ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Friday, January 02, 2015

Gun control by any other name

Would still stink of totalitarianism. Don't fall for the rebranding of gun control as "gun safety":
The gun control movement, blocked in Congress and facing mounting losses in federal elections, is tweaking its name, refining its goals and using the same-sex marriage movement as a model to take the fight to voters on the state level.

After a victory in November on a Washington State ballot measure that will require broader background checks on gun buyers, groups that promote gun regulations have turned away from Washington and the political races that have been largely futile. Instead, they are turning their attention — and their growing wallets — to other states that allow ballot measures.

An initiative seeking stricter background checks for certain purchasers has already qualified for the 2016 ballot in Nevada, where such a law was passed last year by the Legislature then vetoed by the governor. Advocates of gun safety — the term many now use instead of “gun control” — are seeking lines on ballots in Arizona, Maine and Oregon as well.
It's always pure deceitful rhetoric with the fucking rabbits. Always. The fact that they've been roundly defeated for two decades just means that they'll rebrand, lie, and try again.

And observe that giving their inch only encourages them to immediately go after the mile.
In Washington, those who pushed the ballot measure through say they will begin a campaign to get the State Legislature to pass measures to keep guns from those with mental illnesses, children and people with a record of domestic violence.
Never give them an inch. Never compromise. Never moderate. And always punch back twice as hard.

Labels: , ,

78 Comments:

Anonymous WinstonWebb January 02, 2015 4:14 PM  

Now would be the perfect time to infiltrate and co-opt this movement. "Gun Safety" means we should put a ballot measure in place to require public schools to give mandatory firearm safety courses at every academic level. Also, "Gun Safety" means a new law that allows police officers to draw their weapons ONLY when fired upon. "Gun Safety" means that individuals that choose to hire armed security personnel must show that they are qualified to evaluate said personnel by showing personal proficiency with the arms in use by their guards.

All of this promotes Safety!

Blogger ManiaC Provost January 02, 2015 4:33 PM  

Surely, any foreign national found with a firearm should be immediately deported? And presumed to be at fault if there was some sort of crime.

Anonymous Sam the Man January 02, 2015 4:35 PM  

One of the interesting things I read some time ago is that the NRA offered a compromise back around 1998 and 1999, when there was a big push to make all transfers go through dealers after columbine.

In any case the NRA offer was to support the instant check being required on all individual sales, but, the service had to be open to individuals and free to them. As such if one was top sell a gun one would call in to the PICS system, read off the buyer’s driver’s license and if there was no prohibition, the sale would go through. The seller would record the approval number and have to retain it for 7 years along with a description of the arm and its serial number. All the government would have is a record of that the buyer was qualified to buy an arm on that date. So the was no registration, but the system would have allowed any arm found at a crime to be traced for 7 years after the last sale (99 +percent of criminal guns). Reasonable compromise.

The NRA also wanted the seller who did this to be indemnified against any kind of a lawsuit, as by doing the check the seller was implicitly transferring the responsibility for the sale from himself to the government. Back then the anti-gun folks were attempting to use lawsuits against folks to discourage individual sales.

In any case the foes refused the deal. They wanted every sale to go through the dealer, with a paper record of the arm and serial number, de-facto registration. Rather than get a compromise that would have really addressed and possibility of guns being obtained by criminals through intrastate commerce, they torpedoed the deal. Pretty clear there goal is universal registration by force of making every sale go through dealers.

Vox is right: at this point no compromise is possible with the left. They are not attempting to reduce crime or increase gun safety, fast and the furious proved that. All they want is a civil population at their mercy. Wannabe Stalinists all.

Anonymous Stg58 / Animal Mother January 02, 2015 4:42 PM  

Gun control equals genocide. Always. Why do they want your guns? Ask them until they break.

Anonymous JRL January 02, 2015 4:51 PM  

The Washington initiative was so broadly written that if you go out plinking with a buddy, he can't legally borrow your gun. You have to go to the dealer and fill out paperwork first. It is absurd.

Anonymous kfg January 02, 2015 4:55 PM  

Isn't that shoulder thing that goes up a safety item?

Here in NY they've been telling us for decades that they weren't going to come after grandpa's shotgun or our deer rifles, Now they're trying to define everything but muzzle loaders as banned assault rifles.

They've already taken my Wrist Rocket.

Not one fucking inch.

Blogger James Dixon January 02, 2015 5:09 PM  

> Here in NY they've been telling us for decades that they weren't going to come after grandpa's shotgun or our deer rifles

As Vox say, they always lie. Always. Never forget it.

Anonymous Stickwick January 02, 2015 5:11 PM  

Stg58 / Animal Mother: Why do they want your guns? Ask them until they break.

Granted, a few of them are the nasty Bill Ayers types who want to round up the incorrigibles and put them into death camps, but most of them aren't that extreme, and it's not that difficult to get to the root of their gun-grabbiness. Here's my experience, after debating several anti-gun liberals about gun rights. For females, the anti-gun thing tends to be based more on irrational fear combined with ignorance. For males, however, it tends to be different. Every time I get into a discussion with one them, it comes down to a confession that there have been times when, if he'd had a gun, he would've impulsively killed someone out of anger. Mind you, some of these guys are otherwise seemingly normal, educated, urbane, college professor types. It was quite shocking the first time one of them confessed this to me, but there you have it. It's classic projection. They have anger problems and fantasies of hurting other people, so they think everyone's like that, and, therefore, guns must be banned or at least heavily controlled.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus January 02, 2015 5:13 PM  

For those who haven't already read it:

All the Way Down the Slippery Slope: Gun Prohibition in England and Some Lessons for Civil Liberties in America

The bottom line: trying to keep a right by making "reasonable concessions" to show you are reasonable people and worthy of the right leads only to complete suppression and elimination of the right. The only hopeful approach is to fight all the way and concede nothing, however "reasonable".

Another point worth noting (among many): in England, the police were far from neutral; they were active in rendering the public as helpless as possible, and used their discretion to make the system much more restrictive, even without changes in statutory language.

Anonymous FP January 02, 2015 5:17 PM  

The WA law is so bad some places have stopped selling flare guns and nail guns for fear of breaking the law. The state AG is staying quiet for the moment. Its up to county/city law enforcement and DAs.

We're getting ready for a fight here in Oregon next month as the dems now control the house and senate. I suspect they'll put up a version of HB3200 from 2013 that even banned .22lr guns that held more than 10 rounds. Anything that could hold over 10 rounds was an assault weapon and you could only have one registered to you, along with all mags registered. It will be interesting to see the attitudes of the Oregon GOP, I fear several of them will bend over having failed to learn anything from recent years. Hopefully more will learn that there is no compromise here but I doubt it.

I figure that idiot Gotlieb from the SAF will come down here and promote another compromise. Thankfully we have the OFF who is openly of the no compromise philosophy.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus January 02, 2015 5:20 PM  

JRL: "The Washington initiative was so broadly written that if you go out plinking with a buddy, he can't legally borrow your gun. You have to go to the dealer and fill out paperwork first. It is absurd."

The idea is to make gun ownership as burdensome as possible. That will diminish gun culture, and in the long run that leads to less resistance to further impositions. Resist everything!

Anonymous Rolf January 02, 2015 5:21 PM  

As a resident of Washington State, the passage of I594 really sucked. It's defacto registration, it's very poorly written (or very "cleverly" written to Gruber the voters of the state, depending on your perspective). The SAF has already filed a lawsuit against it; it's mostly likely going to be struck down, or heavily modified. It's going to be a huge mess to sort out, and will be up in the air for a while. In the mean time, teaching a friend to shoot on the back forty by handing him a gun will be illegal.... Maybe. Or maybe not. Depends if the DA likes you or not, sort'a. Perhaps, IYKWIM.

A very distinct chilling effect on training, so much so that the Department of Fish and Wildlife has "deemed" Hunter's Ed instructors to be law enforcement officers for the purposes of the law so they can check out and handle guns, in spite of the fact that it is in direct contradiction of the definition of LEO contained in the law. Uhhh, guys? I don't think that's how "law" is supposed to work.

The NRA is the leading "gun safety" group, because it teaches actual gun safety classes.

Anonymous Susan January 02, 2015 5:51 PM  

FP,

I don't know where in Oregon you live exactly, but former Salem talk show host Bill Post said that banning anything that holds over 10 rounds of ammo was not only stupid, but could be easily gotten around by taping two 10 rounders together end to end. When one is done, simply flip it around and re-insert.

Cool thing about Bill, is he is now in the state legislature, and given his nature, he is going to be a serious burr under the democrat saddles. I look forward to his term in office.

Anonymous Jack Amok January 02, 2015 5:54 PM  

yes, I've stepped up my gun acquisition schedule in response to I-594 because I know the people behind it will take it as encouragement to push for more.

Blogger Chris Mallory January 02, 2015 6:00 PM  

"Surely, any foreign national found with a firearm should be immediately deported?"

Outside of a few tightly controlled ports, why wait until they are found with a firearm.

Blogger Cataline Sergius January 02, 2015 6:01 PM  

Michigan for the moment is all right but that was mostly due to the fact that Michigan's old left was based out of Detroit where there was never much support for it.

At the moment there is even less support for it. Detroit's Police Chief actually more or less said, 'for God's sake arm yourselves, we can't protect you!"

Michigan's new left however is a very different kettle of smelly disgusting fish. Their capital is Ann Arbor and they are doing their level best to turn it into a mini-silicon valley:

Ann Arbor, Michigan.
City population: 116,121
Major school: University of Michigan
Ranked No. 6: High-tech startup density among small to midsize metro areas (2010)
Ranked No. 8: Density of digital technology startups among small to midsize metro areas (1990-2010)
Ranked No. 2: Largest increase in density of digital technology startups among small to midsize metro areas (1990-2010)
Ranked No. 2: America’s 20 most economically vibrant college towns (2011) (gag but accurate)

Look for an assault on Michigander's second amendments rights to start here. It will be well financed and hyper-SJW. And of course it will be based on common sense gun-safety.

Giving Tech money to the SJWs, was like giving oil money to the Wahabists.

Anonymous farmer Tom January 02, 2015 6:02 PM  

You write this on the same day, this , is in my news feed.

Anonymous Jack Amok January 02, 2015 6:09 PM  

I-594 already caused our local Scout group to cancel all shooting activities because the asnine law is unclear about whether it's legal to hand a student a rifle. The lawyers are trying to figure it out. State regulators have no answers.

As Titus said, the whole point of the law was just to hassle gun owners. I don't have Rolf's confidence it will be struck down or modified as our courts are sadly not reliable. The best response is to buy more guns. If it's illegal to hand my wife or my son my rifle at the range, well, I'll just make sure they have their own to bring.

I just built two nice ARs for under $500 each, including red dot sights.

Anonymous Jack Amok January 02, 2015 6:10 PM  

Surely, any foreign national found with a firearm should be immediately deported?

California has some of the strictest gun control laws of any state.

Yet it's a misdemeanor in CA to be in possession of a stolen gun.

They're not anti-gun, they're just on the other side.

Blogger Kelfa23 January 02, 2015 6:41 PM  

Vox, since you live in Italy, do you still enjoy firearms ownership? I guess I'm asking if you really think its goig to be that bad in the USA that you'd rather live in Europe without owning a firearm yourself, then to stay in the US and have a lot more ease in owning weapons. This isn't a criticism, Im a gun owner, but Im also looking to get dual citizenship in Spain so I can more easily move abroad when/ if the time comes.. so I guess I'm asking what my options are

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus January 02, 2015 6:50 PM  

Jack Amok: "The best response is to buy more guns. If it's illegal to hand my wife or my son my rifle at the range, well, I'll just make sure they have their own to bring.

I just built two nice ARs for under $500 each, including red dot sights."

This is a nice case of "living well is the best revenge."

Anonymous maniacprovost January 02, 2015 6:53 PM  

Outside of a few tightly controlled ports, why wait until they are found with a firearm.

First, to be clear, I'm including H1-B and other visa holders. Second, of course I'd like to deport 99% of them immediately, but that's not politically feasible - I mean, it's inhumande and cruel. But if they have GUNS, we have to get rid of them, for the CHILDREN.

As an unintended consequence, everyone would know that foreign nationals are unarmed.

Anonymous maniacprovost January 02, 2015 7:06 PM  

Giving Tech money to the SJWs, was like giving oil money to the Wahabists.

Here's the thing. Yes, they're making billions by supplying apps that allow teenagers to rabbit more efficiently. I'll even concede that the actual productivity-improving stuff like PCs, MS Office, and SQL has provided a lot of cash to idiot leftists who did not have to learn the value of captialism.

(Capitalism being a phenomenon that arises in a free market, whereby productivity increases are driven by the accumulation of capital, resulting in the rise to power of the capitalist class. Technological advances increase productivity without necessarily requiring the accumulation of much capital, thereby existing as a separate phenomenon.)

However- information technology has only realized half a percent of its potential, because it has not infiltrated older industries, except generically. Every industry benefits from email and Excel. What we also need are expert systems, stochastic analysis systems, and a lot of very domain-specific tools that the SJWs have never even heard of. They are condemned to compete over more and more advanced social networking / messaging apps, because they have no practical experience with anything except endless jabbering and some piss poor UI, flash, noncompliant html, etc. skills.

Anonymous Roundtine January 02, 2015 7:07 PM  

Sounds like another way to keep guns out of the hands of minorities and women.

Blogger Bogey January 02, 2015 7:12 PM  

If you have a mental illness you're just going to have to find another way to defend yourself. Of course if they can't be trusted with a gun why should they be trusted with free speech? It's obvious free speech can be more dangerous than guns, no?

Anonymous Salt January 02, 2015 7:22 PM  

I-594 already caused our local Scout group to cancel all shooting activities

And they smile. Now to drag it out in the courts. Notice how the ambiguity is working against the gun owner. Why is that?

Anonymous map January 02, 2015 7:29 PM  

Stickwick,

Anger issue and impulse control are usually problems for registered Democrats. That is why most school shootings occur in Democrat areas.

Registered Democrats should be full disarmed, with restricted rights across the board and mandatory medication. Everyone else should be free to do what they want.

Blogger Vincent Castrillo January 02, 2015 7:58 PM  

But VD, if we punch back only twice as hard as them if will still be punching like a girl.

Think more Sean Connery, bring a gun to a knife fight.

Anonymous Wyrd January 02, 2015 8:03 PM  

Gun control is for wimps and commies:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbHH5xZcVvQ

Blogger Chris Mallory January 02, 2015 8:04 PM  

"First, to be clear, I'm including H1-B and other visa holders."

I am including anyone who had their paternal line immigrate here after 1800. Ship them all back.

Anonymous The other skeptic January 02, 2015 8:12 PM  

Surely, any foreign national found with a firearm should be immediately deported?

Well, it is not against the law for permanent residents to own guns. You just have to fill out more paperwork.

Also, surely it is racist to require gun purchasers to provide identity info, since all those new voters from south of the border won't have any ID info.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus January 02, 2015 8:13 PM  

Bogey: "If you have a mental illness you're just going to have to find another way to defend yourself."

Good luck. :/

Of course, the main idea again is to constrict gun culture as much as possible.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus January 02, 2015 8:15 PM  

The other skeptic: "Also, surely it is racist to require gun purchasers to provide identity info, since all those new voters from south of the border won't have any ID info."

Isn't the assumption that the cartel men will have brought their own guns, supplied by the U.S. government?

Anonymous Anon January 02, 2015 8:16 PM  

"It's always pure deceitful rhetoric with the fucking rabbits. Always. The fact that they've been roundly defeated for two decades just means that they'll rebrand, lie, and try again."

Well they did the same thing with "Globull Warming" / "Climate Change". Totalitarians rabbits lie through their teeth daily.

Anonymous kh123 January 02, 2015 8:17 PM  

STOP OWNING THINGS WE'RE AFRAID OF.

Which is essentially the same plank for both feminists and anti-Iranians.

Anonymous Anon January 02, 2015 8:19 PM  

"Of course, the main idea again is to constrict gun culture as much as possible."

So only gang bangers, homicidal sociopaths and militarized police can have them in the rabbits leftard utopia. O Vey!

Blogger Pseudotsuga January 02, 2015 8:24 PM  

A female friend of a friend stated on a Facebook posting about guns that if she sees somebody wearing a gun,she becomes afraid. Thus, she was all over I-594 so she could feel more secure! The I-594 campaign was well-crafted to appeal to emotion--don't we all want to be safe? If we can work to keep guns out of the hands of "those" people, then we can all be safer!
And Washington voters rabbited...

Anonymous The other skeptic January 02, 2015 8:28 PM  

Isn't the assumption that the cartel men will have brought their own guns, supplied by the U.S. government?

Ahhh, I forgot about that. Would you believe that it is racist to require those illegals from Canada to provide ID when buying guns?

Anonymous The other skeptic January 02, 2015 8:30 PM  

A female friend of a friend stated on a Facebook posting about guns that if she sees somebody wearing a gun,she becomes afraid.

You should tell her she should be afraid of being raped by the vibrants when she can no longer own a gun.

Anonymous Sociology January 02, 2015 8:33 PM  

Its like "pro-abortion" being magically turned into "pro-choice". They change their words for political reasons bu the goal is the same.

They knew they couldn't shut down gun shows or person-to-person gun sales right away, so they adjusted their target and split the opposition by only going after federal gun sales with their "background checks". The second background checks were established, gun show sales without checks were called "the gun show loophole", as though it magically snuck around regulation somehow.

But this is a lie. The gun haters deliberately excluded gun shows from their proposed regulations to get SOMETHING on the law books. Only then did they turn their aim on gun shows and start talking about the "gun show loophole". If they made their intentions clear fro the start, they would never have been able to split us.

The pattern is eternal: take a small bite in the direction they want, and then they come back for a second, third, fourth, fifth bite until they get it all.

Blogger J Curtis January 02, 2015 8:39 PM  

Veteran And Former Cop Sues After Guns Confiscated Because He Sought Treatment For Insomnia

OpenID cailcorishev January 02, 2015 9:02 PM  

A female friend of a friend stated on a Facebook posting about guns that if she sees somebody wearing a gun, she becomes afraid.

So she's a big fan of concealed carry, right?

Blogger Emmanuel Mateo-Morales January 02, 2015 9:05 PM  

@kh123

You... DO realize that Iran, as is stands now with the asshats ruling it, is the country most willing to use the bomb if they get their hands on it, right? They'll either be stupid and use one bomb (though even one bomb would be sufficient for the destruction of Israel) or they'll be smart and build up a stockpile and then use it.

Either that, or something worse: Iran gets the bomb, doesn't use it, and suddenly, every fucker in the mid-east and their burka wearing mothers tries ten times as hard at getting it.

Anonymous The other skeptic January 02, 2015 9:05 PM  

Illegals can now get driver licenses in CA.

Of course, those who cannot pass the tests will still drive illegally, so the whole scam will not make anyone safer, despite what the wankers claim.

Anonymous Anubis January 02, 2015 9:10 PM  

The best thing about gamergate is that no one who ever played minecraft will think a brick is not part of a wall. Just like leftists want to ban plastic bags because they cant admit they don't like latino littering, gun control is their way of saying blacks are too violent. If a leftist talks to me about gun grabbing I tell them "MS-13 gangbangers walk openly with fully automatic weapons I cant buy, if you don't like guns would you be willing to have the death penalty for illegal aliens & felons caught with guns?" Leftists say every cop killer is inne cent as a form of appeasement but think the only black guys that have ever been guilty of a crime are Clarence Thomas & Bill Cosby. Cosby would have to shove gold diggers out of the way if he wanted to get a woman alone to rape.

Blogger James Dixon January 02, 2015 9:17 PM  

> You... DO realize that Iran, as is stands now with the asshats ruling it, is the country most willing to use the bomb if they get their hands on it, right?

No, I know nothing of the kind. Nor have I seen any convincing evidence that this is the case. I'm sure you'll readily provide such if it's available, won't you?

Logic suggests we should consult history. Exactly how many countries have used nuclear weapons on other countries in our recorded history. And exactly which countries was it? Enquiring minds want to know.

Anonymous kh123 January 02, 2015 9:17 PM  

Well, at this rate, we'll have to outlaw the study of physics wherever the Koran is read.

Anonymous kh123 January 02, 2015 9:20 PM  

...And besides, I seem to recall several countries roundabout there that get regular infusions of military or financial aid from the US.

Blogger JACIII January 02, 2015 9:23 PM  

At the risk of incurring the wrath of Wheeler; Years ago I joined the Jews for Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JFPO) as a token gentile. Apparently this subset of Jews has a good cultural memory of the consequences of being completely at the mercy of a state and are quite dedicated to their cause.

Anonymous Anon January 02, 2015 9:26 PM  

"At the risk of incurring the wrath of Wheeler; Years ago I joined the Jews for Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JFPO) as a token gentile. Apparently this subset of Jews has a good cultural memory of the consequences of being completely at the mercy of a state and are quite dedicated to their cause"

That's nice but Wheeler is on his way.

Anonymous Too-Soon-ami January 02, 2015 9:29 PM  

Anubis: "Leftists ... think the only black guys that have ever been guilty of a crime are Clarence Thomas & Bill Cosby. Cosby would have to shove gold diggers out of the way if he wanted to get a woman alone to rape."

You don't seriously think Cosby is innocent of the allegations, do you, just because he was famous and well-spoken? The revealed pattern shows he had a definite fetish for a particular "scenario" that did not feature the words, "Yes, please." (Unless the question was, "Would you like me to stop?")

Anonymous Too-Soon-ami January 02, 2015 9:42 PM  

JACIII: "Apparently this subset of Jews has a good cultural memory of the consequences of being completely at the mercy of a state and are quite dedicated to their cause."

If only the superset of Jews were as dedicated to, how do you say, Not Destroying the Native Majority's Stable Society -- by fomenting the Civil Rights and Feminist movements, and introducing cultural and demographic pollution -- the subset would not fear, so much, being disarmed.

Blogger automatthew January 02, 2015 9:44 PM  

The revealed pattern shows he had a definite fetish for a particular "scenario" that did not feature the words, "Yes, please."

Shut up, rabbit.

Blogger automatthew January 02, 2015 9:46 PM  

One sign of a liar is the reliance on the indirect: "The revealed pattern…"

What pattern? Revealed by whom? In what manner?

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus January 02, 2015 9:47 PM  

JACIII: "Apparently this subset of Jews has a good cultural memory of the consequences of being completely at the mercy of a state and are quite dedicated to their cause."

Jews concerned with what's best for the Jews, you say. Are you sure? That seems unusual.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus January 02, 2015 9:54 PM  

The other skeptic: "Ahhh, I forgot about that. Would you believe that it is racist to require those illegals from Canada to provide ID when buying guns?"

(TDT stares suspiciously, uncertain if a Get Smart parody skit is starting.)

No.

Anonymous kh123 January 02, 2015 10:02 PM  

"What pattern? Revealed by whom? In what manner?"

Keep tempting them and we may get the SJW-equivalent of an Aquinas telling us about the difference between general and special State revelations. "I answer that, anything which exceeds the State must therefore be revealed by the State to be above its rightful station, since man cannot know his limits naturally without first being disarmed, both of his arrogance & of his firearms, of which are a partial salve to his ignorance."

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus January 02, 2015 10:06 PM  

STOP OWNING THINGS WE'RE AFRAID OF.

kh123: "Which is essentially the same plank for both feminists and anti-Iranians."

I think with Iran it's more the Libya Plan, Pt. II: "please show us beyond doubt that you are disarmed, so that we can then safely violate our commitments to you, attack you, slaughter your national leadership, rob and wreck your nation, and plunge your country into a Hobbsean hell."

Strangely, the Iranians are dragging their feet on that agenda.

Anonymous Shut up, Blidge January 02, 2015 10:13 PM  

We got us a Josey Wales!

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus January 02, 2015 10:20 PM  

By the way, American gun-owners are dragging their feet on a similar agenda.

After you give up your guns, all those horror stories from England, the point of which is that the government won't let English people defend themselves at all, are coming to a jurisdiction near you. Once you are disarmed, prior promises don't matter.

Sociology January 02, 2015 8:33 PM, you are right. I've never seen an issue where it was clearer that the idea was to get the camel's nose in the tent, in order to get the whole camel into the tent, in order to collapse the tent, and all the word games were means to that end.

Blogger bob k. mando January 02, 2015 10:55 PM  

testing

Anonymous Too-Soon-ami January 02, 2015 10:55 PM  

"What pattern? Revealed by whom? In what manner?"

The pattern: Luring aspiring actresses and models to his residence, under pretense of "helping you get a gig", then slipping mickeys into their drinks, then trying to slip something else into them.

Revealed by: Several formerly-aspiring actresses and models.

By manner of: Filing lawsuits and issuing public testimonies.

When several women step forward with the same story, and none of them share the same hypnotherapist or attended the McMartin Preschool, there's a good chance more than one of them are telling the truth.


Or maybe I'm wrong. Maybe it's all a SJW conspiracy to perform a high-tech tar-and-feathering of the only "respectable" black elder to condemn sagging pants and ebonics and other TNB, to keep his uppity black mouth shut. Or maybe the KKK is behind it, to keep the ghetto trash in the ghetto with their pants below their asses, by destroying the credibility of the One True Negro To Save Them All.

Anonymous Porky January 02, 2015 10:57 PM  

Rabbit: "I like gun control!"

Me: "So you agree with what Hitler did to the Jews."

Rabbit: "No! I just think...."

Me: "You disgust me. This conversation is over."





Anonymous H2 January 02, 2015 11:19 PM  

Regarding Bill Cosby: I am sure he slept with many women during his acting prime, as I am sure many big time actors sleep with women. The fact that those women are coming out now, while we're in peak feminism and rape culture hysteria, makes me doubt the drugging aspect though. This topic might be more suitable for Alpha Game, where we can discuss how women want to be around men with high social status.

Blogger LP 999/Eliza January 02, 2015 11:48 PM  

"Becomes afraid of a gun?"

What an idiot, does she not understand the right, choice to self defense.

SJW's worshipers still do not understand gay marriage is a side show, no one is giving up their gun.

Blogger James Dixon January 03, 2015 12:03 AM  

> By manner of: Filing lawsuits and issuing public testimonies.

But not by going to the police. Strange that, isn't it?

Anonymous Barko Ramius January 03, 2015 12:04 AM  

Bruthas like Cos got two things on the mind, getting paid and getting pussy. And getting some ass is payday.

I guess I just dis-qualified myself from owning a firearm with that thought.

Blogger bob k. mando January 03, 2015 12:06 AM  

Wendy Davis admits she was lying to get votes when she said she was in favor of open carry:
http://dailycaller.com/2014/12/31/wendy-davis-says-she-regrets-campaign-stance-on-guns-which-she-took-to-win-votes/


because, of course, now that she is unelectable in Texas she's bucking for some Demoncrat slot on the national stage.


Anonymous Jack Amok January 03, 2015 12:41 AM  

The I-594 campaign was well-crafted to appeal to emotion-

There was also a conveniently timed school shooting. I-594 was losing in the polls before that.


Or maybe I'm wrong. Maybe it's all a SJW conspiracy to perform a high-tech tar-and-feathering of the only "respectable" black elder to condemn sagging pants and ebonics and other TNB, to keep his uppity black mouth shut.

Why wouldn't that be your first assumption?

Blogger grendel January 03, 2015 1:59 AM  

Yep, the old take your Dad's gun to school and blow away your friends loophole.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus January 03, 2015 2:27 AM  

bob k. mando: "Wendy Davis admits she was lying to get votes when she said she was in favor of open carry..."

Davis’ announcement came just weeks after her campaign suffered its first of many major blows when it was reported that she had fibbed about her background.

Davis’ new admission on her open carry stance appears to support those critiques.

...

“What I do know is that as an elected public servant, I’ve always been true to my core beliefs. Always. And I’m so proud of that,” she added. “And this was the only time I felt like I’d strayed a bit from that.”


Classic social justice warrior: caught lying yet again; so proud of her honesty.

Anonymous Noah B. January 03, 2015 4:00 AM  

"Illegals can now get driver licenses in CA."

Of course... most of the sane ones don't want a driving license. If they get pulled over, they can just make up a name, fail to appear, and that's that. In many respects, non-hispanics are already second class citizens. We're expected to obey the laws and actually punished when we don't, while hispanics without ID are largely ignored because of the hassle it creates for cops to deal with them.

Same goes for social security numbers. All those are good for is paying taxes.

Anonymous Porphyry January 03, 2015 4:18 AM  

"Of course... most of the sane ones don't want a driving license. If they get pulled over, they can just make up a name, fail to appear, and that's that." You mean you don't really need a licence? and the dmv is just for show, man I wish I had known that before I waited in line for 5 hours.

Anonymous Anon January 03, 2015 4:28 AM  

"In many respects, non-hispanics are already second class citizens."

Yep, "For English press, 1".

Anonymous kfg January 03, 2015 9:24 AM  

" . . . the old take your Dad's gun to school and blow away your friends loophole."

Back in the day, we had our own guns and took them to school so we wouldn't have to return home and collect them to go squirrel hunting.

And what Porky said. Jews who do not remember Warsaw puzzle me.

Blogger Jack Hanson January 03, 2015 9:27 AM  

One of the more promising things about 2A rights is that its one of the few (if only) places we've been successful in unringing the bell. Usually a law is passed and that means we can never ever talk about it again.

Witness the current bs in the Senate: Most important thing ever? No not the illegal amnesty treason bur Kwystone XL. This dead gay country gets stupider by the day.

Anonymous FP January 03, 2015 12:20 PM  

Susan: "Cool thing about Bill, is he is now in the state legislature, and given his nature, he is going to be a serious burr under the democrat saddles. I look forward to his term in office."

I hope he does well. I think he is a good man (I used to listen him fairly often) but my overall impression is that he is a party man first above all.

Anonymous Ain January 03, 2015 7:38 PM  

"...refining its goals and using the same-sex marriage movement as a model to take the fight to voters on the state level."

So the voters are going to overwhelmingly vote it down and judges will declare it to be the law anyway?

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts