ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Wednesday, July 22, 2015

#PPGate

Someone asked me at the Brainstorm session last night how abortion foes could utilize #GamerGate tactics to take down Planned Parenthood. I said I didn't know, but that it would be tough if they were reliant upon government funding, because choking off government funding is difficult.

Well, Moe Lane just provided the answer.
“Here are the 41 companies that have directly funded Planned Parenthood.”

    Adobe
    American Cancer Society
    American Express
    AT&T
    Avon
    Bank of America
    Bath & Body Works
    Ben & Jerry’s
    Clorox
    Coca-Cola
    Converse
    Deutsche Bank
    Dockers
The rest of the 41 corporations are listed at the link. Start sending emails, complete with quotes from the Planned Parenthood people about selling organs from aborted infants, to the PR/Marketing departments of these corporations and asking them if they support those practices. Put all the relevant names and emails on a central site, complete with various draft emails, and then start sending emails. Recruit others to do so. Talk about your activities under the #PPGate hashtag.

Don't threaten, don't talk about boycotts, don't quote Bible verses, just try to get a statement from them concerning whether they support Planned Parenthood's sale of harvested human organs. Don't whine, suck it up and recall that thousands of gamers did this for weeks before getting any results. Another important thing is to regularly push encouraging graphic memes on Twitter; this is only one of hundreds of examples of the images posted by #GamerGaters to keep the emails flowing.

Labels: ,

282 Comments:

1 – 200 of 282 Newer› Newest»
Blogger Owen July 22, 2015 10:46 AM  

Decades ago, my grandmother not only refused a woman soliciting for March of Dimes at her door, but ripped into the woman. She said March of Dimes funds abortions.

The woman said she was wrong and nothing could be further from the truth.

Interesting to note March of Dimes funds PP, according to the list.

Blogger VD July 22, 2015 10:52 AM  

The woman said she was wrong and nothing could be further from the truth.

SJWs always lie.

Blogger Greg Doyle July 22, 2015 11:01 AM  

This is idiotic. You think people are better off getting back-alley abortions because your religion doesn't agree with it? How is this different from Muslims trying to institute sharia law?

Blogger Owen July 22, 2015 11:03 AM  

Greg's world compels only two solutions: The Left's Way or the most horrible circumstances imaginable become routine.

Good gravy, that's high school level of reasoning.

Blogger Steveo #238 July 22, 2015 11:03 AM  

The real cost of being an sjw is rising... like a red tide carrying the lies that kill healthy life & wet with denial, they refuse ownership of the stench and bile of the death; but the tide still rises. The sjws even make their gaia angry...

Blogger Josh July 22, 2015 11:03 AM  

Shut up Tad

Anonymous hausfrau July 22, 2015 11:05 AM  

You're right Greg Doyle. I can't wait for the day when legally dismembering children alive is both safe and rare. I wouldn't want anyone to suffer because they chose an unscrupulous practitioner to dismember their child alive.

Blogger Nate July 22, 2015 11:05 AM  

" You think people are better off getting back-alley abortions because your religion doesn't agree with it?"

The back alley abortion myth was always bullshit.

And on top of that... Damn Right... I do think its much better off if women are forced to risk their health and lives to MURDER unborn kids.

And everyone involved should be tried for murder when they show up a bloody mess at the hospital.

I have not one ounce of sympathy for the unrepentant murderers.

Blogger Nate July 22, 2015 11:07 AM  

wait wait wait...

Johnson and Johnson provides funds to Planned Parenthood?????

Blogger Sean July 22, 2015 11:08 AM  

It was me that asked and I thank you Vox. I will be sending out emails.

And Greg. 56 million people have been slaughtered by abortion. How does that compare to the number women who died in the back alley?

How do you justify 56 million lives lost versus at most a handful of women in your twisted little minds

#younglivesmatter

Blogger The Observer July 22, 2015 11:09 AM  

Considering that even a "safe and rare" abortion more than triples a woman's chances of breast cancer, any abortion may very well be a death sentence.

Why do you want women to suffer from life-threatening breast cancer, Mr. Doyle?

Anonymous Alexander, #10 July 22, 2015 11:10 AM  

I'm in.

I'll start looking up names and contacts tonight. If any Ilk do so as well, you can send contact info for any of the company reps to vfm0010 at the gmailz and I will compile into a nice neat list that can be publicized by anyone interested.

Blogger JDC July 22, 2015 11:10 AM  

I can't wait for the day when legally dismembering children alive is both safe and rare. I wouldn't want anyone to suffer because they chose an unscrupulous practitioner to dismember their child alive.

And a practitioner who understands the importance of providing the least crunchy method available for sucking our the fetus. Don't want those donated tissues to be too traumatized.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan July 22, 2015 11:10 AM  

More black abortions than live black births in NYC. PP doing more for property values than the KKK.

Blogger Josh July 22, 2015 11:10 AM  

What about contacting them on twitter?

Blogger Josh July 22, 2015 11:12 AM  

More black abortions than live black births in NYC. PP doing more for property values than the KKK.

SHILL TYPE: The Politico
>Inserts outside divisive issue into thread
RESPONSE: Ignore, report, hide post.

SHILL TYPE: The Discreditor
>"Anita Sarkeesian is such a filthy whore. I want to fucking murder her"
RESPONSE: Condemn. Reply and clearly state that you do not agree with the shill. Report on sight.

Blogger Steveo #238 July 22, 2015 11:13 AM  

hausfrau's onto something...

you're not pro-choice - you're pro-dismembering your child alive.
you're not for providing clean safe abortions as an option - you're pro-dismembering your child alive
anytime someone mentions the issue now, I'm bringing that gun to the table immediately.

Anonymous hausfrau July 22, 2015 11:13 AM  

Well this is difficult. I'm locked into a two year contract with Verizon. How does one address them when you can't deny them business for a while? What approach is best?

Blogger Josh July 22, 2015 11:14 AM  

Well this is difficult. I'm locked into a two year contract with Verizon. How does one address them when you can't deny them business for a while? What approach is best?

Don't threaten, don't talk about boycotts, don't quote Bible verses, just try to get a statement from them concerning whether they support Planned Parenthood's sale of harvested human organs.

Anonymous Alexander, #10 July 22, 2015 11:15 AM  

What would be very useful also is a list of quotes, as well as who the speaker is and their position. The SJWs (the wiki brand especially) love to divert the topic by quibbling over that that's not the exact quote, or so-in-so is actually the marketing director assistant not the assistant marketing director and so clearly we don't know what we are talking about.

So having a list that allows a supporter who is not going to do anything that requires too much work to have it all at their fingertips, to say "do you agree when So-and-so, the what-not at PP, said 'Quote' " would be nice.

Blogger Giraffe July 22, 2015 11:15 AM  

Coke and Pepsi also spoke up for gay marriage, if you're killing multiple birds with one email.

Anonymous Incurvatus July 22, 2015 11:16 AM  

United Way on the #PPGate list is extraordinarily vulnerable here to getting crushed in the offices across the land.
"Hey boss, I feel very hurt that we're being asked to raise money in the office to harvest baby organs."

Blogger skiballa July 22, 2015 11:20 AM  

Nate

"wait wait wait...

Johnson and Johnson provides funds to Planned Parenthood?????"

It wouldn't surprise me if it were a kind of kick-back situation, J&J produces a wide variety of medical supplies, instruments, and implants. I used to make J&J branded hip-joint implants, and there where other devices that they had produced for other brands.

Anonymous Stingray July 22, 2015 11:21 AM  

Good gravy, that's high school level of reasoning.

It's an SJW. Expect nothing more. Appealing to the most horrible (in their mind's) situation imaginable is what works. Plus it's a short term feels machine.

They don't care about the long term consequences because they can't prove direct correlation (in the feels) and they can't see long term anyway. But back alley abortions can make a nice bloody movie in their heads that make them feel bad, scared, and repulsed.

They can't do this with babies because they don't care/can't see the baby/won't allow themselves to imagine this because it's anti-narrative. This is why abortionists hate ultrasound and the 3D imaging.

Blogger Josh July 22, 2015 11:21 AM  

http://ppgate.blogspot.com/

Anonymous FisherOfMen July 22, 2015 11:22 AM  

>>You think people are better off getting back-alley abortions

Greg Doyle thinks all Christian, Muslims, and Jews who are not willing to fund harvesting children's organs should be captured, caged, and if necessary, executed by the state.

Anonymous James Parliament July 22, 2015 11:22 AM  

Greg Doyle is idiotic.

VD, I'm slow on the tactics - why not talk about boycott? Or are you limiting this stricture to correspondence with the corporations?

I can see how it would seem unwieldy to throw that threat around and never back it up, but I wonder how to advise people to act if they aren't going to write letters.

Blogger Marissa July 22, 2015 11:26 AM  

This is why abortionists hate ultrasound and the 3D imaging.

I wonder if a movie is in the works, like Silent Scream, showing an abortion on 3D imaging. I'm horrified at the thought and I don't think it should be sought after, but if there is already existing medical footage, it would be powerful.

Anonymous Alexander, #10 July 22, 2015 11:26 AM  

It's prepping the battle area. You have to mobilize before you can credibly attack.

If the PR guy at Coke suddenly gets a thousand emails asking for Coke's stance on dismembering babies, that's going to ring an alarm bell. There's no need (at this point) to make threats of any action against Coke at this time. It gives time to push the message out to our own side and also gives Coke or whoever the chance to take action.

Anonymous hausfrau July 22, 2015 11:26 AM  

"Hey boss, I feel very hurt that we're being asked to raise money in the office to harvest baby organs."


"Dear Sir/Mam, I see you are a significant contributor to Planned Parenthood. I'm sure you have heard about the recent controversy concerning PP selling fetal tissue. Could you please explain your company's position on selling gently used baby parts to research companies?"

Blogger Josh July 22, 2015 11:29 AM  

For example, here's a list of all adobe related twitter accounts:

http://www.adobe.com/news-room/social-media.html

Blogger Josh July 22, 2015 11:30 AM  

http://www.adobe.com/news-room/pr-contacts.html

Anonymous Susan July 22, 2015 11:32 AM  

Maybe Mr. Doyle should explain to the class why it was so much safer at the Gosnell House of Horror, and why he went to prison?

The publicity of the 65 videos, slow released over the foreseeable future, is going to be not only tough for be PP baby chop shop to explain away, but it is going to be very hard for members of Congress to sit by on the sidelines.
I do not think it will be too much longer before Trump joins into the publicity free for all.

PP baby chop shop is a great label for them since their exposure in the first video.

Blogger Jim July 22, 2015 11:34 AM  

I'd much rather put pressure on a governor or two to use civil forfeiture laws to seize all of PP's assets within a state on grounds that it's a criminal enterprise.

Worst case scenario: civil forfeiture laws get repealed. So, a win either way.

Anonymous Stingray July 22, 2015 11:38 AM  

it would be powerful.

If it exists, it would be very powerful. As would calling it the PP baby chop shop. These things are visceral. Just like the stupid back alley abortion nonsense. Visceral is a tool of SJW's and PP has not given us the visceral tools we need to fight back. Kurt Gosnel should have been enough but as many have said, many on our side don't have the courage to use it. Many more think it's unseemly to do so.

Blogger VD July 22, 2015 11:38 AM  

How is this different from Muslims trying to institute sharia law?

Most atheists also oppose legalized murder, cannibalism, and the involuntary harvesting of human organs.

And theft. If it's the mother's body, why isn't she getting paid?

Anonymous BGS July 22, 2015 11:39 AM  

#PPGATE will scare a lot of politicians as they will think the pictures of them snorting cocaine off of 14yo boys penises came out.

Blogger Josh July 22, 2015 11:39 AM  

Holy shit.

Y'all are fucking ridiculous.

YOU HAVE ONE JOB TO DO.

To quote the OP:

Start sending emails, complete with quotes from the Planned Parenthood people about selling organs from aborted infants, to the PR/Marketing departments of these corporations and asking them if they support those practices...

Don't threaten, don't talk about boycotts, don't quote Bible verses, just try to get a statement from them concerning whether they support Planned Parenthood's sale of harvested human organs.


Instead of doing this ONE SIMPLE TRICK, y'all are:

engaging with obvious trolls
talking about the KKK
trying to expand this to gay marriage
whining about your cell phone contract
talking about Donald Trump
wanting to convince a governor to seize property through civil asset forfeiture

SHUT UP. FIND EMAIL ADDRESSES. SEND EMAILS.

Blogger Lovekraft July 22, 2015 11:41 AM  

and lets not forget abortionist Kermit Gosnell who last year was exposed for throwing aborted babies out with the garbage, among other obscenities. Much hand-wringing but no major clawback of abortion rights (IIRC).

I debated a feminist moonbat a few years ago and informed her that, even though I do not have primary action in an abortion (being a woman's decision), the decision to have an abortion ON WHIM or SPITE directly reflects upon the society, of which I am a member.

In other words, abortion is not a private act. It affects our society and thus can and should be challenged. Otherwise, you have stories like organ-harvesting.

Blogger Cail Corishev July 22, 2015 11:41 AM  

why not talk about boycott?

Because boycotts don't scare them. Big corps have been boycotted over and over, and it's never hurt them much. Verizon isn't Tor; a few thousand disgruntled customers won't touch their bottom line. For a boycott to hurt them, it would have to involve millions of people, and they don't think that's possible, so they'll see it as an empty threat.

What they do fear is bad press. Not so much because it'll hurt the bottom line, but because it could mean their bosses will have cameras stuck in their faces while they're asked uncomfortable questions, and they might come blame people in the PR department for it. That's why all these companies embraced every SJW cause under the sun in the first place -- to keep SJWs from causing bad press. Jesse Jackson has made a great living on: "Hey, nice corporation you have here; be a shame if someone started calling you racist."

That's why Vox's question is perfect: no CEO wants to be asked on camera whether he supports selling baby parts. His underlings know that, and will look for ways to make sure that doesn't happen. One possible way would be for them to stop funding PP.

Blogger Jim July 22, 2015 11:42 AM  

Josh:

I'm also going to work, eating lunch, driving my car, and breathing. What's your point?

Blogger Josh July 22, 2015 11:43 AM  

#PPGATE will scare a lot of politicians as they will think the pictures of them snorting cocaine off of 14yo boys penises came out.

SHILL TYPE: The Politico
>Inserts outside divisive issue into thread
RESPONSE: Ignore, report, hide post.

Blogger VD July 22, 2015 11:44 AM  

VD, I'm slow on the tactics - why not talk about boycott? Or are you limiting this stricture to correspondence with the corporations?

Because it's neither necessary nor relevant. Idiot conservatives always babble about lawsuits and boycotts, then do neither. Stop thinking you're all strategic geniuses who will conquer evil with the pure power of your minds and send the fucking emails already.

Seriously, how stupid is it to be shown what actually works, but then instead of simply implementing the working model, muse about if perhaps you shouldn't be maybe doing something else instead that might theoretically work better, but in practice has reliably failed for at least 30 years?

You don't need to understand one damn thing. You just need to implement the model and send the emails. That was one thing GG was very good about. Whenever someone started babbling about "maybe we should do this" or "perhaps it would be a good idea to do that", a frequent response was "STFU and email".

If you want to get results, stop thinking. Start doing.

Blogger Salt July 22, 2015 11:45 AM  

@DonovanGwinn posted on Twitter 19h19 hours ago - "The easier the access, the rarer abortion gets."

56 million lives lost is getting rarer? This is the crap SJWs spout.

Blogger Rabbi B July 22, 2015 11:47 AM  

"I'm also going to work, eating lunch, driving my car, and breathing. What's your point?"

I think his point is: Put up or shut-up.

VD gave a clear directive that requires no explanation and no quibbling over the fine points.

Anonymous The Original Nekkid Stillers Capitaliss Fan July 22, 2015 11:48 AM  

If this leads to a call for an outright boycott or even severe amounts of bad press for those companies... watch out for MSM reverting back to one of their favorite default positions of "this boycott and negative press will hurt the companies and cost the people jobs!"

Growing up around deep coal mining towns and subsequent strip mining towns, this was always the tactic, that I noticed even as a kid, of the local media in the cover up when the recklessness & environmental, safety, traffic, and infrastructure catastrophes of said industrial activities were called into question at the local Township meetings. Like I said, even as a kid, it was so transparently obvious to me that the companies were using the shill local media as way of blackmailing/threatening the people with termination of the few remaining jobs that were out there if they didn’t shut up.

Of course, that millions of jobs then, and probably tens of millions of jobs now, including future incurred job losses due to the industry owners' lust for gratuitous profits, was and is never mentioned in the local or MSM. So be sure to always call them on this fact – “Where were they when that sucking sound was heard near the Mexican border and over in Beijing? Why the focus on jobs now with this issue?”

Proceed from there.

Anonymous Huckleberry (#87) -- est. 1977 July 22, 2015 11:48 AM  

why not talk about boycott?

You have X amount of acres to burn and Y amount of fuel to do so.
Do you:

1) Burn 100% of Y immediately and hope the result is intense enough to catch, self-sustain and burn 100% of X

or

2) Burn Y in small increments around the perimeter to increase the likelihood that the fire will catch, self-sustain and burn 100% of X possibly without even exhausting Y

Two takes longer, sure, but it's success is more probable.

Blogger Jim July 22, 2015 11:50 AM  

VD gave a clear directive that requires no explanation and no quibbling over the fine points.

Then Josh should stop quibbling. He's posting here when he could be tweeting.

Anonymous Stingray July 22, 2015 11:50 AM  

Josh,

Those are brilliant. A compilation like those internet personalities that Markku links to would be fantastic.

Blogger VD July 22, 2015 11:51 AM  

I wonder how to advise people to act if they aren't going to write letters.

Advise people? Who the fuck are you? You're nobody. So don't give advice. If they aren't going to write letters, they aren't going to do anything. Don't waste your time on them.

Now STFU and send an email or three.

Want to succeed like #GamerGate? Then ACT like #GamerGate.

And that's why it may be difficult for conservatives to effectively emulate GG. They've got numbers, but they lack the average gamer's dislike of talk and preference for action. And perhaps more importantly, they're too desperate for approval. Gamers are the exact opposite, as they lionize "zero fucks given".

Anonymous James Parliament July 22, 2015 11:52 AM  

Thank you for the explanations.

Blogger RobertT July 22, 2015 11:54 AM  

Good advice. The problem with this kind of thing in the past has been resorting to Biblical authority. Which your opponents don't acknowledge. Neither does the press. So they just laugh at you.

On the other hand, I do like the Trump model. If they smear you, turn it around on them. Tell everyone they smeared you, then make fun of them for doing it. Laugh at them. Make jokes about their ethics. Tie this stuff into their overall corporate ethics.

Anonymous Huckleberry (#87) -- est. 1977 July 22, 2015 11:58 AM  

why not talk about boycott?

Also, seriously, do you go all-in on the first hand of poker? And if you do, how long do you manage to stay at the table?
As in that, so is this.

Blogger swiftfoxmark2 July 22, 2015 12:00 PM  

Well, we all know that PepsiCo is actually a buyer from Planned Parenthood, so I'm pretty sure they'll support it.

Blogger Ghost July 22, 2015 12:01 PM  

They kinda went all in with the No More Tears idea...

Blogger Josh July 22, 2015 12:07 PM  

Then Josh should stop quibbling. He's posting here when he could be tweeting.

I've been emailing to various Adobe PR contacts asking them if they support the sale of organs from aborted infants.

Now STFU and email.

Blogger Jim July 22, 2015 12:12 PM  

I've been emailing to various Adobe PR contacts asking them if they support the sale of organs from aborted infants.

That's impossible, as you've been posting here. STFU already and get to it.

Anonymous Rhys O'Reilly July 22, 2015 12:13 PM  

Don't forget to spread this list of advertisers around to as many people as possible and encourage them to send emails.

Make an infographic or meme (like the one Vox has above) saying something like: "These brands support selling dead baby parts...do you?" Spread it across the internet.

Most people do not care for long diatribes and boring videos but a picture of a dead baby with a quick caption guilt tripping them will impact on an emotional level.

Create a growing PR problem that forces a company to publicly make a statement and then use that statement to attack them when they inevitably defend selling dead baby parts.

I have followed gamergate since the beginning and another thing they do successfully is fight the enemy wherever they encounter them. Whenever an article is written that attacks gamergate then any gamergater who sees it will be in the comments calling bullshit. This is why memes and one liners and overblown rhetoric is useful.

Right now PP is countering all this by saying the video is edited and is lying. The unedited version (3 hours long) is available online. I have not seen it. Assuming it is damaging then use that video whenever a PP supporter makes a comment that the first the video is edited you post something like, "Here is the original unedited video. Make up your own mind."

Blogger VD July 22, 2015 12:15 PM  

Don't be an ass, Jim.

Blogger Jim July 22, 2015 12:17 PM  

Sorry VD. On the census, my race is "Other: asshole."

For AT&T, http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=1916

I take it Corporate Issues, Corporate Citizenship, and maybe Blogger Relations would be the ones to contact?

Blogger David-093 July 22, 2015 12:24 PM  

I'm sending some emails to Adobe and AT&T now. Does anyone have the relevant quotes from PP to use?

Blogger VD July 22, 2015 12:24 PM  

Sorry VD. On the census, my race is "Other: asshole."

NP.

I take it Corporate Issues, Corporate Citizenship, and maybe Blogger Relations would be the ones to contact?

Sounds like good places to start. Remember, it's not the deluge, it's the drops wearing the stone away.

Blogger Josh July 22, 2015 12:27 PM  

I'm sending some emails to Adobe and AT&T now. Does anyone have the relevant quotes from PP to use?

The buyers ask Nucatola, “How much of a difference can that actually make, if you know kind of what’s expected, or what we need?”
“It makes a huge difference,” Nucatola replies. “I’d say a lot of people want liver. And for that reason, most providers will do this case under ultrasound guidance, so they’ll know where they’re putting their forceps. The kind of rate-limiting step of the procedure is calvarium. Calvarium—the head—is basically the biggest part.”
Nucatola explains, “We’ve been very good at getting heart, lung, liver, because we know that, so I’m not gonna crush that part, I’m gonna basically crush below, I’m gonna crush above, and I’m gonna see if I can get it all intact.”
“And with the calvarium, in general, some people will actually try to change the presentation so that it’s not vertex,” she continues. “So if you do it starting from the breech presentation, there’s dilation that happens as the case goes on, and often, the last step, you can evacuate an intact calvarium at the end.”
Using ultrasound guidance to manipulate the fetus from vertex to breech orientation before intact extraction is the hallmark of the illegal partial-birth abortion procedure (18 U.S.C. 1531).
Nucatola also reveals that Planned Parenthood’s national office is concerned about their liability for the sale of fetal parts: “At the national office, we have a Litigation and Law Department which just really doesn’t want us to be the middle people for this issue right now,” she says. “But I will tell you that behind closed doors these conversations are happening with the affiliates.”
The sale or purchase of human fetal tissue is a federal felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $500,000 (42 U.S.C. 289g-2).

Blogger Brad Andrews July 22, 2015 12:27 PM  

This issue should put a stake into the idea that "it is just a mass of tissue" once and for all. That has effectively been dead for some time, but now we have a way to push in their face that it is definitely not a mass of tissues.

Turning this into a meme is important.

I will write emails over the next few days when I can carve out the time.

Anonymous Porky July 22, 2015 12:28 PM  

Can't wait to read all the delicately worded politically sanitized doublespeak responses.

All written by PP Action Fund operatives, of course.

Anonymous Randy M July 22, 2015 12:29 PM  

Thank you for this. I supported--no, just generally approved of--gamergate, but didn't bother to do anything much. I sent an email to Tor.
Those were worthwhile endevours. This is all the more so, so I will spend time tonight in the effort:

Find sponsors contacts
E mail them to ask if they approve.

Blogger David-093 July 22, 2015 12:29 PM  

That'll do it, thanks Josh.

Blogger Josh July 22, 2015 12:36 PM  

What I've been emailing:

Adobe has financially supported Planned Parenthood.

Recently, a Planned Parenthood executive said the following:

“We’ve been very good at getting heart, lung, liver, because we know that, so I’m not gonna crush that part, I’m gonna basically crush below, I’m gonna crush above, and I’m gonna see if I can get it all intact.”

Does Adobe support the sale of organs from aborted infants?

Blogger rumpole5 July 22, 2015 12:37 PM  

Thank you. I just opened this on a break from e mailing my congressmam & senators about this very subject!

Blogger David-093 July 22, 2015 12:39 PM  

Here's mine:

To X,

I have recently read very distressing information that AT&T has provided funds to Planned Parenthood. As you are undoubtedly aware by now, a scandal has been broken about Planned Parenthood selling the body parts of dead babies. Below is a copy of the dialogue from the Planned Parenthood executives as they discuss this criminal act:

//The buyers ask Nucatola, “How much of a difference can that actually make, if you know kind of what’s expected, or what we need?”
“It makes a huge difference,” Nucatola replies. “I’d say a lot of people want liver. And for that reason, most providers will do this case under ultrasound guidance, so they’ll know where they’re putting their forceps. The kind of rate-limiting step of the procedure is calvarium. Calvarium—the head—is basically the biggest part.”
Nucatola explains, “We’ve been very good at getting heart, lung, liver, because we know that, so I’m not gonna crush that part, I’m gonna basically crush below, I’m gonna crush above, and I’m gonna see if I can get it all intact.”
“And with the calvarium, in general, some people will actually try to change the presentation so that it’s not vertex,” she continues. “So if you do it starting from the breech presentation, there’s dilation that happens as the case goes on, and often, the last step, you can evacuate an intact calvarium at the end.”

Nucatola also reveals that Planned Parenthood’s national office is concerned about their liability for the sale of fetal parts: “At the national office, we have a Litigation and Law Department which just really doesn’t want us to be the middle people for this issue right now,” she says. “But I will tell you that behind closed doors these conversations are happening with the affiliates.”//

Are you aware that Planned Parenthood is committing a felony by doing this? Here are the laws specifically addressing what they do:

The sale or purchase of human fetal tissue is a federal felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $500,000 (42 U.S.C. 289g-2).

Using ultrasound guidance to manipulate the fetus from vertex to breech orientation before intact extraction is the hallmark of the illegal partial-birth abortion procedure (18 U.S.C. 1531).

AT&T has provided funding to Planned Parenthood. Does AT&T support this kind of behavior? I would appreciate a response to this disturbing information.

Thank you.

Blogger Jack Aubrey July 22, 2015 12:41 PM  

@Josh #64. thanks for the quotes - I will send some emails to companies on the list whose products I use or have used.

I'll also burn my Dockers, but probably should wait until I get home and take them off first.

Blogger Tiny Tim July 22, 2015 12:42 PM  

Also many Board Members of the largest corporations sit on Planned Parenthoods various boards.

When I worked for DuPont they shared board members.

Blogger J Melcher July 22, 2015 12:43 PM  

Greg asks: "How is this different from Muslims trying to institute sharia law?"

The difference is that federal, state, county and local governments operating under secular rules have already enacted secular laws regulating human trafficking, sale of human organs, proper cleanliness and maintenance standards for facilities providing health-related services, and standards of disclosure and transparency in contracts. The video revealing that Planned Parenthood as an organization, and the court records revealing the standards of Kermit Gosnell as an example of a particular provider, clearly show that the abortion industry is in violation of those already-existing, secularly enacted, laws.

That clearly distinguishes this from efforts of immigrants and severe minorities to begin implementation of new, religion-based, "sharia" laws.

Blogger Brad Andrews July 22, 2015 12:44 PM  

This issue should put a stake into the idea that "it is just a mass of tissue" once and for all. That has effectively been dead for some time, but now we have a way to push in their face that it is definitely not a mass of tissues.

Turning this into a meme is important.

I will write emails over the next few days when I can carve out the time.

Blogger Brad Andrews July 22, 2015 12:47 PM  

The law has nothing to do with this, at this point. It is reprehensible and that is the point of the emails. Make them justify their socially intolerable position.

Blogger Bateful Higot July 22, 2015 12:48 PM  

* RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.

Boycotts only do so much. People who want to boycott companies like J&J have no IDEA how far they reach with their subsidiaries. It won't work. Right now we're using Alinsky's playbook. As others have noted, the best action right now is to personalize the issue. Force these companies to make statements. Statements build the controversy. That is a very simple, realistic, and attainable goal. Vox provided very simple and clear instructions that will best bring about this purpose. Imagine if Johnson & Johnson's PR or execs made ANY sort of statement on dismembering infants for organ harvesting, or, if they were merely asked such a question in a public manner. That alone would do more to energize(and polarize) this issue than any number of public protests or "boycotts."

Blogger Brad Andrews July 22, 2015 12:49 PM  

The law has nothing to do with this, at this point. It is reprehensible and that is the point of the emails. Make them justify their socially intolerable position.

Blogger Tiny Tim July 22, 2015 12:53 PM  

To paraphrase Jesus: "those that hurt the little ones will wish they had never been born".

That statement does give me comfort.

In other words, the members of PP will wish they had been aborted before all of this is over.

Blogger J Melcher July 22, 2015 12:54 PM  

Oh, I see the consensus is that Greg was not asking a good faith question. So a good faith answer was not required. Sorry 'bout that.

Anonymous Dave July 22, 2015 12:55 PM  

Boycotts against multi-national corporations are difficult to organize and sustain. However each of us as individuals can make a choice to spend our money elsewhere. Don't support Coke or Pepsi by buying their products. That's it. No threats, no marching, no organizing; just don't buy their products.

Mozilla Firefox case in point

Blogger David-093 July 22, 2015 12:56 PM  

Here's who I emailed at Verizon:

Torod.Neptune@VerizonWireless.com
Chuck.Hamby@VerizonWireless.com
Sharon.Oddy@VerizonWireless.com
Adria.Tomaszewski@VerizonWireless.com

This is the Verizon contact page: http://www.verizonwireless.com/news/contacts/

Blogger Tiny Tim July 22, 2015 12:58 PM  

Killing babies via abortion is ritual killing of the innocents, blood sacrifice. Sacrificing the innocent transfers the most power. Causing pain during the ritual is also empowering to the Satanist.

How you get the morons to donate their children for sacrifice is the difference in this practice and throwing your new born into a volcano.

This is why the elites are so attracted to abortion. They are predominantly acolytes of Lucifer.

Blogger Giraffe July 22, 2015 1:00 PM  

coke and pepsi only give a webform. It may be a waste of time, but I'll try using it and ask them to reply to my email address.

Anonymous Ron July 22, 2015 1:05 PM  

I just spent my lunch break emailing and posting. I already have people that would never read here sharing my #PPgate posts on Facebook.

Anonymous Roundtine July 22, 2015 1:07 PM  

It's probably too late this year, but the other thing to consider is shareholder proposals. If you are a shareholder, you should say in your email that you will make a proposal for the next annual meeting (find out exactly when it is in case there's time to do one in the next few weeks or months). This is the type of story companies want zero association with.

Anonymous Anonymous July 22, 2015 1:08 PM  

"VD, I'm slow on the tactics - why not talk about boycott? Or are you limiting this stricture to correspondence with the corporations?"

Boycotts have a mixed result.

Maybe a better tactic would be to find out who--specifically--at each company is responsible for the PP support. Get someone to go on record as the person supporting PP at the company.

Make the political personal.

Then you can go after that person. Instead of a generic boycott, it can be a boycott until so-and-so is released or apologizes for their support of PP.

This will send the message that the safe move is no longer to just fall in line with the liberal/SJW agenda.

This is how the Tor boycott is arranged. Had conservatives who boycotted Disney said "we are boycotting Disney until Eisner resigns" it would have had more effect than the "we are boycotting Disney until..(some nebulous condition)" they used.

Putting the heat on someone specifically at the company will have more impact than a generic boycott.

Blogger David-093 July 22, 2015 1:09 PM  

If you have the contacts page for these companies list them here so we don't have to search all over creation for them.

Avon Contacts:
http://www.avoncompany.com/aboutavon/contactus-global.html
http://media.avoncompany.com/index.php?s=10916

Clorox:

https://www.thecloroxcompany.com/contact/#


Anonymous Ron July 22, 2015 1:13 PM  

I'm seeing a single-pane Planned Parenthood drive through cartoon. "Would you like fava beans with that?"

Blogger jay c July 22, 2015 1:15 PM  

List of Twitter accounts:

Adobe
AmericanCancer
AmericanExpress
AskLiberty
ATT
AvonInsider
bathbodyworks
benandjerrys
BofA_Help
Clorox
CocaCola
Converse
Dockers
Energizer
Expedia
ExxonMobil
FannieMae
Ford
Groupon
Intuit
JNJCares
LaSenza
LeviStraussCo
Macys
MarchOfDimes
Microsoft
MorganStanley
Nike
Oracle
Pepsi
Pfizer
Progressive
Starbucks
SusanGKomen
Tostitos
Unilever
UnitedWay
Verizon
WellsFargo
Xerox

Blogger David-093 July 22, 2015 1:16 PM  

Would it be more effective if we all picked one company to message on Twitter?

Anonymous Roundtine July 22, 2015 1:17 PM  

Shareholders who do not want to rely on the company’s proxy materials, and who may be circulating their own proxy statement and proxy card, must often give the company at least 120 day "advance notice" of their proposal. These "advance notice" requirements appear in the company’s by-laws and most recent proxy statement. Shareholder proposals may cover a variety of topics, including matters of corporate governance, social and environmental issues. To be eligible to submit a proposal, a shareholder must own at least $2,000 in market value, or 1%, of a company’s outstanding stock for at least one year. They must continue to hold those shares through the meeting date.

Once a company receives a shareholder proposal, it may choose to include the proposal in its proxy materials, work with the shareholder toward a mutually agreeable solution (which may include withdrawal of the proposal) or submit a No-Action request to the SEC in order to exclude the proposal from the company’s proxy materials.


<a href="https://www.shareholdereducation.com/SHE-proxy_proposals.html“>Proxy Proposals</a>

Blogger VD July 22, 2015 1:20 PM  

Would it be more effective if we all picked one company to message on Twitter?

Not one, but a core list of seven to ten. That's what we did with GG.

Anonymous Randy M July 22, 2015 1:22 PM  

"The law has nothing to do with this, at this point. It is reprehensible and that is the point of the emails. Make them justify their socially intolerable position."

Morally, sure, but I'm not so sure about this tactically. Isn't it effective to frame this with "Do you support companies who have been convincingly documented breaking federal law?" because that gives the sponsor an easy out without them feeling like they are taking sides in the culture war. They can position themselves as above it, but needing to see adherence to clearly spelled out laws.

I'm open to convincing that simple outrage is preferable, but remember sjw's and their allies are not outraged about the same things.

Anonymous AlteredFate July 22, 2015 1:23 PM  

Here is a more extensive list I found and it includes links to each company directly.

http://greatdebateusa.com/exposepp.php

Blogger David-093 July 22, 2015 1:27 PM  

Not one, but a core list of seven to ten. That's what we did with GG.

Alright that works for me. My recommendations are AT&T, Bank of America, Coke, Exxon, Microsoft, Macy's, Nike, Pepsi, Starbucks, and Verizon. With Trump's protest against Macy's still on-going, a pile on by PPG would add some salt to the wound.

Anonymous AlteredFate July 22, 2015 1:28 PM  

Here is the active link for those who don't copy/paste

Anonymous Ron July 22, 2015 1:31 PM  

That list may be a bit dated. Sun Microsystems?

Blogger Travis Kurtz July 22, 2015 1:32 PM  

David-Good list. None of those companies, as I see it, have a vested interest in what Planned Parenthood does. I'll start sending emails to those companies. I would remove Starbucks, it's pretty clear they're going for a Progressive tone in their marketing strategies. Starbucks would more likely wear their support for Planned Parenthood as a badge of honor.

Anonymous Curious ... July 22, 2015 1:34 PM  

I would remove Starbucks, it's pretty clear they're going for a Progressive tone in their marketing strategies. Starbucks would more likely wear their support for Planned Parenthood as a badge of honor.

Wouldn't it be important to have evidence that Starbucks doesn't care?

Blogger Nate July 22, 2015 1:38 PM  

#PeePeeGate hehehehehe

Blogger VD July 22, 2015 1:38 PM  

Isn't it effective to frame this with "Do you support companies who have been convincingly documented breaking federal law?"

No. That sounds ridiculous. "Convincingly documented"? Also, PR people aren't lawyers. They have no clue what you're talking about. You're also offering an incredible amount of wiggle room. What does "documented" mean? Is the documentation really convincing?

Keep it simple. "Does CORPORATION support trafficking in human organs?"

Blogger Wayne Earl July 22, 2015 1:42 PM  

No, theyre better off using birth control and being accountable for their own actions.

There is no such thing as an unplanned pregnancy - if you are having sex, even with birth control, you're planning on preganancy.

Anonymous AlteredFate July 22, 2015 1:43 PM  

@Ron

Just noticed some of the companies are no longer with us. Maybe we can count those scalps...lol.

Links must have been to the related PP sites...most are 404 now.

Geez...fail!

Blogger Jourdan July 22, 2015 1:44 PM  

Speaking as a man who lost his sister to cancer and who saw his mother and father contribute thousands of dollars to the American Cancer Society in the hopes that their work could spare future parents their unbearable pain and loss, this...

....pisses me off to an entirely new level I heretofore was unaware existed.

Anonymous Randy M July 22, 2015 1:47 PM  

"No. That sounds ridiculous."
Ok, thanks.

Blogger Daniel July 22, 2015 1:48 PM  

Yes, Greg. Back alleys are far more sanitary, ethical and humane than Planned Parenthood abortions. For one thing, the back alleys don't dare sell murdered corpses on the open market.

Blogger hank.jim July 22, 2015 1:55 PM  

This gives "SusanGKomen" an acceptable excuse to get out of supporting Planned Parenthood. Finally, there is justice.

Anonymous FP July 22, 2015 1:57 PM  

"And theft. If it's the mother's body, why isn't she getting paid?"

Because PP is non profit, for the mother anyway. ;)

American Cancer Society contact info:

http://www.cancer.org/aboutus/howwehelpyou/contactus/index

It looks like they don't have a public email contact, its all through their website forms, live chat or phone. Probably best to post on twitter.

Anonymous praetorian July 22, 2015 2:02 PM  

Randall Stephenson, AT&T CEO
rs2982@att.com (direct)
randall.stephenson@att.com

Anonymous Invid July 22, 2015 2:02 PM  

Contact info:
Xerox:
Business Ethics & Compliance Office - ethics@xerox.com

Media contacts - http://news.xerox.com/contacts
Karen Arena - Global Public Relations - karen.arena@xerox.com
Sean Collins - Corporate Public Relations - sean.collins2@xerox.com
Bill McKee - Corporate Public Relations - bill.mckee@xerox.com

Anonymous BigGaySteve July 22, 2015 2:06 PM  

Darn it Mantraman Josh is on to us. I guess I might as well post the picture of us so people can see who they are talking to.
https://images.encyclopediadramatica.se/0/0d/Nazis_and_gays_hate_feminists.png

" You think people are better off getting back-alley abortions because your religion doesn't agree with it?"

Oddly the leftists that make this claim responded with the word racist when asked about the 3 Puerto Ricans that kept kidnapped underage girls in their basement for years and would starve them/punch in belly when they got preg. Even stranger the Puerto Rican Flag they proudly flew was taken down and replaced by a US flag after the first nights reporting, the PR flag was present on the google street view of their house. http://www.ramzpaul.com/2013/05/flag-mystery-at-house-of-horrors.html

What would be very useful also is a list of quotes, as well as who the speaker is and their position.

"I want a Lamborghini" worker at the nonprofit Planned Parenthood on the 2nd video discussing prices.

I wonder if a movie is in the works, like Silent Scream, showing an abortion on

What if there was a horror movie where the women going to get abortions get harvested as well? Like the new movie coming out about SJWs being eaten by cannibals in the jungle.

If the PR guy at Coke suddenly gets a thousand emails asking for Coke's stance on dismembering babies,

Is it true that coke's secrete ingredient is baby brains?

Blogger David-093 July 22, 2015 2:11 PM  

@Travis and Curious

Thanks good points. Lets substitute Starbucks for Susan G. Komen, they could probably be changed pretty easily and it would be good to have a victory we can claim early on.

Blogger skiballa July 22, 2015 2:11 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Anonymous Alexander, #10 July 22, 2015 2:12 PM  

Is it true that coke's secrete ingredient is baby brains?

And you thought Soylent Green was a warning, not an instruction manual!

Anonymous Mr. Rational July 22, 2015 2:13 PM  

Considering that even a "safe and rare" abortion more than triples a woman's chances of breast cancer

Thank you for proving that it's not just SJWs who always lie.  ANY crusader who puts ideology ahead of truth will always lie.  This is why "pro-lie" is a meme.

Blogger Badmojo July 22, 2015 2:15 PM  

So that's how March of Dimes prevents birth defects!

It all makes sense now.

Blogger JC July 22, 2015 2:22 PM  

http://newsroom.bankofamerica.com/files/doc_library/file/Newsroom_Media_Contacts_page.pdf

BofA Media Relations - Arts and Culture
Diane Wagner
Phone: 312.992.2370
diane.wagner@bankofamerica.com

Blogger bw July 22, 2015 2:31 PM  

....pisses me off to an entirely new level I heretofore was unaware existed.

The Corps have been the pimps all along, the State simply the prostituted whore with "law" making, ie coercive, powers.
The Corps have understood that Westerners have been funding their own dissolution all along, ignorantly, but voluntarily.
This is but one topic of funding and power. Wait 'till all the others are revealed. Same Globalist Corps and tax exempt Foundations, and...
"Business" is how it's been done, the "libertarian" and "classical liberal" myths notwithstanding (those only work with a certain type of people and society - the weakness was exploited by white traitors in league with the committed, ethno-Tribe - for Gloabalist agendas).

Anonymous Invid July 22, 2015 2:37 PM  

Contacts (a bunch of media/PR addresses which might not be as effective as getting a board member or CEO)

PepsiCo
PepsiCo Corporate Media Inquiries - pepsicomediarelations@pepsico.com

Nike:
Media relations - media.relations@nike.com
Investor relations - Investor.Relations@nike.com


Morgan Stanley
media relations - mediainquiries@morganstanley.com
individual investors - indivfeedback@ms.com
client advocate - ClientAdvocate@morganstanley.com


Microsoft
Corporate Citizenship - cause@microsoft.com
Press contact - rrt@waggeneredstrom.com


Johnson & Johnson
Media Contacts - Ernie Knewitz - Vice President, Global Media Relations - eknewitz@its.jnj.com
Amy Jo Meyer - Director, Corporate Media Relations - ameyer15@its.jnj.com

Blogger bw July 22, 2015 2:37 PM  

Just noticed some of the companies are no longer with us

Careful. They purposefully change names every so often and merge with bigger companies, etc. so folks can't follow the money and power as easily.
This is the consolidation and monopolization spoken of. A great many of them are being purposefully deceptive.
As simple example, Arthur Anderson is now Accenture.
ETC ETC ETC

Blogger Blume July 22, 2015 2:42 PM  

Amen

Blogger bw July 22, 2015 2:46 PM  

Hell, as I've long noted (he's a nutjob!) and some others occasionally have noted around here for years, they've told you right up in your face all along and on a daily basis who they are and what they serve and believe in with the very fact of their use of symbolism and logos.
Our esteemed host has even noted the pentagram's prevelent usage at one time I believe.

You're a dualistic yin-yang new age (ancient/eastern mysteries) adherent and promoter, Pepsi drinker. etc Congrats.
Understand the historical significance, then you can understand where your money goes and what it supports.
It is part of their ritualistic belief system to "show it to you" without you seeing it. Mo power and laughs that way, bitchez.

Anonymous James Parliament July 22, 2015 2:46 PM  

One reply back:

Thanks for your message. Xerox Corporation has not provided any corporate financial contributions to Planned Parenthood.

Carl Langsenkamp
Xerox Corporation
(585) 423-5782 (o)
(585) 261-8632 (m)

Anonymous Daniel #0189 July 22, 2015 2:53 PM  

Emails sent. I am targeting J&J, Clorox, March of Dimes and the United Way.

Anonymous Ron July 22, 2015 2:54 PM  

Shut up BW.

Anonymous Daniel #0189 July 22, 2015 2:55 PM  

James, check with the Xerox foundation - most of these corporations have a "cares" foundation that gives them legal cover in times like these.

Anonymous Who Dat July 22, 2015 2:56 PM  

Interesting use of words. Notice he said, 'corporate financial contributions'. I wonder if they are structured where a contribution would be considered happening from a 'regional' office instead.
Alternatively, if Xerox has nothing to do with PP why is PP claiming they do? Or are the contributions non-financial (i.e. copy machines donated to the non-profit)

Anonymous Daniel #0189 July 22, 2015 2:58 PM  

James, never mind - the list of 41 is now down to 40:

"This story has been updated. Xerox was erroneously listed on Planned Parenthood’s website as having been a donor. “We have communicated with Planned Parenthood. They have removed Xerox from this list of companies that match gifts to the organization. It was not correct,” a Xerox representative told The Daily Signal."

Anonymous Alexander, #10 July 22, 2015 3:03 PM  

It's all very round-about. Note that in their 2011 Report on Global Citizenship, Xerox Foundation claims that 15.1% of its 'investments' went to United Way... which donates to Planned Parenthood.

Now Xerox may also directly donate to them - they're clever enough to keep PP's name off the front page, at any rate. But at the very least they are connected in the chain. And what they do explicitly name reads like a social justice wet dream of organizations, so I don't see any real reason to just take word without proof that they don't support PP.

Blogger Nikis-Knight July 22, 2015 3:12 PM  

Maybe Xerox.still gets them money in a roundabout way, and that should be checked out. But, if they are now ashamed to be associated with them, that's a small victory and potential talking point.

Anonymous Mrs. Wif July 22, 2015 3:23 PM  

People also need to remember that abortion regulation in America has made a lot of progress towards the side of the angels. Liberals frequently complain about the success in closing down abortion clinics and reducing abortion provider numbers once regulations are passed requiring the abortion clinics meet cleanliness standards higher than those of a back alleyway. Many pro-life people have worked hard to get the regulations around cleanliness and proper licensing tightened up. It turns out that if you insist a real doctor do it, in a room meeting normal surgical cleanliness standards, abortionists stop providing their services. Many of them simply can't and won't do it. Most people don't realize that abortion clinics do not have to meet standard surgical requirements in many locales and that you can help women by pushing for European style regulation.

That's also another approach, pointing out how pretty much all of Europe has stricter regulation than America. Liberals hate when people point that out.

Blogger Res Ipsa July 22, 2015 3:24 PM  

Vox,

This is your best anti SJW post to date.

Thanks

Blogger CM July 22, 2015 3:28 PM  

I think i've heard enough from abortion advocates on "women's health".

If that's what you're selling, then Wendy Davis picketting over regulatory measures for sanitation and reporting (you know, like REAL doctors) post-Gosnell has a message for you.

Women's health & lives don't matter to abortaficianados anymore than tiny humans do.

Anonymous R Wilson July 22, 2015 3:28 PM  

Look into T Mobile. They sometimes have deals where they buy out your contract and pay the cancellation penalty.

Anonymous R Wilson July 22, 2015 3:30 PM  

It's better to focus and keep the email to a single topic.

Remember, we're trying to influence these sponsors, not attack them.

Blogger Daniel July 22, 2015 3:31 PM  

Leave Xerox out - they are the first to publicly distance themselves from PP, they should be rewarded. Right now, the actual financial backing is of secondary importance. What is importance is that the list of 41 (now 40) are given the chance to pick a side: for corpse sales or against. Xerox picked correctly and by leaving them alone, they will show the others that there is a path of least resistance.

Isolate. Question. Liberate/Destroy, based on the response. Xerox picked well, stepped up, and divested themselves publicly from PP's death trafficking. They are squarely deserving of living peacefully in Liberated Land.

Focus on the other 40.

Anonymous R Wilson July 22, 2015 3:33 PM  

This is just the beginning of what is likely to be a prolonged campaign.

Boycott talk can come later. First, we do what are essentially the "warning shots."

Blogger Shimshon July 22, 2015 3:35 PM  

"Thanks for your message. Xerox Corporation has not provided any corporate financial contributions to Planned Parenthood."

Even so, complain to THEM that PP is using (or besmirching) their good name to ply their deathly wares. Get the name removed from PP's list of supporters.

Blogger wrangler July 22, 2015 3:39 PM  

I emailed Adobe, Am Cancer, AMEX, ATT and Avon today. I'll get to work on the Bs and beyond tomorrow.

Blogger CM July 22, 2015 3:46 PM  

@Nate -

Did some quick math with abort73.com numbers...

Assuming $3 per bottle of baby shampoo per month in the first year of life, in 2011, J&J facilitated in the loss of $1.9 B due to aborted babies.

I'd like to target their stock holders.

Blogger CM July 22, 2015 3:55 PM  

VD -

Given the party line on abortion is women's health, how would bringing PP's response to health regulations on abortion providers into #PPGate be received?

Is the SJW tactic to stay cohesive and narrow or is there leeway to go lone-wolf and broaden? Or does that weaken the assault?

Blogger Marissa July 22, 2015 3:58 PM  

Planned Parenthood removed Xerox from their list here. A cached version of that page shows Xerox used to be on there.

Anonymous Mr. Rational July 22, 2015 3:59 PM  

Blackgenocide.com is complaining that there were 13 million black abortions since 1973.

How many more Detroits, Trentons, Selmas, Garys and Baltimores would those 13 million have made?  Judging by the objective facts and utilitarian outcome, Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood were and are right.

Sorry, but them's the facts.  And frankly, if you pull the DWL trick of crying over "Black lives" while they would stomp your skull into mush while laughing gleefully, you really need to ponder the meaning of life more deeply.

Blogger Marissa July 22, 2015 4:01 PM  

Fuck off, agent provocateur. No one deserves to be ripped apart in the womb.

Anonymous praetorian July 22, 2015 4:08 PM  

"The madman is not the man who has lost his reason. The madman is the man who has lost everything except his reason."

MOAR EMAILS.

Blogger David-093 July 22, 2015 4:12 PM  

Daniels right. Xerox issuing a statement like that is a good thing. Focus on the emails and the core companies we'll message on Twitter. If all these companies do is issue a statement distancing themselves publicly from PP then it's a win. Minor, but still important.

Anonymous Dave July 22, 2015 4:14 PM  

Thank you Marissa keep putting the truth out there.

Anonymous paradox July 22, 2015 4:16 PM  

It reads Verizon not Verizon Wireless. Different company which is owned in part by Verizon and Vodafone. So with the information given can't say Verizon Wireless is directly funding. However, would put it past it. I've worked for Verizon Wireless, it's a SJW company from hell.

Anonymous paradox July 22, 2015 4:26 PM  

How does one address them when you can't deny them business for a while? What approach is best?

Even if it turns out to be Verizon Wireless, what cell company are you going to go with? You did see AT&T also gives to PP. And don't think you can go with a no contract prepaid phone. Those companies buy cell bandwidth from Verizon Wireless and AT&T for their phones to run on.

Anonymous IsMise July 22, 2015 4:29 PM  

Coke: rots your teeth, adds inches and pounds, shortens your life, and helps murder your innocent unborn.
It is the duct tape of genocide.

Anonymous BCM July 22, 2015 4:33 PM  

Incurvatus (#22) is absolutely correct. United Way is a nexus for corporate donations that flow to PP. Asking United Way if they support organ trafficking and getting them on record one way or another will probably have more effect than any of the other names.

Anonymous GG #34356 July 22, 2015 4:36 PM  

Don't forget to spread this list of advertisers around to as many people as possible and encourage them to send emails.

Make an infographic or meme (like the one Vox has above) saying something like: "These brands support selling dead baby parts...do you?" Spread it across the internet.


No. Not yet. That is a nuclear tactic against the advertisers. The advertisers are not the target. PP is. You do not accuse brands to support that yet. What you want is instilling in those companies the threat that you might do that full force in the future.

So the operation you spread is "These are advertisers of PP. Ask those companies about PP". It's a call to action, a plan. Not a meme. The meme/ propaganda you remix is "send those emails". You need to give the companies time. Only after they fuck up and choose the side of planned parenthood you burn them. Like Intel gets burned in GamerGate with their logo plastered all over the insanity FemFreq spouts.

It's a numbers game. You can get more people to ask companies about their stance than you can get people to hate on a company.

Anonymous RoH July 22, 2015 5:00 PM  

The problem here is that the release of the full video, instead of a highly edited portion of the conversation, shows conclusively that there is no selling of baby parts.

Anonymous HankW July 22, 2015 5:05 PM  

Of course they would deceptively edit the video, then release the full version to discredit themselves. Genius!

RoH, if you are going to lie all the time, at least learn to do it well.

Blogger Badmojo July 22, 2015 5:07 PM  

March of Dimes is starting to get defensive:
https://twitter.com/MarchofDimes/with_replies

Anonymous paradox July 22, 2015 5:12 PM  

Like Intel gets burned in GamerGate with their logo plastered all over the insanity FemFreq spouts.

And Intel's logo plastered hurts their profits how? Accomplish nothing more than a good laugh. These SJWs companies are so big, they don't care what a few people do to their logos, they are still making money.

Blogger CM July 22, 2015 5:13 PM  

If what MoD says is true, then how is it that PP has 2 mistakes on their donor list?

Anonymous Senghendrake July 22, 2015 5:14 PM  

"How many more Detroits, Trentons, Selmas, Garys and Baltimores would those 13 million have made? Judging by the objective facts and utilitarian outcome, Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood were and are right."

Hit the road, sockpuppet.

Anonymous LurkingPuppy July 22, 2015 5:15 PM  

@The Observer:

Considering that even a "safe and rare" abortion more than triples a woman's chances of breast cancer, any abortion may very well be a death sentence.

A reference to support that statement would be quite useful.

Blogger Cail Corishev July 22, 2015 5:19 PM  

If all these companies do is issue a statement distancing themselves publicly from PP then it's a win. Minor, but still important.

Maybe minor, but it still seems pretty big to me. It's not every day that a major corporation distances itself from PP and forces PP to remove it from their supporters list. And it took, what, a few hours?

The way this stuff usually goes is: A story comes out about some organization supporting something heinous. Opponents react with outrage, passing it around among themselves and posting it where they hope to outrage others. Perhaps they start a boycott of some sort. The organization ignores them, and after a few days or weeks, the furor dies down.

So what's different here? I see two things: specific targeted action, and leaving an escape route.

1) Specific, targeted action. Someone did the legwork to make a list of specific companies and contacts at them, and they were contacted in a concerted way. Imagine you're a PR person at J&J: instead of looking at the usual weekly haul of disjointed complaints and threats, you're looking at what appears to be an organized campaign. That's much more likely to get your attention and seem like something you might want to address before it grows.

2) Leaving an escape route. Instead of accusing and making threats, we asked an open question. That leaves them a noble way out: "Why no, we don't support that; thank you." It doesn't put them on the defensive (much) and invites them to take the high road. (I just realized I forgot to do that in a tweet I sent on a separate topic today. Dammit.) It doesn't matter that the subtext is obvious; this is rhetoric.

Most people who run corporations aren't doctrinaire SJWs. They may hire plenty of them and sympathize with them, but that doesn't mean they want to be out front carrying the SJW banner themselves. If you can suggest that their support for a particular group is about to become unpleasant for them, they may take the escape route offered. They can't do that if you've already lumped them in with the SJWs and put them on the defensive.

This is big. The victories may be small now, but I'm convinced we're onto something fundamental here.

Anonymous gg #34356 July 22, 2015 5:21 PM  

And Intel's logo plastered hurts their profits how? Accomplish nothing more than a good laugh. These SJWs companies are so big, they don't care what a few people do to their logos, they are still making money.

Memes can melt feel beams.

It's a PR attack. It hurts their profit indirectly. Intel paying money to the social justice mafia does hurt them if enough gamers think of them as cowards and thus are subconsciously influenced in their buying decision. Since it is hard to measure it is better to use the threat of that action instead of the action itself. The company will try to avoid bad PR. But once you launched the nuke there is not much the company can do anymore. And you can't take it back either.

Blogger Marissa July 22, 2015 5:22 PM  

March of Dimes admitted in those Twitter conversations that 5 of their local chapters have given money to Planned Parenthood but only for prenatal counseling for low-income mothers. How precious!

CM, March of Dimes would be their third "mistake". Supposedly Ford Motor Corporation has also disavowed them. The Daily Signal list in the original post has been updated to 39 donors.

Anonymous BGS July 22, 2015 5:26 PM  

shows conclusively that there is no selling of baby parts.

Non profit worker says "I want a Lamborghini" while talking prices of baby parts, then says "our legal team says to say x". Yea and Serena Williams said he didn't do steroids.

Blogger Daniel July 22, 2015 5:31 PM  

The companies are not SJWs, even if their giving has blown in an SJW direction. Most of them have done that in the first place ONLY because the SJWs blew...and no one blew back.

This is the blow back. Phase one is to let the potential innocents get away from ground zero. The enemy is the one actually murdering and selling off the baby corpses.

Blogger Conan the Cimmerian July 22, 2015 5:31 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Daniel July 22, 2015 5:34 PM  

Planned Parenthood is not the only one to "crush below, crush above."

It is PP's organs, and only their organs, that we want. Yes, it really is about ethics in abortion.

Anonymous paradox July 22, 2015 5:44 PM  

It's a PR attack. It hurts their profit indirectly.

The problem is Intel doesn't care enough to spend on PR to confront what it see as a fringe group, putting SJW quotes, with the company's logo. Especially ones Intel agrees with.

Anonymous Laz July 22, 2015 5:44 PM  

Mr. Rational: "Blackgenocide.com is complaining that there were 13 million black abortions since 1973.

How many more Detroits, Trentons, Selmas, Garys and Baltimores would those 13 million have made? Judging by the objective facts and utilitarian outcome, Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood were and are right.

Sorry, but them's the facts. And frankly, if you pull the DWL trick of crying over "Black lives" while they would stomp your skull into mush while laughing gleefully, you really need to ponder the meaning of life more deeply."

F you guys. I mention this last year and you guys want to crucify me but, not 1 word about it today.

Blogger Badmojo July 22, 2015 5:53 PM  

Tomorrow morning I plan to visit my local Wells Fargo branch and when they ask "how can we help you?" I'm going to respond with:

"I'm here to find out why Wells Fargo actively funds human trafficking. Is there someone here who could explain that to me?"


Tweets and emails are one thing, but I think in-person will be more effective and disturbing for the people listening. I will *not* threaten or confront, I'll just keep asking them to explain... in more and more detail.

Blogger Conan the Cimmerian July 22, 2015 5:59 PM  

Can't Stop the Signal / Amplify the Signal:

http://conancimmerian.blogspot.com/2015/07/amplify-signal-meet-41-companies-that.html

Blogger The Observer July 22, 2015 6:07 PM  

"A reference to support that statement would be quite useful.."

Sure. The breast cancer-abortion link has been very well-documented.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369207

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19771534

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20335156

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24272196

Here's one linking number of abortions to death in childbed:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22954474

"Thank you for proving that it's not just SJWs who always lie. ANY crusader who puts ideology ahead of truth will always lie. This is why "pro-lie" is a meme."

Fuck off, you liar.

Blogger Sir Wilshire (#320) July 22, 2015 6:11 PM  

Josh,

Are you in Tennessee? I'm going to post a link on social media to that blog you have listing the 41 companies and let people know you the quotes listed in the other 2 posts to use in their emails.

I'm in several groups, including some with thousands of apologists that are already pretty active in arguments online, so emailing some companies occasionally won't be a big deal to them.

Will you be updating the 41 company post to say Ford and Xerox have already dissociated? That might help encourage even more.

Blogger Joe A. July 22, 2015 6:13 PM  

Fucking Microsoft. Why am I not surprised.

Blogger Sir Wilshire (#320) July 22, 2015 6:15 PM  

Nevermind on the 2 companies.

Blogger David-093 July 22, 2015 6:29 PM  

"F you guys. I mention this last year and you guys want to crucify me but, not 1 word about it today."

Did you miss Marissa's response to him? Take a breather and focus on what we're doing today.

Blogger Edward Dunai July 22, 2015 6:38 PM  

Got a response from Ford Motor Company, they state that they do *not* fund Planned Parenthood and that they've not had a relationship with the Ford Foundation for for almost 40 years. Copy of their message attached.

Hello Edward,

My name is Marigold, I am from Ford`s Customer Relationship Center (CRC). I have reviewed your email regarding your feedback to Ford’s donation for Planned Parenthood.

Ford Motor Company does not contribute to Planned Parenthood. Our charitable arm is the Ford Fund – not the Ford Foundation. We have had no affiliation with the Ford Foundation for nearly four decades.

Thank you for contacting Ford Motor Company.

Sincerely,

Marigold
Customer Relationship Center
Ford Motor Company

Anonymous hausfrau July 22, 2015 7:15 PM  

So I'm trying to compile a post including all the email information of these companies for a couple Republican Precinct Committee Person facebook groups. I will include instruction to request clarification on the companies stance rather than an outright boycott threat. Say what you will about the republican party as a whole (it disgusts me) but the local people are generally good. There are a lot of die hard pro-life types that would dig into this type email campaign. I have sent emails to Tostitos (no good way to contact them), United Way, American Cancer Society, and Susan G Kommen. I would like to limit the list to 10 companies. What are the best options under the circumstances?

Blogger bw July 22, 2015 7:17 PM  

ONLY because the SJWs blew...and no one blew back - Daniel

It looks to me history seems to show a pattern otherwise, bro.
They are this and support and first pushed this because a society like this is easiest to rule over. They created the SJW purposefully while they themselves needn't be or believe anything about it for themselves personally. They are Oligarchs and the ruling Families, not collectivists. That is for the people.
This is their plan and it is their agenda, with the State following like a necessary coercive shadow (when needed). The State and politicians are their cover, as well as their own dollars traded amongst themselves known as "media" outlets (advert).
They've done quite well changing hearts and minds sans coercion.

Warburg did not sit in front of Congress in the 50's and note to the US govt that there would be world government one way or another (para) for no good reason. They were quite confident they had it already back then. So what had been accomplished or what was the foundation that led them to that conclusion? It was prior to his speech. The body was dead and in the coffin, everything since has been simply nails.

As for Ford, it is their tax exempt $Foundation and its "work" that needs the historical spotlight on it. See the Reece committee (Govt doing its job yet alas, it was shut down) and all subsequent info on the Big Foundations. TheCorps bought the Govt their foundations were made tax exempt, then turned the society on its head with its dollars and think tanks and grants etc.

On February 17, 1950, James Paul Warburg confidently declared to the United States Senate: “We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” James Paul Warburg (1896-1969) was the son of Paul Moritz Warburg, and a nephew of both Felix Warburg and Jacob Schiff, both associated with Kuhn, Loeb & Company...Paul M was head of CFR for its initial decade and on advisory board of FED when founded...
etc etc etc

Paul M. Warburg & The Men Who Started the Federal...
www.jekyllclub.com/2010/12/the-federal-reserve-and-the...

The Federal Reserve And The Men Who Created It -Paul Moritz Warburg. Part Six – Paul Moritz Warburg. Boarding the train with the others bound for Jekyll Island that ...

Blogger CM July 22, 2015 7:19 PM  

The Observer -

I tried finding these but I only got one and it was buried under the American Cancer Association, Susan G Komen, and some other pro abort claiming "NO LINK NO LINK!"

Anonymous BigGaySteve July 22, 2015 7:22 PM  

It gets better they are following the Breitbart release videos slowly model.
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/07/22/woah-planned-parenthood-tells-congress-future-expose-videos-will-be-even-worse-much-worse/

NY Times posted a 1500 word expose trashing the video makers.

It turns out you can order chocolate baby penises:
"While this work is standard and essential during any abortion procedure, any filming in such an area would be an extremely serious invasion of our patients’ privacy and dignity. We also believe that in at least one interaction at a Planned Parenthood facility, the Biomax representative asked questions about the racial characteristics of tissue donated to researchers studying sickle cell anemia, apparently seeking to create a misleading impression.
"In fact, given the scope and length of the deceptive practices perpetrated by Mr. Daleidan, and the lengths he apparently went to in order to advance his political agenda, there may well be thousands of hours of videotape that he will deceptively edit into short video clips to release for many months."

Blogger Daniel July 22, 2015 7:40 PM  

Bw: "it looks to me..."

The term you seek is "seems."

Anonymous Donn #0114 July 22, 2015 7:47 PM  

BGS I believe the word you were looking for was not expose but 'smear job'.

Blogger David-093 July 22, 2015 7:53 PM  

In related news, we really need a better name for this than PPGate. As Nate so eloquently demonstrated above...it sounds lame.

Anonymous Toby Temple July 22, 2015 8:02 PM  

This is good. PPGate will definitely be big.

Blogger CM July 22, 2015 8:27 PM  

patients’ privacy and dignity

Oh no! Constitutional Right violation!

Anonymous Toby Temple July 22, 2015 8:37 PM  

Hey! If its not a baby then those are not organs, right?

Blogger Sir Wilshire (#320) July 22, 2015 9:05 PM  

Is there a blog yet that has a list of email addresses for contacting? Even if it's not all of them.

If not, anybody want to work on a google doc together getting it filled out? Then we will post it.

Blogger Marissa July 22, 2015 9:25 PM  

Looks like Planned Parenthood removed their list of donors from the website I linked above. I archived it today so you can see the difference in the corporate matching section. All donors removed...

Anonymous TimP July 22, 2015 9:33 PM  

Cail Corishev (at 159); that's a really good explanation of why we should stick to basic inquiry emails. Which is why I'm not turning IsMise's "duct tape of genocide" quote into an image meme ... yet.

Blogger SirHamster (#201) July 22, 2015 9:43 PM  

@Marissa

Do you have the archive link handy?

Blogger jonw July 22, 2015 9:44 PM  

Done

Anonymous The Original Hermit July 22, 2015 10:01 PM  

"In related news, we really need a better name for this than PPGate. As Nate so eloquently demonstrated above...it sounds lame."

SangerGate
GoebbelsGate

Blogger Unknown July 22, 2015 10:02 PM  

Some one has probably pointed this out already, but....

Isn't it possible that PP has been lying to their corporate donors as well? How the hell could they know that PP is a huge govt funded abortion mill that mostly aborts black babies?

I didn't really. And I didn't know how much funding they got from the US taxpayer.

Blogger Marissa July 22, 2015 10:05 PM  

SirHamster, here's the URL, can't link now since I'm on my phone:

http://web.archive.org/web/20150722195452/http://www.plannedparenthood.org/planned-parenthood-metropolitan-washington-dc/get-involved-locally/donate-locally

Blogger Cail Corishev July 22, 2015 10:36 PM  

Isn't it possible that PP has been lying to their corporate donors as well? How the hell could they know that PP is a huge govt funded abortion mill that mostly aborts black babies?

Well, fifteen minutes of research would have told them. I have pro-life friends who post about the black/white abortion ratio and the Sanger/KKK connection on a regular basis on Facebook. I can understand ordinary people not knowing about it since the media won't touch it, but if you're writing a check to a controversial organization, some due diligence is in order.

But that's why framing it as a concerned question is best. If they really don't know, it gives them a chance to act on the info. If they do know, it gives them a chance to pretend they didn't and act accordingly. In either case, putting them on the defensive and making them feel like the lines have already been drawn with them stuck on PP's side won't do any good.

Blogger Cail Corishev July 22, 2015 10:41 PM  

Or to put it in the words of The Swayze:

Dalton: ...and [rule] three: be nice.
Bouncers: (laughing)
Dalton: I want you to remember that it's a job. It's nothing personal.
Dalton: I want you to be nice...until it's time to not be nice.
Bouncer: Well, how're we supposed to know when that is?
Dalton: You won't. I'll let you know.

Blogger David-093 July 22, 2015 10:45 PM  

@The Original Hermit

LifeGate

Blogger Marie July 22, 2015 10:47 PM  

I'm in the process of emailing the companies and I have passed this information on to a number of friends. A couple of them have popular blogs with readers who I suspect do not read here. I am hopeful the bloggers will pass the word along to their readers and we'll have even more emails going out.

@193 Unknown.

It doesn't matter if PP lied to their corporate donors. It matters if their corporate donors will still stand by them in light of recent events.

Getting into a debate about what the corporate donors knew and when is distracting from the main point. Turn off the flow of corporate money into PP's evil, evil, evil hands.

Anonymous James Parliament July 22, 2015 10:54 PM  

This seems interesting as well - American Cancer Society:

Thank you for reaching out to your American Cancer Society. We appreciate you taking the time to contact us. The Society does not currently have grants to Planned Parenthood. The American Cancer Society has historically funded a very limited number of Cancer Control grants to local Planned Parenthood affiliates to implement smoking cessation programs for trained clinic staff to provide smoking cessation assistance to patients and pregnant women. We do not fund or have ever funded abortion or contraceptive counseling. The grants were used exclusively for the implementation of cancer control programs to help patients seeking care and to improve the health of the unborn fetus and the child once born.

Furthermore, rigorous internal tracking and financial reporting requirements prevented the use of these grants for anything but their intended use. The program under which the grants were funded has now expired, and there are no plans to award any more such grants at this time. During the grant period, the program in question became a top source of health provider telephone calls to tobacco cessation Quitlines in the area of the country where the program was in effect. I hope this is helpful. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to reply.

Thank you for contacting your American Cancer Society.

Harpal
Online Cancer Information Specialist

Anonymous Mr. Rational July 22, 2015 10:58 PM  

No one deserves to be ripped apart in the womb.

Thank you for providing a textbook example of the anthropomorphic or pathetic fallacy.  Something which has never had a central nervous system capable of conciousness or even sensation has never been a "someone" either.  Embryos are no more human beings than are gametes.

I know you like bright clear lines drawn well over to your side.  You'd do well to remember that a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds.

And just FYI, I have a piece of cadaver bone in me.  Someone was "ripped apart" to help repair damage.  It was donated either by them or by their next of kin.  I don't see a moral difference between that and donating the tissues of an aborted embryo.

Fuck off, agent provocateur.

You need to look that term up.  You're almost as bad as the DWLs who call you "ignorant" if you tell them facts they don't want to hear.  (At least you aren't using terms like "demon".  Maybe there's hope for you.)

If you think PP is bad, just watch what happens in a collapse.  People will resort to letting defective or unwanted infants die as they did before the orphanage movement.  You'll wish PP was still around.

Hit the road, sockpuppet.

Ah, "disqualify" in action.  I've been around under this handle since the days of OneSTDV.  Try again.

A reference to support that statement would be quite useful.

It's bogus.  As a hint to HOW bogus, breast cancer used to be known as the disease of nuns.  How many abortions do nuns have again?

1 – 200 of 282 Newer› Newest»

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts