ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Tuesday, January 24, 2017

Identity politics are here to stay

And there is no place for white people in the Democratic Party:
Candidates aspiring to take over as chairman of the Democratic National Committee met Monday night to discuss what went wrong in 2016 and how to get the party back on track. Early into the event the candidates gravitated toward a particular scapegoat for the party’s poor showing in November: Political consultancies owned by white people.

“We have to stop, particularly with the consultants,” said the chairman of the South Carolina Democratic Party, Jaime Harrison. “You cannot come to the DNC and get a contract and the only minority face you have is the person answering the phone.”

Minority consultants “need to get the same resources that the white consultants have gotten,” said a Fox News analyst and candidate for the chairmanship, Jehmu Greene. "The DNC did a piss poor, pathetic job" attracting minorities, she said.

Democrats must provide “training” that focuses in part on teaching Americans “how to be sensitive and how to shut their mouths if they are white,” urged the executive director of Idaho’s Democratic Party, Sally Boynton Brown, who is white.

The event’s moderator, MSNBC’s Joy Ann Reid, asked the candidates how the party should handle the Black Lives Now movement.

The candidates uniformly emphasized that the party must embrace the activists unreservedly.... Asked whether they would agree to work with President Trump, the candidates agreed they would never do so, which drew some applause from the otherwise quiet crowd at George Washington University.
Translation: it's time to get those Trumpslide! 2020 shirts made.

One would think this means that there isn't any place for non-whites in the Republican Party, except that in the political sense, identity means who you want in government. And any rational non-white living in the USA should want white government, because that is what almost all of them - or at least their ancestors - came seeking in the first place.

The single biggest single mistake made by the Founding Fathers was this one: immigrants and their descendants should never have been permitted to vote. After all, no one forced them to immigrate to that particular society and they had nothing to do with creating the society they are seeking to join.

If the God-Emperor truly hopes to make America great again, stripping post-1965 immigrants of all voting rights, state, federal, and local, would be the best thing he could do short of sending them all back to their homelands. Why should people who are not Americans in any sense except paperwork be allowed any say at all in how American society is structured or how Americans live?

Labels: , ,

140 Comments:

Blogger JACIII January 24, 2017 5:06 AM  

“how to be sensitive and how to shut their mouths if they are white,” urged the executive director of Idaho’s Democratic Party, Sally Boynton Brown, who is white.

Why couldn't she have said this prior to the vagina march?

Blogger Bruce January 24, 2017 5:06 AM  

But that leads to the question as to whether Californians are American? What about Southerners versus Northerners? What about (((them)))?All I am asking for is a definition of what constitutes an American.

Blogger SteelPalm January 24, 2017 5:07 AM  

A novel, easier alternative to expatriation, and one that is worth strongly considering.

Rationally, I would be perfectly happy to give up my voting rights as a first-generation immigrant if it meant millions of Asians, Africans, Mexicans, etc. weren't overwhelmingly voting Democrat.

Were you partially inspired by Starship Troopers, Vox? Regardless, it's interesting, and I hope someone tries implementing this system.

Blogger Cerdic Ricing January 24, 2017 5:16 AM  

A novel, easier alternative to expatriation, and one that is worth strongly considering.

He didn't say it was an alternative to expatriation, but a stopgap before it. Evicting them is still the most optimal choice.

Blogger Lazarus January 24, 2017 5:19 AM  

Another candidate said black Americans are now living with “justified fear” of being killed after Donald Trump was elected president.

I knew I could find something positive in the article if I looked long enough.

Blogger SteelPalm January 24, 2017 5:22 AM  

@4

Might want to work on your reading comprehension before correcting others. The word "stopgap before it (expatriation)" never appears above, but rather

"would be the best thing he could do short of sending them all back to their homelands."

So yes, not as good as repatriation, but not a "stopgap" for anything.

Thinking about it more, Vox's system HAS been implemented in many nations, from ancient Greece to present times, but never in such a retroactive fashion.

Anonymous John Hancock January 24, 2017 5:26 AM  

Saw this classification on another forum. Genuinely interested in any comments; whether you agree or disagree.


Basically it goes like this:

-Nationalism is based on shared cultural values that are considered the founding principles of a specific nation, which are valid in that specific nation.

-Civic nationalism is based on the assumption that those values can be learned, if one accepts them.

-Ethnic nationalism is based on the assumption that those values are related to ancestry

-Racial nationalism is based on the assumption that those values are related to visible race

-Religious nationalism is based on the assumption that those values are based on a common religion.

-Of these different forms of nationalism only civic nationalism is compatible with liberal democracy, all the other forms of nationalism are based on a hierarchy of people in society based on ethnic, racial or religious features, and so put an ethnicity, a race or a religion in a superior position in society. They can be called ethnic, racial or religious supremacy.

Blogger Cerdic Ricing January 24, 2017 5:26 AM  

@6

It's not a permanent solution, however. We can see how that worked with slavery. Diversity + proximity still equals war, regardless of whether they can vote.

Doing this action would be good for now, but it would be delaying before the inevitable. It is still much better than doing nothing.

Anonymous Rocklea January 24, 2017 5:38 AM  

"Translation: it's time to get those Trumpslide! 2020 shirts made."

I think the way the Democratic Party is destroying itself, Trump will probably be running against 'What's Aleppo?' Gary Johnson and the Libertarians.

Blogger Krul January 24, 2017 5:44 AM  

I was very pessimistic before this election, as were I think most people on the Right. One big reason for that is that we either didn't perceive or underestimated the trend that Trump's success has put in the spotlight: the Left's self sabotage. The whites and Jews who pushed for policies like affirmative action and racial quotas are now being forced out of power in the party, to be replaced by incompetents whose main qualification is skin color. It's SJW convergence writ large.

Anonymous aegis-1080 January 24, 2017 5:46 AM  

"The candidates uniformly emphasized that the party must embrace the activists unreservedly.... Asked whether they would agree to work with President Trump, the candidates agreed they would never do so, which drew some applause from the otherwise quiet crowd at George Washington University."

That's funny, because right now Dems are livid that they got cucked and 14 of their Congresscritters voted to confirm Trump's CIA pick:

https://theintercept.com/2017/01/23/14-senate-democrats-fall-in-line-behind-trump-cia-pick-who-left-door-open-to-torture/

Those 14 include Tim "Gayface" Kaine. So much for the "Russian influence".

Blogger VD January 24, 2017 5:48 AM  

Were you partially inspired by Starship Troopers, Vox?

No, by the fact that I have lived, quite happily, for most of my adult life in places where I had no voting rights. I don't see why I should be telling Italians how to run Italy. I like the results, so why do I need to stick my two cents in?

Blogger VD January 24, 2017 5:50 AM  

So yes, not as good as repatriation, but not a "stopgap" for anything.

Well, it is, in that the 1964 demographic balance was guaranteed to Americans. That is an unfulfilled promise that the government is duty-bound to restore, and that Americans have the right to insist upon.

Anonymous One Deplorable DT January 24, 2017 5:53 AM  

it's time to get those Trumpslide! 2020 shirts made.

At the rate the Democrat party is going, just get the Emperor for Life Trump shirts made.

Anonymous One Deplorable DT January 24, 2017 5:58 AM  

Minority consultants “need to get the same resources that the white consultants have gotten,” said a Fox News analyst and candidate for the chairmanship, Jehmu Greene.

Yeah. The resources. If Y.T. would just give minorities more resources then they would be equal.

That must be it. What else could it be?

Side note: what in the hell is Fox News doing with that woman as an 'analyst'? What is she analyzing, her navel lint?

Blogger James Dixon January 24, 2017 6:06 AM  

> Jaime Harrison ... Jehmu Greene ... Joy Ann Reid ... Sally Boynton Brown

Do I detect a pattern here?

> Minority consultants “need to get the same resources that the white consultants have gotten,” ... on teaching Americans “how to be sensitive and how to shut their mouths if they are white,” ... The candidates uniformly emphasized that the party must embrace the activists unreservedly.

Oh well, never interrupt your opponent when she's in the middle of making a mistake.

Anonymous simplytimothy January 24, 2017 6:09 AM  

Look at your last paragraph. It assumes that liberal democracy must be multi ethnic, racial etc.

This is a form of circular reasoning.

Second, I reject the oppobrium placed on the word Supremacy.

$0.02

Anonymous Longtime Lurker January 24, 2017 6:16 AM  

Second Rule of Holes: If you find your opponent standing in one, hand her a shovel. It's gonna be fun watching the Democratic Party destroy itself with this nonsense.

Blogger JACIII January 24, 2017 6:16 AM  

Minority I.T. worked out really well for the DNC. Minority consultants should be just as fruitful.

Black people vastly overestimate their percentage of the population so it makes sense black people acting toward making their voting block more monolithic will yield their desired results.

My question is how do the cucks not cringe when they say those things? Is there some kind of anti-selfpreservation mental illness?

Blogger Rusty Fife January 24, 2017 6:28 AM  

John Hancock wrote:Saw this classification on another forum. Genuinely interested in any comments; whether you agree or disagree.



Basically it goes like this:

-Nationalism is based on shared cultural values that are considered the founding principles of a specific nation, which are valid in that specific nation.

-Civic nationalism is based on the assumption that those values can be learned, if one accepts them.

-Ethnic nationalism is based on the assumption that those values are related to ancestry

-Racial nationalism is based on the assumption that those values are related to visible race

-Religious nationalism is based on the assumption that those values are based on a common religion.

-Of these different forms of nationalism only civic nationalism is compatible with liberal democracy, all the other forms of nationalism are based on a hierarchy of people in society based on ethnic, racial or religious features, and so put an ethnicity, a race or a religion in a superior position in society. They can be called ethnic, racial or religious supremacy.


I've taken this test before. There are not only the three (ethnic and racial are degrees of the same thing) nationalisms. You forgot magic dirt nationalism; where if you have one dry foot, you are the fruit of the mother soil.

Why choose "liberal democracy" as the design standard when there are so many other government types abailable, such as Oligarchy? Looking around the globe, it isn't obvious it is superior.

Aren't you assuming what nationalism is superior by which government form is selected as the basis? Because circular reasoning.

Blogger MycroftJones January 24, 2017 6:30 AM  

The Biblical model is for them to have no vote, no eligibility for office, and no ability to own land, excepting a residence inside a densely populated city. The wording says "walled city", but a close reading indicates a high rise condominium might fit that bill. Jury is out whether suburbs are allowed or disallowed. I lean toward disallowed.

The Philippines (and Mexico) follow this Biblical model of voting and land ownership. That is why Duterte was serious when he invited ALL the refugees to come to the Philippines. They have the laws in place to handle it. The influx can't disinherit the natives.

Anonymous JustAnotherPairOfEyes January 24, 2017 6:36 AM  

" immigrants and their descendants should never have been permitted to vote. "

How would this idea be applied to mixed individuals? Or Alexander Hamilton who was an immigrant and a bastard?

I just discovered that yet another branch of my ancestors,this a line which had already long been in the us as of 1850, were mixed race. Their descendants, telling the family stories to their children, didn't mention the racial details so they essentially white-washed their ancestry. I guess what I'm saying is that a lot of the people, especially those whose ancestors have long been in the US, are only passing for pure white.

The Mayflower generation interbred with the Natives (cause there weren't enough European women available here). So the ethnic guy whose grandparents came over in the 1920s from Poland is a lot more white than the guys who signed the Declaration of Independence or voted on the Constitution.

Blogger MycroftJones January 24, 2017 6:38 AM  

@22 If you are a descendant of the Puritans, like me, then you have a covenant with the Almighty, that they made on your behalf. Under the terms of that covenant, there is a 10 generation rule. If the mixing happened 10 generations ago and you are of good character, then we'll pretend it didn't happen.

Anonymous John Hancock January 24, 2017 6:40 AM  

"Why choose "liberal democracy" as the design standard when there are so many other government types abailable, such as Oligarchy?"

I think the writer meant to frame the categories in terms of American politics. "Liberal Democracy" (liberal as in liberty) is an adequate description of the American system.

Blogger synp January 24, 2017 6:46 AM  

Democrats must provide “training” that focuses in part on teaching Americans “how to be sensitive and how to shut their mouths if they are white,”
Yes! I want in! Where do I sign up? Oh, it's just for Americans. Too bad.

it's time to get those Trumpslide! 2020 shirts made.Especially if the candidate is Keith Ellison or Elizabeth Warren. In they can get Oprah...

Blogger Rusty Fife January 24, 2017 6:49 AM  

John Hancock wrote:"Why choose "liberal democracy" as the design standard when there are so many other government types abailable, such as Oligarchy?"

I think the writer meant to frame the categories in terms of American politics. "Liberal Democracy" (liberal as in liberty) is an adequate description of the American system.


America is neither liberal nor democracy. The author is an idiot.

Blogger Rusty Fife January 24, 2017 6:50 AM  

synp wrote:Democrats must provide “training” that focuses in part on teaching Americans “how to be sensitive and how to shut their mouths if they are white,”

Yes! I want in! Where do I sign up? Oh, it's just for Americans. Too bad.


In this case, Jews are not white.

Blogger VD January 24, 2017 6:54 AM  

How would this idea be applied to mixed individuals? Or Alexander Hamilton who was an immigrant and a bastard?

They don't vote. You want your kids to have the vote? Don't race-mix.

I guess what I'm saying is that a lot of the people, especially those whose ancestors have long been in the US, are only passing for pure white.

You're absolutely wrong. Solipsism is no substitute for statistics. According to a large-scale 23 and Me study, the average white American is 98.6 percent European. It's American blacks who are mixed, being 24 percent European.

Blogger VD January 24, 2017 6:55 AM  

"Why choose "liberal democracy" as the design standard

Because the author is a civic nationalist, trying to justify civic nationalism.

Blogger synp January 24, 2017 6:57 AM  

Rusty Fife wrote:
Yes! I want in! Where do I sign up? Oh, it's just for Americans. Too bad.

In this case, Jews are not white.


So we're not allowed to shut our mouthes? You racist!

Blogger Stilicho January 24, 2017 6:59 AM  

Universal suffrage is a god that failed. It must be tossed on the ash heap of history before it destroys this country. The franchise must be limited to those who can generally be trusted to exercise it in a fashion that preserves the nation, its morals, and traditions.

Blogger Cataline Sergius January 24, 2017 6:59 AM  

During The Young Turks hilariously epic election night meltdown, once the death of their hopes and dreams became obvious, the very first name they started floating was Kamala Harris.

Now admittedly, TYT may as well be called the SJW News Network and they were definitely off their feed that night. But that is how they think at this point.

"The next candidate for POTUS Must Be a woman and a POC. That is the only way to bring the Obama coalition back together."

Blogger Rusty Fife January 24, 2017 7:01 AM  

Let's look at The Idiot's own definition to see that they have (or believes we have) no ability rto foresee consequences.

John Hancock wrote:-Civic nationalism is based on the assumption that those values can be learned, if one accepts them.

"If one accepts them"...how would you know someone accepted them? An inquisition? Better, you could watch what people do to see if they have the shared cultural values, like gun ownership. The Inquisition could audit all Americans and if they had at least enough fire arms to equip their family and proof of monthly militia training for every male over 13yo, then they would pass one of the Amendment tests. You could save money by having snitches and using the NSA to watch everyone's evrey purchase ans communication for wrong think. So Liberal. So Democratic. So Idiotic.

Anonymous Rory January 24, 2017 7:04 AM  

Seriously though, please put them up on Dark Lord Designs. I want to start rocking that bad boy.

Blogger Tatooine Sharpshooters' Club January 24, 2017 7:07 AM  

Why choose "liberal democracy" as the design standard when there are so many other government types available, such as Oligarchy? Looking around the globe, it isn't obvious it is superior.

Is liberal democracy (with universal suffrage) not the political equivalent of the feel-good participation trophy culture? Every body "gets a voice", no matter how small (or negative) their contribution to the whole is. Davros had a rant to that effect once:

They talk of democracy, freedom, fairness. Those are the creeds of cowards. The ones who would listen to a thousand opinions and try to satisfy them all.

Blogger Buybuydandavis January 24, 2017 7:08 AM  

VD: Translation: it's time to get those Trumpslide! 2020 shirts made.

SJWs may turn out to be the downfall of the Left. They are institutional arsonists. Now they're burning down the Left's institutions.

Anonymous basementhomebrewer January 24, 2017 7:12 AM  

Hilary 2020: "This your bitch be!"

Blogger Stilicho January 24, 2017 7:15 AM  

Sig XM17 will replace M9. Made in America (NH). Hat tip Hognose. Glock fanbois wept. #MAGA #MAAA

Blogger J.M. January 24, 2017 7:17 AM  

Rusty Fife wrote:Let's look at The Idiot's own definition to see that they have (or believes we have) no ability rto foresee consequences.

John Hancock wrote:-Civic nationalism is based on the assumption that those values can be learned, if one accepts them.

"If one accepts them"...how would you know someone accepted them? An inquisition? Better, you could watch what people do to see if they have the shared cultural values, like gun ownership. The Inquisition could audit all Americans and if they had at least enough fire arms to equip their family and proof of monthly militia training for every male over 13yo, then they would pass one of the Amendment tests. You could save money by having snitches and using the NSA to watch everyone's evrey purchase ans communication for wrong think. So Liberal. So Democratic. So Idiotic.


It's not such a bad idea considering the very Founding stock of whites in almost every nation of the West has so far selected for less liberties and self-destruction so far. Or do you think there were millions of Germans and Swedes voting in UK elections so gun control laws could be enacted? or in Australia, Canada and New Zealand all countries where the Englishmen founding stock prevails and which are on the way of becoming police states (Brexit or not in the case of Britain). Or that Russians have been behind the leftists idiocy that has characterized France in the 20th and 21st centuries?

Vox observations about the pernicious impacts of uncontrolled immigration are right but his theory is fundamentally flawed since immigrants are a symptom not a cause of the decline.

Blogger Rusty Fife January 24, 2017 7:22 AM  

J.M. wrote:It's not such a bad idea...

It is a bad idea. Apparently the words: idiot, Inquisition, audit, NSA, and wrongthink were not strong enough to make the point.

Blogger J.M. January 24, 2017 7:24 AM  

Inquisition was not such a bad idea considering the events. That's what I meant. Unlike you, I don't consider race or ethnicity enough.

Blogger Gunnar Thalweg January 24, 2017 7:26 AM  

@19. "My question is how do the cucks not cringe when they say those things? Is there some kind of anti-self preservation mental illness?"

The so-called cucks are the Republicans who hold to (among other things) equality under the law, correct? It's not mental illness; it's a worthy cause. Many people don't want identity politics to win. They are like the guy in the bar trying to keep two fighting parties apart -- they keep the peace. But if they don't get enough support, the fight breaks out, anyway.

The Alt-Right is simply the flip side of the left (and more and more, mainstream Democrats). To paraphrase Thomas Sowell, it's the replacement with what works with what sounds good.

It sounds good to divide up the world into ethnic countries. Getting there will require a lot of blood, and even then, you won't have accomplished anything.

I'll go down swinging for equality under the law.

Blogger Rusty Fife January 24, 2017 7:28 AM  

J.M. wrote:Inquisition was not such a bad idea considering the events. That's what I meant. Unlike you, I don't consider race or ethnicity enough.

I'm not considering anything but the idiotic idea that 'civic nationalism is compatible with liberty'. It is utterly false.

Blogger synp January 24, 2017 7:31 AM  

Cataline Sergius wrote:During The Young Turks hilariously epic election night meltdown, once the death of their hopes and dreams became obvious, the very first name they started floating was Kamala Harris.

And they haven't done that anymore in the last few weeks. Now it's all Warren, Sanders, Clinton (again?) and Michelle Obama.

But in January 2013 Hugh Howey published his prescient novel Shift, which correctly predicted that the first Democratic female candidate for President would lose, and the second one would run in 2052. Predicting Hillary's loss so far in advance makes me trust the second part of his prediction implicitly.

Blogger Robert Coble January 24, 2017 7:31 AM  

James Carville, Democrat consultant:

"When your opponent is drowning, throw the son of a bitch an anvil."

Stand back and just watch the bitches sink themselves!

Blogger Deplorable Gaiseric January 24, 2017 7:36 AM  

Gunnar Thalweg wrote:I'll go down swinging for equality under the law.
Yes, you will.

But you've got your analogy completely backwards with regards to what works and what sounds good. Homogenous nation-state societies work. Multicultural diversity sounds good. But it doesn't work.

Blogger peter blandings January 24, 2017 7:40 AM  

My question is how do the cucks not cringe when they say those things? Is there some kind of anti-self preservation mental illness?"
yes, there is. mass insanity is real. read "extraordinary popular delusion and the madness of crowds." charles mackay 1841. God bless the DNC. may they last forever.

Blogger VD January 24, 2017 7:40 AM  

The Alt-Right is simply the flip side of the left (and more and more, mainstream Democrats). To paraphrase Thomas Sowell, it's the replacement with what works with what sounds good.

No, the Alt-Right is not "the flip-side" of the Left, but the polar opposite. And "equality before the law", civic nationalism, and "liberal democracy" do not work. You only ever believed they did because they were supported by the underlying white, Anglo-Saxon Protestant ethno-state.

Now that there it is no longer there to support them, they are, as should be expected, being revealed as failed concepts. Go down swinging if you like. But you will go down.

Anonymous Rocklea January 24, 2017 7:41 AM  

One vote per married couple who own the property they reside in unencumbered. No vote for public servants of any kind. No vote for immigrants at all, perhaps to be revisited after five generations of good character and compliant with the first two rules. No criminal record in ancestry.

Blogger Jew613 January 24, 2017 7:42 AM  

I'm loving that at the very moment the Democrats are doubling down on trying to get the minorities, who are consistent Democrat voters anyway, His Majesty has flipped the Construction Union's leadership into his corner.

Anonymous basementhomebrewer January 24, 2017 7:55 AM  

"Hilary? Who this bitch be?

You on sosh securitay?

She yo bitch be!

You got low innncummm?

She yo bitch be!

You got disability?

She yo bitch be!

You wanna trade in that old Obamaphone for a fresh Clintonphone?

She yo bitch be!

Hilary: She yo bitch be!"

Blogger OGRE January 24, 2017 7:56 AM  

The DNC is taking the 'divide and conquer' strategy and applying it internally. How progressive! Alienating their largest ethnic group will surely lead to success!

Its going to get real funny real fast once the black, latino, muslim, SJW coalition start turning on one another, which is the inevitable result of identity politics. And the more the fat, bluehaired, otherkin, brony, shemales push their nutjob agenda, the sooner the other groups start to break away. And I think we are seeing the first cracks in that coalition starting right now.

Anonymous #5454 January 24, 2017 7:57 AM  

As our host has pointed out repeatedly, any converged organization ceases its primary purpose at some point. So too will a converged political party. TRUMP 2020!

Blogger James Dixon January 24, 2017 8:00 AM  

> What is she analyzing, her navel lint?

Something slightly lower than that.

Anonymous VFM #6306 January 24, 2017 8:01 AM  

So in 2020 Hillary is now going to be the first openly gay black Presidential candidate to lose in a Trumpslide and in 2024 will be the first to do it as a corpse.

If you want to understand futility, imagine a wetfoot stamping on Hillary's face forever.

Anonymous Jay Will January 24, 2017 8:11 AM  

If they can get away with this talk now, imagine if the numbers were much worse. They'll want your children dead just like the South Africans.

The last white man wouldn't be free he'd bear the full weight of the "crimes" of his ancestors. White guilt is an eternal crime of unchanging x, as whitey recedes in numbers each whitey scum takes a greater percentage of x.



Blogger dc.sunsets January 24, 2017 8:14 AM  

Peter Blandings, yes, there is. mass insanity is real. read "extraordinary popular delusion and the madness of crowds."

And if you want to grasp WHY, read the two book set, "Socionomics" by Robert Prechter, Jr. Elliott's Wave Principle holds out two uses: 1. A predictive model to navigate an unknown future. 2. An explanation for the patterned cycles of history.

IMO it is permanently controversial with regard to #1 because of the infinite variation within the basic pattern, but #2 is slam-dunk the best explanation for human social behavior available today.

We are biologically predisposed to herd, the impulses occur during preconscious cognition and our rational minds simply rationalize whatever bubbles up from the emotional herding-centers of our limbic system.

BTW, this stands in total opposition to Leftism, because the WP of HSB posits a permanent and unchanging human NATURE, while all forms of Leftism posit that no such thing exists, and that people are malleable and subject to being changed by wise stewardship (or the proper application of torture.)

Blogger Duke Norfolk January 24, 2017 8:27 AM  

One Deplorable DT wrote:At the rate the Democrat party is going, just get the Emperor for Life Trump shirts made.

Yep, and it would be hugely triggering. Deliciously so. (as with the whole God Emperor meme, which is by design, of course)

Blogger dc.sunsets January 24, 2017 8:28 AM  

The more fiercely the "Coalition of the Fringes" tries to in-group in order to better enforce the past extortion of the white majority, the faster they drive whites out of the muddy middle and into white identity politics.

More, please.

The more Negro- (and Mestizo-, Somali-, Syrian-, etc.) Fatigue sets in, the quicker we can insure that the agencies of the state coalesce around the functional identity that keeps the electricity in the wires and maintains the order we expect everywhere but Englewood, South Chicago, Rockford or St. Paul.

The USA's choice is stark:
1. A multi-ethnic state exclusively run by whites (the Mexico Plan.)
2. A disintegrating polity where what arises amounts to semi-autonomous, racially- & ethnically-homogeneous city-states of vastly differing levels of wealth that engage in hot-cold-hot-cold cycling warfare, or
3. A geography mostly that of now, after a long civil war of one pogrom after another reproduces a mostly homogeneous citizenry.

#3 might emerge after a de facto period of #2.

Or maybe order will return after a shitty period. (grin)

Anonymous Jay Will January 24, 2017 8:31 AM  

Future voting can be undertaken with the sound off. Your guy looks like you. Diversity knows this already.

Blogger Avalanche January 24, 2017 8:31 AM  

@44 " Now it's all Warren, Sanders, Clinton (again?) and Michelle Obama."

White pretending other; (((white-ish))); whited sepulchre; and monkey. "Ah have seeeeen the Promised Land!"

Guess they missed this just-barely-past election?

Blogger Avalanche January 24, 2017 8:35 AM  

@54 "> What is she analyzing, her navel lint?

Something slightly lower than that."

AND she's got a brand-new hat just like it!

Blogger dc.sunsets January 24, 2017 8:40 AM  

@42 Many people don't want identity politics to win. They are like the guy in the bar trying to keep two fighting parties apart -- they keep the peace. But if they don't get enough support, the fight breaks out, anyway.

Bull. Those who "don't want identity politics to win" are fools, FOOLS, who try to "keep the peace" as a gang of violent criminals engage in waves of robbery and rape...so the "Can't we all get along?" asshat tells his fellow victims to put away their guns.

There is NO MORAL EQUIVALENCE here. Anyone who claims that Affirmative Action, minority set-asides and any criminal justice theory that excuses underclass barbarism (of any race, but especially based on race) is not CRIMINAL suffers from a Cranial Lead Deficiency.

Taking money, a job or a contract from "A" to give to "B" simply because of ancestry (in Africa or Spain--signaled by nothing but a surname, that is-- these days) or sex is pure evil. Its entire rationale rests on proving a negative, so it is sophistry.

There's another term for a person who engages in sophistry in order to obtain something they value. CON ARTIST, AKA a criminal.

So no, this isn't about preventing a bar fight.

Blogger F.D. Stephens January 24, 2017 8:41 AM  

Your "what if there was no place for whites in the Democratic Party" is a great concept for a near future dystopian novel.

Anonymous JustAnotherPairOfEyes January 24, 2017 8:50 AM  

VD: "You're absolutely wrong. Solipsism is no substitute for statistics. According to a large-scale 23 and Me study, the average white American is 98.6 percent European."

Your 98.6% figure is for modern American whites by DNA tests.

I make no claims about modern American whites or their DNA. The argument is about 1776 not 2017 and it is about ancestry not DNA.

The roughly 10 generations since 1776 will dilute ancestry to 1/1024. But DNA is inherited by only 92 chromosomes which typically are passed on unbroken. So an ancestry of one part in 1024 simply cannot be detected by DNA testing. It's scientifically impossible to gauge the ancestry of the 1776 founding fathers by DNA testing of Americans in 2017. Even if you used only samples from people who were pure descendents of the 1776 founding fathers the test would be statistically useless. The test simply cannot be done. In addition, the Indian blood of that time has been diluted by breeding with the millions of pure Europeans who immigrated to the US since 1776.

Your statistical tests give zero evidence that even a single one of the founding fathers were pure white. Instead, that is easily shown by tracing the ancestry of individuals, particularly the ones who had recently immigrated to the US.

A quick google search finds that the Randolphs, the wealthiest and most powerful family in 17th century Virginia, are descended from Pocahontas, a famous Indian. Their descendants include a signer of the Declaration of Independence and a half dozen early US presidents. That one Native American, Pocahontas, boasts over 100,000 known US descendants (the vast majority of which will call themselves "white"). And this is Indian nobility. Only God knows how many other Indians are in the woodpile of the early settlers.

Anonymous FP January 24, 2017 8:50 AM  

'“how to be sensitive and how to shut their mouths if they are white,” urged the executive director of Idaho’s Democratic Party, Sally Boynton Brown, who is white.'

So Sally says to her fellow honkies to jump down turn around and pick that bale of cotton. Equality is only for the peoples of color.

Yeah, keep pluckin that chicken DNC.

Blogger Ron Winkleheimer January 24, 2017 8:54 AM  

For a couple of weeks after the election I thought it would be at least one, more likely two election cycles before the Dems got their act together and the sane ones took back control from the whack job SJWs. I now think that may not be possible. Perhaps that is why Chuck Schumer is looking increasingly strained. There is no way for him to jump ship and become a Republican, he is not long for the Democrat party, and getting honest work is completely out of the question.

Blogger dc.sunsets January 24, 2017 8:55 AM  

@42 I'll go down swinging for equality under the law.


And where, pray tell, is that to be found in the USA now? Why did it disappear?

If people can be easily divided into groups (by skin color or obvious ancestry, for instance), natural heterogeneity will cause different mean outcomes for those groups to occur.

This is axiomatic.

WHEN (not if, WHEN) this happens, how long will it take, anywhere, EVER, before efforts to tip the scales---AKA UNEQUAL TREATMENT BEFORE THE LAW---will be pushed?

FFS, we already know the answer.

Equality before the law cannot exist anywhere that a polity is 1) heterogeneous and 2) "democratic." It's bad enough we humans come in two sexes, a fertile ground on which con artists can foment political conflict.

All of this "worked" as long as
1. The USA was relatively homogeneous
2. The feral government's reach was relatively limited.

Now that we have everyone BUT whites nearly 100% engaged in identity politics (look at vote percentages, D vs R, for every minority group!) and the limited government template of the Constitution is utterly ignored and the government is nothing but a vehicle for looting the out-groups, anyone who wishes to return to "civic nationalism's" rejection of identity politics is too biased, immature, ignorant, blind or stupid to be part of the discussion.

Blogger Ron Winkleheimer January 24, 2017 9:02 AM  

Hell, the Transgenders are complaining that the Wimmins March sent the the dangerous message that "having a vagina is essential to being a woman." Blacks are telling whites that they must "be woke."

I saw an interesting video yesterday. Bunch of black "activists" hollering out some slogan or another, a skinny Asian kid in glasses in a long sleeved button shirt (if they cast this kid in a movie the SJWs would be accusing the film makers of stereotyping Asians) stood up and yelled back at them, "this is a library!"

Blogger Robert Divinity January 24, 2017 9:03 AM  

10:

The whites and Jews who pushed for policies like affirmative action and racial quotas are now being forced out of power in the party, to be replaced by incompetents whose main qualification is skin color. It's SJW convergence writ large.

Hence the venom spewed toward "college-educated women" who joined their working class sisters in voting for Trump. White women were supposed to remain part of the cultural Marxist coalition until they weren't needed later this century. In the meantime they were expected to relinquish power to their noble savage betters (ditto Jews of either gender). The ludicrous, incoherent "women's march" was a lame attempt to bring those YT bitches back into the fold. The freakshow probably made the exit permanent.

42:

I'll go down swinging for equality under the law.

Are you swinging now? I bet not. White men haven't been equal under the law for going on two generations now. Continue to dream the cuck fantasy. The rest of the white masses have awakened, perhaps not even too late.

Blogger Ron Winkleheimer January 24, 2017 9:05 AM  

The Asian kid had an accent that makes me think that he was from China. American universities make a lot of money educating foreign students. And the Chinese elite like to send their kids to American universities were they can get a good STEM education and make connections.

It will be interesting to see what happens when the diversity starts to interfere with that money flow.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan January 24, 2017 9:05 AM  

It would be a hoot to have these Glorious People of Color and their lackey whites to explain the new caste system.

You know it must hurt these POCs and lackeys something fierce, all their internal propaganda tells them of their supremacy, but internally whites are still in charge in the Democratic party and outside the Democratic party whites are still in most cases enjoying success.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan January 24, 2017 9:09 AM  

That equality cuck up thread has never in his life scolded a person of color over his certainty of equality with that POC, never and they never will. He's a joke of the kind once tolerated on the Right.

Blogger rumpole5 January 24, 2017 9:09 AM  

I disagree with your proposition that immigrants and their descendants should never vote. Instead, use a variation based on Deuteronomy 23. Confer voting rights on descendants of Western European immigrants in the third generation, and on the descendants of immigrants from other countries in the seventh to tenth generation.

The passage even has a provision for cucks and pajama boys who are "wounded in the stones".

Blogger Cail Corishev January 24, 2017 9:12 AM  

That is why Duterte was serious when he invited ALL the refugees to come to the Philippines. They have the laws in place to handle it. The influx can't disinherit the natives.

Until the influx convince/force the natives to give them power; then the game is up.

Maybe that's not inevitable; maybe the Filipinos would be resistant to it. But white European men seem pretty susceptible. After all, they once did have all the power in the US, but they gradually voted to extend it further and further to other groups that would destroy what they had built. (Or their representatives did, which is supposed to be the same thing in "liberal democracy.") When women started agitating for the vote, for instance, men could have told them no, but they didn't. The whites who stayed back in England followed a similar tragectory.

So, assuming you can get the vote restricted back to pre-1965 citizens, how do you keep it that way, keep the voters from getting stupid and giving it away again? Or is that impossible, and the best you can hope for is a good run? Writing anything into a constitution appears to be a holding action at best, since it lasts until the representatives decide to ignore it.

Direct democracy might help, since the problem seems to be that the non-voting groups can agitate and convince the representatives to give them power. When the vote was extended to women, were men in general in favor of that? I don't know. Clearly, American voters would not extend the vote to illegals today, yet we have politicians wanting to do just that.

Blogger pyrrhus January 24, 2017 9:16 AM  

@57 Yes, Prechter has shown that humans have at least as much tendency to herd as cattle. So when the social impulse reverses (Trump), the previous leaders get buried in a stampede and , if they are lucky, aren't guillotined.

Anonymous Satan's Hamste January 24, 2017 9:18 AM  

"Or do you think there were millions of Germans and Swedes voting in UK elections so gun control laws could be enacted?"

No, just millions of women. There was no serious support for 'gun control' in the UK until women were allowed to vote. Before that, any Briton could walk out of jail at the end of their sentence and buy a gun over the counter with no questions asked. Two years after, gun registration was imposed.

Blogger pyrrhus January 24, 2017 9:20 AM  

"The Constitution is not a suicide pact." Oliver Wendell Holmes

Blogger Robert What? January 24, 2017 9:20 AM  

"And any rational non-white living in the USA should want white government, because that is what almost all of them - or at least their ancestors - came seeking in the first place."

And that is because Whites, specifically White Christians, are the only group that is willing to give the "other" a fair shake. Almost all other identity groups look out only for their own.

Blogger pyrrhus January 24, 2017 9:23 AM  

@77 The female franchise has to be drastically restricted, preferably abolished altogether. But we aren't there yet...

Anonymous Magus January 24, 2017 9:23 AM  

Satan's Hamste wrote:"Or do you think there were millions of Germans and Swedes voting in UK elections so gun control laws could be enacted?"

No, just millions of women. There was no serious support for 'gun control' in the UK until women were allowed to vote. Before that, any Briton could walk out of jail at the end of their sentence and buy a gun over the counter with no questions asked. Two years after, gun registration was imposed.


This is why I'm more sympathetic to the female-franchise argument than the racial identity one, for why there was this big shift.

Looking at my fellow Englishmen, including people like my father, who voted for this stuff, I'd argue a pussification, where we white anglicans *chose* to go this path. Women voted for it, and men went along with it. Although I'm still hard pressed to explain why the men went along with it. Speaking to my father, he claims that there was a shift in the British mindset, post-WW2, in an almost post-apocylaptic way, where people clung to socialism because it seemed to offer some theory of prosperity in the face of a crumbling empire and capital. "Stick together or die individually."

Anonymous W. Lindsay Wheeler January 24, 2017 9:24 AM  

It is not that the FFofA "made a mistake" is that they were steeped in error. It is error from their religious heresies to their involvement and engagement in the Enlightenment which was an atheistic revolution. The "Nature's God" in the Declaration of Independence is a reference to Baruch Spinoza's Pantheistic conception of God, not the Christian God. They did NOT have the right, ancient "laws of nature" either. Half of the FFofA were Masons and the symbol on the American flag, the stars, is a Masonic symbol.

Until Americans reject the errors--they are doomed to death and destruction.

Blogger pyrrhus January 24, 2017 9:25 AM  

@79 No, it's because non-white governments always become 3d world idiocracies....

Blogger Marty January 24, 2017 9:27 AM  

Seems like Sally should follow her own beliefs and shut her own mouth since she is white.

Anonymous Magus January 24, 2017 9:27 AM  

To add to what I said before, I'm also more sympathetic to the idea that it was the expansion of the franchise in general, not just women. The labour movements which preceded the formation of the Labour Party itself, which led to so many of the standing policies we have in the UK, would have been cut off at the legs if they simply did not have the power to vote.

Blogger Mountain Man January 24, 2017 9:30 AM  

The DNC distilled to its purest form:

https://www.lewrockwell.com/political-theatre/youre-racist-sexist-disagree/

Anyone white who is still a member is beyond help.

Anonymous Satan's Hamster January 24, 2017 9:34 AM  

"I'd argue a pussification, where we white anglicans *chose* to go this path."

I think your father is right about post-war socialism. It's hard to go from being the most powerful empire the world has ever seen to a European backwater in a couple of decades, and that psychological shock does explain a lot about post-WWII Britain.

But you also have to remember that large numbers of young British alpha males were killed in WWI and WWII, and many of the rest left as part of the post-WWII 'brain drain'. The country would be a very different place if those men were still there.

Blogger Mountain Man January 24, 2017 9:39 AM  

"extraordinary popular delusion and the madness of crowds."

Great book !

Blogger dc.sunsets January 24, 2017 9:47 AM  

Don't confuse symptoms with causes.

Women got to vote because of a long period of growing comfort and (notwithstanding the world wars, etc.) peace. Hardship drives patriarchy. Ease causes men to indulge women.

At a deeper level, social mood was in a 3rd wave up (as posited by Prechter) since the late 1700's. Rising social mood brings out accommodation, trust, willingness to try new things, etc. In this view, the disasters discussed (women's suffrage, & then the Utopian social programs like the Civil Rights & Hart-Celler Immigration Acts of the 1960's) all stemmed from a very long period of the herd moving upward in mood.

Just as with commodity pricing (which also obviously exhibit patterns described by the Wave Principle), the cure to destructive, idiotic Utopian social programs is their increasing dominance.

It's the Society-Level equivalent of any fully-converged organization: Output (Order, justice, etc.) declines to zero as consumption of resources goes "Full Black Hole."

A "Converged" Society cannot produce order or any facsimile of justice. It will squander its wealth, leading eventually to a collapse in living standards and inevitable warfare when social mood turns down in its endogenously-regulated variation.

The rot we see grew far deeper because social mood resolutely kept choosing to rise or recover when it could have openly entered the inevitable "bear market." We can and did "flip heads" one time after another.

This deepened the hole in which we find ourselves, and did so massively. We would have been better off if Grand Supercycle wave III ended in 1995, or openly had ended in 2000. Instead, the herd was willing to paper over the gangrene with another TWO waves of credit inflation, putting vastly more of the Rave on the charge card before it gets declined.

This gave us enough time for F-ing Lunacy to become open public policy. Our great-grandchildren will shake their heads in wonder at the folie a plusiers that seized the body politic.

"Great-grandpa, did people all dance in the street naked and run around screaming with their hands in the air?"

Blogger Durandel Almiras January 24, 2017 9:48 AM  

"stripping post-1965 immigrants of all voting rights, state, federal, and local, would be the best thing he could do short of sending them all back to their homelands."

Yes, absolutely. It would also be nice to have the vote restricted to people who are invested in the future of the country. Limit the vote to one per intact household (hetero) with at least 2 kids and are not welfare recipients nor make 25% or more of their household income from the public sector.

Anonymous Magus January 24, 2017 9:49 AM  

@87. Perhaps, but the World Wars weren't our most deadly wars - only 10% of soldiers died, and that's still only 1% of all men. And I don't follow the logic that it'd all be alphas dying - by definition, they're more likely to be in Officer roles, who certainly were at greater risk in WW1, but less so in WW2. (If I were to follow your argument, I'd say, therefore, it applies much more to WW1 than WW2).

It's a good point but I'd definitely have to get some more data.

Blogger dc.sunsets January 24, 2017 9:59 AM  

While we're restricting the franchise, I reiterate my call that anyone with dual citizenship (de jure or de facto...East Asians & Ashkenazim, cough, cough) be disallowed from voting, too.

I'd also add, stripped of ownership of any mass media organ, too, or at least facing time in the crowbar motel for any hint of political involvement.

The only people who should have a seat at the discussion table should be those who are 100% invested and who have nowhere else to go.

Blogger tz January 24, 2017 10:01 AM  

Or just reverse the 19th amendment.
And the 17th while we're at it.
But the Democrats have the tiny minorities:
Trannys
Wall St. Banksters
Tech moguls
Hollywood and music celebrities.

0.01%?

Blogger August January 24, 2017 10:03 AM  

I am glad my enemies are so reliably off the ball. This chick should be willing to do what it takes to win. Democrat politicians with demographic data on their voting districts have to be looking at this chick like she's nuts.

Blogger Dirk Manly January 24, 2017 10:17 AM  

Exactly what would be dystopian about anti-white whites being kicked out of their own party?

Anonymous veryfunnyminion January 24, 2017 10:19 AM  

Even this Indian (dot not feather) writer understands magic dirt fail.

"The reality of India (and many similar countries) must be understood for the sake of their wretched poor people. How can one be of any use if one doesn’t properly understand their problems? A faulty understanding of these societies has resulted in Europe suffering a migrant crisis. The West must understand for its own sake how deeply entrenched cultural traits are."

Nor can magic dirt be exported:

" Indian institutions were designed to be run by the British. With them no longer at the helm, these institutions have mutated over the last 70 years to accommodate the underlying irrationality, tribalism, and superstitions of India. They have slowly but surely crumbled away, decaying and becoming degraded."

http://www.acting-man.com/?p=48415

Blogger Timmy3 January 24, 2017 10:24 AM  

The DNC is turning into a Black party. Everyone in the panel is black. Exactly who is more welcoming? Blacks or Whites?

BTW: Not sure what Trump is doing with DACA. Is he horsetrading or delaying?

Blogger liberranter January 24, 2017 10:25 AM  

And any rational non-white living in the USA should want white government, because that is what almost all of them - or at least their ancestors - came seeking in the first place.

It's quite the optimistic stretch to assume that the swarthy denizens of the world's Shitholestans that make up the bulk of today's "immigrants" are capable the logical, critical thinking required for this realization.

Blogger Stilicho January 24, 2017 10:35 AM  

@90 so your solution would be to deprive. Washington, Franklin, and Jefferson of the vote, but let Jeb Bush vote. No thanks.

Blogger Gaiseric January 24, 2017 10:38 AM  

dc.sunsets wrote:There is NO MORAL EQUIVALENCE here. Anyone who claims that Affirmative Action, minority set-asides and any criminal justice theory that excuses underclass barbarism (of any race, but especially based on race) is not CRIMINAL suffers from a Cranial Lead Deficiency.
I've had fair luck black-pilling via rhetoric by pointing out that these cucky attitudes are AT BEST criminal negligence and reckless endangerment.

Quite honestly, they should be seen as treason.

Anonymous Bellator Mortalis January 24, 2017 10:38 AM  

It is difficult for almost anyone to prove they have 10 generations of ancestors in the USA. I am an exception as my ancestry on both sides goes way back in the USA. I can prove 9 generations on the paternal side, and 10 generations on the maternal side.
That 9th generation paternal line ancestor was Claudius Tullos, born in Scotland in 1641, granted a patent of land in Virginia in 1665, and died in Virginia in 1700.
The 10 generation maternal line ancestor was the father of Claudius' wife Sarah (born 1648 in Virginia), that father was Matthew Rodham. Matthew was born 1620 in England, and died 1674 in Virginia.
If you wanted to limit the vote to those who can prove 10 generations of ancestry in the USA you will have a very limited pool of voters. It is even possible that in some sparsely populated western states there would be zero people who could vote.

Blogger MycroftJones January 24, 2017 10:38 AM  

@99 Franklin, the atheist who played around with the Hell Fire club? Yeah, he shouldn't have had the vote.

Blogger Dirk Manly January 24, 2017 10:41 AM  

Nobody is more invested in the future of the country than a citizen who is also an enlisted man. Enlisted women don't even come close.

Blogger dc.sunsets January 24, 2017 10:42 AM  

OT Why there can be NO PEACE.

The Scum is oozing out to oppose removing firearm suppressors from NFA 1934.

Anyone who revels in my hearing loss/tinnitus (due to shooting) and hopes to continue seeing my descendants suffer for engaging in an activity they disapprove of is my moral enemy.

Not hyperbole. MORTAL enemy. I don't want them shut up, I want them gone, and I look forward to a post-Phase Change world where such people will be literally "fair game," 12 month 24/7 open season.

Blogger dc.sunsets January 24, 2017 10:51 AM  

@101, this is why in the real world what will likely occur is that the franchise will be "limited" to those who in-grouped with the faction that wins the war and wipes its opponents from the field.

In-grouping in an environment of civil war promises to be very detailed and move far beyond just race/ethnicity.

Imagine just how invasive will be people's methods of qualification when letting in an impostor means a bomb is planted or a pathogen dispersed.

The future promises a step-wise slide from violent protests/suppression to bombing malls, airports, homecoming dances, you name it. People will in-group and the innate need to "fit in" will cause people to coalesce around extremely intense ideological beliefs, and the various camps (of differing beliefs) will be utterly unable to coexist.

If one group's member crosses into another's territory and shoots someone or plants a bomb, total warfare will result, and the instigator's tribe will likely be exterminated.

After a period like that, you can expect a polity to march in utter lockstep on pretty much every issue of importance.

Blogger Dirk Manly January 24, 2017 10:51 AM  

I was on a multi-national e ercise in Norway in 2000. The Scandinavian natuons REQUIRE all firearms to be fitted with a suppressor when being fired.

Blogger Lovekraft January 24, 2017 10:52 AM  

As long as they kept provoking a response, they were winning. Now that Trump shut that down, they are frantically trying to reconstitute the message.

So far, only Menopause Marches, Soros-son slithers, and other circus shows.

And since we should never expect humility and pleas for forgiveness from the Obamas of the world, let's press on.

Anonymous Jack Amok January 24, 2017 10:57 AM  

Sixty years of concerted, relentless effort to build an inclusive, colorblind, content-of-their-character and not color-of-their-skin society has culminated in "teaching Americans how to shut their mouths if they are white."

That is complete and utter failure. Anyone still carrying a torch for civic nationalism needs to come to grips with that. We tried to make Civic Nationalism work, and we failed. Not for lack of effort, we tried very hard and at enormous cost. We failed because it was an impossible goal.

If 1950's America couldn't make it work, it can't be made to work. Time to move on.

Blogger Silly But True January 24, 2017 10:58 AM  

OT: Let the lolololulz begin RE: liberal compassion:

Obama murders drug offender with prison commutation.

http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2017/01/24/michigan-man-whose-drug-sentence-commuted-by-obama-is-shot-dead/

Blogger Trid January 24, 2017 11:05 AM  

Is it race mixing if a western kraut mixes with an eastern frog, immigrates to the U.S. and mixes with one of the founder's posterity?

Blogger Lazarus January 24, 2017 11:06 AM  

Identity Politics Epic Fail:

Images of so-called anti-Trump rioters breaking Starbucks' windows, busting trash cans, and burning bourgeois limousines in the streets of Washington DC really exposed the reality of the alt-left's tolerance and 'stuck it to the man'. The only problem being, in the case of the limo, 'the man' was Muslim immigrant Muhammad Ashraf whose small business now faces $70,000 losses and an injured employee.

Blogger Silly But True January 24, 2017 11:20 AM  

And when I think of conservative-supporting businesses, it's Chick-fil-a, Hobby Lobby, and... Starbucks.

For liberals, there's never anyone liberal enough to be spared identity politics.

Blogger pyrrhus January 24, 2017 11:26 AM  

Katie Hopkins warns Theresa May to can her silly feminism in meeting with Trump...http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4148702/KATIE-HOPKINS-hope-Theresa-doesn-t-blow-now.html

Blogger Lovekraft January 24, 2017 11:36 AM  

There are the ideologies that fall flat based on their internal illogical tenets and proven actions. Socialism, communism etc.

The ideology that has any form of overt violence will fail once it expands beyond parasitic conditions (taqqiya - feed off the host).

There are ideologies that, because they invoke a more legalistic, passive approach, appear on the fringe. Similar to VD saying an Israeli party could very well be alt-right in principle.

The ideology that has any form of overt violence will fail once it expands beyond parasitic conditions (taqqiya - feed off the host).

The ideology that self-corrects and does not argue from a dominating narrative has the best chance.

Blogger pyrrhus January 24, 2017 11:40 AM  

Identity politics will prove to be the Pandora's Box that destroys the present Democratic party. In the end, hispanics and asians will never consent to be ruled by blacks...

Blogger dc.sunsets January 24, 2017 11:51 AM  

In the end, hispanics and asians will never consent to be ruled by blacks...

The "fringes" only coalesce when social mood (and trust) are high. The way the democrat party evolved, its extinction is guaranteed once the KKKrazy glue that holds all those disparate parts together evaporates.

Looks like the Obama-Clinton Effect was all that's needed.

Blogger Ingot9455 January 24, 2017 12:05 PM  

Oh please, let them hire Keith Ellison as head of the DNC.

Blogger MycroftJones January 24, 2017 12:13 PM  

@110 Quote: Is it race mixing if a western kraut mixes with an eastern frog, immigrates to the U.S. and mixes with one of the founder's posterity?

Answer: yes, it is race mixing, but it falls under the 3 generation rule, not the 10 generation rule.

Anonymous A Most Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents January 24, 2017 12:14 PM  

Sig XM17 will replace M9. Made in America (NH). Hat tip Hognose. Glock fanbois wept. #MAGA #MAAA

Very interesting. One of the criteria included "ability to accept optical sight", and Beretta wasn't up to that. So little dot sights that the roony gamesmen have been playing with are now probably being used by special ops, and in time will become standard. Just like the Aimpoints on carbines 10 to 15 years back.

Still in a minor caliber. That's all NATO's fault.

Blogger VFM #7634 January 24, 2017 1:14 PM  

If the God-Emperor truly hopes to make America great again, stripping post-1965 immigrants of all voting rights, state, federal, and local, would be the best thing he could do short of sending them all back to their homelands. Why should people who are not Americans in any sense except paperwork be allowed any say at all in how American society is structured or how Americans live?

Blacks too. Especially black women.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uz5Hg1YLnHE

Anonymous BBGKB January 24, 2017 1:24 PM  

Harrison. “You cannot come to the DNC and get a contract and the only minority face you have is the person answering the phone.”

Shitivious and Latrina's ideas must be given equal weight. Since we are against fat shaming that means literally

Why couldn't she have said this prior to the vagina march?

The cunt stroll was organized by Linda Sarsour, a sharia advocate with ties to Hamas.

y. In the meantime they were expected to relinquish power to their noble savage betters (ditto Jews of either gender).

No jews were planning on giving up control.

our most deadly wars - only 10% of soldiers died, and that's still only 1% of all men.

You forget jews want the best of white people dead. That a coal miners daughter can be prettier & smarter than a jewish princess galls them.

“Out of every one hundred men, ten shouldn't even be there, eighty are just targets, nine are the real fighters, and we are lucky to have them, for they make the battle. Ah, but the one, one is a warrior, and he will bring the others back.” ― Heraclitus

Anonymous Shut up rabbit January 24, 2017 1:25 PM  

JustAnotherPairOfEyes wrote:A whole crock 'o shit


It's hard to believe someone so utterly ignorant of genetics would dare to open their mouth on the subject (we're in, "Everyone in the room is stupider for reading this..." territory here). Not even close enough to have to discredit, not even orbiting anywhere near the galaxy of genetics...

Wait-a-minute...is this one of those, "Reject the white man's colonial science!" protests or something? If it is, please gibs us a primer on kaangs genetics first 'cause we all learned our science in the first world using experiments an' evidence an' sheet!

Anonymous A Most Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents January 24, 2017 2:15 PM  

Female Secret Service agent melts down on social media saying she would not take a bullet for Trump. Then backtracks. Then etc. But she's with Her, because vagina.

No identity politics there, no.

Blogger bara January 24, 2017 2:33 PM  

An an immigrant, I would support no voting rights until the third generation or so (maybe more). Makes perfect sense from a tactical point of view. I lose my vote, but in exchange I take dozens (maybe hundreds) that would go against my interests. Sounds like a really good bargain to me.

Blogger Mats January 24, 2017 2:49 PM  

As Democrats get less White, they start to lose their hability to calculate consequences.

Blogger dc.sunsets January 24, 2017 3:06 PM  

The DNC is doubling down on their own version of Minority Hiring and Promotion.

Given the level of innumeracy among blacks, this is among the most entertaining things to occur this week.

Blogger weka January 24, 2017 3:30 PM  

@72. The Chinese and Japanese are sending their kids to Aussie and Kiwi universities because (a) they are in the top 500 ranking (b) they read the news, noting the POC activists ruining the freaking library (c) they don't want to have their kid a special snowflake or cannon fodder in the next Red Guard revolt the Chinese Communists put down.

Blogger Gaiseric January 24, 2017 3:34 PM  

A Most Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents wrote: Female Secret Service agent melts down on social media saying she would not take a bullet for Trump. Then backtracks. Then etc. But she's with Her, because vagina.

No identity politics there, no.

"You're fired."

Blogger OGRE January 24, 2017 3:46 PM  

And in corresponding yet seemingly unrelated news, Trump wins over the unions by doing more for them in his first week of office than any president has done in generations. On the same day that the DNC essentially tells the union voters to shut the hell up.

Does the DNC not realize where its political power has always come from? They couldn't gift wrap Trump a better inauguration present.

Anonymous PinochetsChopperPilot January 24, 2017 3:57 PM  

#79: I was thinking about that the other day, as obvious as it is. Altruism, especially outgroup altruism is nearly a completely white phenomena. Every church, institution, government agency (Peace Corps, USAID), that engages in altruism, does so from a foundational set-point of White culture.

Blacks and Asians especially have zero interest in helping others, even their own. I think with other Hispanics, it's a mixed bag, depending on genetics and culture/nation.

There are individual exceptions, but roughly, only white people join the peace corps, or doctors without borders, or volunteer to pick up trash in other peoples' neighborhoods.

Anonymous BBGKB January 24, 2017 5:55 PM  

Female Secret Service agent melts down on social media saying she would not take a bullet for Trump

"In one Facebook post O'Grady wrote at 11:07 p.m. on a Sunday in October, she endorsed Hillary Clinton and said she would endure "jail time" rather than "taking a bullet" for what she regarded as a "disaster" for America."

Send her to prison in Mexico since amnesty international proved Mexico wasn't sending it's rapists, because even the cops in Mexico rape women. She definitely needs to be removed from her position, especially since she probably wasn't good at her job anyway.

Obama murders drug offender with prison commutation.

It turns out black men live longer in prison than free.

Anonymous My Take January 24, 2017 5:57 PM  

@62 Same color and size I'll wager...

Anonymous Discard January 24, 2017 7:47 PM  

22. JustAnotherPairofEyes: Alexander Hamilton was no more an immigrant for moving to New York than Ben Franklin was an immigrant for moving to Pennsylvania. Both were born British subjects and moved to another place populated by British subjects.

The Mayflower generation did very little mating with the Indians, nor did any other British generation. That's why America is full of White people, unlike Mexico, where the Spanish did do a great deal of mating with the aborigines. Look at them and notice the difference.

When you read history, you need to use your brain as well as your eyes.

Anonymous Discard January 24, 2017 7:52 PM  

42. Gunnar: Pay attention. The best countries are divided by ethnicity. Note the problems caused by the introduction of Sand People into the lands of Snow People. The bloody work of sorting the peoples of the world into their own niches had already been done, now idiots like you will force us to do it over.

Blogger Thucydides January 24, 2017 9:21 PM  

"The DNC did a piss poor, pathetic job" attracting minorities, she said."

Are they beaming this stuff in from a parallel universe? The DNC is *all about* identity politics, minorities and disenfranchising white, middle class Americans. IF this is their communication to the public then they are even more self-unaware than I had imagined.

Breaking the Democrat party into its constituent parts should not be all that difficult, we can have the Bernie Bro's and Occupy's "Socialist Party" for the ideologues, and a La Raza party, a BLM party, a LGBTQ party, an Islamic party and so on for each "identity" group the Democrats have been nurturing for decades.

What will be even more fun for the Alt Right is the idea of "Intersectional conflict", so we can target Black women in the BLM party and ask why they are not in the Feminist party (or go the other way around). Endless fun can be had once you start mapping out all the potential intersectional conflict points in the Democrat party today (and indeed this looks like a promising line of attack to splinter the Democrat party, ESPECIALLY when the dust settles and a new chairman emerges. "Why does *ze* not represent the concerns of Hispanic/black/feminist/millennial/gay/insert victim here/ voters?"

The New American Party will face a shrunken internal faction of Republicans and a constellation of factious, infighting identity parties as time progresses. MAGA indeed.

Blogger Thucydides January 24, 2017 10:00 PM  

Sally Boynton Brown, who is white, also suffers from the delusion that a great many credentialed people have; they will always be the ones in control.

The whites who must "shut their mouths" are not highly virtued Progressives, but the Deplorables and "bitter clingers" who live in middle America, hold steady jobs and raise families in houses they own.

I'm very unclear why they seem to believe that their savage Brownshirt armies of BLM, Hispanic gngbangers and others will not finish the job by storming the gated communities and stealing the most desirable real estate and "stuff" once they have pillaged the lesser possessions of the deplorables, or even that their armies of private security guards will remain to defend them from the onslaught.

Of course, they also believe they will prevail agains people with large amounts of firepower, the desire and will to protect their families and property, and often military backgrounds and well organized civic institutions to manage and direct efforts and resources in the crunch.

Blogger Sweet One January 24, 2017 10:33 PM  

"If the God-Emperor truly hopes to make America great again, stripping post-1965 immigrants of all voting rights, state, federal, and local, would be the best thing he could do short of sending them all back to their homelands. Why should people who are not Americans in any sense except paperwork be allowed any say at all in how American society is structured or how Americans live?"

How could he do this without having literal civil war?

Anonymous Shut up rabbit January 25, 2017 1:52 AM  

Sweet One wrote:How could he do this without having literal civil war?

We would he want to? Diversity + proximity = war. We all know there'll only ever be one winner when the inevitable happens and the sooner the better for everyone concerned.

One swift retaliatory strike following some half-assed BLM coup (ie, fellow blacks, lets go to the mall and loot for freedom!) followed by self deportation of all involved is better than a Stalingrad like cleansing of the infestations once it spreads.

Blogger DonReynolds January 25, 2017 2:05 AM  

"The DNC did a piss poor, pathetic job" attracting minorities, she (Jehmu Greene) said.
Of course that is silly.
Bernie Sanders did not do well with minority voters, but the Democrats did their usual superb job of winning big percentages ONLY with minority voters. That is precisely why they lost the election. White voters are still about 70 percent of the lawful voters in this country. Hispanic may be 16 percent of the US population, but only half of them are US citizens and eligible to vote.

Blogger James Dixon January 25, 2017 9:45 AM  

> I was thinking about that the other day, as obvious as it is. Altruism, especially outgroup altruism is nearly a completely white phenomena. Every church, institution, government agency (Peace Corps, USAID), that engages in altruism, does so from a foundational set-point of White culture.

Even more than that. It was a white Christian phenomena. The only reason liberals still carry on the tradition is because they can do it with other peoples' money.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts