ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2018 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Monday, September 22, 2014

Escalating #GamerGate

A veteran game developer, Brad Wardell, who unlike Zoe Quinn actually has a fair amount of game development experience, weighs in on #GamerGate:
In my mind, the balance of wrongdoing is heavily weighted on the opponents of #gamergate.  Mainly, because its opponents have had a long head start of character assassination and harassment. I know some of my friends in the media will be appalled by that but that’s mainly because they haven’t seen the shit storm directed at anyone who dares not support the “social justice” narrative for the past few years.

Without the August 28th mass “gamers are dead” article series on multiple sites, none of this would have happened. Let’s remember that.  It was a tempest in a teapot before that.

Every major escalation I’ve seen in this industry conflict has begun with one side mass misrepresenting others with a very broad brush.

The anti #gamergate people are the ones who brought me in

One thing to make clear here: The pro-#gamergate people didn’t ask me to stand up for them. They made no demands on me.  All I did was, as game developer, was tweet that I like gamers and don’t like seeing gamers misrepresented.  For that, the anti-#gamergate people started smearing me. (SJW logic: Make up allegations, use allegations as evidence, repeat).

In other words, I was not/am not trying to use #gamergate to get a pound of flesh. You want me to quit throwing in the misdeeds of the SJW crowd in SJW faces? Then tell them to quit character assassinating me.  Because, let’s face it, I have a large, heavy, blunt instrument in the form of having been falsely accused of sexual harassment and having won that case so thoroughly that the plaintiff had to publicly apologize. You don’t get more clear cut than that in the legal world.  I’d be delighted to just talk about games, tech, etc. But if you’re going to suggest I’m some sort of misogynist or rapist or sexual harasser then yea, I’m going to use the 800 pound mace that SJWs carelessly crafted for me.

And for those truly concerned in the gaming media: If you want to do “the right thing” (even if it’s two years late): Feel free to have the articles and threads that smear me set to just not be indexed by search engines. Is that really asking for a lot? No censorship. No retractions. No apologies.  Just make it so that new harassers aren’t born every time someone looks at the first page of Google results on us. I’ve been doing stuff 20 years, I’ve helped invent a number of the technologies you guys use on your PCs every day. But it’s all crowded out because the media chose to use me as a cartoon villain to push forward an agenda. Thanks for that. I just love having to discuss the Kotaku article every few weeks with some investment banker or enterprise customer. I really enjoy having to answer awkward questions by extended family. And the occasional random “You fucking shit lord, I hope you die in a fire!” emails I get are just..well they’re just so heart warming. Thank you for that.

The double standards

When I see a Ben Kuchera arguing for the deletion of threads because they might encourage harassment of game developers, I ask, where was he when I was taking a beating on nearly every gaming forum for something I didn’t even do? Oh that’s right, he was helping spread it!  Yea, thanks for using an image that shows a claim that I asked my female employees if they enjoyed tasting semen. And you know what? I didn’t hold any of this against anyone. I didn’t send PR people to demand threads removed. No DMCA messages. But it’s pretty infuriating to see calls to censor discussion based on “harassment” when they had no problem when I was the target.

Except, of course, in my case, I hadn’t actually done any of the things I was alleged to have done. No, I’ve gotten to fry for the past couple years in countless threads across the net.  I also want to point out that even though we won, and we got a public apology, some don’t consider that enough because apparently we were supposed to demand the plaintiff admit in writing to committing perjury. So even mercy is frowned upon by these people....

Let me preface this: NO ONE can survive detailed scrutiny. This is doubly true if the person doing the scrutiny is not giving you the benefit of the doubt.

Historically, the activist columnists in other industries have gotten away with trashing their opponents. It’s easy to lampoon the Tea Party people, for instance because their core base aren’t very technical and have no real means to strike back.  Same was true of the Occupy movement which got overrun by SJWs and was easily dismissed soon after.

But gamers are technical. They do have the means to fight back.  I’m sure it never occurred to the columnists who wrote “gamers are dead” that their targets would be able to effectively return the favor. Those who have had great success cherry picking and editing quotes/emails/tweets to create a false narrative of their opponents never dreamed that doing so would come back to haunt them.
I am very loosely acquainted with Brad, having spoken to him a few times when he was at Stardock. He's a smart guy and he's perceptive too. However, I think he's making one mistake here, the same mistake that most people in the SF/F community have made over time, which is thinking that being reasonable and moderate and fair to the other side is an option. It is not. There is absolutely no evidence supporting that belief... one can't even call it a conclusion. Fantasy would perhaps be the better term.

We're not dealing with reasonable people here, we are dealing with psychologically damaged people who want to utterly trash and destroy the things we love due to their envy, their mental instability and their evil, twisted ideology. They're not going to stop simply because they've been shot down once or twice. Failure doesn't demoralize them because it is their natural state. They're simply never going to stop until you have submitted to them and they have destroyed yet another predominantly male bastion.

Understand that I'm not considered an extremist because I'm a hot-tempered angry person given to historically unusual positions, but because the Social Justice Whores all realize that I am immune to their influence and I am therefore a threat to them by demonstrating that their victory is not inevitable Progress and one need to cower before them. Unlike most of their targets, I can take every accusation of sexism and racism and homophobism and religionism and inequalism and bigotism, laugh at it, and refuse to be swayed by it. What they call an extremist is nothing more than an individual who will not submit to them and dutifully confess that black is white and gay is good and two plus two is five on command.

As Instapundit says, we have to punch back twice as hard. Trash back twice as hard. They're not used to it. They can't take it. They freak out when we simply point out the observable fact that Zoe Quinn aka Chelsea Van Valkenburg is a slut, and, allegedly, a whore. They go ballistic when we observe that Anita Sarkeesian is a complete fraud who knows virtually nothing about games. They are furious when we note that very few people read most of their award-winning works and that there is little science in their "science fiction". We don't have to assassinate their characters because they don't have any. And they can't handle the truth, which makes it our most potent weapon.

But only for those with the courage to stand up for it and wield it. So stop temporizing and thinking you're going to somehow straddle the fence. Stop thinking that perhaps you can keep your head down and escape notice. You're not. That's the first step towards ultimate submission. Choose consciously and courageously, don't let your fear of rejection make up your mind for you.

After all, being rejected by this collection of delusional neurotics is an absolute badge of distinction and good sense.

UPDATE: The SJW are now launching attacks on The Escapist due to its refusal to fall in line:
This is an attack by the Anti-Gamergate side. Kuchera was unable to browbeat Greg Tito into censoring the discussion, now that the corrupt journalists are losing this debate rapidly, the Anti-GG side is desperate to shut down the discussion.

They've already begun censoring on 4chan. They've turned it into a SJW hugbox, to the point where being politically incorrect in /b/ (the bloody POLITICALLY INCORRECT FORUM) is a ban worthy offense.

If you wonder why the Anti-GG side is doing this, the answer is simple:

They're bloody terrified of losing their power.

For about 3 years now, they've had the privilege to attack, patronize, and demean others. They could insult people sarcastically, insinuate that all attempts to disagree with them were based on "racism" or "misogyny" rather than logic. Now with Gamergate being more popular and them being shown for who they are, they are absolutely desperate to end the discussion.

They've been painting us as the harassers, us as the doxxers and the "hackers". You can all see now, that this is a lie. They're a group founded on hatred, a clique desperate to retain their power and trying to censor the opposing side's discussion.

Say what you will of us, but we haven't been attempting to bring down sites for allowing the opposing side to speak.

So the next time someone says "We aren't trying to silence you" or "we aren't trying to take your games or websites away!" just know that it is a lie. It happened to 4chan. It's attempting to happen here. We wont let them silence us.

Labels: ,

110 Comments:

Anonymous Stg58/Animal Mother September 22, 2014 6:31 AM  

People like Brad would do well to re watch the Terminator, and listen to Michael Biehn describe the Terminator.

Blogger Cataline Sergius September 22, 2014 6:54 AM  

The primary weapon of the SJW appears to be coordinated shaming and the past few weeks have shown that, it is in fact quite coordinated.

Observation: There are only two types of men completely immune to the this tactic. Alphas and Omegas.

Never thought they could get together on anything but there it is. Both are immune to the threat of lost status.

Anonymous Aufhebend September 22, 2014 7:07 AM  

I think he's making one mistake here, the same mistake that most people in the SF/F community have made over time, which is thinking that being reasonable and moderate and fair to the other side is an option. It is not.

That's actually one of the most frustrating things to see in the #gamergate camp and will eventually lead to whatever gains they have made in this campaign being lost when the SJWs return.

Blogger buzzardist September 22, 2014 7:10 AM  

Occupy was taken over by the SJW crowd? Ummm...no. Occupy was astroturfed by the very heart of the SJW crowd from the very start. This was their attempt to create a populist movement that could have the same effect that the Tea Part had achieved in the 2010 elections. But, very quickly, Occupy revealed itself for what grotesque people those involved were.

This is why SJW always want to keep the attention focused on someone else. They are twisted, perverse people themselves, and the light of day will send normal people fleeing from them. If the SJW folks can just keep everyone trained on the evil of someone else, maybe people won't take a glance backward to see who is making the accusation. That's their hope. And that's why the only course of action is to laugh at accusations and then to say, "O.K., so you want to make this personal? Let's talk about you for a few minutes. Let's talk about what kind of person you are." I've done it before, and they really do start shrieking, screaming, and uttering profanities at the same scrutiny and attention being placed on them as they try to put on others.

I had an encounter with a SJW whom I'd met a couple times previously on social media a few months back. He's the epitome of a white liberal, and loves leveling charges of racism at people. His schtick is that he lived overseas for a number of years, and he turned into an activist campaigning for what he called "human rights," but what was little more than imposing those left-wing American values on a foreign culture that had no interest in becoming a multicultural hellhole. I pointed this out, and I noted from the start that this guy a) tossed around racism accusations at the drop of a hat, b) used aggression, intimidation, and threats to try to bend people to submission, and c) was simply an unhappy person who'd come from a broken, twisted home and who had, himself, burned through his marriage, and now he was trying to inflict that unhappiness on others. Predictably, he quickly called me racist, denied every having met me, denied saying several crude statements he'd made in public before hundreds of people, and then went about trying to tout a few photographs gathered on his blog as Ph.D.-quality research. It was truly a comical performance, and he quickly disappeared and stopped trying to engage with me at all when I gave detailed evidence that he was a liar, deconstructed the "data" on his website from the perspective of a person who actually holds a Ph.D., and laughed at his racism accusation.

And that's how it's plain that these people are liars, hypocrites, and charlatans. They've constructed themselves as delicate flowers who can't be touched, and yet they want to take sledgehammers to everyone else in the world who doesn't pretend to be a flower like them. They're not delicate flowers. They are merely ugly bullies who are terrified of social rejection and who only survive by being part of an inside group of self-congratulatory nitwits. Expose them to someone who doesn't shower that adulation on them, but who actually turns a critical eye to their behavior, and they flee.

Anonymous Danto September 22, 2014 7:12 AM  

Couple things.

1. The gaming "journalists" threw Brad under the bus. Look up the false sexual harassment allegation stories.

2. Techraptor did an interview with another developer, Daniel Vavra techraptor.net/2014/09/12/interview-daniel-vavra/ (dev)

3. Anita Sarkeesian already influenced big studio games like Mirror’s Edge 2. Her complaint was, the control scheme being “too complicated”. She already influenced Bungie who made (allegedly forced onto them), Destiny. I don't know how or what. I haven't played Destiny since I don't own a console. Rumor is, other big studios are hiring her as a consultant.

Anonymous Michael September 22, 2014 7:24 AM  

It's obvious the SJW (feminists, homosexuals and other self-described "victims") view themselves above the rest of us. Therefore, I suggest using this anytime you encounter one of them: #You'reTooSpecialForMe

SJW, why bother with us? We cannot even run our own private business without the threat of you SJW breathing down our necks, dictating policy and welding lawsuits. Clearly you're on another level; we're unworthy of you. Hitler's vision of a "master race" has been fulfilled in you. You even possess the power to violate our Constitutional rights with nothing more than your feelings. #You'reTooSpecialForUs

Anonymous VD September 22, 2014 7:26 AM  

Rumor is, other big studios are hiring her as a consultant.

All the better for their competitors.

Blogger Markku September 22, 2014 7:41 AM  

3. Anita Sarkeesian already influenced big studio games like Mirror’s Edge 2. Her complaint was, the control scheme being “too complicated”.

We probably should send mail to DICE that we're not going to buy their games, because of this terribly sexist assumption that women cannot cope with the kind of controls that men can. Such ideas will only lead to oppression of women in the industry, and we can't support such things with our money in good conscience.

Shame. I think Mirror's Edge was an absolutely excellent game. I STILL talk about it to any poor soul who accidentally gives me the slightest excuse.

Anonymous Danto September 22, 2014 7:49 AM  

Leak from a second writer. He is upfront about his identity. I mentioned him before: http://blogjob.com/oneangrygamer/2014/09/gamergate-its-not-over-until-someone-goes-to-prison-says-game-journalist/ (William Usher)

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus September 22, 2014 7:51 AM  

"Every major escalation I’ve seen in this industry conflict has begun with one side mass misrepresenting others with a very broad brush."

That's called escalation dominance. It's a big advantage.

If you play by those rules you may feel more moral but you won't be. There's nothing moral about bowing down respectfully to Social Justice Warriors.

You won't even gain a false reputation for morality, because you're helping on to victory people determined to defame you.

Initiate. Start that fight. Pull the trigger whenever the time is right. That's how the winners do it.

Anonymous Anonymous September 22, 2014 8:30 AM  

Truth matters; the battle of our time.

Anonymous Michael September 22, 2014 8:30 AM  

What could possibly be more awkward than being compared openly with Hitler's master race and following through by demonstrating their social privilege at the expense of others?

Anonymous ... September 22, 2014 8:30 AM  

shame --> sanction of the victim

Anonymous Logan September 22, 2014 8:32 AM  

What does 'SJW' stand for?

Anonymous VD September 22, 2014 8:32 AM  

What could possibly be more awkward than being compared openly with Hitler's master race and following through by demonstrating their social privilege at the expense of others?

Congratulations. You are completely missing the point. That sort of thing doesn't work at all. They don't care about being awkward. You're still trying to be the good guy. Forget about all those clever little games and fake submissions. Open and staunch resistance is the only successful strategy.

Anonymous Anonymous September 22, 2014 8:38 AM  

This strongly reminds me of how the media called Mass Effect 3 purchasers, that disliked the ending work, a bunch of "entitled gamers". It was character assassination all the way. Bioware said it was "art", and only later did it come out it was the art of 1 or 2 superior writers, not the normal process of collaboration and iteration review.

For homosexual type aesthetics or romance relationships, people would be better set on buying Japanese visual novels. You would get far more bang for your buck, and leave out most of the abuse from Hollywood types.

Anonymous Anonymous September 22, 2014 8:43 AM  

In America, the "punch back twice as hard" thing came from Andrew Breitbart's work. If you look up the internet videos of O'Keefe grilling ACORN on child sex trade in the US Mexican border, it's a perfect example of Breitbart esque work. Unfortunately Breitbart died of a heart attack... yea I know.

Many conservatives or Republicans or patriots in America just don't have his aggression gene or personality type. They aren't hard core true believers. They believe in American exceptionalism and patriotism, yes, but they do not believe the Leftist alliance is evil. So they aren't going to extinguish, crucify, or burn out evil. Not even in the privacy of their homes and families, they submit to their relatives Telling Them about Hussein O and ObamaCare and all that other trash. They don't say much of anything. They are quiet, thinking it will blow up.

But if 2014 has shown people anything... it is that the Left ought to be hated and that it will not blown over. They will never, ever leave you alone. So people hate Hussein O, aka Michelle Obama's husband. Yet that hate itself is insufficient. It is only a testing, training phase for hating the entire Leftist alliance. Everyone in it, only with true hate can people exert the level of force needed to end the threat. True belief, true love, true conviction, whatever it is that motivates people to fight. Hate is merely the easiest and most marketable commodity to human consumers.

Anonymous Josh September 22, 2014 8:44 AM  

In the battle between angry nerds and angry feminists, the nerds are going to prevail. What are the feminists going to do, refuse to sleep with them? Call them nerds?

Anonymous guzchell September 22, 2014 8:45 AM  

"What does 'SJW' stand for?"

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=sjw

Anonymous Josh September 22, 2014 8:49 AM  

Many conservatives or Republicans or patriots in America just don't have his aggression gene or personality type. They aren't hard core true believers. They believe in American exceptionalism and patriotism, yes, but they do not believe the Leftist alliance is evil. So they aren't going to extinguish, crucify, or burn out evil. Not even in the privacy of their homes and families, they submit to their relatives Telling Them about Hussein O and ObamaCare and all that other trash. They don't say much of anything. They are quiet, thinking it will blow up.

Incorrect. The reason you don't see them fighting back is because they have jobs, families, and civic organizations. They're very busy. They don't have the time to crush leftists. They're too busy doing other things. In the long game, they're going exactly what needs to be done to win.

Anonymous Salt September 22, 2014 8:50 AM  

The SJWs do not have human nature on their side and, as one Ilk pointed out, are seemingly the social Hitlers, the sensitivity police, of our time, trying to produce their version of the Master Race. What's interesting is the rapid spread of their infestation, like diseased roaches, into all of society. They won't win in the end, but the damage they're going to cause may very well be worse than any past conflict in history.

Anonymous Michael September 22, 2014 8:51 AM  

Vox, let's see. They've attacked innocent businesses, forcing them to close down or change their policy, as well as humiliated others into losing their jobs. Turn it against them. I'm not anti-confrontational; you should know this from my previous comments here. But you're taking it for granted that every other SJW can be handled exactly like Zoe Quinn and her ilk, i.e. easily exposed as frauds, which might not always be the case.

Anonymous Josh September 22, 2014 8:54 AM  

But you're taking it for granted that every other SJW can be handled exactly like Zoe Quinn and her ilk, i.e. easily exposed as frauds, which might not always be the case.

Has there ever been an example of a SJW that turned out to not be a fraud?

There are probably a lot of liberals and even feminists who play and design games. They're not SJW because they care more about actually playing and making games and not about whether or not cgi boobs are an example of patriarchal oppression.

Anonymous Leonidas September 22, 2014 8:57 AM  

I don't personally know Brad Wardell. However...

15 years ago I was one of three programmers who launched our own game company. Us being very inexperienced and having no capital, it didn't go anywhere. But fast forward to today and I write graphical software for the army, one of my former partners works for Stardock (and thus directly for Brad). The third just co-founded his own game company again. Those of you who play games probably haven't heard of it yet. But by this time a year from now, you WILL have heard of it. And oh yeah, Brad Wardell is funding his venture.

FWIW, those two guys have NOTHING but great things to say about Brad.

Observation: There are only two types of men completely immune to the this tactic. Alphas and Omegas.

Three. You forgot Sigmas.

Anonymous Michael September 22, 2014 9:00 AM  

Josh, "Has there ever been an example of a SJW that turned out to not be a fraud?"

We know that they're in the wrong; heck, they know they're wrong. However, you might not always be able to disprove an accusation, nor prove a conspiracy, in which case you'll need a different strategy than merely pointing out the obvious.

Anonymous dh September 22, 2014 9:06 AM  

A good strategy for the SJW warriors is what, I think, Dalrock conceived of, which is, for men who are immune from the SJW pressure to create a permanent per-person search optimized record of the doings of SJW warriors, so that in 6 months, 12 months, 18 months down the road, one of the SJW types goes to get a job, the first result for their name is.. all the shit they've pulled.

Anonymous Michael September 22, 2014 9:11 AM  

Another point I should make is this: in a war, there is bound to be losses on both sides. It's unrealistic to expect that things will always go the right way. Look at how fast the NFL caved in to the SJW, and for what? Just because a couple of their employees (out of thousands) were caught doing naughty things in their private lives. Lest you forget, this is the same organization which threatened to pull out of Arizona if they passed a bill protecting the religious freedom of private businesses there. In the video game industry, the SJW have already taken the reigns in companies such as EA, promoting homosexuality and so forth. And there's inevitably going to be more that fall to their agenda. In which case it's going to come down to the people, the gamers, to decide with their wallets to say no to the SJW agenda.

Anonymous Anonymous September 22, 2014 10:22 AM  

The reason you don't see them fighting back is because they have jobs, families, and civic organizations. They're very busy. They don't have the time to crush leftists.

They have plenty of time. Every time they see an Obama voter or family member talking about Sarah Palin. You just don't see it because it's mostly private for them, but not private for the country. It gets out in other ways as it encourages the attack mentality.

The Tea Party also had jobs to deal with. But they weren't attack focused either, even though they had the organization but not the funding due to the IRS, ATF.

Anonymous Anonymous September 22, 2014 10:26 AM  

In which case it's going to come down to the people, the gamers, to decide with their wallets to say no to the SJW agenda.

Like people can now do with medical insurance in the US and with national healthcare in Britain?

A little ironic there. This is the progression, after all. It won't stay this way.

Anonymous Anonymous September 22, 2014 10:30 AM  

Open and staunch resistance is the only successful strategy.

Yep. You can't let them set the terms of the debate, obviously. But you also can't just try to turn their rules against them, because that still plays into their frame. You have to set your own terms -- preferably terms that go so far beyond theirs that it scares them -- and completely ignore their attempts to set the terms as you would a 3-year-old's attempt to set his own bedtime.

It's the "he brings a knife, you bring a gun" mentality, and you have to stick to it relentlessly with no guilt.

Anonymous Michael September 22, 2014 10:37 AM  

ymarsakar, "Like people can now do with medical insurance in the US and with national healthcare in Britain?

A little ironic there. This is the progression, after all. It won't stay this way."

True, but you're conflating the socialization of health care with the SJW attack on gaming. The former has already happened, whereas the latter is a WIP and therefore capable of being effectively countered.

Blogger The Deuce September 22, 2014 10:37 AM  

I think GamerGate needs to have but one goal, not five: Make the SJWs feel such pressure, such exposure, and such scorn that from now on, if they even think about going after gaming and gamers, they are overwhelmed by memories of depression and suicidal feelings, and instantly recoil and scurry back into their caves.

The SJWs are vicious, hate-filled, miserable people driven by a deep sense of shame, which they try to rationalize away by telling themselves they are just victims of society's disapproval, and by demanding that everyone else approve of them and tell them that they're good and normal and wonderful and have nothing to be ashamed of.

Anything that reminds them of their shame causes a visceral reaction of fear and self-loathing, which is why they are so hyper-sensitive and demand such complete and total adherence to their narrative. Even the slightest dissent, the slightest disapproval, the slightest reminder that they are deviants, is deeply uncomfortable and intolerable to them, and must be forcibly silenced. They live in terror of their shame being truly exposed to the light of day, and not having anywhere to hide and deflect it.

So give them what they fear. Give them a reminder. Give them a million reminders. Bury them beneath an unending, unbearable torrent of exposure and shame until they break, and retreat into their shells far, far away from gaming forever.

Anonymous Viking September 22, 2014 10:40 AM  

Sounds like a good enough reason to go over to the Escapist and click though some of their ads.

Anonymous bob k. mando September 22, 2014 10:43 AM  

Josh September 22, 2014 8:54 AM
Has there ever been an example of a SJW that turned out to not be a fraud?



as with Sharpton, other SJWs seem to have a remarkable ability to unerringly choose frauds to get behind.

i think this is because they prioritize on "emotive appeal" rather than facts.

and who is going to have a more emotionally appealing story? some poor schlub who actually had real life happen to them? or someone who fabricated a story specifically designed to jerk tears?

Anonymous Quartermain September 22, 2014 10:43 AM  

SJW supposedly means Social Justice Warrior though they're anti-social, not about justice, and too cowardly to be actual warriors.

SJW actually stands for:

Stupid
Jerks
Wailing

Anonymous Michael September 22, 2014 10:46 AM  

The Deuce, 10+ post.

Anonymous Josh September 22, 2014 10:52 AM  

They have plenty of time. Every time they see an Obama voter or family member talking about Sarah Palin. You just don't see it because it's mostly private for them, but not private for the country. It gets out in other ways as it encourages the attack mentality.

What the hell are you talking about? A feature of conservative minded people is that the personal is not the political and vice versa. Wanting ordinary people to go around confronting Obama or Palin supporters all the time is the wrong strategy. All you'll accomplish is creating your own cadre of SJW's.

The Tea Party also had jobs to deal with. But they weren't attack focused either, even though they had the organization but not the funding due to the IRS, ATF.

The tea party was a colossal failure and was quickly co-opted by the political professionals. One of the reasons for the failure was that the tea partiers had to go back to work.

Blogger The Deuce September 22, 2014 10:55 AM  

as with Sharpton, other SJWs seem to have a remarkable ability to unerringly choose frauds to get behind.

i think this is because they prioritize on "emotive appeal" rather than facts.


No, it's the other way around. They become SJWs because they are moral deviants and frauds in the first place. Being an SJW is all about trying to deflect your own shame and guilt for being an immoral fraud onto others. It's about telling yourself that the shame and guilt isn't your own fault for being a selfish immoral deviant after all, but everyone else's for making you feel bad about it with their moral standards.

So of course a movement based all around deflecting shame for one's own immorality is going to be populated and led by deeply fraudulent, immoral people.

Anonymous Giuseppe September 22, 2014 11:11 AM  

All these SJWs, PC, soulsuckers are inspiring me to revive my blog, which due to pretty heavy life stuff and almost terminal lack of time has been defunct for a couple of years. It will require an actual paid revamp and of course I expect to be alienated and rejected even more than my already misanthropic outlook tends to have done so far, but dammit, someone has to shoot back. And no, I don't intend to do things in half-measures. One thing I am 100% in agreement with VD is that these skunk-fart excuse for human beings need to be treated without mercy. And like others have said, they need to be exposed at every turn.
I know from experience their heads pop at that.

Besides, it's the Batman concept (from the dark knight returns) let them realise every time they come after you, you will expose them. Let fear rule them. Their own pathetic and dirty little lives will have spotlights of truth burning on them. Followed by bullets of logic and facts until they are dissolved back into the fart-mist from whence they spawned.

Blogger Mekadave September 22, 2014 11:53 AM  

Does anyone have any info on what other games Sarkeesian is being hired to screw up besides Mirror's Edge 2? (if any) Her wiki page is no help. Not much in Google searches either.

Anonymous Corvinus September 22, 2014 12:18 PM  

The primary weapon of the SJW appears to be coordinated shaming and the past few weeks have shown that, it is in fact quite coordinated.

Observation: There are only two types of men completely immune to the this tactic. Alphas and Omegas.

Never thought they could get together on anything but there it is. Both are immune to the threat of lost status.


@Cataline Sergius
I'd argue that Sigmas would be able to handle a crowd turning on them much better than Alphas would, although I suppose Alphas would have their confidence and egos to help them through.

But yeah... SJW tactics are so consistent and predictable because they're most effective on Deltas.

Blogger MidKnight September 22, 2014 12:20 PM  

@Danto - thanks for the link, that was an excellent interview

(Posting again so people don't have to search) http://techraptor.net/2014/09/12/interview-daniel-vavra/

Anonymous Difranco September 22, 2014 12:30 PM  

Apparently, the Gamergate folks have abandoned 4Chan and went to 8Chan, since it turns out that Moot's girlfriend is involved with Gawker.

Anonymous VD September 22, 2014 12:36 PM  

Apparently, the Gamergate folks have abandoned 4Chan and went to 8Chan, since it turns out that Moot's girlfriend is involved with Gawker.

That explains it. I thought perhaps they were talking to him about buying it.

Anonymous maniacprovost September 22, 2014 12:44 PM  

It's only a matter of time until games with "hate speech" are rated M. Killing Muslim terrorists? Hate speech. A 12 year old player of your game calls someone a fag and you "encourage a culture of hate" with insufficient banning? You're off the Xbox network. Shooting down the spacefighters of the eeeevil Trade Federation? Totes kewl.

Anonymous Josh September 22, 2014 12:50 PM  

A 12 year old player of your game calls someone a fag and you "encourage a culture of hate" with insufficient banning? You're off the Xbox network.

Yeah, not so much

Anonymous Giuseppe September 22, 2014 12:57 PM  

"I think GamerGate needs to have but one goal, not five: Make the SJWs feel such pressure, such exposure, and such scorn that... "

Yes. This is correct and it is indeed the bring a gun to a knife fight mentality, but the #gamergate people still don't get it. I posted a link to one of Zoe's nude pics which as far as I understand she made public (i may be wrong on this but doubt it and in any case don't care) didn't use the #gamergate hashtag and just pointed out we should renind people what her assets as a game designer were. There was an instant backlash and mass reporting me by...wait for it...#gamergate people! In other words, by trying to be be "fair" and honourable, they were saying posting her slutty pictures was wrong, wrong, wrong. Because "..it has nothing to do with the issues..." Umm....no! Fucking excuse me, it has EVERYTHING to do with the issues, because a man with her "skills" would never have got the exposure she did from the "journalists" (though, with the amount of faggotry going on in that whole field it's probably debatable). The #gamergaters were too prudish or naive to accept the simple fact that ZQ behaved exactly like a whore, except with none of the integrity of an actual whore. If she publicly stated "I suck cock for good reviews" then I would see little problem with the whole thing...but of course that would be absurd because it would invalidate any review ever written about her, so it is important to expose the reality of what she is. I wasn't banned from twitter (yet?) but it's telling that I was blocked by a large percentage of the so-called anti-feminists. Only a few hardcore anti-feminists who have a similar grasp of the situation as well as a hilariously un-pc sense of humour joined me in tbe battle, but this is the point. When it gets ugly you can't even count on half of the "pretend ilk".

Anonymous Red Comet September 22, 2014 12:59 PM  

It's no surprise that Wardell is against the games media. As he briefly said, they tried to ruin him a few years back during one of their recurring feminazi witch hunts.

Unfortunately for them Wardell was no Brendan Eich and did not back down. He ultimately filed a lawsuit against the chick that sued him over stolen property and it all ended with the suits dismissed and her having to write an apology.

Breitbart also released the member list of the Gaming Journolist today. Link here.

Anonymous Corvinus September 22, 2014 1:11 PM  

Many conservatives or Republicans or patriots in America just don't have his aggression gene or personality type. They aren't hard core true believers. They believe in American exceptionalism and patriotism, yes, but they do not believe the Leftist alliance is evil. So they aren't going to extinguish, crucify, or burn out evil. Not even in the privacy of their homes and families, they submit to their relatives Telling Them about Hussein O and ObamaCare and all that other trash. They don't say much of anything. They are quiet, thinking it will blow up.

@ymarsakar
Conservatives, which would include practicing Protestants, are simply classical liberals who are uncomfortable with many of the implications of progtardery. When progtards talk about conservatives being "behind the times", they're literally correct. This also nicely explains the mysterious inability of Republicans to effectively oppose progtard enterprises, and to otherwise consistently bend to progtardery and eventually adopt progtard opinions (such as raciss = evil).

This is why Dark Enlightenment attitudes frighten SJWs; the toolbox they employ against conservatives is useless on those who've gone full DE.

Anonymous VanDerMerwe September 22, 2014 1:12 PM  

Do leftist non-SJW's exist? Because that Internet Aristocrat dude thinks so. And surely SJW are a mere symptom of leftism?

Blogger Markku September 22, 2014 1:16 PM  

When progtards talk about conservatives being "behind the times", they're literally correct.

We should call ourselves reactionaries, like I do. Because, by definition, I am not a conservative.

The fact that most people misunderstand the etymology of the word as "reacting to something" instead of "action towards a previous state of affairs" isn't my problem.

Anonymous Josh September 22, 2014 1:17 PM  

This is why Dark Enlightenment attitudes frighten SJWs; the toolbox they employ against conservatives is useless on those who've gone full DE.

The dark enlightenment, if it exists, is in many ways just a mirror image of SJW's.

Anonymous FP September 22, 2014 1:18 PM  

List is apparently from here: http://blogjob.com/oneangrygamer/2014/09/gamergate-its-not-over-until-someone-goes-to-prison-says-game-journalist/

Google email list on imgur (in the comments of above link):
http://imgur.com/RthRTMK,poRDtcM,cg2xGG5,Pzp8ecz,nYY9BGK,SnM92N5,M0a8bNU,8C0rieQ

The "scandal" with Brad Wardell was a joke. I remember all of the SJW types ripping him on the quarter to three forums. Fueled by his conservative leaning posts in the past. I note from the list of names released at Breitbart that TomChick, the owner of quarter to three is part of the game journolist group.

"Apparently, the Gamergate folks have abandoned 4Chan and went to 8Chan, since it turns out that Moot's girlfriend is involved with Gawker."

The cliche of cliches. He betrayed his clan to give his princess all the loot.

Anonymous Josh September 22, 2014 1:21 PM  

Do leftist non-SJW's exist? Because that Internet Aristocrat dude thinks so. And surely SJW are a mere symptom of leftism?

Our own dh and northern hamlet are examples. So are people like Nate Silver and Bill Simmons.

Anonymous Corvinus September 22, 2014 1:21 PM  

The dark enlightenment, if it exists, is in many ways just a mirror image of SJW's.

@Josh
I'm curious as to why you think this is so. IIRC, SJWs base their philosophy on feelgood BS, whereas DE is based on inconvenient truths that directly disprove the feelgood BS. There's a big difference between being based on truth and being based on falsehood.

Anonymous Corvinus September 22, 2014 1:23 PM  

Do leftist non-SJW's exist? Because that Internet Aristocrat dude thinks so. And surely SJW are a mere symptom of leftism?

Our own dh and northern hamlet are examples. So are people like Nate Silver and Bill Simmons.


I'd argue that any non-SJW or anti-SJW atheist qualifies.

Anonymous Josh September 22, 2014 1:26 PM  

There's a big difference between being based on truth and being based on falsehood.

The dark enlightenment is based on evolution and atheism. That ain't truth.

Blogger James Jones September 22, 2014 1:26 PM  

Zoe Quinn, and people like her are what God made hell for.

Anonymous Corvinus September 22, 2014 1:34 PM  

The dark enlightenment is based on evolution and atheism. That ain't truth.

@Josh
Sure, certain DE writers are atheists, but since there are Christians involved as well, I don't think atheism defines the DE.

Blogger Markku September 22, 2014 1:34 PM  

Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?

Oh, wait, it's millennials.

umad heathenfag? y u no maek sense?

Anonymous FP September 22, 2014 1:37 PM  

Get rid of comments! Thats the answer people! Pod Six is jerks! Ban comments!

http://kernelmag.dailydot.com/issue-sections/staff-editorials/10326/make-comment-sections-cost-money/

"But failing that, there is a way to save comments and shore up the flagging news industry simultaneously. It is this: Make comments cost money."

Anonymous Corvinus September 22, 2014 1:45 PM  

"But failing that, there is a way to save comments and shore up the flagging news industry simultaneously. It is this: Make comments cost money."

As with comment sections that require Facebook or otherwise make it easy to dox someone, such comment sections would quickly turn into SJW circlejerks.

Anonymous Josh September 22, 2014 1:53 PM  

Sure, certain DE writers are atheists, but since there are Christians involved as well, I don't think atheism defines the DE.

I didn't say defined, I said based on.

Blogger Markku September 22, 2014 1:55 PM  

I would also say that Dark Enlightenment is the atheist section of the wider neoreactionary movement. Christians are another section. They are known as "Christians".

Blogger Chris Scena September 22, 2014 1:56 PM  

Josh, I would argue that Bill Simmons is most certainly a SJW. Just read his latest mailbag about Goodell.

Anonymous Josh September 22, 2014 1:59 PM  

Josh, I would argue that Bill Simmons is most certainly a SJW. Just read his latest mailbag about Goodell.

I would counter with "women ruin everything."

Compare Simmons to Florio or Deadspin.

Anonymous dh September 22, 2014 2:03 PM  

"Our own dh and northern hamlet are examples. So are people like Nate Silver and Bill Simmons."

Yeah, SJW is almost exclusively an American thing. In countries with a more robust leftist movement, you find all sorts of things that American SJW's can't tolerate: anti-gay leftists (France has many); anti-immigration leftism (a fairly good chunk of Europe), pro-corporate leftism (Scandinavian parties), pro-big-business leftism (Germany).

Then there's South America, where you have Christian leftists who are fairly traditional but also leftist. The current Catholic Pope is in this camp probably

Anonymous Ideas Have Consequences September 22, 2014 2:06 PM  

"Dark Enlightenment" was just Molbug's rationalization for voting for Obama.

Blogger Chris Scena September 22, 2014 2:12 PM  

Josh, maybe Simmons isn't as much of a SJW as Florio or Deadspin, but he still fits the mold, much to my disappointment as I used to find him entertaining. And the rest of his Grantland site is even more bloated with SJW bullshit than most of his writing.

Not trying to pick a fight. If you feel he isn't an SJW, I would genuinely like to know why.

Anonymous Corvinus September 22, 2014 2:16 PM  

I would also say that Dark Enlightenment is the atheist section of the wider neoreactionary movement. Christians are another section. They are known as "Christians".

@Markku
Way too imprecise. Most Christians seem to be horrified by "raciss" views, and see no problem with gladly adopting Africans.

Anonymous Corvinus September 22, 2014 2:18 PM  

Yeah, SJW is almost exclusively an American thing. In countries with a more robust leftist movement, you find all sorts of things that American SJW's can't tolerate: anti-gay leftists (France has many); anti-immigration leftism (a fairly good chunk of Europe), pro-corporate leftism (Scandinavian parties), pro-big-business leftism (Germany).

@dh
SJW is a particularly disgusting offshoot of Puritan universalism, and as such is primarily centered in Protestant Anglophone countries. Although, as the mass hysteria in Sweden at SD winning 13% in the recent election shows, it also seems to dominate Sweden and perhaps Norway.

Anonymous Josh September 22, 2014 2:21 PM  

Not trying to pick a fight. If you feel he isn't an SJW, I would genuinely like to know why.

As I said, he originated "women ruin everything."

He's also written some very un-PC things, especially in the book of basketball.

Would a SJW have approved the Dr V story?

Yes, Simmons is a lot more careful these days, since he's the editor of espn's prestige site.

Blogger Markku September 22, 2014 2:48 PM  

Way too imprecise. Most Christians seem to be horrified by "raciss" views, and see no problem with gladly adopting Africans.

I don't know if you consider yourself a Christian, as in "follower of Christ". If you don't, then I understand if you didn't quite catch my drift.

I meant to imply that if you aren't a reactionary, you aren't a Christian, even if you belong to Christendom. Some people here would call such a person a Churchian. I'd call him a "goat", or a "tare".

Anonymous Corvinus September 22, 2014 3:38 PM  

I meant to imply that if you aren't a reactionary, you aren't a Christian, even if you belong to Christendom. Some people here would call such a person a Churchian. I'd call him a "goat", or a "tare".

@Markku
True, and I agree with you. But it's still highly annoying when a certain group of progs bogart your group's name.

Blogger Johnny Caustic September 22, 2014 3:39 PM  

Apparently, the Gamergate folks have abandoned 4Chan and went to 8Chan, since it turns out that Moot's girlfriend is involved with Gawker.

Can someone please unpack this for me? Why would Moot's girlfriend cause Gamergate folks to abandon 4chan for 8chan?

Blogger The Deuce September 22, 2014 4:08 PM  

Can someone please unpack this for me? Why would Moot's girlfriend cause Gamergate folks to abandon 4chan for 8chan?

4chan, previously a bastion of free speech and political incorrectness, has been censoring posts about Zoe Quinn, the SJWs, and GamerGate and banning the posters. Kotaku, which together with Polygon is SJW central in the gaming world and implicated in much of the corruption and Quinn's journalistic sexcapades in particular, is a part of Gawker Media, itself a hard-left media corporation which also owns sites like Jezebel, io9, Deadspin, and of course Gawker.com. Moot's girlfriend works for Gawker. So, do the math.

Anonymous Casual September 22, 2014 4:08 PM  

@Johnny Caustic

I'm not sure about the Gawker link or his girlfriend's involvement, but the reason there's a mass exodus is because 4chan's mods have implemented a sitewide ban on GamerGate discussion and are banning posters / deleting threads wherever they appear. 4chan's userbase is strongly against censorship, especially on this particular issue, so they're migrating to 8chan in droves as a result.

I can't imagine what Moot's thinking by implementing this policy, but the general consensus is he's either been bought off by someone or threatened into silence in some way.

Blogger Markku September 22, 2014 4:12 PM  

To give an example, at 4chan, the commonly accepted word for a person of African-American descent has traditionally been "nigger". Not primarily due to any political affiliation, but for lulz.

Blogger Mekadave September 22, 2014 4:22 PM  

Hmmm... Moot hasn't tweeted anything at all since July 10th. That can't be a coincidence.

Anonymous Sevron September 22, 2014 5:54 PM  

I feel like this loss of 4chan has been the Left's most salient victory in years.

Anonymous Anonymous September 22, 2014 7:12 PM  

Josh ,
A feature of conservative minded people is that the personal is not the political and vice versa. Wanting ordinary people to go around confronting Obama or Palin supporters all the time is the wrong strategy. All you'll accomplish is creating your own cadre of SJW's.

If you don't want to win, you won't win. So just give up since the Left and Islam actually wants to win. They'll do whatever they think needs doing. While you're going to go back to work for the slave plantation. Does that sound like a workable strategy here?

As for the Tea Party, the Republicans tried to stamp them down in alliance with the Left so much that conservatives are no longer talking about having any loyalty to the national Republican party. That's how far they have been "co-opted". Which is to say, it backfired.

Corvinus ,

What do you mean by DE's methods? How are they the same or different from SFW or Leftists?

Blogger Tommy Hass September 22, 2014 7:34 PM  

"pro-corporate leftism (Scandinavian parties), pro-big-business leftism (Germany)."

Aren't those the same? Also, what German party are you referring to? SPD?

As for /b/ being the politically incorrect board: that would be /pol/.

And yes, this is unreal. moot caving is unbelievable.

Blogger Tommy Hass September 22, 2014 7:38 PM  

"So just give up since the Left and Islam actually wants to win. "

Please don't put us in the same category as those degenerates.

Anonymous Anonymous September 22, 2014 8:18 PM  

Hass ,

I don't know what you mean. Who is us? Is Josh the leader of some faction here that I should be aware of, to which he represents the majority positions of?

Anonymous Smokey September 22, 2014 9:33 PM  

As for /b/ being the politically incorrect board: that would be /pol/.

It used to be /b/ a long time ago, then all the non-PC stuff shifted to /pol/.

Blogger Tommy Hass September 22, 2014 9:33 PM  

Us, as in, Islam. :)

Blogger Akulkis September 22, 2014 10:09 PM  

What could possibly be more awkward than being compared openly with Hitler's master race and following through by demonstrating their social privilege at the expense of others?

Well, most of them ARE Jewish, so accusing them of being the master race, andtakin a privileged social position won't phase them at all... after all, THEY ARE INSTRUCTED SINCE CHILDHOOLD THAT THEY ARE THE MASTER RACE, AND EVERYONE SHOULD TREAT THEM ACCORDINGLY.

That's what REALLY pisses them off about what the Germans did starting in 1933 -- they Nurenburg laws were a complete inversion what the satanic Talmud(*) teaches.

(*) AKA "Oral Torah", [literally "oral law"] but actually sanctimonious arguments for traditional sins, and therefore heresy. "Oral law" as opposed to the "Written Law" which is the first 5 books of the old Testament ... the Written Torah. Only the Jews believe that "Written Torah" needs to be extended and accompanied by a bunch of "get 2 Jews together and they'll tell you 3 opinions" heretical bullshit idiocy.

Blogger Akulkis September 22, 2014 10:14 PM  

* Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim is like killin a wild animal."
* Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Geniles should be killed."
* Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty to death."
* Libbre David 37: "To communicate anything to a Goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly."
* Libbre David 37: "If a Jew be called upon to explain any part of the rabbinic books, he ought to give only a false explanation. Who ever will violate this order shall be put to death."
* Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."
* Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of the subertfuce wording."
* Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do no save Goyim in danger of death."
* Hilkkoth Akum X1:"Show no mercy to the Goyim."
* Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."
* Choschen Hamm 266, 1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returnss lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by doing so, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."
* Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."
* Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the wrold are not human beings but beasts."
* Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messia comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."
* Nidrash Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."
* Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."
* Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may vioalte but not marry a non-Jewish girl."
* Rosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."
* Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."
* Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."

Blogger Akulkis September 22, 2014 10:39 PM  

"What does 'SJW' stand for?"

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=sjw


You are too kind.
I prefer

http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com

Blogger Michael Maier September 22, 2014 10:56 PM  

Sevron September 22, 2014 5:54 PM

I feel like this loss of 4chan has been the Left's most salient victory in years.


No joke... 4Chan will hound a family til the dad fucking CROAKS but they have to be politically correct?

Blogger Mekadave September 22, 2014 11:10 PM  

I read somewhere that moot replaced all of the usual 4chan mods with SJWs. Is that correct?

Anonymous TheExpat September 22, 2014 11:18 PM  

4Chan will hound a family til the dad fucking CROAKS but they have to be politically correct?

Not any more. 4Chan was it's members.

Now, it's "Don't fuck with 8Chan."

Blogger Akulkis September 23, 2014 12:46 AM  

Incorrect. The reason you don't see them fighting back is because they have jobs, families, and civic organizations. They're very busy. They don't have the time to crush leftists. They're too busy doing other things. In the long game, they're going exactly what needs to be done to win.

The problem is that the SJW's are often funded doing pointless, makework jobs, by leftists in power... using either family fortune, or government grants, or other forms of tax monies... so that they literally DO have time to sit around all day getting paid while attacking society.

Blogger Akulkis September 23, 2014 12:48 AM  

The SJWs do not have human nature on their side and, as one Ilk pointed out, are seemingly the social Hitlers, the sensitivity police, of our time, trying to produce their version of the Master Race. What's interesting is the rapid spread of their infestation, like diseased roaches, into all of society. They won't win in the end, but the damage they're going to cause may very well be worse than any past conflict in history.

Same playbook as from Soviet Russia...

If you don't believe me, read up on the concept called the "New Soviet Man"

They literally tortured a nation for 80 years with that shit.

Blogger Akulkis September 23, 2014 1:47 AM  

Yep. You can't let them set the terms of the debate,

On that note, NEVER use the term "capitalism." As soon as you use it, you agree to the ENTIRE Marxist argument against any non-Communist socio-politoco-economic structure.

ALWAYS use the term "free market" or "customer-driven economy" or ANYTHING except "Capitalism"

Same thing goes for "Capitalist" ... Instead use "investors"

Blogger Akulkis September 23, 2014 1:54 AM  

All these SJWs, PC, soulsuckers are inspiring me to revive my blog, which due to pretty heavy life stuff and almost terminal lack of time has been defunct for a couple of years. It will require an actual paid revamp and of course I expect to be alienated and rejected even more than my already misanthropic outlook tends to have done so far, but dammit, someone has to shoot back. And no, I don't intend to do things in half-measures. One thing I am 100% in agreement with VD is that these skunk-fart excuse for human beings need to be treated without mercy. And like others have said, they need to be exposed at every turn.
I know from experience their heads pop at that.


Misanthropic Bitch, is that you?

Blogger Akulkis September 23, 2014 1:56 AM  

since it turns out that Moot's girlfriend is involved with Gawker.

So it turns out that Moot is p-whipped.....

HILARIOUS!!!

Blogger Akulkis September 23, 2014 2:03 AM  

The dark enlightenment, if it exists, is in many ways just a mirror image of SJW's.

It's fighting against assholes with their own types of weapons and ammo.

Blogger CM September 23, 2014 6:27 AM  

which is thinking that being reasonable and moderate and fair to the other side is an option

Being merciful is more than just about the hear and now.

But also, being merciful has the power to turn more people to your side than showing none.

You might be a highly intelligent guy, but God's wisdom trumps yours, here.

Showing mercy to one person is not his casting pearls before swine.

Blogger CM September 23, 2014 6:28 AM  

OMG. /melt with embarrassment. *Here and now.

Blogger Desiderius September 23, 2014 7:59 AM  

"Josh, I would argue that Bill Simmons is most certainly a SJW. Just read his latest mailbag about Goodell."

Goodell's the one hiring the feminazis and letting Rice off with a slap on the wrist because DV is a black thing that he wouldn't understand. Just because the SJW's are making hay of it to attack the NFL, doesn't make Goodell the good guy or people that call for his replacement wrong.

Most regular people have had to put up all our lives with blacks, especially star athletes, getting away with all kinds of shit while authorities like Goodell, even "conservative" ones (often, especially conservative ones), look the other way and SJWs shoot down anyone who says anything about it. Now that Simmons, et. al. have trained that cover fire on another target -> Goodell and the owners, there's finally an opening to call for some accountability and apparently there's a groundswell out there driving ratings.

All along, its been "conservatives" like Annenberg, McArthur, Goodell, etc... who have served on the Boards and funded the Foundations that have hired the professors, ministers, producers, etc... who have made the SJW creed ubiquitous. Some of us, likely a bare majority, just live our lives quietly ignoring it, but there's nothing like a viable alternative movement to challenge it at the moment.

Blogger Desiderius September 23, 2014 8:02 AM  

"So it turns out that Moot is p-whipped.....

HILARIOUS!!!"

Same thing happened to Krugman.

Anonymous Michael September 23, 2014 9:19 AM  

Akulkis, "You are too kind.
I prefer

http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com"

Google is part and parcel with the push for social Marxism. They're even cutting ties with a conservative group for denying 'climate change.'

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/la-pn-google-conservative-20140922-story.html%22

I suggest either startpage or duckduckgo as good alternative search engines.

Blogger Mekadave September 23, 2014 10:25 AM  

Same thing happened to Krugman.

Are you saying that Krugman wasn't always a Marxist twat?

Anonymous dark September 23, 2014 10:08 PM  

Brad Wardell makes or is involved with wonderful smart games like gal civ and sins of a solar empire and now I learn he's not a pussy whipped mangina? looking forward to buying gal civ 3 even more now.
As for 4chan it's only a name the guys that made it what it was haven't been killed they will or have just moved on now with a grudge its more a warning about the risks of relieing on the good faith of one person than a win for sjwing.

Blogger Robert What? September 24, 2014 4:48 PM  

The thing I don't get is why these corrupt, colluding publications are still in business? Why haven't male gamers cancelled their subscriptions enmass and removed the shortcuts from their browsers? (ie, drop the bottom out of their website traffic so they lose all their advertisers.) That is the only thing that will make any difference at all. If the male gamers are not willing to do that then expect the gamer establishment to continue to spit on you

Anonymous dark September 24, 2014 10:44 PM  

Who's to say they haven't

Anonymous Anonymous September 25, 2014 9:36 AM  

Robert, it's mostly because this stuff isn't even on their radar. It's like the nerd in high school: he doesn't understand the cliquish social climbing that goes on, doesn't want to understand it, just wants it to leave him alone. It's like a foreign language -- one that sounds like people swearing and spitting on each other. So when he grows up and sees this stuff on gaming sites, his eyes glaze over and he moves on to the info he's looking for. It's automatic. He's not going to engage with it until it forces him to.

Anonymous Rollory September 27, 2014 6:03 AM  

It's really really interesting to see on-topic comments that follow the blog rules and contribute information nobody else has get deep-sixed like that.

Blogger TheCitadel October 02, 2014 10:29 PM  

Just want to point out, that Christians operating in NeoReaction are not merely referred to as Christians, but as either 'Theonomists' or 'Throne & Altar Reactionaries'. Yes, the more secular end of the spectrum has found an intense interest in #Gamergate, but we also find it amusing.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts