ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2018 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Friday, May 11, 2018

Mailvox: the nations of Heaven

A longtime regular concurs with my post on identity and expands the indictment to include all the cuckservatives and Churchians who claim to be opposing the Left on various details while submitting to them on the whole.
You are spot on with your identity post.

What infuriates me isn't the Left and SJWs trying to obliterate the past, but the cucks and Churchians who go along with it. The stupidist part of the whole thing is that they clearly see all of the old institutions have been destroyed, and most large Evangelical churches are now little more than personality cults surrounding popular pastors, BUT they utterly refuse to follow the logic back to institutions because of racism, identity politics, and their love of losing. I'm convinced they love to lose as it proves their piety and dedication.

The Alt-Right is inevitable because it is literally the only alternative going forward.

The worst of the Churchians are globalists who literally want to destroy nations in their vision of a multi-ethnic Christian ideal. When it's clear from the Bible that God values nations and even mentions people from all nations in Revelations. Think about this: we will no longer be identified by being married in heaven, but WILL be by nation.
If you are treating your wife as if she is the Holy Mother of God and both your nation and your culture as if it they are things which do not merit your pride, then you are taking a very, very perverse approach to life.

Labels: , , ,

58 Comments:

Blogger Ledford Ledford May 11, 2018 11:08 AM  

"I'm convinced they love to lose as it proves their piety and dedication."

This is also an easy out for lazy people. Don't ask me how I know this.

Blogger CM May 11, 2018 11:12 AM  

And the priests render to Caesar what is God's.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother May 11, 2018 11:31 AM  

This message is Chuck Norris approved.

Blogger Sweep the Leg May 11, 2018 11:32 AM  

Been seeing the same thing. I had a gentleman who operates a large Christian homeless shelter/ministry in my area suggest that Christians should not oppose the tearing down of Southern War Memorials, and that those who did were just unwilling to own up to past sins and were fearful of what the future may look like.

I was the only one in our group to counter his argument and challenge his acceptance of lawlessness for the sake of his virtue signalling. After, people privately tell me they agree, but wouldn't speak up.

It's either many Christians are caught in the zeitgeist or are afraid to say anything about it. Both sad.

Blogger Iskander Magnus May 11, 2018 11:47 AM  

The wooolly thinking is pervasive even among “tight” evangelicals. See http//:truthandtidings.com/2018/04/a-Christian-worldview-race-racism-and-reality/ by Dr AJ Higgins. Omits just about all positive Biblical data in favour of national identity being a constructive thing.

Blogger Solaire Of Astora May 11, 2018 12:01 PM  

The first five verses of Micah chapter 4 are explicit in this regard. The nations exist after the Messiah rules the earth. I always thought nationalism was the default Christian position at least from a scriptural perspective. Weak minded people have been mentally abused into associating nationalism with extremism and evil.

Blogger pyrrhus May 11, 2018 12:05 PM  

Furthermore, there can be no civilization with the Nations...An amorphous mob of grifters seeking only their own short term benefit couldn't even organize a scout troop.

Blogger pyrrhus May 11, 2018 12:05 PM  

"without" the nations

Blogger August May 11, 2018 12:06 PM  

When I first started reading lots of blogs- thanks to the now defunct Google reader- I had a lot of 'Christian' content, which eventually got whittled down because of this 'noble loser' nonsense. There was I think was called What's Wrong With the World, which definitely helped me form this idea, that they were there to lose and lose nobly.

But there were a lot of others. They couldn't go with Ron Paul, probably can't stand Trump, and wouldn't take any sort of non-approved chance to achieve objectives. More than one Republican governor should have been willing to risk jail over the years- assuming they believed in the constitution and/or Christ- but they didn't have the guts.

Blogger Rabbi B May 11, 2018 12:07 PM  

@3 Stg58/Animal Mother

This message is Chuck Norris approved.

Yes...but the real question is where standeth Jack Ward?

Blogger Durandel May 11, 2018 12:12 PM  

@Solaire - it was the default. The Modernists/Marxists have just been busy in the Church. If Catholic, look up the history of Liberation Theology (KGB made) and Bella Dodd’s testimony about getting Marxists into Catholic seminaries in the USA.

The Protestants just invited the toxin earlier, but the whole Western Church is infected with it.

Blogger select star May 11, 2018 12:19 PM  

"The indictment to include all the cuckservatives and Churchians who claim to be opposing the Left on various details while submitting to them on the whole."

Oh Vox that's just hate truth. /s Totally agree, sick of the cuckservatives and pseudo "Christians" though such conditions are not new. MPAI is a universal force that spans time and space.

Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?" - Matthew 12:46-50

Blogger OGRE May 11, 2018 12:24 PM  

@12 Durandel

precisely. Thats the basis of transmodernism, a marriage of marxism and spirituality..and especially trying to include elements of Christian theology whether real or perversions thereof. Dussel's "History and the Theology of Liberation" is a foundational work in the movement.

OpenID Überdeplorable Psychedelic Cat Grass May 11, 2018 12:29 PM  

To further your reader's point Vox, those that wish to tear down nations have forgotten about the Tower of Babel.

I got engaged within the last few weeks. Prior to that I was at a relative's house with my then gf.

To further your point Vox, one of my siblings said I should love my gf like Mary. I quoted Ephesians 5:21. Heads exploded. One of my in law's siblings asked me to repeat it twice. It only occurred to me that by the 2nd time he ask me to repeat it that he was wanting to troll everyone else.

The responses about wives submitting to their husbands were not surprising but obviously disappointing.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash May 11, 2018 1:05 PM  

@Uber
Congratualtions, may you have a fecund and happy marriage.
I presume you meant Ephesians 5:21-24.

I've seen 5:21 used as an excuse for the "mutual submission" heresy.

for context:
Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God. Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash May 11, 2018 1:07 PM  

Reading that again, it occurs to me that a lot a Churchians have the verse precise, yet exactly backwards. Just as they demand the husband submit to the wife, they demand Christ submit to His church.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash May 11, 2018 1:10 PM  

My wife points out that they demand that all men submit to all women just as they demand that Christ submit to all people.

Blogger Durandel May 11, 2018 1:15 PM  

@Snidley - yes, force Christ to submit to his bride, the Church, and then they force the Church to submit and confirmed to them. Hence why many now have a music concert in place of just worship, or female pastors, etc etc

Blogger Starboard May 11, 2018 1:21 PM  

17. Huh, interesting. I heard an evangelical woman posit that she is only required to submit to her husband rather than the second class citizen standing of submitting to all men.

Who would have thought that moderns would lack clarity? Yes, that's sarcasm. (So tempted to end with cheers and a smiley face, but I am not a troll; I am not a troll)

Blogger Al May 11, 2018 1:26 PM  

In spite of that apotheosis of the Judas Council (i.e., Second Vatican Council, 1962-65) known as Pope Francis the Groovy, there are actual Catholics who continue to embrace the hierarchy of reality. These actual Catholics are now known, since the Judas Council, as "traditional" Catholics. They may be found most abundantly in and associated with the SSPX, which enjoys the great honor of being branded by the (((perfidious SPLC))) as a "hate group." There's no one more real, more radical today than a "traditional" Catholic.

Bishop Richard Williamson was a leader of the SSPX for many years until he left after internecine squabbling. Nevertheless he remains an actual ("traditional") Catholic. Here are some of his words:

"Any inequality today is a horror. For the Catholic Church [the actual Catholic Church, not the post Second Vatican Council abomination represented by the perfidious likes of Pope Francis], it's not at all a horror. God has designed everything unequal, practically everything: the flowers, the animals, the plants, the mountains, the nations, the peoples, the races, the sexes, the individuals, everything in God's creation is unequal. What God plans is a great variety, and an order in the variety, with some things higher and some things lower. And St. Paul says in the Epistle to the Romans, 'Don't start questioning God on why he put this lower and put that higher.' It's like a building, that stone is lower than that stone and that stone is higher.... Compare blacks with whites, broadly speaking, blacks will be superior in some things and whites will be superior in others. But generally speaking, the blacks are lower down on the wall and the whites are meant to be higher up on the wall. That's just the way it is. That's the reality. When the whites stopped doing what they should be doing, which is leading the blacks, then...."

-Bp. Richard Williamson (2008 lecture on The Sillon, No. 3 in the Stockholm Conferences 2008 audio series at the St. Marcel Initiative website)

Blogger Ominous Cowherd May 11, 2018 1:30 PM  

Snidely, don't lump Ephesians 5:21 with the remainder of the chapter.

Ephesians 5:1-21 covers your behavior outside the household. It winds up with ``Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God,'' talking about our relations with fellow Christians outside our families.

Ephesians 5:22-33 covers our behavior within the family. It specifically instructs husbands and wives. Nothing to do with 5:21 and previous.

There can be no connection between 5:21 and 5:22-33, because if they cover the same topic, they contradict.

Blogger Al May 11, 2018 1:34 PM  

I would also give you this excerpt:

"For if they [Europeans] had kept the Faith of St. Paul, they would never have let themselves be deceived by the liberals' false equality and charity, which are no more than a parody of Christian equality and charity. St. Paul says, 'For as many of you as have been baptized in Christ, have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek: there is neither bond nor free: there is neither male nor female. For you are all one in Christ Jesus' (Gal. III, 27,28). Similarly, 'putting on the new man, him who is renewed unto knowledge, according to the image of Him who created him. Where there is neither Gentile nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian nor Scythian, bond nor free. But Christ is all, and in all' (Col. III, 10,11).

"Notice how in each of these quotations, St. Paul frames the equality of different human races, classes and sexes within Christ. In other words the equality is before God, and will only be fulfilled in Heaven. St Paul would never have dreamt of denying or wiping out the inequality of human differences before men. As to the inequality in this life between Jew and Greek, see Romans and Galatians; between bond and free, see Philemon; between man and woman, see Ephesians and Colossians. The will of God for men on earth is that Catholic save Jew, that the man free look after the bondsman and that the man be head of the woman. So when the white men give up on saving Jews, looking after other races and leading their womenfolk, it is altogether normal for them to be punished respectively by the domination of Jewish finance, by the refusal to follow of the non-white races and by rampant feminism.

"For by refusing Christ, these whites no longer understand the divine dimension of the true equality between men. Retaining however from Christianity, because it suits their pride, the sense of the value of every man, then all eternity's equality has to be squeezed into this little life on earth, where it necessarily crushes the hierarchies willed by God between races, classes, and sexes. So by affirming the equality of men without Christ and without eternal life, these white men betray alike Jew and bond and woman.

"In chronological order, before Christ, nobody in their senses would have dreamt of denying the inequality of different races, classes and sexes. When Christ came, nobody in their senses imagined that men's equality in Christ wiped out these differences, it transcended or rose above them. However post-Christian modern man, by refusing anything transcendent or anyone above him, has lost all grip on reality, and in all likelihood it will take rather more than a few thousand cars getting burnt for him to see straight once more."

-Bp. Williamson, "Thoughts," November 2005

Blogger Al May 11, 2018 1:36 PM  

Finally, I refer you to Chapter 10 of Fr. James Wathen's book entitled Who Shall Ascend? Chapter 10's title:

"The Myth of Equality"

Blogger Heian-kyo Dreams May 11, 2018 1:42 PM  

The local Catholic parish is more interested in se habla espanol and sending money to Central America than providing a spiritual refuge for the Americans that they guilt into paying for everything.

If you're a priest and advertise hablo espanol, you're part of the problem.

Blogger Uncle John's Band May 11, 2018 2:01 PM  

@ 19. Starboard

"Huh, interesting. I heard an evangelical woman posit that she is only required to submit to her husband rather than the second class citizen standing of submitting to all men."

So not marrying is the loophole. How Talmudic.


I wonder if churchians are so consumed with their own worthlessness as a people because on some level they know what they are. Peterson frames things in terms of being abased and worthless as well. So do certain branches of feminism and other "abject" gender studies. All are solipsistic liars.

Figuring out how to deal with unrealized or sublimated guilt and self-loathing ("avoidance" to use a classic buzzword) may be a step to breaking through to some of these unconscious traitors.

Blogger Al May 11, 2018 2:03 PM  

@24

Quite right. I'm talking about actual Catholics, now known as "traditional" Catholics, not stinking NeoCatholics fully processed by the Judas Council Revolution. No one is more red-pilled than actual, "traditional" Catholics.

OpenID bgkoranburner May 11, 2018 2:11 PM  

local Catholic parish is more interested in se habla espanol and sending money to Central America than providing a spiritual refuge for the Americans that they guilt into paying for everything

I went to a DieVerseCity festival at a college on Cino de May, & made the jews at the redistricting booth cry. After answering what to do with DACA families Jewy said "you must want the US to be a White Christian nation" I replied
"you are more realistic than evangelicals they think Mexicans who show up at church for handouts in Mexico will show up in US churches when taxpayers hand out more"

"I'm convinced they love to lose ... an easy out for lazy people

Blogger Lyon May 11, 2018 2:18 PM  

"Think about this: we will no longer be identified by being married in heaven, but WILL be by nation."

This is approaching the heart of the matter.

Thanks Vox for this provocative post. Nothing wrong with a little provocation, in line with Luke 12:51 and Matthew 10:34...

Do you think that I came here to bring peace on the earth? No, I tell you, but rather division.

Do not assume that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.

Blogger Starboard May 11, 2018 2:21 PM  

25 UJB: "I wonder if churchians are so consumed with their own worthlessness as a people because on some level they know what they are. Peterson frames things in terms of being abased and worthless as well. So do certain branches of feminism and other "abject" gender studies. All are solipsistic liars."

Their sense of worthlessness is off. When faced with the glory of our Lord, we know our own worthlessness, but we bask in the joy of being forgiven, and we leap to do the Lord's will in both gratitude and agreement.

Their sense of worthlessness results in despair or debasement, or even enjoying the debasement. The foot washing comes to mind. We are to serve each other and lift each other up, but how they "serve" suggests a fetish somehow. Eew. Pride in their own humility? Is there some perverse earthly positive reinforcement in submission, especially submission to those who hate you? It's off, but I'm not sure how.

Blogger Peter Gent May 11, 2018 2:25 PM  

Uncle John's Band wrote:So not marrying is the loophole. How Talmudic.
Not really, since then she is still under her father or brothers, if she has them.

Blogger Wolfman at Large May 11, 2018 2:30 PM  

It will be interesting to see how God divides the people into Nations. Will it be different than how people would think to divide themselves?

Blogger Ominous Cowherd May 11, 2018 2:35 PM  

Starboard wrote:17. Huh, interesting. I heard an evangelical woman posit that she is only required to submit to her husband rather than the second class citizen standing of submitting to all men.

That actually makes sense. Wives are to submit to their husbands, not to some other woman's husband.

As for ``second class citizen,'' women shouldn't be submissive to strange men, but they definitely need to sit down and shut up in public. A woman should remain under her father's authority until she marries. Women generally don't do well on their own.

Blogger Feather Blade May 11, 2018 2:39 PM  

Uncle John's Band wrote:@ 19. Starboard

"Huh, interesting. I heard an evangelical woman posit that she is only required to submit to her husband rather than the second class citizen standing of submitting to all men."

So not marrying is the loophole. How Talmudic.


Why on earth would you want your wife submitting to other men?

Blogger Dirk Manly May 11, 2018 2:43 PM  

@4

"I was the only one in our group to counter his argument and challenge his acceptance of lawlessness for the sake of his virtue signalling. After, people privately tell me they agree, but wouldn't speak up."

Next time you all get together, name the people who were so cowardly.

Show that cowardice will gain them nothing, other than the contempt that cowards always get regardless of which side they stand for.

Blogger Starboard May 11, 2018 2:55 PM  

32 OC "That actually makes sense. Wives are to submit to their husbands, not to some other woman's husband.

As for ``second class citizen,'' women shouldn't be submissive to strange men, but they definitely need to sit down and shut up in public..."

She was using not submitting to all men as an argument to not have to be quiet in public, specifically mixed bible study. Of course then we remember Paul and wonder why an evangelical woman who is sola scriptura would conveniently forget.

Ah well.

Blogger Colin Flaherty's baby momma May 11, 2018 3:00 PM  

1 Timothy 2
11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.
15 Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.

9 In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array;
10 But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works.

1 Corinthians 14
34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also saith the law.
35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.

Ephesians 5:22
"Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the Saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.

Colossians 3:18
Wives, submit to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord.

1 Peter 3
Wives, likewise, be submissive to your own husbands, that even if some do not obey the word, they, without a word, may be won by the conduct of their wives, 2 when they observe your chaste conduct accompanied by fear. 3 Do not let your adornment be merely outward—arranging the hair, wearing gold, or putting on fine apparel— 4 rather let it be the hidden person of the heart, with the incorruptible beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is very precious in the sight of God. 5 For in this manner, in former times, the holy women who trusted in God also adorned themselves, being submissive to their own husbands, 6 as Sarah obeyed Abraham, calling him lord, whose daughters you are if you do good and are not afraid with any terror.

Genesis 3
16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

Deuteronomy 22:5 “A woman shall not wear anything that pertains to a man, nor shall a man put on a woman’s garment, for all who do so are an abomination to the Lord your God.
20 But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel:
21 Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father's house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you.

Blogger Ominous Cowherd May 11, 2018 3:04 PM  

Starboard wrote:She was using not submitting to all men as an argument to not have to be quiet in public, specifically mixed bible study.

Ah, got it. So, where was her husband?

Blogger Colin Flaherty's baby momma May 11, 2018 3:06 PM  

Proverbs 21:9 It is better to dwell in a corner of the housetop, than with a brawling woman in a wide house.
Proverbs 21:19 It is better to dwell in the wilderness, than with a contentious and an angry woman.
Proverbs 25:24 It is better to dwell in the corner of the housetop, than with a brawling woman and in a wide house.
Proverbs 27:15 A continual dropping in a very rainy day and a contentious woman are alike.

Exodus 22:18
"Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live"

1 Timothy 5:5 The widow who is really in need and left all alone puts her hope in God and continues night and day to pray and to ask God for help. 6 But the widow who lives for pleasure is dead even while she lives.
8 But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.
Anyone who does not provide for their relatives, and especially for their own household, has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.
9 No widow may be put on the list of widows unless she is over sixty, has been faithful to her husband, 10 and is well known for her good deeds, such as bringing up children, showing hospitality, washing the feet of the Lord’s people, helping those in trouble and devoting herself to all kinds of good deeds.
11 As for younger widows, do not put them on such a list. For when their sensual desires overcome their dedication to Christ, they want to marry. 12 Thus they bring judgment on themselves, because they have broken their first pledge. 13 Besides, they get into the habit of being idle and going about from house to house. And not only do they become idlers, but also busybodies who talk nonsense, saying things they ought not to. 14 So I counsel younger widows to marry, to have children, to manage their homes and to give the enemy no opportunity for slander. 15 Some have in fact already turned away to follow Satan.

Blogger stevev May 11, 2018 3:09 PM  

Please forgive the OT request: Can anyone recommend a church in Austin that isn't centered on a personality AND/OR over-produced music "ministry" and worship leaders?

Blogger Starboard May 11, 2018 3:23 PM  

37. OC - exactly. But what if he thinks she should be leading a mixed bible study? Sounds like a Churchian trap.

36/38 CFBM -yep. Now post the verses that cover the husband's duties to wife, children, and family.

Blogger select star May 11, 2018 3:27 PM  

"Please forgive the OT request: Can anyone recommend a church in Austin that isn't centered on a personality AND/OR over-produced music "ministry" and worship leaders?"

When it comes to cities like Austin relocation is probably your best option.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother May 11, 2018 3:40 PM  

Little Vine Primitive Baptist Church

915 E 52nd St
Austin, TX

http://www.littlevinepbc.org/

OpenID bgkoranburner May 11, 2018 3:40 PM  

Can anyone recommend a church in Austin that isn't centered on a personality AND/OR over-produced music "ministry" and worship leaders?

You can't swing a dead cat in Austin without hitting a couple of _______

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother May 11, 2018 3:42 PM  

Oak Hill Primitive Baptist Church

11408 FM 1826
Austin, TX

www.oakhillpbc.org

Blogger stevev May 11, 2018 3:56 PM  

Awesome! Thanks STG58/Animal Mother. bgkoranburner, wha???
select star, thanks, I guess... :-)

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother May 11, 2018 3:58 PM  

Stevev,

No women preachers, deacons, or song leaders. Guaranteed. Tell the pastor at Little Vine, Mark Richards, hello for me.

Blogger SciVo May 11, 2018 4:30 PM  

Incidentally, as anticipated, the Democrats were unable to maintain their hysteria indefinitely. Adrenal exhaustion took longer than I hoped, but shorter than I feared; it happened in plenty of time for unpromising polls to make their discouragement self-reinforcing in the run-up to the midterm elections.

All those reporters -- which is to say, Democrat operatives with bylines and lavalier mics -- were apparently expecting Trump to be on impeachment trial by now, and totally blew the medium-term strategy of emotional manipulation. This fails to disconfirm my suspicion that they were fooling themselves as much as anyone else. It's schadenfreudelicious!

Blogger Dire Badger May 11, 2018 4:30 PM  

There is no passage in the bible which contains the word 'compromise'.

Compromising with evil is evil. Simply a lesser evil than wholehearted support. God did not call upon us to choose the lesser evil.

Blogger Dire Badger May 11, 2018 4:46 PM  

I seriously would ask everyone who regularly comments on this blog, and considers themselves a Christian... When was the last time you bore your testimony to the Tranny, the Jew, the Liberal, the Pagan, or the Atheist? When was the last time you seriously tried, one on one, to get them to see the truth? I don't mean arguing online, I mean actually placing yourself within conversational distance?

I am not so great at it myself, but I do know that all people who call themselves Christian, regardless of denomination, Catholic, Mormon, Protestant, or otherwise, is called upon to do a LOT more than simply 'defend' Christianity.

Blogger Dire Badger May 11, 2018 4:48 PM  

BTW that was a rhetorical question. I don't need people to reply.

Blogger Al May 11, 2018 5:14 PM  

@49

Today's reigning diabolical disorientation has reached the point that their ears are stopped up and their eyes do not see. Attempting to argue with those who have abandoned rationality is an exercise in futility. We're commanded not to throw pearls to swine. They're reprobates, and in the most strictly technical sense of that word; that is, they've placed themselves beyond reach.

Blogger Laramie Hirsch May 11, 2018 5:29 PM  

Vox, write a book on these fake right-wingers, and call them out by name! Even a short one would be enough to raise awareness.

Blogger Uncle John's Band May 11, 2018 5:46 PM  

@ 32. Ominous Cowherd

"That actually makes sense. Wives are to submit to their husbands, not to some other woman's husband."

Good point. I was thinking about her justification for assuming authority within the church and completely missed the inter-familial implications.

Blogger Dire Badger May 11, 2018 7:52 PM  

Al wrote:@49

Today's reigning diabolical disorientation has reached the point that their ears are stopped up and their eyes do not see. Attempting to argue with those who have abandoned rationality is an exercise in futility. We're commanded not to throw pearls to swine. They're reprobates, and in the most strictly technical sense of that word; that is, they've placed themselves beyond reach.


So did Saul.

Blogger Ominous Cowherd May 11, 2018 9:05 PM  

Dire Badger wrote:@49... they've placed themselves beyond reach

So did Saul.


God dealt with Saul. God must deal with the modern reprobates.

Blogger Ariadne Umbrella May 11, 2018 11:32 PM  

Bethany Lutheran Church
3701 Slaughter Lane
Austin, Texas

Missouri Synod,

Haven't been in a few years, though.

Blogger The Rev May 12, 2018 12:10 AM  

Truth here.

Blogger SciVo May 12, 2018 4:01 AM  

stevev wrote:bgkoranburner, wha???

Faggots. You can't swing a dead cat in Austin without hitting a couple of homosexual men, and Big Gay _______ doesn't even have to finish his sentence for us to know what he's talking about. (It's him, but he isn't wrong.)

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts