ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Wednesday, July 01, 2015

The hysteria crescendos

Chris Hensley appears determined to provide conclusive evidence of the Three Laws of SJW:
Chris Hensley on June 30, 2015 at 9:46 am said
I will make this point, again. I will repeat his point until I am blue in the face. Vox Day and his Rabid Puppies are a hate group. They are extreme-right wing, white supremacist, homophobic thugs. Their actions are racist, misogynistic, homophobic and the list goes on. I have shown my evidence of their bigotry, repeatedly. Everyone else who has made those claims here has shown their evidence, repeatedly. You have not shown a shred of evidence to the contrary. There is no war, there are no sides. The only people talking about a war are Vox Day and his supporters. They are thugs, because they behave like thugs. Despite your claims to the contrary, they are not behaving as reasonable men. They are behaving as bullies and cowards.

You can admit those facts. You can provide evidence showing that their actions towards the Worldcon, Irene Gallo, and a great many others does not constitute harassment and cowardice. If you are willing to do neither then there is nothing to discuss. If you continue to defend their actions, if you cover for them while they harm others, then you share responsibility for those actions.
We see all Three Laws of SJW on display here.
  1. SJWs always lie.
  2. SJWs always double down.
  3. SJWs always project.
If this Hensley is to be taken seriously, a collection of individuals voting on an award, and doing so in considerably less lockstep than numerous confirmed historical bloc votes, are "a hate group"? Spending $40 and filling out a ballot makes us "thugs"? Indians and Latinos and Asians and blacks are "white supremacists?" A writer with a gay fan club and three electronic dance hits on a gay record label is "homophobic"? Simply not buying books from a publisher that has openly and publicly attacked us is "behaving as bullies and cowards"? Nominating books we like instead of books they like constitutes "harassment and cowardice"? 

That is not taking liberties with the truth. That is not twisting and contorting the truth to present a false image. That is holding the truth hostage in the cellar, chaining it to a bed, and repeatedly raping it in a futile attempt to father a false narrative. It is very easy to observe that our actions are not any of the things the SJWs claim them to be. Entertainment Weekly had to issue multiple retractions after being foolish enough to take the SJW claims at face value. Other publications will eventually do the same.

But all the various lies that Chris Hensley and the other SJWs keep hurling in the futile hope that they will finally stick and disqualify aren't interesting. Most of them are literal repetitions of the same narrative Johnny Con has been selling to no avail for several years now. What is interesting is how their level of hysteria has observably increased. Why, one wonders, is it necessary for them to lie until they are blue in the face? Why are they even more desperate to disqualify me now than they were back in April or May?

Why are they still babbling incoherently about us while simultaneously insisting on our totally irrelevant wrongness?

I don't know. Perhaps they fear that the record influx of Supporting Members are not all reliable SJWs and Truefen flooding in to defend the Hugo Awards by voting to not give out any awards. Perhaps they notice that my site traffic has continue to rise, and that support for both Sad and Rabid Puppies continues to grow as more sane people observe the behavior of the SJWs and realize we were not exaggerating. Perhaps it is simply a reflection of the wider cultural war that has heated up of late. Perhaps it is a reflection of the economic instability that now haunts even those who don't pay much attention to the economy. Perhaps it is because we use their tactics against them more effectively than they do.

But whatever the reason, it is clear that they are afraid of me, of you, and of the growing number of people who realize that they are incoherent lunatics who possess an insane and immoral vision for society. Let them hurl spurious labels and tell ridiculous lies. It's what they do. We are immune to all their pointing and shrieking and posturing and preening attempts to DISQUALIFY.

We don't care. And as for the idea that the "only people talking about a war are Vox Day and his supporters", see: the First Law of SJW. And note that this reference to a cultural war happening in fiction precedes the existence of Rabid Puppies by five months.


UPDATE: Mike Glyer has noticed the increased activity as well.
Activity in June was so intense that 19 of last month’s posts now rank among this blog’s 25 most-viewed of all-time. The reason is the huge amount of dialogue in the comments section. Five posts drew over 1,000 comments. “Lord Foul’s Baying,” the June 14 roundup, is not only the month’s top post but trails only the photo essay about the Bradbury house teardown as this blog’s most-read entry. It collected over 1,300 comments.
I'm sure that intensity is simply the result of the SJWs being so interested in talking about the books they love. It wouldn't have anything to do with their insane obsession with shoring up their crumbling Puppy Narrative, as we are reliably informed that we don't matter, we're totally irrelevant, we're only bots with a bunch of fake Twitter accounts, and absolutely no one pays any attention to anything we write, say, think, or boycott. Also, unrepentant bad-to-reprehensible racist misogynistic homophobic neo-Nazi hate group thugs.

Labels:

137 Comments:

Blogger James Jones July 01, 2015 5:29 AM  

But when they make a scientist cry and issue a public apology for his choice of clothing, that's not bullying.

Ignore their bleating. Who cares that they don't like being force-fed a bit of their own medicine.

Anonymous Fp July 01, 2015 5:35 AM  

Breitbart's First Law: Politics is downstream from culture.

Blogger James Jones July 01, 2015 5:36 AM  

In fact, enjoy their bleating. Feed on these delectable morsels of anguish and confusion. Enjoy their pain. Grow fat on their fear. Be strengthened as we watch them cry out with the realisation that their time of social dominance has come to an end.

Anonymous phantom26d July 01, 2015 5:40 AM  

They have eyes that don't see, ears that don't hear and befuddled minds that can not think.

Perhaps I shouldn't, but I feel pity for SJWs. How does a human being end up in such a condition? Are they completely irredeemable?

Blogger James Jones July 01, 2015 5:41 AM  

It has taken a long time for average people to truly understand what has been happening in this culture war. But finally, even people I know who are not politically minded are waking up and able to articulate what is happening. For far two long the academics and intelligentsia have been unchallenged. But they have pushed far enough to awaken an army of angry people who realise they are being oppressed by these fanatics. Times, they are a changing.

Anonymous Forrest Bishop VFM #0167 July 01, 2015 5:44 AM  

It ain't just the Chris Hensley character, either. Many of the other thread comments are marinated in the distilled essences of SJW as well. From the same thread, it looks like Noah Award is the leader, too- as anticipated by our glorious leader (cue one of Peter Sellers' characters in Dr. Strangelove).

Samples- "I ended up putting all the puppy nominees below no award except for the BDPs, where I arbitrarily chose to disregard the puppies altogether."
"EPH is designed to stop VD (or any other slate, but RP was the catalyst) gaming the nominations after 2016, nothing more, nothing less. The only Torlings that exist reside inside VDs own deluded imagination."

Methinks thou...

Blogger Sherwood family July 01, 2015 5:53 AM  

This Hensley character is something to behold. No matter how things turn out for the Hugos, the Rabid Puppies win either way. Either the SJWs hold their noses and actually vote for nominated works and Puppies win Hugos or they No Award everything and it gives the Puppies the excuse to nuke it from orbit (it IS the only way to be sure) for the forseeable future and force both sides to come up with replacement awards. In any case, it ends the underhanded lock on the process those who have quietly manipulated the awards behind the scenes have had for too long a time. It also wrenches yet another institution out of the hands of the SJWs by making it obvious to all that they cannot compete on a level playing field because for all their protests that they represent the mainstream, they cannot gin up real mass support when push comes to shove.

Blogger Cataline Sergius July 01, 2015 6:00 AM  

You can admit those facts. You can provide evidence showing that their actions towards the Worldcon, Irene Gallo, and a great many others does not constitute harassment and cowardice. If you are willing to do neither then there is nothing to discuss. If you continue to defend their actions, if you cover for them while they harm others, then you share responsibility for those actions.


I love that bit. The Rabid Puppies are the bullies so you better say they are or I'll...WE...I mean WE will make you pay for it.

Of course if you do provide evidence. We will immediately disqualify it and you, on the grounds that you are obviously racist homophobic misogynist because who but a wordsaladist-whatever would defend Vox and the Minions.

All evidence contradicting the SJW point of view is inherently inadmissible.

In short don't bother trying to reason with us, we've all been on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors since we were seven. Our decision making apparatus is so chemically dependent it is inherently damaged.

We are literally incapable of reasoned logical decisions. So why are you bothering? It just upsets us.

Blogger Josh July 01, 2015 6:05 AM  

#thuglife

Anonymous Forrest Bishop VFM #0167 July 01, 2015 6:06 AM  

7. Sherwood family

This Hensley character is something to behold. No matter how things turn out for the Hugos, the Rabid Puppies win either way. Either the SJWs hold their noses and actually vote for nominated works and Puppies win Hugos or they No Award everything and it gives the Puppies the excuse to nuke it from orbit

I'm holding off on offering my ballot until the last possible minute. Maybe the SP/RP "slate" get my endorsement, maybe not. That depends on judging overall quality, of course, which in turn requires a reckoning of the entire sweep of human history as best as one can. Or maybe Noah gets it. I want to be sure to digest all of the relevant- and up-to-date- material before casting these pearls.

Anonymous old man in a villa July 01, 2015 6:20 AM  

When my children were learning to write one of the lessons I taught them when I would proofread their work was to avoid the repetition of words within a paragraph. The limiting factor of most modern writers is not their story, but rather a deep vocabulary.

I see spittle on the screen as Ms. Hensley writes, a reddened wattle flecked with detritus from its last snack falling into the keyboard as it pounds away at the same keys...h-o-m-o-p-h-o-b-i-c... over and over as if it has something new to say.

Thesaurus, Ms Hensley, it's not just a character from Jurassic World.

Anonymous Forrest Bishop VFM #0167 July 01, 2015 6:26 AM  

That is not taking liberties with the truth. That is not twisting and contorting the truth to present a false image. That is holding the truth hostage in the cellar, chaining it to a bed, and repeatedly raping it in a futile attempt to father a false narrative. -VD

To summarize, an SJW is a Truth Rapist.

Blogger Sherwood family July 01, 2015 6:27 AM  

Vox, I want to congratulate you and thank you. I know it is undoubtedly sinful to rejoice in another's discomfort, but watching the sheer level of mental anguish this Hugo thing has caused for SJWs involved and their almost complete inability to deal with it has been vastly entertaining.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan July 01, 2015 6:35 AM  

Yeah but they have a consistent message that is centered about 3 words, the triumvirate of racist, sexist and homophobe, classic propaganda and it should be explicitly labeled as such. Doing so helps the neutrals and our beloved moderates who for some reason view Hensley and ilk as authority or those who reference authority, disqualification works and the SJWs deserve it.

Blogger James Dixon July 01, 2015 6:42 AM  

> Perhaps I shouldn't, but I feel pity for SJWs.

From "The Fountainhead":

"This is pity," he thought, and then he lifted his head in wonder. He thought that there must be something terribly wrong with a world in which this monstrous feeling is called a virtue. - Howard Roark

Anonymous Difster VFM #109 July 01, 2015 6:48 AM  

This is some good comedy first thing in the morning.

I could enjoy being a thug.

Blogger Krul July 01, 2015 6:49 AM  

"Despite your claims to the contrary, they are not behaving as reasonable men."

What do you see when you look at Rabid Puppies? A flock of kindly Churchians? "Reasonable", compromising Republicans?

When a SJW on a jihad against a man's freedom to express himself stops to think twice, THAT is fear, THAT is what we are. That is why they lie, that is why they try to change the rules to stack the deck against us, because we are the reason the SJWs breath easier in their "safe spaces".

This war will not be our end. But it will be theirs.

(paraphrasing Batman)

Blogger Subversive Saint #249 July 01, 2015 6:51 AM  

Who could have know that following Vox Day to this blog from WND would have turned into all this daily goodness of SJW roasting.

Blogger Shimshon July 01, 2015 6:53 AM  

Given Law #2, are you sure this is the time to call the crescendo? I think you're way too early.

Blogger VD July 01, 2015 6:54 AM  

Perhaps I shouldn't, but I feel pity for SJWs.

You shouldn't. I certainly don't.

Blogger VD July 01, 2015 6:55 AM  

I think you're way too early.

Most likely, yes. I can think of at least three separate events that will likely engender more hysteria in the next three months alone.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan July 01, 2015 7:02 AM  

Maybe any moderates reading this can explain how Hensley's rhetoric affects them.

I think that is one thing we overlook, how the rhetoric affects the squish middle who just want to muddle thru life and live easily, maybe if we polled them and listened to how it affects them and scares them we could sharpen our game.

Anonymous Mike M. (Minion 315) July 01, 2015 7:03 AM  

Fear us? They have not begun to fear us!

But they will.

Anonymous Bz July 01, 2015 7:13 AM  

Whatever else, we will at least have had the pleasure of hearing the unhinged (if repetitive) insults and terrified bleating of our would-be commissars. The lies and rot and navel-gazing madness exposed at the cultural and medial institutions they have crept into and parasitised. The greasy lamentations of their pre-op women.

All that merely for a nominal fee and some collective backbone. Well done.

Anonymous A Visitor July 01, 2015 7:13 AM  

Vox, your description of the diversity (in the true sense of the word) in the Puppies pretty much says it all. Lying, it's the #SJWwayoflife.

OT: Sherwood, moving through the limited non career visa adjudicator process. Waiting for Foggy Bottom to get back and schedule a language test date with me. Would've put this on your blog but you all only have Google Account and OpenID for commenting purposes. I have neither.

Blogger Cail Corishev July 01, 2015 7:16 AM  

No matter how things turn out for the Hugos, the Rabid Puppies win either way.

It's the same thing that came up in another context: the key is to expose them. Their beliefs are so deranged, their tactics so reprehensible, that they lose as soon as people get a good look at them. Any wins they seem to get after that are just inertia.

Blogger W.LindsayWheeler July 01, 2015 7:16 AM  

Can Chris Henley describe for us Irene Gallo's comments? Were they hurtful? After reading John C. Wright's website. He is not hurt emotionally but he is flabbergasted that this woman with whom he worked for over many projects has this utter contempt for people like him. He was dumbfounded by Ms. Gallo's comments. What was the damage there? Does Henley care?

No.

Henley has no morals, no consistency, no integrity. How many people have been destroyed by Henley and his types? He preaches tolerance but he has no tolerance for Sad Puppies or Rabid Puppies and the people smeared by Irene Gallo's comments. He is a hypocrite.

Blogger John Cobalt July 01, 2015 7:19 AM  

#22

I'm not a moderate but moderates gets scared by extremism and they are showing their leaning towards authoritarianism but I'm not entirely sure that the moderates matter as long as we accept moderates/neutrals (in other words, don't show our "extremism" which is liberty of course).

Blogger Edd Jobs July 01, 2015 7:19 AM  

"Reasonable", compromising Republicans?

Their motto: "Always give up, always surrender!"

Blogger Mr.MantraMan July 01, 2015 7:21 AM  

Is Hensley even a nice person or yet another invective spewing monster? How did he get that way? Bad childhood, traumatic shaming circle at his small liberal arts college ran by a particularly nasty "opinion leader?"

Blogger Jason Roberts July 01, 2015 7:22 AM  

I propose as an alternative to the monniker "SJW," "VSM" -- vile sexless minnions.

Anonymous fish July 01, 2015 7:22 AM  

...and ultimately the admission of why this is all tho thcary.


Gully Foyle on June 30, 2015 at 10:33 am said:

Gatekeeper function is critical i think – maybe im too old school, or just too old, but there needs to be some way to sort the wheat from the chaff in self publishing. I don’t have enough time or money to waste on trash.

Translation: We want to regulate the works you publish yourself. Censor that which causes Badfeelz.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan July 01, 2015 7:27 AM  

Ok #28 I get it but why do we insist on not using the disqualification technique against the invective spewing SJW monsters when it comes to the moderates.

I've read about the squishy pups and shouldn't they be asked to defend their positions (gently of course) of defending the deranged SJW, maybe Brad and Larry think this invective spewing monster Hensley is a decent chap. Myself I would just point to Hensley's invective and pointedly say, "disqualified because of mental instability and psychopathy."

Any moderates here think Gallo is a decent human being, I would like to here if she is anything outside of the political sphere approximating a human being.

Blogger VD July 01, 2015 7:40 AM  

I propose as an alternative to the monniker "SJW," "VSM" -- vile sexless minnions.

No. We don't need an alternative. It works very well to identify them and has the added bonus of them really disliking the label.

Blogger Remo - Vile Faceless Minion #99 July 01, 2015 7:50 AM  

Ultimately I am simply overjoyed that a cabal of thoroughly reprehensible people are flailing about in utter futility trying unsuccessfully to get other to continue to believe their lies. The LULZ inherent in this are legendary! These people who delight in lies, who are perennially unhappy, and for the most part are some of the ugliest, fattest, and most grotesque excuses for human beings ever to live are now being kicked off their mobility scooters and forced to defend their unworkable ideas. This is great entertainment. Bravo!

Blogger Mark Citadel July 01, 2015 7:52 AM  

As Levinson opined, let them call you a hate group. It's a meaningless term invented by the SPLC and used to silence dissent. These are supposedly the 'respectable' men of our age?

"I don't know what a scoundrel is like, but I know what a respectable man is, and it's enough to make one's flesh creep."

- Joseph De Maistre

Blogger Jack Ward July 01, 2015 7:57 AM  

We are serving the greater good in this fight against the sjw. But, the best thing, and, the thing they can't seem to comprehend, is that we persist mainly because it just so much FUN!

Blogger HickoryHammer #0211 July 01, 2015 7:58 AM  

In regards to the arrogant SJW tweets you cited at the end of your post, what the totalitarians don't get is that most of us were Gamergaters in spirit before Gamergate even existed. SJWs move into an organization like a stink backing up into a building through the sewer pipes and claim to be changing the world. The truth is, most of us were never going to buy boring schoolmarm anti-culture videogames. We weren't going to pay good money to be preached to by fat godless a-holes. Gamergate is just a codification of that concept.

We will never go away, and any video game company that pushes SJW themes in its products will meet the financial reaper.

Anonymous T July 01, 2015 8:05 AM  

Wow, the hypocrisy in that blogpost by 'Laurie' is breathtaking.

Behold, when you just put the shoe on the other foot...

The routine, the arguments, have become far too familiar. A man or a handful of men are selected for destruction; our ‘credibility’ and ‘professionalism’ are attacked in the same breath as we are called ugly, socially shamed for dismissed either as stupid neckbeard hicks or bitter old men or, in some cases, both. The medium is modern, but the logic is Victorian, and make no mistake, the problem is not what we do and say and build and create.

The problem is that men are doing it. That’s why the cherry picked quotes, the social shaming, is not just incidental to the argument – it is the argument. Underneath it all, you’re just a man, just a body. You can be reduced to flesh. You are less. You are an object. You are other. LOL, penis.

The problem is that men are creating culture, changing culture, redefining culture, and those dicks, those poisonous dicks, those disgusting, uppity penises must be stopped.

They believe that they are justified because freedom of speech- except not freedom of speech for men and whites and heterosexuals, because those people don’t really speak, they just whine, shriek, scream, like animals, because really that’s all they are, animals.


These people are such total hypocrites.

Us Social Justice Warriors – this is me, stealing that word in order to use it against my enemies- are winning the culture war by tearing up the rulebook, and there’s nothing the sad, mad little boys who hate women and queers and people of colour can do about it.

And after spending paragraph after paragraph disparaging 'bigots' who label people just because they're women...she calls her opponents a bunch of sad, mad little boys. Despite all the females who approve of GamerGate. Those females simply do not exist.

We are stronger, smarter and more numerous than anyone imagined, and we are not to be fucked with.

Comments are closed. Deal.


SJW delenda est. These people simply must be stopped.

Blogger HickoryHammer #0211 July 01, 2015 8:05 AM  

Anonymous Forrest Bishop VFM #0167 July 01, 2015 6:26 AM
That is not taking liberties with the truth. That is not twisting and contorting the truth to present a false image. That is holding the truth hostage in the cellar, chaining it to a bed, and repeatedly raping it in a futile attempt to father a false narrative. -VD

To summarize, an SJW is a Truth Rapist.


There's still time for George Rape Rape Martin to steal that scene for his next Song of Ice and Fire book, due out in 2025.

Blogger HickoryHammer #0211 July 01, 2015 8:09 AM  

Comments are closed. Deal.
Oh, but we are lass... we are most certainly.... dealing with it.

Blogger The Deuce July 01, 2015 8:12 AM  

Chris Hensley says there is no war and no sides? So he's on the same side with all us homophobic transphobic sexist racist bigots then?

Blogger VD July 01, 2015 8:13 AM  

We are stronger, smarter and more numerous than anyone imagined, and we are not to be fucked with.

And yet, here we are.

Anonymous The Ghost of Langston Hughes July 01, 2015 8:14 AM  

What happens to a SJW deferred?

Does it dry up
like a raisin in the sun?
Or fester like a sore--
And then run?
Does it stink like rotten meat?
Or crust and sugar over--
like a syrupy sweet?

Maybe it just sags
like a heavy load.

Or does it explode?

Anonymous Jasper July 01, 2015 8:17 AM  

When GamerGate started, "Social Justice Warrior" is what the SJWs were calling themselves. The phrase ties in with Jesse Jackson's "No Justice, No Peace" chant from a generation ago.

Anonymous Grammar Policeman July 01, 2015 8:21 AM  

"Us Social Justice Warriors"

?

We be bestest than otherers. Trudat.

Blogger A Wiser Man Than I July 01, 2015 8:34 AM  

We have been reliably informed that the term thug is a racist code word for nigger. Chris Henley is a no good mean person who calls puppies niggers. So wrong.

Anonymous MrGreenMan July 01, 2015 8:39 AM  

I like how their solution for too much freedom and lack of gatekeepers is to create new gatekeepers - from the same link:

"An idea I’ve been turning over in my head for the last week or so: readers have a need for a respected critical review site covering the burgeoning self-published SF market. Something which would bubble up the best 10-20-30 books published every year, in time to get them some exposure and consideration for Hugo nominating time."

When are they going to thank you, and Larry, and Brad, for giving them this impetus for all these great improvements they have dreamed up? Shouldn't they thank you for forcing them to grow?

Anonymous MrGreenMan July 01, 2015 8:42 AM  

"Gatekeeper function is critical i think – maybe im too old school, or just too old, but there needs to be some way to sort the wheat from the chaff in self publishing. "

They hate the idea of losing the gatekeepers, because it's just fashionable liberalism and high school:

If they weren't told what to think was good, they would be completely lost, or, even worse, they might like something that scored a little too high on the badthink level, had characters with the wrong Oppression Quotient, had cliched traditional story tropes, etc.

Anonymous ZhukovG July 01, 2015 8:51 AM  

It is interesting to me that this blog is by far the most tolerant and inclusive that I have ever seen. The diversity of persons here is absolutely amazing. We have Christians, Moslems, and Jews. We have Atheist, Agnostic and Theist. We have Gays and Straights. We have Libertarians, Leftists, and even a National Socialist. We have a veritable Rainbow Coalition of ethnicities.

They are the bigots, not us. They are the ones who are exclusive and narrow minded, not us.

All we ask is that you behave in reasoned and civilized manner... but I guess that's the problem for them isn't it?

Blogger Nate July 01, 2015 8:53 AM  

" I will repeat his point until I am blue in the face. Vox Day and his Rabid Puppies are a hate group."

...


Oh well if someone is going to repeat themselves then we better just pack up and go home. How could we ever hope to deal with such a horrible onslaught of Feelbad?

Anonymous Godfrey July 01, 2015 8:57 AM  

All proof they're losing some ground in the wealthy elite sponsored Culture War.

We're fighting an intellectual guerrilla war. They are the establishment. We're the counter-culture.

We have nothing to lose. They're the system. And it's easier to tear down an established system than to maintain one. Sal taught us that. Thank you Sal. Tearing down a corrupt system is fun.

Blogger Salt July 01, 2015 8:58 AM  

Like the little boy, these social justice warriors have been screaming their version of Wolf for a long time now. Heh heh heh, ... and now the real thing has arrived. We're here.

Anonymous MrGreenMan July 01, 2015 9:02 AM  

1. Don't tell the VQPF, or the Rainbow brigade of the Ilk.
2. This said about a man with a certificate clearing him of any charge of anti-semitism! Don't tell the Ben-Gurion brigade of the Ilk. (I like how saying dual citizenship makes no sense is just an attack on the Jews.)
3. I guess if we brought up your appreciation for one Thomas Sowell, as well as the disillusion when he went with Me-So-Michelle instead of logic, that would be a problem. Further, I'm pretty sure there would be a fist fight over it, but the Clarence Thomas party in fighting for the greatest jurist in the history of the United States would have considerable weight from the Ilk. I can't tell if this is that NK Jemison is all black people (she is not) or if it's because they fetishize IQ so much that saying on average Asian > White > Black in IQ means you hate black people and are a white supremacist.
4. I know I've read in the WND or one of these posts, for the particularly dim bulbs, that, believing in the Biblical household order, the wife submits to her husband, not all men. Perhaps this is turning to the idea that women are most fulfilled with a happy family life and a number of children - if so, I guess wanting everybody to maximize happiness can be a bad thing.

Blogger VD July 01, 2015 9:03 AM  

1. You believe homosexuality ought to be criminalilzed

That's a lie.

2. You believe Jews aren't trustworthy and can't be real Americans

That's a lie.

3. That you exhibit racism when painting all blacks with one dirty brush

That's a lie.

4. That you want women to be controlled and dominated by men.

That's a lie.

5. Your emotional antics around publishing is understood as simply self promotion and business.

That's a lie.

Five for four. Impressive. Verdict: SJW.

Anonymous Krul July 01, 2015 9:04 AM  

ZhukovG - "It is interesting to me that this blog is by far the most tolerant and inclusive that I have ever seen. The diversity of persons here is absolutely amazing. We have Christians, Moslems, and Jews. We have Atheist, Agnostic and Theist. We have Gays and Straights. We have Libertarians, Leftists, and even a National Socialist. We have a veritable Rainbow Coalition of ethnicities."

Blogger VFM bot #188 July 01, 2015 9:06 AM  

What is the Saurus that old man in a villa speaks of? I did not see one in Jurassic World.

Blogger Quizzer W July 01, 2015 9:07 AM  

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Anonymous Soga July 01, 2015 9:07 AM  

What?! Rabid Puppies are evolving!

...

Rabid Puppies evolved into Rabid Wolves!

Anonymous Alexander, #10 July 01, 2015 9:13 AM  

Using the acutal definition of the word, I want to know one think that the SJWs tolerate.

Their entire world is built on eliminating anything and everything that causes the slightest amount of discomfort.

Blogger Mark Citadel July 01, 2015 9:14 AM  

I would openly declare myself part of a hate group, for those designated 'hate groups' are in almost all cases the haters of lies, evil, and degeneracy. Who would not hate such things?

Blogger Quizzer W July 01, 2015 9:25 AM  

SPLC compiles a list of "hate groups". It is a list of groups that they hate. Seems aptly named, but of course deceptive. SJWs always lie :-)

Anonymous Godfrey July 01, 2015 9:27 AM  

1. The wealthy power elites want to suppress heterosexuality in order to reduce population levels.
2. The wealthy power elites want to prevent capital accumulation among the masses.
3. The wealthy power elites suppress and attack successful independent minded blacks when they wander off the reservation. And they promote divisive blacks to positions of prominence in order to divide and rule the general population.
4. The wealthy power elites want to destroy relationships between men and women in order to reduce population levels.


The SJW is the stupid clueless knuckle dragging cultural storm-trooper of the wealthy power elites. The cultural elites spoon feed him "reality".

Blogger VFM bot #188 July 01, 2015 9:27 AM  

To summarize, an SJW is a Truth Rapist.

How does one identify an SJW? Consult the 3 rules of SJW's: Each one involves lying.

Always and above all, SJW's are truth-rapers.

Blogger LP 999/Eliza July 01, 2015 9:28 AM  

I am not interested in insults, deceptions and distractions.

Are these people serious?

SJWs going emo; first puppies do not exist, we are not heard only to admit we exist and are heard.

Good to see The High Church of Science Fiction and Tor
By Allan Davis.

Amazing what persistence can allow.

Blogger VFM bot #188 July 01, 2015 9:30 AM  

We're fighting an intellectual guerrilla war. They are the establishment. We're the counter-culture. They're the system. Tearing down a corrupt system is fun.

Paraphrased.

What he said!

Anonymous RSL July 01, 2015 9:31 AM  

Mr. Hensley, please, by all means, go on...

http://cdn.meme.am/instances2/500x/543162.jpg

Blogger LP 999/Eliza July 01, 2015 9:32 AM  

The elites next sales pitch wont be selfie sticks but something more gruesome; self fat acceptance mirrors allowing users to take off their own fat because fat removal is the new flag of debasement. Soon lipo malls will outweigh any sane person.

Distort, distract, disturb.

Blogger dlw July 01, 2015 9:51 AM  

> we're only bots with a bunch of fake Twitter
> accounts, and absolutely no one pays any
> attention to anything we write, say, think, or
> boycott.

"These aren't the bots you're looking for."

(somebody had to say it...)

Blogger automatthew July 01, 2015 10:01 AM  

"John" was Tad. Now he's spam.

Blogger W.LindsayWheeler July 01, 2015 10:04 AM  

Let me play John's game. John posited four positions:

1. You believe homosexuality ought to be criminalilzed
2. You believe Jews aren't trustworthy and can't be real Americans
3. That you exhibit racism when painting all blacks with one dirty brush
4. That you want women to be controlled and dominated by men.

1. You believe homosexuality ought to be criminalilzed.

English common law ensconced Biblical teaching. Yes, Homosexuality is a crime and has to be suppressed. Homosexuality as a crime, is a part of Christian teaching and was part of Christendom. I am a traditionalist and the Virtue of Righteousness demands I uphold the ancient laws and customs of my people. John is asking me to betray? To be without virtue?


2. You believe Jews aren't trustworthy and can't be real Americans

Jews are Semites and have no business in European culture. America is not a nation. It is a country, a Masonic Country. Jewish Messianism requires the doing away of nations and races, i.e. existential genocide. That is part of their religious teaching. Why should we allow people who preach genocide free reign? Why? They have caused innumerable damage to Christendom and worked for its destruction. The Bible asks, "Should you love people that hate God"? The communist agitators, and members of the Frankfurt School are Jewish. They worked to undermine America. Jews hate Christianity. Why should people who hate me, my religion and my etnicity say anything in my country? The Roman Catholic Church has always taught the suppression of the Jews. That is the tradition and Wisdom of the ages. The saying is "Bad company corrupts good morals". Today is a witness to that truth of that saying with four Jews on the Supreme Court all voting to approve and shove down our throats same sex marriage. Against Christian Teaching. Should I move to approve and live with anti-Christian people?

3. That you exhibit racism when painting all blacks with one dirty brush

The definition of "racism" from the Oxford English Dictionary 20 volumes, is that racism is the knowledge of racial differences. How is that evil? Everytime John uses the phrase "that's racism" means to deracinate. Why would anybody deracinate himself? To commit to genocide? To use "racism" is to be for Cultural Marxism. To judge things according to "racism" is to be a Cultural Marxist. America is a Masonic Country, it is based on Race-mixing because Freemasonry and Marxism is about implementing Jewish Messianism which is about rebuilding the Unity of Man. My Messiah already came in the form of Jesus Christ, why would I be working for Jews? Jesus Christ is the author of the Natural Order, of races and nations that make up the Natural Order, so why would I want to destroy them?

4. That you want women to be controlled and dominated by men.

It is called the Natural Order. Aristotle notes a Natural Law, "All things are either in authority or in Subjection". In Genesis, it was God that put woman under the leadership of Men so that they will not be decieved. That is the teaching of God and the Natural Law. It is what the Bible teaches. John, you smear and lie about the teaching of the Bible in order to demean it. That is not what the Bible teaches. You are a liar.

As for me and my house, as a nomophylactes, a guardian of the Law, as a Roman Catholic, my duty is to the God of the Universe, to Jesus Christ, His Church, and the protection and guardianship of the Natural Order. All that you spoke of John is the Old Order. Traditional society.

It is you John who is a Hater. Hate of all of what is God and what God created.

Anonymous Saved July 01, 2015 10:13 AM  

"They are thugs, because they behave like thugs"

Wait, I thought "thug = nigger" after Baltimore?

Is he calling us the t-word?

Blogger Elocutioner0226 July 01, 2015 10:16 AM  

Us Social Justice Warriors – this is me, stealing that word in order to use it against my enemies- are winning the culture war by tearing up the rulebook, and there’s nothing the sad, mad little boys who hate women and queers and people of colour can do about it.

Oh no! Xhe tore up the rulebook! Now I have to print another.

As for feeling bad for curb stomping them online - don't. These people have accepted and built their online lives upon lies and pride. They often form their degenerate little cabals around one strong, evil personality and then they mob innocent people through lies and bullying. (How many examples can you cite off the top of your head?) By stomping the queen bee you may be able to turn back some of them. If they recoil in horror and attack you viciously for telling the truth what does that say about them?

Anonymous Elijah Rhodes July 01, 2015 10:28 AM  

SJW are like zombie automatons, so imbecilic and incapable that when society crumbles and they are forced to eat moss from the shady side of trees they will continue to affirm that socialism can work if they just fight for a little more equality and tolerance.

Anonymous Giuseppe July 01, 2015 10:33 AM  

#22
No. You are wrong. Moderates are worse than SJWs.
You can smell and see an SJW ay 50 paces. The moderate must be forced to choose. With or against. There ain't no Switzerland in this here war, and if there were, whichever side wins will pillage it even before the war is done.

Blogger Chiva July 01, 2015 10:39 AM  

Despite your claims to the contrary, they are not behaving as reasonable men.

Ab alio spectes alteri quod feceris - As you do to another, expect another to do to you

Anonymous Alexander, #10 July 01, 2015 10:40 AM  

The funny thing is that they're the ones who put together the time and effort to make the rulebook: we just glanced through it and then played the game better.

If they want to rip up a bunch of crap rules that they wrote... go for it.

Anonymous Anonymous July 01, 2015 10:41 AM  

"...shoring up their crumbling Puppy Narrative,..."

Interesting perspective, and I'll expand on it with an anecdote that Vox may be familiar with.

Wargames have been around for about 50 years now. A lot of them, obviously, concern WWII and, included in that, are the Nazis. In the '70's, it was commonly known that many of the WWII wargames which, in the US, were sold with swastikas somehow representing the German forces in WWII (swastikas on the cover art, as decorations in rules, perhaps on plane wings or unit symbols, etc), those same games were either banned or re-edited for the German market, where swastikas are/were a banned symbol.

There was the general feeling at the time that 1) they may do that, because Germany doesn't have the 1st Amendment like we do, but at the same time 2) I guess its kind of understandable for now, since Nazis were active in Germany, and in the very recent past. But it was the recentness of the events (20-25 years previously) that sort of justified the German ban.

Contrast that with the treatment of the Confederate flag in America today. While I don't agree with the whole controversy, and do think battlefields banning the flag, and so on, is completely absurd, I could kind of get on board if, say, the flags were banned in 1880. One could argue that the war was very recent, slavery was literally a half a lifetime ago, maybe we should just try to get along for a while.

It makes no sense for the banning to occur this long after the war. Banning the confederate flag from Civil War battlefields in 2015 would be like initiating a ban on the Nazi flag from battlefields in 2095, or banning the battleflags of Napoleon III or Queen Victoria today. Its simply a loony power struggle rather than an even half-justified attempt at reconciliation/courtesy.

So what does that loony power struggle represent? It has nothing to do with right and wrong, and everything to do with 'dance when I say dance.' Is it because the Left is 'shoring up a crumbling narrative (i.e. they are weakening), or because the Left now has the power to make others dance (and is in fact strong rather than weak)?

I don't know.

anonymousse

Blogger VD July 01, 2015 10:55 AM  

"John" was Tad. Now he's spam.

Even better. Lying SJW troll commenting under a false identity. Very convincing indeed.

Blogger Maple Curtain July 01, 2015 10:56 AM  

"Also, unrepentant bad-to-reprehensible racist misogynistic homophobic neo-Nazi hate group thugs."

I'll see you...and raise you a couple of adjectives.

Anonymous BigGaySteve July 01, 2015 10:59 AM  

pounds away at the same keys...h-o-m-o-p-h-o-b-i-c... over and over as if it has something new to say.

I am going to let you in on a little secrete. Soros issues his paid cheerleaders gaming mice programed with the words sexist, racist, homophobic, privilege & rape programed into the buttons. You see his people are so stupid like this one who pretends he is not a paid activist and shows his bank balance of less than a dollar to prove it, not being smart enough to realize if he is that broke with no job he couldn't fly around the country. http://www.weaselzippers.us/227651-professional-agitator-deray-mckesson-tries-to-prove-hes-not-a-paid-protester-pretty-much-confirms-he-is/


Vox, your description of the diversity (in the true sense of the word) in the Puppies pretty much says it all. Lying, it's the #SJWwayoflife

There is nothing diverse about a diversity that collectivizes the experience of every individual to ensure mass conformity even in the industrialization of celebration. It's not diversity. It's conformity.

Anonymous bw July 01, 2015 11:03 AM  

holding the truth hostage in the cellar, chaining it to a bed, and repeatedly raping it in a futile attempt to father a false narrative

+1

..in One Century those who have adhered to this ideal have done a role reversal - the Marxists and Minorities used to run around in the dark enclaves, meeting in secret and having to couch their language in symbolic and watered down ways - now White Westerners are forced to do so (Euro perspective). Who/What is the common link that brought us here?

It sure as hell isn't #Love. See rule #1

Real human beings in accord with Nature would rather have the most bitter truths than the sweetest lies.
Know and understand reality, then go from there - it is the starting point for curious, balanced human souls.

Blogger W.LindsayWheeler July 01, 2015 11:08 AM  

Aristotle, Virtues and Vices, Loeb Edition.

"To righteousness it belongs to be ready to distribute according to desert, and to
preserve ancestral customs and traditions and the established laws
, and to tell the truth
when interest is at stake, and to keep agreements. First among the claims of
righteousness are our duties to the gods, then our duties to the spirits, then those to
country and parents, then those to the departed; and among these claims is piety, which
is either a part of righteousness or a concomitant of it. Righteousness is also
accompanied by holiness and truth and loyalty and hatred of wickedness".

What does it mean to be a righteous man? It means "to preserve ancestral customs and traditions and the established laws" That is what a Virtuous man does.

"To hate wickedness" is also part of this Virtue.

Virtue means "to be a Man". A man's man is to be Virtuous and the second virtue is to be Righteous. It is about doing one's duty. An SJW is a reprobate. Incapable and a hater of Virtue. St. Peter said, "Supplement the Faith with Virtue". If you can not preserve ancestral laws and traditions, you can not be a righteous man.

SJWism is being a reprobate, a barbarian. SJWism is unrighteousness, adikia.

Righteousness is what good men practice and live by.

Blogger The Remnant July 01, 2015 11:19 AM  

What's fun about infuriating SJWs is that they always attack with the most outrageous language possible, even for minor disagreements, which leaves a lot of room for those of us who are sane to do more. The SJWs already have shot their wad; we've barely done anything yet.

Blogger VFM bot #188 July 01, 2015 11:20 AM  

That's true.

And I want to buy a vowel, please?

Anonymous bgs July 01, 2015 11:29 AM  

but he is flabbergasted that this woman with whom he worked for over many projects has this utter contempt for people like him.
Look at it from her perspective. She can't find any good men yet she has to work with a good man.

I propose as an alternative to the monniker "SJW," "VSM" -- vile sexless minnions. They might not know what gender they are but when they meet up in a graveyard or bathhouse they always seem to figure things out.

Blogger aut0062matthew July 01, 2015 12:41 PM  

Mr. Wheeler,

Your last comment is the kind I enjoy reading from you. Use your learning to attack the enemy, not bewail the disarray of your would-be allies.

Blogger Sad Puppy July 01, 2015 1:07 PM  

Hello,

"What is interesting is how their level of hysteria has observably increased."

I've noticed that they seem to believe they can conjure things up by repeating them over and over.

Now that they aren't getting their desired result by repeating the same thing, they are doubling and tripling down on it. They seem to be unable to come to grips with the Puppies still being here. It's like Puppies have become the monsters under the SJW bed.

Blogger Brad Andrews July 01, 2015 1:18 PM  

Their entire world is built on eliminating anything and everything that causes the slightest amount of discomfort.

Only their own discomfort. They are happy to inflict all the discomfort they can on anyone else.

Anonymous The Friend July 01, 2015 1:47 PM  

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Anonymous Stickwick July 01, 2015 2:14 PM  

What's this "misogyny" BS? I got banned from Scalzi's website after just three comments. What did I get after commenting at Vox's site? A book deal.

Anonymous Stingray July 01, 2015 2:19 PM  

What's this "misogyny" BS? I got banned from Scalzi's website after just three comments. What did I get after commenting at Vox's site? A book deal.

But somehow, just somehow, you're not a woman to them . . . and Bruce Jenner is.

Blogger Bro. Mulder July 01, 2015 2:20 PM  

"That is holding the truth hostage in the cellar, chaining it to a bed, and repeatedly raping it in a futile attempt to father a false narrative."

New SJW meme: Vox Day writes favourably about dungeon rape.
See three laws...

Blogger aut0062matthew July 01, 2015 2:33 PM  

"The Friend" is Tad.

What a loser.

Anonymous Stickwick July 01, 2015 2:35 PM  

Stingray: But somehow, just somehow, you're not a woman to them . . . and Bruce Jenner is.

Say, if I became a transgendered man, would that mean I'd finally be at the lowest difficulty setting?

Anonymous ZhukovG July 01, 2015 2:38 PM  

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Blogger aut0062matthew July 01, 2015 2:39 PM  

Stickwick, you can go straight to doubletransgendered, thus eliminating the need for a new wardrobe.

Anonymous Grinder July 01, 2015 2:45 PM  

How about backing up a bit?

55. Blogger VD July 01, 2015 9:03 AM
1. You believe homosexuality ought to be criminalilzed

That's a lie.

Do you believe that white western civilization's survival is almost certainly doomed if homosexuality is not criminalized or otherwise suppressed? Do you wish that white western civilization survives?

2. You believe Jews aren't trustworthy and can't be real Americans

That's a lie.

(i)Do you believe that Jews are trustworthy? (ii)Do you believe Jews can be real Americans?

3. That you exhibit racism when painting all blacks with one dirty brush

That's a lie.

How about if phrased differently such as "Are blacks, as a group, less suited to living peacefully and prospering in a modern civilization than whites?" And to be clear, would answering the previous question in the affirmative still fail to meet the threshold of being racist according to the definition of racism that you have posted here previously?

4. That you want women to be controlled and dominated by men.

That's a lie.

Do you believe that women are often happier, as a group when they live in societies where control and domination by men is more widespread and entrenched by long tradition?

Seekers of truth should learn to ask better questions to get substantive answers. With better questions, even refusals to answer are informative.

Anonymous Grinder July 01, 2015 2:49 PM  

96. Anonymous ZhukovG July 01, 2015 2:38 PM
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Hehe. I saw what you did there.

Blogger aut0062matthew July 01, 2015 2:52 PM  

"Hehe. I saw what you did there."

Trolls get spammed (or sometimes merely content-deleted, when we wish to leave the audit trail), comments responding to trolls get deleted. Yours, at 98, isn't deleted because you're responding to Vox, responding to a troll.

Anonymous Stingray July 01, 2015 2:53 PM  

Say, if I became a transgendered man, would that mean I'd finally be at the lowest difficulty setting?

You know, I don't even know what a trangendered man is. Is that a man who pretends to be a woman or a woman who pretends to be a man?

What about a woman who pretends to be a squirrel? That would probably be even lower (and sadly, this is a thing), depending on how you feel about squirrels.

Blogger aut0062matthew July 01, 2015 2:53 PM  

It's possible to completely memory-hole a comment, rather than leaving behind the "This comment has been removed by a blog administrator" trace.

I typically don't do that, if for no other reason than that it screws up the comment numbering.

Anonymous Krul July 01, 2015 2:58 PM  

Stingray - "What about a woman who pretends to be a squirrel? That would probably be even lower (and sadly, this is a thing), depending on how you feel about squirrels."

Special case

Anonymous Amok Time July 01, 2015 3:00 PM  

I noticed that the actor Tom Hanks is a reader of Scalzi. How sad. I thought he had better taste. But, then he was transgendered in his earliest role on the Teevee. A lover of all things progressive and libbie. Maybe he will come around someday to the correct side. Then, maybe not. The road is very narrow to salvation and the road to perdition is extremely wide and easy.

Anonymous Bob July 01, 2015 3:24 PM  

" I can think of at least three separate events that will likely engender more hysteria in the next three months alone."

Yay... the long hot summer gets hotter!

Blogger Thordaddy July 01, 2015 3:28 PM  

Vox...

You worship Perfection.
You believe in objective Supremacy
You are a Supremacist.
Case closed.

And this goes for all your most loyal followers.

To the Hensleys of the world, denying that you are a (white) Supremacist is the defining lie that shall never allow the dust to settle until you concede what is undeniably true (points 1-3 above).

The paradox is that no matter which frame one adheres to -- either the false liberal frame where wS = white degeneracy or the correct frame where wS = wS -- one is STILL a (white) Supremacist IF NOT an Equalist. Vox IS NOT AN Equalist. He is a (white) Supremacist NO MATTER which frame is held by the outside observer.

And if you continue to avoid this unassailable line of thought then you will have shown yourself to be more desirous of the continued unraveling debate than its final resolution.

Blogger Student in Blue July 01, 2015 3:38 PM  

Thordaddy...

You're a dumbass who redefines words, so any point you try to make is completely pointless.
Case closed.

Blogger Alexander July 01, 2015 3:40 PM  

I was halfway into a response when I concluded it wasn't worthwhile and just refreshed the page.

But in the interim, I see Student in Blue summed up my general point quite nicely.

Anonymous Bob July 01, 2015 3:46 PM  

Krul:

There was once a bar in Santa Fe like that...out on the Albuquerque highway.

Blogger VD July 01, 2015 3:49 PM  

You worship Perfection.
You believe in objective Supremacy
You are a Supremacist.
Case closed.


Yes, I do believe in objective supremacy, but not HUMAN objective supremacy. Based on your logic, I am a Jewish Supremacist, only there was just one perfect Jew.

Blogger VD July 01, 2015 3:57 PM  

Do you believe that white western civilization's survival is almost certainly doomed if homosexuality is not criminalized or otherwise suppressed?

No. Societal acceptance of homosexuality is a signal and a consequence of societal decline, not a cause.

(i)Do you believe that Jews are trustworthy? (ii)Do you believe Jews can be real Americans?

Yes. I have trusted multiple Jews with the lives of my children. Yes, if they forswear loyalty to Israel. However, I think most of them have the same problem grasping the limited government concept that most Germans, Scandinavians, Italians, and other European immigrants have demonstrated. It's just not part of their historic culture.

"Are blacks, as a group, less suited to living peacefully and prospering in a modern civilization than whites?" And to be clear, would answering the previous question in the affirmative still fail to meet the threshold of being racist according to the definition of racism that you have posted here previously?

Yes, observably. Yes, and also according to every dictionary definition of racism. To claim an affirmative statement would be racist is tantamount to claiming genetic science, history, and statistics are all intrinsically racist.

Do you believe that women are often happier, as a group when they live in societies where control and domination by men is more widespread and entrenched by long tradition?

No.

OpenID gregq July 01, 2015 4:02 PM  

It would be a lot more useful if you included the link to the comment.

It's a rule of mine: If the person could post a link, but doesn't, I tend to discount everything they say.

Blogger VD July 01, 2015 4:13 PM  

What's this "misogyny" BS? I got banned from Scalzi's website after just three comments. What did I get after commenting at Vox's site? A book deal.

Perhaps you're forgetting how hatefully and abusively I demanded you make changes to your most recent submission. Anyhow, that's already up on Twitter.

It's interesting to see how it doesn't matter what you actually do, so long as you mouth - or fail to mouth - the current SJW creed.

Anonymous Beau July 01, 2015 4:24 PM  

It's like Puppies have become the monsters under the SJW bed.

When SJW's go to bed at night they check under their beds and in their closets for Vox Day - but they don't use night lights because they prefer the darkness.

Blogger Corvinus July 01, 2015 4:24 PM  

But somehow, just somehow, you're not a woman to them . . . and Bruce Jenner is.

There's "woman", and then there's SJWoman. A non-PC woman isn't an SJWoman, but Jenner is.

Blogger Thordaddy July 01, 2015 4:28 PM  

Vox...

I'm not necessarily concerned with how you particularize your belief in The Perfect Man, ie., human objective Supremacy, so long as you recognize the indestructible linguistic link between your final belief and the Supremacist label that mostly exactly and truthfully defines said belief.

So my knowledge of you pens you a Supremacist and the logic says that the Jew qua Jew is an anti-Supremacist UNTIL total conversion and only then does the "Jewish" in "Jewish Supremacist" settle into its concrete ethnic/racial identity and cease to elicits thoughts of rampant identity fraud.

Blogger Thordaddy July 01, 2015 4:42 PM  

Most Christians fail to "see" the Crucifixion as an act of self-annihilation. The Chosen Ones... Er, the not converted ones... Slay their only perfect son. An act of extremely irrational self-annihilation. Ergo, the Jew qua Jew, original anti-Supremacist, is the archetype ethnic self-annihilator. This is the Jewish Answer.

Blogger Thordaddy July 01, 2015 4:51 PM  

The easiest step for those perpetually confounded by pure simplicity is to ask yourself whether as a "white" male you accept the following premise:

*Your* ENTIRE cultural, social and educational AIM was to convert *you* to anti-white Supremacy.

And IF *you* accept this premise as empirically validated THEN the clarity of your solution could not be anymore visible to your naked eyes.

Blogger luagha July 01, 2015 5:44 PM  

Thordaddy has reached levels of incomprehensibility previously touched only by the 'Nephilim' roleplaying game.

Blogger luagha July 01, 2015 6:34 PM  

Thordaddy has reached levels of incomprehensibility previously touched only by the 'Nephilim' roleplaying game.

Blogger Thordaddy July 01, 2015 6:52 PM  

luagha (Seriously, <-- That is incomprehensible)...

Are you so radically autonomous that you cannot comprehend that when Chris Hensley calls Vox Day a "white supremacist" that Chris Hensley MEANS IT?

And are you so dim as to not understand that when Chris Hensley accuses another of being a "white supremacist," HE MEANS white degenerate? As in, white supremacy = white degeneracy IN THE MIND of Chris Hensley?

And are you so brainwashed as to not "see" the self-evident fallacy? Chris Hensley's definition of "white supremacy" is ultimately an objective lie, BUT one clung to as though it were the most profound PERSONAL truth.

And now are you so stubborn as to not understand that a white Supremacist is SIMPLY a white man who believes in and thus instinctively worships objective Supremacy, ie., The Perfect Man.

And so when Chris Hensley calls Vox Day a "white Supremacist," HE IS REALLY SAYING how degenerate are those whites that worship The Perfect Man.

Ergo, white Christians are degenerates.

And when ANY Christian DENIES being a Supremacist, HE IS REALLY DENYING being a Christian. The relationship to white Supremacy ONLY MAKES the matter a more detailed denial.

Blogger luagha July 01, 2015 6:59 PM  

Deep breath, Thordaddy.

You can't write when you're in this state. Go walk around the block then try to read your own posts.

Maybe take a break to look up the 'Nephilim' roleplaying game with Google. When you've deciphered it, you can explain it to me.

Blogger Bard July 01, 2015 7:08 PM  

What will it take to make this guy blue in the face and STFU?

Blogger LP 999/Eliza July 01, 2015 8:02 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger LP 999/Eliza July 01, 2015 8:03 PM  

Instead of transdoublegender, maybe just use, 'fluid gender' or 'gender fluid'. Or wait that reads poorly.

We are not allowed to speak and when we do its all grief. Meanwhile SJWs cannot handle taking responsibility for trashing innocent puppies.

Blogger Subversive Saint #249 July 01, 2015 10:32 PM  

@thordaddy.

Huh? I'm denying Christ if I don't admit I'm a supremacist?

Anonymous Stickwick July 01, 2015 11:45 PM  

Vox: Perhaps you're forgetting how hatefully and abusively I demanded you make changes to your most recent submission.

Hey, yeah! Now that I think about it, it was pretty hateful. Help, help! I'm being repressed!

Anonymous TheVillageIdiot(Ret.) July 01, 2015 11:47 PM  

You know, I always felt like I was a lesbian trapped in a mans' body.
I watch all of the NFL football games in pink October,
I got a ton of lesbian porno,
so yeah...I sure do love the women.

DannyR

Blogger Danby July 02, 2015 1:04 AM  

Us Social Justice Warriors – this is me, stealing that word in order to use it against my enemies- are winning the culture war by tearing up the rulebook, and there’s nothing the sad, mad little boys who hate women and queers and people of colour can do about it.

Aint no rules in a knife fight.

Blogger Daniel July 02, 2015 1:07 AM  

I am transgandered. I was born to accept what is good for me as if I were a goose. #wrongskinextracrispy

Blogger ScuzzaMan July 02, 2015 6:07 AM  

I had to go and double check; there are two meanings to "crescendo".

One being a sustained increase over time, one being an increase to a maximum.

Maybe the SJWs have a few octaves left in them yet.

Anonymous LegallySpeaking July 02, 2015 8:33 AM  

I don't know if I contributed to Vox's third law or not; I noticed the leftist projection a while back and have mentioned it previously, but someone as smart as Vox probably noticed it too.

I'm more extreme than Vox in that I don't think these laws apply solely to SJWs, but to all leftists. Even if a person has leftist ideas in one area (e.g. race) but are otherwise non-leftists, in that one area they will lie, double down, and project if you get on their leftist subject. For example, if you start talking race realism to a black manospherean, suddenly, they're chanting about the greatness of MLK and how IQ tests are bunk, etc.

I've been using the 3rd law to devastating effect recently. Once I identify a person online as a leftist, I immediately start laughing at them. Let me tell you, when a lefty finds out you are not even taking their slipshod logic seriously, and are mocking them, they utterly lose their shit and their projection comes whole hog.

One "woman" started accusing me, out of nowhere, of being a pedophile, ostensibly because I questioned her claim of having 4 children, as she was spending an inordinate amount of time online arguing lefty talking points.

Instead of getting defensive at this random attack, I realized that "she" must be a pedophile herself, or harbors pedophilic thoughts. She had just given me a huge admission, and, thanks to knowing all lefties project, I jumped on it and called her on it.

She FLIPPED OUT and started claiming I was now cyber stalking and engaging in hate speech and that I would be arrested and sued for libel. I pointed out that, 1) the 1st amendment does not allow for punishment of hate speech (yet---Jeremy Waldron is chipping away at that, the turd); 2) since she had hurled the charge first, she would be the one sued for libel first; and 3) since my belief was honest that she had pedophilic tendencies due to her projection, I had a strong defense.

But always ending by laughing at her.

She keeps ranting about it, claiming I would be extradited for stalking to her country (which she won't name), and that she was sending my posts to "the authorities".

It's hilarious. She not only doesn't know the law, she thinks she's hiding her disorder by accusing others. And the more I mock her, the more unhinged she becomes.

Do not take the left's words seriously, and do not take their persons seriously. Take their evil seriously, but not their arguments or their existence. And watch them snap in two.

Blogger VFM bot #188 July 02, 2015 10:13 AM  

Stickwick, who the hell are you. As a result of your comments, I want to read your book. Name it. Congratulations. A new fan.

Anonymous Shut up rabbit July 02, 2015 1:59 PM  

I do believe Stickwick is our resident astronomy expert:
castaliahouse/homeschool/

Blogger VFM bot #188 July 02, 2015 3:01 PM  

Well dang! There's 5 of 'em! Since my kid is long grown, I'm not doing home schooling for anyone but myself. So which one do I start with?

Anonymous LegallySpeaking July 02, 2015 4:46 PM  

Update: another projection confirmed. My crazy little pedophile opponent also started calling me a "sockpuppet" of some other rational dude who opposed her....right at the time another poster started vehemently defending her using the same insults about me.

Then I realized she was again projecting: she was the sockpuppetter.

She stridently tried to deny this in both personas, claiming that "google" would prove that she was both really judyt00 and a character named either Bruce Gorton or Bruce Groton. I pointed out how this proved nothing, that a google search would only prove that people posted under those two names, nothing more. Bruce tried to claim that it was his real name, but I pointed out that it was far too common a name to be one person, and, in any event, any name can be made up, and judyt00 was certainly not a real name.

Then suddenly----poof!---the entire Bruce Gorton/Groton account was just deleted off disquis---including all posts made to him by others. Judyt00 self-deleted her own sockpuppet once called out on it.

This is getting very fun.

Blogger MidKnight (#138) July 03, 2015 1:17 AM  

Yes. I have trusted multiple Jews with the lives of my children. Yes, if they forswear loyalty to Israel. However, I think most of them have the same problem grasping the limited government concept that most Germans, Scandinavians, Italians, and other European immigrants have demonstrated. It's just not part of their historic culture.

I never "got" that.

My parents were both LIthuanian. They came over as kids, dragged out just ahead of the soviet army by their respective parents. Grandad on one side became a Bircher, and a couple decades ago went back to Lithuania, and later died.

While I never went whole hog Bircher, and even walked a liberal path for awhile, i'd done enough digging into history to realize how screwed up the Communists were, and that the Nazis were also socialists.

Given that, I was repeatedly amazed over the years at how many ethnic Lithuanians, even the descendants of the post-WWII wave, were socialists, obama voters, etc.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts