ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Monday, October 31, 2016

The dam is breaking

And the Trumpslide I'd predicted before the conventions now looms:
According to former Jimmy Carter pollster Pat Caddell, Hillary Clinton is hemorrhaging support as a result of the FBI announcement and we could see a repeat of the 1980 election when anti-establishment candidate Ronald Reagan won in a landslide.

Caddell drew comparisons to the 1980 presidential race, which was close right up until the final days before the electorate abandoned Carter and rallied around the anti-establishment candidate, leading to Reagan taking victory in a landslide.

Caddell noted that Carter’s entire campaign had been built around portraying Reagan as unqualified and “dangerous,” in a similar vein to how Clinton has demonized Trump. Caddell explained that the polling between Reagan and Carter was close up until the final weekend when “the dam broke” and Reagan shot ahead by ten points.

Stating that he had been looking at the data regarding unfavorability ratings for both Clinton and Trump, Caddell noted that since Friday, large numbers of voters had been structurally “moving against the status quo – the incumbent who is essentially Hillary Clinton.”
Interestingly enough, Drudge is now reporting that Hillary Clinton's unfavorability rating has hit record highs and now exceeds Donald Trump's. She has been such a historically horrible candidate that the net result of all her campaign spending was to lose 9 points of favorability since May 2015.

Sixty percent of voters view Hillary Clinton unfavorably, according to a ABC News/Washington Post poll released Monday morning, the highest level of unpopularity yet for the Democratic presidential nominee.

The difference, of course, is that plenty of people are going to vote for Trump despite their dislike of his bombastic personality. No white people who aren't drinking the Clinton Kool-Aid are going to vote for Hillary.

Meanwhile the early voting numbers look positive for the Trump campaign:
Trump communications advisor Jason Miller said on Breitbart News Sunday that Donald Trump has thousands of more early votes racked up than Mitt Romney did during this point in the 2012 election, giving them more momentum heading into the final week of the 2016 presidential election. “I want to give you a couple of early voting, absentee voting successes we’ve seen,” Miller told SiriusXM host Matthew Boyle. “We can talk about polls… But let me tell you about real votes coming in now in Florida. Republican numbers at this point are a combination of absentee voting and early voting. Republican numbers are up seven percent, and Democrat numbers are down ten percent. So, what does that mean?”
If the rest of the election follows that pattern, a 17-point turnaround means a Trumpslide.

Labels:

122 Comments:

Anonymous Daedalus Mugged October 31, 2016 2:32 PM  

Smells like victory.

Anonymous Clueless Cuckservative October 31, 2016 2:36 PM  

Anyone else would be beating her by an even bigger margin.

Anonymous An Extremely Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than A Basket Of Twenty Deplorable Cents October 31, 2016 2:38 PM  

The difference, of course, is that plenty of people are going to vote for Trump despite their dislike of his bombastic personality. No white people who aren't drinking the Clinton Kool-Aid are going to vote for Hillary.

If the retired schoolteachers, the earnest social workers, the Nice White People, just stay home, just don't vote, yeah, that's going to be good enough in some places.

Blogger Timmy3 October 31, 2016 2:42 PM  

The wall is getting higher.

Anonymous A Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents October 31, 2016 2:42 PM  

Posted on an earlier thread:

Trump in Michigan:

"How can Hillary expect to manage the government when she can't manage her email"?

I'm missing Rodney Dangerfield.

Trump 2016 for the LOLZ!

Blogger cheddarman October 31, 2016 2:43 PM  

Lock her ass up! Maybe she and Huma can share a cell to save the Trump administration money.

Anonymous Will October 31, 2016 2:44 PM  

Doug Schoen bailed yesterday also.

Blogger Ron Winkleheimer October 31, 2016 2:44 PM  

Clueless Cuckservative beat me to it. Its going to be, "Hillary was such a bad candidate anybody could have beat her." And, "Hillary would have won in a landslide if it wasn't for Weinergate."

One thing that has struck me though is how thoroughly inept these people actually are at running a criminal enterprise.

If it wasn't for the almost complete corruption of the MSM and politicians and the willful obtuseness and ignorance of a vast amount of the electorate these people would be lucky to be running a penny stock scam from a boiler room.

Anonymous dagwood October 31, 2016 2:49 PM  

"Caddell noted that Carter’s entire campaign had been built around portraying Reagan as unqualified"

So, Carter thought that the two-term governor of the vastly-larger-than-Georgia state of California was unqualified. So much becomes clearer when you hear a thing like that.

"And, "Hillary would have won in a landslide if it wasn't for Weinergate."

TRANSLATION: I would have gotten away with it, too, if it wasn't for you meddlesome kids!

So, Hitler would have won in a walk if only a psychopathic career criminal hadn't made the mistake of getting caught. Now there's an argument fit for Cicero.

Blogger Anchorman October 31, 2016 2:49 PM  

The Clinton camp are swinging at Comey because his letter is "light on details."

That tells me that they're used to "inside scoop" warnings and briefs and that Comey really did go rogue.

If CNN/NBC/CBS/ABC start 24/7 coverage of Senate and House races, you know the internals are toxic and they've been "all hands on deck" to get the House or Senate to salvage something from this cycle.

Anonymous Daedalus Mugged October 31, 2016 2:49 PM  

It is telling that the 'best case' in the Weiner emails is that in her drive to hide her corruption, Hillary! treated national security interests with such contempt that it was accidentally misplaced onto the laptop of a notorious perv. That is the best case.

Anonymous Kusala Blue October 31, 2016 2:50 PM  

Pat Caddell. Riiiigghhht.

OpenID basementhomebrewer October 31, 2016 2:50 PM  

Ron Winkleheimer wrote:Clueless Cuckservative beat me to it. Its going to be, "Hillary was such a bad candidate anybody could have beat her." And, "Hillary would have won in a landslide if it wasn't for Weinergate."

One thing that has struck me though is how thoroughly inept these people actually are at running a criminal enterprise.

If it wasn't for the almost complete corruption of the MSM and politicians and the willful obtuseness and ignorance of a vast amount of the electorate these people would be lucky to be running a penny stock scam from a boiler room.


It's the chicken and the egg theory. Do they do such a sloppy job because they don't want to take the extra effort and they assume everyone will cover for them, or does everyone cover for them because they do a sloppy job?

I suspect it's the first one. These guys were once small fish and didn't have anyone to cover for them. They were getting away with their schemes then so I assume they must have at one time been very good at it. Now they have gotten away with it so many times that they just keep getting more and more complacent.

Blogger Anchorman October 31, 2016 2:50 PM  

So, Carter thought that the two-term governor of the vastly-larger-than-Georgia state of California was unqualified.

Dems always portray GOP prez candidates as dumb or out of touch or both...and always racist.

Blogger OGRE October 31, 2016 2:51 PM  

Unfortunately the drawback to the Comey announcement is it lets the media in the aftermath of a Trump victory push the narrative that the only reason he won was because of the FBI butting in, that Hillary would have won except for Comey's involvement. But, if it isn't that it would be something else no matter what. And hopefully we can see a Trumpslide significant enough to make it clear that he was going to win regardless of the FBI investigation.

A few points in a few key states could push him into 330 electoral vote territory.

Anonymous Zek October 31, 2016 2:52 PM  

Bev Harris just reported that she found the master key to steal the election using electronic voting machines. Linked at Drudge

Anonymous Zek October 31, 2016 2:53 PM  

http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-video/

Anonymous Just another commenter October 31, 2016 2:54 PM  

May not make a difference. Via a link from Drudge to Infowars: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fob-AGgZn44

They can get any result they want with that system.

In many states are all votes are machine-counted; some have paper ballots bubbled in to count, some are only on screens.

Anonymous Just another commenter October 31, 2016 2:56 PM  

Wow. Three of us reporting the same things in a 2-second span. Must be true, then :-)

Anonymous Tiny Duck October 31, 2016 3:00 PM  

Man, I almost feel sorry for you guys. I think voxday guaranteed a Romney win in 2012, and well....

Mrs. Clinton is going to win a landslide. I would look forward to all the butthurt but you guys are so pathetic that I jst feel bad for you

Blogger Anchorman October 31, 2016 3:03 PM  

TROLLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Blogger SemiSpook37 October 31, 2016 3:04 PM  

I'm still waiting for the attack cyborgs that Caddell promised. It's been almost 15 years...

...oh? That was a shitty SNL sketch? Nevermind.

At least the REAL Pat Caddell learned something, unlike his compatriots from the Carter clusterfuck. I can respect that.

Blogger Ostar October 31, 2016 3:05 PM  

Will it be close enough in key states though so the DEMS can steal it by voter fraud? If there's more stories about how Trump should accept the results right before or on election day, then the stealers will feel confident they have enough fraud.

Anonymous Down and Out in... October 31, 2016 3:07 PM  

While I've got my fingers crossed for a Trump win whether by a hair or by a tsunami, a genuine Trumpslide would not only be exquisite, it would be very, very very useful in the wars to come.

All the same, I'm going to spend Election Night far, far away from broadcast media, locked in a room with some Ernie Bushmiller, a loaded revolver, and a bottle of Tullamore Dew.

Anonymous A Most Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents October 31, 2016 3:07 PM  

@15 OGRE
Unfortunately the drawback to the Comey announcement is it lets the media in the aftermath of a Trump victory push the narrative that the only reason he won was because of the FBI butting in, that Hillary would have won except for Comey's involvement. But, if it isn't that it would be something else no matter what.

You answered your own worry. Libtards who screech "selected, not elected" in the wake of a close election one year will find some other excuse in some other year. There's always going to be a Narrative why some annointed D didn't get the brass ring.

So what? So f-ing what?

We. Don't. Care.

That's what.

Anonymous kfg October 31, 2016 3:07 PM  

" . . . until the final weekend when “the dam broke” and Reagan shot ahead by ten points."

Of course what actually happened was that the pollsters had to align themselves with reality in order not to appear completely out of it and destroy their credibility even with the credulous.

Blogger Crude October 31, 2016 3:09 PM  

To think that just last week the headlines were all 'Clinton to just drive to a massive landslide.'

Anonymous VFM #6306 October 31, 2016 3:11 PM  

Can you imagine a Democrat ever once saying, "The unfortunate thing about Obama's historic win is that some Republicans can naysay him because McCain wasn't all that conservative?"

I don't care if Clinton is videotaped assraping a transvestite with an aborted baby in a Target bathroom and that's used as an excuse for her "popularity" waning.

Trump winning is Trump winning.

Blogger Ostar October 31, 2016 3:13 PM  

As I have heard it, the Repub "leaders" have known for decades that Dems consistently use voter fraud. Their response has just basically been: Well, we just need to win by a couple more points to be sure.

Instead of working towards clean elections, they have just let the fraud cancer metastasize. I've never heard what the Repubs got out if it in return, unlike immigration for example.

Blogger Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus October 31, 2016 3:13 PM  

Don't you people realise that we HAVE to vote for Hillary so that we can elect the First Woman Preznet????

Blogger Anchorman October 31, 2016 3:17 PM  

I've never heard what the Repubs got out if it in return, unlike immigration for example.

Money. They, like the Dems, use certain issues to scare people into forking over their money. Abortion, national security, social security, racism, etc.

They don't want to fix the problems, because then they wouldn't have something to scare folks next election cycle.

Anonymous SaltyDonnie October 31, 2016 3:18 PM  

Excellent. Caddell is the Last Honest Democrat, and he's usually reliable.

Still, too much to hope for. Like celebrating a touchdown lead in the Super Bowl with 2:30 left on the clock. I just can't do it.

There's a whole week yet to go, and a WHOLE lot of bullshite should be expected. Will it flow? Will it have an impact? Who knows. I'm sure MSM Clintonistas are fiendishly photoshopping Trump sodomizing a disabled billy goat while wearing a sombrero as we speak.

Anonymous Bowman October 31, 2016 3:18 PM  

No white people who aren't drinking /*the Clinton Kool-Aid*/ are going to vote for Hillary.

Blogger OGRE October 31, 2016 3:19 PM  

@24 and @27 You misunderstand me. I'll take the Trump win anyway it comes. As long as he gets 270 votes its all good. I would prefer it to come without giving the globalists any ammunition to build a counter-narrative--it makes the post election media tears taste so much the sweeter. But then again, a bombshell dropping such as Clinton diddling little girls or using the N-word would make their heads explode and that would be just as delicious.

Ogres are always hungry...I need some SJW suffering to keep me well fed.

Blogger Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus October 31, 2016 3:20 PM  

I'm sure MSM Clintonistas are fiendishly photoshopping Trump sodomizing a disabled billy goat while wearing a sombrero as we speak.

Ironically, that might win him a slice of the Muslim vote.

Blogger Stilicho October 31, 2016 3:21 PM  

Kratman's new column is out on everyjoe.com go read it, grok it, live it. Time to start developing "shadow" institutions to delegitimize institutions controlled by leftists (supreme court, e.g.). Principle can be applied at local level as well.

Anonymous Deplorable Psychedelic Cat Hair October 31, 2016 3:22 PM  

"While I've got my fingers crossed for a Trump win whether by a hair or by a tsunami, a genuine Trumpslide would not only be exquisite, it would be very, very very useful in the wars to come.

All the same, I'm going to spend Election Night far, far away from broadcast media, locked in a room with some Ernie Bushmiller, a loaded revolver, and a bottle of Tullamore Dew."

@23 Sounds like a recipe for Russian roulette. Don't go 6 on us.

"You answered your own worry. Libtards who screech "selected, not elected" in the wake of a close election one year will find some other excuse in some other year. There's always going to be a Narrative why some annointed D didn't get the brass ring.

So what? So f-ing what?

We. Don't. Care. "

@24 THIS X 1000! Who gives a flying f what the media thinks? Est. Repubs? Cucks? F'em all!

"Instead of working towards clean elections, they have just let the fraud cancer metastasize. I've never heard what the Repubs got out if it in return, unlike immigration for example."

It's simple. Power.

Blogger Chris Mallory October 31, 2016 3:26 PM  

Ron Winkleheimer wrote:One thing that has struck me though is how thoroughly inept these people actually are at running a criminal enterprise.



The Clintons have kept their enterprise running twice as long as Capone did.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan October 31, 2016 3:28 PM  

So you're saying that virtue signaling Never Trump no longer has any cache?

Anonymous Undocumented Civilizationalist October 31, 2016 3:29 PM  

And to continue the trend, "polling guru" Nate Silver of 538 is going...shall we say, wobbly. Two of his tweets from today:

@natesilver538
"Either polls are having trouble capturing a random sample, or voter preferences are quite volatile. Either way, lots of uncertainty."

and then:

"Esoteric hot take: If polling swings are exaggerated by non-response bias, that suggests a significant risk of systemic polling error."

So from Hillary win 320+ in the electoral college and possibly even taking Texas to... "lots of uncertainty."

Today is the first real day I have just sensed the shifting headwinds.

Anonymous The Egghead McMuffin Fan Club October 31, 2016 3:32 PM  

@38

Well, we're not quite sure yet. Let us discuss it and we'll get back to you.

Anonymous Napoleon 12pdr October 31, 2016 3:44 PM  

I like Pat Caddell, he's an Old School Democrat. Believe it or not, they weren't always the party of treason. Folly, yes, but not treason.

FWIW, the decisive moment in the 1980 campaign was the debate. Reagan did what he had to do, which was to sound like a sane, credible alternative to the disaster that was Carter.

Blogger Lovekraft October 31, 2016 3:52 PM  

The desire for revenge is not going to go away with a Trump victory. Just letting them go about their lives after acting and attempting to thieve, manipulate, harass etc will not sit well with many.

Same for the marxists. They know this and will be on hyper-alert to this possibility.

Does justice in the course of righting the ship (including massive purges of bureaucracies, educational institutions, firings) represent revenge or is it a necessary step?

I believe we on the alt-right need to send a strong message that attempts to repeat the mistakes of giving cultural marxists an entry point will be met harshly.

Blogger Jew613 October 31, 2016 3:58 PM  

Ostar wrote:As I have heard it, the Repub "leaders" have known for decades that Dems consistently use voter fraud. Their response has just basically been: Well, we just need to win by a couple more points to be sure.



Instead of working towards clean elections, they have just let the fraud cancer metastasize. I've never heard what the Repubs got out if it in return, unlike immigration for example.


The reason is pretty simple. Back in 1981, the Republican party of New Jersey discovered some pretty massive fraud going on in the governor's race. The Democratic party of New Jersey claimed this was racist, sued, and the Republicans settled agreeing to not try to stamp out voter fraud anywhere in the USA.

http://judicialview.com/Court-Cases/Civil-Procedure/Democratic-National-Committee-v-Republican-National-Committee/10/201975

Blogger Cail Corishev October 31, 2016 3:59 PM  

And to continue the trend, "polling guru" Nate Silver of 538 is going...shall we say, wobbly. Two of his tweets from today:

He's just plain babbling now. He's been saying it's important to look at the averages, because individual polls may vary. So why can't he just look at the averages? Because now too many of them aren't saying the right things, so the average doesn't come out where he wants it?

Blogger James Dixon October 31, 2016 4:01 PM  

I voted on Saturday, but since something around 2/3rd's of my state will go for Trump, it didn't really matter that much.

Blogger michael savell October 31, 2016 4:01 PM  

Don't start getting complacent.If Hilary had just blown Switzerland up, women in the USA would still vote for her alongside those husbands who do as they are told.

Anonymous Be Deplorable, Not Afraid October 31, 2016 4:02 PM  

To anybody who thinks that oh, say, their favorite dog, could have beaten Hillary, I have this. Think back to the lame losers the GOPe was trying to get us to follow: Jeb, Kasich, etc. Do you think any of them would have taken the fight to Hillary, or would they have just tried to lose gracefully? We can't spare Trump; he fights!

Blogger Ron Winkleheimer October 31, 2016 4:02 PM  

The Clintons have kept their enterprise running twice as long as Capone did.

I can't argue with that. But he didn't have the IRS on his side.

Blogger Revelation Means Hope October 31, 2016 4:06 PM  

Looking at my facebook feed to capture who is supporting Crooked Clinton. Will never trust them again if they are a male. If they are a woman, I probably never trusted them to begin with on anything of substance. Still won't give the women a pardon on this one, however.

Supporting Hillary just because of her vagina means you cannot be associated with me and my family.

The reason I'll be writing it down is that I'm finally pulling the Facebook plug this year. Been slowly unfriending people after getting their contact information, but will accelerate this now.

Blogger Cataline Sergius October 31, 2016 4:12 PM  

Trump spent the day campaigning in Grand Rapids.

This is significant because the last time Michigan went Red was in 1988...in a Presidential election. In the off years it has often has gone Republican.

Trump is feeling confident enough to campaign in what is traditionally enemy territory.

Also Trump is listening to better advice than Romney did. Honestly if Romney had tried he could have landed Michigan, his father's name would have done that for him.

I never heard George Romney mentioned once during the 2012 campaign. Yet Michigan has a Republican governor and a Republican congress.

Michigan is can be carried but not by a Cuckservative.

Anonymous Anonymous October 31, 2016 4:13 PM  

The Democrats' reaction to the emails has not been remarked on enough. I haven't heard one of them say that the emails weren't real, authentic messages sent by or through Hillary, Huma, or whoever. They just rant and rave about how the messages were "stolen". So what? are they real or not?

Also the other possible consequence of hacking has not been looked at. Couldn't Russian or Chinese hackers influence State Department decision-making (such as it was and is!) by introducing fake info and irrelevancies to the stream of emails that might make decision-makers wrong or confused about what to do? Hillary certainly sounded confused in the hours around Benghazi events. Or maybe it wouldn't matter. And it certainly makes no difference to the dead now. But it is coming back zombie-like to make a big difference to HRC.

Anonymous A Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents October 31, 2016 4:18 PM  

@50
Caught part of Trump's speech livestreamed. Worth the time.

Strategy: In the last 48 hours Trump has held rallies in Michigan, Colorado, New Mexico and Nevada that I know of. That's called "going on the offensive".

Blogger Ron Winkleheimer October 31, 2016 4:19 PM  

@50

Caught a snippet of Shep Smith this afternoon, he seemed annoyed with Trump for campaigning there.

Blogger Alexander October 31, 2016 4:19 PM  

I voted on Saturday, but since something around 2/3rd's of my state will go for Trump, it didn't really matter that much.

Not true. We can't stop them from spinning the narrative they want to spin, but by kek I will enjoy every single tear shed by cucks and progressive alike on the evening of Nov. 8, and every vote counts towards the popular vote anguish.

Blogger JaimeInTexas October 31, 2016 4:19 PM  

FWIW, in Houston's south side, near NASA-JSC, I just walked into the polling place. No line. I was shocked and so was the poll worker at the entrance. There were people voting but no line! Did people forgot that early voting is two weeks? What I hear is the early voting in traditional Republican areas has seen huge increase in voting. The traditional Democrat areas has seen some increase in some polling places only.

Blogger Cataline Sergius October 31, 2016 4:20 PM  

Oh my Stars and Whiskers!

Hillary has just resurrected the "Daisy Ad" from 1964.

Wait a minute.

Who was Hillary backing in 1964?

Remind me, someone?

Blogger darkdoc October 31, 2016 4:22 PM  

Obama press secretary came out today and defends Comey.

Telling my wife this weekend that if Comey isn't fired, and is even defended by Obama (crickets would have been good enough), that Comey did this with full knowledge (and approval) of Obama.

Rumor is all 33000 deleted emails turned over by Wiki today. The Dems (Obama most of all) may be just trying to save themselves, and goodbye Hillary.

Blogger Anchorman October 31, 2016 4:23 PM  

Ross Douthat:

In Trumpworld as Hitler's Bunker terms, this is probably like when Goebbels thought FDR's death would save the Nazi regime.

Blogger JaimeInTexas October 31, 2016 4:23 PM  

Abbreviated old Texas joke.

Man: Jose why are you crying?
Boy: Because my dad does not love me?
Man: But your dad is dead!
Boy: Yes, but he came back to vote for JFK but did not visit me.

Another oldie.
Q: Why Florida quit borrowing Chicago's voting machines?
A: Because last time Daly won the governor's election.

Blogger Cail Corishev October 31, 2016 4:26 PM  

@47, Yeah, the claim that Some Other Guy could have beaten Hillary assumes that Some Other Guy would have run a campaign like Trump's, raised and hammered at the same issues as Trump, inspired the same followers as Trump, and frightened the Dems into the same self-inflicted wounds that Trump has. Pigs would have flown sooner.

Blogger Cail Corishev October 31, 2016 4:31 PM  

In Trumpworld as Hitler's Bunker terms, this is probably like when Goebbels thought FDR's death would save the Nazi regime.

Does anyone have a Cuck-to-English translator?

Blogger Basil Makedon October 31, 2016 4:31 PM  

Tuesday is Nuke from Orbit day, assuming that anyone has a warhead left in the silo.

Anonymous A Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents October 31, 2016 4:38 PM  

@60

Does anyone have a Cuck-to-English translator?



No, but if you just imagine Douthat as Baghdad Bob maybe you can make sense of it.

That reminds me, has anyone told Hitler about the Weiner laptop yet?

Anonymous An Extremely Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than A Basket Of Twenty Deplorable Cents October 31, 2016 4:45 PM  

Shoulda looked before I asked.

Hitler learns of latest Clinton emails

Blogger Vlad October 31, 2016 4:49 PM  

I bet heavily on Trump to win and now I should get a nice payout. Will make a Trump victory that much more sweeter

Blogger Lucas October 31, 2016 4:52 PM  

I find this all too "good" to be true.

By the way, wasnt Reagan part of the Bohemian Groove? And the Franklin Coverup tainted him a bit, right?

Anyway, let's hope Trump wins.

Anonymous That Would Be Telling October 31, 2016 4:53 PM  

@43 Jew613:

Ostar wrote:
[...]

Instead of working towards clean elections, [Repub leaders] have just let the fraud cancer metastasize. I've never heard what the Repubs got out if it in return, unlike immigration for example.


The reason is pretty simple. Back in 1981, the Republican party of New Jersey discovered some pretty massive fraud going on in the governor's race. The Democratic party of New Jersey claimed this was racist, sued, and the Republicans settled agreeing to not try to stamp out voter fraud anywhere in the USA.


That's just binding on the RNC, right? It wouldn't be difficult to set up separate organizations to fight voter fraud; the real problem, of course, it that they'd rather lose, and lose the entire country while they're at it, than be called racist.

Blogger SteveK October 31, 2016 5:03 PM  

I'm currently visiting Washington DC. I've seen several "I'm with Her" Kool-aid drinkers proudly wearing their shirts and hats. No crime is big enough to change their minds.

Anonymous johnc October 31, 2016 5:07 PM  

Has anybody been following Hillary's twatter?

Holy smokes talk about complete desperation. She's on about terrifying people with the fear that Trump is going to launch nuclear weapons at any moment. Isn't this rehashed stuff from September? And then she had three tweets in a row bringing up teh Russians! again.

I know she's trying to scare her voters into getting out there and voting, but this looks pathetic.

Blogger Ezekiel October 31, 2016 5:12 PM  

How ironic that the predilections of a sex-addicted New York Jew may well be the thing that plays a decisive role in saving the Republic...

I'll take a miracle wherever I can find it, but frankly I still don't see why the emails/Comey's investigation are hurting Clinton more than either the #draftourdaughters meme or the fact that she openly called for the rigging of elections in a foreign country. Perhaps the latter is getting absolutely no airplay on American TV (the country in question is Palestine after all, to whom our (((leaders))) can do whatever they please) and perhaps the former is never going to reach the newsfeed of politically-centrist/apathetic Philadelphia soccer-moms (given the insulating nature of converged social networks), but hadn't the normies pretty much come to accept criminalistic corruption as part and parcel of the Clinton campaign, and something worth having if it means keeping a "bullying warmonger" (3rd rule of SJW's...) out of the White House?

Anonymous BGKB October 31, 2016 5:13 PM  

Hilary had just blown Switzerland up, women in the USA would still vote for her alongside those husbands who do as they are told

Would they still be wusses when their wives can't see it?

Blogger S1AL October 31, 2016 5:20 PM  

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/303542-doug-schoen-reassessing-my-support-for-hillary

Well... Damn.

Blogger Sam Lively October 31, 2016 5:20 PM  

I broke the dam.

Blogger horsewithnonick October 31, 2016 5:33 PM  

Does anyone care what a cuck has to say?

Anonymous A Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents October 31, 2016 5:44 PM  

@66
Consent decree

That's just binding on the RNC, right?

Good question. Very good question.

It wouldn't be difficult to set up separate organizations to fight voter fraud; the real problem, of course, it that they'd rather lose, and lose the entire country while they're at it, than be called racist.

Unless that group consisted of people who just. Don't. Care.
That group might find all sorts of interesting things to light up.

Hm.

Anonymous Ron October 31, 2016 6:07 PM  

I don't think she will get near the negroid vote she is expecting. Aside from blacks being inherently lazy creatures, they also have an aversion to White women in authority, particularly negroid females.
What she will get is the "black church lady vote". Where Democrats visit large negroid churches and essentially bribe the corrupt negroid preacher that fleeces his congregation into convincing his low IQ black flock to vote for the Democrats.

They deserve what they get. I personally think Trump would be far better for negros for the simple fact of cutting illegal immigration. But negroids are so racist, they are willing to cut their nose off to spite their face.

Anonymous An Extremely Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than A Basket Of Twenty Deplorable Cents October 31, 2016 6:12 PM  

Infamous Louisiana reptile James Carville appears to have gone insane on MSNBC.

Carville claims FBI, GOP and KGB are rigging the election. No kidding.

“This is in effect an attempt to hijack an election,” Carville claimed. “It’s unprecedented … the House Republicans and the KGB are trying to influence our democracy,” he said.

Best. Election. EVAH!

Trump 2016 for the LOLZ!

Blogger Cail Corishev October 31, 2016 6:13 PM  

The fact that they're trying to portray Trump as the scary war-monger in the race is just bizarre. He's so clearly anti-war by instinct that a cuckservative third party sprang up to oppose him on that very issue. I guess Steve Sailer is right: it's always 1969, and leftists always see themselves as peace-loving flower children fighting against some white man who wants to draft them.

Anonymous fish October 31, 2016 6:39 PM  

BADTHINK....BADTHINK.....BADTHINK....! SFGATE HAS DISCOVERED AND INSTANCE OF BADTHINK!

"What makes a rich celebrity risk his very brand in order to climb a political pulpit?
That question applies not only to Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump but also to Scott Adams, the "Dilbert" creator who was long seen as a truth-telling champion of the beleaguered cubicle dweller. Why has Adams spent this election cycle writing political blog posts and at one point endorsing Trump, knowing it would alienate much of his audience?"



http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Why-Scott-Adams-of-Dilbert-fame-risked-his-10425039.php

Anonymous 10/31 October 31, 2016 7:03 PM  

@75
>What she will get is the "black church lady vote". Where Democrats visit large negroid churches and essentially bribe the corrupt negroid preacher that fleeces his congregation into convincing his low IQ black flock to vote for the Democrats.

A+ still laughing

Blogger Unknown October 31, 2016 7:55 PM  

It translateseems as:" WAAAAAAA! You'really not voting for my candidate! Oh I have soiled myself."

Anonymous 11B October 31, 2016 8:01 PM  

With one week left Trump needs all the ammo he can get. If you can afford it, please consider donating directly to Trump's campaign at this site. Any amount, from $1 on up is accepted and will make a difference.

Blogger Ezekiel October 31, 2016 8:05 PM  

An Extremely Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than A Basket Of Twenty Deplorable Cents wrote:Infamous Louisiana reptile James Carville appears to have gone insane on MSNBC.

Carville claims FBI, GOP and KGB are rigging the election. No kidding.

“This is in effect an attempt to hijack an election,” Carville claimed. “It’s unprecedented … the House Republicans and the KGB are trying to influence our democracy,” he said.

Best. Election. EVAH!

Trump 2016 for the LOLZ!


To be fair, I could just as easily see Rove or Cheney making an ass of himself like that too.

I've said before that America is turning into a gerontocracy, if it isn't one already. I actually have to wonder how many of the more deranged Trump-hating Boomers and Silents really do think that he's getting aid from the Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti.

Anonymous 11B October 31, 2016 8:36 PM  

Sheldon Adelson, who pledged $100 million to elect Trump in May but has yet to contribute, has just pumped $25 million into a Trump SuperPAC.

Why would Adelson, who hadn't followed through on his promise to date, suddenly give $25 million and be open for another $25 million in the final week of this campaign if he didn't think it was a sure thing?

Blogger Kristophr October 31, 2016 8:53 PM  

"Tuesday is Nuke from Orbit day, assuming that anyone has a warhead left in the silo. "

How much of the Clinton Foundation money is simply flat out stolen or fraudulently gathered?

Blogger Kristophr October 31, 2016 8:53 PM  

And if the Clinton Foundation is fraudulent, when were taxes paid on the monetary gains?

Blogger Basil Makedon October 31, 2016 9:01 PM  

@54 I am voting tomorrow in roughly the same area, I'll see what the line is like in the AM.

Blogger bob kek mando ( Grab 'Em By The Pussy And Their Hearts And Minds Will Follow ) October 31, 2016 9:04 PM  

Obama's official line is that Comey is doing a fine job.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/31/politics/white-house-james-comey-clinton-emails/

this leaves two possibilities:
1 - Comey is off the reservation but the already discovered info is SO bad that Obama has decided to cut her loose

2 - Comey is doing this with Obama's full knowledge and, likely, under his direct instruction

if #2, either Obama is leaving all the rest of the Dems in the dark ... or they are way better actors than i gave them credit for.

Blogger bob kek mando ( Grab 'Em By The Pussy And Their Hearts And Minds Will Follow ) October 31, 2016 9:08 PM  

83. 11B October 31, 2016 8:36 PM
Why would Adelson, who hadn't followed through on his promise to date, suddenly give $25 million and be open for another $25 million in the final week of this campaign if he didn't think it was a sure thing?



that's not how this works.

all this means is that Adelson has moved from completely dismissive of Trump's chances to thinking it's possible.

IF Trump becomes president
THEN Adelson does NOT want to be known as the guy who pledged millions to Trump ... and then reneged on

Anonymous Java Cup October 31, 2016 9:11 PM  

1) If Trump is a Kremlin plot going back five years, Putin earned the presidency. No one in DC has that sort of vision.

2) Dropped off mail-in ballot at early voting polling place today in Phoenix (east valley) just to see. Small room, 4 ballot marking stations, all full up and about 10 waiting. Ballot box was so stuffed almost couldn't get mine to fit. 3-4 more showed up to drop-off as I turned to leave. All white.

Blogger bob kek mando ( Grab 'Em By The Pussy And Their Hearts And Minds Will Follow ) October 31, 2016 9:12 PM  

also, the only purpose for this is too buy influence.

leaving your 'contribution' until the last week of the election rather hampers the ability of the candidate to use it.

Trump knows Adelson is just playing the game and will, in public, be very gracious towards Adelson ( just as he is being very gracious towards Comey now ) but he's not going to trust that little ((( turd ))) any further than he can throw him.

Blogger Ned October 31, 2016 9:54 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Basil Makedon October 31, 2016 9:56 PM  

@90

Meh, I'm fine with Adelson's action. He's contributed more money to the cause than I have after all, final week or no. I doubt he is under any illusion that Trump will be overly grateful, this isn't Adelson's first rodeo. He's better than the Koch's who prefer Hillary.

Trump's campaign can't legally coordinate with a SuperPAC in any event. Last week of the election, the PAC at least knows where to target and how. Michigan, PA, Colorado

Anonymous krymneth October 31, 2016 11:02 PM  

Well, it's end-of-newsday on Monday and the Clinton kill-shot to distract from all their bad news appears to be... claiming Trump has a secret server that communicate with Russia. A ludicrous claim since that is not even what servers are for.

Looks like they're out of bullets. Like, out out. Epically out.

And what I would consider reliable sources (Wikileaks and O'Keefe) are saying they still aren't done. (O'Keefe sometimes overplays his hand, but he's got at least two scalps, so he's not a joke.) To say nothing of what comes from the FBI. To say nothing of the scandals that got squeezed out of the news this week because there is so damned much bad news for Hillary that the new cycle is too small to contain it and could be revived if there is a lull in the news. (The bit about discussing fixing the Palestinian election could merge with the voting machine news on the last few hours and revive, for instance.)

It ain't over 'til it's over, be sure to vote, keep the press up, don't get complacent, etc etc... but suddenly I'm really appreciating clean living and having the reasonable expectation of sleeping soundly tonight and not waking up to a fresh round of krymneth scandals in the morning.

Blogger Cail Corishev October 31, 2016 11:09 PM  

I read about 2/3 of the Slate article about the Russian server before quitting lest my eyes roll out of my head. I'm in the IT/DNS business, and it's complete nonsense. They don't even use the terminology correctly; it looks like they interviewed someone in the business long enough to halfway understand the concepts, and then threw together what sounded scary to them.

I doubt it'll go anywhere, because it's too full of buzzwords for anyone not in the business to understand it well enough to judge by it, and anyone who does know the topic will know it's stupid.

If that was the big kill-shot they've been giggling about, the Trumpslide cometh.

Blogger G-S. October 31, 2016 11:19 PM  

Aint gonna happen. Wake from your stupor before it's too late. I watched Inception tonight and it's obvious you are still in your own dreamworld.

Blogger M Cephas October 31, 2016 11:54 PM  

"No white people who aren't drinking the Clinton Kool-Aid are going to vote for Hillary"

If you replace "white people" with "white men", I think it would be a fairly accurate statement. White women are up in the air.

Anonymous Coastwatcher November 01, 2016 12:10 AM  

Jaime, Howdy neighbor. Freeman Library has had a line around the back of the building every day of early voting. Long time resident of Clear Lake, and have never seen this.

Blogger American Spartan November 01, 2016 1:46 AM  

Sam Lively wrote:I broke the dam.

I broke the fucking dam, it was with a boat.

Anonymous Just another commenter November 01, 2016 1:47 AM  

According to ZeroHedge, Peter J. Kadzik (a very good friend of Podesta and an assistant attorney General) will be heading up the "investigation." Of course, were the hard drive to tragically crash and lose all the emails, it would be entirely coincidental and unforeseeable. Of course, if wikiLeaks then dropped the whole 650K emails into the public sphere (or at least post enough to prove they have them, "just in case") it would be Karma writ large.

Blogger Shimshon November 01, 2016 2:51 AM  

@69 The reason while the Comey switch might gain more traction vs all the other recent reveals is because it might occur to people that if he's reviving something he already dismissed and walked away from, it must be really bad. Especially as everyone already knows she's a crook. At least, that's how it looks rhetorically to me, even with no further details by him.

Blogger rho November 01, 2016 3:20 AM  

Serious question: is VD culpable if Trump wins and turns out to be a disaster?

Blogger Snidely Whiplash November 01, 2016 3:40 AM  

The alt-Right is so far inside their OODA loop they aren't even realizing what the attack vector is before a new one crops up.
It's not even Trump doing it. It's Wikileaks, Cernovich, vote fraud activists, local police, NYPD, FBI, 10,000 memes per day, even their own goddamn false flags are hurting her.

It's like watching Rhonda Rousey take on Max Baer, Bruce Lee and Sugar Ray Leonard all at once.
Funny as hell.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash November 01, 2016 3:49 AM  

Chris Mallory wrote:The Clintons have kept their enterprise running twice as long as Capone did.
Capone was well into the throes of syphilitic dementia by the time he was arrested, unlike...
Never mind.

Blogger rho November 01, 2016 3:51 AM  

Snidely Whiplash wrote:The alt-Right is so far inside their OODA loop they aren't even realizing what the attack vector is before a new one crops up.

It's not even Trump doing it. It's Wikileaks, Cernovich, vote fraud activists, local police, NYPD, FBI, 10,000 memes per day, even their own goddamn false flags are hurting her.

It's like watching Rhonda Rousey take on Max Baer, Bruce Lee and Sugar Ray Leonard all at once.

Funny as hell.


Rhonda Rousey vs. Sugar Ray Leonard.

Blogger rho November 01, 2016 3:54 AM  

Snidely puts VD as Rhonda versus Sugar Ray Leonard.

So telling.

Blogger tim November 01, 2016 3:58 AM  

See You Next Tuesday

Blogger Snidely Whiplash November 01, 2016 4:02 AM  

rho wrote:Snidely puts VD as Rhonda versus Sugar Ray Leonard.
VD wasn't even pertinent to the comment, unless you're talking about syphilis.
You're either drunk or abysmally stupid.

Blogger rho November 01, 2016 4:04 AM  

tim wrote:See You Next Tuesday

Tuesdays always come around, homeslice.

Blogger rho November 01, 2016 4:05 AM  

Snidely Whiplash wrote:rho wrote:Snidely puts VD as Rhonda versus Sugar Ray Leonard.

VD wasn't even pertinent to the comment, unless you're talking about syphilis.

You're either drunk or abysmally stupid.


Or scarily prescient!

Blogger Snidely Whiplash November 01, 2016 4:33 AM  

Drunk then.

Anonymous EH November 01, 2016 4:39 AM  

@ 16,17,18
I'm positively predisposed toward Bev Harris, she's been almost alone in pursuing evidence of electronic election fraud for over 15 years. But.

The Black Box Voting video was really, really stupid. Completely disorganized, tons of irrelevant crap about some county fraud that had nothing to do with the vote-switching program, yet totally lacking in information about what was actually in the GEMS system, while trying to give the impression that this vote-rigging app was found in GEMS, whereas it was apparently written entirely by Black Computer Guy. The 24-minute video had about two minutes of actual information. They spent more time than that pant-hooting about it at a Black church.

The "big revelation" is that votes are stored in the database as floats, which is shady, but not even remotely evidence of anything by itself. They don't even mention the much bigger problem of having mutable values for the vote records in the first place, apparently compounded by no transactional security, digital signatures, hashes or even checksums. Maybe Black Computer Guy can't figure out how to do fractions without floating-point numbers, but it isn't hard at all.

We already knew that it is possible to build a vote stealing app on a general-purpose computer, especially one with a full OS, database and programming languages. They need to put out a paper that lays out exactly what was already built-in, how it differs from what any database already has built-in, and how it differs from what should be in a secure system.

Blogger rho November 01, 2016 4:56 AM  

Snidely Whiplash wrote:Drunk then.

I can be both, son.

Anonymous Wesson November 01, 2016 5:07 AM  

Ostar,

The GOP can use felon roles to stop poor areas from voting. Besides, a bigger question is who has control or access to the electronic voting machines.

Blogger Benjamin Kraft November 01, 2016 5:28 AM  

@101. You're funny. I don't think YOU know what you're saying, so there's no reason I ought to either.

@102: OODA?

@111: Yeah, I caught where he said that he himself wrote it, even while playing an extremely fast-paced game while listening. Made me cringe a bit, because it was so obvious they were just trying to scare-tactic people who didn't watch the whole video, or didn't watch it carefully.

I'm now heavily inclined to distrust anything that comes flying at me from that general affiliation.

Blogger Daniel November 01, 2016 6:50 AM  

I found astonishing the similarities with argentinian 2015 elections. Same thing here, will never trust a cristina fernandez supporter ever again

Blogger G-S. November 01, 2016 9:54 AM  

Trump will lose. If you really believe he's going to win then you can put hard cold cash down and win it back in multiples at any online gambling site. Go make a bet:

http://www.oddschecker.com/politics/us-politics/us-presidential-election-2016/winner

I bet on Hillary, and only winning a smaller portion of money. If you think I'm wrong, put even more of your money on Trump. I dare you to bet the house on it.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash November 01, 2016 10:42 AM  

G-S. wrote:I bet on Hillary, and only winning a smaller portion of money. If you think I'm wrong, put even more of your money on Trump. I dare you to bet the house on it.
"I am so confident in my narrative that I put actual money on it!"

So the fuck what dude? What has that to do with anything in the known universe? I bet on things like the distribution of cards in a shuffled deck and the specific movement behavior of a cubical piece of plastic. That has nothing whatever to do with reality at the time I make the bet, only with my emotion attitude concerning them, combined with a certain, and rather small, amount of mathematical calculation.

There are plenty of people here who have laid money down on Trump and told us about it. Does that disprove anything you have said?

Fucking morons.....
Matthew, Markku, can we get a better class of morons in here some time? That'd be great, thanks.

Blogger Basil Makedon November 01, 2016 11:41 AM  

The betting markets were once highly predictive, until people noticed that fact and then started using them as yet another gaslighting demotivator.

Then, people noticed that the betting markets were predictive as long as you focused on the number of bets, not the money line. Then, people adapted to factor that into their gaslighting demotivator.

I don't have a great deal of faith in them any longer. If you consider that trillions of dollars of graft are at stake, then dropping tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars manipulating betting markets to demotivate even .5% of the voting public is a wise investment.

Moreover, if you succeed in demotivating, all that happens is you make LESS on your bet, not that you actually loose money.

Seriously, if you had say 300k to spend -- you could buy one 30 second ad in a battleground state one time OR you could manipulate a so-called "predictive market," which will pay you off on your wager and demotivate your enemy who is desperately seeking some information signal that is not tainted by the converged media. Which would you do?

Blogger Ezekiel November 01, 2016 6:25 PM  

Shimshon wrote:@69 The reason while the Comey switch might gain more traction vs all the other recent reveals is because it might occur to people that if he's reviving something he already dismissed and walked away from, it must be really bad. Especially as everyone already knows she's a crook. At least, that's how it looks rhetorically to me, even with no further details by him.
That makes sense.

Blogger Ezekiel November 01, 2016 6:37 PM  

rho wrote:Serious question: is VD culpable if Trump wins and turns out to be a disaster?
Define "disaster".

Merely incompetent and/or politically unsuccessful? More so that Cruz might have been? Yes, he would be at least partially culpable.

Evil? Clinton plant? Just another cuck or shitlib who won't even try to Make America Great Again? Then the God-Emperor goes on the guillotine and VD would only be considered culpable if he doesn't suggest something even more entertaining.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts