Saturday, November 28, 2015

Why Britain entered the EEC

And why the globalist establishment is desperate to keep the UK in the EU:
The answer is that Harold Macmillan and his closest advisers were part of an intellectual tradition that saw the salvation of the world in some form of world government based on regional federations. He was also a close acquaintance of Jean Monnet, who believed the same. It was therefore Macmillan who became the representative of the European federalist movement in the British cabinet.

In a speech in the House of Commons he even advocated a European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) before the real thing had been announced. He later arranged for a Treaty of Association to be signed between the UK and the ECSC, and it was he who ensured that a British representative was sent to the Brussels negotiations following the Messina Conference, which gave birth to the EEC.

In the late 1950s he pushed negotiations concerning a European Free Trade Association towards membership of the EEC. Then, when General de Gaulle began to turn the EEC into a less federalist body, he took the risk of submitting a full British membership application in the hope of frustrating Gaullist ambitions.

His aim, in alliance with US and European proponents of a federalist world order, was to frustrate the emerging Franco-German alliance which was seen as one of French and German nationalism.

Monnet met secretly with Heath and Macmillan on innumerable occasions to facilitate British entry. Indeed, he was informed before the British Parliament of the terms in which the British approach to Europe would be framed.

Despite advice from the Lord Chancellor, Lord Kilmuir, that membership would mean the end of British parliamentary sovereignty, Macmillan deliberately misled the House of Commons — and practically everyone else, from Commonwealth statesmen to cabinet colleagues and the public — that merely minor commercial negotiations were involved. He even tried to deceive de Gaulle that he was an anti-federalist and a close friend who would arrange for France, like Britain, to receive Polaris missiles from the Americans. De Gaulle saw completely through him and vetoed the British bid to enter.

Macmillan left Edward Heath to take matters forward, and Heath, along with Douglas Hurd, arranged — according to the Monnet papers — for the Tory Party to become a (secret) corporate member of Monnet’s Action Committee for a United States of Europe.

According to Monnet’s chief aide and biographer, Francois Duchene, both the Labour and Liberal Parties later did the same. Meanwhile the Earl of Gosford, one of Macmillan’s foreign policy ministers in the House of Lords, actually informed the House that the aim of the government’s foreign policy was world government.

Monnet’s Action Committee was also given financial backing by the CIA and the US State Department. The Anglo-American establishment was now committed to the creation of a federal United States of Europe.
The joint immigration crises, in the USA and the EU, are no accident, but represent a last-ditch effort by the globalists to prevent the rise of nationalism shattering their totalitarian dream of world government. Of course, it's not going to work, as it has only sparked a nationalist reaction that is considerably more intense than even the provocateurs were expecting. The response to the crisis of the legitimacy of the modern state is not going to be in support of an additional layer of government.

None of this is new information, nor is it even, strictly speaking, news, but it is interesting to see it now leaking out into the mainstream European press.

Labels: ,


Blogger Hammerli280 November 28, 2015 4:54 AM  

Interesting...and one wonders if deGaulle isn't due for a reassessment. He might have been one of the sanest post-war European leaders, even if he was a PITA.

Anonymous PhillipGeorge©2015 November 28, 2015 5:34 AM  

Vox, it was the Russian Revolution that removed the St George Cross medal and the fall of the Soviet Union in 1992 that saw it's reinstatement. The coat of arms was also reinstated containing St George slaying a dragon, and the Eagle wearing crowns crowned with crosses and holding a scepter and an orb on which sits another cross. And shocking the world came Vladimir's announcement that he was going to act according to the Russian National interest. As France and Germany seem destined to throw Turkey under the metaphorical bus, a leader shocks the world saying he'll act in the national interest.
Good fences make good neighbours. Not partners, not federations, not coalitions of the willing, not agreement holders, not pact participants.

And this is my blipvert. Ideologies , like economic models, are almost always stupidly oversimplistic. Nations exist in irreducible complexity. While meta narratives are useful, every situation has to be tailored. And if they are, "in the national interest" everyone knows where everyone stands. It seems Vladimir rides an eagle with an orb and scepter at it's feet. And looking to Russia's unique history for his every affirmation. Is there any wonder he stands out now! What so many poster hear want is some glimmer of hope that their own leadership would simply act, in the national interest. Not for a Europe, not for foreigners, not giving away other people's money, not for some teenage sentiments of ego driven goodness.

Anonymous DJF November 28, 2015 5:46 AM  

The EU and its predecessors was always a political project disguised as an economic project. That is why its economics are so messed up, they make economic decisions based on their political agenda of making a European wide and even beyond (Turkey, North Africa) unified government.

That is why they allowed Greece to join the Euro even though everyone knew that Greece’s accounting was fake. And why they signed a association agreement with Ukraine even though its economy is a basket case and the EU has too many basket cases already. Its all about expanding its political control, not economics.

Blogger Glen November 28, 2015 7:01 AM  

They were willing to sacrifice anything to avoid another European war. What is unclear if if they feared more the moral consequences of war, or the physical destruction of such a war aided by atomic weapons. The lingering fear in the UK of military rule should also be kept in mind.

Blogger Sean November 28, 2015 7:53 AM  

If you want the anser to this, just watch Yes Minister

Anonymous McOxford November 28, 2015 8:00 AM  

For those masochists interested in reading more about this I highly recommend this this book, now out of print, free from the author's website.

Blogger Cataline Sergius November 28, 2015 8:05 AM  

Why the UK entered the union in the first place.

You've got to love Sir Humphrey.

Blogger Cataline Sergius November 28, 2015 8:12 AM  

So far as the British Forien Office is concerned it's Misson Complete time to go home

The globalist elite have never had a sharp eye for their own long term interests. Short term certainly but not long term.

If they did they never would have allowed the UK in, in the first place.

Blogger Stilicho #0066 November 28, 2015 8:30 AM  

Interesting that, after the wolves fought WWII, the rabbits' reaction was to push for a world-wide, totalitarian, socialist state, ostensibly to prevent the possibility of another regional totalitarian, socialist state.

In other words, the rabbits think that Hitler didn't go far enough or have the right people (them!) in charge.

Blogger Jeff Y November 28, 2015 8:39 AM  

Once conspiracy theory, now mainstream media trope. The Overton Window has moved.

Blogger Hammerli280 November 28, 2015 9:09 AM  

@8 Stilcho:

The notion that World War II was caused by nationalism permeated post-war thinking, and did tremendous damage.

Blogger Harry Spitz November 28, 2015 9:10 AM  

@9. Stilicho #0066
For long time I have thought that a Nazi Europe would have looked a lot like the EU, but would have based in Berlin.

Anonymous Anonymous November 28, 2015 9:13 AM  

It looks like Hungary may be the promised land. They redid their constitution in 2011 around nationalism, traditional Christian values, ethnicity and Hungarian culture and the family unit as the building blocks for a strong society.

They also take protection of their citizens seriously. I guess its no surprise that the former eastern bloc countries are swinging hard to the right after the socialist utopia they lived under...

Anonymous Godfrey November 28, 2015 9:31 AM  

There is indeed a very exclusive club that runs - or attempts to run - this planet. And you, I and 99.9999% of the people on this revolving sphere are not members.

And the key to their power is the fiat international banking system. Whoever has a legal monopoly on counterfeiting soon owns the world.

Blogger Josh November 28, 2015 10:16 AM  

There is indeed a very exclusive club that runs - or attempts to run - this planet. And you, I and 99.9999% of the people on this revolving sphere are not members.

Anonymous Anonymous November 28, 2015 11:08 AM  

What is the underpinning for their thought that a one world government would stop all wars (let alone work)? Did they blame governments for starting WWI & WWII and therefore felt that if there was only one government it would have no one to war against? Or is that just their propaganda and this goes to the easiest reason - power?

And where do the AshkeNazi elite fit in on this need for a one world government and the killing of the European races and their national pride?

Anonymous Godfrey November 28, 2015 11:17 AM  

It's simply a desire to return to an ancient form of government (e.g. Pharaoh) wherein a small elite manipulate and control the masses. All peoples, cultures, religions, competing classes (i.e. the middleclass) and rivals who threaten the plan are to be destroyed. Do you have an IQ near a hundred or more? Well then, you're a threat.

Anonymous BigGaySteve November 28, 2015 11:38 AM  

What is the underpinning for their thought that a one world government would stop all wars (let alone work)?

From the conservative treehouse: "The conservative believes in abundance. The liberal believes in scarcity.

The conservative believes man is born free and will be who he is, no matter what arbitrary limitations or rules are put on him...

And therein lies the roots of love and fear respectively. For the conservative, when life presents great struggles, he knows he has the power to surmount them. Happiness stems from internal strength and perseverance. For the liberal, when life presents great struggles, the system failed, therefore they were at the mercy of a faulty system, and they believe that only when the system is fixed can their life improve. Happiness is built on systemic contingencies, which they will then seek to control or expect someone else to.

One blames himself. The other blames anyone and everyone but himself.

Anonymous Hrw-500 November 28, 2015 11:54 AM  

@3, Glen

"They were willing to sacrifice anything to avoid another European war. What is unclear if if they feared more the moral consequences of war, or the physical destruction of such a war aided by atomic weapons."

Good question, maybe they fear both the physical destruction of such a war and the moral consequences of war. I wonder if they read the predictions of Nostradamus and/or Siener Van Rensberg?

Blogger Josh November 28, 2015 12:03 PM  

I wonder if they read the predictions of Nostradamus and/or Siener Van Rensberg?

Probably not...

Blogger Curtis November 28, 2015 12:33 PM  

That is interesting, considering the latest, slickest CIA-ISIS Boo video.

A still shot from the video. Notice the left foot placement:

You can find the video here:

The Club of Rome map was created in 1973. With a few 21st century modifications, it is so 21st century:

All your resources belong to us and the containment of Nationalist Russia:

“We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” – February 17, 1950, James Paul Warburg

Nationalism has to give way to a new Global body. By conquest, or consent.

Blogger kurt9 November 28, 2015 12:41 PM  

All the more reason why the E.U. needs to go away and the nationalists returned to power in the various European countries. I think the U.N. itself will be another casualty of the termination of the E.U. project and mandarins. The U.N. is largely driven by the same forces that drove the formation of the E.U. and it will likely share the same fate.

VD, you suggested that the E.U. will go away over the next two election cycles. Given that this is 10 years, I think it needs to go away faster than that.

Anonymous RedJack #22 November 28, 2015 1:13 PM  

A colleague of mine is English (not British, English). There is a real possibility according to him that the island may break back up into four nations again (Wales, Scotland, England, and Cornwall).

They only agree on one thing, they do not like the EU.

This isn't good. A return to radical nationlism will swing much further than it would have say, ten years ago. Rather than language, culture, borders, it will include (I fear) race. Not just "black, brown, white" but "Irish, English, Welsh, Saxon, Bavarian, Gaul".

In other words it won't be back to pre WWI borders, it will be back to post Western Roman Empire borders. That will probably lead to the end of some groups and the rise of others. There is no way to get all the "immigrants" out of Europe now, there isn't enough manpower to do it. Just like you had better be prepared for the South West US to go Aztlan.

And I hope I am wrong. I really do. But as a fan of history (to borrow Dan Carlin's phrase) I fear I am not.

Anonymous Forrest Bishop November 28, 2015 1:59 PM  

...Harold Macmillan and his closest advisers were part of an intellectual tradition that saw the salvation of the world in some form of world government...

That's Macmillan of the publishing house, which owns Tor Books. "In retirement Macmillan took up the chairmanship of his family's publishing house, Macmillan Publishers, from 1964 to 1974. He brought out a six-volume autobiography: Winds of Change, 1914–1939 (1966) ISBN 0-333-06639-1... blah blah." So, like Churchill, he thought history would be kind to him, in six volumes no less. War is the continuation of publishing by other means.

Anonymous BigGaySteve November 28, 2015 3:09 PM  

Phill Sandifer & Tranny Nyberg can get paid to bugger 9yo kids.

"“Several of these criminal sponsors are even associated with, or actively engaged in, the practice of sex trafficking and human smuggling,”

Anonymous Jack Amok November 28, 2015 4:38 PM  

Did they fear moral consequences or physical destruction? Maybe both, but ultimately I think they feared not being in charge more than either, because their political and intellectual heirs are willing to risk everything to hang onto their scraps of power.

Notice how they had zero interest in being responsible stewards of the societies they were entrusted with. They didn't care about any destructive consequences of war. They just wanted to push other people around.

Anonymous Not fragile November 28, 2015 4:52 PM  

Antiracism in Norway is a death cult.

Anonymous Eric the Red November 29, 2015 3:26 AM  

@10 and @11: Yes you're correct. If nationalism had been the actual driving force, then why did the Nazis try to take over all of Europe? Instead they should have been happy within their own borders, or at least after getting the Sudentenland. "National Socialism" was always simply an entryist name for globalism. Meanwhile, the Soviets were eagerly trying to do the same. These two great evils were not based on nationalism, but instead motivated by totalitarian ideology, with the same underlying globalist scope.

The new globalists (neo-globalists?) have controlled the writing of history and the dissemination of news ever since WWII. They use that power to divert attention from their own evil, by trying to force down our throats the meme that nationalism was the culprit behind war then and would be the same now. A perfect counter-meme has come from the Poles...

"EU macht frei!"

Anonymous Eric the Red November 29, 2015 3:52 AM  

The neo-globalists learned a few things from WWII:

1) entryism is the key to a surreptitious takeover of the masses;
2) a lie told often enough through control of media and education will take root in the kneejerk subconscious of the populace;
3) memes (pithy slogans) and narratives (stories) are the best way to disseminate lies; words can always be cleverly devised to rationalize anything under the sun;
4) fascism or some modification thereof is the most efficient form of government ever devised.

The neo-globalists have been busy little Struldbrugs ever since. Now they have perpetrated corporatism at the top and socialism at the bottom for the governments they control. As China and other developing nations institute the same structure for their societies, they will then automatically fall into the neo-globalists' lap.

Blogger James Higham November 30, 2015 3:42 AM  

As I've been trying to get across to Brits since 2006.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts