ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2018 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Tuesday, October 30, 2018

Migration is war

The second migrant caravan crosses violently into Mexico:
Second migrant caravan storms into Mexico: 'Violent' group from Central America carrying BOMBS and guns defies a huge police presence to cross the border from Guatemala as Trump deploys 5,200 troops.

The second caravan making their way up through Central America have members armed with explosives. Had gasoline bombs made of soft-drink bottles, and improvised PVC tubes to launch fireworks. Mexican federal police briefly blocked the migrants from crossing the Suchiate River on Monday, but the migrants soon defied the law enforcement presence and broke through into Mexico. Many tried to swim or wade across to Mexico, some while carrying children. Law enforcement avoided a second day of violence, a day after a confrontation left one migrant dead.
Troop deployments are well and good. But they are meaningless unless the President is prepared to actually utilize their firepower when the border is attacked.

Labels: ,

107 Comments:

Blogger Steb October 30, 2018 5:28 AM  

The caravans are prepared to use violence, and they've got nowhere to retreat because the people who brought them this far aren't going to help them go back. No food. No transport. It's the modern version of burning the boats to motivate your army, like the Spanish did when they conquered Mexico.

Blogger DJT October 30, 2018 5:38 AM  

Trump needs to send the army across the border and set up a forward position in Mexico so nobody even gets close to crossing that border. A DMZ of sorts. No concerns about posse comitatis then.

Don't worry Mexico, we aren't seizing your territory. We don't want it. We're simply doing a job that Mexicans just won't do.

Blogger Lurker October 30, 2018 5:54 AM  

"Second migrant caravan storms into Mexico: 'Violent' group from Central America carrying BOMBS and guns defies a huge police presence to cross the border from Guatemala as Trump deploys 5,200 troops."

Basically more demoCRAP/socialist voters. I understand the concept of Right Wing Death Squads that was bandied about in my youth in regards to Central/South America political news bites.

Right Wing Death Squads = Antibodies

Blogger Ransom Smith October 30, 2018 6:25 AM  

Second migrant caravan storms into Mexico: 'Violent' group from Central America carrying BOMBS and guns
Future doctors and lawyers coming to practice their profession.

Blogger ZhukovG October 30, 2018 6:28 AM  

The sooner we use 'deadly force' to defend the border; the more lives will be saved.

Blogger Rocklea Marina October 30, 2018 6:31 AM  

The caravans are prepared to use violence, and they've got nowhere to retreat because the people who brought them this far aren't going to help them go back. No food. No transport. It's the modern version of burning the boats to motivate your army, like the Spanish did when they conquered Mexico.

A very good point. When Australia implemented it's "Turn back the boats policy", the navy would intercept the boats, ensure they were sea worthy and leave them a heading and enough food, water and fuel to return to Indonesia. Those that were not, or had already made landfall, were detained offshore, processed for legitimacy, then sent home or resettled elsewhere.

No matter what is decided, it will be costly. The benefit of a contiguous sea border, is that approaches by air and sea are the only possibilities. And what happens at sea is out of sight, out of mind and classified. America's problem is more difficult and much more visible.

Blogger Lazarus October 30, 2018 6:34 AM  


Trump: We will 'build tent cities' for migrant caravan


President Trump during an interview on Monday said that the administration is planning to "build tent cities" for the thousands of migrants seeking asylum who are heading towards the Southern border.

I guess the A10's are all busy elsewhere.

Will wait three days to see what really happens. Maybe he will put them on the Mexican side

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/413761-trump-we-will-build-tent-cities-for-migrant-caravan

Blogger Duke Norfolk October 30, 2018 6:38 AM  

Lazarus wrote:Trump: We will 'build tent cities' for migrant caravan


Ugh. That's a tar pit we really don't want to step into. How can any good come from that?

Blogger Rocklea Marina October 30, 2018 6:47 AM  

The asymmetry of various costs will be telling in the future once really large numbers of people are on the move.

Blogger Rabid Ratel October 30, 2018 6:57 AM  

The third 'caravan' will be armed to the teeth with modern infantry weaponry, and will roll over the Mexican army as if it doesn't exist. The first and second caravans were shit-tests which Mexico failed. You can't respond to violence by appearing or acting weak.

This has serious implications for both USA and Mexico. Maybe Fred Reed will have to move to Brazilia to find the Mexican utopia he is looking for.

Blogger Skyler the Weird October 30, 2018 7:14 AM  

We need to put the tent city near an airstrip then humanely airlift them to Iraq and Afghanistan.

Blogger The Lab Manager October 30, 2018 7:14 AM  

Well come'on. Don't you know the libertardians at the Economic Policy Journal think all this trash should be allowed to come in because of 'cheap' labor. Of course, they never consult those who would be competing with that labor or ask themselves what diseases or problems they would bring in.

I would love to see VD debate Robert Wenzel on immigration.

Blogger Crew October 30, 2018 7:49 AM  

Holy shit. The God Emperor is awesome!

https://www.axios.com/trump-birthright-citizenship-executive-order-0cf4285a-16c6-48f2-a933-bd71fd72ea82.html

Blogger maniacprovost October 30, 2018 7:49 AM  

I wonder why, with all the cheap labor, Honduras doesn't have a booming economy?

Clearly it's the combination of cheap Central American labor with Ivy League MBA managers and Wall Street financiers that makes the magic happen.

Following the logic, it would be even MORE economically efficient to deport all the MBAs and hedge fund managers to Honduras.

Blogger Galt-in-Da-Box October 30, 2018 7:52 AM  

George $oro$ must be delighted to see his latest investment paying off so well.

Blogger Sherwood family October 30, 2018 7:53 AM  

If Trump shoots them expect to have the Left lose their minds and try for a violent overthrow.
If Trump doesn't shoot them more will come, armed and invading with violence which will eventually touch off some kind of violent response from people wanting to secure the border. That will be met the same way that this synagogue shooting has been met, with efforts to destroy Trump's legitimacy by linking him with any blood shed.

If he puts them in tents then it is the "babies in cages" all over again.

There is no scenario here that doesn't end with civil unrest. The Left are waiting for it. They know it is coming and are going to act accordingly.

Blogger basementhomebrewer October 30, 2018 7:53 AM  

DJT wrote:Trump needs to send the army across the border and set up a forward position in Mexico so nobody even gets close to crossing that border. A DMZ of sorts. No concerns about posse comitatis then.

Don't worry Mexico, we aren't seizing your territory. We don't want it. We're simply doing a job that Mexicans just won't do.


Also ban the reporters from the DMZ. No embedded journalists with the troops and don't let them within sight of where the troops are stopping people, for the media's safety of course.

I am fine with starting the nice route after that. You cross the line, we shoot you. If they start attacking our troops or trying to rush the line en mass then the mean rules come out about merely approaching the line.

Blogger Tom Rogers October 30, 2018 7:54 AM  

@2

Good idea, but the drawback is once the USA 'occupies' part of Mexico, you know (((what will then happen))).

Better to have the DMZ on the US side of the border (excepting San Diego), and also build an actual militarised border structure across the whole length of it, making it properly fortified like the old Inner German Border. Unfortunately when President Boomer says 'build the Wall', that's not what he has in mind. If it's done, then it's a start, but not enough.

Blogger Tom Rogers October 30, 2018 8:00 AM  

Addendum to my comment @18

I forgot to mention:

I don't believe posse comitatus would apply in concept to such a scheme; or, if it does, it would not be an obstacle or could be circumvented fairly easily in several ways - but much depends on the political strength of the president.

Blogger Crave October 30, 2018 8:01 AM  

Troop deployments are well and good. But they are meaningless unless the President is prepared to actually utilize their firepower when the border is attacked.

I mentioned this in conversation yesterday except my assertion was that we need to build the wall, but we must have the willpower to defend it.

Blogger Heian-kyo Dreams October 30, 2018 8:09 AM  

@Crew
Ending birth right citizenship is a great step!

Blogger Azimus October 30, 2018 8:11 AM  

How can anyone argue these are refugees seeking asylum?

Blogger Crave October 30, 2018 8:15 AM  

There is no scenario here that doesn't end with civil unrest. The Left are waiting for it. They know it is coming and are going to act accordingly.

Seriously addressing the situation requires attacking the enablers. Anyone, directly or indirectly, providing aid and assistance to the invaders should be cut off and kicked out.

Blogger Sherwood family October 30, 2018 8:30 AM  

The Left are working very hard to trap DJT in a way that will legitimize what they have wanted to do from day one: impeach him and seize control of the presidency or neuter him so that it doesn't matter if he holds it anyway. He needs to build up popular support for whatever he chooses to do in a way that insulates him from those efforts.

Blogger Samuel Nock October 30, 2018 8:39 AM  

Trump to sign Executive Order removing right of Birthright Citizenship for children of non-citizens and illegals.

https://www.axios.com/trump-birthright-citizenship-executive-order-0cf4285a-16c6-48f2-a933-bd71fd72ea82.html

Blogger Avalanche October 30, 2018 8:40 AM  

@24 "The Left are working very hard to trap DJT in a way that will legitimize "

Yes, so have you voted yet? Transported others to polling to vote? Urged neighbors to vote? Get on it! (For the very first time in my life, I voted yesterday straight-line Repub. Not entirely happy about it, but it's necessary... I hope in 2020 there is a straight-line ALT RIGHT!) (No politicking allowed, but I DID wear my silver "Q" necklace when I went.)

Blogger Mr.MantraMan October 30, 2018 8:41 AM  

"Muh A-10s" the usual right wing tough talk meant to pacify the CONNEDservatives, but never ever challenge the legitimacy of the establishment.

So Trump and his border wall rhetoric get flash mobbed by a mob of peasants who work for globalist oligarchs and foreign governments does he fall into the usual loser trap of right wing tough talk and then capitualation? Nope.

Trump if reports are accurate is actually offering up a right wing counter offensive against the soft underbelly of the establishment, birth tourism racket.

Blogger Watchu talkin bout Willis October 30, 2018 8:41 AM  

If TGE orders the machine-gunning of these "caravans" he will not only ensure a second term, he will eventually have a memorial built on the Mall in DC. That is, once the old 60s-era commie-boomers are finally scraped off.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan October 30, 2018 8:49 AM  

#28 sure, you keep thinking that.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 9:04 AM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger David Ray Milton October 30, 2018 9:06 AM  

1) The Left is certainly preparing a ‘damned if you, damned if you don’t’ situation with Trump.Unsurprisingly, CNN’s caption with Don Lemon last night read, “Trump Wrong To Call Caravan ‘Invasion.’” Even aside from the understanding here that migration and war are indistinguishable, I thought to myself, “What the hell else do you call 14,000 people insisting on passing a border unwelcomed?”

2) I love the optics of Trump banning Birthright citizenship via Executive Order, but I’m pretty sure the God-Emperor knows that it will be shot down by the courts faster than obese water fowl. And here’s the unfortunate part of our improved Supreme Court situation, I think according to Mark Levin in “Men in Black,” (or it could have been in an interview with Stefan) he claimed that even among right-leaning judges that birthright citizenship as being guaranteed by the constitution is considered Law 101, and he mentioned Gorsuch specifically as an example of someone who held that view. In other words, in order for it to actually hold up, I think we will have to wait for Congress to do the deed and ain’t no one ready to hold their breath for that.

Blogger Damelon Brinn October 30, 2018 9:07 AM  

If he puts them in tents then it is the "babies in cages" all over again.

So his approval rating will go up more? Excellent.

Trump says something about tents, and also says they won't be allowed into the country. Most everyone seizes on the tent remark and ignores the second one. There are already 22 miles of razor wire unrolled, another 150 miles coming. Last week the black pills said he would never send troops; this week they say the troops won't shoot. Trump specifically called it an "invasion" which makes posse comitatus irrelevant since an invasion means national defense, not law enforcement. Now he's hitting birthright citizenship. It's almost like President Trump is serious about this, no matter how many people want to frame it as, "Yuk yuk, bad orange man playing for votes from racists who hate brown people."

Mexico isn't happy about any of this and doesn't want to see the border closed or their new trade deal scuttled. I wouldn't be surprised to see some kind of joint operation worked out that lets us work on their side of the border without needing Congress to agree to an invasion. That would prevent any "Gotcha, I stepped on US soil so now the rules are different" BS that they say immigration lawyers will try to pull.

But it does come down to the president's will. This is what he was elected for. If he doesn't stop them, he might as well not have run. I think he knows that.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 9:08 AM  

@10

"The third 'caravan' will be armed to the teeth with modern infantry weaponry, and will roll over the Mexican army as if it doesn't exist. The first and second caravans were shit-tests which Mexico failed. You can't respond to violence by appearing or acting weak."

And that's when the Feds will start arresting every single U.S. citizen who is involved in the organizing, financing, and coordination of this BS and put them on well-publicized trials for Treason. If ginning up an invasion of your own country doesn't count as Treason, than what does?

Note to Avalanche -- guess how many sets of parentheses I removed from the above posting, while still saying everything I originally wrote.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 9:10 AM  

@11

"We need to put the tent city near an airstrip then humanely airlift them to Iraq and Afghanistan."


Kind of like this solution:

To Serve Man: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHdJUDBYA0o.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey October 30, 2018 9:19 AM  

In 372 AD, the Romans granted asylum to hundreds of thousands of refugees. They were legitimate refugees, not just "economic migrants" -- they were fleeing the westward advance of the Huns, who already had crushed the Ostrogoths, leaving widespread slaughter in their wake. The Romans allowed them to cross the Danube to seek the protection of the Roman Empire.

That group of refugees is known today as the Visigoths.

Soon after they crossed the Danube, they started to raid the occasional Roman town. But Romans would have committed similar crimes if they weren't there, of course.

In 378 AD, the main body of the Goths forced the line of the Balkans, making it almost to Adrianople, where they met Emperor Valens leading a Roman army of 60,000 men. It was the worst Roman defeat since Cannae. More than 40,000 lay dead on the field, including the Emperor, Tha Grand Masters of the Infantry and Cavalry, the Count of the Palace, and 35 corps commanders.

17 years later, Alaric the Goth ruled the north, raiding wherever he pleased.

38 years after the refugees crossed the Danube, Alaric sacked Rome.

They did the right thing, though. It would have been inhumane to turn them away. Very intolerant.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 9:21 AM  

@15

"George $oro$ must be delighted to see his latest investment paying off so well."

Don't count George's eggs before they've hatched.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 9:22 AM  

@16

"
If he puts them in tents then it is the "babies in cages" all over again.

There is no scenario here that doesn't end with civil unrest. The Left are waiting for it. They know it is coming and are going to act accordingly."

And we all know where THAT ends up:

Kill a Commie for Mommy.

Blogger Looking Glass October 30, 2018 9:23 AM  

@33 David Ray Milton

You clearly aren't yet thinking in the Age of Trump properly. The legal technicalities almost matter in so much as to fit within acceptably societal standards. Dot your i's and cross your t's. Beyond that, the current Legal System is literally just make sure 5 Justices say it's legal.

Thus, the benefits of setting a Definition, which is what an EO would actually do.

1) Drive the Left nuts.
2) Accelerate the discussion on the topic.
3) Accelerate the confrontations a decade before the Left is ready for it.
4) Force the Left to act in defense of the indefensible.
5) Watch as the Left badly overplays their hands on something that polls in the high 60s against their position.
6) Drive the Media further into irrelevance as everyone further tunes out their ranting.

It's important to understand that the current Immigration system has maybe 7% approval, and that's pretty much just D.C. Establishment people. This is the Right-side version of "prevent abortions for 16 year old rape victims".

Also, and just as a note, SCOTUS always has its finger to the wind keeping an eye on where things are going. Trump actually has a lot of "plays" with regards to both convincing SCOTUS it's wise to reign in the absurd definitions used to justify "anyone born on US Territory is automatically a citizen". Not the least of which is declaring anyone in the USA illegally as an "illegal enemy combatant" and use strict War Powers to enact it.

It's a winning play. No "tut tut" to be had here. Learn.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 9:25 AM  

@18

"
Better to have the DMZ on the US side of the border (excepting San Diego), and also build an actual militarised border structure across the whole length of it, making it properly fortified like the old Inner German Border. Unfortunately when President Boomer says 'build the Wall', that's not what he has in mind. If it's done, then it's a start, but not enough. "

Can't do that, because treasonous judges will say, "He was on U.S. soil -- you can't harm him!"

It's better to risk murder charges for killing them on Mexican soil, because juries can always acquit.

Blogger Looking Glass October 30, 2018 9:25 AM  

Ken Prescott wrote:Vox, either this is an Alt-Reichtard, or an FBI shill.

Given the current state of the Federal Government, never underestimate the power of "and".

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 9:25 AM  

And military tribunals definitely will.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan October 30, 2018 9:25 AM  

"Optics" is the monkey trap for the right. Being stuck in this monkey trap we then do not concern ourselves with the first principle of 4GW, Legitimacy. So literally we are stuck debating between Suits or Swastikas, no literally we are stuck with some goofs using the word "kikes" or if we use our keyboards to label someone. Is Ben Shapiro a legitimate representative for white christian men, never asked even though I think not.

Blogger Looking Glass October 30, 2018 9:26 AM  

Dirk Manly wrote:@15

"George $oro$ must be delighted to see his latest investment paying off so well."

Don't count George's eggs before they've hatched.


I'm not honestly convinced old Georgie is actually in control of his Network anymore. Either they are massively panicked or control of their own tools are badly compromised.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 9:32 AM  

@22

"How can anyone argue these are refugees seeking asylum?"

We could house them in the currently unused (since the Warren Burger court said crazy people can't be institutionalized against their will) mental asylums.

"Welcome to Asylum. Here's your own rubber room. No, you don't get a job. And you will get no money to send home to your family. Also, to offset the expense of housing and supervising you, you will work in the asylum gardens. Oh, by the way, there are NO women here. When you don't feel crazy any more, we'll airlift you out of here. Just say when."

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 9:35 AM  

@23

"Seriously addressing the situation requires attacking the enablers. Anyone, directly or indirectly, providing aid and assistance to the invaders should be cut off and kicked out. "

That's what the Dec 2017 Executive Order was all about. Complete financial shutdown for anyone involved in any sort of thing like this... which may include anyone who has ANY financial transactions with the above... and chain-reaction outwards -- those who have financial transactions with those who have financial transactions with those who are behind this, etc.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 9:39 AM  

@30

"The kikes have declared war on the white race. They have done it long ago."

It started with their seizure of Russia in 1917, killing tens of millions of Christians -- especially clergy, and then their declaration of war against Germany in 1932.

Blogger pyrrhus October 30, 2018 9:40 AM  

Catholics and Soros backed groups, including Immigration lawyers....https://www.wnd.com/2018/04/border-caravan-call-it-the-george-soros-express/

Blogger Damelon Brinn October 30, 2018 9:43 AM  

The net is full of legal scholars this week, pointing out that the president technically can't do this or that with the military because of such-and-such law. That's so weird. For my whole lifetime we've been fighting wars without even a basic declaration of war from Congress, and the opposition party did nothing but grouse and threaten to withhold funding and then cave in to "support the troops." To think that it's okay for a president to unilaterally send troops to Bumfuckistan, but it's not okay to use them to defend the border against invaders who carry foreign flags and brag about how they're going to occupy American territory whether we like it or not, unless all Hawaiian judges have signed off on the plan.... I look forward to the media's attempt to sell that insane narrative to Americans.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey October 30, 2018 9:49 AM  

@42
If we can forward deploy US troops in Korea to defend their border, and forward deploy troops in Syria to support AL Qaeda, we can forward deploy troops in Mexico to defend our own border. The problem is, as always, that the media/ deep state/ mega donor complex doesn't want it defended.

@45
On "optics" --
Need to emphasize that most of the Dem agenda is driven by anti-white hatred (not so-called "racism" -- or even worse, "reverse racism"), and keep hammering that.

@46
I'm not honestly convinced old Georgie is actually in control of his Network anymore.

He was as of a couple of years ago.

There's a lot of good stuff in the archives of the (now-shoahed) dcleaks.soros.com site.

This has some good links:

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-21/shilling-soros-washington-posts-omission-facts-defense-narrative

Blogger Iron Spartan October 30, 2018 9:50 AM  

Everyone is ignoring Mexico's part in this.

Having armed gangs rape, pillage, and plunder their way from your southern boarder to the northern one is going to turn Mexico into a open war zone. The caravans that are shooting at the police now figure that they can do what ever the hell they want and no one is going to stop them. Imagine a swarm of locust descending on the land, with another swarm behind that and another swarm behind that.

Do you think the cartels that run many of the Mexican provinces are just going to let the invaders destroy their land? Do you think they are going to watch the border get locked down and go "Oh well, guess we need to find a new business." Mexican cartels and central American cartels are bitter enemies and rivals, not friends.

If the Mexican government doesn't get a handle on this and soon, Mexico will be an official failed state. Do you think the corrupt bureaucrats are going to lay down and see their bribes and power dry up without a fight? We are seeing the opening acts of the Central American War. The question will be how do we stay out of it.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 10:11 AM  

@33

"1) The Left is certainly preparing a ‘damned if you, damned if you don’t’ situation with Trump.Unsurprisingly, CNN’s caption with Don Lemon last night read, “Trump Wrong To Call Caravan ‘Invasion.’”"

There's a way to counter-meme this:

German migrants / Poland 1939

German Migrants / France 1940

German Migrants / Russia 1942


German Caravan / Taking a rest in Poland 1939

Blogger David Ray Milton October 30, 2018 10:13 AM  

Your 1-6 is the underlying goal of the EO (which I support BTW), but you’re kidding yourself if you think that this will not have to go through Congress.

7% of the population ??? The Mexican population alone is over 10% of the population. And I live in Phoenix, if you don’t think there are a ton of cucks who lie awake at night fantasizing about all of those “Refugees” running into their arms crying “Mhysa! Mhysa!” then you’re wrong.

I hope Trump’s strategy works, but it’s going to be a hard fought battle just like the Wall and DACA. The courts will give him hell and they are formidable. He won’t be able to just sign off on it uncontested.

Blogger Tom Rogers October 30, 2018 10:27 AM  

@42

Dirk, as with anything, it depends on the political reach and power of the president. If he de facto commands Congress, he can pretty much do what he likes.

In that vein, I'm intrigued to know why Trump hasn't started on the Wall already, given that the GOP have one of the largest House majorities ever and also a majority in the Senate. I am British, so there are probably aspects to this I am missing, but I do understand the nuances of the American system - probably better than an average American - and I realise that Trump doesn't necessarily control Congressional Republicans. Nevertheless, it seems odd that he has done relatively little given the propitious political circumstances.

I'm NOT being negative or laying on Trump, just curious as it does seem odd that he is so cautious. Why do we need to wait for these midterms? And will Trump and his defenders then come up with another set of excuses for inaction?

Trump is now announcing that he might ban or abrogate jus solis. Well...errr...go ahead Mister President. What's stopping you? Why does he just announce things? Is he scared of somebody?

@51

I wholeheartedly agree. The ball is in Trump's court. The GOP have controlled the House and had a majority in the Senate for long enough. There are no excuses.

He needs to:

1. Put a 'border zone' on the US side of the border. (Note: This already exists anyway jurisdictionally).
2. Militarise or paramilitarise the border. Use National Guard, even re-start conscription and hold an annual draft lottery. Whatever.
3. Build the wall NOW, using unilateral executive powers if necessary - get the structure up and running and operational inside two years. But forget his plans for a 'soft Wall', instead make it a near-impenetrable IGB-style fortification. Have it ready prior to re-election, so that if he does lose in 2020, he has a lasting and concrete legacy that will be difficult for a Democrat to unravel.
4. To hell with SCOTUS. If SCOTUS or even DoJ try to block him, he should flood SCOTUS with originalists and in effect install a revolutionary court. (Presidents can appoint as many Justices as they like).

Bottom-line - Notwithstanding the checks and balances, the U.S. president has extensive unilateral executive powers. Trump is too cautious, messed up the DoJ appointment and has not been bold enough in his SCOTUS appointments.

Blogger Mr Darcy October 30, 2018 10:31 AM  

@55:

Then a decision must be made. Will the president grasp the situation for what it is and ignore the law (and his oath of office) and thus SAVE the country, or will he allow himself to get bogged down in legal niceties and thus LOSE the country? The choice is stark. Depending on when the first ones begin to arrive (they won't arrive together), he may have to ignore the midterms and SAVE THE COUNTRY. Our house is in flames. It's pointless to sit around discussing the various methods available to extinguish the fire---while the house burns to the ground. Because if this first "caravan" is not stopped cold, then by Thanksgiving, there will be 20,000 "migrants" arriving, and by Christmas, 200,000. By next summer 2,000,000. A decision must be made. Soon.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 10:35 AM  

@33

" I think according to Mark Levin in “Men in Black,” (or it could have been in an interview with Stefan) he claimed that even among right-leaning judges that birthright citizenship as being guaranteed by the constitution is considered Law 101, and he mentioned Gorsuch specifically as an example of someone who held that view. In other words, in order for it to actually hold up, I think we will have to wait for Congress to do the deed and ain’t no one ready to hold their breath for that."

It's pretty easy to destroy it.

The only precedence that is cited for Birth Right Citizenship for the children of foreigners is the Kwan case -- a guy born to two Permanent Residents, who had been here lawfully since they stepped off the boat.

Saying that Kwan is the same as some border jumper who comes in un-announced, and flies foreign flags from their house when they're not hiding from immigration officials is nothing more than false equivocation.

When the 14th Amendment was written, "under the proper jurisdiction of" meant "gives allegience to".

We have NEVER granted citizenship to *all* children born here. The children of diplomats born here aren't granted U.S. citizenship. The children of ANYBODY on a non-permanent visa have never been granted citizenship. How in the world that means we should give citizenship to children of foreigners who didn't even bother to apply for ANY sort of visa, and just sneaked across the border, is beyond reason

Blogger Looking Glass October 30, 2018 10:35 AM  

@55 David Ray Milton

The "Law" is whatever 5 SCOTUS Justices declare it is. Justices that probably have protection details now. Trump, in the legal realm, doesn't over-reach and let SCOTUS just pick & choose. We haven't seen the EO yet, and people are already cucking hard. The optics value alone is worth it, for now, but the legal aspects will be a strategic victory down the line.

Also, they're virtue signaling. The instance that doesn't signal virtue, you'll find people suddenly change their position quite rapidly.

Blogger Looking Glass October 30, 2018 10:39 AM  

@58 Dirk Manly

Yup. Properly tailored EO laying out a definition would be all it actually takes. One that this SCOTUS, or especially the next one, will uphold. Especially if RBG kicks the buck or leaves soon. Trump always builds strength on strength. That's how you keep winning.

Blogger Jim Androadie October 30, 2018 10:40 AM  

Human trafficking on a large scale. Follow the money and charge those supplying it.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 10:50 AM  

@46

"I'm not honestly convinced old Georgie is actually in control of his Network anymore. Either they are massively panicked or control of their own tools are badly compromised."

The 2017 Executive Order has put him in handcuffs and a straight jacket. Spies in the Whitehouse were able to get information out, which reached him, which is why he gave away $BILLIONS to his NGOs in November 2017.

His direct control of things is fading. Now that the money is no longer in his accounts, the recipients don't have to listen to him (the money is already IN their NGO accounts).

While the Dec 2017 Executive Order which calls for freezing the assets of t hose involved in trafficking and government corruption specifically applies first effects only to foreign nationals.... Old Georgie screwed up by not giving up his Hungarian and other citizenships. Thus, he can probably be targeted directly. Even if not, it allows the freezing of assets of anybody who interacts or conducts any financial transactions with someone involved in government corruption or trafficking. Since he's funding the invasion ships in the Mediterranean, that makes him fair game.
Probably a lot of bribe money to politicians in the EU pseudo-government, Germany, and Sweden. This opens another pathway if it hasn't been exercised yet, which it seems it has -- he isn't jet-setting around very much lately like he was as recently as 12 months ago.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 10:53 AM  

@51

"To think that it's okay for a president to unilaterally send troops to Bumfuckistan, but it's not okay to use them to defend the border against invaders who carry foreign flags and brag about how they're going to occupy American territory whether we like it or not, unless all Hawaiian judges have signed off on the plan.... I look forward to the media's attempt to sell that insane narrative to Americans."

I look forward to the day that leftist judges and fakenews talking heads are all hiding in fear, after seeing
1) Some of their friends swinging from lamp posts
2) Some other of their friends being executed on the spot at various airports trying to flee the U.S.

Blogger MendoScot October 30, 2018 10:53 AM  

@53 Not everyone, IS, but the situation is a lot more complex from inside Mexico.

The cartels control the North of Mexico - Sonora, Chihuahua, Sinaloa, probably Coahuila as well. I'll get back to that, because you have to start in the South.

The Federal Government's control of the Southern provinces has been weak since the Zapatista rebellion. They still dominate the urban centres, but most of the border areas - Yucután, Tabasco, Campeche, Chiapas - are subsistence/rural/strongly Indio and effectively governed by the neo-Marxist insurgents in a precarious arrangement with DF (Mexico City, DF). The border is entirely porous, and the attempt to stop the caravan there can be seen as theatre - DF saving face by not admitting that they don't decide who gets through.

The caravan is now transiting to the areas controlled by DF. Perhaps not coincidentally, this is where they are being pressured into asylum, or repatriated. The news reports are already hinting at the high attrition, although attributing it to other causes. My suspicion is that Trump's pressure on DF is paying off here.

The unpredicatable part will be when they enter the Northern provinces. The cartels control both the police and the army there, so they will decide what happens. They might let them pass or even help them, or they might view militarization of the border as too much risk.

In any case, we've only seen the first of three acts in the Mexico play, and I don't think we'll understand the significance of the troop movements until the third.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 10:55 AM  

@52

"The problem is, as always, that the media/ deep state/ mega donor complex doesn't want it defended."

In the end, Trump is going to have to start looking to what Lincoln and Wilson got away with. Since this is a case of invasion, not secession nor a foreign war of choice, those precedents will be very difficult to challenge if used in this circumstance.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey October 30, 2018 11:01 AM  

@55
I hope Trump’s strategy works, but it’s going to be a hard fought battle just like the Wall and DACA. The courts will give him hell and they are formidable. He won’t be able to just sign off on it uncontested.

The legacy media narrative is that any random district court judge (out of 678) possesses the absolute authority to overrule any and all of President Trump's executive orders (or even routine administrative decisions), simply by issuing a "temporary injunction."

So far, the GOPe (and, to a certain extent, Trump) have supported this canard. Not to mention their constant promotion of the trope that an unconstitutional executive order by Obama (Obamnesty) has the status of black letter law -- or perhaps is equivalent to a Constitutional amendment...

Blogger maniacprovost October 30, 2018 11:08 AM  

We are seeing the opening acts of the Central American War. The question will be how do we stay out of it.

Historically, a war with central American countries would rrsulrin the USA rounding up their citizens and sending them home. Maybe even large scale movement of naturalized immigrants back to their home countries to avoid civil disturbances.

Blogger Looking Glass October 30, 2018 11:10 AM  

@62 Dirk Manly

Part of the propaganda of Movies is to convince everyone that direct action is the best possible recourse. As Trump & team are showing, boxing your opponents in, restricting their movements and just waiting normally is extremely valuable. Further, the "head of the Hydra" is rarely that important, it's the Network that's far more important.

As a result, unwinding the network of Bagmen is actually the key. Without the physical ability to inflict harm on your adversaries, you functionally have no offensive power. Plus, and this is something lost on most people, Money is not Power. Money is a means by which one can acquire access to a lot of Power, but Money will never be Power. Our wonderful & merciless Host doesn't have a dues paying group of followers, but a horde of Vile, Faceless Minions. There's a reason for that. There's also a reason Honor & Loyalty are so valuable and useful.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 11:11 AM  

@55
"I hope Trump’s strategy works, but it’s going to be a hard fought battle just like the Wall and DACA. The courts will give him hell and they are formidable. He won’t be able to just sign off on it uncontested."

Why do you think Trump visit's Andrew Jackson's grave in Tennessee and on the first day in office, had Jackson's portrait hung in the Oval Office?

It certainly was NOT to abide by the diktats of traitorous judges.

"[The Chief Justice] has issued his decision. Now let him enforce it." -- Andrew Jackson.

Blogger Looking Glass October 30, 2018 11:13 AM  

@66 Dirk Manly

Trump uses 3 Presidents in his icongraphy: Washington, Jefferson & Jackson. The SCOTUS has clearly gotten the message.

Blogger Jack Amok October 30, 2018 11:24 AM  

Vox, either this is an Alt-Reichtard, or an FBI shill.

The real tragedy of Gab being shut down. All the inmates have to find somewhere else to go.

Blogger Looking Glass October 30, 2018 11:26 AM  

@59 Dirk Manly

I also brought up old Georgie due to a few discussions I've had with others. Those activist networks have gone nuts. They've been unchained, which signals either they're fighting for resources or too many resources are flowing without anyone keeping the reigns on them. (Both but "regional" differences is also in play.) Either is good for our side, but there's also a noticeable trend of anything outside of DC going horribly for the networks.

Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is Enemy Action. And there's way too many self-defeating moves across the Globe. There's a noticeable trend for actions around the DC Area to be well Operated, but, outside of DC, everything keeps falling apart. Either it's a clown show or it falls to pieces. Which means something is up. Granted, the new generation of Elites are pretty stupid, but they still have skilled, if evil, operators around them. Their networks are clearly badly compromised. Who and for what purpose? That's something we might never know.

However, letting Georige, Hillary & Obama just be annoying in retirement is an acceptable solution if their objectives and those over them are removed from power. If not, well, things can be dealt with when the time comes.

Blogger veryfunnyminion October 30, 2018 11:28 AM  

Dear Proconsul,

unfortunately we were unable to engage the Goths as they brought women and children with them in the baggage train.

Yours soyfully,

General Wimpius Maximus

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 11:31 AM  

@53

"In that vein, I'm intrigued to know why Trump hasn't started on the Wall already, given that the GOP have one of the largest House majorities ever and also a majority in the Senate. I am British, so there are probably aspects to this I am missing, but I do understand the nuances of the American system - probably better than an average American - and I realise that Trump doesn't necessarily control Congressional Republicans. Nevertheless, it seems odd that he has done relatively little given the propitious political circumstances."

The President can only spend money in the ways allocated by Congress (unless the bureaucracy goes along with the illegal re-allocation of funds, such as they did when Obama was directly funding BLM and Antifa, without any legal leg to do so). The bureaucracy is heavily leftist, and literally food-drags even on the things which ARE legal if they don't like it.

Since Congress hasn't provided funding for the wall, it's difficult to get done.

We need to return to the days of no permanent bureaucracy. The patronage/political spoils system allowed for REAL change in government behavior with the inauguration of a new President. The Federal Employees Union needs to be abolished -- by Supreme Court order if need be.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 11:38 AM  

@53

"Trump is now announcing that he might ban or abrogate jus solis. Well...errr...go ahead Mister President. What's stopping you? Why does he just announce things? Is he scared of somebody?"

Ultimate authority on such issues is in the Congress. However, Congress has never spoken on the "anchor baby" issue.

My suspicion is that Trump doesn't yet have the votes, with a propaganda-proof margin, to get a bill passed to limit birthright citizenship to the children of citizens or alternatively to children of citizens and those with Permanent Resident status.

Trying to push such a bill through too soon could cause a reaction putting "anchor baby = citizenship" as an Act of Congress, which would be akin to breaking the divider in a chemical time-delay explosives igniter.

Blogger OneWingedShark October 30, 2018 11:40 AM  

VD wrote:Troop deployments are well and good. But they are meaningless unless the President is prepared to actually utilize their firepower when the border is attacked.
This is absolutely true, and the situation is becoming (and now is) like the Mexican saying goes "between a sword and a wall" -- We no longer have the luxury of ignoring the border crossings and now must lick the third rail in politics: use lethal force.

DJT wrote:Trump needs to send the army across the border and set up a forward position in Mexico so nobody even gets close to crossing that border. A DMZ of sorts. No concerns about posse comitatis then.
There's no worry about Posse Comitatus in any case whatsoever here -- the law in full reads:
18 U.S. Code § 1385 - Use of Army and Air Force as posse comitatus
Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

The Constitution, in Article 4, Section 4, says: "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence."

ZhukovG wrote:The sooner we use 'deadly force' to defend the border; the more lives will be saved.
I've been saying this for years.

Dirk Manly wrote:@18"Better to have the DMZ on the US side of the border (excepting San Diego), and also build an actual militarised border structure across the whole length of it, making it properly fortified like the old Inner German Border. Unfortunately when President Boomer says 'build the Wall', that's not what he has in mind. If it's done, then it's a start, but not enough. "

Can't do that, because treasonous judges will say, "He was on U.S. soil -- you can't harm him!"

Publicly hanging some treasonous judges would do wonders for our Judiciary.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 11:42 AM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 11:43 AM  

@54

"Will the president grasp the situation for what it is and ignore the law (and his oath of office) "

The oath contains the pledge to defend the Constitution. If defending the Constitution requires violating Statutory law, he has a legal defense.

Blogger Crew October 30, 2018 11:49 AM  

Trump is now announcing that he might ban or abrogate jus solis. Well...errr...go ahead Mister President. What's stopping you? Why does he just announce things? Is he scared of somebody?

Well, I think he announces these things so he can put the fear of God into them yet again and cause them to fragment their opposition with each new things he announces.

It may also be a case of growing his base and keeping them voting for Republicans (and I think he is going to purge as many of the cucks as are up in 2020.)

I think he will do it.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 11:52 AM  

@67

"Trump uses 3 Presidents in his icongraphy: Washington, Jefferson & Jackson. The SCOTUS has clearly gotten the message."

He needs to add Lincoln -- "No, California will NOT be allowed to turn become a foreign territory where U.S. laws are ignored and federal officials, going about their lawful business, are interfered with, or heaven forbid, harmed in any way, by the state and local governments."

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 11:56 AM  

@69

"However, letting Georige, Hillary & Obama just be annoying in retirement is an acceptable solution if their objectives and those over them are removed from power. If not, well, things can be dealt with when the time comes."

Actually, it's not.

Examples need to be made of them.

Legally, Drawing and Quartering is on the table at the moment (we are still at war in Afghanistan), the Dec 2017 EO, and the military alert to deploy troops to the border both contained declarations of a State of Emergency.

He's building a VERY solid legal foundation to let all hell loose on these people before it's all said and done.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 11:57 AM  

Husseing Obama -- first half-black President. First President executed for Treason.

That would stay in the national memory for as long as the country exists, and longer.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 12:00 PM  

@74

"Publicly hanging some treasonous judges would do wonders for our Judiciary."

If just a few divorce-raped men had killed a few "family court" judges in the 1970's, we wouldn't be where we are now.

Blogger Damelon Brinn October 30, 2018 12:06 PM  

I'm intrigued to know why Trump hasn't started on the Wall already, given that the GOP have one of the largest House majorities ever and also a majority in the Senate.

If you didn't sleep through 2016, you might be aware that many of those Republicans hate Donald Trump and would love to see him gone just as much as the Democrats would. The (R) after their name doesn't mean he commands their votes. Also, he's enough of a throwback to actually care about the Constitution and things like separation of powers, so he's trying to do these things the old-fashioned way. He would prefer to force Congress into doing its job, if that's possible, before ruling by executive order.

Lindsey Graham says he will introduce legislation backing up Trump's take on birthright citizenship. Whatever got into Lindsey during the Kavanaugh hearing, it seems to be hanging around. Just don't let him near DACA.

Blogger Looking Glass October 30, 2018 12:12 PM  

Dirk Manly wrote:Husseing Obama -- first half-black President. First President executed for Treason.

That would stay in the national memory for as long as the country exists, and longer.


Publicly humiliating the Empty Suit would be a more fitting & useful punishment. Make him actually tell the truth about who is controllers were and let the incompetent one languish in the bed he's made.

The same doesn't apply to the real power players in the background. They can decorate DC's streets.

Blogger OneWingedShark October 30, 2018 12:22 PM  

Dirk Manly wrote:Husseing Obama -- first half-black President. First President executed for Treason.

That would stay in the national memory for as long as the country exists, and longer.

That it would.
The only problem is that so many high political officials, and bureaucrats, were complicit that it coming to trial would implicate them, too. -- A very strong case could be made, in parallel, with the judiciary denying 'standing' to anyone bringing up the issues under 18 USC 241 & 242.

Blogger OneWingedShark October 30, 2018 12:27 PM  

Dirk Manly wrote:@74

"Publicly hanging some treasonous judges would do wonders for our Judiciary."

If just a few divorce-raped men had killed a few "family court" judges in the 1970's, we wouldn't be where we are now.

This is very true.

What is interesting about it though is that now that it's established procedure to have family court w/o juries the whole system violates the 7th Amendment:
"In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law."

You could thereby make a case against these "family court" judges based on 18 USC 241 & 242.

Blogger Doktor Jeep October 30, 2018 12:52 PM  

Well if they are bringing bombs and guns at least it's more honest.
It's an invasion force - and this is a sign the left is still losing.
Meanwhile we're losing sleep in Florida. If Gillum gets in and the border with Mexico gets tight and militarized there will be flotillas.

Blogger Lance E October 30, 2018 1:10 PM  

Rabid Ratel wrote:The first and second caravans were shit-tests which Mexico failed. You can't respond to violence by appearing or acting weak.

I'm sure those Mexican police tried reeeeally hard to stop the caravan. Honest, Señor Trump, we are doing the best we can! There are just too many of them!

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 1:45 PM  

@82

"
Publicly humiliating the Empty Suit would be a more fitting & useful punishment. Make him actually tell the truth about who is controllers were and let the incompetent one languish in the bed he's made."

If you don't think being strapped naked to a board, while your stomach is sliced open, and all of your internal organs are removed and displayed to the crowd, and then having your arms and legs torn from your body by horses isn't humiliating enough, then I just don't know what to tell you.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 1:47 PM  

@83


"That it would.
The only problem is that so many high political officials, and bureaucrats, were complicit that it coming to trial would implicate them, too. -- A very strong case could be made, in parallel, with the judiciary denying 'standing' to anyone bringing up the issues under 18 USC 241 & 242."

There is no Statute of Limitations on Treason. And we were at war for every single day of Obama's Occupy Whitehouse gig.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 1:51 PM  

@85

"Well if they are bringing bombs and guns at least it's more honest.
It's an invasion force - and this is a sign the left is still losing.
Meanwhile we're losing sleep in Florida. If Gillum gets in and the border with Mexico gets tight and militarized there will be flotillas."


That's OK. If the Navy and Coast Guard are sinking boats, that's a LOT more difficult for the press to make sensational photographs of. Using infrared digital photography from satellites, every single raft used can be tracked. And the Navy and Marines have no legal restrictions that are put on the army and the USAF by the Posse Comitatus Act.

Blogger Salt October 30, 2018 2:18 PM  

This isn't how to deal with this.

"If they applied for asylum, we’re going to hold them until such time as their trial takes place," Trump told the Fox News host.

"Where? We have the facilities?" she asked.

"We’re going to put up - we’re going to build tent cities," Trump responded. "We’re going to put tents up all over the place. We’re not going to build structures and spend all of this, you know, hundreds of millions of dollars -- we’re going to have tents."

"They're going to be very nice," he added.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 2:36 PM  

Wood floors, sporadic electricity, no cell-phone towers. Average walk to the nearest latrine being at least 1/10th of a mile (all centered around the camp administration buildings-- hey, we don't need to spend lots of money to lay lots and lots of pipe... if you don't like it, and want to withdraw your application, we'll arrange for you to go home to your old home where the outhouse was 20 yards away from your house.

The African camp will have food cooked by contractors -- all native Mexicans. The central American camp will have food prepared by contractors. All native africans. The arab camp will have food prepared by Japanese -- that will save on cooking fuel. The Chinese camp will have food prepared by... Americans, such that meat will require the use of knives at the table.

Blogger Damelon Brinn October 30, 2018 3:32 PM  

Trump and his people have repeatedly pointed out that migrants from south of Mexico can't apply to the US for asylum because the law says they had to apply in Mexico. Is that a contradiction with "if they applied for asylum"? No.

Blogger MrNiceguy October 30, 2018 3:56 PM  

It's pretty logical to argue that someone in the country as a result of extra-judicial activity has demonstrated that they reject U.S. government jurisdiction. Unfortunately, the Venn diagram mapping logic and judicial decisions has a very small overlap, particularly as applied to this administration.

Blogger Tom Rogers October 30, 2018 4:44 PM  

@81

I know he doesn't command their votes and I know many of them dislike him, but that is not an excuse. Trump promotes himself on the basis that he is a successful businessman and is able to get things done. My question to him would be: Where is the Wall? It could have been started by now, even built already.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 30, 2018 5:24 PM  

Wall needs money.

Unlike a CEO, he doesn't control the purse strings.

However, just bringing back the forces in Korea, and some those still left in Germany should be provide enough savings for a LOT of wall, if he orders that the engineer units start doing a LOT of training in the construction or permanent fortifications in both level and mountainous terrain.

Blogger Brian Kilburn October 30, 2018 5:45 PM  

Seal the border %100 and the drug cartels will send the caravans back.

Blogger Damelon Brinn October 30, 2018 6:34 PM  

One point I haven't seen discussed much is that Trump is breaking the seal on "send troops to border." However much emotional resistance Americans have to "militarizing" the border, that will pass quickly now that it's a done deal, and it will be much easier to keep them there than it was to find the excuse to send them. Then he can tell Congress, "Look, I'd like to reduce their numbers, but they still report regular incursion attempts. Give me the Wall, and then we can talk."

I know he doesn't command their votes and I know many of them dislike him, but that is not an excuse.

No, it's a reason. But I agree with your point, if not your concern: he will have to start getting more forceful with them if the midterms don't convince them to get on board.

Blogger Hammerli280 October 30, 2018 6:41 PM  

I suspect Trump is trying to force the Invasion Mob to commit the first violent act. Once they start the shooting, we can hit back hard...on both sides of the border.

Including the Lincolnesque trick of slinging a few dozen prominent Dems into jail for the duration of the emergency.

Blogger Cluebat Vanexodar October 30, 2018 8:18 PM  

Let the master work. You will be pleasantly surprised.
If done correctly, this move is full of win. Lots of humanitarian potential here.
Talk about A-10s and napalm is very counter-productive, and show a weakness of imagination.
The God Emperor has got you covered.

Blogger Cluebat Vanexodar October 30, 2018 8:27 PM  

"Citizens of the great country of Mexico. I am deeply sorry for setting up this humanitarian operation on your soil witout the express permission of your government. We tried to work together with them on this, but they were adamant in allowing these migrants to illegally cross your country to enter the United States." blah blah "sovereign responsibility to the rule of law" blah blah "this well-appointed temporary community will only be necessary for as long" blah blah "any future expansion required to comfortably house these unfortunate people will need to naturally be away from the southern border" blah blah "until we have a big beautiful wall with the most modern security."

Blogger Cluebat Vanexodar October 30, 2018 8:29 PM  

Imagine the profound silence of the MSM when MPs turn rapists and murderers over to the Mexican authorities.

Yes this is full of win.

Blogger Dangeresque October 30, 2018 8:29 PM  

Just another example of immigrants doing the jobs that Americ... uhh... Mexicans won't do.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 31, 2018 12:43 AM  

Mexicans ARE Americans, you racy racist!

/SJW

Blogger Paul M October 31, 2018 6:46 AM  

The correct way to deny passage to foot traffic and light vehicles is barbed wire and a clearly marked minefield.

Blogger Dirk Manly October 31, 2018 7:15 AM  

With medium and heavy machine guns in towers overlooking the minefields and barbed wire.

Blogger Lurker October 31, 2018 11:32 AM  

Mehico that failed colonial project from the Spanish going back hundreds of years and now a giant welfare state/ Mestizo reservation writ large with a patina of governance is the globullist front line attack literally on the one country standing in their way ie… the good ol USofA. Sound familiar?


Mehico, America's Palestine. What to do?

Blogger Dirk Manly November 01, 2018 2:51 AM  

The native Mexicans have little to lose but their lives. The white (Spanish) Mexicans have a LOT to lose. The key is to threaten them. Put enough pressure on the white leadership, and they'll pacify the rest of the population ... or go back to Spain, and leave the problem to us to deal with as we please.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts