ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Friday, July 31, 2015

If they're upset now....

This is interesting. Apparently the SJWs are more than a little worried about my upcoming book, SJWS ALWAYS LIE: Taking Down the Thought Police.
KIA mods censor major threads and happenings including Julian Assange and Vox Day. (self.KotakuInAction)
submitted by endomorphosis
Vox Day
Before https://archive.is/zLVKT
After https://archive.is/gS76X
Julian Assange
https://archive.is/UkfNu
Sargon's kickstarter controversy
https://archive.is/zQHvp
Just wait until August 27th, the one-year anniversary of #GamerGate, which I plan to celebrate by publishing the book. It is a pulls-no-punches, gives-no-fucks book in the tradition of The Irrational Atheist; some of it you'll be familiar with since it involves concepts I've worked out here on the blog, but now usefully clarified, codified, and weaponized.

As for the concern trolls at KiA, I have a direct message for you.

You've done good work, but you're not the leaders of #GamerGate. You're not the GG police either. You don't speak for #GamerGate anymore than I do. That's the beauty and the power of a decentralized organization; no one is in charge, no one is in control, and no one is able to decide who can or cannot support it.
 
Now stop acting like SJWs, shut the fuck up, and send emails. We can turn on each other and fight it out once Gawker and Vox Media are dead, the Vampire Sarkeesian moves onto her next industrial victim, John Flynt is committed, and the Advocacy Track at GDC is history.

Labels: ,

86 Comments:

Blogger Sparx401 July 31, 2015 4:09 PM  

It is a pulls-no-punches, gives-no-fucks book in the tradition of The Irrational Atheist; some of it you'll be familiar with since it involves concepts I've worked out here on the blog, but now usefully clarified, codified, and weaponized.

My body is ready.

Anonymous Soga July 31, 2015 4:11 PM  

Reading the comments about you at KiA...

Sheesh, so much badfeelz triggered. Those guys really do need to stop acting like SJWs. They even talked about how they needed PR. That's SJW talk. Why, that's practically what cuckservatives do on a daily basis - "Work on your PR! Don't say such raciss things!" And we know cuckservatives are "right-leaning" SJWs.

So indeed, email on.

Anonymous Donn #0114 July 31, 2015 4:13 PM  

I can't imagine that it takes a lot of digging to find SJW's lies. Sifting through all the 'industrial grade' to find 'gem' quality is probably most of the work. It's not like they don't lie on reflex.

Will it have pics?

Blogger maniacprovost July 31, 2015 4:18 PM  

I would disagree about cuckservatives being SJW-like. Surely some are, but it's a different disease. They are not even wrong in principle; legal immigration isn't inherently bad. It's just that they have no practical understanding of the scale of the problem. Water is good, but too much will drown you. The building permits on the swimming pool are irrelevant.

Do you want your children to drown?

Blogger Floyd Looney July 31, 2015 4:18 PM  

Law of the Left: "It's Okay When We Do It" (like racism, sexism, slurs against gays are all okay if they are used against conservative targets)

Anonymous Huckleberry July 31, 2015 4:37 PM  

It is a pulls-no-punches, gives-no-fucks book in the tradition of The Irrational Atheist

Someone should call ahead and alert Nevada.

Anonymous patrick kelly July 31, 2015 4:40 PM  

I'll admit I understand the reluctance to associate ilk/SP/RP/VD etc. especially if they haven't taken the time or effort to catch up on the history and try to understand what was actually written or said as compared to how it has been portrayed in propaganda and hit pieces.

Coming face to face with reality of this war is difficult and unpleasant for those of us who are not natural leaders or warriors. At some point you have to choose a side to at least support if you don't have the stomach to fight on the front lines yourself. For me it is about who I would die beside in battle and have some satisfaction it was a good death......

Blogger VD July 31, 2015 4:53 PM  

For me it is about who I would die beside in battle and have some satisfaction it was a good death.

It's fascinating to see all the people who would sell each other out in a heartbeat gathering together. I'd rather have one man I could trust at my back come Hell or high water than one hundred at my side who will run the moment the temperature rises a few degrees.

Anonymous 334 July 31, 2015 4:57 PM  

I love this. Can't wait.

Blogger Rabbi B July 31, 2015 5:08 PM  

"I'd rather have one man I could trust at my back come Hell or high water than one hundred at my side who will run the moment the temperature rises a few degrees."

Yep. No doubt.

"Jonathan said to his young armor-bearer, “Come, let’s go over to the outpost of those uncircumcised men. Perhaps the Lord will act in our behalf. Nothing can hinder the Lord from saving, whether by many or by few.”

“Do all that you have in mind,” his armor-bearer said. “Go ahead; I AM WITH YOU HEART AND SOUL”

. . .

"Jonathan climbed up, using his hands and feet, with his armor-bearer right behind him. The Philistines fell before Jonathan, and HIS ARMOR-BEARER FOLLOWED AND KILLED BEHIND HIM. In that first attack Jonathan and his armor-bearer killed some twenty men in an area of about half an acre."

(I Samuel 14)

Blogger ScuzzaMan July 31, 2015 5:12 PM  

Any day you can upset an SJW is a good day.

'Ware the taft of August, motherfuckers!

Anonymous Soga July 31, 2015 5:12 PM  

The Judas road is easy and well-traveled.

Of course, we know where that road ends. A field.

Anonymous Cuca Culpa July 31, 2015 5:25 PM  

TheHat2 is a concern troll and far too willing to fall for the PR trap. He even met Flynt. I think he's been bought myself.

Anonymous Red Comet July 31, 2015 5:35 PM  

Sarkeesian is on the way out thanks to her and her puppet master Jonathan McIntosh's various rants that sank to Jack Thompson levels of stupid. Even hardcore SJW stronghold NeoGAF's owner said to stop talking about her.

The only reason she got involved in videogames in the first place was because most other subject areas already had their entrenched rad fem poster girls soaking up all the attention and money. Gaming was a Blue Ocean for her for a few years there, but now that there's competition from younger, crazier feminazis and nutso trannies she's old news.

When the cash flow gets worse I expect she'll branch out to super-hero films or tabletop gaming or something. That's what all con men do when their current well dries up.

Anonymous JN July 31, 2015 5:41 PM  

Just saw this:

ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2015 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Vox owns my words!

Blogger Rantor July 31, 2015 5:42 PM  

Got my first vile SJW response to a tweet today. It's surprisingly nice to know you broke through... I thought of writing back, but I don't care. And I am certain that a response only feeds their tiny little egos.

Blogger Student in Blue July 31, 2015 5:44 PM  

@12. Cuca Culpa

On the other hand, he recently stepped down as moderator of KiA, so...

Blogger Elocutioner #0226 July 31, 2015 5:45 PM  

"He says stuff that can be wilfully misinterpreted as an idiot test. You have failed."

At least one person gets it. Most on that thread do not.

Blogger Cataline Sergius July 31, 2015 5:52 PM  

And if you want to avail yourself of a chance to annoy SJWs, Then vote in the Hugo's...Now.

Voting closes today at midnight Pacific.

Blogger Elocutioner #0226 July 31, 2015 5:54 PM  

@14 JN Vox owns my words!

Thank you for replying. Once Vox receives your words on his blog, Vox Popoli, he carefully and lovingly reorders them into clever rhetorical and dialectical devices to be strategically deployed in our ongoing struggle against the forces of insanity. Once these traps are in place hapless SJWs are triggered and explode in devastating paroxysms of outrage and spittle. It is not a sight for the weak of heart. Or stomach. Know that your contribution is making a difference.

Glory to the Rabid Puppies!

Blogger VFM bot #188 July 31, 2015 6:29 PM  

I'd rather have one man I could trust at my back come Hell or high water than one hundred at my side who will run the moment the temperature rises a few degrees.

People who find their way here and stay around---not to mention those who actively participate---are unlikely to run when the temperature rises.

I mean, shit, just getting here and becoming a regular reader means the temperature has already gone up. So what? We don't care.

Blogger VFM bot #188 July 31, 2015 6:35 PM  

I can't imagine that it takes a lot of digging to find SJW's lies. Sifting through all the 'industrial grade' to find 'gem' quality is probably most of the work. It's not like they don't lie on reflex.

Larry Correia's takedown today of a scummy, lying SJW who put multiple obvious lies into The Guardian gives over a dozen easy examples. See for yourselves:

http://monsterhunternation.com/2015/07/31/fisking-the-guardians-latest-sad-puppy-of-the-week-article/

Anonymous Takin' a look July 31, 2015 6:41 PM  

I wonder exactly what the libs and SJWs think of the "Cuckening"?

Anonymous Homesteader July 31, 2015 6:43 PM  

WESTMORELAND. O that we now had here
But one ten thousand of those men in England
That do no work to-day!

KING. What’s he that wishes so?
My cousin, Westmoreland? No, my fair cousin;
If we are mark’d to die, we are enow
To do our country loss; and if to live,
The fewer men, the greater share of honour.
God’s will! I pray thee, wish not one man more.
By Jove, I am not covetous for gold,
Nor care I who doth feed upon my cost;
It yearns me not if men my garments wear;
Such outward things dwell not in my desires.
But if it be a sin to covet honour,
I am the most offending soul alive.
No, faith, my coz, wish not a man from England.
God’s peace! I would not lose so great an honour
As one man more methinks would share from me
For the best hope I have. O, do not wish one more!
Rather proclaim it, Westmoreland, through my host,
That he which hath no stomach to this fight,
Let him depart; his passport shall be made,
And crowns for convoy put into his purse;
We would not die in that man’s company
That fears his fellowship to die with us.
This day is call’d the feast of Crispian.
He that outlives this day, and comes safe home,
Will stand a tip-toe when this day is nam’d,
And rouse him at the name of Crispian.
He that shall live this day, and see old age,
Will yearly on the vigil feast his neighbours,
And say “To-morrow is Saint Crispian.”
Then will he strip his sleeve and show his scars,
And say “These wounds I had on Crispin's day.”
Old men forget; yet all shall be forgot,
But he’ll remember, with advantages,
What feats he did that day. Then shall our names,
Familiar in his mouth as household words-
Harry the King, Bedford and Exeter,
Warwick and Talbot, Salisbury and Gloucester-
Be in their flowing cups freshly rememb’red.
This story shall the good man teach his son;
And Crispin Crispian shall ne’er go by,
From this day to the ending of the world,
But we in it shall be remembered-
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother; be he ne’er so vile,
This day shall gentle his condition;
And gentlemen in England now-a-bed
Shall think themselves accurs’d they were not here,
And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks
That fought with us upon Saint Crispin’s day.

"That fears his fellowship to die with us."

Plant your flag...

Anonymous KC9ZNR July 31, 2015 6:46 PM  

Cataline @18 - the Hugo voting site is being annoyingly glitchy, it took me three attempts at a login and a few erased categories (that were filled out prior) before all the categories showed up and things finally saved properly. I have little confidence in whatever system they're using, so I recommend y'all check your ballot confirmation emails carefully.

Anonymous Takin' a look July 31, 2015 6:51 PM  

@24

Save copies and dead tree them too would be a good idea.

Anonymous BGS July 31, 2015 7:08 PM  

People who find their way here and stay around...are unlikely to run when the temperature rises.

We ran like little girls from the die verse city.

Anonymous Takin' a look July 31, 2015 7:17 PM  

Did you flee staunch allies or fair weather friends? No shame in retreat BGS if you have nobody backing you

Blogger Sheershaw July 31, 2015 7:37 PM  

I always figured that if anything would bring GamerGate down, it'd be the reddit crowd.

When gay play-acting was shoved down the country's throat, the KiA people created and upvoted a thread celebrating #LoveWins. The reddit GGers are basically die-hard liberals who are only against third-wave feminism because it threatens their porn and video games. They cannot resist the urge to signal what good liberals they are on issues that don't really concern them in particular.

Anonymous Obvious July 31, 2015 8:00 PM  

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Anonymous Roundtine July 31, 2015 8:00 PM  

Those few KiAs want to be 90% SJW (without the 10% extremism), but the SJWs they want to fight today were just like them 5 to 10 years ago. Cthulhu always swims left.

If you want to stop the SJWs, you're gonna need a Shitlord.

Anonymous Red Comet July 31, 2015 8:04 PM  

KC9ZNR @24

Their servers are probably being pounded since today's the deadline and more people actually give a shit this year thanks to the Puppies.

Anonymous ggrevolt anon July 31, 2015 8:08 PM  

It's not the KiA userbase which is the problem. It's the moderators who are in control.

On 8chan a new GamerGate board is trying to get on its feet. Today it came out that TheHat2 (former top moderator at KiA) false flagged himself on ggrevolt to paint the board in a bad light. This false flag then was used to smear the whole board in a guilt by association attack.

Thread: https://8ch.net/ggrevolt/res/29118.html
the board owner can see IP hashes and saw that the verified TheHat2 poster posted before:

Firstly, he STARTED the infamous 'Cuckman is Ragequiting thread' himself >>19877, (the one where he was allegedly doxed),
He called KIA cuck central (we know bro) >>19883
Said Logan Mac should take overKIA >>19916
Agreeing KIA should be nuked lel >>19975
A run down on his relationship with Mods, again backs Logan Mac (say's Porygon is his best friend)
Manufactured the who 'how fucking dare you fiasco' then posted his own twitter for us to mock him >>24084 >>20034
Posted about hisTwitter gone private and 'BTFO'ing himself >>24087
Saying of himself
>He's a god damn attention whore who is desperate to play the victim card >>24098 Very accurate on that one.
Accusing himself of going to Boston to hook up with Brianna Wu >>21366
Telling an anon who didn't buy that bait, to 'Fuck off Porygon' (who is his best friend lel) >>21378
Remember that rumour he liked to get pegged?, Hat certainly does >>21384


Lefties gonna lefty.

Blogger macengr July 31, 2015 8:19 PM  

I've been a regular reader since 2005, although I rarely comment. It's amazing how much I've learned here. I'd be proud to stand with you.

Blogger overcaffeinated July 31, 2015 8:30 PM  

@2

"Those guys really do need to stop acting like SJWs. They even talked about how they needed PR."

They're likely recovering SJWs/leftists. They've been told their entire life that being a "racist" (with no distinction made between someone who'd prefer not to live in a black neighborhood and KKK lynch mobs) is the worst thing anyone can possibly be (only a slight exaggeration). So then they hear Vox is a racist, read some out-of-context quotations and react without doing further research. Unfortunate, but understandable. If they're on KiA, there is some hope for them. It's difficult to unlearn decades of brainwashing. I think if they keep being nudged in the right direction, they'll get there.

Blogger JaimeInTexas July 31, 2015 8:37 PM  

Saint Crispin’s day speech was made by an arrogant, entitled, brat that tried to rouse poor folk pressed as cannon fodder for "king and country." Glorious to die for kings ... spare me the hubris. Check out the speech after the battle. Shakespeare is making s point that is different than what you interpret it to be.

Blogger overcaffeinated July 31, 2015 8:42 PM  

@12

I think TheHat2's agenda was to keep KiA focused on gaming, and not let it expand into a free-for-all where anything remotely associated with SJWs is allowed. Even still, there were plenty of posts marked off-topic that were unrelated to gaming. It makes sense: GamerGate is about gaming, right? If you want to start a general SJW sub or whatever, no one is stopping you, and there were always links to related subs like TumblrInAction. I think he did a decent job as mod, and he's gone now, anyway.

Blogger Student in Blue July 31, 2015 8:43 PM  

After all the listen and believe going on in KiA in regards to Vox, I wasn't expecting much of KiA anymore, but... I didn't really know much about Hatman but that's some pretty significant evidence, and I'm pretty much believing it now even though I was very skeptical before.

Anonymous Donn #0114 July 31, 2015 9:00 PM  

My favorite comments were the ones where they agreed that you were not saying you were for the utilitarian argument but you were cryptically agreeing with utilitarians. They didn't care what the transcript read, they knew what was in your heart.

Anonymous ggrevolt anon July 31, 2015 9:42 PM  

It makes sense: GamerGate is about gaming, right? If you want to start a general SJW sub or whatever, no one is stopping you,

The KiA community voted at least 3 times against the limitations. They strongly told the moderators that they want to decide via upvotes and downvotes what they consider relevant. At some point Hatman said Protein World shouldn't have been allowed on KiA. A win like Protein World, not on KiA. That is insanity.

A significant part of the KiA community knows SJWs need to be dealt with. And in terms of warfare it is utterly stupid to limit yourself to battlefields in your own cities. If SJWs attack other cities it makes a ton of sense to send support fire. Even if you lose that battle. It's not a gaming city. The collateral is not suffered by gaming. But that simple concept is something Hatman et. al. never understood.

That divide and conquer strategy to tell a significant part of the community to fuck off and create their own sub is cancer. Another simple concept which is too hard to grasp for them.

Blogger VFM bot #188 July 31, 2015 10:06 PM  

Excellent subtitle, just excellent: "Taking Down the Thought Police." Yes.

Anonymous Scintan July 31, 2015 10:07 PM  

I'd rather have one man I could trust at my back come Hell or high water than one hundred at my side who will run the moment the temperature rises a few degrees.

Now these are truly words to live by. When push comes to shove, it's better to have one true friend than to have a thousand false ones.

Anonymous taqiyyologist July 31, 2015 10:13 PM  

"Sarah Palin is a Cunt"

Those T-shirts told me all I need to know about dehumanization.

Were the subject anyone else, I would have thought, "Senseless Misogyny!"

But it's Sarah. She's not a person, amirite?

Blogger VFM bot #188 July 31, 2015 10:19 PM  

Excellent subtitle, just excellent: "Taking Down the Thought Police." Yes.

Blogger MI7 July 31, 2015 10:41 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Anonymous 204 July 31, 2015 10:42 PM  

Didn't expect to see that on CucktakuInAction.

Anonymous zen0 July 31, 2015 10:52 PM  

THIS comment has been removed by the author....

(Your turn)

Blogger ray July 31, 2015 11:31 PM  

We can turn on each other and fight it out once Gawker and Vox Media are dead, the Vampire Sarkeesian moves onto her next industrial victim, John Flynt is committed, and the Advocacy Track at GDC is history.


Dunno who john flynt is but the rest sounds ambitious. A nice healthy bite.


The whole Gamer thing has broad support. I play a bit but novice levels and versions, simple relaxation. Techies, basement legends, o/c nerds w/math, engineers, imagineers . . .you couldn't PAY these isolated interests to band for a purpose. Yet there they are. And that's just on the tech side. There are other dimensions of support.

When the progs disrespected the game guys I felt like I'd just opened a Christmas present. Went to the front door and somebody had left a pile of gold nuggets on the porch.

Anonymous Scintan July 31, 2015 11:36 PM  

OT: I have been invited to debate a female pastor on two topics that are near and dear to VP's heart. We'll be debating both women as reverends/pastors/etc... and whether or not Christians should judge other people.

Now, I know that this is like tossing out the meat to the lions, and I don't want to throw this thread off the rails, but I wonder if Vox would set up a thread to discuss it in a scholarly manner, involving biblical quotes and the teachings of the great scholars, as I'm thinking about using comments and approaches of others in an attempt to avoid the boredom of repeating my own arguments for the nth time. I'd certainly understand if the answer is 'no', but I'm looking for ways to make it a bit more fun for me.

Note: I'd be looking for more esoteric positions and arguments, at least as much as the typical Matthew 7 v. Luke 13 style back and forth. I now return you to your regularly scheduled thread, already in progress.

Blogger overcaffeinated July 31, 2015 11:53 PM  

@47

Here's a decent starting point: http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/apost_letters/1994/documents/hf_jp-ii_apl_19940522_ordinatio-sacerdotalis.html

Most of the references are other Catholic Church documents that may not in themselves hold much water in your context. But if you start digging into their references, I'd imagine you'll be able to uncover some good amount of arguments for your side.

Anonymous WLiZ August 01, 2015 12:10 AM  

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Anonymous Homesteader August 01, 2015 12:33 AM  

@ JamieinTexas

"Saint Crispin’s day speech was made by an arrogant, entitled, brat that tried to rouse poor folk pressed as cannon fodder for "king and country." Glorious to die for kings ... spare me the hubris. Check out the speech after the battle. Shakespeare is making s point that is different than what you interpret it to be."

Spare ME the hubris.

I've read the play. And watched it.

You did read the part about

"Let him depart; his passport shall be made,
And crowns for convoy put into his purse;"

didn't you? Not exactly "cannon fodder" if they're free to leave.

And the part about

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother; be he ne’er so vile,"

Not exactly elitist, is it?

Look, I'm not sure what 1st year community college leftist got to you, but do spare us the knee-jerk marxist, deconstructionist, explication. It's tiresome at best, sophomoric at worst, and just makes you look too short for the ride.

Blogger SciVo August 01, 2015 12:46 AM  

@ WLiZ:

Speaking only for myself, I would love to see you coherently express your philosophical and political positions, if only to watch the piranhas tear them apart.

Blogger SciVo August 01, 2015 12:49 AM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Anonymous Wyrd August 01, 2015 12:58 AM  

The problem VD has is not that he hasn't figured out how to express his philosophical and political positions in a way that won't make people roll their eyes and conclude he's an idiot. The problem is that when he does manage to coherently express his ideas people roll their eyes, think he's an idiot and write him off as a confused lightweight with delusions of grandeur.

Dude, I'm as dumb as they come. Sometimes my knee-jerk reaction to VD is exasperation such as his views on evolution and law enforcement; however, I've learned since to calm down and examine his case, and as such, he is pretty rock-solid. Still can't understand his NWA appreciation, but as is opined in O Brother Where Art Thou?, there ain't no accounting for taste.

Anonymous IM2L844 August 01, 2015 1:02 AM  

The problem is that when he does manage to coherently express his ideas people roll their eyes, think he's an idiot and write him off as a confused lightweight with delusions of grandeur.

That's not a bug; it's a feature.

Blogger Danby August 01, 2015 1:07 AM  

"The problem VD has is not that he hasn't figured out how to express his philosophical and political positions in a way that won't make people roll their eyes and conclude he's an idiot. The problem is that when he does manage to coherently express his ideas people roll their eyes, think he's an idiot and write him off as a confused lightweight with delusions of grandeur."


No, actually, they are idiot tests, If you read what he writes and immediately roll your eyes and think he's an idiot, it's because you're an idiot.. If you actually read for meaning rather than skimming until offended, you will see that he is making a serious, thought-out argument. I don;t always agree with him (who does?), but I have learned to respect his thinking process.
You, on the other hand, have yet to earn even the respect I would give to Mr Rational Man or Obvious.

Blogger bob k. mando August 01, 2015 1:28 AM  

49. WLiZ August 01, 2015 12:10 AM
The problem is that when he does manage to coherently express his ideas people roll their eyes, think he's an idiot and write him off as a confused lightweight with delusions of grandeur.



neither your inability to grasp compound concepts more complex than "fire hot, ice cold" nor your flat refusal to acknowledge straightforward facts that contradict your indoctrination are ... not Vox's problems.


for instance, it's well established genetic fact that Caucasians and Asians have Neanderthal admixture in their heritage ( something <3% ), whereas Negroes are 100% Homo sapiens sapiens.

therefore, when Vox says something like "NK Jemisin and I are not equally Homo sapiens" he is perfectly correct.

because HE is less Homo sapiens than she is. being as 98% is less than 100%, you see.

whereas you retards immediately start bleating about how he supposedly just called her sub-human ...

which is a bald faced lie.

Blogger YIH August 01, 2015 1:31 AM  

@13 Red Comet:
Even hardcore SJW stronghold NeoGAF's owner said to stop talking about her. [from the link]:
Now that we're largely post-GG and she's not the figurehead for women in a war against basement dwelling 8chan terrorists, it's probably time for Anita Sarkeesian's poorly researched, reactionary blanket statements and self-sabotaging fringe feminism to not always be given attention by default.
Top kek. I always get a kick out of the meme that we are all 'basement dwelling'. My home (like many others) is built on a slab - there is no basement.

Blogger bob k. mando August 01, 2015 1:31 AM  

should have noted "sub-Saharan Negroes".

American blacks have, on average, some 30% white heritage. therefore, an American black will probably have Neanderthal genes but the admixture will likely be less than 1%.

Blogger DBSFF August 01, 2015 1:40 AM  

WLiZ

By all means, provide some examples. Both of Vox incoherently expressing himself, and of Vox coherently expressing a "lightweight" opinion. Vague generalities that bear no relation to reality are usually emblematic of a coherent and good-faith interlocutor.

Of course, SJWs always lie. Especially the liberal arts majors who haven't yet realized that they grew up and were educated in a near perfect bubble, and their vaunted education is nearly worthless.

Anonymous Forrest Bishop VFM #0167 August 01, 2015 1:56 AM  

57. YIH August

@13 Red Comet:
Even hardcore SJW stronghold NeoGAF's owner said to stop talking about her. [from the link]:
Now that we're largely post-GG and she's not the figurehead for women in a war against basement dwelling 8chan terrorists, it's probably time for Anita Sarkeesian's poorly researched, reactionary blanket statements and self-sabotaging fringe feminism to not always be given attention by default.

Top kek. I always get a kick out of the meme that we are all 'basement dwelling'.

Not only a basement-dwelling disqual, there's lots more SJW warrenthink packed into that one sentence. AS has become "reactionary", the term commies/lefties use for their opponents, i.re cast out from the SJW herd. Feminism itself can't be disqualified so she's placed into the "fringe", again cast out from the herd. The Warrenfuehrer commands you to pay no attention to her.

And notice the "post-GG" gamers have died once again, like OBL likes to do. And if you don't believe that you are an "8chan terrorist".

It is a pulls-no-punches, gives-no-fucks book... usefully clarified, codified, and weaponized.

Bring. It. On. :)

Blogger Minion777 August 01, 2015 2:44 AM  

@47

I suggest you try Dalrock for specialization:
https://dalrock.wordpress.com/

Present yourself as a devout who sticks to scripture, read the relevant verses that make your point, denounce detractors as Jesus did with a whip. Read the verse where he actually did that.

Don't actually hit anyone, have everything recorded and a lawyer on retainer,

Blogger Groot August 01, 2015 2:46 AM  

@39. ggrevolt:
"SJWs need to be dealt with."

Here you go, right here. This just needs to be the, of course, automatic assumption, say no more. And then the endless fun. That's what brings allies, from those that join in to those who watch and support. Strategizing, playing, winning. Fun, dagnabit!

Blogger James Jones August 01, 2015 3:02 AM  

VD, do you actually sleep? Your productivity shames me. I would love to know what an average day looks like, and how you balance all of this with being a father, and keeping Spacebunny happy. She must be the lowest-maintenance woman ever created.

Anonymous Scintan August 01, 2015 3:30 AM  

Present yourself as a devout who sticks to scripture, read the relevant verses that make your point, denounce detractors as Jesus did with a whip. Read the verse where he actually did that.

Don't actually hit anyone, have everything recorded and a lawyer on retainer,


It's just a friendly debate on the two topics. No hitting will be involved. I'm doing it more for the laughs as this is a pastor who actually told someone in my family that Christians are not to judge, and quoted the 3 usual passages as her evidence.

Blogger Groot August 01, 2015 3:38 AM  

@46. ray:
"Dunno who john flynt is"

John Flynt is Brianna Wu's original name. I think it's allowable to change your name (my wife changed hers when we married), but changing gender is just pretend. SJW is just another word for creepy perv. Can you claim to be a woman and go in the local community college's women's showers? Women, wives, daughters, be afraid. The SJW is not your friend, is not on your side.

Anonymous VD August 01, 2015 3:50 AM  

The problem VD has is not that he hasn't figured out how to express his philosophical and political positions in a way that won't make people roll their eyes and conclude he's an idiot. The problem is that when he does manage to coherently express his ideas people roll their eyes, think he's an idiot and write him off as a confused lightweight with delusions of grandeur.

This is expected. The gap across which no effective communications can take place is 2 SD.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan August 01, 2015 7:06 AM  

I voted but yet to receive a confirmation so perhaps after following those instructions my votes are out in the netherworlds.

Any poor results and I will claim voter fraud faster than they can say Democratic Party.

Blogger JaimeInTexas August 01, 2015 8:37 AM  

Yes, I have tead the play, on my own. It is hubris. Had the speech been made on English soil, when facing a French invasion it would be different. The offer was made and no peasant in his right mind will take the offer. Nice words that king and cannon fodder are brothers. Sure. Until the long gets back on the throne. I have also seen the play.
Hubris, arrogance, pride ... all gone upon facing all the dead.

Blogger jay c August 01, 2015 10:20 AM  

The problem with leftists is that they are all SJWs at some level. Temporary alliances, such as GamerGate, are fine so long as you understand that they will inevitably turn on you, and you prepare for the event in advance.

Anonymous patrick kelly August 01, 2015 10:45 AM  

"people roll their eyes"

OMG they roll their eyes at you.....and won't sleep with you.....the gigs up now.....HAHAHAHAHAHAH !!

Anonymous Giuseppe August 01, 2015 10:47 AM  

It's fascinating to see all the people who would sell each other out in a heartbeat gathering together. I'd rather have one man I could trust at my back come Hell or high water than one hundred at my side who will run the moment the temperature rises a few degrees.

THIS. Exactly This. And from personal experience by the way, two such men can achieve greatly against many times their number. And even it turns out as a Butch Cassidy and Sundance finish, well, that's not a bad way to go. Surrounded by your enemies and with a higher body count on your scorecard than theirs.

Anonymous Giuseppe August 01, 2015 11:06 AM  

This is expected. The gap across which no effective communications can take place is 2 SD.

And this. In fact, finding this out on your blog may have been the one thing that has explained more to me about my difficulties with other humans than any other single data point. And it has actually given me a small but definite measure of peace witht eh ever-present MPAI fact.

Anonymous Homesteader August 01, 2015 11:17 AM  

"KING HENRY V
This note doth tell me of ten thousand French
That in the field lie slain: of princes, in this number,
And nobles bearing banners, there lie dead
One hundred twenty six: added to these,
Of knights, esquires, and gallant gentlemen,
Eight thousand and four hundred; of the which,
Five hundred were but yesterday dubb'd knights:
So that, in these ten thousand they have lost,
There are but sixteen hundred mercenaries;
The rest are princes, barons, lords, knights, squires,
And gentlemen of blood and quality.
The names of those their nobles that lie dead:
Charles Delabreth, high constable of France;
Jaques of Chatillon, admiral of France;
The master of the cross-bows, Lord Rambures;
Great Master of France, the brave Sir Guichard Dolphin,
John Duke of Alencon, Anthony Duke of Brabant,
The brother of the Duke of Burgundy,
And Edward Duke of Bar: of lusty earls,
Grandpre and Roussi, Fauconberg and Foix,
Beaumont and Marle, Vaudemont and Lestrale.
Here was a royal fellowship of death!
Where is the number of our English dead?
Herald shews him another paper

Edward the Duke of York, the Earl of Suffolk,
Sir Richard Ketly, Davy Gam, esquire:
None else of name; and of all other men
But five and twenty. O God, thy arm was here;
And not to us, but to thy arm alone,
Ascribe we all! When, without stratagem,
But in plain shock and even play of battle,
Was ever known so great and little loss
On one part and on the other? Take it, God,
For it is none but thine!
EXETER
'Tis wonderful!
KING HENRY V
Come, go we in procession to the village.
And be it death proclaimed through our host
To boast of this or take the praise from God
Which is his only.
FLUELLEN
Is it not lawful, an please your majesty, to tell
how many is killed?
KING HENRY V
Yes, captain; but with this acknowledgement,
That God fought for us.
FLUELLEN
Yes, my conscience, he did us great good.
KING HENRY V
Do we all holy rites;
Let there be sung 'Non nobis' and 'Te Deum;'
The dead with charity enclosed in clay:
And then to Calais; and to England then:
Where ne'er from France arrived more happy men.
Exeunt"

He never "faces" the dead. He gets the tally, and praises God.He shows reverence, as a gallant soldier will.
The last line of the speech you refer specifically says "HAPPY MEN".

Again, where are you getting your Cliff Notes from? Your "interpretation" has little to do with the text.

Blogger JaimeInTexas August 01, 2015 1:22 PM  

Henry definitely got thrown off the arrogance horse and had to walk the walk of the humble. Henry becomes solemn at the cost to the defendants of their own homes. To go back to reign and forget all that happy band and sqweeze the taxes out of them.

Blogger JaimeInTexas August 01, 2015 1:26 PM  

My intrerpretation is my own. Put those words in the mouths of Grsnt, Sherman, Sheririan, Custrr, etc. Then, maybe you will see what those words coming out of Henry, ptr battle, are so hollow. He is nothing but attempting to justify his actions by sounding great notes that only himself believed.

Anonymous Homesteader August 01, 2015 3:52 PM  

JaimeInTexasAugust 01, 2015 1:22 PM
"Henry definitely got thrown off the arrogance horse and had to walk the walk of the humble."

Look, Agincourt was a VICTORY. An incredible one, worthy of tribute to King and Host. In spite of that, Henry gives the credit to God, the respect to the fallen, and thought nothing of himself. He WAS humble-he was NOT "HUMBLED". He recognizes that, in soite of his thirst for Glory, that all Glory belongs to God.

" Henry becomes solemn at the cost to the defendants of their own homes"

He was solemn in the face of a fallen, worthy foe.That often happens with warriors.

". To go back to reign and forget all that happy band and sqweeze the taxes out of them."

The only thing Henry went back and "sqweezed" out was diarrhea, to the point of death. He died of dysentery, REMEMBER?

"My intrerpretation is my own."

That's apparent.

" Put those words in the mouths of Grsnt, Sherman, Sheririan, Custrr, etc. Then, maybe you will see what those words coming out of Henry, ptr battle, are so hollow. "

Generals Grant, Sheridan, Sherman, and Custer served in the Union Army during the Civil war. They dutifully destroyed large portions of the South as part of an invading force, ordering the deaths of thousands of Confederates fighting to defend their homes in tge process. (As you say Henry did to the French.) So I'm not sure what your point is here.

"He is nothing but attempting to justify his actions by sounding great notes that only himself believed."

KING HENRY V
All things are ready, if our minds be so.
WESTMORELAND
Perish the man whose mind is backward now!
KING HENRY V
Thou dost not wish more help from England, coz?
WESTMORELAND
God's will! my liege, would you and I alone,
Without more help, could fight this royal battle!
KING HENRY V
Why, now thou hast unwish'd five thousand men;
Which likes me better than to wish us one.
You know your places: God be with you all!

Only he believed?

Anonymous Wyrd August 01, 2015 3:56 PM  

I'd rather witness a play about how Prince Hal survived an arrow in the face.

Blogger bob k. mando August 01, 2015 4:52 PM  

66. Scintan August 01, 2015 3:30 AM
I'm doing it more for the laughs as this is a pastor who actually told someone in my family... as HER evidence.



i think i've identified your problem. or at least one of them.


one note, i would try and separate those two debating points. otherwise, she's likely to keep trying to switch tracks on you anytime you start to make progress.

of course, if this is going to be a formal debate with allotted times and response periods, it won't be an issue.

something else i've noticed, once a denomination throws out the requirement to be 'a married man with children' from the list, they usually manage to do away with all of the other requirements as well.

as a fer instance, i had a buddy who was dating a divorced woman who had two kids. her physician ex-husband was so abusive about dragging her back into court to try to adjust the alimony payments down that the judge threatened to throw him into jail for contempt the next time he tried it.

my buddy was spending nights at her house ( even though he claimed not to be doing anything ) on the weekends.

the Methodists considered her 'pastor' material and were putting her through classes. last i heard she was in Dowagiac as an assistant pastor.

i can't speak to the reputation of her daughters, i never really talked to them. but there was NO OTHER ASPECT OF HER LIFE that would have been even remotely acceptable as a 'leader' of the church.

it might be worthwhile to nose around about this woman pastor's life that your going to be debating.

there is almost certainly A REASON why she wants to demand that no one 'judge' her.


5 (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)

do you see that?

the ONLY SITUATION in which an acceptable married woman would be 'head of household' would be if her husband had been incapacitated in the line of duty. ie - combat injury, firefighter, etc.

in which case, she's going to be busy enough as a single parent trying to care for her household.

unmarried people of ALL SEXES are not demonstrated to be fit to lead a congregation.


note as well that the reason that the elders of the church are to be beyond reproach is so that OTHERS MAY JUDGE THEM and not find them wanting.


https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Timothy+3&version=KJV

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Titus+1&version=KJV

Blogger JaimeInTexas August 02, 2015 3:18 PM  

@78 Does not look like we are to reach an agrreement. Looking at the same text I see arrogance, an attempt to justify invasion for vainglory and later a humbling of consequence. Also, there is the whole context of kings, wars and who ends up paying the price for meager benefits., if any.

Blogger JaimeInTexas August 02, 2015 3:22 PM  

@78 Union war criminals.

Blogger Groot August 03, 2015 1:13 AM  

77. JaimeInTexas and 78. Homesteader:

I have some sympathy for portions of what you each propound, but I also have another take. JaimeInTexan rebels against what a tyrant chooses to do with the novel use of a powerful new weapon, the Welch longbow, dealing death with such vainglorious disregard for life. Homesteader revels in the glory of Shakespearian iambic pentameter that gasps in wonder at the unexpected glory of life plucked so dominantly, so effortlessly, so decisively from what had seemed certain defeat. Certainly, God must have wanted it so!

My take: Did you know that a Welsh longbow could pass right through armor, through a man's leg, through the other side of the armor, and into the horse's flesh. Dang! Technology is the shit.

Blogger JaimeInTexas August 03, 2015 2:23 PM  

I do not disagree with what you said about Shakespeare talent with the English language.

I knew the longbow was a big technological advance because if its range but I did not know it could go through armor. I suppose that it makes sense.

Blogger automatthew August 05, 2015 9:20 AM  

WLiZ was Tad.

Blogger Anna Wailliam August 11, 2015 10:37 AM  

This was a actually incredibly beneficial submit. In theory I'd prefer to create like this also - getting time and actual effort to Alpha XTRM make a excellent piece of writing but what can I say I procrastinate alot and by no means appear to obtain a thing done.http://www.healthcaresups.com/alpha-xtrm/

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts