ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2018 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Tuesday, August 29, 2017

The Terrible Cowardice

This is a guest post from an occasional contributor who prefers to remain anonymous. Please don't assume that he speaks for me or that I necessarily agree with any or all of his various assertions and conclusions.

The Terrible Cowardice of the Left

I grew up in England.

I came of age as the Spice Girls were soaring to the top of the hit parade.  ‘I’ll tell you what I want, what I really, really want’ echoed from every bedroom.  Girls strode around proclaiming the new age of GIRL POWER, boys insisted - unconvincingly  - that they only listened to the Spice Girls for the music.  It was the dawn of a whole new age.

Well, actually it wasn't.  But we thought it was.

There was a girl at my school who I’ll call Jane.  She was one of the blessed, as far as looks were concerned.  I don’t think there was a single boy who didn't lust after her.  A smile from her could brighten up your whole day.  She would have been a cheerleader, if we’d had cheerleaders.

There was also a boy who I’ll call Kevin.  He was a nerd.  Spotty, glasses, slightly overweight, maybe not the ugliest boy in the school, but certainly in the bottom ten.  He was the kind of person whose mere existence attracted bullies. I’d known him since I was a child, but we’d never really been friends. People who stood too close to him got bullied too.

So one day, Kevin takes it into his head to ask Jane - yes, JANE - out.  I’d never thought he had it in him. I never dared ask her out. But he did it.

Jane gaped at him, let out an incredulous laugh and told him, in no uncertain terms, that she wouldn’t go out with him if he was the last person on Earth.  She ripped him a whole new one.  Kevin staggered off, looking as though someone had punched him in the head.  Boys laughed, glad that they hadn't been the target of her wrath; girls laughed and chatted about Girl Power.  Jane’s victory would have made her the most popular girl in the class if she hadn't already held that title. I imagine Kevin wanted to blink out of existence and die. But he had to keep coming into school for the remaining year. People were rubbing salt into his wounds until we left for university.

There was another person  in this little story.  Gaston - believe me, the name fits - was a football player.  He was handsome, muscular, and had a habit of playing cruel jokes on his victims.  He was the jock’s jock.  He’d once thought it was amusing to shove my head down the toilet, then yank down my trousers when I tried to escape.  He was popular because students preferred to have him on their side than against them. It won’t surprise you to hear that Gaston started to date Jane in our final year of school.

A few weeks before we left the building for the last time, we were in the gym for our regular torture session.  Jane was wearing a skirt an inch or two above the knee, drawing all of our eyes.  And then Gaston takes it into his head to flip her skirt up, exposing her underwear.  We all saw.

Jane let out a nervous little laugh and brushed her skirt back down.

I can imagine just how humiliated she must have felt, at that moment.  If I - a boy - hated having my bottom exposed, it must have been far worse for her.  Everyone had been looking at her bum.  I expected her to tear into Gaston with all the vitriol she’d hurled at Kevin.  Girl Power, you know?

She didn’t, of course.  She tried to pass it off as a joke, but I could tell she was upset.

But why didn't she light into Gaston?  Why didn't she dump his ass on the spot?

She was scared.  Kevin might have been a boy, but he was no threat to her.  There were plenty of girls who could have beaten him up, in that school.  Gaston could have broken her effortlessly.  He’d beaten me up, once or twice.  No one wanted to get on his bad side, even if it meant accepting public humiliation.  She let him get away with it.

No one else tried to stop him either.  Gaston committed blatant sexual assault and got away with it.  And who could blame them?  The teachers had very little power to discipline their charges.  None of the boys or girls wanted to make an enemy of him ...

I have no idea what happened to any of them, after I left school.  And I don’t really care.

A brave man or woman is someone who stands up to great odds, accepting the risk of serious injury, or even death, in the name of their cause.  Sometimes, this is as simple as standing up in front of an angry crowd and speaking the truth; sometimes, it is as complex as multi-leveled combat operations.  Many on the Left say that they are brave, that they are putting everything on the line.  But is that actually true?

It is easy to stand up to someone as puny as Kevin.  Jane was in no danger.  Even if Kevin was strong enough to hurt her, I have no doubt that all the boys would have piled onto him before he could do real harm.  We didn't have virtue-signalling in those days, but we certainly did have white knighting.  Gaston?  It’s a great deal harder to stand up to someone so strong, so popular, so entrenched as the good guy that it would be difficult to undermine him.

The thing I’ve noticed about the Left these days is that it is largely composed of cowards.

Pretend, for the moment, that you’re a feminist.  You believe, very firmly, that women should have equal rights to men.  You may even believe that women are superior to men.  So tell me, why aren't you protesting the migrant crisis in Europe?  Why aren’t you standing up for the rights of Muslim women?  Why do you not see Radical Islam as a threat to your very existence?

One possible answer, of course, is that feminists are more concerned with problems closer to home.  (Which ignores the fact that this problem is moving increasingly closer to home.)  But another is far darker.  Feminists are scared.  Western men do not, in general, have a habit of beating or shooting women who defy them.  And those who do are not regarded as heroes by the rest of the male population.  But Islamists?  Radical Muslims regard feminism - the radical notion that women are human beings, as Marie Shear put it - as poison.  They do NOT regard women as human beings.

This problem is deeper than you might suppose.  A person raised in a different culture might have very different ideas about the way the world works than yourself.  The idea that a woman who doesn’t cover herself from head to toe is just asking for it is horrific, as far as I am concerned, but that doesn’t mean that migrants don’t have that opinion.  And the idea that they are going to instantly change, the moment they set foot in the West, is laughable.

All the concepts we take for granted, that a woman can say ‘no,’ that underage children are not to be touched, are not graven in stone.  They’re cultural norms that have become part of our lives so much that it is hard to believe that others don’t share them.  But they don't.

Or pretend that you’re a homosexual.  Conservatives may dislike homosexuals, but radical Muslims throw homosexuals off buildings.  Which one of these is the true threat to homosexuals?  Why aren't homosexuals protesting migrants?

Because they’re scared.

On one level, the political elites in both Europe and America managed to declare discussions about immigration taboo.  This had the effect, for better or worse, of pushing such matters into the hands of the far-right.  But it also made it impossible for feminists or homosexuals or other liberal groups to oppose immigration without being branded racists or worse.  And while a person from the Right may shrug off the charge of racism, a person from the Left would take it far more seriously.  The Descending Hierarchy of Victimhood puts Muslims below feminists and homosexuals, thus providing cover for anything they do to anyone above them.  Anyone who challenges Muslims is ‘punching down.’

But on another level, people who question radical Muslims, people who oppose them, are threatened, attacked and sometimes killed.  This is a very real problem.  Feminists and homosexuals and leftists in general are scared of being hurt and killed.  And who could blame them?  No one is immune to fear.  It is difficult to muster the bravery to fight back when you know that everyone will side against you, that  authority, however defined, will not protect you.  Instead, they choose to deny reality and attack people who can’t - who won’t - hit back.

The Left has long since cast aside its ability to make moral judgments.  It is incapable of understanding that a person who has had a bad upbringing - or whatever - still needs to suffer the consequences of their actions.  Instead, it has created a situation where real threats are ignored and imaginary threats are blown out of all proportion.  Few on the left dare to oppose it for fear of being smeared by the ‘racist’ brush.  And it has betrayed its own people.

The good thing about this is that more and more people are becoming aware that the emperor has no clothes.  The bad thing about this is that a great many innocent people, feminists and homosexuals and everything else, will suffer for the Left’s cowardice in the face of the true enemy.

Labels:

199 Comments:

Anonymous Tanjil Bren August 29, 2017 4:26 AM  

A thoroughly worthy guest post. Thank you both of you (author and host).

Anonymous Looking Glass August 29, 2017 4:29 AM  

It took Muslims in Europe killing all of about 2 journalists for all Left-wing Media to never say anything bad about Muslims. What's the Goebbels' quote about the Big Lie? The Truth becomes the biggest danger?

Though it goes deeper for the Left. To admit the Big Lie is false is to reject their entire religion. This is why they'll drive Western countries to the brink of civil wars before they'll admit the problem.

Anonymous You could have been Americans, you really could... August 29, 2017 4:30 AM  

Welcome to my m9d

Europeans wishing Europe didn't turn out in a way compatible with American values is kinda hilarious.

Anonymous Flat Lander August 29, 2017 4:43 AM  

"I can imagine just how humiliated she must have felt, at that moment. If I - a boy - hated having my bottom exposed, it must have been far worse for her."

Do you even woman, bro? A sexy bad boy asserts his dominance over his gal, gives her an emotional spike (sweet, sweet outrage), makes her gina tingle and you call this sexual assault?

Blogger DonReynolds August 29, 2017 4:46 AM  

Perhaps....and I say perhaps, because perhaps he is correct and the Leftists are cowards, but part of me wants a better reason, one that may make more sense.

Have they created their own version of Frankenstein, by their own assumptions, by their own suppositions, by their own pre-cast version of reality? Maybe, they have painted themselves into a corner and now they cannot get out....except by getting paint on their socks.

So what can they do? They can wait until the paint dries and just apply a bit of patience. They can call for help, and hope that crow only tastes feathery on the first bite. They could get help but they would have to admit that they made a mistake. (That seems to be the hard part.) If they admitted to being wrong about radical Islam, does that mean they were wrong about unchecked immigration, does that mean they were wrong about racial integration, does that mean they were wrong about equality, maybe even gender equality? What would be left of the Left if they ever had to admit to being wrong about anything at all? Maybe nothing, since each step was pre-destined the moment they made the egalitarian pledge. If people are not equal and the law cannot make them equal, what can?

Anonymous You want this to be hurtful. I get that. August 29, 2017 4:47 AM  

Flat Lander wrote:"I can imagine just how humiliated she must have felt, at that moment. If I - a boy - hated having my bottom exposed, it must have been far worse for her."

Do you even woman, bro? A sexy bad boy asserts his dominance over his gal, gives her an emotional spike (sweet, sweet outrage), makes her gina tingle and you call this sexual assault?


"And then I fired up the jon boat."

Anonymous Anonymous August 29, 2017 4:47 AM  

That was a great post. A real treat to read this morning to start my day. Thanks for the effort to write it.

The points about the left being moral cowards need to be hammered home often and spread to a wide audience. The radical Muslims want to destroy Western Civilization and those leftists who celebrate those animals are odious. We need to expose them for their crimes against humanity.

The left claims "high moral ground" even as they are foul degenerates. Bastards.

Anonymous He's clearly both August 29, 2017 4:56 AM  

Here's a fun questionnaire.

Is VD more Native American or more native Mexican.

Anonymous You could have listened to Grant, Stoddard and Robertson August 29, 2017 4:59 AM  

You could have been Americans, you really could... wrote:Welcome to my m9d

Europeans wishing Europe didn't turn out in a way compatible with American values is kinda hilarious.


Americans thinking they are culturally superior to Europeans are kinda hilarious.

Blogger Phillip George August 29, 2017 4:59 AM  

Good post. It fits in well with the one about affirmative action being protection money.

Protection Money is subject to inflation however and the Protection Money Investment Bubble is bursting.

When any bubble bursts you revert to blue chips. That's us. We are the blue chip stocks

Blogger joc August 29, 2017 5:08 AM  

Good post except for the usual kowtowing in the form of 'radical islam'. It's just islam that's the problem. Regular old islam.

Blogger The Observer August 29, 2017 5:16 AM  

The bad thing about this is that a great many innocent people, feminists and homosexuals and everything else, will suffer for the Left’s cowardice in the face of the true enemy.

Bullshit.

They are traitors and enemies and must be destroyed.

If muslims are the common cold, these groups are AIDS that prevent a proper response.

Blogger Thanks, J. August 29, 2017 5:17 AM  

People, bitches, leftists, need their "Kevins". Reminds me of this blog post http://thewaywardaxolotl.blogspot.ca/2017/08/charlottesville.html ..."people love to hate. We have an innate capacity for hate. Just as a cat wants to hunt even if it gets its food from a can, humans want to fight wars even if we don't need to. War just feels good, at least if you win. Because Humanism's in-group is humanity, that leaves Humanists without many morally acceptable targets for hatred. For leftists, the only acceptable targets of hate are "haters" (ironically): racists, sexists, xenophobes, etc., if they are white men. Those are the only socially acceptable targets of hatred. Leftists, and normies in general, are desperate for socially acceptable targets to unleash their hatred on. Nazis make the perfect target."

Blogger justaguy August 29, 2017 5:18 AM  

Please note that the majority of the post is about basically High School drama-- and it is used as an example of how larger society acts as learned in the institutionalized setting we use to set our cultural norms and values...School trains our population to be sheep and follow the knowingly incoherent dictates of the administration masters. The unintended effects are a dysfunctional society as the individual members have been indoctrinated against norms that actually worked-- so the best and brightest are no longer reproducing nor maintaining a workable society. (look to any large city)

The fight is over who gets to be the administrators and make incoherent decisions, and how to maintain power over our cliques. See Trump vs establishment. Why would we expect Western values such as courage from the Left or society, we are no longer teaching these?

Blogger szopen August 29, 2017 5:27 AM  

Flat Lander wrote:"I can imagine just how humiliated she must have felt, at that moment. If I - a boy - hated having my bottom exposed, it must have been far worse for her."

Do you even woman, bro? A sexy bad boy asserts his dominance over his gal, gives her an emotional spike (sweet, sweet outrage), makes her gina tingle and you call this sexual assault?


I am not sure what kind of women you interact with, but I assure you are be wrong.

There are a lot of women who love alphas and love dominance, but at the same time might also love to keep public appearances. While there is a large group of women who just love to be treated like shit, there is also another group of women who hate being treated like shit in public, because that lowers their position in female social hierarchy. Begin miserable "harmless" boy I am I had the doubtful privilege of being "friend" of many women and I remember how keen they were of making sure their boys and their boys actions were considered OK by other women.

Blogger VD August 29, 2017 5:49 AM  

I am not sure what kind of women you interact with, but I assure you are be wrong.

Yes, this part demonstrated the author's Delta/Gamma failure to grasp that female psychology is different than male psychology. The girl wasn't humiliated at all, she was both taken aback and turned on by the display of male dominance.

Blogger Dirk Manly August 29, 2017 5:53 AM  

If they hated the bad boy behavior, they would have dumped those guys rather than bragging to you about about the men's demonstrable obsession while shedding oh soon many crocodile tears on your shoulder.

You're not alone -- I used to believe women's sob stories, too.

Blogger Dr. Φ August 29, 2017 5:55 AM  

I would suggest that both in the analogy and with respect to immigration, the fear of physical violence among Western women isn't nearly as palpable as the prospect of lost status. It would have been extraordinary if Jane had actually been able to beat up Kevin, and it was unlikely that Gaston would have physically laid into Jane had she treated him as she had treated Kevin. Rather, what was at stake for her in both instances was status: being sexually assaulted (if we can call it that) by Gaston wasn't nearly as damaging to Jane's status as the prospect of being thought in the same league as Kevin. Meanwhile, verbally eviscerating Kevin only enhanced her status, while doing so to Gaston would have diminished it.

Likewise with immigration. Currently, the increase in the threat of rape or murder by an immigrant to any particular individual is distributed wildly unevenly, but the threat of social ostracism for speaking out is universal, certain, and immediate. In contrast, complaining about "Nazis" will only earn one applause from the People Who Matter.

Blogger Lovekraft August 29, 2017 5:56 AM  

I've been fleshing out the analogy of pimp and their turned out discards. How centuries of nefarious attack have left many scarred people.

If we could explain modern psychological damage in simple terms like this, it will help people see their true enemy, instead of what their 'pimps' direct them to hate.

As a bonus, it really takes a swipe at Rap/HipHop 'culture.'

Blogger Koanic August 29, 2017 6:21 AM  

It is a tragedy that the cowardice of Gaston prevented him from fully exploring lovely Jane's lust for public humiliation. All women have an autonomic slap reflex, and our bold hero had not yet found her (flexible) limit.

Let us hope a Pakistani gentleman filled the void. Inshallah!

Blogger szopen August 29, 2017 6:24 AM  

VD wrote:I am not sure what kind of women you interact with, but I assure you are be wrong.

Yes, this part demonstrated the author's Delta/Gamma failure to grasp that female psychology is different than male psychology. The girl wasn't humiliated at all, she was both taken aback and turned on by the display of male dominance.


Based on my experience, I disagree. I do not mean by that I disagree she would not be aroused; but I do think that at the same time she could feel discomfort, posssibly higher than arousal. There is no contradiction in "being humiliated and turned on" in the same time. I think it would all depend on the context and the mores of this girls' social circle. In my experience, girls really DO care about social perception of themselves and can do really strange things only to please their peers.

I mean, for men it's hard to observe female hierarchies because, generally, men do not give a shit about female hierarchies - a thing especially true for men who are high in status themselves. Moreover, female "hierarchies" are far less clear-cut, fluid and subtle than male and might be more precisely descibed as "matrices" instead of "hierarchies".

Nevertheless, girls compete for in-group status as fiercely as boys. Having an alpha boy is a clear status gain point. But if alpha PUBLICLY does something, which in that particular social circle is considered humiliating, then - even if the girl would not feel humiliated by the act per se - then girl loses status points. More importantly, it gives other girls pretext to attacks on the girls' status, which could be hidden under a false cover of "caring".

There is also another take on that: I keep reading that females have constant drive to get the better alpha and that they constantly care about signaling their high sexual market value. If alpha publicly treats a girl in a way which is commonly thought as unacceptable, he publicly signals the girl does not have high value in his eyes, factually lowering her value. This simply must cause discomfort.

Actually, what surprise me in this story is in how she treated Kevin: From what I saw, high value girls are paradoxically more polite to really low status guys than to medium-status. Obviously, Kevin by even thinking he had a chance with her is a danger, because that signals her lower sexual market value, so must be countered; but if he is really low-status, then his advances were so absurd that no one should seriously take them as signaling the value of the girl in question. High status girl usually are more cruel with guys who actually a just one step below them.

Blogger Wayne August 29, 2017 6:27 AM  

Kevin/Jane/Gaston interaction sounds like the basic plot of most John Hughes films

Anonymous basementhomebrewer August 29, 2017 6:38 AM  

Likewise with immigration. Currently, the increase in the threat of rape or murder by an immigrant to any particular individual is distributed wildly unevenly, but the threat of social ostracism for speaking out is universal, certain, and immediate. In contrast, complaining about "Nazis" will only earn one applause from the People Who Matter.

To flesh this out further with the high school analogy, it is arguable that all of society has been trained to accept the female social hierarchy and it's dictates. In today's high school the "authorities" would step in and slap the "sexual assault" accusation on Gaston. Then the police would be called and he would get jammed up on that charge. This would create a lot of drama at school and while he would try to swagger it off, he would still be nervous, which would cause him to be more timid. This would then start lowering his status. In the opposite direction Jane, survived the "sexual assault" and maintained her status. She wasn't seen as the one making a scene it was the "authorities". She maintains her status and even gains some for being a "brave victim". This starts to place the woman's hierarchy above the men's at school since it is becoming harder and harder to climb to the top of the men's hierarchy and stay there without the authorities intervening. In short all the men are becoming the equivalent of Kevin when compared to the women on the top of the hierarchy.

This is about where we are at in today's society. There are some few "bad boys" willing to stand up to TPTB, but they tend to get slapped down hard. Their reaction to that slap down is a noticeable change in attitude and tone which fails to inspire the same confidence as before the beat down. In short, western men are allowing western women to dominate society and we are in a death spiral because of it.

Blogger Timmy3 August 29, 2017 6:44 AM  

The Left are not scared. They don't agree with the Right. There's a fundamental difference of opinion regarding Muslims and immigration. They silenced their own regarding Muslims and rape. The charge of racism is more powerful than the crime. They chose their fate.

Blogger ZhukovG August 29, 2017 6:49 AM  

What a Leftist fears more than anything is being kicked out of the Warren. They will, unless 'red pilled', endure anything to avoid that.

Anonymous Anonymous August 29, 2017 6:52 AM  

Gaston is the hero of this story for doing what every boy in that gym wanted to do and asserting the primacy of male desire and female attractiveness. God Bless Gaston, save us from total faggotry.

Blogger Othmar Regin August 29, 2017 6:59 AM  

So the moral of the story? We need to be more like Gaston and I am not being sarcastic, if you want to rule you have to do it either through fear or awe or preferably both, being nice is for losers.

Anonymous Mycroft Jones August 29, 2017 7:00 AM  

Either the left doesn't take the Muslims seriously as a threat, viewing them as dirty sand naggers, or it is like the Poz. You know, bug-chasers. The Left seek their own death. They crave to be dominated by a strong partiarchal authoritarian system. In essence, Leftists are women, no matter what their physical genitalia are.

Anonymous Mycroft Jones August 29, 2017 7:02 AM  

And that is why right wing women are rare, but women who fall for right wing men are the norm. Right wing is masculine; Left wing is feminine.

Blogger ZhukovG August 29, 2017 7:06 AM  

Our respected host could shed a better light on this than I, but I wonder is there really such a thing as a Leftist Alpha?

I understand that there are Alphas who identify as Leftist, who talk the talk so to speak. But do they actually believe in Leftist doctrine or is it merely a tool by which they effect their dominance?

I can believe that an Alpha could genuinely believe in Rightist, particularly Alt-Right, doctrine. But I suspect that an Alpha would not ever truly be Leftist.

I am certainly not an Alpha myself, so I am not sure.

Blogger Xellos August 29, 2017 7:10 AM  

"a great many innocent people, feminists and homosexuals and everything else, will suffer for the Left’s cowardice in the face of the true enemy"

Feminists, homosexuals and their kind are not innocent people - they are of the Left. They're cowards because they don't care about anyone but themselves, which is a fundamental trait of the Left.

Blogger Stilicho August 29, 2017 7:10 AM  

No one on the left is innocent. They have, one and all, chosen lies over truth, wrong over right, self-indulgence over discipline, and evil over Truth. The gods of the copybook headings are waiting in the wings.

Blogger Nathan August 29, 2017 7:11 AM  

Not only is the author's misunderstanding of Gaston and Jane due to applying of male psychology onto women, his interpretation of the dynamic with Muslims had the same flaws. Women and homos don't attack Muslims because Big Daddy Government tells them not to through WaPo, CNN, and NYT. For example, after WaPo runs their story about Antifa yesterday, homos and women in good standing with Daddy now know who is on his shit list (masked fags).

Blogger Ransom Smith August 29, 2017 7:12 AM  

I'm honestly convinced leftists by and large actually think Muslims can be taught Western behaviors. I don't think the elites believe it. But Susie Leftson probably bends her gamma husband's ear every night about bringing those poor refugees over and giving them education.

Anonymous Franklyspeaking August 29, 2017 7:14 AM  

The Left will continue to fracture, but not until it takes down the (literal) white male patriarchy. How they cannibalize each other afterwards isn't something they are thinking through right now, as some giant corporate strategy--instead, each slice of the identity/victim group, is privately planning or aware of their long-term goals (Latinos, Muslims...maybe not so much the Low IQ blacks).

What kills me is that all these white folks (to the Left or Soft Right) are going to go RIGHT DOWN with them unaware that THEY are on the menu, and when they realize (the ones that already don't) it will be too late. The warnings have gone unheralded, which is why you see whites still showing up to "protest racism", when tens of thousands of whites are victimized by so-called "minorities" every year.

What rises from the ashes (perhaps culturally and geographically), if Whites are to survive, will HAVE to operate like Israelis do on the West Bank. ANY perceived defection to the interests of another group will HAVE to be slammed down asap, and harshly. There will have to be codified laws and oral history past down to instruct each newer generations of what hazards await when whites let others into their geographic and cultural space.

Blogger Othmar Regin August 29, 2017 7:18 AM  

"The bad thing about this is that a great many innocent people, feminists and homosexuals and everything else, will suffer for the Left’s cowardice in the face of the true enemy." - that is not a bad thing it's the only right thing that can and must happen. Islam it self is the best antidote for the Left and Zionism we the "Alt-Right" must treat Islam as a temporary ally in our fight against the former two. Let the Left, Zionists-/Christians and Islam all fight each other while we remain the only man standing.

Blogger The Kurgan August 29, 2017 7:20 AM  

Heh. Szopen, You really haven't got a clue about women do you?

Anonymous Mycroft Jones August 29, 2017 7:24 AM  

@36 Islam isn't an ally. Islam is the bad boy rapist on the prowl, that the Left-wing adulterous wife lusts after and chases, happily participating in the destruction of her husband and children. You think husband should treat bad boy as an ally? Really?

Blogger Harambe August 29, 2017 7:26 AM  

ZhukovG wrote:Our respected host could shed a better light on this than I, but I wonder is there really such a thing as a Leftist Alpha?

I understand that there are Alphas who identify as Leftist, who talk the talk so to speak. But do they actually believe in Leftist doctrine or is it merely a tool by which they effect their dominance?

I can believe that an Alpha could genuinely believe in Rightist, particularly Alt-Right, doctrine. But I suspect that an Alpha would not ever truly be Leftist.

I am certainly not an Alpha myself, so I am not sure.


Well it's a great question. I would assume (rightly or not) that a "leftist alpha" would be a contradiction for the simple reason that leftism is the politics of the lower-classes (originally in terms of wealth, but now in terms of social standing). My history is a bit rusty, but I recall "true believer" being sort of a disparaging term used by the communist "inner party" to refer to the "useful idiots" who thought they were serious about their utopian propaganda.

So in my mind, a leftist alpha is just like a banker telling you to get another loan, but wouldn't actually do so himself. Or like the girl who tells you her perfect guy is someone with a soft heart who "listens" and writes poetry, but then makes the sex to mr Gaston from our story.

Blogger Resident Moron™ August 29, 2017 7:27 AM  

Men don't know or care about female status hierarchies, but I'm going to write three pages about it.

OK.

To more pertinent points; there's no doubt in my mind that the Left are individually cowards. It's almost part of the definition. But unchecked collected cowards can do a lot of damage, witness Antifa mobbing various innocent bystanders in addition to their intended targets, as well as their looting and vandalism.

As ever, the character of the enemy is largely irrelevant. The real question we ought to be asking ourselves is, do we have the character to respond accordingly?

Blogger Harambe August 29, 2017 7:29 AM  

Or: the leftist alpha is a guy who makes you do retarded sh*t so you lower your own value, and by contrast his own value is increased. Kim Jong Un is the only capitalist in North Korea.

Anonymous basementhomebrewer August 29, 2017 7:29 AM  

Othmar Regin wrote:"Alt-Right" must treat Islam as a temporary ally in our fight against the former two. Let the Left, Zionists-/Christians and Islam all fight each other while we remain the only man standing.

I sense someone has been writing middle east strategy pieces about letting ISIS fester for eternity "over there".

Blogger Antony August 29, 2017 7:29 AM  

2 Lovecraft 19 - I've often thought an analysis of the way pimps control their prostitutes would be a good analogy for how social pressure/spooking, especially from blacks, is used upon western society and its women in particular.
On ebook on the subject is "Pimp - the story of my life" by Iceberg Slim, who was at the time one of Chicago's main pimps. - https://www.amazon.co.uk/Pimp-Story-Life-Iceberg-Slim/dp/1847673325

Blogger Sillon Bono August 29, 2017 7:30 AM  

Looking Glass wrote:It took Muslims in Europe killing all of about 2 journalists for all Left-wing Media to never say anything bad about Muslims. What's the Goebbels' quote about the Big Lie? The Truth becomes the biggest danger?

Though it goes deeper for the Left. To admit the Big Lie is false is to reject their entire religion. This is why they'll drive Western countries to the brink of civil wars before they'll admit the problem.


In some western countries will get as bad as to have to fire artillery shells against buildings.

And even then the left will keep defending the invaders.

That is why when the civil war start the traitors will go first.

There is only one question that is not clear to me, and it is what will the USA do? Will they bombard us in Europe like they did to whites in the Balkans?

This is my main worry, the (((USA))) aren't to be trusted.

Anonymous yeoman August 29, 2017 7:32 AM  

false equivalence between radical Islam and migrants.

Blogger Elizabeth August 29, 2017 7:33 AM  

szopen wrote:Flat Lander wrote:"I can imagine just how humiliated she must have felt, at that moment. If I - a boy - hated having my bottom exposed, it must have been far worse for her."

Do you even woman, bro? A sexy bad boy asserts his dominance over his gal, gives her an emotional spike (sweet, sweet outrage), makes her gina tingle and you call this sexual assault?


I am not sure what kind of women you interact with, but I assure you are be wrong.

There are a lot of women who love alphas and love dominance, but at the same time might also love to keep public appearances. While there is a large group of women who just love to be treated like shit, there is also another group of women who hate being treated like shit in public, because that lowers their position in female social hierarchy. Begin miserable "harmless" boy I am I had the doubtful privilege of being "friend" of many women and I remember how keen they were of making sure their boys and their boys actions were considered OK by other women.


I recently discussed a similar issue with an older and wiser male friend: Our former landlord, a wealthy married man with three children, was quite the ladies' man. His wife turned a blind eye to his philandering, but expected him to consort with his inamorata outside of the county so as not to embarrass her. In turn, he didn't leave her because he didn't want to hand over half of his considerable wealth to her in a divorce.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine August 29, 2017 7:34 AM  

@45. yeoman.

You're right.

Migrants aren't radical Islam.

Neither is ISIS or the Muslim Brotherhood.

They're normal, fundamental, faithful Islam. This is why Islam itself must die.

Blogger Desdichado August 29, 2017 7:35 AM  

Not bad. I cringed at the characterization there of "sexual assault" but still not bad. Deprogramming is a big deal. It takes a long time. Lingering effects of the original programming will still hang around for a long time.

Blogger Nate Winchester August 29, 2017 7:40 AM  

If they hated the bad boy behavior, they would have dumped those guys rather than bragging to you about about the men's demonstrable obsession while shedding oh soon many crocodile tears on your shoulder.

Men tolerate a lot of crazy actions from women if the woman is sufficiently hot enough, don't they? But do the men really "like" the crazy? (well, some might - no accounting for taste) Or would men generally prefer the hottie to be more domestic and sensible?

Just because the attraction is sufficient to excuse some behavior doesn't therefore follow that the person actually likes that behavior. (And usually when a woman leaves an alpha, it is usually because his behavior has finally exceeded what her attraction is able to permit.)

Blogger Lone Catholic August 29, 2017 7:41 AM  

He's right that the Left is largely composed of cowards.

OTOH, I found his post a bit hard to follow, and frankly, a bit hard to take seriously. He seems to assume the legitimacy of feminists, homosexuals, and liberals -- groups that really should be stamped out of any healthy society.

He also seems to expect that we bear the burden of their dilemmas and predicaments, and treat them as valid concerns.

The truth is that feminists, homosexuals, and liberals are people with mental and spiritual disorders. The left let the immigration problem get out of control, and the aforementioned groups simply have to endure the consequences. We need to come up with useful ideas and practical solutions that don't involve needlessly pondering the fate of feminists, homosexuals, and liberals.



Blogger Desdichado August 29, 2017 7:41 AM  

@49. We tolerate it, in women who are worth the trouble, of course. Nobody likes it.

Blogger Artisanal Toad August 29, 2017 7:48 AM  

The quality of many of the comments in this thread encapsulates the reason why Vox Popoli is such a great blog.

Anonymous Flat Lander August 29, 2017 7:49 AM  

I see you are well on your Red Pill journey and you may be reading the right people. But you still need to kill your idealism and embrace the fundamental ferality of girls' behaviour.

Discomfort and humiliation coming from a HSMV man (in this case the apex alpha) are a source of validation, status and arousal. All the other girls in her circle understand it on a visceral level. They may whisper later in outraged tones, but they get it: Gaston owns Jane, does with her as he pleases and she loves it.

I imagine you (and your female friends) have no problem when that discomfort comes from amused mastery, teasing, cockiness and verbal displays of dominance. ("He's such a jerk sometimes" she said with a dreamy smile and pressed her thighs together.)

What gets plugged-in men's panties in a twist is the physical dominance (rape culture, violence against women REEEEEE!). That's why the "sexual assault" canard is trotted out so easily, when there is no actual assault.

While we whine about humiliation, hundreds of millions of girls visit Christian Grey's sex dungeon and post naked selfies on social media.

Blogger Harambe August 29, 2017 7:50 AM  

We'll put up with it if the poonani is sweet enough. But when they start rationing the poonani, we start to wake up from the stupor and we re-evaluate.

Blogger bosscauser August 29, 2017 7:53 AM  

In the 30's the Jews squabbled over what to do about Hitler...
Yes they did!

Gab.ai/GaryCauser

Blogger ZhukovG August 29, 2017 7:55 AM  

@Sillon Bono: Trust your Mother, but cut the cards.

The USA will soon, and for a period of time at least, cease to be the leading actor on the world stage.

It may, in fact, be more likely that European and Asian powers will feel the need to occupy us.

Blogger Out of Nod August 29, 2017 7:59 AM  

During the Obama days, I had the pleasure of "working" with a militant leftist. Atheist, academic, unhealthy, druggy/alcoholic, divorcee, contrarian, and generally messed up. He was out right anti-Christian, anti-government (accept where his rights and thoughts were concerned), and anti-American. When he discussed religion with you, the Christians were always the bad guys but when you bring up Muslims, he had nothing but praise for it - and he would do it with a smile. Leading up to the Trump candidacy, he would often come to work whining about Trumps rise to power. I can only imagine how he is now.

Another leftist I know tends to be contrarian, delving into philosophies where if you ask him a simple "How are you?", his response is always "I don't know..." Interactions with him are like walking on eggshells, he is that intense. To even bring up a topic that goes against his belief makes you a target and he will attack you thinking he is doing the world a favor. I heard of interaction between him and another guy (Christian, engineer, masculine) where race realism comes up in a discussion. Triggered him. He was bitching to the world calling the guy a Nazi. You could attempt to reason the existence of Nazis with him but he won't buy it. He was that indoctrinated.

The pattern is the same. They fit the gamma and omega molds to a T. Worst off, they are anti-Christian and anti-civic, every single time - not realizing their own hypocrisy. They are truly agents of chaos.

Blogger Johnny August 29, 2017 8:01 AM  

Cowardly or brave, none of us want to be hurt and modifying behavior when dealing with somebody who is a potential threat is routine. In men it can be seen in how big a guy is. Big guys grow up not commonly feeling threatened and often have a calm assertiveness as a result. Little guys (the nerd stereotype) often end up being meek or feisty. The feisty-ness is an overcompensation.

As for our elite, their opinion of foreigners has little to do with foreigners. It is about us, the middle and lower classes. Harassment or deprecation is a way of gaining control over other people, and the now routine deprecation of western societies produces an element of submission. It is the submission in us that they want. They are not building up Islam, they are running down Christianity by building up Islam. They are not celebrating diversity, they are running down conventional culture. (The so called diverse society is an oxymoron.)

Christianity got into the same thing in the Middle Ages. They got humility out of the parishioners by portraying them as sinners that needed fixing, and empowering the priest was the fix. The more sin the better, and the result was a guilt trip society, and this is where our current social elite would like us to be.

(The link at @13 gets into this.)

Blogger Mr.MantraMan August 29, 2017 8:02 AM  

But conservatives always fall into the trap of fighting everybody all the time every time. Next week the media will start a different fight and conservatives will rush off to be the stooge for the millionth time.

The Left is comprised of lots of little grouplets, let them fight it out at least for lulz.

Blogger LES August 29, 2017 8:03 AM  

Both islam and the Left are opposed to Christendom. Everyone fears radicalized Muslims.

Islam is not monolithic and there are Muslim countries that want to have a reformation and become part of the 21st century. Why isn't the US bombing and killing Muslims in Indonesia, the largest Muslim country?

Anonymous Flat Lander August 29, 2017 8:04 AM  

Alphas come in all colours of the rainbow for the simple reason that social hierarchies/status games informed by by the sexual market occur everywhere. Joss Whedon became a de facto Alpha and banged tons of actresses for 16 years, but he maintains that it's the evil patriarchy that made him do it.

Some even advance that it's the Blue Pill Alphas contributed mightily to the mess we are in.

Blogger Johnny August 29, 2017 8:05 AM  

VD wrote:she was both taken aback and turned on

My take is that women have an inherent approach avoidance response to sex. That is why women need to be pandered to at first or always. The need is to overcome the feeling of deprecation that goes with the sex act.

Blogger szopen August 29, 2017 8:12 AM  

Resident Moron™ wrote:Men don't know or care about female status hierarchies, but I'm going to write three pages about it.

OK.

(1) When someone here writes "women are this" and "men are this" I know this actually means "most women" or "plurality of men". I thought I do not have to write any kind of qualifier in my post.

(2) I do not give a shit about female hierachies in any sense other than being curious in the same way I am curious about social structures in ant colonies.

(3) I have not written "men don't know" but "it's hard for men to observe". Now, it's nothing to be proud about, but in one period of my life girls treated me like some kind of mascott, and quite a few were frequently visit my home. In fact, while thinking about this response an extremely unflattering thought came to me how they were treated me those long passed days. Nevertheless, because of that I had plenty of opportunity to observe the interactions between the girls, and how they were seeing the world around them. It does not give me any special insight about women's psyche, as was later proven by me comitting every mistake in the book (pedestalising, failing the shit tests etc) when I was tired of being treated like their best friend. But it I got some material upon which I may base my thoughts.

And one is that girl really DO care about what other girls think. The girls I interacted with were conformist bunch always seeking for the other girls opinions on everything.

Yes, exceptions existed. NAWALT and so on.

Anonymous Dyskord August 29, 2017 8:13 AM  

@53

Its easy to fall into the equality trap. Its how our society has neutered men. We are all equal. We are all the same. Excellence is being ordinary.

As a man being pantsed in front of peers is a show of disrespect and when specifically done in the presence of the opposite sex, a deliberate attempt to humiliate.
The victim male has few methods of response.
a) accept the disgrace and acknowledge your status as low man on the social totem pole.
b) Pretend to be part of the joke- laugh with the others. Try to save face despite the embarrassment.
c)get angry- Though if the perpetrator is stronger, more popular and socially superior then thoughtless, directionless anger/violence would likely only increase the humiliation.

We must then assume that a woman would respond the same, having the same motivation.
However a popular girl dating a popular Alpha would by no means react the same.
she is popular, desired and admired. By flipping her skirt she wasn't humiliated. he merely gave the boys a peek of what they desired. It probably gave her momentary social boost.


Blogger SmockMan August 29, 2017 8:20 AM  

I see why VD put the disclaimer.

Blogger szopen August 29, 2017 8:23 AM  

@64
"However a popular girl dating a popular Alpha would by no means react the same.
she is popular, desired and admired. By flipping her skirt she wasn't humiliated. he merely gave the boys a peek of what they desired. It probably gave her momentary social boost. "

Really? If you would see a boy who flips a skirt of his girl that would raise your opinion of the girl?!

Anonymous Flat Lander August 29, 2017 8:25 AM  

Johnny wrote:VD wrote:she was both taken aback and turned on

My take is that women have an inherent approach avoidance response to sex. That is why women need to be pandered to at first or always. The need is to overcome the feeling of deprecation that goes with the sex act.


Comfort, familiarity, safety are all antithetical to unnegotiated desire and a fast sexual response.

When you describe is the terribly inefficient Beta/provider game: you jump through her hoops (pandering, dinner dates, comfort) and when you have shown enough compliance, she lets you bang her on the 10th date and then divorces you after 5 years.

Blogger Harambe August 29, 2017 8:26 AM  

Honestly, I would think her a slut if she merely giggled about it.

Blogger szopen August 29, 2017 8:29 AM  

Harambe wrote:Honestly, I would think her a slut if she merely giggled about it.

This.

Blogger Artisanal Toad August 29, 2017 8:31 AM  

@49

"Men tolerate a lot of crazy actions from women if the woman is sufficiently hot enough, don't they? But do the men really "like" the crazy?"

Crazy in the head has a very high correlation to crazy in bed. If as you say, she is sufficiently hot enough, the answer is quite apparent. Especially if the man *isn't* an alpha, because alpha's have the capacity to obtain women who are both sufficiently hot and feminine.

"And usually when a woman leaves an alpha, it is usually because his behavior has finally exceeded what her attraction is able to permit."

Check your assumptions. Women like dominant behavior that is typically translated as "asshole" or "jerk" behavior from a man they are attracted to, because that triggers and reinforces their attraction response. However, in the long term, they only stick around if he also meets the threshold of her comfort and security needs. The alpha will blow through her shit tests, but when he fails her loyalty tests that spells the end of the relationship.

Why does she claim she left because of his asshole behavior, rather than because he didn't provide her with the comfort of knowing he would continue to give her that behavior and not dump her whenever he felt like it? Women love the asshole alpha behavior but they also need the beta comfort and security too. Typically they cannot get both in one man. Alpha fux and Beta bux sums up the dynamic quite well. With the claim that she was a victim of alpha abuse, she preserves her ability to stroke the ego of a beta provider she isn't really attracted to in order to get his provisioning.

Rather than listen to what women say, observe what they do.

Blogger Doug Cranmer August 29, 2017 8:32 AM  

You all have this same way of talking. It sticks out like a sore thumb.

Anonymous Flat Lander August 29, 2017 8:34 AM  

szopen wrote:@64
[...]
Really? If you would see a boy who flips a skirt of his girl that would raise your opinion of the girl?!


Of course. That's a healthy relationship between a man and his appropriately submissive girl. She may squeal and protest, but she's loving it.

You really need to stop listening to what women say about themselves and their relationships.

Blogger Othmar Regin August 29, 2017 8:38 AM  

Look we've got 3 Great enemies, the SWJs/Left, Islam, Zionist-Christianity - all number in the hundreds of millions(even Billions) how big are we? tens/hundreds of thousands?! maybe.. just think about it. We got no chance in a million to defeat anybody without them exhausting them selves 1st, and the best way to achieve this by allowing them(temporarily) to have exactly what they want while "we" wait till the shit-storm has passed all the while growing and getting stronger.

I link a great video by Varg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8180IssOz1s

Blogger Desdichado August 29, 2017 8:38 AM  

szopen wrote:And one is that girl really DO care about what other girls think. The girls I interacted with were conformist bunch always seeking for the other girls opinions on everything.

Yes, exceptions existed. NAWALT and so on.

All you had to say was "crab basket effect." Yeah, yeah—we've all heard of it.

Of course the girl was embarrassed. But not in the same way as a guy would be. Gaston displayed to her and the rest of the school that she was his; that he claimed her, and she could do with her as he pleased. Given that that's usually what gals crave and work for; to be claimed by a high status man, the false equivalencies are rather silly.

Calling it sexual assault is absolutely absurd on multiple levels. Not only would a man not feel that it's sexual assault if it happened to him (pantsed publicly, etc.) but women only think its sexual assault if it's Kevin who does it. Calling it that is cringe-worthy white-knighting, pedestalizing, and the actions of a man who desperately needs to reframe.

Blogger szopen August 29, 2017 8:39 AM  

Flat Lander wrote:szopen wrote:@64

[...]

Really? If you would see a boy who flips a skirt of his girl that would raise your opinion of the girl?!


Of course. That's a healthy relationship between a man and his appropriately submissive girl. She may squeal and protest, but she's loving it.

You really need to stop listening to what women say about themselves and their relationships.

I don't care about what they say. I know that her value would immedietely drop like a stone in my eyes. Just like a Harambe above stated, I would consider her a slut if she would reacted in any other way than being extremely embarassed (which would not change my opinion, only caused me to pity her) or hit the guy (Which would raise my opinion of her). I am saying here about my visceral first reaction. I am really deeply surprised that anyone would think differently.

Anonymous Dyskord August 29, 2017 8:44 AM  

@66
Remember were talking about High schoolers.
Secondly I never said it would raise the boys opinion of her or grant her higher esteem.
I said it would raise momentarily her social status as the hottest girl in school.
To put it bluntly the horny high school boys will fixate on the flip skirt, those who saw it and those who missed it. For a short time it will be the talk of the school.
Her desirability will go up amongst the boys.

Blogger Robert Divinity August 29, 2017 8:45 AM  

Outstanding identification of the primary problem: cowardice. Stateside it's not just the Left, either. The Cucks always will side with communist terrorists and denounce the handful of self-proclaimed Nazis and Klansmen. The former poses an actual threat to the Romneys and Rubios. The latter are theoretical menances.

And while a person from the Right may shrug off the charge of racism

More increasingly do, but see the above. It's still a semi-effective control mechanism for the communists, albeit nowhere near as powerful as in the past.

Anonymous I'm Not a Fascist. But My Sons Are. August 29, 2017 8:46 AM  

I am really deeply surprised that anyone would think differently.

That's because you're a bride hunter. They ain't all brides, yo.

Blogger Desdichado August 29, 2017 8:52 AM  

szopen wrote:I don't care about what they say. I know that her value would immedietely drop like a stone in my eyes. Just like a Harambe above stated, I would consider her a slut if she would reacted in any other way than being extremely embarassed (which would not change my opinion, only caused me to pity her) or hit the guy (Which would raise my opinion of her). I am saying here about my visceral first reaction. I am really deeply surprised that anyone would think differently.
Yes, all of that is true. But you are not typical, you are a traditional guy looking for a traditional girl. Many of us arguing with you are too, but unlike you, we're not delusional about our preferences being dominant or normal in the population at large.

Blogger Aeoli Pera August 29, 2017 8:54 AM  

This is what it looks like when a Delta gets woke.

Blogger szopen August 29, 2017 8:54 AM  

Desdichado wrote:szopen wrote:And one is that girl really DO care about what other girls think. The girls I interacted with were conformist bunch always seeking for the other girls opinions on everything.

Yes, exceptions existed. NAWALT and so on.


All you had to say was "crab basket effect." Yeah, yeah—we've all heard of it.

Heh, I haven't heard the term before. I've googled it and I found a nice blog to read. Thanks!


Of course the girl was embarrassed. But not in the same way as a guy would be. Gaston displayed to her and the rest of the school that she was his; that he claimed her, and she could do with her as he pleased.

Agreed it was different; But still I disagree that he merely shown that she is his. It all depends on the social context; In my country, in my times what he did would not signify merely that she is his, but that he does not value her much and that he thinks she has such a low value that he can replace her with any other girl any time. Whether or not this is true is immaterial, the fact is that this, in my humble opinion, simply had to lower the social standing of the girl. Girls may want to f* an alpha, but they also want to cherish an illusion that they are irreplaceable. Losing an illusion is not a pleasant thing, especially in public.

Compare a boy saying in public to a girl "you are my property" to "you are my slut". Both signify dominance.

I bet she would not feel humiliated by antyhing he would order her to do in private; in public, that's a completely different thing.


Calling it sexual assault is absolutely absurd on multiple levels. Not only would a man not feel that it's sexual assault if it happened to him (pantsed publicly, etc.) but women only think its sexual assault if it's Kevin who does it. .

Agreed.

Blogger Desdichado August 29, 2017 8:59 AM  

@81. Sure; you're not wrong there. One aspect of his signaling was that he didn't value her. Most women on facing that signal will double-down on trying to impress him with her value, though—not take the hint that they'd be better off with someone else.

Blogger szopen August 29, 2017 9:01 AM  

Desdichado wrote:szopen wrote:I don't care about what they say. I know that her value would immedietely drop like a stone in my eyes. Just like a Harambe above stated, I would consider her a slut if she would reacted in any other way than being extremely embarassed (which would not change my opinion, only caused me to pity her) or hit the guy (Which would raise my opinion of her). I am saying here about my visceral first reaction. I am really deeply surprised that anyone would think differently.

Yes, all of that is true. But you are not typical, you are a traditional guy looking for a traditional girl. Many of us arguing with you are too, but unlike you, we're not delusional about our preferences being dominant or normal in the population at large.


Hmm, maybe you are right. Moreover, maybe situation in Poland few decades ago can't be compared to the situation in US nowadays, so I guess I will shut up.

BTW, I am married since I was 23.

Blogger Cail Corishev August 29, 2017 9:03 AM  

Jane didn't blast Gaston because she liked being Gaston's girlfriend. Nothing to do with fear of being assaulted by the big dude. Assuming it bothered her at all, which it probably didn't, or at worst in an ambiguous embarrassed-and-turned-on way.

I didn't read any further.

Anonymous DissidentRight August 29, 2017 9:07 AM  

Leftists are about as “afraid” as the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorra, and just as innocent. Lot looked at those towns and saw many innocents. The angels of death did not. Don’t be afraid; let God sort the dead.

Blogger Cail Corishev August 29, 2017 9:14 AM  

Actually, what surprise me in this story is in how she treated Kevin

Yes, that part reads like an 80s teen movie to me. I've never seen a girl go nuclear on a guy like that, and all the times I've been turned down by a hottie, she tried to do it nicely with a LJBF. Real people have assured me it happens, though. And the Kevins of the real world usually don't approach the Janes in the first place, so if one does, who knows.

Blogger Othmar Regin August 29, 2017 9:15 AM  

@85 even though we probably think of a different "God" I agree 100% there is nothing worth saving anymore, the Alt-Right needs to stop white-knighting for this (past or present) civilization, we need to flush it all down the toilet and go back to the drawing board.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine August 29, 2017 9:17 AM  

Jane doesn't get aggressive to Gaston because she can only lose out of that deal. She wants to keep Gaston.

Sure, the deltas and gammas would love it, but she doesn't care about them.

She does, however, have to act embarrassed, whether or not she actually is, because the other girls and the traditional boys (whatever status) would immediately finger her for a slut if she doesn't. Maybe she is. Maybe she isn't. The only reason she'd do something like giggling is if she was both a slut, and acting up as rebellious to some authority.

Blogger Robert Divinity August 29, 2017 9:19 AM  

I agree 100% there is nothing worth saving anymore, the Alt-Right needs to stop white-knighting for this (past or present) civilization

For those of us who see Western Civilization as humanity's pinnacle and still salvageable, this comes across as unmerited defeatism. It's "knighting." Period.

Blogger Cecil Henry August 29, 2017 9:19 AM  



Well, this guy is only 15 years behind in waking up, and then only tepidly.

I guess all the virtue signalling points have been rung out.

Good start, you have a long way to go.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine August 29, 2017 9:20 AM  

@82. Desdichado, "Sure; you're not wrong there. One aspect of his signaling was that he didn't value her. Most women on facing that signal will double-down on trying to impress him with her value, though—not take the hint that they'd be better off with someone else."

Depends. If she just tried a shit test on him within a few seconds before that, he just passed it with flying colors by saying "woman, you're not my boss. Observe."

It's not necessarily "I don't value you." It is "I don't value you as much as you think I do."

Anonymous Bowman August 29, 2017 9:22 AM  

"Feminists and homosexuals and leftists in general are scared of being hurt and killed"
LOL, centrist projecting himself.
Feminists and homosexuals and leftists are the ones leading the charge anti-West, anti-White, anti-civilization.
Feminists and homosexuals and leftists are the ones who cover Islam barbaric nature, immigration's madness, and communism horrors.

Anonymous Flat Lander August 29, 2017 9:26 AM  

szopen wrote:Desdichado wrote:szopen wrote:I don't care about what they say. I know that her value would immedietely drop like a stone in my eyes. Just like a Harambe above stated, I would consider her a slut if she would reacted in any other way than being extremely embarassed (which would not change my opinion, only caused me to pity her) or hit the guy (Which would raise my opinion of her). I am saying here about my visceral first reaction. I am really deeply surprised that anyone would think differently.

Yes, all of that is true. But you are not typical, you are a traditional guy looking for a traditional girl. Many of us arguing with you are too, but unlike you, we're not delusional about our preferences being dominant or normal in the population at large.


Hmm, maybe you are right. Moreover, maybe situation in Poland few decades ago can't be compared to the situation in US nowadays, so I guess I will shut up.

BTW, I am married since I was 23.


All women are promiscuous, given the right incentives and environment. That's an evolutionarily selected for trait. And that includes contemporary Poland, where restraints on female behaviour have been lifted in the same way as in the West.

Also:
szopen wrote:Girls may want to f* an alpha, but they also want to cherish an illusion that they are irreplaceable. Losing an illusion is not a pleasant thing, especially in public.

That's your projection speaking. No girl wants to be with a man without options. That's why an abundance mentality coupled with dashes of dread and unapologetic displays of public dominance are so effective at maintaining a girl's attraction, affection and desire.

If you are a traditionalist Christian guy, Dalrock has a lot to say in a way that may resonate better with your sensibilities.

Finally, I am starting soon red pill/positive masculinity workshops in Warsaw. If you want to share your experiences, you are welcome.

Blogger Orc_Democracy August 29, 2017 9:31 AM  

Muslim immigration is a scenario of the more dominant males moving in on the beta/gamma English males. The English women don't really mind because they might get a chance with the more audacious males at the end. While the beta/gamma English complain that the muzzies aren't true gentlemen.

Blogger Harambe August 29, 2017 9:31 AM  

Psychopaths get more quality poon

Anonymous Johnny Mayonnaise August 29, 2017 9:33 AM  

@22 Wayne:

Kevin/Jane/Gaston interaction sounds like the basic plot of most John Hughes films.

Yes, due to its stunning lack of originality.

"Gaston" -- rrriiiiight -- is a cartoon: Football/soccer player. Handsome. Muscular. Jock's jock. Cruel. Gets the beautiful, popular girl, who also happens to be cruel. And swirlies! And pantsing!

Eye roll ...

The bad egg in my high school was a relatively slender doper who played Lacrosse, had a terrible complexion, drove a beat-up two-door Ford Torino, and picked fights with guys from other schools "just for the fun of it." Definitely not John Hughes material.

"Gaston" is pure fantasy. Perhaps that's why the writer prefers to stay anonymous ...


Anonymous trev006 August 29, 2017 9:34 AM  

Intriguing. I had always assumed that bravery, or at least the capacity to harm, was why the Alt-Right admires Breivik no matter what issues they had with his tactics, and why they tolerated the Alt-Reich for as long as they did. The capacity for being on the social margins, plus being ready to inflict pain.

Blogger Emmanuel Mateo-Morales August 29, 2017 9:41 AM  

"The bad thing about this is that a great many innocent people, feminists and homosexuals and everything else, will suffer for the Left’s cowardice in the face of the true enemy."

This is about the only point I contest. Feminists and fags aren't innocent and are only getting what they had coming.

Blogger SirGroggy August 29, 2017 9:46 AM  

Why didn't she dump his ass on the spot?

It's spelled arse. Are you really an Englishmen?

The thing I’ve noticed about the Left these days is that it is largely composed of cowards.

The right isn't brimming with bravery either, have you noticed? As Vox said before, SJWs goes to one extreme, putting politics above everything else, whereas right-wing people tend to go to the other extreme, suppressing their politics and not speaking up, but instead focusing on their life's duties and keeping politics out of it - this is also a fault and there is a lack of bravery.

So tell me, why aren't you protesting the migrant crisis in Europe?

Because they see non-white people as oppressed victims and needing support. In leftism, the victim is sacred. It is as a mother to a crying infant - everything else must be put on hold to look after the victim.

Why aren’t you standing up for the rights of Muslim women?

Actually you are wrong - they do. They drone on endlessly about how women are oppressed by men all across the world. They do it constantly. They say, yes we stand up for Muslim women, but why just Muslim women? We stand up for all women not just Muslim women.

The correct stance: how Muslims set up their society is not our business. They can run their societies how they see fit. It is not our problem. When it is safe for them to go back, they must go back to their countries, where they will be able to run their Islamic societies how they please. It is not our business to tell them how to treat their women and families. That is for them to decide, to reform or not, as they see fit. They should stay in their countries and we should stay in ours, and we should respect each-other's national sovereignty and leave each-other to our own religions.

Why do you not see Radical Islam as a threat to your very existence?

Because it most likely isn't, unless they get nuclear weapons.

The only threat right now is demographic displacement and replacement, and that can happen not just from Muslims, but anybody who is non-European. Whether it is Muslims or Mexicans, the result is the same more or less, which is the inevitable rise of identity politics. Yes the Muslims are the worst and the most hostile to the west, and the most immoral according to Christian morals. But all third world immigration is catastrophic, and this includes the lowering of the population average IQ - the dysgenic effect.

Feminists and homosexuals and leftists in general are scared of being hurt and killed. And who could blame them? No one is immune to fear.

Women are not meant to be brave. It is a mistake to place women in a position requiring bravery. Homosexuals have taken on a female identity and so are in the same place. It is up to men to be brave. This was known at all times in human history - it is the current prevailing insanity of our culture which requires right-wing nut jobs such as myself to remind somebody of that which has always been known by humans - except now, in the west. It is still known in Arabia, for instance - and they are right about that. That is why Islam is not uniformly bad - they still remember things we have forgotten in our degeneracy.

Feminism is a much, much, much more dangerous enemy than Islam. Islam is not a problem unless you let it overrun your borders. If you have strong men in power, then this will not be allowed to happen. If you allow feminism to feminise your society, then you will have women, homosexuals and weak men in power - thus your country will be overrun by all sorts of non-European immigrants - from where it does not particularly matter. Feminism has already done the damage, and it is a catastrophe from which the west will struggle to recover, probably for centuries.

Blogger pyrrhus August 29, 2017 9:52 AM  

Women are cowards, yes, because they are the weaker sex. But the actual answer to their attitude is that women love Bad Boys, because their instincts tell them that Bad Boys are alpha males. And invaders from other cultures are the ultimate Bad Boys, while the men who have failed to repel them are Betas or worse to the female psyche....

Blogger SirGroggy August 29, 2017 9:53 AM  

The bad thing about this is that a great many innocent people, feminists and homosexuals and everything else, will suffer for the Left’s cowardice in the face of the true enemy.

Islam is not the true enemy. It is the weakness of our own culture that is the true enemy. If our own culture was solid and strong, then this would not have been allowed to happen. Emphasis on allowed. We were not defeated in war by Islam or any external enemy - this was self-inflicted. Never forget that.

Anonymous Dyskord August 29, 2017 9:53 AM  

@85
Most of the left have no idea who or what the brown/ black masses they champion are.
To Joe and Jane liberal who practice faux paganism because its trendy. Are avowed Atheists because they can't grasp the idea of a being more intelligent and greater than they are. "Its an imaginary friend in the sky RFLmao"
Joe and Jane are secular. they get their cues from reddit and the news and popular zines. To them virtue signalling is more important than actual virtue and moral outrage is superior to morality.
They believe that the white man is the oppressor. they believe in white guilt. They don't have any clue nor any impetus to learn what a world would be like without whitey in charge. In their minds its a utopia. In their heart of hearts they envision the noble savages living proudly without modern technology and at one with their environment.
they don't honestly believe the world will change, can change. Everything will be the same only the guy in charge will be brown or tan or black or whatever.
To them anything not white, liberal and atheist but part of the diversity is an amorphous blob. The brown or black folks in their mind haven't got their own cultures, religions, beliefs, morals or virtues. the blob doesn't have any goals other than Jane and Joe's. the blob are victims who will be placed on pedestals and given power. Then they blob will continue to run the world the way its always been run...
Liberals aren't all evil commies. Some are just wilfully ignorant.

Blogger Emmanuel Mateo-Morales August 29, 2017 9:54 AM  

@9

Who started WW1? Europeans.

Who started WW2? Europeans.

Both of which were horrible wars that are probably the two most important events in world history that lead us to this precipice.

Who loves socialism more generally? Europeans.

Who loves abortion on demand more generally? Europeans.

Who loves assisted suicide on demand more generally? Europeans.

Who are bunch of godless wretches more generally? Europeans.

Who have a greater love for their foreign subversives more generally? Europeans.

Whose culture is so weak that there's a genuine possibility that their foreign subversives will destroy them even though that despite all the crap going on, they haven't suffered a tenth of the horribleness American foreign subversives have placed on it? Europeans.

Who has the greater and longer history of Imperialism and Colonialism? Europeans.

Who has a greater and longer history of starting wars (as French apologists like to use)? Europeans.

Blogger pyrrhus August 29, 2017 9:55 AM  

Gaston was a real Bad Boy, so Jane was never going to be anything but submissive to him....

Anonymous Flat Lander August 29, 2017 9:58 AM  

SirGroggy wrote:
[snip]

When it is safe for them to go back, they must go back to their countries, where they will be able to run their Islamic societies how they please.


Full agreement with all your points, except for the bolded part. Safety and public order in their countries is not our business either.

Blogger pyrrhus August 29, 2017 9:58 AM  

"The bad thing about this is that a great many innocent people, feminists and homosexuals and everything else, will suffer for the Left’s cowardice in the face of the true enemy."

They aren't innocent, and there is nothing unfair about suffering for your collective cowardice and denial of civilizational decency. The punishment will fit the crime....

Blogger Koanic August 29, 2017 10:06 AM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger CM August 29, 2017 10:06 AM  

Jane doesn't get aggressive to Gaston because she can only lose out of that deal. She wants to keep Gaston.

I think the dynamics would have shifted if there had been a higher status male in the community (the school).

If there were options, she may have tolerated less.

This is only a guess, though.

Blogger Koanic August 29, 2017 10:07 AM  

Do not try to determine whether flashing her panties is moral. That is impossible.

Instead, only try to realize the truth:
there is no panties.

Then you'll see that is is not the girl's ass which flashes, it is only your alpha self.

Blogger Rez Zircon August 29, 2017 10:07 AM  

An interesting take, but I think doesn't quite expose the level of instinct at work like this does:

http://blog.jim.com/war/why-feminists-support-islamic-rape-jihad/

which concludes:

"And feminists, in supporting Rape Jihad, are unconsciously pursuing their optimal evolutionary reproductive strategy, which is to be sold naked in chains on the auction block by Islamic State.

Female emancipation is a shit test that we failed, and feminists support Rape Jihad because they are unconsciously looking for men who will pass their shit test."

Of course being a coward is a good way to fail a shit test, so it's really all one thing.

Anonymous A Most Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents August 29, 2017 10:13 AM  

Too many words, and too much Gamma. The Left is simple in an abstract sense, this is the true Leftard motto:

Better to rule in Hell than serve in Heaven.

Everything else comes from this position.

Blogger Emmanuel Mateo-Morales August 29, 2017 10:15 AM  

@56

I hope they like seeing why you don't start a land war in North American anymore than you do in Asia then and that those fags can swim thousands of miles.

Blogger Sterling Pilgrim August 29, 2017 10:15 AM  

I was friends with a Gaston in high school... super dominant in our little circles, could get girl's numbers like Kevin would get zits before school pictures.
He settled down in College with a "nice, pretty girl" from a prominent family in the college town. They then moved to the country on land his parents owned and she, being a nurse, struck up an affair with a doctor.
An over-weight doctor with glasses and average looks, basically a Kevin all grown up with a fat wallet.
Go figure.

Anonymous Kat August 29, 2017 10:17 AM  

From my perspective re the skirt flip. I've been in some situations where I felt like a guy could get me to do something I'd regret later, and I got out of there as fast as I could. Coming from a culture where virginity was mandated those "tingles" could scare the living daylights out of me. I would say self-preserving fear + tingles are the most likely response for a "good girl" who truly believes her future marriageability depends on her actions that day.

Anonymous TheTruthIsNeverAcceptable August 29, 2017 10:18 AM  

Othmar Regin wrote:@85 even though we probably think of a different "God" I agree 100% there is nothing worth saving anymore, the Alt-Right needs to stop white-knighting for this (past or present) civilization, we need to flush it all down the toilet and go back to the drawing board.

We moderns have this insulation to the reality of history and the times of depravity that came before us. Renewing/restoring the culture is what the concept of Christian revival is about and by it God proves he is not finished with us yet and we are not yet ready for the apocalypse. Let us hope revival is on the horizon. Many people are fervantly praying for it. It not, well, the end comes.

Blogger Scuzzaman August 29, 2017 10:21 AM  

OT but related:

Trump Compared To What?

"4) Bluestockings Cannot Win
The Republican Party was calcified intellectually and ethically. It had lost two consecutive elections to Barack Obama. Despite eventual control of Congress, the presidency, and the Supreme Court (due to grassroots activism and Tea Party exuberance), the government grew ever larger in the last decade, taxes rose, regulations increased, and political correctness engulfed even more of our lives from the universities to the ways we’re permitted to discuss political issues such as illegal immigration in public. Before Obama doubled the national debt, a Republican president had done the same.

In truth, the Republican Party had returned to its 1960 caricatures of bluestocking establishmentarians, gauging its success by the health of Wall Street rather than Main Street, occasional compliments from the New York Times, and praise from the European Union, the United Nations, and the World Bank—while half the country in the interior was written off as globalization’s sore losers.
"

Blogger SirGroggy August 29, 2017 10:23 AM  

Right wing is masculine; Left wing is feminine.

That is decreasingly the case due to the rise of identity politics.

In the Trump/Hillary election, white men and women voted for Trump, everybody else voted for Hillary.

If you are not white but vote right-wing in the west, it means you support the continued white majority even though you are not white. E.g. a black man in the USA voting Trump because he doesn't want the country to be overrun with illegal immigrants.

Blogger ZhukovG August 29, 2017 10:23 AM  

@Emmanuel Mateo-Morales: In the scenario I am considering the Europeans and Asians come not as unwelcome invaders but invited and welcomed bringers of order.

I certainly hope it does not come to that. Which is why we need to ensure a viable successor state to the USA (assuming we can't save the USA itself)that can assume control of the American nuclear arsenal.

Blogger Quilp August 29, 2017 10:26 AM  

If people operate solely at the level of emotion (fear) that means it's very difficult to reach them with dialectic or rhetoric. I suppose that's true of some. Most on the left I believe aren't afraid, they love being the bully.

Virtue signaling belongs more (at least hypothetically) to a shame & honor society than a Western Christian Nation, where virtue may be seen, but isn't supposed to be proclaimed by the self. As much as the left screams about slut shaming, fat shaming etc, they are forever pushing us towards shame & honor, just categories they think are important.
What are the chances "Jane" grew up to be an SJW? I would think high.

Blogger Desdichado August 29, 2017 10:28 AM  

Kat wrote:From my perspective re the skirt flip. I've been in some situations where I felt like a guy could get me to do something I'd regret later, and I got out of there as fast as I could. Coming from a culture where virginity was mandated those "tingles" could scare the living daylights out of me. I would say self-preserving fear + tingles are the most likely response for a "good girl" who truly believes her future marriageability depends on her actions that day.
I'd feel pretty sure that that already sailed for Jane; the public display of his dominance and possessiveness was just the public expression of what had already happened in private.

Blogger SirGroggy August 29, 2017 10:30 AM  

"And feminists, in supporting Rape Jihad, are unconsciously pursuing their optimal evolutionary reproductive strategy, which is to be sold naked in chains on the auction block by Islamic State.

Way too convoluted and pseudo-scientific.

We should have learned by now that the leftist will always find a way to integrate information into their narrative. ISIS raping women, for instance. This is not a problem with immigration, it is a problem with patriarchy and toxic masculinity, and we need to educate these lovely dark skinned handsome Muslim young men to stop being so wild. It's Beauty and the Beast. The Muslim men are beasts and women love to be able to tame and civilise wild men. It never occurs to them to shut the borders and it never occurs to them that these people don't belong here. As for women being treated badly in the Islamic world, that is also integrated into their narrative as proof that we need to stand up for women's rights all over the world and keep making 'progress' just as we have made progress in the west.

Anonymous Jeff August 29, 2017 10:39 AM  

These girls don't look scared to me.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/09/06/00/2C01C4AE00000578-3223828-image-a-21_1441496354570.jpg

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey August 29, 2017 10:39 AM  

@4 Flat Lander

Exactly. Attributing Jane's reaction solely to physical fear is... wow, just wow. I can't even. Also, "feminism - the radical notion that women are human beings?" lolwut?

The rest of the piece is solid, but seems to overemphasize physical fear relative than fear of social exclusion/ outgrouping. And I would suspect that there is a strong component of hatred, not just fear. Perhaps this is their chance to shove Gaston's head in the toilet?

Blogger Azure Amaranthine August 29, 2017 10:39 AM  

"The Muslim men are beasts and women love to be able to tame and civilise wild men. It never occurs to them to shut the borders and it never occurs to them that these people don't belong here."

It also never occurs to them that a woman can only ever "tame" a weak and self-crippled man.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine August 29, 2017 10:44 AM  

"seems to overemphasize physical fear"

Extrapolate. This is a less-than-physically-capable male who is either not coherent enough to apply any other potential modes of force to the equation.

Blogger SirGroggy August 29, 2017 10:48 AM  

Jeff wrote:These girls don't look scared to me.


Exactly. They are not cowards - on the contrary, they are pathologically altruistic.

"And feminists, in supporting Rape Jihad, are unconsciously pursuing their optimal evolutionary reproductive strategy, which is to be sold naked in chains on the auction block by Islamic State.

Also, in evolutionary psychology, women are not promiscuous but on the contrary are much more selective than men. Women want to mate with a high quality man who has a good chance of staying and providing and protecting. So, they are not looking to be ill-treated, on the contrary they need protection when they are vulnerable during their pregnancy and they will have vulnerable infants to protect also. That is why women are attracted to an 'alpha' male, not because he will ill-treat them but because he is more likely to be able to protect them and provide resources for her and her babies. Plus, an 'alpha' male is likely to have earned the respect of the other men of the tribe, therefore he is more likely to be a strong man of virtue and therefore a good choice of mate. Jordan Peterson called this 'out-sourcing' of part of the mate selection process. In mythology the word for alpha male is hero - a man of high virtue. And it all makes sense.

Blogger tuberman August 29, 2017 10:49 AM  

What do the "Janes" really do about the "Gastons?"

Most often, they have it both ways, as they DO GET A THRILL from the "brutes" cruelty and aggression, and then they talk to their GFs about how horrible it all was (victim again).

She is likely to have sex with with him, and then because she is so wonderful, will eventually have a nasty breakup with him, unless he is truly dangerous (not often in Western society). Seen this several times, and it was fun to watch.

I'd even seen one good/bad girl play it every witch way (pun intended). She was as much of a player as all the bad boyz, then became a good girl again and married a nice guy, good husband prospect.

Blogger SirGroggy August 29, 2017 10:55 AM  

Full agreement with all your points, except for the bolded part. Safety and public order in their countries is not our business either.

Perhaps. Is it morally right to return genuine refugees to a war zone? I say, wait until it's safe.

Blogger tuberman August 29, 2017 11:00 AM  

125. SG

"Exactly. They are not cowards - on the contrary, they are pathologically altruistic."

That is exactly the disease, and these low lives believe they are angels.

Anonymous Flat Lander August 29, 2017 11:07 AM  

SirGroggy wrote:Full agreement with all your points, except for the bolded part. Safety and public order in their countries is not our business either.

Perhaps. Is it morally right to return genuine refugees to a war zone? I say, wait until it's safe.


Not advocating dumping them in the middle of a hot conflict, but temporary camps in safe zones as close as possible to their homelands are cheaper and safer for us than letting them live in social housing, on our streets and in favellas like the Calais jungle.

Blogger RedPill Angel August 29, 2017 11:13 AM  

The connection between the skirt flipping in high school, and the present situation of the Left is a bit tenuous, but his conclusions are correct. The Left isn't just scared, they have been terrified into a societal level case of Stockholm Syndrome. The symptoms include positive feelings towards their captor; refusal to cooperate with police forces and other government authorities; belief in the humanity of their captor and adoption of the values of the captor.

The skirt flipping is what used to be called "teasing" and was seen as an indication of interest, however demeaning. A girl with a strong loving father in the home would not have hesitated to slap him, though, despite his high status. The pretty girl's acceptance betrayed neediness.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine August 29, 2017 11:17 AM  

"Is it morally right to return genuine refugees to a war zone? I say, wait until it's safe."

Is it morally right to aid people in escaping the just consequences of their actions?

Don't kid yourself. Those places were warzones before we ever got involved.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine August 29, 2017 11:19 AM  

@128. It's not even pathological altruism. Altruism would care about the actual results.

It's patholgical vainglory or lust disguising itself as altruism.

Anonymous Gen. Kong August 29, 2017 11:25 AM  

Fear is an insufficient explanation for the silence of bother sisterhoods (feminists and gays) in the face of Musloid invasion and well-documented Musloid behavior towards both groups, though it no doubt plays a part. For one thing, both groups are not only silent about the crimes of Musloids and dindus (who I note the guest author failed to mention), but actively endorse the ongoing importation of more Musloids and dindus by the genocidal native ruling elite, their connected (((moneybags))), the (((fake news))), the fake schools, the fake church, the fake government and the fake police. Britain is a totalitarian gulag which has no free speech for the natives. Fear might also come into play because the entire system is in place to punish any word of complaint with death by orc gang-rape in prison for an act of protest like throwing bacon on a mosque. If they give you a de-facto death sentence for that, the obvious answer to those willing to cross the line is to cross it all the way. Journalist + rope + tree. Some assembly required.

Blogger Nate August 29, 2017 11:35 AM  

"Fear is an insufficient explanation for the silence of bother sisterhoods (feminists and gays) in the face of Musloid invasion and well-documented Musloid behavior towards both groups, though it no doubt plays a part. "

It absolutely is sufficient. That it is irrational and stupid is irrelevant. Fear often makes people do incredibly stupid things that lead them straight into the teeth of the very thing that they are afraid of.

While there are other factors... Fear is likely the largest.

Blogger tuberman August 29, 2017 11:37 AM  

Azure Amaranthine wrote:@128. It's not even pathological altruism. Altruism would care about the actual results.

It's patholgical vainglory or lust disguising itself as altruism.


What are you a (((niggling lawyer)))? The term "pathological altruism" has been used for a long time for this weirdness, and it has been effective. These people are getting what they want, which is the deconstruction and destruction of Western Civilization. They think the West and White Males are demons, and they are angels here to correct ancient wrongs. The "actual results" in the short to medium term is completely what they want, and they don't think about or care about the long term results.

The emphasis is on the first word "pathological."

Blogger VFM #7634 August 29, 2017 11:48 AM  

No one lifts the head cheerleader's skirt like Gaston

Blogger Snidely Whiplash August 29, 2017 11:49 AM  

Koanic wrote:Do not try to determine whether flashing her panties is moral. That is impossible.
Instead, only try to realize the truth:
there is no panties.
Then you'll see that is is not the girl's ass which flashes, it is only your alpha self.

There is one picture that sums up high school girls for me.

And @szopen, girls lie. They lie to each other, they lie to men, and especially they lie to themselves.
If the girl got angry, that's a status saving move, she wants other girls to know she has options. If she tries to pass it off as a joke, that's a status saving move, she can't afford to lose this guy.

The girl that lets the guy grab her ass in the hallway is showing off to the other girls.

Blogger VFM #7634 August 29, 2017 11:52 AM  

Our respected host could shed a better light on this than I, but I wonder is there really such a thing as a Leftist Alpha?

@30 ZhukovG
If I had to guess: sure there are and have been, but they're becoming increasingly rare as leftardery gets more and more insane and anti-natural.

Anonymous Grayman August 29, 2017 11:56 AM  

Flat Lander wrote:SirGroggy wrote:Full agreement with all your points, except for the bolded part. Safety and public order in their countries is not our business either.

Perhaps. Is it morally right to return genuine refugees to a war zone? I say, wait until it's safe.


Not advocating dumping them in the middle of a hot conflict, but temporary camps in safe zones as close as possible to their homelands are cheaper and safer for us than letting them live in social housing, on our streets and in favellas like the Calais jungle.


It is morally UNJUSTIFIABLE to allow any significant number of these invaders, refugee's or whatever you call them, into European nations. You are sacrificing those who live there and their way of life for a stranger who will rape, kill, abuse, infect, deconstruct them!!!!

Anonymous Gen. Kong August 29, 2017 12:01 PM  

There is only one question that is not clear to me, and it is what will the USA do? Will they bombard us in Europe like they did to whites in the Balkans?

This is my main worry, the (((USA))) aren't to be trusted.


Right now, the treasonous leaders and top military of the Fake Banana Empire would indeed side with the invaders and the local Euro-traitors. They're presently at work on a Ukraine-style "color revolution" to topple the Polish government, who is still too stupid to realize that they need to leave both EUSSR and NATO. This can't last forever though as FBE is wobbling itself. The FBE is not your friend, it is your worst enemy.

Spencer, who has been very wrong about a number of things and has engaged in activity which casts serious doubt about his loyalties, is correct about one thing: most Euro nations are too small to remain independent militarily. Once a sufficient number of invaders have been imported they will be invited to join the militaries of the NATO countries or a new EUSSR military to make damned sure places like Poland and Hungary are brought to heel.

Anonymous Grayman August 29, 2017 12:01 PM  

@125 SirGroggy

Plus, an 'alpha' male is likely to have earned the respect of the other men of the tribe, therefore he is more likely to be a strong man of virtue and therefore a good choice of mate. Jordan Peterson called this 'out-sourcing' of part of the mate selection process. In mythology the word for alpha male is hero - a man of high virtue. And it all makes sense.

And now you realize why the left hates the right so much, rails against "hetero-normative" culture, despises Cis-genedered males who ooze toxic masculinity.

Look at this picture, there are no hero's there and never will be. the left is the mob of the misfits and they hate the right for that.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DIaAU1DVwAEI9Ww.jpg

Blogger Cloom Glue August 29, 2017 12:10 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Anonymous Gen. Kong August 29, 2017 12:21 PM  

It absolutely is sufficient. That it is irrational and stupid is irrelevant. Fear often makes people do incredibly stupid things that lead them straight into the teeth of the very thing that they are afraid of.

While there are other factors... Fear is likely the largest.


Likely the largest factor for the rank and file but the endorsement of increased invasion by both groups suggests their hatred for the now-vanished Christendom (the evil rayciss YT patriarchy) exceeds any direct fear they have of the Musloids and other orcs who are actually raping them and tossing them off buildings. This hatred is largely a product of decades worth of indoctrination (brainwashing) and gaslighting. The ruling oligarchy enforces this brainwashing through fear (look at the fate of bacon man) so your point about fear being the largest single factor is correct. It's not just the fear of the Musloids and orcs though. "Insufficient" was an incorrect choice of word on my part. Fear is quite sufficient to keep things as they are, but it's not the only element in the poisonous mix.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey August 29, 2017 12:21 PM  

Now that I've actually read the thread, looks like Jane and her skirt have been run into the ground without me joining the dogpile. Whoops. Nice job by Flat Lander in particular.

"For example, after WaPo runs their story about Antifa yesterday, homos and women in good standing with Daddy now know who is on his shit list (masked fags)."

Note the later editing of the headline, though. "Antifa" was one of the first things to go. There seems to be some sort of rule in operation where antifa are allowed to identify themselves as such, but no one else is supposed to point out that they're antifa. Seems as if I've seen a similar rule somewhere else...

@45 yeoman
"false equivalence between radical Islam and migrants"

Excellent point. As you point out, he problem is not "radical Islam" per se, but replacement-level non-White immigration.

@50 Lone Catholic
"He seems to assume the legitimacy of feminists, homosexuals, and liberals -- groups that really should be stamped out of any healthy society."

Good point. This is a DR3 equivalent, "You're only hurting youselves! Why can't you just see that?" level of argument. What, we're better than the hajis because we're so enthusiastically pro-homo? Please.

@59 Mr.MantraMan

"The Left is comprised of lots of little grouplets, let them fight it out at least for lulz."

Better yet, put a lever in those cracks and pry, pry, pry. Tyrone Trump style.

"Islam is not monolithic"

Perhaps realizing that radical Sunni (specifically Salafist/ Wahhabist) groups are behind the vast majority of terrorist attacks, then looking into who funds, arms, and trains those groups, and who uses them as proxies in international conflicts, might be helpful here?

"I am saying here about my visceral first reaction"

Is it possible that women have different "visceral first reactions" than men do?

"In the Trump/Hillary election, white men and women voted for Trump"

Muh marriage gap, tho. Could argue that White women who are invested in the traditional system will vote more "masculine," while cat ladies...

Anonymous Deplorable me August 29, 2017 12:25 PM  

@53 Flatlander

Discomfort and humiliation coming from a HSMV man (in this case the apex alpha) are a source of validation, status and arousal. All the other girls in her circle understand it on a visceral level. They may whisper later in outraged tones, but they get it: Gaston owns Jane, does with her as he pleases and she loves it.

Ah,that's my problem. If any guy humiliated me or treated me like his property, I'd do my best to make him eat out of a tube. Guess my folks screwed up and didn't teach their daughters to look for men who would treat us like whores; they kinda emphasized the crazy concept of "respect."

I tip my hat to all the fathers here who are making sure to raise their daughters properly.

Blogger modsquad August 29, 2017 12:27 PM  

A bully in high school is one thing, but get past high school and you learn quickly the worst bully is the State. I've seen guys in high school retaliate against the "Gastons", some lost, some fought to a draw. Either way, "Gaston" left them alone after that because bullying those few now required effort. There was one senior year "Gaston" who had his clocked cleaned out by a freshman. That ended his career.

But to fight against the State, that's another matter. Because there's no school tomorrow after you stand up for yourself. There's only one outcome and it's a vicious beat down coming your way in the form of financial ruin, prison or death. What the State, and most bullies don't understand, is that cowardice is temporary. Even the weak are not as weak as they appear. There's no protection against a man who's decided the outcome doesn't matter.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey August 29, 2017 12:34 PM  

@124 Azure Amaranthine
"seems to overemphasize physical fear"

"Extrapolate"

Fair enough. Your next sentence seems to be missing a word or two, though.

@125 SirGroggy
"Jeff wrote:
These girls don't look scared to me.

Exactly. They are not cowards - on the contrary, they are pathologically altruistic"

Could be some component of that, but it looks more like a "Bad boys incoming!" expression to me.

"Don't kid yourself. Those places were warzones before we ever got involved"

But we have to bomb them over there, so we can bring them over here, though. Otherwise we'd have to go with some sort of "refugees from climate change" narrative, and even the Left might find that a little too nonsensical.

Blogger Robert Divinity August 29, 2017 12:37 PM  

The USA will soon, and for a period of time at least, cease to be the leading actor on the world stage.

It may, in fact, be more likely that European and Asian powers will feel the need to occupy us.


The world has noticed another country can piss at will on the United States and its puppets if it has developed nuclear weapons than can be delivered as far as the Imperial City. North Korea and Pakistan can get by with anything as long as the Imperial City, Londonistan, and Slay Paree aren't in mortal danger. The idea that the United States would put the Imperial City at risk if Alaska or Hawaii were hit, let alone Guam, is ludicrous. Asian and European nations don't need anything more than nukes that can hit Georgetown to achieve a modus vivendi to their liking. If Americans wanted to ensure their safety if they live outside the area of concern, the underground command and control facilities reputedly in West Virginia would be flooded tonight.

Fear is an insufficient explanation for the silence of bother sisterhoods (feminists and gays) in the face of Musloid invasion and well-documented Musloid behavior towards both groups, though it no doubt plays a part.

Fear underpins the other reasons given to submit. The rationales have one common denominator.

Blogger ZhukovG August 29, 2017 12:44 PM  

@Jeff: They are terrified. Though much more of each other than the Muslim.

What the Leftist fears more than anything is being purged. Either by 'Outgrouping', or by the more permanent Stalinist method.

Anonymous Gen. Kong August 29, 2017 12:45 PM  

SirGroggy:
Islam is not the true enemy. It is the weakness of our own culture that is the true enemy. If our own culture was solid and strong, then this would not have been allowed to happen. Emphasis on allowed. We were not defeated in war by Islam or any external enemy - this was self-inflicted. Never forget that.

Islam is still a deadly enemy. It is globalist, utopian and expansionist in nature. I think a better term would be "lesser enemy". Feminism is indeed a greater enemy, but it is merely one skin of the greatest enemy of all, which is the globalist, utopian and expansionist religion of western ruling elites. Their plan is to co-opt Islam into their one-world religion to go along with their one-world government. Breivik was correct in targeting those he did. May a million Breiviks arise to deal with the elites and all who do their bidding. No quarter, no mercy.

Anonymous CitizenOutkast August 29, 2017 12:46 PM  

Leftists don't fight Muslims because they have the same spiritual father. True, they are still cowards, but since they consistently kick the ass of conservatives in society, that's certainly not all of them.

Satan created Islam. Satan rules leftist thought. They are all his, and even he knows a divided kingdom cannot stand, so any infighting among his children would be limited or just for show.

Anonymous A Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents August 29, 2017 1:13 PM  

Satan created Islam. Satan rules leftist thought. They are all his, and even he knows a divided kingdom cannot stand, so any infighting among his children would be limited or just for show.

This. They would rather rule in Hell than serve in Heaven.

Blogger tuberman August 29, 2017 1:21 PM  

Gen. Kong wrote:SirGroggy:

Islam is not the true enemy. It is the weakness of our own culture that is the true enemy. If our own culture was solid and strong, then this would not have been allowed to happen. Emphasis on allowed. We were not defeated in war by Islam or any external enemy - this was self-inflicted. Never forget that.

Islam is still a deadly enemy. It is globalist, utopian and expansionist in nature. I think a better term would be "lesser enemy". Feminism is indeed a greater enemy, but it is merely one skin of the greatest enemy of all, which is the globalist, utopian and expansionist religion of western ruling elites. Their plan is to co-opt Islam into their one-world religion to go along with their one-world government. Breivik was correct in targeting those he did. May a million Breiviks arise to deal with the elites and all who do their bidding. No quarter, no mercy.


GK, I agree with your assessment, yet will add that I believe that the hardest-core third wave Feminist think they are the backbone of the elite Leftist/Globalists, as they are the most self-loathing Globalists of all these self-loathing beings. If anything brings the Leftism back in any form after "the Saxons Get Angry," it will women, renewing it from hiding.

Blogger Othmar Regin August 29, 2017 1:24 PM  

@114 Maybe your "God" wants to keep this $hit-hole for him self a while longer, I know of a few Gods that want to remake it a new and flush this scum down the toilet of oblivion.

Blogger tuberman August 29, 2017 1:31 PM  

Othmar Regin wrote:@114 Maybe your "God" wants to keep this $hit-hole for him self a while longer, I know of a few Gods that want to remake it a new and flush this scum down the toilet of oblivion.

Please do, tell us about all your "gods." Expound! Tell us all about what you believe, and where you are coming from....safe space
Right Here for you.

Blogger John Williams August 29, 2017 1:32 PM  

Here's a woman's perspective on being mistreated.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash August 29, 2017 1:33 PM  

A Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents wrote:This. They would rather rule in Hell than serve in Heaven.
Except they won't. That is what makes Satan laugh loudest. He never actually delivers on his promises.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey August 29, 2017 1:52 PM  

OT: looks like the legacy media blackout on the news of the theft of WN 1.0 site Stormfront's domain is breaking down. It's actually being reported by multiple mainstream sources now. This is likely the model that they'll try to follow in the future-- just cut off dissident sites, and toss them down the memory hole. They need better discipline among media outlets to pull it off, though.

Anonymous AB.Prosper August 29, 2017 2:12 PM  

Sterling Pilgrim wrote:I was friends with a Gaston in high school... super dominant in our little circles, could get girl's numbers like Kevin would get zits before school pictures.

He settled down in College with a "nice, pretty girl" from a prominent family in the college town. They then moved to the country on land his parents owned and she, being a nurse, struck up an affair with a doctor.

An over-weight doctor with glasses and average looks, basically a Kevin all grown up with a fat wallet.

Go figure.


Doctors are very high status compared to a Gaston type.

Anonymous Rien August 29, 2017 2:29 PM  

It is said that man tests nature and women test men.

What if the men of the west have been tested and have fallen short?
What if women want men to stand up to them?
What if women would rather buy fifty shades of grey than ... oh wait... they did...

I have said it before, and I say it again: There are no paradoxes. If you see something you think is a paradox you are having a cognitive dissonance.

Anonymous johnc August 29, 2017 2:33 PM  

@155 Please do, tell us about all your "gods." Expound! Tell us all about what you believe, and where you are coming from

Ohh jeez, don't go there. That's going to be an intellectual black hole. The Varg types don't even understand basic philosophy.

Anonymous TheBoom August 29, 2017 2:34 PM  

Fascinating story but the writer overthinks the problem. Women are on the side of Muslims because:
1. That is the in thing to do

2. Muslims won't fail their shit tests.

Women go out of their way, when in power, to cover up Muslim rapes and molestations (think Rotherham, Sweden and many more). Women want to be dominated. Gaston dominated her. Muslims dominate western women and western men don't.

When a woman supports Islam and embraces the hijab as a sign of the resistance, she is able to embrace being dominated while appearing to be a brave, fierce, independent woman. The best of all worlds. End of story.

Blogger D. Bay August 29, 2017 2:58 PM  

@29

"Right wing is masculine; Left wing is feminine."

Not always. In some cases, sure. Yet Michael Medved isn't exactly ultra masculine and he's pretty much neocon right.

While radical leftists like Che Guverra and Fidel Castro seemed ultra macho.

Anonymous Anonymous August 29, 2017 3:28 PM  

Leftists are certainly craven, but it is not cowardliness that explains their main behaviors. The author left out that Leftists are idiots who seek to project their own faults onto actors outside of themselves rather than deal with reality. This is why they push for policies that remove personal responsibility and obligation from themselves onto society and government to deal with. This is why they hate Christianity. This is why they push for feminism and excuse female behavior (and why the author laughingly misread Jane's so called embarrassment), and excuse all bad behavior. For if they called bad behavior out, they would have to address their own rather than demand society to deal with it.

The author who wrote this came to their conclusion because of projection. The author is a coward, and a leftist, so therefore the Left's problems are that they are cowards. No, the left are dangerous idiots who refuse to repent and want to commit suicide but want to take down the normies with them. This is why the only good Leftist, even a supposedly "woke" one, is a dead Leftist. They all have to go back...to their father, Satan.

Anonymous Tanjil Bren August 29, 2017 3:33 PM  

"Please don't assume that he speaks for me or that I necessarily agree with any or all of his various assertions and conclusions."

Like all your posts, I generally assume these are discussion pieces (on the odd occasion a test subject, the commenters scurrying about its mental maze).

Just curious, but why did you feel the need to say this?

Anonymous Flat Lander August 29, 2017 3:34 PM  

Deplorable me wrote:@53 Flatlander

Ah,that's my problem. If any guy humiliated me or treated me like his property, I'd do my best to make him eat out of a tube. Guess my folks screwed up and didn't teach their daughters to look for men who would treat us like whores; they kinda emphasized the crazy concept of "respect."

I tip my hat to all the fathers here who are making sure to raise their daughters properly.


A wardrobe malfunction engineered by your boyfriend merits at least a deep coma. I see.

What do you do to men who catcall you? To men who stare at your tits? To men who brush against you in public transport? To men who tell sexist jokes down at the pub? To men who have bikini babes on their Hawaiian shirts?

That's a lot of disrespect to deal with, don't you agree?

Anonymous glosoli August 29, 2017 4:14 PM  

The OP is nonsense.
It has nothing to do with fear.
It's a mutual attack by evil against good.

Blogger Cail Corishev August 29, 2017 4:25 PM  

It has nothing to do with fear.
It's a mutual attack by evil against good.


Yep. That's not to say a lefty journalist in Paris doesn't fear Muslims. He probably does. But the lefty journalist in Des Moines shills for them just as hard, and it's not because he thinks they're waiting right outside to Charlie Hedbo him. It's because they're on the same side.

Anonymous BBigGayKoranBurner August 29, 2017 4:40 PM  

I never say I am an outlier around gays because they will think I came out as a liar.

Why aren't homosexuals protesting migrants? Because they’re scared.

Some are paid to say moslems are peaceful, some are stupid enough to believe the first, the rest think moslems will attack well armed white church going Christians for them just like feminists think moslems will attack the pretty girls for them

Anonymous Jill August 29, 2017 4:48 PM  

One of Jane's biggest concerns is going to be, oh, no, why did I wear my ratty granny panties today? The older you get, the more you forget how devastating stuff like that was in high school. And that has nothing to do with the rest of the post, sorry.

Blogger tuberman August 29, 2017 4:55 PM  

D. Bay wrote:@29

"Right wing is masculine; Left wing is feminine."

Not always. In some cases, sure. Yet Michael Medved isn't exactly ultra masculine and he's pretty much neocon right.

While radical leftists like Che Guverra and Fidel Castro seemed ultra macho.



But, D. Bay, don't ya know, NeoCON is Left. (the second syllable clues you.)

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey August 29, 2017 4:56 PM  

"The rest think moslems will attack well armed white church going Christians for them just like feminists think moslems will attack the pretty girls for them"

Sounds about right. There's a reason that the Left is always going on and on about "hate" and "hate groups"-- it's projection. What holds the Left (what Steve Sailor calls the "coalition of the fringes") together is simply hatred-- of normal White men, of Christianity, of tradition (Western tradtion, anyway).

Blogger tuberman August 29, 2017 5:00 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey August 29, 2017 5:08 PM  

@171 tuberman

"But, D. Bay, don't ya know, NeoCON is Left. (the second syllable clues you.)"

In one of my favorite National Review articles, Stephen Schwartz begins by "explaining" why no one should mention that the original neoconservatives were all "former" Trots, then seems go off the rails partway through, finishing by swearing eternal fealty to ol' Lev Bronstein, and cursing the memory of those evil Stalinist heretics, who strayed from the true path of internationalism.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/207196/trotskycons-stephen-schwartz

Blogger tuberman August 29, 2017 5:11 PM  

Tanjil Bren wrote:"Please don't assume that he speaks for me or that I necessarily agree with any or all of his various assertions and conclusions."

Like all your posts, I generally assume these are discussion pieces (on the odd occasion a test subject, the commenters scurrying about its mental maze).

Just curious, but why did you feel the need to say this?


It is obvious why he said that first line. Have you ever watched the comments on his Darkstream? It's because MPAI, and several people would start attacking him as if he was in complete sympathy with everything stated in that post.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash August 29, 2017 5:19 PM  

Francis Parker Yockey wrote:In one of my favorite National Review articles, Stephen Schwartz begins by "explaining" why no one should mention that the original neoconservatives were all "former" Trots
Stephen Suleiman Schwartz, Semi-Jewish, Islamic convert, radical Trotskyist Neoconservative.
In any just world, he would wind up having to execute himself.
Why anyone has ever listened to him is a complete mystery.

Anonymous BBGKB August 29, 2017 5:25 PM  

feminists and homosexuals and everything else, will suffer for the Left’s cowardice in the face of the true enemy

We fled DieVerse City for Whitopia after the food stamp system went down for 8 hours on 10-12-20-13

Why isn't the US bombing and killing Muslims in Indonesia, the largest Muslim country?

The highest value targets in Indonesia are working toilets. Also Indonesia expels moslems when they can https://www.rabwah.net/indonesian-authorities-forcibly-evict-ahmadiyya-muslims-from-bangka/

Better to rule in Hell than serve in Heaven.Everything else comes from this position.

They say the foam parties there are to die for

"Is it morally right to return genuine refugees to a war zone?

Let make a bet to see if I can find a gay gun owner who is a race realist before you find an "genuine refusegee"?

Anonymous Tanjil Bren August 29, 2017 5:27 PM  

Tuberman: I've never seen a disclaimer like that before. Of course, I may just have missed it before now. Curious, is all. I just tend to agree with him: who cares what anyone thinks. Hence the question.

Blogger Nate Winchester August 29, 2017 6:25 PM  

Is that a rebuttal? You just supported my point the only difference being that you specifically classified the breaking point of tolerance.

Rather than listen to what women say, observe what they do.

The flaw there is the assumption nobody ever does something they don't like. (As if women enjoyed footbinding.) When men especially should know the truth.

Anonymous joke10 August 29, 2017 6:52 PM  

I thought Jordan Peterson's idea on the topic was interesting.

Blogger ZhukovG August 29, 2017 7:02 PM  

@BBGKB: Indonesia is a Sunni Muslim country, in fact the most populous one. The article refers to the Ahmadiyya sect which are kind of like the Mormons of Sunni Islam and therefore not very popular in Indonesia.

One thing that distinguishes this sect is a belief that Jihad never allows for killing infidels(save in self defense)or forcing others to convert. Not very popular with Sunnis.

Blogger IreneAthena August 29, 2017 7:12 PM  

Time was when Jane would’ve delivered to Gaston’s ears and face a loud "Fresh!" and a hard smack. A wimpy but chivalrous fellow might've burst through the crowd of leering creeps to defend her honor and become her hero! Or was that just in movies from the forties?

Does it make a difference that Jane had accepted her place as Gaston's lady and all its attendant public displays of "affection"? After all, it's a rare woman who keeps her husband at arm's distance after the minister says, "you may kiss the bride," even though what follows is WAY more intimate than a peck on the cheek, and it takes place on the altar in front of everyone IN GOD'S HOUSE, of all places! And a husband's playful smack on his wife’s rear is probably regarded by all onlookers and by the lucky wife herself as completely endearing.

I don't know about this case, though. Jane's upskirting seems to cross the line between affection and humiliation. Where do you draw the line here? Public bodice-ripping? Recording intimate encounters and publishing them on social media? What would you dads do if you witnessed your son-in-law Gaston doing this to your daughter Jane? Maybe this post was highlighted for rhetorical purposes: it is inconsistent to excuse mistreatment of women in other cultures and then to act shocked about it when it occurs in our own.

Blogger IreneAthena August 29, 2017 7:22 PM  

"Is it morally right to return genuine refugees to a war zone?"

There is a book out that might be worth reading: Refuge: Rethinking Refugee Policy in a Changing World. It describes and asks for Western support for innovative programs that provide employment opportunities for refugees in the countries neighboring the regions in conflict.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash August 29, 2017 7:34 PM  

IreneAthena wrote:What would you dads do if you witnessed your son-in-law Gaston doing this to your daughter Jane?
It's her problem, not mine.
And frankly, this isn't "mistreatment". He wants to show off his property, both that he owns it and how attractive it is, and she wants to show off the man she's caught, and who proud he is of her body.
If it bothers her, she'll address it. Or she won't, because she likes being bothered. Either way, it's pretty mild stuff and not worth worrying about.

Blogger Buybuydandavis August 29, 2017 7:41 PM  

"Jane let out a nervous little laugh and brushed her skirt back down.

I can imagine just how humiliated she must have felt, at that moment. "

Always the possibility that she liked it. She was the center of attention for her physical assets, made so by He-Stud male.

She gets to show off her ass, but without taking personal responsibility for exposing it. Much like "leaked" sex photos and videos.

Blogger Buybuydandavis August 29, 2017 8:01 PM  

Dr. Φ wrote:
Likewise with immigration. Currently, the increase in the threat of rape or murder by an immigrant to any particular individual is distributed wildly unevenly, but the threat of social ostracism for speaking out is universal, certain, and immediate.


Moral free riders.

It's particularly acute for women, who are valued for their compassion and kindness.

Blogger IreneAthena August 29, 2017 8:47 PM  

@183 Snidely, I wouldn't say that I'm particularly worried about it; I said that I suspected the blase reactions from the regulars are to prove a point: men from all cultures, not just white men, should be held to the same high standards regarding treatment of women. I did wonder, and am still curious about the degree of public exposure of his "property" (I'd prefer the word "treasure" but oh well) that would be considered inappropriate enough to warrant intervention by concerned family members.

OTOH, maybe I'd just as soon NOT hear your answers to that question. Ewwwww. I'll just go with my assumption that the "she enjoyed it" attitude is for rhetorical purposes.

I'd rather talk about Refuge: Rethinking Refugee Policy in a Changing World. Or that someone would read it. It seems to simultaneously acknowledge both the legitimate fears Westerners have about immigration of hard-to-assimilate cultures and the desperate condition of refugees, creatively, humanely, and reasonably.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash August 29, 2017 9:19 PM  

@IreneAthena
Is trumps should.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey August 29, 2017 9:25 PM  

@180 ZhukovG
"@BBGKB: Indonesia is a Sunni Muslim country, in fact the most populous one. The article refers to the Ahmadiyya sect which are kind of like the Mormons of Sunni Islam and therefore not very popular in Indonesia"

Sunni Muslims, and Salafists in particular, are prone to declaring other sects to be, not just heretical, but kafirs/ infidels.

Anonymous Gen. Kong August 29, 2017 10:56 PM  

Slightly OT but also related to Alt-Tech: The usual suspects decided to shut-down Barnhardt in the wake of C-ville for her less than obsequious remarks about the religion of eternal love and peace (though note she carefully exempts Talmudic Satanists from much criticism for their genocidal wickedness, much less a Talmud torched with bacon strips for strange reasons). At any rate it turns out the web-hosting place that attempted to shut her down was run by Endurance International Group, which is owned by (drumroll) .... Talmudic Satanists (Warburg Pincus and GS Capital Partners). Look at the long list of "brands" they own. Betcha all have similar "terms of service".

Blogger Don M. August 29, 2017 11:14 PM  

Imo, the reason women go after western men instead of migrants etc, is mainly because that's where the money is. The migrants, even though they are much worse towards women and gays, for example, they are also 'oppressed' by western men, so they become unholy allies. It's the same old tired theme where people who feel 'oppressed' fights for their 'rights' against their 'oppressors'. Workers against the factory owners, socialists and communists against capitalists, unions against businesses, women against men, 'minorities' against whites etc.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash August 29, 2017 11:15 PM  

OT Overhead from my daughter
"So, I was reading a Dilbert book. Have you ever noticed that every single thing Dogbert says is something Dad would say?"

Blogger Luke (alias "Lines With Chrome") August 29, 2017 11:29 PM  

They can call for help, and hope that crow only tastes feathery on the first bite.

Crow is a dish best eaten while still fresh from the oven; the colder it gets, the harder it is to swallow.

Blogger Bix Cvvv August 30, 2017 2:12 AM  

Gaston (the fictional character) sort of reminds me of me, at certain times in my past (except I was never messed up enough to bully other kids). Here is what I would have thought, at the age when I was most like Gaston: this girl is hot but sort of a loser, what kind of girl goes off on some poor needy nerd like a crack whore who thinks, in her crack whore stupid rage, that the fifty was a five (and yeah, that happens, but probably with 20s and 5s, to get technical)? I gotta check out her reactions. And, if Gaston is, in fact, like I was, here is what Gaston thought when she just smiled without even calling him out for messing with her - and for sharing her attractions with the unworthy plebes - yeah, she ain't good enough for me, I can find a girl who looks like that who isn't so fragile that she erupts at poor little nerds. Of course I might be wrong. None of us are good looking long enough to really get the hang of what it means to understand other good looking people. Theologians understand that the map (theology) is not the territory (God's world). (When Aquinas was dying - and he understood almost everything - he felt the need to say everything clever he had ever said was straw. And he was right). As Tolkien said, we are all - men and women - in the boats together, heading to the same place.

Anonymous DonReynolds August 30, 2017 2:42 AM  

@146 modsquad
"But to fight against the State, that's another matter. Because there's no school tomorrow after you stand up for yourself. There's only one outcome and it's a vicious beat down coming your way in the form of financial ruin, prison or death."

You seem to believe the state cannot be beat. I know for a fact that the state can be beat and the best proof of that is the American revolution.

I have studied the situation closely, because it is important, just what exactly makes it possible for otherwise loyal citizens to take up arms against their own government. Concord and Lexington were fought in the middle of April 1775, and the Patriots fought multiple battles with British forces for a year, two months, and about 20 days before declaring independence from the British Crown. During this time, Washington and his officers toasted to the King's good health every day at dinner and only stopped the practice when the Continental Congress declared independence.

During the American revolution, the Patriots never had the support of more than 25 percent of the people...and often it was less. The British had been more successful at recruiting Americans to side with the King's cause. Washington himself had served alongside the British .....and against the French, not even ten years earlier. He had hoped for a commission in the British Army, but ended up in command of the Virginia militia.

It is a huge step for any people to bear arms against their own military forces, but that is exactly what happened. This is particularly true when the military is in possession of overwhelming force of arms. The Tory Militia hated the Patriots even more than the British themselves, resulting in the most bitter and personal sort of civil war, where there were very few rules governing civilized warfare.

Blogger VD August 30, 2017 4:40 AM  

Maybe your "God" wants to keep this $hit-hole for him self a while longer, I know of a few Gods that want to remake it a new and flush this scum down the toilet of oblivion.

Put down the Deities & Demigods, sport.

Anonymous Simon in London August 31, 2017 8:11 PM  

The idea that Jane's differing reactions were determined by a threat assessment of whether she could take the boys in a fight, was one of the funnier things I've read recently.

Anonymous Anonymous September 01, 2017 8:08 PM  

I suck at empathy, so how on earth is it meant to be a bad thing when feminists and faggots suffer for their treachery?

A bad thing would be them NOT suffering the consequences of their dumb actions, and that's been going on too long. These are not innocent people, and they fully deserve what's coming to them. I wouldn't even piss on them if they were on fire.

Everything must balance out; that is satisfying. If Western Europeans and Anglos hadn't been such back-stabbing sell-out cowards chasing that juicy carrot, then we wouldn't find ourselves in this predicament. Europeans and Anglos WILL suffer and die as debt for this aforementioned vile behavior.

But I know we will survive as a people; perhaps dramatically diminished, but at least we will be cleansed out cowards and traitors, gotta thank the Moslems for that.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts