ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2017 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Sunday, July 02, 2017

Transfer is not a dirty word

Richard Spencer justifies the ethnic cleansing of America in a truly shocking article:
Transfer is not a dirty word

Raise your hand if you were shocked at the breakdown of the so-called Civil Rights Movement. If you are raising your hand, give yourself a nice, hard slap across the chops. Maybe that will wake you up from your reverie of self-delusion.

The Civil Rights Movement was doomed from the start. The Black enmity for Whites and the United States of America allows for neither justice nor peace.

Here is the bottom line: If you believe that a white ethnostate has a right to exist, then you must allow America to transfer the Blacks and the Hispanics from the 50 States proper. It's an ugly solution, but it is the only solution. And it is far less ugly than the prospect of bloody conflict ad infinitum. When two populations are constantly enmeshed in conflict, it is insane to suggest that somehow deep-seated ideological change will miraculously occur, allowing the two sides to live together.

Unfortunately, this insanity is generally accepted as "the only way forward." President Trump accepts it because it is politically palatable. The Blacks and Hispanics accept it because for them, it is a Trojan horse. The whites accept it because they are afraid that if they expel the Blacks and Hispanics, they will be called racists.

For anyone who is white, being called a racist is unspeakably terrible. That is the secret weapon of the Blacks. Any time the whites get wise and threaten to address the problem, the Blacks pull out their big stick, equating white self-interest with racism. Their cartoons draw nooses and white hoods and cry Holocaust. Their newspapers call the God-Emperor another Adolf Hitler. Their spokespeople cry "Genocide!" And whites cower in fear that they could be equated with their racist grandparents.

White Americans don't realize that expelling a hostile population is a commonly used and generally effective way of preventing violent entanglements. There are no gas chambers here. It's not genocide; it's transfer. It's not Hitler; it's Churchill.

After World War II, Poland was recreated by the Allied Powers. In doing so, the Allies sliced off a chunk of Germany and extended Poland west to the Oder-Neisse line. Anywhere from 3.5 million to 9 million Germans were forcibly expelled from the new Polish territory and relocated in Germany.

British Prime Minister Winston Churchill was pleased with the result. In 1944, he had explained to the House of Commons that "expulsion is the method which, so far as we have been able to see, will be the most satisfactory and lasting. There will be no mixture of populations to cause endless trouble ... a clean sweep will be made. I am not alarmed by the prospect of the disentanglement of populations, nor even by these large transferences, which are more possible in modern conditions than they ever were before." Churchill was right. The Germans accepted the new border, and decades of conflict between Poles and Germans ended.

Ethnic conflict in America is exponentially more volatile than German-Polish conflict ever was. And the solution is far easier. If there was "room in Germany for the German populations of East Prussia and of the other territories," as Churchill stated, there is certainly room in the spacious Black states of Africa for 37 million African-Americans and the roomy Spanish-speaking countries states of Central and South America for 60 million Hispanics. If Germans, who had a centuries-old connection to the newly created Polish territory, could be expelled, then surely Blacks and Hispanics, whose claim to be Americans is dubious at best, can be expelled.

It's time to stop being squeamish. White Americans are not Nazis. Transfer is not genocide. And anything else isn't a solution.
Oh, sorry, my mistake. It appears I was a little confused. That wasn't Richard Spencer writing about America, advocating the expulsion of Blacks and Hispanics. That was (((Ben Shapiro))) writing about Israel, advocating the expulsion of Palestinians and Israeli-Arabs.

I can't help but wonder: is the Littlest Chickenhawk is also willing to publicly defend the necessity and morality of transferring US Jews to Israel?

Labels: ,

179 Comments:

Blogger great_o'rety July 02, 2017 5:20 AM  

"If Germans, who had a centuries-old connection to the newly created Polish territory, could be expelled (...)"

Poles had also a centuries-old connection to this newly created Polish territory. As Czechs and Swedes did. And were it really "Germans" or rather Austrians, Prussians, Saxons and Branderburgians?

Blogger Gifford Pinchot July 02, 2017 5:22 AM  

Vox, let's be reasonable here. these are two completely separate scenarios.

One involves the unconstitutional* exploitation of people historically oppressed minority groups to help stop the inevitable collapse of white privilege. And as is known to everyone with a college education, the USA was set up as a liberal state for ALL RACES and ALL RELIGIONS. Ethnic conflict isn't an issue in the U.S

The other involves the peaceful transfer of people to avoid ethnic conflict for GOD'S CHOSEN PEOPLE.

*"Give me your tired, your poor,Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free" No exceptions!

Anonymous llsepher July 02, 2017 5:26 AM  

I don't suppose Ben Shapiro be reached for comment? lol

Blogger Noah B The Savage Gardener July 02, 2017 5:29 AM  

It's not fair using his own words against him like that.

Blogger SteelPalm July 02, 2017 5:30 AM  

Has Ben Shapiro commented on white nationalism? I stopped paying attention to him in March 2016 when he decried the forceful dismemberment and rape of some attention-seeking, lying female reporter by Trump's then campaign manager.

That aside, yes, this is a strong argument for omninationalism.

Anonymous Rocklea July 02, 2017 5:31 AM  

But Israel was founded by refugees, on liberal secular values, from its inception. Their diversity is a strength. Ben Shapiro is a RAAAAAA....

I like Richard Spencer's idea though, stand up guy.

Blogger Lucas July 02, 2017 5:32 AM  

The levels of "da goyim knowing" are getting genocidal

Blogger Noah B The Savage Gardener July 02, 2017 5:34 AM  

Yeah mad props to Richard Spencer. He finally wrote something that is coherent and well-argued.

Anonymous Sebastian X1/9 July 02, 2017 5:40 AM  

Wonderfully done! very funny. this sort of thing is effective.

Blogger Lucas July 02, 2017 5:41 AM  

"I can't help but wonder: is the Littlest Chickenhawk is also willing to publicly defend the necessity and morality of transferring US Jews to Israel?

He will say that jews are not a threat to Americans, and so, that doesnt aply. Besides , the USA is a nation of imigrants build upon judeo-Christian values. No race has more right for America than any other, the Immigration Act of 1791 notwithstanding.

Anonymous 5343 Kinds of Deplorable July 02, 2017 5:42 AM  

Freakin' rhetorical genius. I'm still holding my sides. Nice swerve.

Blogger Hazim July 02, 2017 5:44 AM  

I like what you did there Vox.

Anonymous dystonia July 02, 2017 5:45 AM  

It's funny how this solution to such an issue keeps occurring to certain people. This is (((Matt Yglesias))) writing 15 years ago -- http://yglesias.blogspot.com/2002_03_31_archive.html#11339052

Blogger Desillusionerad July 02, 2017 5:52 AM  

It's like they learned a different lesson from Hitler than te west did

Anonymous Darth Dharmakīrti July 02, 2017 5:58 AM  

When I first came here I made fun of the attitude toward "(((DA JOOOS)))," this despite always having considered Israel an illegitimate entity. Thanks to VD's ironclad logic, my position has reversed: an ethnostate for the Jews, fine, whatever, and they can all go there.

Slightly OT but related: what I truly do not understand is how (((these people))) and their useful idiots think all this is going to end. I mean, MPAI, sure, but who exactly believes that 600 million or so Europeans are just going to accept 200 million illiterate Africans living on welfare, defecating in the streets, raping their women? It's been almost 75 years since the end of the second phase of the Anglo-German War. Do (((they))) seriously think they can keep cashing that check forever?

Blogger Shimshon July 02, 2017 6:09 AM  

Ben, you have to go back. Our people call it Aliyah. Then again, his wife is even more Fake American than he is.

Anonymous Eduardo July 02, 2017 6:10 AM  

Wow.... Just wow... Will you and Ben ever become best buddies?!? I mean, it might still be time to be his Indian Friend!

But it was a fantastic post, for all sorts of reasons, including the cruelty.

Anonymous JAG July 02, 2017 6:17 AM  

When the time finally comes, and the USA starts the process of rounding up, and transferring the Blacks to Liberia, most Blacks will beg to stay after the usual screams of racism fail. They will promise to behave, and stop being leeches. Hopefully, the people of that future epoch will not fall for it. They have to go back. They must go back.

Anonymous Luke July 02, 2017 6:31 AM  

2. Gifford Pinchot July 02, 2017 5:22 AM
"Vox, let's be reasonable here. these are two completely separate scenarios.

One involves the unconstitutional* exploitation of people historically oppressed minority groups to help stop the inevitable collapse of white privilege. And as is known to everyone with a college education, the USA was set up as a liberal state for ALL RACES and ALL RELIGIONS. Ethnic conflict isn't an issue in the U.S

The other involves the peaceful transfer of people to avoid ethnic conflict for GOD'S CHOSEN PEOPLE.

*"Give me your tired, your poor,Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free" No exceptions!"


1) If your background on the U.S. Constitution had gotten as far as reading the Preamble, you'd know that the U.S. was set up by the founders for whites to be the only citizens. (They also only saw white MEN as rightful voters.)

2) The excerpt from the quote associated with the Statue of Liberty in NYC harbor not only is not in the Constitution (nor in the Declaration), or other wise U.S. law, it's not even on the statue. It's on a wall in the nearby museum, I understand.

Sigh. Another 105 IQer grossly out of his league among the Ilk.

Blogger Gifford Pinchot July 02, 2017 6:37 AM  

@Luke

Severe autism detected.

Anonymous 5343 Kinds of Deplorable July 02, 2017 6:38 AM  

Another 105 IQer grossly out of his league among the Ilk.

Or a troll, or one of the VFM being totally sarcastic. I must confess sometimes I can't tell from a single comment.

Blogger Gifford Pinchot July 02, 2017 6:42 AM  

for clarification, it was (obvious) joke alluding to the "zeroth amendment".

Another these 33 EQer grossly out of his league among the Ilk.

Blogger F.D. Stephens July 02, 2017 6:49 AM  

Who will be the first Black, Hispanic, Self-Loathing White or Fake News Outlet (but I repeat myself) to lay into Richard Spencer? My hope is it will be an (((immigrant))), but it's much more likely to be a low IQ BLM apparatchik or Latinx activist.

Anonymous Eduardo July 02, 2017 6:56 AM  

Dude, do you really think anything ridiculous in today's world can be ridiculous enough to be a self evident joke?!?

No one knows Bruh! No one...

Blogger YIH July 02, 2017 7:08 AM  

Shimshon wrote:Ben, you have to go back. Our people call it Aliyah. Then again, his wife is even more Fake American than he is.
I'm not sure if you know how little Benny got dubbed the littlest chickenhawk. Vox dubbed him such due to the fact he was so enthusiastic for US action in Iraq. I can't find that particular WND column but IIRC Vox said of the then 18-year old Shapiro: ''If he's so gung-ho about Iraq then why doesn't he go down to his local recruiter's office and sign on the dotted line?''. Of course, little Benny didn't do that - and wasn't about to.
IIRC, he would be required to serve a year in the IDF if he made Aliyah. My guess is he doesn't want to do that either.

Blogger ZhukovG July 02, 2017 7:13 AM  

Unfortunately for the United States, barring divine intervention, we have passed from being 'a City on a Hill', to soon being 'a Warning to Others'.

Let us pray that the successor state(s) to the USA will be wiser; they'll have no choice but be humbler.

Blogger Cail Corishev July 02, 2017 7:13 AM  

I stopped paying attention to him in March 2016

Same here, but unfortunately, many of my conservative/Trump-supporting friends didn't, and continue to share his articles. He talks a good game about Muslims (((naturally))) and bashes certain types on the left with gusto, so I guess they've forgiven or forgotten the preachy NeverTrumping, and they're either blind to the Israel-first-ism and other neoconnery or agree with it.

Blogger Samuel Nock July 02, 2017 7:18 AM  

This was a pwning so absolute, so total, that Shapiro -- if he were a man of honor -- would never again put fingertips to keyboard to discuss any political matter relating to the United States.

Blogger Samuel Nock July 02, 2017 7:21 AM  

There is no other characteristic so representative of, so consistent or ever-present in the Neocon than lack of self-knowledge, lack of introspection, lack of awareness of how others perceive him compared to how he sees himself.

Shamelessless, or chutzpah, plus lack of introspection.

Anonymous Achates July 02, 2017 7:23 AM  

You had me going for a moment. Though in retrospect, that does not look like Spencer's writing style. I would love to see little Ben try to squirm his way out of this; he would probably claim that America is somehow unique because "muh constitution" and can overcome all ethnic, racial, and religious difference because reasons.

OpenID simplytimothy July 02, 2017 7:25 AM  

We are.

OpenID simplytimothy July 02, 2017 7:31 AM  

The Olive Branch Club Of Wrath.


well done, kemosabe.

Blogger Johnny July 02, 2017 7:32 AM  

Gifford Pinchot wrote:*"Give me your tired, your poor,Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free" No exceptions!

The visual message of the Statue of Liberty does not match that little propagandistic message at all. Said to be female, the body parts of the statue are more masculine then feminine. And that flaming club held up over the head is more easily seen as a threat than a guiding light. If the night were dark, the ally narrow, and that thing were coming at you; the thought would not be, "Give me your huddled masses," it would be, "I'm getting out of here and fast!"

Blogger rumpole5 July 02, 2017 7:32 AM  

If the USA was set up to take all kinds, why then did the constitution itself forbid further importation of Africans after a period of years, and why did the very first congress immediately pass a law limiting immigration to white Christians only?

Anonymous Bobby Farr July 02, 2017 7:33 AM  

Benji's ignorance of American history and culture is such that it would never occur to him or his ilk that these arguments might apply to him or the USA. After all, he is a "white" person and the USA is a nation of immigrants so what possible basis would there be for deporting him, who is as much a native as a Mayflower descendant.

Anonymous DirkH July 02, 2017 7:44 AM  

@10. Lucas July 02, 2017 5:41 AM
" He will say that jews are not a threat to Americans, and so, that doesnt aply. Besides , the USA is a nation of imigrants build upon judeo-Christian values."

Nah, he will say that, as the 400,000 Blacks imported from Africa were the property of mostly Jewish slaveholders, sending them back would be illegal expropriation of their jewish owners. Also, it would wreck the profits of the current (((slumlords))), and World Jewry would see this as the Casus Belli and declare Holy War.

Anonymous Godfrey July 02, 2017 7:57 AM  

Obviously Ben's a racist Nazi.

Tear down Israel's wall!

Blogger Mr.MantraMan July 02, 2017 7:58 AM  

Bah humbug, as a social justus warrior of near pure virtue I'm all for expelling those deplorable whites to a concentration camp and we will call it America and there they can stew in their isms, ists and phobias.

Anonymous Basket of Deplorables July 02, 2017 7:59 AM  

To be to fair to (((Ben))) and Vox's twist, the logic of both arguments is valid and holds. Transfer is not a dirty word, advocates of mono-ethnic states are not automatically Nazis, and separation is likely the only viable path to sustainable peace. This is the way all of the homogeneous nations have emerged.

Anonymous Rocklea July 02, 2017 8:02 AM  

Identity is always at the forefront; or perhaps it's better to say the deep subconscious; on display for all see and hear, for those who have eyes that see and ears that listen, this is obvious. The sojourners natural defense, when pressed, is to say "we" are different here, problems over there are not the same as (insert country here). The hyphenated (insert country here)s, are, sojourners, much better than immigrant that word, sojourner.

Anonymous Mr. Rational July 02, 2017 8:09 AM  

@18  It's really not that hard to deal with that problem if we require long-term contraception for bad behavior and end AA/diversity/disparate impact.  The latter eliminates the fake Black middle class outright and allows public schools to be cleaned up, slashing the burden on White society.  When Blacks are rewarded for their actual capabilities and deeds, most of the problem will at least be kept at bay.  The former would cut off most of the flow of welfare babies and keep the thugs from breeding more of their own.  If the Black birthrate fell to 0.5 babies/woman skewed toward the high achievers, a remnant of 20 million falls to 5 million in one generation and improves immensely in quality.  If you set the bar high enough you wouldn't even have that many.

We can get started right away with private prisons in Liberia, removing our thug class.

We Whites need to apply this to our own as well.  There is essentially nothing useful for people with sub-85 IQs to do already, and cutting off the bottom 15% of the IQ/criminality curve every generation will be immensely eugenic.

Blogger Jew613 July 02, 2017 8:24 AM  

Transfer is like removing a cancer from your body. Yes, the surgery is painful but the alternative is far worse. Some version of it is probably the only solution in Israel & the Western countries.

Blogger Jakeithus July 02, 2017 8:35 AM  

My grandmother was one of those Germans living in Poland, having to flee in advance of the Red Army after WW2. To hear her say it, they were Germans and always lived in Germany, despite what government may have said about any borders or who they owed allegiance to.

I find it interesting what that says about civic nationalism, and it's the first time I've really thought about that.

Anonymous Teapartydoc July 02, 2017 8:41 AM  

Went to TownCuck. Comments closed.

OpenID simplytimothy July 02, 2017 8:44 AM  

Shapiro knows Shapiro will go.

Blogger Robert Coble July 02, 2017 8:49 AM  

Jeremiah 29 (KJV)

17 Thus saith the Lord of hosts; Behold, I will send upon them the sword, the famine, and the pestilence, and will make them like vile figs, that cannot be eaten, they are so evil.

18 And I will persecute them with the sword, with the famine, and with the pestilence, and will deliver them to be removed to all the kingdoms of the earth, to be a curse, and an astonishment, and an hissing, and a reproach, among all the nations whither I have driven them:

19 Because they have not hearkened to my words, saith the Lord, which I sent unto them by my servants the prophets, rising up early and sending them; but ye would not hear, saith the Lord.


Lord, we would rather not have those ((('vile figs'))) among us any longer. We've had enough of the ((('curse'))) among us.

You have to transfer back, Ben. It's past time for you to make aliyah. Help drive out the Canaanites, Hittites, Amorites, Perizzites, Hivites, and Jebusites from the land flowing with milk and honey.

Go in peace, oh ye cousin of Judeo-Christ, GO HOME with Her blessing!

MEIGA - Make Eretz Israel Great Again!

Blogger James Dixon July 02, 2017 8:50 AM  

> One involves the unconstitutional* exploitation...

Oh, I'm absolutely certain the judges can find some excuse in the living document to justify it. Maybe they'll discover a new right to privacy that can't be practiced in their current location, or simply consider it a tax on the people being moved. As long as Christian whites are made to pay for it, the justifications can be endless.

> Wow.... Just wow... Will you and Ben ever become best buddies?!? I mean, it might still be time to be his Indian Friend!

Irving (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CD8EtvWW8nw) didn't have an Indian side kick.

> Unfortunately for the United States, barring divine intervention...

Do you really think Trump would have won without divine intervention? Yes Hillary was a terrible candidate, but their plans should have worked.

> To be to fair to (((Ben))) and Vox's twist, the logic of both arguments is valid and holds.

Of course it does. I'd have no problem with Israel rounding up every Palestinian, dropping them at the Egyptian border, and telling them cross or be shot.

> ...much better than immigrant that word, sojourner.

From dictionary.com: sojourn ... a temporary stay

Blogger James Dixon July 02, 2017 8:52 AM  

> Went to TownCuck. Comments closed.

The article is from 2003. That's not surprising.

Anonymous Avalanche July 02, 2017 8:53 AM  

Well, you certainly raised my eyebrows in horror in the beginning -- cause there is no chance Richard Spencer is that stupid!!

But of course (((Shapiro))) completely left out the starvation, beatings, rapes, and deaths of upwards of a half million (JUST from the Polish "transfers"; not including Hungary, et al.) don't make a dent in (((his))) suggestion: because all those deaths of "forcibly expelled" Germans suit (((him))) just fine!


And gee! From the (((article))):
"Any time the Jews get wise and threaten mass expulsion of Arabs, the Arabs pull out their big stick, equating Nazism with Zionism. Their cartoons merge swastikas with stars of David. Their newspapers call Ariel Sharon another Adolf Hitler. Their spokespeople cry "Genocide!" "

So, JUST like the jews do to White Western nationalists and our God Emperor... Huh. Equal (((opportunity))) weapon, eh?

(((Shapiro))) writes:
"The Germans accepted the new border, and decades of conflict between Poles and Germans ended."

Like the Germans had ANY option to reject it?! (And funny too, how the option to forcibly "transfer" the JEWS -- let's say, to poor Madagascar? -- isn't an option! And hey! we could call Madagascar "a land without people for a people without ... er ... forcibly transferred from ... a land." That (((lie))) worked once, why not twice?)

I'm all for transference of foreigners out of OUR country -- and (((bennie and his 'jets'))) must go too! But it's beyond underhanded for him to pretend this has ANYthing to do with "avoiding a violent war."

Arm up, ammo up! It's a'comin'!

Anonymous Avalanche July 02, 2017 9:07 AM  

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rm-douglas/expulsion-germans-forced-migration_b_1625437.html

From which:
"...
By mid-1945, not merely the largest forced migration but probably the largest single movement of population in human history was under way, an operation that continued for the next five years. Between 12 and 14 million civilians, the overwhelming majority of them women, children, and the elderly, were driven out of their homes...

From the beginning, this mass displacement was accomplished largely by state-sponsored violence and terror. In Poland and Czechoslovakia, hundreds of thousands of detainees were herded into camps -- often, like Auschwitz I or Theresienstadt, former Nazi concentration camps kept in operation for years after the war and put to a new purpose.

The regime for prisoners in many of these facilities was brutal, as Red Cross officials recorded, with beatings, rapes of female inmates, gruelling forced labour and starvation diets of 500-800 calories the order of the day. In violation of rarely-applied rules exempting the young from detention, children routinely were incarcerated, either alongside their parents or in designated children's camps. As the British Embassy in Belgrade reported in 1946, conditions for Germans "seem well down to Dachau standards."

Though the death rates in the camps were often frighteningly high -- 2,227 inmates of the Mysłowice facility in southern Poland alone perished in the last ten months of 1945 -- most of the mortality associated with the expulsions occurred outside them.

Forced marches in which inhabitants of entire villages were cleared at fifteen minutes' notice and driven at rifle-point to the nearest border, accounted for many losses. So did train transports that sometimes took weeks to reach their destination, with up to 80 expellees crammed into each cattle car without adequate (or, occasionally, any) food, water or heating.

The deaths continued on arrival in Germany itself. Declared ineligible by the Allied authorities to receive any form of international relief and lacking accommodation in a country devastated by bombing, expellees in many cases spent their first months or years living rough in fields, goods wagons or railway platforms.

Malnutrition, hypothermia and disease took their toll, especially among the very old and very young. Although more research is needed to establish the total number of deaths, conservative estimates suggest that some 500,000 people lost their lives as a result of the operation."




"The history of the postwar expulsions, though, shows that there is no such thing as an "orderly and humane" transfer of populations: violence, cruelty and injustice are intrinsic to the process."

"... as the historian B.B. Sullivan has observed in another context, "greater evil does not absolve lesser evil." The postwar expulsions were by any measure one of the most significant occurrences of the mass violation of human rights in recent history."

OOPS, little (((Benji))) guess you left all this out!

Anonymous Godfrey July 02, 2017 9:20 AM  

Ben has somewhere to escape to. Do you?

Is there a white nation you can escape to as the hate for whites is ratcheted up around the world?



Israel has a wall.

Anonymous scottsretired July 02, 2017 9:47 AM  

I don't think "deportation" is feasible at this point, more like a partition of the US--which has already occurred for the most part, the problem is, whites are not free to keep blacks out of white areas/towns/cities.

Imagine if free association was ACTUALLY permitted, and someone could start a chain of restaurants, movie theaters, airlines, where it was explicitly white (or even just non-black). It would SKYROCKET and we would find out who REALLY does/doesn't like blacks (no one does). People would pay premiums-as they do with long commutes and higher housing costs already--if they thought they could go on a vacation in which the entire flying, hotel, beach and dining experience were free from a SINGLE black face, or mouth/voice. It would be (almost) sad to see how quickly blacks would find out what people really think of them.

And of course, as with the whole "we moved because of 'better schools'" stuff liberals say to mask their inherent belief that blacks are inferior/feral, it would be interesting to see all the white liberals explaining how they took ALL WHITE AIRLINES to ALL WHITE BEACH "because it just worked out with our summer schedule better."

Blogger Alec Rawls July 02, 2017 9:50 AM  

Jews and Christians are not populations that are in any kind of troublesome conflict with each other, either in America or anywhere else in the world.

Anonymous Uncle Maffoo July 02, 2017 9:54 AM  

there is certainly room in the spacious Black states of Africa for 37 million African-Americans

Parody aside, this is actually a great idea. They can even carry over some of the technology that YT stole when they wuz kangs.

Blogger Aeoli Pera July 02, 2017 10:06 AM  

BTFO

Anonymous Reagan weeps July 02, 2017 10:11 AM  

Yo racist dipshits... Jews are not a threat to Christians. Jews and Christians worship the same God and are basically the same religion. So why are you alt-righters always attacking the JOOOOOS? Are you so mad at conservatives you are choosing to go full racist leftist?

Blogger VD July 02, 2017 10:11 AM  

Jews and Christians are not populations that are in any kind of troublesome conflict with each other, either in America or anywhere else in the world.

That is quite possibly the dumbest statement that anyone has ever made here in the 14-year history of this blog. Jews have been expelled over 100 times from Christian nations. And Jews are primarily responsible for the demographic destruction of the United States, which is why the elite Jewish organizations have been discussing the need to leave the USA since 2006.

Blogger VD July 02, 2017 10:14 AM  

Jews and Christians worship the same God and are basically the same religion.

No, they do not. Jews do not worship Jesus Christ. Christians do. Your statement is antisemitic.

I don't think "deportation" is feasible at this point, more like a partition of the US--which has already occurred for the most part, the problem is, whites are not free to keep blacks out of white areas/towns/cities.

Agreed. Which, of course, is why I have been saying that the USA will break apart. There is no will to restore the pre-1965 demographic balance required to preserve the Union, so it will collapse and there will be an amount of ethnic cleansing in the various successor states.

Non-violent, one hopes, but probably in vain.

Anonymous LES July 02, 2017 10:20 AM  

@56
Jews have always considered Christianity as Jewish heresy and blasphemy. The Jews have sought to eliminate it beginning with the crucifixion of Jesus.

Blogger Cail Corishev July 02, 2017 10:22 AM  

Jews and Christians are not populations that are in any kind of troublesome conflict with each other,

Because Jews have things they way they want them, and Churchians are only too happy to defer to them. Also, that depends on what you call "troublesome."

Let Christians rediscover their history and their faith and roll back to the "don't molest them but don't mix or deal with them" attitude preached throughout the centuries of Christendom, and see how quickly that changes.

Blogger Matt July 02, 2017 10:23 AM  

Its too bad he's a Jeewy cuck, because I very much like his dismantling of abortion advocates and "muh slavery" arguments.

Anonymous BBGKB July 02, 2017 10:26 AM  

The whites accept it because they are afraid that if they expel the Blacks and Hispanics, they will be called racists.

People have to understand that no matter what you do you will be called racist anyway, the best part of BLM was seeing a white haired jew professor wearing a BLM shirt with his own blood on it.

It's not fair using his own words against him like that

Especially without an archived link, Benji could alter the past

, he would be required to serve a year in the IDF if he made Aliyah. My guess is he doesn't want to do that either

Are not ""religious"" jews like Benji granted exceptions or does he need to grow a beard first??

Anonymous Pitcrew July 02, 2017 10:32 AM  

Classic r patterns from the r/K paradigm. Having lost friends in Iraq, the "widdlest chickenhawk" would be an apt description, if 18yo Ben was so gungho he should have signed up. If he loves Israel as much as he claims, he would sign up there too.

This is going to be a big problem in the future. The leaders of nations should be derived from the fighting forces, not the pampered classes. I see the cuck behavior everywhere, even when I see comments like "someone ought to" or "someone should", which usually involves some melonhead having bigger, stronger men do the fighting (and dying) or policing for them. Usually the melonhead commenters then naturally talk about sex or hotties they want to bang and not the tasks at hand. Points to an r-selected psychology so pervasive in the ambitious for leadership. They want their better competition removed so they can breed their weak genes. This is how nations enter their collapse phase which is so common throughout history.

Anonymous TLM July 02, 2017 10:32 AM  

@52 Imagine if free association was ACTUALLY permitted, and someone could start a chain of restaurants, movie theaters, airlines, where it was explicitly white (or even just non-black). It would SKYROCKET and we would find out who REALLY does/doesn't like blacks (no one does). People would pay premiums-as they do with long commutes and higher housing costs already--if they thought they could go on a vacation in which the entire flying, hotel, beach and dining experience were free from a SINGLE black face, or mouth/voice. It would be (almost) sad to see how quickly blacks would find out what people really think of them......


Took the family on a trip to South Dakota back in the mid-2000's. In an 8 day span we saw 1 black person at Mt. Rushmore. It was so incredibly peaceful. No Mexicans either. Even the temporary summer workers were young early 20's white Europeans on some visa program (The girls were quite attractive).

This was before Obama. Heard he f*cked that little slice of paradise up by importing refugees, fair housing, etc.

Anonymous Rocklea July 02, 2017 10:33 AM  

Reagan can weep
" So why are you alt-righters always attacking the JOOOOOS?"

Point 10 of the 16
The Alt Right is opposed to the rule or domination of any native ethnic group by another, particularly in the sovereign homelands of the dominated peoples. The Alt Right is opposed to any non-native ethnic group obtaining excessive influence in any society through nepotism, tribalism, or any other means.

"Are you so mad at conservatives you are choosing to go full racist leftist?"

Yes we know, the leftist are the real racist, but what, what exactly, have conservatives, conserved?

Point 3 of the 16
The Alt Right is not a defensive attitude and rejects the concept of noble and principled defeat. It is a forward-thinking philosophy of offense, in every sense of that term. The Alt Right believes in victory through persistence and remaining in harmony with science, reality, cultural tradition, and the lessons of history.

And in case you don't get it yet;
Point 12 of 16
The Alt Right doesn't care what you think of it.

Anonymous Reagan Weeps July 02, 2017 10:34 AM  

Jesus was a Jew. But your unhinged rant sounded better in the original German.

My grandmother always told me that anyone who hates the Jews really hates themselves. You project and call Israel fascist? It is because you are fascist.

I would say this anti-Semitic post is a new low for your kind. But Trump's wrestling tweet this morning is even more disgusting.

You are all literally madmen who should be removed from society and institutionalized.

Blogger tz July 02, 2017 10:37 AM  

I think after the partition separates the makers from the takers, the taker states will fail like Zimbabwe and Venezuela.
Californians will probably put single payer on the ballot and it will pass. And more out/in migration will happen.
It's subtle, but the migration is already happening.
And the Blue Texas cities are already complaining about having red values and laws imposed.

One more thought - the partition will initially be white vs "multi cultural", at least until la raza purges blacks and other events within the non-white areas. Whites will be tolerated to keep things running for a while.

(South Africa's power grid is still up and maintained by whites, but there is a new law forcing racial quotas - so their grid will likely be down in a few years)

Blogger Gapeseed July 02, 2017 10:39 AM  

Logic is cruel.

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 10:46 AM  

William the Conqueror and Oliver Cromwell both invited Jews to settle in England. The history is complicated.

Blogger Cail Corishev July 02, 2017 10:48 AM  

Are you so mad at conservatives you are choosing to go full racist leftist?

Your cuckservative brethren have been running with that "the alt-Right is actually Left" theme for a while now. Doesn't work, because it's dumb. You're gonna have to cuck harder.

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 10:48 AM  

I spent a week I Israel a few years ago.I saw a lot of churches open and functioning.

Anonymous Rocklea July 02, 2017 10:48 AM  

"You are all literally madmen who should be removed from society and institutionalized."

And there, is the projection. You have to go back.

Point 15 of 16
The Alt Right does not believe in the general supremacy of any race, nation, people, or sub-species. Every race, nation, people, and human sub-species has its own unique strengths and weaknesses, and possesses the sovereign right to dwell unmolested in the native culture it prefers.

Blogger DeploraBard July 02, 2017 10:52 AM  

Hitler had feelings

Blogger ((( bob kek mando ))) - ( Communists murdered +100 Million trying to genocide the Bourgeois. suffering a Marxist to live is a Crime Against Humanity ) July 02, 2017 10:55 AM  

35. Bobby Farr July 02, 2017 7:33 AM
Benji's ignorance of American history and culture



Ben isn't ignorant of anything.

he is WELL aware that both US and Jewish Law don't say anything remotely like what he's claiming.


and it's no accident that he demands that the US implements policies that are the exact opposite of how the God of the Old Testament tells nations to comport and compose themselves.

Blogger Michael Maier July 02, 2017 10:59 AM  

VD wrote:Jews and Christians are not populations that are in any kind of troublesome conflict with each other, either in America or anywhere else in the world.

That is quite possibly the dumbest statement that anyone has ever made here in the 14-year history of this blog. Jews have been expelled over 100 times from Christian nations. And Jews are primarily responsible for the demographic destruction of the United States, which is why the elite Jewish organizations have been discussing the need to leave the USA since 2006.


I honestly do not think I'd even object to others lynching Jews in this country. Reap what you sow, pal.

Blogger ((( bob kek mando ))) - ( Communists murdered +100 Million trying to genocide the Bourgeois. suffering a Marxist to live is a Crime Against Humanity ) July 02, 2017 11:00 AM  

oh noes!

Danica figured out how to get to Victory Lane twice in the same year.

Anonymous TLM July 02, 2017 11:01 AM  

I bet $50.00 that Reagan Weeps is John Hagee.

Blogger Michael Maier July 02, 2017 11:01 AM  

Reagan Weeps wrote:Jesus was a Jew. But your unhinged rant sounded better in the original German.

My grandmother always told me that anyone who hates the Jews really hates themselves. You project and call Israel fascist? It is because you are fascist.

I would say this anti-Semitic post is a new low for your kind. But Trump's wrestling tweet this morning is even more disgusting.

You are all literally madmen who should be removed from society and institutionalized.


So you're bragging about your grandmother being a vapid twat?

Anonymous DonReynolds July 02, 2017 11:19 AM  

Fortunately or unfortunately, there is no country....not even in Afrika....that will accept American Negroes. They do not want them and they are wise to take their position.

Liberia? Yes, there is still a country called Liberia on the west coast of Afrika. It is not a small place, roughly the same land area as the state of Arizona. But no, they do not want them either. Lincoln's big idea of returning Negroes to their homeland died when he did. He said it was the only decent thing to do.

If history is any guide at all, American history is not about a border between Poland and Germany, nor is it about Churchill. In the American experience, hostile populations were the subject of shooting wars until 1925. Yes, less than a century ago. The fragments of those hostile populations were relocated onto reservations. Some of them still live there in self-governing enclaves, not subject to white man's law. Those who choose to assimilate somewhat have left the reservations and live in the larger society.

This is not Europe with frequently shifting borders and passing governments. Italy did not even exist until about the time of the US civil war and Germany did not exist as a nation until a decade later. French Republics rise and fall ever since the revolution. The USA does not have that experience.

What we do have is a provision in the US Constitution that allows NEW STATES to be created from existing states, with the consent of the state legislature. The Indian reservations were never separate states. They were areas where no law applied except as provided by treaty, which was Federal law. Otherwise, they governed themselves.

Presently, it would be impossible to make a treaty with the Negroes or the Hispanics or the Muslims because they have no authority of their own, meaning there is no possibility of their "leaders" signing a treaty that the rest would abide by, nor would it be enforced (except by the Feds).

So the best device for separating hostile populations in the American system would be to carve out and create NEW STATES from existing states, where they would be required to relocate. Statehood means that Federal law would remain in force. If you do not accept Federal law, then we are talking independence and independent nations. When we do that, the South will be first in line.

Blogger Josh (the gayest thing here) July 02, 2017 11:23 AM  

People would pay premiums-as they do with long commutes and higher housing costs already--if they thought they could go on a vacation in which the entire flying, hotel, beach and dining experience were free from a SINGLE black face, or mouth/voice.

Have you never been to Aspen?

Blogger Cail Corishev July 02, 2017 11:27 AM  

Ben isn't ignorant of anything.

Right. He's not stupid either, he's an opportunist and has other loyalties. The fact that he's on the right side of some issues doesn't change that.

But Trump's wrestling tweet this morning is even more disgusting.

So it's that effective, huh? I figured as much, but it's always nice to have cuckfirmation.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash July 02, 2017 11:37 AM  

natschuster wrote:William the Conqueror and Oliver Cromwell both invited Jews to settle in England. The history is complicated.
Well, when you have to extirpate the native ruling class, some groups are more effective than others.

Blogger wreckage July 02, 2017 11:49 AM  

@82, nah, it was about grabbing a slice of the taxes from the banking sector, nothing more, nothing less. Jews didn't cause any trouble in the UK for close to 400 years thereafter, then suddenly, right at the same time the Marxists seized control of... well, everything, suddenly there's a JQ.

Except there isn't. There's Marxists. Now, psychologically speaking you can argue that Marxism is a pathological, viral form of the worst emotional problems of the European Jew, but the historical fact is that without Marxism to make it viral and virulent, that pathology is largely harmless to people outside the clade.

It's like a bit of mental DNA that was benign in its host population, then one day became a plasmid that in turn broke out of the reservoir and started a plague.

I personally suspect it didn't happen that way, but it's a decent model.

Anonymous DonReynolds July 02, 2017 11:49 AM  

@19 Luke
"2) The excerpt from the quote associated with the Statue of Liberty in NYC harbor not only is not in the Constitution (nor in the Declaration), or other wise U.S. law, it's not even on the statue. It's on a wall in the nearby museum, I understand."

My own relatives arrived in this country more than a century before the Revolution, so we have no fond thoughts about the Statue of Liberty, but a little history would be helpful.

The Statue of Liberty was created by the French for EGYPT....for the port of Alexandria. It was not intended for the USA. But when the Egyptians decided they did not like the statue (or could not pay for it), it had to find a new home.

That was when the French made a deal with civic do-gooders in New Yawk to buy the statue. They had to find a place for the statue and build the base for the statue to stand upon. They did the usual fund raisers, which included a poetry contest, with the promise that the winning poem would be inscribed on the base of the statue. That is where the words come from. It is a poem, not a law, not a declaration of public policy....it was the winning poem in a poetry contest. That is all.

Anonymous andon July 02, 2017 11:49 AM  

It's time to stop being squeamish. Jews are not Nazis.

today's "jews" aren't even jews and they have no historical link to what they're calling "israel"

Anonymous Brick Hardslab July 02, 2017 11:50 AM  

I can see why they left the comments turned off. This was a nasty cut over here imagine if our littlest chicken hawk had to read that over there. He might have been taken by apoplexy or the vapors.

Blogger Robert What? July 02, 2017 11:52 AM  

@Jag,

"most Blacks will beg to stay after the usual screams of racism fail."

You are likely correct. But within one or two generations it would revert to the former hostility towards Whites.

Blogger ((( bob kek mando ))) - ( Communists murdered +100 Million trying to genocide the Bourgeois. suffering a Marxist to live is a Crime Against Humanity ) July 02, 2017 11:52 AM  

66. Reagan Weeps July 02, 2017 10:34 AM
You are all literally madmen who should be removed from society and institutionalized.



come and institutionalize us, you child raping useless faggot.

you were just fine with Dennis Hastert, and that's all we need to know about you.

Blogger pyrrhus July 02, 2017 11:54 AM  

Edmund Burke was writing about the destruction of traditional England by the jewish bankers in the late 18th century...David Ricardo came along about the same time.

Anonymous andon July 02, 2017 12:05 PM  

52. Anonymous scottsretired July 02, 2017 9:47 AM
I don't think "deportation" is feasible at this point, more like a partition of the US--which has already occurred for the most part, the problem is, whites are not free to keep blacks out of white areas/towns/cities.


why would you give up your country just because a bunch of parasitic invaders moved in?

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 12:06 PM  

But why weren't they afraid the Jews would turn on them afterwards?

Anonymous Avalanche July 02, 2017 12:06 PM  

@67 "And the Blue Texas cities are already complaining about having red values and laws imposed."

Semi-sorta-OT question. Is it useful rhetoric to keep using 'blue and red' (media terms originally) -- or should we start using 'commie and liberty' or 'socialist and Constitutionalist' or just 'leftie and Right'? I actually have to think each time: which color means which side? For some reason I can't get it cemented in my brain (probably BECAUSE it came from the media and I reject brainwashing?)

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 12:13 PM  

And wasn't Cromwell part of the native ruling class?

Anonymous andon July 02, 2017 12:13 PM  

56. Anonymous Reagan weeps July 02, 2017 10:11 AM
Yo racist dipshits... Jews are not a threat to Christians. Jews and Christians worship the same God and are basically the same religion. So why are you alt-righters always attacking the JOOOOOS? Are you so mad at conservatives you are choosing to go full racist leftist?


i thought this one sounded like Billy Joe Bob

Anonymous Rezny July 02, 2017 12:20 PM  

@92
Probably because Red was Soviet and Blue was NATO. So Red meant socialism, Blue meant liberty across the world for 70 years, if not longer.

But its the reverse back in US of A now. Memes colliding and such.

Blogger Flair1239 July 02, 2017 12:36 PM  

I was so excited for a moment that Richard Spencer may have actually wrote that.

Blogger Ezekiel July 02, 2017 12:40 PM  

I can see us holding to "red" in the sense of "redpill", beyond that?

There was a time when I would have said that the only people who really use "red and blue" are liberals, conservative caricatures created by liberals, and very stupid conservatives who have no problem with liberals literally putting words in their mouths. Hard to tell the second from the third...

Blogger Ezekiel July 02, 2017 12:41 PM  

Reagan weeps wrote:Yo racist dipshits... Jews are not a threat to Christians. Jews and Christians worship the same God and are basically the same religion. So why are you alt-righters always attacking the JOOOOOS? Are you so mad at conservatives you are choosing to go full racist leftist?
...case in point.

Anonymous Just another commenter July 02, 2017 12:46 PM  

That is some really weapons-grade rhetoric. Most excellent. Logos, pathos, and ethos, well-mixed. Makes the unthinkable thinkable, and the thinkable unthinkable. Draw a clar parallel between the totally absurd and teh completely reasonable. I can see people all over the political spectrum having an anurism over that. With any luck, they will, so we don't have to hear their sorry asses whining.

Well done!

Anonymous DonReynolds July 02, 2017 12:55 PM  

Avalanche wrote:@67 "And the Blue Texas cities are already complaining about having red values and laws imposed."

Semi-sorta-OT question. Is it useful rhetoric to keep using 'blue and red' (media terms originally) -- or should we start using 'commie and liberty' or 'socialist and Constitutionalist' or just 'leftie and Right'? I actually have to think each time: which color means which side? For some reason I can't get it cemented in my brain (probably BECAUSE it came from the media and I reject brainwashing?)


If Red and Blue seems confusing, it may be because the colors were reversed (even in the media) during my lifetime. But you are right....Red was always associated with the communists, in Russia, in China, and the Red Star of international communism. The Democrats apparently complained about being considered the Reds, so the media changed it.....but it did not fool anybody.

natschuster wrote:And wasn't Cromwell part of the native ruling class?

No. Oliver Cromwell was part of the petty nobility....landowning, barely middle class, farmer, a yoeman, a freeholder. He had fought wars against the British monarchy and aristocracy, which was the ruling class at the time.

natschuster wrote:William the Conqueror and Oliver Cromwell both invited Jews to settle in England. The history is complicated.

Interesting point, seldom mentioned anymore. The Jews were expelled from England by Royal Decree no less than nine times and the word "holocaust" originally described the massacre of the Jews IN ENGLAND, not Nazi Germany.

Roughly a third of the invading army of William the Normandy, were not Norman French in the least. They were mercenary Swiss and Lombardi, which is exactly how my own family became English. The original Swiss name of Regenwald was Anglicized as Reynolds and were given lands by William in the vicinity of Devon and Somerset. He needed swords around the Welsh frontier.

Anonymous Jack Amok July 02, 2017 12:55 PM  

the historical fact is that without Marxism to make it viral and virulent, that pathology is largely harmless to people outside the clade.

I had no idea Marxism was so prevalent between the 12th and 16th Centuries

Anonymous IndecisiveEvidence July 02, 2017 1:00 PM  

Watching folks like (((Shapiro))) and (((@neontaster))) square this circle is always hilarious. They twist themselves in knots.

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 1:06 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Anonymous andon July 02, 2017 1:07 PM  

The Jews were expelled from England by Royal Decree no less than nine times and the word "holocaust" originally described the massacre of the Jews IN ENGLAND, not Nazi Germany.

the eternal victim. dont step on their toe or you'll be accused of committing a holocaust

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 1:07 PM  

so petty mobility wasn't part ogbyhe ruling class?

Blogger Robert Coble July 02, 2017 1:08 PM  

@66. Reagan Weeps:

You provide a classic illustration of SJW Law 3: SJWs always project.

Since you accuse everyone here of being anti-Semitic, by your own (or your Grandma's) "logic," YOU MUST BE ANTISEMITIC! Why do you hate the Jews so much?

"You are all literally madmen who should be removed from society and institutionalized."

Et tu, Brute?

Blogger Kek's SS Guard July 02, 2017 1:11 PM  

Shapiro and his butt buddy, Gay Benson, are typical of the Neo Cucks; they have never accomplished anything in life, but know better than then rest of us dirt people. Those two would never survive the first day of boot camp (or summer camp, for that matter)

Blogger Snidely Whiplash July 02, 2017 1:21 PM  

natschuster wrote:And wasn't Cromwell part of the native ruling class?
Yes, and yet his campaign for dictatorial personal power against the royalists destroyed the native ruling class, eventually requiring the importation of nobility from the Continent. It also required the loan of tens of thousands of pounds, which was facilitated by bringing the Jews in to London. And since Cromwell was a believer in a farrago of nonsense typically associated with the Protestantism of the day, he believed that bringing in Jews would cause God to bless the country he was busy tearing apart at the seams.

Blogger kurt9 July 02, 2017 1:23 PM  

I noticed with humor that discussion has been closed on the Townhall site.

Anonymous andon July 02, 2017 1:58 PM  

105. Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 1:07 PM
so petty mobility wasn't part ogbyhe ruling class?


covfefe?

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 2:07 PM  

sorry typo should be of the.

I just read that Casimir the Great invited Jews to settle in Poland.

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 2:45 PM  

People studying in a Yeshiva can defer military service since Torah study confers protection.

Anonymous Crew July 02, 2017 2:59 PM  

It is strange that boomers seem to have been inordinately influenced by Jewish bullshit about melting pots and "we are the world" and crap like that.

Blogger John Williams July 02, 2017 3:41 PM  

@Gifford Pinchot
One involves the unconstitutional* exploitation of people historically oppressed minority groups to help stop the inevitable collapse of white privilege.
How can a system that gives its heirs an overwhelmingly unfair advantage be doomed to collapse?
And as is known to everyone with a college education, the USA was set up as a liberal state for ALL RACES and ALL RELIGIONS.
The Founding Fathers 1790 immigration law explicitly allowed Whites, the scope of the religious freedom was to freely worship Jesus Christ as Lord & Savior, and no where is government support implied as a right or lifestyle.
Give me your tired, your poor,Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free
You're confusing a poem written by an Eastern European Jew as a founding document of the US, which it is not.

Blogger Alec Rawls July 02, 2017 5:00 PM  

"Jews have been expelled over 100 times from Christian nations." That is history, not the present, and was a product of scapegoating. The only provocation on the Jewish side was success. Of course they strove to monopolize and cartelize where possible, as all economic actors try to do when they can, but that is nothing compared to the far more prevalent government charted monopolies that have held most societies back. Without the backing of government power Jewish business acumen has overwhelmingly been a boon wherever it has prospered.

"And Jews are primarily responsible for the demographic destruction of the United States."

Is VD attributing neo-Malthusian eco-religion to Jews? I'm sure there have been some Jews. Is Ehrlich Jewish? But the movement is dominated by WASPS who turned away from Christianity, and the economist who absolutely nuked neo-Malthusianism at a time when half the field still gave it some credibility was the Julian Simon, the greatest champion of population ever.

One can point to Jews who are influential on every side of every issue. That doesn't make them Jewish issues. It just shows how much of a part of America Jews are. If you want to judge the value of that contribution you cant just tally up the negative influences. You also have to tally the positive, which are a hundred times greater.

Income provides a first approximation for a person's contribution to society. It shows how much others are willing to pay for the value provided. It can of course be far off. People can steal instead of produce, and productivity doesnt always make it to market, but the first approximation captures the bulk of what is going on, and it shows Jews to on average be great contributors to society.

Blogger Cail Corishev July 02, 2017 5:08 PM  

Wow, scapegoated more than 100 times? That's some incredibly bad luck. Doesn't sound very Chosen; maybe they're the UNchosen People.

But please, tell us more about how we're just envious of their superior abilities. That always goes well for them. When they're being "scapegoated" again, maybe they'll thank you.

Blogger Matamoros July 02, 2017 5:35 PM  

@66. Reagan Weeps Jesus was a Jew.

Where did you get that unbiblical assertion?

The bible plainly says that Jesus is a Galilean, and a Nazarene, not a Jew.

Judea, or Jewry as the Douay Rheims translated it, was the home of the Jews.

Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a "Jew" or to call a contemporary Jew an "Israelite" or a "Hebrew." - Jewish Almanac, pg. 3.

Anonymous Ominous Cowherd July 02, 2017 6:03 PM  

Reagan Weeps wrote:Jesus was a Jew. B

Jesus of Nazareth was a devotee of a religion which centers around rejecting Jesus of Nazareth? Better find another lie - that lie don't fly.

``Judaism,'' as we know it today, didn't, couldn't come into existance until after God sent His Messiah as He had promised, and until after the ungodly Hebrews had rejected their Messiah.

Jesus could not have been a Jew, and wouldn't have wanted to be if it had been possible. Jesus was a faithful Hebrew.

Anonymous andon July 02, 2017 6:18 PM  

Without the backing of government power Jewish business acumen has overwhelmingly been a boon wherever it has prospered.

a boon to who?

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 6:33 PM  

if Jesus is the Messiah he is a descendant of King David who came from the tribe of Judah. And from the time of the Babylonian exile all Israelites and Hebrews were called Jews. See the Book of Esther.

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 6:35 PM  

From the time of yhe Babylonian exile all Israelites and Hebrews were called Jews. See the Book of Esther.

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 6:36 PM  

The people they hire? The business ventures they finance?

Anonymous andon July 02, 2017 6:42 PM  

nah, we see who does the work and we see who walks away with all the money. up until now jews have had the privilege of living in white countries but whites dont need jews.

its like scrooge pretending he's doing you a hell of a favor

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 7:06 PM  

But isn't capitalism a good thing?

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 7:07 PM  

You guys are beginning to sound like Marxists?

Blogger Cail Corishev July 02, 2017 7:15 PM  

You guys are beginning to sound like Marxists?

No we're not?

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 7:19 PM  

This is what I find very strange about anti-semitism. Jews are both Marxists and Uber Capitalists. Black people accuse Jews of oppressing Black people. White people blame Jews for encorageing multiculturalism and such. I'm so confused.

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 7:23 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 7:24 PM  

Oh and sometimes Judaism is a race and sometimes it's just a religion. It's all so confusing.
.

Anonymous andon July 02, 2017 7:25 PM  

(((schuster)))

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 7:33 PM  

Thank you.

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 7:50 PM  

CC:

He is faulting Jewish managers for profiting from labor. That's Marxism.

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 7:50 PM  

CC:

He is faulting Jewish managers for profiting from labor. That's Marxism.

Anonymous andon July 02, 2017 7:56 PM  

nah, i observe. we dont need you.

who are you going to parasite off next? what happens when the entire world is aware of you?

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 8:07 PM  

You mean the world isn't aware? But people on this thread said people have been aware for 2000 years. That's what those expulsions were all about. I'm so confused.

Anonymous andon July 02, 2017 8:39 PM  

yes, you do seem to be confused. you mention that quite often

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 8:43 PM  

What do you expect, you keep on contradicting yourselves.

Blogger ((( bob kek mando ))) - ( Communists murdered +100 Million trying to genocide the Bourgeois. suffering a Marxist to live is a Crime Against Humanity ) July 02, 2017 8:48 PM  

129. natschuster July 02, 2017 7:24 PM
Oh and sometimes Judaism is a race and sometimes it's just a religion. It's all so confusing.



yeah, and the Jews themselves wouldn't have ANYTHING to do with propagating THAT specific bit of confusion, now would they?

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 8:58 PM  

Judaism is primarily a religion, but it had a racial aspect, since most Jews are descended from the original Isrselites. That's what Jews have always said. See antisemites say Judaism is one or the other. They say it is a race when talking about expulsion, then they say it is a religion when talking about Jews aren't the heirs of Biblical Jews.

Blogger ((( bob kek mando ))) - ( Communists murdered +100 Million trying to genocide the Bourgeois. suffering a Marxist to live is a Crime Against Humanity ) July 02, 2017 9:04 PM  

139. natschuster July 02, 2017 8:58 PM
They say it is a race when talking about expulsion, then they say it is a religion when talking about Jews aren't the heirs of Biblical Jews.



take it up with Yahweh, punk. he's the one who threw you vipers out.

The Goyim Know.

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 9:13 PM  

Hey we try to repent and pray for the reception every day. We take it up with G-d all the time. Some people say that the founding of the State of Israel is the beginning of the redemption. It does match some of the prophecies in the Bible.

P.S. Why are you so angry?

Blogger Cail Corishev July 02, 2017 9:39 PM  

Never get in a man's way when he's confirming the worst stereotypes about his people.

Anonymous andon July 02, 2017 10:09 PM  

most of the phonies who call themselves "jews" today aren't even semitic

and here you are prattling on with your anti-semitic nonsense

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 11:32 PM  

What would those stereotypes be? Could it be Jewish intelligence? After all nobody is countering my arguments, just insulting me.

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 11:34 PM  

See that's what I mean. Jews aren't a race, you say. But when it comes to expulsion or some such, Jews are a race.

Anonymous Db Cooper July 02, 2017 11:36 PM  

>> It does match some of the prophecies in the Bible.

"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it."

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 11:49 PM  

I was refering to the prophecies that talk spout the Jews returning from the four corners of the Earth. That's what actually happened. I don't know about any lies.

Anonymous Db Cooper July 02, 2017 11:54 PM  

I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.

Anonymous andon July 02, 2017 11:55 PM  

See that's what I mean. Jews aren't a race, you say. But when it comes to expulsion or some such, Jews are a race.

when did i say that jews arent a race?

sounds like you're just a liar

Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 11:59 PM  

What did you mean when you said Jews aren't Semites? Most people who say that mean that Jews aren't descended from ancient Isrselites but are European converts so they aren't a distinct race

Blogger natschuster July 03, 2017 12:04 AM  

I'm not rich. I can barely pay the bills. So I guess this doesn't apply to me.

Blogger natschuster July 03, 2017 12:05 AM  

And there is a difference between lying and being mistaken.

Anonymous Raker Tooth July 03, 2017 12:24 AM  

Somebody help me out here...so blacks, Hispanics and Jews are the problem. If you put them together with the WHITES that enable those groups, you have about half the US population. We have an ideological problem that rivals any other. The other thread had a comment about classical music driving off the vagrants; maybe there are policies or practices that will drive away the left? Don't criticize CA for being different, encourage them to secede, but first get leftists to go there. One might revise government aid. Free housing? Well sure, sort of...there's no heat, you must cut, split, and stack your own firewood. Food, why sure, the garden is over there, and we'll even provide the canning jars and lids. There are full fledged slaughtering and butcher facilities on premises, you'll just have to get a little...bloody.
That way, no one can say you completely cut off assistance, it was merely modified. If any state, just one, did that, end_of_welfare in that place, as we know it. It's really not much different from what was done before, people weren't given stamps, they got flour and other staples.
@92 Exactly!! I was thinking about this the other day. I see it just about every day, usually twice a day, the right keeps using the terms set by the left. So some people keep waiting for the left to 'get it'. They never will get it because that wasn't their intent all along. The other day I read "failed gun control policies". Failed what? Failed as a public safety measure? I've been hearing conspiracy people for years describing gun control laws as steps toward disarmament. I understood the point, but figured that it's possible the left is actually stupid enough to believe it would make society safer. But lately, so many things have become clear. We really are living in a different time, when uncertainty is vanishing, the left's long time motives are crystal clear. Kill all white people comes to mind.
The problem I have with calling gun control laws disarmament, is that term has been around for awhile. Maybe we should now say "London Bridge IN THE DAMN NECK disarmament policies. Be descriptive.

Anonymous andon July 03, 2017 12:30 AM  

150. Blogger natschuster July 02, 2017 11:59 PM
What did you mean when you said Jews aren't Semites? Most people who say that mean that Jews aren't descended from ancient Isrselites but are European converts so they aren't a distinct race


ashkenazi jews are khazars from the turkish and ukrainian region. they have nothing to do with israel. maybe thats why some jew in the U.S. govt bragged about spending $5 billion overthrowing the ukrainian govt. once people understand that the jews are a fraud and have no right to Palestine, they'll have to go take over/steal another country

Blogger natschuster July 03, 2017 4:38 AM  

So Ashkenazi Jews are white then?

Blogger Robert What? July 03, 2017 6:29 AM  

@natschuster,

Modern Ashkenazi Jews are most likely of Turkic and Asiatic descent. They are most definitely not descendants of the ancient Hebrews.

Blogger natschuster July 03, 2017 8:00 AM  

#1. Most of the genetic studies I read about show that Ashekenazim are closed to other Jews and Middle Easterners than to other people. And Turks are kind of Middle Eastern. And Kohanim have a unique chromosome.

#2. The Bible says that converts to Judaism are just as Jewish as anyone both Jewish. It isn't only about race.

#3 What about Sephardim?

Anonymous Db Cooper July 03, 2017 9:52 AM  

Even secular Jews worship their own blood as "gods" on Earth. In reality, Jews are a mongrel mix of Edomites, Hebrews, Canaanites, Italians, Turks and Khazars. Any pure blood by genetics is cursed for the murder of Christ (Matthew 27:22). But if the Jews see themselves as "one people" -- a race -- then why is it wrong we we goyim treat them as such?

Blogger natschuster July 03, 2017 10:17 AM  

You can believe anything you want. It's what they at the seeming contradictions confuse me.

Anonymous Db Cooper July 03, 2017 10:30 AM  

The Talmud is full of contradictions. It is what happens after your Temple is smashed by God and all you have left is your supposed "Chosen master race" beliefs. Why secular Jews continue their tribal loyalty is also a contradiction.

Blogger natschuster July 03, 2017 12:16 PM  

The BIble says Jews are the chosen people. And as stated above it isn't about race. Any Gentile, for example Ivanka Trump
,can become Jewish. And as far as the contradictions in the Talmud through study and analysis we manage to reconcile most of them. That's what Tosfos is for. And most secular Jews today tend to be antitribal. zFor example the intermarriage rate is well over 50%.

Anonymous Db Cooper July 03, 2017 2:36 PM  

Those who call themselves "Jews" today are literally the Synagogue of Satan. Their father is the devil, a liar and murder from the beginning.

God's Chosen People are His Church, those who follow Jesus Christ. Become a Christian and you can join us in eternal life.

Otherwise you are the spawn of Satan and our worldly and spiritual enemy.

Blogger natschuster July 03, 2017 2:43 PM  

L get the spiritual enemy thing. I don't get the worldly enemy 1hing. I have no intention of ever causing you any worldly harm
I don't hate you. a The Talmud gittin 62b, says I am even obligated to support you if you are, poor, visit you if you are sick and bury you when you die.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash July 03, 2017 3:23 PM  

natschuster wrote:I don't hate you. a The Talmud gittin 62b, says I am even obligated to support you if you are, poor, visit you if you are sick and bury you when you die.
And cheat me when you do business, lie to my face when I see your schemes, and destroy my home to convert it into a more comfortable home for your fellow tribalists.

Blogger Billy Ray July 03, 2017 3:28 PM  

"the necessity and morality of transferring US Jews to Israel?"

and you have the nerve to say you alt right assholes aren't anti semitic. What's next, you gonna start calling for boxcars and ovens?

Blogger natschuster July 03, 2017 3:37 PM  

it says in the Shulchan Oruch Choshen Mishpoy 348:2 that it is forbidden to rob a Gentile. And I might offer you a fair price for your house, yes. But that about it.

P.S. Why are you so angry?

Anonymous Mike July 03, 2017 3:40 PM  

"What's next, you gonna start calling for boxcars and ovens?"

Jews put Palestinians in boxcars and concentration camps but we are much more humane. We can easily ship all the Jews to Israel using 747s and cruise ships. The kikes love to travel 1st class.

Anonymous Mike July 03, 2017 3:47 PM  

Lol, yet you robbed the Palestinians of their homes, lands and livelihoods.

Why does the stereotype of the dishonest duplicitous Jew persist for thousands of years, across continents?

PS: why you still try to fool the goyim in the Current Year?

Blogger natschuster July 03, 2017 3:55 PM  

if you study history you will find there is no such thing as a Palestinian that most the Arabs settled in Palestine came from elsewhere in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries that there the Palestinians could have had their own homeland buy they rejected and the land was jewish hundreds of years before any Arabs where there and the Palestinian refugee problem is the result of a war the Arabs started. Read "From Time Immemoroal"And TjeInnocents Abroad"

Blogger natschuster July 03, 2017 3:58 PM  

I never heard of boxcar or concentration camps. Most of the Arabs refugees left in their own. Could you provide some evidence for your assertion?

Blogger natschuster July 03, 2017 4:41 PM  

sorry typo should be " THe Innocents Abroad" by Mark Twain.

Anonymous Mike July 03, 2017 4:53 PM  

I am not a churchian cuck. Your bullshit doesn't work in the current year.

http://m.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Conflict/Former-UN-envoy-parallels-between-Gaza-strip-and-a-concentration-camp-497458

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2715466/Israeli-official-calls-concentration-camps-Gaza-conquest-entire-Gaza-Strip-annihilation-fighting-forces-supporters.html

http://www.newsweek.com/israel-not-accept-single-palestinian-old-borders-defense-628786

Blogger natschuster July 03, 2017 5:26 PM  

Your first post was from a UN envoy, So it is suspect. And saying it is kinda like a concentration camp doesn't mean much. And Gaza is under control of the Hamas now. They are Palestinians. So may be they are to blame.

The second post was about an idea from a Israeli official that says the shoukd make Gaza a comncenmtratin camp, not that they did. And that itd a reaction to missle being lanuch at knbdergartens.

And I didn't see anything about concentration camps in the third post, just Israel holding on to land it conquered in an existential war started by the Arabs. And I didn't spot anything about boxcars.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash July 04, 2017 2:22 AM  

natschuster wrote:if you study history you will find there is no such thing as a Palestinian that most the Arabs settled in Palestine came from elsewhere in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries that there the Palestinians could have had their own homeland buy they rejected and the land was jewish hundreds of years before any Arabs where there and the Palestinian refugee problem is the result of a war the Arabs started. Read "From Time Immemoroal"And TjeInnocents Abroad"
Yes, we know the lies the Jews tell about Palestine. We've heard it our whole lives. It's not true.

Blogger natschuster July 04, 2017 3:59 AM  

Perhaps you could provide a source?

Blogger natschuster July 04, 2017 11:40 AM  

sorry typo should be " THe Innocents Abroad" by Mark Twain.

Blogger natschuster July 04, 2017 11:40 AM  

if you study history you will find there is no such thing as a Palestinian that most the Arabs settled in Palestine came from elsewhere in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries that there the Palestinians could have had their own homeland buy they rejected and the land was jewish hundreds of years before any Arabs where there and the Palestinian refugee problem is the result of a war the Arabs started. Read "From Time Immemoroal"And TjeInnocents Abroad"

Anonymous Mr. Rational July 04, 2017 12:49 PM  

Samuel Clemens' account of Israel being a thinly-populated wasteland of swamps and deserts in 1867 was Zionist propaganda?

Who knew?

Blogger Technomad August 20, 2017 2:53 PM  

And after the convulsions following World War I, Greece and Turkey traded populations: Christians (including Turkish-speaking Christians who knew no Greek) to Greece, and Muslims (outside of a few areas) to Turkey. This has cut down considerably on friction.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts