Saturday, October 07, 2017

It is time to ban cars

Or at the very least, assault taxis.

Taxi driver 'deliberately mows down pedestrians' after mounting the pavement outside London's Natural History Museum before being pinned to the ground and arrested in front of stunned tourists



Blogger Josh (the sexiest thing here) October 07, 2017 11:09 AM  

No one needs a high capacity automatic taxi

Anonymous VFM #6306 October 07, 2017 11:19 AM  

They can just put the taxi on display in the museum.

Diversity + Proximity = Natural History

Anonymous Rfvujm October 07, 2017 11:21 AM  

>Low tech attacks using stolen and hired vehicles to randomly rammed into crowds, have been increasingly used by terrorists unable to get hold of guns and explosives.

>It is 'nigh on impossible' for security services to monitor and stop potential terrorists planning such murders and the only way to prevent them is by using barriers to protect pedestrians, according to one expert.

I suppose a Wall could be considered a barrier to protect pedestrians, by some measure.

But how unsurprising that the victims were all congregated in a no-car zone.

Anonymous Anonymous October 07, 2017 11:21 AM  

Only government controlled deliveries card should be allowed imo


Blogger Dave October 07, 2017 11:21 AM  

This wouldn't happen with rickshaws.

Blogger Lovekraft October 07, 2017 11:26 AM  

There is really NO way the typical liberal/leftist can keep ignoring these trends without being brainwashed (or 'turned out' as I like to call it).

Racial profiling ist verboted, but 'trend monitoring' sounds less confrontational.

But what the Obama/Soros racketeers have done to counter any reality-acknowledgment is come up with 'systemic oppression' or 'unconscious bias'.

Further, where in a sane world these race hustlers would be impoverished in the free market of ideas, they are riding the gravy train of dark money, gov't aa programs, tax theft etc.

To get back to my main point: we can't name the problem, so we have two choices: join the left, or maintain our argument. The first option is nihilism.

Anonymous Steve October 07, 2017 11:31 AM  

Time we banned high-capacity assault religions like Islam.

Blogger MichaelJMaier October 07, 2017 11:36 AM  

Those pinning that vile puss bag down should have yelled "STOP RESISTING! STOP RESISTING!" and then twisted an arm til things ripped.

Anonymous JAG October 07, 2017 11:37 AM  

I used to be pro car, but I have seen the light after this latest incident. i realize how wrong I was. I'm holding a press conference later today where cameras will be on hand to see me voluntarily surrender my car to the local sheriff for proper disposal. I urge others to do the same. Failure to do so makes you pro car murder, and means I'm better than you.

Blogger Lazarus October 07, 2017 11:40 AM  

The photo shows a gang of white supremacists oppressing some innocent black fella who was on his way to class.

Take a knee.

Blogger rememberthe5th October 07, 2017 11:41 AM  

When will the British learn? Their silly obsession with cars is making their entire society less safe, they should ban them

Blogger Justin Bailey October 07, 2017 11:53 AM  

Bumper sounds a little too much like bump stock for my tastes. Ban bumpers.

Blogger Ezekiel October 07, 2017 11:57 AM  

In all fairness, he didn't actually kill anyone. The one good thing about sand-niggers is that most of them lack enough agency to steal something with decent weight and inertia.

Anyway, y'all think car and truck attacks are bad? Wait until one of them decides to pull a Marvin Heemeyer with a stolen bucket loader.

Anonymous Avalanche October 07, 2017 11:57 AM  

@1 No one needs a high-capacity automatic taxi

Finally! A USE for smart cars!

Your taxi awaits... well, five taxis for you and your family, plus two or three for your luggage!

Anonymous Avalanche October 07, 2017 12:00 PM  

@3 "I suppose a Wall could be considered a barrier to protect pedestrians, by some measure."

We should build one and see!

Anonymous badhairday October 07, 2017 12:08 PM  

Early radio reports here in the UK described the driver as 'black'.

If this turns out to be a case of jihadist parking disorder then there's a small upside. The MSM may be giving up on trying to pretend that race and religion aren't factors in this.

Blogger Alec Rawls October 07, 2017 12:10 PM  

All we are asking for is reasonable car-control. It is a simple fact that nobody NEEDS a hybrid car, and this incident shows how extremely dangerous they can be.

Anyone who objects to the banning of hybrid cars should be executed by firing squad (AFTER Nancy Sinatra’s boots have walked all over them).

Anonymous One Deplorable DT October 07, 2017 12:10 PM  

I don't know what anyone is upset about. This is part and parcel of living in a large city. Just ask the mayor.

Anonymous Anonymous October 07, 2017 12:12 PM  

The degree of bystanders' reluctance to beat a subdued sidewalk-driver to death is a measure of the tyranny under which they live.

Blogger AdognamedOp October 07, 2017 12:13 PM  

Good. Fking good. Let em fking die en masse till they get it through their stupid fking commie heads.

Anonymous Darth Dharmakīrti October 07, 2017 12:19 PM  

What exactly is it going to take before we start removing kebab?

Anonymous MJimmy October 07, 2017 12:22 PM  

The driver was identified as Nanook Gluk, a recently arrived Eskimo-Englishman, who claimed "the lack of snow hindered his eyesight." Every. Frickn. Time.

Blogger Cloudswrest October 07, 2017 12:26 PM  

Don't laugh, they probably will get around to banning cars, or at least cars that aren't self driven by government controlled AI.

Blogger Cloudswrest October 07, 2017 12:30 PM  

Freedom to drive must be sacrificed. "... as horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse”

Blogger Unknown October 07, 2017 12:51 PM  

Ban bump stock taxis now!

Blogger Lazarus October 07, 2017 12:54 PM  

Ezekiel wrote:Anyway, y'all think car and truck attacks are bad? Wait until one of them decides to pull a Marvin Heemeyer with a stolen bucket loader.

that happened in Israel a few years back. While the Police were getting ready to maybe do something, a bystander leapt up to the cab and shot the driver in the head.

Threat neutralized.

Blogger pdwalker October 07, 2017 12:59 PM  

Do we get to play "guess the race/religion" is is it already a forgone conclusion?

Blogger darkdoc October 07, 2017 1:03 PM  

Time we banned high-capacity assault religions like Islam.

Post winner. Distills the subject to its necessary elements.

Blogger Unknown October 07, 2017 1:05 PM  

Great Britain is surrounded by a natural moat. It would be a simple matter to just round up all wogs and put them on the other side of the moat, preferably where they came from. Problem solved. Brits had no problem banning guns. Why won't the ban wogs? Why does the Queen not stand up and insist that her people be protected?

Blogger Dave October 07, 2017 1:22 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Dave October 07, 2017 1:28 PM  

We need legislation aimed at holding vehicle manufacturers liable for the costs of the mayhem their products cause.
Lawmakers have the power to make it possible for individuals, cities and states to sue vehicle manufacturers and hold them liable for injuries or deaths caused by their products.

Anonymous BBGKB October 07, 2017 1:35 PM  

Freedom to drive must be sacrificed. "...

All the cunts on the View talked about sacrificing freedoms this week, when the smartest thing to do is STOP & FRISK that they hate.

Blogger Dire Badger October 07, 2017 1:39 PM  

and they are simply going to treat this guy like a criminal. lock him in a box for 5 years so he can perfect his craft of murder, and then cut him loose.

The way you deal with Jihadis... The ONLY way you deal with Jihadis, is to cut down their family/tribe. ALL of them, to set an example for the rest. If you leave any of them alive, you are seeding a new generation with a feud.

Reprisals work perfectly on tribals, and they are the ONLY thing that works. You either use what works or you keep getting your people murdered.

Anonymous 11B October 07, 2017 1:42 PM  

Sorry we are not currently accepting comments on this article.

Gee, they aren't accepting comments on this story at the Daily Mail. I don't recall them refusing to accept comments on the stories about the Vegas shooter.

Blogger My 1 millionth internet profile October 07, 2017 1:45 PM  

These people were asking for it, what with their silly belief that they are still living in a high-trust society:

Exhibition Road was re-opened in 2012 with all barriers removed. The aim was to make cars and people co-exist harmoniously – without the need for hectoring signs and protective steel barriers.
It is visited by millions of people from around Britain and the world but doesn't even have kerbs or pavements.
The idea underlining the project was that when nannying rules and orders - in the form of countless signs, traffic signals and barriers - are removed, motorists take more personal responsibility for their own actions and drive more attentively, making more eye contact with pedestrians."

Anonymous Gen. Kong October 07, 2017 1:52 PM  

... but it was a taxi of peace, and quite green to boot. Do they any other kind of taxi in Londonistan?

Anonymous Gen. Kong October 07, 2017 2:07 PM  

What exactly is it going to take before we start removing kebab?

The free advice given by the latter-day Baalam's ass - a Nigerian Musloid who was even in Londonistan - should be followed ruthlessly:

Remove your governments. They are not for you.

Anyone who thinks the overlords running the show are going to allow the zeks and proles to vote their way out of the gulag is delusional, much like the ghost-dancers here in Kwa-Bananaland who like to moan and drone about 'muh constitootshun'.

Blogger MichaelJMaier October 07, 2017 2:10 PM  

paworldandtimes wrote:The degree of bystanders' reluctance to beat a subdued sidewalk-driver to death is a measure of the tyranny under which they live.

I am of two minds on this.

I LIKE the curb-stomp idea very much.

BUT they might be a source on intel on their tribe if captured alive.

Blogger MichaelJMaier October 07, 2017 2:10 PM  

Sure will never cry if a crowd gets "over-zealous" apprehending one and it dies.

Anonymous Looking Glass October 07, 2017 2:26 PM  

OT: But I any #GG might find this amazing.

Public-facing anti-GG males are extremely likely to be sexual deviants. Not that we would want to deal with most of them, generally, but this is getting both sad & impressive.

Blogger Elder Son October 07, 2017 2:33 PM  

Re: Deception at Mandalay Bay?

Was it a person, plane, helicopter above the stage on the rooftop?

You can enlarge the video, use settings to slow the video down.

Blogger Elder Son October 07, 2017 2:38 PM  

Also: It makes absolutely NO SENSE for Paddock having all those weapons in his room. None whatsoever. Maybe 2, maybe 3, in case of weapons failure. Not 23 weapons, or whatever the official count is now. Why would he take the chance in transporting all those weapons into his room over a few days, if all he was going to do was be a “Lone Wolf” gun-man, shooting from the 32nd floor, into the crowded concert grounds?

Anonymous MIG October 07, 2017 2:40 PM  

Ban car traffic in the big cities except for public buses. All bus drivers should be required to get a high level security clearance.

Anonymous anaxios October 07, 2017 3:05 PM  

InfoGalactic is down:

Sorry! This site is experiencing technical difficulties.

Try waiting a few minutes and reloading.

(Cannot access the database: No database connection)
You can try searching via Google in the meantime.
Note that their indexes of our content may be out of date.

Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core WWW

Blogger APL October 07, 2017 3:13 PM  

Glad to see the MSM are reporting that this incident is most emphatically not terrorist related. So it's just an immigrant that forgot that in the UK they drive on the other side of the side-walk.

Anonymous 8859 ways to be fun. October 07, 2017 3:58 PM  

Happens occasionally in Israel. Pretty nasty.

Anonymous 8859 ways to be fun. October 07, 2017 4:10 PM  

Unless he went to Vegas to buy those as an investment, and after three days of listening to country music pounding his ears, he flipped. I don't agree, but I understand.

Anonymous Godfrey October 07, 2017 4:35 PM  

Why is this guy alive? The pedestrians should have pulled the filthy rabid animal out of his cab and stomped him to death.

Anonymous Battlefrog October 07, 2017 4:38 PM  

Maybe the NRA will jump in and help ban them.

Anonymous rienzi October 07, 2017 6:37 PM  

Having owned an XKE in the distant past, if this dickwad had smashed into my Jaguar I would have worn my arm out hammering my tire iron into his thick skull.

Anonymous Jeff October 07, 2017 7:50 PM  

Almost every Taxi (and Uber) driver in my city is a Muzzie.

Blogger Pseudotsuga October 07, 2017 8:14 PM  

The next thing you know, they're gonna want SILENCERS on those cars so that they can drive around and nobody can hear them coming.

Blogger Tee Stoney October 07, 2017 8:24 PM  

Rickshaws. Because no taxi driver needs that kind of horsepower.

Blogger Thucydides October 07, 2017 8:55 PM  

You can order the taxi, but there is a three day waiting period before you can get into one....

Blogger Dirk Manly October 07, 2017 9:05 PM  


"Great Britain is surrounded by a natural moat. It would be a simple matter to just round up all wogs and put them on the other side of the moat, preferably where they came from. Problem solved."

Then they undermined the moat, so that people could drive cars directly from London to Paris without the use of a ferry or other watercraft.... seemingly neglecting the fact this also makes it possible for invaders to do the reverse.... without the use of landing craft.

Blogger Noah B. October 07, 2017 9:46 PM  

@52 The people ran when they heard the engine roaring. Just think how many people would have been killed if the driver had a Prius.

Blogger dvdivx October 07, 2017 10:45 PM  

They are banning cars. Electric cars will never be viable compared with a diesel or gas engine. Leave it to California to be first at this.

Anonymous Sand Man October 07, 2017 11:23 PM  

California wants everyone to know how concerned they are for the environment.

Blogger Kristophr October 07, 2017 11:49 PM  

An electric car requires 75 amp service to recharge. Damned near all homes have 100 amp service.

You will have to upgrade your home to 200 amp service to recharge at home. A typical block can only handle two or three homes with 200 amp service.

So where is California going to come up with the money to rewire every city in the state?

Anonymous DinduMuffins October 08, 2017 12:05 AM  

#59-- That money will come from the high speed rail fares, of course! Or, more likely, adding $50 onto licensing fees.

Anonymous Clay October 08, 2017 1:55 AM  

I know this is OT, but I was wndering myself, and I'm other folks have.

But, I got my butt out of bed, and searched it:

Blogger Odin Indaway October 08, 2017 1:59 AM  

It's the Bump(er) stock that makes a semi automatic transmission so dangerous. Ban the Bump(er)...

Anonymous Clay October 08, 2017 2:00 AM  

I apologize..Trying to type without looking is retarded.

Blogger Stilicho October 08, 2017 6:58 AM  

@Clay, the current Drudge headline is good for a few laughs: Nate Blows Biloxi

Anonymous Mr. Rational October 08, 2017 9:48 AM  

Kristophr wrote:An electric car requires 75 amp service to recharge.
Hogwash.  The standard J1772 charger tops out at 30 amps.  I've been driving on electric power for 4.5 years using just a 12-amp "convenience cord" at home.

where is California going to come up with the money to rewire every city in the state?
They're not going to need that for electric cars.  They're going to need it for their crazy demand for "renewable" (ruinable) energy.  With capacity factors in the 30% range and downward, moving the same amount of energy takes a lot more peak capacity.

Blogger Were-Puppy October 08, 2017 1:32 PM  

There's always a 2nd car. They are covering something up.

Anonymous Post Alley Crackpot October 08, 2017 11:05 PM  

You'll have to pay $200 extra for each bumper and have them registered with the Bureau of Automobiles, Traffic, and Foul Language. :-)

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts