ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2018 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Tuesday, October 31, 2017

Yes, we noticed, actually


And yet, the Littlest Chickenhawk is very intent on making sure that Arabs don't outnumber Jews in Israel. Color not only matters, it matters more than ideology does. It matters more than religion does. The civic nationalists, the cucks, and the conservatives can preen and posture nonsensically about a) how they don't see color, b) how color doesn't matter, and c) how they would LOVE to vote for a black conservative all they like, but identity politics are here and they will be replaced by identity war sooner rather than later.

There is a reason that Poland is still Polish while America is no longer American. Equality is a demonic lie. Diversity is societal destruction. Everything the civic nationalists and multiculturalists and globalists taught you was false.

It's easy to see who is lying and who is not. All you have to do is pay attention to their arguments and see whose positions are both internally consistent and consistent with reality. God created the nations. It is Satan and his servitors that are seeking to destroy them and recreate Babel.


Labels: ,

246 Comments:

1 – 200 of 246 Newer› Newest»
Blogger WrenchTurner October 31, 2017 8:02 AM  

Goyim real countries for me diversity for thee

Blogger Cecil Henry October 31, 2017 8:03 AM  

Translation:

I don't care what happens to you and your family. AS long as they think the right things.

Some 'conservative' Shapiro is not.

Blogger Mark October 31, 2017 8:04 AM  

We love to build towers, ne c'est-pas?

Blogger Desdichado October 31, 2017 8:04 AM  

The stupidity of that phrase is what is so striking. Is he seriously suggesting that there isn't a very marked statistical correlation between color and ideology?

Anonymous Deplorable Winning October 31, 2017 8:12 AM  

Shapiro is saying he doesn't give a damn about America.

Hey Ben, if color doesn't matter then why do black lives matter?

Blogger Mr.MantraMan October 31, 2017 8:14 AM  

I guess when the likes of the ADL say separate religion and politics it is again just projection.

Blogger Phillip George October 31, 2017 8:15 AM  

In a shooting war I'd still pick any color Christian to share a fox hole with than white atheist.
The Cross is the Ultimate statistic and it only has one Redeemer on it.
The Australian Prime Minister in in Beersheba of Abraham Well digging fame tonight.
It was the last full on Cavalry charge in the history of man. It was a miracle made certain by the point of a bayonet. The next one is Jesus riding the white horse, methinks. It's about formation and ranks.. Fuck yeah.

Anonymous Looking Glass October 31, 2017 8:15 AM  

Since we're on an Old Testament quoting kick today:

Benji won't take down the high places, thus the Lord's anger is against him.

Blogger Zaklog the Great October 31, 2017 8:19 AM  

And like all these leftist elites, Ben Shapiro almost certainly does not have to live in a "browning" neighborhood a couple houses down from a family from the other side of the planet who believes who knows what (including, for instance, that raping a virgin is a great cure for AIDS, that you can kill a bald man and extract gold from his head, or that 9 years old is a fine age for marrying a girl). Nope, Shapiro doesn't have to deal with this shit, so sure he's fine with the browning of America. It doesn't cost him a damned thing.

Anonymous JAG October 31, 2017 8:20 AM  

Cecil Henry wrote:Translation:

I don't care what happens to you and your family. AS long as they think the right things.

Some 'conservative' Shapiro is not.


My translator came up with:

"If shit gets bad here I'll just bug out to Israel. Sucks to be you, goyim!"

Anonymous Anonymous October 31, 2017 8:30 AM  

Shapiro is right.

If you're not a Christian then you should not be allowed to hold public office, teach in schools, etc.

Anonymous Arie Z October 31, 2017 8:30 AM  

Goyim is goyim ... black, brown, red, white

Goyim is NOT the Chosen People. Cry all you want about it. But it’s true.

Blogger marco moltisanti October 31, 2017 8:36 AM  

So. Going to come clean here. I'm a tall, 99% white guy of mixed Scandinavian and British heritage, with a little Cherokee in there somewhere (not enough to be detectable). My wife is a fairly dark-skinned Latina from south of the border with a thick accent when she speaks English. Lots of European blood but she looks more indigenous than European. I spent a large chunk of my young adulthood overseas and she was by far the best woman out of the many I experienced (wouldn't have stopped my wandering and roving if she hadn't been). Kids so far are remarkably white looking, to the point that in her country people often remark on how "blanquitos" they are and how my genetics are "muy fuerte."

I married her before ever really thinking about all of this race realism stuff and still can't say I regret it. She's a sweet, loyal wife, devout catholic, traditional. Showed her the gay X-Men wedding post from yesterday and she's totally down with my supporting Alt.Hero now. I'm from a very blue state and can't really imagine finding a white American girl like that, although maybe they exist in other parts of the country where people are more sane.

I can accept the idea that the alt-right is inevitable. I welcome it for the most part, as far as I understand it. What I want to ask you all is, what's in the future for a mixed race family like mine when the alt.right fulfills its destiny?

Be kind if possible.

Anonymous Anonymous October 31, 2017 8:38 AM  

Has he said he wants more Jews than Arabs? More Jews than Muslims? Or just majority Jewish Israel?

Jews range from black to white, with lots of browns. Jews accept converts.

Saying he wants majority Jews in Israel doesn't sound like he is worried about skin color.

Projection anyone?

Blogger James Dixon October 31, 2017 8:43 AM  

> Everything the civic nationalists and multiculturalists and globalists taught you was false.

A color blind society was a beautiful and seductive dream, but that's all it was. And it was only being preached to whites. All the while the other races were busy practicing identity politics to the fullest, and being encouraged to do so. So yes, it was lies all the way down.

> Shapiro is saying he doesn't give a damn about America.

Why should he? It's not his country.

> In a shooting war I'd still pick any color Christian to share a fox hole with than white atheist.

Don't blame us when you get shot in the back.

> What I want to ask you all is, what's in the future for a mixed race family like mine when the alt.right fulfills its destiny?

What about me? That will be up to you and your neighbors. I'd do my best to make sure they're very friendly.

Blogger Johnny October 31, 2017 8:44 AM  

Relationships are between two people, always, because that is what they are. Thus none of us can declare a relationship unless there is a counterpart that will go along. Even if Shapiro really truly and earnestly means it, it is still only half the story. What does the other side think about it?

That is where a lot of people go wrong in their thinking about this race mixing stuff. In what they think is virtue but is actually a mix of arrogance and hubris, they imagine they can declare reality unilaterally. No need to consult the other side owing to how powerful they imagine their display of virtue to be.

Blogger James Dixon October 31, 2017 8:44 AM  

> Jews accept converts.

Someone has never looked into the process, I see.

Blogger The Observer October 31, 2017 8:44 AM  

@11: The question has been asked, and answered before.

Broad societal movements don't give a shit, and you thinking of you and your family as mixed-race rather than just Americans doesn't help either.

Make yourself useful to your neighbours, be good friends to them, and hope that both you and they are decent enough people to say when the time comes "yes, they're X, but they're OUR X."

Blogger Sillon Bono October 31, 2017 8:44 AM  

@12 Lobo Util,

Not in the middle east they're not.

Go live to Morocco, Algeria, Congo, Niger, SA for a while, then come back and talk to us.

Blogger Duke Norfolk October 31, 2017 8:44 AM  

Does this apply when talking about (some) individuals (few in number and living amongst a white population? Arguably.

But it totally ignores the effects of larger populations on the behavior of individuals.

And that's what matters when we're talking about allowing numbers higher than a couple percent, which line we crossed decades ago, of course. To ignore this is a classic case of not seeing the forest for the trees.

Blogger Emmanuel Mateo-Morales October 31, 2017 8:50 AM  

"Color not only matters, it matters more than ideology does. It matters more than religion does."

... And this is why if I ever had any power in the upcoming second American Civil War, once the right wins, I'd turn on omni-nationalists just as fast as I'd turn on the 'muh constitution' libertardians people and try and impose an explicitly Christian State in which not only are only Christians allowed to be citizens, but everyone is either gonna be kicked out to wherever it is they come from, imprisoned, or killed. Yes, we'll be race realists and people will be free to use whatever racial slurs they want and realize the importance race plays and likely not take in anyone from certain problem populations or below a certain IQ range, but people who paradoxical admit God's existence and yet still claim that race is more important than ideology or religion... well... there's a special place for them. It's called sleeping with the fishies with cement shoes.

Blogger Matthew October 31, 2017 8:51 AM  

Phillip George wrote:In a shooting war I'd still pick any color Christian to share a fox hole with than white atheist.

Which one would pick you, dumbass?

Blogger Matthew October 31, 2017 8:53 AM  

marco moltisanti wrote:What I want to ask you all is, what's in the future for a mixed race family like mine when the alt.right fulfills its destiny?

Upper middle caste in wherever she came from.

Blogger Emmanuel Mateo-Morales October 31, 2017 8:53 AM  

@13

"Don't blame us when you get shot in the back."

Oh fuck off. Like most atheists wouldn't want to destroy their ideological and religious rivals. Shit, most totally fucking do, since most are of the political left and the political left totally does want to destroy everyone. To be fair, I would too in a heart beat, but the thing is, this is, fittingly enough, because of deep-seated ideological and religious differences that can't be resolved by anything than lots and lots slaughter.

Blogger Johnny October 31, 2017 8:54 AM  

marco moltisanti wrote:Lots of European blood but she looks more indigenous than European...

In an ideal world we should be sorting through people and by "the content of their character" along with ability, take the best and leave the rest. Unfortunately events have a way of spinning out of control. Much of history is little more than a recanting of our inhumanity to our own species. And just because us ethnic Europeans have had an easy ride for a couple of centuries does not mean it will continue.

Anonymous Magna Carta October 31, 2017 8:55 AM  

Jesse Lee Peterson, a black Christian, interviewed an Alt-Right activist. In the video, Jesse said "If We Lose White Folks, We Lose America"
Watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dey7NAzPAVA

Lana Lokteff of RedIce.tV interviewed a black woman named "Tree" of TreeOfLogic.com. Tree said, "It is in my interest that white people stay the majority."
Watch: https://youtu.be/CN5rCroe78c?t=47m2

Blogger Emmanuel Mateo-Morales October 31, 2017 8:57 AM  

@20

If you mean, which one would be more likely to attack him in a shooting war, well, do you realize that, in a shooting war, you'd have to kill a significant portion of the white population allied with the left, right? Heck, don't whites make up, if not a majority, a plurality of people on the left? I mean, in a shooting war, are they going to magically switch sides fast enough for it to matter?

Blogger Mr.MantraMan October 31, 2017 8:59 AM  

For most of my adult life the role we whites had was "White Savior", now obviously that is non-workable these days. So now we are off to "white Salvation" where the official coloreds or jews offer us salvation for our "whiteness" or whatever stupid made up thing they call it.

What pray tell is the appeal of that? Obviously some of the posters here even pay full retail for that BS, damned if I understand why.

Anonymous TheTruthIsAlwaysUnacceptable October 31, 2017 9:02 AM  

God created the nations. It is Satan and his servitors that are seeking to destroy them and recreate Babel.

A good shorthand for which side you are on: God or Satan's. One should remind the church cucks that Revelation 21:24-26 and 22:4 say "24 And the nations of those who are saved shall walk in its light, and the kings of the earth bring their glory and honor into it. [no democracy here] 25 Its gates shall not be shut at all by day (there shall be no night there). 26 And they shall bring the glory and the honor of the nations into it." and "2 In the middle of its street, and on either side of the river, was the tree of life, which bore twelve fruits, each tree yielding its fruit every month. The leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations."

Blogger SirGroggy October 31, 2017 9:04 AM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Anonymous Mayonnaise October 31, 2017 9:04 AM  

The "so-called" browning of America? ... as if the term is inappropriate?

"Browning" is appropriate because it's honest. Shapiro thinks that by throwing a misleading adjective in front of it will make it seem less so.

Blogger Nate October 31, 2017 9:05 AM  

the hilarious thing is... the Left knows damn well the browning of america matters. They know it means they win... Its Heads-We-Win Tails-You're-Racist. That's why they are so horrified. Just a few years ago they were so cocky because they knew the gambit would work. It was working.

Now... suddenly "racist" doesn't matter nearly as much... and they are flipping out. Because suddenly losing is on the table again.

Blogger L' Aristokrato October 31, 2017 9:05 AM  

Anyone who still insists in wholly separating ideas from the people who hold them is either dishonest, or stupid.

On a related note, have a look at 'The Alternative Hypothesis' glorious reply to PragerU: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0jSgCXgmDo&t=430s

Anonymous TheTruthIsAlwaysUnacceptable October 31, 2017 9:06 AM  

We can always be an honored visitor in another nation, but we can only be part of our nation, our people, our purpose before the Lord.

Blogger Makeshift October 31, 2017 9:07 AM  

@19

Of race, ideology, or religion, which is known just by looking, and which can be changed?

Blogger Vikki Wilson October 31, 2017 9:12 AM  

When I first heard Ben Shapiro I shared his evident passion for the Enlightenment natural law constitutional principles put in place by the Founders.

But today, being realistic, such things are obscure to the mass of people compared to the power of nationalism.

Anonymous Bobby Farr October 31, 2017 9:12 AM  

Well, he's a foreigner. What else is he going to say? If he acknowledges the proprietary rights of the natives, he also acknowledges his status as an outsider.

Blogger Vikki Wilson October 31, 2017 9:16 AM  

Ben is wedded to Nurture on all issues of group inequality.

But recognises the priority of science in framing transgenederist debate.

Blogger Robert Divinity October 31, 2017 9:17 AM  

Shallow slogans are all the Shapiro types still have. They failed, they have been discredited, and they have no control over the crisis they helped precipitated. They are irrelevant and would be amusing if they hadn't sowed the seeds of social catastrophe.

No one knows how the failed social experiment foisted upon the United States will end, but it is ending right before our eyes. Ben can avert his gaze but fewer and fewer still do.

Blogger SirGroggy October 31, 2017 9:20 AM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger James Dixon October 31, 2017 9:21 AM  

> Is it wrong for a Christian to hate Ben Shapiro?

Where in the Bible does it say hatred is a sin?

Anonymous RACE MATTERS he says October 31, 2017 9:22 AM  

...says the mysteriously tri-racial Indian.

Anonymous Eduardo October 31, 2017 9:26 AM  

@40

U___U he is just a new race...

How do you think you arrived where you are?

Anonymous Rocklea October 31, 2017 9:31 AM  

Ben Shapiro wears his identity everyday. Literally. That's not a bald patch he's covering up. And he calls identity politics stupid. Literally. Projection.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan October 31, 2017 9:33 AM  

At least Shapiro can sell the indulgences from Judeo-Christ, think of what the other groups of the Left can sell, crappy black dominated sporting events, sex with fattie blue hairs, conversion or dhimminitude to dismal Islam.

I would say Judeo-Christ offers the best indulgences.

Anonymous Magna Carta October 31, 2017 9:34 AM  

Ben Shapiro said, only "ideology" matters. So, I suppose Ben supports an "ideology" test for all immigrants? And how will that test be framed, worded, imposed, tested, implemented, proven, enforced, followed up...?

Blogger dc.sunsets October 31, 2017 9:35 AM  

As far as I'm concerned, this blog cannot pound this subject enough. This is the topic of conversation wherever I am able to do so without burning bridges. Revealing the Big Lie of Diversity, Inc and the Equalist Cult is the front of this war that's here.

When the next turn of the wheel arrives, a new and more visceral chapter in the war will come, but until then, ridiculing the Emperor's New Clothes is Job One.

Blogger SirGroggy October 31, 2017 9:39 AM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Desdichado October 31, 2017 9:39 AM  

Magna Carta wrote:Ben Shapiro said, only "ideology" matters. So, I suppose Ben supports an "ideology" test for all immigrants? And how will that test be framed, worded, imposed, tested, implemented, proven, enforced, followed up...?
If only ideology matters, then I suppose it's OK to send all of the anti-American, anti-freedom Fake Americans home to Israel, since they don't share the Founders ideology?

Seriously; that comment is so shallow.

Blogger dc.sunsets October 31, 2017 9:42 AM  

Magna Carta wrote:Ben Shapiro said, only "ideology" matters. So, I suppose Ben supports an "ideology" test for all immigrants? And how will that test be framed, worded, imposed, tested, implemented, proven, enforced, followed up...?

Heaven forbid the test be given only in English. One (among many) test of cucky-cucking is how, on a scale of 1-to-10, outraged is a man by the fact that people who cannot speak English (even after 20 years in the USA) are able to become (paperwork) citizens. Cucks are 9 or less.

It is beyond obvious that a piece of paper doesn't mean you're an American (in the civics book, historical mythology sense), any more than surgically grinding your genitals into sutured hamburger, fashioning a vagina-analog tube in your pelvic region and taking female hormones makes you a woman.

When the re-embrace of reality becomes widespread, those who indulged their impulsive minds in the horror-fantasy narratives of the Left will be driven into the wasteland. Pity them now, for when that time arrives there won't be any pity left.

Blogger SirGroggy October 31, 2017 9:42 AM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger WynnLloyd October 31, 2017 9:42 AM  

It sounds like your family will be aligned with white interests. It seems that your children have a vested interest in white identity politics.
I don't think you have much to worry about. White people are always going to be more altruistic than others even in the midst of an ethnic war. I very much doubt anyone will go around demanding genetic purity tests. If you do as those here have suggested and be productive in society people will come to see your family in a way similar to how you do.

Blogger Johnny October 31, 2017 9:44 AM  

Emmanuel Mateo-Morales wrote:do you realize that, in a shooting war, you'd have to kill a significant portion of the white population allied with the left...

While I take it as a certainty that if we continue on our current path political instability will happen, I do not take it as an automatic that we will see a shooting war. But if we do there will be a run up to it and all the sides will consolidate because that is what people do in time of crises. The number of hard core lefties will be way down and most of them will keep their head down and their mouth shut.

While we go through this business of thinking that our thinking arises from abstract principles, reality trumps principles six days of the week, and for most of us, twice on Sunday also.

Anonymous TheTruthIsAlwaysUnacceptable October 31, 2017 9:45 AM  

James Dixon wrote:>Where in the Bible does it say hatred is a sin?

Let me count the ways...
Leviticus 19:17 ‘You shall not hate your brother in your heart. You shall surely rebuke your neighbor, and not bear sin because of him." The thing being borne is hatred.

The general reason hatred is decried is because it always leads to vengeance and that belongs to God alone.

As a Christian you are called to deal with your hatred.

Titus 3:3 "For we ourselves were also once foolish, disobedient, deceived, serving various lusts and pleasures, living in malice and envy, hateful and hating one another.

Galatians 5:19-21 "19 Now the works of the flesh are evident, which are: adultery,[a] fornication, uncleanness, lewdness, 20 idolatry, sorcery, hatred, contentions, jealousies, outbursts of wrath, selfish ambitions, dissensions, heresies, 21 envy, murders, drunkenness, revelries, and the like..."

1 John 3:15 "Whoever hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him."

1 John 4:20 "If someone says, “I love God,” and hates his brother, he is a liar; for he who does not love his brother whom he has seen, how can he love God whom he has not seen?"

It should be dealt with right away, before the sun sets on the day. The verse uses anger/wrath, but anger not dealt with always turns to hatred as sure as milk left out spoils.

Ephesians 4:26 “Be angry, and do not sin”: do not let the sun go down on your wrath..."

Blogger Cleveland Screamer October 31, 2017 9:47 AM  

Ben has to go back.

Blogger SirGroggy October 31, 2017 9:48 AM  

@52 Thanks for the explanation.

Blogger WynnLloyd October 31, 2017 9:48 AM  

Also I'm guessing there will even be a small number of black Americans who will be aligned with white interests, though this will be a relative rarity.
Still, I very much doubt the "another six million" scenario where noncombatants are systematically killed. There are always civilian casualties in any civil war, but a "final solution" for America is just a leftist scare tactic.
I dont ultimately know, but I would imagine that the small number of nonwhites who are sincerely aligned with the white body politic will not be excluded, though those who attempt to ingratiate themselves after the jump off point will probably be out of luck.
It sounds like your wife is a good woman. I very much doubt there will be a problem.

Blogger James Dixon October 31, 2017 9:48 AM  

> ...says the mysteriously tri-racial Indian.

We prefer the term "full spectrum human".

Blogger dc.sunsets October 31, 2017 9:49 AM  

Emmanuel Mateo-Morales wrote:@20

If you mean, which one would be more likely to attack him in a shooting war, well, do you realize that, in a shooting war, you'd have to kill a significant portion of the white population allied with the left, right? Heck, don't whites make up, if not a majority, a plurality of people on the left? I mean, in a shooting war, are they going to magically switch sides fast enough for it to matter?


IMO you misunderstand the dynamic. By the time sentiment has shifted far enough for BOTH sides of this war to be shooting, the number of unrepentant white leftist lunatics will be tiny compared to now.

This is a process. Between now and the peak rate-of-change, the blue/mauve-haired fatty 3rd wave feminists will have literally sat down and died in place, and the cosmopolitan (((elite))) will have either switched sides or headed to Mother Israel (where effete clowns like Shapiro will find little welcome, be that as it may.)

In-grouping takes time and occurs step-wise. We should all try not to judge the future using a photograph of the now.

Blogger WynnLloyd October 31, 2017 9:50 AM  

And by saying an American "final solution " is a scare tactic, I'm obviously talking about outright, official genocide, not forced deportations or soft ethnic replacement, of which there will be a considerable amount, according to VD (if I understand him correctly).

Blogger James October 31, 2017 9:53 AM  

"what's in the future for a mixed race family like mine when the alt.right fulfills its destiny" As mestizo my self, half Norwegian half Mexican, just like Nacho Libre, I see both Shapiro and Vox Day half wrong about this issue. Shapiro is a real idiot if he doesn't care if there are more Muslims in American than there are Jews. But I do think that the Anglo-Saxon tradition that founded America is like the Greek civilization that needed Rome to save it and preserve it for the benefit of future generations. I'm afraid that just as Greeks could not continue on their own as Greeks so it seems that Anglos and Saxons can't either, for too many reasons to detail here. Vox Day hates the term Judaeo-Christian, but I think of it as similar to the equally as problematic term Graeco-Roman. It is a fact of history that Jews had spread around the Roman Empire long before Christianity came around and the existence of synagogues all over the place did a lot to facilitate the spreading of Christianity when the time came, even though the Jews as such did not become Christians en masse.

Blogger James Dixon October 31, 2017 9:54 AM  

> You shall not hate your brother in your heart.

And how exactly is Ben Shapiro my brother?

Blogger Rashadjin October 31, 2017 9:54 AM  

Semi-OT, but who's running the countdown clocks to civil war in
Netherlands and Sweden?

Can't be more than a few years now, even if it does come and go as a wimper.

Blogger James October 31, 2017 9:58 AM  

"The general reason hatred is decried is because it always leads to vengeance and that belongs to God alone." I hate my enemy until he surrenders, then I go out of my way to show mercy. If someone is not dangerously evil, I don't hate them in the first place, and my hatred is a necessary factor in motivating me to get up off my ass and do something about him. I submit that if you don't hate the guts of the people who are coming to kill your family, your family is as good as dead. Capisce?

Anonymous DDT October 31, 2017 10:00 AM  

As others pointed out: race is a damn fine predictor of ideology.

In fact, as Shapiro has probably quickly found out more than once: saying "I care about ideology, not race!" is a great way for a right-winger to be called an alt-right racist. If your country was filled with nothing but *Romney* voters, you'd be living in an almost black- and largely hispanic-free country. That fact isn't lost on anti-racists, who will insist that even "hiring on merit" is in fact a racist policy.

And what will Shapiro do when that's pointed out? Say "I don't care, if some races are more prone to bad ideology than others, so be it"? Or cuck out further? I have a guess.

Anonymous Anonymous October 31, 2017 10:01 AM  

There are times I seriously don't want to live on this planet anymore. Wish I could skip ahead a hundred years and see whats going to happen.

Meanwhile, I like the show "supergirl" and I noticed this year they changed the introduction to include a reference to her being a refugee.

Blogger Wishing Star October 31, 2017 10:04 AM  

This is a cruel ideology, and gives cover for exploitation. Slavers, pedophiles & con-artist ,would love to have you believe everyone has the same ability.

Blogger Cail Corishev October 31, 2017 10:07 AM  

Hee hee hee. THAT's who had the best headline on /pol/ yesterday: "Ben Shapiro Now Using His Sister’s Khazar Milkers to Bring All the Goys to the Yard"

Blogger Johnny October 31, 2017 10:11 AM  

Spain ran a authoritarian class based society and this was maintained in the colonies. When Napoleon invaded Spain all the Spanish colonies declared their independence. This produced numerous countries with, most commonly, four classes. And thus we have numerous examples of how a class based society can play out when left to its own devices.

First to go were the Peninsular Spanish, the former king's agents. They quickly lost out to the more numerous full blooded Spanish colonials. That left (most commonly) the Spanish, the mestizo mixed race people, and the native Indians. There was some shooting and warfare, but the long term outcome was politically weak and unstable societies run in an authoritarian manner because that was the only way to obtain stability.

Blogger James Dixon October 31, 2017 10:16 AM  

In fact, let me go through these statements one by one:

Leviticus 19:17 ‘You shall not hate your brother in your heart. You shall surely rebuke your neighbor, and not bear sin because of him." The thing being borne is hatred.

Ben Shapiro is neither my brother nor my neighbor.

> The general reason hatred is decried is because it always leads to vengeance and that belongs to God alone.

No, it doesn't always lead to vengeance. That would be a lie.

> Titus 3:3 "For we ourselves were also once foolish, disobedient, deceived, serving various lusts and pleasures, living in malice and envy, hateful and hating one another.

Hating "one another". I.e., your fellow Christians. Ben Shapiro isn't a Christian.

> Galatians 5:19-21 "19 Now the works of the flesh are evident, which are: adultery,[a] fornication, uncleanness, lewdness, 20 idolatry, sorcery, hatred, contentions, jealousies, outbursts of wrath, selfish ambitions, dissensions, heresies, 21 envy, murders, drunkenness, revelries, and the like..."

Uncleanness, lewdness, hatred, contentions, jealousies, outbursts of wrath, selfish ambitions, dissensions, drunkenness, and revelries are all in there. How many of those are sins?

> John 3:15 "Whoever hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him."

Again, brother.

> 1 John 4:20 "If someone says, “I love God,” and hates his brother, he is a liar; for he who does not love his brother whom he has seen, how can he love God whom he has not seen?"

Again, brother.

> It should be dealt with right away, before the sun sets on the day. The verse uses anger/wrath, but anger not dealt with always turns to hatred as sure as milk left out spoils.

No, it doesn't. Another lie.

Blogger Johnny October 31, 2017 10:17 AM  

James wrote:"what's in the future for a mixed race family like mine when the alt.right fulfills its destiny" As mestizo my self,

What I anticipate is that if you pass as "white" now you will pass as white in the future. Even in the intensely racist Nazi Germany, if you spoke German, were more or less European, and had no Jewish blood, you passed as an ethnic German.

Blogger S1AL October 31, 2017 10:18 AM  

"What I want to ask you all is, what's in the future for a mixed race family like mine when the alt.right fulfills its destiny?"

Some parts of the country will care. Others won't. The "dead zone", for example, couldn't care less.

Wholesale ethnic purges are extremely rare, historically speaking, and usually amount more to regional segregation. And because this is America, you have the option of firearms and a middle finger.

---

"In a shooting war I'd still pick any color Christian to share a fox hole with than white atheist."

What some people still fail to realize is that your option there isn't white atheist and non-white Christian. It's not-white Christian and non-white non-Christian.

The browning of Europe and America is a result, not a cause.

Blogger marco moltisanti October 31, 2017 10:23 AM  

"Broad societal movements don't give a shit, and you thinking of you and your family as mixed-race rather than just Americans doesn't help either."

Wish it were easier to reply to another commenter directly.

Anyway, @16 (The Observer). Before getting into Vox and other alt.rightish bloggers I certainly would have thought of my wife as a potential real American. Even now she's certainly vastly closer to the June Cleaver ideal of the good old days than any white girl I've ever met back in my home state or in Europe.

However as Vox et al. hammer home constantly, race matters. Before discovering race realism I wouldn't have though much about my family being mixed race, but I'm coming around to Vox's idea that real Americans are ethnically English. Or British. Actually I'm not entirely clear on that. I remember someone (not sure if it was Vox) here recently putting forth the idea that you must be over of over 50% English descent to be a real American, so I'm not sure if even I qualify. It would hinge on where the Scots fall in the equation in my case.

I appreciate your comment and all the others and will try to reply as time permits. I'm just trying to figure out what might be in the future for my family.

Blogger pnq8787 October 31, 2017 10:24 AM  

What's profound about this to me is that white preople seem to think they need to have some justification for loving their own race. As if the diversity of peoples on earth wasn't a good in itself. No other race is so mentally deranged that they need an ideology to justify their group's survival. This principle even goes down to the individual level. You will notice that no matter what the individual shortcomings of the person, they still feed they need to pass on their genes. The same is true with races. Every other race but the white one, no matter what their lack of acheivements may be, still feel the desire to survive and even expand. Yet the white race is so crippled by altruistic genetics or by brainwashing, I don't know which, that it has to cling to some bullshit ideology to justify it's continued existance, be that ideology, capitalism, communism, freedom, Christianity, or anything else. I've noticed that this tendency even appears among race-realists. I for one don't give a good damn which race is superior. I am for the survival of my race, my people, because they are my people. They are the people I am comfortable with. They are my extended family. I don't need to feel superior to have a desire for my people to survive. So whether the white race has any special redeeming characteristics to me is beside the point.


On similar but side not, please take a look at the following youtube vidio at 28:20 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7ocTwR2RUE . Watch the kind Aryan woman pour out love from her heart for the Somalian refugees. It is the kind people like her who have no logic to see that her endless love for the other is the destruction of her own. Her love is only for the outsider. Is her tendency toward out-group love genetic? In any case it is clear that the cause of the white race is really screwed because before any war for the defense white survival is fought it would have to convince these congenitally altruistic people to learn to hate. I can take at least some comfort in the principle of natural selection though. Her kind, the altruistic to the point of a fault kind, will eventually disappear or be absorbed into another race. They will be gone eventually. I suspect that such altruism only evolved once and will likely not evolve again. Only the extremely cold climates are these altruistic types evolved. But with technology all places have essentially become tropical as far as it impacts survival. So I expect the white race to either die off or to eventually become just as in-group oriented as the tropical peoples.

Blogger James October 31, 2017 10:24 AM  

marco moltisanti wrote:
I can accept the idea that the alt-right is inevitable. I welcome it for the most part, as far as I understand it. What I want to ask you all is, what's in the future for a mixed race family like mine when the alt.right fulfills its destiny?

Be kind if possible.


Unfortunately, the truth has been hidden from most people due to their accepting the promulgated BS of various religious factions. According to Genesis 1:21, 24, 25, He created "every living creature AFTER HIS OWN KIND..." and God said: "Let the earth bring forth the living creatures (Heb. "nepesh", meaning "a breathing creature,") AFTER HIS KIND, cattle and creeping things, and the BEAST of the earth, AFTER HIS KIND."
This AFTER HIS OWN KIND was an unchangeable Law of God, as much so as the Law of Gravity. Those that were reproduced in violation of this Law were not of the creation of God, but of the creation of man. We see in the Ten Commandments that "Thou shalt not commit adultery". This is not screwing some married woman. It constitutes adulterating seed, metals, cloths, and especially breeds.

We also see in Deuteronomy 23:2 that

A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD.

The word for bastard in the Hebrew is mamzer, Strong’s Concordance 4464 mamzer mam zare' from a root meaning

1 : an individual resulting from the interbreeding of diverse breeds or strains; especially : one of unknown ancestry
2 : a cross between types of persons or things
mongrel
mongrelization
mongrelize
Text: Synonyms HYBRID, bastard, cross, crossbred, crossbreed, half blood, half breed, mule

The question remaining for you is what is the “congregation of the LORD”? I don’t know exactly, but I have been led to believe it is the presiding body of the people. The citizenry. Those that are allowed to partake of the decision making process, i.e., voters. The Bible is quite specific about not doing wrong to the “stranger”, or alien in the midst of the land (Exodus 22:21 You shall neither vex a stranger, nor oppress him: for you were strangers …, Leviticus 19:33,34 And if a stranger sojourn with you in your land, you shall not vex him…). This acknowledges that there will be those that are not of the posterity within the nation. They are allowed to live there and are held to the same standards as the descendants of Adam. They will have no say-so in the national decision making process. And there is no rule set in place to invite “strangers” into the land. These rules were set into place long before there were national, ethnic, and racial boundaries, and people just used common sense about what constituted their “land”.
As I understand it, when the separation comes, we are to allow anyone that is not of our lineage to stay, if that is what they want. But, they will only be residents, not citizens, and subject to what the citizenry decides. Ask yourself, what is best for your family?

Blogger Revelation Means Hope October 31, 2017 10:25 AM  

supergirl was one of the worst pilots of a TV show I've ever seen in my life.

They checked off pretty much every single global homo box in that one.

They only missed one, by casting a pretty white woman as the lead. But at least they have her ignoring all the white men around her and going exclusively for the black man. So I guess they checked the more important box of furthering the narrative that white women should be mating with black men.

Anonymous a deplorable rubberducky October 31, 2017 10:25 AM  

Idiot Shapiro sounds again like a leftist who does not understand that reality always, always trumps ideology. You're exactly as foolish as the left if you deny this. A wise mind will always be on the lookout for those times when reality contradicts his framework of beliefs. That's important feedback, warning that one may be on the wrong track, take heed.

You are playing the game, "Round hole, square peg" and blinding yourself to that state when you insist that ideology is the supreme ruler in affairs.

Blogger JohnG October 31, 2017 10:26 AM  

@52 Different hates. You can hate evil, depravity, wickedness.

Blogger ((( bob kek mando ))) - ( Fine Purveyor of Quality Artisanal Gorm ) October 31, 2017 10:29 AM  

Jew Nersey Jew "tired of reading about ... Harvey Weinstein
...
My answer he used and was used.".

http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/harvey-weinstein-was-used-and-used/


nothing to see here ((( Fellow White People ))), just a Jew being "used" by those who wish to advance their careers.

please to be moving along now to some other subject.

Blogger Jew613 October 31, 2017 10:32 AM  

All Jews should be worried about the future of the Jewish state, including the absolute necessity of a strong Jewish majority.

For the first time since Israel was reborn in 1948 the Jewish TFR has surpassed that of the Arabs. The Arab birth rate continues to crash and ours continues to increase. The only other country I know of that has significantly increased its birthrate in the past generation is Russia.

Poland, which is wisely keeping out the non-Polish, has a TFR of 1.34. If the Poles are going to continue to exist they must get their birth rate up to replacement level. This is true for every nation that wishes to survive.

Anonymous TheTruthIsAlwaysAcceptable October 31, 2017 10:33 AM  

James wrote: I submit that if you don't hate the guts of the people who are coming to kill your family, your family is as good as dead. Capisce?

I would argue that I hate what is being done (the sin) and as long as that hateful action is attached to the person (they choose to be that sinful action) they bear the weight of of their choice and receive accordingly. That is all I need to motivate me and it frees me to be merciful when the action or sin is defeated, if it is, since deception is real and Satan is the father of lies as are his children.

This is not always simple and trying to make it simple means a lot of babies will be thrown out with the bath water as is exemplified in the statement, "Kill them all, God will know who are his."

Blogger JohnG October 31, 2017 10:34 AM  

@57 I think the number is relatively tiny anyway. Somebody did a poll a couple years back, people that identified as "Conservative" came it at 40%, people that identified as "Liberal" were at 20%. Most people will sit it out as much as they can if it comes down to blows... tho I'm skeptical anything will happen short of a major catastrophic event/financial collapse. I guess we'll see on 4 November if the wannabe bolsheviks are going to make a serious go at something.

Blogger Johnny October 31, 2017 10:34 AM  

marco moltisanti wrote:but I'm coming around to Vox's idea that real Americans are ethnically English. Or British.

I don't know the numbers for what portion of the population is "British," but I do know that the flyover country is chuck full of Central Europeans along with some Irish and Scandinavian. If only the Brits are Americans, than Americans are a small minority in the country. Divide the country up by this criteria, and they would get something like New England, a small territory relative to the overall country.

The Anglo-Saxons were Germanic tribal invaders. Ethnically they make up maybe twenty five percent of the current British population. The rest are Celts. The Celts lost out to the German tribal people in most areas. Leftover mostly pure Celts are the Scotch and Irish.

Anonymous Avalanche October 31, 2017 10:35 AM  

@7 "In a shooting war I'd still pick any color Christian to share a fox hole with than white atheist."

You idiot churchian cuck! Have you missed all the times the Dark Lord has pointed out that the ENEMY gets a vote? (And that your skin color will be your uniform?) You think a colored Christian will think the way you do? Will have loyalty to you as a Christian, and NOT first-and-foremost to "his people"!

I remember a story from some decades ago -- (allegedly) by a college girl, all liberal and feelz good; who -- went to college as it was 'mixing' roommates by race in their dorms. She put down that "yes of COURSE she'd be HAPPY to have a blac... an "Afro-American" roommate, you bet!"

The tale is of her naive White beneficence and how the black girl was ... "shy and uncomfortable around her," and how she tried to reassure the black and help her "integrate." They manage to limp along for the year -- the White girl ministering in her minds to "help the poor black girl" fit in.

The story ends with the BLACK girl pointing out that SHE had absolutely not wanted a White roommate --SHE had filled in her form with HELL NO, no White roommate!


It will be like that in your putative foxhole! You think, "oh of course blackie will love me and my White beneficence! He will think I am sooooo magnanimous that I would *accept* him over my racial kin; he will love me for my White Christian openness and acceptance! Because (like the obamination) he is a BLANK OBJECT to you -- not a human with his own views on YOU being in HIS foxhole! On you and your people!

Christianity in african minds is SO not Christianity in White minds! Stop being naive!

The enemy ALWAYS GETS A VOTE!

(Oh, and take a look around your church -- fully integrated, yah think? Y'all invite the black folks over after services for Sunday dinner -- and they accept? They invite you and YOU accept? Your kids play together outside of organized sports? Have you EVER discussed politics with them? Do they support BLM and tearing down statues of Geo Washington? Do you?

Do you know anything about them except they *claim* to share your religion?! (Have you ever discussed religion with them to see what they actually think it is?! In Africa, Christianity is heavily mixed up with animism and tribalism. Is that YOUR Christianity too?)

WAKE UP!

Blogger Joshua_D October 31, 2017 10:37 AM  

Rocklea wrote:Ben Shapiro wears his identity everyday. Literally. That's not a bald patch he's covering up. And he calls identity politics stupid. Literally. Projection.

Exactly. It's punks like Shapiro who are going to get the Jews sent back (if they're lucky) or worse. "Only ideology matters!" says the Jew wearing the Jew cap so everyone knows he's a Jew.

Blogger YIH October 31, 2017 10:38 AM  

Little Benny was born and raised in LA yet has apparently not noticed what has happened there and Cali in general.
Tell me again about that supposed Ashkenazim higher intelligence.

Blogger Revelation Means Hope October 31, 2017 10:39 AM  

Hugo award nominated author "Chuck Tingle" celebrates his birthday today.

Happy birthday to a truly inspiring author!

Blogger Johnny October 31, 2017 10:40 AM  

@83

In the same way there is an arrogance to White Supremacy, there is an arrogance to the "we must integrate" crowd. Both groups inherently regard themselves as being in charge, or think they should be.

Anonymous JAG October 31, 2017 10:41 AM  

Related to the browning of America, the Democrats release a new Ford Truck commercial:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXB7vlBl_Vs

Anonymous view October 31, 2017 10:42 AM  

... dont give a damn about the browning of America...

as long as I can just go to Israel if it ever gets out of control

Anonymous Bobby Farr October 31, 2017 10:42 AM  

@72 Real Americans are ethnically American. It is an ethnic identity, not a badge of honor. Your wife's homemaking skills may be admirable but do not operate to magically change her from Mexican to American.

Blogger James October 31, 2017 10:43 AM  

""Kill them all, God will know who are his." "
King Solomon the Wise said there was a time for love and a time for hate.

Sometimes we must kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out.

Other times we should love 'em all and let God sort 'em out.

Anonymous CPEG October 31, 2017 10:43 AM  

At what point, and for what reason, does Benji Shapiro think all these Mexicans will change their minds?

Blogger dc.sunsets October 31, 2017 10:43 AM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Ivaneus October 31, 2017 10:46 AM  

That "magical" article (there's a LOT of magic there to explain his so-called "math") is capped off with the perfect encapsulation of his echo chamber:

The social media points button is called "Claps" because after he said his piece to evil wrong thinker VD, everybody clapped. Or at least that's how he'll tell it on DU.

Blogger dc.sunsets October 31, 2017 10:49 AM  

@7 @83 Lest we forget, there are no atheists in foxholes.

Anonymous BBGKB October 31, 2017 10:50 AM  

Of course he doesn't give a dam about the browning of America, but ask about Israel.

It's not that freedom is bad, but only whites think it's rad.

Nope, Shapiro doesn't have to deal with this shit, so sure he's fine with the browning of America. It doesn't cost him a damned thing.

Au contraire,the(((Elite Looters))) are the only ones to be $$enriched$$ when a 60IQ somali moslem gets imported onto US welfare + section 8 +food stamps + Medicaid.

Jews range from black to white, with lots of browns. Jews accept converts.

The white jews in Israel treat the brown-shepardic jews so badly that shepardic jews stay in Iran, despite Israel offering tens of thousands of US taxpayer given dollars for them to move. Tehran has 1 of only 4 jew charity hospitals in the world.

In a shooting war I'd still pick any color Christian to share a fox hole with than white atheist

Here is a black jewdough-christ preacher- Ghana Pastor prays for men's genitals by touching them in church!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvE1etcGIPM

the left? I mean, in a shooting war, are they going to magically switch sides fast enough for it to matter?

How long from "we moved here for good schools" to "we burned the bridge so Latrina's 21 crackbabies couldn't get here"?

Still, I very much doubt the "another six million" scenario where noncombatants are systematically killed.

Cut off power to any DieVerse City in the Hillary Archipelago, and the free stuff army will attack the liberal whites for us. There is a realistic chance of an 80-90% die off in the US if the power grid went down from a major solar flare/CME/EMP. Shut off the power in white America and most of it goes back to the 1800s, but shut it off in DieVerse areas makes the stone age come back.

Anonymous TheTruthIsAlwaysUnacceptable October 31, 2017 10:54 AM  

James Dixon wrote:In fact, let me go through these statements one by one:

Leviticus 19:17 ‘You shall not hate your brother in your heart. You shall surely rebuke your neighbor, and not bear sin because of him." The thing being borne is hatred.

Ben Shapiro is neither my brother nor my neighbor.

The parable of the Good Samaratan defined neighbor as anyone in need who you came across.

> The general reason hatred is decried is because it always leads to vengeance and that belongs to God alone.

No, it doesn't always lead to vengeance. That would be a lie.

Tell me how hate doesn't lead to action against the hated, which is vengence. The actions may be small or large but it would the be exception for them not to occur.

> Titus 3:3 "For we ourselves were also once foolish, disobedient, deceived, serving various lusts and pleasures, living in malice and envy, hateful and hating one another.

Hating "one another". I.e., your fellow Christians. Ben Shapiro isn't a Christian.

Actually Paul is talking about them BEFORE they became Christians. He is not talking about how they now act as Christians to Christians. Simple exegesis.

> Galatians 5:19-21 "19 Now the works of the flesh are evident, which are: adultery,[a] fornication, uncleanness, lewdness, 20 idolatry, sorcery, hatred, contentions, jealousies, outbursts of wrath, selfish ambitions, dissensions, heresies, 21 envy, murders, drunkenness, revelries, and the like..."

Uncleanness, lewdness, hatred, contentions, jealousies, outbursts of wrath, selfish ambitions, dissensions, drunkenness, and revelries are all in there. How many of those are sins?

All of them, including hatred.

> John 3:15 "Whoever hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him."

Again, brother.

No disagreement there, but who is or will be your brother (one chosen by God in eternity to be his child) is not always known at any given point of time. I can rationalize as well as you can.

> 1 John 4:20 "If someone says, “I love God,” and hates his brother, he is a liar; for he who does not love his brother whom he has seen, how can he love God whom he has not seen?"

Again, brother.

Ditto.

> It should be dealt with right away, before the sun sets on the day. The verse uses anger/wrath, but anger not dealt with always turns to hatred as sure as milk left out spoils.

No, it doesn't. Another lie.

Really, a lie. Me thinks you protest too much and maybe project a bit. Anger unchecked ALWAYS leads to hatred and on that I will argue for, since I have never seen the obverse. I see unrpented anger blossom into deep hatred all the time. Why do you think you are warned to let go of your anger as quickly as possible unless it will take root and grows into hatred? Yes, I haven't done a double blind study but this appears to me to be plain common sense.

Anonymous Roundtine October 31, 2017 10:54 AM  

No other race is so mentally deranged that they need an ideology to justify their group's survival.

You have causality reversed. Whites appear mentally deranged because they've abandoned God for secular ideologies. The approach to migrants is a signaling/holiness spiral. Secularists signal their holiness through increased leftism. By being the most tolerant, by helping the most distant, by being the least racist, the least sexist, the least transphobic, the most green, removing their genitals...almost everything the left does can be mapped to a perverse/Satanic version of Christian concepts such as sin (intolerance), mortification (removing genitals, body piercings), indulgences (carbon credits), holiness (helping migrants, going childless), missionaries (brainwashing children), abstinence (material goods, vegetarian). Getting raped and murdered by a migrant is like a Christian being fed to a lion. Migrant rape victims who are leftists/aid workers often say they feel sorry for their attacker and even help them.

Anonymous WalrusWasPaul October 31, 2017 10:57 AM  

Every white in America, essentially, will be pro-white within 10 years, one step at a time. Not "racist", not "supremist", but pro-white interests, even if someone has non-white friends or family, or wants what's best for everyone--all of which are congruent. It's a matter of numbers and the historical force being applied against whites in this country.

We even say it when we don't realize it. Go to Minutes 6-8, even Laura is talking about us as a people, even if cloaked as civic nationalism. 14 Words basically, along with language, borders, culture-with her contrast in mentioning Hilary, serving as a stand-in for the non-whites and globalists.

Min 6:00- 8:00

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIfg8YekPUE

Anonymous Anonymous October 31, 2017 11:00 AM  

Non-Whites in America are not our brothers, they're invaders and thieves. Hope that helps settle the question on hate in the Bible.

Blogger Anchorman October 31, 2017 11:09 AM  

The current state of “browned” neighborhoods (nations) have people who largely vote the same, have the same collectivist philosophy, and have the same unspoken cultural/philosophical enemies.

So, they get along with each other, right? There aren’t turf wars, based almost exclusively on race, in the diverse/”browned” neighborhoods?

The same thinking “ideology alone matters” is what pushed/pulled us into the Iraq War – to destabilize the Middle East and introduce Jeffersonian democracy, at least at the neocons would tell it. How’d that work out?

Culture. It’s culture that drives politics, more than ideology. We are importing incompatible cultures. We (Hollywood, music industry, etc) are inculcating incompatible cultures.

That is the fatal flaw in the melting pot.

Immigration without assimilation is invasion – and a recipe for civil strife/war.

Anonymous BBGKB October 31, 2017 11:10 AM  

Someone should combine this ad of a redneck making more black/brown kids run than Moooshell Obama with the clip from the cartoon family guy that had naked baby stewi run thru a crowd saying "help me I just escaped from Keven Spacey's basement". What kind of cars are jews known for driving?

https://paworldandtimes.wordpress.com/2017/10/30/whom-does-this-political-ad-help/

Anonymous WalrusWasPaul October 31, 2017 11:11 AM  

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/10/31/having-white-nuclear-family-promotes-white-supremacy-says-new-york-professor-report-says.html

“I mean, if you’re a white person who says they’re engaged in dismantling white supremacy but … you’re forming a white family (and) reproducing white children that ‘you want the best for’ – how is that helping [and] not part of the problem?"

Blogger dc.sunsets October 31, 2017 11:13 AM  

@99 My ancestors conquered a CONTINENT. Their village-idiot offspring began giving it away 150 years ago. I guess it's my descendants' burden to have to reconquer it. Nature loves her cycles.

Anonymous Avalanche October 31, 2017 11:13 AM  

@52 Leviticus 19:17 You shall not hate your brother
Whoever hates his brother
"I love God" and hates his brother...


You're happy to lay on with your favorite verses using the word "hate." How about some definitions of "your brother"!?


You shall surely rebuke your neighbor, and not bear sin because of him."

If the BIBLE *specifically* differentiates between your brother and your neighbor -- why don't you?

Oh, or are you a non-native-English speaker?


The thing being borne is hatred.

No, the thing "not being borne" is SIN! (As in: "not bear sin." It does not read: "not bear hate.")

Notice your verses specifically do NOT say "thou shalt not hate." Instead, the Bible draws distinctions between various types of hate, and objects of hate. (And God knows God recommends hatred all over the place in the Bible; the 'does God hate" concept has been discussed (and instances listed) here in the Dark Lord's blog before!


Be angry, and do not sin:

Anger and hatred are NOT the same thing!

Anonymous BBGKB October 31, 2017 11:21 AM  

Video Fixed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdH-Qo8wWPE

Anonymous Avalanche October 31, 2017 11:29 AM  

@71 "I'm just trying to figure out what might be in the future for my family."

Don't figure it out -- set it up! Become a valued member of your neighborhood. MAKE a tribe out of your local folks.

We're preparing tonight for our Halloween cul-de-sac party: firepit (I just dragged a cartload of logs and branches down to the street edge; a neighbor brings the firepit), drinks, chairs, and candy for handling out. Rather than being separate and in our own homes for trick-or-treaters, we get together, close down the cul-de-sac, and are building / maintaining our 'tribe.' (New family moved in two houses up: tonight's their meet-n'-greet.)

My neighbors, my TRIBE members, often joke that "when the race war starts, they're all coming to my house, cause I have the guns." I always answer(teasingly -- but I semi-mean it!) that "they'd better bring food and water or they're not getting in."

But then, I've been working to awakened them for ten years! With pretty good success! Even if I were not Scots/English, I would be working to build my tribe. (The miscegenated couple nearby doesn't come -- they're sort-of welcome, but (apparently) they don't feel comfortable... SBPDL!)

You do the same! When a woman on the cul-de-sac got sick and moved away, a neighbor and I kept up the yard till it was purchased. The new family moving in (in a few weeks) will also be ... courted...

I have no question at all that my neighbors, my TRIBE, accept me and have my back (or I have theirs, whatever). YOU work NOW to get your family a integral part of your neighborhood! No cul-de-sac? Throw a 'block party'; have a 'movie night' -- with a non-SJW movie. Book club, whatever. BUILD your tribe, and your family be part of the tribe, not those "not-us" down the way.

Blogger Jew613 October 31, 2017 11:35 AM  

BBGKB, Except the Jewish population of Iran has gone down from 90,000 before the Islamic Revolution to 8800 today, and Iran makes it very difficult for Jews to leave. While its true Sephardic Jews were mistreated in the early days of the state that is no longer true.

Blogger James Dixon October 31, 2017 11:37 AM  

> The parable of the Good Samaratan defined neighbor as anyone in need who you came across.

That would be another lie. Christ commanded the listener to be a neighbor to everyone, as the Samaritan was. He did not say that everyone in need was *his* neighbor. In fact, he said the exact opposite. Of the people who passed the man in need, only the Samaritan was his neighbor.

> Tell me how hate doesn't lead to action against the hated, which is vengence.

I hate the Bush family. Have I ever taken vengeance against them?

> All of them, including hatred.

And that lie speaks for itself.

> John 3:15 "Whoever hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him."

> No disagreement there, but who is or will be your brother (one chosen by God in eternity to be his child) is not always known at any given point of time.

I know that Ben Shapiro is not. And the verse doesn't say future brother.

> Really, a lie. Me thinks you protest too much and maybe project a bit. Anger unchecked ALWAYS leads to hatred and on that I will argue for, since I have never seen the obverse...

You're not very observant then. I've been angry with my wife on more than one occasion, and she with me. And in both cases it takes a while to check it, as we've both been known to be rather stubborn.

Blogger Johnny October 31, 2017 11:40 AM  

BBGKB wrote:but shut it off [electric power] in DieVerse areas makes the stone age come back.

This has already happened in New York. The power went out and a portion of the black community went on an immediate looting expedition. In areas where the whites are armed I doubt there would be a general overrun of the white community because people will use lethal force to defend their homes and that would make looting a loser. And it would not be all that long before it would be 'shoot on sight' based on skin color.

In the event of an EMP attack, I don't regard a 90% die off as a scarce number. Most of it would not be by violence but the breakdown in production and distribution of the needs of life.

Anonymous BBGKB October 31, 2017 11:40 AM  

OMG did anyone see the video of Antifa/BLM/Nambla protesting together?

I will say one thing in their defense. Detroit has a 47% functional illiteracy rate & 90% black.

How many of the people in the picture do you think could read + explain the poster? Did Cernovich pay to have his name on the poster?

https://twitter.com/willchamberlain/status/925157565834711042

Anonymous Jack Amok October 31, 2017 11:42 AM  

Who is part of the American Nation? We all have our opinions, but in practice, I think there are three possibilities (and one impossibility). In reverse chronological (and descending Civic Nationalist) order:

Multiculturalism and Magic Dirt! (the impossibility). Everyone is an American!

Pre-1965 America (what most people actually think of when you say Civic Nationalism): "Whites" (Anglo, Scottish, Germanic, Polish, Irish, Italian, Swedish). Enough interbreeding between old European nationalities to create a new national character.

Pre-Ellis-Island America: Predominantly Anglo, with some Scots, Germans and Irish. (((Fellow White People))) are aliens, not members of the nation.

British America: Mostly Anglo, with Germans and Scots accepted as red-headed step-children.

Think of it as a series of firewalls. Every one we have to breech means more pain and suffering to reclaim a nation. My hope is the pre-1965 one will prove viable.

Blogger McChuck October 31, 2017 11:47 AM  

Benny is a Jew first, last, and always. He can't help himself - he's a loyal nationalist, and his nation is not America. That does not mean he can't be useful as a temporary, provisional ally. The Soviets were temporary allies against our mutual enemies in the 1940's, but were not to be trusted outside of the sphere of that conflict. The right is a spectrum (ha, see what I did there?), and people arrive to it at different speeds by different paths. Benny, for all his faults, slings a few more arrows to the left than to the right. He can gain converts from the muddled and the near-left, and nudge them rightwards. From there, they can be guided by firmer, more gentile hands ever more rightwards.

There is more than one red pill. One does not take off the blinkers and open one's eyes for the first time to stare directly into the sun, after all.

Anonymous I'm Not a Fascist. But My Sons Are. October 31, 2017 11:53 AM  

It's easy to see who is lying and who is not. All you have to do is pay attention to their arguments and see whose positions are both internally consistent and consistent with reality.

Internal consistency ≠ consistent with reality: An important distinction.

...says the mysteriously tri-racial Indian.

It continues to baffle me how some people do not understand why Vox's racial composition is essentially a non-issue. Then again, I often suffer -- as I assume many here do or have -- from the reflexive 'if I can do it surely anyone else can too' delusion.

Anonymous Avalanche October 31, 2017 11:56 AM  

@72 " I suspect that such altruism only evolved once and will likely not evolve again."

On the contrary, altruism for one's own appears in both primates and monkeys (e.g., capuchins: two GREAT funny short video showing exactly this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BYJf2xSONc and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meiU6TxysCg) and even dogs!

Altruism is NOT a "non-survival trait" IF we keep to our own! White women's innate programming to care for children (and, alas, childish races!!) is a strength in an all-White country! But, bring in child-seeming invaders, and women have trouble overcoming the innate drive to 'care for' and 'nurture' them!

I don't think we want to dump altruism, we want to dump 'not-us' eliciting altruism that should be saved for our own.

Blogger James October 31, 2017 11:58 AM  

"Are your political sentiments more aligned with those of your ancestors who lived in the Americas 1000 years ago or in Europe 1000 years ago? How about your kids, because each conception is a 52-card shuffle of your DNA."

My ancestors of 1000 years ago were all pagan barbarians, so I don't relate to
their politics.
I relate to the politics of John Locke, James Madison, and especially
Calvin Coolidge, except for the Prohibition fiasco part, which was of course not
all his fault.
The problem with {{{{Ben Shapiro}}}} is that, in spite of being very smart, he is extremely stupid when it comes to basic common sense when it comes to this "color versus ideology" thing. I don't believe that color or race is what determines ideology, but, what color and race do determine is one's biases and mind sets and attitudes and all the other things that make us vulnerable to rhetoric and impervious to dialectic.
I also think that Shapiro's problem is he has believed the propaganda about white racism being the biggest problem in human history, and is blind to the idea that other races are way more racist than white people ever were even at the height of their racism.

Anonymous I'm Not a Fascist. But My Sons Are. October 31, 2017 12:09 PM  

I don't believe that color or race is what determines ideology, but, what color and race do determine is one's biases and mind sets and attitudes and all the other things that make us vulnerable to rhetoric and impervious to dialectic.

And if one's biases and mindset and attitudes and all the other things that make us vulnerable to rhetoric and impervious to dialectic determine our ideology?

No bodies, no minds; essence precedes existence.

Blogger TM Lutas October 31, 2017 12:14 PM  

It is rare but arabs do convert to judaism. What is Mr. Shapiro's attitude towards them? Before assessing his sincerity about race, you really should find out.

Regarding race in america, the definition of white that the american government uses for the census has changed over time and likely will change in the future. Which definition is correct?

Blogger Azure Amaranthine October 31, 2017 12:18 PM  

"The problem with {{{{Ben Shapiro}}}} is that, in spite of being very smart, he is extremely stupid when it comes to basic common sense when it comes to this "color versus ideology" thing."

I doubt he's actually that stupid. He does, however, have the same incentives to play the double standard game as all the other Jews who also perpetually play it. Somewhere deep down he simply does not care about the USA in at all the same way he does care about Israel, thus he would never note any hypocrisy in his stance, because he's only showing you the facade of the thing.

Is it good for the Jews? He does it. Is it good for the Jews but bad for others? He does it without even hesitating. Someone needs to teach these people about game theory and the infinite-recursive prisoner's dilemma, stat. You screw over the other guy (non-Jew) enough times and eventually he'll do nothing but screw over the Jew in return at every possible opportunity. Everyone loses because you can't keep your short-time desires in your pants long enough to not screw over everyone's long-time (or eternal) desires.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine October 31, 2017 12:26 PM  

"Then again, I often suffer -- as I assume many here do or have -- from the reflexive 'if I can do it surely anyone else can too' delusion."

In my opinion, projection of one's-own psyche is the most basic mode for humans to attempt to understand others' motives and perspectives. If all else fails, we tend to default to it, assuming we didn't start with it and only it in the first place.

"It is rare but arabs do convert to judaism."

Part of that rarity is because "You do not simply convert to Judaism". By the time that process is complete they effectively aren't going to be genetically Arab anymore... because that process takes several generations at the least. They're going to be quite a lot more Jewish than Arab by the time their distant descendants are fully accepted (if ever).

Anonymous TheTruthIsNeverAcceptable October 31, 2017 12:27 PM  

James Dixon wrote:> The parable of the Good Samaratan defined neighbor as anyone in need who you came across.

That would be another lie. Christ commanded the listener to be a neighbor to everyone, as the Samaritan was. He did not say that everyone in need was *his* neighbor. In fact, he said the exact opposite. Of the people who passed the man in need, only the Samaritan was his neighbor.

What is it with this lie stuff. You can't argue with someone without poisoning the well. I reject that and doubly reject your doubling down.

Now, using your own argument, everyone is my neighbor. So therefore, Ben is your neighbor. That settles your first question. However, if you take the passage apart, Jesus said, "So which of these three do you think was neighbor to him who fell among the thieves?" IMHO that doesn't apply to everyone on the face of the earth, but the person who was in need that the others passed by. We can brook honest disagreement here, but get off the lie BS.


> Tell me how hate doesn't lead to action against the hated, which is vengence.

I hate the Bush family. Have I ever taken vengeance against them?

I don't know what you do or how that hatred has affected your heart, your thoughts, and your actions or how in any small way (public condemnation for example) you have tried to repay them due to your hatred. "Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the LORD." But, since you said it, I will give YOU the benefit of the doubt and put you in my "he is the rarest of the rare" category.

> All of them, including hatred.

And that lie speaks for itself.

Again the lie BS. All of the items listed in the verses of Gal. 5:19-21 are sins. I am not sure what to say about that denial unless in some way you are Antinomian in your beliefs. Sorry, but you have lost me here.

> John 3:15 "Whoever hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him."

> No disagreement there, but who is or will be your brother (one chosen by God in eternity to be his child) is not always known at any given point of time.

I know that Ben Shapiro is not. And the verse doesn't say future brother.
No it doesn't, but it also doesn't define brother or say it doesn't include future brothers and there we can allow a little grace, if you know what I mean. By the way, how do KNOW Ben Shapiro is not your brother? No man knows the heart, no man.

> Really, a lie. Me thinks you protest too much and maybe project a bit. Anger unchecked ALWAYS leads to hatred and on that I will argue for, since I have never seen the obverse...

You're not very observant then. I've been angry with my wife on more than one occasion, and she with me. And in both cases it takes a while to check it, as we've both been known to be rather stubborn.

I am very observant, but this is about reading comprehension. Note I said "anger unchecked". While you may have been angry with your wife, I will go out on a limb and say it has always been checked, or resisted if you will, with the innate desire to get through or over it. It was not unchecked, for that is absolutely destructively hateful and is difficult to recover from. Only the grace of God can intervene in those occasions.

Have a nice day and drop the "lie" BS.

Blogger tuberman October 31, 2017 12:30 PM  

On a 1-10 scale of contempt, Ben has arrived at 11 in my view.

Blogger Doc Rampage October 31, 2017 12:37 PM  

There is nothing inconsistent in Shapiro's position. He doesn't care about race mixing but does care about religion/ideology mixing. Only the Left and the Alt-Right fail to see the distinction.

Blogger James Dixon October 31, 2017 12:41 PM  

> By the way, how do KNOW Ben Shapiro is not your brother?

By the fact that what he endorses means the death of me an mine. Who argues for the death of their brother?

> What is it with this lie stuff.

Would you prefer untruths? I prefer the simpler and shorter version.

> Note I said "anger unchecked"

And note that I responded to that very term.

> Have a nice day and drop the "lie" BS.

No. You may be sincerely mistaken, but you're propagating lies. Hatred of evil is not a sin.

As to whether espousing actions that will lead to the genocide of a race is evil or not, I leave that up to the individual reader to decide for themselves.

Anonymous E Deploribus Unum October 31, 2017 12:41 PM  

I'm always astounded when people insist there is "no white identity", or when whites themselves dicker about whether a Slav or a Spaniard or an Italian qualifies.

It's much simpler than that: When a brown, yellow or black person refers to "whites", who do they mean? If they're looking at you when they say it, then you better bet you have a VERY personal interest in the success of white nationalism.

Blogger James Dixon October 31, 2017 12:44 PM  

> He doesn't care about race mixing but does care about religion/ideology mixing.

Then why doesn't isn't he proposing mandatory ideological testing of immigrants.

Blogger wreckage October 31, 2017 12:46 PM  

There's no "browning" of America, there's a massive displacement of Americans by Mexicans.

Might as well call the Schleiffen Plan "the teutoniong of France". Only a racist would be against it!

Anonymous patrick kelly October 31, 2017 12:49 PM  

"Of the people who passed the man in need, only the Samaritan was his neighbor."

Yep, the question asked was not who was neighbor to the Samaritan, but who was neighbor to the man in need.

Blogger Chris Mallory October 31, 2017 12:52 PM  

Johnny wrote:I don't know the numbers for what portion of the population is "British," but I do know that the flyover country is chuck full of Central Europeans along with some Irish and Scandinavian. If only the Brits are Americans, than Americans are a small minority in the country. Divide the country up by this criteria, and they would get something like New England, a small territory relative to the overall country.

Ummm No.

The various "British" categories are the largest group if you add them together. And you have to remember that the group of whites who control the Ohio and Tennessee River Valleys, the Eastern part of Texas and those counties in the Lower South not majority black are predominately British descendants, but we call ourselves "American" instead of some Euro title. Those Americans in those areas still make up 20 million people.

Anonymous BasedAirman October 31, 2017 1:03 PM  

marco moltisanti wrote:I can accept the idea that the alt-right is inevitable. I welcome it for the most part, as far as I understand it. What I want to ask you all is, what's in the future for a mixed race family like mine when the alt.right fulfills its destiny?

I'm sympathetic to much of the Alt Right's platform - but, like you, I have 'identity complications' (I'm Jewish) that don't endear me to the more-extreme elements of their movement.

My opinion: You will be fine. Nobody will hurt you, your wife, or your children.

I'm an officer in the Air Force, I've worked as a security contractor for American companies in Latin America, and frankly the military is so civic-nationalist and so integrated that it would never go along with a political agenda that implemented a hard-edged sort of ethno-nationalism in the United States; especially one that targeted Latin Americans or Jews.

The only cause that could motivate 'hard-edged' policies would be a sophisticated sort of racial 'intifada' that was truly uncontrollable by any other means. That said, I don't think your family will suffer blowback from that - and I don't think even those conflicts will turn into 'race wars' or mass persecutions of innocents.

Blogger cheddarman October 31, 2017 1:04 PM  

Benny Shapiro is a moron. a logical Jew would want a nearly 100% white and Christian America. Only white evangelical Christians are gullible enough to keep giving Israel free stuff. Once whitey is a minority in the USA, all "free shit for Israel from America" stops and Israel has to pay its own way.

Blogger Geir Balderson October 31, 2017 1:05 PM  

Then, their is this. A bit off topic.

This white? woman professor states the true way to end racism is for all successful white families to give up their wealth and off-spring and to dissolve and sink into the sea of the turd world. How intellectual of her!

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/10/31/having-white-nuclear-family-promotes-white-supremacy-says-new-york-professor-report-says.html

Of course, when we try to contact her and question her proposals, all communication is unavailable. Toss the Molotov and run for your bunker!
She is despicable!!

Anonymous CPEG October 31, 2017 1:12 PM  

"I can accept the idea that the alt-right is inevitable. I welcome it for the most part, as far as I understand it. What I want to ask you all is, what's in the future for a mixed race family like mine when the alt.right fulfills its destiny?"

That depends on how bad things get in the phase shift. If the collapse is harsh enough, there will be some of all races with enough hate that your family will be in danger from the extremes of both racial groups - in some parts of the empire, anyway. But I sincerely doubt that all, or even most White Americans will actually be on board with that, and not in all of the empire. If she's willing to play along, and especially if your children are willing to assimilate, then only the most superstitious and bitter will have a problem - the question being how many of those there will be, and where.

I hope it works out for you.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine October 31, 2017 1:16 PM  

@TheTruthIsNeverAcceptable, I find you to be insufficiently unacceptable.

You're an adherent of Star Wars-ianity. There's no kind way to put it, you left Christ by the wayside so you could go-along-get-along with pop-culture.

Hate is not of itself evil. It is an emotion both created and exemplified by God himself. The Bible specifically mentions both actions and PEOPLE that God Hates. If you're seriously trying to say that hate is evil, or that hating people is evil... you're FUBAR in the head, and definitely not following Christ in that regard.

With regards to the word or concept "neighbor", why would Jesus use an overly specific term that overtly implies proximity when he could have just said "everyone"? You'll note (if you're being truthful) that he NEVER says "everyone is your neighbor", and that he does NOT EVER say that anyone in need is your neighbor, although I see what you're trying to twist there.

The most obvious and useful definition of "neighbor" involves proximity. If we want to be spiritual about it, we will say that "spiritual neighbors" are those that are close to us in spirit, otherwise it's physical proximity.

With regards to the usefulness of proximity... where do you have the most effect on the World? Obviously the location of your greatest influence is yourself, and your physical influence declines sharply with increasing distance from your physical location. The same is true for spiritual influence, which declines sharply further away from your "spiritual location".

What I'm trying to get at here is that you are capable of the doing the most closest to you. Beyond that, you need to build a firm foundation before your have the stability or strength to "reach out" to others.

Start with yourself, next your family, then your (literal proximity) neighbors. If you can get all of that in order (good luck) THEN you have the latitude to start looking further, to your community, your city, your state, etc. UNTIL then, not only do you NOT HAVE ANY BUSINESS WHATSOEVER MEDDLING IN OTHER COUNTRIES (unless you wish to physically relocate YOURSELF to them as a missionary) but your virtue signaling about loving your "neighbor" on the other side of the world? It resounds falsely when it is plainly seen that in reality you HATE your actual neighbor, whom you wish to harm by moving complete strangers/invaders into his back-yard.


As for vengeance, that emotion too was created and exemplified by God himself. He literally says "Vengeance is MINE", and this is because vengeance is created to enforce Justice, and as such is only useful in subservience to God's perfect Justice, harmful all elsewhere. God himself has employed human assassins. Vengeance is NOT evil in and of itself.

Anonymous Bobby Farr October 31, 2017 1:17 PM  

@124 So my ethnic group should be whatever some ignorant foreigners say it is? No thanks.

Anonymous truthseeker October 31, 2017 1:22 PM  

@cheddarman. The plan is for the USA to be even more politically dominated by diaspora Jews than it already is. They see a majority of white Christians as the strongest potential threat to that plan of domination.

I don't disagree that people of color will be less interested in sending money to Israel than guilt-ridden whitey is. But I don't think the Jewish plan is for people of color to be "the deciders."

Their plan is risky and perhaps ill thought-out. Indeed, white Christians have happily funded and fought Israel's wars for generations now. If "the Lobby" ends up with a country of 49% angry brown people and 49% woken up angry white people, the 2% Lobby may be worse off. But their calculus is that an angry white minority is less of a threat than a huge white majority. We shall see.

This is one reason they hate Trump. He threatens to give them the worst of both worlds. Angry woken up whites who freeze immigration in time to retain a 65% majority.

Anonymous E Deploribus Unum October 31, 2017 1:23 PM  

@134 Not saying your ethnic group "should" be anything. I'm saying in a time of ethnic conflict, you are whatever you are most easily labeled. So go with it. Nobody's going to be taking blood before they decide to outgroup you ... or decide to reach for their weapons.

Blogger VD October 31, 2017 1:29 PM  

If only the Brits are Americans, than Americans are a small minority in the country.

Exactly. Why do you think virtually no one cares about the Constitution anymore. The Germans and Scandinavians and Irish never have. It wasn't part of their tradition or their cultural inheritance.

The parable of the Good Samaratan defined neighbor as anyone in need who you came across.

It did nothing of the sort. That is a blatant lie. It defined a neighbor as anyone who comes across you in need and helps you.

Anonymous Grayman October 31, 2017 1:29 PM  

I'll say it. The jews have to go..... either back to Israel or into the woodchipper, either way they have to go, all they do is undermine their host nations.

Blogger Gloriam Deo October 31, 2017 1:29 PM  

If being American comes from ideology then we can deport and/or revoke the citizenship of anyone who does not follow that ideology. I would almost be ok with civic nationalism if this is what we did with it.

Anonymous TheTruthIsAlwaysUnacceptable October 31, 2017 1:40 PM  

James Dixon wrote:> By the way, how do KNOW Ben Shapiro is not your brother?

By the fact that what he endorses means the death of me an mine. Who argues for the death of their brother?

That is some convoluted logic. He would probably argue that he is not endorsing your death and you would say he is wrong. So be it, but it doesn't prevent the possibility that he is or will be your brother.

> What is it with this lie stuff.

Would you prefer untruths? I prefer the simpler and shorter version.

Neither. They are both incorrect and that is being charitable. I do not accept you as the arbiter of all truth. That is the Holy Spirit. We all see through a mirror darkly but you seem to only see your version of things as "truth" and since I honestly disagree with you, that make me a liar. BS. I am a 40 year biblical student, who reads Greek and am smart enough to have graduated from UMBC in Ancient Studies with a 4.0, but then my reasoned opinions are only lies if they don't fit your straight jacket thinking? Give me a break!

> Note I said "anger unchecked"

And note that I responded to that very term.

No you did not, for I explained my meaning and you side stepped the obvious rationale that your anger toward you wife always has a check on it; it is always limited by your under-girding desire to keep your relationship intact but need to work through the upset. That is not destructive unchecked anger, and that is not a debate point; that is reality.

> Have a nice day and drop the "lie" BS.

No. You may be sincerely mistaken, but you're propagating lies.

No I am not, but you certainly wish it were so.

Hatred of evil is not a sin.

I NEVER said it was and for you to say I did is a misrepresentation of my position, that be as kind as I can be all things considered. Hatred of people is a sin and that is plain and biblical. Jesus didn't weep over Jerusalem because he hated the people and he didn't ask his Father to forgive them for crucifying him because he hated them. But he did hate the desecration of the Temple and what the money lenders were doing turning it into a "den of thieves".

As to whether espousing actions that will lead to the genocide of a race is evil or not, I leave that up to the individual reader to decide for themselves.

I would agree that KNOWINGLY doing so would be an evil action, but there are a lot of deluded people who are wrong about a lot of things and they are not by definition "evil". At various points in our lives we all have to face up to our failures and sins, for we are all guilty of doing evil things (sin is evil and we are all sinners) and in need of repentance. That doesn't make us evil, just human and in need of the blood of Christ to redeem us from ourselves. You and me included.

Blogger VD October 31, 2017 1:41 PM  

What I want to ask you all is, what's in the future for a mixed race family like mine when the alt.right fulfills its destiny?

No one knows. There are too many variables and possibilities involved. But regardless, "what about meeeeeee?" is not an appropriate response to macrosocietal issues.

Blogger tublecane October 31, 2017 1:46 PM  

I was just reading comments by Ben Sasse--actual member of the once-august Senate--lamenting the senatorial candidacy of Roy Moore in Alabama. He's incredulous. How can such a thing as Moore even exist? "White backlash grievance," he calls it. Sounds leftist to him. But Republicans can't be leftists. Which makes it "crappy." Moore's a crappy candidate. Listen:

"We don't know how to talk about what limited government and universal human dignity are. And so I think we're getting a new kind of identity politics..."

If you're a Republican candidate, anywhere in the country at any level, and you're talking about some specific interest that a normal person might possess, touching on normal things like ethnicity, instead of abstract things like limited government and universal human dignity...well, I mean, isn't that just crappy?

A good thing about the Nevertrump phenomenon is that these people define themselves clearly, for once. Though you might have guessed they were all deracinated sophists, now there's no doubt.

Anonymous Cyclone Bob October 31, 2017 1:48 PM  

WynnLloyd: Still, I very much doubt the "another six million" scenario where noncombatants are systematically killed. There are always civilian casualties in any civil war, but a "final solution" for America is just a leftist scare tactic.

Migration is War. The only noncoms are the ones who did not invade us.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine October 31, 2017 1:51 PM  

"I've worked as a security contractor for American companies in Latin America, and frankly the military is so civic-nationalist and so integrated that it would never go along with a political agenda that implemented a hard-edged sort of ethno-nationalism in the United States; especially one that targeted Latin Americans or Jews.

The only cause that could motivate 'hard-edged' policies would be a sophisticated sort of racial 'intifada' that was truly uncontrollable by any other means. That said, I don't think your family will suffer blowback from that - and I don't think even those conflicts will turn into 'race wars' or mass persecutions of innocents."


The military is Civic-Nationalist? Yes.

Integrated? Yep.

It would never go along with a political agenda that implemented a hard-edged sort of ethno-nationalism in the United States? See, this is where you're off the rails. It already does, in several distinct ways. For example, married to a French national? Yeah, your security clearance is GOOOOOONE, no last lines, debate, or alibis. This isn't even counting all the ways that the libtards have and are instituting exactly that kind of policy already... only with a 180 degree rotation, targeting men and whites. Filipino mafia? Yeah that's a thing in the military too, and if you aren't Filipino... get in the long line for logistics.

"The only cause that could motivate 'hard-edged' policies would be a sophisticated sort of racial 'intifada' that was truly uncontrollable by any other means."

You mean like BLM or La Raza only white and probably smarter? Yeah, that's pretty much an inevitability at this point.

"That said, I don't think your family will suffer blowback from that - and I don't think even those conflicts will turn into 'race wars' or mass persecutions of innocents."

Actually, you're right, mass persecution is rather unlikely.




...because mass execution and/or starvation and/or disease are rather more likely. The race wars are already heating up. Anyway, why go to all the trouble of using awkward terms like "race wars" or "helter-skelter" when you could just use the common and ubiquitous "clannish", "xenophobic", "culturally monolithic/heterogeneous", "balkanization", "internecine", etc. A rose by any other name.

Really, these things are much more the rule than the exception, we only think of them as the exception because we (in the USA) have been relatively exempt for rather long ...indicating that the up-and-coming is going to be a doozy, sooner or later.


All that being said, rather than wondering "Will I/my family be safe?", be proactive! Start thinking things like "How can I be useful to the winning team" and "What can I do to cement my value and loyalty as unshakeable in my community -- the community I most want to be a part of when the rubble stops bouncing?

DO NOT start looking around for backs to chalk-mark for stabbing. That's the fastest way to ensure that absolutely everybody, including the enemies of those you backstabbed, sees you as an ambiguous and dangerous primary target. The craven way out may look good for a minute, but as soon as you get that craven reputation, all eyes are heavily upon you. No one wants an unpredictable loose end lying around in the middle of their plans.

Blogger tublecane October 31, 2017 1:55 PM  

@13-"it was only being preached to whites"

That fact is what finally "woke" me on Race Realism. Even if colorblindness is Good, True, and Beautiful, doesn't matter. Because only white people are indoctrinated in it, and thus there will be no colorblind society. Which means whites are only hamstringing themselves by buying into it.

It's as plain as the nose on my face, and if the Ben Shapiros of the world can't understand--assuming they're not just dirty liars (and admittedly there's little basis on which to assume that)--why should we bother listening to them?

Anonymous Avalanche October 31, 2017 2:05 PM  

@129 "I don't think even those conflicts will turn into 'race wars' or mass persecutions of innocents."

Why Pollyanna, how surprising that you stopped by Vox Day's blog! Welcome (I guess?).

Consider, for just one second: lots of military folks (I know, cause I were one!) are absolutely White nationalists -- but you wanna bet they can sniff you out a mile away? You're NEVER going to be invited into the secret handshake group, or be exposed to the reality of how most White warriors think and feel about the destruction by invasion of THEIR country!

Have you ALSO not noticed that most blacks and Hispanics (and women) are NOT front-line soldiers, but work in support positions? Absolutely, there is (always!) a Bell curve -- and there are black sailors and soldier whom White guys would and could trust their lives to. Just as there are ACTUALLY a few black doctors who ACTUALLY passed the med school classes on their own skills, and not because the teachers dare not flunk a black!

BUT -- what are your odds? Do you want to take your sick 3-yr-old to a black doctor,without knowing if he 'floated' through school on his skin color? Do you know what the call the guy who graduates at the very bottom of a 5-person med school class? They call him DOCTOR! You want him treating your child?

And you're clearly unaware of the ONGOING race war here in the States -- the one the news covers over? The one you're not supposed to know about, prepare for, or react to? Your skin color IS and WILL BE your uniform! (Ever heard of no-go zones? Ever try to line that idea of with Baltimore and Detroilet and huge swatches of Chicongo?) Maybe take a day and read this: https://www.amren.com/the-color-of-crime/ Wake up!

Blogger Lovekraft October 31, 2017 2:06 PM  

Right now the tribe is in the hot seat, with Weinstein being front and center. No one wants to bring it up in case the pitchfork mob comes after him (although I believe Maher tried to and was hounded) but I believe there is a major problem with western Jewish women being generally miserable, controlling and condescending re their spouses.

Perhaps this is an example of Shapiro, in order to stay in his wife's (and by extension her vast network's) good graces by, yet again, redirecting/paying homage to the globalist feminist god.

A theory, but if you think about how the Weinstain scandal ripped the lid off a lot of secret favoring/payoffs/complicity, a new dynamic is appearing - one where the alt-right gets to watch the SJW/marxist left scramble to regain control of the narrative.

Speaking of which, here's Molyneux speaking of a hidden scandal much, much worse than the Catholic pedo scandal (took about 15 years, and the media still avoids it). Public school teacher child rape:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hP9PqNv-zk

Anonymous Avalanche October 31, 2017 2:06 PM  

* 500-person med school class...

Blogger Meimou October 31, 2017 2:09 PM  

Phillip George
In a shooting war I'd still pick any color Christian to share a fox hole with than white atheist.
The Cross is the Ultimate statistic and it only has one Redeemer on it.
The Australian Prime Minister in in Beersheba of Abraham Well digging fame tonight.
It was the last full on Cavalry charge in the history of man. It was a miracle made certain by the point of a bayonet. The next one is Jesus riding the white horse, methinks. It's about formation and ranks.. Fuck yeah.


As others pointed out,the black Christian gets a vote, and they may side with their fellow blacks over you,or Soros shock troops(blm, anifa) over you...

Another thing, even if the black Christian votes to share a foxhole with you, don't think that the majority will; on a micro level, religion may trump race, in a micro level it never will. How many black Christians voted for Obama? How many black Christians voted for the witch over a nationalist who wanted to MAGA?

You have a bunker in a apocalyptic scenario, you can choose between 1000 black Christians or 1000 white atheist.
Would you really choose the blacks? You can't pick just one, it has to all or nothing. I wouldn't choose the blacks and I am one, though I'm not Christian.

Blogger tublecane October 31, 2017 2:11 PM  

"Ideology does [matter]"

For all the talk about how "identity politics" is leftist (because leftists weren't foolish enough to abandon then), I can remember a time when conservatives used to be explicitly anti-ideology. Not long ago, "ideologue" was a curseword. Ideology was for rootless intellectuals who couldn't make up their own minds and needed cheat sheets.

Mittens Romney recently was heard to say Trump has no ideology, as if that was a bad thing. Think of what kind of person takes that as an insult. That's a man who wanted to run the country. And who, by the way, was entirely incapable of presenting an alternative to Obama's ideology on healthcare or foreign policy. That's a minor but important point. Ideology is so blasted important to them, but really we're talking about the difference between the Stones and the Beatles. Which loom large for fans of 60s British Invasion rock, but to an aficionado of classical music or jazz, for instance, the differences are picayune.

Now, it's about all they think they have left, though what passes for mainstream conservative ideology is a hodge-podge that changes every half-second. It's ideology in the Marxist sense of thin rationalization for m material interest. They want to stay in power and/or keep getting a paycheck, and have nothing but this week's talking points with which to justify themselves.

Blogger marco moltisanti October 31, 2017 2:22 PM  

I reckoned that if you're certain the alt.right is inevitable you must have some ideas as to where the race mixers fit in. As has been noted many times, there are a lot of us.

I'll always be a "what about meeeeee" guy like everyone else but you can do that and be aware if there big picture at the same time.

Blogger Meimou October 31, 2017 2:24 PM  

VD
What I want to ask you all is, what's in the future for a mixed race family like mine when the alt.right fulfills its destiny?

No one knows. There are too many variables and possibilities involved. But regardless, "what about meeeeeee?" is not an appropriate response to macrosocietal issues

I see your point but the guy does have a family to think about, I wouldn't ask what about meeeeee myself, but I have no one to take care of.

Blogger marco moltisanti October 31, 2017 2:25 PM  

Do they only revoke your security clearance if your wife is French for some reason? I know lots of active duty military guys with Central American wives who still have their clearance as far as know. My clearance survived marrying my Central American wife.

Anonymous Anonymous October 31, 2017 2:44 PM  

"future for a mixed race family"

If the apocalyptic prognosis never come to pass or if they do but some of the mixed people are allowed to stay, they will almost certainly drop in social rank. Ruthless discrimination and difficulty finding a marriage partner are the human norm.

Anonymous Charlottesvillain October 31, 2017 2:46 PM  

Speaking of such things:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/28/us/politics/virginia-governor-race-immigrants-northam-gillespie.html

Many of these immigrants, who tend to be socially and fiscally conservative, are not naturally Democrats. But Mr. Ramadan and others said Republicans’ harsh approach to immigration has driven them to be Democrats, and it may be difficult to get them back.

“They are people of faith. They came here for less government. They are natural voters for the Republican Party,” Mr. Ramadan said. “But they are also emotional voters. They want to feel accepted. They want to feel welcome, but the Republican Party has failed to do so. Democrats have done a much better job.”

Tom Davis, a former Republican congressman who represented Northern Virginia, said he saw the transformation happening “under my feet.”

“We are losing ethnic voters en masse,” Mr. Davis said. “Vietnamese, Koreans used to be the backbone of my vote. They are very Republican in the way they live their lives, but I saw the immigration issue just turn it south.”
...
Mr. Ramadan said he ran as a conservative and won a district that was 60 percent Democratic in his state delegate race from a Loudoun County district.

“I have been telling my party until there is no breath left in me, you truly need to widen the tent and not just talk about it,” Mr. Ramadan said. “And start working the new voters of Virginia and not the old voters that are shrinking in Southwest. The future is Northern Virginia. The future is the Asian vote. The future is the Latino vote.”
...
From her fifth-floor office, Phyllis J. Randall, a Democrat and the first African-American woman to lead a Virginia county board of supervisors, can look down on the courthouse square in Leesburg, the Loudoun County seat. Just beyond her view is a monument to Confederate soldiers that has been the subject of heated protests.

She favors moving the monument but said older members of her board and community disagreed.

“It is so generational,” she said. “People 35 and younger grew up in a more multicultural area, so I think there are times when younger people have a lesson to give older people.”

In Manassas, where Mr. Iyer’s restaurant does brisk lunch business, schools and car dealerships incorporate the word “battlefield,” a reflection that the area’s tourism economy thrives in part by celebrating both sides of Civil War heritage. And yet, at the Stonebridge at Potomac Town Center shopping mall on a recent morning, the majority of morning customers at Starbucks and the Apple store were minorities.
...
“When I had a choice I feel that the Democratic Party views are more inclusive, more tolerant, more favoring,” he said. “Republicans want to keep it for Americans. America is a great country, but these foreign nationals relate more to a feeling of being included.”

Blogger Azure Amaranthine October 31, 2017 2:47 PM  

@153. marco moltisanti, even if your wife is Chinese or Russian or whatever else, you might be able to work something out, but French intelligence has a long and sordid history of honey traps willing to do pretty much anything including get married for years. In short, the French's favoured tactics make it a total no-go, even by contrast with countries that are a lot more physically threatening.

Blogger Meimou October 31, 2017 2:47 PM  

Grayman
I'll say it. The jews have to go..... either back to Israel or into the woodchipper, either way they have to go, all they do is undermine their host nations.

What? Woodchippers? Are you the jigsaw killer?

You're right about them undermining their host nations, even the right Wing jews you seem to do it, as if it's genetic. This would explain the hostility been Sharpiro has towards whites advocating for their self interest, he even called the mild-mannered Jared Taylor a white supremacist. Called VD one too,that's when he lost me as a fan.

I read somewhere that a greater percentage of Jews voted against Trump in than Hispanics. Makes sense, their parasite like nature instinctively knew what threat Trump was to them.

(((Scorpions gonna scorpion))l

Blogger tublecane October 31, 2017 2:51 PM  

@155-Yes, everyone is a born Republican. If but the party adopts the policies of the NYT, everyone would vote for it.

Or, failing that, the other party would win with NYT policies, and we'd win anyway. It's foolproof!

Anonymous Tipsy October 31, 2017 2:52 PM  

One of the things I have a certain amount of expertise in is Control Theory, which is the mathematical theory of describing 1) how dynamic systems behave under feedback and 2) how to design feedback laws so these systems do what you want. An example: balancing a broom on your hand. The broom wants to tip over, but by watching it, you can move your hand in such a way to keep it upright.

One dichotomy that exists in this theoretical framework is the dichotomy of performance versus robustness. Using the broom example above, a high performance system might keep the broom as still as possible, but a robust system will keep it upright even if someone pushes you while you're balancing the broom. So, performance represents a theoretical optimal situation under nominal conditions, and robustness represents functionality under unknown or unmodeled perturbations.

It's almost canonical that there always is a trade-off between performance and robustness.

As it happens, control theory is a pretty rich source of metaphors for anything that evolves in time. The trade-off between performance and robustness, too, seems to happen in societies as well. I was reading about how some far flung cities in the proto-multicultural Austro-Hungarian empire seemed to be able to provide a peaceful environment for Poles, Germans, Ukrainians, and Jews, all of whom lived together in relative harmony. When the political order was disrupted, however, the various ethnic groups were at each other's throats.

This seems like a classic performance vs robustness issue. Under a well established order things worked well for the many, but when societal perturbations were significant and deviated significantly from the nominal, the high performance system broke down because it wasn't robust enough.

I see the cultural Marxist project in America to be an attempt to optimize the "performance" of the country along the left wing metrics of the "redress of oppression", "secularism", "diversity", "fairness", "feminism", "LGBT rights", etc., but what's happening is that the country is become less robust, that is, less cohesive, less trusting, less safe, less moral, and as a result more prone to breakdown.

In other words, I'm worried that Cultural Marxism, by destroying the robustness of our society, is inexorably leading the country into civil war.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine October 31, 2017 2:54 PM  

"Many of these immigrants, who tend to be socially and fiscally conservative, are not naturally Democrats. But Mr. Ramadan and others said Republicans’ harsh approach to immigration has driven them to be Democrats"

Are you shitting me? Not only are those statements largely complete bullshit, but they're trying to defend people who are willing to vote against the American People for the sole reason that the American People don't want to be endlessly invaded?

They're literally voting against the Americans, who they're supposedly becoming part of, because the Americans want do do what's good for the Americans? So in short they are not Americans, because they'd rather stab the actual Americans in the back.

THEY ALL HAVE TO GO THE HELL BACK.

Anonymous Charlottesvillain October 31, 2017 2:55 PM  

@157 "I read somewhere that a greater percentage of Jews voted against Trump in than Hispanics. Makes sense, their parasite like nature instinctively knew what threat Trump was to them."

It seems that the more secular ones are especially subversive (at least in this way. Orthodox Jews have their own style)

54% of Orthodox Jews, 24% of Conservative Jews, 14% of "Just Jewish" Jews, 10% of Reform Jews, and 8% of Reconstructionist Jews voted for Trump.

http://religionnews.com/2017/09/13/most-us-jews-oppose-trump-but-the-orthodox-stick-with-him/

Blogger Azure Amaranthine October 31, 2017 3:00 PM  

@157. Meimou, it's pretty simple, really. The real Jews went back to Israel when given the option, because they actually cared about being Jews and about being a nation. If they didn't go back and have no intention of doing so, they have rejected their own supposed nationality and heritage.

You know what that means? All the "Jews" that didn't make aliyah are FAKE JEWS!

That being said, if they claim to be Jews but don't want to go back to Israel, well, that rather makes me think that really they just don't want to be US Citizens, doesn't it? The wood chipper or Israel is actually quite the fair choice for anyone who insists that they are a Jew. "You're not with us? Cool. Go back to your real people or die."

Anonymous RobertL October 31, 2017 3:03 PM  

Marco, out of interest, have you asked the brown people what they would do to you as an individual in the event of a general reclamation of Aztlan? Also, should you die before your wife, where would you rather she and your children were?

Blogger James Dixon October 31, 2017 3:09 PM  

> Neither. They are both incorrect and that is being charitable.

No, it's not.

> I NEVER said it was and for you to say I did is a misrepresentation of my position

You said hatred was a sin. You imposed no limitations on that statement. Thus, per your statement, hatred of evil must be a sin. If you didn't mean that, then correct what you said.

> ...but there are a lot of deluded people who are wrong about a lot of things and they are not by definition "evil".

So you think Ben Shapiro is deluded? I wish that were the case.

> "We don't know how to talk about what limited government...

Well, to be fair to him, that's what the Republicans have done for 60 years: Talk. So he's an expert on it. When it comes to actually limiting government, even by something as simple as cutting spending? Well, that's another matter.

Blogger James Dixon October 31, 2017 3:10 PM  

It's --> they're. Only corrected because the mistake changes the meaning of my reply.

Blogger VFM #7634 October 31, 2017 3:12 PM  

I read somewhere that a greater percentage of Jews voted against Trump in than Hispanics. Makes sense, their parasite like nature instinctively knew what threat Trump was to them.

@Meimou
Yup... but just barely.

Anonymous Grayman October 31, 2017 3:13 PM  

@159 Tipsy

HEY!!!! a shout out to someone else familiar with control theory!!!!

Once you see the world through that lens it changes everything!.

In my case it was exothermic reactors (and bioreactors) in series and parallel which make a great analogy for economics.

Thats also why modern supply chains terrify me. Massively over optimized systems tend to collapse suddenly with little warning and in ways that are hard to predict and at times with little apparent impetus.

Anonymous Grayman October 31, 2017 3:18 PM  

Well, to be fair to him, that's what the Republicans have done for 60 years: Talk. So he's an expert on it. When it comes to actually limiting government, even by something as simple as cutting spending? Well, that's another matter.

lets just stop with the cutting cutting spending wet dreams. We are currently at the peak of a an exponential debt cycle, such that the RATE of debt EXPANSION must increase continuously or the entire thing implodes since there isnt enough collateral in existence to cover even a fraction of the existing debts.
Cutting government spending (a major contributor to the increasing rate of debt expansion) is suicidal. Yes it will happen at some point and has to happen at some point and yes it will be catastrophic. Yet no politician is going to willingly push that self destruct button, that is the reduction in spending.

Anonymous Grayman October 31, 2017 3:22 PM  

@157

What? Woodchippers? Are you the jigsaw killer?

Woodchippers are more humane than ovens and use significantly less energy than an oven, to achieve the same ends. Its about efficiency.
As a side benefit it does also send a much more effective message then an oven.

Anonymous E Deploribus Unum October 31, 2017 3:27 PM  

Do you know what the call the guy who graduates at the very bottom of a 500-person med school class? They call him DOCTOR!

VERY good point, 'Lanche.

Blogger James Dixon October 31, 2017 3:32 PM  

> Thats also why modern supply chains terrify me.

In particular, just in time delivery is a disaster waiting to happen.

> lets just stop with the cutting cutting spending wet dreams. We are currently at the peak of a an exponential debt cycle

Now? Probably. 20 years ago? Probably not. 30 years ago? Definitely not. Like I said, 60 years they've been talking.

Blogger Tatooine Sharpshooters' Club October 31, 2017 3:39 PM  

Rare, exclusive footage of wee Binyamin spreading the gospel of civic nationalism:

https://youtu.be/yQEoicOExdI?t=24m26s

Anonymous TheTruthIsNeverAcceptable October 31, 2017 3:39 PM  

James Dixon wrote:> I NEVER said it was and for you to say I did is a misrepresentation of my position

You said hatred was a sin. You imposed no limitations on that statement. Thus, per your statement, hatred of evil must be a sin. If you didn't mean that, then correct what you said.

Actually, I quoted Galatians that says hatred is a sin, without the qualification you seek. When challenged I clarified, but not in the direction your assumption expected. Your assumption was incorrect. You keep doubling down rather than seeking the truth in our differences, where it is to be found. That is not called debate; it is your way or the highway.

My catch phrase for over 25 years has been "A heart and mind searching for truth in a lying world" and it is my imprimatur. I don't give up what I believe is true just because someone disputes it...that would mean my belief is not really belief. I argue for my position until I am PROVEN wrong or just agree to disagree, since some things are not completely knowable. But I have changed dramatically over the years as the truth of matters became clear.


> ...but there are a lot of deluded people who are wrong about a lot of things and they are not by definition "evil".

So you think Ben Shapiro is deluded? I wish that were the case.

I honestly don't know since I don't read much of what he says. I remember when he first started at WND as a sort of teenage wonderkid and he seemed reasonable for the most part but not exceptional, so he didn't interest me. I never thought about his Jewishness until recently, mostly because of what is said here.

Hate is a difficult topic to deconstruct biblically, but the easiest litmus test on most things biblical and Christian is to ask where is your heart and what is your motivation (or what are you trying to justify). As I said, I have always been a seeker of the truth and came to believe, as the book by Arthur F. Holmes said, "All Truth is God's Truth" and as such seek it no matter what, for in seeking it I seek my God.

Blogger Al October 31, 2017 3:44 PM  

Marco Moltisanti, there are no easy answers to your situation. Let's face it, you were a cuck and now have to live with it. I know how it is. Twenty years ago I was shacked up with a gorgeous Thai babe. Now the idea is inconceivable. Fortunately, we didn't have children.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine October 31, 2017 3:45 PM  

Just think, someone(s) "owns" all that debt and is/are perfectly happy with it increasing exponentially even though it's been completely non-remunerable since day one by design... why?

In my mind, it's because it's a layer of obfuscation, shadows and smoke screen over what's actually being bought and sold, what's actually being bartered for.

Alternatively, they're utterly demon-possessed and just want to see everything burn as violently as possible when they eventually let it collapse. Those economic families seem to stably last a looong time somehow, way longer than any normal generational cycles allow for. My money's on evil supernatural intervention.

Could be both.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine October 31, 2017 4:07 PM  

"Hate is a difficult topic to deconstruct biblically, but the easiest litmus test on most things biblical and Christian is to ask where is your heart and what is your motivation (or what are you trying to justify)."

Because the rest of your response is effectively an evasion, I'll just go with this part.

A lot of people think, simply, that Hate is the opposite of Love, and that if "God is Love", hate must be evil.

This is too simplistic. Hate is not the opposite of Love, rather, both actually imply an interest or investment in the object of the emotion. Hate and love both "care" about their objects.

A more apt "opposite" for love would perhaps be "loathing", a combination of dislike, aversion, and disgust. Even yet, God is said to Loath specific lists of both actions and people who commit certain actions, so Loathing cannot be simply evil either.

One way to think about the subject of Hate is thus:

A: God "hardened" some peoples' hearts in the Bible, them being completely unwilling to change for the better.

B: Some of these people died (and appear to have been set aside for Hell) as a result of their hard hearts.

C: If a person's heart is hard and evil unto death, are they meaningfully separable from the evil to which they have cloven? They are not meaningfully separable from beyond the point their heart hardened.

D: Thus, a person with a hear "hardened in evil" unto the death may by all means be hated, because they are become a manifestation of nothing more than evil itself. Whether this is purely God's action, or (my thought) a logical result of they themselves giving over their God-given free will to a demon or devil, I cannot say. Nevertheless, the result is the same. That person, from the "hardening in evil" until the point of their death, is nothing other than evil, and may be hated.


The trick here, as with so many things is that human understanding is fallible. We have no way of knowing for certain that a person's heart is "hardened in evil unto the death" in and of ourselves. Only God can know such a thing, and only God can impart such flawless knowledge, thus if God says to love it, one should love it, and if God says to hate it, one ought hate it.

Blogger TM Lutas October 31, 2017 4:09 PM  

@119 Azure Amaranthine - "Part of that rarity is because "You do not simply convert to Judaism"." Every group has their own entrance criteria. They get to pick for themselves. We get to pick for ourselves, civilization survives on such common sense understandings.

I have yet to ever see a judaism conversion process that is multi-generational in any subgrouping of judaism. Could you point one out? Or would you rather the alternative of withdrawing the assertion?

Blogger marco moltisanti October 31, 2017 4:12 PM  

Interesting. Now that you mention it you do hear about French espionage and you don't hear about it from El Salvador or Guatemala.

Anonymous BBGKB October 31, 2017 4:13 PM  

In the event of an EMP attack, I don't regard a 90% die off as a scarce number. Most of it would not be by violence but the breakdown in production and distribution of the needs of life.

We fled DieVerse City for a nice Whitopia after seeing the massive chimpouts when the food stamp car went down for 8 hours on 10-12-2013. The US grain reserve only has enough grain for 1/2 a loaf of bread per citizen. People in Venezuela wish they bought a few 5 gallon buckets of rice/beans before their crash.

BasedAirman-I'm an officer in the Air Force, I've worked as a security contractor for American companies

Have you ever meet a competent non Asian minority in the military that was not Cuban? I was in the army.

I don't disagree that people of color will be less interested in sending money to Israel than guilt-ridden whitey is

As long as they get their cut of gibs me dats non whites will be ok with it, the problem will be not enough productive white suckers.

The parable of the Good Samaratan defined neighbor as anyone in need who you came across.

Its right next to the gay wedding cakes verse. Judo Christ did the miracle of changing a tree into chop sticks.

Mixed race family... "what about meeeeeee?" is not an appropriate response to macrosocietal issues.

Forget about moving in next to the faggots with the earth sheltered greenhouse.

DO NOT start looking around for backs to chalk-mark for stabbing. That's the fastest way to ensure that absolutely everybody

Yea seriously you don't want to be within bad breath range of them when they die, use a scope. When a murse posted his resume as proof that I was wrong about illegal aliens using ambulances as "free" taxies, he said that travel nurses only do enemas all day. Along with posting news links to non Asian minorities using ambulances as free taxies I pointed out he never experienced true DieVerseCity if he thinks doing enemas is worse than a black homeless man's foot assessment(that travel murses get stuck doing).

Just as there are ACTUALLY a few black doctors who ACTUALLY passed the med school classes on their own skills, and not because the teachers dare not flunk a black!

I have never meet Dr Ben "Pyramid Silo" Carson, but how many do you think there are in the US? Caron got the highest SAT in Detroit for over 40 years(since whites left) but 1 out of 50 Asian boys gets a perfect math SAT and likely a higher total than Carson.

Thats also why modern supply chains terrify me. Massively over optimized systems tend to collapse suddenly with little warning

I would imagine all the regulars here would have a 6 month+ supply of freeze dried food to survive the Nigapocalypse

Anonymous Tipsy October 31, 2017 4:22 PM  

Grayman wrote:@159 Tipsy

HEY!!!! a shout out to someone else familiar with control theory!!!!

Once you see the world through that lens it changes everything!.

In my case it was exothermic reactors (and bioreactors) in series and parallel which make a great analogy for economics.

That's also why modern supply chains terrify me. Massively over optimized systems tend to collapse suddenly with little warning and in ways that are hard to predict and at times with little apparent impetus.


Yep, yep, and yep. So much is designed to be highly optimized and therefore made not robust. Take electrical grids. Great at distributing power with low losses and optimized economics. But there are a few choke points (e.g., into LA) that, if disrupted, could bring down the whole system.

Another system that was highly optimized: Corporate Economics. Sure, out-sourcing and off-shoring and reducing vertical integration was more "efficient" from a perspective bottom line success, but it ended up destroying what was a pretty robust economic ecosystem.

BTW, did you also study Game Theory? You can cast robust control design in a non-cooperative game theoretic way. (Cf. in linear systems Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations vs Issac's equations). Also a rich source of ways in which to understand the world.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine October 31, 2017 4:33 PM  

"I have yet to ever see a judaism conversion process that is multi-generational in any subgrouping of judaism."

You may want to look at the historical Gentiles for a very plain example. They could, over the course of enough generations, be permitted back into the more "inner" parts of the Temple and be considered "Jews" rather than "Gentiles", although they could never be Levites again, no matter how many generations.

Obviously converting to the religion itself does not take generations. Being a particularly "accepted" or core part of it on the other hand... did, and as far as I know does still, though perhaps not quite as overtly in the absence of quite such a monoculture. As a people, many of those who call themselves "Jews" nowadays would certainly be called "Gentiles" or worse by the older standards, as they are far too mixed with other people groups to claim to be "Jews" by blood.

It's sort of a messy topic to try to talk about as an outsider, as there are no other races/religions I am aware of (aside from perhaps some tiny tribal ones somewhere...) that are so intertwined as the Jews were. Heck, the word is still commonly used for both the race and the religion.

Blogger James Dixon October 31, 2017 4:39 PM  

> Your assumption was incorrect

I didn't make any assumptions about your statements. I merely took them at face value.

And note that I did allow for your being mistaken. I said your statements are lies. I didn't say the lies originated with you. I've seen too many others make them over the years.

> A heart and mind searching for truth in a lying world...

Well, keep searching. You'll make progress. None of us will actually get there in our lifetimes, but we do the best we can.

> Just think, someone(s) "owns" all that debt and is/are perfectly happy with it increasing exponentially even though it's been completely non-remunerable since day one by design... why?

I suspect the greater fool principle. That there will always be someone else to buy them out before time runs out.

Anonymous Uncle John's Band October 31, 2017 4:48 PM  

@ Marco Moltisanti

As others have noted, you are conflating macro and micro-level phenomena. There is nothing you can do as an individual to influence the former. Just watch where things are going and respond accordingly. But when things do go down, we will see far more local autonomy/empowerment then we do now, and who is going to be part of the community will be decided on a micro level. So do what has been suggested and buy in. Completely. Lose the split identity crap and be part of the nation you claim to want to be part of. Will your wife stand with the American nation against her own? Like Avalanche said, start building a tribe. There’s no guarantee, but but the stronger your bonds to your community, the better your chances.

Anonymous Anonymous October 31, 2017 4:52 PM  

Woodchippers are more humane than ovens

In the spirit of literalism: concentration camp inmates died of disease, exhaustion, and gassing. The purpose of the crematoria was body-disposal.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine October 31, 2017 4:55 PM  

"I suspect the greater fool principle. That there will always be someone else to buy them out before time runs out."

While entertaining, I don't think they really sell it often, and I'm not sure the time CAN run out until they want it to.

Blogger ant becker October 31, 2017 5:06 PM  

An excellent read https://www.amazon.com/Diversity-Illusion-Ed-West/dp/1908096314/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1509483922&sr=8-1&keywords=diversity+illusion

Blogger James Dixon October 31, 2017 5:07 PM  

> Hate is a difficult topic to deconstruct biblically, but the easiest litmus test on most things biblical and Christian is to ask where is your heart and what is your motivation (or what are you trying to justify)

In this case, I was simply noting that hate as a general case is not commanded against in the Bible. There are specific exhortations (not to hate your brother,for instance), but no general commandment that I am aware of. God himself is said to hate certain people and certain actions, in fact, which he could hardly do if hate were a sin (for those interested, see Proverbs 6:16-19).

Your quotations dealt with specific cases which weren't applicable in this one, not the general case. Then you got the point of the parable of the good Samaritan completely wrong (again, for those interested, see Luke 10:25-37 for the full text).

We've discussed these matters here before. You're not the first one to make such comments. The fact that they always show up is why I called them lies.

Anonymous BBGKB October 31, 2017 5:12 PM  

"I have yet to ever see a judaism conversion process that is multi-generational in any subgrouping of judaism."

There is the one drop jewish is enough to count if a nobel prize winner, but the jewish enough to marry a Cohen is a lot different.

debt...That there will always be someone else to buy them out before time runs out."...While entertaining, I don't think they really sell it often

(((They))) just get more ZERO interest rate fiat currency from the (((FED))), to roll the debt over until they are too big to fail, ever since they took the US off the gold standard.

Anonymous Tamarind October 31, 2017 5:19 PM  

Man! The obsession among you folks with Jews is clinical. Probably a case of projection and more.

Blogger marco moltisanti October 31, 2017 5:21 PM  

Haven't asked all of them, but being white is generally very prestigious down here if you know your place and know the culture. I'd probably do fine, in fact the wife and I are strongly considering emigrating to one of the nicer Latin American countries. They do exist, her country just isn't one of them.

I would rather have the wife raise the kids in the US. Again, her country is a bit of a hell hole, for the most part.

Blogger marco moltisanti October 31, 2017 5:24 PM  

I appreciate your input, you pedo. Fair to call you that I figure since you're at least as much of a pedophile as I am a cuckold.

Anonymous View October 31, 2017 5:35 PM  

But if u find yourself making similar points to BKGB you know u r on a track u dont want to be on. at least I do...Kids sometimes truth is better left unsaid

Blogger Meimou October 31, 2017 5:43 PM  

Tamarind
Man! The obsession among you folks with Jews is clinical. Probably a case of projection and more.

If the frog was obsessed with the scorpion it would still be alive.

Blogger Were-Puppy October 31, 2017 5:47 PM  

@52 TheTruthIsAlwaysUnacceptable
James Dixon wrote:
>Where in the Bible does it say hatred is a sin?


Let me count the ways...
---

Most of your examples are about "your brother". Is Shapiro your brother? Only if you worship Judeo Christ.

Blogger Phillip George October 31, 2017 6:28 PM  

Thankyou @20 Matthew and @149 Meimou

the semi final word is this

A country can survive multiethnic, is cannot survive multicultic.

When Britannia Ruled it was for "God, King and Country"

Since Roman times or now, nothing has changed.

God and King are the same man.

The only way to fix fucked up nations is "For God, King and Country"

and so 1000 blacks might just Vote for Me.

Blogger SirGroggy October 31, 2017 6:30 PM  

Color doesn't matter. Ideology does.

It's not really about color. On a strictly literal interpretation, we would tend to agree, the color of somebody's skin is of course of little importance.

What he is saying is that ethnicity does not matter, and the group of people making up the original nation do not matter.

He is saying that the people are interchangeable, the original Americans can be swapped out for Somalis or Mexicans, or in the case of England the English can be swapped out for Pakistanis and the Dutch can be swapped out for Moroccans.

What it really means is, Ben Shapiro doesn't care one iota if the original American people are replaced with a hodge-podge of random nationalities, as long as the 'new Americans' agree with Ben Shapiro politically.

The obvious truth is that since Ben Shapiro is not one of the original Americans himself, he has rather a vested interest in making sure that the original American people are replaceable.

I would like to see Ben Shapiro travel the world and give speeches to the Japanese about how being Japanese doesn't matter and the population of Japan should be replaced with Ethiopians, or for that matter Chinese, because 'why not?' since it just 'doesn't matter'.

Blogger TM Lutas October 31, 2017 6:37 PM  

@181 Azure Amaranthine - In other words, you're coatracking your personal issues with jews while I'm actually discussing the post and don't really know you well enough to have an opinion about you or care about your obsessions. Thanks for resolving that, good talk.

@188 BBGKB - Which standard is relevant to the original observation about jewish majorities in Israel that was in the post? In your opinion, is it your proposed one drop rules or the "marry a Cohen" standard? And how do you know Ben Shapiro's standards on the matter?

Blogger SirHamster October 31, 2017 6:44 PM  

VD wrote:The parable of the Good Samaratan defined neighbor as anyone in need who you came across.

It did nothing of the sort. That is a blatant lie. It defined a neighbor as anyone who comes across you in need and helps you.


VD is correct on who is defined as the neighbor.

Jesus: "Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?"

Answer: "The one who had mercy on him."

Jesus: "Go and do likewise."


The Christian has a particular command here, however, to be like the Samaritan. There is nothing here about the Samaritan having received mercy from the robbed man. The Samaritan was not his neighbor by that definition. Yet in choosing to show mercy, he became neighbor to the robbed man. The Christian is to create neighbors through mercy.

This command flips the previous question of "Who is my neighbor?" on its face - "Go be a neighbor."

Yet, consider the Samaritan's example carefully. He did not show mercy to the indifferent who passed by the wounded man. He did not show mercy to the robbers. He showed mercy to the victim of injustice.

That should sound familiar, because God desires justice and mercy from Man.

He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the LORD require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God.

Where a Ben Shapiro walks by the side of the road and shows indifference to Americans robbed of their inheritance by globalist elites, it is a Christian's duty to show mercy to the robbed and to bind those broken by injustice. Not to inflict injustice on the downtrodden.


It is not wrong to show mercy to all and to become a neighbor to all that one comes across, but learn to triage. There is no command to show equal mercy.

1 – 200 of 246 Newer› Newest»

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts