ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2017 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Saturday, December 24, 2016

A dangerous parting shot

The Washington Post belatedly begins to understand that perhaps those crazy people saying Obama is, at the very least, pro-Muslim, weren't necessarily so crazy after all:
PRESIDENT OBAMA’S decision to abstain on a U.N. Security Council resolution condemning Israeli settlements reverses decades of practice by both Democratic and Republican presidents. The United States vetoed past resolutions on the grounds that they unreasonably singled out Jewish communities in occupied territories as an obstacle to Middle East peace, and that U.N. action was more likely to impede than advance negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians.

The measure, approved 14 to 0 by the Security Council Friday, is subject to the same criticism: It will encourage Palestinians to pursue more international sanctions against Israel rather than seriously consider the concessions necessary for statehood, and it will give a boost to the international boycott and divestment movement against the Jewish state, which has become a rallying cause for anti-Zionists. At the same time, it will almost certainly not stop Israeli construction in the West Bank, much less in East Jerusalem, where Jewish housing was also deemed by the resolution to be “a flagrant violation under international law.”

By abstaining, the administration did not explicitly support that position, which has not been U.S. policy since the Carter administration. In explaining the vote, U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power pointed out that the council was sanctioning Israel even while failing to take action to stop a potential genocide in South Sudan or the slaughter in Aleppo, Syria. Yet in failing to veto the measure, the Obama administration set itself apart both from previous administrations and from the incoming presidency of Donald Trump, who spoke out strongly against the resolution.

Israeli officials charged that the abstention represented a vindictive parting shot by Mr. Obama at Mr. Netanyahu, with whom he has feuded more bitterly than he did with most U.S. adversaries. The vote could also be seen as an attempt to preempt Mr. Trump, who appears ready to shift U.S. policy to the opposite extreme after naming a militant advocate of the settlements as his ambassador to Israel. Whatever the motivation, Mr. Obama’s gesture is likely to do more harm than good.
It boggles the mind how the American Left fails to understand that importing people from countries where the population is anti-Israel was always going to move the US in an anti-Israel direction.

Labels: ,

120 Comments:

Blogger dvdivx December 24, 2016 11:36 AM  

These people aren't white and hate Christians as well as hating whites. That's what counts for the left. It is a sickness that can not be cured through logic or discussion.

Anonymous LES December 24, 2016 11:40 AM  

When will Israel define its border? Is it Genesis 15:18 from the river in Egypt to the Euphrates river in Iraq? Didn't God make His covenant conditional on the obedience of Abraham's offspring? Deuteronomy 28. Does the modern, secular state called Israel have a living prophet telling the Jews to take the land away from the people living there? The 10 tribes of the Kingdom of Israel were conquered and assimilated in 722 BC leaving the southern Kingdom of Judah (and the tribe of Benjamin). They were conquered in 586 BC. Later Judeans (Jews) returned to Judea. The land today should rightfully be called Judea, not Israel, and of course Jews should be allowed to live there. But I disagree that it should be a solely Jewish state. Also, I do not believe that the modern, secular state called Israel has anything to do with the Second Coming of Christ. Modern Israel is not the Israel of the Bible.

Blogger Michael Maier December 24, 2016 11:45 AM  

The Jews sabotage everything everywhere in the world and they expect to get special treatment for how THEIR NATION acts?

Let them be thoroughly screwed by the same garbage they foist on others.

Blogger Johnny December 24, 2016 11:47 AM  

"Genesis 15:18 from the river in Egypt to the Euphrates river in Iraq?"
I forget the exact name, but the reference was to a small river south of Judah to the Euphrates. Realistically it was more of a territorial claim than a reality. The reality was something closer to from Dan to Beersheba, with some on again off again control of territory to the east of the Jordan River.

Anonymous BiigGayKoranBurner December 24, 2016 11:48 AM  

By the Whorey Hosts of the Washington Post, they might be coming around.

a potential genocide in South Sudan or the slaughter in Aleppo, Syria

Not as much of a problem of the genocide going on in France & Germany.

parting shot by Mr. Obama at Mr. Netanyahu, with whom he has feuded more bitterly than he did with most U.S. adversaries

Bibi wants to cut off the supply of cheap arab rent boys to Tel Aviv

Blogger Lovekraft December 24, 2016 11:53 AM  

Alt-righters are looking at this this way:

Either the Brown Globalist wins and there is no notion of national/ethnic sovereignty beyond what global orgs like the UN define it as.

OR

Israel gets to keep their own immigration/settlement agenda and screw the rest of the world.

Both scenarios, from my perspective, paint the actors as vile. Those who are not Jewish or Muslim want them all to shut the f up and go away.

Blogger Lazarus December 24, 2016 11:57 AM  

The petulance of a prima donna flouncing offstage.

US Embassy will be moved to Jerusalem. Potential sites already being scouted.

LES wrote:Modern Israel is not the Israel of the Bible.

Well, not the Torah part. Just the part of the prophesies relating to Israel restored in the Land.

Blogger Some Dude December 24, 2016 12:02 PM  

If want to understand how Zion thinks, read the (((Washington Post))). Obama did a good job today. Most president's cower under Zion's miserable glare. People fail to understand zion imports muslims to white countries to frack trust and white homogeny, not to endorse islam. They couldn't care less about ideology. The only thing that matters is - what benefits Zion.

Communism in Russia under (((Bolshevism))) is fine for example. Neoliberalism for (((Wall Street))) in America. There is no hypocrisy. Because it's about race, not dumb symmetry of verbal abstraction. Nietzsche has written extensively on Jewish 'moralising' suckers for gain 150 years ago.

Meanwhile in Israel they have a wall, mines, apartheid against arabs, blood citizenship, ban on Ethiopian jews returning and forced arab resettlements to shit land. Most neocons have 140 plus IQs. They are neither democrats or republicans. What matters most is Zion's ethnic genetic interest which thankfully free information flows on the internet provide away from their academy, media, courts, politicians and book publishers.

Blogger Some Dude December 24, 2016 12:04 PM  

Also note how all the countries of the world voted for it. Even the UK.

Blogger Cataline Sergius December 24, 2016 12:06 PM  

The Washington Post belatedly begins to understand that perhaps those crazy people saying Obama is, at the very least, pro-Muslim, weren't necessarily so crazy after all:

My own view is that he is a little beyond merely pro-Muslim.

Obama is...I strongly believe...a Muslim atheist. He spent enough of his childhood in madrassa schools that he probably identifies privately as Islamic. Although there is also no doubt in my mind that he is also an atheist. He appears to be quite high on narcissistic and Machiavellian. Those talents make even a false path to God difficult to find at the best of times.

Regardless, I suspect his grandparents set about making him an atheist when he was put into their charge. His mother was at best disgracefully negligent as a parent so she was unlikely to object. Even if she wasn't herself an atheist and there is zero doubt in my mind that she was.

But Obama was in that Madrassa school during those fundamentally important years when your original identity is formed. When you create that first image of yourself as who and what you are. It's not something you can ever leave behind even if you consciously reject it.

Blogger tz December 24, 2016 12:09 PM  

The Holocaust card is over-limit and expired, so are no longer "victims", and Jews look white. The left doesn't learn, I wonder how long it takes in the Hillary archipelago to come up with "Jewish Privilege".

Anonymous patrick kelly December 24, 2016 12:11 PM  

The UN and Obama are horrible negotiators a strategists unless they are trying to provoke Israel.

Like with Assad, they give Israel no reason to compromise or negotiate further.

Once you're stated goals are the removal and death of people or peoples, you give them no reason to pursue anything other than a fight to the death, total victory or defeat.

Trump on the other hand will likely handle things differently, at least that is my hope. I'm loving the way he has the MSM and SJW/Cuck world dancing to his arms race tune. Putin also seems to appreciate it.

Blogger Doom December 24, 2016 12:18 PM  

As I mentioned in half a dozen places, American Jews voted for this. They were warned, pleaded with, told, and ignored. They continually choose their muslim kin over European stock in America and Europe over and over, hoping reason will remain with the stock... then choose even outside that stock for leadership. I think we should let that stand and just back away from Israel until they and their people in America, Europe, and Israel choose otherwise, openly, and strongly, themselves. Fuck happy Hanuka, however a very Merry Christmas, to all.

Anonymous BBGKB December 24, 2016 12:18 PM  

But Obama was in that Madrassa school during those fundamentally important years when your original identity is formed. When you create that first image of yourself as who and what you are.

He also had a Tranny prostananny back then. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2110437/Revealed-Barack-Obamas-gay-transgender-prostitute-nanny-cracked-trying-mothers-lipstick.html

Anonymous Elipe December 24, 2016 12:19 PM  

Why is it such a bad thing that the US no longer sides with Israel?

Blogger Johnny December 24, 2016 12:20 PM  

I favor support for Israel because it is useful in a transitory way. Islam is the bigger threat, and it is the threat we decline to admit exists. Thus if Israel provokes the Arabs, so much the better. We need them to be nasty enough that we figure out that they are nasty.

Plus if Israel goes down we could easily end up importing many more Jews. And if Israel stays around many of our Jews could end up moving to their self declared homeland.

Anonymous trev006 December 24, 2016 12:22 PM  

Obama has always hated Israel, of course, but such policy is a brick in the face to the Juicebox Jews, not to mention Haim Saban, Will Kristol, and Ben Shapiro. Polarizing Jewish sentiment in the US towards white (and Jewish) nationalism or globalism benefits both Trump and Obama so much I'm starting to wonder if they both read game theory.

The Palestinians might really regret Trump's complete lack of foreign policy support. If he doesn't want to be liked by the UN and the Arabs, he can let Israel escalate infinitely against the Palestinians.

Blogger Johnny December 24, 2016 12:24 PM  

"But Obama was in that Madrassa school during those fundamentally important years..."

Although Obama panders to blacks he does not seem to think of himself as black. Seems like more of an atheist-globalist sort of thing. D'Souza labels him as anti-colonialists, which does seem to be part of it.

Blogger Some Dude December 24, 2016 12:28 PM  

@13 The jews fund both sides equally look at the top 20 donors of both sides.

The optimum configuration for jews is Obama social policy of Blank Slate emasculated white men who shoved gamma jews heads into lockers in high school. And republican low IQ cucknomics - no redistribution of wealth from the top 1%, of whom the vast majority are jewish or helping whites get up the ladder to challenge.

Bet Reagan ain't so lookin good now with his illegal amnesty and jew economic protection racket. The man had a 105 IQ and dementia and was chosen for a reason.

Most conservatives protecting the rich don't realise the (((rich))) would gladly ship their jobs overseas, send them into stupid wars for Israel and saddle their nation in debt to pay tribute to Zion.

Learn to relinquish ideology. This isn't about propositions and utopias for children's puzzle games. But DNA, tribe and patriot fervour for family and ancestors.

In Weimar Germany, according to Harvard historian Niall Ferguson, jews were 2% of the population and controlled 58% of the wealth. So Hitler wanted to redistribute that.

Thats why its called NATIONAL SOCIALISM.

Blogger TontoBubbaGoldstein December 24, 2016 12:28 PM  

@10

I also suspect Obama is atheist/agnostic, as I suspect are many politicians. Being raised Muslim he may have still have a *warm fuzzy* feeling for the religion/culture. Interestingly it seems that many American atheists who were raised Christian are incredibly hostile to their birth religion/culture.

As far as abstaining from a UN resolution, more power to him! Not only should the US abstain from most UN resolutions; we should totally extricate ourselves from the organisation.

Blogger Wanda Sherratt December 24, 2016 12:29 PM  

It's not likely that anything Obama does can "pre-empt" Donald Trump. The night he was elected, an astute talking head on one of the networks took in stride his decision to address the crowd at the Hilton before Hillary had given a concession speech. She said it emphasized Trump's determination never to let Hillary Clinton set the terms of engagement. He wasn't going to dance attendance on HER. (Or even the media - none of the TV news networks had "officially" granted him the 270 electoral votes until he started speaking.)

So I agree that Obama's administration has "set itself apart". We already see it as a malignant aberration, an interruption in the normality of American life.

Blogger pyrrhus December 24, 2016 12:35 PM  

Of course, Israel has not been negotiating in good faith, as it gradually displaces the population on the West Bank (sound familiar?).....But American jews, who heavily supported Obama for both terms, were delusional in thinking that an anti western "community organizer" would ever be pro Israel...

Anonymous Salt December 24, 2016 12:36 PM  

Johnny wrote:Although Obama panders to blacks he does not seem to think of himself as black.

Think he's always wished he'd been named Tom?

Blogger Some Dude December 24, 2016 12:39 PM  

@15 Its not. Israel gets the US into stupid wars and sells interracial sex to white daughters on their tv shows/movies/music, not arabs. Arabs couldn't damage the US like that with 100 terrorist attacks.

Israel preys upon conservative and liberal stupidity alike and bribes and blackmails dem/repub cucks wantonly. Most donors are explicitly Zionist.

The key is to see the alt right's intellectual contribution - the US should serve the US people, not Israel or Saudi Arabia. Or the 'far' left's contribution - white productivity should be for Americans, not Jewish capital and their rentboy gentile cucks....yeowsaaa.

When will people realise its the people against Zion?

It'll have to censor the internet eventually. People are seeing these patterns and more. Snowden showed they watch all domestic american people, because they are scared of the American people. Tell me, if our Masters were American, why would they be scared of Americans?

Because they are our (((Masters)))!!! Taa daa.

Blogger Cecil Henry December 24, 2016 12:44 PM  

Israel must fight its own wars and stop parasitizing the West.

Fed up. This is not America's concern.

Anonymous That Would Be Telling December 24, 2016 12:46 PM  

@15 Elipe:

Why is it such a bad thing that the US no longer sides with Israel?

This isn't neutrality, a veto would have supported the status quo. This is enmity, and besides it not being wise to make war against a nuclear power (remember that's one of the reasons we voted for Trump due to Team Hillary's visceral desire for a war with Russia?), is the Middle East (which has a great influence on the price of oil, even as we become more energy independent), or the world in general, a better place if Team Obama succeeds in setting another part of it on fire?

Blogger Feather Blade December 24, 2016 12:49 PM  

@22 under the "good fences make good neighbors" doctrine of international relations, everything to the west of the Jordan river to the sea should be Israel.

The Palestinians (assuming they actually want their own state, and assuming that they actually are the descendants of the Philistines) should be somewhere to the southwest of Israel, not scattered in two separate enclaves bracketing Israel.

Blogger Chris Mallory December 24, 2016 12:50 PM  

Johnny wrote:Islam is the bigger threat

Close our borders and Islam ceases to be a threat. They can only hurt us if we invite them in.

Obama got this one right. Nothing in the Middle East is any business of the US government. Israel should sleep in the bed it has made. If that means a few million Muslims sweep Israel into the Med, then so be it.

People keep talking about how "Obama hates Israel". Well, I wish he hated me enough to send me four billion American tax dollars every year.

Blogger Chris Mallory December 24, 2016 12:52 PM  

That Would Be Telling wrote:This isn't neutrality, a veto would have supported the status quo.

The "status quo" is the US being the bottom butt boy for the terrorists in Tel Aviv.

Blogger Lazarus December 24, 2016 12:55 PM  

Some Dude wrote:Also note how all the countries of the world voted for it. Even the UK.

That is the best reason for considering it a stupid idea.

Blogger Lazarus December 24, 2016 1:01 PM  

Chris Mallory wrote:People keep talking about how "Obama hates Israel". Well, I wish he hated me enough to send me four billion American tax dollars every year.

You could probably get it, if you promised to buy F-35's with it.

Anonymous screaming eagle December 24, 2016 1:04 PM  

"....boggles the mind how the American Left fails to understand that importing people from countries where the population is anti-Israel was always going to move the US in an anti-Israel direction."

a. there is no national interest for the US to support Israel..

b. there in biblical requirement to support Israel either despite all this horseshit
about the jews being Gods people == they haven't been Gods people in 2000 years.

c. Obama finally makes a decision that is nationalist and in the US interests and VD is against it.

d. you have become so crazed with your immigration theories that you see boogie men where there are none... it is not the political will of anti Israeli immigrants driving this -- its the US for once in its existence taking a stand towards its interests.

e. if it encourages the Palestinians to seek more legal actions then that is perfectly fine.

The west, in it arrogance caused this problem, along with others, by imposing unilateral borders and creating nations on in an area where this is 5000 years of legitimate inhabitants.

Sorry .. for once, the US got it right here...

Blogger Some Dude December 24, 2016 1:07 PM  

@30 @27

Lots of Jewish commenters here I see.

I think everyone should study that closely. Many jews see themselves as Jewish first, American second, or even third. That's why we all have open borders, 'Rac-ism' invented in the 1940s by Jews, Magic Negro Luther King for Zions civil rights and the lebensraum wars for Israel - Libya, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, Afghanistan, and attempted coups in Turkey and Iran plus bribes to Eygpt.

Uncle Zion won't stop under all the Middle East is pacified.

Israel is the most hated country in the world - the UN showed that today.

Anonymous That Would Be Telling December 24, 2016 1:10 PM  

28 Chris Mallory:

Johnny wrote:
Islam is the bigger threat


Close our borders and Islam ceases to be a threat. They can only hurt us if we invite them in.


You're ignoring the nuclear powered Pakistan, who most everyone believes was funded by the Saudis on the condition that the latter will get warheads if they need them, and that looking ever more likely due to the soon to become nuclear Iran, which hates us with a burning passion.

Doesn't matter if that's deserved or not, I know which side I'm on, and apropos of that:

@29 Chris Mallory:

That Would Be Telling wrote:
This isn't neutrality, a veto would have supported the status quo.


The "status quo" is the US being the bottom butt boy for the terrorists in Tel Aviv.


Obviously I don't see us as being in that posture, and if I have to chose between Israel and the Muslims it's "terrorizing", that choice is really simple as well.

Blogger Some Dude December 24, 2016 1:10 PM  

Funny how Burmese people can see the settlements and middle eastern wars are all the hand of Zion, but people with internet and primary education in the West think Arabs are just naturally cray cray.

Yeah...

Could it be because Zion controls the media? NAWWWWW

Blogger Cail Corishev December 24, 2016 1:13 PM  

You can "not side with Israel" without being pro-Muslim, which is what Obama has been. (In fact, it's possible to be pro-Muslim and pro-Israel, or anti-both.) This isn't Obama taking a stand against Israel-first-ism, because he knows this is a meaningless act in the last moments of his administration. It's just his usual petulance and attention-seeking.

Obama's not a practicing Muslim only because he's too busy contemplating his own navel to worship anything else. But his pro-Muslim (and anti-Christian, anti-American) sentiment has been clear since the beginning. Like Pope Frank, he somehow got elected to the leadership position of a people and a culture he hates, so when he gets a chance to make trouble for it, he does.

Blogger Some Dude December 24, 2016 1:15 PM  

@34 is a cuck bumboy.

Pakistan is never going to nuke America. Iran wants nukes because it saw what happened to Iraq and Syria.

You can't be that fucking retarded to see what's going on. The necons literally published an enemies list in the late 90s. The only ones left are Syria and Iran.

If Pakistan has nukes. And so does North Korea.

Blogger Some Dude December 24, 2016 1:18 PM  

By the way I'd wager the reason Pakistan wasn't invaded like Afghanistan, even though it had lots of radical islamists was its nukes.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey December 24, 2016 1:27 PM  

Exactly. The ideology is just a smokescreen.

"Communism in Russia under (((Bolshevism))) is fine for example. Neoliberalism for (((Wall Street))) in America"

Sometimes the two are combined in one person. Take a look at the life of Armand Hammer sometime. (((Communist)))? Or (((capitalist)))? It's not really the right question, is it?

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey December 24, 2016 1:31 PM  

"D'Souza labels him as anti-colonialists, which does seem to be part of it."

That would fit with the Churchildhood bust incident. Ironically, though, Churchill likely did more than any other man to bring about, or at least speed up, the dissolution of the British Empire.

Blogger Student in Blue December 24, 2016 1:32 PM  

Obama can't just help but make everything about him, even during the point in time where he's traditionally powerless.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey December 24, 2016 1:34 PM  

Yawn. Who cares? Let the various desert tribes sort out their own problems.

Blogger Ingot9455 December 24, 2016 1:40 PM  

@27 The biblical Philistines are more likely genetically Greek, being a part of the Sea Peoples and originating in the Aegean Sea. A big Philistine graveyard was found just recently (it turns out that identifiable Philistine graveyards are very rare) and they're doing genetic testing on them now to be sure.

Anonymous Satan's Hamster December 24, 2016 1:45 PM  

"Iran wants nukes because it saw what happened to Iraq and Syria."

Don't forget Libya. Gaddafi promised to give up WMDs in order to cosy up to America, and his reward was a knife up his asshole from Clinton's thugs.

Every leader on America's shit-list now knows that they need nukes if they want to survive.

Anonymous That Would Be Telling December 24, 2016 1:50 PM  

@37 Some Dude:

@34 [is not someone I can intelligently respond to, so I'll just lead off and continue with silly insults (FIFY)]

Pakistan is never going to nuke America. Iran wants nukes because it saw what happened to Iraq and Syria.


I'm not seriously worried about Pakistan nuking us. I am worried that some entity gaining their nukes will, which is why I, you know, mentioned that it's widely believed some are pledged to the Saudis. I'll now explicitly add that you're making a really big, existential even if you're in the US or Dar al-Islam, bet on these warheads always and forever staying under the control of more responsible types who, among other things, don't want to see us implementing a nuclear Final Solution to the Muslim Problem after the third or so US city gets reduced to radioactive slag.

And maybe I should convert, because Iran has some powerful precognitives to realize they needed to start their nuclear program a decade before we occupied Iraq.... And their motives now are irrelevant; it wasn't like we developed nukes to keep the Soviet Union in check, in fact, Oppenheimer and others, probably including ones who were even more active in giving them our secrets, were of course quite distressed by this prospect.

Serious military intelligence starts with capabilities and goes from there, and I'm noting the likely coming increase in dispersion of nuclear capabilities bodes ill for the US.

Anonymous karsten December 24, 2016 1:51 PM  

It boggles the mind how the American Left fails to understand that importing people from countries where the population is anti-Israel was always going to move the US in an anti-Israel direction.

Which is literally the only -- ONLY -- good thing about importing such people.

(Obviously doesn't outweigh the negatives, though.)

At the very LEAST, the U.S. should care not a whit about what happens in the Mideast, keep its nose (and money and soldiers) out of there, and keep its people out of here.

So the U.N. sanctions Israel. Who cares? Not our business.

But at the BEST -- if we were thinking stragetically -- we would support the Palestinians: both as fellow victims of the (((tribe's))) malfeasance, and as a way of encouraging the (((tribe))) to start supporting the U.S.'s closing of its borders and preserving its founding stock, instead of pushing for America to open its borders to one and all.

I.e., our line should be: "We'll support your ethnic interests after you start supporting ours, i.e., a white Europe and a pre-1965 white-proportioned America."

Sauce for the goose.

Blogger Ingot9455 December 24, 2016 1:52 PM  

We can look on the bright side. Now the God-Emperor has 14 countries on his shit list that he can reduce/remove voluntary (not treaty-bound) foreign aid to.

Blogger Chris Mallory December 24, 2016 1:55 PM  

That Would Be Telling wrote:You're ignoring the nuclear powered Pakistan,

The Pakis are worried about India, not the US.

We don't have to choose the Israelis or the Arabs. Let them kill each other and if Israel threatens to unleash it's nukes, flatten it.

Anonymous That Would Be Telling December 24, 2016 1:58 PM  

@44 Satan's Hamster:

"Iran wants nukes because it saw what happened to Iraq and Syria."

Don't forget Libya. Gaddafi promised to give up WMDs in order to cosy up to America, and his reward was a knife up his asshole from Clinton's thugs.

Every leader on America's shit-list now knows that they need nukes if they want to survive.


Indeed. It's hard to express how phenomenally stupid Hillary is, although the pattern was clear as early as her Wellesley graduation and tenure on the Watergate committee.

And Obama, does he just want to see it all burn? A smart Muslim or Muslimphile wouldn't have put her in that position and specifically gone along with arranging Gaddafi's murder, although I'll note you can go back to at least Vietnam and JFK and his best and brightest arranging the same for the leaders of South Vietnam, who were actually official allies of the US.

Blogger Chris Mallory December 24, 2016 2:01 PM  

Obama isn't a Muslim. Like both Bushes and Clinton, he is an atheist who worships self and power. Even Reagan is suspect due to the pagan astrology he allowed in the White House.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan December 24, 2016 2:03 PM  

In good news Jordy Nelson owns the Vikes

Anonymous Bell Worthington December 24, 2016 2:12 PM  

@32

Did Vox actually say anything pro-Israel?

Looks to me like he's just pointing out another example of the left's persistent failure to connect demographic cause with political effect.

On every other point I agree. This is like the one America first thing Obama has ever done.

Now if you want to see some real Israel cocksucking, head over to r/The_Donald. Israelbros! +666 upboats.

Anonymous Bell Worthington December 24, 2016 2:21 PM  

Edit to my last. The first question should be "Did Vox actually say he disagreed with Obama on this issue?"

Blogger VFM #7634 December 24, 2016 2:33 PM  

The biblical Philistines are more likely genetically Greek, being a part of the Sea Peoples and originating in the Aegean Sea.

@43 Ingot9455
I've thought that the Sea Peoples were the former non-Indo-European inhabitants of Greece who were being squeezed out and expelled by the invading Mycenean Greeks coming in from the north. (Migration is war.)

Blogger VFM #7634 December 24, 2016 2:34 PM  

Did Vox actually say anything pro-Israel?

Looks to me like he's just pointing out another example of the left's persistent failure to connect demographic cause with political effect.


@52 Bell Worthington
The Left is demonic, and only wants to destroy. So for the Left, anything that destroys Western / Christian civilization is good; it doesn't matter whom it harms.

Anonymous karsten December 24, 2016 2:36 PM  

"I've thought that the Sea Peoples were the former non-Indo-European inhabitants of Greece who were being squeezed out and expelled by the invading Mycenean Greeks coming in from the north. (Migration is war.)"

I've more often heard that they were the Mycenaean Greeks themselves.

Blogger Stilicho December 24, 2016 2:44 PM  

The American (((Left))) is one of the most remarkably short-sighted groups in history. Not unlike the Mensheviks... some irony there for those so inclined.

Blogger tz December 24, 2016 2:48 PM  

@32 - Vox can observe a FACT without endorsing it. Bringing in the 3rd world to a 1st world country turns it into a 3rd world country. Bringing in Muslims will be bad for Jews.

We have a crypto Muslim green socialist still in the oval office for just under a month.

If this causes Trump to dump the UN, all the better, it is a drain, a parasite, interferes, wants unconstitutional declartions of Rights and is more globalist than the CFR.

From Ronaldus Magnus UN Ambassador:

A furious Mr. Lichenstein replied that if member states felt "they are not being treated with the hostly consideration that is their due," they should consider "removing themselves and this organization from the soil of the United States. We will put no impediment in your way," he continued, "The members of the U.S. mission to the United Nations will be down at the dockside waving you a fond farewell as you sail off into the sunset."

Blogger tz December 24, 2016 2:56 PM  

@45 bet on these warheads always and forever staying under the control of more responsible types who, among other things, don't want to see us implementing a nuclear Final Solution to the Muslim Problem after the third or so US city gets reduced to radioactive slag.

As long as it is in the Hillary Archipelago, who cares? Even when Nate silver went nuclear on Twitter. Think of it as urban renewal. Nuke the left coast, the eastern blue enclave, and Denver, and it cauterizes the commie wound.

Blogger tz December 24, 2016 3:00 PM  

I'm far less worried about Pakastani nukes than China's low quality but still deadly anti-aircraft missiles getting into the hands of terrorists so they can shoot passenger jets here and in the EU.

One nuke can destroy a city but the question will be how many will happen net. The cheap, shoulder rockets against defenseless passenger jets can be anywhere and destroy transport and commerce by airplane.

Anonymous That Would Be Telling December 24, 2016 3:13 PM  

@59 tz:

@45 bet on these warheads always and forever staying under the control of more responsible types who, among other things, don't want to see us implementing a nuclear Final Solution to the Muslim Problem after the third or so US city gets reduced to radioactive slag.

As long as it is in the Hillary Archipelago, who cares?


I'm prepared to survive the fallout from that, if the winds blow the wrong way for me. That's not true of I'd expect 99% of the other people in flyover country, although of course lots of them simply would be lucky on which ways the winds blow.

It would be massively disruptive, and that alone would kill a lot of people. Plus even if most of the people residing in that "Archipelago" are deserving in some sense of that fate, such an attack cannot go unanswered, else there will be more and more, and more hits upon us.

Blogger tz December 24, 2016 3:19 PM  

Vox actually made a stronger point earlier that in Minnesota, a longstanding Jewish woman was replaced with a Muslim Somali.

They could see that coming less than they could see the Trumpslide.

Blogger VFM #7634 December 24, 2016 3:54 PM  

Vox actually made a stronger point earlier that in Minnesota, a longstanding Jewish woman was replaced with a Muslim Somali.

They could see that coming less than they could see the Trumpslide.


@62 tz
Again, that doesn't bother them one bit.

But being replaced by a white Christian Republican would eat them like a canker.

Again: their rule is "whatever destroys Western civilization is good".

Blogger Bob Loblaw December 24, 2016 4:07 PM  

Chris Mallory wrote
People keep talking about how "Obama hates Israel". Well, I wish he hated me enough to send me four billion American tax dollars every year.


Obama probably wouldn't send Israel anything if it was up to him. But it's not.

Anonymous Eric the Red December 24, 2016 4:11 PM  

As far as I'm concerned, the Israelis have every right to drive the effing "Palestinians" into the sea... just don't expect any help in any way, shape, or form from the US.

Anonymous Eric the Red December 24, 2016 4:13 PM  

As far as I'm concerned, the Israelis have every right to drive the effing "Palestinians" into the sea... just don't ever expect any help in any way, shape, or form from the US.

Anonymous That Would Be Telling December 24, 2016 4:42 PM  

@60 tz:

I'm far less worried about Pakastani nukes than China's low quality but still deadly anti-aircraft missiles getting into the hands of terrorists so they can shoot passenger jets here and in the EU.

One nuke can destroy a city but the question will be how many will happen net. The cheap, shoulder rockets against defenseless passenger jets can be anywhere and destroy transport and commerce by airplane.


You're envisioning the end of the TSA?

Remind me again what the downside of this is....

Seriously, are these "cheap" or "inexpensive" MANPADS? The former should be fairly easy to counter, the latter could get troublesome, but we do have all sorts of defense measures. Although I doubt people under the flight paths would appreciate a constant rain of not always expended flares.

But there's other stuff that uses lasers and whatnot, and you know who's been facing this threat since 1969, and has some pretty sophisticated defenses, some are even civilian aircraft rated...?

Blogger YIH December 24, 2016 4:49 PM  

The Vikings got a lump of coal in their stocking, courtesy of the Packers. The Browns won, no, seriously, they did. The Titans got the lump of coal too, and Mariota's season is over.

Blogger Chris Mallory December 24, 2016 4:59 PM  

Bob Loblaw wrote:Obama probably wouldn't send Israel anything if it was up to him. But it's not.

He offered them even more than they were getting. Increasing the welfare is not "not send(ing)".
From the April 28, 2016 NYT.
"President Obama has proposed granting Israel the largest package of military aid ever provided by the United States to another nation"

Anonymous karsten December 24, 2016 5:03 PM  

"Obama probably wouldn't send Israel anything if it was up to him."

A U.S. President who actually DID put America First WOULDN'T send Israel anything.

Anything except their co-ethnics, that is.

Blogger Feather Blade December 24, 2016 5:36 PM  

@33 What, you don't think it's a good idea to have an unmistakeable geologic demarcation between the territories of two peoples who want to kill each other?

@43 Huh, cool. Now I wonder if "Phoenician" and "Philistine" are somehow related...

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable December 24, 2016 5:36 PM  

Both scenarios, from my perspective, paint the actors as vile. Those who are not Jewish or Muslim want them all to shut the f up and go away.

I honestly don't care, except that I think they should stop pussyfooting around and just kick out all the non-Jews, and say "these are our boundaries," and then do whatever they want within those boundaries. And then respect when the U.S. do similar. That would be great.

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable December 24, 2016 5:49 PM  

Obama is...I strongly believe...a Muslim atheist.

I agree. The evidence is overwhelming.

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable December 24, 2016 5:50 PM  

(Well actually probably Muslim agnostic.)

Blogger Johnny December 24, 2016 5:57 PM  

Huh, cool. Now I wonder if "Phoenician" and "Philistine" are somehow related...

There is some vague thought that the Phoenicians may have cooperated with the Sea People when they first moved in, but they are definitely a different people. The Phoenicians were Semites and closely related to the Jews. And the invaders were Caucasian for sure and probably from around the Aegean, but nobody is really sure.

Anonymous karsten December 24, 2016 5:59 PM  

"I honestly don't care, except that I think they should stop pussyfooting around and [1] just kick out all the non-Jews, and say "these are our boundaries," and then do whatever they want within those boundaries. And then [2] respect when the U.S. do similar. That would be great."

"Would be great." And it would be great if Santa Claus existed too.

Think: If we allow (((them))) -- let alone help them! --- do the former [1], what possible incentive do they have to do the latter [2]?

Out of the goodness of (((their))) hearts? Out of (((their))) legendary adherence to honor and principle? Yeah, right.

Rather, they'll have every reason to enjoy doing the former [1] and doing anything but the latter [2] -- as they've been doing so far -- because "ethnostate for me but not for thee" has worked spectacularly well for them thus far, since we stupidly-gullible goyim have been letting them have their cake and eat it too.

If we want them to do the latter [2], then we have to give them an incentive: like saying, "You won't get to do the former [2] until and unless you first stop obstructing us from doing the latter."

Anonymous That Would Be Telling December 24, 2016 6:02 PM  

@68 Chris Mallory:

Bob Loblaw wrote:
Obama probably wouldn't send Israel anything if it was up to him. But it's not.


He offered them even more than they were getting. Increasing the welfare is not "not send(ing)".

From the April 28, 2016 NYT.

"President Obama has proposed granting Israel the largest package of military aid ever provided by the United States to another nation"


Military aid isn't generally what we refer to as "welfare", unless you're talking about dollars sent to the US defense industry. And sending our stuff over there to get real world live fire experience has its own value that can be immeasurable.

On the other hand, that article has no details on the proposed package, says the negotiations were not going well, it could easily be read as Obama lying through his teeth for the pitch perfect headline: "Obama-Netanyahu Rift Impedes U.S. Offer of Record Aid Deal for Israel."

It does seem that it did go through, but it's the usual Obama style agreement, the Congress wasn't involved (although it's not like the GOPe cares about money getting spent with or without their authorization), it pretends it can determine what will happen for the next 10 years and so on. "More Mush from the Muslim", to paraphrase that delightful Boston Globe editorial title about Carter.

Blogger Daniel December 24, 2016 6:03 PM  

We must start informingbpeople that the actual jews are not the biblical ones. They are impostors

Blogger Daniel December 24, 2016 6:10 PM  

When i read about iran sometimes it feels that its the older oned ones who hate the west not their millenials. What do you think?

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable December 24, 2016 6:20 PM  

As far as abstaining from a UN resolution, more power to him! Not only should the US abstain from most UN resolutions; we should totally extricate ourselves from the organisation.

I disagree. That is poor relationship management. We should kick their offices out of the USA, give them as little money as contractually possible, and use our position on the Security Council to veto all the binding resolutions. (They can be issued no other way.)

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable December 24, 2016 6:22 PM  

(It is possible that I'm neuroatypical and misunderstanding relationship management.)

Blogger tz December 24, 2016 6:31 PM  

@47 most in NATO. It will be interesting if somehow Turkey and Israel picks a fight and the Turks invoke article 5.
Got out of the UN, then out of NATO - The USA as policeman of the world is as appreciated as Darren Wilson.

@63, they aren't that stupid or wouldn't have survived for 2000 years after Jerusalem fell. They may be venomous scorpions but know enough to wait for shallow waters to sting the Frog to death.

@66 - did I say there was a downside? Apple would have to manufacture here instead ow waiting for Chinese Junks to cross the ocean.

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable December 24, 2016 6:51 PM  

By the way I'd wager the reason Pakistan wasn't invaded like Afghanistan, even though it had lots of radical islamists was its nukes.

Evidence that white atheists are all disingenuous liars: they never use the existance of Pakistan -- congenital rapists with nuclear weapons -- as evidence against the existence of God. They’re merely "eff you Dad" anti-West.

Blogger Akulkis December 24, 2016 7:01 PM  

@45

"because Iran has some powerful precognitives to realize they needed to start their nuclear program a decade before we occupied Iraq.... "

You mean, that after 10 years of fighting Iraq, and only coming to a stalemate, our ability to utterly destroy Iraq's air force and army in 5 weeks, starting out from HALF WAY AROUND THE WORLD didn't create an impression on the Iranians?

They already knew they were on the s-list due to the 1979-80 takeover of our embassy in Tehran (an act of war, and sufficient grounds to to retaliate at ANY level desired, by the way. If they had done such a thing to the Russians, Iran would still be glowing to this day.)

Blogger Akulkis December 24, 2016 7:03 PM  

@45

"And their motives now are irrelevant; it wasn't like we developed nukes to keep the (((Soviet Union))) in check, in fact, (((Oppenheimer))) and others, probably including (((ones who were even more active in giving them our secrets))), were of course quite distressed by this prospect."

Fixed that for you.

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable December 24, 2016 7:12 PM  

Every leader on America's shit-list now knows that they need nukes if they want to survive.

Something that confuses me is why we made that happen. I get why Hillary is proud of it; she's a sociopath. But it is so foolish to turn everyone else into cornered rats. Why?

Anonymous Ronnie speaks December 24, 2016 7:23 PM  

The Jew is clever and tricky. However, foresight seems to be lacking in their collective strategic movements.

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable December 24, 2016 7:23 PM  

Serious military intelligence starts with capabilities and goes from there, and I'm noting the likely coming increase in dispersion of nuclear capabilities bodes ill for the US.

You are looking at it wrong. It bodes well for nationalism. The only thing is to make sure that we nuke the capital cities of countries that would give nukes to terrorists. (I don't think that includes Pakistan, because you can't rape radioactive dust.)

Blogger Some Dude December 24, 2016 7:46 PM  

@75

Great point.

But if you take it a step further, South Africa got sanctioned, embargoed and pilloried in Western (((media))) for being rac-ist.

And Israel has the exact same deal going on with Arabs. If the US didn't exist, the UN would rightly slap sanctions on Israel for human rights and ethnic cleansing issues.

Its an open and shut legal case. Today China, Russia, Malaysia, Senegal, France, UK, Uruguay, Japan and fuckin Venezuala all agreed on something. These countries usually can't agree on naming nature parks.

Think about that. Our (((media))) pretends the whole world can't see what's going on and the whole 290 members are anti-semitic, and its the US' fault.

But fuckin Venezuala and Senegal get it. Its a total absurd joke how much Zion has total control of American media.

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable December 24, 2016 8:36 PM  

Out of the goodness of (((their))) hearts? Out of (((their))) legendary adherence to honor and principle? Yeah, right.

That is not good relationship management because they would have no incentive to follow the instruction otherwise.

And the alternative is also a no, because it would put our actions under their control.

So just tell them what's going to happen, and invite them to join in the nationalism. Nothing more, nothing less.

Anonymous Die Fledermaus December 24, 2016 8:59 PM  

Well, this is fun.

Blogger CynicalMan December 24, 2016 9:54 PM  

Many seem to think that if Israel ceased to exist that Islam would cease to be a threat. The reality is the exact opposite, eliminate Israel and Islam marches on to its next victim. The Israel/Palestine issue is not about returning land to the so called Palestinians it is about Islamic conquest.

Anonymous karsten December 24, 2016 10:10 PM  

"Many seem to think that if Israel ceased to exist that Islam would cease to be a threat."

No one thinks that. OTOH, Western self-defeating interference in the Mideast -- their homeland -- definitely fans the flames, to no benefit to ourselves, and of benefit only to a parasitic (((tribe))) that works only in its own interests and against ours.

"The reality is the exact opposite, eliminate Israel and Islam marches on to its next victim. The Israel/Palestine issue is not about returning land to the so called Palestinians it is about Islamic conquest."

What a load of hooey. Get them out of the West and keep them out of the West, and they can't "march on" to anything. Not on to anything that matters to us, anyway.

If they want Israel, let them have it. We were wrong to get involved and take it away from them in the first place. Now, we should just let all those Semitic peoples and their various desert gods sort it out for themselves.

Not our business. Not our interest.

Blogger William Hudson December 24, 2016 10:28 PM  

What is with all this Muslim/Atheist speculation about the top dogs on thw world pyramid? The real controllers are a bunch of child-raping/murdering/eating SATANISTS! What the HELL, people?

Blogger William Hudson December 24, 2016 10:31 PM  

I believe this also includes Mickey Monkey's "husband", Barry.

Blogger Akulkis December 24, 2016 11:13 PM  

@94

http://www.metrolyrics.com/mickeys-monkey-lyrics-the-miracles.html

Blogger Nathan Braun December 25, 2016 2:02 AM  

Jews can't think long term. They want to import millions of muslims into christian countries in order to destroy Christianity, but the muslims will destroy the jews

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable December 25, 2016 2:44 AM  

The Jew is clever and tricky. However, foresight seems to be lacking in their collective strategic movements.

"The Jew"? Wow. You're not wrong, but you're making yourself sound like a Nazi for no reason and that is stupid.

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable December 25, 2016 3:06 AM  

I will also add that while I'm not afraid of Pakistan using its nukes -- because you can't rape radioactive dust -- at the same time and for the same reason, we should evict them all and not allow any more in, because we like our women (when they aren't being insufferable misandrist *unts) and don't want them to be raped (unconditionally).

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable December 25, 2016 3:56 AM  

Jews can't think long term. They want to import millions of muslims into christian countries in order to destroy Christianity, but the muslims will destroy the jews

Oh good Lord. You aren't entirely wrong, but NAJALT and also it's the "Christians" that are Simonists and taking money to work the magic of their dirt.

Anonymous Die Fledermaus December 25, 2016 8:00 AM  

I find it funny how particular, significant subsets of SJW's and Alt-righters begin to sound exactly the same the moment Israel is brought up. I guess everyone has their triggers...

Blogger Rory Porth December 25, 2016 8:27 AM  

Gen 12Gen. 12:1 ¶ Now Yahweh said to Abram, “Get out of your country, and from your relatives, and from your father’s house, to the land that I will show you.

Gen. 12:2 I will make of you a great nation. I will bless you, and make your name great. You will be a blessing.

Gen. 12:3 I will bless those who bless you, and I will curse him who curses you. In you will all of the families of the earth be blessed.”

Anonymous Avalanche December 25, 2016 9:05 AM  

@12 "Once you're stated goals are the removal and death of people or peoples, you give them no reason to pursue anything other than a fight to the death, total victory or defeat."

Hence the enemies of zion refusing to knuckle under and give up their ME lands to the invading ("remove yourselves or death!") jews.

"A land without people" was a LIE!

Blogger Old Ez December 25, 2016 9:07 AM  

You dont need to be promuslim to wish the satanic importers occupying the holy land ill tho.

Anonymous Avalanche December 25, 2016 9:21 AM  

@58 "The members of the U.S. mission to the United Nations ...waving you a fond farewell as you sail off..."

And just THINK of that prime, prime NYC real estate that would be freed up! The Donald may be sad he wouldn't allowed to develop it himself... But there are his sons to do it!

And all those expensive apartments freed up for Americans instead of lawless diplomats and their staff? And PARKING spaces!! Many thousands of parking spaces!

Total win!

Anonymous Teapartydoc December 25, 2016 9:32 AM  

Everyone has their perspective on Israel and the Jewish question. My own is a bit of a middle. If you think my admission of this is a sign that I'm some kind of idiot I'll remind you that I was double major in biology and chemistry back before there was a biochemistry major and I took double the hours of biology necessary for the degree and went on to be a surgical subspecialist.
I lived in Rhodesia when I was a kid. When Rhodesia was under UN sanctions one of the only countries that would trade with Rhodesia was Israel. Without Israeli trade the country would probably have gone under ten years before it did. I remember Rhodesians cheering out loud when Israel won the six day SAR in 1967. Moshe Dyan was practically a Rhodesian national hero. I favored Jews and Israel ever since then. Years went by and I eventually got red pilled on the JQ, but I still have this respect for Israel itself, and the right of nations to exist and survive as long as they aren't a threat to their neighbors. Their internal affairs are their own problems, not those of nations across the seas. The only reason neighboring nations may have an interest is if the policies of an adjoining nation are violent toward them, and they can demonstrate material harm. And the problem is between the nations. No appeals to bullies, regardless of the supposed cache they may have internationally. Of course this is idealistic, but no more so than the ideations of any UN diplomat, and more realistic.
So Israel is a nation, and deserves the same respect we give any other nation. The same is not true for individual Jews, or them collectively, unless we are speaking of them as national citizens. Of Israel. This is the reality that resulted from the creation of the Israeli state. In other words, there is no legitimate diaspora Jewry. It is not legitimate for any former diaspora Jew to assume any dual loyalty. They are either citizens of Israel or of the country of their residence, and it is the right of their nation of residence to accept or reject them as citizens. This is where things are going to go. And I think this is why many cosmopolitan Jews were and are against Zionism. Israel takes away their ability to dissimulate against their neighbors, pretending to be one thing while actually being another, and taking advantage of neighbors who don't realize that they aren't dealing with just another citizen, but what was up to now a legitimate underground organization. What this amounts to is saying that Jewish canals in sovereign countries constitutes a mafia, a form of organized crime that is subject to the same kind of investigation that any other mafia like organization is subject to. The old mafias complained about RICO laws being discriminatory to Italians and we proceeded anyway. The same thing needs to happen to Jewish mafias. And the way to best do this is to recognize them as foreign residents subject to deportation or residence at the discretion of the host country. Citizenship can be revoked. They qualify for automatic citizenship in Israel. They can go there, or remain in the host country, but without citizenship. Laws can be written that regulate the size and scope of the business or real estate holdings that can be owned by foreigners, and regulating the activities of citizen agents of foreigners. These kinds of laws are in effect in many countries already, and were in place in Athens regulating the activities of metic traders in the Piraeus. I suspect objections to us knowing things like this are one of the reasons the left doesn't want us studying the classics.
So this is where I am right now. Pro Israel, but anti Jew.

Anonymous Teapartydoc December 25, 2016 9:35 AM  

Autocorrect made a bunch of errors I didn't notice until after I published the above. Sorry, but I think it's still understandable.

Anonymous Avalanche December 25, 2016 9:42 AM  

@97 "Jews can't think long term. They want to import millions of muslims into christian countries in order to destroy Christianity, but the muslims will destroy the jews"

No, the imported moslems will kill SOME jews while destroying the White nations (eggs,omelettes). On the other hand, if the jews are 'smart' enough to grasp and maintain such control of WHITE nations -- the smartest, most inventive peoples on the planet -- why does anyone think they cannot easily USE the moslems as their (second) great weapon to finish destroying us (after importing, organizing, inciting, and using their first weapon: blacks, to destroy us) and then wipe out the desert apes without a second thought?

No? You mean cause of: "the goodness of (((their))) hearts? Out of (((their))) legendary adherence to honor and principle? Yeah, right."


Anonymous Avalanche December 25, 2016 9:47 AM  

@99 "but NAJALT and also it's the "Christians" that are Simonists and taking money to work the magic of their dirt."

And, uh, NACALT, eh?

Plus, that's why 86% of *AMERICANS* want immigration stopped or cut WAY back?! Nuthin' at all to do with *jewish* control of media, academe, politics, money, medicine?

Anonymous Lawyer Guy December 25, 2016 10:11 AM  

I attended what at the time was the number 5 law school in the country. They took a case to the USSC to be allowed to set a critical mass (quota) for Black and Hispanic students below the cut and harmed their reputation.

As you would expect, a number of the students were Jewish, in fact there were three Hillels right nearby for their fellowship needs.

At the time, suggesting Israel slow down shooting children and bulldozing families of criminals was literally anti Semitic. In IP law there is an ongoing case for the ownership of Kafka's papers. The issue will be settled and then the Israel will set aside the ruling and start again because a nonJew shouldn't have ownership of his writings. Saying that was a bad policy made you Hitler.

A certain number of Jewish students enjoyed having the whip hand at school. Lots of bitching if there were any Friday night events, demands that weekend study only take place Sunday mornings. Your student group would be denounced as KKK if you didn't order goat cheese pizza.

Obama was in Harvard law before my time in law school, and taught law at the same time I was a student in a school ranked very close to Chicago Law.

I suspect the chickens have come home to roost. It turns out what comes around goes around, sometimes.

Anonymous BBGKB December 25, 2016 10:48 AM  

The "status quo" is the US being the bottom butt boy for the terrorists in Tel Aviv.

From the gay film festivals it looks like the only tops in Tel Aviv go for young Arab guys.

105 Teapartydoc:. When Rhodesia was under UN sanctions one of the only countries that would trade with Rhodesia was Israel. Without Israeli trade the country would probably have gone under ten years before it did.

It was painful to read that you are to blind to see what happened. International jewery created the word racism and was behind the boy cot sanctions, then Israel was your only trading "partner" arbitraging all of your economy. Rhodesia was basically enduring jewish lighting for those 10+ years. The only thing that could have saved Rhodesia would be expelling the jews, and black marketing Rhodesia's goods like jews do blood diamonds.

Graham Spanier openly admits to sabotaging South Africa because it limited his access to black boys, before he came to America to be in charge of schools that had pedo scandels like Franklin and Penn State (Spanier went to the same synagogue as Sandusky). No non jewish South African could easily be admitted to the US & lead schools as Spanier did. Jews profited in the destruction of both SA and Rhodesia.

It's no different than when (((foreign))) companies bought up all of the UK's big ports, then paid off government workers to get ride of the little ports & docks. Jews instinctively set up "No way out but thru the jews" situations

Blogger dienw December 25, 2016 11:04 AM  

At best, that piece of land is Judah, and only Judah, not Israel; even so, one cannot consider Ashkenazim and Edomites to be in any way to be inheritors of the promises made to Abraham; especially the Ashkenazi which are Japhethites. Until the House of Israel - the Northern Kingdom - all of those tribes - returns to the land as promised, "Israel" is not Israel.

Anonymous Teapartydoc December 25, 2016 6:11 PM  

Bbjkb: NEVER ever saw a Jew in Rhodesia. Never saw a synagogue. The notion of kicking them out is ridiculous. The Israeli trade WAS black market trade. Even on the black market they were one of the few.
The distinction is between a nation and a race.
We complain about Jews being hypocritical because they want a religious ethnostate for themselves while accusing us of being savages for wanting the same things for themselves. Wanting that for ourselves while accusing Israel of being in the wrong for being such is just as hypocritical.
We need to be consistent. Doing otherwise is plain stupid.

Blogger tz December 25, 2016 10:47 PM  

Gab is so informative
Jews are not White

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable December 25, 2016 10:55 PM  

And, uh, NACALT, eh?

Plus, that's why 86% of *AMERICANS* want immigration stopped or cut WAY back?! Nuthin' at all to do with *jewish* control of media, academe, politics, money, medicine?


Avalanche, we need to accept our own tribe's complicity in order to name and shame them. The way that they're taking money to displace us, and preening with virtue-signaling all the while.

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable December 25, 2016 11:15 PM  

Autocorrect made a bunch of errors I didn't notice until after I published the above. Sorry, but I think it's still understandable.

The standard here is that the correction is more tedious than the error, and you just shouldn't say anything if it's comprehensible.

Blogger justaguy December 26, 2016 1:01 PM  

I think that Tel Aviv and Jerusalem have a much higher cross section to intercept a rogue nuke than NYC, LA, or DC. If Israel didn't exist, our cities would have the highest cross section for first nuke.

Blogger B.J. December 27, 2016 10:18 AM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger B.J. December 27, 2016 10:21 AM  

America: "No matter how many immigrants we flood into your communities, the culture will never change. Enjoy the new food!"

Israel: "HOW DARE the jews try to immigrate to Palestine! They're destroying the culture! It's genocide!!!"

Blogger Feather Blade December 27, 2016 12:10 PM  

If it makes everyone feel better, your average not-particularly-observant Jewish types in the US are pretty anti-Israel, too.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts