ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2018 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Monday, October 09, 2017

Actors ran interference for Weinstein

The sudden downfall of Harvey Weinstein is merely the very tip of the Hollywood iceberg. And it's a really big iceberg of moral sewage and corruption:
In 2004, I was still a fairly new reporter at The New York Times when I got the green light to look into oft-repeated allegations of sexual misconduct by Weinstein. It was believed that many occurred in Europe during festivals and other business trips there.

I traveled to Rome and tracked down the man who held the plum position of running Miramax Italy. According to multiple accounts, he had no film experience and his real job was to take care of Weinstein's women needs, among other things.

As head of Miramax Italy in 2003 and 2004, Fabrizio Lombardo was paid $400,000 for less than a year of employment. He was on the payroll of Miramax and thus the Walt Disney Company, which had bought the indie studio in 1993.

I had people on the record telling me Lombardo knew nothing about film, and others citing evenings he organized with Russian escorts.

At the time, he denied that he was on the payroll to help Weinstein with favors. From the story: "Reached in Italy, Mr. Lombardo declined to comment on the circumstances of his leaving Miramax or Ricucci, saying they were legal matters being handled by lawyers. 'I am very proud of what we achieved at Miramax here in Italy,' he said of his work for the film company. 'It cannot be that they hired me because I'm a friend.'"

I also tracked down a woman in London who had been paid off after an unwanted sexual encounter with Weinstein. She was terrified to speak because of her non-disclosure agreement, but at least we had evidence of a pay-off.

The story I reported never ran.

After intense pressure from Weinstein, which included having Matt Damon and Russell Crowe call me directly to vouch for Lombardo and unknown discussions well above my head at the Times, the story was gutted.
Russell Crowe is hardly a surprise, but suddenly Matt Damon doesn't look like such a good guy, does he? Read the whole thing, there are more details at the link. There should be no slacking off on the attention given to this issue, as it is a promising opportunity in the cultural war, especially given the way in which Hollywood is used as Satan's pulpit.

Labels: , ,

101 Comments:

Anonymous darkestclouds0s October 09, 2017 8:04 AM  

That Cerno meme, LOL.

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=57475

Anonymous darkestclouds0s October 09, 2017 8:06 AM  

The only thing missing is, whey didn't he caption the Bill Clinton photo as something like, "Serial rapist says hello to fellow serial sexual predator" ? That would have been even better.

Blogger Howard Stone October 09, 2017 8:08 AM  

You like apples?

Blogger Lovekraft October 09, 2017 8:14 AM  

"The Nice Guys" with Crowe and Gosling left a bad taste in my mouth:

Gosling's 14-year old daughter follows the two secretly to an upscale LA party in the 70s where she is wandering around the mansion watching hardcore porn and everyone's acting like it's no big deal.

Blogger Lazarus October 09, 2017 8:25 AM  

Hmm. Sharon Waxman is the disgruntled reporter. Looks like an inter-tribal squabble.

Blogger Johnny October 09, 2017 8:26 AM  

Meanwhile they presume to lecture the rest of us.

For me finding out about their income tax filings would be way more interesting than Trump's. Not because I think they would break the law, but to find out how much and in what way they manipulate the system. Money is behind a lot of this. It gives political power, and if it is obtained in a way that is manipulative, a sense of license.
And if they don't pay a lot of tax, they are apt for that reason to favor an expanded government. Hey, they are not footing the bill.

Blogger Koanic October 09, 2017 8:32 AM  

I wasn't aware that people thought Matt Damon was a good guy.

Physiognomically, he played himself in The Departed.

Blogger weka October 09, 2017 8:36 AM  

Crowe has always been a phony, from the time he called himself Russ le Roqand abused his bandmates on the 1980s.

And he could not sing, even by punk standards.

Blogger The Packetman October 09, 2017 8:39 AM  

I've never thought Damon was a nice guy. Good actor, yes; good guy, no.

Blogger SemiSpook37 October 09, 2017 8:47 AM  

I think Matt and Trey had a spot-on portrayal of Matt Damon in Team America.

I consider that version of Matt Damon more suited to protecting Western Civilization than the real one. That dude is a jackass.

Blogger Cataline Sergius October 09, 2017 8:51 AM  

If you read between the lines... Not in this article just generally, you can see that people are still terrified of the guy.

This is terrorist and his hostages stuff. All of Hollywood seems to have Stockholm syndrome when it comes to this animal.

He's been so big and so scary for so long they can't imagine a world without him.

Blogger MendoScot October 09, 2017 8:53 AM  

@11. Agreed. His firing is cosmetic. He knows where all the dicks are buried.

Anonymous VFM #6306 October 09, 2017 8:57 AM  

You commenters are missing the point on Damon. His armor now has a chink. Probably underaged.

You can now freely exploit your impression that he was a bad guy, with known victims, whereas before you only had Team America memes.

Anonymous Man of the Atom October 09, 2017 8:58 AM  

MendoScot wrote:@11. Agreed. His firing is cosmetic. He knows where all the dicks are buried.

Hmmm. That leaves him in a precarious position, if someone wants to ensure that info stays buried as well.

Anonymous CarpeOro October 09, 2017 9:03 AM  

Never thought of Matt Damon as a good guy after I learned who the author he cited in "Good Will Hunting" as the real deal was. Just check the Infogalactic link on Carrol Quigley https://infogalactic.com/info/Carroll_Quigley.

Anonymous Nathan October 09, 2017 9:04 AM  

Matt Damon, eh? Makes me wonder about Affleck and Clooney, now.

Blogger James Dixon October 09, 2017 9:05 AM  

> Hmmm. That leaves him in a precarious position, if someone wants to ensure that info stays buried as well.

One bad batch of cocaine is all it would take.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother October 09, 2017 9:07 AM  

Damn shame too, that cocaine. It's a hell of a drug.

Blogger Aeoli Pera October 09, 2017 9:22 AM  

I presume this is related to the roundup of pedophiles in California a couple of months ago. 4D chess?

Blogger MendoScot October 09, 2017 9:25 AM  

From twatter:

Remember: The Weinstein Company didn't fire Harvey because they found out he was a sexual predator. They fired him because WE found out.

Blogger Nate October 09, 2017 9:35 AM  

Matt Damon? It literally never occurred to me that Matt Damon's whole schtick was anything but a liberal skin suit over an amoral pscyho.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan October 09, 2017 9:35 AM  

"Eyes Wide Shut" fitting that Nicole Kidman has kept her mouth shut as well.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan October 09, 2017 9:42 AM  

So we get decades of Roman Polanski as misunderstood genius but now slob boy goes down because he impregnated a potted plant with his deformed seed. Count me as mystified, but I still won't be siding with feminists against the fat old slobs in H-wood. I grant them no legitimacy, but I'm sure some conservatives will now rush in to white knight.

Blogger Cail Corishev October 09, 2017 9:57 AM  

"She was terrified to speak because of her non-disclosure agreement"

That's interesting, I heard somewhere else yesterday that they commonly use NDAs to keep people quiet. In addition to getting them to record something compromising that can be used to blackmail them, they have them sign a thick NDA that covers all their interactions. So they can threaten not just to ruin the person's reputation, but to destroy him or her financially as well.

You probably can't enforce a NDA on illegal activity, but young starlets (and stars) wouldn't know that.

because he impregnated a potted plant with his deformed seed

If anyone wants to wager that nothing happened here except some creepy behavior toward adult females, and that's all this is about, I'll take that action all day long.

I'm sure some conservatives will now rush in to white knight.

For which side? Depends on whom they think this might ultimately benefit. Did you ever think you'd see conservatives arguing for the right to diss the flag?

Blogger YIH October 09, 2017 10:06 AM  

@24. Cail Corishev
That's interesting, I heard somewhere else yesterday that they commonly use NDAs to keep people quiet.
https://infogalactic.com/info/Michael_Jackson#1993.E2.80.931994:_First_child_sexual_abuse_allegations_and_first_marriage

Blogger GithYankee October 09, 2017 10:09 AM  

Using a position of power to find a better marriage partner is fine, that's part of life.
Using power for sexual coercion is morally wrong, full stop. Roman Polanski was wrong, Weinstein was wrong. Feminists have not lined up against Weinstein, moral people have.
If Bill O'Reilly furthered or hindered careers based on sexual compliance, eff him too. Seems more like a (((thing))) though. The goy as usual were cowards, didn't want to be seen as racist, could have exposed but didn't.

Anonymous Jeff October 09, 2017 10:10 AM  

Many have been wondering why this is all coming out now?

The answer is Trump.

Blogger Theophilus Chilton October 09, 2017 10:11 AM  

@12 Agreed. His firing is cosmetic. He knows where all the dicks are buried.

A guy like that, in a position like that, doing things like that...ALWAYS keeps records. Find them, and Hollywood dies.

Anonymous VFM #6306 October 09, 2017 10:11 AM  

Matt Damon covered for Weinstein.

Everyone covered for Weinstein.

Covering for Weinstein is a PR game for these jackals. Clooney, Klum, Depp, Gosling. All of them.

Anonymous VFM #6306 October 09, 2017 10:23 AM  

"Good Will Hunting, which Mr. Damon initiated when he was a student at Harvard, became one of Miramax’s most profitable releases. Despite some hints of darkness, the film is calculated nonsense of a high order, as phony as anything cooked up by Hollywood committee. Chris Columbus could easily have directed it, after all, though unlike Mr. Van Sant he could not have slipped in the film’s one true scene: Will mocking the therapist played by Robin Williams. (In another version of the screenplay, the therapist sexually services Will.) As Mr. Damon faces the camera in searching close-up, we see the cruelty slide across Will’s face like a shadow and, as important, we see the pleasure he derives from that cruelty."

Blogger Cail Corishev October 09, 2017 10:26 AM  

From twatter:

That was so good I had to login to Twitter for the first time in months just to retweet it. And of course the first reply is from a butthurt Democrat saying, "But mah Trump groping!"

The answer is Trump.

When the Clinton/Epstein Island revelations were under discussion last year, some NeverTrumpers said, "But look, Trump went there once too, so he's just as bad!" When we pointed out that he never went back, and in fact banned Epstein from his own properties and said some cryptic things that hinted he knew what happened there, they said, "Okay, then why didn't he report it or do something about it? He's just as bad!"

That was a legitimate question. This is the answer, and it's just starting.

The other part of this is that point in movies like Temple of Doom where the villain's plans are starting to fall apart, so to ensure the success of his final master scheme, he grabs one of his own henchmen and sacrifices him to his gods for extra power. The guy doesn't have to be a bad henchman; might have even been a good one, but he was expendable. The Deep State has been kinda reeling for more than a year now, its plans not working quite like they used to, often backfiring and digging them in deeper. That's bound to lead to division, betrayals, and trying to sacrifice the other guy before he sacrifices you.

Blogger SouthRon October 09, 2017 10:39 AM  

@16 How anyone could think Clooney is clean is beyond me. I'd rank him as one of the most insecure narcissistic A List betas in Hellywood. What more do you need to know than he publicly complained that his codpiece wasn't as big as Arnold's in Batman & Robin. Did daddy not approve Georgie boy?

Anonymous DeeJay October 09, 2017 10:39 AM  

Pretty sure I'm going to regret asking this (I liked his portrayal of Aubrey in "Master and Commander"), but why in this instance was Russell Crowe not a surprise?

Anonymous Fran October 09, 2017 10:42 AM  

Depp is a known wife beater.

Blogger Cail Corishev October 09, 2017 10:45 AM  

(In another version of the screenplay, the therapist sexually services Will.)

As immoral and amoral as many movies are today, how much worse is what the creators wanted to do? Remember the Raiders of the Lost Ark brainstorming session where they thought it would be cool to have Marian be 10-12 years old when Indiana started his affair with her?

There are so many of those "Oh, I get it now" moments when you watch movies now. When I saw Powder way back in the day, I thought it had a weird but interesting premise, but there's one scene that puzzled me where Powder, even though he's shown no signs of being gay (or having any sexuality at all) and it has nothing to do with the story, gazes for a while at a buff dude showering while the camera pans across him like it's suddenly porn. Later I found out the director was convicted of child molestation on another set. "Oh, I get it now." In the RLM commentary for Batman and Robin, Jay asks, 'How did we get here?" and Mike says, "A flamboyantly gay director named Joel Schumacher, Jay. That's how we got here." That made me think of a scene from The Lost Boys where a buff, shirtless saxophone player is featured for no reason at all. "Oh, I get it now." Then that made me think of the Coreys.

How long til we get the Hays Code back, because Americans decide the only way we can stomach these creeps is by putting strict limits on their perversity again? (Yeah, I realize we have to get the Catholic Church back first. That may take longer.)

Anonymous VFM #6306 October 09, 2017 10:46 AM  

Dame Judi Dench had Harvey Weinstein's name tattooed on her ass.

No. Seriously

Anonymous MJimmy October 09, 2017 10:53 AM  

His name was Ozymandias.

His armor now has a chink. Ya know, as a half east asian I find that comment offensive. Just kidding, let's make racism fun again, I say! Just please, no lynchings, genocides or any of that.

Reality is so much more interesting these days than any tinsel town claptrap. Remarkable to see Matt "Mr. Sincerity" Damon with the impish toothy grin and "shock" of blond hair exposed as just another filthy gwai lo.

Blogger Cail Corishev October 09, 2017 11:00 AM  

On reason this has gone on so long is that almost everyone has some people in Hollywood that they admire. I don't have many, but a few, and it would suck to find out they were kiddie diddlers, for instance.

It's kinda like athletes and steroids. People who get outraged when players get caught usually have some favorite players that they are sure are clean. But you never know anymore, so that creates a sort of tension: "We should try to catch cheaters, but maybe let's not get too good at it. Could we just catch the really bad ones, and let the others slip by?"

When this really gets rolling, the perps exposed won't just be guys like Weinstein who look so creepy they should come with built-in restraining orders. Some will be beloved stars, and that's going to be tough for fans. Then denial will turn into anger.

Anonymous MJimmy October 09, 2017 11:01 AM  

Mensch, I hope Maggie Smith isn't implicated. I am a big Lady Grantham fan.

Anonymous BBGKB October 09, 2017 11:26 AM  

After intense pressure from Weinstein, which included having Matt Damon and Russell Crowe call me directly to vouch for Lombardo and unknown discussions well above my head at the Times, the story was gutted.

They called to say his PP is so small he is the best jew in Hollywood to casting couch for.

And if they don't pay a lot of tax, they are apt for that reason to favor an expanded government

No matter how well a movie does, they can write off profits in ways to lower tax.

You commenters are missing the point on Damon. His armor now has a chink. Probably underaged.

If it's #Pizzagate it's more likely an underage niglet than a chink.

You probably can't enforce a NDA on illegal activity, but young starlets (and stars) wouldn't know that.

Even jew landlords try to get away with clauses that are null & void by law in rental agreements

Covering for Weinstein is a PR game for these jackals. Clooney, Klum, Depp, Gosling. All of them.

Gosling was too pretty of a boy to not be abused in Hollywood. He even did a movie as a high school football player abused by his coach.

Blogger Mastermind October 09, 2017 11:29 AM  

Matt Damon is not surprising at all. Did anyone seriously think that left wing virtue signalling asshole wouldn't do something like this? Scratch a liberal, get a rapist.

Blogger Emmanuel Mateo-Morales October 09, 2017 11:33 AM  

Wait, why is Russel Crowe not surprising, but Matt Damon isn't? I mean, Matt Damon just oozes slime and Russel Crowe, while I'm not surprised is as crooked as any Hollyweirdo, really personality wise didn't seem the type, unless there's something about his history I'm blissfully unaware of.

Blogger Jeff aka Orville October 09, 2017 11:41 AM  

Matt Damon, eh? Makes me wonder about Affleck and Clooney, now.

You just started wondering about Flat Affect and George Clowney? Because I like Clooney's comedic movies, I tend to immediately shut off or close down anything that has him speaking his opinions. Couldn't watch him otherwise.

Blogger Emmanuel Mateo-Morales October 09, 2017 11:45 AM  

"Using a position of power to find a better marriage partner is fine, that's part of life."

No it isn't. The fact that you had to differentiate this particular kind of scummy behavior from other scummy behavior not even by the levels of scumminess, but by saying the former is somehow not the hallmark of scum (by the way, Stan Lee stole another man's wife, so yeah. Hallmark of scum) just shows how scummy society, not that the former isn't scummy. Scum, scum, scum, scum, scum.

Anonymous fop October 09, 2017 11:49 AM  

Airport worker: "Nice dress!"

Ashley Judd: "You sexist pig! I will have you fired!!"

Harvey Weinstein: "Ashley, come here and wash my dick"

Ashley Judd: "Oh, Harvey you big silly! Ok but this is the LAST time."

Blogger BassmanCO October 09, 2017 11:51 AM  

DeeJay wrote:Pretty sure I'm going to regret asking this (I liked his portrayal of Aubrey in "Master and Commander"), but why in this instance was Russell Crowe not a surprise?

Russell Crowe is just a raging asshole. Threw a telephone at a hotel worker who wasn't working quickly enough. Demanded an apology from Steve Martin about a joke he made while hosting the Oscars (intimating that Tom Hanks was behind the kidnapping threats, Hanks played along). Just watch the treatment South Park gave him.

Blogger haus frau October 09, 2017 11:54 AM  

Matt Damon has gay face and the Affleck brothers are notorious for their debauchery. I'm not surprised at their possible involvement in activities that are both immoral and possibly illegal but almost all of these actors and actresses have children. You'd think that would give them a spark of humanity and decency in their hearts, but no, it's just part of the mask.

Anonymous MJimmy October 09, 2017 11:54 AM  

Spokes model Cloonster always struck me as the ultimate phony 'good guy' slimeball di tutti slimeballs. Plus his acting sucks balls, pardon my language. Alright this is too much fun, I'm taking a break.

OT, a native Turkish buddy of mine just told me Trump is hugely popular in Turkey, would not have guessed.

Blogger Emmanuel Mateo-Morales October 09, 2017 11:56 AM  

"Some will be beloved stars, and that's going to be tough for fans."

Then fuck those fans and fuck them with a rusty garden hoe. Shit, I don't give a fuck about live action stars, but even I know the voice actors I used to like are probably dirty as shit as their live action counterparts and deserve to have their heads on pikes and you don't hear my crying about it. Heck, I want those people I used to like taken down a peg (looking at you, Tom Kenny, among others).

Blogger Resident Moron™ October 09, 2017 12:02 PM  

All this hypocrisy, the vicious persecution of innocent bums who make a normal sexual advance and the simultaneous defense of pedophile rapists, is one big affirmation of Vox’s SMV theory.

It’s not what is being requested that’s the insult to a woman; it’s who is requesting it.

Watch.
Learn.
Apply

Anonymous Anonymous October 09, 2017 12:03 PM  

@ Cail Corishev
When the Clinton/Epstein Island revelations were under discussion last year, some NeverTrumpers said, "But look, Trump went there once too, so he's just as bad!" When we pointed out that he never went back, and in fact banned Epstein from his own properties and said some cryptic things that hinted he knew what happened there, they said, "Okay, then why didn't he report it or do something about it? He's just as bad!"

That was a legitimate question. This is the answer, and it's just starting.


I gotta wonder ... A few days ago, Trump sent the foreign policy wonks into a spin with a comment about "the calm before the storm" following a meeting with a bunch of top military brass. Perhaps he wasn't speaking of foreign matters - perhaps he was referring to a domestic storm, with Weinstein as just the first gust of wind.

It would be a classic bit of misdirection if true.

DougK

Anonymous fop October 09, 2017 12:05 PM  

Even the voice of "Tickle Me Elmo" was a pedo.

Blogger Emmanuel Mateo-Morales October 09, 2017 12:06 PM  

@51

Hence, why I hope the whole of Hollywood is burnt down literally and figuratively, preferably with an actual, Dr. Frankenstein esque pitchfork and torch mob.

Anonymous Gen. Kong October 09, 2017 12:11 PM  

So we get decades of Roman Polanski as misunderstood genius but now slob boy goes down because he impregnated a potted plant with his deformed seed. Count me as mystified, but I still won't be siding with feminists against the fat old slobs in H-wood. I grant them no legitimacy, but I'm sure some conservatives will now rush in to white knight.

It's all very curious I agree, but there's nothing at all wrong with a little nip of Schadenfreude when enemies fight against each other so both are destroyed. Never interfere if your enemy is destroying himself. No doubt the bow-ties will be hopping in to defend (((Weinstein))), because Judeo-Christ.

Anonymous Gen. Kong October 09, 2017 12:13 PM  

Emmanuel Mateo-Morales wrote:
@51

Hence, why I hope the whole of Hollywood is burnt down literally and figuratively, preferably with an actual, Dr. Frankenstein esque pitchfork and torch mob.


Rocket Man could get the job done in a single day. I can almost taste the salt of my tears.

Anonymous Ain October 09, 2017 12:33 PM  

They gave it up willingly. Maybe they didn't like it, but they did it. They got rich and famous. They're not victims, they're players of "the game." They're accomplices in the cesspool, and reveals that the sort of people that seek stardom are rarely of good character.

Hollywood actors are afraid of him because they're compromised, and probably on video. Most of them can go down in the same way he did, if not worse. It keeps them in line.

High level politics is the same way.

Anonymous Crew October 09, 2017 12:41 PM  

There's still a lot that is not making sense ... The NY Slimes is not fond of Trump as we all know, so why is this coming out now? It has the potential to destroy Hollywood and lots of big names. It is an enormous attack in the culture wars.

Who benefits, who initiated this and why? Are thy trying to get out in front of something even bigger that is coming down the line?

Blogger EejitInEspana October 09, 2017 12:57 PM  

Underage chinks do 2x damage!

Blogger Cail Corishev October 09, 2017 1:06 PM  

Perhaps he wasn't speaking of foreign matters

There was never any reason to think he was. That was just jumping to conclusions (uh, I see uniforms, must be a military matter) and wishful thinking by the media, which so desperately wants him to get caught up in one of the neocons' foreign wars, both to distract him from his domestic plans and to damage him with his base.

It wasn't really misdirection, just a cryptic statement that they projected all over.

Then fuck those fans and fuck them with a rusty garden hoe.

Agreed. I'm not excusing them, just explaining why even people outraged about this offense or that one won't want to follow it all the way down the rabbit hole. Let's say, hypothetically, that aggressively pursuing the child porn and human trafficking networks that they've uncovered would expose 30% of the elites as serious scumbags, either convicted in court or the court of public opinion. 30% of actors, directors, authors, church leaders, politicians, judges, journalists, famous CEOs, academics, pro athletes, musicians, artists -- across the board, every sector of high society. How many people would thank you after all that dust settled? How many would wish they'd never known?

Again, I'm firmly in the "get it all out and damn the consequences" camp. Just saying many won't be, because it's going to shake them hard.

Anonymous DaveInjustice October 09, 2017 1:06 PM  

So Matt Damon is basically his character from The Departed? well, with any luck....

hopefully it continues on to bring down Disney. They have given over so heavily to the gay agenda its simply insane. And also very creepy how slavishly devoted to it they are. There's a corporation rife with corruption. Sure whenever there's criticism they pretend (like hollywood at large does) that was from the age when they were conveniently ultra conservative. They ignore that from hollywood's beginnings they were made up of bohemian types from the stage who were ultra liberal by the standards of the time, and that this type of quid pro quo happened from waaaay back.

Anonymous A Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents October 09, 2017 1:17 PM  

Then fuck those fans and fuck them with a rusty garden hoe.

That's what it's gonna feel like for some of them. No lie.

@58 Cail Corishev
Again, I'm firmly in the "get it all out and damn the consequences" camp. Just saying many won't be, because it's going to shake them hard.

Exactly. It's gonna be like Jerry Sandusky all over again. Only 10x worse. Because Miramax is part of Disney, das Haus of Maus, and that means kiddies. And Disney is only one tower. There are others.

Blogger Johnny October 09, 2017 1:17 PM  

BBGKB wrote:And if they don't pay a lot of tax, they are apt for that reason to favor an expanded government

No matter how well a movie does, they can write off profits in ways to lower tax.


Actually I was thinking about how much personal tax they pay on the income they show. If I got it right studio accounting is highly manipulated, more than with other big companies. What makes it work is their ability to damage the people who might go after them.

Blogger Johnny October 09, 2017 1:28 PM  

The thing about actors is that we are not as sophisticated as we think we are. Even though we know they are just playing a part we still want to think they are like the person they are pretending to be. Thus it is damaging for them to act contrary to type when they are off screen.

Professional wrestlers play this out more than most and they call it kayfabe. Be who you pretend to be when you are in the ring.

Blogger Cail Corishev October 09, 2017 1:30 PM  

and probably on video.

I can't confirm its authenticity because I didn't see it at the time, but there's a screencap claiming to be from last December, where someone claims that the Fappening was not the result of a hack, but a major Hollywood figure's phone being stolen. I'm not familiar enough with the material to know if that's true, but now people are wondering if it was Weinstein's phone. If it is, the list of people featured in the Fappening could be a good place for media and/or investigators to start asking, "So....so....ever seen Harvey Weinstein naked? And why didn't you tell anyone that's where those pictures came from?"

Come to think of it, that could be why they're burning him now: it's one thing to take compromising pics to get a hold over someone; that's apparently just how the business works. But letting the pics get out to millions of fapping nerds, that's just weak, man.

Anonymous Gen. Kong October 09, 2017 1:35 PM  

Crew wrote:
There's still a lot that is not making sense ... The NY Slimes is not fond of Trump as we all know, so why is this coming out now? It has the potential to destroy Hollywood and lots of big names. It is an enormous attack in the culture wars.

Who benefits, who initiated this and why? Are thy trying to get out in front of something even bigger that is coming down the line?


Must be those damned Russians. Haven't we been told our moral usurperiors that they're the source of all this bad sheeit for a year at least? All hatched from FSB offices in Kremlin by Fearless Leader, Badunov and Natasha - just to spoil things for happy Hollywoody Moose and Squirrel. Either them or it could that scourge of Judeo-Christ, Y.T. Rayciss - the epicenter of all evilest of evil on earth.

Anonymous charlemagne2701@gmail.com October 09, 2017 1:40 PM  

Who knew? Matt Damon is an enabler of sexual assault. He WANTED that sexual predator and his prostitute procurer to stay employed by Disney. DISNEY! A company for KIDS! Sick. Matt Damon wanted the New York Times to HIDE THE TRUTH about a sexual predator. I feel sorry for Matt Damon's wife and kids. How will he explain his behavior to them?

Anonymous DaveInjustice October 09, 2017 1:41 PM  

(In another version of the screenplay, the therapist sexually services Will.)


To be fair, affleck and damon have said they intentionally added totally out of place gay sex scenes to the script to see if the people reviewing them were actually reading/paying attention. Like apparently there was a scene where lambeau and sean just starting blowing each other out of nowhere that was completely without context. Of course now, kinda makes you wonder if they were signalling to a producer....

Anonymous charlemagne2701@gmail.com October 09, 2017 1:57 PM  

I just saw this very interesting detail: "The Weinstein story broke one year to the day that the Access Hollywood tape was leaked."

The Force is strong with the God Emperor Trump. He always punches back harder.

It was a bad miscalculation by liberal Hollywood to go after Trump for locker room talk. Payback is a bitch.

Anonymous doubtusmaximus October 09, 2017 2:42 PM  

This isn't from Trump, this is Jew vs Jew somewhere in Hollyweird.

Blogger Sterling Pilgrim October 09, 2017 2:44 PM  

Let's not forget that this has been going on for the longest time, even in seemingly benign frachises:
George Lucas: I was thinking that this old guy could have been the mentor. He could have known this little girl when she was just a kid. Had an affair with her when she was eleven.

Lawrence Kasdan: And he was forty-two.

George Lucas: He hasn’t seen her in twelve years. Now she’s twenty-two. It’s a real strange relationship.

Steven Spielberg: She had better be older than twenty-two.

George Lucas: He’s thirty-five, and he knew her ten years ago when he was twenty-five and she was only twelve. It would be amusing to make her slightly young at the time.

Steven Spielberg: And promiscuous. She came onto him. George Lucas: Fifteen is right on the edge. I know it’s an outrageous idea, but it is interesting. Once she’s sixteen or seventeen it’s not interesting anymore. But if she was fifteen and he was twenty-five and they actually had an affair the last time they met. And she was madly in love with him and he........... And here is a line from "Marion" the female in the film: Marion: "I was too young, it was wrong and you knew it," Indy's response: "You knew what you were doing"?

Blogger Karl Stodden October 09, 2017 3:12 PM  

doubtusmaximus wrote:This isn't from Trump, this is Jew vs Jew ...



Like Trump's kids' spouses?

Blogger Cail Corishev October 09, 2017 3:18 PM  

They're starting to remove his name from credits now. Whatever they're trying to get ahead of, it's yooge.

Anonymous BBGKB October 09, 2017 3:18 PM  

Perhaps he wasn't speaking of foreign matters

Perhaps TRUMP will have the marines invade Epstein island and force CNN to show all the tapes of politicians.

there was a scene where lambeau and sean just starting blowing each other out of nowhere that was completely without context

That's how it happens, didn't you see the South Park episode of Earth as a reality show with the space jew producers.

"The Weinstein story broke one year to the day that the Access Hollywood tape was leaked."

TRUMP waited 2 full days after shitlibs said they stopped doing identity politics before he reversed Obama's tranny military plan.

Blogger Cail Corishev October 09, 2017 3:20 PM  

In almost certainly unrelated news, two NYT White House correspondents (Haberman and Thrush) have gone dormant on Twitter recently with no explanation. (Thrush actually tried to delete his account, then legal told him that would make it available to fakers, and switched to making it dormant.)

In more news surely unrelated to anything, that Project Veritas piece comes out today or tomorrow, right?

Anonymous Nathan October 09, 2017 3:46 PM  

"Most agreed, but some felt that even if the league did lose a small percentage of fans due to the protests, it also could gain a new audience."

There's that mythical new audience that every marketeer is chasing again...

Anonymous Nathan October 09, 2017 3:49 PM  

Apologies about the previous cross-post.

It will be interesting to see how or if this unravels. Hopefully, they can get Weinstein to name names, but I would also be on the lookout for a rash of sudden suicides as well. Washington isn't the only swamp that needs to be drained.

Anonymous A Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents October 09, 2017 4:00 PM  

@71
They're starting to remove his name from credits now.

Wait, what? That level of unpersoning in just a couple of days?

Whatever they're trying to get ahead of, it's yooge.

It's got to be more than just starlet-wannabes. Anyone seen Woody Allen lately?

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable October 09, 2017 4:14 PM  

Hmm. Sharon Waxman is the disgruntled reporter. Looks like an inter-tribal squabble.

Intra-

Matt Damon? It literally never occurred to me that Matt Damon's whole schtick was anything but a liberal skin suit over an amoral pscyho.

You are more perceptive than I. It literally never occurred to me that his brilliant representation of Bourne as a remorseless blank slate was typecasting.

Anonymous Franklyspeaking October 09, 2017 4:19 PM  

To whomever said it, Weinstein isn't going to "name names", he's more likely going to start bench pressing with an open thumb grip. Or develop an interest in skydiving over Arkansas.

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable October 09, 2017 4:30 PM  

To be fair, affleck and damon have said they intentionally added totally out of place gay sex scenes to the script to see if the people reviewing them were actually reading/paying attention. Like apparently there was a scene where lambeau and sean just starting blowing each other out of nowhere that was completely without context. Of course now, kinda makes you wonder if they were signalling to a producer....

Be that as it may, it puts Chasing Any in a whole new light. And also those songs with Kimmel and Silverman. They know tropes so they know lampshading, how drawing attention to something can make it seem like a joke instead of a flaw.

If "openly down-low" is a possible thing, then they are.

Blogger daddynichol October 09, 2017 4:42 PM  

"She was terrified to speak because of her non-disclosure agreement"

In earlier days, that's called prostitution. Pay for her services and keep her mouth shut if she wants more work.

Blogger Cail Corishev October 09, 2017 4:51 PM  

It's got to be more than just starlet-wannabes.

Yep. This isn't the PTA finding out the school principal has been banging a couple of the teacher's aides. This is Hollywood. If Polanski ever comes back, they'll throw him a parade. They gave Bill Clinton as much cover as they could, and Weinstein is the kind of operator and donor who made that possible. They're not this worked up over some lay-for-play regret.

Anonymous Takin' a Look October 09, 2017 5:25 PM  

doubtusmaximus

This isn't from Trump, this is Jew vs Jew somewhere in Hollyweird.


I don't see it as mutually exclusive.

As an aside, great comments; get right with Jesus and buckle up, the ride is gonna get intense. As for me, I have my own affairs I still stress over, but a huge weight has been lifted from my shoulders. I've felt like Cassandra for near unto 20 years, no longer.

Kill them all God-Emperor Trump. Crush every last nest of these fuckers like the British crushed the Thuggees.

Blogger Noah B The Savage Gardener October 09, 2017 5:57 PM  

I suspect that the Weinsteins have much worse secrets than manipulating adult women into sex. Now that Trump controls the NSA and it's producing so much winning, I'm learning to love Big Brother.

Blogger SemiSpook37 October 09, 2017 6:22 PM  

Be that as it may, it puts Chasing Any in a whole new light.

Maybe so, but that film was Kevin Smith’s writing, and Damon wasn’t anywhere near that particular scene. Granted, I haven’t heard Tons of Fun step up to defend Harvey, myself, but I’d be extremely disappointed if he did. Always struck me as the quiet type that would go along, but damn if you didn’t realize just how f’ed up in the head he truly was, if pressed.

Blogger Emmanuel Mateo-Morales October 09, 2017 6:55 PM  

"Just saying many won't be, because it's going to shake them hard."

Who do you think I want to suffer next?

Anonymous DaveInjustice October 09, 2017 7:14 PM  

Tons of fun"

Guessing you mean Kevin Smith?

He did actually step up and say he was unhappy for his early career to be associated with Harvey. He told a story in one of his Q&As about basically turning his back on the guy and going his own way. I wonder now if there isn't​ more to that Story

Anonymous Anonymous October 09, 2017 7:21 PM  

@24 Heard of some nouveau riche pharmacists who used to used payoffs and NDAs after DMT and cocaine induced rapes. Police are aware too.

Blogger Cail Corishev October 09, 2017 7:32 PM  

Heh. Spot The Alpha: Ultra-Beginner's Round

Blogger Robert Browning October 09, 2017 7:51 PM  

Why does the Jew York Times let the cat out of the bag?? What has Weinstein done to deserve such treachery?

Blogger Lovekraft October 09, 2017 7:54 PM  

Learning about Russell Crowe's involvement with The Toad King in shutting down a 2004 NYT article, I posted a review of "The Nice Guys" on IMDB.

It's approved. If you know me, you will be quite please to know IMDB still has a spine.

Anonymous Susan() October 09, 2017 8:00 PM  

Roman Polanski has been getting a pass from his sins basically because everyone still feels sorry for him because of the gruesome murder of his wife Sharon Tate and their unborn baby. It wasn't too long after that that he molested the 13 year old.

Something bad, big and real ugly is coming, and the Left turning on this guy means it is something that even they cannot approve of. So they will try desperately to stay ahead of it so they survive.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 09, 2017 8:22 PM  

@37

(((Matt Damon)))

Blogger SemiSpook37 October 09, 2017 9:12 PM  

DaveInjustice wrote:He did actually step up and say he was unhappy for his early career to be associated with Harvey. He told a story in one of his Q&As about basically turning his back on the guy and going his own way.

Yeah, I did mean Kevin. "Tons of Fun" is what Jay (Mewes) referred to him as in Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back.

That's good that he distanced himself from Harvey. Once you get past both the Silent Bob and Comic Book Man acts, Kevin does seem like a reasonable guy to be around. Could also be that he's got a daughter and is being a dutiful father to her, especially knowing there's ALWAYS guys like Harvey out there. Just a hunch.

Anonymous Gen. Kong October 09, 2017 9:39 PM  

Roman Polanski has been getting a pass from his sins basically because everyone still feels sorry for him because of the gruesome murder of his wife Sharon Tate and their unborn baby. It wasn't too long after that that he molested the 13 year old.

Something bad, big and real ugly is coming, and the Left turning on this guy means it is something that even they cannot approve of. So they will try desperately to stay ahead of it so they survive.


No, (((Roman Polanski))) got away with it because (((they))) scream "never again!" about fellow pedo (((Leo Frank))), who received far more mercy from the mob in 1914 than he deserved. A whole worldwide network of liars, shysters and slush money exists to make sure folks like Weinstein can have as many goyim toddlers as they like.

It's a very strange situation indeed so I expect something big is in the works. Fearless Leader, Boris and Natasha have been very busy apparently. Perhaps the Clinton gang is feeling the heat and tossing excess fat over the side of their bus to hell. Time will tell.

Blogger Matthew October 09, 2017 10:57 PM  

Spooner, please take your meds.

Blogger Matthew October 09, 2017 11:02 PM  

Pace Gen. Kong, but the least interesting thing about the Leo Frank story is that Mary Phagan was only 14. Yes, my blood boils at the thought of a young girl treated that way, but the reason that Jew was violently extracted from a local jail and hung by the neck until he was dead was that the establishment stood up for him, up even to the level of the governor of the state.

Blogger Cail Corishev October 09, 2017 11:43 PM  

Interesting article at the Jewish magazine Tablet: "The Specifically Jewy Perviness of Harvey Weinstein: The disgraced film producer is a character straight out of Philip Roth, playing out his revenge fantasies on the Goyim"

Blogger Nakota Publishing October 10, 2017 12:02 AM  

Weinstein made unwanted sexual advances? So what? The woman can refuse, or resign, and tell the world he's a scumbag. Doesn't mean she deserves a red cent of compensation, unless he touches her against her will, or violates her contract. Same goes for the leches at Fox. This imaginary crime of "sexual harassment" creates perverse incentives for women to string a man along until he crosses some red line, and then it's payday.

Blogger AdognamedOp October 10, 2017 1:54 AM  

Yeah but, c'mon,..this isn't your common guy seeks gal in the workplace stuff. Take a look at Kristen Stewarts face. It has an, I got tea-bagged by a fat, filthy pig, look to it.

Anonymous Looking Glass October 10, 2017 5:18 AM  

One interesting theory put forward is that Harvey was the contact point through which NBC leaked the Trump Tape to the WaPo. NBC had it, but they sat on it. This isn't too far fetched, as Harvey was the boss of the head of NBC News for a long time.

A little bit of a stretch, but Trump has angles to play the Tribe against itself. Though the main thing would mean that Harvey had made even higher level enemies.

Another angle is that Harvey pissed off the Obamas after Malia interned there. Harvey could easily have made himself some enemies that were way too big.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts