ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2014 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Thursday, July 26, 2012

Africans kill each other, white disarmament the answer

Obama comes out of the closet on gun control:
Faced with a clamor in his party for stricter gun control in the wake of the Colorado movie-theater massacre, President Obama said Wednesday night he would “leave no stone unturned” in seeking new measures to reduce violence nationwide, including more restrictive background checks on gun purchases.

“A lot of gun owners would agree that AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals,” Mr. Obama said at the annual National Urban League convention in New Orleans. “They belong on the battlefield of war, not on the streets of our cities.”

The president blamed “politics and lobbying” for defeating gun-control measures when outcries arise after mass shootings in the U.S. And he said the nation’s attention should not just be focused on mass shootings, such as the one on Friday in Aurora, Colo., but on the daily shooting deaths of youths from gun violence in major cities.

“Every day, the number of young people we lose to violence is about the same as the number of people we lost in that movie theater,” Mr. Obama said. “For every Columbine or Virginia Tech, there are dozens gunned down on the streets of Chicago or Atlanta, here in New Orleans.
Let me see here. If young Africans are regularly gunning down other young Africans in large cities where there are already stringent gun control laws, how is disarmingattempting to disarm white suburbanites and exurbanites going to reduce the level of violence in any way?

It seems to me that disarming suburban white America is much more likely to lead to this sort of thing. One of the reason the urban Africans tend to restrict their violence to their own turf is because they know they're both outnumbered and outgunned outside it.

And as far as I'm concerned, every adult male citizen should be required by law to own an AK-47, a handgun, a shotgun, and a rifle with a scope. If the Republicans had any real balls, they would pass such a law and dare the Democrats to oppose it.

Labels:

129 Comments:

Anonymous cherub's revenge July 26, 2012 12:14 PM  

We're sorry but reader comments are currently unavailable.

Don't want the rif-raff to realize they aren't alone in their thoughts.

Anonymous Slowpoke July 26, 2012 12:16 PM  

"And as far as I'm concerned, every adult male citizen should be required by law to own an AK-47, a handgun, a shotgun, and a rifle with a scope. If the Republicans had any real balls, they would pass such a law and dare the Democrats to oppose it.

And it would have precedent behind it too.

Anonymous TLM July 26, 2012 12:19 PM  

The poor AK is always the whipping boy for the politicians. The goof in Aurora used an AR, more would be dead if had used an AK. And most of the home boys use Hi Point pistols that sell for $150.00, but they get mentioned. The last I heard of a gang banger using an AK was watching Boyz In The Hood almost 15 years ago.

Anonymous Other Josh July 26, 2012 12:19 PM  

Now the Colorado shooter is asking people "Why am I in jail... what did I do?"

This entire situation keeps getting stranger. A notebook of his plans was mailed to a Colorado university? I'm sure this will be used to "prove" his guilt.

This has false flag written all over it.

Blogger Vox July 26, 2012 12:23 PM  

It is reported that Holmes bought the AR-15 the same day he failed an exam. It might be informative to learn if there is a time stamp on the receipt, as it wouldn't shock me to learn the gun was bought at the same time he was taking the test.

Amazing how these shooters can bend the laws of time and space.

Anonymous Vidad July 26, 2012 12:24 PM  

"every adult male citizen should be required by law to own an AK-47, a handgun, a shotgun, and a rifle with a scope."

Damn right.

Blogger El Borak July 26, 2012 12:27 PM  

every adult male citizen should be required by law to own an AK-47...

They would have to buy one or pay a tax/penalty/contribution. Now that we know that such a requirement to engage in commerce is constitutional, there's really no reason not to do it.

Anonymous Other Josh July 26, 2012 12:28 PM  

If Holmes keeps asking questions and gets too verbal about things, he might end up mysteriously dead - attributed to suicide or prison violence, I'm sure. The gov't doesn't want a drugged perp talking too much, now do they.

Anonymous Seriously... July 26, 2012 12:31 PM  

And as far as I'm concerned, every adult male citizen should be required by law to own an AK-47, a handgun, a shotgun, and a rifle with a scope. If the Republicans had any real balls, they would pass such a law and dare the Democrats to oppose it.

Stop the hypocrisy. Either you want the government out of your life or you don't, you can't have it both ways.

Anonymous Sheila July 26, 2012 12:34 PM  

Vox, I don't know if I've ever seen you address this question directly. What, in your opinion, was God's purpose in creating the negro race?

Blogger Vox July 26, 2012 12:35 PM  

What, in your opinion, was God's purpose in creating the negro race?

First, that's ludicrously off topic. Second, I don't pretend to have any idea what His purpose might have been in creating anything. Amusement, one hopes.

Anonymous Stickwick July 26, 2012 12:40 PM  

A lot of gun owners would agree that AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers ...

This is stupid. AK-47s look scary, if you're the bedwetting type, but they use a 7.62 x 39 round, which is kind of meh compared with stuff used in ordinary hunting rifles. Consider grandpa's old .30-06 bolt-action hunting rifle -- the ammo packs way more punch and has a longer range than the AK-47 round.

So, tinfoil hat time. All this blather about how dangerous "assault rifles" are and how they're only for warfare makes me wonder if the gun-grabbers are setting us up for a long-term plan of grabbing guns that "a lot of gun owners would agree" are perfectly fine. After the scary black tactical "assault rifles" are banned, some legislator suddenly realizes that grandpa's old bolt-action hunting rifle is more powerful, and kills things even deader, than an AR or an AK, and why aren't these dangerous rifles banned, too? Am I just paranoid or is this plausible?

Anonymous RC July 26, 2012 12:46 PM  

"Am I just paranoid or is this plausible?"

More than plausible, it's all but guaranteed. There is nothing politically survivable that they won't say or do to rid them of the scourge of the 2nd.

Blogger R. Bradley Andrews July 26, 2012 12:46 PM  

God created one race, from Adam and Eve.

Stupidity runs throughout mankind.

Blogger Scott July 26, 2012 12:48 PM  

And as far as I'm concerned, every adult male citizen should be required by law to own an AK-47, a handgun, a shotgun, and a rifle with a scope. It's blatantly unconstitutional to mandate someone buy something. They just have to tax anyone who doesn't.

Blogger Conan the Cimmerian, King of Aquilonia July 26, 2012 12:56 PM  

“A lot of gun owners would agree that AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals,”

The US has been using the M16(AR15) for generations. Not the the AK-47.

Historically, they have belonged in the hands of communist soldiers looking to kill the innocent and enslave the free. Also, the Soviets supplied arms to many throughout the Mid-East. So I guess we know from where his view of guns is originating....Communists or Muslims.

It is good that he has chosen to out himself.

Blogger Conan the Cimmerian, King of Aquilonia July 26, 2012 1:01 PM  

Seriously... July 26, 2012 12:31 PM

And as far as I'm concerned, every adult male citizen should be required by law to own an AK-47, a handgun, a shotgun, and a rifle with a scope. If the Republicans had any real balls, they would pass such a law and dare the Democrats to oppose it.

Stop the hypocrisy. Either you want the government out of your life or you don't, you can't have it both ways.


It is called being a responsible citizen and member of the militia.

See Switzerland for clarification.
See Kennesaw, Georgia for clarification as well.

Blogger Conan the Cimmerian, King of Aquilonia July 26, 2012 1:05 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Positive Dennis July 26, 2012 1:06 PM  

I think it is humorous that Vox is choosing not to comment of those suggesting the unconstitutionality of his proposed gun law. It is satire folks. The purpose is to encourage those, like me, that have no weapons to consider this as an option. I am. What Remington Shotgun model should I get?

Anonymous stg58 July 26, 2012 1:07 PM  

I am in compliance.

Anonymous WaterBoy July 26, 2012 1:08 PM  

Stickwick: "AK-47s look scary, if you're the bedwetting type, but they use a 7.62 x 39 round, which is kind of meh compared with stuff used in ordinary hunting rifles. Consider grandpa's old .30-06 bolt-action hunting rifle -- the ammo packs way more punch and has a longer range than the AK-47 round."

It's not the punch that is scaring them, it's the speed. A semi-auto can fire more shots in a shorter amount of time, while grandpa's rifle has to cycle each one manually.

Same reason a high-capacity magazine is "more scarier" than several small capacity ones -- they think that the second or two it takes to change each one out would allow more people to run away.

Idiots, the lot of them.

Blogger Hood July 26, 2012 1:11 PM  

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin.

Of course there is some question over what an "essential" liberty is.

Anonymous paradox July 26, 2012 1:12 PM  

Conan the Cimmerian, King of Aquilonia July 26, 2012 12:56 PM

The US has been using the M16(AR15) for generations. Not the the AK-47.


Obama mentioned the AK47 because it's the symbol of Communist Revolution. Obama is correct though... The 2nd Amendment is for hunting... George Washington used his firearm to hunt tyrants in the Revolution.

MOLON LABE!

Anonymous JartStar July 26, 2012 1:13 PM  

Historically, they have belonged in the hands of communist soldiers looking to kill the innocent and enslave the free. Also, the Soviets supplied arms to many throughout the Mid-East. So I guess we know from where his view of guns is originating....Communists or Muslims.

It is good that he has chosen to out himself.


No, he picked the AK-47 because so few Americans either have one or really want one. It also brings the image to white liberal voters of LA gangs. If he had said "AR15" rather than "AK-47"he could have cost himself the election on the spot.

He essentially built himself a gun-strawman to attack. His handlers knew what to put on the teleprompter.

Anonymous jack July 26, 2012 1:17 PM  

The AK is notoriously inaccurate beyond about 200 meters. It is also notoriously able to take extreme abuse; dragged through the mud, let rust to pieces and still fire. Kalasnikov designed it with loose tolerances for that very purpose. Its ideal for third worlders that don't like the work of firearm maintenance.

I suppose from that point of view it might deserve some of the attention it gets as an assault weapon. But, as pointed out above, there are far better weapons available. I would be surprised if the AR used in Colorado was automatic. Probably a semi with a big mag. I could have told that guy, just on general principal, that those big cap. mags will jam if you look at them wrong. When I was in Nam we never ever loaded more than 18 into our M14 mags and I never loaded more than 6 or 7 into my .45 ACP.

Anonymous Stilicho July 26, 2012 1:17 PM  

A few days ago, Vox wrote: It will be interesting to see if Obama is dumb enough to try running on gun control after this.

The question has been answered pretty much as I expected it to be. The interesting part will now be to see how many (and which) of the so-called conservatives go along with Obama and to see exactly how Captain Underoos tries to straddle the fence given his abysmal record on gun control. Can we expect a statement ala Romneycare: it was the right decision for Massachusetts, but not for the rest of the country...we need to oppose Obama gun control so that we can enact Romney gun control...etc.?

Anonymous Cat McClusky July 26, 2012 1:22 PM  

The first thing that probably went through peoples minds when they read of Holmes sending the notebook to the psychiatrist; that is the notebook detailing what he was planning, would be that he wanted to be stopped. That he was out of control and he knew it.

The package was apparently "lost in the mail". It's bizarre that since there was no apparent response from the psychiatrist or law enforcement Holmes forged on full bore with the plan; no hesitation or second guessing screw-ups.

Anonymous horsewithnonick July 26, 2012 1:23 PM  

"Of course there is some question over what an "essential" liberty is."


The right to own property is considered essential by virtually anyone who recognizez individual rights at all.

Guns are property.

Any questions?

Blogger Conan the Cimmerian, King of Aquilonia July 26, 2012 1:23 PM  

Positive Dennis,

You might consider Mossberg first. Lots of tactical/home defense choices.
The pump 500 is a good start.
They have a very useful combo that has both home defense and field barrels in a single package.

The Remington 870 used to have such a home and field combo. havent' seen on at a store in a while though.

You cannot go particularly wrong with either.

Blogger Conan the Cimmerian, King of Aquilonia July 26, 2012 1:24 PM  

JartStar,

I forgot to complete that post with the /s.

Anonymous Stilicho July 26, 2012 1:26 PM  

What Remington Shotgun model should I get?

None. Start with a less expensive Mossberg pump (12 Gauge). Once you are proficient with it, move on to other guns.

Anonymous scoobius dubious July 26, 2012 1:28 PM  

"every adult male citizen should be required by law to own an AK-47, a handgun, a shotgun, and a rifle with a scope. If the Republicans had any real balls, they would pass such a law"

Um, I do believe that that law already exists in fact, and it goes something like this:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Traditionally, a "well regulated Militia" basically consists of all able-bodied adult males in the first place. Also traditionally, they were privately armed, viz., they armed themselves. Do, math, etc etc.

So we already have it on the books; we just have to enforce it.

On the side, I note in passing that the #Occupy libtards were very fond of that Guy Fawkes mask from "V for Vendetta". The advertising motto of that dreadful film was, "People should not fear their governments. Governments should fear their people."

And yet these are the exact same libtards clamoring for gun control. How on earth is a government supposed to fear a disarmed people? Ah, but we already know the answer: government is only supposed to fear the right _kind_ of people. The rest of you NRA mal-pensant gun-apes don't actually qualify as "people", and your rights can be safely ignored.

Anonymous Noah B. July 26, 2012 1:32 PM  

Let's not lose sight of the delicious irony that this is coming from an admitted murderer. Obama personally ordered the killing of al-Awlaki, an American citizen, without any sort of due process of law.

So much for repudiating stereotypes, I guess.

Anonymous scoobius dubious July 26, 2012 1:42 PM  

Re gun control: using the logic of "disparate impact" law (and the statistics speak for themselves) shouldn't we permit the court to ban gun ownership by blacks and Hispanics, and only by them?

My civil rights are being violated by the high levels of black and Hispanic (and ONLY black and Hispanic) gun crime. My civil right of free movement across state lines and within certain areas of state boundaries is being grossly infringed due to black and Hispanic gun crime (in the exact same way that a state-by-state determined, non-uniform approach to gay marriage would violate the rights of gay married people by restricting their freedom of movement, I might add). Furthermore, black and Hispanic gun crime disrupts interstate commerce, and as we all know, Congress has reserved to itself the right to regulate state commerce.

It therefore stands to reason, as both a matter of logic and a matter of law, that black and Hispanic rights to bear arms should be, nay, MUST be, curtailed and infringed with extreme prejudice.

Blogger Bob July 26, 2012 1:44 PM  

" ...every adult male citizen should be required by law to own an AK-47, a handgun, a shotgun, and a rifle with a scope."

Well nuts!

I just sold my .270 semi-automatic rifle with 4-14 scope and two ten-round clips. (couldn't find 20-round clips anywhere)

Getting too old to shoot it anyway.

But I still have my 12 guage Winchester Defender.

Anonymous Mark July 26, 2012 1:44 PM  

"If young Africans are regularly gunning down other young Africans in large cities where there are already stringent gun control laws, how is attempting to disarm white suburbanites and exurbanites going to reduce the level of violence in any way?"

Exactly. The answer belies the motive behind all gun control: disarming the law-abiding.

A similar question needs to be asked of the recent rash of gun crime in Toronto, ON, Canada.

Anonymous FUBAR Nation (Ben) July 26, 2012 1:46 PM  

Let's see here. The government can be trusted with guns but citizens cannot. This is coming from the same government that uses drones to blow up suspected terrorists and ends up killing large numbers of civilians.

I love how even some of the "conservative" talk show hosts want more gun control now, showing their true colors.

Blogger Leatherwing July 26, 2012 1:56 PM  

" Vox July 26, 2012 12:23 PM

It is reported that Holmes bought the AR-15 the same day he failed an exam. It might be informative to learn if there is a time stamp on the receipt, as it wouldn't shock me to learn the gun was bought at the same time he was taking the test.

Amazing how these shooters can bend the laws of time and space."


When did you start posting as Vox? I thought some brazen fool was trying to hijack your ID. A couple of days ago you were still VD in comments.

Blogger Markku July 26, 2012 1:57 PM  

The package was apparently "lost in the mail". It's bizarre that since there was no apparent response from the psychiatrist or law enforcement Holmes forged on full bore with the plan; no hesitation or second guessing screw-ups.

Same thing happened here. A father made it quite clear that he is going to kill his family if he doesn't get psychiatric help. No reaction. Then he killed his wife and kids. That got a reaction.

Anonymous RC July 26, 2012 1:57 PM  

"It's not the punch that is scaring them, it's the speed. A semi-auto can fire more shots in a shorter amount of time, while grandpa's rifle has to cycle each one manually." - Waterboy

While many of grandpa's hunting rifles are bolt-action, there are many hunting-style rifles that are semi-auto. I've owned several over the years. The Ruger Mini-14 is just one example. The old Winchester Model 100 is another.

Anonymous Dr. J July 26, 2012 1:59 PM  

including more restrictive background checks on gun purchases.

Yeah, because DeShaun and LeMarius are picking up their gats at the local Gander Mountain or Cabela's. Those background checks are real crime stoppers in the hood. /s

Oh yeah, Vox, can't believe it hasn't been said yet - dat's raciss!

Anonymous Clay July 26, 2012 2:00 PM  

"

Bob July 26, 2012 1:44 PM I just sold my .270 semi-automatic rifle with 4-14 scope and two ten-round clips. (couldn't find 20-round clips anywhere"


Bob, what the heck kind of semi-auto .270 did you have that would take a ten round clip?

I've got a BAR .270, but it will only hold 4+1.

Anonymous Noah B. July 26, 2012 2:04 PM  

"It's not the punch that is scaring them, it's the speed. A semi-auto can fire more shots in a shorter amount of time, while grandpa's rifle has to cycle each one manually."

The politicians are, of course, using any excuse that they think will work. If they can successfully ban the "assault rifles" they'll come after the "high powered rifles" next.

Anonymous Hildebrandt July 26, 2012 2:05 PM  

"And as far as I'm concerned, every adult male citizen should be required by law to own an AK-47, a handgun, a shotgun, and a rifle with a scope. If the Republicans had any real balls, they would pass such a law and dare the Democrats to oppose it." - Vox

AMEN!

Anonymous rho July 26, 2012 2:14 PM  

"And as far as I'm concerned, every adult male citizen should be required by law to own an AK-47, a handgun, a shotgun, and a rifle with a scope."

Too many different kinds of ammunition to be practical. You'll never pass the Armed Citizen Act that way. Unless, perhaps, the Supreme Court allows for ammunition exchanges in every State.

If you can keep it to two calibers, I think we can pass this with a $1000 tax on not owning a firearm and $0.25 for every round of ammunition you don't have, up to $750.

Anonymous paradox July 26, 2012 2:27 PM  

"And as far as I'm concerned, every adult male citizen should be required by law to own an AK-47, a handgun, a shotgun, and a rifle with a scope. If the Republicans had any real balls, they would pass such a law and dare the Democrats to oppose it." - Vox

Make mine a M14... or at least a an AK-74 in 556. AK-47s are too inaccurate for a 400 to 500 yard range.

Anonymous cherub's revenge July 26, 2012 2:33 PM  

What Remington Shotgun model should I get?

Remington as balanced as a saw log and an action as smooth as 80 grit.

Get an Ithaca. But I'm biased toward bottom eject shotguns. God bless John Browning.

Anonymous Noah B. July 26, 2012 2:42 PM  

The Benelli M3 is really nice.

Anonymous WaterBoy July 26, 2012 2:42 PM  

RC: "While many of grandpa's hunting rifles are bolt-action, there are many hunting-style rifles that are semi-auto."

That is true, but Stickwick specifically mentioned "grandpa's old .30-06 bolt-action hunting rifle", so that is what I went with. If the perception that hunting rifles are relatively safer for TPTB to live with keeps their focus away from hunting rifles in general, let them keep their delusion.

Anonymous Anonymous July 26, 2012 2:46 PM  

Ya'll are daft. Think of the carnage. It says so right here:(sarcasm off)

http://www.rolereboot.org/culture-and-politics/details/2012-07-why-most-mass-murderers-are-privileged-white-men

jcw

Anonymous tungsten July 26, 2012 2:54 PM  

I'm all for owning guns, but owning one didn't seem to help the South Arican family in the article Vox linked:

"They then shot her with her husband’s gun before shooting him in the head too, reported praag.org."

Anonymous Noah B. July 26, 2012 2:55 PM  

"If the perception that hunting rifles are relatively safer for TPTB to live with keeps their focus away from hunting rifles in general, let them keep their delusion."

That is NOT their perception. Their attack on assault weapons, or anything else, is just a divide-and-conquer tactic. And it's not just about guns. These people believe more government is the answer to every problem, and any sort of freedom that you still have is a potential obstacle to their grand ambitions.

Anonymous cherub's revenge July 26, 2012 3:02 PM  

You might consider Mossberg first. Lots of tactical/home defense choices.
The pump 500 is a good start.


Yeah, other than it's not bottom eject, I can't say anything bad about my 500. It's seen every kind of slime and muck you'd find on the bottom of a jon boat and goes bang evertime I pull the trigger and will cycle anything cleanly.

Plus, for about 160 bucks you can put a rifled barrel on it with a cantilevered scope making it convertible to deadly to around 150 yards (with practice of course) in under a minute.

Anonymous realmatt July 26, 2012 3:05 PM  

I'm all for owning guns, but owning one didn't seem to help the South Arican family in the article Vox linked:

"They then shot her with her husband’s gun before shooting him in the head too, reported praag.org."


Well you have to be holding the gun in order to use it. And had Mr. Vania been carrying when the 3 low-lives attacked him.

Anyway, stories such as these should serve as a reminder to people that they're never safe, no one will protect them, and when you invade a nation and murder or enslave it's people, it's best to go all the way and git r done. No more of this half ass garbage. The next generations aren't so forgiving.

Even damned lions know to kill the offspring of the previous father.

And if you can't stomach that, then stay home.

Anonymous paradox July 26, 2012 3:13 PM  

Positive Dennis July 26, 2012 1:06 PM

What Remington Shotgun model should I get?


While not a Remington, I'm partial to my Mossberg 590a1. Ghost ring sights, for slugs, double extractors, metal trigger guard, and heavy barrel.

Anonymous tviper July 26, 2012 3:26 PM  

I read that Obama is going forward with the UN treaty to ban ownership in the US. Looks like you were right, VD, he is throwing the election.

Blogger Conan the Cimmerian, King of Aquilonia July 26, 2012 3:26 PM  

“AK-47s Belong In The Hands Of Soldiers…..”

Blogger Conan the Cimmerian, King of Aquilonia July 26, 2012 3:27 PM  

The link above shows how control is good.

Blogger Conan the Cimmerian, King of Aquilonia July 26, 2012 3:28 PM  

The edit feature is missed.

Anonymous Randy M July 26, 2012 3:35 PM  

"If the Republicans had any real balls, they would pass such a law and dare the Democrats to oppose it."

You can't do that, you can tax people without guns more. Which is also true as a general rule; and also partly esplain why they want it.

Anonymous Stilicho July 26, 2012 3:46 PM  

I read that Obama is going forward with the UN treaty to ban ownership in the US. Looks like you were right, VD, he is throwing the election.

It doesn't matter, Mittens is a gun banner too, no matter what he says today. One brief glimpse of his record reveals his true position on the issue. Ditto for socialized medicine, abortion, taxes, etc. Captain Underoos is the white Obama.

Anonymous duckman July 26, 2012 4:08 PM  

From the South African piece:

The family dog was killed by having his stomach cut open.

Has anyone alerted PETA to this outrage?

Anonymous DT July 26, 2012 4:09 PM  

What, in your opinion, was God's purpose in creating the negro race?

I hesitate to post this because it's OT, and I'll understand completely if it gets deleted. But it's gnawing at me, so I'll post my answer and see if it sticks.

God created Adam and Eve. They sinned. One of the consequences of that sin is that the genomes of all living things decay over time. There's genetic change, but the evolutionists have it backwards. The change is towards disorder.

Different population groups have been under different pressures in terms of breeding (tribal vs larger groups), environment, disease, survival, etc. Which means that their genomes have mixed and decayed in different ways. This is not God "creating" the races. It is in fact one of the consequences of a world shaped by sin. No race has been spared, and I imagine if we could compare our bodies today to those of Adam and Eve and the first few generations of man, we might be shocked to realize just how far we have fallen.

I would like to add that while I'm tired of the racial "we're all equal under the skin" nonsense, and I believe that we need to be honest about the genetic differences between races, I suspect that most of the problems with minority crime in America can be traced to and solved with culture. Unfortunately Europeans have been taught to hate their culture and minorities to embrace theirs, so the cultural transference is going the wrong direction.

Culture, by the way, is behavior, choice. It's important to understand the genetic differences between races, including things such as average IQ, and how that feeds into behavior and culture. But a person with an IQ of 80 can still choose Christ, while a person with an IQ of 140 chooses sin and death. I don't believe God is the direct cause of the genetic characteristics of today's races, and He certainly isn't the direct cause of the choices of their individuals. "What was God's purpose in creating the negro race?" is the wrong question. "Why did man sin, and why does he continue to sin?" is the right one.

(Unless, of course, you're a Calvinist. In which case every negro child brutally killing another is all for glory or something. Clay pots you know.)

Anonymous O.C. July 26, 2012 4:25 PM  

> And as far as I'm concerned, every adult male citizen should be required by law to own an AK-47,

Aw, do I have to buy one of those pieces of junk? Can't I just keep my Garand?

Anonymous Joe Doakes, Como Park July 26, 2012 4:36 PM  

If violence is committed by armed criminals - which it is - and if society wants to disarm those criminals to reduce violence - which we do - and if we know what portion of the population makes up the largest group of violent armed criminals - which we do - and if society has limited resources - which it does - then it makes sense for society to target its scarce resources on disarming that portion of the population where the largest proportion of violent armed criminals reside.

In the Twin Cities, crime stats prove that's the young Black male population of North Minneapolis and Frogtown. So, Mr. President, are you ready to lead searchers door-to-door? To stop and frisk every Black male between the ages of 13 and 30? To do what it takes to get guns off the street?

Or are you not being serious?
.

Anonymous Anonymous July 26, 2012 4:56 PM  

I demand tactical nukes that I can aim at lunatic fucking racists like the author of this blog.

Anonymous Poli_Mis July 26, 2012 5:03 PM  

Captain Underoos is the white Obama.

Nothing so succinctly sums up the the future. Doomed.

Where are my keys? I'm heading to the store for some Paulaner.

Anonymous Poli_Mis July 26, 2012 5:06 PM  

And whomever declared this to be a good year for Sam Adams Summer Ale was spot on.

Anonymous SouthTX July 26, 2012 5:35 PM  

Speaking of AK's, this video is funny as hell. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhxqIITtTtU

Blogger ajw308 July 26, 2012 5:46 PM  

You, Joe, are being Raciss!! Dey statistics, day be raciss too.

Anonymous The Other Guy July 26, 2012 5:50 PM  

Hello everyone,

This is a rather odd question:

Having never shot a gun, I am unsure where to go or what to do. I've never had anyone to show me or teach me. I think about buying something that I perceive as easy and cheap, like a shotgun, but then, I don't know how to clean it either. And where does one go to shoot a shotgun? The range? The few places with classes in my area focus primarily on handguns, which I would prefer to avoid until I have a better grip on what I'm doing.

Any suggestions?

Anonymous patrick kelly July 26, 2012 6:11 PM  

RE: The Other Guy:

If you have any friends or family who own guns and enjoy recreational shooting ask to join them.

If not, find a range where you can rent something, or sign up for a class where you can rent something.

Although I started with long guns, I see no reason why someone shouldn't learn about handguns first. The Browning or Ruger target pistols in .22 lr or a revolver for the same are fairly easy to get a handle on, and aren't all that noisy or intimidating. Even a .38 special revolver with 4" barrel or longer might do.

Heck, I rented a Glock .45 the first time I went to shoot a pistol by myself before I owned any.

Anonymous Russell July 26, 2012 6:24 PM  

RE: The Other Guy

Depending on your state, some Hunter's Education programs offer shotgun training.

Start with a .22 handgun. I have and recommend a Browning Buck Mark; there are other options out there like the Ruger.

Make sure you have ear and eye protection, find a local range and have fun!

Anonymous Noah B. July 26, 2012 6:33 PM  

@Other Guy

A .22 is the best weapon to start out with, either in terms of ownership or practice. Both the Browning Buckmark and Ruger MKII/MKIII family of .22 pistols make good choices for pistols. There are a number of excellent .22 revolvers out there, and again Ruger is a good choice for a .22 revolver. Smith and Wesson makes some great and some not-so-great .22 revolvers. You want something without an unreasonably high trigger pull, which is the main problem I've seen with .22 revolvers.

Marlin and Savage make some good bolt action .22 rifles, and the advantage of these is that they shoot a wide variety of ammo very well. The Ruger 10-22 is one of the most popular and best all-around .22 automatic rifles.

Renting first is not a bad idea, but it can be difficult to find the specific firearm you're interested in renting. If you're going to buy, I would suggest going through a reputable dealer and comparing prices. Differences in prices can be pretty dramatic from one dealer to the next, for exactly the same gun. Guns that are sold by individuals are far more likely to be malfunctioning than new guns sold by dealers, and if you're new to all this, you probably aren't in a position to be able to thoroughly inspect a gun, and you probably also don't want the hassle of having to either fix a gun yourself or take a gun you just bought to a gunsmith.

Anonymous RC July 26, 2012 6:42 PM  

@Other Guy - You will find helpful people at most any range.

Anonymous Godfrey July 26, 2012 7:01 PM  

If you were a plantation owner, would you want your slaves armed?

Anonymous aero July 26, 2012 7:02 PM  

I wonder how boldly Obama and Bloomberg would talk if they lead by example and disarmed their bodyguards.

as the saying goes you first

It is obvious that these leaders have no faith in WE THE PEOPLE. The only reason this can be is because they are up to no good.

Anonymous kh123 July 26, 2012 8:19 PM  

"why-most-mass-murderers-are-privileged-white-men"

I didn't know Gulbudin Hekmyatar or Pol Pot were rich Caucasian. With the Bloods, Crips, and MS13 following right on the heels of the Lions Club.

It all depends on categorization.

Anonymous bw July 26, 2012 8:53 PM  

“A lot of gun owners would agree that AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals”

This is nothing more than psych-warfare from his handlers, and that by obvious omission - that of Constitutional, therefore lawful, 2nd Ammend practicing Americans...who are apparently getting more and more AK's everyday.
Nothing more than the most murderous, coercive force in history getting to define terms: government military force = good. Who's the criminal? You. Whose power is threatened? Not the puppet masters, gatekeepers, and true government and corporate criminals - the Cryptocracy.

Anonymous scoobius dubious July 26, 2012 9:59 PM  

"I demand tactical nukes that I can aim at lunatic fucking racists like the author of this blog."

Wow! You won!! You won by calling him a racist! You're the greatest debating champion who ever lived!!

Time for the ticker-tape parade down the Canyon of Heroes, to celebrate the brilliant tactician who deployed the "you're a racist" gambit!

I wonder who'll cause most of the trouble at the parade, though. And I wonder who built the Canyon. And who invented the ticker-tape. And why they never seem to have ticker-tape parades in Kinshasa.

Eh, best not to think about it. Huzzah! Huzzah-a-roonie!! You called him a racist! Ultimate smackdown!!!!11!

Blogger JohnG July 26, 2012 10:06 PM  

"This is stupid. AK-47s look scary, if you're the bedwetting type, but they use a 7.62 x 39 round, which is kind of meh compared with stuff used in ordinary hunting rifles. Consider grandpa's old .30-06 bolt-action hunting rifle -- the ammo packs way more punch and has a longer range than the AK-47 round." Stickwick

Bah. 5.56 is faster but it's a pellet. The 30-30 and 7.62x39 are actually very similar. Absolutely the 30-06 is much more powerful. Feds were terrified of the BARs when the mob was using them in the prohibition days (and I do quite like my Civvy BAR - in .300WM though). Probably would be more guys dead if Holmes was using an AK, but maybe not, everytime I see somebody shooting one, it's gangsta style from the hip, thrusting it every time they fire (the Liberia civil war pics of those morons shooting are awesome btw).

Anonymous III July 26, 2012 11:13 PM  

Tell that to the millions of dead on the receiving end of a AK.

Anonymous O.C. July 26, 2012 11:33 PM  

@Anonymous, "I demand tactical nukes..."

Actually, I think you'd find that Vox fully endorses the idea of Family Atomics.

Anonymous The other skeptic July 27, 2012 12:03 AM  

Bloomberg ignores the obvious solution to events like Aurora

More concealed carry means more careful people.

Anonymous kh123 July 27, 2012 1:40 AM  

Wasn't there someone on your WND column the other day that went on about how Obama's never made any attempt to repeal gun rights.

Anonymous III July 27, 2012 2:21 AM  

None. Start with a less expensive Mossberg pump (12 Gauge). Once you are proficient with it, move on to other guns.

Attention ladies. We will start you with the 22. Once you have become proficient with it, we will train you with the M16.

If you want a home defense - get a Mossberg OR Remington. Handgun in 40 or 45 (just to appease the pussies) as my 9mm suits just fine.

If you want a BATTLE RIFLE... get a M14/M1A or M4.

Just remember this. If/when TSHTF and military/police are roaming the streets... what will be the prevalent ammo laying around?

Anonymous Idle Spectator, African't July 27, 2012 3:07 AM  

The current top comment on the UK Daily Mail article:

"Quick test: What do these following places have in common? South Africa, Detriot, London, East Saint Louis, Compton, East L.A., Chicago, Paris, Mogadishu, Flint, Cape Town and Johannesberg?"

Uh-oh. I think the "tolerant whites" are begininng to emerge from their long slumber.

What a bunch of fucking savages.

"I think what you just said was kinda racist..."
Come at me bro! COME AT ME! CALL ME RACISSSS. Strike me down with your name calling!

Anonymous Idle Afrikaner Spectator July 27, 2012 4:00 AM  

Vox this one South African story is just the tip of the whiteberg. I'm not even going to repeat what crimes I have seen. It's a level of bad like the Democratic Republic of the Congo where they are eating people and pet crocodiles are attacking passengers on airplanes.

The first post-apartheid president was fine. But Nelson Mandela is only one man and can only do so much. He was very exceptional. An educated and brilliant tribal Thembu, who was basically an aristocrat, as a great-grandson of Ngubengcuka, one of the kings of the tribe. I can't really say the same about the current South African president, Jacob "I took a shower after sex, so that should prevent HIV transmission" Zuma.

My favoritee Zumacdote, after rape charges against him were dropped: An Independent analyst suggested, "The fear of seeing Zuma and his crowd marching to the Union Buildings wielding machine guns is unnerving mostly to the middle class and businessmen, according to recent surveys.

I think anyone with a functional brain attached to their brainstem would find that unnerving.

If you are white?
Get. The. Hell. Out. Of. South. Africa. Now.

Anonymous OriginalFrank July 27, 2012 6:32 AM  

Otherguy - go here to find an intro class - shotgun, pistol, or rifle - near you. Many provide the guns. Or will if asked.

http://www.nrainstructors.org/searchcourse.aspx

Anonymous New_World_Ohio_Resident July 27, 2012 6:38 AM  

Otherguy - Depending where you live, there may be an Ilk member that could help you. If you're in the NW Ohio area, we can blast away... :)

Anonymous Luke July 27, 2012 7:13 AM  

Re the "serial killers [in the U.S.] have always mostly often been whites, even accounting for their population predominance" belief:

Actually, that appears to have been less than entirely accurate:

http://www.amazon.com/Rise-Black-Serial-Killer-Documenting/dp/1475012802/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1343387391&sr=1-1&keywords=black+serial+killers

(Same URL shortened:) http://tinyurl.com/bl8gjcq

Anonymous Papapete July 27, 2012 8:42 AM  

Remember that a concealed carry license and membership in your state rifle association in many cases qualifies you to buy from the Civilian Marksmanship Program. This means that you can get an M1 Garand drop-shipped directly to your door. Note that the 30-06 round reliably penetrates body armor with proper ammo at reasonable ranges and the gun is accurate out to 500 yards with iron sights.

Anonymous California Nationalist July 27, 2012 8:55 AM  

As I keep telling you, the country is headed towards civil war.

The power elites push disarmament to render Whites helpless in the face of federal tyranny and the Afro-Hispanic onslaught.

Blogger Galt-in-Da-Box July 27, 2012 9:28 AM  

Do they make the SIG 550 in 7.62x39?
If so, I'll have to put one on my want list: They outrange the AK by a good 250 yards, and that's just the wimpy little 5.56 mousegun!

Anonymous Clay July 27, 2012 9:58 AM  

If the 5.56x45 is such a wimpy mousegun, it makes you wonder why the Russians converted to the AK-74, chambered for the 5.45x39. And the Chinese are going with the 5.8x42.

Just sayin’.

Anonymous Noah B. July 27, 2012 10:44 AM  

@Clay

Part of the thinking is that a seriously wounded soldier requires a military to expend even more resources on evacuation and medical care than would be the case for a soldier who dies quickly. The same line of reasoning goes into the development of anti-personnel mines.

Anonymous Stilicho July 27, 2012 11:17 AM  

5.56x.45 is more accurate to significantly greater ranges than the 7.62x.39. The AK is a cheap, durable, reliable, close range, peasant weapon. Spray and pray. As such it makes sense for a lot of forces. If you have the means, the time and dedication to become a proficient rifleman, then 7.62x.51 (.308) is a better choice than either and you have some very nice options in rifles with the M1A variants and the AR-10 style rifles.

Anonymous Anonymous July 27, 2012 11:45 AM  

@ scoobius dubious

Out here in civilization, where the author and readers of this blog are scum and people with IQs below 90 are laughed out of the public square, calling the lot of you racist is the most obvious statement in the world. So hold your ticker tape parade when you are finished with the circle jerk.

As for civil war, go for it. Put your fucking money where your mouth is and start it. You will be exterminated in seconds and the world will be a much better place.

Blogger ajw308 July 27, 2012 11:56 AM  

"why-most-mass-murderers-are-privileged-white-men"

I didn't know Gulbudin Hekmyatar or Pol Pot were rich Caucasian. With the Bloods, Crips, and MS13 following right on the heels of the Lions Club.

It all depends on categorization.

KH, is this the link you were looking for?

Blogger ajw308 July 27, 2012 12:03 PM  

Clay, go read Blackhawk down. There were firefights were the US troops cold see the white billowy shirts of the enemy moving due to the exiting .223 rounds, but enemy was high on kaht and intent on killing the Americans. .308 rounds woulda knocked them over, if not killed them outright.

There is a reason you don't/can't hunt deer with FMJ, let alone a FMJ .223.

Anonymous 300WMFan July 27, 2012 12:47 PM  

Part of the thinking is that a seriously wounded soldier requires a military to expend even more resources on evacuation and medical care than would be the case for a soldier who dies quickly.

Maybe not so much...



"Every good myth, has a lot of truth to it, and this one is no different; it's a very good myth, but it just isn't true. We didn't adopt the 5.56, because it was designed to wound; in fact the 5.56 nato chambering WAS NOT designed to "wound not kill"." - CB

One of the better reads I've run across re the 5.56.


Anonymous 300WMFan July 27, 2012 12:49 PM  

Stoopid HTML tags:

http://anarchangel.blogspot.com/2007/02/Okay-so-why-did-we-choose-556.html

Blogger Spacebunny July 27, 2012 12:59 PM  

Out here in civilization, where the author and readers of this blog are scum and people with IQs below 90 are laughed out of the public square, calling the lot of you racist is the most obvious statement in the world. So hold your ticker tape parade when you are finished with the circle jerk.

As for civil war, go for it. Put your fucking money where your mouth is and start it. You will be exterminated in seconds and the world will be a much better place.


I'm sorry, dear, but did you mistaken think you've made any sort of argument refuting what has been written, or is it that you are normally rewarded for your emotional outbursts?

Anonymous J. Crow July 27, 2012 1:31 PM  

@Anonymous

Nah, we're simply going to stock up on the guns that you hate ever-so-much, sit back, crack open a beer, and watch your Secular Utopian Dream(tm) collapse under its own deluded, totalitarian weight. Much like Andrea Dworkin's knees.

But don't cry, little Leftie. When your unarmed, nigger-loving ass has been properly "loved" by the niggers, we might take pity on your quivering carcass and grant you sweet 5.56x45mm release.

That, or you'll just get stringed up outside the nearest gas station.

Anonymous California Nationalist July 27, 2012 4:51 PM  

We're going to hit the deluded white liberals (DWLs) first, since it is they who prop up the System.

Without their support, the MultiKult would collapse.

We're going to hit 'em hard and string 'em up from the lamp posts.

I will personally volunteer to undertake such actions myself, as I've no hesitation in targeting race-traitors and terrorists.

Civil War II first.

After that, the War of American Liberation, in which we will expel the third world colonial population and achieve independence.

Anonymous Anonymous July 27, 2012 5:32 PM  

Lots of talk here. Like I said before about civil war. Put your fucking money where your mouth is and start it. Not tomorrow. Today.

All fucking talk. All fucking pussies. You will never do it.

Anonymous J. Crow July 27, 2012 5:49 PM  

You can stop clenching your anus in fear and outrage, little Leftie. California Nationalist is not really going to start a civil war.

Who you should worry about are the patient ones. The ones who will wait until Sugar Daddy State can't protect you anymore. The ones with the guns.

Assuming the niggers don't take care of you first.

Anonymous Anonymous July 27, 2012 6:20 PM  

Not scared at all j crow. If English were your first language, you would see clearly I am calling you out. Shut up already and start your civil war. You will be exterminated in seconds.

Will you do it or are you a fucking pussy? We know the answer already, don't we?

Anonymous The Other Guy July 27, 2012 6:26 PM  

Thanks for the advice folks. I found a good range with a very helpful staff, much better than the gun stores I had been browsing through. I think I'll start with a .22 and go from there.

As an aside, any of you with sons, take this advice: my father was around but not much interested in me, never even taught me to shave. I've had to either stumble through experiences on my own or get lucky enough to meet someone considerate and knowledgeable. Make sure you encourage your sons interest and skills and make yourself available.

Anonymous J. Crow July 27, 2012 6:32 PM  

Not scared? You're pissing yourself so hard you can't even read straight, little Leftie.

There will be no civil war. But there will be an extermination.

Blogger Spacebunny July 27, 2012 6:41 PM  

Anonymous - pick a handle, anonymous comments aren't allowed.

Anonymous tiredofitall July 27, 2012 7:09 PM  

Will you do it or are you a fucking pussy? We know the answer already, don't we?

Brave talk for someone commenting anonymously.

Anonymous Idle Spectator, Tolerance Superhero July 27, 2012 7:44 PM  

Doesn't everyone know every population on Earth is exactly the same?

Hispanics, Jews, Aboriginals. All the same. All the same genes. They all look exactly the same. Except for Affirmative Action purposes, which is still needed just in case. Same. Same. Same. Can't we all just get along?


By the way man, this tofu burger is amazing. //hits bong

Blogger The Aardvark July 27, 2012 8:53 PM  

"Family Atomics"

Always thought that was the most charming term.

Anonymous The other skeptic July 27, 2012 9:30 PM  


my father was around but not much interested in me, never even taught me to shave.


What else did he fail to teach you? How to have sex, perhaps?

The modern conceit that fathers have to be around to hold their son's dicks for them really is stupid and seems to be a feminist way of shaming men.

Frankly, when I was growing up I did not need my father to teach me how to shave or those other things. Perhaps he could have taken me to the range so I could learn to shoot, but I eventually managed some semblance of that myself as well.

I just needed him to be there providing a roof over my head and food and as an example of a father who stuck around. All the rest I could figure out for myself!

Anonymous The other skeptic July 27, 2012 9:49 PM  

Rather than mandating that everyone buy an AK-47, perhaps they could make learning how to make one tax deductible as an education expense. Maybe a Hope and Change Credit or something.

Anonymous scoobius dubious July 28, 2012 10:41 AM  

"You will be exterminated in seconds"

Wow, who does that remind me of? Oh yeah, now I remember... Darth Vader.

Well at least now we know what's really in the hearts of our "tolerant" betters.

Ah, just fuckin' with ya. We've known all along what's in your poisonous shriveled hearts, you assholes.

Anonymous scoobius dubious July 28, 2012 10:45 AM  

"If English were your first language, you would see clearly I am calling you out."

Not sure you actually even know what that last phrase really means. Let me ask you: has a man ever told you to step outside? Did you do it? I'd pay a nickel to find out what happened next. Maybe even a shiny dime.

Nah, a preening little leftist shit like you has never even done anything that would come to a man's attention, much less ruffled him to the point that you'd have to step outside.

Anonymous scoobius dubious July 28, 2012 10:49 AM  

"Shut up already and start your civil war."

Oh, it's already started. Just not in a way you'd recognize at first. But when it's over, I promise you, you'll be the first to know.

Anonymous scoobius dubious July 28, 2012 11:11 AM  

"Out here in civilization, where the author and readers of this blog are scum and people with IQs below 90 are laughed out of the public square, calling the lot of you racist is the most obvious statement in the world."

First off, as the old joke about the grad students and the light bulb goes, Define your terms.

What, in your view, is a "racist"? Be precise. "People I don't like" won't cut it as a definition. You used the word, and I didn't, so I assume you must know what it means. Kindly instruct me.

You have an IQ north of 90, unlike me; so I presume that a simple definition, by way of explaining what you specifically mean, will not be a burden for you.

"Out here in civilization"

Once again: who built the Canyon of Heroes? Why did they do it? Do you even know what it is? (Don't google it, you're civilized, you must know!)

And also... who didn't build it?

"where the author and readers of this blog are scum and people with IQs below 90 are laughed out of the public square"

I'm glad to see you believe that people with sub-par IQs should be laughed out of the public square. Ah, democracy among the tolerant classes! Shall we take away their vote, as well? You do realize that the sub-90 class composes a majority of your allies, don't you?

Now of course the defense will be: 'B-b-b-but, IQ can't "really" be measured! It's a social construct!' But again: you introduced the term, I didn't. It must have meaning for you. Do you believe in science, or don't you? What do you know about IQ distribution, as measured by science? What might it have to do with your personal definition of "racist"?

Take your time.

"the author and readers of this blog are scum and people with IQs below 90 are laughed out"

I'm confused here. Do you mean that people who have IQs below 90 are categorically scum, or do you mean that all people with IQs below 90 should be laughed away, whether they read this blog or not, or do you mean that only people with IQs below 90 read this blog, or do you mean something else entirely?

One last question, since your IQ is clearly so superior to the rest of us... What was your preferred method for breaking into the Adams House swimming pool at night to go skinny-dipping? Did you do the thing with the lock, or the thing with the door hinges?

Don't google it. Either you know what I'm talking about, or else you don't.

Anonymous kh123 July 28, 2012 1:22 PM  

"KH, is this the link you were looking for?"

Nope, but interesting. Recognized the Beltway Snipers' names.

Interestingly, Wayne Williams isn't listed.

Anonymous kh123 July 28, 2012 1:29 PM  

Or Colin Ferguson for that matter.

Anonymous RC July 28, 2012 1:44 PM  

"The modern conceit that fathers have to be around to hold their son's dicks for them really is stupid and seems to be a feminist way of shaming men.

Frankly, when I was growing up I did not need my father to teach me how to shave or those other things. Perhaps he could have taken me to the range so I could learn to shoot, but I eventually managed some semblance of that myself as well."

You must be joking. Many of us have had to figure things out on our own but a wise, skilled, engaged, and good father can make a momentous difference in his sons' lives.

Anonymous physphilmusic July 28, 2012 2:55 PM  

What was your preferred method for breaking into the Adams House swimming pool at night to go skinny-dipping? Did you do the thing with the lock, or the thing with the door hinges?

Did you really go there, scoobius dubious? In my personal experience, the majority of people schooled at similar places turn out to be left-liberal PC-worshipping assholes like this guy.

Anonymous Anonymous July 30, 2012 9:23 AM  

Damn, I fully expected you fucking rubes to start the civil war this weekend! What happened? Did mom not let you out of your basements? Did you jerk off so hard on your guns that you gummed up the works?

Get fucking cracking, pussies! Your "brave" racist compatriots await you!

Of course, we know this isn't happening. Despite screwing up your IQs of 73 and writing your illogical comments, the simple truth is you have no fucking balls.

Anonymous J. Crow July 30, 2012 11:02 AM  

Projecting your own miserable life and low intelligence onto others isn't an argument, little Leftie. But by all means, keep up with the paranoid masturbation to imaginary civil wars and evil KKK militias. Or is it the rape-by-African-American part that gets you off?

The true pussy is the unarmed little faggot hiding behind his masters, like a nigger on the plantation. And we all know pussies get fucked.

Anonymous Anonymous July 30, 2012 11:27 AM  

Sorry, J Crow, but scroll up. The fucking toothless rubes who patrol this site threatened civil war over and over again. I am just reminding them. And I realize again that you are illiterate, but I have stated over and over again that there is no fear on my side. I *want* you to start a civil war and I *know* you will be exterminated in seconds.

Will you all do it or not?

And why would you imagine I am unarmed? Unlike all of you fucking pussies, I served my country and learned how to defend myself. And I will, so no worries there.

So project your cowardice somewhere else, rube. Out here in civilization, we know who the pussies are.

With that, I will say my goodbyes. I gave you your chances to launch your civil war, and you didn't. Case closed.

Anonymous J. Crow July 30, 2012 12:23 PM  

Again with the lame excuses, little Leftie. Shrieking that you're not afraid while shaking in a pool of your own urine doesn't convince anyone, not matter how many times you say it. Sure you don't have Aspergers as well?

If you'd bother to wipe away the mixture of tears, snot and semen from your face long enough to actually read what we grown-ups have actually said, you'd see that there's been exactly one person talking about starting a "civil war" other than you, and he's not being serious. (PROTIP: Learn to count.) Why would we waste such time and effort when we can simply sit back, relax, and deal with you Leftie pussies after the collapse? The answer, as we've already explained, is that we won't.

Oh, and playing Halo over and over again on the old Xbox your step-dad bought you to shut you up while he banged your mom doesn't count as "serving my country". But feel free to mewl otherwise to the niggers lining up behind you. I'm sure they'll be very impressed with your mastery of self-defense.

And just to prove my point, you now run away like the frightened little faggot you are. Go ahead, scuttle back home and kneel before your government masters. Their dicks aren't going to suck themselves.

Case closed indeed.

Anonymous Clay July 30, 2012 2:56 PM  

I don't suppose this is gonna be one of those threads that ends with, "why can't we all just get along"?

Post a Comment

NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS. Anonymous comments will be deleted.

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts