ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2020 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Black on brown

I suspect this sort of response isn't going to end well for the African-American community:
[R]eal estate agent Christina Dudley said she was walking to her car just before 9 p.m. when she saw several young black males and two black females chasing a 37-year-old Hispanic man west on North Linwood Avenue past East Fairmont Avenue. "One of the boys had a handgun out and it was pointed at the back of him," Dudley said in an interview.

They caught up to the man at the corner of Fairmount and N. Streeper Street, and the male with the gun beat the victim with what appeared to be his gun while others kicked and stomped him, Dudley said.

"They were just yelling and calling him names as they ran after him, but once they were hitting him and after that they started yelling, "This is for Trayvon, [expletive]," said Dudley, who heard the chant repeated multiple times....

Using a translator, police spoke to the victim, who knows some English, according to the police report. The victim told officers that he was standing in the intersection of Fairmont and N. Potomac Street when a group of five black males first approached him. He described all of the males as between 16 and 18 and told police a 6-foot suspect with a black "stretchy" shirt and mohawk told him, "What's up, [expletive]." When the victim raised his phone to call 911, the suspect raised his shirt and flashed a silver handgun in his waistband.

The victim turned and ran before he was caught in the 2800 block of Fairmont and was beaten, police said. He sustained abrasions to his elbows and forearms but refused medical attention. Police listed all of the suspects involved as black males. Three were "skinny" while one was described as overweight.
As can be seen in Mexico, the moderate time preferences of Hispanics tend to make them more organized than blacks and less temperate than whites when they turn violent. When black and white communities collide, the result tends to lean towards segregation. When black and brown communities collide, the result tends to lean towards the eradication of the former.

Blacks not infrequently engage in this sort of random public group beating.  Hispanics not infrequently leave collections of dead bodies neatly displayed in public.  Welcome to America 3.0.

However, it is interesting to note that the black community understands George Zimmerman is Hispanic, even though the mainstream media still wants to affect that he is white.

Labels:

142 Comments:

Anonymous Toby Temple July 16, 2013 4:21 AM  

So Latino Power in Amerika will be first unleashed on the blacks.

It would be best for the whites to go Machiavellian and make proper use of this opportunity to gain back the US of A.

Anonymous Mr. Nightstick July 16, 2013 4:30 AM  

I don't know why but I want to be Machiavellian about all this but then I hear these words in the back of my mind, Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.

Blogger CostelloM July 16, 2013 4:51 AM  

Well someone needs to bring blacks to heel lest the entire world become Detroit. If whites won't do it permit the Mexicans to try. Blacks remain peaceful only when cowed and seem to think that the world is Africa and that they are in numerical majority simply because everyone in the hood looks like them. A large stack of severed black heads on stakes might be just the thing to restore balance and let everyone get along especially since blacks have no trouble resorting to exactly the same tactic.

Blogger CostelloM July 16, 2013 4:52 AM  

I should emphasize that this outcome is not something I find desirable but unfortunately see as inevitable.

Anonymous Toby Temple July 16, 2013 4:54 AM  

I don't know why but I want to be Machiavellian about all this but then I hear these words in the back of my mind, Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.

My good man, is that going to be your excuse for doing nothing?

Anonymous Rasputin July 16, 2013 4:59 AM  

" A large stack of severed black heads on stakes (...)"

That seems very disorderly, wouldn't it be easier to just skip the stakes if the goal is a stack of heads?

Anonymous Spike July 16, 2013 5:01 AM  

I'll repeat myself from an earlier thread. I find this coming violence shadenfruedalicious.

On a tangental note, I happen to know a young woman who is quite proud of her brown heritage, despite being pretty damn white in appearance and name, who recently posted a pro-travon comment on facebook. Of course, her husband is black, and she's got a thing for black men, which makes observing her shifting tribal loyalties somewhat amusing.

Anonymous Myrddin July 16, 2013 5:33 AM  

I have weak wrists. I can't use more than one peacemaker at a time yet.

Anonymous Remnant July 16, 2013 5:47 AM  

There is going to be a mixed (no pun intended) reaction by the black community as to whether they go after whites or hispanics.

Many blacks, particularly "professional" blacks, have very much bought into the Zimmerman-is-white narrative. If this were a purely brown on black story (or black on brown, which is what it really was) from day one, the Sharptons and Crumps of the world would never have gotten involved.

Given that Zimmerman was involved in stereotypically white activities (neighborhood watch group), many blacks are simply going to continue to see the story as white on black and act out accordingly.

Anonymous p-dawg July 16, 2013 5:48 AM  

@Myrddin: You shouldn't use more than one at a time anyway. Hitting your target with one round is infinitely better than missing with two.

Anonymous Oso July 16, 2013 6:07 AM  

"When black and brown communities collide, the result tends to lean towards the eradication of the former."

That was my thought over the last few days. If blacks ever started attacking Hispanics in earnest, they'd be in for a very rude awakening - there is no sense of racial guilt among Hispanics. There is La Raza.

Humorous side story:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/07/15/protester-rebuked-by-angry-woman-for-bringing-up-lgbt-oppression-at-trayvon-martin-rally-this-is-not-about-no-gay-st/

Anonymous zen0 July 16, 2013 6:09 AM  

I think their owners should be held legally responsible for the medical bills.

Anonymous Crude July 16, 2013 6:15 AM  

Humorous side story:

I wonder how long before the LGBT activists irritate everyone to the point of falling in disfavor.

Anonymous DT July 16, 2013 6:45 AM  

So this is a hate crime, right? And Holder is going to get right on this one...right? And the attackers are going to be charged under hate crime laws, and charged for civil rights violations.

Right?

Anonymous Bah July 16, 2013 6:56 AM  

Blacks not infrequently engage in this sort of random beating.

Random? This wasn't random at all. They picked him because he was Hispanic. "Justice for Trayvon"...

Anonymous Idle Spectator July 16, 2013 6:56 AM  

When black and brown communities collide, the result tends to lean towards the eradication of the former.

It's even worse than you fear. It will not be a neat and clean kill. I am thinking of Brazil and Cidade de Deus.

It would be best for the whites to go Machiavellian and make proper use of this opportunity to gain back the US of A.

That's exactly what the Conquistadors did in Latin America. Welcome to America 3.0...

I would prefer the California of old though.

If whites won't do it permit the Mexicans to try. Blacks remain peaceful only when cowed and seem to think that the world is Africa and that they are in numerical majority simply because everyone in the hood looks like them. A large stack of severed black heads on stakes might be just the thing to restore balance and let everyone get along especially since blacks have no trouble resorting to exactly the same tactic.

There's a theory circulating that the Elites are letting in large Latino populations to serve as a buffer for these things, and also as a weapon to use against the black community. It makes sense. Demographics can be a weapon. It has been tried before lots of times, i.e. moving Chinese into Tibet, English into Scotland, Japanese into Korea, Russians into Kazakhstan, ect.

On a tangental note, I happen to know a young woman who is quite proud of her brown heritage, despite being pretty damn white in appearance and name, who recently posted a pro-travon comment on facebook. Of course, her husband is black, and she's got a thing for black men, which makes observing her shifting tribal loyalties somewhat amusing.

That's why I brought up the Dominicans. Are they going to go black, brown, or both?

Many blacks, particularly "professional" blacks, have very much bought into the Zimmerman-is-white narrative.

Professional blacks have been absolutely decimated from this economic downturn. Then if you take away White Guilt and the Government Affirmative Action edifice, I don't know fuck all what they are going to do. The average black is only 85, yes, but what's interesting is high IQ is found in black females. There was even a Thomas Sowell column on that point. They might be doomed to a perpetual matriarchy. Which is of course Hell on Earth with regards to technology.

In whites it is the talented tenth, in the black community it is more like the talented 1%.

Blogger Jamie-R July 16, 2013 6:58 AM  

Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.

It's blessed are the cheesemakers. No one has to deal with savagery and accusations of false premise in 2013 America with no means to a defense, so just remember it could refer to any makers of dairy products.

Blogger beerme July 16, 2013 7:01 AM  

The only job that Hispanics do in this country that whites will not is ethnically cleansing their areas of blacks. Whites would've done it peacefully through restrictive covenants and other nonviolent means via freedom of association. The Hispanics are just going to start piling up bodies until they leave. The blame should rightly fall on our feral government, but that will happen right after Nate comes out as an Auburn loving homosexual atheist.

Anecdote time: My Haitian cab driver back in college was appalled by the savagery of the Hispanics.

Anonymous Let it rain July 16, 2013 7:01 AM  

"When black and white communities collide, the result tends to lean towards segregation. When black and brown communities collide, the result tends to lean towards the eradication of the former."

You did the unthinkable; you made a convincing argument to donate to the National Council of La Raza.

Anonymous Idle Spectator July 16, 2013 7:06 AM  

Another good example of demographics as weapon: Texians* reached critical mass before the push for independence of Mexican Texas in 1836.

*Before someone "corrects" me, Texian, not Texan. That's the modern term. Texasian, Texilingan, Texican, and Texonian were also used.

Anecdote time: My Haitian cab driver back in college was appalled by the savagery of the Hispanics.

It's that damn Aztec influence.

Anonymous Puddin July 16, 2013 7:18 AM  

Notice how its nearly always in packs these blacks run. Arent too many Treyvons willing to take on the non black themselves. Its because singularly, they are cowards. Socially their identities are drawn from the pack. Intellectually, theyre an amoebic argument for evolution. As we have seen, they cant be reasoned with. All they know how to do get welfare, fight, and block traffic. And of course, copulate, as our welfare state well knows.

Anonymous Bob Ramar July 16, 2013 7:24 AM  

What surprises me is Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, not to mention the New Black Panthers, wanting to foment more discord over this. They are obviously trying to keep themselves meaningful to their masters and blacks in throng to the Democrat Party ... but the Hispanic population is paying attention as are whites. Surely somebody in the Democrat party has figured things out and told them to 'put a sock in it'?

Anonymous dh July 16, 2013 7:24 AM  

It's that damn Aztec influence.

I am not an expert of Mexican demographics, but just from what I see on television, they have several sub-groups of their own. The more-Spanish, continental group seem to be the more desirable, popular groups. The less popular seem to be the shorter, more squat, browner groups. Are those the traits associated with native populations?

Anonymous Dr. Idle Spectator, Harvard Ethnology July 16, 2013 7:38 AM  

Speaking of mysteries, in the vein of that black female thing...

I have a theory that Gypsies are basically "reverse Jews."

Jews are higher in verbal and mathematical skills, but they score lower in visual-spatial skills.

I think Gypsies are the opposite. They are low in verbal and mathematical, but high in visual-spatial. It would explain the high crime rate and general craftiness despite the 70 IQ average, and number of musicians, dancers, con artists, athletes, actors, ect.


Just an Idle theory.

Anonymous Adsignatos D. July 16, 2013 7:42 AM  

Well if it's one little thing liberals got right, it is this lovely idea of America being a "melting pot" of cultures.

It is, and the fire continually rises until a giant mess spills over. As many have said before, this is just one perturbation.

Anonymous Desiderius July 16, 2013 7:42 AM  

"The less popular seem to be the shorter, more squat, browner groups."

George Zimmerman, Bulgarian-Hispanic.

Anonymous Roundtine July 16, 2013 7:44 AM  

Imagine the trouble some right-wing political group could stir up if they started running Spanish language ads telling Hispanics that the media and Democrats (Obama!) will turn on them in racial disputes. Just show Obama speaking, Holder, explain how the DOJ got involved, then quote the NYTimes and other media outlets using the term "white Hispanic". Then end with, White Hispanics, which party stands for you?

Anonymous Desiderius July 16, 2013 7:50 AM  

"Blacks remain peaceful only when cowed"

Heh, that's not peace. Our species didn't become apex predator on this planet through cowardice. The only true avenue to peace is common purpose, usually provided by a common enemy.

Anonymous Dr. Idle Spectator, Harvard Ethnology July 16, 2013 7:54 AM  

am not an expert of Mexican demographics, but just from what I see on television, they have several sub-groups of their own. The more-Spanish, continental group seem to be the more desirable, popular groups. The less popular seem to be the shorter, more squat, browner groups. Are those the traits associated with native populations?

Yes. It is:
Indio - Native Amerindians.
Meztizo - Indio and European mix.
Criollo - Someone of Spaniard ancestry, but born overseas.
Peninsular - Someone of Spaniard ancestry, and born in Spain.

What a shocker the highest concentration of Europeans is in Ciudad de Mexico (Mexico City), where all the power resides in the Federal District. Take a look at the mayors of Mexico City. Do they look "Amerindian" to you?

And the Mexicans have the never to call the US racist. Look in the mirror, Snow White.

Anonymous Salt July 16, 2013 8:04 AM  

When black and white communities collide, the result tends to lean towards segregation. When black and brown communities collide, the result tends to lean towards the eradication of the former.

In time the question shall be, what happens when brown meets white? Given the rise of la Raza, I suspect white would rather side with black.


Anonymous PolBubbaPot July 16, 2013 8:19 AM  

Rasputin said:
That seems very disorderly, wouldn't it be easier to just skip the stakes if the goal is a stack of heads?

Word.

Blogger TontoBubbaGoldstein July 16, 2013 8:27 AM  

I have a theory that Gypsies are basically "reverse Jews."

"Anti-Semites"

Book recommendation for you : The 10,000 Year Explosion.

Blogger Ron July 16, 2013 8:27 AM  

The real problem here is that people in the black community obviously havent played much Civ IV, if they did they would realize that you never ever want to be neighbors with Montezuma if you are Mansa Musa or Shaka Zulu.


Shaka has good spearmen, but his spearmen are no match for the fury of the Jaguar fighters. And Mansa Musa's gold bonuses cant make up for Montema's ability to sacrifice slaves without generating unhappiness.

Blogger Nate July 16, 2013 8:30 AM  

hey!

Where is our damn SFWA update? I get up in the morning... I have my coffee... and I read about the next gloriously stupid thing in the SFWA report.

That's what I do.

Vox! Dammit! You put this crack out there and got us hooked. Follow through dammit.

Blogger Ron July 16, 2013 8:32 AM  

Am I the only one who just had the thought of how awesome it would be if everyone who ever participated on this blog, and that includes the author, and yes - all the Scalzi crew, could get together for a massive Civ V deathmatch?

Actually, what I would really love is to set Vox and five of his associates against Scalzi and five of his in a Civ V deathmatch.

Blogger Nate July 16, 2013 8:33 AM  

is it blasphemous to admit that I thought Age of Empires was way more fun?

Anonymous Clayton Bigsby July 16, 2013 8:36 AM  

"A large stack of severed black heads on stakes might be just the thing to restore balance and let everyone get along especially since blacks have no trouble resorting to exactly the same tactic."

So, are you going to start your rampage now? I suppose one's religious values is cast aside in this case. I mean, you seem to be salivating at the thought of this impending "bloody race war". No, you won't do anything immediately (or ever), you'd rather talk big. Notice how its generally in packs you guys run. Going alone, you'd shit your pants.

Blogger TontoBubbaGoldstein July 16, 2013 8:37 AM  

Blessed are the peacemakers.

Somewhere a Colt* is smiling.



Different family, Loki.

Blogger Nate July 16, 2013 8:39 AM  

" Going alone, you'd shit your pants."

Everyone runs in packs on both sides. Going it alone just gets you killed by another pack. Only morons go it alone.

Anonymous Anonymous July 16, 2013 8:43 AM  

Wikipedia says there are 39 million blacks in the US, and 50M Hispanics. So by the time they get their amnesty and their families brought in on chain migration, plus expanded guest worker programs, Hispanics will outnumber blacks about 2-1. They're going to need jobs, and there won't be enough available in the private sector, so they're going to start competing with blacks for the Affirmative Action government jobs. John Derbyshire pointed out that most Americans would rather hire smiling brown people to trim their hedges than angry black people, which is how we got this immigration/AA combo in the first place. But what happens if the state HR departments decide they too prefer brown over black to fill their minority quotas?

Even if it doesn't come to violence, blacks are going to get squeezed, just as blue-collar whites have been, but they have far less to fall back on. Are we just gonna put 90% of blacks on permanent welfare? Does anyone think that would be sustainable?

Anonymous VD July 16, 2013 8:44 AM  

Where is our damn SFWA update? I get up in the morning... I have my coffee... and I read about the next gloriously stupid thing in the SFWA report.

It's up now. I was interested to learn that Jemisin has been yapping about me for nearly five years, which is about four more than I'd ever heard of her.

Blogger JACIII July 16, 2013 8:45 AM  

Everyone runs in packs on both sides. Going it alone just gets you killed by another pack. Only morons go it alone.

Except for the serial killer.

Blogger TontoBubbaGoldstein July 16, 2013 8:49 AM  

Are we just gonna put 90% of blacks on permanent welfare? Does anyone think that would be sustainable?

I) Yes

2) Yes. Leftists, All Democrats, Most Republicans, Keynesians...

Anonymous alexander July 16, 2013 8:50 AM  

I'd prefer an ilk/sfwa death match in Victoria. In that game you can set policies that encourage your more militant minority groups to emigrate to nations with high social welfare spending... where they continue to be angry and prone to armed revolt.

Anonymous ZhukovG July 16, 2013 8:51 AM  

@Salt

I disagree, as a native Floridian, I have had significant contact with both groups. On the whole I find Hispanics to be much more articulate, and reasonable. If I had to choose, I'd pick the Bario over the 'Hood any day.

Blogger Nate July 16, 2013 9:08 AM  

"Except for the serial killer."

touche'.

Even snipers need a spotter.

Anonymous Shut Up, Nate July 16, 2013 9:23 AM  

"Everyone runs in packs on both sides. Going it alone just gets you killed by another pack. Only morons go it alone."

No, put your money where your mouth is. If porch monkeys and spics are the enemy to "noble whites", then drink your whiskey, take out your gun, and start blastin' with Bible in hand. Talk is fucking cheap about the "bloody race war". As Toby Temple stated clearly, it's time for whites to go Machiavellian. It's now or never. Hop to it!

Anonymous teddles July 16, 2013 9:24 AM  

"It's now or never. Hop to it!"

The douche is strong in this one.

Anonymous The other skeptic July 16, 2013 9:31 AM  

This case has not garnered as much attention as the Zimmerman case

I wonder why? No elections close?

On the topic at hand, in numerous countries it has proven disastrous to import one pest to deal with another pest. I don't think it is worth it.

Anonymous bob k. mando July 16, 2013 9:34 AM  

ZhukovG July 16, 2013 8:51 AM
I disagree, as a native Floridian,




huh. i grew up in Melbourne.

don't stop at a restaurant on I-95 in Fort Pierce. they're staffed by the most useless, shiftless people ( regardless of race ) i've ever seen in my life.

we used to stop there every so often on the way back from Punta Gorda Speedway ... it got to the point where we would intentionally stop anywhere else, rather than in Fort Pierce.

Anonymous bob k. mando July 16, 2013 9:40 AM  

Shut Up, Nate July 16, 2013 9:23 AM
...then drink your whiskey, take out your gun, and start blastin' with Bible in hand. Talk is fucking cheap about the "bloody race war". As Toby Temple stated clearly, it's time for whites to go Machiavellian




you dumbfuck. 'Machiavellian' doesn't have anything to do with wholesale slaughter, whether carried out by individuals or groups.

it has to do with EFFECTIVELY manipulating groups of people to do your will.

'Machiavellian' might be an appropriate adjective to apply to someone who encourages illegal Hispanic immigration in order to create buffer areas between white and black communities ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machiavellianism

regardless, i prescribe for you to read and contemplate 'The Prince' for as many times as it takes you to comprehend what it's saying.

TL:DNR
shut up, Tard.

Anonymous Mob-Rules July 16, 2013 9:45 AM  

@Idle Spectator

All Dominicans of White, Black, and West Indian descent from the actual island of Hispaniola will pick Hispanic. Even black Dominicans from the island hate American blacks. The black Dominicans born or raised in the USA that wannabe like American Blacks will pick American Black.

Anonymous Clayton Bigsby July 16, 2013 9:57 AM  

Your issue is with Toby Temple. I referred to HIS quote and HIS context.

You absolutely lack nuance. If some posters here are convinced that there is an impending “bloody race war”, are they not more inclined to dupe others who are "uneducated" about the matter into thinking along those same lines to “gain back the US of A”? Whatever means necessary, right? Might makes right! Murder, mayhem, chaos, the whole 9 yards. So it is apparent he same commentators here who are gung-ho to kill niggas and webacks are able to detach themselves from conventional morality--you know, the Ten Commandments--and hence work to manipulate others for their own doing. Besides, I thought Amerika was forever doomed and was not even worth the fight to reclaim. No one here can make up their minds.

So, “Bobble Head”, are you in or are you out?

Anonymous Andre July 16, 2013 10:01 AM  

Just gonna join the OT Civ V discussion here. The second expansion has just come out (Brave New World) and it's incredibly good. There's nothing quite as entertaining as tossing Montezuma, Shaka, Genghis Khan and Alexander in the same map and watching the inevitable bloodbath ensue.

Also, with this expansion, Civ V becomes the most incredibly complex and replayable game I've ever played. Highly recommended.

To give an example: I was the early adopter of the Freedom ideology in my own little game, while Alexander and Shaka adopted Autocracy. Genghis Khan went for Order, hilariously. Since Alexander is a huge dick, he proceeded to gain the alliance of the majority of City-States and was the host of the first few meetings of the World Congress. That couldn't stand.

I sent spies to attempt coups on several City-States, and on the medium term was very successful. On the following Congress, I managed to shift the hosting power to one of my allies, Enrico Dandolo of Venice. With that, I managed to later propose and pass (by the shameless buying of votes with my diplomats) Freedom as World Religion. What followed was incredible.

The people from Greece, the Zulus and Mongolia started revolting against their governments and proclaiming freedom from their States, joining my own country. Waves of revolutionary discontent reduced those civilizations' power and the majority of other civs, including the Aztecs, adopted Freedom as their ideology.

A thing of beauty!

Anonymous Andre July 16, 2013 10:03 AM  

Sorry, Freedom as World *IDEOLOGY*.

Passing a World Religion is almost impossible without dire diplomatic consequences in the game (I'll try it in my new game since I'm playing as Alexander anyway and he's, well, a huge dick).

Anonymous Dan in Tx July 16, 2013 10:07 AM  

@ZhukovG X2 here. Given the choice between the two, we get along with our Meskins pretty good here, especially compared to the Africans.

Anonymous Mr Gamer July 16, 2013 10:08 AM  

Apples and Oranges. It's like comparing a rifle to a handgun. Two different tools for two different tasks.

Anonymous DaveD July 16, 2013 10:23 AM  

Locally, we just had a white man die, possibly from the effects of 6 black teenagers beat him into a coma last year...because they were bored. Somehow, that wasn't racist but a Hispanic shooting a black thug who had jumped him is.

DD

Anonymous patrick kelly July 16, 2013 10:24 AM  

@Toby: "My good man, is that going to be your excuse for doing nothing?"

There is a large area between doing nothing and stacking severed heads with room for peacemakers to do something.

Blogger Nate July 16, 2013 10:28 AM  

"No, put your money where your mouth is. If porch monkeys and spics are the enemy to "noble whites", then drink your whiskey, take out your gun, and start blastin' with Bible in hand. Talk is fucking cheap about the "bloody race war". As Toby Temple stated clearly, it's time for whites to go Machiavellian. It's now or never. Hop to it!"

More binary thinking. Moron. I said nothing about Toby's position on race war. My position in fact has nothing to do with race. I think you'll see rural blacks and rural whites fighting side by side against urban whites and urban blacks.

I was just pointing out that the claim that Toby is a coward for running in a group is disingenuous... because everyone runs in groups. Groups are human nature.

Anonymous bob k. mando July 16, 2013 10:29 AM  

Clayton Bigsby July 16, 2013 9:57 AM
Your issue is with Toby Temple.



no, my issue was improper use of the language. and Toby used the term properly.

you're the fuckwit who doesn't understand what Machiavellian means.

just keep re-reading Toby's first post til you get it. he never suggested anything but fomenting conflict between browns and blacks because he assumes that browns will drive the blacks out. he never said the first word about "White violence". he was talking about "White Manipulation".


the amusing thing being that no one has to foment anything. hispanics and blacks already don't get along, as can be seen throughout central and South America. it was the artificial destruction of US immigration policies which was Machiavellian ... and that goes back at least to the 1960s and Ted Kennedy's "Immigration Reform".



Clayton Bigsby July 16, 2013 9:57 AM
So, “Bobble Head”, are you in or are you out?



am i down with defending my neighborhood if a black / hispanic mob shows up to burn it down? sho nuff. i just got my Argentino Modelo 1927 .45 back from the gunsmith. i'd prefer to try it out in a non-combat situation first but you gots to do what you gots to do.

hope i don't forget my earplugs.

Blogger Taqiyyotomist July 16, 2013 10:30 AM  

If albinos made up 9 percent of the population, and more than half of them were rioting, kidnapping, torturing, screaming, cussing, killing, looting, stealing, shooting, raping, beating, mobbing, ganking peaceful non-albinos, (and glorifying all of this in their preferred musical grenres), I suspect that there would be a good bit of anti-albino sentiment going around.

Many people would not want to go near a group of albinos, because: self preservation.

Sugar. Water. Purple. <---google is yo' frin'.

Blogger Nate July 16, 2013 10:31 AM  

And nothing I have said contradicts my position that america isn't worth fighting to save. Those fighting won't be fighting for america. They'll be fighting for home.

Anonymous LL July 16, 2013 10:33 AM  

All this black, brown, & white talk, have you noticed that yellows don't cause nearly as much ruckus? Just an observation. And from my personal experience, yellows are about the most racist ethnic group out there, but they definitely prefer segregation.

Anonymous Loki Sjalfsainn July 16, 2013 10:38 AM  

Mr. Bigsby, I gather you are not familiar with the saying, "Let's you and him fight."

Different family, Loki.

I believe there is a ten-yard penalty for giving me the horselaugh before I have arrived.

Or is it a ten-minute head start? My age makes me forgetful.

Anonymous VD July 16, 2013 10:51 AM  

All this black, brown, & white talk, have you noticed that yellows don't cause nearly as much ruckus?

There aren't as many here, and they don't stick together at all. Try telling a Japanese man that he is "Asian" and therefore identical to a Korean. He will look at you with contempt and think "stupid round-eye".

Hell, the Japanese don't even think some people from Japan are Japanese.

And with one billion Chinese, why should anyone from China sign on for being "Asian". That's a fundamentally Western perspective.

Anonymous patrick kelly July 16, 2013 10:52 AM  

""It's now or never. Hop to it!""

This is not the warren you are looking for.

Blogger Nate July 16, 2013 10:58 AM  

"There aren't as many here, and they don't stick together at all. Try telling a Japanese man that he is "Asian" and therefore identical to a Korean. He will look at you with contempt and think "stupid round-eye"."

Japan is the most racist country in the world.

Blogger RobertT July 16, 2013 10:59 AM  

When black and brown communities collide, the result tends to lean towards the eradication of the former.

Darn.

Anonymous Huckleberry - est. 1977 July 16, 2013 11:00 AM  

have you noticed that yellows don't cause nearly as much ruckus?

It's because they're busy buying up the entire West Coast.

In Los Angeles, despite all the bluster of "takin' it to Whitey", the "mostly peaceful" Black protesters have, of course, taken to the streets of their own dwindling neighborhoods to light fires, break windows, etc.
10 years ago, Compton and north Long Beach were deep in the 'hood. Now, every house flies a Mexico flag. And the Mexicans are being driven out of north and east Los Angeles by hipsters willing to pay $900,000 for a two-bedroom house that comes with the "ethnic experience."
The hipsters are paying the Mexicans a lot of money for shitty housing, sending them into the 'hood, and the Mexicans are driving the Blacks right into the sea.
I'm not sure that this ends particularly well for anyone involved...

Anonymous Toby Temple July 16, 2013 11:05 AM  

And where do Filipinos like me fall under? We are Asian but physically Latino(except for the ones with Chinese blood).

And Clayton Bigsby, how do you understand the word Machiavellian?

he never said the first word about "White violence". he was talking about "White Manipulation".

This. Bob got it.

Blogger RobertT July 16, 2013 11:23 AM  

Anecdote time: My Haitian cab driver back in college was appalled by the savagery of the Hispanics.

Your college experience was considerably from mine.

Blogger RobertT July 16, 2013 11:28 AM  

Its because singularly, they are cowards.

That's great as a theoretical position, but I wouldn't put it into practice if I were you. You may have noticed most of the pro athletes in this country are black.

Anonymous Clayton Bigsby July 16, 2013 11:35 AM  

"am i down with defending my neighborhood if a black / hispanic mob shows up to burn it down? sho nuff."

And this event happens regularly in the United States every day in white neighborhoods. (rolling of eyes)


"More binary thinking. Moron. I said nothing about Toby's position on race war. My position in fact has nothing to do with race."

Saying nothing about a topic nevertheless makes a statement. Ever inference before?


"I think you'll see rural blacks and rural whites fighting side by side against urban whites and urban blacks."

It's about tribe, remember? Or do you even forget what you spout off?


"he never said the first word about "White violence". he was talking about "White Manipulation"."

It's called making an inference, dude. Machiavelli stated, “when trouble is sensed well in advance it can easily be remedied; if you wait for it to show itself, any medicine will be too late because the disease will have become incurable".

The darkies are among us. They are infesting our institutions, correct? The horde must be exterminated lest they seize our property and plunder our women folk, right?


"Those fighting won't be fighting for america. They'll be fighting for home."

One's home in America.


"And where do Filipinos like me fall under?"

As an invader. Only whites are allowed in the United States from what I gather here.


"have you noticed that yellows don't cause nearly as much ruckus? "

Then you haven't been paying attention.

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/3071662/t/asian-gangs-are-brothers-crime/#.UeVlWGQa8wI

Anonymous Bah July 16, 2013 11:35 AM  

have you noticed that yellows don't cause nearly as much ruckus?

They do back in their own countries. Riots, civil war, ethnic unrest, insurgency, terrorism... there's plenty of all of that in yellow countries.

Anonymous Mr. Nightstick July 16, 2013 11:40 AM  

My good man, is that going to be your excuse for doing nothing?

I have already told my Mexican friends that they are Italian. Hey if it works for Vox, it will work for them.

Blogger Nate July 16, 2013 11:41 AM  

"Saying nothing about a topic nevertheless makes a statement. Ever inference before?"

No moron. It doesn't. Your inference is incorrect and sloppy.

Blogger Nate July 16, 2013 11:44 AM  

"It's about tribe, remember? Or do you even forget what you spout off?"

More idiocy. Why don't you try to keep track of who says what a little better.

Anonymous civilServant July 16, 2013 11:44 AM  

Those fighting won't be fighting for america. They'll be fighting for home.

Which is why they will lose.

Blogger Nate July 16, 2013 11:56 AM  

"Which is why they will lose."

Says the historically ignorant. People fighting for home always win eventually.

See Afghanistan for details.

and if that is to modern for you... take a look at the American Revolution.

Anonymous E. PERLINE July 16, 2013 11:59 AM  

It is white liberalism that has had a bad influence on the blacks. Liberals will see they have paid too high a price for the votes they bought.

The blacks have paid a high price too. They have sacrificed their family units, and without fathers, the sons are running wild.

The only way they can get back in grace is to drop their resentment at real or imagined mistreatment. But who is going to teach them?

Anonymous ZhukovG July 16, 2013 12:00 PM  

@ Dan in Tx

I had the privilege of spending a few months in Texas, courtesy of Uncle Sam and the Tax Payers. I got to see a lot of the state (Farwell to San Antonio) in my travels and enjoyed it all (even the Llano Estacado). If ever there was a state that I was confident could make a go of it as an independent nation it would be Texas.

So, if ya'll ever secede, to hell with the U.S., I'm going to Texas.

Anonymous Clayton Bigsby July 16, 2013 12:02 PM  

Indeed, the blackies and the brownies will be fighting for their home. Why don't you double down and say by 2015, the majority of whites in our country will have had enough with the coloreds and band together to remove them...permanently.

Again, follow Machiavelli's advice...“when trouble is sensed well in advance it can easily be remedied; if you wait for it to show itself, any medicine will be too late because the disease will have become incurable".

The darkies are among us. They are infesting our institutions, correct? The horde must be exterminated lest they seize our property and plunder our women folk, right?

Anonymous bob k. mando July 16, 2013 12:10 PM  

Clayton Bigsby July 16, 2013 11:35 AM
And this event happens regularly in the United States every day in white neighborhoods. (rolling of eyes)




well, no.

that's the funny thing about short time preference cultures. they don't usually possess the planning and self restraint necessary to wait until they're 5 miles out of the 'hood before they start burning shit down. they almost always burn their own homes and businesses and drag white truck drivers from the cab in the middle of their own neighborhoods.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Reginald_Denny

i'm just saying, that in the unlikely event that a black mob gets it's head far enough out of it's ass to get out to my neighborhood i've got no problem donating a few rounds to the cause. lead end first.

course, i'd do the same for a white mob. or an individual house breaker for that matter.

when IS the last time a large, white mob went on a rampage? the Civil War draft riots?




Clayton Bigsby July 16, 2013 11:35 AM
Saying nothing about a topic nevertheless makes a statement. Ever inference before?



ah, inference. that's a complex tool that you really need a nuanced mind and a well rounded world view to employ properly. far more nuanced and well rounded than you, Clayton deary.

hardly anybody here bothers to debate Wheeler when he shows up. that doesn't mean we all want to be Spartans. that just means we recognize the futility of it.







Clayton Bigsby July 16, 2013 11:35 AM
One's home in America.




don't know if you've noticed this but there's plenty of La Raza ( The Race ) members living in the US as well.




Clayton Bigsby July 16, 2013 11:35 AM
The darkies are among us. They are infesting our institutions, correct? The horde must be exterminated lest they seize our property and plunder our women folk, right?




what part of "Ted Kennedy's 1965 Immigration Reform" are you failing to comprehend?

it was Machiavellian and it addresses the problem about which you are expressing concern. and it was done well in advance.





Clayton Bigsby July 16, 2013 11:35 AM
As an invader. Only whites are allowed in the United States from what I gather here.



yepper.

that's why we forced that notorious person-of-color, Vox Day, to emigrate to Italy.

Anonymous bob k. mando July 16, 2013 12:13 PM  

ZhukovG July 16, 2013 12:00 PM
So, if ya'll ever secede, to hell with the U.S., I'm going to Texas.




Chris Rea never really got enough radio play. but then, i think he confuses modern genre sensibilities.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMk208Op1Jc

Blogger Nate July 16, 2013 12:27 PM  

Bob K. Mando...

Why are you bothering with this moron?

Anonymous civilServant July 16, 2013 12:29 PM  

Which is why they will lose.

Says the historically ignorant. People fighting for home always win eventually.

See Afghanistan for details.

and if that is to modern for you... take a look at the American Revolution.


I notice you decline to cite the Southern Rebellion ....

Achieving historical results requires starting with historical conditions. Our present conditions are not conducive to achieving the outcome you assert will happen. You are much more likely to wind up with something which looked like the Shenandoah Valley after Sherman marched through.

If you are lucky.

Anonymous civilServant July 16, 2013 12:35 PM  

when IS the last time a large, white mob went on a rampage? the Civil War draft riots?

Depicted very well in the movie "Gangs of New York."

Blogger Nate July 16, 2013 12:45 PM  

"Achieving historical results requires starting with historical conditions. Our present conditions are not conducive to achieving the outcome you assert will happen. You are much more likely to wind up with something which looked like the Shenandoah Valley after Sherman marched through.

If you are lucky."

As always... you're a blithering bootlicking idiot. The South had the war won and chose to lose it for the sake of honor.

Even IF such a thing was to happen again, and it won't, because its not breaking along those lines any more than its breaking over racial lines, it would turn out very differently this time as the South is no longer concerned with such things as ancient out-dated notions of fair fighting and "honour".

Anonymous bob k. mando July 16, 2013 12:51 PM  

Nate July 16, 2013 12:27 PM
Bob K. Mando...



lower case, if you please.




Nate July 16, 2013 12:27 PM
Why are you bothering with this moron?



why are you bothering with him?

as for me:
1 - he's amusing me
2 - he provides a useful example for other libtards, and may ( i admit this is purely hypothetical ) actually warn some of them off if their arguments aren't any better thought out than this
3 - you may have noticed that i have a certain weakness for low hanging fruit
4 - provides an opportunity to point out truly Machiavellian policies
5 - gives me an opportunity to zing some one-liners



it's somewhat like Vox against the SFWA. even if Vox wins in every particular, it's still just a delaying tactic against the rising tide of stupid.

not completely without merit. and, every so often, something gets through the stupid.

promethean was a success, dh only partially so. thus far.



civilServant July 16, 2013 12:29 PM
Achieving historical results requires starting with historical conditions. Our present conditions




'present conditions' are predicated on the US .gov and FedReserve being able to float unlimited quantities of funds on the bond market and the 'international reserve status' of the USD.

what happens when that bubble collapses? do you think that 'future conditions' may, possiby, just maybe, be slightly different than those we have today?

Anonymous civilServant July 16, 2013 1:05 PM  

Even IF such a thing was to happen again, and it won't, because its not breaking along those lines any more than its breaking over racial lines, it would turn out very differently this time as the South is no longer concerned with such things as ancient out-dated notions of fair fighting and "honour".

Nate.

You will be Sherman and his army.

You already are.

Achieving historical results requires starting with historical conditions. Our present conditions

'present conditions' are predicated on the US .gov and FedReserve being able to float unlimited quantities of funds on the bond market and the 'international reserve status' of the USD.

what happens when that bubble collapses? do you think that 'future conditions' may, possiby, just maybe, be slightly different than those we have today?


Yes. But more to the point several other conditions have changed already - now - and these will have even greater effects at variance with the historical results appealed to than any financial or monetary collapse.

Anonymous patrick kelly July 16, 2013 1:06 PM  

"I notice you decline to cite the Southern Rebellion....."

No one here is seriously expecting war against a standing US military on a national scale, but against roving gangs of a vibrant golden hoard at the local level.


"Achieving historical results requires starting with historical conditions...."

The conditions in question are more like what I describe than the SR, but yes, sometimes local inhabitants loose to invading professional armies, and sometimes they win, but those historical examples don't have any bearing on whether it is reasonable to prepare and plan to successfully defend against FSA zombie mobs.



Anonymous bob k. mando July 16, 2013 1:19 PM  

civilServant July 16, 2013 1:05 PM
But more to the point several other conditions have changed already - now -




if one of your 'several other conditions' is the modern high tech, drone armed forces ...

the interesting thing about a high tech, highly mechanized fighting force is that this requires MASSIVE rear echelon support and lines-of-supply.

and maintaining that rear echelon and LOS logistics requires ...
a functioning economy.

if the FedGov can no longer purchase the fuel oil and tight tolerance machined parts / IC components it requires because so much of the supply chain is sourced overseas
AND
those countries no longer accept USD for transactions ...

Anonymous Clay July 16, 2013 1:21 PM  

Clayton Bigsby was one of the funniest characters Dave Chappelle ever portrayed. If you've never seen the sketch, you should Google it. (though it's hard to find the whole sketch in it's entirety).

Anonymous ZhukovG July 16, 2013 1:25 PM  

@ civilServant

For starters I believe it was Phil Sheridan that was responsible for the Rape of the Shenandoah. Sherman’s war crime was the March to the Sea.

Now, while the Army of Northern Virginia did surrender at Appomattox, the CSA government dissolved itself rather than surrender. This created a wonderful anti-climax to the whole affair. Various ‘carpet bag’ governments were established in the southern states, which were overthrown a few years later. The US government wisely refused to intervene in this ‘little civil war’, as the Union was left intact and Southerners were temporarily placated by the local victory.

But the South has always remained a distinctively rebellious region, only pacified by amounts of federal largess that would be considered criminal had the CSA, in victory, demanded it as tribute.

The tribute from the US Government will stop along with similar payments to other ‘entitled’ parties.

Now, whether or not the Flag of the Confederacy (I vote for the First National) will fly again over all of Dixie, I have no idea. But the ‘Empire of Lies’ is doomed regardless.

Blogger TontoBubbaGoldstein July 16, 2013 1:31 PM  

People fighting for home always win eventually.

"Always" is a strong word, Kemosabe.

*cough* War for Southern
Independance* cough

Anonymous TJ July 16, 2013 1:36 PM  

dh: The less popular seem to be the shorter, more squat, browner groups. Are those the traits associated with native populations?

Which is the largest percent of the illegals I see here. We're getting Mexico's cream of the crop.

Anonymous bob k. mando July 16, 2013 1:45 PM  

Clay July 16, 2013 1:21 PM
Clayton Bigsby was one of the funniest characters Dave Chappelle ever portrayed. If you've never seen the sketch, you should Google it. (though it's hard to find the whole sketch in it's entirety).




http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/82404406/

Anonymous Susie July 16, 2013 2:01 PM  

Mexico, the first Central American Spanish-speaking country below the USA, has:

- A small minority of almost pure to completely white Spanish speakers who rule the country and make up its elite, whether Criollo (Spanish born abroad) or Peninsular (Spanish born in Spain). High caste/social group and Catholic in religion. This is 10% of Mexico.

- A large and vast working class to middle class of mestizos (half-white and half-Amerindian) to maybe castizos (3/4 white and 1/4 Amerindian). Middle caste/social group and Catholic in religion. Assimilated to Spanish norms. Almost never in contact with Amerindians. This is 80% of Mexico.

- A small but dangerous full-blooded Aztec Amerindians. They make up 10% of Mexico and a huge proportion of the illegals. Low caste, sometimes regarded as "untouchables" (pariahs) just like in India (which is in Asia).

It's a spectrum, a skin color line, a ethnic features line and also a SES line altogether.

Anonymous Clayton Bigsby July 16, 2013 3:20 PM  

"but against roving gangs of a vibrant golden hoard at the local level."

Indeed, the fair-skinned, bald perpetrators of such violence will be properly rounded up, if this impending "bloody race war" materializes, complements of law enforcement.


"but those historical examples don't have any bearing on whether it is reasonable to prepare and plan to successfully defend against FSA zombie mobs."

You can prepare and plan all you want; do you have the wits, the fortitude, and the technology to successfully sustain against that "invasion"?


"The South had the war won and chose to lose it for the sake of honor."

Must be the sour mash talking. Gator hunting on your mind as well?


"he provides a useful example for other libtards,"

It never ceases to amaze me how a person automatically resorts to characterizing their verbal sparring opponent simply because an interpretation was offered contrary to their own line of thinking. Default button pressed and acknowledged.


"provides an opportunity to point out truly Machiavellian policies"

Blaming a Kennedy for our nation’s problems? That is akin to a librul still pointing the finger at Bush today. Pleeeezzzz, nigga.

If you want make the case the Immigration Act of 1965--which CAPPED the throngs of wetbacks from crossing our borders (whereas there had been no quotas)--as Machiavellian in nature, then be prepared to indict the Catholic Church, which strenuously pushed for this legislation, citing family reunification, and company executives, which desired a cheaper labor force to reduce costs and boosts profits (ah, the sweet smell of capitalism). Ironically, the debates at the end of the twentieth century replay the questions that European immigration raised at the beginning of the 1900’s.

The law is the law. Work to change it, since the consequences of that legislation is seemingly dire from your perspective. So, heed Machiavelli's advice: “when trouble is sensed well in advance it can easily be remedied; if you wait for it to show itself, any medicine will be too late because the disease will have become incurable"?

The darkies are among us. They are infesting our institutions, correct? The horde must be exterminated lest they seize our property and plunder our women folk, right?

Certainly whites cannot expect the blackies and brownies to expedite the process and achieve the desired outcome, they fuck things up all the time (especially if they are too lazy to travel long distances to white neighborhoods and have a low IQ to boot).

Get your gun out, get in your Ford 150, and let's go to the hood/barrio!

Anonymous Loki Sjalfsainn July 16, 2013 3:34 PM  

And now, ladies and gentlemen of the Ilk, standard trolling tactics, illustrated courtesy of Clayton Bigsby:

NO U: "but against roving gangs of a vibrant golden hoard at the local level."

Indeed, the fair-skinned, bald perpetrators of such violence will be properly rounded up, if this impending "bloody race war" materializes, complements of law enforcement.



Yer mighty brave in cyberspace: You can prepare and plan all you want; do you have the wits, the fortitude, and the technology to successfully sustain against that "invasion"?


Don't drink and troll: Must be the sour mash talking.


Cracka is wack: Gator hunting on your mind as well?


Did I say...?: It never ceases to amaze me how a person automatically resorts to characterizing their verbal sparring opponent simply because an interpretation was offered contrary to their own line of thinking. Default button pressed and acknowledged.


History? What's that?: Blaming a Kennedy for our nation’s problems? That is akin to a librul still pointing the finger at Bush today. Pleeeezzzz, nigga.


All Christians Are Catholic: If you want make the case the Immigration Act of 1965--which CAPPED the throngs of wetbacks from crossing our borders (whereas there had been no quotas)--as Machiavellian in nature, then be prepared to indict the Catholic Church, which strenuously pushed for this legislation, citing family reunification, and company executives, which desired a cheaper labor force to reduce costs and boosts profits (ah, the sweet smell of capitalism). Ironically, the debates at the end of the twentieth century replay the questions that European immigration raised at the beginning of the 1900’s.

I have no depth perception LOL!: The darkies are among us. They are infesting our institutions, correct? The horde must be exterminated lest they seize our property and plunder our women folk, right?

Certainly whites cannot expect the blackies and brownies to expedite the process and achieve the desired outcome, they fuck things up all the time (especially if they are too lazy to travel long distances to white neighborhoods and have a low IQ to boot).

Get your gun out, get in your Ford 150, and let's go to the hood/barrio!

Anonymous Stilicho July 16, 2013 3:36 PM  

It never ceases to amaze me how a person automatically resorts to characterizing their verbal sparring opponent simply because an interpretation was offered contrary to their own line of thinking. Default button pressed and acknowledged.

I'm sure many things amaze you. That does not refute their veracity.

then be prepared to indict the Catholic Church, which strenuously pushed for this legislation, citing family reunification, and company executives, which desired a cheaper labor force to reduce costs and boosts profits

New around these parts I see.

The horde must be exterminated lest they seize our property and plunder our women folk, right?

I must have missed that claim. Quotes, please.

Anonymous patrick kelly July 16, 2013 3:51 PM  

@CB: "Indeed, the fair-skinned, bald perpetrators of such violence will be properly rounded up, if this impending "bloody race war" materializes, complements of law enforcement."

Nope, local LEOs are more likely to be joining in defending the very neighborhoods they and their own families live in. Nice try troll guy.

There may be more densely populated urban areas where the local cops fall in with the fed line, but those are also likely to be the areas where the trip wires spring and alert the rest of us to what is coming, and our local LEOs are still highly populated with good-ol-boys from around here who have little to no allegiance to DC.

IMAO our local cops are very cognizant of how thin the blue line is and how quickly they would depend upon the well armed, nominally law abiding populace in times of zombie invasions.



Anonymous bob k. mando July 16, 2013 4:05 PM  

Clayton Bigsby July 16, 2013 3:20 PM
Get your gun out, get in your Ford 150




F-350 diesel dually, thank you very much. it's a working truck, so suck it.


why would you think i would have a problem with blaming the Catholic church ( the org which gave us Liberation Theology ) for something?

you slow on the uptake or what?




Clayton Bigsby July 16, 2013 3:20 PM
It never ceases to amaze me how a person automatically resorts to characterizing their verbal sparring opponent simply because an interpretation was offered contrary to their own line of thinking.


nah, bra.

you're a not a libtard because you use a 'contrary ... line of thinking'. you're a libtard because you are historically and linguistically illiterate and steadfastly refuse to apply any coherent set of standards and reasoning to what you DO know.

kind of like dh yesterday.

Ilk: yo, dh, what's your definition of Left / Right?

dh: Left is someone who wants to increase the size of gov and number of programs and Right is someone who favors devolution of government and individual self sufficiency.

Ilk; point out numerous examples of American Leftists

dh: no, no one in the United States is Leftist. even Al Gore and Bill and Hillary Clinton are MOR. you have to go to Europe or something to find a real Leftist.

Ilk: *facepalm*





Clayton Bigsby July 16, 2013 3:20 PM
Blaming a Kennedy for our nation’s problems? That is akin to a librul still pointing the finger at Bush today. Pleeeezzzz, nigga.
...
which CAPPED the throngs of wetbacks from crossing our borders (whereas there had been no quotas )


a - prior to Kennedy's bill, Mexican illegals where a TINY proportion of what they are now
b - Kennedy's bill practically eliminated white euro immigration
c - Kennedy's bill is still in effect, just like Carter's annual budgetary increases
d - you're a bald faced liar, the 1965 act was specifically adopted because earlier policies were characterized as 'racist'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1965_Immigration_Act
"The 1965 act marked a radical break from the immigration policies of the past. The law as it stood then excluded Latin Americans, Asians and Africans and preferred northern and western Europeans over southern and eastern ones."

Anonymous Lorem Ipsum July 16, 2013 4:09 PM  

"In time the question shall be, what happens when brown meets white? Given the rise of la Raza, I suspect white would rather side with black."

Not really. In any conflict between two peoples, generally the ones with the longer time preference will win.

Whites are rightly considered the apex predator amongst Homo Sapiens for a reason.

Anonymous stg58/Animal Mother July 16, 2013 4:10 PM  

Andre,

I have read that Civ V is the worst of all versions. Specifically, for the maintenance and unit movement functions. The commenters I read on Amazon hated the maintenance going to zero, building going slowly because you had to pay gold for each turn of construction, and each road tile costing one gold thus effectively eliminating road construction.

The limitation of one unit per tile seems crazy since you can't move units down a road with out getting off the road to pass another unit, thus making moves take forever.

Anonymous stg58/Animal Mother July 16, 2013 4:22 PM  

Even IF such a thing was to happen again, and it won't, because its not breaking along those lines any more than its breaking over racial lines, it would turn out very differently this time as the South is no longer concerned with such things as ancient out-dated notions of fair fighting and "honour".

Lee won't let the Federals escape to DC this time. He learned his lesson.

Republican Party, Red From the Start

Anonymous Desiderius July 16, 2013 4:23 PM  

Gods and Kings made Civ V playable and even somewhat interesting if one is competing vs other humans to get the best time, but the AI is still completely fried by one-unit-per-tile and I'm unaware if multiplayer is even yet viable.

The corporate yes-men culture has done great damage to the ability of the game developers there to evaluate the playability of their own product or to respond in a timely manner to flaws in the game.

Anonymous Desiderius July 16, 2013 4:25 PM  

"Whites are rightly considered the apex predator amongst Homo Sapiens for a reason."

It has not always been so, or our skin would not be white.

Don't get cocky.

Anonymous stg58/Animal Mother July 16, 2013 4:33 PM  

Gods and Kings made Civ V playable and even somewhat interesting if one is competing vs other humans to get the best time, but the AI is still completely fried by one-unit-per-tile and I'm unaware if multiplayer is even yet viable.

The corporate yes-men culture has done great damage to the ability of the game developers there to evaluate the playability of their own product or to respond in a timely manner to flaws in the game.


That really sucks. I am not in favor of the 100 unit doom stacks, but there has got to be a happy medium.

Anonymous Alexander July 16, 2013 4:40 PM  

I didn't like how in Civ II a defending stack would be wiped out if the top man died (though that could make sense if the stack was surrounded...) it seems that a happy medium could be reached by:

- giving bombers and artillery some sort of chance to damage every unit in a stack
- when the top level of a stack is defeated by a ground unit, that attacking unit has a chance to follow up with a charge/rally/whatever - translating into a small chance of splash damage. Cavalry and other fast units could get a greater chance bonus as a recognition of their superior speed, or you could make it one of the promotions available to the unit.

Anonymous Mr Gamer July 16, 2013 4:53 PM  

"limitation of one unit per tile...".
Actually units can pass through one another. This makes the moving of units much more feasible. The money limitations were put in place to discourage the unit spamming that one used to see in the earlier civs

Anonymous stg58/Animal Mother July 16, 2013 4:57 PM  

Mr Gamer,

That makes so much sense. I couldn't believe that units could not pass through one another. How does the game differentiate between a unit passing through and staying for the party?

Blogger LL July 16, 2013 6:00 PM  

@Clayton Bigsby, the second paragraph of your link reiterates what I said. They prefer segregation. The yellows can be as barbaric as they want in their homelands, but here, they tend to create self-segregated enclaves and their criminal elements prey within that enclave, for the most part. And Huckleberry, I think Koreans give the Japanese a run for their money in racism. Amusingly enough, because of long term exposure to US troops, their racism has a weird heirarchy, as in, white officers best, white enlisted, black officers, black enlisted, and I have seen very few interactions with hispanics. Heaven help the girl who sinks low enough to latch onto a black enlisted man. She is the bottom shit of a shitpile

Blogger LL July 16, 2013 6:06 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Anonymous castricv July 16, 2013 6:57 PM  

What these pieces of human garbage never understand that if a day comes when Hispanics en masse choose to hate black idiocy more than "white imperialism" there will be lakes of blood at worst and complete and utter government mandated segregation at best. Hispanics have no concept of guilt for these people and see them right now as lazy useless idiots. More Hispanics like myself are seeing them for what they really are and hence...

Proximity + Diversity = War will come to pass.

Think about it. Whites are self segregating. Hispanics are the ones that have to live in poorer areas and go to poorer schools. They can be led around for a time by hucksters and coddled by handouts, but when enough of their sons are beaten or daughters disrespected they will be more hardcore than Stormfront. Just look at parts of CA for what's to come.

Perhaps VD and co. are not seeing the potential alliance between old white America and 2nd generation and older Hispanics in regards to the "problem". I only know of two of my entire extended family that can even tolerate Obama. This is not to say that unchecked immigration is not completely harmful. It is. However, an unintended side effect while we slide down is an inevitable washing of feral blacks....

Anonymous Loki Sjalfsainn July 16, 2013 8:00 PM  

I didn't like how in Civ II a defending stack would be wiped out if the top man died (though that could make sense if the stack was surrounded...) it seems that a happy medium could be reached by:

- giving bombers and artillery some sort of chance to damage every unit in a stack
- when the top level of a stack is defeated by a ground unit, that attacking unit has a chance to follow up with a charge/rally/whatever - translating into a small chance of splash damage. Cavalry and other fast units could get a greater chance bonus as a recognition of their superior speed, or you could make it one of the promotions available to the unit.


((It's been a while since I played any Civ game, but didn't they fix that in C2: Test of Time?))

Blogger Doom July 16, 2013 8:00 PM  

Shhhhh! They might actually be reading.

Who am I kidding, even if they were, and understood, they aren't civil enough to control their urges.

This could be the best show I've seen in a long time. And with the greater numbers, attitude, greater political power, higher intelligence, stronger ethic, minority status, and all else, politicians and the media are going to be gagging on their own spittle about what, if anything, to do. Should be absolutely beautiful. Some pigs really are more equal.

Anonymous Clayton Bigsby July 16, 2013 9:25 PM  

“why would you think i would have a problem with blaming the Catholic church ( the org which gave us Liberation Theology ) for something?”



Because the RCC is the “true” faith, you fucking heathen.


“a - prior to Kennedy's bill, Mexican illegals where a TINY proportion of what they are now”

And as a consequence of that cap, the population exploded. Unintended consequence, huh.


b - Kennedy's bill practically eliminated white euro immigration

First, it’s called ebb and flow. Second, it SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCED WHITE EUROTRASH, you know, the ones who are Roman Catholic and socialist, or heaven forbid, atheist? Unless, thirdly, you are playing the victim card. I only thought libruls flashed it religiously. Tsk, tsk, tsk, Fourth, it wasn’t Kennedy’s bill, it was DA JOOS who were responsible. Know your fucking history.

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/05/ted-kennedy-did-not-pass-the-immigration-act-of-1965/


c - Kennedy's bill is still in effect, just like Carter's annual budgetary increases.

Work to change the law. You are a legal citizen of my country, right?



“you're a not a libtard because you use a 'contrary ... line of thinking'. you're a libtard because you are historically and linguistically illiterate and steadfastly refuse to apply any coherent set of standards and reasoning to what you DO know.”

So you are able to make that claim based on a series of blog entries??? Pleeezzzz, nigga!


d - you're a bald faced liar, the 1965 act was specifically adopted because earlier policies were characterized as 'racist'

Racism--this term has been bastardized to the point it is rendered meaningless. Besides, if it be the case, so what? The other two factors I mentioned were equally prominent. Do you oppose family reunification? Do you oppose business owners controlling costs? Fascist!


“More Hispanics like myself are seeing them for what they really are and hence...”



Castro, I mean castricv, you will eventually be castrated by the whites here. You’ve been warned.

Anonymous Thor July 16, 2013 9:28 PM  

Loki, trust me, you are not a Christian.

Blogger JaimeInTexas July 16, 2013 9:58 PM  

put me down as yes vote on the 3rd national. I prefer, as more probable, Lone Star, aka Bonnie Blue, aka Republic of West Florida.
Yeah, baby ... let's hear it for the Republic of Texas.

Anonymous bob k. mando July 16, 2013 9:59 PM  

Clayton Bigsby July 16, 2013 9:25 PM
Because the RCC is the “true” faith, you fucking heathen.



wouldn't be the first time a Catholic has tried to call my kind insulting names. if you tried to kill me, that wouldn't be a first either.

you ARE a Catholic, aren't you? and not just some lipschitz atheist miming religion for rhetardoric purposes?



Clayton Bigsby July 16, 2013 9:25 PM
First, it’s called ebb and flow. Second, it SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCED WHITE EUROTRASH, you know, the ones who are Roman Catholic and socialist,




eastern Euros tend to be Orthodox.

you know the Orthodox, right? those are the sects which hew closer to the old traditions than the Roman Catholics do ...

besides, are you really asking me to choose between Greek and Mexican cuisine? i'm not sure i can do that.






Clayton Bigsby July 16, 2013 9:25 PM
Work to change the law. You are a legal citizen of my country, right?



don't know if you've noticed this, but Congress and the President and the Supreme Court are already completely off the chain. they pass whatever they want without regard to whether or not the people want it.

whether or not the bankers want something, now that ... that is a different story.

at this point 'legal' means nothing. there is no 'law' that the US .gov will not break at it's whim.



Clayton Bigsby July 16, 2013 9:25 PM
Racism--this term has been bastardized to the point it is rendered meaningless. Besides, if it be the case, so what?




racism, schmacism, who cares?

oh, wait.

racism is the issue which brought you out of the woodwork in the first place.

Clayton Bigby is Chappelle skit about ... racism.

racism isn't a hot button issue for you at all. nosireeeee.

yeah, lot of integrity you got going on there.

Anonymous Anonymous July 16, 2013 11:03 PM  

More Trolls here than in a classic fairy tale.

Anonymous paradox July 16, 2013 11:47 PM  

JaimeInTexas July 16, 2013 9:58 PM
put me down as yes vote on the 3rd national.


Kind of favor Missouri's Confederate Flag. However, could go with something new.

Anonymous Clayton Bigsby July 17, 2013 12:51 AM  

"you ARE a Catholic, aren't you? and not just some lipschitz atheist miming religion for rhetardoric purposes?"

I'm a Festivusian.


"besides, are you really asking me to choose between Greek and Mexican cuisine? i'm not sure i can do that."

Forgive me, the lesser of two evils is out of style.


"racism is the issue which brought you out of the woodwork in the first place."

Actually, you may have noticed I have a certain weakness for low hanging fruit and it gives me an opportunity to zing some one-liners.


"yeah, lot of integrity you got going on there."

I would first look in the mirror before making that judgement. Or perhaps you could take a page from Kjerstin Gruys,

Anonymous Clayton Bigsby July 17, 2013 12:56 AM  

"they pass whatever they want without regard to whether or not the people want it."

Perhaps you can move to Russia. Josh or Nate or some douchebag here raves about it.

OR, for the third time, you can heed Machiavelli's advice: “when trouble is sensed well in advance it can easily be remedied; if you wait for it to show itself, any medicine will be too late because the disease will have become incurable"?

Anonymous Toby Temple July 17, 2013 1:58 AM  

OR, for the third time, you can heed Machiavelli's advice: “when trouble is sensed well in advance it can easily be remedied; if you wait for it to show itself, any medicine will be too late because the disease will have become incurable"?

A rationale for preemptive strike.

No wonder you made this statement:
No, put your money where your mouth is. If porch monkeys and spics are the enemy to "noble whites", then drink your whiskey, take out your gun, and start blastin' with Bible in hand. Talk is fucking cheap about the "bloody race war". As Toby Temple stated clearly, it's time for whites to go Machiavellian. It's now or never. Hop to it!

You see, Clayton, when I said "whites should go Machiavellian" I was not referring to start a bloody genocide.

So the next time you read comments here, it would be best to never attempt reading the commenter's mind.

Anonymous Clayton Bigsby July 17, 2013 9:07 AM  

Skippy, you will never get Mallory. She simply lets you hang around for comedic relief.


"So the next time you read comments here, it would be best to never attempt reading the commenter's mind."

Mi amigo, please note no one outright condemned the action I was describing. Telling, is it not?

Anonymous Andre July 17, 2013 3:56 PM  

Dear stg58/Animal Mother,

Sorry, I'm late to the discussion!

It seems absolutely unreasonable for me to consider Civ V the "worst of all Civs". I guess it can be a bit of a paradigm shift, since they tried so many new things, but I honestly believe that this Civ, now with the latest expansion "Brave New World", is the best Civilization game ever.

First, building roads costs money per turn, yes. But once you connect a city with the Capital, it provides you with a money bonus, so clever road placement is actually lucrative. Also, roads help you move units through your territory more quickly, so in times of war they're essential for quick reactions.

Each turn of construction costs production, not gold. You can shift your city focus to production ir order to build more quickly, thus sacrificing money, but that's an option only.

Also, units do pass through. But one unit per hexagon is just perfect. In action, it just feels right. Combat is much more interesting now that you have to position your units smartly, rather than making the infamous "stacks of doom".

Finally, here's a link with everything that's been implemented in the last expansion. Honestly, the game is a blast to play.

http://well-of-souls.com/civ/civ5_bravenewworld.html

Anonymous Toby Temple July 18, 2013 3:06 AM  

Mi amigo, please note no one outright condemned the action I was describing. Telling, is it not?

And what do you think that tells us, Clayton?

Blogger James Dixon July 18, 2013 8:24 AM  

> Perhaps you can move to Russia. Josh or Nate or some douchebag here raves about it.

It's been considered.

> Mi amigo, please note no one outright condemned the action I was describing. Telling, is it not?

About you? Yes. About the folks here? Not so much so.

Anonymous Clayton Bigsby July 18, 2013 11:55 AM  

"And what do you think that tells us, Clayton?"

Use your own brainpower to figure it out, Skippy. Alex has no time for you with trivial matters, he has money to earn and skirts to chase.


"It's been considered."

Actually, the choice is easy for you. Leave...


"About you? Yes. About the folks here? Not so much so."

Late to the festivities I see. Step to the end of the line and wait your turn like a good little rabbit.

Blogger James Dixon July 18, 2013 12:33 PM  

> Late to the festivities I see.

Late? Not hardly. I just don't bother commenting to most inanities. I guess it just happened to be your lucky day.

> Step to the end of the line and wait your turn like a good little rabbit.

Yeah, right.

Anonymous Clayton Bigsby July 18, 2013 2:45 PM  

Actually, it is your lucky day. For being the good little White Knight by coming to save your dark damsel in distress, you won a Brokeback Mountain edition Pink Endurance Jack Ass. Congratulations!

Anonymous Toby Temple July 19, 2013 2:11 AM  

Use your own brainpower to figure it out, Skippy.

I can't read your mind, Clayton, despite my above average brainpower.

Alex has no time for you with trivial matters, he has money to earn and skirts to chase.

That is one pathetic excuse to make since you are the one who posted this:

Mi amigo, please note no one outright condemned the action I was describing. Telling, is it not?

So again,what do you think the absence of outright condemnation of the action that you were describing tells us?

Anonymous Clayton Bigsby July 19, 2013 11:41 AM  

I'll say it again. I don't have time for trivial matters because you can't figure it out on your own based on the context of the conversation.

Anonymous Toby Temple July 20, 2013 11:59 AM  

So you are too stupid to answer the question. Thanks for playing, mr. stupid.

Anonymous Clayon Bigsby July 20, 2013 5:05 PM  

I see Skippy is still desperately trying to get Mallory to like him. Even though she specifically stated the problems with the growing Hispanic population, which means that there will likely be more Latin American-style infiltration, assassination, and terror directed at the lower levels of law enforcement.

Anonymous Toby Temple July 22, 2013 7:22 AM  

Poor mr. stupid needs help in reading comprehension.

You said...
please note no one outright condemned the action I was describing. Telling, is it not?

So I ask you...
What do you think the absence of outright condemnation of the action that you were describing tells us?

mr. stupid, you seem to mistake me for a mind reader and be able to discern what you think. That is because you are stupid. I do not know what you think. Which is why I am asking you to divulge it.

Anonymous Clayton Bigsby July 22, 2013 2:36 PM  

You do know what I think, Skippy. It's all there for everyone to see. Just straighten out your thinking cap, it is a bit slanted on your head. Hop to it!

Anonymous Bah July 22, 2013 5:28 PM  

Filipino women are good for only one thing...porn. The guys? Worthless shit bags. Just my two cents.

Anonymous Clayton Bigsby July 25, 2013 11:31 AM  

"Please note no one outright condemned the action I was describing. Telling, is it not?

Perhaps Toby Temple finally figured it out...

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts