ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2018 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Sunday, September 03, 2017

Too late to worry about it now

Now that whites are learning to play the game properly, the Fake American Left is suddenly wants to change the rules again and give up on identity politics.
Identity politics was conceived and executed from the beginning as a movement of depoliticization. Feminism has become severed from class considerations, so that for the most part it has become a reflection of what liberal identitarians themselves like to call “white privilege.” Feminism, like the other identity politics of the moment, is cut off from solidarity with the rest of the world, or if it deals with the rest of the world can only do so on terms that must not invalidate the American version of identity politics.

For example, because all identities are equally sacrosanct, we must not critique other cultures from an Enlightenment perspective; to each his own, and race is destiny, etc. (Which certainly validates the “alt-right,” doesn’t it?) This failure was noted by neoconservatives some decades ago, a breach into which they stepped with a vigorous assertion of nationalism that should have had no place in our polity after the reconsiderations brought about by Vietnam and Watergate. But it happened, just as a perverted form of white patriotism arose to fulfill the vacuum left by liberal rationality because of the constraints of identity politics.

To conclude, identity politics — in all the forms it has shown up, from various localized nationalisms to more ambitious fascism — desires its adherents to present themselves in the most regressive, atavistic, primitive form possible. The kind of political communication identity politics thrives on is based on maximizing emotionalism and minimizing rationality. Therefore, the idea of law that arises when identity politics engenders a reaction is one that severs the natural bonds of community across differences (which is the most ironic yet predictable result of identity politics) and makes of the law an inhuman abstraction.

This depoliticization has gone on so long now, about 30 years, that breaking out of it is inconceivable, since the discourse to do so is no longer accessible. For anyone trained to think outside the confines of identity politics, those who operate within its principles — which manifests, for example, in call-out culture (or at least it did before Trump) — seem incomprehensible, and vice versa. We are different generations divided by unfathomable gaps, and there is no way to bridge them. The situation is like the indoctrination in Soviet Russia in the 1930s, so that only an economic catastrophe that lays waste to everything, resulting from imperial misadventures, can possibly break the logjam. Short of that, we are committed to the dire nihilism of identity politics for the duration of the imperial game.
The irony of someone called "Anis Shivani" worrying about identity politics in America is downright amusing. Identity politics are the rules of the game in all sufficiently multiracial and multireligious societies. Sort out your identity, build your alliances, pass laws that favor your identity, and screw everyone else.

Shivani uses the word "depoliticization" improperly. What he really means is "deideologicization".

In any event, identity politics have been baked in the cake since 1965. And it is why the #AltRight is inevitable, regardless of whatever name of the identity is eventually established for white American nationalists.

Labels: ,

68 Comments:

Blogger Jimmy Glover September 03, 2017 1:05 PM  

It is a bit humorous to watch Crowder, Sargon, even Milo spend a lot of time how they are not alt right, then articulating their alt right position.

OpenID paworldandtimes September 03, 2017 1:05 PM  

Among equal rivals, conflict is a straightforward competition for land and resources.

US-style multiculturalism is a different sort of thing, a paradoxical imperative on the part of non-Whites to claim Whites' land and resources, but with the twist that Whites must continue to buy into the one-way subsidy system.

PA

Blogger Timmy3 September 03, 2017 1:18 PM  

This means the Left is predictable. Identity politics does work until it doesn't to their advantage. Then we reap the benefits.

Anonymous BBGKB September 03, 2017 1:22 PM  

I loved that TRUMP held off on banning Trannies in the military until the left said they would stop identity politics, then waited 2 days more so the news would get out but politicians would forget it. Then leftists just sperged pure ID politics for days.

PA- I just posted a heavy identity/resource politics gab:
"I also advocate those getting taxpayer paid prenatal care get drug testing

The main argument is they are going to hold fetus hostage by not caring for it

"Drop the drug test or the crack baby gets it" @weka

Obviously in Mursing settings I say the mom has a gun to her head&belly threatening harm

Blogger Mr.MantraMan September 03, 2017 1:25 PM  

I love Identity Politics and I'm alt-right.

Cucks haven't done a thing to stop the Left's IP so they got no cred.

Anonymous Kapper September 03, 2017 1:39 PM  

I clicked the link VD supplied & scrolled down to read the comments. As I expected, Anis has enraged his fellow leftists, nearly all disagree with him. Not surprising since we all know SJWs always double down.

Blogger Thucydides September 03, 2017 1:42 PM  

The Progressives have also started to realize that "Identity politics" is not only susceptible to the sorts of attacks the Alt-Right/Alt-West can deliver, but it's internal contradictions mean the structure is easily destroyed by internal dissension.

So long as the US had a large and growing economy and a relatively small number of people leeching off of it, it was quite possible to give plenty of "freestuff" to the various identity groups to keep them supporting the PTB and not looking too hard at the fact the upper echelons of the Progressive power structure in politics, media, academia and the bureaucracy was all white.

However the tilling point was somewhat before the 2012 election, when Romney identified that 47% of the US population was receiving government benefits in some form or other. Once the number passed 30% or so, the demands were outstripping the productive capabilities of the US economy, and each individual group in the Identity pyramid was now large enough to want to elbow the others out of the way.

So the best possible 4GW approach is to look at their own theory of "Intersectionality" and "Intersectional conflict" and increase the pressure at these friction points between the groups. Supporting initiatives like getting the Bernie Bros to depart the Democrat party or encourage Maxine Walters desire for a "Black Party" (and extend that to the other tribal groups in the coalition like La Raza and the Islamists) and you could create the perfect storm (especially as the leadership of the DNC runs around trying to put out fires by offering more concessions to placate one group, and simply amplifying the desires of other groups the get the same or better deals for themselves).

At some point the billionaire donor class behind all of this will realize that there simply isn't enough cash to pay all the danegeld, and that these identity groups will be looking to storm the gated communities if they are *not* getting their slice of pie. Interesting to think about how *they* will react.....

Blogger dc.sunsets September 03, 2017 1:43 PM  

What is the post-1913 USA but a vast wealth redistribution scheme? Post-1965 it became organized by identity, as one faction-defined-by-race/sex/blah-blah-blah lobbied for more slop at the trough.

The "farmer" put it all on the National Mastercard and no none knew what is the credit limit.

Today's acrimony may indicate that the limit approaches. Those being farmed no longer blindly consent to being insulted while being stripped.

Blogger Zimri September 03, 2017 1:43 PM  

Sounds like Mark Lilla, "The Once and Future Liberal". The title hints at the Kennedy White House.

Anonymous Icicle September 03, 2017 1:43 PM  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGe6017JwPw

"Colonel, what are these minorities thinking after sh*tting on everything for years?"

on the part of non-Whites to claim Whites' land and resources, but with the twist that Whites must continue to buy into the one-way subsidy system.

F*ck that noise.

Anonymous Korbin Ransley September 03, 2017 1:47 PM  

@1 That does seem kinda funny. I like and respect Gavin McInnes, and Kyle Chapman. I do wonder how they would respond if someone asked them if The F.O.A.K. The Fraternal Order of Alt Kights was Alt Right or not.

Blogger pyrrhus September 03, 2017 1:48 PM  

The notion that everyone can play identity politics, and even be praised for it, except whites has always been absurd...now people are slowly realizing that.
BTW, Indians are as monolithic in their support of other Indians as blacks, and view whites as easy pickings, so they have to go back too....

Anonymous Tipsy September 03, 2017 1:48 PM  

"Identity politics was conceived and executed from the beginning as a movement of depoliticization."

When the first sentence is a lie, I don't bother to read any further. There was nothing noble about Identity Politics; it was conceived as a means of overturning the established order.

Blogger Dirtnapninja September 03, 2017 1:50 PM  

Take the weapon of the enemy and use it against them.

Blogger tuberman September 03, 2017 1:50 PM  

The new rules are Deconstruct Globalist/Leftists with agility, and in both expected and unexpected ways, until their madness leads to death.

Blogger Zimri September 03, 2017 1:51 PM  

BTW, Indians are as monolithic in their support of other Indians as blacks, and view whites as easy pickings, so they have to go back too....

Sounds like Nobel Peace Prize Winner Aung San Suu Kyi, and her policy toward the Bengalis Rohingya of Rakhine.

Blogger tuberman September 03, 2017 1:53 PM  

As General Patton once said, "Hold them by the nose (the expected), while kicking them in the ass (the unexpected)."

Anonymous Panzer Man September 03, 2017 2:00 PM  

External politics has always been identity politics. That's why "nations" came about and existed for centuries.

Internal politics are just squabbles within the identity, which leave the overarching identity unchanged other than by slow historic forces.

However, by breaching the barrier and importing multiple nations into one country, the rise of internal identity politics was inevitable. It doesn't matter the scale; the same forces that produced nations (unbridgeable differences of race, culture, language, history, belief, etc.) are simply imported inside the borders, resulting in nation-building within the political boundaries instead of outside it.

Their conditions are impossible. Internal ideological politics are only possible when one identity extends over most of the population. Place multiple identities within the population, and you'll inevitably get the same inter-identity conflict as between entire nations, while the intra-identity conflict will occur on a smaller scale (Alt-Lite vs. Alt-Right, for instance).

Blogger Mr.MantraMan September 03, 2017 2:01 PM  

No ninja no, no, no we are principled true conservatives we shall overcome via essays of pure truth not guile.

I love essays, I hate guile.

Anyone who thinks we can use Identity Politics against the Left is wrong, I'm with Gavin McCinnes and his Asian girlfriend and her son, I am a true conservative.

Anonymous Korbin Ransley September 03, 2017 2:02 PM  

@8 Wow. Well put.

@10 Insecurity, self consciousness, and resentment are very real.

If hatred is the cowards revenge against those who intimidate them, then is resentment the revenge of the self conscious against those who they see as superior?

Blogger seeingsights September 03, 2017 2:03 PM  

One aspect of Anis Shivani's essay I didn't like is that its written in a left-wing academic style--a type of writing that appears in liberal arts and social science academic journals.

The essayist could have gotten all the points across in simpler language and in 1/3 the space.

Anonymous Gen. Kong September 03, 2017 2:10 PM  

The Alt-Right is in more places than most imagine. Its ideas are found in the Philippines (Duterte) and even cropping up in places like Nigeria.

Blogger Ronin F9 September 03, 2017 2:12 PM  

"With equal pleasure I have as often taken notice that Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people--a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs, and who, by their joint counsels, arms, and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody war, have nobly established general liberty and independence." - John Jay, Federalist No. 2

There are only two pertinent questions now. Is the inevitable divorce going to be amicable or not and how do we divide the property? My feeling is that the Fake Americans deserve a one-way boat ticket out of here and that's it.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine September 03, 2017 2:22 PM  

Smells like Brahmin, and not the two-headed variety.

Yes, the Indians are extremely nepotistic, much like the Fake Jews, so don't make chi-chi, gora. Maybe the real Jews (in Israel) too, but I'm not certain on that one, goyim. Remember to stay away from the arabushim though, they either don't see abeed or they do (for them).

Native American? Why are you so apple?

Latinos? You bet, and they hate the black people way more than the white people do, though they're stealthy about it sometimes... around gringos.

Black people? Yuh, cracka. I kno a woman, Ann, she even go to da white Church.

Han Chinese? They're not even circumspect about it. Apologize? To guizie? Gweilo? What word.. Why apologize to devils?

Japanese? You're not welcome here gaijin, please leave. Stop being so yankee.

Et cetera.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey September 03, 2017 2:30 PM  

This man writes for a living? That excerpt lacks clarity of both thought and exposition. OK, skimmed through the link: he did a better job with the body of the essay, and and didn't really start to sink into this swamp of imprecision and adjectival excess until he hit the conclusion.

Shivani fails to answer the important question, though. Is he pro-White, or anti-White?

Anonymous A Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents September 03, 2017 2:31 PM  

Identity politics was conceived and executed from the beginning as a movement of depoliticization.

Not gonna read an article that starts off with a blatant lie. Identity politics was all about politicization of everything.
Every. Single.Thing.

Bake me a cake, leftards. Bake me a cake right now.

Anonymous Deplorable Winning September 03, 2017 2:35 PM  

seeingsights wrote:ne aspect of Anis Shivani's essay I didn't like is that its written in a left-wing academic style--a type of writing that appears in liberal arts and social science academic journals.

The essayist could have gotten all the points across in simpler language and in 1/3 the space.


Yeah, an ugly piece of work, filled with fuzzy thinking and ad-hoc terms. I get the impression that English isn't this foreigner invader's first language.

To conclude, identity politics... desires its adherents to present themselves in the most regressive, atavistic, primitive form possible

This reification demagoguery sounds like something Marx, Mussolini, or Rousseau would come up with. "Identity politics" has no causal agency- let alone "desires"- of its own, anymore than the social contract, the forces of material production, or the state do. It's a crude way of thinking. Regressive. Atavistic. Primitive.
It's almost like s/he's projecting or something.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey September 03, 2017 2:43 PM  

"the most regressive, atavistic, primitive form possible"

This "multiple negative adjective" technique can be useful in responding to leftists, btw. Phrases like "Your regressive, atavistic, primitive race-denialism notwithstanding" really seem to wind them up, for some reason.

Anonymous Deplorable Winning September 03, 2017 2:55 PM  

Francis Parker Yockey wrote:"the most regressive, atavistic, primitive form possible"

This "multiple negative adjective" technique can be useful in responding to leftists, btw. Phrases like "Your regressive, atavistic, primitive race-denialism notwithstanding" really seem to wind them up, for some reason.


Ok, good point. And that's one of the psycho-weapons they have been using, like in "racist, misogynist, homophobic..."
There's a rumor going around that we have to sink to their level to fight them. Take their weapons and turn them around.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine September 03, 2017 2:55 PM  

@28. Welcome to the party that is my normal written-communication style.

Blogger DonReynolds September 03, 2017 3:02 PM  

@21 seeingsights wrote:One aspect of Anis Shivani's essay I didn't like is that its written in a left-wing academic style--a type of writing that appears in liberal arts and social science academic journals.

The essayist could have gotten all the points across in simpler language and in 1/3 the space.


I know. It makes my head hurt to read that dribble. It is like assembly instructions written by a friggin committee. Every little aside must be included. Everyone must be mentioned by name and their own subagenda shoehorned between the lines. It is like being pistol whipped to read it.

Blogger BlowMe September 03, 2017 3:08 PM  

More evidence that leftists suck at math.

And that they suck at considering the potential long-term implications of their policies, a tendency Thomas Sowell called "stage-one thinking".

But what else would we expect?

Just children being children.



Blogger DonReynolds September 03, 2017 3:22 PM  

@23 Ronin F9 wrote:

There are only two pertinent questions now. Is the inevitable divorce going to be amicable or not and how do we divide the property? My feeling is that the Fake Americans deserve a one-way boat ticket out of here and that's it.


You may have combined too many separate decisions into one.

We certainly agree that a divorce is inevitable. Whether we have to go through the domestic violence first, remains to be seen. Like with any divorce, the actually property settlement will never be equitable and cannot be anticipated....unless you imagine that our bitter enemies will somehow agree on the division of property. But when the split occurs, all sides will be delighted because no side is going to end up with everything.

There are other actors in this particular divorce. There are paramours. There are the "avenging angels" of Child Protective Services. There are the psychologists, in the form of popular media. There are creditors and lienholders. And given the very public nature of the divorce, there will be external actors that will take advantage of the situation, like employers and other family members on both sides. And there will be the usual false witnesses, who will claim to have knowledge of things that never occurred and still more false witnesses that will swear it is all true.

So who gets the house and who gets the mortgage and who gets the family business? Fortunately, the house is 50 separate states, and they will have their own say about what part of the house WE will get to live in and what part of the house will our enemies live in. I expect we will have to share the house, just as we do now, except that the partitions might become actually walls and not just rooms where we are unwelcome. Nobody is going anywhere, unless they sell their part to us. Which is possible but unlikely.

Anonymous Charlottesvillain September 03, 2017 3:26 PM  

It's the writing style of insecure people. Google image search Anis Shivani and you'll see that in every single photo, he has his chin tilted up like a Jersey tough guy using false machismo as a shield.

Anonymous logprof September 03, 2017 4:04 PM  

Vox, I thank you for the free books, but I was just enstupidated by reading that passage you quoted.

Ye gods.

Blogger Ceasar September 03, 2017 4:05 PM  

"Shivani uses the word "depoliticization" improperly."

He uses a lot of words improperly in this article and other work. I would compare his writing to impressionism in art. Exactness and coherency is not needed just let the reader (viewer) fill in the blanks.

Blogger Quilp September 03, 2017 4:16 PM  

I searched Shivani, and because it's Holiday weekend, and I'm bored, I decided to read more of him. Now I remember why I loathe academics. @36 nailed it, it's a lot like impressionistic art.
If you feel the need to punish yourself
http://subtropics.english.ufl.edu/index.php/2017/06/12/notes-ascendancy-identity-politics-literary-writing/

http://subtropics.english.ufl.edu/index.php/2017/06/12/notes-ascendancy-identity-politics-literary-writing/

Blogger Ransom Smith September 03, 2017 4:38 PM  

They actually think the train has breaks?

Blogger YIH September 03, 2017 4:47 PM  

The American Cuckservative
Is cucking hard core.
He's whining about <a href = ''http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/how-diversity-is-tearing-america-apart/".
Yet he cannot accept what his father and (great) grandparents thought were as natural as water is wet.
Africans are as compatible with America as Mac software (and being a SWPL, he adores Macs) is as compatible with Windows or Linux.

Anonymous tublecane September 03, 2017 4:49 PM  

That excerpt is Grade-A Gobbledygook. But it doesn't matter, because of he message is clear and the headline, at least, makes sense: identity politics is hampering or may hamper progressivism because white people discovered it on the nick of time. It's a bit like Scooby-doo after the villain's mask gets torn off, "We almost got away with it, too! If it weren't for those darn nationalists and their stupid dog."

The headline really should read, "Cheese It, They're Onto Us."

Blogger Ezekiel September 03, 2017 4:55 PM  

tublecane wrote:The headline really should read,
"THE GOYIM KNOW!!!"

Blogger seeingsights September 03, 2017 4:56 PM  

'It's the writing style of insecure people. '

Yes. They are insecure because they are poor arguers, like Shivani. In an online philosophy discussion list, of which I am a member, there was a grad student in philosophy whose posts were verbose. Someone made an objection to inductive reasoning: just because something occurred X number of times, does not mean that it will occur X+1 number of times. The verbose one asked for references. (Facepalm). That's a classic objection to inductive reasoning that goes back to the time of the ancient Greeks, and the verbose one asked for references.


'Google image search Anis Shivani and you'll see that in every single photo, he has his chin tilted up like a Jersey tough guy using false machismo as a shield.'

Wow. Different photos of him, each with an upturned chin.

Blogger Ezekiel September 03, 2017 5:00 PM  

...as an aside, between things like this and things like Noam Chomsky denouncing Antifa, it gives me some hope that at least some leftists are, if not honorable, then at least intelligent enough to have some survival instinct. Andrew Anglin might have been on to something when he said we're better off with the Real Left/Old Left than we are with the Fake Right.

Anonymous tublecane September 03, 2017 5:16 PM  

"a vigorous assertion of nationalism that should have had no place in our polity after the reconsideration brought about by Vietnam and Watergate"

Still with the Nixon? How old is he his guy? I get Vietnam--though it should be recognized as causing people to reconsider militarism, imperialism, etc., not nationalism--but what on earth does Watergate have to do with it?

This mini-Neocon Narrative section is funny to me, and I really can't make out the point of it, but if I'm allowed to psycho-analyze for a moment. When the article says "this failure was noted by neoconservatives," it means the failure of identity politics to live up to Enlightenment standards? Okay, probably. Because neoconservatives were commies who championed Consensus Liberalism and its supposed crowning achievement: the civil rights movement. Which was in their eyes to make us all the same, only able to be differentiated on rationalistic and economic grounds.

The left saw various groups as still useful politically, and wanted to keep going beyond Consensus Liberalism. The unpopularity of things like Vietnam and Watergate helped them, nevertheless the New Left failed for a while. They continue to hold it against Nixon, the Silent Majority, and the traitorous neocons, who illegitimately (somehow) kept the revolution down. They required a decade or more to Long March through the institutions and set up PC, over and amongst things like the Reagan Revolution, which by rights oughtta been discredited by Vietnam, Watergate, the Great Depression, the Spanish Inquisition, the Holocaust, the St. Bartholomew Massacre, feudalism, the genocide of the American Indian, the slave trade, Japanese internment, the subjugation of women, McCarthyism, and everything else that's bad in their book.

Anyway, neocons actually switched teams because of Israel's vulnerability and their sense that the left would abandon imperialism, as well as their realization that blacks would never be the New Jews. (Not that they wanted anyone to be the New Jews, because as is said of the Highlander: there can only be one.) Identity politics running afoul of Enlightenment principles sounds like post hoc rationalization to me. But it instructive nevertheless that lefties thus characterize neocons, and bring them up in the context of changing tacts. They, who had been Public Enemy #1 during the Dark Age of Bush the Younger. I was going to say, "besides Nazis," but they were Nazis themselves, as you'll recall.

Despite the fact that neoconnish nationalism is a thing that should not be, and they're probably bringing it up to say alt-right nationalism is a thing even more should not be-ish, in effect they're telling me they want progressives to be the New Neocons. "Oh, no, sir. None of your identity politics here. This is a club for gentlemen!"

Funny how the alt-right brings that out in people. Obviously it brings it out in neocons, who were born to be radical communists but we're born-again to be "Not here, sir!" pseudo-gentlemen. Apparently, plenty of others in the range of acceptable opinion are like that, too. Actual commies and SJWs will fight fire with fire. But enough will tuck tail and run from various tactics when confronted with the specter of real rightist populism. Rather than the usual weak tea they call fascism.

Anonymous A Most Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents September 03, 2017 5:23 PM  

@39 YIH

Skimmed it, Dreher is still years behind the events of Current Year. Lots of mopes, shills and SJW's in the comments. Dreher has a new policy that's funny:

UPDATE: Here’s a new policy I have. If you read a post of mine, and you restate it in a comment in some absurdly distorted way, I’m not going to bother to answer you. I’m just not going to post it. If you are genuinely confused about something, I’m happy to clarify, if I have the time to do so when I approve that batch of comments. But if you’re just asking a “When did you stop beating your wife?” kind of question, too bad, you’ve wasted your time. Ain’t gonna post it.

It's almost like he's learned that some Social Justice types tend to lie.

Anonymous tublecane September 03, 2017 5:25 PM  

"Identity politics have been baked in the cake since 1965"

The Liberal Consensus got greedy. They had their identity politics all to themselves after FDR. Well, not if you count certain class, occupational, and regional loyalties to the Republican Party. But that was nothing like tying up the blacks, the aged, women, the "working man," the bums, etc. They were the only party playing that game for keeps.

Despite the occasional Republican president, Democrats and the ruling liberal order had Washington wrapped up, politically and especially bureaucratically, for decades. Mass popular movements like the rejection of them dirty hippies and the Reagan so-called revolution (which was in part the electoral defection of Democrats who weren't really one of their pet identities) didn't put a dent in their rule.

The only way to screw it up was to alienate the majority population and turn it against the smaller groups. One way to do that was to allow the lunatics to run the asylum with PC. Another way was to screw up racial politics by accelerating the various rights movements. The very worst was to doom the nation with Invite the World.

Anonymous tublecane September 03, 2017 5:29 PM  

@42-"The verbose one asked for references."

That's when you hit 'em with, "Hume, b*tch!"

Blogger Azure Amaranthine September 03, 2017 5:35 PM  

@33. Don, I don't think it's going to be nearly as civil as you do.

Divorces only happen when people still recognize the law (and the marriage) as legitimate in the first place. This marriage is obviously illegitimate, for several reasons, and the (material) law approximates to a kangaroo court. They're going to try to give the "woman" half of everything she didn't earn,(actually everything. Remember, abuse and domestic violence are "male-only crimes") and to make the "man" pay child support until kingdom come for children that neither ever have existed nor ever will.

The only upside is that she's inevitably going to burn that fancy, expensive house (city) down around her ears, and you don't pay child support to dead fake ex-spouses. Especially if the kangaroo court never got to pass judgement because they all died in the same fire while fornicating with the woman.

What time is it? It's a quarter-till hills-and-mountains o-clock.

Anonymous A Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents September 03, 2017 5:36 PM  

'Google image search Anis Shivani and you'll see that in every single photo, he has his chin tilted up like a Jersey tough guy using false machismo as a shield.'

He's just trying to look like 0bama.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine September 03, 2017 5:43 PM  

@46. tublecane, "The only way to screw it up was to alienate the majority population and turn it against the smaller groups. One way to do that was to allow the lunatics to run the asylum with PC. Another way was to screw up racial politics by accelerating the various rights movements. The very worst was to doom the nation with Invite the World."

The crop is full of parasites. Do you burn the crop to the ground and start a new one ASAP, or do you sit there and stare at it? The parasites are inevitably going to consume the entire crop and destroy themselves even if you just stare at it, the problem is that you'll use up most (or all) of the rest of the growing season by waiting.

Stop at a sustainable level of parasites? Since when were parasites either that intelligent or that selfless? They're selfish morons, it's baked into the very parasite being.

Note that the term parasite was actually a political term before it was a biological one and let that inform your understanding of how this all plays out for the Nth time. The parasites all die, most of the infected die with them, and the world goes on with the people who either kept themselves clean or escaped the corporal entity and cleansed themselves before the great quarantine came down.

Blogger Tatooine Sharpshooters' Club September 03, 2017 5:44 PM  

From a quick glance at the comments (the responses are completely predictable, really), the proglodyte base just ain't havin' it. It is also seems "Anis Shivani" is classed as just an privileged white man as soon as he questioned the infallible Party line.

It's also interesting to note that the great majority of the negative comments are from very, very white people. I guess there's no upper limit to self-hate and delusions of solidarity with people who would happily see them dead.

Anonymous 5343 Kinds of Deplorable September 03, 2017 6:00 PM  

'Google image search Anis Shivani and you'll see that in every single photo, he has his chin tilted up like a Jersey tough guy using false machismo as a shield.'

He's just trying to look like 0bama.


Well he looks like an Anis.

Blogger DonReynolds September 03, 2017 6:37 PM  

@38 Ransom Smith wrote:They actually think the train has breaks?

Everything they have ever done was predicated on the idea that the train has brakes and they could stop and get off whenever they need to pee. They know there are brakes. They have even seen the brake handle.

What they do not know or understand is how many miles it takes for the brakes to stop the train....especially when it is speeding downhill. That is the part they have seriously miscalculated.

Blogger VFM #7634 September 03, 2017 6:40 PM  

"Identity politics has only served to disempower the left and fuel the rise of white nationalism. Can we move on?"

Ha ha ha. Because white men (and a large number of white women) have finally realized that leftism has come to mean "screw over white people" and have decided in turn, "screw these guys".

Not to worry, though... Mr. Shivani's attitude is a tiny minority. The progtards are guaranteed to double down.

Anonymous tublecane September 03, 2017 6:40 PM  

@50-I hyperbolize with "the only way to screw it up," of course.

I think the entire modern project, from the Enlightenment on, may be unsustainable.

Anonymous Objective Observer September 03, 2017 6:45 PM  

His name is Anis.

Imagine what that was like growing up. Then add that face. You were expecting gratitude?

Anonymous A Most Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Deplorable Cents September 03, 2017 6:52 PM  

@51 Tatooine
From a quick glance at the comments (the responses are completely predictable, really), the proglodyte base just ain't havin' it.

That comment thread is like a miniature DNCe meeting with all sorts of poo flinging and self-hatred. One word totally missing: "immigration". Another word missing: "Antifa". Whole lotta denial goin' on.

Blogger DonReynolds September 03, 2017 7:02 PM  

@48 Azure

"Don, I don't think it's going to be nearly as civil as you do."

I am very sorry if I left you with that impression. I do not expect it to be civil in the least and what finally kicks it off will most uncivil.

"Divorces only happen when people still recognize the law (and the marriage) as legitimate in the first place. This marriage is obviously illegitimate, for several reasons, and the (material) law approximates to a kangaroo court."

In the South, we know this was (at best) a shotgun wedding, with a bayonet at our backs. So no, I see no reason to believe the marriage was valid since 1865. The first century there was occasional attempt of sincere reconciliation, but in the past few decades, they no long pretend. They despise us with a passion.

"The only upside is that she's inevitably going to burn that fancy, expensive house (city) down around her ears, and you don't pay child support to dead fake ex-spouses. Especially if the kangaroo court never got to pass judgement because they all died in the same fire while fornicating with the woman."

Since they have rejected all possibility of a civil divorce, much less an amicable divorce, they have made it a matter of survival. For them to survive, WE cannot. For us to survive, they cannot. That makes life very simple.

Anonymous CitizenOutkast September 03, 2017 7:44 PM  

How soon until cucks get wind of this and say "well, thank God we can finally put that nationalism nastiness behind us and get back to the ol' E Pluribus Unum, since it's a Constitutional amendment or such." I think they won't be able to wait very long before "forgiving" the left and trying to work with them again.

I may be off, quite easily, but I've never seen leftists back off of one of their strategies because of conservative kickback. Yet, we're seeing it now because of the alt-right.

Anonymous PinochetChopperPilot September 03, 2017 7:59 PM  

Our tactics should always revolve around: Agree and/or Amplify and/or Neg. Vary your verbal path based on who you are talking to...full on "black power" dindu, or "Happy Negro" or Normie, or "Professional White Female Victim"

Every day interactions and conversations, lunch room, kids little league, etc.

Say you hate the Confederate Flag? I hate the American flag for flying over slavery 70-something years...it SHOULD come down, ASAP...and Colin Kapernick should stop kneeling in subservience to it...

I want a Flag for The United White Nation...

Congrats on the promotion Becky...do NOT let anyone even say a WORD about you not having any babies yet...besides, with population issues and all the immigrants from (list brown countries), those blessed children need strong independent women to work hard and pay taxes for all these schools that are filling up. Can you pass the sugar behind the microwave? Thanks!

Richard Spencer reminds me of what Jews do to Arabs on the West Bank...he's like "literally Israel".... I'd have more respect for him if he at least admitted he wanted full apartheid. Can you pass the salt Bob?

I went to a synagogue once Rachel..but there was like, ZERO DIVERSITY and I had to leave...felt slimy for even being there...hard to believe you actually go to one...wow..what's that feel like?

Certain "Powers that Be" wanted to get rid of Pinochet simply because he was pro-environment! The socialists hated that..! Look it up.

Anonymous PinochetChopperPilot September 03, 2017 8:01 PM  

#CandidatesOfColorOnlyDNC2018

Anonymous Jack September 03, 2017 8:38 PM  

I just can't stop laughing about the name Anis.

Blogger James Dixon September 03, 2017 9:35 PM  

> They despise us with a passion.

As far as I can tell, they always have. That was one of the reasons for round one.

> For them to survive, WE cannot. For us to survive, they cannot. That makes life very simple.

Yep. It's coming. The exact timing isn't known, but it's well past the point of anything other than an outside war stopping it now. It's obvious that all the election of Trump has done is buy us some time.

The only real question is whether the war will come before or after financial collapse.

Anonymous Raker Tooth September 03, 2017 11:38 PM  

Killer blog, killer comments.
@36 cool. I contemplated taking it further: It's like the Emperor's new abstract art, the factions of the left all say "It's beautiful! It makes perfect sense!"
Don Reynolds, great insights.

Blogger Ken Prescott September 03, 2017 11:41 PM  

Once you pull the pin, Mister Hand Grenade is no longer your friend.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine September 04, 2017 3:08 AM  

"For them to survive, WE cannot. For us to survive, they cannot. That makes life very simple."

It's a bit less complicated even then that. It's not a two sides, who wins zero sum game.

They're going to kill themselves either way, so it's just a binary output. Do we let them drag everyone else down with them (0), or do we put them out of their misery(1)?

Blogger newbietrader September 04, 2017 3:35 AM  

so you bash the left for playing identity politics and then play identity politics JUST LIKE THE LEFT, So tell me again how you are different from the left? oh right, you're not, old left alt right nazis versus new left commies. who both hate jews and blacks and want to deny people free speech rights, want big gov't to impose what they want when they want they way they want.....

Anonymous A Most Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Deplorable Cents September 04, 2017 3:38 PM  

@newbie concern troll

As Vox stated, Identity politics happen to be baked into the cake since 1965. We just recognize the inevitable. Your random word salad merely provides amusement to us, knowing that window-licking leftards are distressed is fun.

We. Don't. Care.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts