ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Thursday, October 22, 2015

The disorder of the counterfeit virtues

Edward Feser explains how substituting social justice ideals for the cardinal virtues necessarily disorders both SJW minds and society:
Let’s consider the fate of the cardinal virtues in a modern democratic society.  The words “wisdom,” “courage,” “moderation,” and “justice” are certainly not absent in such societies.  To some extent the content of the traditional virtues is even respected -- democratic citizens will approve of the courage they read about in military history or see portrayed in movies like Saving Private Ryan, will commend moderation where overindulgence might affect bodily health, and so forth.

But much more prominent than the cardinal virtues -- and to a large extent coloring the conception democratic man has of the content of the cardinal virtues -- are certain other character traits, such as open-mindedness, empathy, tolerance, and fairness.  The list will be familiar, since the language of these “virtues” permeates contemporary pop culture and politics, and it can be said to constitute a kind of counterpoint to the traditional cardinal virtues.  And in each case the counter-virtue entails a turn of just the sort one might expect given Plato’s analysis of democracy -- from the objective to the subjective, from a focus on the way things actually are to a focus on the way one believes or desires them to be.

Hence wisdom, as a Plato or Aquinas conceives of it, is outward-oriented, involving a grasp of objective truth in the speculative and practical spheres.  Open-mindedness, by contrast, is oriented inwardly, toward the subjective, concerned not with objective reality itself so much as with a willingness to consider alternative views about objective reality.

Courage has to do with the will to do what one ought to do in the face of danger or difficulty.  The courageous man will do his duty even though he is afraid or feels uncomfortable or put upon, and we praise him precisely for ignoring these subjective feelings.  Empathy, by contrast, involves precisely a focus on such feelings -- indeed, even to the point of sympathizing with the one who has failed to be courageous.  Courage says: “Yes, it was difficult; but you should have done it anyway.”  Empathy says: “I understand why you didn’t do it; it was so difficult!”

Similarly, moderation tells us that we sometimes need to refrain from indulging our appetites, in some cases even when we have an extremely powerful desire to indulge them.  Tolerance, by contrast, refuses to condemn such indulgence.  Toleration works in tandem with empathy, as moderation works together with courage.  Just as courage is reason’s ally in keeping the appetites at bay -- it reminds us that it is weak and shameful to indulge when reason says we shouldn’t -- so too is empathy the ally of the appetitive part of the soul in its war with reason, giving it permission to indulge and to ignore what unkind, unfeeling reason is saying.  Courage and moderation command: “You’re a human being!  Don’t act like animal!”  Empathy and toleration respond: “We understand, go ahead, you’re just an animal anyway!” 

Finally, whereas justice requires us to conform our desires to the order of things, fairness commands the order of things to conform itself to our desires.  Justice says: “John is richer than you are and Paul has more authority.  But that is as it should be, since John worked harder and Paul is wiser.”  Fairness says: “John is richer than you are and Paul has more authority.  That’s not fair!”  Justice treats equals equally and unequals unequally.  Fairness treats everyone equally; or rather, it treats everyone the way the one shouting “Unfairness!” thinks they should be treated.

Now, all of that makes the counter-virtues in question sound pretty bad -- or it should make them sound bad, anyway -- but I hasten to add that none of this entails that there is nothing of value in open-mindedness, empathy, tolerance, and fairness.  Far from it.  The objective truth at which wisdom aims is not all built into us and it is not all obvious; it needs to be acquired through hard work.  Open-mindedness facilitates that.  Realistically inculcating the virtues, including courage, requires an understanding of actual human circumstances, including human weaknesses.  That requires empathy.  The road to virtue is, given human weakness, inevitably paved with repeated failures to live up to it.  Tolerance of these failures (albeit not approval of them) is, accordingly, no less necessary to the realistic inculcation of virtue than empathy is.  And some inequalities really are rightly decried as unfair insofar as they arise from injustice.  (John might be richer than you because he is more hard-working.  But it might instead be because he is a thief or a fraudster or someone who knows how to game the system.)

So, there can be real value in open-mindedness, empathy, tolerance, and fairness, and a wise man will acknowledge this.  But it is crucial to see that their value is instrumental.  They are of secondary value, of significance precisely insofar as they facilitate the acquisition of wisdom, courage, moderation, and justice.  A soul which strives primarily to acquire those traditional cardinal virtues, even while acknowledging the value within limits of open-mindedness, empathy, tolerance, and fairness in the process of acquiring them, is rightly ordered.  But a soul which primarily values open-mindedness, empathy, tolerance, and fairness, and either rejects the traditional cardinal virtues or relegates them to second place, is disordered.
Dr. Feser is more measured than I am. I believe we can confidently declare Equality, Diversity, and Tolerance to be evil, because we can judge them by their fruits. And their fruits are nightmarish and societally destructive.

Labels: ,

48 Comments:

Blogger Josh October 22, 2015 12:00 PM  

South Park's latest episode, "safe space" is just astounding.

Y'all need to watch it.

Blogger Stilicho #0066 October 22, 2015 12:23 PM  

Even if we accept, for the sake of argument, the SJW'S assertion that those secondary tools/methods ARE their "principles" it is still an evil philosophy precisely because it elevates means above ends and thereby claims the ends don't matter as long as you get there using the subjective measures of which SJW'S approve. In short, they are claiming that if it makes you FEEL good, then it IS good. No wonder they consistently achieve an evil result.

OpenID malcolmthecynic October 22, 2015 12:27 PM  

Once again, Dr. Feser's article is simply outstanding.

Blogger slarrow October 22, 2015 12:42 PM  

Dr. Feser is dialectically correct. Vox is rhetorically correct.

Blogger HardReturn¶ October 22, 2015 12:49 PM  

Cardinal virtues are quaint and declasse in a society circling the drain where subjectivity reigns and it all depends on what the meaning of "is" is. David Josiah Brewer, U.S. Supreme Court Justice more than a century ago, said: “For it is written by the finger of the Almighty in the everlasting tablets of the Universe that no nation can endure and prosper into and through whose life does not run the golden thread of equal, exact, and universal justice.” (from Encyclopedia of Religious Quotations, p. 261)… equal, exact, and universal justice… not social justice. Not one set of rules for Group A and another for Group B, with Lady Justice peeking from under her blindfold to ascertain if one side is Officially Aggrieved or the other is Authorized Victim.

Blogger ZhukovG October 22, 2015 12:49 PM  

I would say that Equality, Diversity and Tolerance are not evil. I base that assertion on the fact that while SJW's use these words in practice they, along with everything else they touch, pervert them.

Equality = Repression of Straight European Males.
Diversity = Everyone Who Thinks Like Me. Christians Require Reeducation.
Tolerance = Approve and Applaud Every Perversion.




OpenID Steve October 22, 2015 12:51 PM  

Someone should explain to him that those are not the definitions open-mindedness, empathy, tolerance, and fairness. We have had presidents that didn't know what the meaning of IS IS or the meaning of IS IS in ISIS.

Blogger Rabbi B October 22, 2015 1:07 PM  

"Open-mindedness, by contrast, is oriented inwardly, toward the subjective, concerned not with objective reality itself so much as with a willingness to consider alternative views about objective reality."

“You shall not at all do as we are doing here today—every man doing whatever is right in his own eyes—In those days there was no king in Israel; everyone did what was right in his own eyes." (cf. Deuteronomy 12 and Judges 17)

Disorder indeed. As long as people are determined to reject 'G-d on the outside' so they can worship 'god on the inside' as they understand him, the result will be nothing less than a society that ceases to be wise and ceases to do what is good and right. G-d is the measure of all things, not man.

Every way of a man is right in his own eyes, but the Lord weighs the hearts. To do righteousness and justice is more acceptable to the L-rd than sacrifice. (cf. Proverbs 21)

Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil;
Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness;
Who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes,
And prudent in their own sight!

(cf. Isaiah 5)

Blogger glad2meetyou October 22, 2015 1:38 PM  

@6

I agree. Judging equality, tolerance, and diversity on their fruits is problematic because the objective of SJWs includes none of those. SJWs don't believe in or live by these virtues.

Blogger Steve, the Dark Ninja of Mockery October 22, 2015 1:44 PM  

Well, that's too abstract for Steve. I'm thinking Who? Whom? about some real life living, butter huffing, actual SJW's.

Namely, the SFWA Board. Would You Bang?

Cat Rambo, President.
Plus points: President Rambo has an awesome name, like the female version of Jake Rapeface or Chester Ironballs.
Minus points: looks rougher than Egyptian whisky. Or a 50-something German prossie at 4am.
Rating: 3/10 WNB.

MCA Hogarth, Vice President
Plus points: not fat or old. Bewbs.
Minus points: looks a bit like McLovin.
Rating: 6/10 WB

Sarah Pinsker, Director
Plus points: own hair and teeth.
Minus points: pretty sure she used to be a man.
Rating: 4/10 WNB

Lee Martindale, Director
Plus points: Buffet-finding skills.
Minus points: Handicapable. Pubic fright wig.
Rating: Ha ha! No.

Blogger VD October 22, 2015 1:47 PM  

I agree. Judging equality, tolerance, and diversity on their fruits is problematic because the objective of SJWs includes none of those. SJWs don't believe in or live by these virtues.

And if only Communism was done right.... You've gotten it backwards. SJWs aren't pursuing those ideals wrong, they are the CONSEQUENCE of pursuing those ideals.

Blogger BassmanCO October 22, 2015 1:52 PM  

@10

You are a cruelty artist, sir.

Never change.

Blogger SirHamster October 22, 2015 2:01 PM  

I agree. Judging equality, tolerance, and diversity on their fruits is problematic because the objective of SJWs includes none of those. SJWs don't believe in or live by these virtues.

Are we judging "equality, tolerance, and diversity", or "Equality, Tolerance, and Diversity"?

Those are not necessarily the same thing, and I think that difference already captures the nuance you wish to point out.

Blogger Michael O'Duibhir October 22, 2015 2:19 PM  

"So, there can be real value in open-mindedness..."

Depends on what one means by "open-mindedness." If it means placing objective truth in the dock then it's a crock.
"Dr. Feser is more measured than I am."

Dr. Feser is an adherent of the Vatican II religion, if that tells anyone anything. But he's nevertheless usually spot on in his arguments.

Blogger ScuzzaMan October 22, 2015 2:33 PM  

"Dr. Feser is more measured than I am. I believe we can confidently declare Equality, Diversity, and Tolerance to be evil, because we can judge them by their fruits. And their fruits are nightmarish and societally destructive."

I'm not so sure that he is any different. A "disordered soul" might be a very polite euphemism in his circles, but there's only one fundamental moral dichotomy, and his calling it "ordered soul" and "disordered soul" isn't really different from calling it Good and Evil.

The real distinction in your statement and his is that he says the fruits we see are the results of putting the secondary-but-good things in first place, while you hold (pursuit of?) those things to be evil in and of themselves.

I tried to put this in a biblical context to see how it shakes out. "Thou shalt have no other gods before me" might imply that having other gods after God might be copacetic, except .... there ARE no other gods, so having them is lying to ourselves, hence necessarily evil.

So, by the end of my comment, I agree with you.

Blogger Were-Puppy October 22, 2015 2:39 PM  

@10 Steve, the Dark Ninja of Mockery

Chester Ironballs.
---

And now for an intermission.

Blogger Joshua Sinistar October 22, 2015 2:52 PM  

The problem with the lowest common denominator is its too damn low. When everyone succeeds the only winners are the ones who didn't try hard. When everyone is entitled to their needs, they just focus all their attentions on their wants. When everything is free the only way to get anything is with force and violence. The difference between socialism and anarchy is a police state. Support your local sheriff boys.

Blogger DadOfTen October 22, 2015 2:52 PM  

I just saw a picture in my mind of someone who gave up smoking 6 months ago. They are a rabid anti-smoking zealot. Of course everyone else ought to be too. Not only that, but now that they have such virtue, they will tell everyone else why white bread and meat will kill them. They think we should outlaw sugary drinks. The self righteousness multiplies as they figure that they can fix the world because of their virtue. Did I forget to mention that they also are pedophiles, steal money from little old ladies, and beat their kids regularly?

Blogger Geoff October 22, 2015 2:55 PM  

Steve, normally a 6 would be a WNB. But I agree with your assessment in this case.

Blogger ZhukovG October 22, 2015 3:06 PM  

@11. VD

But Vox, (With all due respect to your Dark Lordship) I would argue that this very blog is a veritable haven for all three of these very subjective virtues.

Equality = Each poster is equally vulnerable to having their ideas mangled ruthlessly and are free to fire away others.

Diversity = This is by far one of the most diverse blogging communities I have ever seen. Every thing from the fringe to the mainstream is here...

because....

Tolerance = You will let just about anyone, who doesn't go completely insane, give their opinion, even if only for 'chew toy' value.

I do agree that when SJWs pursue these virtues nothing but evil is the result, but that is because of SJWs. Everything they do is evil and perverse. They destroy and build nothing.

Blogger Jay Lucas October 22, 2015 3:17 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

OpenID thenoisyrogue October 22, 2015 3:26 PM  

I agree with this but I think the writer needs to swap empathy for sympathy. Empathy is a rare gift and I've met very women who are empathetic. If all these SJWs running around were actually possessed of the trait empathy we may not be having as many problems with them as we are.

Blogger Desiderius October 22, 2015 3:33 PM  

"Depends on what one means by 'open-mindedness.'"

A mind is like a parachute, if it's open all the time it's a real drag. To perform its proper function, it needs to open when called upon to do so, but it spends the vast majority of its life closed.

Blogger Desiderius October 22, 2015 3:34 PM  

"I agree with this but I think the writer needs to swap empathy for sympathy."

Yeah, sympathy is from to Greek for "suffer with." The sheltered lives led by SJWs preclude them from the capacity to do so.

Blogger Desiderius October 22, 2015 3:37 PM  

"SJWs aren't pursuing those ideals wrong, they are the CONSEQUENCE of pursuing those ideals."

As ideals instead of means. Guns don't kill people, people kill people.

In the case of SJWs, distinction without much difference though, granted.

OpenID Steve October 22, 2015 3:48 PM  

Empathy is a rare gift and I've met very women who are empathetic.

Keep in mind what women call empathy is what Anna Stublefield used when she knew DJ wanted her to take off his diaper and give him a BJ from yesterdays story.

Blogger Jeff Y October 22, 2015 4:06 PM  

Harrison Bergeron. End game.

Blogger Tom Terrific October 22, 2015 5:10 PM  

And SJW won't listen to dialectic so we must pummel them with rhetoric.

The goals? To cause BadFeelz, ButtHurts, BrainPains.

The tools: Mockery and Contempt.

Blogger Tom Terrific October 22, 2015 5:12 PM  

And SJW won't listen to dialectic so we must pummel them with rhetoric.

The goals? To cause BadFeelz, ButtHurts, BrainPains.

The tools: Mockery and Contempt.

Blogger vashine October 22, 2015 5:21 PM  

Just another reason why I jumped the Protestant ship and went Orthodox Catholic. There are plenty of shitlib priests (and one Pope) in the Church, but when it comes to official dogma, the Catechism, the Church Fathers, and apostolic interpretation of Scripture... Rome has it right, despite all the priests, bishops, cardinals, or even "Catholic" laymen who want you to think otherwise.

Christianity is NOT a tolerant religion. Not tolerant of evil or heresy. Not tolerant of humanistic, evil notions of 'equality' and 'diversity'. God's Law. His Virtues and His morality.

We need to get our Crusader-Conquistador moxie back. Now.

Blogger Arborist (#0232) October 22, 2015 7:03 PM  

Excellent writing, excellent curating. God bless you Vox Day.

Blogger Gaza October 22, 2015 8:05 PM  

I am half-way through "The Intolerance of Tolerance" by D.A. Carson. He follows a similar tack in drawing out the evil consequences of pursuing such ideals (Tolerance) but instead of a first-order (virtues) vs second order (character traits / SJ ideals) inversion he focuses more on what he calls the "old" [based on objective Truth] definition of Tolerance with the "new" [based on relative, equalist notions of truth] as part of the over-arching inversions of the heirarchy of moral virtues, i.e. the supreme virtue of tolerance is supplanted by the supreme sin of intolerance, thus the operating condition of the virtue of tolerance is no longer the necessity of practicing tolerance from a position of truth but rather the necessity of practicing tolerance from a position of sameness/equality.

The social primacy of equalism destroys Truth and so it becomes that "we must be tolerant, not because we cannot distinguish the right path from the wrong path, but because all paths are equally right."

The consequences become evil if the hierarchy/order of pursuit is altered but the same can result if the essences of those pursuits are gutted of their meaning through the demonic possession of the SJW semantics.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother October 22, 2015 10:10 PM  

Ah, Bernadette Peters. What a great piece of ass.

Blogger automatthew October 22, 2015 10:19 PM  

Empathy is the ability, for good or for evil, to viscerally comprehend the passions of others.

Sympathy is the shallow, narcissistic assessment of what others would feel like if they were you.

OpenID tz October 22, 2015 10:25 PM  

Equality, diversity, and tolerance aren't intrinsically evil, and in context good

Equality, "before the law", or opportunity is foundational.

Diversity allows all things - but SORTS justly - some are lesser, some are greater.

Tolerance doesn't call the police to the crazy (socialist, SJW) uncle, but might turn in his gun. Won't happen here, mainly because there are no socialists or SJWs, or those who come close are looked upon as crazy, and "Molon Labe" tends to be personal rather than collective. I'm waiting for a gun-control SJW to be given the cowboy boot into a geyser while someone says "This. Is. Wyoming!".

Blogger automatthew October 22, 2015 10:26 PM  

Bernadette Peters. What a great piece of ass.

Bernadette Peters is Madeline Kahn's Erika Christensen.

Blogger Phillip George October 22, 2015 10:37 PM  

Let God be true and every man a liar.

That's just one way I know Vox is on the money with SJWs always lie.
The above article is a good exercise in logic, reasoning, but, cut to the chase again.
You know stuff because of language. "We communicate therefore we are" [the improvement on Descartes] The Godel Incompleteness, Fitch Paradox, linguistic empiricism corollary is that Jesus is who He said He is.

Circumvent the heart ache, Cut at the Jugular artery rather and carotid vein. The other way of saying the astronaut depressurizes the capsule and gets a real whiff of space.

OpenID Jack Amok October 22, 2015 10:44 PM  

The bit is getting flipped on this. The NorCal town I grew up in was so hippy-dippy leftwing, it's the place you'd move to if San Francisco was just too damn conservative for you.

They have a huge homeless problem now of course. Well, let's be clear - they have a bum problem. A vagrant problem. A problem with nut-cases and drug addicts. Groups have began protesting recently and they're being called names by the SJWs.

They don't care. "The time for being nice has passed" and "Fuck being politically correct it's fucking ruining our country" are what they're are saying when the SJWs try to shut them up.

But they're doing things too. A mentally deranged bum was pepper-sprayed and his camp burned. He left town. People noticed it worked. I think it will happen more often.

Blogger Phillip George October 22, 2015 10:47 PM  

oops, carotid artery.

Blogger Groot October 22, 2015 11:04 PM  

First, Stevil, you are genius. I always enjoy your posts. Cheers! (Kippis!)

Second, women easily go to Mommy mode, because women. They know best, be obedient, be careful, SJW, duh.

Third, you are the Daddy. If they Mommy you, you are an idiot. Yeah, wearing the diapers and everything.

Being scared of women is like being scared of dandelions. WTF is the matter with you? They are nice, they give blow jobs, they crave your approval, they apologize reflexively, they mother your children, they are awesome. They have boobies. Awesome!

If men try to Mommy you, you give them the Vox Day treatment: Mockery, Scalzify them, flay them alive. Ha! What fun.

Blogger Joshua Sinistar October 23, 2015 12:01 AM  

If tolerance is a virtue then cowards must be heroes because they are willing to tolerate anything that doesn't kill them. Why would anyone want tolerance for anything but pain? Pain is a fact of life, but nothing good needs to be tolerated. Tolerance is the excuse of cowards who want the secret police arrest the dissidents. Open minded should have limits also. Are you willing to suffer fools? Are you willing to listen to lies because someone believes them? Relativity is great for Physics but bad for culture. Standards are what make life liveable and laws enforceable. When anything is permitted, the strong survive and the weak serve them or die. I doubt these professional victims who appeal for sympathy are willing to live by the Natural Selection their fake Darwinistic Atheism implies. If they were really True Believers of Natural Selection, they would be eugenicists opposing all charity and welfare and forcing people to work or die. Their Humanism is a fake and phony substitute for Christianity whose morality conflicts with their degenerate lifestyles. Instead of Adam and Eve, their Garden of Eden is full of noble savages who run about naked living in harmony with some Anthropomorphic Nature Goddess invented by Madison Avenue to sell dishwashing detergent and feminine hygiene products. Their creationism is as unintelligent as they are, with blundering accidents and unintended consequences. Socrates and Plato would grab torches and burn down what passes for academia today. They have worse logic than Star Trek geeks who dress in cosplay as Spock or that hot Vulcan woman who can't seem to keep her uniform on.

Blogger ray October 23, 2015 12:02 AM  

#8 -- Exactly. All applicable along with 'lovers of themselves' and mucho mas.

Christ went over this too -- the convenient rebellion of rejecting Scripture as guide for one's own conscie . . . uh will. He said folks would do whatever they wanted to him and his servants. Well they would until they couldn't anyway.

The People is a convenient fiction for stronger and older powers. I'm well aware I don't even know what's best for myself.

Blogger Joshua Sinistar October 23, 2015 12:36 AM  

People should trust in God but be wary of people. Altruism is easy for Deities for they have no need of you, but even the Saints did not live on bread alone. The spirit may be strong but the flesh is weak. These liberals flesh is so weak they may as well be a gelatinous goop. Liberalism and the Left is like a giant blob of formless goop glomming onto every fad and following every fashion, having no direction and only base desires for fulfillment.

OpenID true-poser October 23, 2015 7:51 AM  

@20

You're somewhat missing the point.
Diversity, tolerance, equality are means, one of the many, to achieve goals.
When you turn means themselves into goals, you're trying to perfect processes, not the product.

And then the damnedest thing happens.
You can't apply 20/80, 1d20, two sigmas, good-enough-for-me, etc to these processes, because as you forfeited achievable goals, you have nothing to measure the efficacy.
Then the rationalization kicks in, arbitrarily dragging substitute "goals" into picture and getting you into a very real dichotomy paradox, as the process never ends.

If the goal is, for instance, diversity(tm) in place of a productive community, you'll bring in demography checkboxes, trying to get all sexes onboard, then all skin colors, then all ethnicities, then all disabilities and down the rabbit hole.
Funny thing is that you'll stop caring about all these people filling the checkboxes quite soon, even if you did at first. People are interchangeable, checkboxes aren't.

However, if you leave these virtues as means, that'll suggest they're just one of the many tools.
Imagine screwdrivers and pliers sharing the same toolbox and as willfully used as hammers!
That's blasphemy! It's totalitaristic! Backwards-minded! Even if you get the job done, it'll be forever tainted by these reactionary tools!
Hammers are the only way. Remember, inside every gook there is an American trying to get out, everything is a nail, if you hit it hard enough.

Blogger Steve, the Dark Ninja of Mockery October 23, 2015 8:09 AM  

BassmanCO - thank you, but I thought I was being generous.

Were-Puppy - I've never seen The Jerk but am pleased to have stolen a Steve Martin joke. The Evil Legion of Stevil strikes again.

Steve Martin is one of my all-time favourite comedians, along with Eddie Murphy and Larry David. He's the wild and crazy guy the city needs.

Also, is The Jerk now verboten, like Blazing Saddles and Song of the South?

Geoff - My taste in women is quite catholic. There's no shame in banging a stone cold 6, as long as you don't tell her your real name.

Groot - you are as wise as you are Groot.

I keep the wife on her toes by making bizarre and unreasonable demands.

"Bow to your sensei!"

"Call me MISTER Steve!"

"Pretend you're a naughty pony!"

She doesn't comply, but it does distract her from the typical womanish counterdemands, like asking me to chew with my mouth closed and not bite my toenails during dinner and whatnot.

She's 1/32th Cherokee or something, so I like to give her a handful of beads when she asks for pocket money.

Married life is basically total war.

Blogger CM October 23, 2015 11:10 AM  

I like this essay. I'd say Wisdom is the keystone, though. All the rest are corrupted by it.

Diversity, Equality, and Tolerance are perverted in the absense of Wisdom.

Dialectically, Diversity is not the homogenization of culture and erasure of boundaries that progressives and SJWs promote. A rainbow would not be a rainbow if the colors merged and lost their fractured boundaries.

Rhetorically, I recognize the virtue in completely rejecting these terms as evil as VD says.

Blogger CM October 23, 2015 11:10 AM  

Corrupted without it.

Blogger Elizabeth Ramirez October 24, 2015 8:37 AM  


ONLY FOR US

Play Angry Birds Space!
The sky is no longer the limit! Explore the galaxy with Angry Birds and their Superpowers. Angry Birds Games Free Download. Big collection of free full version games for all devices. Angry Birds Games Free Download and play for free.
So download this awesome game and play today!
Download The Game

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts