Sunday, December 24, 2017

Like a prince to the slaughter

It is increasingly evident that Meghan Markle is going to chew up Prince Harry before she spits him out and walks off with millions. She is a female superpredator - there are even fairly reliable rumors that she did an amount of escorting before her big television break - and he clearly has absolutely no idea what he is in for. I find it astonishing that the monarchy is permitting him to marry this woman even though there is almost no chance he'll ever get anywhere near the throne.
Prince Harry will not be taking part in the traditional royal Boxing Day shoot because he doesn't want to upset his fiancee Meghan Markle.

The 33-year-old was just 12 when he took part in his first festive shoot but has pulled out because Miss Markle is a keen animal rights campaigner.

Miss Markle, 36, doesn't like hunting and Prince Harry is said to have shocked gamekeepers at Sandringham after he informed them he won't be there on December 26.

Instead, his brother Prince William, 35, and 69-year-old father Prince Charles, will take part in the shoot. A royal source told The Sun: 'The Boxing Day shoot was always going to be a tricky issue. Meghan is a keen animal rights campaigner and doesn't like hunting in any form. 'Harry loves it and has always been out there on Boxing Day. But if it means breaking with long-standing royal traditions to avoid upsetting her, so be it.
This promises to be the worst ending for an English royal since King Charles I met the headman. And, you may recall, that started with an unwise wedding too. It's just... embarrassing, really.

Labels: ,


Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother December 24, 2017 12:13 PM  

What a pussy

Blogger S1AL December 24, 2017 12:13 PM  

"My wife/girlfriend doesn't like it when..." may be the most destructive rationale of our era.

Blogger MendoScot December 24, 2017 12:14 PM  

I knew it was going this way when they scheduled the wedding for FA Cup Final day.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother December 24, 2017 12:19 PM  

Is it a Fall wedding? Abomination.

Blogger Miss Carnivorous December 24, 2017 12:20 PM  

She has the magic hoo hoo!

Anonymous bearspaw December 24, 2017 12:26 PM  

@4 FA Cup is usually in late May...

Blogger Dave December 24, 2017 12:32 PM  

How long before they announce he'll be taking her name?

Anonymous Ivan Throne December 24, 2017 12:33 PM  

I am aghast enough at this engagement that, out of respect for the Royal family, I will circumspectly shut up and make no further comment.



Blogger pyrrhus December 24, 2017 12:35 PM  

Utterly pathetic...Harry needs to be removed from the line of succession.

Blogger Ransom Smith December 24, 2017 12:40 PM  

It's really a wonder to me how little of Philip's genes seem to have passed on to the successive generations.

Blogger Wuzzums Fuzzums December 24, 2017 12:42 PM  

36 years old. Pretty. No career. No prospects for acting. Unmarried.

It was either some Prince Harry or a Harvey Weinstein for a person like her. She chose the better option and will probably bail out after a newer model sets her eyes on Harry. With a considerable amount of money. Or will get suddenly pregnant once she senses competition incoming.

Anonymous Anonymous December 24, 2017 12:45 PM  

It will be a disaster. But they did it to themselves, again.

I'm old enough to know that this is all self-correcting in the end. It may be a few years or a few centuries.
But it usually involves quite a bit of blood.

Anonymous TD December 24, 2017 12:49 PM  

She likes herself some hunting, but she already got her prey.

Blogger McChuck December 24, 2017 12:50 PM  

Oh, come on, he's marrying a foreign mulatto Jewish Progressive Marxist globalist feminist divorcee. What could possibly go wrong?

Blogger Wormwood December 24, 2017 12:51 PM  

Preggers within the six months. She has to put the lock down on those royal resources and title.

Anonymous Brick Hardslab December 24, 2017 12:52 PM  

This is completely unacceptable. If it was enough to take a prince out of the running to marry a divorcee before it should be the same now.

Despite his service he lacks self-confidence. He needs an English girl about ten years his Jr. Not an American, 'escort'.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother December 24, 2017 12:52 PM  

Why can't Harry marry Kate's sister?
She's in her thirties but at least she's hot, white and English.

Anonymous Causal Lurker December 24, 2017 12:54 PM  

Harry, the performance artist formerly known as a prince.

Blogger Astrosmith December 24, 2017 12:54 PM  

Well, Philip is not his grandfather, because Charles is not his father.

Anonymous John Piper December 24, 2017 12:55 PM  

He is a good Christian real man marrying those sluts

Blogger Nakota Publishing December 24, 2017 12:57 PM  

God save the royal cuck!

Blogger Eric Slate December 24, 2017 12:57 PM  

I thought that Prince Harry was supposed to be the alpha one, that Diana got the genes for by sleeping around....

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother December 24, 2017 12:58 PM  

He's a faggot

Anonymous a deplorable rubberducky December 24, 2017 1:00 PM  

Depressing. It used to be said openly don't marry a foreigner, and don't marry interracial, but that was deemed impolitic. So the wisdom behind those thoughts got ignored, and now has to be learned all over. All you need is love, right? But those guys who wrote that had just dropped acid.

Blogger Alan December 24, 2017 1:05 PM  

The fact that she owns a rescue dog is a HUGE warning sign.

Blogger Thucydides December 24, 2017 1:07 PM  

Rather sad, considering as "Mr. Wales" he has a well earned reputation for service and bravery in the front lines of combat.

His uncle Prince Andrew had a similar story, brave Royal Navy pilot (he served in the Falkland Islands war flying a helicopter towing a giant freaking radar reflector behind an aircraft carrier to draw away antiship missiles), but his marriage turned into a disaster.

Anonymous Steve December 24, 2017 1:07 PM  

It's really a wonder to me how little of Philip's genes seem to have passed on to the successive generations.

Yarp. Philip is an impressive man, a textbook alpha male and apparently no slouch in the cranial department either. Queen Elizabeth isn't a genius or anything, but she seems to have solid common sense.

Their kids are all horribly disappointing.

Speaking of Charles I, I highly recommend CROMWELL (1970). Splendid turn from Alec Guinness as the ill-fated (but admirable in his own stubborn, stupid way) monarch, while Richard Harris brings the eponymous butcher/hero to shouty, scenery-chewing life.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother December 24, 2017 1:08 PM  

A great man bears no seed. WTF happened with Prince Charles? Recessive inter royal family inbreeding mutation rears its jug eared head?

Blogger Wuzzums Fuzzums December 24, 2017 1:11 PM  

I don't understand why people are actually upset. The royal family is getting its just deserts which is entertaining, and the weakling contender to the throne has been ousted which is great news on a political level.

Personally I have more respect for her than the royal family. She just outplayed them all. A person acting in its own self interest is far less dangerous than a true believer in a position of power.

Anonymous Paula December 24, 2017 1:12 PM  

Theo, I'm curious if you've read Josephine Armistead's Silicon Ideology?

Blogger Lovekraft December 24, 2017 1:13 PM  

Well, if this aversion to hunting follows its course, the Muslim slaughter of animals (halal) should be on the review list. Give her what she wants, then amplify it.

Blogger TontoBubbaGoldstein December 24, 2017 1:16 PM  

TBG sure hopes our Dark Lord and AWCA is not concerned that posting an NFL thread will upset Spacebunny.


Anonymous JAG December 24, 2017 1:19 PM  

Astrosmith wrote:Well, Philip is not his grandfather, because Charles is not his father.

Surprisingly close to the lyrics of Shaq rap song in the 1990s.

"Phillip is my father,

because my biological didn't bother."

Anyways, pussy-whipped is the diagnosis for Prince Harry.

Anonymous Jonathan December 24, 2017 1:25 PM  

Who would have thought that marrying a near 40, divorced, black-jew, hardcore feminist was a bad idea?

Anonymous Charlottesvillain December 24, 2017 1:29 PM  

Silly boy.

Blogger papabear December 24, 2017 1:35 PM  

What a disaster.

Blogger Silly but True December 24, 2017 1:38 PM  


More like still doing, but just the price is a bit higher.

Anonymous Just another commenter December 24, 2017 1:41 PM  

Wow. That's just pathetic.

Sadly, it's also not that uncommon.

Blogger JACIII December 24, 2017 1:46 PM  

Women like Meghan are for freak f**ks. Nothing more. The older woman must have really put it on the boy.

Blogger VD December 24, 2017 1:48 PM  

More like still doing, but just the price is a bit higher.

That's very clever, equating escorting with marriage. How very astute of you! Obviously the two relationships - client/escort vs man/wife - are almost exactly the same thing... if you're a bitter involuntary celibate man.

Blogger Silly but True December 24, 2017 1:58 PM  

You've taken metaphor in the wrong direction: I was equating a sham marriage with escorting for the escort.

Blogger kmbr December 24, 2017 1:59 PM  

**The older woman must have really put it on the boy.**

The turn it on, turn it off porn star routine.

And they always turn it off when they get what they were after.

Anonymous Sam the Man December 24, 2017 2:03 PM  

My wife mentioned that Harry did not go to the boxing day shooting event last year. No idea if that is true.

Now I have known my share of combat vets who still liked shooting, but would not hunt.

Not defending the Girl it is the most odd match since Edward gave up the throne, just saying might be his choice. That said the press is saying it was to avoid upsetting the girl in which case he really is kind of P-whipped.

Blogger cheddarman December 24, 2017 2:10 PM  

Pathetic that the English, Scottish, Welsh, Cornish and N. Irish people allow this from Harry.

Anonymous Tyson December 24, 2017 2:15 PM  


My dad couldn't hunt deer after Vietnam, but had no problem with quail and dove.

I have some pity for Harry since a woman of his brother's wife calibre is hard to find even as a prince.

Blogger Jeff aka Orville December 24, 2017 2:16 PM  

The fact that she owns a rescue dog is a HUGE warning sign.

Probably a pit bull and I'll bet she has some nasty tats somewhere too.

Blogger VD December 24, 2017 2:17 PM  

You've taken metaphor in the wrong direction: I was equating a sham marriage with escorting for the escort.

It's not a sham marriage. It would be far less of a problem if it was.

Anonymous Bellator Mortalis December 24, 2017 2:39 PM  

As an American, my ancestors helped us break free from the British Crown more then 2 centuries ago. So whatever they do, is of little matter.

Anonymous Looking Glass December 24, 2017 2:48 PM  

This is going to end poorly, though we already knew that.

Blogger Koanic December 24, 2017 2:49 PM  

Royals should embody the spirit of the nation. I think he's doing that admirably.

Blogger SteelPalm December 24, 2017 2:51 PM  


Black privilege is definitely a thing, especially the way black government officials view their position.

Anonymous Godfrey December 24, 2017 2:57 PM  

Restore the Stuarts. Down with the Hanoverian pretenders. They were a farce from the beginning.

Anonymous Napoleon 12pdr December 24, 2017 3:08 PM  

Dump her, Harry! You can still save yourself! And everyone around you!

You know a woman is trouble when she objects to her man's wholesome hobbies. It's an act of control and domination.

I recollect hearing that Prince William bought his wife a Swaroski (yes, probably misspelled) spotting scope. Tier 1 kit...and there's got to be an interesting story to it.

Blogger Robert Pinkerton December 24, 2017 3:13 PM  

Perdita est Britannia in morte aeterna.

Blogger Tatooine Sharpshooters' Club December 24, 2017 3:14 PM  

She can't care that much about "animal rights", what with publicly ripping the balls right off of a sad, motherless little puppy like that.

Anonymous Godfrey December 24, 2017 3:16 PM  

The emasculated boy Prince.

Blogger Ransom Smith December 24, 2017 3:17 PM  

Restore the Stuarts. Down with the Hanoverian pretenders. They were a farce from the beginning.
Bring back the Stuarts
Bring back the Angevins

Blogger DonReynolds December 24, 2017 3:28 PM  

I wish Prince Harry well in the coming years. He always wanted to be the bad boy and with the Brits, what could be more bad boy than with a black girlfriend?

I will not be the first to predict that he will take his own life unexpectedly.

Blogger tweell December 24, 2017 3:29 PM  

The problem is that Harry has picked up too much from his military service, including the choice of wife.

Whiskey Mike, Mark 1 Mod 69 Sierra Series. NATO classification is “Stripper”. Has all the same features of the Bimbo series, but it can hold down a job in the entertainment industry.

Blogger Bradford Walker December 24, 2017 3:37 PM  

If the Royal Family really cared, they'd either buy her off or (more likely) bump her off.

They don't care. They are letting her prey upon Harry. They already wrote him off, and informally cut him out of the line of succession; their lack of action about this is the tell.

Blogger swiftfoxmark2 December 24, 2017 3:38 PM  

Geez, you'd think she'd tell to stop attending the Freemason meetings or something....

Blogger tublecane December 24, 2017 3:39 PM  

@23-Royals used to marry foreigners all the time. Harry's grandmother did. Prince Philip is Greek and Danish, and at the same time second-cousin to his wife, I think. So plenty of boarder-jumping there.

But now that they marry commoners, there's no reason why Harry shouldn't find him an English Rose.

Anonymous Anonymous December 24, 2017 3:41 PM  

Who cares. He's far off in the line of succession anyway.

Blogger Stilicho December 24, 2017 3:48 PM  

Prince Phillip: dammit, Harry, the phrase is "you have to go back"... not "black"

Blogger tublecane December 24, 2017 3:48 PM  

@59-"or (more likely) bump her off."

That's what I was thinking. Don't the royals "know people?" Aren't they connected to, if not part of, the NWO? Don't they have any vampire-pedophile-international conspiracy juice?

If Harry's weak, there's no reason he'd need to go down or bring his family down with him, no matter how ensorcelled he is. The fact that they're letting it happen means they probably think it will be beneficial. Show the world that they're "with it," or whatever.

Anonymous Avalanche December 24, 2017 3:48 PM  

@5 "She has the magic hoo hoo!"

Aw, come on-- he has access to nearly every hoo hoo in the Empire!!

Or, perhaps, as Katie Hopkins (great British trouble-maker) described a sign she saw at a "pussy march": "My vagina is made of steel." Perhaps Markle has just such a sign?

Anonymous rotekz December 24, 2017 3:58 PM  

Harry is the son of James Hewitt, not Charles. Therefore the establishment does not care who he marries as he will never sit on the throne no matter what happens. He's being allowed to buy the Royal Family progressive points to maintain popularity with those that might otherwise be anti-monarchy.

Blogger Red Bane December 24, 2017 3:58 PM  

Maybe if she steps out of line they will just to a Diana on her?

Anonymous Dick Enberg December 24, 2017 3:58 PM  

he has access to nearly every hoo hoo in the Empire!!

Oh my! Let me tell you though, not every hoo hoo is magic!

Blogger vorlos December 24, 2017 4:02 PM  

We care. My ancestors fought in the Continental Army with Gen Washington too. But we share the history, language, heritage and religion. Further, England is the symbol of the West. She is the mother country. Harry and the royals are now traitorous enemies. They have chosen sides. We are the west. They are anti. Charles I the lot. England belongs to us.

Blogger Stilicho December 24, 2017 4:02 PM  

The Brits just want a magic mulatto of their own... bless their hearts

Anonymous Avalanche December 24, 2017 4:04 PM  

@16 "Why can't Harry marry Kate's sister?"

Sentence that pretty girl to lie back and think of England for the REST OF HER LIFE!?!? How cruel you are!!

Anonymous Avalanche December 24, 2017 4:10 PM  

@43 "Pathetic that the English, Scottish, Welsh, Cornish and N. Irish people allow this from Harry."

You mean all 214 of them left on the islands?
You can bet all the CURRENT residents of Londonistan think it's amazing and great!

Anonymous Avalanche December 24, 2017 4:15 PM  

@63 "If Harry's weak, there's no reason he'd need to go down or bring his family down with him, no matter how ensorcelled he is. The fact that they're letting it happen means they probably think it will be beneficial. Show the world that they're "with it," or whatever. "

Next the big wedding. And THEN the plane crash, and the country will "draw together in their grief" and "onward Anglican soldier!"

Blogger Snidely Whiplash December 24, 2017 4:25 PM  

Ransom Smith wrote:It's really a wonder to me how little of Philip's genes seem to have passed on to the successive generations.
It's generally considered that he has none of Phillips genes.

Blogger tublecane December 24, 2017 4:32 PM  

By the way, I've heard more than one person claim Markle "passes" as white. Why has "passes" been defined down to "is less black than Wesley Snipes?" She's quite apparently of mixed race, at least. Though people may guess some variety of brown.

A similar redefinition is used in judging whether women "pass" as men, and vice-versa. I was going to say thanks to World War T, but I think PC says a person passes if they identify as something, end of debate. Even if they look like Dick Butkus in lipstick and a skirt.

Anyway, for those a bit behind Current Year strictures there's been a redefinition of gender "passing" similar to that for racial passing. You pass if you're slightly more feminine or masculine for your sex, rather than being easily mistaken for the opposite sex.

Sup wit dat?

Blogger Matrick December 24, 2017 4:35 PM  

People who think that Harry isn't the son of Charles haven't taken the time to compare his photos to Prince Philip in his younger days.

Blogger liberranter December 24, 2017 4:52 PM  

Maybe the Queen will decree "that slut will NOT wear white at her wedding! Otherwise there will be no wedding!"

Blogger Dan Kurt December 24, 2017 5:14 PM  

re: "It's really a wonder to me how little of Philip's genes seem to have passed on to the successive generations." Ransom Smith

Perhaps it is because Harry is not related to Philip but is the bastard of a fling between his mother and a chauffeur, James Hewitt.

Dan Kurt

Anonymous Ominous Cowherd December 24, 2017 5:32 PM  

If your woman isn't into your hobbies, she's not into you.

Blogger U PC BRO? December 24, 2017 5:34 PM  

@16 "Why can't Harry marry Kate's sister?"

She (Pippa) already married her beta orbiter. A rich cuck who waited until she was done with the carousel. I'm sure they are very happy.

Anonymous SAK December 24, 2017 5:38 PM  

England belongs to us.

England belongs to the English. Nobody else.

And most defintely not to the descendents of people who through hard fight and bloodshed declared their independence from England and her royalty.

Anonymous Daniel December 24, 2017 5:49 PM  

Pussy-whipped beta. Pray for him.

Blogger Koanic December 24, 2017 5:53 PM  

The Bible says that the land belongs to God, not man. England has turned from God to embrace atheism, and now demonstrates just how bad atheists are at evolution. Allahu akbar.

Blogger Matrick December 24, 2017 6:01 PM  

Stop repeating rubbish and actually take the time to look at the people whom you're commenting about.
Compared to Prince Philip:

Anonymous BBGKB December 24, 2017 6:18 PM  

he has access to nearly every hoo hoo in the Empire!!

Weka has informed me that all the good marriageable women are hiding in a crossfit in New Zealand

Who would have thought that marrying a near 40, divorced, black-jew, hardcore feminist was a bad idea?

I would never have considered it.

Blogger vorlos December 24, 2017 6:30 PM  

England belongs to all her descendants. We fought George and had disagreements, but never gave up our ancient heritage. England belongs to us. Remove this lot and reclaim England.

Anonymous SAK December 24, 2017 6:54 PM  

England belongs to all her descendants. We fought George and had disagreements, but never gave up our ancient heritage.

Oh, I see, declaring independence didn't mean independence, but instead a continuation of the fullness of a heritage that includes loyalty to King and Country. Fine, present your terms for the return of the thirteen colonies and all they have come to possess. I am not sure they will be accepted, but if you beg hard enough they might be.

Although I must say, I find this all very surprising and very unlike anything I would expect from Americans. I had always thought you were happy to accept both that American's do not own England and that the English do not own America. It's the kind of mutual respect that allows us to get along.

Blogger vorlos December 24, 2017 7:40 PM  

Sak, you must never have met a genuine American. It is not about "ownership" rather a shared heritage. These "royals" are simply placeholders and need removal as they have betrayed us.

Blogger SteelPalm December 24, 2017 7:54 PM  

Vorlos is either an idiot or a liar. Englishmen are not Americans, and Americans sure as fuck don't own Britain, nor does the British government or their royal inbreds owe America a goddamn thing.

Funny that despite Vox rightfully railing against the stupidity various pan-white movements, we still have fools believing in this soft form of globalism. It never works, because while Americans and Brits are closer than Americans and Chinese, they're still two distinct peoples.

Blogger vorlos December 24, 2017 7:59 PM  

Two distinct people with a shared heritage. That is fact.

Anonymous Ghost Who Walks December 24, 2017 8:14 PM  

In my neck of the woods, it is said that many escorts own rescue dogs.

Blogger Akulkis December 24, 2017 8:21 PM  

...or she meets with a mysterious demise, which Scotland Yard will testify was totally a legit accidental suicide.

Anonymous SAK December 24, 2017 8:33 PM  

It is not about "ownership" rather a shared heritage.

Two distinct people with a shared heritage.

If that is all you had ever said, then I suspect SteelPalm would not be, at least for this, calling you: "an idiot or a liar". Which is nice follow-up to Lazarus's remark a few days ago: "What about, you know, other men who think you [vorlos] are a dickhead."

Blogger vorlos December 24, 2017 8:45 PM  

Sak, you have become incoherent. Just another C-man loser. You have no response worth posting. Try to keep up.

Blogger Cataline Sergius December 24, 2017 8:48 PM  

American buccaneers used to have the brains to try and fit in when they married for a title.

Admittedly they used to come from the ranks of the American nouveau riche so brains and drive were part of the equation. Clearly not the case with Meghan.

This is the first (public) step of Meghan's driving a wedge between William and Harry.

Blogger Michael Neal December 24, 2017 9:19 PM  

I am descended from the Plantagenets both on my family tree and DNA testing confirm, also shared my 15th great grandfather with George Washington, my 10th cousin. There are many like me with similar lineage, almost anyone with early family ties to Americas founding.

Blogger vorlos December 24, 2017 9:30 PM  

Yes, we share a common and great heritage. I detest the ruination now before us.

Blogger Tuatha December 24, 2017 9:37 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger weka December 24, 2017 9:41 PM  

He's as far from the kind of succession as Alexandria Victoria was in 1825. Then royals havento do.what th Govt says, and they want this.

It will not.end well.

Blogger Tuatha December 24, 2017 9:46 PM  


Greetings potential comrade, let me introduce you to a new form of nationalism known as American Futurism.

It is a movement devoid of any prior misunderstanding on the truth of the U.S.A as a mere corporation posing as a nation built upon the demonic counter-tradition of freemasonic lies and philosophical egalitarianism. It is the guide to the creation of a real nation of kin and kith that is independent of any and all previous failures such as the church, democracy, the enlightenment and the concept of basic human rights.


Anonymous Iron Spartan December 24, 2017 10:25 PM  

So when this turns into a flaming train wreck, whats the over/under that the British media blames Harry for all the fallout?

Blogger vorlos December 24, 2017 11:29 PM  

The queen permitted it as she permitted the destruction of England. It would appear the sell out of our people is for shekels a la the Kardashians with the establishment of the marketable black lineage connected to them. This is nothing short of treason against our heritage and people. Is England really going to permit this trashing of the West? Bad enough we are brainless consumers instead of citizens, but to see England go is not to be borne.

Blogger Thucydides December 25, 2017 1:27 AM  

I'd go for the Tudors myself, if there are still any sufficiently clear bloodlines that can be traced back to Henry VIII
The Lancastrians are a bot more problematic. Henry V was a great monarch, but his line petered out after him

Blogger zsxd02 December 25, 2017 2:26 AM  

Very helpful tips to help in website design.
แทงบอล sbobet

sbobet mobile


Blogger Wynn Lloyd December 25, 2017 4:11 AM  

When it comes to Britain, I imagine most Anglo-Celtic Americans see the U.K. and England specifically as a distinct but related nation (obviously).
Kind of like close cousins. You probably won't mortgage your house to get your cousin out of jail, but a few hundred for bail is easy enough.

We don't have any rights or responsibilities regarding England, but we don't want it to sink into the ocean, either.
That's true for all white nations. We even have sentiments for non-white countries like Japan, Israel, Taiwan, Columbia, Chile, Kurdistan (one day, lol), but but obviously we don't acknowledge them as part of the same unit.

If I had to choose yes or no, I'd choose for the British to revive their power and dominate Europe, even though I would not want to risk a single grain of our sovereignty. They're closer to us than any other European nation so it's only natural to want them to prosper. Also, there's a little bit of latent hostility to one's ancestral homeland falling to invaders. I know a guy of Italian heritage who always depressed after traveling to Italy and seeing so many invaders, even though he is a patriotic American of a fourth or fourth th generation,I think.

This is the bigger issue, though; who has uglier women- the USA, U.K., Australia, Canada, N.Z., S.A., etc?
Tough call. Anglosphere women are the lowest in feminine charms on Earth, imho.

Blogger Gordon Scott December 25, 2017 8:34 AM  

I always thought that Harry was the bastard of Hewitt. But if you look at the timing, it doesn't match up. And he really does look like his grandfather.

It is a shame. Aussie author John Birmingham had an alternate history wherein Harry joined the SAS and had a successful career. Mind you, Birmingham is pretty much a SJW lefty, so....

Blogger Gordon Scott December 25, 2017 8:45 AM  

It's also worth remembering that his grandmother and head of the firm, Betty Battenberg, is over 90. She's tired, and doesn't feel like pushing the way she might have years ago. She and her advisers tried to manage things with her kids, and all but Eddie wound up in divorce court. Let Harry have his Hollywood trollop. By the time it goes bad, I'll be Charles' problem.

Anonymous Sim1776 December 25, 2017 12:19 PM  

Exactly. He's like 4th or 5th in line of succession now. The Royals are looking to buy multi-culti points. Kates pregnant again, I believe, so that will push Harry back even farther.

Anonymous Sim1776 December 25, 2017 12:23 PM  

The cuck probably likes to watch...

Blogger vorlos December 25, 2017 3:37 PM  

Wynn, srsly? Africa, Asia has better looking? Better looking what. Our genetics are sought after world wide and nobody spends thousands on cosmetic surgery to look Asian or black. Who do you think everyone pays to look like? Answer: whites.

Anonymous Stan Adams December 25, 2017 7:24 PM  

I couldn't agree more. Americans should stay out of English affairs, and vice versa.

The British Empire was the ultimate globalist enterprise. Invade the World and Invite the World are flip sides of the same coin.

(Why are Indians allowed to dominate the American tech industry? Because they're from the "Anglosphere.")

My goal, both for myself and for my country, is to secure as much autonomy and independence as possible. As an American, I refuse to recognize any foreign national's claim to my loyalty, my obedience, and/or my respect. I don't care if that national is the Queen of England or the Last King of Scotland (Idi Amin).

As for the claim that the Queen is my cousin, I have plenty of dingbat SJW relatives in my family, and I sure as hell don't let them tell me what to do or how to think. I don't care if you're my twin brother or my clone. My mind is my own.

I believe the United States is already massively over-centralized. Why should I want to see the U.S. subsumed into a new British Empire?

In practical terms, the "special relationship" is merely a power-sharing arrangement between various globalist factions in Washington and London. (Did British hearts swell with pride when Blair joined in on Bush's little adventures in Iraq and Afghanistan?)

How strenuously has the Queen objected, publicly, to the invasion of her homeland and the wholescale replacement of her people? What has she done to secure a stable future for her kind? Her private feelings aside, has she done anything for native Brits other than to preside over their displacement?

Roosevelt and Churchill famously bridged the Atlantic to win the war. But then the winners on both sides of the pond got to work selling out their peoples. One wonders whether all European peoples might not have been better off allowing the Axis side to win.

Blogger Nate73 December 26, 2017 12:11 AM  

Is it still alpha if you let your wife buy and pick all your clothes? I think that's what we'll see next.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts