ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Friday, May 15, 2015

Mailvox: whitewashing history at Wikipedia

Wikipedia's gatekeepers are up to their usual shenanigans, in this case, attempting to casually brush the topic of Cultural Marxism under the carpet to keep it from innocent eyes:
In case you haven't noticed the "Cultural Marxism" entry to wikipedia has been deleted and replaced by "conspiracy theory" at the body of the "Frankfurt School" page.

I noticed this a few days ago.  After reading a work on Critical Race Theory which wasn't inspired by an article I read on the Baltimore riots.  It reminded me a lot of the line of thinking that Pat Buchanan describes as Cultural Marxism in "Death of the West."  Naturally, I looked up Cultural Marxism on wikipedia and I find that the page had been deleted and replaced.  Orwell would be proud.  To be quite honest, this really has shocked me.  Call me sheltered, but the audacity and dishonesty of it is appalling.

Being an optimist (or a masochist) I looked at the talk page to see if I couldn't reason with someone.  Turns out that the page replacement took place in November and that a single editor it engages in some serious gate-keeping.

Over the past five months several dozen people have expressed concerns with the page and he dismissed and passive-aggressively threatened them all without answering any arguments.

I decided to engage with him, but the results are about what you'd expect.

Here's a summary:

Me:I don't think Cultural Marxism counts as a conspiracy by any reasonable definition and this article leans way left.  Can you please define your terms for Cultural Marxism and give me your criteria for conspiracy theory.

Him :Ok go ahead and try to prove your conspiracy theory Mr. Tin-foil hat man.  Oh and Welcome (grumble)...can you please go away...be a shame if someone were to report you for vandalism.....and did you know Satanic, baby eating, white supremacist Anders Breivik used the phrase "Cultural Marxism" in his manifesto...you don't want to be like him do you...be a shame if you got reported....


You can imagine two days of this I'm sure.  But if you have time, I'd love to know what you think of the debate.  I've rarely dealt with someone so completely unwilling to actually argue all the while claiming that the battle was over before I got there and that he's the victor. 

I've finally got him to consider an academic source from Paul Gottfried, but it looks like this will take time.

So, what I'd really like is you to give a shout on your blog detailing what's happened.  It's bigger than two guys fighting on the internet considering how many people use wikipedia, if only to get oriented in finding out more about a topic.  I know I do, or before this did.  Just a link would get more people involved.

I've decided to ask you because a) Castalia has published work by William Lind, one of the (if not the) coiners of the phrase "Cultural Marxism" to describe the ideology, obsessions, tactics, and behaviors of the Left and their current diffusion in society at large and b) because no one should know better than you that so-called little issues like Gamergate and the Hugos are key battlegrounds in the culture wars and will lead to bigger things. 

Honestly I think keeping wikipedia honest (as far as it's possible) is even bigger.  This isn't just a case of "oh no!  Somebody's wrong on the internet!"
What do I think? I think this is simply SJWs SJWing. And what do SJWs do? The lesson, as always, is this: SJWs always lie. The ironic thing is that Wikipedia has a fairly extensive entry on one of the more important cultural Marxists, Herbert Marcuse, and even quotes him in some detail concerning the cultural Marxism he advocated, and which the SJWs practice.
  • "Liberating tolerance, then, would mean intolerance against movements from the Right and toleration of movements from the Left."[17]
  • "Surely, no government can be expected to foster its own subversion, but in a democracy such a right is vested in the people (i.e. in the majority of the people). This means that the ways should not be blocked on which a subversive majority could develop, and if they are blocked by organized repression and indoctrination, their reopening may require apparently undemocratic means. They would include the withdrawal of toleration of speech and assembly from groups and movements which promote aggressive policies, armament, chauvinism, discrimination on the grounds of race and religion, or which oppose the extension of public services, social security, medical care, etc."[17]
It should come as no surprise that cultural Marxists, which is what the SJWs manifestly are, don't want people to understand their core doctrine or its roots in the misapplication of a failed economic theory.

Labels: ,

55 Comments:

Anonymous Hal May 15, 2015 3:29 AM  

If you re-read 1984, it becomes clear that Winston is a wikipedia editor.

Anonymous Peter Pan May 15, 2015 3:47 AM  

Related: William S. Lind on Cultural Marxism:

William S. Lind: What is Cultural Marxism?

Blogger Brad Andrews May 15, 2015 4:04 AM  

Wikipedia is ensuring I never donate to it again.

Anonymous Titus Didius Tacitus May 15, 2015 4:12 AM  

It's related to Jewish Bolshevism:

Jewish Bolshevism also known as Judeo-Bolshevism is a conspiracy theory that the Jews were at the origin of the Russian Revolution and held dominant power among Bolsheviks. Similarly the Jewish Communism theory implies that Jews have been dominating the Communist movements in the world. They are part of the Jewish World Conspiracy theory that Jews control world politics.

Part of a series on
Antisemitism

Anonymous Stilicho May 15, 2015 4:15 AM  

All it takes to steer a ship to a different destination than the one intended is a little nudge in the wrong direction here and there, especially early in the journey. Sjw's always do this and they are relentless... it is their religion... and they are just as fanatical as any mohamedan jihadi.

Anonymous Steve May 15, 2015 4:41 AM  

Eh. Not sure why you'd ever want to donate to Wikipedia.

I happily use it as a free rider when I want to find basic non-contentious information, but it's no Encyclopedia Britannica. It's worth what they charge for it, IMO.

Re: the time-rich SJW Aspie virgins who edit it, you'll never out-Gerrib them. Those guys aren't distracted by things like sex with women, fatherhood, or people who would miss them if they stroked out at their computer.

So they can afford to stay up to the wee hours, furiously bashing their sticky keyboards, doggedly edit-warring over articles about Babylon 5, stoically inhaling a miasma of body odour and Cheeto dust as they "work".

Anonymous ticticboom May 15, 2015 5:06 AM  

Remember when the Left supported free speech for everybody?

Me, neither. Sedition, yes, anything they disagreed with, no.

Anonymous ticticboom May 15, 2015 5:18 AM  

Hey, don't knock Babylon 5, that show was awesome... aside from the last season. The follow up series sucked, though.

Blogger Krul May 15, 2015 5:43 AM  

I've got to give credit to Ayn Rand for seeing what was going on and giving clear and resounding warning so long ago. The Fountainhead describes how SJW's infiltrate industries like literature and the press, then use those industries to promote products that sell their ideology over work of genuine quality. Gate keeping, as its called now.

Also, I read something - I think it was by Anthony Flew - who warned about ideas that are accepted and promulgated without being critically questioned. He said these ideas are spread "by insinuation, rather than explanation" if I remember correctly. These ideas are difficult to correct because they are rarely explained or even identified, just quietly accepted into the mind's operating assumptions like virus software.

Referring back to Aristotle's two types of learners, I think its the Rhetorical types who adopt and promote ideas primarily through insinuation. The example from The Fountainhead is Elleworth Toohey's promotion of The Gallant Gallstone (a novel that attacks the idea of human free will) by peppering news articles with oblique references to it rather than advertising for it openly.

There are plenty of real examples in media. Peter Pan linked an article above in which William S Lind a familiar example: "Today, when the cultural Marxists want to do something like “normalize” homosexuality, they do not argue the point philosophically. They just beam television show after television show into every American home where the only normal-seeming white male is a homosexual". Clearly this same method is used to promote "Politically Correct" (read "Actually Incorrect") ideas on politics, law, religion, race, sex, and the family.

Anonymous Giuseppe May 15, 2015 6:06 AM  

The other lesson that is always the sane is this:

Sunlight always burns SJWs

Blogger Salt May 15, 2015 6:07 AM  

All it takes to steer a ship to a different destination than the one intended is a little nudge in the wrong direction here and there

Before SatNav, one could place a small magnet appropriately in the compass binacle. An astute navigator might notice the shift in star or sun/moon position as to course set while the perpetrator would point to the compass and say, "But, we're right on course." Only by allowing investigation can the deed be understood.

Anonymous Steve May 15, 2015 6:07 AM  

ticticboom - B5 is just a poor man's DS9. :P

Krul - The Gallant Gallstone would have won a Hugo, my love.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan May 15, 2015 7:04 AM  

SJWs look tactically strong, operationally effective but strategically weak. Basically a large bunch of white and jewish true believers in Cultural Marxism with a few Asian hangers on who are attracting the racists of the colored races and calling it victory.

It is who they are repelling though is where strategic power will come from since in the who-whom power struggles of the left they are kicking capable white men to the curb so they can appeal to black, brown morons and Asian midwits.

Right now these capable white men are stuck in idiot nonsense of converting people to a particular strict ideology and going nowhere.

But what is growing is FreeFor, or freedom from the SJW.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan May 15, 2015 7:17 AM  

Open borders and the current anarchy are a strategic mistake on the part of the establishment. Looks great from the tactical and operational standpoint but it is driving away the conservative ratifiers from the establishment where they have less and less to lose by opposing the establishment.

Tea Party grannies cannot tell us to play nice with the SJW much longer.

Blogger Nate May 15, 2015 7:34 AM  

"Tea Party grannies cannot tell us to play nice with the SJW much longer."

its not the Tea Party grannies telling you to play nice. Its the neo-con northeastern republican establishment doing so. Those masterminds who brought you Romney and McCain and Dole.

Blogger buzzardist May 15, 2015 7:36 AM  

I'm splitting my sides open with laughter. Cultural Marxism is a right-wing conspiracy theory? My very, very lefty grad school professors are going to be in for quite a shock to learn that they assigned grad students in a "Critical Theory" class to spend the better part of a semester immersing themselves in a right-wing conspiracy. I mean, there are scores of academic books dating back 30 years or more dealing with Cultural Marxism, and more than a few with "Cultural Marxism" explicitly in the title.

It's truly amazing how risible this mid-wit Wikipedian has made himself. A nitwit sees some criticism of Cultural Marxism on right-wing sites, and his instinct is to solve the problem by having the whole of Cultural Marxism declared a conspiracy theory. This is truly a high mark for comic nonsense from the left and from Wikipedia.

Blogger Nate May 15, 2015 7:52 AM  

reading this... I am reminded that human bodies are excellent sources of nitrogen...

Blogger Krul May 15, 2015 7:56 AM  

Nate - "reading this... I am reminded that human bodies are excellent sources of nitrogen..."

Funny thing. When I first glanced at the cover of David the Good's book, I honestly thought the title was Compost Everyone. No joke.

Blogger Mom May 15, 2015 7:56 AM  

This Tea Party granny does NOT advocate playing nice with SJWs.

Blogger Nate May 15, 2015 7:58 AM  

One thing that is useful to keep in mind... in most, if not all cases, SJWs are simply reacting with their first visceral instinct.

X gives feelbads. X is therefore morally wrong. X must be destroyed.

That's it. That's the whole process. There is no research phase. There is no consideration phase. I'm not at all convinced there is even a tactical or strategic planning phase. its just feel and react... then rabidly defend your reaction at all cost.

After brain injury people often become what appears to be impulsive. But it isn't quite that. When they realize they want something... the first idea to pop into their heads that will get them that something is what they do. And getting them to stray from that path is like pulling teeth. The notion that plan A is not the best plan... or even.. that plan A may be a catastrophically bad plan... never occurs to them.

Sound like a SJW to you?

Anonymous zen0 May 15, 2015 8:08 AM  

>Sound like a SJW to you?

Smells like an animal

Blogger Krul May 15, 2015 8:21 AM  

Nate, your description is spot-on. They are whim worshipers, who hold their impulses as unquestionable absolutes.

However, I would humbly add another step to the process: Rationalization. Unlike the unfortunate victims of physical brain damage, SJWs possess the ability to think. However, instead of using it rationally to perceive reality, they abuse it to justify their whims. After accepting an impulse, like envy or lust, their neglected minds immediately start cobbling together an ideology to rationalize it, made up of any proposition that occurs no matter how dubious or incongruous, provided it can be interpreted to somehow justify the impulse. This is the source of evil philosophies like Cultural Marxism, and the reason that they are normally revealed to be a makeshift wreckage of contradictions and falsehoods after even the most superficial rational examination. It's also the reason that they explicitly reject reason and objectivity so often.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan May 15, 2015 8:23 AM  

Tea party grannies are on the contuim, but yeah the north eastern Adelson man whores are the main problem.

One thing to our advantage operationally and strategically is that the SJW can be baited to act tyrannically

Anonymous Hrw-500 May 15, 2015 8:55 AM  

The Internet archive had archived some old entries of Cultural marxism
https://web.archive.org/web/20141213021555/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism and a wiki called "Speedy Deletion wiki" about deleted Wikipedia entries added it on their wiki. http://speedydeletion.wikia.com/wiki/Cultural_Marxism

Anonymous FP May 15, 2015 9:03 AM  

"its not the Tea Party grannies telling you to play nice. Its the neo-con northeastern republican establishment doing so. Those masterminds who brought you Romney and McCain and Dole."

Yes but it is the rock ribbed republicans, grandpas and grannies who still push the establishment locally because they'd "rather see mitch mcconnel leading the senate than harry reid".

Anonymous Lulabelle (68) May 15, 2015 9:05 AM  

"So they can afford to stay up to the wee hours, furiously bashing their sticky keyboards, doggedly edit-warring over articles about Babylon 5, stoically inhaling a miasma of body odour and Cheeto dust as they "work"."


lol. So cutting. So gross. So true. That went straight into the quote archives (which I keep just for my own enjoyment). Thanks Steve.

Anonymous Roundtine May 15, 2015 9:24 AM  

The old Cultural Marxism entry looks like it was written as a conspiracy theory by leftists, so no surprise to see it moved to the conspiracy page. It started long before the 1990s in the 1960s when some leftists started substituting race/sex etc. for class. Some on the Left shifted to race and other issues when it became clear, around the time of Nixon, that the American proletariat didn't want anything to do with Marxism or communism. Once you understand that, the Cultural Marxism term makes complete sense and you can fully understand why blacks can't be racist, for instance, just as you would not be confused if someone said the proletariat cannot oppress the bourgeois. If you're ever confused about things SJWs or Cultural Marxists say, plug in bourgeois for white and proletariat for the minorities, and you're listening to the same crap arguments from 70 years ago. Cultural Marxism is a great term because all the other terms such as PC have confused the right (myself included) for almost 30 years, because the Left would say confusing and contradictory things on race. Even today, many think leftists are just liars or ignorant when they say blacks can't be racist, but in the context of Marxism, this is actually logical and you would predict they would say that.

Blogger VFM 188 May 15, 2015 9:34 AM  

Well, so much for Wikipedia. Here's the last sentence in the entry on "the gamergate controversy": Voting for the 2015 Hugo Award nominees was hijacked by coordinated groups, including one led by Gamergate advocate Theodore Beale (aka Vox Day). The protest slate sought to counteract the diversity of nominees and winners of the awards.

I swear...they are cultural termites. They never, ever, EVER give up, they NEVER stop eating away at the foundation of any civilization where they're tolerated. Brings to mind Jefferson's dictum that "eternal vigilance is the price we pay for liberty." SJW's are forever. They just change their stripes. It is a fundamental, ugly flaw in human nature. Sigh.

Blogger Krul May 15, 2015 9:38 AM  

"Voting for the 2015 Hugo Award nominees was hijacked by coordinated groups, including one led by Gamergate advocate Theodore Beale (aka Vox Day). The protest slate sought to counteract the diversity of nominees and winners of the awards."

SJW's always lie.

Blogger luagha May 15, 2015 9:38 AM  

It is not for nothing that 'Rhetors' change the past in Neal Stephenson's ANATHEM.

Blogger cavalier973 May 15, 2015 9:56 AM  

Conservatories has it covered:http://www.conservapedia.com/Cultural_Marxism

Blogger cavalier973 May 15, 2015 10:03 AM  

The one Wikipedia entry I entered was immediately tagged for removal by some knucklehead. The editors disagreed, eventually, and the article remains: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_K._Van_Brunt

It's about one of Norman Rockwell's models.

Blogger Chris Mallory May 15, 2015 10:06 AM  

"Those masterminds who brought you Romney and McCain and Dole."

Don't forget the failures known as Bush the First and Bush the Lesser.

Anonymous LuggageLad May 15, 2015 10:13 AM  

The Wikipedia mod who is sitting on the page is a Communist. He was even slapped down by Jimmy Wales at one point due to the outrage, but I guess he was allowed to run free once it died down.

http://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/2occ7m/wikipedias_cultural_marxism_article_now_redirects/

Blogger cavalier973 May 15, 2015 10:31 AM  

Conservapedia, not "Conservatories"

Anonymous bgs May 15, 2015 10:43 AM  

Tea Party grannies cannot tell us to play nice with the SJW much longer.

Its not the Tea party that is saying to play nice but the guys who took Jewish cash. If you count Soros and Sheldon Adelson as jews. 8 billion a year in aid to Israel and most ends up in their pockets.

"So they can afford to stay up to the wee hours, furiously bashing their sticky keyboards, doggedly edit-warring over articles about Babylon 5, stoically inhaling a miasma of body odour and Cheeto dust as they "work"."

They also don't have to work as they got HIV to get on social security disability.

Blogger W.LindsayWheeler May 15, 2015 11:04 AM  

Good luck on trying to change Wikipedia. I have been battling them since 2004 about the term republic and that Sparta is a Republic. I finally quit. Wikipedia is about the Marxist definition of all things. It itself is Marxist. The founder of Wikipedia is Jewish. You will also be driven of Wikipedia if they smell "anti-semitism" on you.

Blogger IM2L844 May 15, 2015 11:17 AM  

The notion that plan A is not the best plan... or even.. that plan A may be a catastrophically bad plan... never occurs to them.

Discretionary Pluralism is plan A

Blogger ScuzzaMan May 15, 2015 11:19 AM  

I was, for a time, involved in editing the wikipedia page on political prisoners. Suffice it to say that any definition that implies that the US has political prisoners was not allowed. Any complaint along such lines was a pretext to take umbrage and accuse me (and others) of being anti-American. IOW, "disqualify! disqualify!", and etc ...

There's nothing inherently more reliable or less ideologically biased about wikipedia than any other source. That people treat it as if it were, is a testament to the truth of MPAI, and nothing else.

"Test all things, hold fast to that which is good." remains sound advice.

Blogger Joshua Sinistar May 15, 2015 11:21 AM  

I think that now people are beginning to see that the jews are all insane. They have to be. Why would a sane person believe anything that Satan the ultimate liar has to say.
Get a load of their insanity. "A lie told often enough becomes the truth" LOL ROFLMAO If you keep telling the same lie, eventually everyone figures it out and all you have to do is repeat the lie for someone to know you're a liar.
This is why they always LOSE.

Blogger jaericho (#107) May 15, 2015 11:25 AM  

ticticboom - B5 is just a poor man's DS9. :P
Poor only because Paramount stole the idea. B5 >>> ds9.

Blogger rcocean May 15, 2015 11:37 AM  

As someone stated Wikipedia is itself a cultural Marxist enterprise. The Left differs from the Right in many things, one of which is they have large numbers of very smart people who are always willing to push their ideology under any guise. Further, the Left understands the Right's weaknesses very well, one of which is their obsession with "tolerance" and "anti-racism". So all Wikipedia has to do is label anyone who discusses "Cultural Marxism" as an anti-Semite and the they win. The victim usually falls into the self-defeating "I hate anti-Semitism more than anyone" mode, while every other Rightist flees like Dracula from the Cross.

Anonymous Steve May 15, 2015 11:43 AM  

Joshua Sinistar - I think that now people are beginning to see that the jews are all insane.

Even David Lee Roth? :(

Jaericho - Shallow of me, I know, but the low budget production values on B5 put me off.

The uniforms looked like hotel bellhops, and even by the standards of the mid-90's their CGI work looked cheap. It really broke the immersion when they cut to a lensflare-ridden view of space with garishly shiny spaceships that looked like they came from a Playstation game.

DS9's model-based space scenes have held up better, visually speaking. And it had some amazing actors.

Blogger CM May 15, 2015 12:01 PM  

They would include the withdrawal of toleration of speech and assembly from groups and movements which promote aggressive policies, armament, chauvinism, discrimination on the grounds of race and religion, or which oppose the extension of public services, social security, medical care, etc.

Reading this... especially the bolded part...

I know that the country as a whole, with very few holdouts, was moving in a pretty solid direction of NOT being discriminatory on race or religion.

So, when people aren't being discriminatory, did that remove a weapon from their arsenal? Are they purposely introducing and fomenting battles of discrimination in order to use that as a weapon?

Anonymous Jack Amok May 15, 2015 12:13 PM  

be a shame if someone were to report you for vandalism

Immediately report him for making threats. Since it seems he's already gotten in trouble with the bigwigs at Wikipedia, might be enough to get him the heave-ho. Maybe not, but it's always worth the effort to see if you can get a rabbit chucked out of the warren.

Blogger natschuster May 15, 2015 12:26 PM  

I don't think cultural marxist is an accurate description of today's SJW's. Marx had a big problem with people who did not work, but got money anyway. He wanted to create a worker's paradise. Modern SJW's hate people who work for a living. They love people who don't work. They can't do enough ofr the parasites. I think it would be more accurate to call them cultural tics. Or maybe, since tics don't stay on the host after finishing a meal. they should be called cultural tapeworms. Tapeworms stay in the host forever, just like SJW's.

Anonymous Steve May 15, 2015 12:38 PM  

Natschuster - Marx had a big problem with people who did not work, but got money anyway.

Did he?

Karl Marx himself was a freeloading parasite who lived off relatives and friends.

Blogger natschuster May 15, 2015 12:45 PM  

Steve: Okay, he claimed to have a problem with people who didn't work. That's different than modern SJW's who love parasites.

Blogger Brad Andrews May 15, 2015 1:01 PM  

I happily use it as a free rider when I want to find basic non-contentious information, but it's no Encyclopedia Britannica. It's worth what they charge for it, IMO.

Lots of good technical stuff there for the most part, but those are relatively non-political so they may escape this junk. Also decent for finding out details about a movie, TV or anime series.

Blogger jaericho (#107) May 15, 2015 2:29 PM  

@Steve - Fair enough. I agree the cgi has not held up well, but then they didn't have much of a budget for one either.

The first season is really rough and sometimes painful, but season 2.5 - 4 is some of the best scifi I've seen on tv. I was really disappointed with all the screwing the tv companies did to it. JMS had to condense season 5 into season 4 and wrap everything up. Oops, I guess we'll renew you after you finish all the storylines. Let's make season 5 now. I can only imagine what B5 would have been if JMS was able to do what he originally envisioned. It would have been glorious.

As for actors, I'm still going to say B5 on this one. :) Andreas Katsulas stole the show in B5.

Anonymous BigGaySteve May 15, 2015 3:08 PM  

"rcocean -The Left differs from the Right in many things, one of which is they have large numbers of very smart people who are always willing to push their ideology under any guise. Further, the Left understands the Right's weaknesses very well, one of which is their obsession with "tolerance" and "anti-racism"."

They have very very small numbers of smart people with large numbers of low IQ lemmings not smart enough to figure out what's in their best interest. These small numbers take the $8billion in US aid to Israel and use it to bribe politicians, & to give lemmings paid jobs to be their cheerleaders. The lemmings cheer what they are told. The only weakness is not realizing rhetoric is the only thing low IQ lemmings understand. The left is also willing to outright hire people to protest for them. Is it really that smart to be a "cardboard cutout" from an Ayn Rand novel in 1943 or carry out the scams Martin Luther wrote about 500years ago? I think everyone has gotten over being called racist thanks to Bath House Barry.http://hillbuzz.org/extreme-black-anger-in-chicago-at-obama-he-done-did-it-he-ruined-it-for-us-white-people-dont-feel-guilty-no-more-and-wont-do-stuff-for-us-now-64493

One of Steve Sailor's recent articles highlights democrats not smart enough to act in their best interest.:
http://www.unz.com/isteve/new-york-new-york-its-a-helluva-town/
"My saying is — again, I’m not racist — every black person has a price. The average price for a black person here in Bed-Stuy is $30,000 dollars. Up over there in East New York, it’s $10,000 dollars. Everyone wants them to leave, not because we don’t like them, it’s just they’re messing up — they bring everything down"

"The scary part about doing this is, if the black guys start to realize how much the property will sell for. This is a new thing now, the past year. A million, two million dollars—it’s crazy, crazy numbers. None of them realize yet—some of them do—the amount of money you can get"

Anonymous T May 15, 2015 3:53 PM  

Okay, he claimed to have a problem with people who didn't work. That's different than modern SJW's who love parasites.

No, modern SJWs don't love parasites either. They simply claim they don't exist and/or are a tiny minority and that most people taking free benefits treat them with reverence and spend them so, so responsibly.

Basically, the same thing they are doing with whitewashing this wiki article. It's totes just a few individuals, it's not some pervasive problem!

Blogger Cuca Culpa May 15, 2015 11:25 PM  

>Before SatNav

When SHTF, they're going to turn selective availability back on, and your GPS will put you a mile away from your actual destination. Only rabbits rely solely on electronic thingamagijigs.

Blogger Cuca Culpa May 16, 2015 12:26 AM  

DS9's model-based space scenes have held up better, visually speaking. And it had some amazing actors.

I rewatched In the Pale Moonlight just the other day. Avery Brooks just killed it. Wow, that's nearly 20 years old.

Anonymous A. Nonymous June 01, 2015 2:07 AM  

I rewatched In the Pale Moonlight just the other day. Avery Brooks just killed it. Wow, that's nearly 20 years old.

Always found him too "stagey", personally. Same with Gregory Peck.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts