ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2017 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Wednesday, April 05, 2017

Shutting down the enemy

Hungary has the brains to starve the parasite:
Hungarian lawmakers on Tuesday approved legislation that could force the closure of a prestigious Budapest university founded by US billionaire investor George Soros, sparking fresh protests. The English-language Central European University (CEU), set up in 1991 after the fall of communism, has long been seen as a hostile bastion of liberalism by Prime Minister Viktor Orban's government.

MPs in the 199-seat parliament, dominated by Orban's Fidesz party, voted 123 in favour and 38 against the legislation affecting foreign universities operating in Hungary.

The new rules ban institutions outside the European Union from awarding Hungarian diplomas without an agreement between national governments. They will also be required to have a campus and faculties in their home country -- conditions not met by the CEU.

Failure to comply would mean the CEU could not accept new student intakes from 2018, and possibly close by 2021.
Their next step should be to target all foreign-funded NGOs. NGOs are the stealth army of everyone from the CIA and the Roman Catholic Church to wealthy private parties. If I were in government, I would not permit a single foreign NGO to operate within my country's borders. They reliably do far more harm than good, as the recent series of color revolutions and civil wars tends to demonstrate.

Labels: ,

84 Comments:

Anonymous Jordi April 05, 2017 5:46 AM  

Neither the Chinese nor the Russians are stupid

Here is why they heavily regulate NGOs within THEIR borders

Blogger Ron April 05, 2017 5:56 AM  

God bless Vox for this post, he is speaking the absolute truth

The NGOs are a nightmare in my country. Theyve destroyed the culture and youth, and they do it openly. They bribe and corrupt their way into nearly every institution and movement, and those they do not bribe they kill, marginalize and at the very least harass. Theyve brought us to the line of civil war. And because of them, our worst enemies have their jaws right on our throats.

Whats worse, they routinely aid the worst elements in the country, so that a hundred thousand people can march in protest and no one will hear a word of it. peaceful protests are met with horses, blidgeons, tear gas, and foreign born guards who beat the boys and sexually assault religious girls, even ministers are beaten, all this is documented. And no one is held to account. Because the watchdog institutions are either corrupt, intimidated or just ignored.

If the Hungarians can manage to do what Vox said, then in saving themsekves they will have done more for my people than gratitude can express. Would to God that the Germans would do the same for their own people and throw out the barbarian invaders.

May God damn Soros to Hell. His name is not "soros" it is "tzarot". His name means suffering and he is a source of suffering for all of humanity.

Blogger Sherwood family April 05, 2017 5:58 AM  

I can attest that this is exactly how they function. Jordi is absolutely right as well. Look at the Open Society Foundations, formerly the Open Society Institute. This is a George Soros creation which has hydra-like heads poking out from under every rock and bush. They are involved in everything in the country I am in. The government here has been at pains to extricate them based on the Russian model without offending foreign donors enough to dry up the money coming in. It gets to be a conflict of interest between controlling what goes on in their territory and getting the cash flow that foreign funding brings in. Foreign funded NGOs are a fifth column no matter how noble their aims. If they are entirely internally funded they're probably fine but once money starts coming in from outside it is easy to steer them toward the policy goals of the foreign power funding them.

Blogger Lazarus April 05, 2017 6:01 AM  

Good for Hungary. Hopefully this is part of a growing trend. A bill was introduced in the Israeli Knesset at the end of March proposing the elimination of property tax breaks for NGOs.

Im Tirtzu CEO Matan Peleg, who was involved in promoting the bill, welcomed the proposal and said it is absurd for the Israeli taxpayer to subsidize the property taxes of anti-Israel NGOs serving the interests of foreign governments.

“This bill conveys an important message to those seeking to harm the Jewish and democratic identity of the State of Israel by means of foreign government funding,” said Peleg. “We will work to see to it that the State of Israel will not fund or subsidize those seeking its destruction.”


http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/227459

Blogger VD April 05, 2017 6:02 AM  

The government here has been at pains to extricate them based on the Russian model without offending foreign donors enough to dry up the money coming in.

That's the problem. Forget the foreign donors.

Blogger Pteronarcyd April 05, 2017 6:04 AM  

"I would not permit a single NGO to operate within my country's borders."

You would ban domestically funded NGOs, too? Would that not effectively ban all non-profit orgs?

Blogger ZhukovG April 05, 2017 6:18 AM  

@Pteronacyd: The context of the OP, would indicate that he means NGO's that operate contrary to the interests of the 'Nation' within the 'State'.

For example, in the United States most NGO's and the government itself act in ways contrary to the well being of the American Nation.

Blogger VD April 05, 2017 6:21 AM  

You would ban domestically funded NGOs, too?

I added "foreign" for clarification.

Anonymous Clay April 05, 2017 6:29 AM  

You European folks always flummox me.

The US has had to come over there, Twice, and rescue your asses.

You want the US to pay the Lion's share of NATO.

I have nothing left to say about Europe, that is not derogatory.

Except Finland. They are cool in my book.

Anonymous TheHiss April 05, 2017 6:35 AM  

@9. As a European I completely agree with you.

Blogger VD April 05, 2017 6:37 AM  

The US has had to come over there, Twice, and rescue your asses.

Don't be ridiculous, Clay. The US leaders desperately wanted to come over. They weren't needed at all for either WWI or WWII. They just wanted to get in on the spoils.

It's the USA that wants to keep NATO alive, not the Europeans.

Anonymous Clay April 05, 2017 6:40 AM  

BTW...do "NGO's" have a symbol? Some mark?

How do we identify them?

Are they like the Illuminati? The Masons?

Do they have "meetings"? The New World Order?

Blogger ZhukovG April 05, 2017 6:41 AM  

@Clay: I can understand that you are flummoxed. However, your second statement betrays a certain ignorance of history. As for your third statement; if the US chooses to pay for NATO, how is that the fault of Europeans. I can assure you that Europeans really don't care what you think of them and I agree that Finns are cool.

Blogger Stilicho April 05, 2017 6:41 AM  

Ban all foreign NGOs, remove tax exempt status for all domestic NGOs that accept any govt funding.

Blogger VD April 05, 2017 6:41 AM  

Look at a map of Russia's 1942-1944 advance sometime. Notice where the German forces on the East Front are in April 1944. Germany had been expelled from Russia and was already done before D-Day.

Blogger VD April 05, 2017 6:42 AM  

BTW...do "NGO's" have a symbol? Some mark?

They are registered as such, Clay, as non-profit organizations. Stop embarrassing yourself.

Blogger Stilicho April 05, 2017 6:42 AM  

@Clay they are legion.

Blogger Skyler the Weird April 05, 2017 6:45 AM  

We didn't go to Europe to save their assets, we went to Europe to save U.S. Bankers assets. They had loaned the Allies tons of money in 1914 and by 1917 it appeared they wouldn't be repaid if Britain and France lost the war.

Anonymous Clay April 05, 2017 6:48 AM  

Well, VD, I know what you are saying.

I wasn't trying to be ridiculous.

So, if you say, the US would shut off all funds to NATO, It would be a bunch of happy Europeans dancing in the streets?

We are obviously the boil that hurts their asses.

Blogger Kona Commuter April 05, 2017 6:48 AM  

My old classmate worked for a NGO. He is super cagey what he was doing and last I heard he was working in our nations capital but again, super cagey saying for who and doing what. A very intelligent but unassuming man.

+1 for stamping on the necks of foreign NGO's operating within your borders. Send them back home to fix things there

Blogger FrankNorman April 05, 2017 7:07 AM  

15. VD April 05, 2017 6:41 AM

Look at a map of Russia's 1942-1944 advance sometime. Notice where the German forces on the East Front are in April 1944. Germany had been expelled from Russia and was already done before D-Day.


The USA was invested in WW2 long before D-Day, as I'm sure you know. The Atlantic convoys, the battles in North Africa, the invasion of Italy...

The Russians may think that the Eastern European theatre was all that mattered, but they should not expect the rest of us to agree with them.

Blogger Balázs Varga April 05, 2017 7:13 AM  

This is a good start. There are some protests, but I have met soldiers with Ak-47s on the subway so I trust everything is under control.

Also, the US did not save our assets, as almost half of Europe was the enemy. So we don't owe the US for anything in that regard. What we can owe you for is if Trump keeps on supporting right wing eastern european goverments.

Blogger Cataline Sergius April 05, 2017 7:13 AM  

Shutting down anything that Soros funds is step in the right direction.

That old warlock can't last too much longer but he can last long enough.

Anonymous VFM #6306 April 05, 2017 7:17 AM  

Clay...yes. If NATO shut down, there would be dancing in the streets.

You have to go back. To America.

Blogger Lazarus April 05, 2017 7:25 AM  

Cataline Sergius wrote:That old warlock can't last too much longer but he can last long enough.

I don't know about that. Evil old bastards seem to go on forever (((Henry Kissinger))) is still alive, for instance. They are sorta like, maybe, lizard people.

Anonymous Silly but True April 05, 2017 7:25 AM  

The long list of recommendations to make foreign NGOs better: raze Geneva.

Anonymous VFM #6306 April 05, 2017 7:40 AM  

CEU later!

Blogger Dirtnapninja April 05, 2017 7:41 AM  

These NGOs could not function without the river of money coming in from fake charities and the huge foundations. We need to attack the funding networks and break the power of these foundations.

These foundations play the same role in spreading neocommunism that the saudi billionaire class plays in spreading Salafism.

Anonymous Darth Dharmakīrti April 05, 2017 7:43 AM  

@21

The Russians may think that the Eastern European theatre was all that mattered, but they should not expect the rest of us to agree with them.

God damn you are retarded.

It was the Ostfront that broke the Wehrmacht and sent it back to Germany a shambling wreck, on the backs of 27 million dead Russians. There would have been no D-Day, African Campaign or no, if the invasion of Russia hadn't failed. The Anglo-American alliance would have been simply incapable of it.

Anonymous Darth Dharmakīrti April 05, 2017 7:46 AM  

I mean the post- D-Day breakout invasion of the Rhineland very nearly failed, and that was with 14 year old boys taking the place of the seasoned veterans who died in the sludge and the snow of the Russian heartland.

Blogger VD April 05, 2017 7:49 AM  

So, if you say, the US would shut off all funds to NATO, It would be a bunch of happy Europeans dancing in the streets?

Without question. Here is a clue: the Okinawans don't like US bases on their island either.

Blogger dc.sunsets April 05, 2017 7:53 AM  

Employees of anything resembling an NGO (defined broadly) are de facto government employees and/or agents of a foreign power (political or private matters not.)

Whether agents of a communist power, a cult or a "foundation," their purpose is always subversion.

Their agents should be treated as such.

Blogger Wanderer April 05, 2017 7:53 AM  

Hungary has already been targeting NGOs.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-10/trump-s-win-prompts-hungarian-call-for-crackdown-on-soros-groups

Anonymous Rocklea April 05, 2017 8:01 AM  

Hey Hey
Ho Ho
Soros NGOs
Have Got To Go

Blogger dc.sunsets April 05, 2017 8:09 AM  

BTW, in the USA we should shut down (and confiscate the assets of) any "charity" that engages in anything remotely connected to political activity.

Politics should be defined broadly and all organizations engaging in it should be openly so registered. Any organization that drifts into politics on the down-low should be deemed subversive and shut down.

The way to enforce this is to do the same as is done with billing fraud to the FedGov. Example: When a pharma company was "helping" doctors defraud Medicare, three middle managers blew the whistle and split something like 80 million dollars in "rewards."

You want to police the Ford Foundation, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Soros, et. al.? Turn their own employees into profit-seeking whistle blowers.

Money controls politics. Every dollar that seeks to do so should be openly announced. Those who try to subvert politics under the disguise of charity or community development should be treated as agents of a foreign power and SHOT.

Anonymous Clay April 05, 2017 8:11 AM  

VD wrote:So, if you say, the US would shut off all funds to NATO, It would be a bunch of happy Europeans dancing in the streets?

Without question. Here is a clue: the Okinawans don't like US bases on their island either.


Oh, I understand the Okinawans big-time.

I wonder why??? Care to extrapolate?

Ya know, the Europes are always marching and protesting about something, against the US.

It just doesn't seem right that the US should be shouldering NATO anymore.

Why aren't they protesting for a NATOEXIT?

I don't know. I don't live there.

Blogger dc.sunsets April 05, 2017 8:11 AM  

We need to do with politics what 2nd world countries do with property ownership to avoid rich foreigners from swooping in and buying up all the choice land out from under the citizens' butts.

NO FOREIGN MONEY in politics. Get caught, get droned.

Blogger Basil Makedon April 05, 2017 8:16 AM  

NATO served a purpose in the immediate post-war era, but I struggle to find a rationale for it any longer. I suppose you can make the Animal House argument -- "it has a long tradition of existence to itself and the community at large."

But in all seriousness, what precisely is the threat that NATO is protecting everyone from?

Russia has some advanced weapons and some decent troops -- and, of course, has nukes. That being said, Russia has an economy somewhat smaller than that of South Korea and barely larger than Australia. California, Texas and New York each have a larger economy when considered on their own.

It's population is shrinking (slightly), though it does have a highly educated population with high quality scientists/engineers. It's primary export is oil/gas and is not doing well.

Arguably, Russia is a threat to the Ukraine and to the Baltic Republics. However, is that really our business? Should the most indebted nation in the history of the universe really be borrowing more money to defend not-allies or allies that offer us little in even trade?

Moreover, I would argue that Turkey -- a full fledged NATO member -- is a greater threat to our interests and the other NATO members than is Russia. Turkey is actively threatening the Germans, the Dutch and others.

If this isn't clear evidence of strategic confusion and uselessness, I'm not sure what would be.

Blogger VD April 05, 2017 8:16 AM  

Why aren't they protesting for a NATOEXIT?

They have since the 1960s. In case you haven't noticed, their governments are US-owned.

Anonymous Clay April 05, 2017 8:23 AM  

I'll have to take your word for it, but the last time I'm really remembering the presence of NATO "protesting" NATO, is when the Germans wanted the Pershing Missiles removed.

Like I said; you are more attuned to that than I am.

Anonymous ThirdMonkey April 05, 2017 8:35 AM  

I would put Catholic Charities in the foreign NGO pot. They play a huuuuge role in settling refugees in the US. Who would've thought there would be a sizeable Somali population in the Texas panhandle?

Anonymous Ominous Cowherd April 05, 2017 8:45 AM  

ThirdMonkey wrote:I would put Catholic Charities in the foreign NGO pot.

American Catholics may be American, but the Roman Catholic church is not. I suspect Snidely and others will tell us that Catholic Charities isn't Catholic, anyway.

Either way, they have to go back.

Blogger seeingsights April 05, 2017 9:34 AM  

I'm a member of an academic Internet list which has mostly philosophers of science but also historians, mathematicians, scientists. Some there have expressed opposition to what Hungary is doing. Some have expressed opposition to Brexit and Trump.
I'm tempted to reply to them but I'll lay low. I might be of use as an infiltrator of a pro-globalist institution.
As a suggestion, perhaps Alt-Right folks and nationalists could infiltrate globalist institutions. Interesting things could be done such as leaking info from these institutions.
Cernovich has infiltrated globalist institutions--he says he has sources in major media organizations.

Blogger JWM in SD April 05, 2017 9:34 AM  

"US billionaire investor George Soros".

US citizen George "Blofeld" Soros. Why is he still not in a prison cell?? Surely he is on the GE's radar?

Blogger JWM in SD April 05, 2017 9:37 AM  

"Politics should be defined broadly and all organizations engaging in it should be openly so registered. Any organization that drifts into politics on the down-low should be deemed subversive and shut down."

Could that include the so called "Refugee Services" non-profit, luthern organizations here in the US? Because you know that they are still flying in refugees at night here right?

Anonymous Airman Snuffy April 05, 2017 9:37 AM  

@ThirdMonkey both they and Lutheran Social Services have been instrumental in turning Minneapolis into Little Mogadishu. The govt pays them to do it, too, thousands per "refugee". It has to stop.

@Vox the US played a bigger role in the WW2 European theater than you are crediting it with. The Russians would not have been able to stop the German advance without the mountains of war material the US supplied them with. (A fact that Slavaboos love to ignore when they claim Russia stopped Germany singlehandedly.) The number of Russian dead is a useless statistic when determining who accomplished what; dying against an enemy isn't promoting their defeat.

Blogger Cail Corishev April 05, 2017 9:40 AM  

Catholic Charities does some good things locally like running food pantries, and they've also held the line against states trying to force them to do adoptions for homosexuals. But they're also hip-deep in the refugee resettlement scam. Shutting down their foreign operations would be a good thing, as they'd be forced to return to true charitable works, and American Catholics could support them in good conscience again, which isn't currently possible.

Blogger VD April 05, 2017 9:46 AM  

The Russians would not have been able to stop the German advance without the mountains of war material the US supplied them with.

Perhaps, perhaps not. But that does not change the fact that the USA did not have any need to send a single soldier to Europe. The ONLY reason it did so was to be able to participate in the victory conference with an army on hand.

Anonymous Silly but True April 05, 2017 9:48 AM  

@Cowherd: "I suspect Snidely and others will tell us that Catholic Charities isn't Catholic, anyway."

Where I live Catholic Charities is one of the largest sponsors of non-profit health clinics, several of which offer abortions. In one case, the building housing a clinic where abortions are performed is actually owned by Catholic Charities and its tenants administered by Nuns.

I make no judgments about their fealty to Catholocism but I do make of that as I will. But then I'm not Catholic anyway.

Anonymous Airman Snuffy April 05, 2017 9:55 AM  

@Vox Agreed on your last two points.

The argument I have heard that the US invasion was intended to stop USSR takeover of western Europe doesn't hold much water with me; anyone thinking that doesn't seem to have looked at FDR's political beliefs.

Anonymous Grayman April 05, 2017 9:55 AM  

NATO is about money and power. There are substantial entrenched interests in European governments and the MIC that makes up NATO its more or less an international branch of the deepstate.
Killing Nato is like trying to kill "healthcare" in the US. Too many people would lose their power and money and as such it wont happen without replacing the current power structure.

Blogger Josh (the gayest thing here) April 05, 2017 9:56 AM  

The ONLY reason it did so was to be able to participate in the victory conference with an army on hand.

A secondary reason might have been to deter a West coast invasion.

Anonymous Silly but True April 05, 2017 9:58 AM  

That brings to mind Sir Arthur Harris' infamous speech:"...They sowed the wind, and now they are going to reap the whirlwind."

Really by 1942 Berlin itself was a whore to Britain taking whatever money shots they wanted. By 1943, every power and its lame bastard stepson were gangbanging her in the ass with massive daytime bombings.

Blogger mushroom April 05, 2017 10:05 AM  

Airman Snuffy wrote:...

@Vox the US played a bigger role in the WW2 European theater than you are crediting it with. The Russians would not have been able to stop the German advance without the mountains of war material the US supplied them with. (A fact that Slavaboos love to ignore when they claim Russia stopped Germany singlehandedly.) The number of Russian dead is a useless statistic when determining who accomplished what; dying against an enemy isn't promoting their defeat.


That is what the Germans on the Russian Front believed.

Anonymous arw April 05, 2017 10:06 AM  

@Josh

Frankly I think it's a discussion that needs to be had.

/stirring the pot

Anonymous fop April 05, 2017 10:16 AM  

Saudi Arabia builds mosques and madrassas by the thousands in the west. Do you think they would allow us to build a christian church in their country?

Anonymous Satan's Hamster April 05, 2017 10:22 AM  

"So, if you say, the US would shut off all funds to NATO, It would be a bunch of happy Europeans dancing in the streets?"

Few things would be better for Europe than killing NATO. NATO has allowed Europeans to live in a fantasy world since WWII where they can open their borders to everyone and disarm their own people because Uncle Sam will come to protect them if they need it. I read the other week that the EU is now demanding that EU nations ban private ownership of any gun that even looks like a military weapon. Because scary.

Without NATO, they'd also have to cut welfare to fund a competent military. That would dramatically curtail the refugee scam as no-one would want to see welfare cut for natives in order to pay 'refugees' to stay home and breed.

The European 'leaders' would obviously hate it, for the same reasons. They would have no place in a de-cucked Europe.

Anonymous A Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents April 05, 2017 10:29 AM  

In the US Soros organizations have funded OnlyBlackLIvesMatter, many gun-control politicians and initiatives, drug legalization campaigns, and "good government". For two or three election cycles Soros orgs of the "good government" variety have focused on the state Secretary of State; that office is in charge of election polls, voter registration, certifying election results and other similar duties. In the recent election Soros orgs concentrated on a few District Attornies, the county-level officer in charge of criminal prosecutions.

Soros orgs in the US have gone from large campaigns to smaller, targetted ones. They went after Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Arizona and turned him out of office.

Soros organizations are anti nationalist, pro globalist, anti-localist. Orban's party is quite correct to go after them. Would that the US could do the same.

Anonymous BBGKB April 05, 2017 10:36 AM  

that could force the closure of a prestigious Budapest university founded by US billionaire investor George Soros, sparking fresh protests

They have the best lesbian basket weaving professors in the world.

NGOs are the stealth army of everyone from the CIA and

What is worse is when people confuse them with charity, Doctors Without Borders has done more to damage civilization than most terror groups.

Ron The NGOs are a nightmare in my country. Theyve destroyed the culture and youth, and they do it openly. They bribe and corrupt

Which country are you in?

You European folks always flummox me.The US has had to come over there, Twice, and rescue your asses.

The jews that produce the show Man in the HIGH Castle make a convincing case the US helped the wrong side in WWII just like general Patton said 6 days before he was killed.

Are they like the Illuminati? The Masons? (((reptilians)))

That old warlock can't last too much longer but he can last long enough...Evil old bastards seem to go on forever (((Henry Kissinger)))

They are chowing down on bags of baby dicks from planned parenthood to stay alive.

Oh, I understand the Okinawans big-time.I wonder why??? Care to extrapolate?

They would throw the bodies of US soldiers who raped locals into the Cave Of The Negros.

I suspect Snidely and others will tell us that Catholic Charities isn't Catholic, anyway.

I might go protest outside the Lutheran church next to the Lutheran social services in my state for Easter services, it seems like the thing Luther would approve of.

I'm tempted to reply to them but I'll lay low. I might be of use as an infiltrator of a pro-globalist institution.

The path of the black knight. I might get a t shirt made that says
"Boy Scouts Supreme Court Win 2000
1000+ jewish lawyers forced them to take trannies by 2017"
People might not be able to tell if I am a shitlib gloating or redpilled. If anyone has any suggestions on a better version let me know

Blogger DemonicProfessorEl April 05, 2017 10:42 AM  

Satan's Hamster wrote:Without NATO, they'd also have to cut welfare to fund a competent military. That would dramatically curtail the refugee scam as no-one would want to see welfare cut for natives in order to pay 'refugees' to stay home and breed.

The European 'leaders' would obviously hate it, for the same reasons. They would have no place in a de-cucked Europe.


This, basically. The sentiment I've gotten from Europeans is that they generally like Americans, don't like the US government, and don't like NATO.

The younger Euros like all the free stuff that American money gets them, but they're young and don't know how to properly express why they resent the US (Americans pay for the stuff Western Europeans like = dependence therefore a hit on their pride). You also usually find this in the more leftist-leaning European. You know, the kinds that think nationalized healthcare is "free."

I think most Europeans would welcome a NATOEXIT, overall, even with some of the "goodies" deleted.

Also, the USA's biggest contribution to World War 2 was supplying Russia with metals like iron and copper as well as material, like tank treads and tire rubber. Especially in 1942, while the manufacturing core was getting rebuilt in central Russia.

Not to diminish the fighting in France or Italy, but the Russians did do the bulk of the combat operations in the European theatre.

Anonymous A Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents April 05, 2017 10:57 AM  

In the US the Soros orgs used to concentrate on ballot initiatives such as gun control and higher level offices. For the last 2 or 3 election cycles Soros orgs have been more focused on state and local level offices such as Secretary of State and District Attorney.

The Sec of State in states is usually in charge of voter registration and running elections, specifically certifying elections. The DA's are local prosecutors who have quite a bit of discretion in what crimes are prosecuted vs. plea bargained.

So Soros wants gun control, wants legal weed, wants to control the people who run elections and control the local officials who prosecute crimes. Nothing sinister there, right?

Oh, plus in the last election a Soros org specifically targeted Arpaio, the sheriff in Arizona who has been energetic in prosecuting illegals and smugglers. He lost.

Sure wish the US would follow Hungary's lead. Soros is very much anti nationalist, anti nation.

Blogger Sheila4g April 05, 2017 11:18 AM  

Another thing to shut down or slash funding to [at least until the US government is under control] is what used to be known as USIA or USIS, now the office for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs at State. Initially founded to "fight communism," it included Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty, as well as numerous "cultural" exchanges and programs. Courtesy of that, we have lesbian Masha Gessen [my parenthesis key isn't working, but very applicable here]. Back in the day, USIS people were even more globalist and naive than USAID folks, and the programs and exchanges they sponsored were all fully SJW converged long before there were official SJWs. It works hand in glove with NGOs. With all due respect to Sherwood, Jourdan, and others still in the belly of the beast, State needs to be slashed and the Foreign Service and associated agencies represented in embassies cut to the bone. As bad as it was in my day, it's a thousand times worse today.

Blogger DemonicProfessorEl April 05, 2017 11:23 AM  

I've said this a few times - the globalist neo-Left/neo-Caliphate is a house of cards. They may appear strong (or "antifragile" as someone put it once), but they're very dependent on other people's money (read: our money).

Once we turn off the cash spigot, they're defanged.

Blogger Luke (alias "Lines With Chrome") April 05, 2017 11:24 AM  

If CNN is giving favorable coverage to protests going on in your country, you can rest assured those protests are not in the interests of your country.

Anonymous Prionyx April 05, 2017 11:25 AM  

If they need to do their Good Works, let them do so in the foreign countries where it's needed; risking only their own skins. Instead, they're being arm-chair missionaries which allows them to virtue-signal their righteousness while importing the problem into our countries where they become "someone else's" problem and the blood of innocents gets spilled.

Anonymous Prionyx April 05, 2017 11:28 AM  

My previous comment (#64) was in reply to Cail Corishev (#47):

> But they're also hip-deep in the refugee resettlement scam. Shutting down their foreign operations would be a good thing, as they'd be forced to return to true charitable works

Anonymous Athor Pel April 05, 2017 11:48 AM  

"18. Blogger Skyler the Weird April 05, 2017 6:45 AM
We didn't go to Europe to save their assets, we went to Europe to save U.S. Bankers assets. They had loaned the Allies tons of money in 1914 and by 1917 it appeared they wouldn't be repaid if Britain and France lost the war.
"



Yes and no.

There were plenty of US companies that did plenty of business with Germany DURING the war, it was done through South American cut-outs but done just the same. Tetra-ethyl lead being one of the prime commodities and bearings being another critcal item.

Officially German subsidiaries of US companies kept on doing business as usual inside Germany, keeping track of expenses and revenue but not sending those profits back to the US, but working with the Nazi's nonetheless. The Germans couldn't have done the planning after Wannsee without IBM computers for example.

I bet many here can guess some of the family names involved without much trouble.

Anonymous Grayman April 05, 2017 11:55 AM  

The Germans used the eugenics program being built by the US military and the Rockefellers as a template...

Anonymous Avalanche April 05, 2017 12:42 PM  

@58 "The path of the black knight. I might get a t shirt made that says
"Boy Scouts Supreme Court Win 2000
1000+ jewish lawyers forced them to take trannies by 2017"
People might not be able to tell if I am a shitlib gloating or redpilled. If anyone has any suggestions on a better version let me know"

Might do better -- and even incite discussion? -- if you use an approximately accurate number of jew lawyers...


Boy Scouts win in Supreme Court: 2000
~857 jew lawyers forced them to take trannies: 2017


Then you'd able to say to an interlocutor that there were alllll these jew lawyers (1,000 seems like exaggeration) nibbling away at the Supreme Court 'law of the land' decision; overturning that decision by bleeding it to death.

(Slightly shorter, still kinda long?)

Anonymous I Am Irony, Man April 05, 2017 12:42 PM  

Vox: "Their next step should be to target all foreign-funded NGOs. NGOs are the stealth army of everyone from the CIA and the Roman Catholic Church to wealthy private parties. If I were in government, I would not permit a single foreign NGO to operate within my country's borders. They reliably do far more harm than good, as the recent series of color revolutions and civil wars tends to demonstrate."

As the Russian government is currently trying to do with the extremist Jehovah's Witnesses, noting that their organization is based in and funded from the U.S.

Blogger Stilicho April 05, 2017 1:00 PM  

@68 "Boyish Scouts"

Blogger William Meisheid April 05, 2017 2:03 PM  

Grayman, do you have credible sources for that for further research?

Blogger Snidely Whiplash April 05, 2017 2:25 PM  

Ominous Cowherd wrote:I suspect Snidely and others will tell us that Catholic Charities isn't Catholic, anyway.

CC is basically an arm of the Welfare State now, though it is administered by Catholics. They are careful to maintain an arms-length separation from direct involvement in abortion and gay marriage, but only that.

Anonymous Silly but True April 05, 2017 2:36 PM  

@Meisheid:
The main connection was top Nazi doctor, Otmar von Verschuer. He was funded by Rockefeller Foundation.

During the Holocaust, Verschuer's assistant, Josef Mengele, continued eugenic twin research at Auschwitz.

Anonymous Ominous Cowherd April 05, 2017 2:43 PM  

BBGKB wrote:I might get a t shirt made that says

"Boy Scouts Supreme Court Win 2000

1000+ jewish lawyers forced them to take trannies by 2017"


Seems like lousy rhetoric to me. Too long, requires explanation.

How about ``Boy Scouts beat the homos in court in 2000, surrendered to the trannies in 2017''? I'm still not feeling the emotions, so it's probably still lousy rhetoric.

Anonymous Clay April 05, 2017 4:02 PM  

Huh. Let them trannies go to Camp Kickapoo.

Blogger Akulkis April 05, 2017 7:38 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Akulkis April 05, 2017 7:39 PM  

Soros deserves death

Preferred method of execution: Whipping with a leather lash until dead, pour encourager les autres.

Blogger Akulkis April 05, 2017 8:03 PM  

According to an old Army joke from the Cold War era, The THREE purposes of NATO are

1: To keep the USSR out of Western Europe

Two: To keep the Germans out of France

THREE: To keep the French from pissing off the Germans yet again.

Blogger Akulkis April 05, 2017 8:25 PM  

@61

I have met a few people in the State Department. Not a single one was loyal to our country. ALL of them said that their job was to represent other countries -- as if those countries don't already have their own State Departments do do that.

Anonymous Didas Kalos April 05, 2017 10:48 PM  

Soros the "US Billionaire?"

Blogger weka April 06, 2017 12:05 AM  

The T Shirt should read.
"Supreme court saved Boy Scouts 2000.
Lawyers killed cis Scoutz 2018"

SJW always salt the land they leave behind. Leave them no cover. They have to go home, with the NGO that employs them and the strangers they bought in.

Blogger JP April 06, 2017 12:21 AM  

mushroom wrote:Airman Snuffy wrote:...

@Vox the US played a bigger role in the WW2 European theater than you are crediting it with. The Russians would not have been able to stop the German advance without the mountains of war material the US supplied them with. (A fact that Slavaboos love to ignore when they claim Russia stopped Germany singlehandedly.) The number of Russian dead is a useless statistic when determining who accomplished what; dying against an enemy isn't promoting their defeat.


That is what the Germans on the Russian Front believed.


Can you blame them? In all of their *victorious* battles they were outnumbered 2 to 1 in infantry, tanks, planes, arty, etc. Judging by their economy pre- and post-war, where did all that shit come from?

Blogger david stones April 12, 2017 4:08 AM  

I am giving a testimony of how i become rich and famous today… i was deeply strangled up by poverty and i had no body to help me, and also i searched for help from different corners but to no avail… I see people around me getting rich but to me i was so ashamed of my self so i met a man on my way he was very rich and he was a doctor so he told me something and i think over it though out the day so the next day i looked up and i keep repeating what he said to me. ” if you want to get rich quick and be famous” you need to cross your heart and do what is in your mind so i tried all i could in other for me to do as he said so later on i told my fellow friend about this same thing then my friend was interested in my suggestions so i decided to look in the internet and i found an email address of this great fraternity( illuminatihomeforall@gmail.com ) so we decided to contact them and fortunately we did as they instruct us to do and later they told us to get some requirements and all the rest… so this initiation took us just a week and later on the great fraternity gave us $7,000,000.00 to start up our lives…. and now am testifying that if in any case you want to join any great fraternity all you need to do is for you to contact them because they are legitimate and they do as they have instructed you to do. So email them now at ( illuminatihomeforall@gmail.com or Call any of our agents via mobile or whatsapp +2348143502763

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts