ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Saturday, December 20, 2014

She won't ride with her

The only place my Australian fan's famous dialogue took place was in her head:
Confession time. In my Facebook status, I editorialised. She wasn’t sitting next to me. She was a bit away, towards the other end of the carriage. Like most people she had been looking at her phone, then slowly started to unpin her scarf. Tears sprang to my eyes and I was struck by feelings of anger, sadness and bitterness. It was in this mindset that I punched the first status update into my phone, hoping my friends would take a moment to think about the victims of the siege who were not in the cafe.

I spent the rest of the journey staring—rudely—at the back of her uncovered head. I wanted to talk to her, but had no idea what to say. Anything that came to mind seemed tokenistic and patronising. She might not even be Muslim or she could have just been warm! Besides, I was in the “quiet carriage” where even conversation is banned.

By sheer fluke, we got off at the same station, and some part of me decided saying something would be a good thing. Rather than quiz her about her choice of clothing, I thought if I simply offered to walk her to her destination, it might help.
It’s hard to describe the moment when humans, and complete strangers, have a conversation with no words. I wanted to tell her I was sorry for so many things—for overstepping the mark, for making assumptions about a complete stranger and for belonging to a culture where racism was part of her everyday experience.

But none of those words came out, and our near silent encounter was over in a moment.
Another day, another media fraud perpetrated by SJWs eager to believe the word of a mentally unstable woman.

Labels:

157 Comments:

Anonymous Dirtnapninja December 20, 2014 12:04 PM  

Another Pious fraud

Blogger Michael Maier December 20, 2014 12:08 PM  

But we did get some hilarious parody meme pics out of it so we have that going for us.

Anonymous zen0 December 20, 2014 12:21 PM  

How many races are there again? Does this mean Christian is a race also? It is hard to keep up with the SJW categories. It is almost as if they just make stuff up.

Anonymous Ain December 20, 2014 12:26 PM  

Leave it to SJWs to find a completely useless thing to feel proud of and pat their own backs over.

Anonymous Trimegistus December 20, 2014 12:30 PM  

New rule of thumb: any media story based on a woman's testimony should be assumed to be false. She's either lying or mistaken.

Anonymous Is it all in my head? December 20, 2014 12:39 PM  

Classic example of a female living inside her head as if it was the real world. It is innate. It's how they are, to some degree. It's why so many women in the West are on various psychotropic prescription drugs. And before the "men do that too!' shrieks show up, yeah, I know, it was Phillip K. Dick who defined "reality" as that which remains when you stop believing in it. But the fact remains, solipsism is very, very female.

Something to keep in mind when dealing not just with SJW women, but all women.

Anonymous Northy December 20, 2014 12:53 PM  

Speaking of Muslims, I am warming to the Islamic idea that there should be 4 female eyewitness accounts to challenge that of one man.

Blogger Rantor December 20, 2014 1:09 PM  

That's right, can't say something when you are in the quiet carriage. Society would frown on an act of decency if it involved any noise in the quiet carriage. If someone has a heart attack, make sure they gasp quietly and don't count chest pumps out loud, they might disturb the piece, he'll chest pumps may be too loud. Someone choking? Walk them to the next car so no one gets upset if they make noises when you perform the Heimlich maneuver.

Anonymous Northy December 20, 2014 1:13 PM  

@Rantor

This woman has no problem throwing her(?) race under the bus, but she does not want to break decorum in the "quiet carriage".

Anonymous Haven Monahan December 20, 2014 1:14 PM  

She should have contacted me. I would have helped her in any way possible.

Blogger Rantor December 20, 2014 1:15 PM  

So the heroine was cowed by society's need for quiet... Sorry, I just find this freekin' lame. In version three, we'lol learn that no, she wasn't in the quiet carriage, and that actually she saw a woman who took a scarf off from around her neck, and that made her think of this terrible scene that she could imagine transpire get in a quiet wagon, and she cried.... Oh the agony.

And the tweete were running at over a hundred a minute last week as everyone shared in this non-moment. This imagined incident. In version four we'll learn she was actually riding in a cab and her shoe came untied and it was like removing a head scarf... Auugh

Blogger The Anti-Gnostic December 20, 2014 1:23 PM  

Classic example of a female living inside her head as if it was the real world. It is innate. It's how they are, to some degree. It's why so many women in the West are on various psychotropic prescription drugs. And before the "men do that too!' shrieks show up, yeah, I know, it was Phillip K. Dick who defined "reality" as that which remains when you stop believing in it. But the fact remains, solipsism is very, very female.

In men, it manifests in economists and scientists living in computer models instead of the real world.

All part of the same age-old heresy known as Gnosticism.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus December 20, 2014 1:24 PM  

Northy: "Speaking of Muslims, I am warming to the Islamic idea that there should be 4 female eyewitness accounts to challenge that of one man."

The religion of Islam is superior to the religion of political correctness. Between "women don't lie!" and "a woman's testimony must have additional support" the Muslim way is proving wiser.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 1:33 PM  

If one understands "racist" as passive-liberal speak for "white supremacist" then charges of "racism" when jihadists are involved makes much more sense AS the jihadist is a violent anti-white Supremacist in particular and an anti-Supremacist religiously-speaking.

Anonymous Wyrd December 20, 2014 1:36 PM  

She should have contacted me. I would have helped her in any way possible.

#IllRideWithHavenMonahan

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 1:38 PM  

So when Merkel claims German "islamophobia" is "racist," she is REALLY SAYING that the Germans are "white supremacists" and jihadists HATE, HATE, HATE the genuine white Supremacist.

Anonymous Salt December 20, 2014 1:38 PM  

I hope her attention continues.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 1:40 PM  

And when the Japanese scientist who stated unseemly things about Angry Black Female was called a "racist???" His accusers were telling him to NOT BE equal to a "white supremacist."

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 1:45 PM  

sky's blue. water's wet. women lie.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 1:48 PM  

Every liberationist movement whether homo-sexual, Jewish, Islamic, minority, dyke, or female fears, loathes and hates the ability of a white man to strive towards objective Supremacy and absolutely go into a virtual murderous rage at the thought of a voluntarily collective of white men all striving towards Supremacy in concert... What is better known and understood as white Supremacy.

The linear progression in a formerly white post-liberated society is:

Radical autonomy --> anti-radical autonomy --> white Supremacy --> Supremacy...

You white boys better get hip to the inevitable.

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 1:54 PM  

shut up moron.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 1:55 PM  

The ignorant masses BELIEVE they are shaped by their environment. The high IQ minority understand that in molding the relevant players they then shape the environment. There are only two relevant players in this game. Supremacists and anti-Supremacists. True Christians and Equalists. Creators and self-annihilators. Desirous of genuine free will and desirous of total freedom. A lover of the right things and a lover of all things.

Almost ALL THE WEST are anti-Supremacist ESPECIALLY anti-white Supremacist.

So "we" descend.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 1:56 PM  

Nate... You're an anti-white Supremacist... An "equalist" amongst the ilk. Have enough integrity to admit as much.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 1:59 PM  

I gave a simple, straightforward explanation of how the "racism" charge gets tied into jihad and this Nate character comes forth to apparently run distraction for the "religion of peace?"

Anonymous bw December 20, 2014 2:01 PM  

Tears sprang to my eyes and I was struck by feelings of anger, sadness and bitterness

The double-mindedness and emoting is as far as I got.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 2:02 PM  

Nate...

Are you white?

Do you believe in objective Supremacy?

If your answers are "yes, yes" then you, my friend, are PERFECTLY, truthfully, precisely and exactly to be understood as a white Supremacist.

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 2:03 PM  

"this Nate character"

***chuckle***

Anonymous Porky December 20, 2014 2:04 PM  

Now every media outlet in the world will print a retraction of the bogus story which they never fact checked.

Not.

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 2:06 PM  

What I think Thordaddy... is that you're a boring one trick pony that is incapable of talking about anything but your one pet topic.

Every single time you comment... its precisely the same thing.

So your sin isn't that you're wrong. Its far worse than that.

Your sin is that your are boring.

Anonymous Porky December 20, 2014 2:08 PM  

Do you believe in objective Supremacy?

Define "objective Supremacy", muthafucka.

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 2:08 PM  

"Now every media outlet in the world will print a retraction of the bogus story which they never fact checked."

Now Porky! it doesn't matter if its true! don't you know? her story spoke to their higher selfs!

Anonymous Jack Amok December 20, 2014 2:09 PM  

In men, it manifests in economists and scientists living in computer models instead of the real world.

Don't confuse males with men.

@Rantor

So women have tired of writing fan fiction about TV shows and now are writing it about real life? I suppose we should just be thankful her story didn't involve a secret billionaire were-pyre with a toally bitchin' bondage dungeon. #itsallafantasyforher

Anonymous Porky December 20, 2014 2:13 PM  

it doesn't matter if its true! don't you know? her story spoke to their higher selfs!

So it's like Santa Claus? It's true if you believe in your heart?

Anonymous Noble Lie December 20, 2014 2:13 PM  

Plato good! Aristotle bad!

Anonymous Harsh December 20, 2014 2:14 PM  

You white boys better get hip to the inevitable.

If being a white supremacist means hanging out with idiots like you, Thor, I'll pass.

Anonymous Jack Amok December 20, 2014 2:14 PM  

...this Nate character...

Thordaddy has posted here plenty of times before. How can he possibly be so clueless about Nate? I guess he doesn't read the comments much, just writes his own.



Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 2:15 PM  

one has to wonder if the retard knows he posting about white supreme-ism on a the blog of a Red Man.

Blogger Expendable Faceless Minion December 20, 2014 2:16 PM  

I'm flabbergasted that she's willing to admit she lied. Most of the women I know would have stuck to their story even if contradicted by videotape. Why change it now?

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 2:17 PM  

"Most of the women I know would have stuck to their story even if contradicted by videotape. "

because she believes the fact that she lied doesn't matter.

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 2:18 PM  

You have to remember that truth and honesty mean absolutely nothing to rabbits... and she is clearly Grade A rabbit

Anonymous Porky December 20, 2014 2:18 PM  

Yes, Virginia, there is a sanity clause.

Anonymous Count Bullets-ula December 20, 2014 2:34 PM  

Vox is a mentally unstable stalker.

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 2:34 PM  

fascinating isn't it that TD just up and disappeared...

Anonymous Salt December 20, 2014 2:41 PM  

because she believes the fact that she lied doesn't matter

It's not the story that's descriptive but the underlying emotions, which for her, stay the same. Ergo, there was no lie there at all.

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 2:46 PM  

"It's not the story that's descriptive but the underlying emotions, which for her, stay the same. Ergo, there was no lie there at all. "

Precisely. Note that in the original version the thoughts in the muslim's head were what was important.

In reality... its what was going on in the rabbit's head that really matters... and what actually happened in meat space... is totally irrelevant.

Anonymous Edjamacator December 20, 2014 2:46 PM  

Wow. Sounds like she's been listening to Weird Al just a bit too much.

Personally, I don't think that's possible, but then I'm not some SJW idiot.

Anonymous Salt December 20, 2014 3:03 PM  

In reality... its what was going on in the rabbit's head that really matters

That is how rabbits lie with impunity from the warren. The truth lies elsewhere, not to be found in the words themselves but between them. There are no rules to hysteria.

Anonymous Anubis December 20, 2014 3:19 PM  

"I'm flabbergasted that she's willing to admit she lied. Most of the women I know would have stuck to their story even if contradicted by videotape. Why change it now?"

Not only this woman but they found a woman to admit to a mistake over a decade old that couldn't be proved, the woman who said it was her mistake to list bath house Barry as being born in Kenya in his autobiography. At this rate if I live to be as old as my great grandmother I may come to know of a 3rd woman who admits to such. Hopefully while the US still exists.

Anonymous Wyrd December 20, 2014 3:24 PM  

Vox is a mentally unstable stalker.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Kmn_9CILtM

Imagine this is told by a grouper.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 3:25 PM  

The Perfect Man...

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 3:27 PM  

Nate... Is this forum the "circus" in the Bread and Circus paradigm?

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 3:32 PM  

Lol... No clown... There is no coercion to "join" a fellow white Supremacist AND this fact is why "they" hardly exist outside the minds of the rabid anti-white Supremacists such as yourself.

You just don't get the psychological war that is being perpetrated on you and how you willingly fall in line with the "equalists."

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 3:33 PM  

I'm not clueless about Nate...

The ilk is clueless about Nate being an anti-white Supremacist...

And so was I until today...

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 3:36 PM  

What does that mean when the "equalists" believe Vox to be a "white supremacist?"

The only false charge, apparently, is that Vox is not white BUT he is most certainly a Supremacist... Er, a Red anti-equalist.

Anonymous Count Bullets-ula December 20, 2014 3:42 PM  

Vox is all white.

Anonymous Steve-waa December 20, 2014 3:47 PM  

For the past 3 plus or so years on various conservative leaning websites, Thordaddy was posting about "dyke supremacy". Almost every comment was about "dyke supremacy". Over and over and over again. Like a broken record.

Looks like he has now moved on to the term "white supremacy". Everyone on this site should just be ready for the repetition. Over and over and over again.

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 3:49 PM  

Thordaddy... you were asked a direct question. Answer it.

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 3:51 PM  

" Over and over and over again."

here that kind of idiocy will get him banned... unless ducking direct questions doesn't get him banned first.

Blogger Giraffe December 20, 2014 3:52 PM  

Count Bulletula.

You racist.

Vox is not pure white. He's part Nate of American, and part Mexican. I think there may be more.

Why do you bully people who aren't white?

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 4:04 PM  

" He's part Nate of American"

bahahahahahahaha

Anonymous Wyrd December 20, 2014 4:05 PM  

Vox's lament:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6E98ZRaU1s

Anonymous Harsh December 20, 2014 4:14 PM  

Vox is all white.

Typical racist white man trying to tell other people what their race is.

Anonymous VD December 20, 2014 4:15 PM  

I'm not a "supremacist" of any type. I think the very concept is absurd. Supreme by what metric, Thordaddy?

Anonymous Harsh December 20, 2014 4:16 PM  

Vox is a mentally unstable stalker.

You're projecting, creepy boy. Who's on whose blog constantly?

Anonymous Count Bullets-ula December 20, 2014 4:29 PM  

Vox and Markku are on mine.

Anonymous kfg December 20, 2014 4:29 PM  

"Yes, Virginia, there is a sanity clause."

And how an irrelevant SJW got in my pajamas I'll never know.

Anonymous Stg58 / Animal Mother December 20, 2014 4:51 PM  

Hooray for Captain Spaulding!

Anonymous kh123 December 20, 2014 4:55 PM  

The story would've been better with an offer to share a bag of Doritos.

Anonymous H2 December 20, 2014 4:59 PM  

If these writers and bloggers don't get fired or see real-world consequences for their "editorializing", we probably will see some more social justice hoaxes in 2015. I think Roissy said that as the narratives come closer to collapsing, they will act even crazier.

Anonymous kh123 December 20, 2014 5:01 PM  

...Oh wait, Korra already covered that angle.

Anonymous kfg December 20, 2014 5:11 PM  

Dan Greenfield recently covered this:

http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2014/12/life-in-post-truth-america.html

Blogger david dorian December 20, 2014 5:12 PM  

In the PC world of SJW's,

Truth is NO defense.

Enough with these evil parasites. They destroy all they touch.

Anonymous Student in Blue December 20, 2014 5:19 PM  

"Vox and Markku are on mine," he types fervently on his mortal enemy's blog. How dare he be asked to conduct himself! How dare they impose standards on his glorious self! Why can't these ignorant people see the vast evil that is Vox Day?

Briefly he entertains the idea of spending time on a website where he is not banned, but discards that heretical thought immediately. No, the cause is too just, is too righteous, to --

Hold that thought. Emma just came online

"O frabjous day!" he chortled in his joy. "Now I can link Emma all these fierce fights I'm having on her behalf, and she'll be so impressed..."

Oh dear. It appears she went offline soon after he sent his first line. She's probably busy. That's what Yama always liked about her, such an artsy and industrial girl! Truly after his heart, she is. It's just a shame that there isn't anyone else online to share his victories with.

'Why do people seem to avoid me?' he wonders as he travels back into Vox Day's blog. 'They couldn't hate me, could they? Why would anyone possibly hate me?'

It must be because he is so righteous. He is being misunderstood, persecuted even. Well, he'll just have to show those naysayers how righteous he is by surrounding himself by people who never wanted him there!

"Now look!" he types furiously, "I never wanted you there on my blog to begin with..."

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 5:33 PM  

Steve-waa...

Let me correct you... I spoke of "female supremacy" REFERENCING the lexicon of the PUAs, gamers, MRAs.

THERE IS NO SUCH ANIMAL.

The "thing" YOU CALL "feminism" IS ACTUALLY DYKE "nature" manifest. In other words, "feminism," LACKING ANY REMNANT of femininity, IS A MOVEMENT of "female self-annihilators." Otherwise known throughout history as dyke and euphemistically referred to as lesbian and inexplicably called "woman" by many a "sexist" anti-white Supremacist.

If you are a white male... There is genuine white Supremacy OR self-annihilation. It's inevitable.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 5:37 PM  

Lol... What's the question Nate?

White Supremacist: a white man who strives towards objective Supremacy.

Objective Supremacy = The Perfect Man

What's the DISPUTE, Nate.

I'm an anti-Equalist just like Vox and you, supposedly. But now, you are saying you are some degree of equalist, but JUST TO A LESSER DEGREE than those rabbits. Lol.

Anonymous Giuseppe December 20, 2014 5:39 PM  

Heh,
had a raging facebook argument with a guy on this very topic. What sparked it off was the original Kum-media article on this and the guy saying that was THE WAY to react to Muslim terrorism. I said, no, the way was for the so-called non-radicals Muslims to publicly denounce this stuff, which of course is not being done, because basically terrorism is prescribed in the Koran. He provided 4 links, none of which worked, all from the same site trying to say non-radical muslims do denounce this stuff....where?
Then his girlfriend joined in saying I was ignorant of Islam because of her theology studies (in another religion!) and that basically I was a racisssss bigot. I explained I had undoubtedly more contacts with muslims than the both of them combined both culturally as well as intimately, since, over the years, I have more than once indulged in some cross-cultural experiences involving some rather attractive women of Islamic orientation. All in the interest of religious tolerance I assure you. I then proceeded to educate them in the actual Quarnic texts and the pedophilic Muhammed. Then today this came out. Whole discussion on Facebook was suddenly mysteriously disappeared. I sent him a private message to this post. Let's see if I get a reply. Or if he at least changes girlfriend. I doubt it, but hey...there's always hope another SJW wakes up.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 5:40 PM  

Vox...

If one is an anti-Equalist then one is a Supremacist, passive-aggressively-speaking.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 5:44 PM  

Do not forget that I started my contribution to this thread in explaining how the anti-white Supremacist can interject "racism" into a psychological confrontation with potential jihad.

There is quite simply both a common enemy and mutual desire amongst the "white" anti-white Supremacist and the jihadist that explains the charge of "racism" intersecting with religious zealotry.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 5:55 PM  

Nate...

You and a lot of the ilk have real beef WITH THE MERE CONCEPT of The Perfect Man EVEN though the SJWs are attempting to "perfect" (white) man right in front of your eyes.

What are you going to do with this unnatural aversion to that which can counter the radical social engineers?

Anonymous Porky December 20, 2014 6:21 PM  

Objective Supremacy = The Perfect Man

So...objective supremacy = subjective ideal?

Well that clears things up.

Anonymous Ben December 20, 2014 6:23 PM  

Lotta Christians post here, TD. You say we have "real beef" with the concept of a perfect man? Derp.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 6:30 PM  

Porky...

Objective Supremacy = The Perfect Man = Jesus Christ...

I didn't think you needed help in expanding this equation to include the objective empirical fact.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 6:34 PM  

Since there are Christians, white Christians and liberal "Christians" then how do YOU differentiate yourself so other know exactly who you are?

If you are white and truly Christian... I suggest the label white Supremacist.

It also indicates that one is an anti-Equalist... Er, NOT A liberal "Christian."

Anonymous Ben December 20, 2014 6:36 PM  

Dude. Jesus wasn't white. Give it a rest.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 6:37 PM  

In other words, if you just simply say, "I'm a Christian" then the default assumption is that you are actually dispirited, deracinated, homo-sexualized and bureaucratized. You are really a liberated Christian. You are not a true Supremacist. You are some degree of equalist. Get it?

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 6:42 PM  

You are simply attempting to yank "us" back into the liberal frame. Jesus Christ's "skin color" is only relevant to us in so far as acknowledging that revelation requires particular actors AND ALL their characteristics mean something. Don't get hung up on the contextual groundwork so as to excuse yourself from confronting the primary substance.

A white Supremacist is a white man who strives towards Supremacy. Nothing more. Nothing less.

What is the REAL BEEF?

Anonymous Carlotta December 20, 2014 6:52 PM  

An editorial is where you give your opinion. This is what is known as fiction. What else has she "editorialised" ?

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 6:52 PM  

The entire legitimacy of the alt-rite critique clings to the idea of white Christians as not white Supremacists BUT in fact liberal "Christians." The alt-rite at its core are "white" anti-white Supremacists/"white" anti-white Christians. Ergo, "white" males who hate white men who strive towards Supremacy. So the narrative-building that goes on in the alt-rite IS EQUAL TO the narrative-building that goes into all radical liberationist movements. The alt-rite is simply attempting to be the most radically autonomous collective of high IQ "white" males always willing and able to maximize their autonomy at the expense of "white supremacy," whether real or contrived.

Anonymous Laura Woulds December 20, 2014 6:58 PM  

Thorduddy is making me nostalgic, I'm missing Great Books For Men.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 7:07 PM  

Cats really think they took the right pill. That they've glimpsed the Matrix. They have a scrap piece of notebook paper, gut level, with a chicken-scratched tic tac toe field of play. One X. One 0. 4 steps max. That's reality.

Tic tac toe
Life is heat
It shall flow
Forget the matrix
That's all show
Think "hate tricks"
So white man goes
Where no white man
Should have to go...
Think false tips
So white Knights
Can delight
In the sight
Of doing right
In the mirror at night...
Think raw scripts
The Singularity
And anti-Equalists
Redundant phenomena
Infinite regress
Our "lords" are creating it
And you digress...

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 7:09 PM  

I "love" my tiny harem of internet stalkers. IRL, they want BABIES...

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 7:14 PM  

"Objective Supremacy = The Perfect Man"

This is the beef you blithering moron.

Objective Supremacy = Unicorn Farts


There is no perfect man. Striving for perfection is profoundly stupid.

Anonymous Jack Amok December 20, 2014 7:14 PM  

Thordaddy, when your doctor changes up your meds, you really ought to hold off commenting for a few days to see how things settle out.

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 7:15 PM  

If objective Supremacy = the perfect man that I am no supremacist and anyone who is is a damned fool.

Perfection is not possible. Its not even a worthy goal.

And as to your other question.. I'm not white. I don't even know what you mean when you say white.

I bet you don't mean Greek though.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 7:24 PM  

Nate...

Then have the integrity to state that you are an anti-Supremacist AND some degree of "equalist" AND that the beef in gamergate is amongst "white" anti-white Supremacist and just plain any and all other anti-white Supremacist?

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 7:25 PM  

Jack... Amok... That has the stereotypical stench of homo-sexual liberation

Anonymous Porky December 20, 2014 7:27 PM  

If you are white and truly Christian... I suggest the label white Supremacist.

Oh now I get it, Thordaddy. You take an already well defined term and twist it around so you can get attention on the internet. Let me try....

If you are white and lift weights, I suggest the label White Power.

If you are white and enjoy saltines, I suggest the label White Cracker.

If you are white and have an Oedipus complex, I suggest the label White Muthafucka.











Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 7:27 PM  

Nate...

Don't kid yourself... You and the ilk? Open source social engineers.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 7:32 PM  

No "Porkeee"

You take an INTUITIVELY UNDERSTOOD term that has been perversely re-defiined, i.e., liberated, to the direct detriment of all white males AND YOU TWIST IT BACK into its original meaning and understanding.

B-deep, b-deep, b-deep.... That's all, Porkeee!"

Anonymous Jack Amok December 20, 2014 7:35 PM  

That has the stereotypical stench of homo-sexual liberation

Semi-coherent rants, counter-dependant behavior towards others, calls people who disagree with him gay, thinks he knows everything...

What irresponsible parent is letting their teenager hang out on this forum?

Anonymous Porky December 20, 2014 7:35 PM  

Well then you should have no problem accepting the label "gay".

Anonymous Student in Blue December 20, 2014 7:39 PM  

$10 says Thordaddy doesn't actually believe anything he/she types, but is just trying to bait people out into saying things that can be massively taken out of context (for screencapping) by perverting definitions.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 7:41 PM  

Jack... Amok... LeSS you forgot, I STARTED with a very coherent explanation of why an "white" anti-white Supremacist would interject "racism" in a psychological confrontation with potential jihad...

Jack... Don't let your mind... Run... Amok.

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 7:42 PM  

"Open source social engineers. "

piss off retard

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 7:44 PM  

You would lose a lot of ten dollars.

I guess you're in the Matrix... Or outside the Matrix... Or you sit on the fence in between the Matrix and anti-Matrix?

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 7:45 PM  

Anti-Equalist = Supremacist...

Who has the highest IQ able to refute this equation?

Anonymous Jack Amok December 20, 2014 7:54 PM  

I STARTED with a very coherent explanation...

You started with no such thing. You started with exactly what I said - a semi-coherent claim about what "racist" really means, followed by a semi-coherent rant - capitalized shouting included - about Angela Merkel (putting together a coherent rant about Merkel ought to be a fairly easy thing to pull off, but it was apparently beyond you at the time). After that, you just started picking fights and calling names.

Now, if you'd like to present your case in a dialectic manner, I'll listen. But if all you have is more rhetoric, then you won't get anything but scorn from me. Are we clear on that?

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 8:05 PM  

"Anti-Equalist = Supremacist..."

Word that I made up = Word that I made up...


Who will dispute me??

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 8:09 PM  

On the contrary, "gay" is passive liberal-speak for those unwilling to acknowledge that they were FORCED to speak less truthfully and therefore destined to communicate less clearly and thus totally susceptible to a corruption of the inner dialogue.

Homo-sexuality = self-annihilation.

"Gay" is the term used to hide this pertinent fact of reality.

Of course, I object. And any sane, healthy-minded white man would object AND does.

Blogger D. Lane December 20, 2014 8:14 PM  

$10 says Thordaddy doesn't actually believe anything he/she types, but is just trying to bait people out into saying things that can be massively taken out of context (for screencapping) by perverting definitions.

I'll take the other side of that. His approach strikes me as True Believer. To quote an unknown B action movie, "I've seen this before..."

Anonymous Maximo Macaroni December 20, 2014 8:16 PM  

TD: some therapy: try one post without the words "white", "supremacy" "objective" and "equalist" Hope you don't explode in frustration.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 8:17 PM  

Jack...

You have no REAL battle with jihad. And you have no REAL battle with the SJWs...

What YOU DO HAVE...

Is a common enemy called "white supremacy" AND a mutual desire called radical sexual autonomy.

The battles "WE" witness are amongst all manner of anti-Supremacists, particularly, anti-white Supremacists.

When an anti-white Supremacist cuts the throat of another anti-white Supremacist then we have evidence of self-annihilation...

The trick is in having such increasingly prevalent phenomena ALWAYS come at the expense of "white supremacy."

Did you learn nothing from the Zimmerman affair.

A "racist" anti-white Supremacist is a tough identity to maintaim under the right critique.

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 8:20 PM  

"Is a common enemy called "white supremacy" AND a mutual desire called radical sexual autonomy."

This is why we say you're a fucking retard.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 8:22 PM  

Equations Nate will reject...

Man = woman
Hot = cold
Up = Down

Equations Nate will maintain...

Black = white
Homo = hetero
Lebron = Jordan

The Equation Nate will defend to the death...

white Supremacy = white degeneracy

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 8:25 PM  

Black does not equal White.

Homo does not equal hetro.

Lebron certainly doesn't equal Jordan.

As for this idiocy...

"white Supremacy = white degeneracy"

I have no idea what your idiotic made up phrases mean... nor do I care. I have no idea what you mean when you say things... nor do I care... as the mad ravings of drooling idiots aren't of great interest to me.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 8:26 PM  

Well... That's more anti-equalist for the ilk. It's still a pose, though.

What matters IS WHERE YOU DEMAND REALITY bend to your sense of equality? However tiny of a degree it may be?

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 8:27 PM  

I believe the concept of equality is false on its face. Equality does not exist in nature. I do not believe men were created equal by God either... though I believe in God's eyes without our savior we are all equally dead.

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 8:30 PM  

"What matters IS WHERE YOU DEMAND REALITY bend to your sense of equality?"

What the hell are you babbling about now?

where have I demanded such a thing? Site it or shut the fuck up you blithering idiot.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 8:32 PM  

Nate... Quit being so offended by the knowledge that you have not one wit of concern over the collective descent of the "white" male of the West. I don't expect YOU to understand a solution for "him."

BUT....

You could understand IF YOU ACTUALLY CARED.

But you don't... So you lurk as facilitator of "white" male self-annihilation.

Clearly, the enemy is one's own identity... Or in the case of US, our total lack of defineable identity.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 8:33 PM  

Then you are a Supremacist.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 8:39 PM  

Nate...

One cannot be an anti-Equalist and an anti-Supremacist. You are attempting to PLAY as a "racist" anti-white Supremacist. Meaning, you mimic the thinking of the HBD CROWD whose beef with "low-IQ blacks" IS REALLY a beef with the concession of intellectual equality to their black peers. Couple this with a learned aversion for "white supremacy" and we have the "racist" anti-white Supremaicst EVEN when he's "black?"

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 8:40 PM  

"Then you are a Supremacist."

I ask a second time... you blithering moron of a fucktard. Where did I demand reality bend to my idea of equality?

Quote where I did such a thing... or retract.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 8:41 PM  

Nate...

You can be a genuine black Supremacist...

It is not against the Law... Yet...

And it might just make a lot of Angry Black Females less angry. After all, what black lady would not want the perfect black man?

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 8:41 PM  

" You are attempting to PLAY as a "racist" anti-white Supremacist. "

More idiocy.

Specific quotes moron. What did I say that supports this bullshit claim.

Blogger JACIII December 20, 2014 8:43 PM  

Shutup Tad

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 8:46 PM  

Nate...

If YOU CLAIM to be an anti-Supremacist THEN YOU BELIEVE that EQUALITY exists somewhere BECAUSE objective Supremacy exists nowhere. Even if this equality is simply that of "redundant phenomena."

Redundant phenomena = redundant phenomenon...

That is the equality that the anti-Supremacist believes in...

It translates into...

No Singularity. No Supremacy.

We get it already.

We're stuck in the infinite negress...

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 8:47 PM  

You're mentally masturbating thordaddy. You make up imaginary terms and use those terms to define and qualify each other. Your language is not useful. It doesn't provide any clarity to the situation.

Its just a giant logic circle jerk.

I cannot be an equalist because I thoroughly deny equality exists in nature.

I cannot be what you call a supremesist because I thoroughly deny the idea perfection exists in nature.. and I deny that its even a goal worthy of setting.

I am neither.

I reject your idiotic mental masturbation.

I have no loyalty to the white race... I am not white. I am greek. The in-group I am loyal to is defined more by geography and ideals than race.

I would rather spend time with a black confederate secessionist than a white liberal yankee.

Anonymous tiredofitall December 20, 2014 8:49 PM  

"I "love" my tiny harem of internet stalkers. IRL, they want BABIES..." - Thordaddy

Well unless they're hoping to have hopelessly retarded ones, I'm betting they'll skip over you when the time comes.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 8:58 PM  

No equality... No Perfection...

You stand where? What do you call yourself? You're loyal what EXACTLY?

I can't read between the lienes.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 8:59 PM  

You don't know Mrs. Wood... I was attempting to go along with the inside hilarity.

Anonymous Ben December 20, 2014 9:09 PM  

Nate I can't believe you're actually trying to reason with this rube.

Anonymous Jack Amok December 20, 2014 9:12 PM  

Psyc meds. Usually I'm not a big fan of them, but this fucking loon needs a does of something. He's going through a deranged meltdown that would put a lot of SJWs to shame.

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 9:17 PM  

"Nate I can't believe you're actually trying to reason with this rube."

I'm not reasoning with him. Mostly I'm insulting him. Between the insults I'm pointing at his circle jerk of definitions and laughing.

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 9:19 PM  

"
You stand where? What do you call yourself? You're loyal what EXACTLY?"

Why should I care where you put me in your overly simplistic binary worldview? I couldn't care less how retards categorize me.

What I take exception to is the outright lies you posted about what my own views actually are.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 9:20 PM  

The in-group I am loyal to is defined more by geography and ideals than race -- Nate

BUT IF you glanced the proper frame, you would get the following translation:

The in-group I am actually DISLOYALto is defined more by geography and ideals than race because I inhabit a radically autonomous environment DEVOID of genuine white Supremacist to either love or hate, admire or reject, worship or demonize

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 9:22 PM  

Nate...

The name of the game is mold the player to shape the environment.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 9:24 PM  

Nate...

You call those insults? I've been a bouncer for almost twenty years... And not a visible scar to prove it. Lol... Come on, man.... This is psychological warfare from birth for any white boy that has clue.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 9:28 PM  

"Racist" anti-white Supremacist?

What's the lie? That's the player you are. The environment that surrounds you bends to that will to an indeterminate degree. You are in fact, seeking an equilibrium in place of identity crisis. I am helping see what you are so that you may correct your faulty orientation.

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 9:31 PM  

"The name of the game is mold the player to shape the environment."

through mental masturbation?

piss off retard.

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 9:33 PM  

' I am helping see what you are so that you may correct your faulty orientation."

***Chuckle***

no. you're sitting in a corner with your pants full of shit telling us all how smart you are because your pants are full of shit.

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 9:34 PM  

"Nate vs Thordaddy, brilliant!"

All you have to do now is explain how thordaddy is deserving of anything but a dismissive insult.

Anonymous Giuseppe December 20, 2014 9:34 PM  

Well....
Nate sure is one open-minded guy.
When rambling mental deficients try to engage me in conversation on say the bus, I just blank them or tell them to fuck off. But not Nate.
I think there may be a kind-hearted would-be therapist under all that Southern, Greek, redneck shell after all.

Anonymous Jack Amok December 20, 2014 9:39 PM  

BUT IF you glanced the proper frame, you would get the following translation:

The in-group I am actually DISLOYALto is defined more by geography and ideals...


Someone has to owe loyalty to something before they can be disloyal to it. Given the spectacular lack of interpersonal skills you have put on display here, just where do you think you get the authority to define who any of us owe loyalty to?

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 9:43 PM  

Nate...

I'll stand by the assertion that a "white" anti-white Supremacist who interjects "racism" into a manufactured psychological confrontation with potential jihad IS SIGNALING ALLIANCE to said jihadist PREMISED on the understanding of MUTUAL anti-white Supremacy.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 9:53 PM  

Your handle is Jack.Amok...

To one with an acute perception, your writing with its attached authorship is an internal-personal attack each and every time you electronically.pen...

Jack Amok = radical autonomist...

Anonymous MrGreenMan December 20, 2014 10:30 PM  

This comment thread should be captured and stuck under glass, or maybe just pinned in place.

If Australians were to bring back individual handgun ownership after having their chocolate cafe seized, because to do otherwise will cause crazy white girls to go into weird fantasies about Muslims and persecution, where would the .40 S&W fit on the gay/not-gay cartridge map?

Some threads, I just miss the weeper.

Anonymous Giuseppe December 20, 2014 10:49 PM  

@MrGreenMan,
thank you for returning us to a more readable thread topic.
Empirically the .40 cannot be a gay calibre since I own one. That said, it was also just my lazy default carry piece. If I was actually working I carried a .357 magnum and frankly, if I actually had to go into something where shooting was definitely gonna happen and for some reason I couldn't get my hands on a tank or a long gun, I would seriously consider a .50 desert Eagle. My only concern would be that it is very slow to bring actively to bear in rapid successions shots, but accuracy-wise it is comparable to a good quality revolver, which the .357 I own most definitely is. I would probably go with the .357 though, just cause I know it best, and know I can to rapid follow-ups with it, but still, the .50 DE is just... kinda hypnotic really.

Blogger Nate December 20, 2014 10:57 PM  

" where would the .40 S&W fit on the gay/not-gay cartridge map? "

The .40 is a man stopper. There is a big gap between it and the 9mm.. bigger than the gap between the 40 and the 45.

Many, if not most, ilk carry 40s.

Anonymous Shibes Meadow December 20, 2014 11:01 PM  

Dull, dull, dull. This conversation is boring. Can we go back to talking about torture again?

Blogger Jassi December 20, 2014 11:06 PM  

It's been fun reading a few of you trip over yourselves trying to defend against the one ever-potent kryptonite of the SJW's - SUPREMACY!!!!

"We're the best at nation building. Our culture is the most free and prosperous. We have the highest intelligence. Our armies are the strongest. But supreme? No way dude. THAT is too far!" Some of you don't even see the irony. You laugh and scoff at accusations of "racism" but break down from accusations of a different word with the same applied meaning.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 11:29 PM  

Thank God someone can see some light!!!

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 11:32 PM  

And the next step is to not see this as unconscious BUT a fully conscious doing.

Anonymous Jack Amok December 20, 2014 11:40 PM  

The trolls are multiplying. Somebody get the torch.

Many, if not most, ilk carry 40s.

It also seems to be the most common sidearm for local police around here, and cops these days certainly don't like to go around undergunned.

Blogger Thordaddy December 20, 2014 11:51 PM  

By definition, a genuine white Supremacist could never be a troll... Only the anti-Supremacist could coherently fill that role since being trollish WOULD NOT contradict any personal "principle."

Blogger Thordaddy December 21, 2014 12:59 AM  

Quote please... And that's good to hear...

Anonymous No one of consequence December 21, 2014 8:44 AM  

Pat's banned here, Thordaddy. Don't bother responding to him, because his comments will get spammed, and yours in reply will be deleted.

Blogger Feather Blade December 21, 2014 11:38 PM  

The in-group I am loyal to is defined more by geography and ideals than race -- Nate

BUT IF you glanced the proper frame, you would get the following translation:

The in-group I am actually DISLOYALto is defined more by geography and ideals than race because I inhabit a radically autonomous environment DEVOID of genuine white Supremacist to either love or hate, admire or reject, worship or demonize


I do believe Thordaddy has a degree in post-modern literary criticism.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts