ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2017 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Tuesday, April 18, 2017

That is his Post-America

What warms the hearts of civic nationalists is the complete absence of actual America:
A man who shared his heartwarming photo of a Hasidic couple scooting over on a subway train so they could make room for a Muslim mother feeding her baby has gone viral.  The man, Jackie Summers, who blogs for The Good Men Project, and who is a Taoist, said he gave up his seat to the Hasidic couple on the F train in New York City on Easter Sunday. The F train runs from Brooklyn, through Manhattan, and into Queens. 'A Taoist (me) gives up his seat so a Hasidic couple could sit together. They scoot over so a Muslim mother could sit and nurse her baby, on Easter Sunday,' wrote on Facebook and in his blog. 'This is my America: people letting people be people.'
The problem, of course, is that Islam, Judaism, and Taoism are not American. FFS, they're not even Western. And none of them are celebrating the Resurrection of Jesus Christ on Easter Sunday in the nation that once celebrated "No King but Jesus".

That is not America. That is Post-America. It has literally nothing to do with anything American except geography. Which, of course, is why the Left loves it. They want to live in the Disney utopia of "It's a Small World", where everyone is simultaneously diverse and all the same.

  • 'Now that's the kind of America I would like to live in.'
  • 'This *is* the future that liberals want.' 

No doubt it is. But America is not a place. America is not an idea. America is not the entire human race. America is not the world. America is a Christian nation of European people who are the genetic Posterity of the Founding Fathers. Paper Americans are no more actual Americans than paper tigers are genuine tigers.

And civic nationalism is to nationalism what social justice is to justice.

Labels: ,

264 Comments:

«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 264 of 264
Anonymous Theresa Carson April 18, 2017 2:51 PM  

"it won't help when the belt feds come out."

what's a "belt fed"?

Anonymous A Most Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents April 18, 2017 2:55 PM  


what's a "belt fed"?


Anything it will eat. Just don't feed it too much or it will get fat. No one likes a fat belt.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash April 18, 2017 3:06 PM  

Higher income earners are the people who employ the lower income earners. And by jacking up the cost of employees, you reduce the demand for employees.
Seriously, are you just pretending to be this stupid? This is Jr High level economics.

But "consequences" are not a "Progressive" thing, are they? Intent is all that matters, not how a policy affects real people in the actual world.

Blogger American Spartan April 18, 2017 3:10 PM  

We do. Or at least we are in the bracket that is supposed to, but after various deductions the effective rate we pay is slightly lower.

Of coruse

Anonymous Theresa Carson April 18, 2017 3:20 PM  

"Higher income earners are the people who employ the lower income earners. And by jacking up the cost of employees, you reduce the demand for employees.
Seriously, are you just pretending to be this stupid? This is Jr High level economics."

How did we survive the 40s, 50s, 60s and 70s without understanding basic Jr. High level economics?

In 1960 the tax rates ranged from 20% to 91% over 21 different brackets. And yet, somehow, America didn't collapse. In 1960 the top .1% of earners controlled roughly 8% of all the wealth in the U.S. In 1980, that tiny slice of the population controlled 6% of the total wealth. Then something started to happen. Tax rates for the extremely wealthy as well as cap gains taxes started to decrease significantly. Today, the top .1% of earners control roughly 22% of all the wealth in the country. I think that's a problem.

I dont' support going back to the tax structure of the 1960s. But i do support increase personal income tax on top earners. I also support a financial transaction tax of between .001% and .15% on various kinds of financial transactions, raising in the neighborhood of $200 Billion annually.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash April 18, 2017 3:26 PM  

"Stealing" is not spelled "raising"

Anonymous Theresa Carson April 18, 2017 3:39 PM  

""Stealing" is not spelled "raising"

I know. That's why I used "raising".

Anonymous Mathias April 18, 2017 3:43 PM  

@206,

Before the 1920's the effective income tax rate for everyone was 0%, and we had an effective army, navy, and social support system via Church communities and private charities. People paid their own doctors and teachers, and both services were affordable and the people paying them had effective control over their delivery. Then the income tax and "Great Society" happened. Been downhill ever since.

Anonymous JAG April 18, 2017 3:46 PM  

Theresa Carson wrote:"So why dont you pay that much RIGHT NOW?"

We do. Or at least we are in the bracket that is supposed to, but after various deductions the effective rate we pay is slightly lower.


Why do you take those deductions? You don't have to.

Anonymous JAG April 18, 2017 3:47 PM  

Mathias wrote:@206,

Before the 1920's the effective income tax rate for everyone was 0%, and we had an effective army, navy, and social support system via Church communities and private charities. People paid their own doctors and teachers, and both services were affordable and the people paying them had effective control over their delivery. Then the income tax and "Great Society" happened. Been downhill ever since.


Don't forget about the Raw... err.. I mean New Deal.

Anonymous Frog April 18, 2017 3:54 PM  

What will happen to non-posterity whites, those who are decendents of European immigrants (like Donald Trump)?

Anonymous Frog April 18, 2017 3:58 PM  

What will happen to non-posterity whites, those who are decendents of European immigrants (like Donald Trump)?

Blogger Cail Corishev April 18, 2017 4:00 PM  

What will happen to non-posterity whites,

Why don't you tell us what you think should happen? None of us is setting policy any more than you are.

Blogger maniacprovost April 18, 2017 4:12 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger maniacprovost April 18, 2017 4:14 PM  

The common theme I'm seeing here is that Theresa is defending what she "wants" to happen, despite supporting asinine policies that will only result in white dhimmi [edited for crudity].

Anonymous Mathias April 18, 2017 4:17 PM  

@212,

What precisely, do you mean by posterity? Technically, only the New England states and part of the South are properly English, the bits of America that were Spanish, Dutch, French, and German colonies joined as nations formed from those people. One of the big problems that will lead to breakup is that the USA is a chimera of European posterity, each adding their own Republics/Commonwealths to the mess to begin with.

Most likely what will happen is each respective European ethnicity will migrate to their historical colonial territories. Texas will be mostly Central European + Spanish country, the Louisiana area will continue to be a bastion of French culture, New England will continue to be the land of the founders and the Baja area will continue being completely crazy.

Anonymous Theresa Carson April 18, 2017 4:19 PM  

"Before the 1920's the effective income tax rate for everyone was 0%, and we had an effective army, navy, and social support system via Church communities and private charities. People paid their own doctors and teachers, and both services were affordable and the people paying them had effective control over their delivery. Then the income tax and "Great Society" happened. Been downhill ever since."

Actually, the social system via charities and churches, wonderful as they were and are, could not do enough to help those during the great depression.

More importantly, if you got rid of the individual income tax, corporate income tax and SS payroll tax, you'd be left with about $285 Billion in other sources of revenue (for 2014). In 2014, the military budget alone was $520 Billion.

I'm not sure what the impact would be of reducing our military budget by nearly half would be, but then again we'd probably have to reduce it by 75% under these kinds of tax revenues in order to have a military and a stripped down, bare bones federal government. We'd also have to figure out how to deal with the millions of homeless and sick folks that would result from no more SS and no more medicare and no more medicaid.

On the other hand, without any taxes, the average income earner ($30K annually) would see their spending income skyrocket from $25,500 to $30,000.

Anonymous Theresa Carson April 18, 2017 4:23 PM  

"Most likely what will happen is each respective European ethnicity will migrate to their historical colonial territories. Texas will be mostly Central European + Spanish country, the Louisiana area will continue to be a bastion of French culture, New England will continue to be the land of the founders and the Baja area will continue being completely crazy."

This is not the correct answer to the question, "What will happen to non-posterity whites?"

The correct answer is, Nothing. You can't tell the difference between a german and Frenchman and no one cares anyway.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash April 18, 2017 4:25 PM  

Mathias wrote:echnically, only the New England states and part of the South are properly English, the bits of America that were Spanish, Dutch, French, and German colonies joined as nations formed from those people.
The Midwest (Ohio to Nebraska) is solidly descended from New Englanders Parts of the West are as well, like Utah, Idaho, Washington and Oregon, and much of Alaska.
The region further south, Oklahoma, Missouri, Kansas, Arizona and Southern California is largely of Southern or Appalachian stock.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash April 18, 2017 4:28 PM  

how much money was created out of thin air to finance the Federal budget last year?

Anonymous Mathias April 18, 2017 4:29 PM  

@218,

You are completely ignoring knock-on effects. It's likely that the remaining revenues would rise sharply as the velocity of money in the economy increases due to the increased cashflow of everyone. This, coupled with a general fall in the price of everything would more than compensate for the loss of said parasitic systems. Furthermore, we could keep said programs around if we pared them back, say by removing from the rolls fake-Americans.

Furthermore, the great depression was not a natural event, it was a weapon of the Central Bankers, used to warp and mangle our social institutions in an all-too-successful black coup. The solution to the great depression was not the establishment of the welfare state, it could of been solved with a couple dozen bullets in the correct skulls. We don't have those sorts of economic events when we get rid of the (((bad actors))). When Jackson abolished the bank, the result was 70 years of 8 - 15% wage growth for everyone. This was the basis of American middle-class wealth and power in the 20th century, and unfortunately daddy's wallet has run out.

Anonymous Mathias April 18, 2017 4:34 PM  

@219,

Just because you can't see the difference, does not mean that everyone cannot. I can generally tell if a White person is of Texan stock by looking at them, we have a different look to us than Whites from other parts of the world. Indeed, have you never seen a chart of the different European ethnicities? They are quite distinctive in appearance.

Anonymous Mathias April 18, 2017 4:38 PM  

@220,

As a result of migrations coming out of New England. That doesn't change the fact that there were Frenchmen in Louisiana and Germans and Spaniards in Texas before the Scots-Irish-English arrived. I agree, its a gradient, but it's there, and the differences will become more stark as life gets harder.

Anonymous Theresa Carson April 18, 2017 4:42 PM  

"Furthermore, the great depression was not a natural event, it was a weapon of the Central Bankers, used to warp and mangle our social institutions in an all-too-successful black coup. The solution to the great depression was not the establishment of the welfare state, it could of been solved with a couple dozen bullets in the correct skulls. We don't have those sorts of economic events when we get rid of the (((bad actors))). When Jackson abolished the bank, the result was 70 years of 8 - 15% wage growth for everyone. This was the basis of American middle-class wealth and power in the 20th century, and unfortunately daddy's wallet has run out."

I had to look up what the (((....))) thing was.

You're nuts.


"You are completely ignoring knock-on effects. It's likely that the remaining revenues would rise sharply as the velocity of money in the economy increases due to the increased cashflow of everyone."

What revenues? Fees? Fines? Excise Taxes? Custom Duties? Fed Reserve income? Are folks going to buy more beer to increase excise taxes? Will they incur more fines?

You think the decrease in prices would more than compensate for a 90+% reduction in federal income??

I repeat: You're nuts.




Anonymous Theresa Carson April 18, 2017 4:45 PM  

"Just because you can't see the difference, does not mean that everyone cannot. I can generally tell if a White person is of Texan stock by looking at them, we have a different look to us than Whites from other parts of the world. Indeed, have you never seen a chart of the different European ethnicities? They are quite distinctive in appearance."

First, what does "Texas Stock" mean? And I guarantee you can't tell the difference between many different european ethnicities.

More importantly, it all just doesn't matter. There is no need and there will be no need to discern any differences.

Anonymous Mathias April 18, 2017 4:51 PM  

@225,

Accusing me of insanity instead of addressing my arguments will win you no victories here, this is a den of intelligent men. If my arguments are incorrect, you need to tell me why in order to have replied substantially.

And no, its not nuts, if that money is not taxed, it has to go somewhere, and where it will go is into the spending habits of ordinary Americans, both in consumer spending and capital investment. Furthermore, if everyone has their tax burden relieved, they can offer the same products at vastly decreased prices, and make the same margin, this on top of the fact that they wont be paying taxes on the income either. That means their effective income would receive a substantial, double-digit marginal boost. All of these effects multiply against eachother.

Now, what does all this activity generate? That's right, trade, including international trade. Which is taxed via excises. I'm not crazy, I just understand that an economy is an ecosystem, and that pulling lightly on just a few of its strings has huge butterfly effect type consequences.

Finally, the Church itself only demands %10, what makes the Kingdoms of Man think they can demand more from us than the institution of the Lord of Creation?

Anonymous Frog April 18, 2017 5:09 PM  

@Cali Corishev "None of us is setting policy any more than you are." Afair point. I think it will end up sorting itself out on case by case basis and probably vary from one community to another.

Blogger Michael Maier April 18, 2017 5:42 PM  

Theresa is EXACTLY why broads should keep their fool mouths shut.

Anonymous LurkingPuppy April 18, 2017 6:01 PM  

At least she's not a hemoglobin supremacist (“We all bleed red!”) like President Trump. So much hate for cephalopods.

Blogger papabear April 18, 2017 6:07 PM  

Ostensibly another smarter-than-the-average-woman woman throwing her weight around.

Blogger papabear April 18, 2017 6:07 PM  

Perhaps we could say higher T-level than the average woman as well.

Anonymous 5343 Kinds of Deplorable April 18, 2017 6:14 PM  

Perhaps we could say higher T-level than the average woman as well.

Given that this is the Internet, at a certain point you have to ask "Is this a woman at all?"

Blogger Snidely Whiplash April 18, 2017 6:18 PM  

Theresa Carson wrote:Why do men still get so fragile and uppity when they are bested by a woman?
Why do women think they have won when they have manifestly had their fat asses handed to them?

Oh, right, inability to actually follow an argument, leading them to substitute their feelings for reason.

Anonymous 5343 Kinds of Deplorable April 18, 2017 6:31 PM  

Second, did someone here demonstrate that there is a movement in America to cull all but the white christians.

Gosh, Theresa, you've completely stumped us now. I guess we'll all crawl back into our patriarchal caves and admit we have no clue what's going on in the world. Thanks for showing up to straighten us out.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash April 18, 2017 6:42 PM  

We don't cover old ground just because an idiot shows up and asks us to. We've been over that ground repeatedly for years. It's all in the archive. Google is your friend. Well, no they're not, but they do help find stuff you're interested in.
But when you demand an answer, we just have to give you what you demand. You're different because, well, why?

TOGTFO

Anonymous Ominous Cowherd April 18, 2017 6:49 PM  

Frog wrote:What will happen to non-posterity whites, those who are decendents of European immigrants (like Donald Trump)?

I'm going to guess that those who aren't calling attention to themselves aren't going to be noticed one way or another.

Anonymous 5343 Kinds of Deplorable April 18, 2017 6:57 PM  

That wasn't an answer to my question.

Ah, but we have no obligation to answer your questions. We don't care whether you live or die. If you want actual answers, go read the archives like a good acolyte. Otherwise, kindly piss off. You are accomplishing nothing.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash April 18, 2017 7:10 PM  

There's no point.
1) it's been established. and
2) you'd just dismiss it out of hand anyway.

But, okay, sit down sweetheart and I'll explain it to you.
You see, this big ol' movement [people have touting diversity? I'm sure you've seen the signs that say "Diversity Is Our Strength"?

That's all lies. It is demonstrated, not only by historical example, but by solid behavioral research, that Diversity actually breeds friction and societal dysfunction. When people have differing standards of right and wrong, manners, aggression, submission, time preference and in-group and out-group trust, it becomes difficult to impossible to work together in any mutually satisfying way, to work out differences, or to even live near one another.

That is why, as we say on the Right, "Diversity + Proximity = War". Throughout human history, when two populations of differing nationalities live side-by-side, either one submits and is enslaved or subsumed and more often than not destroyed, or they partition and live separately.
Even America.

So it doesn't matter what policy proposals are before legislatures. Certainly there is none now. There may not be any until after the next Civil War. When the crisis hits, whether it be a financial crisis, a terrorist attack, a NK nuke, an antifa riot gone bad enough, a BLM riot that gets out of control of the Soros-backed handlers, whatever it is, this country will fracture like a glass plate left on a hot burner. That's when the killing starts, and policy-makers will have nothing to do with it.

Blogger VD April 18, 2017 7:21 PM  

Why do men still get so fragile and uppity when they are bested by a woman?

That's enough, Theresa. Your comments are no longer desired. Go away now.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash April 18, 2017 7:30 PM  

damn, my comments are gonna get nuked again.

Blogger SirHamster April 18, 2017 7:32 PM  

Snidely Whiplash wrote:damn, my comments are gonna get nuked again.

You could always not touch the poop. :P

Blogger Snidely Whiplash April 18, 2017 7:51 PM  

SirHamster wrote:You could always not touch the poop.
That's a purely theoretical construct, and I know it.

Blogger Cail Corishev April 18, 2017 8:16 PM  

Someone was asking how to recognize the poop, so here's a good learning example. Go back and look at Theresa's comments on this post (assuming Vox doesn't trash the whole mess). "She" started out her very first one by calling Vox "stupid." How freaking hard is that to spot? Does that sound like someone who wants to have a substantive conversation? Then she proceeded to push the goalposts around all day, and took a thread about civic nationalism and made it all about her and her evasive ramblings about whatever.

Cripes, this isn't that hard. We know there are several obsessed trolls who post under changing names here. When you see a name you don't recognize, maybe just don't reply to it right away. If you wait to see if it hangs around a few days and doesn't get spammed, you'll avoid nearly all the steaming piles.

Anonymous Mathias April 18, 2017 8:56 PM  

@243,

Forgive me I didn't see her first posts, so I didn't really have the idea that she was being disingenuous to start. Furthermore, I believe the spotting is made more difficult by the forum's popularity and post velocity.

Anonymous SmedleyFan April 18, 2017 9:20 PM  

@234 Haven't laughed that much in a while. Thank you.

You're nuts=I can't keep up, because my understanding and acceptance why things are the way they are is shallow and superficial. My guess is she/he is an accountant.

Blogger Hunsdon April 18, 2017 10:08 PM  

I like the way she kept using that word, "terroir." I noticed it right away, and it kept getting funnier and funnier. Wiki . . . uh, I mean, Infogalactic says it "is the set of all environmental factors that affect a crop's epigenetic qualities, when the crop is grown in a specific habitat. Collectively, these environmental characteristics are said to have a character; terroir refers also to this character."

Our stock, our soil, our traditions, our folkways: all of these things go into making us who we are. You bring in different varietals, you get . . . different wine.

"Some grape varieties thrive better in certain areas than in others."

The train is fine. The wine? It'll be fine too.

Blogger Were-Puppy April 18, 2017 10:38 PM  



That Ain't My America - Skynyrd
https://youtu.be/-KVmRtEO18k

Blogger Were-Puppy April 18, 2017 10:43 PM  

What would have been epic is if John Rocker had entered that scene :P

Blogger Were-Puppy April 18, 2017 10:55 PM  

@43 American Spartan
Honest question Vox, can we take away citizenship from people born in America?
---

I recall recently hearing that the invader who was behind the "womens" march had her very fake american citizenship stripped and sent back to some rag rathole.

Anonymous Mathias April 18, 2017 11:05 PM  

@43,

Depends on what "born in America" means, if its just some anchor baby, the people who would complain about it are deportation candidates themselves. If you mean could we strip citizenship from people with a longstanding history here, probably not, those sorts of people are likely to be better defended (friends and family in high places, enough cash to put up some resistance court-wise, a long list of possible sympathetic fellow citizens to protest on their behalf..).

In fact, there is a very sound legal argument that the whole concept of citizenship by soil is illegitimate to begin with, and any citizenship's that are a result of a illegitimate process are themselves illegitimate, and therefore never were in the beginning. They were aliens the entire time, regardless of the colors of law being flown.

Sort of like how when a law is declared unconstitutional, that applies retroactively to all it's supposed effects and anything that uses it as a basis is invalidated as a result.

The term "fake citizen" is not figurative. Not in the least.

Blogger Were-Puppy April 18, 2017 11:06 PM  

@75 Silly but True
Is it just me, or does anyone else hearken back to John Rocker in 1999 anytime someone shares their experiences with New York mas transit:
---

Haha yes, I recall John Rocker running through a hail of thrown D-cells and God knows what else to the pitchers mound when we played the Mets.

I also think of a Blue Oyster Cult song - Hot Rails to Hell - which is about the NYC subway.

Blogger Were-Puppy April 19, 2017 12:20 AM  

@107 a deplorable rubberducky
An Easter without Christians, a perfect America without Americans. This photo expresses such emptiness, such hollowness. That this celebrated is frankly macabre and unnatural.
---

I got that same weird vibe from it. Like an HP Lovecraft weird thing going on there. Imposters who have replaced real people, taking their place, pretending until the day when _____?

Blogger dfordoom April 19, 2017 12:35 AM  

@51. Northern Observer

Rounding up all of the brown Christians, but leaving all of the areligious non-posterity Europeans is an odd end state to strive for. While it might be easier, the country won't be any further ahead.

If you keep the liberal, feminist, LGBT and atheist whites you'll still have a country that is a sewer. The problem is liberalism. That's the cancer destroying our civilisation.

White liberals are the enemy. That's why white nationalism is unworkable.

What is needed is segregation, on political and/or religious grounds. Christians and atheists need to live in separate countries.

Blogger dfordoom April 19, 2017 1:08 AM  

@139. Theresa Carson

After all these terrible people have entered our country we remain a bastion of capitalism.

That's exactly the problem. Everything that is destroying western cultures, from open borders to feminism, is being pushed by global capitalists. The United States has become a pus-filled source of degeneracy because it is a bastion of capitalism.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash April 19, 2017 1:26 AM  

I got that same weird vibe from it. Like an HP Lovecraft weird thing going on there. Imposters who have replaced real people, taking their place, pretending until the day when _____?

Back in the '70s BBC had the original The Avengers starring Diana Rigg as Emma Peele (the original kick-ass grrrrl) and Patrick MacNee as John Steed.
I saw the first episode recently. The vaguely Russians were patiently replacing the English with agents who took over their lives, one village at a time, enslaving the originals to work in their underground nut mines or something (I'm not too clear on that part). The goal to eventually replace the entire population.

Somebody at Cambridge saw that and thought "No need to be stealthy about it."

Blogger Shimshon April 19, 2017 2:16 AM  

@243 "How freaking hard is that to spot?"

Cail, I don't get it either. I learned this a while back. A first comment to the post by an unknown mere minutes after a post, challenging, usually hostile ("stupid"). Rapid clip and lengthy content-free responses, goalpost-moving. These are all easily identified patterns. It seems like the same suspects fall for it too.

I can see the point of a more...private...super-secret, even...venue for people discuss the issues amongst themselves, like the pre-troll days. Whether or not such even exists. Like one of those Fake News reports about Trump. But I'm just speculating here.

This thread would be a lot easier to follow if there was no poop touching going on. Once I detected that Theresa was a troll, I decided to ignore "her" and "her" "interlocutors" (such as they fancied themselves), and I caught up pretty quickly.

Blogger Shimshon April 19, 2017 2:17 AM  

I almost forgot...Hello, fellow white people.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey April 19, 2017 9:42 AM  

@Theresa Carlson

Nice parody of the typical unthinking leftist, mindlessly parroting the narrative. Kudos.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey April 19, 2017 9:48 AM  

@american Spartan

"Honest question Vox, can we take away citizenship from people born in America?"

Where are the Pieds-Noirs today?

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey April 19, 2017 10:19 AM  

@Katt Brenner

"One thing to do to neutralize the Abraham-Mohammed alliance is to immediately gainsay anyone who uses the term 'Judeo-Christian'
We need to replace it with 'Judeo-Islam'."

Exactly. "Judeo-Islamic" is a very useful term. You don't have to wait for someone to use "judeo-Christian." It makes a good "agree and amplify" in a lot of situations where someone is shilling for muh diversity. Or just drop it in passing, to plant the seed.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey April 19, 2017 10:34 AM  

@Theresa Carson

So you're not a parody of the typical virtue-signaling, unthinking leftist? You actually are one? That's kind of sad. Surely no one can be this incapable of comprehending a basic concept like "nation," can they?

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey April 19, 2017 10:37 AM  

@Theresa Carson

"And we can take appropriate action."

Define "we" in this context.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash April 19, 2017 10:57 AM  

I thought I was bad about the poop. But at least I don't wait until the day after it gets banned to reply.

Blogger Jed Mask April 19, 2017 3:29 PM  

@191

"You and Rod Drehe can live out the "Benedict opinion" and f--k off while we save the Western World, and do not think for a heartbeat that you will have ANY place in it."

... I don't know the man "Rod Drehe". Is he a Christian? I'd have to look him up.

That said, Christians don't "curse". No need for that "profanity" across the computer screen Mr. "American Spartan".

I get you want me to "leave you alone now"... Sorry I "hurt" your feelings. Was not my intentions. Amen.

~ Bro. Jed

«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 264 of 264

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts