With the advantage of distance, I have to say my current favorite thing about the book is the Crazy Eddy component. It's a fine line to walk, with heaven on one side and hell on the other, and so far the protagonist is dancing along it quite well. But whether he's a sinner or saint will depend on if dragons can fly.
Anyway, I like Crazy Eddy. It's the most dangerous, high stakes and difficult game there is, one where one must often behave ruthlessly while appearing good, and where things are rarely what they seem.
Oh yeah, and vox's book reflects the double-edged nature of the pursuit. Instead of a magical maguffin that will cure all ills, you have something much closer to the nature of social revolution - a dragon that may work for you, or just burn everything. We like the metaphor.
They've always taken hell for that color scheme, even when they started. It's kind of like Bolt dogging on the 100 and still breaking a world record. They figure their writing is so good it sucks you in anyhow, and then you don't care, and then they have you.
And it is true. Surridge and Harvey especially, but all of the posters there are pretty terrific (except for two, but I skip over them so fast that I forget they are still there), and considering that it is mostly for fans of the magazine (which is on an extraordinarily long publication cycle, and has been since the beginning), I highly doubt they'll change now.
Out of curiosity, what kind of critique is more valuable to an author? Joe public or a more professional review? Or is it such that they cannot be compared?
Scoop, Evelyn Waugh Prelude to Foundation, Isaac Asimov Forward the Foundation, Isaac Asimov King Rat, China Mieville An Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic Thought: Vol I, Murray Rothbard Vile Bodies, Evelyn Waugh Sharpe's Battle, Bernard Cromwell Sharpe's Company, Bernard Cromwell Sharpe's Sword, Bernard Cromwell The Desert Spear, Peter Brett The Daylight War, Peter Brett Macroscope, Piers Anthony Greenwitch, Susan Cooper Lord of Light, Roger Zelazny The Meaning of It All, Richard Feynman Victory of Eagles, Naomi Novik The Theory of Money and Credit, Ludwig von Mises Down on the Farm, Charles Stross Tactics, Asclepiodotus Terms of Enlistment, Marko Kloos Officers and Gentlemen, Evelyn Waugh Men on Strike, Helen Smith Infinite Jest, David Foster Wallace
Looking for Jake, China Mieville
11 Comments:
With the advantage of distance, I have to say my current favorite thing about the book is the Crazy Eddy component. It's a fine line to walk, with heaven on one side and hell on the other, and so far the protagonist is dancing along it quite well. But whether he's a sinner or saint will depend on if dragons can fly.
Anyway, I like Crazy Eddy. It's the most dangerous, high stakes and difficult game there is, one where one must often behave ruthlessly while appearing good, and where things are rarely what they seem.
Oh yeah, and vox's book reflects the double-edged nature of the pursuit. Instead of a magical maguffin that will cure all ills, you have something much closer to the nature of social revolution - a dragon that may work for you, or just burn everything. We like the metaphor.
How many words is "A Magic Broken?"
Three
That was funny. Something like 20,000. Novella length. I think Vox said it was 50-100 pages conceptually.
It reads fast, in any case. 20 minutes if you read fast, an hour if you read slow. Definitely worth the dollar.
Please someone tell them that black background websites are not appropriate anymore. I mean, Geocities died for a reason.
They've always taken hell for that color scheme, even when they started. It's kind of like Bolt dogging on the 100 and still breaking a world record. They figure their writing is so good it sucks you in anyhow, and then you don't care, and then they have you.
And it is true. Surridge and Harvey especially, but all of the posters there are pretty terrific (except for two, but I skip over them so fast that I forget they are still there), and considering that it is mostly for fans of the magazine (which is on an extraordinarily long publication cycle, and has been since the beginning), I highly doubt they'll change now.
I haven't read your books VD, but the covers of every one of them are very well done.
I like black backgrounds because they're easier on your eyes. The Google homepage, for example, is like staring into a lightbulb.
Vox,
Out of curiosity, what kind of critique is more valuable to an author? Joe public or a more professional review? Or is it such that they cannot be compared?
The review is not as well written as the book was.
Post a Comment
NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS. Anonymous comments will be deleted.
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home