ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Thursday, October 20, 2016

Nothing is sacred, nothing is safe

From SJWs. They insist on injecting their filth into EVERYTHING they encounter:
Kara Desiderio and her partner Kristina Wertz’s 13-month-old daughter loves Hello magazine for toddlers. The problem: The publication, which is owned by Highlights for Children, has yet to depict same-sex couples anywhere in its pages. So on Friday, October 14, Wertz took to the Highlights for Children Facebook page to express her concern.

“One of the reasons we appreciate Hello is the diversity represented — families of all races, interracial families and grandparents,” Wertz wrote. “We are consistently disappointed, however, in the complete lack of same-sex parents in Hello magazine. I think a lot about the things that create culture — the subtle and not so subtle messages that our kids get about how the world works. Since becoming a parent, I feel keenly aware of the messages kids’ books send to tiny minds.”

Wertz continued: “There is a deep need for books that positively reflect back the diversity of the world around us and I hope that Highlights embraces that diversity because we would like to keep it in our little one’s life as she grows.”

The Hudson, New York–based mom didn’t get the response she was hoping for. “We understand your wish to see your family’s situation represented in Highlights Hello,” wrote a Highlights for Children editor. “For much of our readership, the topic of same-sex families is still new, and parents are still learning how to approach the subject with their children, even the very little ones. We believe that parents know best when their family is ready top open conversation around the topic of same-sex families.” The staffer added: “We will continue to think deeply about inclusion — specifically, how to address it in developmentally appropriate ways for our broad audience.”
Needless to say, because the publisher was dumb enough to offer to "think deeply about inclusion", that has only increased the SJW pressure on them. The excuse for targeting them is because they used the word "situation". Nothing is too small or petty to justify a convergence campaign!

And if Highlights is foolish enough to cave and converge, it is going to quickly find out how much of their readership is not going to tolerate even a modicum of SJW filth, no matter how "developmentally appropriate" it is.

SJW delenda est. Never give them an inch. Never give them anything.

Labels: ,

123 Comments:

Blogger BassmanCO October 20, 2016 6:56 PM  

Went to the article and shockingly, there is no way to leave a message, especially my question about why we have to go out of our way to be inclusive of families that make up less than 1% of the country. How is that a reflection of what is normal?

Anonymous Scintan October 20, 2016 6:56 PM  

"Goofus goes in dry, even with first time partners."

"Gallant always uses plenty of lubricant."

Blogger CM October 20, 2016 6:58 PM  

I like Highlights and am impressed with how well they handled a situation they know is anathema to the majority of their audience.

Blogger SteveK October 20, 2016 7:03 PM  

Wertz and Desiderio were not moved. “[They’re] stopping short of a clear commitment to include LGBTQ families in the pages of their magazine,” Desiderio tells Us Weekly. “It is conservative, lacking in sincerity and fails to provide a clear path forward.”

Wertz and Desiderio clearly lack any commitment to tolerating others who do not pose a threat. Let them issue a public statement about their path forward toward minding their own business.

Blogger pyrrhus October 20, 2016 7:07 PM  

Sounds like there is already a fair amount of convergence at the magazine, but management is aware of the market problems associated with going all the way....I can tell you from personal experience that kids, especially boys, are not real comfortable with the "Jimmy has two Daddies" scenario...

Anonymous Godfrey October 20, 2016 7:10 PM  

They seldom if every create. They usually hijack.

If they want a magazine featuring psychologically disordered female couples who had mother issues, then start you own magazine. It's that simple.

Anonymous MongoJimmy October 20, 2016 7:11 PM  

'Sick f*ckin' World...' -- Junior Soprano

I used to read those in the Sixties when I was a Kid.

Blogger Random October 20, 2016 7:17 PM  

Scintan wrote:"Goofus goes in dry, even with first time partners."

"Gallant always uses plenty of lubricant."


NEW KEYBOARD

Anonymous Ominous Cowherd October 20, 2016 7:18 PM  

Pa and Pa Timbertoes? What a knot-headed idea.

Blogger OGRE October 20, 2016 7:18 PM  

The goal is not inclusiveness and tolerance. It is and always has been about desensitizing and normalizing. It is an attack on the family as the basis of social stability and as the foundation of civilization and culture...so that the state may step in and take that role. The ultimate goal is to use the law to force the Christian church to marry homosexuals; at that point the churches face the choice of either staying true and facing open persecution by the state or practicing blatant heresy.

Anonymous weWUZcuckyKANGSansheeit October 20, 2016 7:23 PM  

It sounds like the mag is already converged: one set of leftist radicals simply being attacked by an even more noxious set. Popcorn and beer are more appropriate than pity or advice.

Anonymous Nym Coy October 20, 2016 7:27 PM  

Oh, they'll converge. We get that magazine and the number of mixed race and single parent families in it is high. The publisher is probably already sympathetic and held back only by marketing.

Blogger Sam Lively October 20, 2016 7:29 PM  

@10

The goal is inclusiveness and tolerance until the Trojan Horse is included and tolerated past the gates.

Valorizing inclusiveness is always the initial problem - as soon as that principle is accepted then the admission of some kind of Trojan Horse is inevitable.

Anonymous weWUZcuckyKANGSansheeit October 20, 2016 7:31 PM  

@10 "The ultimate goal..."

Maybe it's because I'm a former left-aligned moderate and not a practicing Christian that it's easier for me to see this, but I'm amazed that so many Christians are so lackadaisical about the threat, tut-tutting over Mr. Trumps crudities while their enemies plan their destruction. I got news for Churchians: your God isn't going to come save you. He didn't save the Byzantines, who I bet were on average FAR FAR better Christians than most of you. If you don't fight, the Left will either destroy your or let in enough Islamics to destroy you and them.

Anonymous Alice De Goon October 20, 2016 7:32 PM  

The magazine needs to decide which side of the bread its butter is on and take a stand. Either they side with non-converged Christians and keep up with their "Mommy and Daddy can introduce gays if they want" policy, or they can side with the Churchians and SJWs and give Heather two mommies. Either way, they're going to lose a huge portion of their audience and face the prospect of either having the World mad at them, or having God mad at them. Better for them to lay this to rest as soon as possible and deal with the consequences, than to remain lukewarm until someone forces their hand.

I'm guessing they'll fall on the "Having the World and the SJWs happy with you" side of the fence, seeing as how it sounds nicer to espouse and has fewer immediate consequences.

Those long-term consequences though....WEW!

Anonymous Minack October 20, 2016 7:32 PM  

(((Wertz)))

I hate these people so damn much. They won't be satisfied until the whole world is as filthy as they are.

OpenID basementhomebrewer October 20, 2016 7:39 PM  

It sounds like they really want to cave but know that catering to 0.5% of all couples with children is not a winning business model.

Part of me envies people at family publications (with strong leadership that will back them) who receive this SJW schlock. My responses would be along the lines of "Feel free to cancel your subscription and try to find a publication that caters to your degenerate life style. I would recommend one but I don't know of any."

I would even relish the interview from the SJW rag. "No one complains about us not catering to children who's parent's beat them as if it's normal. Why should we cater to parents who abuse their children in more subtle ways?"

Blogger haus frau October 20, 2016 7:42 PM  

The new season of the Loud House on Nickelodeon added a pair of queers with an adopted black son that the main character is friends with. Of course, they are white, upper middle class, and very refined compared to the traditional nuclear structured Loud family. After a great deal of arguing, I finally had to explain to my seven year old boy that he couldn't watch Loud House anymore because of it now featured a pair of men who behaved as only a husband and wife should and that it was a perversion the show writers had slipped in to make him accepting of this sin against his parents wishes. Thank you Nickelodeon.... and by thank you I really do mean rot in Hell.

Blogger Lazarus October 20, 2016 7:44 PM  

Nym Coy wrote:Oh, they'll converge. We get that magazine and the number of mixed race and single parent families in it is high. The publisher is probably already sympathetic and held back only by marketing.

Well, you better let them know in detail how you feel and what you will do if they cave.

Blogger Lovekraft October 20, 2016 7:50 PM  

They're coming hard and fast, pushed by hidden powers, of that I have no doubt. These people, being disenfranchised and uneducated, look to destroy rather than seek alliances/common ground and start constructive action. Pure evil.

On a related note, I was watching the latest episode of Gotham and there's a scene where Penguin and Riddler are together and bonding. Simple male bonding, showing appreciation for each other.

I turned to my wife and told her that if the show writes them as gay I will f'in lose it.

Anonymous Brick Hardslab October 20, 2016 7:52 PM  

Scintan wrote:"Goofus goes in dry, even with first time partners."

"Gallant always uses plenty of lubricant."


My wife and I were discussing a serious issue when I glanced at my computer and read your comment. She was furious for a second until I read it to her in context and she busted up.

Made my afternoon.

Blogger Franz Lyonheart October 20, 2016 7:57 PM  

SJW delenda est

Digging into my school Latin, this has bugged me for a while. Isn't it rather.... SJW esse delendam? I mean, it isn't destroyed YET. Anybody more proficient in Latin than me online?

PS. Yes. Otherwise the train of thought is fine...

Blogger Sam Lively October 20, 2016 7:59 PM  

@14

The rationalization process generally goes like this:

1. If we support Trump it will make the Left hate us even more and call us hypocrites.

2. If we don't support Trump they will see that we were consistent and THEY will be the hypocrites for still hating us.

3. Hillary will persecute us and we'll know that it was for the right reasons!

The legit celebration of Jesus' sacrifice and Stephen's martyrdom and the condemnation of Peter's ear-chopping, coupled the illegitimate exclusion of the more unsavory OT heroes (not to mention the 2000 years of Christianity since the NT left off) from general Christian discourse has really narrowed the average Christian's perspective on the culture war. They feel like any culture war engagement that doesn't resemble passive martyrdom will get them a handslap from Jesus.



Blogger ChickenChicken Sweep October 20, 2016 8:02 PM  

All this palaver just so some whiny losers don't have to have a difficult conversation with their kids:

"Why doesn't anybody have two mommies in Highlights, mama Kara?"

"Because most people realize our 'family' situation is a social and evolutionary dead end, honey."

Anonymous Gedrin October 20, 2016 8:20 PM  

How awesome would it have been to see a one word reply?

"No."

Anonymous Anonymous October 20, 2016 8:22 PM  

Delenda is the gerundive of delere used as an adjective modifying the subject of Carthago/SJW, and the phrase is an example of the passive periphrastic which expresses necessity. Delenda esse is conjugated in the present indicative form of est because it must presently be destroyed.

OpenID somniascipionis October 20, 2016 8:29 PM  

@22

Delenda is the gerundive of delere used as an adjective modifying the subject of Carthago/SJW, and the phrase is an example of the passive periphrastic which expresses necessity. Delenda esse is conjugated in the present indicative form of est because it must presently be destroyed.

Anonymous BigGayKoranBurner October 20, 2016 8:33 PM  

Well what are the odds I came to post something related. Anyone have Crooked Eye Clinton's 2 headed primary deciding coin to flip 6 times?
http://www.latimes.com/books/jacketcopy/la-et-jc-outsiders-gay-20161019-snap-story.html

"S.E. Hinton drew fire from readers on Twitter after she denied that two of the characters in her classic young adult novel "The Outsiders" were gay.

The flap started on Monday after Hinton responded to a tweet from a reader asking whether there were "any romantic feelings" between the characters Johnny and Dallas, two members of the Greasers gang."

if you want to see something scary (((GOOGLE))) images for "white women with child" or "white woman with baby"

Blogger Franz Lyonheart October 20, 2016 8:39 PM  

@27 excellent, thanks for the reply. And Cartago /SJW is in Nominative not Accusative, because it's all the sentence there is, i.e. Vox never uses the historically quoted intro Ceterum censeo. Got it. Lol, that was bugging me for a while, thanks for the free tutoring session!

Blogger Escoffier October 20, 2016 8:50 PM  

weWUZcuckyKANGSansheeit wrote:@10 "The ultimate goal..."

Maybe it's because I'm a former left-aligned moderate and not a practicing Christian that it's easier for me to see this, but I'm amazed that so many Christians are so lackadaisical about the threat, tut-tutting over Mr. Trumps crudities while their enemies plan their destruction. I got news for Churchians: your God isn't going to come save you. He didn't save the Byzantines, who I bet were on average FAR FAR better Christians than most of you. If you don't fight, the Left will either destroy your or let in enough Islamics to destroy you and them.


I can guarantee you this cuckyKangz. There are real Christians out there and they either know or are learning to fight as we speak. This demonic filth will be getting a surprise in the near future.

Anonymous Headcannon October 20, 2016 8:52 PM  

@20 and @25

http://heatst.com/entertainment/outsiders-author-s-e-hinton-crucified-on-social-media-for-saying-her-characters-arent-gay/

It's always funny when they say no.

Blogger Lovekraft October 20, 2016 9:03 PM  

@ 30: I just read this. I always say that, at bottom, it's about money. To elaborate, there is some goal they have in mind, because if it was about simple trolling, they'd be easier to defeat.

Money in the sense I describe means either a shakedown (diversity training personnel, for example), or a continuation of their current gravy train.

If it was about principles, they wouldn't resort to violence and intimidation.

So how to neutralize them based on my theory:
1. Ideal: force them to get jobs. Cut off the gravy train, expose their funding via tax theft.
2. Compromise: force them to develop their own venues, businesses instead of using gov't-backed state indoctrination
3. Last resort: Enact and enforce laws that determine their actions are akin to insurgency.

(sorry for the hijackpost)

Blogger Lovekraft October 20, 2016 9:05 PM  

S.E. Hinton's Infogalactic page hopefully includes this bravery somewhere.

Anonymous 10/20 October 20, 2016 9:13 PM  

@18
You let your son watch Nickelodeon?

Start planning his sweet 16 coming out party now.

That network hires former makers of cuck porn to make children's shows. Every show on network depicts white boys as limp-wristed faggots.


Blogger haus frau October 20, 2016 9:20 PM  

@33 We watch a lot of Spongebob. That's about it. It's Netflix otherwise. I"m aware of the skew on their children's shows like Bella and the Bulldogs.

Blogger Basil Makedon October 20, 2016 9:23 PM  

"I got news for Churchians: your God isn't going to come save you. He didn't save the Byzantines, who I bet were on average FAR FAR better Christians than most of you. If you don't fight, the Left will either destroy your or let in enough Islamics to destroy you and them."

True, he didn't save us in a martial sense, but we did fight for 800 years before finally falling.

We moderns could learn something from that example even if it ended in defeat.

Anonymous BGKB October 20, 2016 9:28 PM  

Scintan wrote:"Goofus goes in dry, even with first time partners.""Gallant always uses plenty of lubricant."

S.E Hinton's Ponyboy realized he was too small to be popular at the bathhouse.

"personal experience that kids, especially boys, are not real comfortable with the "Jimmy has two Daddies" scenario" "Loud House on Nickelodeon added a pair of queers with an adopted black son"

How could you look at this couple and not see that they both are happy to change their niglet boy's diaper? Nevermind you have to log onto facebook now to see his pictures, he used to be an elementary school teacher but now does real estate. Leftists don't even bother trying to find out who I am from him as he probably doesn't remember the names of his last 100 boyfriends. https://www.facebook.com/keith.frank.90

(((Wertz)))I hate these people so damn much. Did you see Cohen Cohen and Cohen?

1 Roger Cohen New York Times: Aleppo is alone, alone beneath the bombs of Russian and Syrian jets, alone to face the violent whims of President Vladimir Putin and President Bashar al-Assad
Aleppo, symbol of failure, symbol of indifference, symbol of American retreat, should not have been left to bleed

2 Richard Cohen Washington Post :But doing nothing is not nothing. It is a policy of its own, in this case allowing the creation of a true axis of evil: a gleeful, high-kicking chorus line of Russia, Iran and Bashar al-Assad’s Syria

3- Nick Cohen The Guardian: From the president of the United States, via the liberal left and nationalist right, to you and me, are we all Jeremy Corbyn now? When we turn off the pictures from Aleppo and look in the mirror, do we see the blandly wicked features of the Labour leader gazing back at us

They're coming hard and fast, pushed by hidden powers, of that I have no doubt.

Even back in the 90s they wanted to legalize underage prostitution, for the good of underage prostitutes. They are drunk on power from recent wins via judge-priest-kings waving magic wands, and think they can nag people into liking them.

Every show on network depicts white boys as limp-wristed faggots.

Would you prefer they depict faggots that can shoot a 45? How many closed minded people will think El Guapo isn't gay when after TRUMP wins the live game show "Don't Garrote More Felons Than A Faggot" comes on? Jenner only had to kill one woman to ID as a woman driver.

Anonymous BGKB October 20, 2016 9:32 PM  

when after TRUMP wins, the live game show "Don't Garrote Fewer Felons Than A Faggot" comes on?

Blogger Moon Man October 20, 2016 9:43 PM  

There's a little speech bubble icon that brings up a Disqus comment section. Please to deliver ordinance.

Blogger Happy Housewife October 20, 2016 9:44 PM  

The Hello magazine is a different publication from the actual Highlights magazine. It's meant for kiddos aged 0-2 years old. My grandmother got my firstborn a subscription, and the plastic pages have lasted long enough for my second to enjoy, too. They're cute, with cute rhymes and cute songs, etc, but they are definitely converged in terms of racial diversity. It's not terrible, really, because it's the old "white character cast as a minority" type thing, but it is enough to roll your eyes at as you open your mailbox to see a cartoon of yet another non white child on the front cover.

That these women want to inject sexual themes into a magazine meant for babies and toddlers tells you all you need to know.

Anonymous VFM #6306 October 20, 2016 9:45 PM  

When is Hello Magazine going to finally portray faithful muslims tossing "families" like Desiderio's off of buildings? They can scream "wheee" and stuff so that children aren't traumatized by diverse religious principles. I mean goddam its 2016 already.

Blogger Benjamin Kraft October 20, 2016 9:52 PM  

The irony with which lesbian "parents" unwittingly talk about "creating culture" and "messages kids' books send to tiny minds" is appalling. Yeah, we get it, you want every girl to be a lesbian. Guess what, no one normal, sane, and ACTUALLY continuing their genetic legacy, rather than PRETENDING to, wants any of your filth.

Anonymous Hezekiah Garrett October 20, 2016 9:58 PM  

@31. I was a 'Go along to get alonger' until they went after Highlights. So screw it.

Unless they've given service to the Nation, (military service or a small Muslim cemetery in their backyard, preferably all garrotted by a feather boa) to the Ovens with them.

Blogger Thucydides October 20, 2016 10:02 PM  

It would be interesting to see what the response of the publisher would be to the opposite sort of inquiry, asking "why are you spending such an inordinate amount of time highlighting atypical families?"

I'll bet it won't be anywhere near as polite as the one she received...

Blogger Badger Brigadon October 20, 2016 10:10 PM  

First they came after Bakeries, but I said "Whatever" because I bake my own cakes.
Then they came after florists and I said "Whatever" because I do not buy flowers.
And then they can after 'Highlights" and I said "Whatever" because my children are grown.
And then they came after me...

Anonymous Elipe October 20, 2016 10:11 PM  

Why don't people just start their own unconverged magazines?

Can't be that hard to take pictures of toddlers, write generic parenting advice, put in a few simple word searches, crosswords, maze games, etc.

Blogger buwaya puti October 20, 2016 10:13 PM  

Hello is owned by Spanish Hola, owned by the Sanchez family of Barcelona. Hola is of course the global celebrity magazine ne plus ultra.
They are in their own way quite a conservative lot. So who knows. They may decide "when in Rome", but are inclined to avoid controversy. So if you all make trouble on this score, it may work.

Blogger buwaya puti October 20, 2016 10:14 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Gavin B. October 20, 2016 10:14 PM  

All my life I was taught cheating was wrong. Cheating is bad. Cheaters never win. When medical science or some child services agency places a child with a homosexual couple, they are helping them cheat. It's not a question of being infertile, two same sex people can never create a child. Helping them cheat nature is wrong.

Blogger buwaya puti October 20, 2016 10:19 PM  

Oh sorry, the magazine is "Highlights Hello" not a spinoff of "Hello". Nevermind. They are your people not mine.

Anonymous LAN sakes! October 20, 2016 10:32 PM  

First they came for the Communists, and I didn't complain because I wasn't a Communist.
Then they came for the illegals, and I didn't complain, because I wasn't an illegal.
Then they came for the Muslims, and I didn't complain, because I wasn't a Muslim.
Then they came for the blacks and the Jews, and I didn't complain, because I wasn't a black or a Jew.
Then I woke up one morning and everything was totally groovy, and I could finally take my kids to the park and send them to public school again.

Blogger Bob Loblaw October 20, 2016 10:35 PM  

I like Highlights and am impressed with how well they handled a situation they know is anathema to the majority of their audience.

Me too. I don't agree this is a door left open to SJWs - it's the quintessential don't-call-us-we'll-call-you brushoff.

Blogger Lazarus October 20, 2016 10:39 PM  

I was watching a documentary on the Basement Tapes as recorded Dylan and the Band, and it was said:

If the past is not alive in you, the future will be empty.

Blogger Lazarus October 20, 2016 10:41 PM  

Badger Brigadon wrote:First they came after Bakeries, but I said "Whatever" because I bake my own cakes.

Then they came after florists and I said "Whatever" because I do not buy flowers.

And then they can after 'Highlights" and I said "Whatever" because my children are grown.

And then they came after me...


And I shot them in the face??

Blogger l' Américain October 20, 2016 10:42 PM  

Killing fields are filling up. 3 weeks until we decide who gets it.

Blogger buwaya puti October 20, 2016 10:43 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Anonymous Eric the Red October 20, 2016 10:44 PM  

Those children's publications are already converged... anybody who subscribes to them has already allowed evil into their house.

@14...
You are correct.

The trouble is,
If someone doesn't believe they're in an existential war, then they're not going to fight.
If someone believes that their religion doesn't allow them to fight, then they're not going to fight.

I always wonder, what are those people in the orange jump suits thinking as they docilely kneel waiting for their ISIS executioners to slit their throat? Because they're a perfect analogy of the so-called Christians in the West.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash October 20, 2016 10:51 PM  

Hezekiah Garrett wrote:preferably all garrotted by a feather boa) to the Ovens with them.
Probably not the best place to flirt.

Anonymous dagwood October 20, 2016 11:02 PM  

Sigh. If only we lived in a world not so full of hateful institutional micro-aggressive structural racism and oppression, a world where gays and Jews and gayish Jews and Jewish gays could flourish and thrive within, say, something like, oh I dunno, maybe even the publishing industry, if only we would let these oppressed individuals be free to publish as they please, in a genuinely free market, free in both content and distribution, then maybe there would be an inclusive magazine for indoctrinating non-gay non-Jewish children into the correct lifestyle choices.

Sigh. If only.

Well I'd love to stay and prattle on, but I've got an urgent editorial meeting with my publishers, Wilhelm Thornstrom, Robert Anderson McAnderson, and Liam O'Gallagher. You know, the types with the stranglehold on the media.



Blogger Lazarus October 20, 2016 11:09 PM  

OT

I am watching the Packers / bears game, the only pink thing I see is the yard marker for first down.

Maybe they are getting the hint.

Anonymous Hezekiah Garrett October 20, 2016 11:11 PM  

@57. Low blow, man. Low blow.

If you're tempted to watch the Al Smith Dinner, DON'T! It's pure penance, like watching an ant farm dressed in tuxes while the late night news theme blares in the background. Interspersed with shots of Cardinal Dolan SHOVELING salad in his piehole like the one retarded Medici they only let out of the attic for Holy Days.

Blogger Lazarus October 20, 2016 11:14 PM  

Eric the Red wrote:I always wonder, what are those people in the orange jump suits thinking as they docilely kneel waiting for their ISIS executioners to slit their throat? Because they're a perfect analogy of the so-called Christians in the West.

I beg to differ. Those Christians did not invite the executioners into their live. They are true martyrs and will receive their reward.

The Christians in the West have invited their executioners in. Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God. They will receive no good reward for their perfidy.

Blogger Mighty Lou October 20, 2016 11:14 PM  

Their 13 month old daughter loves Highlights? Smart baby...

Blogger Aeoli Pera October 20, 2016 11:22 PM  

weWUZcuckyKANGSansheeit wrote:@10 "The ultimate goal..."

Maybe it's because I'm a former left-aligned moderate and not a practicing Christian that it's easier for me to see this, but I'm amazed that so many Christians are so lackadaisical about the threat, tut-tutting over Mr. Trumps crudities while their enemies plan their destruction. I got news for Churchians: your God isn't going to come save you. He didn't save the Byzantines, who I bet were on average FAR FAR better Christians than most of you. If you don't fight, the Left will either destroy your or let in enough Islamics to destroy you and them.


I'm Aeoli Pera and I approve this message.

Anonymous VFM #6306 October 20, 2016 11:24 PM  

OT

I am watching the Packers / bears game, the only pink thing I see is the yard marker for first down.

Maybe they are getting the hint.


No, Chicago's end zone is completely pink. At least that's the rumor. The Bears offense hasn't seen it at all today, though, so who knows?

Blogger Aeoli Pera October 20, 2016 11:25 PM  

Frankly, it boggles my mind that Scott Foval is still alive. Not even the cucky American public would care if he got snuffed.

Blogger Unknown October 20, 2016 11:26 PM  

After reading the entire article and the edited responses, I can see a trend: Complaining "family" says really nothing. Magazine says really nothing. It is trending towards diplo speak.

Might be a strategy.

Anonymous BGKB October 20, 2016 11:31 PM  

Even broke cuck can be right twice a day

benshapiro
Trump asks why Hillary won't return money from human rights violators. Great question.
10:02 PM - 19 Oct 2016

military service or a small Muslim cemetery in their backyard, preferably all garrotted by a feather boa) to the Ovens with them

To be fair I am more likely to poison them or shoot them, unless "Can You Garrote More Moslems Than A Puff" or "Don't Garrote Fewer Felons Than A Faggot" gets approved by Farage or TRUMP.

Anonymous BGKB October 20, 2016 11:33 PM  

Frankly, it boggles my mind that Scott Foval is still alive. Not even the cucky American public would care if he got snuffed

Pay the illegals at the closest Home Depot near his home to beat him up when he stops by.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash October 20, 2016 11:59 PM  

Hezekiah Garrett wrote:Interspersed with shots of Cardinal Dolan SHOVELING salad in his piehole like the one retarded Medici they only let out of the attic for Holy Days.
Not a fan then?

Al Smith would have endorsed Trump.

Al Smith would also have shot Hillary in the face. With silver bullets. While holding a crucifix.

Blogger Jazz The Boxer October 21, 2016 12:36 AM  

@14 - At a forum I was a member of a bunch of Trolls showed up. I recognised them from two previous and identical forums. I warned the mods and site owner that these Trolls were no joke and they'd destroy the forum like they had the two previous ones. "Oh no" the mods said "We will convince them with facts and well reasoned arguments about the errors of their point of view". Suffice it to say that forum collapsed as well from the Trolling.

Another related forum years later I recognised the very same trolls. This time however the mods and the members didn't allow them free reign. It turned out that these Trolls were from an industry body and are actually paid to disseminate industry information & troll dissent.

This is in Australia, a "free" democratic nation.

Blogger dfordoom October 21, 2016 12:38 AM  

@10. OGRE

It is and always has been about desensitizing and normalizing.

Desensitizing has been the key. Even thirty years ago most people were sickened by homosexuality. Now it doesn't bother them. Our natural Yuck Response has been deadened. The trouble is, nothing sickens people these days. They've been so effectively desensitized they think absolutely everything is fine.

Of course to a large extent what has happened is that people have trained themselves not to think about what homosexuality actually entails. They're terrified to think about it in case some part of their Yuck Response still survives.

Blogger Jazz The Boxer October 21, 2016 12:38 AM  

Full disclosure - I also post under "KonaCommuter". Since using Brave my Google accounts have gotten all messed up. KonaCommuter is my politics handle. Jazz is my social handle. It isn't my intention to mislead members here.

Bill Burr is better at computers than me :-P

Anonymous Down and Out in... October 21, 2016 1:00 AM  

"Al Smith would also have shot Hillary in the face. With silver bullets. While holding a crucifix."

If circumstances had made it possible for Al Smith to become president... then NONE of this crap would have happened, and we'd be looking at a vastly different, and happier, century.

Blogger S. Misanthrope October 21, 2016 1:11 AM  

Is this for real? The kid has same-sex parents. Pretty sure she is aware that same-sex parents exist. Maybe parent your child instead of expecting some magazine to do it.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash October 21, 2016 1:20 AM  

Americans in those days would rather vote for a fake Protestant than a sincere Catholic. Probably still true.

Anonymous Eric the Red October 21, 2016 2:00 AM  

@61 Lazarus..

Yes, thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.

However, my point is that no individual in either group is fighting back.

Never predicate your decisions and actions on the belief that 'Christ is coming soon'. That is a weak, mindless rationalization to avoid responsibility. Instead, assume that He is NOT coming soon, and that you'd better get your act together and DO SOMETHING YOURSELF. If this means picking up a sword to defend your family, then you damn well should do it.

Blogger Technomad October 21, 2016 2:37 AM  

I asked a Latin teacher I knew in the SCA about the plural of "delenda est," and he said it would be "delendi sunt." So, "SJWs delindi sunt!"

Blogger bob kek mando ( Grab 'Em By The Pussy And Their Hearts And Minds Will Follow ) October 21, 2016 2:47 AM  

22. Franz Lyonheart October 20, 2016 7:57 PM
Anybody more proficient in Latin than me online?



you seriously intend to debate the fine points of applied Latin with ... Cato the Elder?

Godspeed, you glorious bastard.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carthago_delenda_est

Blogger John Locke October 21, 2016 3:03 AM  

Sjws should be rounded up & kicked out of america, deport them to the middle east so they can teach the muslims "tolerance" hehe I'm sure they'll have a gay old time...

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable October 21, 2016 3:04 AM  

I remember reading every back issue I could get my hands on, hoping to finally find the porpoise.

Blogger Bob Loblaw October 21, 2016 3:34 AM  

The trouble is, nothing sickens people these days. They've been so effectively desensitized they think absolutely everything is fine.

That's true. What's next? The acceptance of pedophilia? Cannibalism?

Blogger tim October 21, 2016 3:45 AM  

Stepping up

Anonymous Shut up rabbit October 21, 2016 3:49 AM  

"interracial families and grandparents..."

Make that "interracial families and grandmothers". No man would ever willingly spend time bringing up kids from another tribe that look nothing like him and by that age, even the SJW cucks are too old to give a shit about pretending anymore.

Even the grandmothers are disappointed with their mongrel grandkids and you rarely see them smiling when they are forced to babysit. I pity one sad grandmother who takes her four grandkids to the park here, none of the four share the same skin colour or physical features - a constant reminder she raised an irresponsible slut and she's stuck with the results.

I always refer to mixed couples as "children of miserable grandparents."

Anonymous Reader October 21, 2016 3:54 AM  

It worries me that the left seems to be winning the ideological battles. It looks like the rot is setting in deeper & deeper in the educational system.

I always have verbal stoush with my 24 year-old daughter on topics such as SSM & Muslim teachings. Many young people nowadays treat same sex relationship as a normal way of life. And this I think is correlated with the decline in belief in God.

My kids are very good children but I consider myself a failure in that my girl is an atheist & the boy agnostic.

If we want to confront the left we should all be in this together because this is about ideology not about skin colour.







Anonymous a deplorable rubberducky October 21, 2016 4:17 AM  

I always wonder how what percentage of these SJW attacks are top-down directed from on high. I think most that get press are coordinated, both the attack and the press coverage. It's a double whammy from two sides, the easiest course of action for the mark is to yield and retreat.

Here's a couple pages out of what's said to be the official Unofficial Democrat Troll Handbook for this election:

https://i.sli.mg/m1S4wl.jpg

Note that part on "Anti-Trump Memes" for the Chans - they say the most effective thing is to plant Nazi memes with Pepe, so they can discredit everybody. They've gotten pretty adroit and sophisticated with these maneuvers. And much of it is top-down directed.

Anonymous Anonymous October 21, 2016 4:18 AM  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aK8mbA083hE

Anonymous RabidRatel October 21, 2016 4:19 AM  

Bob Loblaw wrote:What's next? The acceptance of pedophilia? Cannibalism?

Don't forget live sacrifices and grand orgies.

Anonymous Shut up rabbit October 21, 2016 4:25 AM  

RabidRatel wrote:Don't forget live sacrifices and grand orgies

These are already perfectly acceptable to their participants, it's just that the useful idiots & SJWs of the outer party will never ever be invited so their masters don't care what they think.

Anonymous JudgeDeadd October 21, 2016 4:32 AM  

My god. I don't know what's more horrifying: the fact that there's a litle baby living in such a """family""" in the first place, that the """moms""" are bold enough to actually demand something like this from a family-friendly magazine...

or the fact that the magazine's reply, rather than "No" or "No, what the hell's wrong with you?" or "I'm notifying Child Services", was "Yes, of course, o Sacred Cows of Social Justice, we'll get on that right away! Please don't say mean words about us please please! :( Praise be to Diversity!"

I'm surprised, too, at the self-destructive submissiveness on display here. Why in the world would you want to cater to the kind of degenerates who form a vanishingly tiny percentage of your readership, who will just find something new to get offended by no matter how you try to please them, and whose demands will drive off the entire normal rest of your reader base if appeased? How utterly idiotic must you be to kowtow to the paper-mache Zeitgeist?

I honestly hope that, at worst, within a few decades the society will wake up from its collective insanity, and will finally get the courage to call "same-sex parenting" what it truly is: a horrific, insidious form of child abuse. (Unfortunately, I suspect it will take several high-profile, indefensible cases of abuse in such """families""".)

You know how many of the once-acclaimed works today are criticized for ethnic stereotypes and whatnot? Well, imagine how much worse it will be for those creators who, lured by the promises of blue-haired, problem-glasses-wearing, overweight pseudo-Baals, will today choose to promote such a kind of degeneracy in "children-friendly" media. Once the veil of blindness is lifted, such creators will be remembered for condoning a horrific form of child abuse--in some cases, it will be the only thing they'll be remembered for.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash October 21, 2016 4:33 AM  

a deplorable rubberducky wrote:Note that part on "Anti-Trump Memes" for the Chans - they say the most effective thing is to plant Nazi memes with Pepe, so they can discredit everybody. They've gotten pretty adroit and sophisticated with these maneuvers. And much of it is top-down directed.

And pushed it to the point that nobody cares any more. If they push it any further, you will be able to walk down the street in full SS regalia and no-one will notice.

Anonymous Shut up rabbit October 21, 2016 4:37 AM  

Reader wrote:If we want to confront the left we should all be in this together because this is about ideology not about skin colour.



...to whites. Every other race's ideology is about amassing more resources, territory and opportunities for their kind. Only whites suffer from pathological altruism that makes them privilege other groups over their own.

Why does nobody berate the arabs over arab slavery (which was much, much greater than the trans-Atlantic trade)? Because there is no such thing as arab guilt: nothing to exploit!

Why did africans never discover the wheel, two-story buildings etc in millennia of living unmolested by the evil colonists but suddenly their lack of academic success in the west is due to invisible, unmeasurable "systemic" reasons even when given educational advantages, lower standards and assisted employment?

Yes there are outliers which I will treat on their merits but in the meanwhile I stick to the predictability of statistics over disproven theories relying on absurd notions like blank-slateism and magic dirt.

Anonymous Shut up rabbit October 21, 2016 4:46 AM  

A perfect example of the west's pathological altruism is what is going on in the UK right now. Politicians, virtue-signalling retards and celebrities (but i repeat myself) are maintaining this ludicrous charade that adult, fighting-ages islamic males are "children" to the absurd lengths of even putting bearded men in schools with 11 year olds.

The government first lied saying (against all biology) that the war had prematurely aged them then just started hiding their faces from the public.

Meanwhile their health service is crumbling due to migrant abuses, indigenous people have to wait 50 years for social housing which migrants get on arrival.

Can you imagine people of any other race grinning with self-satisfaction as they knowingly lie and destroy their children's futures and hand civilisation to third worlders who couldn't maintain their own countries in the first place?

Blogger David Power October 21, 2016 6:05 AM  

As Orwell observed in 1984, Totalitarian movements always go after the kids. The Nazis did it, Stalin did it, Pol Pot did it, Mao did it, the North Koreans do it. Why should our Cultural Marxists be any different?

OpenID basementhomebrewer October 21, 2016 6:40 AM  

OT Trump went into the vipers nest and poked it with a stick

Trump didn't pull any punches at this shin dig for the elites. The best part is ~1:34:00 on the video. He starts dropping bombs on her and never really lets up. He called out the heads of the networks earlier in the speech for working overtime to try to get her elected. Interestingly enough it sounds like all of the booing is coming from their direction when Trump takes the gloves off. The looks on the faces of the people on the main stage is priceless though. Hillary's facial reactions followed by Dolan trying to calm her down are also good.

Anonymous TS October 21, 2016 7:06 AM  

"Never give them an inch. Never give them anything."

That's because all they do is take. Which not coincidentally is all satan does.

Blogger Wanda Sherratt October 21, 2016 9:08 AM  

JudgeDeadd @88 - I think that very little culture produced since 2000 will be considered worthy of preservation. The perverted sex will probably eliminate 80% of movies, TV shows, books and songs. I never watch it anymore, so I've pretty much personally filtered that crap out of my life as much as possible. However, I still read and watch some documentary stuff, and what leaps out at me in those is the complete allegiance to Global Warming/Climate Change. The infection is everywhere. I think that about 75 years from now, people will look at our cultural products the way we look at stuff that came out during the Red Scare, only much, much worse.

Blogger dfordoom October 21, 2016 9:10 AM  

@ Reader

because this is about ideology not about skin colour.

Agreed. There's no point in trying to save the "white race" if our civilisation becomes little more than an open sewer. And that's pretty much the point we're at now.

Blogger B.J. October 21, 2016 9:41 AM  

Oh jeez, Highlights? Really?

"Hey kids, find all the hidden dildos in this picture!"

Blogger dfordoom October 21, 2016 9:45 AM  

@Bob Loblaw

That's true. What's next? The acceptance of pedophilia? Cannibalism?

Pedophilia will be next. Seriously. The line that will be taken is that everyone should be free to "love" whomever they choose. It will be pushed to a large extent by the LGBTQWERTY lobby because the sexuality of homosexual children is being oppressed. They'll go slowly at first - just pushing for slight reductions in the age of consent. Once that's achieved they'll push for it to be lowered further.

The push for normalising pedophilia has already begun. Homosexuals are already proselytising in our schools.

We'll be told they can't help it - they were born that way. That they need understanding and acceptance, not oppression.

Incest will be pushed as well. The fact that very few people actually want to engage in incest doesn't matter. Trannies are only a minute fraction of a percent of the population but that hasn't stopped the agitation for trans rights. The advantage of incest is that it's a useful tool for destroying what is left of family life.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash October 21, 2016 10:42 AM  

Wanda Sherratt wrote:I think that about 75 years from now, people will look at our cultural products the way we look at stuff that came out during the Red Scare, only much, much worse.
Except tat Communism was a real threat.

Anonymous Tipsy October 21, 2016 12:19 PM  

@98 Unfortunately, your right. Here's the problem. The natural law informs us that sex is licit when it is connected with family life - for the begetting of children and the pair bonding of adults who can form a family to raise the children.

Once we discarded the Natural Law and concluded that sexual acts needn't have some kind of connection to life, then more and more perversions began to creep in.

What's interesting to me as a middle aged man is how much of what is considered normal in heterosexual activity has its genesis in homosexuality. I had read a while back that the basis of the sexuality of the characters in Sex and the City was really based on the sexual lives of the homosexual writers for that series.

VD was absolutely right when he said "They insist on injecting their filth into EVERYTHING they encounter."

Blogger Jed Mask October 21, 2016 2:55 PM  

Yep, yep. Good lesson. Keep teachin' Vox. Amen!

Blogger Zeke OF Confettii October 21, 2016 3:48 PM  

S. F. "Fandom" has already accepted Pedo. As for Hannibal-ism, I keep checking out the max size of Big Green Eggs.

Blogger Jack Morrow October 21, 2016 4:04 PM  

The main thing I remember from this magazine ca. 1969-70 was Goofus and Gallant. Will they be a couple now?

Anonymous BGKB October 21, 2016 5:13 PM  

the characters in Sex and the City was really based on the sexual lives of the homosexual writers for that series

Always chasing Mr BIG

If they push it any further, you will be able to walk down the street in full SS regalia and no-one will notice.

Did you forget the "Man in the high castle" post here from a few months ago? Even in NYC they liked it for the wrong reasons.

Anonymous Anthony October 22, 2016 4:36 AM  

@98 Incest will come first. I'm not certain they'd ever be able to push pedophelia... but who knows. 5 years ago I'd never have believed we'd have a male 'woman of the year'.

With incest they will be saying "Who are we to get in the way of love?! Let them marry!!"

We need to put an end to this nonsense.

Blogger dfordoom October 22, 2016 5:19 AM  

@ Anthony

I think you're probably right. Incest will be a very easy victory for them. I expect there'll be very little opposition. Compared to homosexual marriage it will seem like small potatoes. The push for incestuous marriage will probably come at the same time as a push for polygamy. If a man can marry another man then letting him marry his sister, or letting a woman marry two or more men, won't seem like much of a big deal at all.

It's all playing out exactly as Huxley predicted in Brave New World - people will give up political freedom in exchange for sexual freedom, and sexual freedom will turn out to be a prison.

Orwell was right about a lot of things but overall Huxley's vision of the future was more accurate. You don't need jackboots - drugs and sex are enough to keep the population under control.

Anonymous Anthony October 23, 2016 12:18 AM  

@106 And you can bet the people they wheel out / the examples they use in the media in attempt to normalise incestuous relationships will likely be two sisters, two brothers or a mother and her tranny son. :)

A father and daughter, or a brother and sister, as disgusting and abnormal as that would be - would actually be considered too 'normal' for the Cultural Marxists. Because it'd be a heterosexual relationship.

With polygamy, it will be pushed primary for the benefit of homosexuals and women. Homosexuals should be allowed to marry multiple people of the same sex and straight women should be allowed to marry multiple men. A man having two or more women to himself wouldn't be something they'd advocate for (directly) for obvious reasons.

By the way, I was thinking about what you said about pedophelia in your other comment and it reminded me that earlier this year, here in Australia, a childcare organisation ( earlychildhoodaustralia org.au ) referred to children as 'sexual beings'. It was reported in the MSM media - people weren't too happy about it. I sent them an email saying if they ever referred to a child of mine as a 'sexual being', that they would 'cease being'.

Funny how the left has become as anti-science as the religious right (who believe in creationism and deny evolution).

The left may accept evolution but they certainly don't accept biology!

Blogger SciVo October 23, 2016 1:48 AM  

Oh, you silly geese. There are "only" 2.721 million FedGov employees. And Anders Brevik killed "only" 77 people (wounding 319). Let us assume that AB was over twice as effective as the average white man would be, and that we can "only" expect 38 dead per attacker; then there would be only 71,606 "lone wolves" in jail by the time all FedGov tyrants were dead. It is as simple as that.

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable October 23, 2016 1:53 AM  

It would literally take less than 72,000 men willing to go to jail to eliminate FedGov. Math!

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable October 23, 2016 2:03 AM  

Or perhaps I should say... less than 88,000. :D

Blogger confederate miner October 25, 2016 7:26 PM  

I applaud your actions but how about taking the next step and get rid of the whole television?

Blogger confederate miner October 25, 2016 7:30 PM  

I hope you are right. We need to pick up the pace

Blogger confederate miner October 25, 2016 7:37 PM  

"They're cute with cute rhymes and cute songs". No they are not cute.you are helping finance the destruction of your culture and race. Nothing about it at all is cute.

Blogger confederate miner October 25, 2016 7:45 PM  

Couldn't agree more! If you are a Christian and are still paying a monthly cable TV bill you probably need to reevaluate what your true values really are. I believe television has done an amazing amount of damage to our society.

Blogger confederate miner October 25, 2016 7:53 PM  

I am a Christian and totally agree. If we are gonna win the Christians in this country are gonna have to get some testosterone. Just wondering are you christian?

Blogger confederate miner October 25, 2016 7:58 PM  

Yes especially since a lot of people are waking up to the lies we have been told about Hitlers Germany.

Blogger confederate miner October 25, 2016 8:08 PM  

Yes especially since a lot of people are waking up to the lies we have been told about Hitlers Germany.

Blogger confederate miner October 25, 2016 8:09 PM  

I am a Christian and totally agree. If we are gonna win the Christians in this country are gonna have to get some testosterone. Just wondering are you christian?

Blogger confederate miner October 25, 2016 8:10 PM  

Couldn't agree more! If you are a Christian and are still paying a monthly cable TV bill you probably need to reevaluate what your true values really are. I believe television has done an amazing amount of damage to our society.

Blogger confederate miner October 25, 2016 8:10 PM  

"They're cute with cute rhymes and cute songs". No they are not cute.you are helping finance the destruction of your culture and race. Nothing about it at all is cute.

Blogger confederate miner October 25, 2016 8:10 PM  

I hope you are right. We need to pick up the pace

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts