ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Sunday, December 11, 2016

Mailvox: why everyone needs SJWAL

That's not an exaggeration. Literally everyone needs to read it nowadays, because absolutely no one is off-limits as far as the SJWs are concerned. Do you have a job? Are you dependent upon someone else having a job? One trival slip-up, one petty violation of an ever-changing Narrative is all it takes for you, or someone upon whom you are dependent, to become a target. Fortunately, this guy happened to have read the book before he came under SJW attack.
I just finished SJWs Always Lie and it was discovered at a much-needed time. Within the last year, I've gradually become Alt-Right. I've also been making my way through [a Master's degree in a fully converged field]. The place is a viper's den of SJW so I've largely been reserved while informing myself as much as possible so as to have ammo to fire back with if exposed. I'm usually much more confrontational by nature but I know when I'm outgunned.

That didn't last.

Events went down almost *exactly* as you describe them in your book. I worked (for free mind you) at a [redacted] doing the necessary bitchwork to advance through the internship component of the program. Someway, somehow a "friend" of mine emailed the office a month-old post I made regarding the differences between men and women in society. Of course, I didn't know this until two weeks after I was fired and told I'd be reported to the university for my misconduct. After two weeks of stonewalling, the head of my department at the university finally told me what I was accused of.

Since then I've been kept in limbo as the department decides what to do with me.

Your book was the exact battle plan I needed. Reminders to never apologise, never back down and always remember that the enemy deal in lies are very useful.

I am curious if you have any input, however. Some of your book I have a hard time following simply because a lot of the strategies and risks you call for I don't have the power to implement fully. I got a lot riding on this. For instance, I don't have a ton of experience, good field connections or ability to tell the faculty to fuck off.

That being said I am locked into the program so it would be hard to remove me plus [for redacted reasons] they can't punish me for speech too severely. I've been consulting with FIRE, a non-profit for legal advocacy for free speech on college campuses. You seem like the type of man to have a lot of insight so any input or wisdom is welcome.

Thank you for inspiring me to keep up the fight during this hell.
Consult with FIRE, prepare an exit strategy in case they're able to kick you out, and stop your online and social media activities. That's the point that a lot of people don't seem to understand. If you aren't in a position to fight, don't hand them information, which is ammunition. I'd also look at registering a complaint concerning the firing for misconduct if the [redacted] violated its own policies. Sure, you don't want the job, but it's a future vulnerability if it is given a pass.

Look, I never had a choice. Because I started writing in the pre-Internet era, but close enough to it that my columns and media interviews were made available on the Internet from the start, I knew that I'd be cut out of jobs and other opportunities all along. Long before WND was even created, I was blackballed from the St. Paul Pioneer Press editorial page when I was easily the best candidate for the job and they didn't even need the Internet to do it.

But as long as you have a choice, it's best to lay low. Keep your Facebook innocuous. If you're going to express an opinion of any kind, do it under an anonymous identity you develop for that purpose and for which you can always maintain plausible deniability. (Translation: always drop identifying details that point at someone else, preferably an SJW.)

Otherwise, the chances are pretty good that some "friend" is going to bring you to the attention of an SJW-converged authority. And, of course, stay out of the vipers' dens! That's a good way to get yourself bit.

Labels:

95 Comments:

Blogger James Dixon December 11, 2016 9:59 AM  

I'm fortunate to have graduated from college back before the SJW convergence started at any but the most left wing institutions (Cal Berkley, etc.) and to have left civil service after only a few years. I gravitated (again, through no skill or planning of my own) to a field that's largely been resistant to SJW entryism (oil, gas, and coal). My personal fragility at this time is purely financial, and that's slowly being remedied. If things go well, I'm only a few years away from being able to retire.

Anonymous SugarPi December 11, 2016 10:12 AM  

So the elementary ed. majors are in charge now... I can't stop laughing, although my alma mater is SJW territory. I was last there during the changeover and just wouldn't be politically correct. I actually did a research paper on the topic of males being superior to females in math. Prof gave me a B and admitted the premise was the reason- not my research or writing ability, which he had previously lauded as superior.
I'm thankful my well-being has never depended on my kowtowing.

Blogger Elizabeth December 11, 2016 10:23 AM  

This country, and the West is general, has become like the freakin' Soviet Union - the culture and economy are based on lies about human nature and how the world works in reality.

Blogger Johnny December 11, 2016 10:29 AM  

What strikes me as really good timing is the startup of Gab and Infogalactic.

lies about human nature...

Nicely put, that really does go to the core of it. Plus of course fake news.

Blogger Gordian12 December 11, 2016 10:40 AM  

As someone who's currently within that mess, my advice to grad students would be to choose their major adviser very carefully. I got into plenty of trouble myself before I wised up and began taking more care, but I was lucky that I had a faculty member who backed me.

Absent that, look for camouflage. There was a very large, active Catholic group on campus that was relatively conservative, so I spent a good deal of time going to their events and meetings so that everyone knew I was associated with them. SJWs are cowards, and so they were less willing to take on what they perceived to be a member of a large, entrenched group. Every time they came after me, I called them anti-Catholic bigots, and I could count on support from my Catholic friends and professors if I framed every argument as an attack on them, collectively, rather than on me alone.

Really, however, to survive in Academia you need to take on a public face and keep your private face hidden. This is a hard lesson, but if you have a mission to accomplish in Academia, you're failing your mission if you can't keep the mask up. My mission is more important than my pride, my vanity, and my temper. Think like a spy; stay undercover while you do what you do discretely. I've turned several students toward the alt-Right that I know of, and I don't know how many, under influence from me, moved in that direction. More importantly, I can't count how many leftists I've demoralized, who have come to me and said that they can no longer support democracy, anti-racism, immigration reform, or the like because they've realized that it's pointless and political activism is a sham. Enemy troops have been taken off the battlefield because of my work; this is why Vox's book is so important for those of us behind enemy lines.

Blogger Off The Wall December 11, 2016 10:42 AM  

Trying to order a few copies of SJWAL to pass out to family & friends from Amazon.ca - says ships within 1-2 months and only 3 copies allowed per customer.

WTF?

Blogger synp December 11, 2016 10:46 AM  

It's rather annoying (in a big picture sort of way) that your advice amounts to "they want to shut you up, so shut up." Nor is this likely to change any time soon. Right-wing politicians can push countries along, but converged fields are rather likely to remain converged for a long time. I don't know what the [redacted] field is, but what happens when he does graduate? Those posts may continue to haunt him through his career.

I personally live and work in a country where convergence is less of a problem, but I wonder if simply posting on your blog isn't "marking" me. I certainly have never been careful with linkability.

Blogger VD December 11, 2016 10:51 AM  

Trying to order a few copies of SJWAL to pass out to family & friends from Amazon.ca - says ships within 1-2 months and only 3 copies allowed per customer.

They'll bring in more very soon, just ignore that. Order three for now, then the rest when their next order comes in.

Blogger VD December 11, 2016 10:51 AM  

It's rather annoying (in a big picture sort of way) that your advice amounts to "they want to shut you up, so shut up."

If you can't afford to fight, don't fight. It's not that hard. That's pretty much the core concept of 4GW.

Blogger VD December 11, 2016 10:52 AM  

Those posts may continue to haunt him through his career.

Exactly. That's why I always, always, always advise anonymity for everyone. Usually to no avail, but at least no one can say I didn't warn them.

Anonymous KR December 11, 2016 10:54 AM  

Sue them.

Do you have your degree yet? If you don't, stay hidden in the weeds as you prepare to sue them. If you do not have that parchment in hand, or think you’ll never get it, then sue them now. You'll ruin your future in your chosen profession, but it seems you don't have much of a future anyway, at least in academe.

Contact a top-notch NYC law firm, hopefully through a conservative friend (or someone here?) ask them to take your case pro bono. But be quiet, as Vox suggests, as you prepare for your lawsuit. Say nothing. Let the lawyers talk for you.

Recently I was doing some research in the online NYT archives, when I came across a few articles about a man in the late 1970s who sued City College, I believe, because they had fired him for supposedly colluding with the CIA. Reading between the lines, I doubt he had worked for the CIA, but rather had been framed by his colleagues.

In a strange twist of events, I met a friend at a coffee shop about that time, and told him about the articles I had just read. He told me that he knew the man in the articles who had been fired, and that the man's sister -- a hard-core leftist -- had turned him in to promote her husband with whom he was competing for one tenure position.

I suppose this is a lesson in wariness. Even our leftist relatives are “enemies” in waiting, it seems.

As the election of Trump has proved, wealth can protect us against the McCarthyite behavior of the Left. A king-sized ego and courage also helps. Ultimately, though, we’ve got to protect each other, for few of could have withstood the onslaught Trump endured. Fewer, still, could have prevailed.

So, be strong within.

And sue.


Blogger Kant Leerus December 11, 2016 10:54 AM  

I have not read SJWAL and so will not comment as to how effective it is (from the points that vox has listed and reviews from people having read it, it definitely seems useful to read)

However, from having read sun tzu, being familiar with bushido, and subversion of cultures and subversion of ideology, I would personally urge any student to keep their mouth shut and move up in the institutions... you can hammer 10 SJWs in a managerial position than you can as a trial junior who is being reviewed for their work...

You may get a bit less sex, but as a white man, it is best to pretend to be a competent (but not extremely efficient) beta male.. if you are too efficient, people will dump tons of work on you and you will never finish. If you are a beta, then women auto pass on you, which during these years means LESS conflict. Don't make friends but be friendly, don't make enemies but have a coherent opinion...

This strategy will result in 0 friends, but you will move up into a better position with experience and some luck.

Alternative is that you have the means to start a successful business and have some sort of cash flow and return on investment (this way you can offend as many SJWs as possible), but if you are young and still in a junior position then I would urge extreme caution

Blogger VD December 11, 2016 10:56 AM  

Those posts may continue to haunt him through his career.

Exactly. That's why I always, always, always advise anonymity for everyone. Usually to no avail, but at least no one can say I didn't warn them.

Anonymous Fred December 11, 2016 11:00 AM  

I'm no expert of implementing the strategy of SJWAL, but having been the subject of a witch hunt about 10 years ago (already semi-red pilled), I know that what Vox recommends is the VERY BEST, FIRST thing to do--and that is to NOT apologize, and not give ANY ground, but instead signal that (the nefarious) "they" (whomever they are), are in for a long, ground-and-pound fight.

Granted, different people will have different levers of power, depending on your industry and the available legal and social groups that can support you--and each person's finances, tenure, experience, marketing power, foreknowledge of "the system", matters. When my situation happened, I was already basically on the inside of an element of the star chamber, was senior in my field, and had a handle on most of what to expect (and they did exactly as I expected and what Vox noted in his book).

I am near retirement, within the same field, having survived, but I make SURE I mentor younger folks (usually men) within my field--to give them a heads up on some "inoculating" behavior to put in place--when and if the hunt comes. Strategies to fend off and/or prevail.

Everyone should read: (1) SJWAL (2) A few books on negotiating (3) one or more books on game theory, and (4) Anti-fragile.

Initiating the offense, not apologizing, implementing counter-attacks, essentially sets your negotiated anchor WAY OUT to the right if they even TRY to take any action against you.

Lastly, from point A to B, through out ANY witch hunt: I also found, even in a crazy system, utilizing a Valkryie type plan can work--counter-attacking by co-opting the same mechanisms for complaints. Using the system to constantly counter, mitigate, initiate new (legal and social) rabit holes they have to constantly address...LETTING THEM MAKE MISTAKES in the legal and admin process...while constantly advancing your cause can absolutely work.

Blogger VD December 11, 2016 11:01 AM  

It's rather annoying (in a big picture sort of way) that your advice amounts to "they want to shut you up, so shut up."

If you can't afford to fight, don't fight. It's not that hard. That's pretty much the core concept of 4GW.

Blogger Cash December 11, 2016 11:08 AM  

I also follow any Alt Right person who isn't anonymous. I figure they are sticking their neck out there and the more followers they have the more we can defend each other.

Blogger Tom Kratman December 11, 2016 11:11 AM  

Sometimes I'm almost moved to renew my license in order to make a constitutional attack on public schools and private schools that live in part off of government supplied, loaned, or guaranteed money, and use color of law to infringe the free speech rights of American citizens. Of course, "almost" is the key word there.

Blogger Tom Kratman December 11, 2016 11:12 AM  

"If you can't afford to fight, don't fight. It's not that hard. That's pretty much the core concept of 4GW."

Nearly anyone can afford a gun and a box or two of ammunition.

Seriously; when someone ruins your life your most moral recourse is to end theirs.

Blogger Tom Kratman December 11, 2016 11:14 AM  

"Exactly. That's why I always, always, always advise anonymity for everyone. Usually to no avail, but at least no one can say I didn't warn them."

I couldn't possibly, and you're not exactly anonymous, either.

Blogger Achilles December 11, 2016 11:24 AM  

"If you can't afford to fight, don't fight. It's not that hard. That's pretty much the core concept of 4GW."

I thought it was to burn down the adviser's house. Then tell him it was a damn shame about his house, but at least his family wasn't in the fire. *wink*wink*

Anonymous That Would Be Telling December 11, 2016 11:27 AM  

@17 Tom Kratman:

"If you can't afford to fight, don't fight. It's not that hard. That's pretty much the core concept of 4GW."

Nearly anyone can afford a gun and a box or two of ammunition.

Seriously; when someone ruins your life your most moral recourse is to end theirs.


It can also work to let it be known that you're the sort of person who would do that without question if someone were succeed in such a stunt. Not sure how you can do that today safely, but it worked for me in the early-mid '80s in an already turning PC academic environment, along with being nice and accepting to a fair degree.

Blogger James Dixon December 11, 2016 11:43 AM  

> Seriously; when someone ruins your life your most moral recourse is to end theirs.

The only way someone could ruin my life is to kill my wife. But then, yeah, all bets are off.

Blogger Tom Kratman December 11, 2016 12:13 PM  

@21:

Killing or even harming, and just possibly merely insulting, one's wife is sufficient to go past mere homicide to creative homicide.

Blogger Tom Kratman December 11, 2016 12:15 PM  

"It can also work to let it be known that you're the sort of person who would do that without question if someone were succeed in such a stunt."

I don't have to actually say it; people who know me, or have even just met me, just seem to know. I suppose it's mostly the eyes.

Anonymous AJ December 11, 2016 12:29 PM  

The first thing I would say is rethink your career path. If you want to have intellectual integrity, it sounds like the path you previously chose isn't going to work. Make your career path robust (or even anti-fragile) from SJW (or whomever) shocks.

The second thing is to start thinking clearly about your enemy's weaknesses. I have dealt with university bureaucrats, and most of them are cowards. Universities are big entities and vulnerable to all sorts of attacks.

Anonymous Lastredoubt December 11, 2016 12:42 PM  

Insofar as the advice in various comments to either go into a non-converged or antifragile livelihood, vs infiltrating, subverting, and under,iningnthe existing institutions, and of course building our own.

All three are needed.

We need people who are living a life of integrity who can support the,selves and families. We cannot entirely give up Twitter/colleges/culture/media until they burn us out, and as noted, that may require different personas or facets presented. And we do need to build up alternatives to what we've had taken from us in the long march.

Not everyone is suited for any particular work.

Anonymous David of One December 11, 2016 1:14 PM  

I would offer a recommendation that whenever/wherever appropriate all us promote the awareness of searching out and reading SJWAL.

I have done this numerous times in the last year starting with Adam Baldwin when Twitter locked him out of his account after weighing in with his opinion about GamerGate (Breitbart, 12/17/15).

I provide the name complete name of SJWAL as for recommended reading and have included the recommendation to search for "SJW Attack Survival Guide".

Plus I think it is important to emphasize to fold that they NEVER apologize to SJW lairs!

Spread the word! It takes work to undue the harm to the mal-educated.

Blogger Daniel December 11, 2016 1:37 PM  

You can get ONE girlfriend and have lots of sex with her. In the long run it is better than lots of girls

Blogger Wanderer December 11, 2016 1:38 PM  

Why would somebody get fired for making a post about the differences between men and women in society? What justification is there?

Anonymous AJ December 11, 2016 1:38 PM  

@Lastredoubt,

Yes, but it doesn't sound like our protagonist was planning on infiltrating or subverting incognito. Instead, he got hammered by doing the opposite of that! So it sounds like his strategy wasn't thought out, and a change in career might be in order not only because he will be more successful doing something else, but he might be happier-more intellectually fulfilled.

Anonymous The OASF December 11, 2016 1:42 PM  

This is the best book Mr. Day has ever written by far going away with it.

I think I mentioned before that after reading this book I had a life-changing epiphany... realizing that about 99.9 percent of all apologies are completely insincere, usually only used strategically and are equivalent to confessions or pleadings for mercy. Perhaps this wasn't always the case in our society, but in this age of universal deception it is the absolute truth. This goes well beyond the realm of anti Social Justice Warrior warfare.

Reading this book it was satisfying to realize that I always did lean strong alt-right and confronted the narrative on many occasions. One of my favorites... I was in a technical advisory meeting and the thick heeled human resources director woman made a comment about the typical thick-headed man. And I was quick to point out that the policy was for all inclusive-ness and the avoidance of ugly stereotypes. A lot of chuckling and murmuring ensued from the other members of the meeting. Her face turned a bright shade of red and I could see the fury on her face as she stared at me for the rest of the meeting. It was a very instructive experience.

Blogger Cail Corishev December 11, 2016 1:51 PM  

What justification is there?

Hate speech, making people feel unsafe, microaggression, whatever they're calling it these days.

Blogger David of One December 11, 2016 1:56 PM  

A point along what The OASF touched on ... I would add to Never trust Human Resources. HR works for the interests of the company/institution first and then the vast majority act on their personal proclivities of SJW thinking in all it variances and perversity.

Anonymous Olof Ree December 11, 2016 2:01 PM  

"If you're going to express an opinion of any kind, do it under an anonymous identity you develop for that purpose and for which you can always maintain plausible deniability. "

Cowardly.

Blogger VD December 11, 2016 2:13 PM  

Cowardly.

You're stupid. And a guaranteed loser. A direct frontal charge is absolutely not the correct tactic in every single situation.

Blogger Dave December 11, 2016 2:19 PM  

HR works for the interests of the company/institution first

Theoretically. See reports of HR personnel screening resumes based on pictures of applicant.

Anonymous John Scalzi Unfinished Asimov Project December 11, 2016 2:25 PM  

As a Blasiaroon (one-eighth Blasian) Woman of Color, I have seen first hand how the erection of Donald Trump has left this nation sore and battered.

I gave in early on erection night, but it turned out many other places the results just kept coming and coming. Hillary was so sore about Donald's erection she couldn't even talk that night; heck the next day she look all bruised and drugged up.

Since then, these people can't keep Donald Trump's erection outta they heads. All they do is corner you on the street, they wanna recount his erection. They keep recounting and recounting the erection and every time Donald Trump's erection just keeps gettin' bigger!

Which is why I say to these people, "You need to chill out and go read JOHN SCALZI UNFINISHED ASIMOV PROJECT: DOOM" on yo kindle and of course many fine writings by Mr. Vox Day, Chuck Timgle PhD, the philosopher Vergil and Aristotle, and I'm gonna write a Colored Woman's Guide to the Erection of Donald Trump soon I hope (if I can swipe me a jar of Nescafe French Roast to keep me caffeinated for the duration!) so these folks can get a grip on Trump's erection and enjoy the landslide, so to speak!

Anonymous Olof December 11, 2016 2:27 PM  

"You're stupid. And a guaranteed loser. A direct frontal charge is absolutely not the correct tactic in every single situation"

It's cowardly. Plain and simple. But we are all entitled to our opinions.

Anonymous Napoleon 12pdr December 11, 2016 2:37 PM  

Facebook offers an option to keep your posts and profile limited to friends only. Use it. THEN keep your posts few and low-key.

And on fora like this one, use different names on different fora. Make yourself hard to target.

Blogger William Hudson December 11, 2016 3:11 PM  

I am blessed in that the family triumvirate, who rule the small corp. where I toil, ALL voted for the God Emperor. That said, the lone female got me fired (walkabout?) over a decade ago in favor of her slacker son. 1.5 yrs later, I was rehired because neither the white girl, worthless black "boy", nor the slacker son (all in succession) could do the job competently.

Actually, the white girl likely could have. I met her and found her competent, but Mommy Dearest didn't like her, and still wanted Sonny Boy in the Director's chair. That turned out to be my ticket back to "Paradise" later.

I am always allowed my personal opinions at the office, but of course, most of them must be kept from our female, black, asian, and moose-lime customers. That's not really too much for them to ask of me.

Blogger Benjamin Kraft December 11, 2016 3:16 PM  


@34. Perhaps his honor and/or truth/justice is worth that much to him.

I certainly have moments where I think mine might be worth that much to me.

Fortunately I'm rather innately gifted from the perspective of online anonymity.

From another perspective, willing martyrs can certainly be useful to their survivors as well, if they do it right. I can't argue with you on the "loser" part though, that's kind of the accepted part of the bargain when you do anything that increases your risk of failure.

@36. Fuck you. I usually censor that word, but you deserve it. Are you seriously that stupid? If you aren't, you *ARE* the cancer killing Christians, and are a genuine anti-christ (since that's not exactly a singular figure).

@39. As a genuine anti-Christian, you would know. You seem to have forgotten that Jesus physically removed people from the outer courts of the Temply... by physically scourging them and literally flipping tables. On top of that, the reprimand "those as live by the sword, die by the sword" should be understood fully, that full understanding having two sides to the coin, namely people who wish to avoid a violent death as opposed those who have more important concerns.

My definition of hedonism includes aversion to pain for no reason other than pain itself. You are slime.

Anonymous The OASF December 11, 2016 3:19 PM  

"Theoretically. See reports of HR personnel screening resumes based on pictures of applicant."

I have to concur with Dave's Point here. It's rather interesting how people think that only market forces drive the success or failure of businesses and then it's all a matter of supply and demand and all that. One would think that the self-destruction of HP and Firefox would be instructive enough to demonstrate but that is almost assuredly not the case. Both of those organizations had to go to almost breathtaking and unimaginable displays of Social Justice Warrior isms to destroy themselves.

Truth is most businesses get by through outright scamming people, taking advantage of tax loopholes, living off of their legacy, openly counting on the government crushing their competition for not adhering to rigged systems in favor of the biggest fishes in the pond, excetera excetera excetera excetera.

A business like castilia house I'm sure is a rare exception, but in order to pull off this accomplishment takes a Herculean effort of wisdom and work ethic that very few even recognize is necessary, much less are capable of.

Anonymous Marvin Boggs December 11, 2016 3:21 PM  

I've got an honest question to ask. I graduated in '86 with a degree in computer science. While there was PC crap going on even then, there was pretty much none in my courses.

Is there PC crap going on in STEM courses? Or is it pretty much limited to the Arts faculties?

Blogger Benjamin Kraft December 11, 2016 3:24 PM  

@34. Whatever happened to being "the salt of the Earth"? Winning may no be possible, but not trying is SIN.

You don't have the faintest clue what Christ's commandments entail. Love is not just letting people do what they want, Love includes protecting the weak and innocent from evildoers, as well as doing things that may hurt people, or that they may not like but that are the most beneficial for them in the long run.

The fact that you're too much of a liar to admit (possibly even to yourself, Godwin's Law, you know) that they are not contradictory does not reflect well on your NONEXISTENT moral standards.

Oh, that teach people to break God's commandments? You mean like you? How about what the Bible says about people who knowingly mislead children, or intentionally alter the Word of God, since that applies to you? Are you volunteering to drown with a millstone around your neck/be removed from the book of life?

Blogger Benjamin Kraft December 11, 2016 3:25 PM  

I hereby admit to willfully touching the poop and do solemnly swear to leave it alone.

Blogger Benjamin Kraft December 11, 2016 3:26 PM  

Also #34. is a type in my @46. I meant @43.

Blogger William Hudson December 11, 2016 3:27 PM  

@43 Log, I understand YOUR POV, but my deer daddeh went to the Big One, WW2, and actually killed people. That said, I know for a FACT that I will see him again in New Jerusalem. God knows what's in our hearts, AND Jesus died to forgive ALL our sins, even the "ones" committed in wartime. Well, Log, thanks to the Skulluminati and their henchmen, this IS War! I'm with the Dreaded Ilk here - NO PRISONERS!!!

Blogger Benjamin Kraft December 11, 2016 3:28 PM  

@50. His POV is blatantly anti-Christian. He's a lying troll, AKA "poop". Don't touch the poop, VD will deal with it.

Blogger William Hudson December 11, 2016 3:31 PM  

@51 HUAA! Heard Understood And Acknowledged.

Blogger Cecil Henry December 11, 2016 3:33 PM  

I just can't believe what I'm seeing here. Why the ongoing, persistent media silence and complicity??


https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/germany/german-flirting-classes-for-refugees/

What is this sickness?? White Genocide is a REAL.

When the government targets a population by race, and then pledges all its resources to find anywhere there are “too many whites,” and then openly goes after community, or county, or state, or country, that is WHITE GENOCIDE.

Is it plausible that the leaders of dozens of White nations have adopted policies antithetical to the survival of their own peoples without agenda?

This is a crime, not a 'policy option'

Blogger Benjamin Kraft December 11, 2016 3:35 PM  

@53. Isn't that kinda entirely off-topic?

I'm still in the middle of reading SJWAL myself, I think I had kind of picked up most of this stuff myself or from reading this blog already though TBH. That being said, yes, most people haven't picked up ANY of this on their own, and I certainly wouldn't have picked up even "most" of it if I hadn't been here.

Blogger William Hudson December 11, 2016 3:36 PM  

about 41: Regarding customers, I forgot "The Most Famous Reindeer of All", (((the Rudolphs))).

Blogger Benjamin Kraft December 11, 2016 3:37 PM  

OT: What's Christ's first and most important commandment? I don't GAF about the second one right now because the first one is FIRST/most important/pre-empts the second in any cases of conflict.

Blogger VD December 11, 2016 3:38 PM  

Go away, Log. You are a quarrelsome and divisive person.

Anonymous Beau December 11, 2016 3:39 PM  

Sometimes I'm almost moved to renew my license in order to make a constitutional attack on public schools and private schools that live in part off of government supplied, loaned, or guaranteed money, and use color of law to infringe the free speech rights of American citizens.

F.I.R.E. is already admirably defending individual free expression. How about the irony of instigating the Free Speech Movement 2.0 to abolish campus speech codes that suppress free speech via legislation denying funds to programs that infringe the 1st Amendment?

Blogger VD December 11, 2016 3:42 PM  

It's cowardly. Plain and simple. But we are all entitled to our opinions.

It's always interesting to see people who have learned nothing since the Civil War. Only an idiot thinks elan is always the right move.

Blogger VD December 11, 2016 3:43 PM  

I'm not waiting for anything. You're banned, Log. Do not comment on this blog ever again. You are not permitted here.

Blogger William Hudson December 11, 2016 3:45 PM  

@53 VD, what would General George Smith Patton, Jr. have done with a "log" yammering about inside his command tent during a battle strategy meeting?

Blogger Benjamin Kraft December 11, 2016 3:45 PM  

*Praise Kek*

I'll comment further on SJWAL when I finish reading it. Shouldn't be long.

Blogger bob kek mando: i can't be racist. why, some of my best friends are ((( Literally Hitler ))). { Vox Gayness intensifies } December 11, 2016 3:48 PM  

28. Wanderer December 11, 2016 1:38 PM
What justification is there?



according to Cultural Marxist dogma, *ALL* sex and race variances are due to how the child is reared ( Nurture ) and genes, epigenetics and hormones have nothing to do with it.

therefore, anyone who notices that there are significant cognitive / emotive differences between sexes and races, for any reason ( other than to assert how the divergent race/sex is 'better' than White Man ), is committing CrimeThink and must be purged from the Collective.

Blogger James Dixon December 11, 2016 3:51 PM  

> It's cowardly. Plain and simple. But we are all entitled to our opinions.

The brave but stupid approach, huh? OK, let's see how that works out for you. The rest of us have tried to learn something from history.

Blogger Dave December 11, 2016 3:51 PM  

Dayum, go away for 10 minutes and all hell breaks loose.

Blogger William Hudson December 11, 2016 3:51 PM  

@59 Does that mean "No grabbing pussy" just because I don't happen to have one? Just askin' here . . .

Blogger James Dixon December 11, 2016 3:52 PM  

Ack, banned while I was replying. Apologies, VD.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash December 11, 2016 3:54 PM  

David of One wrote:I would add to Never trust Human Resources. HR works for the interests of the company/institution first and then the vast majority act on their personal proclivities of SJW thinking in all it variances and perversity.

In my 35 years of workplace experience, HR works to soothe the egos of, rein-force the prejudices of, and provide freeform drama for the ladies who run HR. It's always ladies who run HR, have you noticed?

I have never seen an HR woman who worked in the interests of the company or the employees, except accidentally.

Blogger Benjamin Kraft December 11, 2016 3:59 PM  

@64. What you said. HR is widely known to be the most corrupt/useless/vile department in virtually every company that has one.

Blogger William Hudson December 11, 2016 4:02 PM  

@65 My deer wauf said to tell you that it also includes many "charities", Benjamin. P.S. I seen you touchin' da poop again after you skooled me not to.

Anonymous Carlton December 11, 2016 4:04 PM  

No idea why, but my open ID would not let me leave a comment

Blogger Benjamin Kraft December 11, 2016 4:04 PM  

@66. I understood it could be seen that way. I rationalized it as trying to keep the naive from tripping and falling in the poop by accident, via posting signs.

Anonymous johnc December 11, 2016 4:24 PM  

@42 Is there PC crap going on in STEM courses? Or is it pretty much limited to the Arts faculties?

Tech and sciences have become pretty heavily converged, especially on the West Coast. I actually immediately assumed that was the writer's area of study, to give you an idea of how reflexively I associate convergence with tech.

It must be horrible for a sane person who has to attend university in {{ $currentYear }}. They are practically white martyrs.

Blogger kh123 December 11, 2016 4:33 PM  

"You're banned, Log."

Thank God.

Anonymous Satan's Hamster December 11, 2016 4:55 PM  

"It's always ladies who run HR, have you noticed?"

HR seems to be where most big companies stuff their quota of otherwise unemployable females.

Blogger Off The Wall December 11, 2016 5:00 PM  

Benjamin Kraft wrote:Also #34. is a type in my @46. I meant @43.

Damn I'm confusticated, y'all had a comment fight, Vox purged the troll and now the comment numbers don't line up!

Blogger Cail Corishev December 11, 2016 5:01 PM  

Is there PC crap going on in STEM courses?

I'm about your age, so I can't give a first-hand report, but I hear it's pretty bad. On a similar note, I was recently watching some Computer Science courses on video from Stanford. When the camera would happen to catch a few students in the first row, or pick up a voice asking a question, they would almost invariably be female or non-white. They may already be running out of white guys to beat up with PC.

Fortunately, it's a field you don't need a college degree to succeed in, if you have some ambition and an aptitude for it.

Blogger Cail Corishev December 11, 2016 5:19 PM  

Facebook offers an option to keep your posts and profile limited to friends only. Use it. THEN keep your posts few and low-key.

I've been thinking about that. At the risk of bragging, my circle of family and friends values my opinion (partly because I rarely share it). So I'd like to write more for them about the alt-right and other topics of the moment. I did write one thing about the Podesta-lookalike police sketches, and then some friends wanted to share it, so I ended up making it public so they could. It's nothing I'm not willing to defend, but it certainly puts a stake in the ground that could offend some people.

So it gets complicated. Most people's social media circles are hazy on trust at the edges. Some of my high school classmates and extended family members are likely die-hard liberals, so who knows what they might pass along in a moment of pique.

I think in the future I'll write such things under a pseudonym, and then for my social media friends, just point to it and comment on it. That way it should still have an impact with them, but if they share it, it won't carry my name out in the open.

Anonymous Wyrd December 11, 2016 5:38 PM  

Nearly anyone can afford a gun and a box or two of ammunition.

The wiff of grapeshot is mighty compelling.

Anonymous RCFlyer December 11, 2016 5:50 PM  

I work as an engineer in the defense sector, and even a few years ago I thought I was safe from convergence. Not anymore. The canary in the coal mine for me was the "they're raping everybody up in here" hysteria in the US military a few years ago - I was in uniform at the time and got reamed by a female colonel, after a training session for senior NCOs, just for asking what percentage of rape reports turned out to be false. I retired to the private sector not long after.

Blogger David of One December 11, 2016 6:00 PM  


Jesus had admonished the Apostles with ...

“Behold, I am sending you out as sheep in the midst of wolves, so be wise as serpents and innocent as doves.".

I think that it can be said that is applies to all of us as Believers today.

The Apostles could easily be accused today of not having enough Faith or not being filled with or walking in The Spirit because they didn't want to beaten and jailed by a town or village that "wouldn't receive" them.

Instead they sent other believers ahead to discern if they would be received in a particular town or village. If not ... Jesus told them to shake the dust off of the shoes/sandals from such places.

The Apostles were exercising being "wise as serpents". Wise to the ways of the world.

Likewise we need to train and encourage one another to be wise as serpents to the ways of the world and not run headlong via a "frontal assault".

VD associated this approach in the context of 4GW. This is appropriate as we have brains and we need to be using them. Reading and applying SJWAL is one of many places to start upon the path of wisdom.

How can this be done? I think many ways are available and the one that comes immediately to mind is private and "verified" brainstorming sessions.

For those of us who are Believers, prayer is requisite.

Blogger Rusty Fife December 11, 2016 6:24 PM  

David of One wrote:VD associated this approach in the context of 4GW. This is appropriate as we have brains and we need to be using them. Reading and applying SJWAL is one of many places to start upon the path of wisdom.

Possibly the thing to keep in mind is that 4GW isn't shorthand for "guerrilla war". It is a recognition that the 'Moral Level of War' is the highest ground that can be taken. Therefore, all other strategies, tactics, and actions need to be focused toward taking moral high ground. #pizzagate comes to mind.

Blogger Lovekraft December 11, 2016 6:25 PM  

30: The OASF: "I could see the fury on her face as she stared at me for the rest of the meeting. It was a very instructive experience."

Working somewhere long enough and you begin to recognize and anticipate the varying waves of (women) emotion, and to adjust accordingly.

Which is why being aloof and professional is the only way to deal with the emotional instability (one day that joke's funny, the next it brings you into a review meeting).

The key to work happiness is IMO OWNERSHIP. As VoxDay can likely attest, without owning one's own work is soul-crushing. But in this corporate, cold work world, finding this key takes time and energy.

Anonymous Lawyer Guy December 11, 2016 6:31 PM  

Lawyers get away with a lot more honesty as long as you are in a small/mid firm.

That being said, this sort of thing seem long term bad for the liberals. Sure, they shut up public debate. But it seems like that leads to cell type structures for discussion, and in time those turn into groups for disruption

Blogger Reed Schrichte December 11, 2016 7:25 PM  

Dumbass SJW's think that they can fight fascism with fascism. Hint: it doesn't work.

OpenID basementhomebrewer December 11, 2016 8:10 PM  

James Dixon wrote: I gravitated (again, through no skill or planning of my own) to a field that's largely been resistant to SJW entryism (oil, gas, and coal).

Careful with that assumption. I started my career at one of the larger oil companies and they had a "diversity team". At the time it was annoying and it was fun to see the individual employees at each location who were forced to participate on it corrupt it from it's intended SJW purposes set out by corporate.

I know at this point it has been rebranded as the "Inclusion Team" complete with an executive level hire who's sole responsibility is running this team. His identity and how he identifies would not be surprising for someone hired into this role.

SJWs are everywhere in society and assuming that the nature of your industry will protect you from their infiltration is a rookie mistake.

Blogger James Dixon December 11, 2016 10:02 PM  

> SJWs are everywhere in society and assuming that the nature of your industry will protect you from their infiltration is a rookie mistake.

Oh, that's not an assumption I'm making. SJW's already have a large role in almost every organization in the field.

But there are other factors at play in my specific case. Two of them are the work location and the company ownership. Then there's the fact that I'm fairly close to retirement age.

Anonymous map December 12, 2016 2:27 AM  

Here is what I would like to know: where does Project Veritas get its hidden camera equipment? A good body recorder that allows you to record any conversation of which you are a party would be useful. It also disciplines you to keep your mouth shut. Is there any way to contact them and ask? This would have to be a button cam on a shirt.

Take time to learn your corporate policies and do research on your co-workers.

Blogger synp December 12, 2016 3:32 AM  

Wanderer wrote:Why would somebody get fired for making a post about the differences between men and women in society? What justification is there?

Any time you write about a difference it can be perceived as ranking. Don't believe me? Just look at all the white supremacy claims. So if his post can be perceived as a stated opinion that men are better than women, how can such a horrible person function in a mixed-sex environment? How can he be a subordinate of a woman manager, knowing that he can't possibly show her the proper respect? How can we ask any woman to either be subordinate to him or work alongside him when we know he can never have respect for her abilities?

These things are very easy to spin.

Blogger VD December 12, 2016 6:25 AM  

But there are other factors at play in my specific case. Two of them are the work location and the company ownership. Then there's the fact that I'm fairly close to retirement age.

James, with all due respect, what is the point of these comments which appear to consist of nothing more than you congratulating yourself that what is a serious problem for other people MAY not be a problem for you? How is your good fortune in this regard of any utility to them? What is your advice to them, be near retirement age?

I mean, I very much doubt you go to the doctor's office when he's talking to other patients and announce that you are in better health than they are.

Blogger Benjamin Kraft December 12, 2016 7:32 AM  

@86. I hope his retirement isn't gov-funded in any way... because that comes directly of the pockets of the people who won't be able to avoid/escape/ignore SJWs as easily, if at all.

Blogger Kristophr December 12, 2016 2:14 PM  

Tom Kratman wrote:"Exactly. That's why I always, always, always advise anonymity for everyone. Usually to no avail, but at least no one can say I didn't warn them."

I couldn't possibly, and you're not exactly anonymous, either.


Once you start writing for a living, your anonymity becomes the first casualty.

Blogger Kristophr December 12, 2016 2:24 PM  

Napoleon 12pdr wrote:Facebook offers an option to keep your posts and profile limited to friends only. Use it. THEN keep your posts few and low-key.

And on fora like this one, use different names on different fora. Make yourself hard to target.


Everyone should have a completely bland Facebook page, under an email that is strictly used for only work, school, banking, and government related business, with a LinkedIn account attached.

This is your official persona. Use these pages and email for stuff you are OK with Democrats knowing about, and only these things.

Blogger Kristophr December 12, 2016 2:36 PM  

Reed Schrichte wrote:Dumbass SJW's think that they can fight fascism with fascism. Hint: it doesn't work.

Dumbassed SJWs are fascists. They just project and accuse everyone else of fascism.

Blogger James Dixon December 12, 2016 4:08 PM  

> James, with all due respect, what is the point of these comments which appear to consist of nothing more than you congratulating yourself that what is a serious problem for other people MAY not be a problem for you?

Point taken. I'll try to refrain in the future. I think I was hoping a positive example might be useful to others, but it since it isn't due to any planning on my part it probably isn't.

Anonymous Post Alley Crackpot December 12, 2016 4:45 PM  

"That's why I always, always, always advise anonymity for everyone."

OPSEC isn't just for spooks and spies anymore.

Imagine the impact that the exposure of all of the IP addresses associated with certain Blogspot accounts would have ... and then, at that moment, you no longer have to imagine why I would never, ever, not in a million fucking years leave a comment anywhere without Tor, a private VPN, an anonymously purchased mobile hotspot, or all of the three.

Don't take this personally VD -- it's not about you at all.

There are simply too many other would-be adversaries attached to anyone's hosting solution to ignore OPSEC in everyday Internet life.

Anonymous Post Alley Crackpot December 12, 2016 4:57 PM  

Kristophr @89: In my business, the best reputation is no reputation at all.

No Facebook, no Twitter, no Web page, not now, not ever.

As far as the world is concerned, I'm a techno-Luddite who just isn't very interested in the world of the Internet.

Given an environment with multiple active hostile threats, sometimes it's good to look like you're keeping your head down, even if in reality you're not.

They think I'm letting the Wookiee win. :-)

Blogger EscapeVelocity December 14, 2016 11:45 PM  

Anonymity is the handmaiden of Liberty.

That is why the totalitarians are Hellbent on preventing anonymity online or anywhere else for that matter.

Defend anonymity at all costs. You freedom literally depends on it. This was mentioned in the Bible regarding The Mark of the Beast...regarding commerce. Cash & Bitcoin are your friends.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts