ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2020 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Saturday, April 27, 2013

How anti-racism creates racists

 In news that should surprise no one, it appears that all those lectures on "white privilege", the public service announcements declaring "raciss bad", and television shows and advertisements selling "mudshark good" only ends up making people less tolerant:
Children who are given anti-racism lessons in school are more likely to be intolerant outside the classroom, a major study found yesterday.  It said accusing white pupils of racism causes animosity, and discussing sensitive ethnic concerns such as honour killings paints minority group children in a bad light.

The survey said children who live in mixed neighbourhoods are often free of hostility towards other racial groups. But it found that ‘when more attention in class is being paid to the multicultural society, the liberalising effect of positive contact in class on youngsters’ xenophobic attitude decreases’.
This actually isn't news; there have been several studies indicating the same effect holds true with regards to the global warming propaganda.  But what I find most interesting is that the greatest negative effect isn't on those who are avowedly racist or simply up-to-date on the relevant science, but rather, on the very moderates to whom the racemongers are primarily attempting to appeal.

A 2002 study on advertising showed adults are similarly resistant to the anti-racist propaganda: "People in two minds about their attitudes towards ethnic minority groups become more unfavourable when exposed to anti-racism advertising or arguments, according to new research sponsored by the ESRC. The 'backfire effects' occur both in conscious and non-conscious feelings towards people from ethnic minorities, says a report based on studies by a team led by Dr Gregory Maio of the School of Psychology at Cardiff University."

I suspect the backfire effect stems from the natural human instinct to rebel against propaganda and social totalitarianism. Consider the low point of the most recent European football championship. Even the most oppressed, left-leaning, racially conscious African immigrant could not watch the clumsy anti-racist statements read out in robotic fashion by the captains of the two teams playing in the final without feeling a momentary temptation to burn a cross on someone's lawn, paint a Swastika on a synagogue, order dog at a Chinese restaurant, and sketch a cartoon of Mohammed on the nearest napkin.

The arguments for the anti-racist position are weak and everyone knows it.  That is why the one thing they cannot permit is free and open discourse on the subject, which is a red flag in the eyes of those of every sub-species, color, or creed who happens to value human liberty.

Intellectual fads come and go. The intrinsic intellectual and scientific weakness of the equalitarian position is less demonstrated by the counterproductive nature of the heavy propaganda as the equalitarians obvious awareness of their need to resort to it in the first place. Equalitarianism is merely an eyeblink in the grand course of human history and the half-century of attempts to permanently enmesh the various nationalities and human sub-species is nothing that a decade or two of intense wide-scale violence will not easily undo. The ethnic cleansings of the 21st century will be all the more brutal for the multiculturalism and diversity celebrating of the latter half of the 20th.

It should not be hard to see that love for one's own kind has been falsely spun as hatred for the Other.  And if one is told that one already hates the Other, even when one has no opinion at all about them, then most people are more likely to graduate to genuine hatred before they will give up their natural and instinctive love for their own. 

Who among you would stop loving your child simply because you were told that your love for your child was hatred for all the other children in their school?  Perhaps the most rabbity might, but faced with such a price, even the average rabbit would shrug and admit that, yes, they do indeed hate all those others.

Labels:

60 Comments:

Anonymous OCS April 27, 2013 6:52 AM  

I'm a little curious as to why Hawaii is never really touted (exaggerrated) as equalitarian paradise. I would think the Left would say something like, "Hey look, there's Hawaiians, Filipinos, Samoans, Micronesians, Japanese, Chinese, Korean, and Whites all over Oahu! Diversity yay!"

Of course it's a laughable claim. There's still anti-white sentiments hovering around, and the different groups naturally just congregate amongst each other. We're even having our own little immigration problem with a large influx of Micronesians and Filipinos. Still, you'd think we'd be used as some sort of a ruse...

Anonymous Johnycomelately April 27, 2013 6:56 AM  

This is one of your best posts.

Ex Yugoslavia constantly trumpeted 'brotherhood and unity' and we know how long that lasted.

Anonymous VD April 27, 2013 6:57 AM  

I'll give it its own post later, Bethyada. Thanks.

Anonymous OCS April 27, 2013 6:59 AM  

@bethyada - There are no black, hispanic, or womyn in the top 10. da hell is wit this raciss peeps i dont even

Anonymous Humphrey April 27, 2013 7:15 AM  

"Ex Yugoslavia constantly trumpeted 'brotherhood and unity' and we know how long that lasted."

As a Croat I can say it lasted to long.

Anonymous Clay April 27, 2013 7:28 AM  

I am an old fart. I remember "desegregation" most vividly. l was seeing it & living it , so don't try to tell me how it was from some damn thing you read. Then the riots and the razors came out. My mother moved us quickly to another county.(Mainly, because I almost shot a couple of “youths” who had just beat my little brother up, (I was about 11), and stole one lousy dollar from him. Unfortunately, a cop turned on Robinson road, just as I had chased them down, and was getting a bead on them…(It was just dove-shot.)

Anyway. Almost instantly, we had black teachers with Master's Degrees from Jackson State, and such, who couldn't spell "Kat". Back then, there were no ‘puters with spell check. They would write the questions out by hand, and if I could have corrected their spelling to get points, I would have had an A+++++++++++ average.

Suddenly, they realized…all, (or, most all), of the black kids were failing every test.

So….they invented the “curve” grading system.

“Public Education” died then. After that, I never had to crack a book. Graduated as a Junior , and was off to Miss. State for college, with a scholarship.

Turned out, I got a BA in beer, then went to the University of Southern Mississippi, and got my degree.

So much for that.

Anonymous A April 27, 2013 7:38 AM  

If everything you do - or even your very existence - is de facto racist, then you might as well go all the way. There's no point in trying to appease the leftists. At best they'll say you're condescending.

Anonymous scoobius dubious April 27, 2013 7:47 AM  

Why can't we all just get along?

http://www.worldwarzmovie.com/

Remind you of anyone you know?

Anonymous YIH April 27, 2013 7:48 AM  

Like the other day when I saw the term 'chimpout' (it can be written a one or two words) this is the first time I've seen the term 'mudshark' here. Though the term is somewhat outdated now - the more common terms are 'coalburner' (F) and 'oildriller' (M).
The latter is obviously less common (that old TV show 'The Jeffersons' is the most common example of an 'oildriller' and note that all of the black characters were hostile to awkward around him).
This promotion of miscegenation in media bothers me as well, not only do non-Whites usually have contempt for it, the fate of White women who do it is more often than not a tragic one; what happened to Nicole Brown is sickeningly common - to novelty of the buck wears off or she gets tired of him chimping out and it viciously kills her. As well as if she whelps a niglet she will see it as 'not of her' due to the fact that the cocoanut does not fall far from the palm tree.
It might also explain this trend of buying pet niglets from Africa - the celeb knows the pet is not from her and when it behaves normally she understands (even if she's so libtarded she just couldn't bring herself to admit it) that she adopted a wild animal as a pet and it's behaving like a wild animal (which of course she can hand off to an employee and return to her normal lifestyle).
BTW for those who think it odd that I refer to blacks as wild animals there is this video for just one to quote the late Lawrence Auster:
I’ve said before that I am very reluctant to compare blacks to apes. But it’s simply true that Blackston is behaving and moving, jumping and swinging, like an ape. How many white people in this whole country would be willing to express out loud that simple, true, unanswerable observation?
Many many many more examples can be found with a simple YouTube search.

Blogger RandalThorn April 27, 2013 7:55 AM  

Vox, I am from Greece, I was born on 85'.
Every time, every.single.time. Multiculturism was brought upon as a subject in my public school, the teacher's and instructors not a single time forgot to pinpoint us to the direction of America and proclaim that "America's example of multiculturism has proven to be succesfull."

Now, that the hypocrisy of the left has become more and more apparent (Golden Dawn's position really helped) they are trying to push the blame onto us, for not being "hospital" or "open-minded" enough.

They know they CANT win a dialectical fight based on "white shame" on a nation that was for 400 years enslaved to Turks, Arabs and other subsaharian or mongolian cultures.

I remember the post of a political analyst speaking about the Greek Left's position(s), I will bring it here just to show everyone, that from small to big, leftists are a copy-paste of one another:

"The Greek people have Job's patience when dealing with the lefts, left's not once in their 30+ years of appearance in the parliament (the left was deemed outlawed in Greek parliament until the early 80's) have spoken or acted clearly.

When someone makes a tantrum about the American bombards in Kosovo and then supports the uncontrolled invasion of Albanians in Greece what is if not a schizofrenic case?

How is it possible for you to openly put yourself against the plans for "Big Albania" and then simmultaneously supporting the invasion of Albanians by fighting for open boarders?

I have to remind all of you that the far right parties in Greece where not nowhere to be found for over a decade from the time the flooding of immigrants started (1992). The Greek people did not seem to trust the far Right based on the past actions (WW2, Cyprus, etc.) He expected from the traditional parties to protect him, from the lefts to shout, to analyse, to... talk!

Instead of that antiracist commitees and NGO (non-goverment,yet still goverment paid, organizations) the time that racism was nowhere to be found in Greece. I once again remind you that Golden Dawn was at 0.01% for decades (yes,0.01%) and LAOS (Folks, Orthodox Alarm, another right party, but more mild in it's positions about Golden Dawn) got into palriament at 2007.

From 1990-2007 there was antiracist fury without racist parties just for pre-emptive reasons.

The creators of antiracism knew that THERE WILL BE racism, due to their own machination and took pre-emptive measures.

And the thing that they were preparing was the deterioration of Greece against their rivals, the Russians, who the later, abandoning the hammer and sickle and turning to the Cross again they starting to getting the sympathies of Greek Right as well as the Left.

What did the non-far Right and non-racist parties did?
NOTHING! And if a party has not a say on what is happening to the popolus in Greece then what's the reason for its existance?

They did nothing either because they got bought out, or they neglect the populance, or because "all folks are our brothers (Tallibans included!). I'm sorry, but the people waited for far too long before turn to the far Right because...there was no one else.

Especially the last years that there is a try for a revisionistic version of history and is supported openly the idea of confutation of 1821 (the Greek Revolution against the Turks), the position of left about open boarders combined with Islamic epectatism is a position of suicide.

And all that because the people have no one else.

The Islamic flag has found itself in the center of Athens,we are not Egyptians or Konstantinoupolitans (meaning the Greek portion that still exists in Egypt and Konstantinoupolis respectively), Athens is the last stop of Hellenism, we have nowhere else to turn to, if only Golden Dawn reacts then where the world is going to turn?"

Sorry for my bad English.

Blogger Doom April 27, 2013 8:04 AM  

"...order dog at a Chinese restaurant..." That's racist? My bad.

"Perhaps the most rabbity might... ~ ...admit that, yes, they do indeed hate all those others." I doubt it. No. They would agree and comply publicly, just not live it. Much like they nod and tout multiculturalism while living in lilywhiteland. These people are all talk, no walk.

Anonymous Salt April 27, 2013 8:06 AM  

Blowback, ain't it a b1tch?

Anonymous Severen April 27, 2013 8:09 AM  

I guess people don't like being told what their opinions are, especially when they've tried hard to conform to what they've been told is the "right and good" position. People who have been trying to bend over backwards their entire lives are told "That's not good enough." "Racism" is graded on a curve. Yesterday's "antiracism" is today's "racism". Go back thirty years or so, and you'll probably find people stating that they're "colourblind" and don't see race or try to ignore it. That may have passed for "antiracism" then, but today colourblindness is considered a form of "racism", and the "antiracist" position is explicit discrimination against people of European descent. Anything less is "racist".

In fact, in the modern doctrine of "antiracism", it is impossible for whites to be "nonracist", only "antiracist" (and today, that means advocacy of explicit antiwhite policies). Whites are seen as sponges, uncontrollably absorbing the "racism" of the "white supremacist" society that is Western society (I would say it's the opposite, and that whites absorb ridiculous antiwhite ideas in this society).

Blogger Doom April 27, 2013 8:13 AM  

Oh, but I think you are missing the point of propaganda. It isn't to influence, not always. It is to state something in this case. The government is telling you, not trying to convince you. They don't care what you think, though they will change how you think if they can. It is shoving it down your throat and getting you used to that. Most people are used to it and moderately comfortable with it.

As you say, many don't like some particular part of it. But there is so much of it that most just surrender to the general notion of it. Zero for two terms? McCain and Romney as "opposition"? Do the math, as you are so fond of suggesting one should know how to do to be taken as credible. Then again, you have, I'm talking more generally.

Blogger IM2L844 April 27, 2013 8:15 AM  

Look on the bright side. It won't be much longer and we'll finally be rid of Affirmative Action...the instant whites become demonstrably eligible for it.

Anonymous Rantor April 27, 2013 8:53 AM  

You have been on a roll lately, thanks for the thoughtful and excellent posts. I can certainly agree with this, anything the left tries to tell me, I get an automatic rejection feeling... even on the rare occassion when they might have a valid point.

The worst around here is Janet Napolitano's voice in the DC Metro, "If you see something, say something." The Orwellian nature of the whole war on terror is surreal to those of us who can see it. As they try to tell us what to do and how to think about everything, many will ignore it, some will reject it and the rabbits will join in the song.

The point appears sound, too much anti-racism education backfires. Could we see similar concerns about anti-sexual assault campaigns? I think we already see it with the endless security campaigning. TSA, over 10 billion fondled... and how many actual terrorist caught? Wait, isn't unwanted fondling sexual assault these days?

Blogger tz April 27, 2013 8:56 AM  

One black comentator remebered a cartoon of a black ex-slave in one of the southern legislatures during reconstruction with the sambo features and barefoot. It was a caricature, and a nasty one.

What is being taught about racism is a similar caricature of whites, all being oppressive heartless ice-ogres against the sweet and gentle people of color.

Much like Game, it is observably untrue, but at some point in a previously peaceful integrated place, one of the gentle PoCs will hurl an epithet accusing a white, and so hate and racism starts.

Removing God from the equation also destroys the idea that our abilities and talents and situation is a gift and grace from God - and he knows what he is doing, or as is more commonly put, "there, but for the grace of God, go I". Darwin and natural selection is taught - survival of the fittest in an amoral struggle for life (in spanishnor other languages as needed), then multiculturism, then how to have sex after putting a condom on a cucumber.

The Catholic church is growing in Africa and China, but it simply delivers Christ's call given to a bunch of Jewish rabble, first repeated at pentecost. In Christ there is no Jew or Greek, in that we are all sinners and are called to righteousness. The rules for the African and Chinese are the same for the Mexican, the Japanese and for me. What differences there are need to be used to glorify God, not self. Jesus accepts everyone as they are, but doesn't tolerate them as they are regarding sin.

We will be judged on the content of our character. We are even now - the culture of death is European in origin.

Anonymous Toby Temple April 27, 2013 8:58 AM  

And how much resources have been spent on these propaganda?

Talk about spending to fail.

Anonymous Rantor April 27, 2013 8:59 AM  

Randal Thorn, thanks for the comments and don't worry about your spelling. Your points are well understood. They also gave me more insight into the foundations of Greek nationalism. And it seems that without nationalism, you will cease to have a nation (the goal of the EU no doubt.)

Anonymous Rantor April 27, 2013 9:02 AM  

@tz,

"The culture of death is European in origin." What a crock. The culture of death is global and inherent in fallen man.

Anonymous The Master Cylinder! April 27, 2013 9:04 AM  

@Salt:

Boy, you're a regular Marc Bloch, aren't ya?

Blogger tz April 27, 2013 9:04 AM  

To summarize a point I missed being clear about - Feminism results in Game, Multiculturalism results in soft but much more damaging racism. Integration was happening gradually and naturally until the EEOC and cross-town busing - the latter hollowed out the cities with white flight. Look at Detroit - the ultimate in this liberal experimentation.

(I could add that the Americans with Disabilities act reduced the number of jobs for the disabled, since before there was no threat, just mutual cooperation).

Anonymous rycamor April 27, 2013 9:06 AM  

The ethnic cleansings of the 21st century will be all the more brutal for the multiculturalism and diversity celebrating of the latter half of the 20th.

"In the absence of faith, we govern by tenderness, and tenderness leads to the gas chamber."

- Flannery O'Connor

Anonymous YIH April 27, 2013 9:14 AM  

paint a Swastika on a synagogue
Whenever I see a report of that my first reaction is ''Hey Rabbi, What'cha doin?'' because nearly every time it turns out to be a hoax. Perhaps in Europe that's not so true (due to the muslims) but in the US bet on hoax.
BTW, when you see the names of those who are the hardest drivers of 'multiculturism' the pieces somehow have a way of falling into place - right Scoob?

Blogger tz April 27, 2013 9:16 AM  

The UN and its various policies come from the west. It is America and europe trying to push condoms on Africa. To force Abortion and Gay rights, and even euthanasia. Marx? Besant and Blavatsky?

The culture of death is the anti-Tao (natural law), and is present alongside it in every fallen human heart, but it was only the materialist, feminist, pagan west pushing it on a mass scale and integrating it into its laws. They did import old evils from the around the world - the worst errors instead of the partial truths from other religions, things like Rajneesh and Maharishi Mahesh Yogi.

I'm not sure about Japan - they legalized Abortion early and it is still the favored form of contraception.

Anonymous aero April 27, 2013 9:17 AM  

In 1972 the military started a human relations program. Because of the race riots aboard ships, military bases and solders killing each other in Vietnam. Having attend one of these required programs it was obvious that they wanted the troops to kiss the nigers ass. This was very offensives to other minority's. Thirty years later they determine this program a failure. Now they started a new human relations program. The troops have to let the fags have their way with there ass.
This human engineering was started by the department of education back in the early fifties.

Anonymous YIH April 27, 2013 9:26 AM  

@Severin:
In fact, in the modern doctrine of "antiracism", it is impossible for whites to be "nonracist", only "antiracist" (and today, that means advocacy of explicit antiwhite policies). Whites are seen as sponges, uncontrollably absorbing the "racism" of the "white supremacist" society that is Western society (I would say it's the opposite, and that whites absorb ridiculous antiwhite ideas in this society).
Absolutely! If Vox were to go visit his 'old stomping grounds' it would be quite literally be shoved in his face.

Anonymous Godfrey April 27, 2013 9:32 AM  

This is news?

I guess it may be news for privileged white "progress" types. They tend to live in wealthy lily white bubble-world neighborhoods and view the rest of us - black and white - as pets.

Anonymous Roundtine April 27, 2013 9:36 AM  

Perhaps in Europe that's not so true (due to the muslims) but in the US bet on hoax.

Even if it's not a hoax in the U.S., it's a hoax. If you're a teenager who wants to make the news and drive a community nuts with 5sec of graffiti.......

Anonymous paradox April 27, 2013 9:39 AM  

diversity is good! diversity is great!

Anonymous Roundtine April 27, 2013 9:46 AM  

The left really has a hard time understanding the concept of "if guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns." When you call average people with no racists ideas "racist," you are also moving the real racists from the fringe of society to the center. We are now in the ludicrous situation where Stormfront can claim the rational side of the debate! Who needs Holocaust denial when you've got the media putting out an endless stream of lies?

Anonymous Godfrey April 27, 2013 9:55 AM  

The power elites promote racism because they benefit from it. Divide and rule. It is a technique ruling elites have used since ruling elites existed. Study the rule of the British in Africa if you doubt it.

Anonymous Crispy April 27, 2013 10:26 AM  

How to black-knight the diversity pushers:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/02/11/bofh_2005_episode_5/

Blogger Old Harry April 27, 2013 10:34 AM  

This little weasel is the face of the enemy. Do not foget that McWabbit isn't a joke. He is very serious in his self loathing and in an earlier era, we could have ignored him. We can no longer afford to do so.

http://whatever.scalzi.com/2013/04/24/the-lowest-difficulty-setting-as-teaching-tool/

As as I know, none of my ancestors owned slaves or fought on either side of the Civil War - not that it makes any difference. I didn't do this crap they're accusing Whitey of doing and I refuse to own it any more.

Anonymous JMAC April 27, 2013 10:35 AM  

To OCS who said "I'm a little curious as to why Hawaii is never really touted (exaggerated) as egalitarian paradise."

It would seem you have never lived in Hawaii. Hawaiian are anything but tolerant.

Anonymous Niall April 27, 2013 10:37 AM  

A wrote: "If everything you do - or even your very existence - is de facto racist, then you might as well go all the way."

That's correct. To paraphrase Patrick Henry, if this be racism -- and seemingly everything is, after all -- let's make the most of it. Every conservative must learn not to try to defend himself against the imputation of "racism", because the accuser has already made up his mind in any case, and the act of denial or defence is considered additional proof of guilt.

Besides, since "racism" now encompasses such near-universal human traits as wanting to live among one's own kind and not to have one's community and country transformed out of recognition by mass immigration, we shouldn't be defending ourselves from the charge at all. All that matters is the truth.

Anonymous szook April 27, 2013 10:37 AM  

So Vox really IS raciss...but it's okay.

See, if the Leftist would do it that way we'd all get along a lot better together...

Anonymous Anonymous April 27, 2013 11:18 AM  

"It said accusing white pupils of racism causes animosity, and discussing sensitive ethnic concerns such as honour killings paints minority group children in a bad light."

A recent post from Judgy Bitch springs to mind (http://judgybitch.com/2013/04/22/two-little-dickwads-threaten-to-gang-rape-my-daughter-and-have-the-worst-weekend-of-their-lives/), whereby her daughter was threatened with rape by a small child, who should really have been too young to know of things. She postulated that the reason the child may have done this is because of the current culture in society to label all men as potential rapists, and even try to educate them against it. Do you really think a small child would have been considering anything to do with rape if he hadn't been informed of its existence?

Anonymous Robert April 27, 2013 11:22 AM  

If you take kids of any description and put them in a sand box, they will play happily until the parents show up.

It's an old axiom, perhaps now you could say "until the liberals show up". Then because Jimmy is black and Alex is white, they have to share the pail and shovel for ethnically predetermined periods.

Also Alex and the rest of the kindergarten have to build Jimmy's sandcastle for him. Timmy's ethnically underprivileged and for that reason alone can't do it for himself.

Blogger Old Harry April 27, 2013 11:25 AM  

And they will have to stand by helplessly and watch if Jimmy decides to destroy the sand castle.

Anonymous scoobius dubious April 27, 2013 11:35 AM  

"Do you really think a small child would have been considering anything to do with rape if he hadn't been informed of its existence?"

Depends if the child is a negro, and the girl he threatened was white. If so, then yes, definitely yes.

Anonymous is it can be troll bob time now? April 27, 2013 12:17 PM  

RandalThorn April 27, 2013 7:55 AM
Sorry for my bad English.




you've done very well. a little practice and we'll have a hard time telling you from Markku.




JMAC April 27, 2013 10:35 AM
It would seem you have never lived in Hawaii. Hawaiian are anything but tolerant.




reality has never stopped ( nor even remotely constrained ) the lying of the Left before.

Blogger Rev. Right April 27, 2013 12:36 PM  

The Gramscian purpose of the anti-racism curriculum in schools is to promote racial animosity.

All of the students in the schools my children attended got along fairly well until the lessons got around (quite quickly) to the narrative of white crimes against native Americans, blacks, and women. By the end of elementary school the roles have been set - white male sinners, minority saints, and white female clergy charged with enforcing justice. This is reinforced in high school, codified in university and is reflected as the new reality in the wider culture.

We now live in a world where everyone feels the culture is aligned against him, where no one thinks they live in a just society. Everyone has lost faith in the legitimacy of the laws and rules of the society they inhabit. That was the whole point.

Anonymous E. PERLINE April 27, 2013 12:54 PM  

My brothers and I were brought up in the Bedford Stuyvesant section of Brooklyn and my father, who was strictly a realist, not a racist, was polite to everyone. But he was not TOO polite. To be TOO polite means you are overwhelmingly aware of skin color. That's exactly what makes you a racist. Tell that to the liberal thinkers.

Anonymous Jack Amok April 27, 2013 1:22 PM  

It's not so much the anti-racism propaganda, but the transparent, self-serving hypocrisy. I've got no problem with an honest "treat people like individuals" message. But the whole "these people deserve to be treated better because they're different than you" message is not only annoying, it's patently absurd to think that message will last.

The Racemonger industry has succeeded because White America was affluent enough to afford it. Liberals who lucked into prosperity wanted to show off, kind of like Northwest Amerindians with their potlatching - whoever gives away the most is the biggest man.

Like pretty much every other part of the Liberal agenda, multiculturalism won't last once the wealth needed to paper over the problems disappears.

Anonymous Ivan Poland April 27, 2013 2:13 PM  

That is because Hawai'i was stolen from the Hawaiians and their land was invaded by "immigrants" their culture made illegal and language banned. I'd be pissed too. I live in Hawai'i and the best protest sign (against American occupation) I've seen is "Don't mistake Aloha for weakness" Amene

Anonymous Ferd April 27, 2013 2:31 PM  

"Intellectual fads come and go."

I have such overwhelming pseudo-intellectual fatigue emanating from our supposed "elite" that i would love to chuck it all and go live on a deserted island. Except, i love my secure western life a bit more.

Now, I understand Europe's sentiments in the late 1930's.

Blogger Tom Kratman April 27, 2013 3:22 PM  

Used to see this in the Army, regularly, especially in the very bad 70s and 80s; racial disharmony was never so high as when the RR/EO fascisti came by to lecture everyone on how wicked whitey was and how put upon was anyone with a natural tan. I do not, however, think they intended this. They just weren't that bright nor, based on the reading material, were those above the lecturers.

Anonymous DonReynolds April 27, 2013 3:41 PM  

It would come as a surprise to many, though well understood by sociologists for decades, that there is a distinct difference between the way Liberals (essentially Yankeeland) and Conservatives (essentially Southerners) view the black race. Liberals love the race but hate and fear the individual blacks. Conservatives hate the race but have no problem with social contacts with blacks.

In the South, there has always been close contact between blacks and whites on an individual level. Many of them do not believe themselves to be racists because they have a number of black friends, coworkers, team mates, neighbors, and employees/customers. Black and white individuals know each other very well, without any extraordinary expectations. There are social rules and both sides keep the peace by keeping to the rules. But when faced with rising militancy of the black race or special privileges reserved for blacks, the typical Conservative becomes threatened. He finds racial advantages to be unfair and history does not create a debt to those living today.

Our Northern cousins, who are the Liberals, wax on at great length about how much they love the colorful and vibrant black race, listen to black musicians, and can recite all the important civil rights events of their lifetime. However, they have little interest in them as individuals are resent how individual blacks take advantage of the privileges extended to them by Liberal policies to gain unfairly in housing, education, business, jobs, etc etc. The Liberals are big on tokenism to prove that they are not racist as long as the tokens are a tiny fraction of the total and therefore ineffective in decision making. They fear that a black family moving into the neighborhood will adversely affect their property values. They do not socialize with blacks, except at the company Christmas party. They fear blacks as violent and criminal, avoiding black areas of the city.

Both Liberals and Conservatives are race conscious but they practice that realism in different ways. The Southerner does not care for the race, but may like them just fine as individuals. The Yankee may love the race, but does not want to have anything to do with black individuals.

Anonymous GreyS April 27, 2013 4:28 PM  

I've seen similar stuff with the promotion of homosexuals. Many kids seem to hold gays in even worse regard because it shoved down their throats so often (no, no pun intended).

Over the last decade I've seen a gradual shift from "Hey, you're okay, I'm okay" to a disdain which sort of combines natural disgust with a "F-ing teacher's pet" reaction. That's from young males. Many girls seem to be replacing the "isn't it cute to have a gay male friend" with "not worth my time-- too much drama, let me find a real male".

Anonymous PR April 27, 2013 4:36 PM  

I just came across the term "'Anti-racist' is a code word for anti white". I couldn't agree more.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXc92ZKx2YU&bpctr=1367080094

At my work I'm subjected to diversity and ethics training sessions. But I can't help but to notice the similarity between the word "diversity" and "divide" as in "divide and conquer".

Anonymous Gerd April 27, 2013 4:50 PM  

"paint a Swastika on a synagogue"

So, after 8 decades the German people are now fascinated by their culture of the early to mid-portion of the 20th century. Perhaps,it was instigated by their own jolt of multi-diversity?

As a side note, I have always believed the Germans had the best symbols, graphics and uniforms of WW2. The English looked frumpy and Americans "scruffy". Hitler had designer Hugo Boss prepare stylish designs. And,it all worked from the footwear to the headgear. Gee, Hugo is still in business! I wonder if he might do a mid-century retro collection?? Something to look forward to?


Today, The North Koreans might want to employ Ralph Lauren to bring terror and style to their bluster blitzkrieg. They are so poorly coutured it does limit their credibility!

Anonymous castricv April 27, 2013 4:52 PM  

Remember those ads in the 80s and 90s about "this is your brain on drugs??!!" and then they proceed to show some pwwr chick bang a bunch of eggs with a pan? Yeah, I barely do too.

What is important to note is that not one person ever not took drugs because of these ads. Whereas, many people actually softened a bit to the idea of drugs as a result of the completely overblown hyperbole.

They couldn't have done worse if they had simply said "don't do drugs because your parents and teachers don't want you too."

See where I'm going. But liberals with their soccer mom, guardians of the world attitudes will never get it. It will hopefully be their downfall. I'm finding far more traction with SBPDL, neo-fascist, Moldbugian ideas, etc. in the last 3 years than I ever thought possible. Perhaps letting the idiots continue to rule for a while will cause a mega reactionary outburst. Who knows?

Anonymous OCS April 27, 2013 4:54 PM  

@JMAC - Read everything that I wrote before spouting off. I was pondering why the Left doesn't lie and use us as an example of their fantasy-equalitarian paradise. I never stated that Hawaii was actually such.

Also, I've lived in Hawaii all my life.

Blogger Phoenician April 27, 2013 7:28 PM  

It should not be hard to see that love for one's own kind has been falsely spun as hatred for the Other

See now, here's your problem. You and I are both white.

However, imagine someone who is black, misogynist, racist, too stupid to see the limits of his own education, and desperately trying to annoy better men than him to validate his own objective position as a miserable failure in his chosen field.

THAT is your own kind, not me. Assuming you and I share some sort of bond because we both have a certain skin shade is the sort of stupidity that has made you such a well known loser.

Blogger James Dixon April 27, 2013 9:35 PM  

> Assuming you and I share some sort of bond because we both have a certain skin shade is the sort of stupidity...

Oh, no one here would ever make that mistake.

> ,,, that has made you such a well known loser.

Shoot, is that all it takes to be that successful. Why didn't you tell me earlier?

Anonymous castricv April 27, 2013 9:52 PM  

Ah Phoenician, taking us back to college days of 1974. Good job. You are the only one focusing entirely on pigment. Of course you know this since you are troll, however, if by some small chance you mean what you say then I truly pity you and wonder what blurred vision of this country you are living in.

VD is referring to culture, mindsets, ideals for the future and learned lessons from one's past as being one's own kind. People who want what you and your family want are one's kind. People who look back and see similar art and film as being high art and certain types as being prole art, are one's kind. Being around one's kind reduces annimosity as you know more about what to expect from your surroundings and can plan and act accordingly.

Everyone else in the world realizes this and has no problem saying so. Perhaps your secret fetish days (months) of black history or Cesar Chavez Day have escaped your attention as "our people" days. Most whites feel the way VD describes and are coming around to saying enough.

Anonymous VD April 28, 2013 4:12 AM  

However, imagine someone who is black, misogynist, racist, too stupid to see the limits of his own education, and desperately trying to annoy better men than him to validate his own objective position as a miserable failure in his chosen field.

That's amusing, Phony. You're so dumb that you don't realize that my books sell much better than the average SF/F writer's do... and that field is merely my hobby. Furthermore, don't forget McRapey was the one who made the decision to attack me. I'm simply finishing the job.

Assuming you and I share some sort of bond because we both have a certain skin shade is the sort of stupidity that has made you such a well known loser.

I don't assume anything of the sort. You are not my kind. You are the bowel movements my kind has inadvertently excreted, and from which we need to separate ourselves for much the same reason men find it unhealthy to dwell in their own shit.

Anonymous Anonymous May 11, 2013 9:53 PM  

Excellent post.

Blogger Unknown September 04, 2014 11:12 AM  

Great Site. Please join my anti-racism site at: http://www.occupyracism.com/ I am also an Afrocentrist.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts