ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Thursday, April 23, 2015

SJWs always lie

Case in point: Mary Robinette Kowal:
Mary Robinette Kowal says:   
April 13, 2015 at 6:25 pm   

Speaking as someone who has been the repeated target of Vox Day, this strategy does not work. Until April 11, 2015, I have NEVER mentioned him on my blog. EVER. I have him blocked on all social media.

“He doesn’t attack anyone that hasn’t opened the ball up.”
HA! His first mention of me is mid-2013.

He has threatened to post where I live. And yes, he could, because he has the SFWA directory.

This idea that you can ignore him and he’ll go away is demonstrably not how it works.
What a poisonously stupid little bitch. Keep in mind this is Johnny Con's former VP in SFWA. She is a shameless liar. I absolutely did NOT threaten to post where she lived. She publicly called me out on TWITTER about my claim that accused child molester Ed Kramer was a member of SFWA and was listed as such in the SFWA directory on June 23, 2014. The problem, of course, was that in order to provide evidence of my 100-percent correct claim by posting the relevant page from the 2010 SFWA directory, I would have to expose the names and addresses of everyone on that page, including the lying bitch herself. As it happens, Kowal, Mary Robinette (A) is directly above Kramer, Edward E. (A) on page 26 of the SFWA Directory.

This is the "proof" she cites that I "threatened to post" where she lived. Notice that they started claiming that Kramer was not a member after scrubbing his name from the online membership directory that morning. What a pity that I'd already grabbed a screenshot, knowing how these liars always lie.


Now, note that the convicted child molester Ed Kramer is not a current Active member of SFWA because he has not paid his dues... from prison. He is still eligible and can restore his Active status in the organization any time he simply pays his dues. He was absolutely a member of SFWA in 2010, as the SFWA directory showed, and he was STILL listed as a member of SFWA in their online directory as of June 24, 2014, although SFWA removed the listing only hours after I posted the screencap on my blog.

Note that SFWA member Ed Kramer "was arrested on August 25, 2000 following an anonymous tip, and charged with molesting three teenage boys. The ensuing investigation revealed that Kramer had previously been accused of molestation in 1997 before the alleged victim recanted. Kramer's first attempt to serve his pre-trial detention in house arrest lasted only a week due to a reported visit by a teenage boy. After Kramer suffered a spinal injury in jail, Judge Debra Turner allowed him to go back to house arrest in January 2001.This lasted until 2008."

In any event, Mary Robinette Kowal is not only a liar, but a shameless deceiver as well. Not only did she lie about me threatening to post her address, but she lied about me not leaving her alone AFTER SHE CALLED ME OUT ON TWITTER. Sure, it's true that she hadn't mentioned me on her blog... because she was attacking me on Twitter.

The lesson, as always, is that SJWs always lie.

I don't lie on the Internet, Mary. I told you it will never end. And it hasn't, has it?

Labels: ,

65 Comments:

Anonymous Porphyry April 23, 2015 2:16 PM  

Is it just me or does she look like michaelangelos david? anyways its funny how impossible it is to tell the difference between Omega males and females.

Anonymous Soga April 23, 2015 2:25 PM  

So, keeping files on your enemies seems to be an extremely effective technique, especially when they're SJWs. No wonder these people want the Internet policed so badly; if the cops are at your throat, you can't post screencapped evidence of SJW lies and other evildoings.

Anonymous dh April 23, 2015 2:29 PM  

It's not important what actually happened, only how it made her feel.

She feels like she was threatened, therefore she was threatened. This is also why you should never show restraint. You got blamed for threatening her, and you didn't. Why bother holding back?

Blogger Matt April 23, 2015 2:32 PM  

Hmm. I didn't send you a link to that nonsense when it happened, because I assumed that you had seen it - it was early days, when Larry and Brad were still trying to engage rationally with the other team and everybody seemed to be in everybody else's blog comments all the time.

Sadly, I forgot the "always lie" precept for a moment, and when she posted something seemingly reasonable about Sad Puppies two or three weeks ago, I went and bought her first book... hoping that rewarding rationality would lead to more of it. And, it was cheap.

Then this happened, and it was one day too late to return the book.

I'll probably read it anyway, when I get around to it, just to go and give it the review it deserves. My Pennsylvania Dutch nature and nurture both balk at throwing anything away that I paid for, even if just $4.

Lesson learned. They ALWAYS lie.

Anonymous MrGreenMan April 23, 2015 2:33 PM  

She must protest against all of her comments sounding emotionally unhinged because all the evidence suggests she is an emotionally unhinged individual.

"Sir, here is the yellow pages."
"You doxxing scoundrel! My numbers in there! Damn Ma Bell - she always hated women! Are you trying to give me the Wu treatment? I will make videos from my home studio claiming how I was driven to a safe house to hide!"

Anonymous Eowyn April 23, 2015 2:35 PM  

It's what anyone should do in a toxic space that threatens your reputation and/or livelihood: document, document, document. Because, like VD said, they ALWAYS lie. And they don't even consider it lying. This is a group of people who think gender, sexuality, and other observable realities can be changed with words and hand waving, so telling lies is par for their course.

Shameless.

Anonymous HalibetLector April 23, 2015 2:36 PM  

Why bother holding back?

For the audience. It's amazing how many people on the sidelines change their tunes after watching the rabbits rabbit. The more obvious it is, the harder it is for the observers to ignore. I should know; I was one before reading this blog. It took me years to come around on some topics, but it's hard to ignore the lies when they pile up.

Blogger Josh April 23, 2015 2:41 PM  

Oh man the commenters over there are just going all Duke Lacrosse Team on her lies.

Anonymous MrGreenMan April 23, 2015 2:43 PM  

It has to be a tell up there with "You appear to be saying..." - they confuse good writing with artful and excessive combinations of the f-word. Yes, yes, we all remember when it was just so profound to hear that word...that period was usually called pre-teen.

Blogger Ken April 23, 2015 2:45 PM  

I'll never cease to be astounded at how SJWs wave pedophelia and molestation as irrelevant if their treasured elite are found guilty of such heinous acts.

I imagine the ONLY crime they could find fault with is dog fighting. Although, considering how they're trying to pit Sad Puppies against Rabid Puppies, that might not be beyond the pale, either...

Blogger Krul April 23, 2015 2:47 PM  

“He doesn’t attack anyone that hasn’t opened the ball up.”
HA! His first mention of me is mid-2013.


Apparently she's referring to this post where Vox says:

"Consider the cover of Mary Robinette Kowal's new novel, Without A Summer. Kowal is the current VP of SFWA. She's nice, she's talented, and she's an award-winning writer. She was even nominated for the Best Novel Nebula in 2010.

What she isn't is an SF/F writer. She's a romance writer. The marketing department at Tor Books clearly knows that. Both the Handsome Prince and the Pretty Princess with her bluebirds on the cover are straight out of Disney."


"She's nice, she's talented..." What a brutal "attack" from the AWCA. She'd better watch it or Vox might use The Comfy Chair on her.

Anonymous Alexander April 23, 2015 2:50 PM  

Krul,

Vox said good things about MRK. In MRK's world, that's tantamount to declaring her an unperson to her friends and forcing the rabbits to destroy her career! That's pretty terrifying.

Anonymous Brotha Knight April 23, 2015 2:50 PM  

Mary Robinette Kowal is white.

Vox is non-white.

Clear-cut case of Mary Robinette Kowal being a racist and a bigot.

Black knight her ass. Accuse her of being racist. Accuse you of stalking you on Twitter. Threaten to call her local newspaper or TV station and tell them how you, an innocent Native American, was abused and stalked by a crazy white lady on Twitter.

Blogger Noah B April 23, 2015 2:54 PM  

Damn that thread lived a long time. I had no idea it was still going a week after that.

Blogger Myles April 23, 2015 2:57 PM  

@krul

I'm reminded of Larry patiently explaining to Damien that genres tend to be somewhat vague categorizations. What's the difference between a bodice-ripper story on a space ship and a space ship story where bodices are ripped?

Anonymous Porky April 23, 2015 3:00 PM  

Whoa! You just got micro-aggressed by a puppeteer, biatch!

Anonymous Stilicho April 23, 2015 3:01 PM  

What's the difference between a bodice-ripper story on a space ship and a space ship story where bodices are ripped?

The primary focus of the story. The former is romance, the latter sci-fi. Drawing an exact line of demarcation between the two is difficult and fine distinctions lie in the eye of the beholder.

Blogger Marissa April 23, 2015 3:02 PM  

The beautiful thing about that thread at Brad's is that MRK never once says a word about child rapist Marion Zimmer Bradley. Just priceless, especially after her "women are afraid to speak out in SF!" flounce-off.

By the way, I only see one chin in that Twitter thumbnail. A height-weight proportionate SJW sci-fi writer?

Anonymous fish April 23, 2015 3:03 PM  

What she isn't is an SF/F writer. She's a romance writer. The marketing department at Tor Books clearly knows that. Both the Handsome Prince and the Pretty Princess with her bluebirds on the cover are straight out of Disney."

Okay....so I'm thinking that this is damnation by faint praise..."she's a good writer"...."she's a nice person"....but "she's not an SF/F writer"!

Check the book cover.......Holy Shit...that's the most accurate description of what a book cover represents ever!

I'm surprised Disney hasn't sued!

Anonymous DavidKathome April 23, 2015 3:07 PM  

There is a transexual who crossed paths with you and Roosh on Twitter that likes to claim you threatened to rape him. Of course he tells this to anyone BUT the police because there are consequences to filing false police reports.

Blogger Salt April 23, 2015 3:08 PM  

“But keep in mind I warned you all that if you chose this path, it would never end.” - Vox

MRK took that as another personal threat, a threat to her singular all. Wasn't any threat Mary, it was a promise. It hasn't ended either, now has it?

Anonymous Jon Bromfield April 23, 2015 3:08 PM  

A bit OT but forgive me because it is soooo delish.

In His Own Words, From Scalzi's WHATEVER:

"Back in 2006, at Readercon(!) I was wandering around the dealer’s room when I saw John Joseph Adams talking to a woman I didn’t know. I knew JJA very casually, so I went up to say hello. The woman he was speaking to was the art director of Shimmer Magazine and her name was MARY ROBINETTE KOWAL. JJA introduced the two of us, and Mary and I started chatting and within about five minutes I was aware that I was really intensely attracted to her, in a way that actually kind of spooked me and which I was sure was immediately and clearly obvious, and possibly immediately and obviously creepy."

Imagine that! Scalzi, presumably a sexually capable cisnormitive adult male, meets a woman he finds physically attractive (no accounting for taste) and to him expressing interest is "creepy." And his body's natural reaction is "spooky," though I doubt it was "immediately and clearly [heh! heh!] obvious."

Really tells you all you need to know about John Scalzi, doesn't it?

Blogger kh123 April 23, 2015 3:11 PM  

When you've been told that someone's a stalking relentless threat, while at the same time of no consequence, you'll know that the person in question's reached that SJW milestone of having won some high quality, oh-so-ronery shuggoth hearts. Or free head space, whichever one.

As has been said: Free is cheap, and cheap is easily thrown away.

Anonymous Lana April 23, 2015 3:12 PM  

Speaking of liars, I have a nice little twitter screen grab from today of Jane Carnall admitting she hasn't read any of the Hugo nominees, after she gave 5 of them 1 star reviews at Amazon.uk.

Blogger Marissa April 23, 2015 3:16 PM  

Speaking of liars, I have a nice little twitter screen grab from today of Jane Carnall admitting she hasn't read any of the Hugo nominees, after she gave 5 of them 1 star reviews at Amazon.uk.

Nice!!!! You should submit that to Amazon.

Anonymous Stilicho April 23, 2015 3:17 PM  

Really tells you all you need to know about John Scalzi, doesn't it?

Well, he is a self-proclaimed rapist

Anonymous pseudotsuga April 23, 2015 3:19 PM  

MRK, Brandon Sanderson and Dan Wells do an excellent podcast called Writing Excuses, in which they discuss the craft of writing. They're good writers, and the podcast is good stuff -- Hugo material, in my opinion. To hear Sanderson, a well-regarded and very successful writer, who actually teaches writing classes, discuss writing is worth the price of admission. And he really is a nice guy in person-- I've met him, and I am acquainted with people who know him, so I am confident in that judgment. (Although Sanderson's Tor editor, Moshe Feder, is a rabid anti-puppy.)
But it's difficult to rectify that MRK, who sounds nice, and reasonable, with this MRK. When I look at things like this, and her blog postings, especially the recent ones about the 2015 Hugos, I cringe at the split personality.
I hope that she doesn't rub off on Wells and Sanderson.

Blogger Matt April 23, 2015 3:24 PM  

@Eowyn: "And they don't even consider it lying."

At this point in time, with the public school system effectively controlled by progressives for a century and the universities for at least half that time, it's difficult to tell if many of the SJWs are even capable of realizing when there is a disconnect between their words and reality. They are simply "thinking" in the way they were taught in school.

17 years of Marxist programming interprets rational disagreement as damage and routes around it. To preserve the feelgoods.

Blogger Vox April 23, 2015 3:25 PM  

Speaking of liars, I have a nice little twitter screen grab from today of Jane Carnall admitting she hasn't read any of the Hugo nominees, after she gave 5 of them 1 star reviews at Amazon.uk.

Nice find, Lana. I've already archived it and screencapped the Twitter exchange; will post the links later.

Blogger Marissa April 23, 2015 3:34 PM  

(Although Sanderson's Tor editor, Moshe Feder, is a rabid anti-puppy.)

Shocking - a rabidly leftist, anti-Christian, publishing industry Jew in NY. But I repeat myself.

Blogger Victor April 23, 2015 3:40 PM  

Another lying cunt trying to say she feels "unsafe". Same mentality as false rape accusations, spreading libelous rumours. These creatures need to be punished for this. Matt Forney just talked about this on his last podcast this is VIOLENCE as their lies can have the consequences of the state. media, employers, advertisers etc dulling out punishment on their behalf with no consequences once they've been exposed. Not acceptable. What do you think vox? I hope you're able to legally attack these people without losing all your time. Is there a legal defence organization like there are for home schoolers and such?

Anonymous Alexander April 23, 2015 3:45 PM  

Has our friend-of-many-Toads Glenn Haumann manned up and apologized yet, or are we still playing the 'plausible' deniability game?

Blogger Brad Andrews April 23, 2015 3:57 PM  

Her claims of "due process" in the SFWA led me to reply there.

Due process my rear.

Anonymous Bz April 23, 2015 4:02 PM  

Imagine that! Scalzi, presumably a sexually capable cisnormitive adult male, meets a woman he finds physically attractive (no accounting for taste) and to him expressing interest is "creepy."

In Scalzi's defense, he's probably right about that. Maybe his approach is to set up the first date by calling late at night and starting off with practiced suave friendliness "I'm wearing my dress, are you wearing a dress?". You need to make a connection first of all, right?

Blogger Victor April 23, 2015 4:07 PM  

@Eowyn Yep, document everything. Still does wonders even though our society of laws is becoming more and more distorted by people like Eric Holder who want to cater to these insane people. Have to do what we can...

Anonymous MK April 23, 2015 4:11 PM  

It's amusing, because he's whining like a little girl again.

Whiners gonna Whine.

Blogger Jourdan April 23, 2015 4:19 PM  

Victor, as an attorney, let me just say this: the legal system is every bit as much Leftist territory as the media and the universities. Avoid it at all costs, expect nothing from it.

Anonymous Earl April 23, 2015 4:23 PM  

Vox is running this shit like an intel op. He's got analysts, osint, secret agents. If you need a trigger puller for SSE let me know.

Blogger MidKnight April 23, 2015 4:24 PM  

@ pseudotsuga

I used to recommend that a lot when it was just Dan, Brandon, and Howard.

It took me a while to put my thumb on why I drifted out, even before MRK's stance on "lady editors"/etc. came to my attention, and I think it was the following.

The show was 15 minutes. (You're in a hurry, and we're not that smart)

It gave the three hosts time to actually get some depth on the bite-size topic of the day.

While MRK knows her craft based on her performance on the show (Jeffry's review of "Lady Astronaut of Mars" does compliment her writing, if that's about it) , she also rarely adds any special unique insight (with a few exceptions when referring to her puppetry background) in addition to the guys.

Meanwhile, everyone gets less time to talk, so less depth by anyone on the insight they're providing.

In short - if they were going to add a host they had to find someone much better, or with different insights, to prevent dilution.

And all they got was "diversity"

Blogger Sterling April 23, 2015 4:30 PM  

You could have at least included Mary's parting shot at the comments section when they expressed a moderate amount of scepticism about her claims:

"I’m going to leave with these words, which I expect many of you to mock. When a women has been actually harassed or assaulted — Not she says she has, but she has. In your own head, pick the thing that happened to her — the reaction you showed here to me is a textbook case of what will happen to her.

And this, my fellow SFF fans, is why women don’t feel safe reporting harassment. This is why people got away with it for so long at conventions. And this is why the rules are changing."

Anonymous NorthernHamlet April 23, 2015 4:31 PM  

There's something I always find interesting about these cries that you'll out someone...

Anytime I've requested privately shared information stay private between us, you have always been one of the most respectful people I've ever met in that regard. Maybe it's out of a sense of honor, but you strike me as a man who, if your enemy came to you in earnest and asked that something be off the table, as long as they were willing to keep that bargain themselves, you'd have no issue meeting the request.

Anonymous BigGaySteve April 23, 2015 4:32 PM  

"I'll never cease to be astounded at how SJWs wave pedophelia and molestation as irrelevant"

I bet you guys thought I was joking about a video of someone saying they didn't pay $10 in tax would be worse than a video of snorting cocaine off a 14yo boys penis at the DNC.

"I imagine the ONLY crime they could find fault with is dog fighting."

They did claim racism in the treatment of Vic who thought dog fighting was legal & cops where being racist vs. someone else with evidence of dog fighting on the property that said it was an accident.

Blogger JaimeInTexas April 23, 2015 4:37 PM  

Brad wrote: "Vox has been (and will be again) a shit head. But like I said, this isn’t about Vox anymore. It’s about the tribe. The tribe is trying to decide if I can be pressured to conform. If I can be pricked, poked, prodded, and cajoled into saying the words."

What Vox did was to bring into daylight that it has been about the "tribe" for some time and the crappy books that have been awarded the Hugo is the result.

I do not think Brad is seeing the lights ... almost deliberately.

Blogger Mr. Buford April 23, 2015 4:38 PM  

But of course...
Wander over to her website and this is what you are greeted with on all pages:
This site has been blocked by the network administrator.
Block reason: Gateway BOTNET Filter Alert
IP address: 104.28.12.63
Connection initiated towards Botnet server.

Blogger swiftfoxmark2 April 23, 2015 4:39 PM  

You know, you never had to point out that he was a member. You could have agreed with her and pointed out that he was never expelled for his criminal convictions related to sex with teenage boys.

I would've loved to see that hamster wheel spin...

Blogger Salt April 23, 2015 4:50 PM  

Speaking of liars, I have a nice little twitter screen grab from today of Jane Carnall admitting she hasn't read any of the Hugo nominees, after she gave 5 of them 1 star reviews at Amazon.uk.

It's finding its way about the Twittersphere. These idiots just cannot avoid stepping in the poo.

Blogger Marissa April 23, 2015 5:18 PM  

You could have at least included Mary's parting shot at the comments section when they expressed a moderate amount of scepticism about her claims:

It's like that comic with the feminist robot. All it does is yell "RAAAAAAPE".

Anonymous bub April 23, 2015 5:27 PM  

What is the process for renaming the Hugo to the Theo?
Membership has its privileges.

Anonymous MrGreenMan April 23, 2015 5:36 PM  

@bub

We probably have to show up in person and just put forward the motion at the business meeting, then show up the next year. I would prefer we name it the Floppy McRapey.

---

Kowal's last comment over there:

"When a women has been actually harassed or assaulted — Not she says she has, but she has. In your own head, pick the thing that happened to her — the reaction you showed here to me is a textbook case of what will happen to her."

Yeah, well, it would be good if women like Kowal did not make up stuff like claiming offering to show a page of a member directory because she herself has just denied her existence is tantamount to arriving on her front porch with ice pick and rape gear, then maybe it will be easier to accept credible threats as credible.

As penance, she could always commit seppuku to raise awareness of false accusations and to atone for hers.

Anonymous MrGreenMan April 23, 2015 5:37 PM  

Correction - denied its existence.

Anonymous roo_ster April 23, 2015 5:45 PM  

Off Topic:

For the love of Pete, Martin van Creveld's Kindle edition books on Amazon are pricey! I think Castalia House has a golden opportunity if MvC's CH works are priced to sell instead of priced to languish on the virtual bookshelf. Price them at $5 and I am liable to buy them all, over time, versus buying none of them at $15 a pop. These publishers seem to think a larger share of $0.00 from my wallet is better than a smaller share of $5.00. For flipping electrons.

Anyways, that is my $0.02 after reading MvC's _A History of Strategy_ and wanting more.

Blogger Marissa April 23, 2015 5:56 PM  

roo_ster, you can find another of van Creveld's works, Equality the Impossible Quest, over at Castalia House. It's $6.99. It appears there are only two of his works on the CH website.

Anonymous A Visitor April 23, 2015 6:11 PM  

OT:

Sherwood family, is there a way I could PM you re: State? I saw your place only has Google or OpenID, neither of which I have/feel comfortable using.

Blogger bob k. mando April 23, 2015 6:15 PM  

It's about ethics in Hugo Award voting.

Anonymous roo_ster April 23, 2015 7:53 PM  

Marissa:

Thanks for the heads up.

I am most interested in his military output. I thought i read vd and mvc were going to bring some more of his catalog out via castalia house. I would encourage that.

Anonymous Harsh April 23, 2015 9:03 PM  

Kowal et al aren't as clever as they think they are. That's their weakness.

Blogger LP 999/Eliza April 23, 2015 9:18 PM  

Lying and lack of logic is all they are capable of.

We are no ones servants aside from our religious faith.

Vox's blog is not a clique, he has given countless opposing views/critics time, posts, the problem is that they fail as they lack the IQ requirements.

Countless tries are given to outwit our native american host who is unfairly treated and unethically blacklisted but they fail relaying upon strange lies, deflection, projection, illusions, etc.

Blogger LP 999/Eliza April 23, 2015 9:19 PM  

As long as the Hugo's gain attention and press its all that matters regarding ballots and the like. More press, more attention, more exposure.

Blogger LP 999/Eliza April 23, 2015 9:24 PM  

By the way, didn't the SFWA violate their own rule book/policies several times? Yes or no.

Pple around here often ask questions that we already know the answers to, we are just ascertaining who the liars would be.

Blogger Markku April 23, 2015 11:00 PM  

For the love of Pete, Martin van Creveld's Kindle edition books on Amazon are pricey! I think Castalia House has a golden opportunity if MvC's CH works are priced to sell instead of priced to languish on the virtual bookshelf. Price them at $5 and I am liable to buy them all, over time, versus buying none of them at $15 a pop. These publishers seem to think a larger share of $0.00 from my wallet is better than a smaller share of $5.00. For flipping electrons.

The publishers are too attached to physical books. And it's understandable. They have a huge organization that is primarily devoted to making the physical product and marketing it. E-books are an afterthought. So, they are trying to keep the physical medium on life support by overpricing ebooks and thereby discouraging the customer from choosing it over the physical book.

But by doing so, they have opened themselves to the danger of a new rival, with no such historical baggage, from arising and pricing their e-books on the real sweet spot of price and just not caring about how many or few hard copies get sold.

Anonymous B Lewis April 23, 2015 11:15 PM  

Watching the Pinks twist in the wind has been exquisite. They cannot believe -- literally can not -- believe that anyone would dare to fight back against their Revolutionary program, and in such an effective way.

By the way: some months ago, I drew and mocked up a cover for a Vivian James manga. I ultimately decided not to draw said manga, but now I'm having second thoughts. Do any of you think there might be a market for such a manga?

Anonymous Jack Amok April 24, 2015 3:35 AM  

By the way, I only see one chin in that Twitter thumbnail. A height-weight proportionate SJW sci-fi writer?

No, a hight-weight proportionate Romance writer. c.f. krul's 2:47 post.

Plus, that photo may be old enough to have it's own driver's license.

Here's a more recent one. Still no double chin, and not bad for 46 years old. I'll assume her Twitter photo was just a Throwback Thursday moment. No strong, independant woman would keep using a glamour photo of her younger self, right? That would be sexist and agist and objectifying.

Blogger Bruce Lewis April 24, 2015 9:38 AM  

She looks like Ayn Rand.

Blogger rcocean April 24, 2015 10:42 AM  

Is this one an actual woman or another Gay man who says he's a woman?

Anonymous clk April 24, 2015 12:01 PM  

"The publishers are too attached to physical books. And it's understandable. They have a huge organization that is primarily devoted to making the physical product and marketing it. E-books are an afterthought"

Its taken me a long time to get over my preference of a printed book ,, and while I now do most of reading via ebook (and there are a lot of advantages to ebooks), there are still some books that I want/need in printed format... and aesthetically I doubt for me ebooks ever will match the feel of a old hard bound copy of well loved text book... so dont burn all the presses yet ...

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts