ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2019 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Saturday, September 06, 2014

Jack the Ripper was an immigrant Jew

It's rather like finding out Big Ben was made in Hong Kong. But apparently, immigration has been lethal in Britain for longer than we knew:
The Mail on Sunday can exclusively reveal the true identity of Jack the Ripper, the serial killer responsible for  at least five grisly murders in Whitechapel in East London during the autumn of 1888.

DNA evidence has now  shown beyond reasonable doubt which one of six key suspects commonly cited in connection with the Ripper’s reign of terror was the actual killer – and we reveal his identity.

A shawl found by the body of Catherine Eddowes, one of the Ripper’s victims, has been analysed and found to contain DNA from her blood as well as DNA from the killer.

The landmark discovery was made after businessman Russell Edwards, 48, bought the shawl at auction and enlisted the help of Dr Jari Louhelainen, a world-renowned expert in analysing genetic evidence from historical crime scenes.

Using cutting-edge techniques, Dr Louhelainen was able to extract 126-year-old DNA from the material and compare it to DNA from descendants of Eddowes and the suspect, with both proving a perfect match.

The revelation puts an end to the fevered speculation over the Ripper’s identity which has lasted since his murderous rampage in the most impoverished and dangerous streets of London.
It's quite a fascinating story. And yes, the fact that the killer was an immigrant was integral to his eventual unmasking. I wonder if the English will be disappointed to learn that they cannot take credit for London's most famous murderer. I have to confess, I always favored the Sir William Withey Gull theory. This is the face of Jack the Ripper, who, interestingly enough, was always one of the prime suspects and had been named by Chief Inspector Donald Swanson in his notes.

Labels: , ,

115 Comments:

Anonymous Unidentified September 06, 2014 6:43 PM  

The Juews are the men that will not be blamed for nothing

Blogger Salt September 06, 2014 6:51 PM  

The victim here was a prostitute, so the stated record says. How sure is this that he was in fact the Ripper and not merely a John serviced prior to the killing?

Anonymous VD September 06, 2014 6:56 PM  

How sure is this that he was in fact the Ripper and not merely a John serviced prior to the killing?

You'd have to go through the police reports. But considering that the guy ended up in an insane asylum and was always suspected by the police, it's fairly conclusive. Especially since it appears it was his shawl, not hers, on the basis of the dyes.

Anonymous Hunsdon September 06, 2014 6:57 PM  

My faith in the Ilk are confirmed by the very first post.

Blogger Bob September 06, 2014 6:57 PM  

I don't claim to be a Ripperologist, although I own one book on the subject. I rather suspected it was Montague John Druitt, because the murders stopped after his body was found in the Thames. This will also be a disappointment to novelist Patricia Cornwell, who wrote a book nominating a different candidate for the role of the Ripper.

Blogger Salt September 06, 2014 7:00 PM  

From the 2nd link -

He also claimed that Sir John had been devastated he and his Swansea-born wife Lizzie could not have children and was desperate to find methods to increase fertility.

During the Whitechapel murder spree, the Ripper killed women and removed their sexual and internal organs with surgical precision.

'The uterus were removed from the victims, and I believe John Williams wanted to understand the function of the ovaries, their relation to fertility and to see if he could use the organs he removed from the women to complete his research,' said Mr Williams.


Add in the rest of that story and we have motive.

These days DNA is getting people out. Wouldn't it be bizzare if here DNA were to convict the wrong man?

Blogger Anthony September 06, 2014 7:00 PM  

Salt - we can't know for certain, but the shawl was too expensive, and of East European origin, which makes it unlikely that it's from a previous customer. Hypothesizing - if Kosmiski had been an earlier customer, and given Eddowes the shawl (not likely, but not implausible), she'd probably have tucked it away somewhere safe so she could redeem her shoes (!) from the pawnbroker. In which case, it would have his semen, but not her blood in that quantity.

Anonymous PA September 06, 2014 7:00 PM  

I had a rabid leftist professor in college who speculated that Jack the Ripper was Virginia Woolf's half-brother Gerald Duckworth, who is alleged to have sexually assaulted her.

Blogger Salt September 06, 2014 7:01 PM  

Especially since it appears it was his shawl, not hers, on the basis of the dyes.

Payment for service rendered?

Blogger Salt September 06, 2014 7:05 PM  

In which case, it would have his semen, but not her blood in that quantity.

Quite so. But why would she necessarily tuck it away, if even immediately? It's not like she was expecting to be murdered. Perhaps it was a bit cool in London that night.

Anonymous VD September 06, 2014 7:07 PM  

Payment for service rendered?

Way too expensive.

Anonymous The other skeptic September 06, 2014 7:07 PM  

If we could get all the syrupy eulogies for that Jew Joan Rivers off the TV I would be happy.

Anonymous zippo September 06, 2014 7:10 PM  

"Jack the Ripper was an immigrant Jew"

'Immigrant Jew' is redundant.

Anonymous VD September 06, 2014 7:10 PM  

Regarding the Goulston Street graffito: "According to historian Philip Sugden there are at least three permissible interpretations of this particular clue: "All three are feasible, not one capable of proof." The first is that the writing was not the work of the murderer at all: the apron piece was dropped by the writing either incidentally or by design. The second would be to "take the murderer at his word"—a Jew incriminating himself and his people. The third interpretation was, according to Sugden, the one most favoured at the Scotland Yard and by "Old Jewry": The chalk message was a deliberate subterfuge, designed to incriminate the Jews and throw the police off the track of the real murderer.

Keep in mind that Kosmiski was crazy and died in Leavesden Asylum. We're not talking about a pillar of the community here.

Blogger Salt September 06, 2014 7:12 PM  

This is interesting.

Blogger Salt September 06, 2014 7:16 PM  

From the link I posted -

"It is now known that the suspect in question was a man named Aaron Kosminski, a feeble minded imbecile, who was admitted to Colney Hatch Asylum in February 1891, but who had begun displaying signs of insanity at some stage in the late 1880’s. He believed that a higher power spoke to him, and controlled his actions, and claimed to know the movements of all mankind. He refused to wash and would not accept food from others, preferring instead to eat from the gutter."

Interesting such a man would have such an expensive shawl. Also, according to reports the women were all surgically invaded with precision. By an imbicile?

Anonymous X September 06, 2014 7:20 PM  

"A feeble minded imbecile..."

This guy sounds like a boomer. Sorry Vox :^P

Anonymous VD September 06, 2014 7:21 PM  

That does help clinch it, Salt.

In 1910 Sir Robert Anderson, Assistant Commissioner throughout the murders, wrote in his memoirs that "…'undiscovered murders’ are rare in London, and the ‘Jack-the-Ripper’ crimes are not in that category... I will merely add that the only person who had ever had a good view of the murderer unhesitatingly identified the suspect the instant he was confronted with him; but he refused to give evidence against him…In saying that he was a Polish Jew I am merely stating a definitely ascertained fact…"

Although Anderson didn’t name this suspect, it is apparent that he was referring to Macnaghten’s ‘Kosminski,’ a fact confirmed in 1987 when Chief Inspector Donald Swanson’s copy of Anderson’s memoir was made public.

Swanson was the officer tasked with assessing all the information on the Jack the Ripper case, and few people possessed anything like his comprehensive knowledge of the murders....

Swanson made penciled annotations to Anderson’s narrative, and in so doing provided a little more information. Where Anderson talks of a witness "...unhesitatingly identifying their suspect but he refusing to give evidence against him…" Swanson explains that this was "…Because the suspect was also a Jew… and witness would be the means of murderer being hanged which he did not wish to be left on his mind.."

Blogger Daniel Aledo September 06, 2014 7:26 PM  

This is amazing and a historical breakthrough. I have read books on criminal profiling, forensic psychology and most came down to the same conclusion: Aaron Kosminski was likely the culprit.

This gives additional support to the infamous letter from hell who was clearly written by someone whose English was poor (immigrant?). Interestingly the letter contained Catherine Eddowes' kidney, the victim mentioned in the article that helped solve the case.

This must show without doubt that Aaron was the culprit.



Anonymous VD September 06, 2014 7:30 PM  

I don't think the "Kosminski was a customer theory" can possibly hold up. Catherine Eddowes was in jail until a little after 1 AM. Her body was found at 1.45 a.m.

At 12.55am he brought her from the cell and told her she could go. When he asked her name and address for the release papers, she told him it was 'Mary Ann Kelly of 6 Fashion Street.'

Discharging her from custody Hutt pushed open the swing door to the passage and said 'This way Misses.' As she walked along the passage to the outer door, she asked him what time it was. "Too late for you to get anymore drink," observed Hutt. "I shall get a Damned fine hiding when I get home," she sighed as she opened the door. Hutt was not in the least bit sympathetic "And serve you right," he replied, "you have no right to get drunk."

As Kate left the station, Hutt asked her to shut the door behind her. "All right" she chirped "Good Night Old Cock."

So saying she turned left and headed off towards Houndsditch. According to Hutt’s later estimation it would have taken her around eight minutes "ordinary walking" to reach Mitre Square, during which time the murderer of Elizabeth Stride was also heading towards the square from the opposite direction.

Blogger Salt September 06, 2014 7:32 PM  

Doesn't clinch anything unless it can be shown he had surgical training.

Anonymous VD September 06, 2014 7:43 PM  

Doesn't clinch anything unless it can be shown he had surgical training.

Irrelevant. The claims of surgical precision are disputed by the record.

"In each case the mutilation was inflicted by a person who had no scientific nor anatomical knowledge. In my opinion he does not even possess the technical knowledge of a butcher or horse slaughterer or a person accustomed to cut up dead animals."
- Dr. Thomas Bond

Blogger Salt September 06, 2014 7:45 PM  

Also, when did she acquire the shawl? I've read nothing that she did not have it prior, only that she had it that night. Also, his being a bit of an imbecile, why would he not give it to her if she were to ask? How she got it, or it got there, we do not know. Now, if it is his, being the imbecile he is, he leaves it at the scene of the crime, does that sound like someone with surgically precise skills in removing their sexual organs?

Blogger Markku September 06, 2014 7:46 PM  

The Juews are the men that will not be blamed for nothing

Juwes.

Blogger Salt September 06, 2014 7:51 PM  

He retired from practice in 1903, so why did he keep the surgical knife and glass slides among the personal possessions he left in the library?'

From Vox's 2nd link -

When the killings suddenly stopped, Sir John is claimed to have told friends he'd had a nervous breakdown and retired from London life - moving to Aberystwyth in West Wales.

Mr Williams has uncovered documents showing his ancestor carried out an abortion in 1885 on Mary Ann Nichols - who later became the Ripper's first victim.

Mr Williams even discovered a letter sent by Sir John in 1888 in which he apologises for canceling an evening dinner appointment on September 8 because he had to go to a clinic in Whitechapel.

That was the date the Ripper's second victim Annie Chapman was murdered.

He also matched a knife in Sir John's collection with the pathologist's description of the murder weapon and found that three medical slides from Sir John's collection contained smears from a human uterus.


From my link -

He had a great hatred of women, especially of the prostitute class

Interesting he'd go for removing their sexual organs.


Blogger Salt September 06, 2014 7:55 PM  

The claims of surgical precision are disputed by the record.

Claims of him being homicidal are also disputed. The detective says X, the asylum says Y.

Anonymous Shabbos Goy September 06, 2014 7:58 PM  

Odd.... This was not mentioned in Synagogue this morning....

Blogger Daniel Aledo September 06, 2014 8:07 PM  

"Mr Williams even discovered a letter sent by Sir John in 1888 in which he apologises for canceling an evening dinner appointment on September 8 because he had to go to a clinic in Whitechapel.

That was the date the Ripper's second victim Annie Chapman was murdered."

Let us assume, for sake of the argument, that Williams murdered Chapman. How does that get Kosminski off the hook?
They have DNA from a murder case. He was schizophrenic of a violent type. People who are insane and murder are disorganized killers. And the murders of Jack the ripper are anything but clean or organized.

Come on, killing on a street when a large contingent of the police is looking for you shows that you are not quite there.

Also, don't forget that the "canonical murders" stopped when Kosminski went to an asylum.

Blogger Salt September 06, 2014 8:11 PM  

If Kosmiski's an imbecile, having "great hatred of women, especially of the prostitute class" and having no knowlege of anatomy nor even skills of a butcher to remove the victims sexual organs, he seems more the type to kill a la Looking For Mr. Goodbar type protrayed in that wonderfully grizzly film.

Anonymous VD September 06, 2014 8:11 PM  

Now, if it is his, being the imbecile he is, he leaves it at the scene of the crime, does that sound like someone with surgically precise skills in removing their sexual organs?

"In each case the mutilation was inflicted by a person who had no scientific nor anatomical knowledge. In my opinion he does not even possess the technical knowledge of a butcher or horse slaughterer or a person accustomed to cut up dead animals."
- Dr. Thomas Bond

Again, there weren't any "surgically precise skills". Dr. Bond made the only professional determination at the police's request. The idea that Jack the Ripper had "surgically precise skills" came about only because the organs had been removed. That was why "butchers, slaughterers, surgeons and physicians were suspected because of the manner of the mutilations."

Blogger Salt September 06, 2014 8:13 PM  

Also, don't forget that the "canonical murders" stopped when Kosminski went to an asylum.

"When the killings suddenly stopped, Sir John is claimed to have told friends he'd had a nervous breakdown and retired from London life - moving to Aberystwyth in West Wales."

Anonymous VD September 06, 2014 8:15 PM  

So there is a witness. There is DNA. There is the broken English of the From Hell letter and in the equally strange Goulston Street graffito. And there are no "surgically precise skills" to be explained.

Blogger Salt September 06, 2014 8:15 PM  

"In each case the mutilation was inflicted by a person who had no scientific nor anatomical knowledge. In my opinion he does not even possess the technical knowledge of a butcher or horse slaughterer or a person accustomed to cut up dead animals."
- Dr. Thomas Bond

That was why "butchers, slaughterers, surgeons and physicians were suspected because of the manner of the mutilations."

He didn't possess even those skills.

Blogger Salt September 06, 2014 8:19 PM  

So there is a witness. There is DNA. There is the broken English of the From Hell letter and in the equally strange Goulston Street graffito. And there are no "surgically precise skills" to be explained.

Witness refused to testify. DNA only connects the two together, does not prove he killed her. As to the skills he did not have... the good doctor did. And, he had motive.

Even with the DNA it is all insufficiant to convict.

Anonymous VD September 06, 2014 8:21 PM  

He didn't possess even those skills.

Neither did the Ripper. You're repeatedly missing the point. The media and the police WRONGLY believed the Ripper had an amount of anatomical knowledge just because he cut out the organs. Then when the police asked an actual surgeon to examine one of his victims, the surgeon informed them otherwise.

Blogger Cataline Sergius September 06, 2014 8:22 PM  

Aaron Kosminski, had always seemed to be the most likely suspect from my perspective. I know it's dull but he was the common sense fit.

Anyone know if they did any DNA work on the From Hell letter? Mitochondrial should suffice. It wasn't proven for certain that I know of that it was Catherine Eddowes' kidney. It was the correct kidney of someone with Bright's disease.

It wasn't just poor English. It sounded like something a serial killer would write.

Anonymous VD September 06, 2014 8:23 PM  

Witness refused to testify. DNA only connects the two together, does not prove he killed her. As to the skills he did not have... the good doctor did.

For the third time: "In each case the mutilation was inflicted by a person who had no scientific nor anatomical knowledge. In my opinion he does not even possess the technical knowledge of a butcher or horse slaughterer or a person accustomed to cut up dead animals."
- Dr. Thomas Bond

Your favored candidate is exonerated on that grounds alone. Again, the Ripper had no such skills.

Blogger Cataline Sergius September 06, 2014 8:24 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Cataline Sergius September 06, 2014 8:24 PM  

By correct kidney I mean it correlated to the correct side of the one taken from Eddowes.

Sorry.

Anonymous majneb September 06, 2014 8:29 PM  

Vox, do you think the Cathedral will ignore or fight this because it implicates not only an immigrant but a Jew?

Blogger Salt September 06, 2014 8:30 PM  

Your favored candidate is exonerated on that grounds alone. Again, the Ripper had no such skills.

I see your point, Vox. Curious though, as it's explicitly stated he removed their sexual organs. Not that he totally gutted them of all organs. How did he know which ones to go for?

Anonymous VD September 06, 2014 8:30 PM  

You're clinging to a dismissed myth, Salt.

"Jack the Ripper was not methodical, and neither was he clinically skilled.... A close examination of the evidence, preserved for posterity by Dr Frederick Gordon Brown, leads inexorably to the conclusion that the amateur killer of Catherine Eddowes employed methods that were crude in the extreme. There is little or no evidence the killer possessed anything more than a broad knowledge of where the organs were located, and although Dr Brown believed that the killer possessed such knowledge, he never once stated that the killer possessed any surgical skill."

And, of course, Dr. Bond reached the same conclusions that those who have examined Brown's recorded evidence reached.

Anonymous VD September 06, 2014 8:33 PM  

Vox, do you think the Cathedral will ignore or fight this because it implicates not only an immigrant but a Jew?

No, it's too long ago and too famous. And not even the most insane Hamas supporter is going to try to blame the Whitechapel murders on Netanyahu.

Anonymous karsten September 06, 2014 8:36 PM  

Vox, do you think the Cathedral will ignore or fight this because it implicates not only an immigrant but a Jew?

The Daily Mail article itself already began the practice by calling the man "Polish" rather than what he really was: a Jew.

Which proves for the thousandth time that Mendacious Moldburg's term "Cathedral" is a calculated misdirect on behalf of his kin:

It's a Synagogue, not a Cathedral.

Anonymous VD September 06, 2014 8:36 PM  

How did he know which ones to go for?

Presumably because they are connected to the vagina, I suppose.

Anonymous X September 06, 2014 8:38 PM  

"And, of course, Dr. Bond reached the same conclusions that those who have examined Brown's recorded evidence reached."

There is also the moniker the "ripper" instead of as say the "surgeon".

Anonymous X September 06, 2014 8:41 PM  

correction: instead of saying...

Blogger Daniel Aledo September 06, 2014 8:41 PM  

"When the killings suddenly stopped, Sir John is claimed to have told friends he'd had a nervous breakdown and retired from London life - moving to Aberystwyth in West Wales."

First, I notice that you do not address my point that insane murderers are messy and willing to take risks rational people do not take, (murder on a street while police is looking for you, for example.)

Second, you're changing the subject: How does any of this show that Kosminski did not murder Catherine Eddowes, despite the evidence?

Third: If Sir john had a nervous breakdown when the crimes stopped... How do you know this was caused by the crimes rather than something else? I'll happily wait for your evidence.

Fourth: the paragraph you provided is a bit odd, isn't it? "Sir John is claimed to have told friends he'd had a nervous breakdown..."

Who, in specific, claimed that he had nervous breakdown? notice that it says, " (it) is claimed to have told his friends." rather than than, " his friends claimed." What's going on with this source? Who claimed he had nervous breakdown?

Fifth: Again, If sir John was a serial killer...Why did he stop? Serial murder is addictive, believe it or not, and it is a psychological fact. Also serial killers who are not insane have a cool-down period between murders, but these murders happened quickly: symptoms of a disorganized killer, an Insane person like Kosmiski.

I rest my case.

Anonymous Azimus September 06, 2014 8:41 PM  


The other skepticSeptember 06, 2014 7:07 PM
If we could get all the syrupy eulogies for that Jew Joan Rivers off the TV I would be happy.


Mr Beale says turn off the most awesome propaganda machine in the whole godless world then.

Anonymous FUBAR Nation Ben September 06, 2014 8:42 PM  

Damn, I always though Jack the Ripper was Jack Nicholson in The Shining.

Here's Jacky!

Blogger Cataline Sergius September 06, 2014 8:44 PM  

Interestingly, I don't think that knowing the real identity of killer is going to do anything to dispel the myth of Jack the Ripper.

The well dressed faceless man, silhouetted in fog and strolling through the streets of White Chapel. The homicidal artist determined to peel back the pristine white bandage of Victorianism and make the world look at the puss soaked, seeping, gangrenous wound at the heart of the British Empire.

Reality is not going to stop a trope like that.

Blogger Salt September 06, 2014 8:52 PM  

You're clinging to a dismissed myth, Salt.

I'm not clinging to anything. Just trying to punch holes in the story, see that the wrong man doesn't get convicted.

Anonymous Wyrd September 06, 2014 9:02 PM  

Jack The Ripperz was teh jewz? Dang, I haz to discount me fadder's side of teh familiez...

Anonymous majneb September 06, 2014 9:02 PM  

Vox you may be right that this matter is too old for the Cathedral to care about, but I'm not so sure. It seems that radio silence is already being implemented.

Anonymous buckeyecopperhead September 06, 2014 9:20 PM  

Well, well. Jack revealed as a grubby Polish Jew will certainly disappoint the well-moistened females who envisioned the Ripper as a well-bred, but bad boy, English gentleman.

Anonymous Scotty September 06, 2014 9:22 PM  

Someone can hack out organs like they prepare a chicken for the barbie........they can do a generally decent job, but "surgical skill " requires one not to leave relevant tissue and not extract irrelevant tissue.

This is not rocket science.

Dammit, Jim, its surgery!

Anonymous Wyrd September 06, 2014 9:24 PM  

Chicken surgery, yo!

Anonymous PAPIST FIRST September 06, 2014 9:34 PM  

I BLAME PROTESTANTISM AND MARTIN LUTHER

Anonymous X September 06, 2014 9:37 PM  

"He is often described as having been a hairdresser in Whitechapel, the occupation written on his admission papers to the workhouse in 1890." - thedailymail

Hmmm...

Medieval barbers were also surgeons. Just saying.

Blogger Random September 06, 2014 9:38 PM  

Luther was German, PF.

We're discussing England, so blame King Henry of the Hormones.

Anonymous Anonymous September 06, 2014 9:40 PM  

the one most favoured at the Scotland Yard and by "Old Jewry": The chalk message was a deliberate subterfuge, designed to incriminate the Jews and throw the police off the track of the real murderer.

Interesting that the police had the graffito sponged away before even a photograph was taken, out of fear it could stir up riots against Jews.

Anonymous LT September 06, 2014 9:44 PM  

"I will merely add that the only person who had ever had a good view of the murderer unhesitatingly identified the suspect the instant he was confronted with him; but he refused to give evidence against him…In saying that he was a Polish Jew I am merely stating a definitely ascertained fact."

"Where Anderson talks of a witness "...unhesitatingly identifying their suspect but he refusing to give evidence against him…" Swanson explains that this was "…Because the suspect was also a Jew… and witness would be the means of murderer being hanged which he did not wish to be left on his mind.."

I wonder if he wouldn't testify because the accused was also a Jew and there was some kind of taboo against a Jew testifying against another Jew. I guess ethnocentrism existed even back then.

Anonymous Wyrd September 06, 2014 9:50 PM  

I BLAME PROTESTANTISM AND MARTIN LUTHER

I would too if I didn't look so much like Martin Luther, the bastid....

Anonymous Theodoric of York September 06, 2014 10:07 PM  

Medieval barbers were also surgeons.

Bleed him! Attach the leeches!!

Anonymous 11B September 06, 2014 10:09 PM  

The Daily Mail article itself already began the practice by calling the man "Polish" rather than what he really was: a Jew.

Doesn't the British media already use "Polish" when referring to the negative aspects of immigration?

Anonymous Jerome Horowitz September 06, 2014 10:21 PM  

My how England has advanced, back 126 years ago immigrants murdered women in the shadows of night. Now immigrants murder soldiers in the day light and then behead them. How much more progress can England make?

Anonymous majneb September 06, 2014 10:25 PM  

Other than the original article the MSM appear to be enforcing a complete blackout on this. A little odd.

Anonymous zen0 September 06, 2014 10:33 PM  

How much more progress can England make?


And did those feet in ancient time
Walk upon England's mountains green?
And was the holy Lamb of God
On England's pleasant pastures seen?

And did the Countenance Divine
Shine forth upon our clouded hills?
And was Jerusalem builded here
Among these dark Satanic mills?

Bring me my bow of burning gold:
Bring me my arrows of desire:
Bring me my spear: O clouds unfold!
Bring me my chariot of fire.

I will not cease from mental fight,
Nor shall my sword sleep in my hand
Till we have built Jerusalem
In England's green and pleasant land.

Anonymous Incurvatus September 06, 2014 10:56 PM  

Commenters mentioned the relative silence in the media. I had posted the dailymail link on Facebook, and when I clicked it, FB warned that dailymail.co.uk was a spam site. Hmmmmm.

Blogger Galt-in-Da-Box September 06, 2014 11:00 PM  

"OY MEIN GAWATT, zhat'z yusht vhat Ay alvayz zuspectet abaht yeu, Vox...YEH ANTIZEMITICK!!! *sob-sob* $chmaa! $CHMAA!!!"
~Khazar Bank$ta

Blogger IM2L844 September 06, 2014 11:31 PM  

This is old news. One of those ghost hunter shows on the SyFy channel solve this case last year. Not so funny now, is it, Mr. Doubting Thomas McSkeptic? :|

Anonymous takin' a look September 06, 2014 11:52 PM  

Majneb-

Well it did just come out a few hours ago and it's the weekend, it will probably pick up over the next two weeks and be a major news story, after all, it is the original serial killer news sensation.

I managed to type that with a straight face.

Somewhat contra Vox, as evidenced by the fact ALL the news outlets are an incestuous collaboration as Conan O' Brian so embarrassingly showed; this is not good for the jews, both little brethren and big brethren. All the shills, trolls and the like for the jews are flummoxed by this. They will attack it of course, but it shouldn't have ever seen the light of day in the first place. Remember, social engineering and mind fucking can and does come back to bite the psychos in the ass. The Mishpucha has been very aggressive the last couple of years, it's getting very blatant.

Of course, just how in the hell did this slip pass the kosher censors in the first place?

Blogger Markku September 07, 2014 12:21 AM  

I BLAME PROTESTANTISM AND MARTIN LUTHER

Protestantism also leads to runaway global warming.

"Come home to Rome!", pleads a cute, drowning polar bear cub as his dying words.

Anonymous Action Bronson September 07, 2014 12:22 AM  

I doubt the MSM will pick up the story. If they do, expect a swastika to appear on a Brooklyn synagogue the next day.

Blogger IM2L844 September 07, 2014 12:25 AM  

Of course, just how in the hell did this slip pass the kosher censors in the first place?

There has always been a faction of self-loathing Jewry. Some of the original and most strident anti-Zionists are Jews. Reminds me a little of the white guilt of the SJW.

Anonymous A Plate of Shrimp September 07, 2014 12:38 AM  

Eh, I still say it was Oscar Wilde.

Blogger AdognamedOp September 07, 2014 1:09 AM  

Kool water color portrait. Kinda looks like Quint - Robert Shaw from Jaws.
I could picture the late Shaw starring in a JTR movie and giving a USS Indianapolis type speech where he describes removing a vulva or something in detail. Hoopppaaaa.

Anonymous Anonymous September 07, 2014 1:19 AM  

If it is him, boo. I was really hoping it was H.H. Holmes.

Holmes is, surprisingly, little-known these days, even though his story is very vivid and bloody. He was American serial killer who was greatly theatrical, had a very high number of victims, traveled frequently, and, supposedly, mysteriously disappeared from the U.S.at the exact time the Ripper murders happened in London and then supposedly reappeared in the U.S. when the murders stopped. "The Devil in the White City" chronicles Holmes's Horror Hotel, so fantastic it's hard to believe.

Bonus: Holmes had been trained as a doctor, though Vox has clearly offered strong counter-evidence to the "surgical precision" argument.

Anonymous Daniel September 07, 2014 1:32 AM  

One of the best things about it being reasonably solved is that you can use the truth to test it against the extensive former theories of the other suspects, and sort of reverse engineer the faults in the careful, but incorrect, theories.

For example, many of the eyewitness accounts of the Titanic going vertical on its final descent were dismissed (both immediately and for years afterward) as a) impossible and b) the result of mass shock. Once the ship was discovered and virtually reconstructed, it became apparent that she really did fill up and go vertical: the witnesses were correct.

What this also did was put to shame the reliance on mass hallucination as a plausible event, not necessarily because it disproved mass hallucination by a single instance where it did not occur, but because it was one of the more well-known suspected mass hallucination events in modern times.

Jack the Ripper as the dark side of a sophisticated upper class pleasant-faced man from hell has always been the romanticized fantasy. Now, one can go back and deconstruct the false "bulletproof" theories to identify the blind spot patterns in historical speculation.

DNA research has also put the bullet in Darwin's racist pseudoscience, and likewise provides the conclusive evidence against which its falsehoods may now be measured.

Anonymous Noah B. September 07, 2014 1:43 AM  

"I could picture the late Shaw starring in a JTR movie and giving a USS Indianapolis type speech where he describes removing a vulva or something in detail. Hoopppaaaa."

As much I loved Robert Shaw, I'm really glad that movie didn't get made.

Anonymous Noah B. September 07, 2014 1:45 AM  

"Other than the original article the MSM appear to be enforcing a complete blackout on this. A little odd."

Ignoring the news that doesn't fit their statist worldview is the media's SOP.

Blogger Akulkis September 07, 2014 2:58 AM  


I wonder if he wouldn't testify because the accused was also a Jew and there was some kind of taboo against a Jew testifying against another Jew. I guess ethnocentrism existed even back then.


It's nothing new for the Jews. The Talmud gives Jews arguments to be utterly dishonest and to commit the most unspeakable crimes, all in good conscience.

Blogger Akulkis September 07, 2014 3:06 AM  

The Talmud is the doctrine of the Pharisees, and we all know what Jesus thought of their teachings.

Anonymous VanDerMerwe September 07, 2014 3:28 AM  

"'Immigrant Jew' is redundant."

Daily Mail says he was a Polish immigrant. He must have been a Roman Catholic.

Anonymous Noah B. September 07, 2014 3:48 AM  

I thought they figured out that Kozminsky was the ripper long ago. I even saw it on the Discovery Channel.

Blogger Akulkis September 07, 2014 3:52 AM  

Maybe so, but this is the first really hard evidence.

Blogger Markku September 07, 2014 3:53 AM  

Daily Mail says he was a Polish immigrant. He must have been a Roman Catholic.

If you are insinuating that the article writer is afraid to name his ethnicity, then see how it clearly says "a Polish Jew who had fled to London".

Anonymous Noah B. September 07, 2014 4:05 AM  

He was Polish? Cool, we're finally famous for something besides losing wars.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus September 07, 2014 4:13 AM  

LT: "I wonder if he wouldn't testify because the accused was also a Jew and there was some kind of taboo against a Jew testifying against another Jew."

There always was and there still is; it's called mesirah.

LT: "I guess ethnocentrism existed even back then."

Your guess is correct.

This article on the word "kibosh" is illustrative of Jewish attitudes in London fifty years earlier:

-

Another early example came out of a court case at the Mansion House in the City of London before the Lord Mayor the following year. It related to purported threats of murder by other Jews against an immigrant German Jew named Myers because, Myers said, they believed him to have naturalised, converted to Judaism, which was considered unacceptable:

Please you, my lord, I an’t no such a thing; I am a real Jew, and I never was naturalized. They say so to rise [raise?] the kibosh against me, and my vife, vot I vas a valking mid, vhen they comes down upon us. Ve goes reglar to the synagogue, and the gentlemen knows it.
The Sun (London), 15 May 1835.


The Lord Mayor clearly found Myers and his wife to be unreliable witnesses; the defendants described Myers as “the very worst of beggars and imposters”, with Mrs Myers going about in a turban begging in the streets with her children; a spectator claimed to have seen the whole family “as black as chimney sweeps”, a curious echo of the case the previous year, though the darkening of the skin was presumably to make them seem more exotic. Later in his evidence, Myers said he couldn’t swear to Jews having struck him, but he added “They get other Jews to give me the kibosh upon me, and its all the same to me which of the whole set struck me. All I say, is, that me and my poor wife vill be killed at last by them. They are all against us — all the Jews.”

-

They were not exactly pillars of the community, but what mattered was not "are they good people?" ot "have they behaved lawfully?" but "are they real [blood, not converted] Jews?" That was life and death.

If Jack the Ripper was a real Jew, and there was no reason to doubt that he was, there was good reason for Jews, or even those under the influence of Jews, not to report him to non-Jewish authorities or to testify against him.

Anonymous kh123 September 07, 2014 5:24 AM  

So the Juwes tag was a fairly straight forward thing after all.

This should be the epitaph for Bienes and Madoff.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus September 07, 2014 5:30 AM  

kh123: "So the Juwes tag was a fairly straight forward thing after all."

Yes. It was the simple truth.

Jack the Ripper had a cloak of invisibility. It's called mesirah.

That cloak is still in use.

Blogger Bogey September 07, 2014 7:23 AM  

Especially since it appears it was his shawl, not hers, on the basis of the dyes.

That could mean he didn't even use Catherine Eddowes services. He could have used the shawl as a nappy after he had sex with another woman and never washed it.

Anonymous PC September 07, 2014 8:20 AM  

"the man who identified the murderer was a Jew, but on learning that the criminal was a Jew he refused to proceed with his identification"

Interesting talk about Sir Robert Anderson and the jewish suspect.

http://bit.ly/YmVIGX

sounds like the recent kerfuffle in rotherham.

Anonymous Samson J. September 07, 2014 8:27 AM  

Well, this is the most depressing thing I've read in a while. 19th-century legends should remain in the 19th century, shrouded in mystery

Anonymous bw September 07, 2014 8:37 AM  

I BLAME PROTESTANTISM AND MARTIN LUTHER


"Therefore know, my dear Christian, that next to the devil
you have no more bitter, more poisonous, more vehement an enemy
than a real Jew who earnestly desires to be a Jew.
It all agrees with the judgement of Christ that they are poisonous, bitter, vindictive and malicious serpents, assassins and children of the devils
who kill and inflict injuries by stealth because they cannot do so openly."

Martin Luther, On the Jews and Their Lies


Blogger RC September 07, 2014 9:04 AM  

By way of amusement, it was a bit of a gaffe that the article described the DNA techniques used in the discovery as "cutting-edge."

Anonymous Storm Saxon's Gall Bladder September 07, 2014 11:29 AM  

My personal favorite theory is still that there was no such person as Jack the Ripper. It goes thus:

Every medical student in London knew the alley where corpses were held by the night shift.

Some trollop got killed and her body was left in a cart in the alley beside the police station where medical students cut it up a bit and took some homework material.

Another trull got kilt, much the same .

Being a slow news month a reporter sent a letter to the Central News Agency, the brand new clearing house for news stories shared by all the newspapers but which was unknown to the general public. "I am down on whores and shan't quit ripping them."

Hysteria followed, and three men decide this would be a good time to get rid of their troublesome gel or common-law wife and a quick bit of amateurish cutting would let the mythical "Jack" take the credit.

Reporters were at all the murder scenes and since i really dislike the press they can write on walls and drop bits of apron and keep the story going.

The bodies were cut up with both medical skill and with clumsy butchering. There are bodies enough for all five of your favorite suspects to have killed one of them. Journalists have not changed a bit since then. You can still blame a jew if you so inclined.

That said, i like the mysterious gentleman with a nice hat and a gleam of madness stalking through the fog, hands clutching a razor and a specimen jar, collecting bits for the ghastly experiments awaiting in his laboratory. Probably not true but good material for movies.


Anonymous The other skeptic September 07, 2014 11:46 AM  

Even Drudge wont touch it, it seems.

Blogger Bogey September 07, 2014 1:02 PM  

Drudge has been a bore for sometime now, he misses a lot of interesting stuff.

Blogger Akulkis September 07, 2014 1:47 PM  

Sent the link directly to his email (address is on lower 1/3 of the right-hand column of his page).. We'll see if it shows up.

So far, a half-dozen sites have picked ujp the story, including yahoo.uk. It's Sunday during one of the last warm weekends of summer. The 3rd-stringers are working the newsrooms. Let's see what happens on Monday.

Anonymous Abie Gefiltefish September 07, 2014 1:58 PM  

Swanson made penciled annotations to Anderson’s narrative, and in so doing provided a little more information. Where Anderson talks of a witness "...unhesitatingly identifying their suspect but he refusing to give evidence against him…" Swanson explains that this was "…Because the suspect was also a Jew… and witness would be the means of murderer being hanged which he did not wish to be left on his mind.."

In all fairness to the witness who would not testify, it was not just a matter of personal guilt: he had very specific religious obligations NOT to cooperate with the goy authorities against a fellow Jew.

Jewish law or "halacha" requires (among many other things) that Jews (1) do their best to get fellow Jews released from captivity; and (2) not "rat out" a Jew to the goyim in the first place.

This is not some past practice. It occurs now. Check out www.failed messiah.com. It has a ton of articles about the Jewish community in New York City shielding child molesters--even molesters of JEWISH children. Go to the rabbi first, and if he permits it, you then go to the police. But always go to the rabbi first to see if it can be handled internally.

As Fallen Messiah explains at length, if you DO go to the police first and thereby kick up a media relations sh!tstorm that damages the reputation of the Jewish community, you will be expelled and/or beaten.

Anonymous takin' a look September 07, 2014 2:37 PM  

A little bit gay, but funny.
http://i.imgur.com/SJGP4Qi.jpg

Blogger Bogey September 07, 2014 3:38 PM  

By way of amusement, it was a bit of a gaffe that the article described the DNA techniques used in the discovery as "cutting-edge."

I noticed a lot of people especially Reddit folks aren't actually reading for details.

"It has taken a great deal of hard work, using cutting-edge scientific techniques which would not have been possible five years ago."

"Months of research on the shawl, including analysing the dyes used, had proved that it was made in Eastern Europe in the early 19th Century. Now it was time to attempt to prove that it contained the killer's DNA."

As Vox stated this was the killer's shawl.

"To extract DNA samples from the stains on the shawl, I used a technique I developed myself, which I call 'vacuuming' - to pull the original genetic material from the depths of the cloth."

"I filled a sterile pipette with a liquid 'buffer', a solution known to stabilise the cells and DNA, and injected it into the cloth to dissolve the material trapped in the weave of the fabric without damaging the cells, then sucked it out. "

"They were from the epithelium, a type of tissue which coats organs. In this case, it was likely to have come from the urethra during ejaculation."

So not actually sperm but the cells that coat the inside of the urethra.

Anonymous Godfrey September 07, 2014 4:45 PM  

Kosminski was always my lead suspect. He fit the profile.

Anonymous TroperA September 07, 2014 7:36 PM  

Kosminski was always my lead suspect. He fit the profile.

He was my top suspect as well. It's hard to believe a man could commit a murder spree like that and just disappear into the ether--not when so many people were after him and were so willing and eager to publicize his name and identity. This can be logically explained by a coverup--the police kept his identity a secret because they knew if word got out that there was a Jewish immigrant slicing up native Britons, there would be riots in the streets. The police had the man under surveillance/in custody, and thus knew he wouldn't be doing any more harm so why stir things up if you don't have to?

If the Ripper Murders had happened today, the police would probably have let the guy go free because they didn't want to appear racist. If they had kept him in custody, the media would have downplayed his crime and the UK would have given a collective, apathetic shrug. No worries about THIS generation of Britons rioting over the death of a few native white girls....

Anonymous Godfrey September 07, 2014 8:59 PM  

Now on to the "Black Dahlia" case. My lead suspect in this case is the LA doctor, the one who is the father of one of her girlfriends. I forgot the name.

Anonymous zippo September 07, 2014 11:48 PM  

So can we now start calling him Yakov the Ripper?

Anonymous majneb September 08, 2014 4:02 AM  

Still radio silence from the MSM on this. Care to change your prediction, Vox?

Blogger Markku September 08, 2014 4:14 AM  

I just came home from town, and the tabloids were all screaming "Finn solved Jack the Ripper -case" as their number one item.

Anonymous Anonymous September 08, 2014 1:50 PM  

And, as it's now come out, Hillary Rodham-Clinton is a direct descendant:

http://nationalreport.net/hillary-clinton-descendent-jack-ripper-dna-shows/

The sins of the father, unto the seventh generation.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus September 09, 2014 2:52 AM  

Markku: "I just came home from town, and the tabloids were all screaming "Finn solved Jack the Ripper -case" as their number one item."

Legitimate pride.

And an absence of fear. Which is how the mystery got solved.

Blogger Akulkis September 09, 2014 10:55 AM  

Here in the U.S., the news media are trying to ignore it.

Anonymous Jonathan September 10, 2014 8:19 PM  

He obviously killed them because Nazis.

Blogger MaM September 16, 2014 6:59 PM  

What a dreadful piece of disinformation.

1. There is no none photo or likeness to date. None has been found anywhere.
2. It has NOT been proven. MtrDNA was found. Only nuclear DNA can identify one individual. Why do bloggers like this waste everyone's time?

Blogger MaM September 16, 2014 7:04 PM  

No it's not. It was MtrDNA that was found. Only nuclear DNA can be linked to one individual.
There is no known likeness, to date of him. The blogger is pig ignorant and wasting everyone's time.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts