ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2014 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Saturday, December 22, 2012

That's a bold move, Obsidian

Let's see how it works out for him.  Obsidian takes exception to the way I am The Man keeping the Black man down by utilizing the blatantly raciss tactic of citing international crime and gun ownership statistics in response to the media stampede for more gun control:
The reason why 26 WHITE Women and children died last week; the reason why dozens of largely WHITE people died earlier this year at a movie theatre in Colorado; and the reason why upwards of 100 WHITE teenagers met a bloodsoaked end in Olso, was all due to having too many guntoting Darkies in White Lands.

Now, before anyone out there starts sending my hatemail, no one is more aware of gun violence on the streets of urban America more than me. Thus far, no one - not me, not anyone else in the media, not President Obama himself - has ever denied that urban gun violence isn't a problem, and a huge one at that.

But isn't it just a weebit fascinating that the Alt-Right, when they can get up the gumption to address the clearly depraved monsters in their midst (read: White Males With Problems), just happen to do it in a manner that would be identified, rightly, as deeply intellectually dishonest and highly disengenuous in any other context? Of the more than 60 mass shootings over the past three decades, some 44 of them have been committed by White Males - and when you have ads like these marketed to said White Males (name me all the gangbangers who use Bushmasters as their go-to weapon of choice? I'll wait...), well, it all just makes one go, Hmm...
That's an amusing attempt at rhetorical bluster, but I would be remiss if I did not inform Obsidian that demonstrating a complete failure of reading comprehension is not the ideal way to convince those one suspects of a belief in white superiority that they are incorrect.

But since he clearly did not understand what I was writing about in my recent posts, I will clarify the matter for him.  The reason people died in Connecticut and Colorado in the two mass shootings had absolutely nothing to do with gun-toting Darkies, much less their quantity or location.  Given the Oslo shooter's confessed rationale, the situation there was caused by the presence of too many Darkies (for various definitions of "Darky") in Norway, but had nothing to do with their toting of guns.  However, I was not addressing any of these specific situations, (especially not the Norwegian one, as I have no interest in or knowledge of Norwegian gun control laws), I was addressing one of the primary arguments for gun control that has been repeatedly made in the wake of the Connecticut shootings, namely, the idea that the moderate US firearms homicide rate is caused by the very high number of guns per capita in the United States.

There is nothing "deeply intellectually dishonest and highly disengenuous" about pointing out that the difference between the low firearms homicide rate of Canada and the Western European nations and the moderate firearms homicide rate in the USA is not related to the number of guns per capita in the population, but rather is a consequence of the racial makeup of the population.  In fact, it is absolutely necessary to point this out, because reviewing the differences between the various countries with low rates, moderate rates, and high rates clearly demonstrates that the proposed solution to the higher US firearms homicide rate will not, and cannot, be solved by European-style gun control.

Moreover, Obsidian fails to realize that mass shooting statistics he cites make perfect sense.  Why would it make him go hmmmm to realize that 73 percent of the mass shootings of the past 30 years were committed by members of a race that made up a similar percentage of the population over that time.  Is statistically proportional representation truly a deep mystery to him?

There are real problems to discuss with regards to why young white men commit acts of mass murder.  But they are completely unrelated to the arguments that the pro-gun control forces have presented, and to which I have responded.

Bringing nothing but rhetoric to a dialectical discourse is rather like bringing a knife to a gun fight, then defiantly slitting your own throat.  But that is what Obsidian is purposefully doing here, as he admits that he has no interest in actual debate.  He is simply trying to shut it down and prevent these straightforward and undeniable facts from being considered.
Here's that intrepid White Man Blogger, Vox Day, advising his fellow WND readers on how to respond to calls of reason with regard to getting Bushmasters out of the hands of depraved White Guys:

"Don’t give them an inch. Cut them no slack. Punch back twice as hard. When they bring the knife of emotional blackmail to the argument, draw your .50 caliber Desert Eagle of facts, logic and history and blow them away without mercy."

And they wonder why the Manosphere is regarded as a bunch of f*cking loons?

Really?

A number of my readers, online and off, have asked me: Obsidian, why do you waste so much time and energy on people who clearly have a disengenuous agenda? This is a very good question, and here's my response:

Because history has shown us, again and again - that Evil - or in this case, downright Foolishness - can only exist, when Good Men, do nothing. By chin-checking these fools in the public square, I am letting them know that their days of just being able to say ridiculous crap with impunity are over. They sh*t all over our cherished freedoms in the name of "keepin' it real" - yea, like Chris Rock said, keepin' it real DUMB. These knuckleheads aren't the next George Washingtons or Patrick Henrys; shoot, they can barely get laid and make a life for themselves, let alone be the standard bearers of freedom or liberty. They are not fit to participate in reasoned and intellectually honest discussion of the issues of the day, and should be roundly shouted down until they sitdown and STFU.
The idea that a man who claims my agenda is "disengenuous" and lacks the most basic reading comprehension skills can declare, with a straight face, that I am "not fit to participate in reasoned and intellectually honest discussion" is incredibly amusing.  The fact that his ancestors were once forced to ride at the back of the bus is no excuse for Obsidian to voluntarily ride on a metaphorical short one.

Obsidian isn't chin-checking anyone in the public square except himself.  This is like watching a pudgy little kid walk up to Lebron James and threaten to dunk on him; it would be pathetic if it weren't so damned funny.  He can whine and bluster and cry raciss all he likes, but no amount of the conventional African-American histrionics will alter the international statistics or the clear and undeniable conclusions that logic necessarily draws from them.

Labels: ,

88 Comments:

Anonymous TheExpat December 22, 2012 6:01 AM  

All politics are tribal.

Anonymous The Great Martini December 22, 2012 6:19 AM  


Given the Oslo shooter's confessed rationale, the situation there was caused by the presence of too many Darkies (for various definitions of "Darky") in Norway, but had nothing to do with their toting of guns.


That's an interesting way to interpret causality. For one thing, it's similar to the way leftists are often accused of attributing cause that seems to infuriate the right so much. According to it, the liquor store robbery was "caused" by the poverty of the assailants, though conservatives find it difficult entertaining that level of indirection, since the prime theme of personal responsibility and accountability obliterates any other consideration. So it's interesting that you say that the Norway massacre was "caused" by the particular demons that inhabited Breivik's head. Usually those on the right will have none of that type of argument.

More broadly, I think it indicates a general error in these posts. There's always more than a single way to interpret the chain of cause and effect. In one way, Breivik's demons were the cause of the massacre, but there are any number of other equally valid contributing threads of causality. For instance, you could analyze the incident purely in terms of the failure of security to protect the island.
In one way, minority subpopulations in America are the cause (contribute to) high gun violence, but then again, so is gun prevalence. The particular error here is in the genus of "special pleading." You've found your "cause," the one that appears to be most pleasing to you, while ignoring other equally valid interpretations.

Anonymous kh123 December 22, 2012 6:28 AM  

Would it be worth adding that, besides all the projection in those last few paragraphs of his, Obsidian's not exactly hitting the Malcolm X level - not even the bat-swinging incarnation of - what with the soapbox preening.

Anonymous kh123 December 22, 2012 7:02 AM  

"By chin-checking these fools in the public square, I am letting them know that their days of just being able to say ridiculous crap with impunity are over."

Would this be before or after refusing to acknowledge the number of children killed in foreign countries on account of the POTUS' desire to nation build via predator drones.

Some folks may get the mistaken impression that Obsidian's quite alright with a president (of a certain racial persuasion, coincidentally) who routinely pulls the metaphorical and much larger trigger, with civilians (and kids) at the other end of a much larger barrel, on the other end of the globe. (There's your money to fund armed guards at school, being siphoned off for more than a decade into building madrassas in the Graveyard of Nations). I suppose until there's a Trayvon moment overseas, it's off the social justice radar.

I wonder if he'd acknowledge any of this if the number of foreign and domestic deaths by military or law enforcement could be calculated in relation to the growth of federal government and legislation. Again, until there's a No-Limit Nigga moment, all of that government intervention that gave us integration and civil rights was apparently worth whatever abuses of power that same Leviathan engages in afterwards.

The rally cry of "Give us Barabbas" echoing from the ghettos. Legislate today, with no thought for what it will take tomorrow.

Anonymous VryeDenker December 22, 2012 7:14 AM  

You can take the African out of Africa, but you can't take Africa out of the African. Such is the rationalization of the African everywhere you find him. If he can't win the game by playing by the rules, he simply pouts and declares himself the winner because of his hurt feelings and the suffering of his forefathers.

Now, it's cute in a country where the African still has to play by the rules to a degree, but it's much more diabolical when the African attains political power. It's one thing when he declares the rules to be raciss, but it's quite another when he can change said rules at will.

Anonymous zen0 December 22, 2012 7:20 AM  

@ GM
In one way, minority subpopulations in America are the cause (contribute to) high gun violence, but then again, so is gun prevalence.

It would be difficult to have gun violence without guns, but how much of a factor are mere numbers of weapons, as opposed to cultural factors? Let us see what the Small Arms Survey says:

The U.S. has the highest gun ownership rate in the world - an average of 88 per 100 people. That puts it first in the world for gun ownership - and even the number two country, Yemen, has significantly fewer - 54.8 per 100 people
• But the US does not have the worst firearm murder rate - that prize belongs to Honduras, El Salvador and Jamaica. In fact, the US is number 28, with a rate of 2.97 per 100,000 people
• Puerto Rico tops the world's table for firearms murders as a percentage of all homicides - 94.8%. It's followed by Sierra Leone in Africa and Saint Kitts and Nevis in the Caribbean

Anonymous Toolbox December 22, 2012 7:24 AM  

Martini:

It is interesting to note that you're talking about causality as if every potential chain or link is equally valid. That is just not so. The discussion usually isn't "what all contributed?", but rather, "what is the main causal factor?". "But for X would the event have occurred?" is one question, but not the only question. In the instant event really, the only reasoned inquiry is to ask, "How can we prevent the death? Is it preventable?" The reasoned question is not, "How can we prevent gun deaths?" That kind of reasoning is ludicrousness. That would suggest that if people died by poison gas or knives, it would then be OK.

In the instant case (Conn. school), the events do not specifically tend to show that being armed would prevent the murders. But one thing it so clearly and conclusively proves is that gun free zones do not work. Of course, the alternative is to turn back the legal clocks to a time where the carrying of weapons was not restricted.

Deciding gun control and extending the weapon free zone to all of society is not the answer. Gun free zones are like taking your car to the mechanic to fix your wind shield wipers. When he's done, the transmission doesn't work. He tells you this is proof he needs more money and needs to work on it more. After "fixing" the transmission, not only do the wipers and transmission not work, but now the motor won't turn over. He tells you the only answer is to have him fix everything, complete overhaul. This is the argument for gun control. It can't have not worked...we just need more, that's all. Gun control is stupidity and it's time real men stood up and collectively as well as individually said "no" to the next round. We need to turn back the clocks, not just hold the status quo.

Anonymous Heh December 22, 2012 7:33 AM  

no amount of the conventional African-American histrionics will alter the international statistics or the clear and undeniable conclusions that logic necessarily draws from them.

Statistics... raciss!
Logic... raciss!

Anonymous TheExpat December 22, 2012 7:36 AM  

Trollsidian probably heard somewhere that all political power grows from the barrel of a gun, so he's just trying to disarm the white man. Simple.

Anonymous Orion December 22, 2012 7:51 AM  

"So it's interesting that you say that the Norway massacre was "caused" by the particular demons that inhabited Breivik's head. Usually those on the right will have none of that type of argument."

So help us out here GM. Your saying it may have been any of a number of things that triggered the crazy to come out? Simply casting aside his long term pattern of actions and statements prior to the event makes even less sense when looking for cause and effect. Crazy was the way he attempted to address things, but ignoring that he was pointing out facts shunned by the media there pointing to direct links between rising crime and immigration seems a bit obtuse.

Anonymous salt December 22, 2012 8:04 AM  

The problem with reading comprehension and trying t convince others that one is right is simply that many have that problem and are convinced.

Blogger Nate December 22, 2012 8:08 AM  

Wow... Angry Rhetorical Florish from an angry black man. Purely based on an emotional reaction he had to something he barely read.

Shocking.

Anonymous Anonymous December 22, 2012 8:10 AM  

Amazing! All that bluster without refuting a single fact. This counts for civil dialog on guns these days or for that matter any issue that the left wants to put to the forefront. As frustrating as it is we just have to keep talking. At least we can say we tried.

Blogger JD Curtis December 22, 2012 8:16 AM  

The idea of blaming 'the moderate US firearms homicide rate' on 'the very high number of guns per capita in the United States' is akin to blaming the obesity epidemic in the US on the large proliferation of various types of cutlery available to the American public.

Anonymous TheExpat December 22, 2012 8:24 AM  

Hey, spoons are dangerous. They make people fat.

Anonymous The CronoLink December 22, 2012 8:30 AM  

Oh boy, can't wait for Tad and Obsidian to join forces into an abominable Voltron of stupidity.

Anonymous The Great Martini December 22, 2012 8:31 AM  


Your saying it may have been any of a number of things that triggered the crazy to come out?


That might be true, but that's not my point. All I'm saying is that people can adopt explanations for cause that are sympathetic to how they want to interpret a given event. A polar extreme might be the opinion that "Darkies" (as interpreted by locale) "caused" the Oslo massacre. The insidious thing is that this is actually true, in a twisted sense, but it forfeits the entire moral argument in sympathy to Anders Breivik. To a large extent, now it's not Breivik's "fault" that he massacred people. He was merely a mechanism that reacted to immigration, and then did what he did. And so it goes for the gun argument. You can find a cause sympathetic to your position. It may even be totally valid and above board, but by adopting it, you've already thrown the argument in your favor. It amounts to a form of question begging.

Blogger rcocean December 22, 2012 8:44 AM  

The summary and conclusion of Vox's Argument and statistics is quite simple. Give white Americans lots of guns and you'll still have low levels of gun violence. Give minorities lots of guns and you'll have LOTS of gun violence. Solution: Make gun ownership white only.

LOL!

Anonymous Susan December 22, 2012 8:45 AM  

Hey now! Don't you be thinkin' about takin' my kitchen cutlery! How do you expect me to make the sammiches?

Seriously, there are so many rebuttal arguments to these liberal fools it makes my head hurt. A big one is the number of shootings that have ocurred since the passage of the Brady bill in 1994. But they never talk about that do they? Obsidian sounds like he is the one talking ridiculous crap in the public square.

If libs would take the time to think about some of these arguments, maybe they would calm down. I guess I am expecting too much from a group of people with Ph.D's in stupid.

Anonymous Kickass December 22, 2012 8:46 AM  

That post does appear to have been written by a pre-menstrual teenage female.

Men throwing hissy fits are never a good thing.

Is it wrong that I enjoyed the rebuttle? No, just like watching an excellent boxer. I hope you keep on punching until your twilight years old man.

Blogger W.LindsayWheeler December 22, 2012 8:50 AM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger W.LindsayWheeler December 22, 2012 8:52 AM  

No, you are very wrong Great Martini. Poverty leading to crime and attacking people who commit Treason is another.

Brevik's excuse for the killing was that the leftists there were committing Treason by allowing immigration into Norway. He is right and he is right in what he did. To commit Treason is the Death Penalty. To purposely and with forethought, engage in the dissolution of your nation by immigration, attacking and undermining the homogeneity of one's country, is Treason. It is against the common good.

Poverty is NO excuse to commit crime. Absolutely NONE. Poverty also is no excuse to commit murder. Brevik committed murder because these people committed Treason. The fault lies in the Victims he killed. In poverty there is no fault in the victims!!!! Big difference!

Poverty does cause crime due to envy. That many people, especially in the poorer classes lack self-control. Covetousness, a vice, works in poverty. The cause of crime in poverty is vice, not reason. Brevik used Reason and Logic to reach his conclusions. A poor person robbing a 7-11 is about covetousness, envy. There is NO comparison.

Brevik did what was right for his country. He is a patriot; though a lonely patriot.

Anonymous Godfrey December 22, 2012 9:08 AM  

"How can an otherwise sane individual become so enamored of a fantasy, an imposture, that even after it's exposed in the bright light of day, he still clings to it - indeed, clings to it all the harder? No amount of logic can shatter a faith consciously based on a lie"

We’re not debating rational people on this issue. We're dealing with political fanatics. For the man fed his worldview from the MSM, disarming the serf is political orthodoxy.

The State has murdered and continues to murder thousands around the world. It murdered thousands of men, women and children in Serbia, Iraq, Libya, and Afghanistan and will soon murder more in Syria and Iran. The State is a killing machine run by psychopaths. Yet, like Waco or “Fast and Furious”, when The State kills, it isn’t news because it doesn’t serve the agenda.

For the hypocrites, when The State drone kills the “Darkies” attending a wedding in Pakistan, it isn’t news, its collateral damage.

Anonymous Mr Green Man December 22, 2012 9:10 AM  

It's a shame Obsidian and those like him have no desire to understand why the rates are converging on those of separate civilizations, because it wasn't always like this in America.

As one who has heard too many times a black politician shouting "We will fix our own house," and is waiting for the no-go zones to disappear from a number of major US cities and enclaves, it's a shame Obsidian's thinking brain is not engaged, only his racial offense gland. Of course, he'd learn that the operational end of the race hustle political sales machine is behind things like the three generation destruction of American black society and devolution from one of the most moral.

One would also think that somebody with such a refined racial offense gland would also be regularly angry that, apart from the occasion on Fox News, major US media does not care about murders of black and brown children. Start in Chicago, flip on over to Detroit, head on down to St. Louis -- Barack Obama sure doesn't care about black child deaths. It must be easier to bluster and be offended than to admit one's champion is a fraud and a charlatan.

Anonymous Susan December 22, 2012 9:13 AM  

What treasons were those Norwegian children guilty of Wheeler? If he wanted to do what was right for his country, as you say, he would have chosen a target with adults only, not kids. Brevik wasn't a patriot, he was a coward who could only pick on people who weren't his size. There is no way somebody can justify what he did. Sorry.

Before someone reminds me, I know, we are talking here about Wheeler. It just needed to be said.

Anonymous Susan December 22, 2012 9:18 AM  

Don't know if any ilk are familiar with Larry Correia? He used to own a gun store before he became an author of a series of books called Monster Hunter Nation.

He wrote an interesting piece on his blog about the lunacy of gun control. Only thing I would disagree with him on is he says he loves cops. But he did admit that even they say when seconds count, police will be there in minutes. Other than that tiny statement, very good piece full of facts for rebutting liberals with.

Anonymous Loki of Asgard December 22, 2012 9:24 AM  

For my own part, I am confused. Does this Obsidian truly wish the only guns to be in the hands of the white police, who regularly arrest his kind for "Driving While Black"?

The mortals cry out for a tyrant, truly. Why do I meet with such resistance?

Anonymous catahoula December 22, 2012 9:26 AM  

My yankee husband laughed the first time I used darkie in a sentence. They weren't called that in Cleveland.

It still cracks us up.

Anonymous Aeoli Pera December 22, 2012 9:28 AM  

What treasons were those Norwegian children guilty of Wheeler?

Breivik is convinced his cause is a "war", in which case his choice was tactically sound. They weren't guilty of treason, but they were the next-gen officer corps in training.

Which means he's evil (the act), immoral (the outrage), and delusional (a "war" requires at least the support of your Dunbar tribe). But not irrational.

Anonymous Aeoli Pera December 22, 2012 9:29 AM  

The mortals cry out for a tyrant, truly. Why do I meet with such resistance?

I assume it's just a PR thing. Can you play the saxophone?

Anonymous Loki of Asgard December 22, 2012 9:39 AM  

I assume it's just a PR thing. Can you play the saxophone?

Unfortunately, no. But I do have a knack for making people disappear and pulling weapons out of hyperspace.

If your next suggestion involves handing out imperial kneepads to fat women, I will demonstrate my talents.

Blogger JD Curtis December 22, 2012 9:41 AM  

"If we’re serious about curtailing future Columbines and Newtowns, everything — guns, commitment, culture — must be on the table. It’s not hard for President Obama to call out the NRA. But will he call out the ACLU? And will he call out his Hollywood friends? The irony is that over the last 30 years, the U.S. homicide rate has declined by 50 percent. Gun murders as well. We’re living not through an epidemic of gun violence but through a historic decline.” Charles Krauthammer

Blogger Doom December 22, 2012 9:46 AM  

When they get that way, they can be so like women. I do understand why women seem to think they understand them, and mistakenly trust them. At least once.

Anonymous Susan December 22, 2012 9:48 AM  

One other thing Larry Correia touched on was that in CA at least, CC permits are decided on a county by county basis, and race is a huge factor in deciding who gets the permit. Most of them go to rich white people, usually elected officials.

That was a good piece by Krauthammer this week. I haven't agreed with him on much lately.

Anonymous anon123 December 22, 2012 9:53 AM  

Obsidian, Dave Chappelle keeps it realer than Chris Rock.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRFMu3zb5dA

Blogger Positive Dennis December 22, 2012 10:17 AM  

We are not entitled to our own facts. If one wishes to interprete the facts differently, that is fine, but facts are facts.

Anonymous VD December 22, 2012 10:26 AM  

In one way, minority subpopulations in America are the cause (contribute to) high gun violence, but then again, so is gun prevalence. The particular error here is in the genus of "special pleading." You've found your "cause," the one that appears to be most pleasing to you, while ignoring other equally valid interpretations.

No, gun prevalence cannot be. You have failed to note that there are many countries with HIGHER levels of gun violence and far less gun prevalence. Not only is the interpretation you suggest not equally valid, based on the statistics, it is impossible. There is no special pleading. The only error is yours.

Blogger Doorstop December 22, 2012 10:27 AM  

To quote Obsidian "...everyone with one good eye knows that something is seriously wrong with you White Boys, and it's high time we addressed it head-on." Sounds like projection to me.

Anonymous rienzi December 22, 2012 10:51 AM  

@Susan: What treasons were those Norwegian children guilty of Wheeler? If he wanted to do what was right for his country, as you say, he would have chosen a target with adults only, not kids. Brevik wasn't a patriot, he was a coward who could only pick on people who weren't his size. There is no way somebody can justify what he did. Sorry.

Before someone reminds me, I know, we are talking here about Wheeler. It just needed to be said.



Its not often that I agree with Wheeler, but:

The "children" at the camp weren't a bunch of tots playing with Legos and toasting marshmallows around a campfire. The camp is run by the ruling Labor Party. Its function is as a training venue for high-school aged teens, who have been selected to be future leaders of the party.

The Labor Party is, in the main, the organization most responsible for importing the hordes of third-world immigrants who are rapidly turning much of the east side of Oslo into a third-world dump. Brevik erased any number of future Labor Party Cabinet or Prime Ministers. The equivalent of nuking the campuses of Harvard and Yale during finals week.

Cruel and heartless? Yes. However, incredibly effective in letting those in power know that they can't just do whatever they want with impunity because, however supine the population as a whole, there are individuals who can and will reach out and touch them and their loved ones.

Anonymous HanSolo December 22, 2012 10:57 AM  

See my comments on the "Why US gun deaths are high" post that shows that 10 of the 62 mass murderers were black and 6 were Asian. The % of whites who were mass murderers was in line with the white percentage of the population over the last 30 years while the black was just slightly higher and Asians were 2x as high.

Blogger W.LindsayWheeler December 22, 2012 11:00 AM  

Yes, Susan, it is particularly gruesome. We can all quibble. But these were not children but teenagers. They were thoroughly indoctrinated into Political Correctness and as Aeoli Pera rightly points out they WERE "officers in training". That whole island meeting was to indoctrinate and infuse the teenagers in what they already believed in. They were still committing Treason.

Let me remind all and sundry here that God commanded the genocide of the Canaanites. Man woman and child. Babies. In the Psalms is this Hebrew chant: "Let them dash their babies upon the rocks".

God had no compunction. When evil is ensconced in a society---all are responsible. These people were committing Treason regardless of their age. They were going to be the next leaders in that treason.

To commit Treason---is Death. Automatic. No need for trial. It is in the open. Cultural Marxism, Political Correctness, Social Justice. It is all Treason.

God commanded the total destruction of communities--even babies. Sickness is spiritual. It is in the soul. Just like a farmer eradicates pests and rodents in his field, so does God eradicate evil. Brevik was guided by logic. These young people, above the age of discernment, which is the age 7, knew that they were undermining the status quo. They had to know that! They may not have known all the intricacies and the absolute evil and had all the knowledge. That was not necessary.

These teenagers KNEW that at the minimum, they were undermining the status quo, they were attacking Tradition, they were attacking the "other" half of their society that protested immigration in their society. They KNEW this much. That means regardless if they knew it all, they were guilty of Treason.

To attack the social cohesion of the group is Treason. Plain and simple. Immigration in large numbers, which the Left advocates, is Treason. Plain and Simple.

All persons, clergy, ministers, anybody, government officials, journalists, that advocate immigration, or alien immigration is guilty, tout suite, of Treason.

Brevik was right. He broke thru the taboo of violence and the taboo of killing because the Evil he was facing was too immense, too criminal to let it go.

The rest of us are just cowards, pussies.

Anonymous HanSolo December 22, 2012 11:03 AM  

62 Mass murderers compiled by Mother Jones over the last ~30 years:

44 were white 71% of the total, in line with the roughly 70% white population over the last ~30 years. So, as a proportion of population it’s not just a white thing.

10 were black 16% of the total, roughly in line with their % of the population (1 was Cuban born)

6 were Asian 10%, double their 5% of the population. This was the most surprising thing to me.

1 woman

I saw 2 non-black latinos so 1 or both must have been classified as white. Interestingly, latinos are responsible for a lower portion of mass murder than their proportion of the population, it seems.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/07/mass-shootings-map

Showing the pictures of 8 of the 10 blacks:

http://www.vdare.com/articles/the-fulford-file-jezebel?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+vdareblog+(VDARE.com%3A+Blog+Articles)

Why did mother jones say 44/62 were white? (And I think they added in some Middle Eastern and latinos into the white category so the real "white" rate would be lower yet).

Why did they not point out that Asians committed 2x the number of mass murders that doing their population's percentage would produce (10% instead of 5%)?

Anonymous Orville December 22, 2012 11:06 AM  

Think it was a mistake that in the movie "Idiocracy" that President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho was black?

You don't even have to try to find examples every damn day of "Negroes in the News" where they are perpetrating violence upon someone, armed or not. The black culture is demonstrably far more violent than the white culture whether you use subjective (and manipulated in favor of protecting the racial identity of the perp)news articles, or state and federal crime statistics.

Obsidian is a logic free black hole. He should change his name to Oblivious.

Blogger W.LindsayWheeler December 22, 2012 11:16 AM  

I take NO joy in what Brevik did. I wish it had never had happened. I do not take joy or wish to talk about it. It is bad.

But Brevik and I have no control over events, circumstances or what is going on. We are reactionaries. People are evil and the Evil is growing. I do not particularly like to kill a rabbits or goats for food, but I must. "Feeling" is no way to run one's life. One must do the unpleasant things in life.

Brevik had to do the unpleasant. He, I, wish that wasn't the case--but it needed doing. No true man wants to kill, can kill. But forced into a corner, one must. Brevik was in a corner. He stated as much. No one was doing anything. Good was not winning but losing. He struck out. After all available means have been used, violence is the last resort. Countless of conservative, reactionary columns and writings did not effect change in Norway. So what is the next step?

What is the Next step here in America?

Pat Buchanan has written three books, and countless of articles. Nothing has changed--but have gotten worse. Tiburcio Vasquez is now the Spartacus of the Mexican community in Salinas. After all that Pat has written--has made NO headway even in the community of his co-religionists.

The Next step? Violence.

As Ann Barnhardt has said, we now life in a "Soon-to-be-Balkanized States of Neo-Stalinist Kardashianistan".

It's over and it's done. Now, only years of violence, enslavement, tyranny. That is our reality right now. That is our future. Change your minds. Things are totally different. Everything has changed. There will be NO more peace. It's all over. It's done.

Anonymous Roundtine December 22, 2012 11:27 AM  

The summary and conclusion of Vox's Argument and statistics is quite simple. Give white Americans lots of guns and you'll still have low levels of gun violence. Give minorities lots of guns and you'll have LOTS of gun violence. Solution: Make gun ownership white only.

I'm sure that is how leftists see it, as will blacks who see a white boogeyman everywhere they turn. But the implications of Vox's data are the exact opposite. The main point is to refute a lie, that more guns leads to more violence. Blacks are suffering for these lies, because it is peaceful and law-abiding blacks who are being disarmed by urban gun control laws. The truth is that America's overall greater violence is a result of minorities, but that despite all the guns, their gun homicide rates are similar with those of racially/ethnically similar countries. It's the same with whites. Anti-Americans, foreign and domestic, are trying to say American's are more violent. It isn't true. American whites, blacks, Hispanics and Asians are not more violent that European whites, African blacks, Latin American Hispanics or East Asians. In fact, Vox didn't break it out this time, but there's evidence that Americans are across the board safer than foreigners, once adjusted for race.

Anonymous Steve Canyon December 22, 2012 11:42 AM  

Had to throw in the obligatory "Can't get laid" rebuttal to a well thought-out argument as well. Obviously, an honors graduate from the Amanda Marcotte school of Discourse.

Anonymous Otherwise Silent Observer December 22, 2012 12:29 PM  

"...name me all the gangbangers who use Bushmasters as their go-to weapon of choice? I'll wait..."

What a dumbass - look up a few episodes of Discovery's "Gangland" on YouTube. Gang bangers use automatic rifles all the time (maybe not a Bushmaster specifically, but AK-47 type systems more often), they even have slang for it, they call them "choppers." Obviously, they're not getting their weapons from the local pawn shop. Most gang members get their guns from the same place they get their drugs - so unless and until America can stem the tide of drugs, those same roads for weapons will be open. And guess how the war on drugs is going?

Anonymous stg58/Animal Mother December 22, 2012 1:12 PM  

The "children" at the camp weren't a bunch of tots playing with Legos and toasting marshmallows around a campfire. The camp is run by the ruling Labor Party. Its function is as a training venue for high-school aged teens, who have been selected to be future leaders of the party.

The Labor Party is, in the main, the organization most responsible for importing the hordes of third-world immigrants who are rapidly turning much of the east side of Oslo into a third-world dump. Brevik erased any number of future Labor Party Cabinet or Prime Ministers. The equivalent of nuking the campuses of Harvard and Yale during finals week.

Cruel and heartless? Yes. However, incredibly effective in letting those in power know that they can't just do whatever they want with impunity because, however supine the population as a whole, there are individuals who can and will reach out and touch them and their loved ones.


In Breivik's opinion, I think this would be equivalent to the Hebrew Hammer busting into a Nazi Youth training camp in 1933 and mowing down a bunch of future Wehrmachat and SS officers. If you were 17 in 1933, by 1943 you would be 27, a 1stLt or Captain in the Wehrmacht or SS.

Anonymous Axe Head December 22, 2012 1:17 PM  

Most gang members get their guns from the same place they get their drugs

THe CIA?

Blogger W.LindsayWheeler December 22, 2012 1:18 PM  

The teenagers killed on the island were attending a POLITICAL Camp! The Camp meeting was based on Political Ideology.

You know most people think that God is this Marshmallow in the Sky.

No. God in the Old Testament shows himself to quit Ruthless. Hell is Ruthless. The genocides commanded by God show that he is Ruthless. The quashing of Core's rebellion by Moses was Ruthless. In the New Testament, we see God as loving and kind. God is both. God is Merciful. God gives Ten ways from Sunday mercy. But at some point it ends and the Ruthlessness of God comes in.

See evil is sometimes an act of the will but more often than not, evil is "by nature". These teenagers were "evil by nature".

In the Old Testament, in Genesis, God said He will put enmity between Good and Evil. There is no living together. No Rodney King, "Let's all get along". You can't. God purposely prevents that! He put enmity in. Evil hates Good and Good hates evil. When the patience of Good runs out, it is ruthless.

Lenin and Trotsky both expressed that reactionaries and hold outs against communism were to be ruthlessly liquidated. This is how the Catholic Church dealt with the Albingensen heresy. The Church, like Plato, gave people chances to convert. After that period, one must be ruthless. Plato called for the execution of atheists. The Church executed heretics.

It has to be so. That is reality.

Anonymous J. Doe December 22, 2012 1:22 PM  

The single greatest danger to our country are the 10s of millions of idiots with access to a voting ballot. Guns are the only defense against them.

Blogger W.LindsayWheeler December 22, 2012 1:25 PM  

@stg58/animal mother,

I like how Jews want to be somesort of "Hebrew Hammer" against the Nazis. But the National Socialists were only reactionary against the International Socialism run by the Jews. It is the Jews that cooked up political correctness. It is the Jews that believe in the Unity of Man. Not the Nazis. Genocide has always, always, always, been at the heart of Marxism! In order to bring about the Unity of Man, one must existentially commit genocide! Marxism/Communism is genocide. It was the Communist Party, the Democratic Socialist Party, all led by Jews, in Germany that were the FIRST Genociders. National Socialism was a protective force! National Socialism arose to defend AGAINST Jewish Genociders called Marxists! The National Socialists were somewhat more on the Good side. They were pagan and anti-Christian and anti-monarchical, but at the least, they were about preserving their people.

The real danger has always been the Jews. They must engage in existential genocide, destroying racial boundaries, in order to create the Unity of Man in order to usher in the Messianic Age for their Messiah. All progressives work for this goal.

Anonymous Templar December 22, 2012 1:30 PM  

I know this is a total ad hominem, but reading Obisidian's work makes me think "total liberal, public school-eductaed beta male." Just how I see it. It sums up the poor reading comprehension, poor argumentative style and failure of logical formulae.

Anonymous stg58/Animal Mother December 22, 2012 1:51 PM  

Wheeler,

It was merely an analogy. An immediately accessible analogy.

Yes, I know, the Jews. Yes, naughty, dirty, pagan Jews. Wheeler, you're Catholic, right? There is no paganism in Catholicism, right? No little white statues of people littered all over the place? No processions of people marching behind a couple of priests carrying a little white statue of Someone's mother? No prayers to demigods and goddesses?

I also appreciate how you rail against the Jews for being pagan, then tell me that the National Socialists were more on the good side. Because Marxism/Communism and Socialism are so different.

Just checking. By the way, Hebrew Hammer was a movie.

I am wondering how you and I came out of the same boot camp.

Blogger Justthisguy December 22, 2012 2:10 PM  

Wow, Vox, that was some award-winning cruelty, right there. This is why I won't disagree with you on your blog unless I am quite certain that I am right and you are wrong. That case has not yet happened.

Blogger Justthisguy December 22, 2012 2:43 PM  

Loki has said that he does not know how to play the saxophone. Actually, playing the saxophone is not hard, if one knows how to work a clarinet. The question is, why would anybody wish to play a saxophone? There was a reason why apartment leases used to include a saxophone clause, to wit: "There will be no playing of saxophones, or musical instrumemts." Why, yes, I hate saxophones and saxophonists, having had to sit in front of the sax section as an adolescent bandsman. Mr. B. J. Clinton is a saxophonist.

Blogger W.LindsayWheeler December 22, 2012 3:29 PM  

I said the National Socialists were pagan but not the Jews. I don't like socialists of any stripe. Fascism in Italy was quite docile. It was only in defeated Germany from WWI that National Socialism took a virulent form.

Blogger Duke of Earl December 22, 2012 3:44 PM  

Yes, Obsidian did find himself arguing like a woman there.

Anonymous castricv December 22, 2012 3:57 PM  

Why are you even responding to that twat, Vox? He's proven for years everywhere that he is a troll with an IQ of 85 that gets off on you writing large response to his idiocy.

Anonymous Obsidian December 22, 2012 4:00 PM  

Hello VD,
Glad to see that I've gotten your attention. I'll be responding to your post here in the coming days; in the meantime though, for you and your audience's consideration:

What Does Game & EvoPsych Have To Say About White Guy America's Bushmaster Problem?
http://obsidianraw.bravejournal.com/entry/113235

In that we both are known for writing a bit on Game and related topics, I'd be quite interested in hearing you and your audiences thoughts.

O.

Anonymous Susan December 22, 2012 4:28 PM  

Wheeler, et al, I am aware of God's attitude on treason. I agree with it all, always have. In fact to give you an additional example, because Saul did not kill everyone he was supposed to during a battle, as God instructed, Esther had deal with Hammon(sp?). He wanted to kill jews in revenge for what Saul did to his people.

I think you are forgetting one thing here. God did not instruct this guy to kill all of those kids. Brevik did it on his own initiative, in anger at the government. He committed murder to achieve his own ends. I will never believe God instructed this guy Brevik to kill like that. If God was going to go OT on something, I think it would be San Fransicko, or Thailand, not teens in a camp.

Most parents understand how inquisitive and curious teens are. There are a lot of them that participate in political stuff like this and it means nothing to them other than it was a great experience and way to spend a summer and get laid by the cute guy.

Anonymous Susan December 22, 2012 4:34 PM  

And I don't know why exactly, but the cluelessness of Obsidian's response here was very amusing. He wouldn't be so glad to have VD's attention if he could read between the lines.

I always visualize a giant microscope or a big magnifying glass.

Anonymous Loki of Asgard December 22, 2012 4:51 PM  

Loki has said that he does not know how to play the saxophone...Mr. B. J. Clinton is a saxophonist.

Slow today, are we?

And I don't know why exactly, but the cluelessness of Obsidian's response here was very amusing. He wouldn't be so glad to have VD's attention if he could read between the lines.

Oh, on the contrary. This is a bid for increased traffic, in which case any attention is good attention. It is rather like watching a--what are those beasties?--ramona attach itself to a larger fish.

Anonymous J. Doe December 22, 2012 5:14 PM  

Of the more than 60 mass shootings over the past three decades, some 44 of them have been committed by White Males

Society would be much better off having to deal only with the few deeply depraved white monsters than the millions of blacks and Hispanics whose very nature - low IQ, low impulse control, violence - disposes them to depraved behavior. It is an undeniable fact that they are responsible for the vast majority of gun violence and crimes in this country. But the media and all the little useful idiots ignore this, like they do all Leftist social engineering failures, and deflect the blame on evil guns.

Obsidian imagines himself clever because he's too retarded to know he's an idiot. And this intellectually stunted beast with the reasoning capacity of a two-year old has the vote. The US is finished.

Anonymous J. Doe December 22, 2012 5:34 PM  

Obsidian December 22, 2012 4:00 PM

Hello VD,
Glad to see that I've gotten your attention.


Don't flatter yourself. VD often puts the most delusional and retarded on display as an object lesson in human idiocy. It is not for your sake, but for those reading, as a sort of Public Service Announcement. You are almost certainly beyond reach of the message.

Blogger Longstreet December 22, 2012 5:44 PM  

Hello VD,
Glad to see that I've gotten your attention. I'll be responding to your post here in the coming days


If it's any thing like your first post on the subject it ought to be a real hoot.

Blogger Crude December 22, 2012 5:52 PM  

In that we both are known for writing a bit on Game and related topics, I'd be quite interested in hearing you and your audiences thoughts.

You're both known? Who the hell are you? A "Blogger, inner-city pundit, urban dandy, amatuer photographer, stargazer and public pest." according to your about page. Star-gazer? Urban dandy? What in the hell?

And what's this incredibly pussyish response? Where's the Obsidian who was talking about how he was chin-checking fools to put them in their place? Now, 'Gosh, maybe you guys can give your input on my latest livejournal (sorry, bravejournal) entry?'

I'm part of Vox's audience. Here's my thought: next time you try to 'chin-check fools', try to at least comprehend what the hell they're talking about. And when you switch from the tough guy talk to sudden faux politeness, don't think anyone hasn't noticed the tone switch. You got smacked around, and now you're trying to at least scrape up some credibility.

Anonymous stg58/Animal Mother December 22, 2012 6:00 PM  

It appears that Obsidian's mangina turned on.

Anonymous J. Doe December 22, 2012 6:53 PM  

It appears that Obsidian's mangina turned on.

Wherein fighting withdrawal takes on a literal meaning.

Anonymous Noah B. December 22, 2012 8:02 PM  

Just a strawman, and not even a well executed one at that. Pathetic.

Anonymous Roundtine December 22, 2012 8:25 PM  

Has anyone seen gun homicide rates adjusted for gun ownership rates?

Anonymous zen0 December 22, 2012 8:35 PM  

Roundtine December 22, 2012 8:25 PM

Has anyone seen gun homicide rates adjusted for gun ownership rates?


Check out
zen0 December 22, 2012 7:20 AM

Anonymous zen0 December 22, 2012 8:38 PM  

America always has to think they are the biggest and best, just like Obama, but the stats don't always co-operate.

That is why we refer to the U.S. as the Excited States of America.

Your gun ownership rates should result in multiples of gun deaths if you were a normal country. Y'all been pussified.

Anonymous Roundtine December 22, 2012 9:19 PM  

The problem is the guns are mostly in the hands of people who don't kill, instead of mostly in the hands of army, police and criminals. If the U.S. can become more civilized, it can get those numbers up.

Anonymous Susan December 23, 2012 8:02 AM  

I believe urban dandy refers to the fact that he dresses purty. Kind of like a metrofied mangina.

Anonymous DonReynolds December 23, 2012 10:39 AM  

zen0..."Your gun ownership rates should result in multiples of gun deaths if you were a normal country. Y'all been pussified."

zen0...I have no idea which country you live in, nor does it matter much to me, but if you think gun owning Americans have been pussified....obviously, you have not been in rural America. Maybe in urban areas, gun owners are not particularly visible, since guns are probably for defensive purposes, except by the criminal element. (Are the gun toting criminal class also pussified?) Out in the countryside, zen0....that is where you will find the women have an absolute monopoly on pussy.


Blogger 108042 December 23, 2012 4:53 PM  

"Of the more than 60 mass shootings over the past three decades, some 44 of them have been committed by White Males"

Yeah, the ones youve heard of.

Anonymous yukonyon December 23, 2012 5:33 PM  

So, Obsidian, what is the difference between a mass shooting, and a drive-by? The drive-by perp(s) got away?

Anonymous Obsidian December 24, 2012 3:53 PM  

@Yukonyon:
"So, Obsidian, what is the difference between a mass shooting, and a drive-by? The drive-by perp(s) got away?"

O: Hardly, if prison population rates are anything to go by. Was that a trick question?

In any event, as promised, I've responded to Vox Day's post here: http://obsidianraw.bravejournal.com/entry/113406 I am hopeful that he will indeed takeup the issue of exactly why so many young white men are committing acts of mass murder these days.

O.

Anonymous Obsidian December 24, 2012 3:55 PM  

@Susan:
"I believe urban dandy refers to the fact that he dresses purty. Kind of like a metrofied mangina."

O: So, a "mangina" is synonymous with "dandy"? Really?

Sugar Ray Robinson - the best boxer ever - was without a doubt a dandy. I'm in very good company. :)

O.

Anonymous Obsidian December 24, 2012 4:03 PM  

@Crude:
"You're both known? Who the hell are you? A "Blogger, inner-city pundit, urban dandy, amatuer photographer, stargazer and public pest." according to your about page. Star-gazer? Urban dandy? What in the hell?"

O: Yes, a star-gazer - much like Galileo was. Or Kepler. Or Copernicus. You've heard of those guys, right? And yes, dandies have a long and rich history. Try reading up on it sometime.

At any rate, I was speaking to Vox Day's writings in a Game-related context; to that extent, we are both somewhat known, as I too have written quite a bit on the topic. I invite you to see them for yourself!

"And what's this incredibly pussyish response? Where's the Obsidian who was talking about how he was chin-checking fools to put them in their place? Now, 'Gosh, maybe you guys can give your input on my latest livejournal (sorry, bravejournal) entry?'"

O: I am always amenable to discussing things with people, especially those whom I may disagree with. Doing so doesn't make one a "pussy" in the least.

"I'm part of Vox's audience."

O: Yes, I've gathered that...

"Here's my thought: next time you try to 'chin-check fools', try to at least comprehend what the hell they're talking about."

O: I understood very well what Vox Day was talking about, and I call BS on it. Because it doesn't have a blessed thing to do with the issues at hand, which I have made clear in my posts on the Sandy Hook shootings over the past week or so. That Vox Day has refused to address the issues I've focused on, says a heck of a lot more about him and his ilk than it ever does about me and mine. No matter how many stats from as many countries he wishes to wave.

"And when you switch from the tough guy talk to sudden faux politeness, don't think anyone hasn't noticed the tone switch. You got smacked around, and now you're trying to at least scrape up some credibility."

O: Trust me, the last place I wish to glean any sort of "credibility" are forums that attract people who use as their screen names "Crude". Being polite and sportsmanlike is in no way a weakness; and only an ingrate would attempt to suggest otherwise...

O.

Anonymous Obsidian December 24, 2012 4:05 PM  

@Susan:
"And I don't know why exactly, but the cluelessness of Obsidian's response here was very amusing. He wouldn't be so glad to have VD's attention if he could read between the lines."

O: Thanks...I think?

"I always visualize a giant microscope or a big magnifying glass."

O: Oh, I'm sure you do, Susan...

O.

Anonymous Obsidian December 24, 2012 4:13 PM  

@J. Doe:
"Society would be much better off having to deal only with the few deeply depraved white monsters than the millions of blacks and Hispanics whose very nature - low IQ, low impulse control, violence - disposes them to depraved behavior."

O: I am very sure the bereaved parents of Newtown would be very glad to know that, Mr. Doe. Perhaps you could head on up there and convey your condolences along these lines to said parents personally, and report back the results? I for one would be very interested in reading such a report!

"It is an undeniable fact that they are responsible for the vast majority of gun violence and crimes in this country."

O: No one has denied this - I certainly haven't. If you think so, then I defy you to find where I have indeed denied this fact. Nevertheless, this fact has nothing to do with the horrific events of the past week or so, to say nothing of the past year - and I find it utterly fascinating that you and others here and elsehere (read: White Alt-Rightsphere) seem intent to deflect the focus of the problems of White Men onto those dastardly "NAMs" - so much for the notion of taking personal responsibility, hmm?

"But the media and all the little useful idiots ignore this, like they do all Leftist social engineering failures, and deflect the blame on evil guns."

O: Are you telling me that you're perfectly good with Bushmaster's "Consider your Man Card Reissued" marketing campaign, J. Doe? Just need to get you on the record here...

"Obsidian imagines himself clever because he's too retarded to know he's an idiot."

O: Respect.

"And this intellectually stunted beast with the reasoning capacity of a two-year old has the vote. The US is finished."

O: If indeed the US is finished, it will be at the hands of people who look a heck of a lot closer to you, than they will ever be to me. Newtown is but one of a growing number of examples of this.

Too bad you're much too stuck on White Nationalist Stupid to realize this.

O.

Anonymous NZT December 26, 2012 4:00 PM  

Huh, so when people point out that white male mass shootings are a statistically tiny portion of all shootings, and that the bulk of the American gun violence problem is caused by minorities, this clown responds with lines like:

"I am very sure the bereaved parents of Newtown would be very glad to know that. Perhaps you could head on up there and convey your condolences along these lines to said parents personally, and report back the results?"

Bad enough that this is a feminine, emotional, logic-free argument ("The average person's chances of dying from auto-erotic asphyxiation are statistically insignificant-" "TELL THAT TO DAVID CARRADINE!!!"), but the hilarious thing is that he does the exact same thing himself. At his original blog post when one of the commenters calls out the Middle Eastern kids killed in US drone strikes, he brushes the comment off with "That's just foreign policy, what does that have to do anything?" Lol, go tell the grieving Pakistani mothers that their kids' deaths were "just foreign policy" and report back.

P.S. The drone strikes really are relevant, btw. It's hypocrisy to be enraged over some white-skinned psycho shooting up a school, while claiming that other cases of kids getting murdered are unimportant. Or at least it shows him to be driven by anti-white hatred rather than compassion for victims.

Anonymous Obliviou... I mean, Obsidian December 28, 2012 7:03 PM  

SEE THAT CHIN CHECK, BITCHEZ?!! I CAN FIGHT IT OUT WITH THE BEST OF YOU TRAILOR TRASH YOKALS WITH MY LOGICS AND IMPENETRABABBLE. TRY THAT ON YOUR WHITE BREAD PLATES AND SMOKE IT, HONKEY ASS HOMOS!

Oh, and another thing, YOU MAY NOT REALIZE IT, BUT ME SHOWING UP WELL AFTER THE THREAD HAS DIED TRULY SHOWS THAT I DON"T HAVE TO "TIP TOE" AROUND YOU BUNK ASS FOOLS, BUT CAN LOGIC IT UP WITH VD AND THAT ARISTARTLE GUY HE KEEPS TALKING ABOUT (does he have a blog too?), AND WHATEVER ELSE YOU ALL HAVE TO OFFER!!! BRING IT! C'MON BRING IT! I DARE YOU! Just don't bring up predator drone strikes or dirty Paki kids getting killed, BUT GAWDDAMN! WATCH ME CAP IT UP OVER KIDS GETTING KILLED IN A WHITE TRASH TOWN I'VE NEVER BEEN TO! AND THEIR PARENTS! CHECK YO'SELF!

Anonymous kh123 December 28, 2012 7:14 PM  

"No one has denied this - I certainly haven't."

It'll certainly be interesting to see Obsidian follow up his "white men can't shoot" theme with a blog post highlighting statistics showing Black males disproportionately representing gun murders per their population size, as well as contributing to about half overall firearms murders, according to 2010 FBI statistics.

Unless of course, the FBI's also racist. Or unless it defeats his whole purpose of chin checking honkeys.

Blogger Judy K Lee August 30, 2013 2:20 AM  

adsscounter These blogs are valuable because these are providing such informative information for all the people.

Blogger Frencis Merchant September 27, 2013 5:45 AM  

I consider this the finest blog I have read all this hour.
Sydney Commercial cleaners

Post a Comment

NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS. Anonymous comments will be deleted.

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts