ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Monday, March 02, 2015

Obama vs Israel

No wonder America's Jews are suddenly so conflicted and flirting with some of the Republican presidential contenders:
President Obama is alleged to have stopped an Israeli military attack against Iran's nuclear facilities in 2014 by threatening to shoot down Israeli jets before they could reach their targets, according to reports to emerge from the Middle East at the weekend

The threat from the U.S. forced Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu to abort a planned attack on Iraq, reported Kuwaiti newspaper Al-Jarida.... The report claimed that an unnamed Israeli minister who has good ties with the US administration revealed the attack plan to Secretary of State John Kerry, and that Obama then threatened to shoot down the Israeli jets before they could reach their targets in Iran.

According to the report, 'Netanyahu and his commanders agreed after four nights of deliberations to task the Israeli army's chief of staff, Benny Gantz, to prepare a qualitative operation against Iran's nuclear program.

'In addition, Netanyahu and his ministers decided to do whatever they could do to thwart a possible agreement between Iran and the White House because such an agreement is, allegedly, a threat to Israel's security.'

The sources added that Gantz and his commanders prepared the requested plan and that Israeli fighter jets trained for several weeks in order to make sure the plans would work successfully. Israeli fighter jets reportedly even carried out experimental flights in Iran's airspace after they managed to break through radars.
At some point, even the dimmest American Jews are going to wake up to the fact that the gelding of Christian civilization in the West and the racial diversification of the white nations is very unlikely to turn out "good for the Jews", regardless of how it ends. Some Jews have clearly begun to realize that, as 69 percent of Jews voted for Obama in 2012, nine percent less than the 78 percent who did in 2008. But too many Jews outside Israel still appear to be caught up in the 1970's notion that they can easily defeat an aggressive Islamic Caliphate that outnumbers them about 70 to 1.

The problem is that while speed, cleverness, and finesse are a force multiplier, they do have limits. And I suspect that far too many American Jews, unlike Israelis, don't know how close they were to being defeated at times in the Arab-Israeli wars. A mistake here or there, a failure of nerve on the part of a political leader or a general at the wrong time, and it could have been all over. The American Jews only know that the IDF repeatedly won those wars and assume they can easily do so again.

But history is littered with the examples of defeated nations who attacked other nations in the assumption that their victory was certain. Regardless of what happens in the Middle East, it is certain that American politics is going to become less predictable as the Coalition of Diversity that was created, in part, by elite politically active Jews begins to turn against both Jews and Israel. This would imply that they will increasingly seek influence in the Republican Party, thus increasing the growing gulf there between the moderate Republican elite-for-hire and the various conservative and libertarian grass roots.

Labels: ,

140 Comments:

Blogger Joshua Dyal March 02, 2015 8:08 AM  

I'm not sure that American Jews, in general, really care much about the state of Israel. Or even like it, for that matter.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5IqH7oJ9h4

Blogger Nate March 02, 2015 8:12 AM  

American Politics is about to get very strange. Not in the historical sense or anything... but in to the average 50 year old citizen things are going to look weird I think. Both parties are in the last stages of suicide ceremonies that have taken decades to execute... and their replacements haven't appeared yet.

Anonymous Steveo March 02, 2015 8:15 AM  

Sounds like it is political QE for neocononsense...The next shemitah could be a really big deal.

Anonymous Working Class Brit March 02, 2015 8:16 AM  

I have to say that regardless of its merits (and veracity), an outright threat is a much bolder approach than I'd expect of Obama.

Do you think he would have actually given the order to shoot down the Israeli jets had they ignored him?

Blogger Mr.MantraMan March 02, 2015 8:19 AM  

I see a lot of this at typical Democratic party political infighting. The jews hold the top spot and those below want it, basic human nature. We should let them fight, even encourage it.

IMO Obama has been masterful in handling them and Israel and cashing the big checks, the GOP on the other hand is stuck with kooks like Sean Hannity who seems to be one bad day from flying to Israel and throwing himself off of Masada.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan March 02, 2015 8:22 AM  

If Israel had done that attack wouldn't have thousands of American service members been in the line of return fire?

Anonymous bw March 02, 2015 8:30 AM  

They simply want to make sure the two candidates are theirs.
Following the money, "Central Park West" is as revealing and daring as the slut whore media could possibly be.

Blogger Nate March 02, 2015 8:32 AM  

"Do you think he would have actually given the order to shoot down the Israeli jets had they ignored him?"

yes. they already were working on their explanation... "like a liberty... in reverse. its an accident you see."

Blogger IM2L844 March 02, 2015 8:33 AM  

Do you think he would have actually given the order to shoot down the Israeli jets had they ignored him?

Absolutely...and then he would have publically lied about it calling it a grievous misidentification and/or miscommunication error or some such.

On second thought, with the unprecedented accelerating metastasis of leftist corruption in government, they've become much bolder and obstinate about such things in the last few years. Maybe he would have just said, "I told you so."

Blogger Alexander Thompson March 02, 2015 8:34 AM  

This doesn't seem like just a Jew problem.

It seems the Muslim president is going to allow Iran to nuke whoever they want in the name of their pig god.

Blogger Chris Mallory March 02, 2015 8:40 AM  

"It seems the Muslim president is going to allow Iran to nuke whoever they want in the name of their pig god."

A "muslim" president who has appointed five times as many Jews to high office as he has muslims? Yeah right. Obama is an atheist, just like every other president since 1981, who worships self and power.

It is fairly amazing that he slipped his puppet strings long enough to make this threat. Must have seen too many Age of Ultron trailers.

Anonymous takin' a look March 02, 2015 8:42 AM  

The ghost of Walther Rathenau goes BOO!

Blogger Joshua Sinistar March 02, 2015 8:42 AM  

People still believe that this is just part of a brilliant Centuries old plan for World Domination. However, its now becoming more and more obvious that its actually just the pathology of a parasitic invasive species of inferior creatures which use subterfuge and deception to weaken its host in order to supplicate its needs.
There is no great plan here to see. The invaders hate these creatures even more than Hitler did. This is hardly what you would call a strategy.
Obama was chosen because he was a big F You middle finger to Whites. The fact that he's a black muslim who hates jews is hardly even a consideration to these fools.

Blogger IM2L844 March 02, 2015 8:48 AM  

Obama is an atheist, just like every other president since 1981, who worships self and power.

Well, Scott Walker, when given the chance to answer the question, "Do you believe President Obama is a Christian?" should have responded with, "We know one thing unequivocally. Obama is a well documented liar."

Blogger Salt March 02, 2015 8:49 AM  

I wonder if Obama attends the Cremation of Care ceremony at the Bohemian Club?

Blogger YIH March 02, 2015 9:04 AM  

President Obama is alleged to have stopped an Israeli military attack against Iran's nuclear facilities in 2014 by threatening to shoot down Israeli jets before they could reach their targets, according to reports to emerge from the Middle East at the weekend
Yes, I did click the link. I wanted to see the name of the writer. For the record, it's David McCormack (apparently a Gentile).
The reason I noted that was this comes off as jewish hyperbole.
by threatening to shoot down Israeli jets
Color me very skeptical.
That account may well be true, but considering the jewish hyperbole I've seen before (such as those 6 million holocausts) my gut says ''fiction passed off as news'' - like that threat to the US that Saddam Hussein supposedly presented.
Shimshon, that's ''where on the doll the jews touched'' me.

Blogger Josh March 02, 2015 9:05 AM  

If Israel had done that attack wouldn't have thousands of American service members been in the line of return fire?

Yes, which is why they told the Israelis no.

Blogger Josh March 02, 2015 9:06 AM  

This would imply that they will increasingly seek influence in the Republican Party, thus increasing the growing gulf there between the moderate Republican elite-for-hire and the various conservative and libertarian grass roots.

When this happens, it will be a complete disaster for the republican party.

Blogger Bob Wallace March 02, 2015 9:07 AM  

Payback for the attack on the Liberty.

Anonymous Steve March 02, 2015 9:08 AM  

The American Jews only know that the IDF repeatedly won those wars and assume they can easily do so again.

To survive, Israel has to win every conflict with the Arabs.

The Arabs only need to win once.

That's not a good long-term situation for Israel, given the demographics of the region.

Blogger YIH March 02, 2015 9:12 AM  

Scrolling down I just saw this:
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu was forced to abort a planned attack on Iraq after the U.S. threatened to shoot down Israeli jets
Caption under the photo of Netanyahu.
Typo or 'freudian slip'? You decide.

Anonymous Rothbardian March 02, 2015 9:15 AM  

The only anti-neocon party are the Democrats.

That is why I am voting Hillary, and so is Pat Buchanan and Lew Rockwell.

Blogger Nate March 02, 2015 9:18 AM  

"Yes, which is why they told the Israelis no."

nu-uh... its because obama is double secret MUSLIM WARRIOR and he is making sure Iran can nuke Israel!!!

Blogger Josh March 02, 2015 9:23 AM  

nu-uh... its because obama is double secret MUSLIM WARRIOR and he is making sure Iran can nuke Israel!!!

Nuh uh, he's a double secret GAY ATHEIST MARXIST MUSLIM WARRIOR!

WAKE

UP

SHEEPLE

Anonymous Alexander March 02, 2015 9:24 AM  

After Libya and Ukraine, nuclear non-proliferation is completely off the table. So recognizing that no deal will ever be made, no matter the incentives, Obama has punted the issue into the next administration, and threatened anyone who could make the punt fall short.

Between that and deciding to give no fucks about Cuba, I have to say that the Obama team seems to have reclaimed some political smarts. That 9% are going right back into the Democrat fold anyway, because Hilary is different. And even if they weren't, why should Obama, who in 2017 will join the ranks of Sharpton and Jackson, care anyway?

Blogger YIH March 02, 2015 9:24 AM  

For those who think I was lying about that captionI did a screencap of it.
The cut and paste was accurate, it clearly says Iraq.
You know, the 'Q' is not even close to the 'N' on the keyboard.

Anonymous Athor Pel March 02, 2015 9:35 AM  

"The report claimed that an unnamed Israeli minister who has good ties with the US administration revealed the attack plan to Secretary of State John Kerry, and that Obama then threatened to shoot down the Israeli jets before they could reach their targets in Iran."


When does an Israeli government official leak a "state secret" to the US State Department and it not be disinfo? And why isn't this Israeli minister in jail right now?

And then there's this:

"The sources added that Gantz and his commanders prepared the requested plan and that Israeli fighter jets trained for several weeks in order to make sure the plans would work successfully. Israeli fighter jets reportedly even carried out experimental flights in Iran's airspace after they managed to break through radars."


If those Israeli jets got to Iran while training then why weren't they shot down by the US? How did the US not see them and if they did see them then how did they know the Israeli's were just practicing?

There's nothing about this story that's straight, it's all bent.

Anonymous clk March 02, 2015 9:36 AM  

"If Israel had done that attack wouldn't have thousands of American service members been in the line of return fire?"

How else could israel make sure that then US were on their side for the aftermath of this without a few thousand US soldiers dead in the counter attack.... in this situation the US was right.

We are going have to accept at some point that iran and other states will have nuke technology.. its not that high of a bar anymore.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan March 02, 2015 9:48 AM  

The words I hate most coming out of the ME "cease fire." I really don't care, what I want is political correctness and its enforcement arm here in the West to be put up against the wall and shot till it stops moving. Then let the chips fall where they may. If it takes Israel and its outfit to bleed the beast then let them bleed it and weaken it. Call my strategy the Reverse Don Nickles, where we flip the jews many billions of $ and tell them to attack.

Anonymous Eric Ashley March 02, 2015 9:49 AM  

And then we can accept that its a real low bar for Iran to 'lose' a nuke to a terrorist group, and its dead simple for a freighter with a nuke to enter LA harbor.

This sounds like gutless moderates shoot at their own side garbage.

But its nice to see confirmed that the US does restrain Israel from clobbering Those Idiots, for those who doubted the US did any such thing.

Blogger YIH March 02, 2015 9:50 AM  

clk:
We are going have to accept at some point that iran and other states will have nuke technology.. its not that high of a bar anymore.
Like it or not that's the case. South Africa had and dismantled them, Pakistan has confirmed nukes, Israel and North Korea very likely do as well.
Both Japan and Saudi Arabia have openly claimed that should they choose to do so they could have them as well.
The genie's out of the bottle, to put it bluntly I'm no more afraid of ''Iran's nukes'' (does that sound like a Tom Clancy novel to you?) than I am of Pakistan's.
Think about it, if Iran (or North Korea, or Pakistan for that matter) were to actually launch a nuke it would be detected and they would have hell itself rain down on them.

Blogger Shimshon March 02, 2015 9:51 AM  

Last week, there was an Israeli leak that said Iran has no nuclear weapon program. True or not, it obviously undermined Netanyahu's position that Iran does have nuclear ambitions. Perhaps this is just a matter of competing leaks? I don't think Bibi ever had any intention of an Israeli attack. But who knows for sure?

Blogger Josh March 02, 2015 9:54 AM  

Last week, there was an Israeli leak that said Iran has no nuclear weapon program. True or not, it obviously undermined Netanyahu's position that Iran does have nuclear ambitions.

Pretty much every American intelligence agency, along with MI-6 and Mossad IIRC, have determined Iran does not have an active nuclear weapons program.

Blogger Nate March 02, 2015 9:55 AM  

"And then we can accept that its a real low bar for Iran to 'lose' a nuke to a terrorist group, and its dead simple for a freighter with a nuke to enter LA harbor."

Can you explain for us why an Iranian nuke program is more dangerous to the world than a North Korean one?

Blogger Shimshon March 02, 2015 9:59 AM  

Josh, I have read as much myself. Which is why I think Bibi has stupidly painted himself into a corner with his insistence on Iranian nuclear ambitions and attempting to enlist the US to do Israel's dirty work for it. I've been reading about Iran's imminent nuclear capability for decades now.

Blogger Chris Mallory March 02, 2015 10:02 AM  

"And then we can accept that its a real low bar for Iran to 'lose' a nuke to a terrorist group, and its dead simple for a freighter with a nuke to enter LA harbor."

And the downside here is?

Can we get them three more so they can take out DC, NYC and Boston while they are at it? Make it four and find a boat going into Chicago while we are at it.

Blogger Josh March 02, 2015 10:04 AM  

I've been reading about Iran's imminent nuclear capability for decades now.

They will have nukes in six months!

Bibi, the boy who cried "nuke!"

Anonymous Eric Ashley March 02, 2015 10:13 AM  

Chris,
Heh.

One downside is that the Blue's would go nuts, and the Conservatives would support them, and soon enough Iran would be a sheet of green glass.

Again, you might say....So?

And you'd have a point. But a lot of the folks here whine about collateral damage. I can't see them as being happy about 'Farsi will be spoken only in Hell'.

Nate,
Two not great points to follow.
1. More nuke armed nuts is bad.
2. NK seems to have a plan. Scream like a nut, take Western welfare, continue the god-king's dynasty. Iran says they are happy to die for Allah.

Now, you get to the One Billion Dead question. Are they serious? I don't know. I don't even know if they know.

I do know that intelligence guys are trained not to look at intentions so much as capabilities.

Myself, I favor MantraMan's solution...turn the Israeli's free to slaughter Those Idiots.

Blogger YIH March 02, 2015 10:16 AM  

Eric Ashley:
And then we can accept that its a real low bar for Iran to 'lose' a nuke to a terrorist group, and its dead simple for a freighter with a nuke to enter LA harbor.
Gee, where have I read that Tom Clancy novel before?
Oh I know!

Blogger Josh March 02, 2015 10:16 AM  

Iran says they are happy to die for Allah.

Citation needed

Anonymous Alexander March 02, 2015 10:21 AM  

My reading has been that Persians are happy to let Arabs die for Allah. And that while they might wish America and Israel to disappear, they want to be around for the afterparty.

Blogger Nate March 02, 2015 10:31 AM  

"Now, you get to the One Billion Dead question. Are they serious? I don't know. I don't even know if they know."

Are they serious about what? if you're asking if they are serious about making nuclear weapons... I would say they are stupid and irresponsible if they are not.

In 2015 there are haves and have nots. The haves do whatever the hell they want... and the have nots have life dictated to them.

They absolutely should be looking to acquire nukes. It is insane not to.

Blogger Doom March 02, 2015 10:36 AM  

Honestly, I hope the Dems can keep them. With their extreme, at best, moderation... they are not conservative allies and never will be. Not so long as progressivism is the actual underpinning of their faith, certainly in America. Don't let them in. It would be like having a child stand watch over the city gates... foolish.

Anonymous That Would Be Telling March 02, 2015 10:38 AM  

Alexander

My reading has been that Persians are happy to let Arabs die for Allah. And that while they might wish America and Israel to disappear, they want to be around for the afterparty.


Iran's demographics are nothing short of disastrous, and that's said to be particularly true for the Persians. A total fertility rate for the country of 1.77 per the UN for the last half or so of the last decade, probably less, and this is said to be the fastest drop in modern history, from almost 7 back in the 50s to above 6 when the revolution happened.

So if the Persians are dying out, their leaders might be less restrained in what they plan to do.

Blogger luagha March 02, 2015 10:46 AM  

So if Iran doesn't have a nuclear weapons program, why do we hear about those motorcycle guys attaching bombs to the windows of cars with nuclear scientists in them in Iran every so often?

Blogger YIH March 02, 2015 10:46 AM  

That Would Be Telling:
Iran's demographics are nothing short of disastrous, and that's said to be particularly true for the Persians. A total fertility rate for the country of 1.77 per the UN for the last half or so of the last decade, probably less, and this is said to be the fastest drop in modern history, from almost 7 back in the 50s to above 6 when the revolution happened.

So if the Persians are dying out, their leaders might be less restrained in what they plan to do.

Assuming those numbers are even somewhat accurate, shouldn't we be cowering under our beds about the threat of Japan and Italy maybe getting nukes?
Duck and cover kids!

Anonymous Alexander March 02, 2015 10:57 AM  

That Would Be Telling,

I think that would be a telling reason why they want nukes - because they won't be able to field a traditional army if it comes to a war. But demographic decline can be overcome if outsiders can be kept out in the interim.

Blogger YIH March 02, 2015 10:57 AM  

luagha:
So if Iran doesn't have a nuclear weapons program, why do we hear about those motorcycle guys attaching bombs to the windows of cars with nuclear scientists in them in Iran every so often?
I wonder where ''those motorcycle guys'' came from?
Probably the same place as Stuxnet.
What I want to know is assuming all this ''bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran'' shit you're selling, how would it not be a rerun of the farce that was ''Operation Iraqi Freedom''?
Fool me once, ect, ect...

Anonymous Porky March 02, 2015 10:57 AM  

Zechariah 14:12 - And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.

Blogger Joshua Sinistar March 02, 2015 11:00 AM  

I'm no friend of Israel, but the Ayatollah getting the bomb seems like a problem to me. I'm somewhat close to the Bad Apple which is a bomb magnet for Mohammed's betas looking to score some in Heaven. A bomb might leak enough rads to hit the airstream and make me lose my hair and glow in the dark for years. All this because of some phony "White Privilege"? I don't think so!

Anonymous Alexander March 02, 2015 11:00 AM  

The other thing to keep in mind is that the Persians think the Arabs are complete pieces of crap. Iran would rather have Israel around and have Jews and Arabs shooting at one another, than Israel a radioactive sheet of glass and Iran following two minutes later, and the remnants of both nations being colonized by Arabs.

Anonymous zen0 March 02, 2015 11:03 AM  



U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samatha Power at AIPAC today:

"The United States of America will not allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon period," Power emphasized, noting this is a shared goal with Israel and the foundation of the US's policy.

While touting diplomacy as a means to stop Iran's nuclear program, she noted America is prepared to take any steps to stopping a nuclear Iran, vowing "there will never be a sunset on America's commitment to Israel's security."


There. A politician has spoken. Everyone relax.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus March 02, 2015 11:17 AM  

After Muammar Gaddafi, everyone should understand that if you are in the path of the neocons disarmament is simply a preliminary to destruction.

Of course this applies to American whites. Don't give up your guns. Whatever you have, keep, and try to improve your training and your arsenal.

Anonymous bw March 02, 2015 11:28 AM  

if you are in the path of the neocons disarmament is simply a preliminary to destruction.

Especially, interestingly enough, if you are a more secular Muslim head of state, have been used at one point by the West, and threaten to trade oil in other than Petro Dollars.

Anonymous Eric Ashley March 02, 2015 11:29 AM  

YIH, actually its Belmont Club's 'Three Conjectures'.

And considering that Clancy 'predicted' an airline strike (as I did) I wouldn't be keen on slamming him.

Josh, rolls eyes. Really? Fine, rules of the blog.

Ahmadinajahad has written that the End of the World will occur within his own lifetime, and he is a Twelver. In order for the Mahdi to come, something like 80% of the world's population gets toasted. Rouhani, also seems to be a Twelver.

The use of even one nuclear bomb in Israel will destroy everything. It is not irrational to contemplate such a possibility...Rafsjani.

OK, Josh that was harder than I thought it'd be.

Blogger TontoBubbaGoldstein March 02, 2015 11:33 AM  

President Obama is alleged to have stopped an Israeli military attack against Iran's nuclear facilities in 2014 by threatening to shoot down Israeli jets before they could reach their targets,...

At long last...Vindication for the Nobel committee!!

Blogger Nate March 02, 2015 11:36 AM  

"So if the Persians are dying out, their leaders might be less restrained in what they plan to do."

oh FFS...

The persians are not dying out. 1.3 million live births to 400k deaths each year.

That's a very strange way of dying out.

Anonymous That Would Be Telling March 02, 2015 11:42 AM  

Nate: sub-replacement fertility.

Anonymous Eric Ashley March 02, 2015 11:42 AM  

Nate, !B Dead is very roughly the Muslim pop.

The question is in regards to 'Iran says they are willing to die for Allah.' Are they? Magic 8 Ball says 'try again later'. I suspect they don't even know. Its easy to talk big about how you're going to 'die fighting' but the only people that seemed to have meant in in the modern age are the Japanese.

But we're getting into stuff unlike certain other stuff where my opinion and five bucks will get you a cup of coffee. I don't have a good guess, and one reason I win arguments is that I try to stay away when I'm just guessing.

As to your theory that everyone needs nukes....hmmm, could be.

Blogger Josh March 02, 2015 11:51 AM  

Josh, rolls eyes. Really? Fine, rules of the blog.

Ahmadinajahad has written that the End of the World will occur within his own lifetime, and he is a Twelver. In order for the Mahdi to come, something like 80% of the world's population gets toasted. Rouhani, also seems to be a Twelver.


Immadinnerjacket is no longer in office.

Do you have any direct quotes of Rouhani saying he would be happy to die for Allah?

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus March 02, 2015 11:56 AM  

"At some point, even the dimmest American Jews are going to wake up to the fact that the gelding of Christian civilization in the West and the racial diversification of the white nations is very unlikely to turn out "good for the Jews", regardless of how it ends."

No such enlightenment followed the destruction of Rhodesia, or the fall of white South Africa, or many other milestones. The browning of America inspires gloating; the prospect of majority-non-white America is a cause for glee.

In more than a hundred cases, white nations have spared themselves from further Jewish aggression by asking the Jews to leave. Jews repenting of their ethnic aggression against whites? That doesn't happen. The options are whites saving themselves or continued Jewish aggression.

The Jewish people are simply more aggressive than whites. That is reflected in Jewish aggressiveness in the Middle East, and also in the policies that organized Jewry supports against "Western" populations.

Blogger Josh March 02, 2015 11:57 AM  

The use of even one nuclear bomb in Israel will destroy everything. It is not irrational to contemplate such a possibility...Rafsjani.

The entire quote, in context:

If one day, the Islamic world is also equipped with weapons like those that Israel possesses now, then the imperialists' strategy will reach a standstill because the use of even one nuclear bomb inside Israel will destroy everything. However, it will only harm the Islamic world. It is not irrational to contemplate such an eventuality. Of course, you can see that the Americans have kept their eyes peeled and they are carefully looking for even the slightest hint that technological advances are being made by an independent Islamic country. If an independent Islamic country is thinking about acquiring other kinds of weaponry, then they will do their utmost to prevent it from acquiring them. Well, that is something that almost the entire world is discussing right now.

Blogger Nate March 02, 2015 12:00 PM  

"Nate: sub-replacement fertility."

yes yes...

Its cute and all to say 1.7 births per woman is disastrous!!!! and we will just go on ignoring that 900,000 more people were born than died.

Population Momentum.

To put it another way... meh.

20 years of sub replacement birth rate can, and often are, wiped way by a single baby boom... which is often only a year or two.

Blogger Nate March 02, 2015 12:01 PM  

Demographics is destiny... but you absolutely cannot read much into demographics... because demographic trends are non-linear... and can totally reverse over night.

Anonymous Samuel Scott March 02, 2015 12:02 PM  

The Jewish people are simply more aggressive than whites. That is reflected in Jewish aggressiveness in the Middle East, and also in the policies that organized Jewry supports against "Western" populations.

Yeah, those German Jews were so aggressive in forming partisan attack units to counter the Nazis in Germany to try to avoid the Holocaust and get out of the country. It's not like they boarded the trains without a fuss because, after all, they were good Germans. Nope. Not at all.

/ Statements that paint with a broad brush are almost always wrong

And by the way -- this is story is likely BS. If it were true, it'd be the dominant theme of the news cycle for at least a day or two. All we have is some random Kuwaiti newspaper.

Blogger Nate March 02, 2015 12:06 PM  

to put a point on my problem with this birth rate business... I'll note that Iran's birth rate decline started in the mid 60s... when the population was 25 million or so.

The population is now over 75 million.

Blogger Josh March 02, 2015 12:07 PM  

No such enlightenment followed the destruction of Rhodesia, or the fall of white South Africa, or many other milestones. The browning of America inspires gloating; the prospect of majority-non-white America is a cause for glee.

Because Rhodesia and South Africa provided Israel with billions in aid to buy American weapons systems...

Anonymous Steve March 02, 2015 12:08 PM  

"President Obama is alleged to have stopped an Israeli military attack against Iran's nuclear facilities in 2014 by threatening to shoot down Israeli jets before they could reach their targets, according to reports to emerge from the Middle East at the weekend"

If he had shot them down it would have been the only salutary thing the black bastard did in his whole miserable life. Good for me that I can still honestly say that if his Kenyan father had beaten his jew mother to death in a groid chimp rage when he found out that she was pregnant like most of these hairless apes do,the world would be 100% better off,instead of,say, 90%.

It's kind of bittersweet,honestly,;because this dumb chimp flubbed this one, we've all got 12 million reasons to be upset.

Blogger Josh March 02, 2015 12:12 PM  

Good for me that I can still honestly say that if his Kenyan father had beaten his jew mother to death in a groid chimp rage when he found out that she was pregnant like most of these hairless apes do

Obama's mother is Jewish?

Yes, clearly black males beat their pregnant baby mommas to death, as evidenced by Shawn Kemp, Travis Henry, Adrian Peterson, Antonio Cromartie, etc. Because none of them have reproduced.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus March 02, 2015 12:17 PM  

If you are in the path of the neocons disarmament is simply a preliminary to destruction.

bw: "Especially, interestingly enough, if you are a more secular Muslim head of state, have been used at one point by the West, and threaten to trade oil in other than Petro Dollars."

Protecting Europe from seaborne mass non-white immigration is bad for your life expectancy too, judging by this example.

At this point in time, Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And Jews are going to be part of that transformation which must take place; Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that. It's a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode, and Jews will be resented because of their leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.

I guess Gaddafi wasn't clear enough that this is a transformation that must take place. Must.

Anonymous Steve March 02, 2015 12:18 PM  

"This doesn't seem like just a Jew problem.

It seems the Muslim president is going to allow Iran to nuke whoever they want in the name of their pig god."

Iran isn't going to nuke anyone. Russia might nuke somebody, and I think if Iran created a mess for Russia to clean up, they might even nuke Iran. But really, Shi'ite fundamentalists like the Iranians are the least dangerous to us of all three Muslim factions. They only want to kill the jews and the Muslims that support the jews.

I've got no problem with that. Jews have done fuck all for us, and we've got them on tape admitting to engineering mass immigration policy to change the composition of our countries for the worse.Bring the Allah to their Kabbalah,my Shi'ite friends. You have my blessing,as long as you stick to beheading uniformed officers and confirmed spies,I don't give a damn.I'm not going to do a thing to stop you from doing whatever you want to these jews.They're not Americans, they're alien parasites with foreign passports.

Anonymous ivvenalis March 02, 2015 12:18 PM  

It doesn't make any sense that Obama threatened to shoot down Israeli aircraft if they've already made flights (multiple) into Iranian airspace. If the US had the capability to shoot down Israeli aircraft flying towards Iran, they'd have to be able to detect them at any time (plausible, even if they avoided Jordan and SA there is currently a lot of US air activity over Iraq). So they must have seen them fly to Iran before if they've really done that. If he was willing to attack Israeli aircraft, why didn't he do it then? If he were willing to do it only in the case of an attack, how would he know that THIS time it was for real and not just another probe? AFAIK, the only way to determine an aircraft's munitions loadout in flight is to literally have another fighter fly up to it and look.

Anonymous Eric Ashley March 02, 2015 12:21 PM  

Immadinnerjacket is a predecessor. I don't think totalitarian states wander far on basic policy quickly, especially when predecessors have a hand in choosing follow-ons. Also Rouhani thanked the Mahdi for his election.

What I said was Iran, not a specific individual. Individuals are useful as representatives for the more general policy in this argument. It would be interesting to have a Gallop Poll in Iran.

"If you could destroy the Jews in Israel with four nukes, but it would cost the utter destruction of Iran, would you push the button?"

I have no such quotes from Rouhani.

However, him being a twelver is indicative.

Your fully contexted quote does support a defensive instead of apocalyptic mindset, so touche'.

Anonymous LES March 02, 2015 12:21 PM  

I guess it is no coincidence that the AIPAC meeting and Netanyahu's address to Congress happens just before Purim, the celebration of the massacre of over 75,000 Persians as recorded in the Book of Esther.

The Jewish Encyclopedia doubts the historicity of Esther. However, in 614 AD when the Persians conquered Jerusalem aided by the Jews, the Jews "bought" the Christian captives and slaughtered 60,000 of them at Mamilla Pool with great joy.

Anonymous Steve March 02, 2015 12:22 PM  

"Obama's mother is Jewish?"

Yes, that is why Obama recently said "I am jewish in my soul".Jews hold that non-jews do not have souls and are animals in human form created by the demon Yahweh to serve jews as slaves.In order to be "jewish in your soul" your mother must have been jewish.


"Yes, clearly black males beat their pregnant baby mommas to death, as evidenced by Shawn Kemp, Travis Henry, Adrian Peterson, Antonio Cromartie, etc. Because none of them have reproduced."

http://www.dailystormer.com/section/race-war/

You were saying?

Blogger Nate March 02, 2015 12:27 PM  

'http://www.dailystormer.com/section/race-war/"

oh for fucks sake.

Dude shut up and go back to commenting on youtube.

Blogger Josh March 02, 2015 12:27 PM  

http://www.dailystormer.com/section/race-war/

You were saying?


Those aren't examples of black males beating their pregnant baby mommas to death, which was your original assertion.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus March 02, 2015 12:31 PM  

If Israel does forcefully disarm Iran, will this mean that NATO will end its missile shield, which after all is supposedly directed against Iran and not against Russia?

I would be pleased to see Putin's reaction to that question.

Blogger Josh March 02, 2015 12:32 PM  

Yes, that is why Obama recently said "I am jewish in my soul".Jews hold that non-jews do not have souls and are animals in human form created by the demon Yahweh to serve jews as slaves.In order to be "jewish in your soul" your mother must have been jewish.

1) you're wrong:

Dunham was born in Saint Francis Hospital in Wichita, Kansas,[8] the only child of Madelyn Lee Payne and Stanley Armour Dunham.[9] She was of predominantly English ancestry, with some German, Swiss, Scottish, Irish, and Welsh ancestry.[10]

2) shut up retard

Anonymous Steve March 02, 2015 12:32 PM  

I'm thinking of changing my name to "Not The Racist Steve - The Other Steve".

But I think the other guy should call himself Stormfront Steve.

Blogger Josh March 02, 2015 12:36 PM  

But I think the other guy should call himself Stormfront Steve.

I agree

Anonymous Steve March 02, 2015 12:39 PM  

"Those aren't examples of black males beating their pregnant baby mommas to death, which was your original assertion."

You sound pretty sure. There's 259 pages worth of entries there. Did you check them all already?

http://www.dailystormer.com/black-will-stand-trial-for-beating-pregnant-white-wife-to-death/

There are more if you would like me to fetch the direct links for you.



Anonymous LES March 02, 2015 12:39 PM  

Obama's daddy?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cr0GY1xE3H8

Anonymous Aliyah to Khazaria March 02, 2015 12:45 PM  

Obama threatened to shoot down IDF Jets? And that he's a muslim that hates the Jews? Don't make me laugh.

Somehow I doubt we'd ever see a true muslim in a situation like this:

https://rabbibrian.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/obama1-scaled500.jpg

Yes, that is why Obama recently said "I am jewish in my soul."

Now that is one of the few times I will take an Obama pronouncement at face value.

Anonymous Steve March 02, 2015 12:45 PM  

"1) you're wrong:

Dunham was born in Saint Francis Hospital in Wichita, Kansas,[8] the only child of Madelyn Lee Payne and Stanley Armour Dunham.[9] She was of predominantly English ancestry, with some German, Swiss, Scottish, Irish, and Welsh ancestry.[10]"

Is that from Wikipedia? Super-reliable,man. All I have to say is that if she had no jewish ancestry, she was certainly ugly enough to qualify as an honorary hooknose.

"2) shut up retard"

I proved you were full of shit and you don't even check evidence provided to you. As long as I provide evidence for my claims, I don't HAVE to shut up.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus March 02, 2015 12:45 PM  

Steve: "There are more if you would like me to fetch the direct links for you."

No thanks.

And Steve? Ease up a little. This is said in a friendly way. Maybe watch laughing Putin till you feel cheerier.

Blogger Nate March 02, 2015 12:47 PM  

"I'm thinking of changing my name to "Not The Racist Steve - The Other Steve"."

If we have BigGaySteve I don't see why we shouldn't have Stormfront Steve.

Blogger Josh March 02, 2015 12:48 PM  

Wrong again Storm front Steve

The number of children born to black and white couples and to Asian and white couples almost doubled.

So if the number of black white babies has doubled, your assertion that the majority of black males kill their pregnant baby mommas is not factual.

Blogger Nate March 02, 2015 12:49 PM  

"I proved you were full of shit and you don't even check evidence provided to you. "

Dude... keep it up. You're just making yourself look more and more idiotic.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus March 02, 2015 12:51 PM  

Steve: "As long as I provide evidence for my claims, I don't HAVE to shut up."

That's where you're wrong.

Vox Day has odd sensitivities regarding Jewish issues, and if he's not comfortable he may ban you or put silly speech restrictions on you, even if he admits at the same time that he has no credible counter-argument on whatever the specific issue is, and that you may be right. It's his blog, he can do that.

Again: ease up. And again: this is said in a friendly way.

Blogger Josh March 02, 2015 12:54 PM  

Vox Day has odd sensitivities regarding Jewish issues

Please elaborate.

Remember, RINO accused Vox of being anti Semitic last year.

So how is vox both anti Semitic and anti anti Semitic?

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus March 02, 2015 12:59 PM  

Josh: "Please elaborate."

Of course not.

Blogger Vox March 02, 2015 1:00 PM  

I proved you were full of shit and you don't even check evidence provided to you. As long as I provide evidence for my claims, I don't HAVE to shut up.

Well, you do have to a) not annoy me, and b) be civil to your fellow commenters. It's not looking great at the moment. I suggest you work on (b) and that will take care of (a).

Vox Day has odd sensitivities regarding Jewish issues, and if he's not comfortable he may ban you or put silly speech restrictions on you

That's not true. I have nothing of the sort. Google, on the other hand, observably does, and I don't intend to permit this blog to be taken offline because some idiot anti-semite, or, for that matter, philo-semite, can't abide by the current rules of discourse presently deemed acceptable by Google.

Blogger Nate March 02, 2015 1:02 PM  

"So how is vox both anti Semitic and anti anti Semitic?"

Not speaking for Titus here... but I thought he was simply suggesting that Vox wasn't perfectly predictable on this. I don't think Vox enjoys being characterized as either semetic or anti-semetic.

Blogger Vox March 02, 2015 1:05 PM  

So how is vox both anti Semitic and anti anti Semitic?

Because I'm neither anti-semite nor philo-semite. I don't care any more about the Jews than I do about the Tibetans, the Peruvians, or the Chinese. For some reason, this tends to be upsetting to both anti-semites and philo-semites alike.

Blogger Josh March 02, 2015 1:08 PM  

For some reason, this tends to be upsetting to both anti-semites and philo-semites alike.

Hedgehogs tend to dislike foxes.

For what it's worth, I've found our Israeli commenters to be much saner on these issues than many of their American cousins.

Blogger Nate March 02, 2015 1:10 PM  

"For what it's worth, I've found our Israeli commenters to be much saner on these issues than many of their American cousins."

well sure. They don't have to do the "jewish american" dance. Israel first makes all the sense in the world coming from them.

Blogger Vox March 02, 2015 1:11 PM  

I don't think Vox enjoys being characterized as either semetic or anti-semetic.

I grew up in Minnesota. To be accused of having an opinion on Jews tends to strike me as being accused of feeling strongly about Tibetans or some obscure animal in the Amazon. The only Jew I'd ever even heard of was Rudy Boschwitz, the senator. And frankly, his lisp was considered a much more defining characteristic than his religion or ethnicity.

Until I went to college on the East Coast, I thought of Jews about the same way I thought of Armenians. You know, the people the Turks killed. I don't find them anywhere nearly as interesting as either the antisemites or the Jews themselves do. But they are observably one of the modern flashpoints so one can hardly ignore them either.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus March 02, 2015 1:11 PM  

Vox: "Google, on the other hand, observably does..."

Ah. That improves my understanding.

Anonymous Steve March 02, 2015 1:19 PM  

"So if the number of black white babies has doubled, your assertion that the majority of black males kill their pregnant baby mommas is not factual."

Obviously "most of these apes" was not meant to be taken literally,but was a reference to a great number of them doing so compared to Whites and probably compared to Asians as well.You're obviously making a pedantic argument now,deliberately ignoring the colloquial meaning of "most of these" or "most of this" in favor of the technical meaning. Fair enough. Carry on.

"Dude... keep it up. You're just making yourself look more and more idiotic."

Yes, I suppose I am. The company a man keeps quite rightfully says a lot about him. I suppose I will disabuse myself of yours.Then I won't look "idiotic" to anyone stupid enough to believe that black males don't beat pregnant White women to death at a rate which vastly overshadows the rate at which White men beat pregnant black females to death.

"Vox Day has odd sensitivities regarding Jewish issues, and if he's not comfortable he may ban you or put silly speech restrictions on you, even if he admits at the same time that he has no credible counter-argument on whatever the specific issue is, and that you may be right. It's his blog, he can do that."

That's a fair point. You'll find that I respect claims of that nature.I'm actually not here to disrupt or derail and I will gladly yield the floor to the "anti-racist" Cultural Marxist fifth column who are more worried about looking "rayciss" to their leftwing extremist pals than keeping pregnant White women from being beaten to death by their black impregnators. When you guys get tired of listening to their bullshit, we'll probably see each other again.

"Again: ease up. And again: this is said in a friendly way."

Of that I have no doubt. I'm not going to ease up,but I'm not going to stick around either. Why would I? I'm not a jew. If my beliefs and ideas and vision of civilization is different than the majority of those here, then I'm not going to tell anyone,and certainly not going to try to force anyone here to accommodate me or my beliefs.

I did like getting my news about SJW's in publishing from Vox, but I suppose there's probably other blogs where I could do that.And I could overlook Vox's "odd sensitivites" vis a vis the hebrews because I see him as basically a good,or at least truthful guy, who I agree with 95% of the time.Or "very often" for the pedants. However, there may come a time when people like Vox,or even people like me, are seen as "too soft". I hope people will cut him some slack if that day ever comes. For my part, I will try to convince them to do so,whatever good it will do.

Blogger Nate March 02, 2015 1:19 PM  

"I grew up in Minnesota. To be accused of having an opinion on Jews tends to strike me as being accused of feeling strongly about Tibetans or some obscure animal in the Amazon"

Growing up in the south my experience was much the same. The anti-semetism didn't make any sense to me... nor did the stereotypes of rural/southern people hating jews... since I was a rural southron and I neither hated jews nor knew anyone that did. Jews were simply not on our minds.. and largely still aren't.

Like you say... flashpoint.. unavoidable now.

Blogger Joshua Sinistar March 02, 2015 1:20 PM  

Look not that I care about the Middle East generally, but if Iran did have a bomb what are the chances they'll try to get it past the 24/7 365.24 day security at the Giant Wall in Palestine?
What do we have at our border? A lemonade stand? An absentee ballot center? You could probably drive a scud missile through Southern California and they would think its for a movie!

Blogger Nate March 02, 2015 1:23 PM  

'to their leftwing extremist pals than keeping pregnant White women from being beaten to death by their black impregnators. "

Wannabe. You have no idea what racism looks like.

You think a real racist gives a damn if a black man beats the white girl he knocked up to death? You've lost your mind. She was dead to him the second she so much as winked at that black man.

There is a lyric to an old David Allen Coe song that I keep thinking about... There's nothing quite as useless.... something something something..

Blogger Nate March 02, 2015 1:27 PM  

i still don't get why we're supposed to wet ourselves about Iran getting nukes when Pakistan and North Korea have them.

Blogger Josh March 02, 2015 1:27 PM  

Obviously "most of these apes" was not meant to be taken literally,but was a reference to a great number of them doing so compared to Whites and probably compared to Asians as well.You're obviously making a pedantic argument now,deliberately ignoring the colloquial meaning of "most of these" or "most of this" in favor of the technical meaning. Fair enough. Carry on.

My advice in the future: be more precise in your arguments.

Blogger Josh March 02, 2015 1:28 PM  

i still don't get why we're supposed to wet ourselves about Iran getting nukes when Pakistan and North Korea have them.

Because our bestest friend Bibi said Iran was totally going to, like, kill everyone with nukes and stuff...

Blogger Chris Mallory March 02, 2015 1:29 PM  

"There is a lyric to an old David Allen Coe song that I keep thinking about... There's nothing quite as useless.... something something something.."

I was listening to that album this weekend. The only song off of it that I have ever heard on the radio was "Panheads Forever".

Blogger Rabbi B March 02, 2015 1:31 PM  

"For what it's worth, I've found our Israeli commenters to be much saner on these issues than many of their American cousins."

I think that's a fair observation. There seems to be more of a sense of entitlement and arrogance among many Jews in the U.S. which is not so much the case in Israel. Perhaps this is because the Jews in Israel are engaged in a REAL fight for their continued existence as a people and as a sovereign nation IN THEIR OWN LAND, rather than trying to fight for and establish their so-called "rightful" place in the U.S. There is simply no such thing.

I do not have a "rightful" place here at this blog. I participate here because the host graciously permits me to do so. Even if I behave myself, the host reserves the right to ask me to leave. That's his right, not mine. It's his house, not mine. If that's true here in Voxland, how much more in all the other lands where we find ourselves scattered.

I think the Jews in Israel understand this better then their "American cousins".

Blogger Rabbi B March 02, 2015 1:32 PM  

*. . . than their American cousins

Blogger Nate March 02, 2015 1:34 PM  

" "Panheads Forever"."

AKA: An Ode To Oil Leaks

Blogger Nate March 02, 2015 1:40 PM  

Also... I have to say this is a big day here at Vox's blog... I think this is the first time we've ever had a stormfronter site stormfrontish websites while white knighting for mudsharks.

Blogger Josh March 02, 2015 1:42 PM  

Also... I have to say this is a big day here at Vox's blog... I think this is the first time we've ever had a stormfronter site stormfrontish websites while white knighting for mudsharks.

Well see it couldn't possibly be those poor innocent white girls fault if they got knocked up by a black dude...because after all they're pure and holy princesses...

Blogger Owen March 02, 2015 2:04 PM  

Having no experience with stormfront types, I honestly thought you guys were joking about how they "white knight" for white women.

In my day, we had a better class of racists.*



* Actually, I'm not that old, but it seems like a thing to say.

Anonymous Huckleberry -- est. 1977 March 02, 2015 2:05 PM  

Also... I have to say this is a big day here at Vox's blog... I think this is the first time we've ever had a stormfronter site stormfrontish websites while white knighting for mudsharks.

We should get commemorative t-shirts printed up.

Anonymous Steve March 02, 2015 2:11 PM  

Did somebody say "ThorDaddy" three times in front of a mirror?

I like Jews and Israelis in general, but I can understand how they could piss people off. They're as clannish as the Greeks and as prickly as the Scots. Then there's that whole Palestinian thing.

But I don't give two hoots about the Palestinians I'm afraid. They lost me at "dancing in the streets to celebrate Muslim terrorist atrocities".

I've never really understood the conspiracy theories about Adam Sandler being part of a master race that secretly rules the world.

I mean, I understand it, but it's just too retarded to believe. Like chemtrails or the moon landings being fake.

Blogger Corvinus March 02, 2015 2:15 PM  

I think that's a fair observation. There seems to be more of a sense of entitlement and arrogance among many Jews in the U.S. which is not so much the case in Israel. Perhaps this is because the Jews in Israel are engaged in a REAL fight for their continued existence as a people and as a sovereign nation IN THEIR OWN LAND, rather than trying to fight for and establish their so-called "rightful" place in the U.S. There is simply no such thing.

I have repeatedly gotten the impression that Israelis are of higher SMV than American Jews. I wouldn't be at all surprised if the majority of American Jewish men weren't Gammas.

Both groups tend to be spoiled rotten, though.

Blogger Corvinus March 02, 2015 2:15 PM  

*were Gammas.

Anonymous Eric Ashley March 02, 2015 2:16 PM  

I explained NK. Pakis is horrible. Would it make you feel better that if I were Prez, both situations would be resolved in the first week, by if neccessary nukes.

My preference is to give NK to China and Paki to India.

Blogger Nate March 02, 2015 2:23 PM  

"I explained NK. Pakis is horrible. Would it make you feel better that if I were Prez, both situations would be resolved in the first week, by if neccessary nukes."

I suggest you pay a little more attention to the history of the proliferation of weapons. Every time a big advancement is made... some king or government tries to keep others from getting it.

And it always fails.

And before long the whole world has it.

Blogger TontoBubbaGoldstein March 02, 2015 2:23 PM  

retarded ... Like ... the moon landings being fake.

*audibly gasps*
You might as well run some 'Bama hatred on the portside 'rigger along with some Titan hate on the starboard. Run a Glock on the downrigger and some Scotch on the teaser, Chief.

Anonymous Aliyah to Khazaria March 02, 2015 2:27 PM  

"Perhaps this is because the Jews in Israel are engaged in a REAL fight for their continued existence as a people and as a sovereign nation IN THEIR OWN LAND..."

The majority of modern day Israeli's are Ashkenazis - the descendants of Khazars. If the Ashkenazis where to really fight for their true ancestral lands, they'd be waging a war of return on the shores of the Black Sea.

Blogger Rabbi B March 02, 2015 2:29 PM  

"I have repeatedly gotten the impression that Israelis are of higher SMV than American Jews.'

This is probably true of the entire culture in Middle East generally when compared with the wussified culture that has become increasingly pervasive here in the US.

http://www.jpost.com/Jewish-World/Jewish-News/New-Jewish-group-wants-to-restore-polygamy

Blogger Nate March 02, 2015 2:39 PM  

"You might as well run some 'Bama hatred on the portside 'rigger along with some Titan hate on the starboard. Run a Glock on the downrigger and some Scotch on the teaser, Chief."

Poor bastard has no idea...

Blogger natschuster March 02, 2015 2:43 PM  


Stcve

"Yes, that is why Obama recently said "I am jewish in my soul".Jews hold that non-jews do not have souls and are animals in human form created by the demon Yahweh to serve jews as slaves.In order to be "jewish in your soul" your mother must have been jewish."

I was always taught that Gentiles do have souls, they go to heaven if they are good, etc. Ther is the concept of Chasidei umos Haolam, piosu people of the nations of the world. And I was always taught all humans were descended from Adam, who was created in the image of Elohim, the Lord, says so in genesis. And I was always taught that the tetragammation was a name of God, not of the devil. It comes from the Hebrew root Ehyeh, whcih measn to be. The Devil is usually referred to as Soton, hence Satan.

Blogger Joshua Dyal March 02, 2015 3:28 PM  

he majority of modern day Israeli's are Ashkenazis - the descendants of Khazars. If the Ashkenazis where to really fight for their true ancestral lands, they'd be waging a war of return on the shores of the Black Sea.

That theory hasn't really born out under DNA analysis.

Blogger Vox March 02, 2015 3:38 PM  

I've never really understood the conspiracy theories about Adam Sandler being part of a master race that secretly rules the world.

Well, in fairness, it would explain his career. He certainly doesn't owe it to his movies being entertaining.

Anonymous Aliyah to Khazaria March 02, 2015 3:57 PM  

"That theory hasn't really born out under DNA analysis."

That depends on who is doing the analysis and what their motives are. Here's a good article on the debate:

http://forward.com/articles/175912/jews-a-race-genetic-theory-comes-under-fierce-atta/?p=all

Note the Scientists who claim to have used DNA evidence to verify the Khazarian hypothesis published their research for all to see, while the pro-Zionist scientists simply denounce it and say they've proved otherwise...but will not release their own data for their research that is their basis for their claims.

"It was a great pleasure reading your group’s recent paper, ‘Abraham’s Children in the Genome Era,’ that illuminate[s] the history of our people,” Elhaik wrote to Ostrer. “Is it possible to see the data used for the study?”

Ostrer replied that the data are not publicly available. “It is possible to collaborate with the team by writing a brief proposal that outlines what you plan to do,” he wrote. “Criteria for reviewing include novelty and strength of the proposal, non-overlap with current or planned activities, and non-defamatory nature toward the Jewish people.” That last requirement, Elhaik argues, reveals the bias of Ostrer and his collaborators."

Huh. Kinda sounds like the whole Global Warming debate.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan March 02, 2015 4:15 PM  

I knew a guy Sandler offered to blow, he turned the offer down, so he said. I've long suspected that anti-semetism is Tel Aviv's best weapon, it keeps the kids in the cult and helps keep sharp borders between the populations, though that is all breaking down.

My concern is finishing off the post 1945 world order, and the jewish story is a linchpin of political correctness. I'm not sure of the details but I am glad that the taboos surrounding those events are being chipped at especially by the other professional victims.

Anonymous Steve March 02, 2015 5:48 PM  

TontoBubbaGoldstein - Um... yes? (smiles politely)

Vox - Sandler's appeal mystified me. I dated an American girl once who insisted we watch a video where Adam Sandler plays a grown man who has to go to school for some reason. She was laughing like a hyena the whole way through, which in retrospect was a red flag. I did quite like Punch Drunk Love though.

Anonymous nil March 02, 2015 5:58 PM  

I've never found Sandler remotely funny. Mel Brooks sucks too.

Anonymous Billy March 02, 2015 7:01 PM  

I'm in agreement on Adam Sander. I guess the latest Hollywood version is Seth Rogan, equally unfunny and over exposed.

Anonymous BigGaySteve March 02, 2015 7:54 PM  

Jews need to understand that they are breeding at musket speed while moslems vaginas are firing out full auto. Even if moslems only kill with 1 out of 200 bullets as seen in the Copenhagen attack, if their enemies can squat out 200 savages faster than jews can produce one IDF, quantity has a quality of its own. The gay bacon eating Jews don't help matters.

"A "muslim" president who has appointed five times as many Jews to high office as he has muslims"
Where are these moslems with above room temperature IQ? If the moslem oil lands didn't import workers with IQ, including the male travel nurse thrown in jail for drinking a bottle of water in 100+ degree daytime heat during Ramadan in Kuwait, they would have no running water.

""Not The Racist Steve - The Other Steve"." If we have BigGaySteve I don't see why we shouldn't have Stormfront Steve."

Just for the record BigGaySteve no longer believes evolution stopped at the neck.The fact that a black moslem serial killer of gays, Mohammad Ali Brown, in 3 states made no MSM news when he was caught 2 weeks after the Ferguson liquor store robber was killed shows that SPADES TRUMP QUEENS as far as the left is concerned. If I was stuck in a diverse city when the SHTF, I would make my way to Chinatown to be on the rooftops with Asian shopkeepers. I will be the one with the rainbow feather boa and a Mauser. If I had to chose between having David Duke for a neighbor or black moslems I would chose the one that thinks gays are victims of Jew mind control over beheaders, you do realize he has stayed out of jail when Holder would love to plant dead tranny crack hoes from Marian Barry's parties on Duke's property, so if nothing else he is scrupulously law abiding. I realized its not the STR8 YT churchgoing men that Soros warned us about ,while handing out free kool aid, that we have to worry about. The question for racist Steve is would he rather have me as a neighbor than Somali moslems?

"That is why I am voting Hillary, and so is Pat Buchanan and Lew Rockwell."

Please don't, I fled a diverse area to do the "bloom where you are planted" thing and the fruit trees we planted might not be productive by the time Shillery gets into office, I don't want civilization to collapse too fast. Do you have any idea how hard it is to talk a boyfriend into having an "ugly" earth sheltered greenhouse in the backyard? I had to throw out that earth sheltered greenhouses are an Indian, feather not dot, Walipini cultural thing.

"I knew a guy Sandler offered to blow, he turned the offer down, so he said."
Listen I saved up for that FLIR sight, & my boyfriend knows I post here.

Anonymous clk March 02, 2015 8:03 PM  

Nate says "Can you explain for us why an Iranian nuke program is more dangerous to the world than a North Korean one".

I think in fact that an Iranian program is slightly less dangerous than a NK but slightly more dangerous than a Paki one ...none would be very dangerous to the US. In attacking the US, if you cant destroy the entire US (and only the USSR/Russia had/has that capability), then you have to deal with a retaliation strike that can destroy all the Irans, NKs, Paki's etc of the world. Any state that does this faces annihilation and thus it would be foolish to do this. Iran is not foolish and they know (despite the stupid things there generals say to the contrary when attacking plywood props made to look like an aircraft carrier) that the US can destroy them easily if poked too hard.


Blogger Joshua Sinistar March 02, 2015 8:50 PM  

clk, don't you remember Imam Obama's promise not to retaliate against nuclear attacks? That's the only promise that bastard will ever keep in his whole life probably.

Anonymous Smokey March 02, 2015 8:51 PM  

But I don't give two hoots about the Palestinians I'm afraid. They lost me at "dancing in the streets to celebrate Muslim terrorist atrocities".

Are you referring to the 9/11 stuff?

Because I'm pretty sure that was fake propaganda. The video of dancing Muslims was apparently from an election about a year or more before that.

Blogger GX3Blogger March 02, 2015 10:10 PM  

Obama insists on saying ISIL instead of ISIS. The second IS stands for Iraq and Syria, areas they currently control. "L" in ISIL is "The Levant" an area that includes Israel and Palestinian areas that they want to control in the near future. Is Obama projecting or wishing by only referring to them as ISIL?

Anonymous Samuel Scott March 03, 2015 4:39 AM  

The majority of modern day Israeli's are Ashkenazis - the descendants of Khazars. If the Ashkenazis where to really fight for their true ancestral lands, they'd be waging a war of return on the shores of the Black Sea.

You are factually incorrect, and I insist that you retract your statement:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Israel

Israeli Ashkenazi Jews: 2.77 million
Israeli Sephardi Jews: 2.92 million

Anonymous Quartermaster March 03, 2015 10:04 AM  

Some American Jews may be flirting with supporting some GOP candidates, but the hardcore of the Jewish left would cut their hands off before supporting anyone from the GOP. As the Apostle Paul put it, "not everyone who is of Israel is Israel." Idiots like Chucky Shumer certainly are not Jews any sense other than the ability to trace their ancestry to the Hebrew nation.

Blogger Vespasian March 04, 2015 2:07 PM  

I've recently been looking into the differences between Dispensational and Covenant theology. In doing so I watched a video from a professor at Biola University, in which he spoke about the origins of Dispensational Theology (DT). He noted that it had its roots in 19th century America and by the turn of the century had become a very popular way of viewing God's working throughout history. It was during this time that Fundamentalism took hold and Christians began to open new schools such as Dallas Theological Seminary and Biola University, both hold to a DT view.

As Reformed Theology and by association, Covenant Theology (CT) fell out of favor, DT came to be the majority of view among Christians in the early to middle decades of the 20th century in America.

I bring this up because DT holds that the promises made to the nation of Israel are still in play and therefore there is still a role for the nation of Israel to play in world affairs. By contrast CT holds that with the institution of the New Covenant, the Church has replaced the literal nation of Israel, has become the spiritual nation of Israel, and as such the literal nation of Israel holds no special place in world events. Those who hold to DT believe strongly (some more so than others I'm sure) in the promise of God given to Abraham found in Genesis 12:3 "I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse." As such to support the nation of Israel today is to curry favor with God, to work against Israel would be result in God's curse.

With the decline in Christian influence in American politics, is it possible that these small steps away from Israel are the result in a diminishing in DT influence concerning political matters and relations with Israel?

I have no way of knowing as I don't know the particular theological leanings of the myriad people who have influenced American - Israel relations over the previous 60 years, but it could be a factor and if it is, as America shifts more and more from Christian ideals and influence it could result in a further turning away from Israel or at the very least the adoption of a much more pragmatic stance.

Anonymous Aliyah to Khazaria March 05, 2015 12:19 AM  

You are factually incorrect, and I insist that you retract your statement:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Israel


Hmmmm....despite looking askance at your insistence that wikipedia serves as a credible source of factual authority, I'll retract my former statement and reformulate it with a more accurate one in it's stead:

The majority of modern day Jews throughout the world are Ashkenazi - the descendants of Khazars. If the Ashkenazi where to really fight for their true ancestral lands, they'd be waging a war of return on the shores of the Black Sea.

Since you insisted on citing Wikipedia as a source of authority, I shall comply and reply in like manner - Wikipedia on "Ashkenazi Jews:"

Statistical figures vary for the contemporary demography of Ashkenazi Jews, oscillating between 10 million[1] and 11.2 million.[2] Sergio DellaPergola in a rough calculation of Sephardic and Mizrahi Jews, implies that Ashkenazi make up less than 74% of Jews worldwide.[22] Other estimates place Ashkenazi Jews as making up about 75% of Jews worldwide.[23]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jews#cite_note-ReferenceA-23

74 - 74% of world Jewry are Ashkenazim. I daresay the word "majority" would apply to that ratio, no?

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts