ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Saturday, September 05, 2015

Weaponized codes

Expect to see a lot of codes of conduct based on this Open Code of Conduct which is expressly designed for being utilized by SJW entryists in organizations everywhere.
Harassment includes, but is not limited to:

    Offensive comments related to gender, gender identity and expression, sexual orientation, disability, mental illness, neuro(a)typicality, physical appearance, body size, race, age, regional discrimination, political or religious affiliation
    Unwelcome comments regarding a person’s lifestyle choices and practices, including those related to food, health, parenting, drugs, and employment
    Deliberate misgendering. This includes deadnaming or persistently using a pronoun that does not correctly reflect a person’s gender identity. You must address people by the name they give you when not addressing them by their username or handle
    Physical contact and simulated physical contact (eg, textual descriptions like “hug” or “backrub”) without consent or after a request to stop
    Threats of violence, both physical and psychological
    Incitement of violence towards any individual, including encouraging a person to commit suicide or to engage in self-harm
    Deliberate intimidation
    Stalking or following
    Harassing photography or recording, including logging online activity for harassment purposes
    Sustained disruption of discussion
    Unwelcome sexual attention, including gratuitous or off-topic sexual images or behaviour
    Pattern of inappropriate social contact, such as requesting/assuming inappropriate levels of intimacy with others
    Continued one-on-one communication after requests to cease
    Deliberate “outing” of any aspect of a person’s identity without their consent except as necessary to protect others from intentional abuse
    Publication of non-harassing private communication

Our open source community prioritizes marginalized people’s safety over privileged people’s comfort. We will not act on complaints regarding:

    ‘Reverse’ -isms, including ‘reverse racism,’ ‘reverse sexism,’ and ‘cisphobia’
    Reasonable communication of boundaries, such as “leave me alone,” “go away,” or “I’m not discussing this with you”
    Refusal to explain or debate social justice concepts
    Communicating in a ‘tone’ you don’t find congenial
    Criticizing racist, sexist, cissexist, or otherwise oppressive behavior or assumptions
They're not even pretending anymore. This is just straight up thought, speech, and behavioral policing, and it explicitly goes in one direction, the direction that provides the SJWs with political control of the organization.

If you don't resist, you will be ruled by these totalitarian freaks.

Labels:

194 Comments:

Blogger Salt September 05, 2015 4:04 PM  

Be careful in the words that we choose

Hey, freaks! Fuck you!

Anonymous The other robot September 05, 2015 4:04 PM  

Lets ask Linux Torvalds what he thinks of this code of conduct.

Anonymous A Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents September 05, 2015 4:12 PM  

This is like something a group of mean girls would come up with to torment the 80% of boys they don't like, and to out group any girls who didn't toe the line.

Coincidence?

Blogger Harsh September 05, 2015 4:13 PM  

Why don't they just write it the way they mean: "Anything straight white males do or say at any time can be considered harassment. Everyone else is free to do and say whatever they like."

Blogger JWM September 05, 2015 4:14 PM  

"Exterminate all of the brutes".

Offensive enough for ya'?
(God help us)

JWM

Anonymous Satan's Hamster September 05, 2015 4:14 PM  

@2: Linus is one of the few software leaders who would tell them to fuck off and die if they tried to push that on him.

Sadly, the IT world has seen a massive influx of SJWs over the last decade or so as they figured they could earn a lot of money doing nothing at a worthless dot-com that only existed to suck in VC capital until it IPO-ed. This is why so much software has turned to shit in the last few years.

Anonymous Amok Time September 05, 2015 4:16 PM  

So, how do they justify the abuse they have given Vox and those of his Ilk over the years? Scalzi seems to have broken 90% of these "rules"?

Blogger D. G. D. Davidson September 05, 2015 4:21 PM  

"Deadnaming," huh? These people would piss me off less if they'd stop making up new words every week. Sooner or later, I expect all the Leftists to wake up and say, "Wait a minute, the things I oppose are so normal and innocuous that I have to invent words for them to make them sound sinister," but they never do.

If someone tries to ding you for "misgendering" (another made up word), answer that you're being criticized for your religious beliefs, which do not allow you to pretend that men are women or vice versa, and get them by their own code.

Anonymous physphilmusic September 05, 2015 4:22 PM  

Theoretically, the first half up to the sentence "Our open source community prioritizes marginalized people’s safety over privileged people’s comfort. We will not act on complaints regarding" can be applied fairly to everyone. After that, where they declare they will not accept any "reverse racism/sexism/etc." complaints, they might as well openly declare that they are left-wing, anti-white and anti-male acolytes of critical theory. I've noticed that some of the bigger companies who are in the list of Todo group, such as Facebook, Yahoo, and Twitter, do not copy that part about reverse racism, perhaps because it might cause an instant backlash. These companies operate on a global scale, and the rest of the world doesn't give a damn that blacks think they are the most oppressed group of people on the planet.

Anonymous MrGreenMan September 05, 2015 4:23 PM  

@7 Amok Time

As you can see by "Our open source community prioritizes marginalized people’s safety over privileged people’s comfort." - they will simply define their enemies as the privileged people, and the complaints of their enemies to be mild discomfort, and their friend the marginalized people, and their petty bitches "safety".

This is why the people who teach homosexual lifestyle acceptance do so through the anti-bullying curriculum - people are scared of saying that an emphasis on safety and making life one unending protective hug by the obliteration of any possible independent thought or dissent is a horrible thing.

Anonymous clk September 05, 2015 4:23 PM  

So I would ask which of the first sections list do you people disagree with ? To me it would seem that part 1 of this is simple good business manners .. certainly practices that I as a professional adult would have not problems with and in infact would expect to be the practice at any company in the US...

I dont care for part 2 because it is a actually contray to the first section ....

Anonymous Biffy September 05, 2015 4:23 PM  

Their worldview is dependent on one day claiming two plus two equals five.

Blogger VD September 05, 2015 4:23 PM  

So, how do they justify the abuse they have given Vox and those of his Ilk over the years? Scalzi seems to have broken 90% of these "rules"?

"Our open source community prioritizes marginalized people’s safety over privileged people’s comfort. We will not act on complaints regarding:"

They simply define me as privileged and declare me to be open season because badthink.

Anonymous physphilmusic September 05, 2015 4:25 PM  

@8
If someone tries to ding you for "misgendering" (another made up word), answer that you're being criticized for your religious beliefs, which do not allow you to pretend that men are women or vice versa, and get them by their own code.

See, this would be possible, up until the point where they openly declare that they won't handle "reverse Xism" complaints. The code of conduct is based on a philosophy that is explicitly anti-white, anti-male, anti-Christianity, and so on, and the superficial veneer of tolerance and compassion is breaking down, even publicly.

Blogger VD September 05, 2015 4:26 PM  

So I would ask which of the first sections list do you people disagree with ? To me it would seem that part 1 of this is simple good business manners .. certainly practices that I as a professional adult would have not problems with and in infact would expect to be the practice at any company in the US.

All of it. That is because you are a fool and you are part of the problem. What part of "give them an inch and they will take a mile" do you have a problem understanding? Do you not get that they will apply the "code of conduct" to their targets and refuse to apply it their allies?

It doesn't matter what it says. The existence of the structure is the problem in and of itself.

Anonymous Clint #47/#73 September 05, 2015 4:29 PM  

Really, we just want to be left alone. We like to read our books, play our games, and meander through life as we please. We are even willing to let the SJW do their own thing, as long as they don't shove it in our faces. Of course, that is how we ended up here.
Now, they are going to push it so far that we are going to put the books and controllers down, smash them, and then go back to our business.
They just can't leave well enough alone. It was not enough that we let them be. Now they want to turn us into them.

Not gonna happen.

If you want to be a fat lesbian, then be a fat lesbian. But don't think that we are going to pretend like you are a beautiful gift. You are vile and will be treated accordingly, as you have decided that we must be in conflict.

Your feelzbadz mean nothing.

Blogger Peter P. September 05, 2015 4:30 PM  

I have already applied for my VFM status. Time to bring the fight to them.

Anonymous MrGreenMan September 05, 2015 4:30 PM  

@11 clk

Ah, well, you don't know how to read this, then. These are written to sound vaguely good - then, well, the right people get on the enforcement committee - like the meltdown at that Opal project or whatever where they decided that this aggression was the second largest code contributor commenting on his private blog that he was a traditional Catholic - for example:

"Sustained disruption of discussion"

To know who is the disruptor you must first know who is in charge of deciding what is the valid discussion. Then, when you realize that, you realize these SJWs really did learn everything in kindergarten - be the bully kindergarten teacher who can just push everyone into line with arbitrary authority and life is good for teacher while she sleeps off a hangover.

"Deliberate misgendering" - when you have to keep a look up table of fens and xirs and zers and zims and thyms and nguyenhersnowhis, you are really going to cut into productivity because you're always having to police what you say for offense when the things that can trigger offense are inherently fluid and faddish. If "Miranda Tate" sends you an email, by their policy, you are supposed to go look up her Tumblr and Twitter, figure out which one is active, and then look for the "preferred pronouns", and try to figure out if zym or zyme is possessive or object.

It is designed to look reasonable if you don't scratch too much. A crazy person can seem sane until you keep them talking long enough.

Blogger Peav September 05, 2015 4:34 PM  

Simple solution. Tell them your name is Susan (if you're male), and that you sexually identify as a vegetable (as opposed to a fruit).

Thus they must address you by that. To do otherwise is harassment, plus it places you in a marginalized group.

Anonymous Stg58 / Animal Mother #225 September 05, 2015 4:37 PM  

Clk,

The Soviet Union had elections, A Constitution, laws, etc. Don you oppose any of those structures?

Anonymous MrGreenMan September 05, 2015 4:37 PM  

@11 clk

Take this as an example: "Criticizing racist, sexist, cissexist, or otherwise oppressive behavior or assumptions"

You might consider that a discussion about whether to use ia-a or has-a OO might be disrupted - as in "sustained disruption of discussion" - if somebody got on the list and started responding to every message saying that the project lead is a horrible man, has said horrible things on his tumblr, and she does not feel safe until the community takes the project away from him, and then she proceeds to file bug after bug demanding he be removed, then she gets her friends to come and do the same thing.

Now, if you were to speak up and say - stop it, we don't care about his tumblr, let's get back to is-a/has-a - YOU would be the one who was disrupting things because criticizing badthink is ALWAYS more appropriate than the actual mission of the software. As they have said in a very odd way - "open source is about people" - well, I thought it was about solving problems cooperatively, but apparently it's about having a chill group of people who all "feel safe" together, instead of a group that cooperates and accomplishes a goal of solving a specific problem well.

Make no mistake - these codes of conduct for programming projects are about taking the authorial ownership away from the original coders and padding the credentials of leeches. They will burn the project down and hope another fool has mistakenly made another one they can colonize and capture. This is life and death for open source, and death is winning.

Blogger IM2L844 September 05, 2015 4:38 PM  

What the hell are threats of psychological violence?

Anonymous Stg58 / Animal Mother #225 September 05, 2015 4:42 PM  

What the hell are threats of psychological violence?

"I will haunt your dreams" --Jane Lynch in "The 40 Year Old Virgin"

Anonymous Giuseppe The Kurgan September 05, 2015 4:42 PM  

No. Fuck that shit. Anyone tries to impose ANY of that shit on me I will unzip and start pissing on their shoes and work my way up them.

Blogger Salt September 05, 2015 4:43 PM  

What the hell are threats of psychological violence?

To them, probably as easy as just mentioning this site.

Blogger AmyJ September 05, 2015 4:49 PM  

What is deadnaming? I can't keep up with their lunatic lingo.

Anonymous 334 September 05, 2015 4:51 PM  

@25. AmyJ

Calling Caitlin Jenner "Bruce", maybe?

Anonymous The other robot September 05, 2015 4:55 PM  

From the Ruby On Rails website:

Ruby on Rails is a breakthrough in lowering the barriers of entry to programming.

Doesn't that tell you that Ruby on Rails is a programming community for retards and that you can expect lots of SJWs there?

Blogger David-093 September 05, 2015 4:56 PM  

Their goal was always, ALWAYS, about power and destruction. What the right-wing "extremists" were saying for years, both before and after the cowardly right disowned them, is true: these people never cared for what they said in public. It was always a means to an ends, and that end is the end of the West.

They have no idea what they've wrought.

Anonymous The other robot September 05, 2015 4:58 PM  

And Rails for Girls confirms it.

Blogger Nate September 05, 2015 4:58 PM  

Fuck these people. All of them.

Anonymous Mike September 05, 2015 5:01 PM  

Corporations are being transformed into agencies of government control.

Back when I was a supervisor in a large insurance company, I was required to attend a diversity workshop. The first thing we had to endure was the noxious video Blue Eyes Brown Eyes featuring the even more noxious Jane Elliott. That's the teacher who had her grade-school students sobbing when she told the brown-eyes kids they were inferior. Later, she had the blue-eyed kids in tears because they were actually the inferior ones.

When the video ended, I sat silently with my arms folded, determined not to speak. The facilitator locked eyes with me and asked, "Let me hear your reaction."

I said, "It looked like child abuse."

He turned to another participant.

I'm glad I'm free of the corporate world.

Blogger Salt September 05, 2015 5:04 PM  

@11 I dont care for part 2 because it is a actually contray to the first section ....

CLK, you still have no understanding of these people. 2 follows 1 from a very peculiar perspective. Codify "all animals are equal" and you can get to "some animals are more equal than others".

Anonymous Godfrey September 05, 2015 5:04 PM  

The experiment is over. It's time to put the lunatics back into the asylum.

Blogger David-093 September 05, 2015 5:05 PM  

"Thus they must address you by that. To do otherwise is harassment, plus it places you in a marginalized group."

Murphy's Law doesn't work in reverse. Why do you think they've relentlessly promoted transsexuality but crushed transracialism almost immediately? Saying you're black or Jewish when you're really white destroys their whole system of victimization and gimmedats, and that obviously can't be allowed, but having a hundred thousand men cut their dicks and subsequently kill themselves over the years works well for them because it's so destructive and causes such confusion. If it causes the immediate harm or destruction of white people, it's okay in their book, but if it threatens their system then it's ruthlessly shut down and swept under the rug.

Blogger David-093 September 05, 2015 5:07 PM  

"The experiment is over. It's time to put the lunatics back into the asylum."

All guerilla warfare depends on the population, specifically the countryside population, supporting and protecting the people. If they don't then it doesn't matter. If you had thirty million Americans able and willing to support any physical movement to reclaim the nation, you could win, but as it stands most people are afraid and waiting for someone else to do it.

And so, the impossibly hard decision we could have avoided will be forced on us via an epic economic meltdown, possibly a natural disaster or two, and a major war.

Anonymous Satan's Hamster September 05, 2015 5:08 PM  

@21: "As they have said in a very odd way - "open source is about people""

Open Source is about freedom. This is why SJW scum hate it.

The good news is that open source can usually just be forked when people grow sick of SJW entryism. So they can't take it and destroy it, as they have with everything else they've smeared their shit over.

@11: Decent people don't need 'codes of conduct'. By demanding one, SJWs just prove they're not decent people. Besides, for them to support just about every form of depravity on the planet, then demand 'codes of conduct', is simply laughable.

Anyone who tries this in any open source project I'm involved with will be told to fuck off.

Blogger David-093 September 05, 2015 5:09 PM  

"Calling Caitlin Jenner "Bruce", maybe?"

Bruce Jenner was useful to them. If Jenner gets the surgery, they'll promote it for a time, then Jenner will be forgotten and probably kill himself.

These people are evil and use people like tools until they're no longer useful, at which point their discarded.

Blogger Crude September 05, 2015 5:16 PM  

Vox and company,

Alright, this actually seems within your reach here. You have here an 'open source code of conduct'. It's a pile of shit.

Why not make your own, open source it as well, and offer it up in exchange?

Anonymous Erik September 05, 2015 5:20 PM  

"...This includes deadnaming or persistently using a pronoun that does not correctly reflect a person’s gender identity. You must address people by the name they give you when not addressing them by their username or handle"

Is there a potential black knighting opportunity here? Call yourself "Praise God", both as name given in person and as username. It has precedent! Point to the code of conduct if they try to call you anything else when talking to you, loudly insist on being addressed as "Praise God".

Anonymous Satan's Hamster September 05, 2015 5:21 PM  

@38: Like I said, decent people don't need 'codes of conduct'.

And do you really think I give a crap about 'codes of conduct' when a customer's system has crashed and millions of people are relying on me to get it working again?

'Codes of conduct' are for people who don't have to live in the real world. VC-funded money pits can have 'codes of conduct' out their ass, because they don't have to produce software that does anything useful. The real world values results over politics.

Blogger RobertT September 05, 2015 5:23 PM  

"Expect to see a lot of codes of conduct based on this Open Code of Conduct which is expressly designed for being utilized by SJW entryists in organizations everywhere."

This sounds suspiciously like a tactic the Bolsheviks used to take control in Russia. They would get a couple of people on the city council or whatever. After a quorum was established, they would keep bringing up new issues which they debated until the wee hours of the morning. When most of the council members gave up & left, and the two Bolsheviks were in the majority, they would pass whatever they wanted.

OpenID cglasgow99 September 05, 2015 5:27 PM  

To quote the political wisdom of Boss Tweed -- 'Let 'em vote for whoever the hell they want, so long as I get to pick the nominations.'

SJWs and codes of conduct are the same -- 'Let them believe in whatever rules they want, so long as we get to decide what the enforcement of them will be like'.

So, asking someone to define an ideal code of conduct is a waste of time. We already have two that have a long track record -- they're called "the common law" and "basic human decency". The important thing is to stop letting SJWs decide who's guilty and who's innocent and actually get back to impartial treatment.

Blogger Were-Puppy September 05, 2015 5:37 PM  

@6 Satan's Hamster
@2: Linus is one of the few software leaders who would tell them to fuck off and die if they tried to push that on him.

Sadly, the IT world has seen a massive influx of SJWs over the last decade or so as they figured they could earn a lot of money doing nothing at a worthless dot-com that only existed to suck in VC capital until it IPO-ed. This is why so much software has turned to shit in the last few years.
----------------

And here I thought it was because they insisted on sending all coding off to India.

Blogger murphaticlaw September 05, 2015 5:37 PM  

@30 Not with a thousand condoms

Blogger Crude September 05, 2015 5:40 PM  

The real world values results over politics.

That's been the battlecry for a good decade or so. The result has been SJW infestation in organizations. The claim that eventually - in years, or maybe decades - these organizations will go under because of that infestation isn't much of a strategy.

So again - let's see someone develop a counter-CoC. Or is the master plan here 'Let the SJWs craft all the CoCs and ignore them while they spread and are enforced.'?

Blogger Were-Puppy September 05, 2015 5:40 PM  

10. MrGreenMan September 05, 2015 4:23 PM
@7 Amok Time

As you can see by "Our open source community prioritizes marginalized people’s safety over privileged people’s comfort." - they will simply define their enemies as the privileged people, and the complaints of their enemies to be mild discomfort, and their friend the marginalized people, and their petty bitches "safety".
-----

It appears privileged people are the new Kulaks.

Anonymous Donn #0114 September 05, 2015 5:40 PM  

Well that's certainly the stupidest thing I've read today. Open source code of conduct? Dumb as fuck. I like how they insist they will allow anyone continue harassing a white male for any reason.

Best part of being an SJW is never having to say you're sorry. Even if you're a pedo, or a rapist, or in sympathy with the same.

Perversion, thy name is SJW. And intolerant perversion. I've tried to warn people that eventually if you keep turning something to the left it breaks. This is broke before it came off the line.

Anonymous Spirit of 76 September 05, 2015 5:44 PM  

Hear, hear!

Anonymous Rhys O'Reilly September 05, 2015 5:45 PM  

OT, Vox can we have a discussion on the best non epic fantasy?

Blogger Joe A. September 05, 2015 5:46 PM  

These SJW puritans. Wow. That list pretty much damns every SJW-minded person as well. The "standards" are too high.

Blogger Were-Puppy September 05, 2015 5:47 PM  

@21 IM2L844
What the hell are threats of psychological violence
---------------

If you have a person at your office constantly bugging you, and you challenge them to mortal combat. They don't know if you mean Mortal Kombat, or mortal combat. It hurts their heads, and they wander off to thing of a new angle to bug and waste your productive work hours.

Blogger VD September 05, 2015 5:51 PM  

Alright, this actually seems within your reach here. You have here an 'open source code of conduct'. It's a pile of shit.

Why not make your own, open source it as well, and offer it up in exchange?


I intend to do so.

Blogger Crude September 05, 2015 5:54 PM  

I intend to do so.

Great. I look forward to it. Hell, if it's open source, I look forward to assisting if I'm at all able.

Blogger James Dixon September 05, 2015 6:03 PM  

> If you had thirty million Americans able and willing to support any physical movement to reclaim the nation,

I suspect we have far more than that. They just don't realize it yet. When they do all hell will break loose.

Of course there doesn't seem to be any way to contact these people directly to actually tell them what you think of them.

Blogger VD September 05, 2015 6:04 PM  

Vox should take the Schizoid Personality Disorder test and.publish the results. Just for fun.

Yes, I'm sure nothing called "Schizoid Personality Disorder" would ever be used against me. I'll get right on it. Also, choose a Name.

Anonymous Adam1 September 05, 2015 6:05 PM  

Notice that this is not a code of ethics which is debatable, but a `moral code`. Ravi Zachariahs would ask, ``If there is a moral law, then who is the lawgiver?`` Thus also notice they don`t appeal to God or English Common Law. Rather, they`re like Judge Dredds` ``I am the law``, or the Minot P.D.s` ``Ve r zee law! U vill oh-bay!``

Anonymous 11B September 05, 2015 6:08 PM  

It seems like a rehash of Herbert Marcuse's Repressive Tolerance.


Liberating tolerance, then, would mean intolerance against movements from the Right and toleration of movements from the Left.

Blogger SciVo September 05, 2015 6:08 PM  

It's all just completely unnecessary. They could simply require everyone to at least pretend to be a straight white man, and then they would all have the same privilege, so they could just sort out disagreements among themselves.

Blogger Anthony Gillis September 05, 2015 6:08 PM  

1) They have the right to attack you, at any time and for essentially any reason whatsoever
2) You have no right whatsoever to defend yourself

Nice. Like Orwell and Kafka had some mutant, gene-spliced offspring.

Blogger Markku September 05, 2015 6:11 PM  

My code of conduct:
----------
COMMON SENSE CODE OF CONDUCT v. 1.0

If you feel offended by someone, your sole recourse will be to take the issue to court, or to answer in kind.

Attribution & Acknowledgements

We tip our hat to #GamerGate which has been bringing much needed common sense to the world of software engineering since August 2014

Anonymous Rolf September 05, 2015 6:12 PM  

"How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg."

Apparently these folks have forgotten the wisdom of our forefathers. (attributed to Abe Lincoln, though it's not him with certainty. It sounds like him, or perhaps Mark Twain. In any case, it makes sense.)

So, XY = "male/him/he", "XX = "female/she/her".
XXY or something like that? I'd be happy to have a conversation with you.

Anonymous Nxx September 05, 2015 6:14 PM  

Deliberate misgendering. This includes deadnaming or persistently using a pronoun that does not correctly reflect a person’s gender identity. You must address people by the name they give you when not addressing them by their username or handle

I therefore DEMAND that henceforth I be addressed by my correct pronoun, which is:

He who is perfectly aware that mass immigration and forced integration is in violation of article 2(c) of the Genocide Convention of 1948 and that anyone who either promotes, justifies or legitimizes mass immigration and forced integration is a genocide criminal who must be tried, sentenced and executed in a humane manner.

Shortening my preferred pronoun to a simple "he" represents a microagression that triggers me and violates my safe space. I will not hesitate to report any such deadnaming to HR.

Blogger epobirs September 05, 2015 6:19 PM  

Under these rules you cannot criticize MZB or Walter Breen as parents. You're actually required to remain quiet when presented with criminal behavior.

Hmmm, don't most states have laws about such things? They may have laid their own minefield and now must walk it without a map.

Anonymous Gx September 05, 2015 6:22 PM  

Tech has been following Silicon Valley, and Silicon Valley has become a meta-corp of startups without even the pretense of professionalism of the corporate world. In such terrain, do-nothing thoughtcrime enforcers can go nuts. The good news is that several of them have been bringed down by the motley crew of wrong thinkers (like Shanley Kane, obliterated by the efforts of Milo and Gamergate) and that the whole building, based on bullshit marketing experiments aka social media websites/apps is another dot-com bubble waiting to burst.

Blogger Hosswire September 05, 2015 6:27 PM  

I hate the assumptions that there should be an agenda & a hierarchy of values & a power to enforce those.

One alternative is a non-Code of Conduct that throws the responsibility back onto the participants. Something like:

This is all voluntary.
We are all adults.
Sort it out.

Anonymous The other robot September 05, 2015 6:28 PM  

I intend to do so.

Open Source Code of Conduct:

1. Show us the code or get the fuck out.

2. Stop whining that you can't get it to build. See figure 1.

3. There is no rule 3. See rules 1 or 2.

Anonymous kfg September 05, 2015 6:29 PM  

@clk: You will address me as "Your Imperial and Royal Majesty."

Blogger Anthony Gillis September 05, 2015 6:32 PM  

It reveals an interesting social order - like a cartoon parody of the already idiotic social orders imagined by the left for nearly two centuries.

In this new social order, the supposedly privileged people are rapidly becoming the lowest, untouchable level of a caste system. And in said caste system, right or wrong are determine by your attributes and not your actions. Meanwhile, the kind of people who would have been institutionalized prior to the 1970s are the new Brahmins.

Although that isn't a fair comparison, at least the higher castes in the Hindu system generally idealized education and a certain amount of self-restraint. The SJWs worship their own ignorance and weakness.

Blogger Anthony Gillis September 05, 2015 6:35 PM  

Though if gibberingly crazy people who can't actually write code want in on a project, or a job at a tech company, this is a great way for them to try.

Blogger D. G. D. Davidson September 05, 2015 6:37 PM  

@61

So, XY = "male/him/he", "XX = "female/she/her".
XXY or something like that? I'd be happy to have a conversation with you.


Among the evils of the Left is using genuinely, legitimately sick people as tools to promote their perversions. More than once I have seen Leftists claim that because such disorders as supermales and Swyer Syndrome exist, male and female are therefore arbitrary social constructions. It's obviously illogical, stream-of-consciousness reasoning, analogous to claiming that there's no such thing as normal metabolism simply because glycogen storage disorders exist. On the contrary, the disorders point toward what is normal.

A hermaphrodite (of any variety) is someone with a genetic disease. Such a person is sick, physically, and physical illness has no particular moral import. Being born with a Y chromosome and a woman's genitalia is vastly different from deliberately going to a mad doctor to have your balls cut off, but somehow the Leftist cannot see this, or will not.

I am coming to the conclusion that all Postmodern errors are essentially category errors.

Anonymous Gx September 05, 2015 6:37 PM  

De-facto caste systems are always the goal of those spiteful enough to become lefties.

After all, if everybody is equally miserable, if your status in life is determinated at birth (love and tolerance right there!), then is not your fault that you are a fucking loser. No wonder that they attack gaming and tech in general, the banner of meritocracy, of "git gud" is anathema for those that spend their sad lifes rationalizating their failures.

Blogger Pseudotsuga September 05, 2015 6:52 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Pseudotsuga September 05, 2015 6:53 PM  

(reposted with corrected HTML tags)
From their preface:
We are committed to providing a welcoming and inspiring community for all and expect our code of conduct to be honored.
Anyone who violates this code of conduct may be banned from the community.

Looking at it from a rhetorical point of view, it's inclusive and feelgoodz abound.
Looking at it from a dialectic point of view (which ought to be that of programmers), the first sentence and the second sentence contradict each other: if it's a welcoming community FOR ALL, how can anyone be banned from that community?

This group which produced this nonsense is not about "open source" anything. That's the red herring, the mis-labeling to direct you away from the real goals of control and power.

Anonymous Laz September 05, 2015 7:00 PM  

Seems very reminiscent of operating parameters for Robocop 3.

Blogger Cataline Sergius September 05, 2015 7:01 PM  

This is what the Thought Police have come?

O'Brien would hang his head in shame.

This is an Eloi version the thought police. Of course that doesn't make them any less dangerous.

Blogger Markku September 05, 2015 7:02 PM  

It seems many of you don't understand what it actually is. "Open Source Community" means discussion forum where you discuss new feature requests, leave bug reports, discuss code improvements, and so forth. For some particular open source software. It is how the numerous developers coordinate the development. This is a template for what you can and cannot say on those forums. If you choose to apply it to your own project, then any forum user who violates it gets his account banned. He can of course still use the software, but not participate in its development.

Blogger Markku September 05, 2015 7:07 PM  

This is how it would possibly realize itself:

"Hi, here's my rewritten version of the login function"
-Super Best Coder Princess

"This is absolutely moronic and creates a security loophole the size of Death Star. Yes, I can see that you are a girl."
-Captain Neckbeard

-BANNED-

Anonymous Bz September 05, 2015 7:12 PM  

If I saw a CV coming past showcasing participation in a project with this sort of "code", it would raise all sorts of red flags. A non-technical contributor indicates pure poison. Even a skilled technical contributor would seem dangerously foolish.

Anonymous Darth Toolpodicus #144 September 05, 2015 7:16 PM  

I used to pray that the collapse would not happen until after I have passed, perhaps in my children's times.

Now, my loathing for these Morlocks has built and compounded to the point where I am almost relishing the day when it is time to break the teeth of these mealy-mouthed curs who talk talk talk behind their walls of the very polite society they are so busily deconstruct. They all talk so big now...depending on the System to facilitate their bullying when probably less than one in ten thousand could enforce their will face to face.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan September 05, 2015 7:27 PM  

This code is silly, silly in an evil way though.

Blogger Cail Corishev September 05, 2015 7:29 PM  

I had to chuckle when I logged into an IRC (quakenet) server the other day and saw the "Server Rules" -- the closest thing we had to a Code of Conduct back in the day:

- No Flooding - No DoS bots - No Warez
- No Clones - No Spamming - No XDCCs
- No Takeovers - No Phishing - No Whiners

There's the best Code of Conduct I've ever seen, maybe the best one possible: No Whiners.

Blogger Anthony Gillis September 05, 2015 7:30 PM  

@71

Yep. Caste systems and a permanent ruling class (themselves) have always been part of the lefty goals. They're more open about it these days, but their self-hatred, self-doubt, and fear of meritocracy haven't much changed since Charles Fourier and his lunatic 'phalanges' nearly two centuries ago.

I remember the first time I encountered really open espousal of a left-ruled aristocracy in person. At one point in college in the early 90s I had this hot but batshit lefty girlfriend who was a server at a restaurant that received a lot of tourists. One day she said she liked the attitudes of Europeans because, and I quote, "They knew their place." I made her explain it, and she revealed it was because they were less likely to cross class lines. She liked workers staying workers for life, etc. This from a girl who wanted to be an academic. It went downhill from there.

Anonymous A Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents September 05, 2015 7:30 PM  

This CoC is tl;dr, I can summarize:

"We are always right, our enemies are always wrong, we decide who our enemies are".

Anonymous A.B. Prosper September 05, 2015 7:35 PM  

The danger here is not the speech codes, that part is obvious. No the danger is in forcing into people into a position where they repudiate the entire edifice of modernity that is protecting these loathsome sub-things

The Right is all about individualism but that is also our Achilles heel. Its really hard to pull entryism in a society with defined values and even someone as smart as Socrates may end up with a cup of hemlock for his troubles.

Push hard enough and otherwise pretty Libertarian people will be all about "Fuck this, time for some collective punishment."

In the end it won't come down to you did this and you are responsible but "Anyone I think is responsible is, the institutions that support you, the schools that you learned this in and depending on who angry people are, you whole damned lineage."

Fuck this ban on bill of attainder, fuck the ban on corruption the blood and act accordingly.

Blogger Derek Kite September 05, 2015 7:36 PM  

1. You call me racist or whatever insult is popular and I will punch you in the face.
2. If you use terms such as privileged, or the many gender studies terms of meaninglessness any rules of decency cease to apply. You are doing violence to the language, acting with hostile intent, and to the extent that it has an effect on me or those I care for, you will be subject to a counter reaction.
3. I vigorously don't care what you do with your body members, and it you attempt to make me care I will consider it as an assault and will respond appropriately.
4. I disagree with the behavior, manners, habits and lifestyles of 95% of the people I run into, and that is a good day. I despise about half of them and take active measures to protect myself and those I care for from being harmed by them. Yet I go about my day, run my business, communicate what I need to, work with these same people, and am a productive member of society. I will not take lessons in human relationships from losers, misfits, government agents or anyone who has not a proven track record of decades of productive living and healthy relationships. Even then with extreme care.
5. I will care about you if you give me a good reason to. Otherwise I don't. If you want me to care make sure it is positive.
6. My family was chased through the streets by mobs fomented by authoritarian scum. I won't take lessons on victimhood from privileged children intent on purely selfish navel gazing. The slightest stench of that authoritarian thinking or action will elicit a reaction. Tuck this little fact in your small mind; those who harassed my family are a forgotten footnote in history, their existence only brought up as an epithet.

I know personally hundreds of people who live like this. They are the foundation of working societies, who are extraordinarily generous with their time, resources and many times their lives. Little tolerance for freeloaders and pompous fools, and with deep distrust for those who can't or won't control their bodies and desires, as a good part of their generosity is consumed helping the victims of that sort put their lives back together.

Blogger SciVo September 05, 2015 7:37 PM  

@ David-093: "If it causes the immediate harm or destruction of white people, it's okay in their book, but if it threatens their system then it's ruthlessly shut down and swept under the rug."

That is plausible, but it is not the only explanation. Their support of transsexualism may be overdetermined. Theodore Dalrymple:

"Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to."

Blogger Mr.MantraMan September 05, 2015 7:39 PM  

I don't think entry into being a "protected class" does much good for the people trying to be a protected class. My guess is that their is pretty strong correlation between protected class status and Spenglarian decline. I can't say causation but from the looks of it if you start sipping the protected class liquor it means human skid row is on your destination list.

Blogger Anthony Gillis September 05, 2015 7:40 PM  

Of course, lunacy like that code, or modern SJW internet mob-rule don't really help them achieve their goal of a static, "safe" society. Far too unstable and unpredictable for that. Instead, it is more like state of nature, if preschoolers got to write the laws of reality.

Blogger Harsh September 05, 2015 7:43 PM  

There's the best Code of Conduct I've ever seen, maybe the best one possible: No Whiners.

The whiners have taken over.

Blogger SciVo September 05, 2015 7:46 PM  

@ Markku: "If you feel offended by someone, your sole recourse will be to take the issue to court, or to answer in kind."

My CoC where everyone has to at least pretend to be straight white males also states that if someone is mean you should either suck it up buttercup, or hit back twice as hard.

Blogger Krul September 05, 2015 7:50 PM  

@15 "It doesn't matter what it says. The existence of the structure is the problem in and of itself."

That's the very heart of the matter. Most people don't realize, until it's too late, that the content of the code barely matters. By agreeing to any such code, they are submitting themselves to the whims of an irresponsible, unaccountable, and hostile authority.

It's a trap. The "reasonable" strictures are the bait.

Blogger Markku September 05, 2015 7:55 PM  

I realize my first Common Sense Code of Conduct was too wordy. Here's 2.0

----

COMMON SENSE CODE OF CONDUCT v. 2.0

We don't care.

Anonymous Eric the Red September 05, 2015 7:56 PM  

I am physically revolted by this leftist insanity. I cannot believe how far my society and civilization have fallen just within my lifetime.

I once was a member of the software community. I worked in Silicon Valley for most of my career. But if I had time-transported to now (assuming I had the latest technical skills), as a straight white Christian male I probably wouldn't be able to even land a job.

Because I didn't see it coming, I am guilty of not having fought it. Now that I am finally aware, I hope I can do something effective to combat this evil, within whatever time left God has to give me.

Anonymous freddie_mac September 05, 2015 7:56 PM  

"Unwelcome comments about lifestyle choices and practices ..."

Of course we all noticed the big "R" missing from that list, right? So, it's still acceptable -- nay, required -- to denigrate a person's religious beliefs and/or practice!!!

Anonymous Wyrd September 05, 2015 8:01 PM  

COMMON SENSE CODE OF CONDUCT v. 2.0

We don't care.


COMMON SENSE CODE OF CONDUCT v. 2.0.1

We don't futtering care.

Blogger Russell (106) September 05, 2015 8:05 PM  

"You must address people by the name they give you when not addressing them by their username or handle"

Hi! I'm John-Scalzi-is-a-rapist, pleased to meet you!

Anonymous freddie_mac September 05, 2015 8:06 PM  

Okay, re-reading and found "religious affiliation" at the very end of the first paragraph ("Offensive comments"), but I still stand by my previous comment. Religious toleration, in terms of treating people from other religions with basic respect, is a dead letter (remember Hillary's comments about "bitter clingers," clinging to guns and religion?). Placing religion at the end makes it easier for the SJWs to drop it from the list.

Taken literally, their speech code eliminates all conversation btw people, except for things like "pass the salt" ... which is probably racist 'cause you're dissing the pepper!

Blogger bob k. mando September 05, 2015 8:13 PM  

8. D. G. D. Davidson September 05, 2015 4:21 PM
answer that you're being criticized for your religious beliefs, which do not allow you to pretend that men are women or vice versa, and get them by their own code.



it's cute that you don't already know how this plays out.

you do that and they're going to say that 'Christians' are a privileged majority and that it is therefore impossible to discriminate against them.

Spike Lee taught me this i don't know how many years ago when he defined racism as something that it was impossible for black people to be ( even Hutu against Tutsi? ). "racism", according to the Holy Word of Spike, requires social power

... of which, blacks supposedly have none

... therefore blacks can be "bigoted" but it is impossible for blacks ( or other designated minority groups ) to be "racist".


the SJWs will define everything in this manner.

it's the primary line of action in DARVO.

which, now that the term has been pointed out, i have been keying on for years. i just wasn't aware that there was a psych term for this common, manipulative, abusive and deceitful behavior.

Anonymous Forrest Bishop VFM #0167 September 05, 2015 8:14 PM  

@97. Russell (106)

"You must address people by the name they give you when not addressing them by their username or handle"

Hi! I'm John-Scalzi-is-a-rapist, pleased to meet you!

Hi, and yourself as well, John-Scalzi-is-a-rapist. My name is SJWs-always-lie; I swear it is.

Anonymous Stuffguy September 05, 2015 8:22 PM  

Food for thought:

http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/04-08-2009/108593-marxism-0/

Anonymous John Wick September 05, 2015 8:24 PM  

This code of conduct is completely fucked. I should be able to make statements like

1. All Christians should be forcibly sterilized to prevent Idiocracy from becoming our future
2. Vox Day is a failed abortion
3. Vox Day should be raped by a gang of rabid dogs
4. Vox Day is beta

Blogger Russell (106) September 05, 2015 8:26 PM  

@100 SJWs-always-lie nice to meet you.

My preferred pronoun is hughschlong, which is of black french jewish arabic origin.

Blogger Student in Blue September 05, 2015 8:30 PM  

@Wyrd

I considered upgrading to the new Code of Conduct version, but y'know... I didn't care.

Blogger pyrrhus September 05, 2015 8:33 PM  

What a bunch of xxxx; glad I'm not working for any corporations any more...

Blogger Student in Blue September 05, 2015 8:38 PM  

@John Wick
I should be able to make statements like[...]

Just adopt the Open Code of Conduct, characterize your opponents as white males (whether true or not), and let the True Justice*™ flow!

(* new packaging, same great hypocrisy!)

Blogger Floyd Looney September 05, 2015 8:40 PM  

These new pronouns and crap remind me of Robespierre and the Reign of Terror more than 20th century communists.

Blogger IM2L844 September 05, 2015 8:40 PM  

@92 "It's a trap. The "reasonable" strictures are the bait."

One they are destined to step in themselves. It's what they do. Their threats of mind rape will not be tolerated lying down.

Blogger Thucydides September 05, 2015 8:41 PM  

Bailing on companies like that and standing together with like minded people to form commercial entities that compete against SJW entries business will work, since the sorts of people who say "F**k this" and leave are most likely the productive ones who actually carry the corporation.

Small and medium companies will suffer first, but even large corporations will feel the effects very quickly when they discover their normal subcontractors are no longer even minimally capable of performing the work.

If you want to preview the end state, read Atlas Shrugged....

Anonymous Anthony September 05, 2015 8:42 PM  

I wonder what should be done to combat this?

A few ideas come to mind:

1. Argue that this type of Code of Conduct is overly long and complex, making it less likely to be actually read and followed than a simpler Code of Conduct would be. Suggest something like "Let's boil this down to 'Everybody has to be civil and respectful to everybody else, which includes addressing other people as they wish to be addressed'."

2. Argue that this Code implicitly *encourages* politicization of discussion, which could distract the Open Source community from its chief coding goals.

3. Appeal to basic fairness, basically an appeal to higher ideals.

4. Black Knight it. For example, an individual posing as a Muslim female might be able to voice complaints that SJWs would find difficult to brush off, and that non-SJWs would get annoyed by. Now it's possible that the SJWs would respond to this by just removing the parts of the code that specifically mention religion, but it could be a bitter pill to swallow for them and it could cause some internal strife.


Personally, I'm skeptical that 2 or 3 will have much success, but 1 or 4 might be worth a shot. I raise all 4 ideas as I'm not that familiar with the Open Source community. I'd like to think that they're mostly logical people that could be swayed by arguments like 2 or 3 above, but the fact this Code of Conduct even exists seems to suggest otherwise.

Anonymous Mike M. September 05, 2015 8:47 PM  

You want a code of conduct? Here it is. The old-timers had this all worked out.

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/6085/6085-h/6085-h.htm

Anonymous SWW September 05, 2015 8:53 PM  

Deliberate “outing” of any aspect of a person’s identity without their consent except as necessary to protect others from intentional abuse

So to protect others, outing someone writes excessively about rape or pedophilia or is convicted of such, is ok, right?...

Anonymous SWW September 05, 2015 8:54 PM  

"who" writes excessively

Anonymous Wyrd September 05, 2015 8:56 PM  

@Wyrd

I considered upgrading to the new Code of Conduct version, but y'know... I didn't care.


COMMON SENSE CODE OF CONDUCT v. 2.1

Go futter yourself.

Anonymous If You Were A User Application, My Love September 05, 2015 9:01 PM  

Student in Blue
I considered upgrading to the new Code of Conduct version, but y'know... I didn't care.

That's a risky upgrade. The new CoC apparently consumes all system resources, crowding out not just user workloads but even O/S; this is due to the CoC demanding ever higher priority. When it crashes, it tends to wipe all memory of its processes.

The CoC upgrade actually looks rather a lot like a virus or some other form of malware.

Blogger D. G. D. Davidson September 05, 2015 9:06 PM  

@99

it's cute that you don't already know how this plays out.

you do that and they're going to say that 'Christians' are a privileged majority and that it is therefore impossible to discriminate against them.


Yes, this occurred to me after I made my comment. I suppose one way around it would be to claim I'm a member of some religion nobody's ever heard of, such as the First Druidical Church of Spaghetti-eating Jedi, Congregationalist, but my actual religion doesn't allow me to do that.

The goal of all of this is to shove Christians out of the public square and, ultimately, into gulags. It will shove other honest people there as well, since anyone of a philosophical bent (that is, anyone who loves truth) will find it intolerably repugnant to treat a kiddy-fiddling eunuch as if he is a woman, but the main target is Christians.

The Church is the conscience of the West, so when Western men hand themselves over to sin, they necessarily hate the Church, which is an external manifestation of that still small voice in their intellects that condemns them for their misdeeds and refuses to shut up. They are so angry at Christians because their consciences torment them.

Anonymous Wyrd September 05, 2015 9:07 PM  

That's a risky upgrade. The new CoC apparently consumes all system resources, crowding out not just user workloads but even O/S; this is due to the CoC demanding ever higher priority. When it crashes, it tends to wipe all memory of its processes.

The CoC upgrade actually looks rather a lot like a virus or some other form of malware.


This "upgrade" is Java! Ewwwww!

Blogger Markku September 05, 2015 9:13 PM  

commit mk82a6dff817ec66f44342007202690a93763949
Author: Markku Koponen
Date: Fri Sep 5 7:57:11 2015 +0200

realized my CoC is too long

Blogger Badmojo September 05, 2015 9:18 PM  

I work in technology and it's shocked me how quickly this has come about. Pre-2012/3, this sort of stuff was unheard of and would have been laughed away. But in the last three years, it's become front and center to the point where it's open warfare.

Unfortunately, I did nothing in the early days to prevent it and now the fight is much harder but it's a fight we MUST have and MUST win.

Blogger Cail Corishev September 05, 2015 9:28 PM  

Why not make your own [Code of Conduct] and offer it up in exchange?

The problem is that normal people don't like dealing with such Codes, and SJWs love it. They'd rather create and enforce codes than anything else that doesn't involve a ball-gag.

So after you, the normal person, create a Code of Conduct for your community, you will go back to work and hope never to hear about it again; but the SJWs will immediately seize on it, start trying to expand and modify it, and pick away at it to find any way they can use it to take over your project.

It's like loading a gun and putting it in your coffee table drawer, even though you know that:

A) You're so forgetful you'll soon forget it's there, and:
B) Your roommate is on parole for shooting his three previous roommates.

Sure, you can keep yourself from getting shot by monitoring the gun at all times, but why load a gun for him in the first place? When you create a Code of Conduct, you're loading that gun, and you're going to have to monitor and defend it to keep SJWs from shooting you with it.

Of course, I'm talking about the standard Code of Conduct that treats everyone like third-graders and tries to make everyone play nice. What some are suggesting here aren't really Codes at all, but Rules. Projects have always had rules, but rules go to specific actions and have specific consequences: Thou shalt not XYZ, and if thou dost, the Judge will act. SJWs -- who hate Rules -- push Codes because by their nature they're exploitable in a way that Rules aren't.

Anonymous Forrest Bishop VFM #0167 September 05, 2015 9:30 PM  

@119. Badmojo
I work in technology and it's shocked me how quickly this has come about. Pre-2012/3, this sort of stuff was unheard of...

It was there at a much lower sound level, going back to the 1970s or even '60s. They had to prepare the ground first. This appears to be the stage where they are openly preparing for war, some say. "They" of course meaning the funders- Soros and the foundations as the most obvious examples- behind the SJWs.

Blogger Dexter September 05, 2015 9:31 PM  

I still don't know WTF "deadnaming" is.

This thing reminds me of Robocop 2, when the evil scientist "open sources" the Robocop rules of engagement by asking the public what Robocop's directives should be, and then includes all of them. Robocop wound up paralyzed by 300 contradictory bullshit directives, and had to reboot himself to get rid of the crazy crap.

Western Civilization needs such a reboot...

Blogger Markku September 05, 2015 9:31 PM  

Deadnaming is calling Bruce Jenner Bruce Jenner.

Anonymous Wyrd September 05, 2015 9:35 PM  

They call me Bruce:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLkC9Bj28So

Blogger GK Chesterton September 05, 2015 9:36 PM  

"perhaps because it might cause an instant backlash"

No because so far it would be massively illegal. If I ever saw that at any firm that I was employed at I would immediately so for discrimination.

"Doesn't that tell you that Ruby on Rails is a programming community for retards and that you can expect lots of SJWs there?"

Hilariously Ruby on Rails is probably the whitest all straight male programming environment in the valley/peninsula. It also means if you are a gal you can get into the group easy because they are desperate to find diversity. It is a great language and platform though.

Blogger GK Chesterton September 05, 2015 9:36 PM  

"perhaps because it might cause an instant backlash"

No because so far it would be massively illegal. If I ever saw that at any firm that I was employed at I would immediately so for discrimination.

"Doesn't that tell you that Ruby on Rails is a programming community for retards and that you can expect lots of SJWs there?"

Hilariously Ruby on Rails is probably the whitest all straight male programming environment in the valley/peninsula. It also means if you are a gal you can get into the group easy because they are desperate to find diversity. It is a great language and platform though.

Anonymous Forrest Bishop VFM #0167 September 05, 2015 9:39 PM  

@119. Badmojo
it's shocked me how quickly this has come about... Unfortunately, I did nothing in the early days to prevent it and now the fight is much harder...

Don't be so hard on yourself. It seemed relatively harmless, then less so, and then less so. It was harder to as do much about it even 10 years ago exactly because it was not as blatant. We also didn't have the weaponry, strategy, tactics, etc., then. So the fight has become easier in some ways. Look how many woke up after Hurricane Hugos* After SJWAL. Both of those thanks to Vox Day, of course. There are others in other areas waking up too.

Anonymous Fp September 05, 2015 9:44 PM  

You can be sure leftard SJWs will suspend all those rules for niggers/mooselimbs.

Blogger David-093 September 05, 2015 10:05 PM  

I used to think Ayn Rand was exaggerating her characters in Atlas Shrugged. I thought, reading it in those halcyon days of 2011, the sniveling, treacherous leftists (the looters) were too unrealistic, that there's no way we'd ever get that insane.

How things have changed in just 4 years. Rand was a prophet, and probably did not make them ridiculous enough.

Blogger Tiny Tim September 05, 2015 10:22 PM  

These perverts nest together in psychological enclaves.

Vox is burning them out.

Quite inspiring.

Blogger Tiny Tim September 05, 2015 10:23 PM  

Vox, a miniature Trump.

Anonymous Giuseppe The Kurgan September 05, 2015 10:31 PM  

Code of Conduct V 0.0
(Please note: This is written in very high level language and compiles fractally and exponentially. Do not be fooled by its apparent brevity)
******
Rule 1: 1+2=3
Rule 2: All flows from rule 1
Rule 3: Those who ignore rule 1 or rule 2 persistently will be shot after the third warning.

********
Note: It makes for a better world.


Anonymous Bill Gates September 05, 2015 10:35 PM  

September 05, 2015 10:31 PM
Code of Conduct V 0.0
(Please note: This is written in very high level language and compiles fractally and exponentially. Do not be fooled by its apparent brevity)
******
Rule 1: 1+2=3
Rule 2: All flows from rule 1
Rule 3: Those who ignore rule 1 or rule 2 persistently will be shot after the third warning.

********
Note: It makes for a better world.


Needs more social justice!

Anonymous TheVillageIdiot(Ret.) September 05, 2015 10:39 PM  

Engineers' Rap by Hard Drive

DannyR

Blogger Student in Blue September 05, 2015 10:54 PM  

Engineers' Rap by Hard Drive

I can't believe this is the first time I've seen this.

Blogger bob k. mando September 05, 2015 10:55 PM  

123. Markku September 05, 2015 9:31 PM
Deadnaming is calling Bruce Jenner Bruce Jenner.



that's fine.

i'll just call him 'Bruce Trans-Jenner' and say that it's an affectionate nickname that i like to refer to him by.

Blogger Markku September 05, 2015 10:55 PM  

Disappointing. From the name of the link, I was expecting something more in this vein

Blogger Markku September 05, 2015 11:00 PM  

more

Anonymous Forrest Bishop VFM #0167 September 05, 2015 11:10 PM  

@103. Russell (106) September 05, 2015 8:26 PM

My preferred pronoun is hughschlong, which is of black french jewish arabic origin.

Any relation to Hugh Jardon? I believe he's French as well.

Anonymous The Open Soros Movement September 05, 2015 11:21 PM  

Spell check is needed in this document, since "open source" clearly is actually "open sores". See how clarifying this is:

Our open sores community prioritizes marginalized people’s safety over privileged people’s comfort.

See? Much more clearer.

Anonymous Forrest Bishop VFM #0167 September 05, 2015 11:36 PM  

@129. David-093
I used to think Ayn Rand was exaggerating her characters in Atlas Shrugged. I thought, reading it in those halcyon days of 2011, the sniveling, treacherous leftists (the looters) were too unrealistic, that there's no way we'd ever get that insane. How things have changed in just 4 years. Rand was a prophet, and probably did not make them ridiculous enough.

Agreed. She lived in the USSR, knew that scene first hand, and could build her characters from it. At the time, Americans hadn't experienced that level of whack. Now of course we've exceeded it, at least in ideation. Now we know first hand how the Bosheviks, the Jacobins, the Khmer Rouge, the Maoists, and the rest of that kind of (proto)Marxian trash could rise to power. You hear me, Sandifer?

Blogger Danby September 05, 2015 11:44 PM  

Code of Conduct for Danby's Open Source Project
1) show us the code
2) you are not required to tel us anything about your race, ethinicity, religion, sexuality, gender identity, pastimes, hobbies, likes, dislikes, turn-ons, family or even your real name in order to contribute to this project. If you bring it up, it is presumed that you want such things to be commented on.
3) you are free to take offense at anything or everything anybody says. Everyone else is free to ignore you.
4) We believe in Free software, Free Speech, and Free Beer.
5) We are not here to welcome you. We are here to write good code. You are exactly as unwelcome as you choose to feel.
6) If you do not like how this project is run, or the people who run it. you are free to fork the code. Good Luck.

Blogger Fatherless September 05, 2015 11:50 PM  

I will set it to music

Blogger Remo - Vile Faceless Minion #99 September 05, 2015 11:51 PM  

I notice that no one attempts to push this agenda in Islamic countries like Iran and for the life of me I can't figure out why. Maybe they have the solution we are missing. "You can't call me 'she' that is a microagression! I DEMAND to be called "Xir" and by not doing so you are violating my personal safe spa-----" sound of knife plunging into neck. Sound of person being dragged to top of building then thrown off. What will they do when the people they are making such demands of stop microagressing and start real honest to GOD genuine aggression? They'll go back into the closet and shut the f*** up or learn to fly that's what.

Anonymous Eric the Red September 05, 2015 11:53 PM  

@142

All good, and I would add...

7) You are expected to be responsible for your own feelings and emotions and your reactions thereof. If you cannot do that, then you are obviously not behaving as an adult and so have no place on this project.

Anonymous Brigadon September 05, 2015 11:56 PM  

The problem is that this code of confuct has been adopted by Github

Which means I am urging all my coder contacts to abandon github

Blogger Danby September 05, 2015 11:58 PM  

Having now seen Markkus version of the code, I admire it for its simplicity, nay, elegance.

Code submission approved.

Anonymous The other robot September 06, 2015 12:00 AM  

So, what we need is an open source project. How about a replacement for Wikipedia?

OpenID malcolmthecynic September 06, 2015 12:02 AM  

I like Danby's version of a code of conduct. You can adapt it for pretty much everything online. Take commenting guidelines for a blog:

1) If you decide that you want to tell us something about yourself, through request or otherwise, you forfeit the right to dictate how we talk about the information

2) Feel free to take offense at anything. We probably won't care.

3) We don't care how welcome we make you feel. If you feel unwelcome, leave.

4) [This one is really only for commenting guidelines] If you lie or sock puppet, you're banned. End of story.

...Workplace code of conducts would be harder, though, thanks to the face to face interaction.

Blogger JWM September 06, 2015 12:23 AM  

I just have a picture of some poor trans-soul sobbing away in a corner...
"What's wrong, Fairy Sparkles?"
"OOOO they- they de de deadnamed me-e-e. waaah"

JWM

Anonymous Rolf September 06, 2015 12:34 AM  

So when you have all your "privilege" officially stripped away, and anyone not a straight white male has the right to make any accusation that is unchallengeable, then....

Wow. Through the looking glass, and beyond. And not in a good way.

Blogger Bard September 06, 2015 12:37 AM  

I am telling you, the transgender entry into the military is the answer to all this nonsense. Pending the rules of implementation, ALL STRAIGHT WHITE males can now declare themselves the newest, latest, greatest. most protected class of minority without having to prove a thing. Think about the black knight possibilities. You can declare yourself to be a transgender lesbian and no one can touch you! Hell, they won't even know how to handle the complaint. Burn it all down.

Blogger Bard September 06, 2015 12:38 AM  

Military provides universal acceptance and ultimate grounds to sow that type of chaos. Already an option in the civilian market.

Blogger Bard September 06, 2015 12:42 AM  

Can't wait to sport my samurai pony tail

Anonymous Forrest Bishop VFM #0167 September 06, 2015 1:01 AM  

@141. Forrest Bishop VFM #0167

@129. David-093
I used to think Ayn Rand was exaggerating her characters in Atlas Shrugged... the sniveling, treacherous leftists (the looters) were too unrealistic, that there's no way we'd ever get that insane. [she] probably did not make them ridiculous enough.

She never came close to this awesome parade of cartoonish characters we see today. They all need necknames. (That started as a typo and I left it alone.)

The Grrm Raper
Scalzi 451
Phil O. Pedifer (New!)

Anonymous Jim Milo September 06, 2015 1:11 AM  

@70

I think you meant 'Open Source Community (Marxist-Leninist)‘

The market for an alternative, bearing in ming Conquest's laws and Vox's tips, exist.

Linus, ESR and other monks might be able to make this happen.

Anonymous Satan's Hamster September 06, 2015 1:14 AM  

@129: Rand grew up in the Soviet Union. She knew these people, and saw what they could do.

The sad part is that so many people refused to believe anyone could really be that bad, so pretty much everything she warned about in 'Atlas Shrugged' has come to pass.

Anonymous Forrest Bishop VFM #0167 September 06, 2015 1:23 AM  

@90. Harsh

There's the best Code of Conduct I've ever seen, maybe the best one possible: No Whiners.

There is an old saying, "neither a borrower nor a lender be".

There is my new saying, "neither a whiner nor a white-knight be".

Those are two different expressions of the same underlying idea.

No Whiners Allowed: No White Knights Allowed.

Anonymous Jim Milo September 06, 2015 1:40 AM  

@110

Matthew 7:12 or Luke 6:31 is faster to write.

Anonymous Jim Milo September 06, 2015 1:45 AM  

@115

That new CoC is a memory ho... er, I mean, memory sus-kin.

Anonymous rubberducky September 06, 2015 1:47 AM  

For the love of God, please make it stop.

What in the world is wrong with people that this madness continues?

How much of a farce and self-reflecting parody does it have to be?

Wake up, humanity.

SHEESH.

Anonymous Jim Milo September 06, 2015 1:55 AM  

@119

But in the last three years, it's become front and center to the point where it's open warfare.

Now that Chelsea is retweeting Sarkeesian, and the fact it started right around when Obama was re-elected, it's clear that my theory was right.

Expanding what counts as 'misogyny' to the ridiculous levels we've seen sets up any answer to Benghazi, Servergate, or any other question about ethics to be 'your harassing me!' when Shillary runs for president.

Also explains why they lost their shit over GamerGate.

Anonymous Jim Milo September 06, 2015 2:06 AM  

@122

Deadnaming is saying you bought a Datsun with your Master Charge, and that you are going to visit Mt. McKinley next year. But your boss at Arthur Andersen may not give you the time off, in which case you might have your Burmese neighbours over for french fries.

That last example is to show that neocons can be idiots too.

Blogger Shimshon September 06, 2015 2:55 AM  

Someone mentioned Bruce Jenner above, so I thought this was an interesting vignette I heard. My friend and neighbor, like me, is from LA. He has a brother still there, who lives in the Burbank/North Hollywood area. He was a large regional park recently (not Griffith Park, can't remember which) and jogging or walking by is Bruce. With a stroller. In the stroller was a dog. Ah, life in LA. Don't remember that scene in the 70s and 80s, but I could see it.

Someone yelled out "Isn't that Caitlyn?" And someone else yelled back (I think it was my friend's brother) "You mean Bruce?" (loudly), at which point it turned and glared for an instant.

Blogger maniacprovost September 06, 2015 3:06 AM  

We need to wear some kind of identifying badge to let people know we're privileged. Maybe a Star of David.

Blogger LP999/S.I.G. Burn'in Up! September 06, 2015 3:17 AM  

What utterly...Nuts.

This is continued proof that no one is allowed to speak, think, have anything, go anywhere or do anything.

All this PC sensitivity nonsense is costly and claims more victims. After all, the sjw or the mentioned above post as described gives way to a notion that some suffer from persecution complexes along with being VERY, very, touchy!

Ah, poor term, Touchy; translation; very sensitive, better off not speaking to the moron at all.

Also have these rule loving, rule worshiping rule makers thought through their stupidity? How will they handle conflict or are they so damaged humans that they cannot process conflict or problems at all.

I suggest these types are the kind of people who stress out about what to wear to the point of obsession as they have nothing else better to do.

Also, who is going to pay for all these plans made by children, err, regressed adults

Blogger LP999/S.I.G. Burn'in Up! September 06, 2015 3:20 AM  

Seriously, who is going to pay the bill for all their nonsense? Is there any way to gauge the IQ of the easily offended or easily hurt? Grow up; this hurts, that hurts, i'sz feelz badz, de broke my whittle rule.

Idiots.

Anonymous dh September 06, 2015 3:53 AM  

I know it's disheartening, but really, the companies and/or projects that go down this road really do fail.

Kodak is a great, great example. This is a company that pioneered gay diversity, trans-friendliness, and HR-run shiny thinking.

It did nothing to save them. They did a bad job engineering new products, bringing them to market, and adapting to digital technology.

In 1988, when Kodak employment was at the peak, it was almost all men, many of Asian descent but mostly white men, in Upstate New York and other white areas.

In 1992, Kodak began an extensive diversity program, hiring a VP for diversity (it has been renamed many times, but it still exists, with whats left in the rubble).

In 1996, they started participating in a "National Coming Out Day". They achieved a perfect score from many gay and lesbian groups regarding their policies towards sexual minorities.

In 1999, their stock reached it's all time high.

In 2009, they had cut from about 58,000 employees to 10,000. In 2010, they won over 40 awards for diversity and gay acceptance.

In 2011, there revenue was 24% of it's peak.

In 2012, they went into Chapter 11, and over the next two years, cut another 2500 employees, and were forced to sell off dozens of business units. They emerged in 2014 with 6,100 employees.

Today, they are worth about $4B. Inflation adjusted, their peak value was around $55B. They are on track for eventual liquidation right now, with an unbroken string of failing quarters since leaving bankruptcy protection. Last financials shows $4B in revenue, with an operating loss of around $700 million. They are desperately seeking new businesses to get into, most recently trying to create an Android based smartphone. They are negotiating with movie studios to retain film based movie options for distribution through 2020, but so far no deals have been signed.

Their current CEO is closely affiliated with Blackstone Group, a private equity firm known to do reverse offerings, where public companies go private, are chopped up, and sold for assets and cash to reward investors.

In the 1990's, instead of focusing on the next thing, Kodak doubled down on film and diversity. When they should have been improving their film business to counter low cost film from Fuji, and building the next and next gen products, they got in bed with gay groups.

In the late 1980's their scientists invented and patented several core technologies that are in use in virtually all cell phones, all devices with digital cameras, batteries, optical processing, data storage, compression, color correction, even laser signal processing. They invented reduced cost film manufacturing techniques that they immediately sat on to preserve short-term profits. In the end all that R&D and engineering work was sold to Apple & Google for $527 million, at auction, during bankruptcy, closing any IP claims Kodak ever had against the two smart phone giants. Well managed and properly used, analysts at the time predicted the portfolio was the most valuable of any company on Earth. Some speculation put it's value at $100B.

The " Winning & Inclusive Culture" manifesto that they spent millions developing was valued at $1 for purposes of the bankruptcy court.

Blogger Danby September 06, 2015 4:21 AM  

@dh,
My former employer, Xerox is on a similar glide path, thanks to their CEO, the vibrant Ursula Burns.
They burned $3B over the last 3 years, and sold of the one money making part of the company this summer.

Blogger maniacprovost September 06, 2015 4:29 AM  

The " Winning & Inclusive Culture" manifesto that they spent millions developing was valued at $1 for purposes of the bankruptcy court.

Whoever bought it got ripped off.

I'm glad that although I work for the most dysfunctional company in our sector, we're too disorganized and unprofessional to be politically correct.

Anonymous Bz September 06, 2015 4:29 AM  

I refuse to learn what 'deadnaming' is; I will however see the use of SJW jargon as another red flag when hiring. For the rest of us all ... please don't encourage them.

Anonymous Bz September 06, 2015 4:31 AM  

"CEO, the vibrant Ursula Burns."

Didn't she get married to Bob Down, taking the name Burns-Down?

Anonymous Bz September 06, 2015 4:35 AM  

Also, I assume we all by now can see that the Github Code of Conduct is rhetoric, not dialectic. Proceed accordingly.

Blogger maniacprovost September 06, 2015 4:40 AM  

From the FAQs:

Q: What is "misgendering?"
A: Misgendering is intentionally or unintentionally using the incorrect gender pronouns for a person. For example, if someone has a penis, and you refer to him as "she," that is Misgendering.

Q: What about "deadnaming?"
A: People change their names for many reasons: Witness protection, becoming a pornstar, or disassociating with their old identity, typically when they come out of the closet and move to L.A. "Deadnaming" is using the old, obsolete name for a person.

OpenID bc64a9f8-765e-11e3-8683-000bcdcb2996 September 06, 2015 5:06 AM  

I don't get it!
Certified member: Open+Code+of+Conduct community, DENIED
According to Wikipedia.... DENIED
Latest humanities studies show.... DENIED

Code Duello ACCEPTED
Mindful that circumstantial possession does not PROVE usage,
They shall be known by the company they keep.
Recommended: Siege. AKA Political Science (sic) and Economics(sic) BD&S
CaptDMO

Anonymous A September 06, 2015 5:17 AM  

John Scalzi likes codes of conduct:

http://www.metafilter.com/152693/You-literally-cannot-pay-me-to-speak-without-a-Code-of-Conduct#6192942

A conference whose organizer literally refuses to have a code of conduct/harassment policy is one I wouldn't even consider being an attendee at, much less a speaker.
posted by jscalzi at 8:35 AM on September 3 [103 favorites]

Blogger Feather Blade September 06, 2015 5:43 AM  

Q: What about "deadnaming?"
A: People change their names for many reasons: Witness protection, becoming a pornstar, or disassociating with their old identity, typically when they come out of the closet and move to L.A. "Deadnaming" is using the old, obsolete name for a person.


Do they consider their previous identity to be deceased?

If so, would those who voluntarily change their name for non-crime-related purposes be considered murders or suicides?

Blogger Thordaddy September 06, 2015 6:45 AM  

This is dyke movement...

Blogger Cail Corishev September 06, 2015 7:58 AM  

No Whiners Allowed: No White Knights Allowed.

That's a good point, especially in this context of open source software projects. As soon as you say "No thanks" to whatever the SJW wants, a bunch of the other contributors will ride forth to compete at being more sensitive and progressive than the next guy -- especially if it's a female, which it usually is. It would be easy enough to ignore or slap down the SJW, if it weren't for those guys reflexively defending her in hopes that someday, somewhere, some woman will appreciate them for it.

I guess that means whatever rules we create to keep SJWs out of an organization, they need to specifically ban white-knighting somehow. Make SJW entryists stand on their own, and they won't have much chance.

Blogger Danby September 06, 2015 10:22 AM  

Y'know, if it take sustained and persistent lying by EVERY damn person in your vicinity to make you capable of coping with the world, maybe you're too mentally ill to be out in public. Your game of make-believe is not my moral quandry.

Blogger Were-Puppy September 06, 2015 10:27 AM  

I believe I have found a role model who violates almost all of the CoC points within the space of 2 or 3 minutes.
Everywhere I go, I violate a CoC

Anonymous The other robot September 06, 2015 10:46 AM  

The " Winning & Inclusive Culture" manifesto that they spent millions developing was valued at $1 for purposes of the bankruptcy court.

If you want to destroy your opposition, get them to engage in a Code of Conduct arms race ...

I see a lot of tech firms in San Francisco and the Bay Area getting heavily involved in Women in Tech despite the fact that women must be a net drain on those companies.

Are they simply trying to attract more make engineers?

Anonymous Forrest Bishop VFM #0167 September 06, 2015 11:19 AM  

@164. dh

I know it's disheartening, but really, the companies and/or projects that go down this road really do fail.

Kodak is a great, great example. This is a company that pioneered gay diversity, trans-friendliness, and HR-run shiny thinking.


Thank you, dh. Fantastic story and a metaphor for the entirety of Western Civilization.


@172. A

John Scalzi likes codes of conduct:

Then he should be provided with one, custom tailored just for 'him', sort of like a bill of pains & penalties. Load him up with conditions, make his personalized CoC follow him around.


@175. Cail Corishev

"No Whiners Allowed: No White Knights Allowed."

That's a good point,... I guess that means whatever rules we create to keep SJWs out of an organization, they need to specifically ban white-knighting somehow. Make SJW entryists stand on their own, and they won't have much chance.

It might be a conceptual breakthrough. "White knight" isn't exactly the right term, too exclusive. One method of subduing or eradicating an organism is to restrict its nutrient supply. Shine the spotlight on the white knight. Load him/her up with whiner rescue missions. Make him devote his own resources to the rescue. Remove the incentive for vicarious generosity.

Blogger Groot September 06, 2015 2:40 PM  

"Unwelcome comments regarding a person’s lifestyle choices and practices, including those related to ... drugs"

As a boss or fellow employee, you are not allowed to make comments about their obvious drug use?

"Deliberate misgendering."

This is what they do, isn't -- what is Jenner now but misgendered?

"You must address people by the name they give you"

Oh, please, make this the rule. What fun!

@164. dh:

That was very interesting and nicely detailed.

@165. Danby:

Google first hit from "CEO, the vibrant Ursula Burns":
"As I've progressed in my career, I've come to appreciate — and really value — the other attributes that define a company's success beyond the P&L"

Bwahaha!

175. Cail Corishev:
Re: "No Whiners Allowed: No White Knights Allowed."

If you associate White Kighting with creepy desperation, via some cultural story-telling by your carefully-chosen leads to newbies, then people will feel at least sheepish about White-Knighting. Yet, your leads can still slap down actual abusive bullshit. There needs to be a distinction, as some things are beyond limits, maybe unwritten, like "Don't be an abusive idiot."

We need more brilliant weapons, like "SJW." There is a need for rules, like the "Rules of the blog" here, or @142. Danby's rules. However, there is a threshold, when you cross into something like

"Code of Conduct Cuck"

or whatever can resonate.

Blogger D. G. D. Davidson September 06, 2015 2:45 PM  

@160

... at which point it turned and glared for an instant.

The dog?

Blogger Dexter September 06, 2015 2:48 PM  

(sigh) Wouldn't it be great if "deadnaming" was the crime of referring to SJWs who had been put in front of a firing squad or deported to Arctic labor camps...

Blogger Badmojo September 06, 2015 3:01 PM  


@142 Danby, I may have to include that in my open source projects. Bookmarked. :)

Anonymous Tom Petty September 06, 2015 4:53 PM  

You don't have to live like a refugee...

Blogger James Dixon September 06, 2015 5:20 PM  

> Are they simply trying to attract more make engineers?

China does it right.

https://www.facebook.com/trendinginchina/photos/pcb.603461796423974/603459879757499/?type=1&theater

Ping pong, huh. If they say so.

Blogger VFM bot #188 September 06, 2015 5:58 PM  

How about our own "code of conduct" that explicitly rejects each of their lunges for power, substituting freedom of thought, word, and deed? It could also include traditional rules of civilization that disqualify SJW's, such as Don't be a liar, Don't be motivated by envy, Don't be a thief, etc. It could be called "The American Rules of Conduct" or "The Western Civ Code of Conduct".

Hmmm. Could be fun, an explicitly sane response to attempted SJW thought-control. Anyone interested in working on it?

Blogger James Dixon September 06, 2015 6:31 PM  

Hmm. Yet another example of rules for thee but not for me by the SJW's: http://www.fox23.com/news/news/national/new-ad-campaign-fat-shames-chipotle/nnY8w/?icmp=cmgcontent_internallink_relatedcontent_2014_partners1

Blogger Sir Wulf September 06, 2015 11:20 PM  

I have always argued in favor of practicing generous, tolerant courtesy, It generally costs me nothing to indulge somebody's quirks, even if they prove to be an odd character. Unfortunately, more and more often I've seen expectations of courtesy turned into a weapon, as SJWs commit gross violations of civil behavior, then expect the issue to be dropped because I'm allegedly "privileged". Even worse, such offenders feel free to ignore gentle, tactful attempts to address issues, but then turn and accuse their enemies of "sealioning" them if the issue is not dropped.

I fear for our future.

Blogger Chris Nelson September 07, 2015 12:21 AM  

The fact there is a need for a Code of Conduct with such details is crazy. In the past we were courteous and professional. (There's also a few arseholes that need to be dealt with, but that's life.) The fact that a SJW non-coder at a Python conference ended up getting 3 people fired for bullshit and the fallout from that caused the CoC madness. In our local programming group, the attendance got split by gender even though we were very inclusive and sensitive. It put the brakes on a good dynamical and good people left to do their own thing.

In the best of the code world only two things matter, can you code/learn and can you work well with others. We don't bring up outside issues like religion and politics because they are usually unnecessary and disruptive. No one cares about social or gender games. Good coders came in all sorts. Injecting PC and SJW in the mix doesn't help. It isolates communities and individuals. It sends mixed signals. It breaks down communications.

Anonymous BGS September 07, 2015 6:05 PM  

@119. Badmojo it's shocked me how quickly this has come about... Unfortunately, I did nothing in the early days to prevent it and now the fight is much harder

Don't be too hard on yourself I went to a gay youth conference in DC, partially funded by taxpayers and I didn't think gay marriage would pass in my lifetime. Of course out of the thousands there I was probably the only one that thought I would be on the paying side of alimony if it happened. I also had the badthink to stand up and say that the streets will never be safe for Ambulance Crew which I was, so the idea of advocating making the streets safe for sex workers would not be possible.

http://www.metafilter.com/152693/You-literally-cannot-pay-me-to-speak-without-a-Code-of-Conduct#6192942

I looked there to see if my post made it past moderation. It seems the only post that didn't validate the skank was if the following was sarcasm "Outline a few basic principles ("build cool stuff") and hire the right people, and everyone figures things out for themselves. And if most or all of the "right people" end up being white and male, remind yourself it's a meritocracy!"

If someone tries to ding you for "misgendering"

I thought you where just an Ugly __________ my love. The hugo award winning tale of deadnaming.

This is like something a group of mean girls would come up with to torment the 80% of boys they don't like

Even a gay Hispanic nurse with a masters degree will not be more emotionally advanced than a middle school girl.

"Deadnaming," huh? These people would piss me off less if they'd stop making up new words every week

Most times I have to look up a word I see here it makes me smarter.

Deliberate “outing” of any aspect of a person’s identity without their consent except as necessary to protect others from intentional abuse

How are you supposed to know they need their hand held and cant take constructive criticism if they are not outed?

Anyone tries to impose ANY of that shit on me I will unzip and start pissing on their shoes and work my way up them.

I hear Kanye West pays people money to do that.

The first thing we had to endure was the noxious video Blue Eyes Brown Eyes featuring the even more noxious Jane Elliott.

Blue eyes give you better night vision. I know of no advantage of having brown eyes.

Black Knight it. For example, an individual posing as a Muslim female might be able to voice complaints that SJWs

They will simply ban "uncle toms" that have badthink. You would think a gay guy linking black & moslem crimes against gays wouldn't get banned quickly from a gay site.

This is dyke movement Arctype jewish lesbian gatekeeper.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts