012 1:35 AM  

Female nerds? Who knew! Well, yeah.

Anonymous SouthTX April 15, 2012 2:19 AM  

The honest truth that I have observed. If females want to have it all. Be an old school wife and mother. Your husband will be willing to lay down his life for you and the kids. Your kid's will hold you in awe for your patience. He will forgive the few day's a month you are PMS'ing. God had(has)it right.

Anonymous SouthTX April 15, 2012 3:00 AM  

Stickwick, I salute you.

Anonymous SouthTX April 15, 2012 3:29 AM  

Married a Brain also. Like you, she just wanted a husband and kids. Thank the Lord for it. Having a very smart wife is a blessing. I have been working a lot. She took care of the taxes. Because she knew I was out of pocket.

Anonymous Laptop Barbie April 15, 2012 4:10 AM  

Steveo says, "Look ahead to your old age of regrets and know that the vitriol you offered was laughed away by the families you disparage, much as the parent laughs away the mud-pies, but loves the child that made them."

I was just making a statement comparable to the vitriol in this post. How is saying that a diaper changer is a loser any more vitriolic than that that a career woman who couldn't find a mate for lack of looks is a loser? Double standard time. For the record, I think women should choose what they want to do. It's about liberty, remember?

Anonymous zen0 April 15, 2012 4:28 AM  

For the record, I think women should choose what they want to do. It's about liberty, remember?

One of the aspects of choosing is choosing badly by succumbing to propaganda and suffering the consequences.

Anonymous Poli_Mis April 15, 2012 5:43 AM  

Stingray, I just want to say thanks for sharing the link to the site about coconut oil.

Both Alzheimer's and Parkinson's run strong in my genes and I wish to prepare. Any evidence this supplement helps with the palsy of Parkinson's? It would be great to keep both mental faculties as well as not shaking like an unbalanced washing machine during the spin cycle.

Blogger SarahsDaughter April 15, 2012 5:55 AM  

I was just making a statement comparable to the vitriol in this post. How is saying that a diaper changer is a loser any more vitriolic than that that a career woman who couldn't find a mate for lack of looks is a loser? Double standard time. For the record, I think women should choose what they want to do. It's about liberty, remember? - Laptop Barbie

What's funny is you think there is vitriol in this post. Your definition of loser is strange as well. When it comes to the game (of life) it is clear, statistically, that the feminist loses. Not an "L" hand sign on your forehead kind of loser, no, this kind of loser is quantitative. This isn't emotional, it is factual and measurable. This isn't about liberty as much as it is about logic. You clearly don't understand that, which is fine. You're posting gibberish amongst some of the brightest women this world has known. It's very easy for us to laugh at you, my apologies.

Anonymous Laptop Barbie April 15, 2012 6:23 AM  

"You're posting gibberish amongst some of the brightest women this world has known."

Maybe you'll make it to Stockholm when they offer a prize in baking.

Anonymous progressive patriarch April 15, 2012 6:33 AM  

"Given all this ugly sexism and repression,
surely you can understand the rage of Jewish feminists. "

You had me at ugly.

Blogger Spacebunny April 15, 2012 6:37 AM  


Maybe you'll make it to Stockholm when they offer a prize in baking.


It's cute that you think this or anything else you've said is in someway a rebuttal, dear. You clearly don't even have the faintest idea what you are talking about or what the grown-ups are talking about. There is a well-known saying about it being better to keep your mouth closed and be thought a fool, then to speak and remove all doubt. It is unfortunate, but not unsurprising that you chose the latter option.

Anonymous VD April 15, 2012 6:40 AM  

Maybe you'll make it to Stockholm when they offer a prize in baking.

And perhaps you'll do so when they offer a prize in Powerpoint. Or Office Adultery.

Anonymous Stringray April 15, 2012 8:32 AM  

Any evidence this supplement helps with the palsy of Parkinson's?

I'm not sure. That video was the first I had heard about coconut oil and dementia. Read some of the comments as well. They are also informative. What I have learned is that the brain prefers ketones over glucose for it's energy source. I don't know enough about Parkinson's to know where the tremors stem from, but going low carb and making your brain burn ketones for it's energy could very well make a big difference. That site I linked to is a very good place to start as is his movie Fat Head. It's available on youtube and Netflix instant streaming.

Anonymous willneverpostagain April 15, 2012 8:38 AM  

Do you think that feminists, who are the masters of the collective, have any clue that they are doing the most harm to the very same collective society with their adulation of careerism? A classic case of claiming freedom to do their selfish damage with.

Anonymous Stingray April 15, 2012 8:39 AM  

Maybe you'll make it to Stockholm when they offer a prize in baking.

This is such a telling phrase. Many women argue that they wish to work so they can stay fulfilled. They are intelligent and therefore must work to use that intelligence. That's such crap. I am not in league with Stickwick or Spacebunny or the other ladies here as far as intelligence, but I'm not an idiot either. Here's what I have discovered. One can learn a vast amount from books. Amazing right? No school room or professor needed. The reason women wish to go to work is to show off there intelligence. They need the validation of someone telling them how smart they are or what a great job they are doing from others. One doesn't get this but from one person if they stay at home. And, unfortunately, hearing it from their husband does not seem to be enough.

(Before anyone jumps in that the husbands don't say thank you enough or at all, sure it happens. But really, how much is he being thanked for going into a crummy job everyday to keep the household afloat? If he is still not saying thank you, there are ways to fix that as well. Feminism has made women selfish and helpless.)

Anonymous RC April 15, 2012 9:09 AM  

@Kiwi

"Note how I said 99.9999% - your church may well be that .0001% exception. They do exist, they are probably about as rare as intelligent atheists sans aspergers, but they do exist."

I understand your point and I don't disagree. My point is that snowflakes do exist and that they can be found if you'll put in the time and effort to do so. I assure you that I'm not trying to assert a change to the overall statistical truth by acknowledging that snowflakes exist.

If you're looking for an attractive woman, it probably won't be productive to limit yourself to the female band members of the University of Utah. Similarly, women won't find an alpha in a women-led church, but there are good churches led by alphas. Were I a woman in search of a good alpha man, I would find an alpha-led church, though I wouldn't limit myself to church either.

Anonymous Outlaw X April 15, 2012 9:52 AM  

And perhaps you'll do so when they offer a prize in Powerpoint. Or Office Adultery.

That is going on (Office Adultery) in our office right now, and they think we cannot see. Everyone is shut mouth but knows.

Blogger LP 999/Eliza April 15, 2012 10:10 AM  

Brightest women? So what.

Maybe our brightness should be with our love, softness and concerns for those around us, like our kids and families. That would certainly shine...

It is also time to drop this hopeful employment attitude, the jobs DO NOT exist. Paper-pushing is becoming visibly unproductive.

Anonymous Outlaw X April 15, 2012 10:11 AM  

Vox you will get a kick out of this. When I was a teenager before my great grand mother died she told me wo9men should not go to w2ork, while my grand mother (her daughter) was the post master and the only one working there in the little town where I was. She actually said what you did. She told me if women didn't go to work they wouldn't run off with other men. I thought she was dumb and backwards, but it seems I was the one dumb and backwards.

Blogger LP 999/Eliza April 15, 2012 10:14 AM  

CrisisEraDynamo:

Possibly, as boomers retire less young people are working and abortion continues its existence.

What is lost on women is that without men they will have to turn to someone or something...

Anonymous debbs April 15, 2012 10:29 AM  

They need the validation of someone telling them how smart they are or what a great job they are doing from others.

Yep. That was my reward many years ago when I drank the kool-aid. Even being successful in my chosen career did not measure up to the joys, opportunities and challenges of being a homeschooling mom. Rather than show off our knowledge, we get to pass it on. I don't know how old your children are, but you may find that as they get older, they also begin to express their appreciation to you for what you do. And the best of all compliments is when your daughter wants to be a SAHM and your son wants to marry one!

Anonymous bob k. mando April 15, 2012 11:14 AM  

Maybe you'll make it to Stockholm when they offer a prize in baking.


maybe you'll make it to Stockholm when they offer a prize for susceptibility to propaganda brainwashing. watch, learn and despair about how easily Edward Bernays manipulated you:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9167657690296627941

of course, as with my comment about Steyn resigning ( Steyn has regularly been the ONLY conservative at extremely liberal rags, he's not going to resign from a 'conservative' publication simply because it is no longer right wing enough ), i'm simply being sarcastic when i say that you may some day go to Stockholm. they don't WANT you in Stockholm. you're FAR more valuable where you are, adding to the weight of 'popular crowd opinion' and demonstrating your Progressive and Transgressive nature and how 'cool' you are.

Anonymous PC Geek April 15, 2012 11:49 AM  

@Stingray

One can learn a vast amount from books. Amazing right? No school room or professor needed. The reason women wish to go to work is to show off there intelligence.

Wow - I had never really thought of it that before - that was genuinely a great insight. nice one Stingray!

The whole point of credentialism and career is status and nothing more than status - i.e. "I am better than this other person since I have 2 masters degrees and I work with this big name company." Never mind that the stuff this person is doing is probably pointless...

Anonymous Curlytop April 15, 2012 1:02 PM  

Stingray: "They need the validation of someone telling them how smart they are or what a great job they are doing from others."

This statement right here reveals the insecurity issue in play with the proclamations about "finding herself in the workforce, or becoming more..." whatever the talking point is these days. And a wholehearted AMEN to the notion that men don't "express" their appreciation enough. Do you know how many times I've had to point this nonsense out to female peers?

I'm in awe at how my spouse keeps it together day in and day out in a world completely upside down as he trudges off to work to support us. He was the one to step up and insist my parents move with us when his job transferred him out of state. Making sure he's fulfilled seems like the bare minimal for me to do and it's not like I don't get anything out of it in the process. ;-)

Furthermore, I much prefer the flowers picked w the roots still hanging onto them, the handmade notes, and random hugs from my children as they express their appreciation than any of those cheap mass produced certificates that I've designed in the past for companies to present to their employees. At the end of life, it's not how many awards you received that matters. And speaking of Stockholm, I thought that was interesting for LB to point to that given that you have to PAY 6 figures to even be considered for a Peace prize. More "notice me" and with the right campaigning, you can get one?

Anonymous Outlaw X April 15, 2012 1:44 PM  

LB to point to that given that you have to PAY 6 figures to even be considered for a Peace prize. More "notice me" and with the right campaigning, you can get one?

If I were in charge of the Nobel Peace Prize, I would give it to the best chocolate chip cookies. Seems ignorant on its face, but it is not. I have learned a lot here and I guarantee that Mommas chocolate chip cookies are better than any power point presentation with the little kitties and boring the hell out of me I have ever seen.

Anonymous SouthTX April 15, 2012 3:24 PM  

Mmm... Gotta go with chocolate chip cookies. Hard to be mad at anyone while eating fresh from the oven ones.

Anonymous NorthernHamlet April 15, 2012 3:53 PM  

What exactly does it mean to lose at the game of life?

Anonymous SouthTX April 15, 2012 4:12 PM  

At the biological level, not reproducing and passing on your genes. On the spiritual, being apart from God.

Anonymous Laptop Barbie April 16, 2012 5:19 AM  

"And the best of all compliments is when your daughter wants to be a SAHM and your son wants to marry one!"

I said Stockholm, not Stockholm Syndrome :)

Anonymous Steveo April 16, 2012 9:14 AM  

God Bless you Curlytop, my condolences on the loss of your father. Thanks for the prayers!

@ Laptop Barbie who writes: I was just making a statement comparable to the vitriol in this post. How is saying that a diaper changer is a loser any more vitriolic than that that a career woman who couldn't find a mate for lack of looks is a loser? Double standard time. For the record, I think women should choose what they want to do. It's about liberty, remember?

Vox made a perfectly valid statement that you simply did not like, as it somehow offended your sensibilities? Are you really going to argue from the feminist perspective that the game of life (which you did not choose to play by the way) is NOT about procreation, expansion and survival? The winners, clearly, are those that procreate.

You changed the game in order to make a disparaging comment about diaper-changers (the winners of the previous statement) thereby proving the validity of Vox's entire statement: "feminism is for female losers in the game of Life".

Sorry, no double standard...

The vitriol to which I referred was yours, AND is also much manifested in the professional feminist rhetoric.

It is about liberty.

How is forced (against the wishes of the parents) indoctrination into feminist ideology about liberty?

Blogger SarahsDaughter April 16, 2012 10:48 AM  

I said Stockholm, not Stockholm Syndrome :)

Aww, a smiley. That's nice. Isn't that a nice follow up to going full retard?

Blogger Master Doh-San April 17, 2012 10:13 AM  

Rush was right: Feminism began as a way to allow unattractive women greater participation in society.

Anonymous Anonymous April 30, 2012 7:20 AM  

You talk about how life is "meant to be" but you wouldn't need multi-paragraph rants about the "evil feminist agenda" if you didn't (deep down) know you're just pretending to be tough.

Have fun. With that.

Anonymous Anonymous May 08, 2012 1:14 AM  

It's long been observed than the least possible for a man to get laid is, the more he will attack feminists. And it was always logical too, that men who are disgusting human beings would seek to place the blame on women who don't act like doormats.

Anonymous Anonymous August 08, 2012 3:55 PM  

"It's long been observed than the least possible for a man to get laid is, the more he will attack feminists. And it was always logical too, that men who are disgusting human beings would seek to place the blame on women who don't act like doormats."

Pathetic shaming language, so nothing new or educational.

What Mr Day and most other MRAs have a problem with is not the fact that these losers women have sought power (that is understandable and somewhat natural) but that they have used deceit, intimidation, manipulation etc etc as tactics and left social upheaval as their end result.

- Lovekraft

Post a Comment

NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS. Anonymous comments will be deleted.

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts