ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2017 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Thursday, March 23, 2017

Attack on Antwerp thwarted

A French Muslim has been arrested after trying to drive a car loaded with liquid gas, assault rifles and knives into a crowd at high speed on a busy shopping street in Antwerp. Belgian police, who confirmed the bomb squad had been sent to the area, said the car was being driven at high speed and that pedestrians had to jump out of the way to avoid being injured. Authorities found knives, a shotgun and a gas can with an unknown liquid in the car prompting officers who usually deal with extremist attacks to take over the case.

Reconquista 2.0 or Sharia.

Labels:

95 Comments:

Anonymous VFM #6306 March 23, 2017 11:31 AM  

Vive la Allah?

Damn French.

Blogger The Other Robot March 23, 2017 11:32 AM  

Wasn't it the (((Globalists))) who invited the Muslims into Spain the first time around?

Blogger Lovekraft March 23, 2017 11:34 AM  

When are we going to see the incremental application of deterrence via going after the ork's associates, family and place of worship for compensation.

I put a single murder by a jihadi as worth $10 million.

Anonymous Bz March 23, 2017 11:35 AM  

A partial sharia of whipping, behanding and beheading muslim offenders might be okay, at least until we get our act together and throw them out. Let's invert the jizya while we're at it. Muslims pay an extra poll tax to Christians.

Anonymous Jay Will March 23, 2017 11:36 AM  

"Reconquista 2.0 or Sharia"

All going according to plan. Nationalists v Muslims to defang both and bring in the new order. Out of the ashes a beautiful new people. See WW2, and the new age it brought in.

Either nationalists will do it or globalists will burn down a mosque and blame it on nationalists to light it up. The pieces are in place just set it off already.

Anonymous Bz March 23, 2017 11:38 AM  

Also, let us generalize the Saudi rule against female driving to not allowing any muslim to drive. It seems to be too great a responsibility for this people of the mud.

Blogger Lazarus March 23, 2017 11:43 AM  

Speaking of false flags, the FBI must be tired of being embarrassed by the VFM and actually found the (((perpetrator))) of all those threats on Jewish community centers.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-23/israeli-teenager-arrested-over-phone-threats-jewish-community-centers

Blogger Mr.MantraMan March 23, 2017 11:48 AM  

Now we have fake antisemetism? WTF, my faith is flagging, must watch another holocaust movie. I will virtue signal my way out of my funk.

Blogger The Kurgan March 23, 2017 11:50 AM  

$1 billion. Also Mecca should be nuked if there is a single death by jihadi.

Blogger The Rev March 23, 2017 11:51 AM  

"French"

Anonymous BBGKB March 23, 2017 11:57 AM  

Authorities found knives, a shotgun and a gas can with an unknown liquid in the car prompting officers who usually deal with extremist attacks to take over the case.

Sounds like carrying Potassium permanganate to set moslems aflame before they want to might be a good idea. I would only have it on me for water purification porpoises of course.

Anonymous Überdeplorable Psychedelic Cat Hair March 23, 2017 12:01 PM  

The question is why didn't they do this with the London attack yesterday simultaneously? Answer: because most likely they were both lone wolves.

Anonymous GregMan March 23, 2017 12:01 PM  

Doesn't sound as if the attack was "thwarted", rather that the muzzie screwed it up. Antwerp got lucky.

Blogger Gaiseric March 23, 2017 12:03 PM  

In related news, I wonder if the MSM—or even Breitbart, etc.—will pick up on the fact that two of the victims of the London attack were American citizens visiting family in London and celebrating their 25th wedding anniversary. The husband was killed in the first pass of the truck and the wife was injured.

Not that Americans necessarily seem to care more when Americans are killed in terrorist attacks abroad, but I'm sure the news will be suppressed nonetheless.

Anonymous fop March 23, 2017 12:04 PM  

Also Mecca should be nuked if there is a single death by jihadi.

Greetings, Mossad agent Kurgan! How's the weather in Tel Aviv today?

Anonymous Ominous Cowherd March 23, 2017 12:08 PM  

The Kurgan wrote:$1 billion. Also Mecca should be nuked if there is a single death by jihadi.

Mecca should be nuked.

Anonymous Jay Will March 23, 2017 12:09 PM  

The globalists play dumb. Their whole schtick is "we stand together" to make it plausible that it is not all deliberate, so when it kicks off they can step in as the good guys, as the Great Allied Forces beating down the globalist funded Hitlerites (a decimated impoverished nation in 1918 developed a ginormous military power in less than 2 decades??)

While there are no doubts shills and liberal idiots amongst all this, this is a centrally planned globalist strategy. We are not meant to submit to sharia we are to be forced to fight it for the benefit of future humanity. Future Moderate Muslims, i'e softened unmanly Muslims, will arise out of this. And Westerners who chose nationalism will once again learn the hard way what that leads to.

The future is a domesticated population of human rabbits overseen by a near separate species. Of course, it might blow up in their face. I hope it does.

Blogger CM March 23, 2017 12:12 PM  

--Mecca should be nuked.--
Yes. Please. And images of Muhammad defaced in extremely sacrilegious ways.

I wish some of y'all ran this country.

Blogger James Dixon March 23, 2017 12:13 PM  

Off topic: http://archive.is/Auz2r

The Dem's are going to filibuster Gorsuch. To get him through the R's will have to shutdown the filibuster. If they're going to do so, they might as well do so completely and ram a full repeal of Obamacare through.

Blogger SteelPalm March 23, 2017 12:18 PM  

@15 fop Greetings, Mossad agent Kurgan! How's the weather in Tel Aviv today?

Don't be an idiot. Not only is Kurgan a long-time commentator here, but the idea of nuking Mecca is a common, obvious one.

Hell, Ann Barnhardt mentioned the same thing in a particularly popular, thought-provoking post back in 2015;

http://www.barnhardt.biz/2015/12/11/how-a-sane-virile-leader-or-leaders-would-handle-the-musloid-problem/

Is she also a secret Mossad agent?

Blogger James Dixon March 23, 2017 12:20 PM  

> Let's invert the jizya while we're at it. Muslims pay an extra poll tax to Christians.

Oh there are lots of inversions we could do. A prohibition on the construction of conversion of new mosques. A prohibition on attempt to convert Americans to Islam. A prohibition on carrying or publicly displaying a Koran or any symbol of Islam. A death penalty for any Christian who converts to Islam. Etc., etc., etc.

Blogger James Dixon March 23, 2017 12:22 PM  

My typing is atrocious today, but I think the ideas came through.

Blogger James Dixon March 23, 2017 12:26 PM  

> ... but the idea of nuking Mecca is a common, obvious one.

I've suggested it several times myself, though I would start with a lesser target, just to give them fair warning that we meant it.

Anonymous Jay Will March 23, 2017 12:27 PM  

@20

The best way of killing your enemies is to get somebody else to do it for you, even better if those people think it was their idea all along.

Team A sniper takes out the youngest child of teams B and C. Team A intelligence pins both murders on the opposing snipers of B and C. Team B and C wipe each other out. Team A wins!

Blogger Lazarus March 23, 2017 12:27 PM  

Überdeplorable Psychedelic Cat Hair wrote:The question is why didn't they do this with the London attack yesterday simultaneously? Answer: because most likely they were both lone wolves.

But still wolves, obeying a common program.

Blogger Shimshon March 23, 2017 12:29 PM  

@4 Let's invert the jizya while we're at it. Muslims pay an extra poll tax to Christians.

No. They have to go back.

Anonymous fop March 23, 2017 12:36 PM  

the idea of nuking Mecca is a common, obvious one.

Of course it is. Is there any other cities you and Agent Kurgan would like us to bomb for you? Tehran, perhaps? Damascus? Really, we just want you to be happy so we will gladly fight all your wars for you if you'll just give us a chance.

Anonymous jOHN MOSBY March 23, 2017 12:47 PM  

23. James Dixon
Medina.

Blogger Kyle Searle March 23, 2017 12:51 PM  

In other news, Israeli jewish man arrested for making 120 bomb threats against synagogues in the USA:

http://news.nationalpost.com/news/world/police-arrest-israeli-jewish-man-as-the-primary-suspect-in-bomb-threats-on-u-s-jewish-targets

Blogger Ingot9455 March 23, 2017 12:57 PM  

I say, what kind of a world is it when you can't trust the Muslims to threaten your Jewish Community Centers?

I suppose if you want it done on time, on schedule, you have to do it yourself.

Blogger SteelPalm March 23, 2017 12:57 PM  

@27

Doubling down on idiocy, I see! I never stated my own thoughts, but judging by the long-time commentators that agree with Kurgan about nuking Mecca, there seem to be an awful lot of secret Mossad agents running around here!

And someone should inform Vox that hardcore Catholic Ann Barnhardt is secretly one as well, as he has shared her work more than once.

@23

I've suggested it several times myself, though I would start with a lesser target, just to give them fair warning that we meant it.

While I love Barnhardt, I do think it's putting the cart before the horse. First repatriate all Muslims from the West, make the ideology illegal, and then see where we are. That might be enough.

Blogger James Dixon March 23, 2017 1:03 PM  

> 23. James Dixon ... Medina.

That would be suitable, yes.

Anonymous BBGKB March 23, 2017 1:05 PM  

OMG what fake news to cover up the moslem terror. (((Police: White sword killer went to NY to attack black people)))

Plenty of niggers in Baltimore no need for him to leave his backyard.
Saying a vet went from Baltimore to NY to kill a black man
https://www.yahoo.com/news/police-man-accused-murder-came-nyc-target-blacks-181346318.html

The question is why didn't they do this with the London attack yesterday simultaneously? Answer: because colored people time. Showing up on time is white privilege.

Also Mecca should be nuked if there is a single death by jihadi...Greetings, Mossad agent Kurgan! How's the weather in Tel Aviv today?

Put me down as voting for nuking mecca during Ramadan

. Is there any other cities you and Agent Kurgan would like us to bomb for you? Tehran, perhaps? Damascus? Really

How about DC when TRUMP isn't there? See he was smart enough to keep his wife & kids far away in a place it's legal to take dumps in the street.

Anonymous Anonymous March 23, 2017 1:07 PM  

> Reconquista 2.0 or Sharia.

Instinctively I understand this, but I don't know how to counter the NAMALT line.

Anonymous fop March 23, 2017 1:12 PM  

judging by the long-time commentators that agree with Kurgan about nuking Mecca, there seem to be an awful lot of secret Mossad agents running around here!

It's hard to tell. Real Mossad agents are nearly indistinguishable from the neocons who agree with and amplify their rhetoric.

One thing is fairly certain. Nuking Mecca is not in the US national interest, either in the immediate or the long term.

Anonymous a deplorable rubberducky March 23, 2017 1:13 PM  

Some are dismissing the Belgian attack as a copycat. I dunno, maybe the timing was hastily moved up out of inspiration from the London attack, but this kebab looks like he had been planning something for a while.

More Coordinated Lone Wolf Kebabery in my book.

Blogger BassmanCO March 23, 2017 1:14 PM  

@27 fop, I think you forgot the "l" after the "f" in your name.

Blogger Shimshon March 23, 2017 1:15 PM  

I still remember Moshe Feiglin's response to 9/11, written soon after.

http://www.jewishisrael.org/america-already-lost/

The entire thing is very good and prescient.

The day after the attack, a wealthy American acquaintance approached me and asked for my comments on the situation. I told him what I thought, and he then surprised me with an interesting offer: “I am willing to pay for a full-page ad in the New York Times. I want you to compose the ad,” he said. I didn’t want to do it, because America’s war isn’t my war, and because I had hoped that this dear Jew would direct his financial resources to far more important endeavors in Israel. But the man persisted, so I composed the following quick draft:

IT IS A CULTURAL/RELIGIOUS WAR.

We can kill a million Bin Ladens, but they will continue to celebrate.

[Photo of Arabs celebrating in the streets]

They have destroyed our symbols.

[Photo of the twin towers going up in flames]

We must destroy their symbols.

[Photos of the al-Aqsa mosque on the Temple Mount, and the Kaaba building in Mecca]

Shocked?

Americans don’t do such things?

Right.

Therefore, America will continue to be destroyed until we understand.

My friend was astonished. “But they will start a religious war!” he exclaimed. “Can you imagine what acts of vengeance will result from this?”

“And what have you suffered just now?” I asked him. “Do you think that they only killed nearly ten thousand people because at the moment they don’t hate you so much”?

“This is a religious war,” I explained to him. “They aren’t afraid to die. They have sanctified death, they die with the name of Allah on their lips, and seventy virgins are waiting for them in Paradise. You don’t frighten them with your bombs. At best, you’ll turn them into shahids. They have directed their attack against your god. You have no alternative, but to direct your attack against theirs. When you destroy their god, they will become powerless and come back down to this world. They will suddenly be frightened by every rustle of leaves and by the prick of a pin. They will know that you understand their language and you are fighting them by their own rules.”

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey March 23, 2017 1:22 PM  

Oy vey. Not to mention:

https://dailygazette.com/article/2017/03/20/police-schenectady-man-spray-painted-swastikas-on-his-own-home

Looks like the demand for victimhood is oustripping the supply of victims..

Anonymous fop March 23, 2017 1:25 PM  

And someone should inform Vox that hardcore Catholic Ann Barnhardt is secretly one as well, as he has shared her work more than once.

I like Ann. But I doubt that Vox is going to look to her for informed, rational foreign policy. Van Creveld might be the one to ask about whether nuking Saudi Arabia is wisdom or foolishness. I would suspect he'd say anyone who advocates such a thing is indeed a fool. Or something worse.

Anonymous Blume March 23, 2017 1:25 PM  

Why not fop?

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey March 23, 2017 1:29 PM  

@Jay Will

(((Team A))) appears to be very well aware of this already.

Anonymous MendoScot March 23, 2017 1:29 PM  

OT: Weaponized autism strikes again!

Shia Laboeuf "humiliated and broken"

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey March 23, 2017 1:31 PM  

@Kyle Searle

"In other news, Israeli jewish man arrested for making 120 bomb threats"

Whatcha doin', rabbi?

Interesting that the Israeli police cooperated, though.

Blogger Nick S March 23, 2017 1:32 PM  

@39

Maybe, but I suspect that if we had nuked the remote mountain caves OSB was reported to be hiding in at the beginning of the Afghanistan operations, like I suggested at the time, we would have avoided a whole bunch of the bloodshed that followed and much of the mayhem we are experiencing today.

Anonymous Ominous Cowherd March 23, 2017 1:34 PM  

fop wrote:One thing is fairly certain. Nuking Mecca is not in the US national interest ...

Mohammedans who are not apostate are our deadly enemies. We must destroy them or be destroyed. Why is nuking Mecca not helpful? Merely because Israel might benefit also?

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey March 23, 2017 1:36 PM  

@Ingot9455

"I say, what kind of a world is it when you can't trust the Muslims to threaten your Jewish Community Centers?

I suppose if you want it done on time, on schedule, you have to do it yourself."

Lol. Don't forget, though, a leftist Black Bernie-supporting journalist, who was trying to frame his White ex-girlfriend, did come through for them:

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN16A1OH

Anonymous Looking Glass March 23, 2017 1:38 PM  

@38 Francis Parker Yockey

The one thing about the Internet is that it's proven pretty thoroughly that most of the post WW1 history is astro-turf. While plenty of real events happened, most of the media optics ones weren't for the reasons stated. Burning down Black churches now appears to have always been to serve a Political objective, not some racial one.

What we see now is simply the information side of the news cycle that can't be buried as well. Suddenly it's black men burning down black churches, jews painting swastikas, Muslims burning down mosques and putting pork-products in places. Funny, that? Though it makes sense. Anyone not of the self-deluding Left isn't going to "send a message!" with a Media Photo-Op. It's really just Munchhausen Syndrome.


@39 fop

Glass Riyadh.

Destroying Mecca & Medina doesn't actually solve much. Talmudic Judaism shows pretty clearly that the loss of a major site can be spun plenty of ways. Riyadh is actually the problem at the moment since they're the major funding source. Much in the way that International Socialism was funded out of their major states, International Islam is funded out of a few places. Eliminating the funding and booting out the Muslims will solve most of the issue for a hundred years.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey March 23, 2017 1:42 PM  

@BBGKB

"OMG what fake news to cover up the moslem terror. (((Police: White sword killer went to NY to attack black people)))"

Sad to see an entire people demonized because of this man's alleged attack, which was clearly the result of mental illness. We must redouble our efforts to fight anti-White hatred and toxic Gentilephobia in the aftermath of this tragic event.

Anonymous Tyler Cobb March 23, 2017 1:43 PM  

Sorry guys. People view white men as the main threat not Islam

In fact People of Color view whites as the main issue http://verysmartbrothas.com/iron-fist-is-too-annoyingly-and-inappropiately-white-to-be-any-good/

Sorry! Nobody likes you!

Anonymous Ironsides March 23, 2017 1:44 PM  

Überdeplorable Psychedelic Cat Hair wrote:The question is why didn't they do this with the London attack yesterday simultaneously? Answer: because most likely they were both lone wolves.

Probably about as close to simultaneous as these jackasses can manage. Don't forget, these people are quite stupid, it's only their violence that puts them ahead of the pitiful, cringing jelly doormats formerly known as Europeans.

Competence isn't the long suit of the Muslime; they only succeed as far as they do because the people who could tear them to shreds in two seconds flat currently prefer to sit inert and let themselves be mangled by what amounts to a bunch of semi-morons with rabies.

Blogger Lazarus March 23, 2017 1:44 PM  

fop wrote:One thing is fairly certain. Nuking Mecca is not in the US national interest, either in the immediate or the long term.

If Iran gets nukes, they will probably do it and save everyone the speculation.

This is becoming unbelievable. Iran has just forbidden its citizens from practicing the Hajj to Mecca, one of the five pillars of Islam. Iran’s prohibition to travel to Islam’s holiest sites, Mecca and Media, confirms what we have been saying all along, that Iran will eventually abandon Mecca altogether. As it seems the Sunni-Shiite divide reveals a major schism between two Muslim holy cities, Mecca on the one hand and Karbala on the other, an un-healable divide that Scriptures in Isaiah 21 predicts Iran will end up nuking Arabia.

http://shoebat.com/2015/04/14/iran-declares-a-war-on-mecca-by-banning-shiites-to-do-pilgrims-to-the-holiest-sites-in-islam/

Anonymous BbigGayKoranBurner March 23, 2017 1:47 PM  

Everyone saying Japan doesn't have a moslem problem the took in 30 refusgees and 2 got rapey in only a few months.

http://pamelageller.com/2016/02/japan-two-muslim-refugees-arrested-in-gang-rape-of-woman.html/

Anonymous A Most Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents March 23, 2017 1:48 PM  

@49 Tyler Cobb

We don't care.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey March 23, 2017 1:55 PM  

@fop

"Why not fop?"

Largely because, as fop says, that kind of rhetoric is promoted by the (((Geller))) type of extreme neocon, in order to stir up the Left to oppose the Right's obvious "xenophobia," "hatred," and "Islamophobia."

It's "Let's you and him fight." You're worrying about which wrestler to back, rather than who's running the WWE.

Look at the people shouting "Nuke Mecca!" the loudest-- what effective steps have they taken to close the door, let alone to remove kebab? All they're doing is stirring up the Left, and the Muz that are already here.

"Nuke Mecca!" rhetoric is simply part of the "invade the world; invite the world" neocon strategy that serves as a justification for Third World immigration. Arab/ Muslim countries are not an existential threat; non-White immigration is.

Don't bomb 'em over there; don't bring 'em over here.

Anonymous fop March 23, 2017 1:58 PM  

Mohammedans who are not apostate are our deadly enemies. We must destroy them or be destroyed. Why is nuking Mecca not helpful? Merely because Israel might benefit also?

Because they are not a direct threat to the US, they are not a destabilizing force in the region, and there are other more effective means of neutralizing their negative international influence.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey March 23, 2017 2:04 PM  

@fop

"I would suspect he'd say anyone who advocates such a thing is indeed a fool."

Actually, you don't have to to be a fool to get sucked into the whole "Let's you and him fight!" game, especially when the entire legacy media sets the rules for it.

Instead of picking a side, you have to reject the frame, and see things from a different perspective.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey March 23, 2017 2:08 PM  

@Nick S

"Maybe, but I suspect that if we had nuked the remote mountain caves OSB was reported to be hiding in"

Perhaps that argument would be better framed in terms of punitive raid vs. invade/ occupy/ the charade of "democracy promotion." Assuming you accept the officially-promoted narrative of 9/11, that is.

Anonymous BBGKB March 23, 2017 2:15 PM  

Instinctively I understand this, but I don't know how to counter the NAMALT line

If good moslems exist they are irrelevant, as they will do nothing to stop the normal moslems from attacking until they fear whitey more than Shitavious Mohamad. Gen Blackjack Pershing stopped jihad against the west with just 2 pigs & 49 bullets.

Weaponized autism strikes again! Shia Laboeuf "humiliated and broken"

That was just mean posting a pic of his Willey.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey March 23, 2017 2:20 PM  

@Looking Glass

"Burning down Black churches now appears to have always been to serve a Political objective, not some racial one."

Actually, a lot of it was Negro lightning, you might say-- the political aspect was secondary/ a cover for the insurance fraud. Though the political aspect was primary in terms of the media coverage, of course. You can easily establish, using mainstream sources, that the facts don't support the "ebil KKK black church burning" narrative (vdare has a couple of good pieces on this), but it doesn't matter. Once it's out of the news, the narrative is all that remains, since few will bother to research it on their own. I wonder how many people "remember" that a bunch over evil White lacrosse players raped a poor innocent Black girl at Duke...

"It's really just Munchhausen Syndrome."

Yep. Though any resemblance of the whole tranny fad to Munchausen (and Munchausen by proxy) is clearly coincidence.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey March 23, 2017 2:25 PM  

@Tyler Cobb

"Sorry! Nobody likes you!"

Top kek. Once again, a leftist's "argument" reveals more about himself than about normal people. Leftists think that "Nobody likes you!" is a substitute for rational argumentation because of their own desperate hunger for social validation, and fear of exclusion.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey March 23, 2017 2:29 PM  

@Lazarus
"If Iran gets nukes, they will probably do it and save everyone the speculation."

On a related note, how many terrorist attacks are carried out by (Saudi-backed) radical Sunni Salafists? Vs. Shiites? Which country is our "second greatest ally," and which is our "second greatest enemy?"

Israeli national interests and US national interests are not the same.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey March 23, 2017 2:34 PM  

@BbigGayKoranBurner

"Everyone saying Japan doesn't have a moslem problem the took in 30 refusgees and 2 got rapey in only a few months."

Someone's doing the raping-- apart from Black US servicemembers, that is. The sample is small, but the indices are strong.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey March 23, 2017 2:41 PM  

@BBKGB

"If good moslems exist they are irrelevant, as they will do nothing to stop the normal moslems from attacking"

This.

How many "Good Muslims" stood up for the 1400 indigenous White English girls that were victimized by Pakistani Muslim rape gangs?

Give me a single example of White rape gangs preying on Third World Muslims in a similar manner, let alone one where the the entire White community colluded to cover up the crimes and protect the rapists.

Anonymous Ominous Cowherd March 23, 2017 2:50 PM  

Looking Glass wrote:Destroying Mecca & Medina doesn't actually solve much. Talmudic Judaism shows pretty clearly that the loss of a major site can be spun plenty of ways. Riyadh is actually the problem at the moment since they're the major funding source.

A very sensible argument! Like it or not, mohammedans are our enemy, so like it or not we must destroy them.

Let's change it to ``Nuke Mecca too.'' We can't leave any of them anywhere, after all.

Anonymous Pisslam March 23, 2017 3:12 PM  

Islam will conquer the world simply by outbreeding the native populations. People will never rise up to deport them or fight back. They'll continue sitting around preaching about tolerance and multiculturalism until the day they're the minority and forced to pay the jizya tax.

Anonymous Pax_Romana March 23, 2017 3:18 PM  

If you begin a Reconquista, an Inquisition is also necessary. You can't fight a god without God, and you cannot wage war against an idea without a better idea.

Aye, the Inquisitors lost sight of the goal in a lot of cases, but the original intent (and if I am wrong, please correct my understanding) was to purge from Spain the dissident elements of Islam.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash March 23, 2017 3:28 PM  

Pax_Romana wrote:Aye, the Inquisitors lost sight of the goal in a lot of cases, but the original intent (and if I am wrong, please correct my understanding) was to purge from Spain the dissident elements of Islam.
That's actually false. The Inquisitors were dedicated, honest, moderate and lenient. The Black Legend of the Inquisition was created more or less out of whole cloth by the British establishment, simply as a tool to whip up anti-Catholic and anti-Spanish sentiment. It was later amplified by Atheists and Jews to whip up anti-Catholic and anti-Christian sentiment. It's a load of bunk.

Tomas de Torquemada did nothing wrong.

Blogger buwaya March 23, 2017 3:43 PM  

"The Black Legend of the Inquisition was created more or less out of whole cloth by the British establishment"

True. This was wartime propaganda continued for 150 years (it was a really long series of wars). And continued onwards as, essentially, folklore.

Very much like the leftovers of Soviet/Communist propaganda still infest the western intellectual worldview.

Blogger buwaya March 23, 2017 3:46 PM  

"but the original intent (and if I am wrong, please correct my understanding) was to purge from Spain the dissident elements of Islam."

More Judaism than Islam. Islam was tolerated to a greater degree, mainly because they were more difficult to get rid of. The final, formal expulsion of Muslims didn't happen till 1609.

Anonymous Bz March 23, 2017 3:49 PM  

By the way, WW2 and Hitler will seem so quaint once Reconquista 2.0 gets rolling. After all, we didn't really hate each other when we fought WW2.

Blogger buwaya March 23, 2017 3:57 PM  

Essential work re the Inquisition is Henry Kamen "The Spanish Inquisition: A Historical Revision"

Of course the Inqusition is very well documented, certainly in the last 50 years there has been quite a lot published on it. The Inquisition itself was meticulous and orderly, and saw itself as justified by its commitment to due process. It ran on paperwork, so it is easy to research.

Blogger Cail Corishev March 23, 2017 3:58 PM  

the original intent (and if I am wrong, please correct my understanding) was to purge from Spain the dissident elements of Islam.

No. The purpose of the Inquisition was to try heretics -- baptized Catholics who were caught practicing other faiths or professing heresies. It dealt with different heresies in different places, but in Spain at that time, the main problem was Jews and Muslims who had falsely converted in order to remain in Spain or to maintain their positions of influence, and then continued to practice their old religions and work secretly against the faith.

While individual inquisitors may have been imperfect and ruthless at times, the Inquisition also provided a buffer between the accused and the rulers, who often would have taken an "Off with their heads and let God sort them out" approach to anyone who caused trouble. At least with the Inquisition there was some form of trial before being handed over to the tender mercies of the state.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey March 23, 2017 5:18 PM  

@Snidely Whiplash

"Tomas de Torquemada did nothing wrong."

Exactly. And he did far more for Spain by the work he did, than he would have by attempting to invade Mecca...

Blogger Snidely Whiplash March 23, 2017 5:19 PM  

As Cail said, if you were a declared Moslem of Jew, the Inquisition had no authority over you. It was only Christians that were subject to inquiry.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey March 23, 2017 5:19 PM  

@buwaya

BVery much like the leftovers of Soviet/Communist propaganda still infest the western intellectual worldview."

I wonder if elements of WW2 propaganda might still infest the western worldview?

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey March 23, 2017 5:24 PM  

@Cail Corishev

"At least with the Inquisition there was some form of trial before being handed over to the tender mercies of the state."

Interesting that witch hunts never caught on in Spain. The Inquisition looked at a few witch accusations, and essentially said "This isn't heresy; this is hysteria."

Anonymous Napoleon 12pdr March 23, 2017 6:11 PM  

BZ for the Belgians!

@44: Concur that Bush the Younger's failure to use nukes in Afghanistan, especially on Tora Bora, may have been a massive mistake.

Blogger Kona Commuter March 23, 2017 6:16 PM  

The invaders in Italy stuffed up their attack.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/03/23/italy-third-vehicle-attack-two-days-police-officer-stabbed/

Blogger Lazarus March 23, 2017 7:10 PM  

Überdeplorable Psychedelic Cat Hair wrote:The question is why didn't they do this with the London attack yesterday simultaneously? Answer: because most likely they were both lone wolves.

You suffer from premature speculation:

http://www.debka.com/article/25976/UK-Parliament-terror-tied-to-Antwerp-attack

Blogger Snidely Whiplash March 23, 2017 7:13 PM  

Francis Parker Yockey wrote:Interesting that witch hunts never caught on in Spain.
Witch hunts are strictly forbidden to Catholics, because they imply that witches have any real power. Any place they have popped up in Catholic countries, they have been rapidly suppressed.

Anonymous Millenium March 23, 2017 7:32 PM  

@34 fop

One thing is fairly certain. Nuking Mecca is not in the US national interest, either in the immediate or the long term.

Agreed. What is in the US interest, both short term and long term, is getting rid of every last muslim in the US, wouldn't you agree?

Blogger Theproductofafineeduction March 23, 2017 7:56 PM  

@49

That is empirically not true given that millions of non-whites are trying into white countries. I don't see millions of blacks, Asians or Hispanics trying to get into any Islamic nations.

Also, those that do think that way are functionally retarded and as such can be disregarded entirely.

Anonymous Luke March 23, 2017 8:01 PM  

The American married couple killed in today's Muzzie terrorist murder in London were apparently Mormo cultists, FWIW.
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865676257/Utah-man-killed-wife-injured-in-London-terror-attack.html

They were from Ogden, UT, & were visiting her parents who were working as Mormo missionaries in the U.K. Except for breeding lots of white kids (most of whom fortunately turn Christian or at least nonMormo when they discover the Internet), I have no use for them. Still, they shouldn't have been killed, of course, and I wish the Brits (after a week or two of Sodium Pentothal and waterboarding) would just drench the Muzzie perp in lard and apply a lit road flare (on PPV, of course).

Blogger John Williams March 23, 2017 9:50 PM  

Mecca? Median? C) All of the above.

Anonymous A.B. Prosper March 23, 2017 10:08 PM  

Luke, Mormons believe a lot of what most Christians consider nonsense but they are doing a far better job of following the Word than a lot of Christians out there.

Most of the ones I've met are exactly what I'd expect a Christian to be and are genuinely good folks who accept Christ with a whole heart

On top of that Utah has the highest TFR in the West, very near that of Chechnya on account of the LDS

God will sort of the error at the end and I suspect he'll be merciful over some of the ridiculous doctrine simply because unlike the heresy of some many churches unlike the dispensationalists and prosperity gospel scum they pull people to Christ not away from him.

Blogger Gospace March 23, 2017 11:08 PM  

At the moment, I wouldn't suggest nuking Mecca. Nuking should be saved as retaliation in kind. A few MOABs on Mecca would send a message without leaving fallout. Followed by continuous one site bombardment until aerial surveillance shows that the black rock is suitable for use as road gravel.

Blogger Theproductofafineeduction March 23, 2017 11:35 PM  

You italicizes Mormon missionary as a bad thing yet the UK would be undeniably better with more Mormoms and less Muslims so I accuse you of not properly shoot into the left.

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable March 24, 2017 12:28 AM  

Jay Will wrote:"Reconquista 2.0 or Sharia"

All going according to plan. Nationalists v Muslims to defang both and bring in the new order. Out of the ashes a beautiful new people. See WW2, and the new age it brought in.

Either nationalists will do it or globalists will burn down a mosque and blame it on nationalists to light it up. The pieces are in place just set it off already.


Stop being so defeatist. Everyone is well aware of the plan, and as soon as the muzzies chimp out over a false flag, my mental model predicts that the other side will turn exclusive private clubs into abbatoirs. Fake news offices. Sanctuary university campuses. Fancy restaurants.

Not mosques. (Unless they're raiding for guns and ammo.)

Do you know how few men would have to be willing to go jail like Anders Brevik to completely eliminate the Federal regulatory state?

Do the calculation some time. I did. It's shocking. Especially when you realize that jihadis must not oppose our Establishment, because it is highly vulnerable. And instead they attack cartoonists and concert-goers.

Which helps explain the Establishment's reaction to terrorist attacks: whether or not it's tacit, there is clear collusion.

Anonymous Garrulus March 24, 2017 6:50 AM  

They are now sowing confusion in the papers about wether this was terror. Some say it was a drunk darkie that flipped out near a checkpoint. But I just did some research and I found this guy was indeed heavily armed and up to no good eventually. http://www.gva.be/cnt/dmf20170323_02796892/had-man-39-die-over-meir-scheurde-terroristische-motieven-sinds-twee-jaar-is-hij-op-de-dool

Anonymous Garrulus March 24, 2017 6:58 AM  

edit: He was not Heavily armed, but he was armed.

Anonymous Luke March 24, 2017 8:23 AM  

Prosper and theproduct, Mormons ignore all kinds of key stuff in the Bible. From not recognizing other gods, to adding and deleting from the Bible, to ignoring the clear rules on how to discern false prophets, they are clearly well past apostate, right up there with mainline Prot denoms that have sexually-active homos and lesbos masquerading as clergy.

Re having a choice between Mormos and Muzzies, of course the Mormos are less dangerous in the short term. I still want them to give up the Book of Mormon, believing that employees of the Mormo church are anything but scammers, etc., and become Christian. As Vox has taught us, when given a choice between two evils, choose neither.

Anonymous Pax_Romana March 24, 2017 11:40 AM  

Thank you for the corrections to my understanding, Cali, Snidely, et al. Your understanding on the subject was fascinating, and as a Protestant, all I had EVER heard was the propaganda.

Buwaya, I looked up the book you recommended, and Amazon has it on Kindle for...outrageous prices. I'll look through my used book store this weekend.

Blogger JP March 24, 2017 12:54 PM  

Easy: We. Don't. Care.

If only 10% of snakes with yellow stripes have a deadly venom, you don't play with the fucking snake. Sure, 90% are harmless, and isn't it unfair that those other snakes don't get the fun of being around people?, but it doesn't matter.

They have to go back.

Blogger JP March 24, 2017 12:55 PM  

Well said.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts