ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2018 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Saturday, January 05, 2019

The shattering of the neocons

They call themselves Never Trumpers, but they are actually Trotskyite world revolutionaries aka neoconservatives. And their day is done.
The Never Trumpers say they don’t recognize a Republican Party where the core tenets are neither free trade nor foreign democracy promotion. But maybe they just didn’t know their voters by sight, because the only party that has truly departed recognition is Never Trump. Each week brings this movement a new and bizarre position: Opposing tax cuts, supporting Obamacare; wishing North Korean talks ill, wishing Democratic investigators well; dreaming of European political meddling, pining for American political comeuppance.

Rick Santorum, the Catholic working-class firebrand rarely seen among Washington’s polite classes, had long commented that a party such as the GOP, with a donor class so out of line with its base, could not possibly continue to function. There could not be such a massive realignment without something somewhere snapping, but despite the Never Trump hysteria, it doesn’t appear to be the party. Though the president’s House was defeated in the first post-Trump national elections and his two-year approval among Democrats lies at historic lows, his approval with his own voters—those who the Never Trumpers courted not long ago—is second only to George W. Bush after 9/11.

As the second year of Trump’s presidency ends, these former Republicans have insulted and alienated their readers until they had none. They’ve squandered their time on unimportant, self-righteous panel discussions, finally reduced to bobbing up in partisan anti-Trump venues surrounded by men and women who called them war criminals just years before, buoyed for a time by saying the right thing about the right enemy. NAFTA, mean words and Donald Trump cannot possibly be the origin of these shattered minds, however vital those were to the breaking.
There is no party for the neocons anymore. The Democratic Party is now the Party of Diversity. Republican Party has finally slipped its Buckley & Bush leash. And no amount of declaring The Littlest Chickenhawk a True Conservative and a Real American, or pushing him to the forefront of the media, is going to put them back in control again.

Labels:

70 Comments:

Blogger Matt January 05, 2019 5:32 PM  

How many election cycles do you figure until we see a large white Dem exodus?

Blogger Ominous Cowherd January 05, 2019 5:37 PM  

One of my hopes in 2016 was that Trump would destroy the GOP. That might still come to pass.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan January 05, 2019 5:39 PM  

Tactically could we not push the neoconmen towards the D party so they can celebrate and be celebrated for their diversity? (they deserve to have their diversity celebrated good and hard).

Blogger The Cooler January 05, 2019 5:41 PM  

I myself don't Twitter, but I came reeeaaaal close to opening a Twitter account the other day just to tell Bill Kristol that he is now the living embodiment of irrelevance, and that he just doesn't know it yet.

Blogger VFM #7634 January 05, 2019 5:44 PM  

Then there's Romney mouthing off. Prediction: Mormons will be a low-birth rate, hard-leftist bloc indistinguishable from Oregonians or Coloradans in less than 20 years.

Their complete caving in the cultural wars as they go over to their natural side with all the other non-Christians is an indicator, as is Utah's tanking birth rate.

Blogger Gettimothy January 05, 2019 5:45 PM  

"Somewhere in Georgetown, the professional class may have blanched, but at Stoney’s Rockin’ Country cowboy bar.."

That ain't no honky tonk

Blogger Justin Bailey January 05, 2019 5:48 PM  

Only a matter of time before killing whites is a Conservative Principle.

Blogger Gettimothy January 05, 2019 5:55 PM  

"This essay is “dangerous,” an unidentified Never Trump friend warned "

The neocon roots of deplatforming Nationalists in one whisper

Blogger James Dixon January 05, 2019 5:55 PM  

> And no amount of declaring The Littlest Chickenhawk a True Conservative and a Real American, or pushing him to the forefront of the media, is going to put them back in control again.

I would have thought the same thing after Reagan, but they took back control and doubled down after his Presidency. I have no doubt they'll try to do the same with Trump.

Hopefully Trump and his backers are busy planning a ready successor.

> How many election cycles do you figure until we see a large white Dem exodus?

As early as 2020, depending on who they select. But I'm guessing no later than 2028.

Blogger Cecil Henry January 05, 2019 5:55 PM  

Remember: the NeoCons consist of guys like this, who seriously thought about running for the Presidency.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWJSKhEwjy8

Blogger Ominous Cowherd January 05, 2019 6:08 PM  

How many election cycles do you figure until we see a large white Dem exodus?

My guess is that it will happen, district by district, as soon as some party runs a candidate who isn't barking mad, doesn't hate Whites and doesn't hate Americans.

That leaves out GOP and Dem candidates.

Blogger Ominous Cowherd January 05, 2019 6:10 PM  


Hopefully Trump and his backers are busy planning a ready successor.


For the long term, the succession matters most of all.

Blogger eclecticme January 05, 2019 6:17 PM  


I think it means A-hole of the week.
https://grouchyoldcripple.com/2019/01/aotw-1-4-2019/
It should come as no surprise that the winner of the prestigious AOTW Award this week goes to Mitt Romney. What a dooshbag! Before he was even sworn in as a senator he wrote an op-ed for the Washington Compost (Motto: Democracy dies with Fake News) bashing Trump.

What Trump had to say.

“I wish Mitt could be more of a team player, you know? I’m surprised he did it this quickly. If he fought really hard against President Obama like he does against me, he would have won the election.”

Blogger Dave January 05, 2019 6:18 PM  

They’ve squandered their time on unimportant, self-righteous panel discussions, finally reduced to bobbing up in partisan anti-Trump venues surrounded by men and women who called them war criminals just years before, buoyed for a time by saying the right thing about the right enemy.

Wonderful line.

Blogger Dirk Manly January 05, 2019 6:22 PM  

@1

"How many election cycles do you figure until we see a large white Dem exodus?"

Depends on when Grandma stops with the "I'm voting Democratic because of JFK" nonsense.

Blogger Dirk Manly January 05, 2019 6:24 PM  

@4

"I myself don't Twitter, but I came reeeaaaal close to opening a Twitter account the other day just to tell Bill Kristol that he is now the living embodiment of irrelevance, and that he just doesn't know it yet. "

That just strokes his ego.

Remember, the opposite of love isn't hate ... it's complete and total apathy.

Blogger AaMcavoy January 05, 2019 6:32 PM  

VFM #7634 wrote:Their complete caving in the cultural wars as they go over to their natural side with all the other non-Christians is an indicator, as is Utah's tanking birth rate.

Can confirm. Utah is strangely influenced by crowds of women on social media. Even BYU unofficially supports gays and explicitly encourages asking permission to give hugs, hold hands, etc.

Blogger The Deplorable Podunk Ken Ramsey January 05, 2019 6:34 PM  

Matt wrote:How many election cycles do you figure until we see a large white Dem exodus?

I don't see that happening anytime soon. Not around here. Quite the opposite is the case, the GOP is dying on the vine and we're well on the way to one-party rule in Northern Virginia.

What I've been advocating instead is for people around here to take a page out of the SJW playbook. Infiltrate the Democrats. Sow chaos. Using the Truth. Primary every one of them with gusto.

Blogger James Dixon January 05, 2019 6:36 PM  

> the GOP is dying on the vine and we're well on the way to one-party rule in Northern Virginia.

What do you expect given the demographics of northern Virginia?

Blogger The Deplorable Podunk Ken Ramsey January 05, 2019 6:40 PM  

James Dixon wrote:What do you expect given the demographics of northern Virginia?

I certainly expected better than the tranny who won Manassas.

Blogger John Atria January 05, 2019 6:49 PM  

"How many election cycles do you figure until we see a large white Dem exodus?"

When white liberals run out of safe neighborhoods to flee to. So probably sometime in the mid to late '20s.

Blogger van helsing January 05, 2019 6:58 PM  

yes UT needs an influx of spine and common sense. in 2016 i was hauling stuff for work thru UT on the way to a test site. The truck broke down. i had to get it repaired, and in the process i had to get a few local uber-style rides. i utilized the same company for several trips, usually getting one young guy as a driver. like me, he was also adamantly pro-Trump. but... he was also very supportive of gay rights. Utah, where hast thou gone? maybe they are old-style conservative in the boonies. not near salt lake city / provo, and that's where the people are massed.

Blogger Jack Amok January 05, 2019 7:15 PM  

Tactically could we not push the neoconmen towards the D party

Doubt we could get them to go back. They already left the Dems when the non-Troskyite commies got ahold of the party. And now that the Donks are being taken over by third-world diversity - especially the Muslims and Africans - there's no support for Israel to be had there.

Trotskyites - amazing bunglers, they're even worse than regular communists who at least reward their supporters for as long as the host society still has some wealth. Trotskyites just hover it all up and get thrown out of power in half the time as commies.

Blogger Jack Amok January 05, 2019 7:20 PM  

The Mormon church as a slow-burning scandal going on with elders getting too interested in the young ladies. It's no where near as ugly as the Catholic homo-pedo priest scandal, but the church authority doesn't appear to be doing anything about it.

Blogger Wishing Star January 05, 2019 7:24 PM  

Matt wrote:How many election cycles do you figure until we see a large white Dem exodus?

This won't happen until the beginning of the next civil war. The assets of the white globalist are coveted by Dems and they won't be separated from their assets without bloodshed.

Blogger Steve Sky January 05, 2019 7:27 PM  

I notice that "it's the President's House", but they don't mention the Senate. If it's the President's House, why isn't it the President's Senate? Or is it because the Senate didn't flip and therefore you can't use the Senate as a club to beat him with...

Blogger Quilp January 05, 2019 7:32 PM  

I live it UT. More than anything the younger Mormons want to be acceptable to what I call "Today Show America". They've already imported so many South and Central Americans just to show their inclusiveness that their majorities are slipping. They still hold power and will for some time, but they speak SJW more than Brigham Young. The mountain town near where I live is still rock solid Trump, but it's getting browner by the day.

What I see with Romney and some older libertarian Mormons is their constant reference to private virtue in order to cover their less than ethical public/business behavior. They seem to think they can swindle all they want as long as they don't have sex outside of marriage, or drink, or have raycis thoughts.

Blogger eclecticme January 05, 2019 8:34 PM  

I noticed long ago that the Dems give a lot of head fakes. They promise to soak the rich but they (and the GOP) are the party of the rich, especially now, and they never follow through. What will happen if they ever follow through? E.g. in CA to start. AOC in NY did not get the memo that soaking the rich is just not done.

Blogger Cecil Henry January 05, 2019 8:37 PM  

@28:

Oh I know full well what soak the rich means.

It never actually means the rich.

It means the middle class. Those people just above you who you see and can vent your envy and resentment on.

Tax the hell out of them with income taxes etc... and give it to me.

The actual rich, the ones who advocate such theft and redistribution to begin with, are never touched.

Same old same old socialism with new lipstick.

Blogger John Russo January 05, 2019 8:43 PM  

Even here in what used to be blood red Idaho, the Democrat / communist / native American/ feminist who said she was the party of Love got close to 38% of the vote for governor.
If it can happen here it can happen anywhere, and it's only a matter of time.
The state itself is still 85% White, but the schools R churning out little trotskyites, and we're being flooded with newcomers from Oregon and California.

Blogger Haxo Angmark January 05, 2019 9:06 PM  

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Blogger Hammerli280 January 05, 2019 9:15 PM  

@29: YES! A thousand times YES!

In modern America, the highest tax rates actually paid are borne by the Payer Class - professionals, skilled craftsmen, and small businessmen. People making $100-200K/year, maybe $250K. The Truly Rich have a wide variety of tax breaks and shelters to protect their income.

Example: In 2011, Mitt Romney made $11 million, on which he paid 12% Federal Income Tax...and could have paid less. In that same year, I made $110K, 1% of what Romney made. I paid just under 18% of that in Federal Income Tax...and I had no ability to pay one penny less.

I don't say anyone should pay a higher rate than I do...I merely say nobody should pay a lower rate.

Blogger Didas Kalos January 05, 2019 9:16 PM  

Saw this Youtube about Mormon coming out of Mormonism and being Born Again. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0mckI8Xfl8&t=124s

Blogger Hammerli280 January 05, 2019 9:20 PM  

I think what's actually going on is a polarity shift between the parties. The GOP thought it was the party of Big Business, but Big Business discovered the lure of crony capitalism in the 1990s and has thrown in with the Democrats.

But for the Dems to get Big Business support, they had to abandon the working-class voters who had been a major voting bloc. Trump walked in and picked them up (as Reagan had in 1980 and 1984).

IF the GOP figures this out, they can replicate the Reagan/Trump formula and keep winning. But the GOP Establishment has never been known for competent electoral tactics.

Blogger tz January 05, 2019 9:22 PM  

Also very good Tucker Triggers the neocons
Including Ben Shapiro.

Blogger Damelon Brinn January 05, 2019 9:31 PM  

I'm not surprised they care more about free trade than all the "family values" issues they paid lip service to all these years. I am a little surprised they're admitting it so openly, though. Trump really has flushed out their true selves.

Blogger Damelon Brinn January 05, 2019 9:35 PM  

"Rick Santorum, the Catholic working-class firebrand rarely seen among Washington’s polite classes"

Not coincidentally, he was also the only other candidate besides Trump to have better than a C grade from Numbers USA before the 2016 campaign got rolling and some of the others saw the immigration writing on the Wall.

Blogger Pathfinderlight January 05, 2019 9:36 PM  

Now I understand why Santorum all but disappeared after his first national primary.

In 2008 and 2012, the Republican base dutifully supported the establishment candidates. Those candidates failed, so the base itself decided to send a message. Pick winners who will help clean up the government.

The response from the GoP elite was breathtaking. They are demanding that the base not control party presidential candidate selection.

Really? Their guy looses twice in a row to a newby senator from corrupt illinois, a guy who should have been beaten handily. After a show like that, you'd think that the GOP elites would be willing to listen to the rank and file, just to see If doing things their way would work.

All the elites really had to do was shut up, let us have the pick, and support the president, even if half heartedly. Instead, they chose to double down on a failed resistance, proving to just about everyone the GOPe is out of touch with America culturally and politically.

Blogger Robert What? January 05, 2019 9:43 PM  

For the longest time the Neocons fooled a substantial portion of the American public by adding the word "conservative" to their name. It was a stroke of genius. The TradCons are still largely fooled viz they think that people like Ben Shapiro are on their side.

Blogger Doug Cranmer January 05, 2019 9:44 PM  

Q's back.

Tons of shit.

Blogger L January 05, 2019 9:51 PM  

Number one tenet of Mormonism is obedience. Hence large numbers of Mormons hired by deep state agencies such as cia and fbi.

Blogger Garuna January 05, 2019 9:55 PM  

How many election cycles do you figure until we see a large white Dem exodus?

During the next Democrat presidency.

Obama destroyed the Democrat party from 2009-2016 on all levels of government and set the stage for Trump. Merkel and the EU revived nationalism across Europe. Globalism is a false song. And the more you see it in action, the more repulsive it is.

We'd already be at the exodus but the GOP blew it by breaking their promises on immigration and healthcare. So we might have to suffer through another Democrat president before it is complete.

Blogger dtbb January 05, 2019 10:00 PM  

Grandma, in your scenario, would at the youngest be 80 years old. Not a big chunk of voters I would guess.

Blogger Dirk Manly January 05, 2019 11:04 PM  

@22

"i utilized the same company for several trips, usually getting one young guy as a driver. like me, he was also adamantly pro-Trump. but... he was also very supportive of gay rights. Utah, where hast thou gone?"

Mormonism naturally leads to such a thing. Wherever polygamy is allowed, and some men have both the inclination and financial means of collecting a harem, then other men (especially those who don't have the financial means to even move out of the area) will have only two alternatives -- celibacy or faggotry.

Blogger Johnny January 05, 2019 11:15 PM  

>>Wherever polygamy is allowed, and some men have both the inclination and financial means of collecting a harem,...

I think what is going on is that in traditional tribal societies some significant portion of the male population would be killed in tribal warfare. That produced a surplus of women and made polygamy a socially sound solution. Once warfare become more selective, there was by custom no longer a seasonal war period, men no longer got themselves thinned out reliably, and polygamy became a less desirable social solution for the majority.

The fact that Muhammadanism has retained polygamy is an indication that it is essentially a warrior cult. It envisions its followers as an elite minority warrior clan, and thus doesn't work out well when they don't thin themselves out with warfare.

Blogger JGP January 05, 2019 11:33 PM  

Okay, I give. Who is Haxo Angmark and what's the deal with him? Ultra-left, neo-nazi? I admit I have no right to know but I'm a curious guy.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother January 06, 2019 12:05 AM  

Haxo is an alt-retard

Blogger Dirk Manly January 06, 2019 12:07 AM  

@45

"
The fact that Muhammadanism has retained polygamy is an indication that it is essentially a warrior cult. It envisions its followers as an elite minority warrior clan, and thus doesn't work out well when they don't thin themselves out with warfare. "

And wherever Muhammadanism is the dominant culture, you find rampant, open homosexuality.

This is what lead to the the DOD putting out an order to all U.S. military personnel to NOT do anything about "bacha bazi" ("boy play") among friendly Afghan personnel. The Moslem weekend is Thursday and Friday. And the practice of Afghan men sodomizing young boys (whom they brought on base as "assistants", "housekeepers," etc., in truth, as sex toys) became so notorious that U.S. troops coined the term "Bacha bazi Thursdays" due to the unmistakable sounds of such sodomizing emanating from the tents of Afghan personnel. When I was in Saudi Arabia, we used to frequently see older men walking hand in hand with young boys everywhere, oftentimes in places where you would not expect a father to be bringing his son (as these men would definitely have their school-age sons IN SCHOOL. (The Saudis even send their daughters to school -- there was a notorious incident in which a girls' school caught on fire, and the Saudi authorities refused to let any girl escape outside from the burning building unless she was wearing a full burkha (the only religiously acceptable outdoor attire for Moslem women in S.A.). As the fire started where those garments were stored during the day (those garments are only required when outside, or when in a place where men from outside the family will be), very few of the girls could (or even wanted to try to) retrieve their burkhas.))

Blogger Ariadne Umbrella January 06, 2019 12:23 AM  

Well, just poking around this a little bit: so, what if the explicitly Muslima congresswomen were there to choke off the 38 Billion dollars sent to Israel each year? And what if they were the ones to fight back against the loyalty oaths to Israel? I'd think, then, it was a race between Islamization, and financial health for us.

They are confined to one or two states with rotten infrastructure and not much in the way of innovative tech. So they aren't going to be rich in the future, right? Minnesota has bridges falling down. Michigan has Detroit.

All of the congress electees that are so awful seem be bankrolled by some PAC connected to Soros. So it's not really an organic American impulse to vote for invaders. It is more mischief from the usual sort of mischief-makers.

Blogger Gen. Kong January 06, 2019 12:38 AM  

Ominous Cowherd wrote:

One of my hopes in 2016 was that Trump would destroy the GOP. That might still come to pass.

Nobody has stabbed Trump in the back more than the Gay Old Pedobears - e.g. the Donor wing of the party (plus all their various lickspittles, step-n-fetchits, and low-rent-boyz). The Neo-Trotskyites (that's what Gottfried has called them for years, btw) have been the braying mouthpieces of the donor class for a long time. The one question which sort of remains unanswered has to do with how much of the idiocracy amongst the 'Conservative Churchians' (worshippers of Judeo-Christ) still dances to the Neo-Trotskyite Internationale. Lots of rent paid in that field too - just think of all the 'churches' busy resettling Musloid/Dindu rapefugees in places like Maine and Minnesota. Ditto for the Chamber of Commerce cucks who mindlessly repeat the wizardly talking-points given to them by the likes of Shapiro, Kristol, etc.

Blogger Gen. Kong January 06, 2019 12:45 AM  

Their complete caving in the cultural wars as they go over to their natural side with all the other non-Christians is an indicator, as is Utah's tanking birth rate.

The fix was always there, but it became readily apparent when their 'prophet' had a "revelation" in 1978 that dindus were eligible for the priesthood (and the BYU football squad). The rainbow flag will be coming along soon. There were previous "prophetic revelations" about polygamy, etc. before then. There have always been an unusually high number of LDS in the FBI, one of the most notoriously corrupt branches of the federal stasi. Captain Underoos, Dingy Harry and Orrin Hatch are all good swampy examples.

Blogger Cetera January 06, 2019 1:55 AM  

Jack Amok wrote:The Mormon church as a slow-burning scandal going on with elders getting too interested in the young ladies. It's no where near as ugly as the Catholic homo-pedo priest scandal, but the church authority doesn't appear to be doing anything about it.

Quilp wrote:I live it UT. More than anything the younger Mormons want to be acceptable to what I call "Today Show America". They've already imported so many South and Central Americans just to show their inclusiveness that their majorities are slipping. They still hold power and will for some time, but they speak SJW more than Brigham Young. The mountain town near where I live is still rock solid Trump, but it's getting browner by the day.

I'm originally from Wyoming, and have known quite a few LDS. I've noticed a trend where the young guys on mission go to Brazil. They want to go to Brazil. When they come home, they are bringing with them a Brazilian thot/stripper. They married the girls, and the girls are happy to marry a white guy who will get them the hell out of Brazil. They are perfectly willing to whore themselves out for a ticket out.

Once here, they continue to dress pretty slutty. Stripper shoes, hot pants/short shorts, titty tanks, etc. They don't speak a lick of English, but they pop out a kid pretty quickly. I'm very curious as to how long this situation lasts, and how much these girls may know about and be preparing for taking everything via divorce court.

But hey, straight-laced Mormon kids getting to bang hot thots for a while will have no consequences, right? It's like a loop-hole, and they're bringing God to them! *rollseyes*

Blogger Dire Badger January 06, 2019 1:58 AM  

VFM #7634 wrote:Then there's Romney mouthing off. Prediction: Mormons will be a low-birth rate, hard-leftist bloc indistinguishable from Oregonians or Coloradans in less than 20 years.

Their complete caving in the cultural wars as they go over to their natural side with all the other non-Christians is an indicator, as is Utah's tanking birth rate.


"Mormons", huh?

Most Utahns despise Mitt. The only reason he was elected was that the alternative was a hardcore leftist pedophile.

Mormons are outnumbered badly in their hometown by the freakshow... The reaction you see, in Salt Lake? That's caused entirely by the exodus of Fags, Bums, and Chicanos that Fled from Seattle and California that they ruined and settled here to start wrecking it in turn.

If you think the "Mormons" have anything whatsoever to do with what's happening in Utah, you are sadly mistaken.

Blogger The Deplorable Podunk Ken Ramsey January 06, 2019 3:03 AM  

Mormonism is a successful religion, despite whatever you or I think about its status as a false religion or not. The same is true with Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, pick one of the major religions that are seen.

Progressivism is a major religion that is seen but constantly hides itself under non-religious or anti-religious banners.

It's dying. Christians, Muslims, Hindus, even down to smaller groups like Mormons, produce functional societies that reproduce themselves through time. Progressivism does not, Progressivism is intentionally aimed as a dagger to the heart of traditional beliefs. Progressivism is at war with nature and cannot even reconcile the male and the female anymore. It will destroy your nation, it will destroy your town, it is aiming to destroy your family, too.

Progressivism is aiming to take you and everything else down with it.

It is Satanic if you ask me, and seduced by nihilism. It's death incarnate, if you like irony.

Blogger Unknown January 06, 2019 3:43 AM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Henryoldrey95 January 06, 2019 3:45 AM  

Makes you wonder how much damage it will cause on its way back to hell.

Blogger JAG January 06, 2019 4:38 AM  

tz wrote:Also very good Tucker Triggers the neocons

Including Ben Shapiro.


From Little Benji: On Wednesday evening, Tucker Carlson delivered a 15-minute monologue on his Fox News program regarding the future of economics and politics in the United States. In that monologue, Carlson accurately bemoaned the current state of the American soul – rising suicide rates and overdose rates, declining levels of family generation, declining ties that bind us together.

Ben notes the bemoaning of a number of things including "declining ties that bind us together," as "accurate". Gee, you think the "browning of America" that Ben "doesn't give a damn about" has something to do with that?

This is supposed to be a prodigy?

Blogger VFM #7634 January 06, 2019 4:46 AM  

"The one question which sort of remains unanswered has to do with how much of the idiocracy amongst the 'Conservative Churchians' (worshippers of Judeo-Christ) still dances to the Neo-Trotskyite Internationale."

@Gen. Kong
Not entirely unanswered. A useful indicator is the vote for Ted Cruz (or worse, Narco Lubio) in the 2016 primary.

Blogger VFM #7634 January 06, 2019 4:50 AM  

"Captain Underoos, Dingy Harry and Orrin Hatch are all good swampy examples."

@Gen. Kong
Not to mention Jeff the Flake.

Blogger Cataline Sergius January 06, 2019 7:11 AM  

I think Trump is looking at Romney and chuckling to himself.

There was a reason that he backed him for the Senate.

He knows that the NeverTrumpers are going to try and primary him.

So he has selected his own opponent. The utterly hapless, hopeless and harmless career loser Mitt Romney.

Seriously, how much sleep do you think Trump is losing over Mittens?

Romney's sense of grandiosity is compelling him forward. The poor fool honestly thinks that this is finally his moment.

But the sad truth is, the only times Romney has ever won anything was when he was clearly and obviously the lesser of two evils.

That is his entire career in a nutshell... and oh good lord, does he think that is in play again? Is that why he thinks he's got a chance?

Blogger Avalanche January 06, 2019 10:05 AM  

@49 "So it's not really an organic American impulse to vote for invaders. It is more mischief from the usual sort of mischief-makers."

Oh oh, prevarication! It's "more TREASON from the usual TRAITORS"! No more wizard words, call it what it is!

Yeah, I know, "funny." It ain't funny.

Blogger Tars Tarkusz January 06, 2019 10:58 AM  

James Dixon wrote:I would have thought the same thing after Reagan, but they took back control and doubled down after his Presidency. I have no doubt they'll try to do the same with Trump.

Reagan is the one who put these people in power in the first place. Reagan was awful.
One of the Neocon's biggest wins was convincing American conservatives that Reagan was a hero and a true conservative. They love him because of the Soviet Union, but for them, it was all about Russians. They hate the Russians and they got immense satisfaction.

Blogger Doktor Jeep January 06, 2019 5:00 PM  

So on Friday I got the AM radio going and it's the usual morning drive "conservative" talk show complaining about how "white" the Republican party is. The host is not a never-Trumper though and on board with most things.
Even people who are not neocons are infected with this civnat brain virus that has them thinking we have to have more blacks and browns in the party or faction. We cannot reasonably have a "whites only" party but if the other parties are "everybody but whites" and we're sitting here trying to be a big tent party then Vox's past statement comes to mind: "You may not be ethnocentric but your conquerors will be". And the reality we are facing is that browns and blacks and women will vote for browns and blacks and women even if the candidates are raging socialeftists.
And all the while accusing whites of doing such a thing. This level of reckless hatred results in gulags.

Blogger tublecane January 06, 2019 6:00 PM  

If I wanted to be charitable I'd say neocons are simply pretending the Republican party stands for whatever they believed in at the peak of their power within it. But I know better. I know they are liars who deliberately conceal what they believe because they know the people they condescend to on the right wouldn't like it.

Blogger eclecticme January 06, 2019 6:06 PM  

The US State dept is insane. Syria wants to move Syrian troops into Kurdish areas of Syria at the invitation of the Kurds and the State Dept is fighting it???

http://theduran.com/sykes-picot-on-acid-us-considering-syria-partition-plan-amidst-troop-exit/

http://theduran.com/how-the-war-party-lost-the-middle-east-2/

Blogger tublecane January 06, 2019 6:06 PM  

@57- On this particular issue Benji is dissembling rather than being obtuse.

Blogger tublecane January 06, 2019 6:09 PM  

@65- It was full of traitorous commies 80 years ago, and I don't believe it was ever cleaned out.

Blogger Count Nomis January 06, 2019 10:16 PM  

This article is somewhat related:

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/12/the_gop_needs_to_stop_being_the_stupid_party.html

Blogger Dirk Manly January 07, 2019 1:25 AM  

@65

"the State Dept is fighting it???"

The State Department has been working against the interests of the American people since at least the 1930s, if not earlier.

Blogger eclecticme January 07, 2019 5:43 PM  

If anyone wants a reminder of how fake the news was in Syria, watch this 8 month old series of 4 videos on the second Syria fake gas attack.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9w8j-avq_0&index=1&list=PLM_tVXBx-AANmfzXRXxPp4NKxh5GWo_TC

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts