ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

"It just makes sense"

Parody is the homage rhetoric pays to dialectic:
Star Wars is getting its first lesbian character. Paul S Kemp has revealed that he is adding the mystery woman to his upcoming novel Lords of the Sith, the next instalment in the official sci-fi canon due out on 28 April.

Little is known about her, but “nerd news” blog Big Shiny Robot has dropped a few hints about what fans can expect.

“Moff Mors is an Imperial who has made some very serious mistakes, but she is an incredibly capable leader and spends much of the book working hard to prevent absolute failure,” a recent post reads. “She also happens to be a lesbian.”

Shelly Shapiro, editor of the Star Wars books, explaining that including a lesbian character “just makes sense”.

“There’s a lot of diversity…there should be diversity in Star Wars,” she said. “You have all these different species and it would be silly to not also recognise that there’s a lot of diversity in humans.
And yet, we won't find any Muslims in Star Wars despite there being a billion of them. We won't find any Christians in Star Wars despite there being nearly two billion of them. How many Chinese, serial killers, and Green Bay Packers fans will we find? But More Muff (how very clever) just happens to be a lesbian.

It certainly didn't take Disney long to gay it up. I'm very glad that I lost all interest in Star Wars about ten minutes into The Phantom Menace. If there is one thing you can count on, it is that once SJWs get involved in something, it's just a matter of time before it is ruined. At this rate, they'll have Han Solo transitioning in the second new film and we'll learn that Luke and Leia got married despite knowing they were brother and sister.

Labels: ,

134 Comments:

Blogger Sherwood family March 10, 2015 5:20 AM  

Why does this group (homosexuals), with an estimated 2% of U.S. population, hold such a powerful position culturally and politically, at this point?

How was it able to gain this level of influence? What gave it the power to take hold of the levers of popular culture?

If we are able to answer that question we may be able to reverse these trends and return the U.S. cultural landscape toward valuing traditional relations.

Anonymous Smokey March 10, 2015 5:35 AM  

I don't think Christianity and Islam serve your example well, since those are religions that are very unlikely to exist in the Star Wars universe, absent the cultural and historical factors that created them in the first place.

Gayness, on the other hand, is just a perversion. It doesn't need a wealth of history to help it make sense in-universe, it just...exists. It wouldn't be weird in Star Wars, any more than a guy with arthritis.

I get what you mean, but the examples aren't very good.

Anonymous Smokey March 10, 2015 5:37 AM  

Also, the headline is false. Juhani from Bioware's Knights of the Old Republic was also a lesbian, way back in...what, 2003?

Blogger Vox March 10, 2015 5:42 AM  

I don't think Christianity and Islam serve your example well, since those are religions that are very unlikely to exist in the Star Wars universe, absent the cultural and historical factors that created them in the first place.

You totally missed the point. There have been religions in every single human society ever. These religions have always held an important and culturally significant place in society. And yet, not only is there neither Christian nor Muslim in Star Wars, there is not even any reasonable facsimile of them or of any other religion.

Even "the Force" is revealed to be nothing more than midichlorian technology.

Blogger Vox March 10, 2015 5:44 AM  

Gayness, on the other hand, is just a perversion. It doesn't need a wealth of history to help it make sense in-universe, it just...exists.

This is also false. "Gay", as an identity, did not exist throughout most of history.

Anonymous Smokey March 10, 2015 5:45 AM  

You totally missed the point. There have been religions in every single human society ever. These religions have always held an important and culturally significant place in society. And yet, not only is there neither Christian nor Muslim in Star Wars, there is not even any reasonable facsimile of them or of any other religion.

Even "the Force" is revealed to be nothing more than midichlorian technology.


Fair point.

Blogger Cataline Sergius March 10, 2015 5:50 AM  

Disney has always wanted a science fiction franchise because Walt always wanted one. They tried repeatedly for decades to get one going. Most of which died in development.

That remains the problem. They actually do like science fiction as an institution but don't know how to make it in practice. They tend to outsource the development talent with disastrous results.

Look at John Carter. When director Andrew Stanton (Wall-E) decided he needed a real science fiction writer to do punch up on his script. He clearly turned to the Hugo Awards for guidance. That is the only possible explanation for selecting Micheal Chabon to rewrite his script.

Chabon wrote the Yiddish Policeman's Union. Which did indeed win the Hugo for best novel of the year. I suppose we should all be grateful that John Scalzi hadn't won his participation Hugo yet. As bad as John Carter's script was it would have been worse if Scalzi was writing it.

Chabon was completely out of his depth. You may as well have hired him to write a Conan script. He simply has the completely wrong personality to write high adventure. Anyone should have been able to spot this just by reading his book. But it did win the Hugo award so he had to know what he was doing right?

The Hugo's have turned into a major SJW entryism tool.

And now it's Star Wars turn. May the Force help them.

Blogger Vox March 10, 2015 5:53 AM  

Chabon was completely out of his depth. You may as well have hired him to write a Conan script. He simply has the completely wrong personality to write high adventure. Anyone should have been able to spot this just by reading his book.

Considering that most Hollywood directors can't be bothered to read the books on which they are nominally basing their movies, I suppose that would have been far too much to expect for a mere script doctor.

Blogger Sherwood family March 10, 2015 5:54 AM  

One reason that "alternative" lifestyles started to appear early in sci-fi is because much of what happens there is already unusual and so the average reader accepts it more easily. As these kinds of characters proliferated in sci-fi/fantasy it made them easier to accept in other mediums. I would argue that there has been a concerted effort to habituate our societies to accepting these things as "normal" rather than as "unfortunate" or "deviant." I think this is one reason that the SJWs and Gamma Rabbit types are so hell bent on keeping the focus of sci-fi on these things instead of on the story. If they can keep people marinating in these things long enough it becomes, in the absence of arguments to the contrary, natural to accept these behaviors and view points as normal instead of realizing that they represent a minority of the population both in the U.S. and throughout history. As Alexander Pope said, "“Vice is a monster of so frightful mien. As to be hated needs but to be seen; Yet seen too oft, familiar with her face, We first endure, then pity, then embrace."

Blogger Cataline Sergius March 10, 2015 5:54 AM  

@Sherwood Family

How was it able to gain this level of influence? What gave it the power to take hold of the levers of popular culture?

That one is easy. The only genuinely feminine thing about Lambdas is that they absolutely crave attention like a heroine addict craves his next hit.

Consequently they gravitate towards show business. Once there they look after each other's interests. It's called the Gay Mafia for a reason.

Blogger Vox March 10, 2015 5:56 AM  

That remains the problem. They actually do like science fiction as an institution but don't know how to make it in practice.

It's not really that hard. Find a good story. Then follow the directions and otherwise leave it the fuck alone. If you asked these idiots to make a cake from a recipe, you'd come home to find the house burned down because they decided it would taste better with kerosene mixed into the batter and frosting made of C4.

Anonymous DT March 10, 2015 5:58 AM  

Meh...it's not actually Disney or the movies (yet). Just some book author.

It's more surprising to me that there aren't already SW books which are far worse. If you had asked me before reading about this I would have guessed that somewhere there was a SW book with furries and/or wereseals.

Blogger Cataline Sergius March 10, 2015 6:01 AM  

Still better Chabon than Scalzi.

"Thanks for saving me Tars Tarkas. I really owe you a blow job."

Anonymous The Spy March 10, 2015 6:02 AM  

I have a serious case of Gay fatigue.

And Disney,ABC, et al. are pushing their filth and degradation on this country and world like they're in hyperdrive. This is clearly an agenda from this anti-Christ network. Make no bones about it.

Blogger Cataline Sergius March 10, 2015 6:04 AM  

It's not really that hard. Find a good story. Then follow the directions and otherwise leave it the fuck alone.

There of course is the big problem. How many good science fiction have been published by the big publishing houses in the last twenty years?

Blogger Sherwood family March 10, 2015 6:09 AM  

One thing that has kept SW from getting too far out was greed. So long as the majority of the clientele were pre-pubescent boys, George Lucas and Fox could not push the envelope too fast or far otherwise you would alienate the parents of this cohort and they'd stop buying the SW figures/etc. Now that the kids that grew up with SW are adults and the rest of the culture has moved toward normalizing this stuff SW can follow suit incrementally without losing its fan base. Try that kind of crap in 1983 and George Lucas' precious trilogy would have been eviscerated by angry Mom's and Dad's that would have kept their kids away from it in droves.

Blogger Sherwood family March 10, 2015 6:12 AM  

Geez...I just looked at my comment. Typo/spelling/grammar mess. My apologies.

Blogger Cataline Sergius March 10, 2015 6:18 AM  

The sad part about Disney is that they do seem to want make good science fiction. Tommorrowland (new trailer BTW) has always been a huge part of the Disney identity. It goes back to the 1939 New York World's Fair, " I Have Seen the Future."

Of course SJW entryist are absolutely committed to destroying this vision of the future and replacing it with an LBGT Gnostic nihilist version.

Blogger Duke of Earl March 10, 2015 6:21 AM  

John Carter is simply a hero in the classical sense. He sees the right path and then does not swerve from it.

Unfortunately the script writer couldn't grok him.

Anonymous PhillipGeorge(c)2015 March 10, 2015 6:26 AM  

The very first time I heard the word progressive it seriously annoyed me. "Progressing to where", "Progressing to what"
Shallow stupid stupefied people can't do the reductio ad absurdum. Thailand unofficially celebrated the world's first triple gay marriage recently and the main stream media clapped like seals eying the trainer's fish.
If Disney can't stomach family friendly well adjusted happy lesbian cannibals it should issue a warning to those of us who love and respect them for who they are.
Progs means shallow, narcissistic, vain, and really, just stupid. Entropy in biology or spectral opacity/ mean free paths, in atmospheric physics in nothing compared to the goodness of sharing their media spaces with oppressed minorities. In my humble opinion Vox - perhaps this inspires a writer on the other side of the world.

Anonymous Apollo March 10, 2015 6:28 AM  

This is also false. "Gay", as an identity, did not exist throughout most of history.

This is an interesting point. Any idea when 'gay' became an identity, and who was responsible for promoting this idea?

Blogger James Sullivan March 10, 2015 6:32 AM  

"Moff Mors"

I had to read that three times. I thought it was a joke. Seriously.

Anonymous HalibetLector March 10, 2015 6:34 AM  

They (Disney) actually do like science fiction as an institution

I wouldn't go that far. Disney likes expanding into profitable areas they aren't currently in. That's the extent of their interest in SF&F and Gaming. This is also why they continually fail at the internet. They don't understand any of these areas, but they know they make money and Disney wants to make more money.

Anonymous PhillipGeorge(c)2015 March 10, 2015 6:35 AM  

Apollo, it was a show of hands vote at a psychiatric convention in America less than a generation ago.

It should blow your mind: Homosexual doesn't exist.

Anonymous Progressive Proud March 10, 2015 6:38 AM  

Paul S. Kemp is gay. So this is perfectly natural and only "offensive" to homophobes. George Lucas would support this, originally Lando was supposed to be a gay character, but the Nixonian squares at 20th Century Fox made Lucas change him. Lando is ex-gay because of Fox fascists.

Anonymous PhillipGeorge(c)2015 March 10, 2015 6:41 AM  

Put this another way: In any parliament, legislature, congress anywhere in the World who can cite a single debate had with respect to the cost benefit analysis done implementing "multiculturalism" as a policy of governance.

Anonymous 2-to-1 March 10, 2015 6:44 AM  

bets that Shelly Shapiro is a dykey land whale?

Blogger Doom March 10, 2015 6:47 AM  

It's for the kids. All for the kids. Mean old whites, men, history, morality, and such, need not apply. This while they are teaching 11 year old girls how to accept sexual advances to 'prevent rape'... or some such. When you deny the truth, all that is left to believe in are lies.

Blogger Sherwood family March 10, 2015 6:58 AM  

Progressive Proud: Unless you know something different about Paul S. Kemp than what he had on his Wikipedia entry and web page, I do not think he is gay. Wikipedia claims he his married to a wife named Jennifer. Unless you think that means he is "married" to a "wife" named Jennifer.

Anonymous Ain March 10, 2015 6:59 AM  

Disney was one of the first corporations to start worshiping the gays. They started gay nights back in the 90's. This isn't surprising.

Anonymous zen0 March 10, 2015 7:05 AM  

@ Progressive Proud

Paul S. Kemp is gay. So this is perfectly natural and only "offensive" to homophobes

Aren't you being offensive to homos by using the word "homophobes" . Shouldn't it be "gayphobes"? If you wanted to use the word homophobe, you should have said "Paul S. Kemp is a homosexual".

Blogger Mr.MantraMan March 10, 2015 7:06 AM  

A life of pure rhetoric must suck balls. Sure we all use it, but honestly the response above is how that person must communicate nearly all the time. I listened to a half hour of a left wing radio talk show last Saturday and was amazed because I don't think the host spoke in more than 6 word sentences. They are like the R2D2s of humanity, short bursts of communications.

Blogger Sherwood family March 10, 2015 7:08 AM  

Progressive Proud: Do you have source for your assertion that Lando was originally envisioned as gay? Did George Lucas mention it as an anecdote someplace? Or is this assertion just based on hearsay?

Blogger Ben Cohen March 10, 2015 7:08 AM  

This was easy to see when the first scene shown was a negro stormtrooper. I think Ghostbusters is going to be made with an all women cast. Considering these non-stop perversions, when will an alternative to Hollyweird appear?

Anonymous Troper A March 10, 2015 7:09 AM  

Sigh. I have to admit, I never saw the need to expand Star Wars beyond the original trilogy. I thought the arc of every character was wrapped up well and the resolution was largely satisfactory. I know that SW is stuffed to the gills with universe building, but it seems to me that anything that happens apart from the main characters is pure fluff. Unimportant. People watch Star Wars and they see a nerd paradise filled with creatures with weird names and superpowered guys in robes. They fail to understand that what made Star Wars great (besides the action and special effects) was the banter between the characters - we were spending time with a group of people we liked and had grown to be concerned about. People who weren't shiny and perfect.

The prequels threw all of that in the dumpster and tried to be some grand Shakespearean tragedy filled with creatures with weird names and superpowered guys in robes (which really doesn't work all that well as it just doesn't fit the tone of the story.. ) And I cared very little about the people in the prequels. In the Original Trilogy, I was constantly saying "How are our heroes going to get out of THIS one?" I rarely asked that in the prequels.

Something tells me this next series of movies that they're making is going to be Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skull all over again. Parading a really old Harrison Ford and the rest of the cast out in front of the cameras to try to get them to relive an old adventure and recapture lost youth, but only serving to remind the audience of the mortality that awaits them and to tell them that they'll never be that 11 year old kid playing with his action figures ever again.

Anonymous zen0 March 10, 2015 7:10 AM  

I propose the acronym LGBTD(etc.) be shortened to SC, for Sexually Confused.

Thus you would have SCC, or, Sexually Confused Community.

Blogger frigger611 March 10, 2015 7:14 AM  

I wish I could find comfort by lying to myself that this is just a sick joke.

I guess I'll have to put more credence now into the stories I've heard from my friends/acquaintances in the Hollywood scene that GL likes to wear a diaper while being entertained by a dominatrix.

Yeah, makes perfect sense now.

Anonymous Heh March 10, 2015 7:16 AM  

How many Chinese, serial killers, and Green Bay Packers fans will we find?

There were Chinese -- the sly and perfidious Neimoidian traders. =)

Blogger Sherwood family March 10, 2015 7:17 AM  

Ben Cohen, I am not sure an alternative will ever appear. Hollywood would have to be defunded. The only way to do that is to cease to buy its wares or consume the goods it produces. A few of us might do that but convincing most people that bleeding Hollyweird dry is worth their missing out on the newest Avengers film is a hard sell. Of course, if one could demonstrate that Hollywood had turned American culture into a cesspool one might have a chance, but there seem to be too many that like it that way.

Blogger Dave March 10, 2015 7:19 AM  

@Apollo @Phillip

It started w/ Michel Foucault pointing out Carl Friedrich Otto Westphal's 1870 essay "contrary sexual sensations" as the birth of homosexuality being an identity than a practice. I've heard others point out that Freud had a big helping hand as well, through Narcissistic Object Choice & the Oedipus complex (among other aspects).

The Art of Manliness website posted two stories (here and here) that looked at male friendships and relationships before they were destroyed by homosexuality becoming an identity, as well as by communism. The homosexual relationships between the Cambridge Five from WWII did not help matters in the least.

And, for the Christian TMI crowd w/ about an hour to kill...

Anonymous HalibetLector March 10, 2015 7:20 AM  

when will an alternative to Hollyweird appear?

It already has. Netflix, hulu and amazon have already produced their own original series. It's only a matter of time before they start making movies as well. Also, Kevin Smith (of all people) has shown another way forward. Nobody talks about that much, though, because he's thoroughly pissed off everybody.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan March 10, 2015 7:28 AM  

Think of all this as mainly fashion, here today, gone tomorrow. This is white leftist one upmanship over the "common enemy" (us), and little more. Once gayness hits the trailer parks its toast.

Anonymous Apollo March 10, 2015 7:29 AM  

@Dave

Great info, thanks!

Blogger Josh March 10, 2015 7:39 AM  

It already has. Netflix, hulu and amazon have already produced their own original series. It's only a matter of time before they start making movies as well.

Those aren't alternatives to Hollywood.

Anonymous kawaika March 10, 2015 7:40 AM  

"I had to read that three times. I thought it was a joke. Seriously."

Maybe it's a reference to bed death.

Blogger Sherwood family March 10, 2015 7:42 AM  

HalibetLector, I tend to agree with Josh. These are not alternatives to Hollywood, at present they are distribution channels OF Hollywood. Now, they might develop into alternatives but I am not convinced that they will do so. For now, the expertise and financing is all in Hollywood and are part of the system there. Until a separate pipeline, with separate financing, and separate creators/purveyors of content grows up there will be no real alternative to Hollywood.

Anonymous PhillipGeorge(c)2015 March 10, 2015 7:43 AM  

You're missing the point Dave
The DSM-II listed homosexuality as an abnormal behavior under section "302. Sexual Deviations." It was the first deviation listed. After much political pressure, a committee of the APA met behind closed doors in 1973.

A show of hands vote effectively established "homosexuals" as a sub species of homosapiens. It was a reinvention of what it is to be human.

In the history of revisionism, science has died the death of a thousand cuts...

Blogger Josh March 10, 2015 7:54 AM  

These aren't the alternatives you're looking for:

"Transparent is an American comedy-drama television series produced by Picrow for Amazon Studios that debuted on February 6, 2014.[1] The series was created and directed by Jill Soloway. The story revolves around a Los Angeles family and their lives following the discovery that the person they knew as their father Mort (Jeffrey Tambor) is transgender.[2] It was picked for a full season by Amazon Studios on March 12, 2014[3] which premiered in full on September 26, 2014.[4] On October 9, 2014, Transparent was renewed for a second season, which will be released in 2015.[5]"

Anonymous Steve March 10, 2015 7:55 AM  

Vox, they already had a gay robot in the first movie.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus March 10, 2015 7:58 AM  

Sherwood family: "Why does this group (homosexuals), with an estimated 2% of U.S. population, hold such a powerful position culturally and politically, at this point?"

Patronage, supplemented by the gay mafia.

Sherwood family: "How was it able to gain this level of influence? What gave it the power to take hold of the levers of popular culture?"

Mass media support. Jews own and control the mass media.

Sherwood family: "If we are able to answer that question we may be able to reverse these trends and return the U.S. cultural landscape toward valuing traditional relations."

Not without being willing to believe the truth, taboo though it is.

Blogger Sherwood family March 10, 2015 8:02 AM  

Titus Didius Tacitus: Which particular truth do we need to be willing to believe to reverse this? I am not sure I followed from your comment. If I understand properly you are saying that a combination of patronage and mass media support allowed this agenda to proliferate. What was in it for the patrons and the mass media?

Blogger Josh March 10, 2015 8:06 AM  

Netflix:

"Laverne Cox is an American actress, reality television star, television producer, and LGBT advocate,[1][2][3] best known for her portrayal of Sophia Burset on the Netflix television series Orange Is the New Black, for which she became the first openly transgender person to be nominated for an Primetime Emmy Award in the acting category,[4][5] and the first to be nominated for an Emmy Award since composer/musician Angela Morley in 1990.[6]"

Blogger Josh March 10, 2015 8:16 AM  

Mass media support. Jews own and control the mass media.

To quote the Larry Sanders show, the Jews don't run Hollywood. The gay Jews do.

Blogger Sherwood family March 10, 2015 8:20 AM  

If it is mass media support, and therefore support from a largely Jewish media establishment, the questions becomes: What does a Jewish media establishment gain from giving a platform to the homosexual agenda? How do they benefit?

Anonymous bw March 10, 2015 8:28 AM  

All Diversity is good and morally right simply by being Diverse and must be represented wherever and whenever possible, and giving the finger to Nature is a special bonus, as we claim hypocritically and with lies that we love Nature and yet are destroying it and its proven, historical methods. Nature haters, we are.

Not without being willing to believe the truth, taboo though it is. -TDT

That's it and that's all. The desperate need for Identity can be a real bitch.

Anonymous paradox March 10, 2015 8:28 AM  

Great... Strap on lightsabers.

Blogger Sherwood family March 10, 2015 8:37 AM  

Thank you, Paradox for inflicting that mental image on all of us.

Anonymous HalibetLector March 10, 2015 8:37 AM  

@Josh, @Sherwood: They are alternatives to hollywood. Based on your comments, what you want isn't a hollywood alternative. You're looking for a hollywood replacement that promotes conservative values over progressive ones. That's like saying you want to replace disco with jazz. It'll never happen and it's irrelevant anyhow. Hollywood is increasingly becoming irrelevant as a distribution model. Just like GamerGate, you should be focusing on independently creating the movies you want to see, then creating a media of your own to cover it. A real alternative, not a wholesale replacement.

I've given this route a lot of thought, but in the end I get hung up on the fact that it doesn't matter if the entertainment is 'progressive' or 'conservative'. Movies and TV rots your brain, no matter the content. In a world where everybody's being entertained to death, does the flavor of the poison matter?

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus March 10, 2015 8:46 AM  

Sherwood family: "Titus Didius Tacitus: Which particular truth do we need to be willing to believe to reverse this?"

Ethnic conflict has become a dominant factor in the development of Western civilization, not only in the crude, lower-class sense that (e.g.) when blacks displace whites in Detroit, the culture of Detroit changes, but in the sense that elites stealthily promote bad culture to ethnicities they are in competition with.

This includes but is not limited to Jews promoting harmful culture to whites, and gay power is an instance of this.

The implication is, every ethnic group should strive for power over its own culture, and not let another ethnic group gain power over its culture and corrupt it. Iranians, Chinese, Jews or whoever: all should strive to see that anything influencing morality (especially sex, which means reproduction, which means a future for that ethnic group) is in the hands of people who identify with that group, support it, and put a high priority on it having a good future. Wanting a good future for their group, they will be properly incentivized to promote healthy morality. This is the key truth.

As the good trees bring forth good fruit, those who really want a good future for their people will promote healthy morality, even if they personally are not spotless.

The contrary view, that morality is best preserved by empowering people who talk a good game about universal morality in general, even if those people have a competitive interest in the downfall of other ethnic groups they can exert a cultural influence over, has been tried. It failed catastrophically, it is still failing, and it will continue to fail. Those that want bad fruit, that is downward social mobility for those they regard as disliked out-groups, are drawn again and again to plant bad trees. That is, they promote the kind of culture that leads to destruction, which is necessarily bad, immoral culture, particularly regarding sex.

The temptation to promote harmful, immoral culture to people you really don't like is too strong. It's a sneaky free shot. It's too deniable. People can do this and get away with it, and those who are highly aggressive and highly ethnocentric will do it.

Sherwood family: "I am not sure I followed from your comment."

Fair enough. Have I made myself clear so far?

Anonymous paradox March 10, 2015 8:47 AM  

Sherwood,

it's not a new concept...it has been done before

Anonymous Mike M. March 10, 2015 8:48 AM  

Castalia House Films, Vox. It's a business opportunity.

Blogger Owen March 10, 2015 8:50 AM  

Why does this group (homosexuals), with an estimated 2% of U.S. population, hold such a powerful position culturally and politically, at this point?

It's a useful cudgel for the enemies of Christianity, because it's easy to misrepresent what the Bible says on the matter.

Anonymous VD March 10, 2015 8:51 AM  

Castalia House Films, Vox. It's a business opportunity.

Let's see how we do with the games first. If we can't even raise enough money for the game kickstarter, then movies are obviously a complete non-starter.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus March 10, 2015 9:04 AM  

Blacks ought to be hostile to non-black owners of record labels and other media promoting gangsta culture to black youth. The attitude of suspicion that some blacks have over this, the concern that "they don't really care about our young people" is, in my opinion, right on the mark.

So what I'm presenting is a universal policy that I think should be followed by any ethnic group: white, black, brown, purple with blue spots, I don't care. Get control of the influences on your culture, and don't let people who see you as an out-group and therefore have an interest in driving you down start selling your kids on "psychedelic" drug use, gangsta culture, homosexuality as an approved "identity" or any other form of corruption that will degrade and weaken your group.

Anonymous Heh March 10, 2015 9:05 AM  

Great... Strap on lightsabers.

Anybody remember the "Candy" x-rated comics from the 1980s? They did a Star Wars parody in which Darth's "lightsaber" emanated from his crotch.

"I am the Dark Lord of the spooge..."

Anonymous Heh March 10, 2015 9:07 AM  

What does a Jewish media establishment gain from giving a platform to the homosexual agenda? How do they benefit?

What if they are just evil and relish destruction regardless of any "benefit" it has?

Blogger Josh March 10, 2015 9:23 AM  

They are alternatives to hollywood.

Hulu is owned by three Hollywood studios. Netflix and Amazon distribute content produced by studios.

How is that an alternative?

Look...do you think HBO is a Hollywood alternative?

If no, than neither are hulu, Netflix, or Amazon.

If yes, than you're using a definition of alternative that is so broad it's useless.

Anonymous Jerome Horowitz March 10, 2015 9:30 AM  

zen0 March 10, 2015 7:10 AM....Thus you would have SCC, or, Sexually Confused Community.
..
Or just SC, for Sodomite Club ? Thereby having documented historical reference.

Blogger Josh March 10, 2015 9:31 AM  

Hollywood is increasingly becoming irrelevant as a distribution model.

Please explain what you think Hollywood's distribution model is.

Blogger Josh March 10, 2015 9:36 AM  

What does a Jewish media establishment gain from giving a platform to the homosexual agenda? How do they benefit?

It's pretty simple. If the gay Jews run Hollywood, they don't really think there's anything wrong with making movies or tv shows about gays.

Anonymous Daniel March 10, 2015 9:43 AM  

Yeah, modernizing a setting that took place such a long, long time ago really could add something to the false archaism of Star Wars: In the next movie, Jar Jar Twinks and Ipod-D2 could design a Starbucks-destroying Roller Coaster for us to all ride on whenever we are at Lesbyland.

Man, I hardly even remember when movies were consistently fun. I think it is interesting that the big movies over the last 12 months or so have been Interstellar, Guardians of the Galaxy, and American Sniper, Spongebob, Fifty Shades of Grey, Kingsman, Lego Movie, etc. The Desecration of the Hobbit couldn't even take advantage of gay angles.

Pretty much anything that provides an unmentioned haven against SJW anti-fun is going to do well.

Anonymous p-dawg March 10, 2015 9:45 AM  

@ HalibetLector: Do you have any actual evidence for your assertion that, no matter the content, merely watching tv or movies "rots your brain"? Or is that just some "old man yells at cloud" crap you're spouting? You know, they used to say the same thing about reading books...

Anonymous Athor Pel March 10, 2015 9:48 AM  

Remember, just because you don't derive pleasure from inflicting evil does not mean that others don't.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus March 10, 2015 9:51 AM  

p-dawg: "You know, they used to say the same thing about reading books..."

Who said that reading books rots your brain, and where and when did they say it?

Blogger Ben March 10, 2015 9:51 AM  

How many Chinese, serial killers, and Green Bay Packers fans will we find?

Well, the Trade Federation viceroys were clearly Asian. As for Packers fans, well, there were a lot of drunks in that cantina in Mos Eisley...

Blogger S1AL March 10, 2015 9:51 AM  

That's a long way to fall from Timothy Zahn saving the Star Wars franchise single-handed...

Blogger Josh March 10, 2015 9:57 AM  

Who said that reading books rots your brain, and where and when did they say it?

White teachers:

Game of Thrones author George R.R. Martin told an audience at the Edinburgh International Literary Festival that his teachers said sci-fi would rot his mind. "When I was 12 or 13, I had teachers take away science fiction books by [Robert A.] Heinlein and [Isaac] Asimov and say: 'You're a smart kid, you get good grades. Why are you reading this trash? They rot your mind. You should be reading Silas Marner,'"

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus March 10, 2015 9:59 AM  

Josh: "You should be reading Silas Marner,.."

That's a long way from "reading books rots your brain."

Blogger Josh March 10, 2015 10:06 AM  

That's a long way from "reading books rots your brain."

Four Bad Side Effects from Reading Fiction

Well, we're getting closer...here's an article about 19th century whites warning about the dangers of reading fiction.

Anonymous Jack Amok March 10, 2015 10:09 AM  

There of course is the big problem. How many good science fiction have been published by the big publishing houses in the last twenty years?

I could write a dozen good scripts based on published Traveller adventures. Another batch based on 2300AD. A movie based on the Kafer Dawn would be, or rather could be, excellent.

Anonymous Jack Amok March 10, 2015 10:13 AM  

The sad part about Disney is that they do seem to want make good science fiction. Tommorrowland (new trailer BTW) has always been a huge part of the Disney identity. It goes back to the 1939 New York World's Fair, " I Have Seen the Future."

My last trip to Disneyland I was... sad in Tomorrowland. I remember when I was a kid, it was about a more or less realistic future. Rockets, submarines, technology. Now it's cartoon futures. Buzz Lightyear and Star Wars and Finding Nemo. Fantasy. Funny thing was, standing across the way in the California Adventure park, I was waiting for my wife and son in a place modeled after the California desert test ranges, and a life sized replica of a rocket engine on a test gantry started steaming and going through a pre-flight test sequence. That felt like the old Tommorrowland, the place where you could actually think about what the future could be like.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus March 10, 2015 10:13 AM  

Heh: "What if they are just evil and relish destruction regardless of any "benefit" it has?"

Then my recommendation would not be altered: don't let them influence your culture!

But there are many other recommendations that also follow from what I think is the important truth of ethnic conflict affecting culture.

For example: should you entrust your white American children to the spiritual guidance of an Indian "guru". Heck no! You should treat gurus as flim-flam men, who do not share your interest in your children's continuing success through many generations.

Another implication is that "multiculturalism" inherently implies an enlarged scope for immoral influences.

Anonymous HalibetLector March 10, 2015 10:15 AM  

How is that an alternative?

Because they also distribute content NOT produced by hollywood studios. Just out of curiosity, what definition of alternative are you using? Mine is "offering or expressing a choice" or "existing or functioning outside of the established society." But, I just noticed a possible definition is "a choice limited to one or two or more possibilities, as of things, propositions, or courses of action, the selection of which precludes any other possibility." To clarify, this last definition is not relevant to the conversation. Just because netflix distributes hollywood content doesn't mean they can't distribute other content as well.

Please explain what you think Hollywood's distribution model is.

I'll admit some ignorance on this subject, but the distribution model that has the most influence on American popular culture is the theatrical release. That's the distribution they have a stranglehold on. Streaming, dvds and digital downloads are open to anybody.

Do you have any actual evidence for your assertion that, no matter the content, merely watching tv or movies "rots your brain"?

Look up Marshal McLuhan's research. Nicholas Carr references that and more recent research into the matter in his book "The Shallows", if you want more accessible material.

You know, they used to say the same thing about reading books...

People say a lot of things. The scientific research and plain old experience says other things.

Or is that just some "old man yells at cloud" crap you're spouting?"

I'm only 30. The crap I'm spouting has more to do with the effects TV has on me and people close to me. They don't call it the opiate of the masses for nothing.

Anonymous p-dawg March 10, 2015 10:19 AM  

@Josh: Correct, it was, specifically, fiction to which I was referring. I believe it was a Puritan position, but I may be mistaken on that. The argument ran that fiction was lies and lies were the province of Satan, IIRC.

Anonymous p-dawg March 10, 2015 10:22 AM  

@HalibetLector: "The crap I'm spouting has more to do with the effects TV has on me and people close to me."

You could have just said "No, I don't have any evidence." Stop blaming external things for your bad decisions and the bad decisions of those close to you. Take some responsibility for yourself.

Blogger Josh March 10, 2015 10:25 AM  

Mine is "offering or expressing a choice" or "existing or functioning outside of the established society.

By that definition, Netflix, hulu, and Amazon are not alternatives.

Anonymous Shut up rabbit March 10, 2015 10:28 AM  

Super hero transvestite anyone? Boy actually gets super powers by dressing as a woman.

Blogger IM2L844 March 10, 2015 10:28 AM  

Pretty much anything that provides an unmentioned haven against SJW anti-fun is going to do well.

I think some of the kids with immature frontal cortexes who run off to join ISIS are thinking along similar lines. Are the SJW's ready to shed blood for their New World Order? I'm afraid that's what it's going to come down to.

Anonymous HalibetLector March 10, 2015 10:35 AM  

By that definition, Netflix, hulu, and Amazon are not alternatives.

I'm curious, what does this alternative you speak of look like?

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus March 10, 2015 10:45 AM  

Sherwood family,

Who should you entrust your children to, according to my idea? The list likely starts with your mother, who probably wants great-grandchildren with healthy family lives, fidelity, and similar attitudes to hers. (At the supermarket a while ago, I overheard (and could hardly have not overheard) an elderly woman pressuring her daughter to provide her with grandchildren, at least one this year and no more putting it off. This is the sort of attitude I'm talking about. That woman was not neutral on whether her line was going to die out, and so she had a very clear agenda for her daughter, including marriage (done) and legitimate children.)

The cultural influences you trust should be like your mother, OK? They should have a strong interest in the continuing success of people like you and your kids.

Jews who think that the white race is the cancer of the world are not acceptable alternative influences. Even if they are exerting their influence indirectly, through the mass media.

Now, going back to our starting point: with Jews having used their media influence to empower gays, and with gays continuing to gain power through the gay mafia, how does one oppose this and restore some kind of traditional morality?

I think if you take an ethnically blind approach you're handicapping yourself, probably too much for that approach to be effective.

You can ignore what's been going on from the point of view of inter-ethic competition, but Jews will not ignore it. You will have the mass media bashing you. You will not start a fight with them, but they will start a fight with you.

If you continue to accept Jews as trusted sources of influence they will remain in power and they will win, which means their gay culture shock-troops will win.

And if you somehow managed to win, Jews still in power would simply start again promoting the same vice or other vices, such as bestiality. (Otherkin liberation?)

Ultimately, to win, I think you have to be willing to displace from key positions of cultural influence an ethnicity that has been waging inter-ethnic conflict by means including the promotion of bad culture, such as empowered homosexuality.

I'm aware that this is discouraging advice, because the odds of success against such formidable opposition are bad. But I think that's how it is.

Anonymous Feh March 10, 2015 11:01 AM  

Do you have any actual evidence for your assertion that, no matter the content, merely watching tv or movies "rots your brain"?

Look up Marshal McLuhan's research. Nicholas Carr references that and more recent research into the matter in his book "The Shallows", if you want more accessible material.


My high school English teacher back in 1979 said it. He made us read this:

http://www.amazon.com/Plug--Drug-Marie-Winn/dp/0670561606/

No doubt even more work has been done since then. But the facts have been known for a long time.

Blogger Josh March 10, 2015 11:11 AM  

I'm curious, what does this alternative you speak of look like?

Nice redirect.

You'll have to ask Ben Cohen, because he's the one who brought it up.

Do you consider hbo to be an alternative to Hollywood?

Blogger Josh March 10, 2015 11:19 AM  

Jews who think that the white race is the cancer of the world are not acceptable alternative influences.

Ah, very good.

So Jews who do not think that the white race is the cancer of the world are acceptable alternative influences.

Blogger kurt9 March 10, 2015 11:20 AM  

Disney stopped being "family entertainment" with the ascension of Eisner as CEO in the early 90's. It was Eisner and his "performance based compensation (based on stock price) that made the bottom line the number one criterion at Disney. It was also this time that Disney began cultivating the "Mouskateers" on the basis of turning them into teen starlets as they grew up.

Blogger John Wright March 10, 2015 11:24 AM  

"Vox, they already had a gay robot in the first movie."

English, not gay. Hard to tell the difference at times, but nonetheless.

Anonymous BigGaySteve March 10, 2015 11:26 AM  

There are a couple of reasons gays are over represented. One is that guys who get HIV on purpose ,called bug chasers, get on social security disability and then can post online all day like it was their job, giving them more free time than someone who works a weekend option. It was somewhat bothersome to discover guys with so much free time while I was working a weekend option. There are a lot of gay artists but its hard to tell if its because they don't need to support anyone other than themselves or that for nonrealistic work Patron is another name for Sugar Daddy. I had a friend who said about how being treasurer of one of the big gay charities at his age looks really good on his resume, who only got the job by sleeping with someone in a higher position & I was still getting calls from collection agencies looking for him for his personal financial screw ups..

When I was in college I went to a LGBT conference in DC, paid for by taxpayers, and even I had enough real world experience to know that most of the things talked about where insane. There where actually lesbians wanting to make the streets safe for sex workers, when the streets are not even safe for 6'+ tall EMTS. The average gay guy thinks all of the sports locker rooms are like a bath house because they couldn't imagine themselves not doing stuff around guys like that. It is an extension of liberals imagining themselves the new commissar ,but never the body in the ditch. Every gay/lesbian for gay marriage thinks they will be collecting alimony from their exes.

Soros donated $33million last year to the protests of Didndo Nutting who committed strong arm robbery on video pummeling an Asian clerk in Ferguson. Two weeks after he was killed, Mohammad Ali Brown was caught after serial killing gays in 3 states, which should have scared gays if it had gotten any coverage. Gaypatriot.net was the only gay news that covered him, as he used the gay hookup app grindr to find his victims, that app lets anyone in the area that also has it the info that you put into it & gives your location.

Soros' ill gotten funds use gays as a weapon. There are gay jews that feel more threatened by Netanyahu than moslems. Soros's money basically gets to set the message in the gay community because when people like Pamela Geller spend money on ads about moslem treatment of gays, not only is it a pittance by comparison but it threatens the jobs of Soros's water bearers.

"Moff Mors"I had to read that three times... a joke- someone who has never been behind a lesbian 50+ bumper sticker car

"Blacks ought to be hostile to non-black ... promoting gangsta culture to black youth".- Remember Jayzee stabbing a record exec

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus March 10, 2015 11:26 AM  

Oh, and the Muslims and other Middle Easterners who are concerned that mass media produced in the Judeo-Christian West might be a negative influence on their children? They're right.

The rules are the same for everyone: don't give up power, don't give up power over your culture, and above all don't give power over your culture to aggressive and highly ethnocentric people who are inclined to see you as an evil out-group. They will have every incentive to corrupt your children and harm your long-term collective success, and they can do it in deniable ways.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus March 10, 2015 11:32 AM  

BigGaySteve: ""Blacks ought to be hostile to non-black ... promoting gangsta culture to black youth".- Remember Jayzee stabbing a record exec"

Silly me, I was thinking of this "hostility" being expressed in typically white ways, not typically black ways.

Blogger Guitar Man March 10, 2015 11:41 AM  

Progressive white people want gay characters. They'll throw a parade for this type of thing.

Anonymous Trimegistus March 10, 2015 11:45 AM  

"Moff Mors."

When the character name is indistinguishable from the X-rated parody version, you've got a problem.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus March 10, 2015 11:47 AM  

Guitar Man: "Progressive white people want gay characters. They'll throw a parade for this type of thing."

They do and they don't. The parade you can have; long term viewership maybe not.

There's a difference between wanting to mark a bit of cultural territory as yours, and long term pleasure in what the territory then becomes.

Anonymous HalibetLector March 10, 2015 11:55 AM  

You'll have to ask Ben Cohen, because he's the one who brought it up.

I'm asking you. Right now, I can't tell if you have any opinion on this at all, or if you just like saying "nuh uh" over and over.

Do you consider hbo to be an alternative to Hollywood?

Hollywood makes movies. HBO is a cable channel. Ask me again when they start making movies.

Blogger Guitar Man March 10, 2015 11:59 AM  

Holy cow, Halibet...besides the fact that H'wood does not just include movie making, HBO makes movies.

http://store.hbo.com/hbo-original-films/index.php?v=hbo_shows_programming_original-films

Blogger Josh March 10, 2015 12:05 PM  

I'm asking you. Right now, I can't tell if you have any opinion on this at all, or if you just like saying "nuh uh" over and over.

I haven't given that much thought to what an alternative would be. It certainly wouldn't be delivering content through web video.

Hollywood makes movies. HBO is a cable channel. Ask me again when they start making movies.

As guitar man pointed out, HBO makes movies.

Blogger Guitar Man March 10, 2015 12:08 PM  

Josh, we all know that the only real alternative to Hollywood is Sherwood Pictures. The quality of movies is unmatched. The acting is amazing. The story lines are always top notch. Fireproof should have won the Oscar's Best Picture!

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus March 10, 2015 12:09 PM  

BigGaySteve: "Soros' ill gotten funds use gays as a weapon." ... "Soros's money basically gets to set the message in the gay community..."

OK, that makes things more concrete.

Suppose you are a reasonably moralistic cultural conservative, and your concern with gays is not with individuals inclined to certain acts (since mankind is always flawed) but with a lobby that represents at most 2% of the population exerting a large and morally dubious influence on culture and law. Can you address your problem effectively while remaining blind to who provides the money and much of the power, and who sets the messaging that upsets you? Maybe, but I doubt it.

Blogger Marissa March 10, 2015 12:23 PM  

Robert Putnam's Bowling Alone also addressed the disastrous effects of television.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus March 10, 2015 12:23 PM  

Just to finish...

Sherwood family: "If I understand properly you are saying that a combination of patronage and mass media support allowed this agenda to proliferate."

Yes.

Sherwood family: "What was in it for the patrons and the mass media?"

Highly ethnocentric people tend to have negative, hostile attitudes to the out-groups they contrast their on-groups with. For example, someone who is fanatical about being Irish might have negative attitudes to the English, keen cultural memories of the great famine, a sense of entitlement to revenge and so on. In sum, their interests will include harm to the out-group.

Jews are not an exception to this general rule of human nature, except that they are extraordinarily ethnocentric, and their having outlived so many other ethnic groups is support for that.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus March 10, 2015 12:35 PM  

When Disney became a Jewish cultural weapon, it was logically possible that it could become a stronger bulwark of Christian culture and a mighty foe of the gay-ification of everything -- but that wasn't the smart way to bet.

Anonymous Curious but not an SJW March 10, 2015 12:40 PM  

Is this on What Sci-Fi Writers Get Wrong About the Future even remotely well thought out?

When they started saying that the future will be more democratic I figured that they were making shit up.

Anonymous Crank March 10, 2015 12:48 PM  

"And yet, we won't find any Muslims in Star Wars"

Maybe they're afraid someone will accuse them of copying the Klingons from Star Trek.

Anonymous HalibetLector March 10, 2015 1:02 PM  

Holy cow, Halibet...besides the fact that H'wood does not just include movie making, HBO makes movies.

I stand corrected.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus March 10, 2015 1:18 PM  

Curious but not an SJW: "Is this on What Sci-Fi Writers Get Wrong About the Future even remotely well thought out?"

No. But I think that piece was just an excuse to play definition games and then say: Only 'inclusive institutions' create wealth! Only 'inclusive institutions' belong in the future!"

Blogger Shimshon March 10, 2015 1:26 PM  

Regarding the brain rot induced by, for example, TV, I remember reading in college in the late 1980s about how countries like South Africa (and I think Israel) provided good laboratories for testing this, as mass market TV was highly restricted until the late 1960s or so, a full generation later than the US. I can't remember the reference, but I do remember reading such.

This is no different than using the case of Switzerland to study the effects of female suffrage.

Blogger Shimshon March 10, 2015 1:28 PM  

According to this article, South Africa only introduced TV in 1976!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_in_South_Africa

Anonymous TLM March 10, 2015 1:32 PM  

Thought Disney had a sci-fi-ish vehicle with the Witch Mountain movies from the 70's ? The reboot with The Rock was pretty good, my kids enjoyed it. Star Wars has sucked since ROTJ.

Blogger dw March 10, 2015 1:47 PM  

Yeah im probably just gonna skip episode 7.

Blogger Outlaw X March 10, 2015 2:01 PM  

in the second new film and we'll learn that Luke and Leia got married despite knowing they were brother and sister.

Sounds like a Greek Tragedy to me.

Blogger Cataline Sergius March 10, 2015 2:04 PM  

English, not gay. Hard to tell the difference at times, but nonetheless.

@John C. Wright.

Your naiveté is endearing on this point but I fear good sir, your trust has been misplaced.

Blogger Cataline Sergius March 10, 2015 2:16 PM  

Seriously guys, check out the Tomorrowland trailer #2. If this is legit, then Brad Bird is a closet Randite or at least a Heinlein fan. It's got a flying rocket tub.

Blogger Marissa March 10, 2015 2:38 PM  

Even though the state-controlled South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) had a virtual monopoly on radio broadcasting, it also saw the new medium as a threat to Afrikaans and the Afrikaner volk, giving undue prominence to English, and creating unfair competition for the Afrikaans press.[1]

Prime Minister Hendrik Verwoerd compared television with atomic bombs and poison gas, claiming that "they are modern things, but that does not mean they are desirable. The government has to watch for any dangers to the people, both spiritual and physical." [2]

Dr. Albert Hertzog, Minister for Posts and Telegraphs at the time, said that TV would come to South Africa "over [his] dead body,"[3] denouncing it as "a miniature bioscope [cinema] over which parents would have no control."[4] He also argued that "South Africa would have to import films showing race mixing; and advertising would make [non-white] Africans dissatisfied with their lot."[5] The new medium was then regarded as the "devil's own box, for disseminating communism and immorality".


Was it all a big mistake? Should they have embraced television and tried to control it or keep it out of their country entirely? It must have had a very strong effect on protests against apartheid and dismantling the apartheid state destroyed South Africa.

Anonymous Harsh March 10, 2015 2:57 PM  

"Vox, they already had a gay robot in the first movie."

English, not gay. Hard to tell the difference at times, but nonetheless.


He was probably just a robosexual.

Anonymous Ain March 10, 2015 3:26 PM  

Titus Didius Tacitus: "For example: should you entrust your white American children to the spiritual guidance of an Indian "guru"."

We do. It's called yoga.

Anonymous Tweetfun March 10, 2015 3:30 PM  

Paul S. Kemp‏ @Paulskemp
Also, if "Moff Diver" strikes you as witty and you're not a pre-teen, you need to sharpen that shit. Your wit be dulled, son. Do better.

https://twitter.com/Paulskemp/status/575366150047006720



Blogger luagha March 10, 2015 3:30 PM  

The really funny SJW thing about SheZow, the superhero transvestite:

The boy who dresses up as a female superhero to use female superhero powers is better at it than the girl would be.

Anonymous TheVillageIdiot(Ret.) March 10, 2015 3:33 PM  

In the immortal words of the love child of R2D2 and Betty Boop;

Well beep-bop-boop...
and a boop-boop-de-doop!


DannyR

Blogger Bard March 10, 2015 3:37 PM  

The Tuscan raiders are moslems

Blogger Bard March 10, 2015 3:39 PM  

Jawas are midget moslems

Blogger Eric March 10, 2015 4:01 PM  

Why does this group (homosexuals), with an estimated 2% of U.S. population, hold such a powerful position culturally and politically, at this point?

You've really begged the question here (in the original sense). Homosexuals aren't powerful enough to do this. This is middle-aged white women and their beta enablers taking yet another victory lap after winning the culture war. They don't give a shit about gays - it's all about showing conservatives who controls the culture.

Anonymous James Schardt March 10, 2015 4:34 PM  

"And yet, we won't find any Muslims in Star Wars despite there being a billion of them"

No, they've got them. People who piss off Jedi or Sith tend to lose their arms with a great deal of consistency. Just say'n

Anonymous BigGaySteve March 10, 2015 5:07 PM  

"To quote the Larry Sanders show, the Jews don't run Hollywood. The gay Jews do."

There are gay jews that feel more threatened by Netanyahu than by moslem savages. This is why they cant even make movies about old testament figures like the recent "Global Warming Noah", & "Hit His Head While Drunk Then Heard Voices Moses" without being sacrilegious. There are gay jews so intellectually dishonest that say they can still go to heaven without believing in God if they follow the rules, but use the rules from the Temple of The Gay Bacon Eating Rabi. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/01/31/meet-the-grindr-rabbi-who-says-the-gay-sex-app-can-bring-jews-together.html .Gay authors, especially Ann Rice's son, always make bad endings, if you get to what seems to be a happy ending in a book by a gay author stop reading because the rest of the pages are the Jenny Jones show. If you are going to have a debate with gay jews wear boots, they will be too distracted from wanting to lick them to have a coherent argument.

LBGT already have the LOGO channel to themselves (today from 1800 till midnight has the Golden Girls), Bravo, Lifetime, E!, Hallmark, Oxygen along with significant parts of Home/Garden, Food, PBS &BBC. Duck Dynasty was supposed to be making fun of rednecks but the left hated that so many watched it for the lack of diversity, they would rather have bad words than bad think.

"they already had a gay robot in the first movie." ~ R2D2 was the man in that relationship

Blogger John Wright March 11, 2015 9:25 AM  

"Your naiveté is endearing on this point but I fear good sir, your trust has been misplaced."

I trust CS Lewis. In Surprised by Joy: The Shape of My Early Life, C. S. Lewis wrote about the schoolboy homosexuality at Wyvern. It is a fairly well-known perversion among the English, as sadomasochism is fairly well-known among the French.

In America, of course, we have both, and more. Ours is a melting pot culture.

Anonymous Discard March 12, 2015 2:32 PM  

Homosexual power comes from a variety of sources. First, as Titus says, Jewish antagonism towards White Christians leads them to support anything that hurts us. As an example, Moslem immigration cannot be good for Jews, but official Jewry supports it anyway, because it hurts us. And Jews control the media.
Second, Hollywood in particular. Jewishness aside, there are crafts within Hollywood that are pretty much owned by homos, in addition to their broad distribution throughout the industry. If you don't go full gay rights, your hair and makeup will never be done right, some people will always forget to return your calls, and you will get poor service in high end restaurants as well. We all know how the dedicated minority beats the mildly interested majority. When homo marriage became a line in the sand, how many Hollywooders would cross it?
Third. Blackmail. Who can afford to have all their dirty laundry hung out in plain view, and then have it amplified by the media? Why do professional sports grovel, for example? Will they lose fans because they simply don't care about homos? All the team owners are rapacious capitalists. They don't care about immigration or affirmative action, so why gay marriage? Because their daughter has screwed 97 Chinese guys at the University of Virginia and their son ran over three Mexican toddlers. They paid somebody to keep their mouths shut, but the Homintern knew and they take their bribes in action as well as money.

This is not an exhaustive list, just some ideas.

Anonymous Discard March 12, 2015 3:47 PM  

Regarding an alternative to Hollywood: Many hit movies today are computer generated. If there can be alternative video games, why not alternative movies created entirely outside the SJW world? Distributed online rather than in theaters and cable TV?

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts