ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2018 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Friday, February 08, 2019

They never saw it coming

Boys are now excluded from the Boy Scouts:
The Boy Scouts of America welcomed the establishment of Troop 86 in Vulcan and Troop 219 in Helena on February 1st. But these two troops are different -- no boys, all girls. The first two of their kind in Central Alabama. With the formation of these two troops, a debate has taken hold. Some think this compromises the central mission of the Boy Scouts, whereas other believe it gives girls new opportunities that they never had before.
It won't be long before men are excluded from the pulpits of Fake Christian "churches" too. This is why our ancestors didn't allow women to join men's groups in the first place.

Labels: ,

113 Comments:

Blogger FUBARwest February 08, 2019 10:46 AM  

Boy scout troop with no boys in it? Man skin suits must be comfy.

Blogger Sammi Hass February 08, 2019 10:47 AM  

Jamboree (when many troops camp together for a weekend or a week) will now have to have plan b stocked. Filthy.

Blogger mike February 08, 2019 10:48 AM  

But boy scouts can't exclude wamen so how can they exclude boymen?

Blogger Warunicorn February 08, 2019 10:48 AM  

I can't think of this as anything other than a cancer.

Why even bother with the title, "Boy Scouts?" Answer: Because they plan on destroying it, intentionally, like with all the cultural norms they've destroyed such as marriage.

F*ck 'em.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother February 08, 2019 10:49 AM  

Trail Life USA

Blogger dienw February 08, 2019 10:52 AM  

Trans Boy Scouts.

Blogger Scott C February 08, 2019 10:52 AM  

I'm sick of men in the alt-right saying "we need more women in the movement." Women who join the alt-right are fly paper for orbiters and they obsess over Islam to the exclusion of other issues because they don't want to obey modesty laws.

Once women (even "right wing" women) enter a male dominated institution they will work to change it to suit their sensibilities.

Blogger D.J. February 08, 2019 10:52 AM  

@5

Indeed.

Blogger Danelle Blackman February 08, 2019 11:00 AM  

The rise and fall of civilizations can be explained by years of passing, then years of failing shit tests.

Blogger Sammi Hass February 08, 2019 11:01 AM  

Idk how to put this but one off the off-menu programmes in Scouts is to help boys in the following types go through rites of passage:

1. Sons of single mothers
2. Disabled boys
3. Immigrant boys wanting to assimilate
4. Nancy boys and sissies
5. Boys who have really sick siblings so they don't get to play and rough house a lot.

These are vulnerable boys in the true sense. I come from a scouting family so I've seen up close how it helps these types of boys.

Blogger dienw February 08, 2019 11:01 AM  

The brazenness is astounding. The complete change took less than a year: they caved on no obvious homosexuals to inclusiveness with proud gays; then they about faced to exclusiveness with no boys groups.

Blogger S1AL February 08, 2019 11:04 AM  

The writers at Babylon Bee are currently wondering how they didn't get there first.

Blogger Seth Schueler February 08, 2019 11:04 AM  

all gay troop is next

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother February 08, 2019 11:07 AM  

Then a dance number, fabulous scouting revue, scout bath house parties, AIDS.

Blogger The Chortling February 08, 2019 11:10 AM  

seems like a perfect demonstration of Vox' Converged Institutions will Die maxim.

Girl Scouts quietly converged in the 90s and then fully imploded-converged in the early 2000s. People left in droves. Girl Scouts is suing Boy Scouts over the inclusion of Girl-only troops because Girl Scouts which is barely on life support these days feels the death knell (financially) coming on.

Boy Scouts will fully converge and die.

Really simple math.

Blogger Unknown February 08, 2019 11:11 AM  

They make it clearer and clearer everyday for us. This is good, let's wake up some more of the uninformed, new troops added to the light side.

Blogger veryfunnyminion February 08, 2019 11:14 AM  

St. Brevik preserve us!

Blogger One Deplorable DT February 08, 2019 11:15 AM  

It's like I went to bed and woke up in a universe where The Onion was reality.

Blogger Nostromo February 08, 2019 11:19 AM  

I pray to God, someone has enough sense to sue these two troops for discrimination. Give 'em what they want. Good and hard.

Blogger Rex Leroy King February 08, 2019 11:21 AM  

They're trying to prove that they only belong barefoot in kitchens, aren't they?

Blogger S. Misanthrope February 08, 2019 11:21 AM  

Chortling, what happened to GS? Those time periods are exactly when I was forced into it, and it sucked. We did nothing but eat unhealthy snacks and celebrate cultures other than America’s. I was finally allowed to quit around 2000, having acquired zero useful skills besides the ability to sell door-to-door.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother February 08, 2019 11:22 AM  

That's where they belong

Blogger ZhukovG February 08, 2019 11:29 AM  

As a Southerner, I note with shame, that this is happening in Alabama!!

The intention all along was to destroy the Scouts. They were a Nationalist organization and the Globalists cannot tolerate their existence. Feminism and Social Justice are just weapons in the Globalist arsenal.

Globalism Delenda Est!

Blogger Ominous Cowherd February 08, 2019 11:29 AM  

Rex Leroy King wrote:They're trying to prove that they only belong barefoot in kitchens, aren't they?

The more shit-tests Western Civ fails, the more desperately Western women devise more extremely ridiculous shit-tests. They just want to be reassured that their men will save them from their own craziness. And to have their bottoms paddled.

Blogger Heian-kyo Dreams February 08, 2019 11:32 AM  

New merit badge: forrest baby delivery.

Blogger CarpeOro February 08, 2019 11:35 AM  

If there was a spin in the collective leadership they would simple transfer both new troops to the Girl Scouts. After all, they are preventing the Girl Scots from an example of how to be 2nd class boys.

Blogger RCR_Chris February 08, 2019 11:40 AM  

The central mission of the Boy Scouts was to turn boys into men.

As with all converged organizations, the mission was flipped upside down, and changed to social justice bs long ago.

All girl trips were inevitable

Blogger Cecil Henry February 08, 2019 11:43 AM  

This shouldn't be a surprise at all. Its written into the spirit of 'equality'.


Four legs good, two legs better.


Here is a great book on the driving motive of the age:




https://epdf.tips/queue/envy-a-theory-of-social-behaviour.html


"The more kindness shown to an envious man the worse he becomes"

Blogger K G February 08, 2019 11:48 AM  

Boomers couldn’t even keep boys in Boy Scouts

Blogger Daniel February 08, 2019 11:48 AM  

Vulcan, god of fire. Helena, queen of Sparta.

Let me guess: their first merit badges will be in hand-to-hand self-defense.

Blogger dienw February 08, 2019 11:48 AM  

Heian-kyo Dreams wrote:New merit badge: forrest baby delivery.

Forrest Gump is an obstetrician?

Blogger SAPPER February 08, 2019 11:52 AM  

Don't forget the endless lawsuits the scouts (new name) are enduring that is bankrupting their organization.

Boys are being raped by gay men.

Blogger I’ve Seen Things You People Wouldn’t Believe February 08, 2019 11:53 AM  

My son gets his Eagle Scout in a few weeks. Then we are O-U-T. I only hope his certificate will still say "Boy Scouts of America".

Achieving Eagle used to mean something. In 5 years, it will be worthless as they dumb down the requirements in the name of "Equality".

Blogger I’ve Seen Things You People Wouldn’t Believe February 08, 2019 11:55 AM  

Stg58/Animal Mother wrote:Trail Life USA

Amen.

Blogger I’ve Seen Things You People Wouldn’t Believe February 08, 2019 11:56 AM  

'2 Deep Leadership" takes on a whole new meaning...

Blogger Azure Amaranthine February 08, 2019 12:00 PM  

"They're trying to prove that they only belong barefoot in kitchens, aren't they?"

Yes.

"The more shit-tests Western Civ fails, the more desperately Western women devise more extremely ridiculous shit-tests. They just want to be reassured that their men will save them from their own craziness."

So much yes.

"Boys are being raped by gay men."

Expected match received.

Blogger Marcus Marcellus February 08, 2019 12:02 PM  

I don't care if this gets me banned from positing here as I very rarely post and the stakes are low, but there is an ethnic/genetic component to this that, like water to a fish, remains hidden from readers of a blog in ENGLISH.

I am not Anglo-Saxon or Celtic, zero British Isles blood. I grew up mostly in America and lived in southern England for years before settling in Italy today.

English-speaking and especially Celtic-American women are not like other white women. There is a pronounced mean-spiritedness to them culturally. They do not like men except in wanting to be men and in taking pleasures away from them. Anglo men have been living with and creating shrews for 3-4 generations now. Even a Continental "feminist" tends to be sweeter and more at ease with her sexuality than an Anglo-American "conservatives." Watch Tucker Carlson and tell me those are "women" he interviews?

Feminism arose in England for a reason. Once I abandoned those women (my ex-wife is a Daughter of the American Revolution, i.e. a cold Anglo monster), all of these strange, unpleasant, pins-n-needles issues disappeared. The girls in Austria, Switzerland, and dare I say parts of Germany are like hot Latinas compared to American women, but white and much prettier (less backwater blood).

I have never, ever advised anyone to leave America to get a wife as most Americans are of various British ethnic groups and probably think the behavior of American women is normal. It is not. I now tell people when they ask: just don't date/marry the American ones, the Australian ones, god-help-you the Canadian and Scottish ones, and you will be okay.

That's my contribution to the feminists debate -it's a cultural, genetic expression as much as ideology. Why else would my Silent Generation father have warned me about them if he was in his late 30s when the "Sexual Revolution" happened? Because they already had a reputation for harpiness and sharpness and uppity mean-spiritedness back then.

Blogger dienw February 08, 2019 12:04 PM  

I think the logical end for the Scouts is something along these lines:
Komsomol

The Komsomol was organized in 1918 in order to band together various youth organizations that had previously been involved in the Russian Revolution; many of these groups had fought in the Civil War. When the military phase ended, a new purpose was set in 1922—to engage the members in health activities, sports, education, publishing activities, and various service and industrial projects. Komsomol membership reached a maximum of about 40 million in the 1970s and early ’80s. In Soviet society, its members were frequently favoured over nonmembers in matters of employment and scholarships. Active participation in the Komsomol was also considered an important factor in gaining membership and eventual leadership positions in the Communist Party.


Something similar to Norway's Labor Party youth wing?

Blogger C Penn February 08, 2019 12:04 PM  

Boy Scout cookies happening in 3, 2, 1...

Blogger Zander Stander February 08, 2019 12:06 PM  

How can a former CIA director be the head of the Boy Scouts? That suggests it is an important arm of the deep state.

Blogger dienw February 08, 2019 12:10 PM  

Zander Stander wrote:How can a former CIA director be the head of the Boy Scouts? That suggests it is an important arm of the deep state.

Bingo!
See my comment above re the Komsomol. It is the prototype for every socialist youth group.

Blogger Meanoldbasterd February 08, 2019 12:11 PM  

Sadly, you have a point. But, as Owen Benjamin has said " leaving your girl because she says crazy shit is like moving because your house has gravity."

Blogger DJT February 08, 2019 12:15 PM  

New merit badge: forrest baby delivery.

More like Forest Abortion.

Blogger The Deplorable Podunk Ken Ramsey February 08, 2019 12:15 PM  

In the article they said they could have formed Girl Scout troops, but the Boy Scouts are more outdoorsy.

But nothing, absolutely nothing, prevents you from forming a Girl Scout troop with the aim of focusing on outdoorsy activities. This happens all the time. And over time these outdoorsy Girl Scout troops seem to revert to the mean and become less outdoorsy, by the way.

Because they fill them up with girls, so they wind up focusing on girlish interests naturally. Whoulda thunk it!

Blogger Azure Amaranthine February 08, 2019 12:19 PM  

"English-speaking and especially Celtic-American women are not like other white women. There is a pronounced mean-spiritedness to them culturally."

Oh believe me, we who have traveled to other countries are fully aware.

" I now tell people when they ask: just don't date/marry the American ones, the Australian ones, god-help-you the Canadian and Scottish ones, and you will be okay."

This male attitude of "let's just run away" is part of the problem. We need to man up and put them back in the kitchen. Running somewhere else for women will just ensure that those resources are expended as well.

Blogger Ominous Cowherd February 08, 2019 12:21 PM  

Marcus Marcellus wrote:
English-speaking and especially Celtic-American women are not like other white women. There is a pronounced mean-spiritedness to them culturally.


They need a firm hand for sure.

Tough men need tough women. Anglo men got soft, but the bitches saw the failed shit-tests and got harder-hearted and bitchier.

Blogger Ominous Cowherd February 08, 2019 12:30 PM  

Azure Amaranthine wrote:This male attitude of "let's just run away" is part of the problem. We need to man up and put them back in the kitchen.

Pimp hand isn't just for pimps.

Sometimes women need to hear no from someone they trust. Western, feminist women don't trust their men, and those failed shit tests are part of the problem. Saying ``shut up and go cook dinner'' at the appropriate time can really strengthen a marriage.

Blogger David Ray Milton February 08, 2019 12:36 PM  

Once you let one girl into the tree house club it stops being the tree house club.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother February 08, 2019 12:39 PM  

The mean, nasty women were frontier women just a century ago. Get tough or die gets out of control fast without the white blood cells and T cells (men), to keep them in check.

Look in the mirror. There's the problem.

Blogger VFM #7634 February 08, 2019 12:41 PM  

@37 Marcus Marcellus

You're right about British Isles women. There's even hard data demonstrating that they're sort of the white equivalent of black American women. Statistics from the U.S. immigration service (USCIS) show "immediate relatives of U.S. citizens" -- mainly spouses, since there's little chain migration from white countries -- from the Anglosphere being heavily male, whereas those from most European countries are heavily female.

This male attitude of "let's just run away" is part of the problem. We need to man up and put them back in the kitchen. Running somewhere else for women will just ensure that those resources are expended as well.

@45 Azure Amaranthine

Yes, this. British Isles men used to be fully hard-assed enough to be able to handle such women. I mean, consider Britain's history for the last half millennium or more. So speaking as a genetically British Isles man, I do think that we have to play on Hard Mode with our own women, but that we should be up to the challenge if we avoid any cuckservative brainwashing about the equality between the sexes, let alone sinking into Gammatude and soyboyism.

Blogger Lance E February 08, 2019 12:44 PM  

Scott C wrote:Once women (even "right wing" women) enter a male dominated institution they will work to change it to suit their sensibilities.

It's a little more complicated than that. Women in the presence of men will shit-test relentlessly and continuously. The institution only becomes truly feminized when men in leadership positions start to fail those shit tests.

That doesn't mean it's not extremely dangerous to admit women to a male institution. But the right wing isn't an "institution", and if you want your movement to expand, you'd better have a next generation.

The problem is that most women claiming to be right-wing are peacocking frauds. They see the catastrophically low-T state of neoliberalism and know instinctively that the kind of men they're looking for are mostly on the right. It's all theatrics. In reality, all women are "right-wing" when married with children to a dominant man. That's characterized by an absence of public displays.


Marcus Marcellus wrote:English-speaking and especially Celtic-American women are not like other white women. There is a pronounced mean-spiritedness to them culturally. They do not like men except in wanting to be men and in taking pleasures away from them.

That is called shit-testing, and the escalation into full-blown feminism is equally the fault of the men who consistently failed them.

More shy and submissive men (and I'm not criticizing - I've been there) may find this horrifying, but willingness to question authority is central to creativity and technological progress. It's very likely that the same genes that made Britain and later America globally dominant are the ones that code for these extreme shit tests. You want the men to have these traits, so they can defend their women, live out on the frontier, or revolt against terrible leadership like what we have today.

But something went wrong, and it was probably related to immigration: our ancestors decided it was a good idea to mix up the haughty, arrogant, purebred English women with more agreeable and submissive European (and many non-European) men who, as populations, could not pass their shit tests. They did this in both Britain and America. The result was a downward spiral of unhappy marriages with women lashing out against their husbands and society in general, leading to "reforms" that created generations of progressively weaker men, and progressively more brutal shit tests to weed them out. As noted in @24.

Blogger dienw February 08, 2019 12:44 PM  

Related: Once more Trump plays 4D, 6D, why even one-zillionD chess, are you tired of winning yet!

Blogger widlast washere February 08, 2019 12:46 PM  

Western men have become much too soft, too kind. When a woman acts up she should be told she's being an ass and it won't be tolerated. You DON'T HAVE TO put up with mindless shit.
I've been married 30 years, you can't put up with crap. If you put up with crap it gets worse, it's as if they think it's permission to misbehave.
Do your own shit testing BEFORE you marry her. If she passes, great, otherwise she knows where the door is.

Blogger Johnny Reb February 08, 2019 12:54 PM  

@dienw

You're having a baby Jenny? Don't worry Forest, that night in the tent you didn't do anything wrong.

Seriously, how does anyone think putting male and female pubescent and post pubescent kids together is a good idea? Oh wait the same people who thought putting Gay scouts and scoutmaster in the scouts was a good idea. At least you can separate the girls by giving them their own troops on the slide to oblivion. I assume the girls claimed they wanted access to the same scouting assets the boys had access to and the leadership were desperate to hold onto those assets. Of course we can't forget the SJWs gleefully riding this train off the cliff.

Vox is right, we have to build our own platforms. Or perhaps many, loosely knit together. Either way, the scouts are done. Like Vox, I need to have my name stricken from the Order of the Arrow. Makes me glad and yet sad at the same time I don't have sons. Anybody know any good women want to get a late start on a family?

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey February 08, 2019 1:11 PM  

@7
I'm sick of men in the alt-right saying "we need more women in the movement." Women who join the alt-right are fly paper for orbiters and they obsess over Islam to the exclusion of other issues because they don't want to obey modesty laws

"B-b-but how will we survive without muh e-thots, tho!"

Blogger Solon February 08, 2019 1:14 PM  

Hate to be that guy that sees a nose behind every curtain...

But feminism was started by Jews. Really. Most of the first wave feminists were Jewish.

Now, this doesn't mean that Anglo men are totally without blame here. They've got a sense of fairness and honor, and they've been Hoodwinked by public education and media to believe that women are and should be psychological equals to men (they aren't). It doesn't occur to them to think that women were kept out of the reins of power and influence for a damn good reason, since that reason has been brainwashed out of them for more than a century.

Unfortunately, there's no way to put American women back in their place. I'd be all for abolishing the 19th amendment but, like I tell people, that cat's out of the bag, and it ain't going back in.

No sense crying about it though. Like Meanoldbasterd quotes here, women are crazy, they've always been crazy, and getting mad about it is like cursing the sky for being blue.

Blogger Solon February 08, 2019 1:19 PM  

As cringey as it is, I never fail to laugh when people actually type out stammering, a la "b-b-but..."

Blogger Azure Amaranthine February 08, 2019 1:24 PM  

"Unfortunately, there's no way to put American women back in their place."

Yes there is. Seduction is sharp on both sides. Assuming that the 19th can't go back in the bag is assuming that law has the whip hand over culture.

It doesn't.

That being said, the 19th isn't going to jump back in the bag all by itself. Catnip though, catnip is a hell of a drug.

Blogger Peaceful Poster February 08, 2019 1:25 PM  

But feminism was started by Jews

proof

Credit RooshV

Blogger Peaceful Poster February 08, 2019 1:29 PM  

If the USA goes the way VD and others here expect, the 19th amendment will be irrelevant.

Blogger Johnny February 08, 2019 1:39 PM  

I imagine Socrates was thinking of a domestic situation when he said that if you let a women become your equal she will become your superior.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine February 08, 2019 1:43 PM  

"If the USA goes the way VD and others here expect, the 19th amendment will be irrelevant."

That is the much more likely outcome. Don't need to repeal a specific if its generality is just gone.

Blogger SAPPER February 08, 2019 1:51 PM  

I get heat from people but the fact is, Islam and Christianity are natural allies in the fight against feminism, homosexuality, and the destruction of the family.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother February 08, 2019 1:54 PM  

No

Blogger Ransom Smith February 08, 2019 1:58 PM  

Islam and Christianity are natural allies
Never go full retard.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother February 08, 2019 1:58 PM  

Too late

Blogger daeth February 08, 2019 2:06 PM  

This was the plan when they first announced they were going to let girls in. Girls are not allowed in the same troop with boys, they have to have their own troop. So nothing new here, this is how they planned it.

Blogger Cecil Henry February 08, 2019 2:13 PM  

@67:

We used to have an app for that.

Its called the 'Girl Guides'


A rose by any other name.... will still elict the same envy.

Blogger Sean Carnegie February 08, 2019 2:16 PM  

I'm sick of men in the alt-right saying "we need more women in the movement." Women who join the alt-right are fly paper for orbiters and they obsess over Islam to the exclusion of other issues because they don't want to obey modesty laws

Yeah, and how is Paul Elam nowadays? "This is a movement for men and, as such, we need women moderating and posting and writing for it!!"

St. Brevik preserve us!

It's funny, ya know? You watch the Norwegian movie "22 July" and just about ten or fifteen minutes in, after the scene with the kids saying what they'd do after becoming PM, you start to viscerally root for Breivik.

Blogger VFM #7634 February 08, 2019 2:20 PM  

The problem is that most women claiming to be right-wing are peacocking frauds. They see the catastrophically low-T state of neoliberalism and know instinctively that the kind of men they're looking for are mostly on the right. It's all theatrics. In reality, all women are "right-wing" when married with children to a dominant man. That's characterized by an absence of public displays.


@51 Lance E
I have a theory that women tend to be right-wing when they're genuinely in love with a healthy (non-shitlib) white man, and left-wing when they aren't. I haven't really seen anything to disprove this theory.

Blogger Damn Crackers February 08, 2019 2:29 PM  

Read "The Assemblywomen" by Aristophanes. He knew almost 400 years before Christ that women (and feminine men) ruin everything.

Blogger Longtime Lurker February 08, 2019 2:30 PM  

Dear Trend: You are not our friend.

Today it's the Boy Scouts. Tomorrow it's the Marine Corps.

And if the ladies put the Marine Corps in the ditch, it can stay there. Forever.

Blogger Tars Tarkusz February 08, 2019 2:31 PM  

One of the reasons feminists wanted women working was to lessen the pimp hand. It works both ways. It gives her a sense that she can walk out, take your stuff and have the cops be her pimp-hand demanding tribute.

But it also made the men rely on her income as well.

We have seen just what a lost generation of boys with little to no male influence has done to blacks.

A few people mention the dissolution of the US. If you think this is going to help, well, I wouldn't count on it. Things which cannot go on forever usually take much longer to stop than anyone could have foreseen.
As long as the US has the money to keep up the police state, you can forget about collapse of society or civil war or whatever anyone imagines is going to happen. This system will likely hold on to power way too long, and certainly way longer than anyone thinks it could.

This is just another example of how the entire thing is rotten from top to bottom and that there is no political or even non-violent answer. It is incapable of reform.

Blogger Laramie Hirsch February 08, 2019 2:37 PM  

Trail Life.

Blogger Elijah February 08, 2019 2:47 PM  

God Fearing christian woman of English ancestry would agree with this. my wife is 100% English ancestry, much smarter than i am but believes that biblical truth that the man is the head of the household. i have now let her work part time after raising our children and she is happy. but i don't need the money. she also asks my advice on whom to vote for.

marry a real white woman, treat her with respect but run your household. she will respect you and make your life great. if you cuck out she will take the reins and ruin your life. be firm but fair.

Blogger Haxo Angmark February 08, 2019 2:50 PM  

@56: "most of the first-wave feminists were Jews"

no, 99.9% of them were Jews.

go over to wikipedia/infogalactic and search "List of Jewish feminists"; you have to click a couple of times to bring it up.

I'd give the url, but (((they))) have restricted access with a block...though the page is still there.

Blogger veryfunnyminion February 08, 2019 2:59 PM  

"So speaking as a genetically British Isles man, I do think that we have to play on Hard Mode with our own women, but that we should be up to the challenge if we avoid any cuckservative brainwashing about the equality between the sexes"

Paging Mr. Capp, Mr. Andy Capp, on line 1.

Blogger Scott C February 08, 2019 3:04 PM  

Lance E -

That's a compromise with feminism. The only reason women can shit test men (in the workplace or otherwise) at all is because men collectively refuse to impose limits on women. The idea that it's ok to allow women into male domains only if men recognize and pass shit tests is a compromise.

It's not necessary to get women politically active in right-wing circles in order for them to grow. As if more women equals more babies. Tradthots resent the idea that a family life is a higher calling than airing someone else's political opinions. They resent the idea that that are natural boundaries on what women can do.

Blogger dc.sunsets February 08, 2019 3:06 PM  

What of "All Institutions are being destroyed from within" do people still misunderstand?

All of the old MUST be burned to the ground before green shoots can spring up. Until then, green shoots of "new" will be napalmed by the Dying Institutions.

Patience may be a virtue, but it's not a common one.

You'll know it's time for renewal when there's no longer anyone interested in calling Nazi, Racist, Homophobe, etc. We're nowhere near that point...yet...and given the continuation of Plenitude for today, where most people are stoned out of their minds on Everything-Is-Awesome, it's not around the corner either.

When the hardships befall us all, even many of us who deplore the sickening Sodom/Gomorrah cesspool of a society in which we live may occasionally long for these antebellum times.

Blogger Sammi Hass February 08, 2019 3:25 PM  

Aye, aye Elijah.

Blogger Kat February 08, 2019 3:26 PM  

Scott C wrote:Lance E -

It's not necessary to get women politically active in right-wing circles in order for them to grow. As if more women equals more babies. Tradthots resent the idea that a family life is a higher calling than airing someone else's political opinions. They resent the idea that that are natural boundaries on what women can do.


If every mouthy woman with extra time on her hands would reach out to and mentor two other women intensively.......we'd probably have more mouthy women.

Point being that we need to bring cultural value back to "unpaid" labor and actual Titus 2 ministries. If the choice is between writing a blog that reaches a few hundred a month and mentoring just three women in your community then we need to choose the mentoring every time.

Blogger Sterling Pilgrim February 08, 2019 3:32 PM  

Who wants to call these troops and insist their sons are allowed in with me?

Blogger Damelon Brinn February 08, 2019 3:58 PM  

I get heat from people but the fact is, Islam and Christianity are natural allies...

You misspelled "ridicule."

Blogger DonReynolds February 08, 2019 4:12 PM  

Growing up in the South in the 1950s and 1960s, my experience was typical at the time, even if no longer the case. Basically, males and females lived apart. An boy infant or toddler may be around the women when they are little but as soon as the boy was old enough, he was bundled off to be with the men and other boys. Mostly it was to learn how to be around men and listen to what men have to tell you and learn what is important in life, even if they do not seem very important at the time. The men and boys ate separately from the females and adjourned to a separate place to socialize. The women and girls tended to cluster about the kitchen and if the weather was not prohibitive, the men and boys picked a spot outdoors. It might be the porch if it was rainy or the living room on cold winter afternoons.

They were often segregated in school too, separate gym was traditional, but there were a number of courses that we known to be gender-specific without any official rules. Yes, the churches and schools both reinforced the social separation by gender, the only real exception being courtship and marriage. Married people normally sat together in church but otherwise people sat with their family, even if they were engaged.

The only time I can recall men and women eating at the same time was in a public restaurant. Even the school lunchroom was often separated by gender, sometimes by formal rule or arrangement and other times by their own preference.

So it was a bit strange for a young couple to figure out how to be married. Neither had spent much time around the other gender, except for siblings. They really did not know much about the other, but they usually managed to form lasting bonds and affection, some even while retaining a certain formality ...that is hard to describe. Almost like an employer-employee relationship, and it probably was, because the law made it that way.

Blogger Lance E February 08, 2019 4:45 PM  

Scott C wrote:The only reason women can shit test men (in the workplace or otherwise) at all is because men collectively refuse to impose limits on women.

Women will always shit-test men. Cultural and legal restrictions on female sexuality simply make them easier for average men to pass.

The idea that it's ok to allow women into male domains only if men recognize and pass shit tests

...is nearly the exact opposite of what I said. Someone commented that women "work to change" male institutions and my reply was explaining that, no, this is not a conscious act, it is simply the result of women being and acting like women.

Women should not be allowed in male institutions. But (a) not everything is an "institution" and (b) it is important to understand WHY they should not be allowed. It's not because of malicious intent. A woman can honestly, with all of her heart, want to participate in male activities without changing anything about them, but her intent ultimately makes no difference to the outcome, because shit-testing is as natural to women as competition is to men.

As if more women equals more babies.

Er, yes, that is how it works. That is the Fundamental Premise. 100 women and 10 men can produce exactly as many babies as 100 women and 10,000 men. Any model of socio-sexual behavior that does not take this into account is wrong and unworkable.

Blogger SciVo February 08, 2019 5:16 PM  

God damn these Locustmen, eating all of our centuries of hard-grown social capital to the ground. I hate them. I HATE them. These TWANLOCs are nothing but enemies inside the gate, and the sooner they get a traitor's just desserts the better.

Blogger Sammi Hass February 08, 2019 5:28 PM  

>A woman can honestly, with all of her heart, want to participate in male activities without changing anything about them, but her intent ultimately makes no difference to the outcome, because shit-testing is as natural to women as competition is to men.

Correct. Owen sums it up well. We women want to know the man we selected can handle x worry we see on the horizon, no matter how inane. He indicated it has to do with ovulation.

Blogger Pathfinderlight February 08, 2019 6:17 PM  

Evidence America is going downhill: .feminists don't even wait a generation between emasculation cycles. They just take what they can like it's a God given right, then act surprised when they face resistance.

Blogger OneWingedShark February 08, 2019 6:31 PM  

Sammi Hass wrote:Idk how to put this but one off the off-menu programmes in Scouts is to help boys in the following types go through rites of passage:

1. Sons of single mothers

2. Disabled boys

3. Immigrant boys wanting to assimilate

4. Nancy boys and sissies

5. Boys who have really sick siblings so they don't get to play and rough house a lot.

These are vulnerable boys in the true sense. I come from a scouting family so I've seen up close how it helps these types of boys.

Aye -- and that's what makes it all the more sad and tragic.

S1AL wrote:The writers at Babylon Bee are currently wondering how they didn't get there first.
Or The Onion.

Nostromo wrote:I pray to God, someone has enough sense to sue these two troops for discrimination. Give 'em what they want. Good and hard.
This is probably the only way to save the Boy Scouts: prayer and "vicious" attacks, make them hurt so bad they wish it was merely Conan's What is best? quote.

ZhukovG wrote:The intention all along was to destroy the Scouts. They were a Nationalist organization and the Globalists cannot tolerate their existence. Feminism and Social Justice are just weapons in the Globalist arsenal.
Indeed so! The globalists HATE any expression of Nationalism, which is also why they have been working endlessly to subvert the natural born citizen requirement in the Constitution in the past 3 cycles: (McCain v Obama; both had NBC issues), (Romney v. Obama; both had NBC issues), their attempt at making it (Hillary v. Cubanadian Cruz) -- all of these were "We Elite Globalists Win, You Deplorable Patriots Lose!".

The sooner we hit back with "heads we win, tails you lose" tactics and scenarios the better.

Zander Stander wrote:How can a former CIA director be the head of the Boy Scouts? That suggests it is an important arm of the deep state.
Or, perhaps, that the Deep State wants to destroy something that was instilling Nationalism.
I suspect that if we knew what the intelligence communities have done in recent decades we would have public-hangings at the best, and "kill them and their families, bulldoze their home and turn it into a dungheap" old testament style retribution as the more likely response.

Blogger Doktor Jeep February 08, 2019 6:52 PM  

All those kids I trained were never in the scouts.....

Blogger Republican Mother February 08, 2019 9:26 PM  

I've watched as the Girl Scouts destroyed their brand, program, and infrastructure by prioritising cookie sales over activities and selling off campgrounds. In addition, you got SJW rammed down your throat.

BSA still has a vast portfolio of beautiful campgrounds, a challenging program of activities, and limited fundraising. The BSA organization is a far better run organization.

Cub scouts go camping as a family and sisters are always have been apart of that experience, as well a being welcome to participate at meetings. Adding girls at this level has not changed anything. Our cub scout girls are segregated and have a female leader in each den. It's just like Girl Scouts used to be, and for busy parents, scout nights get consolidated.

The teens being in segregated troops is a no-brainer. Boys get led by men, and girls by women. Yes, BSA is on the logos, but so what? Are kids learning life skills and having fun? Yes.

It would have been preferable if the Girl Scouts hadn't committed suicide being money grubbers and SJW kill-joys. In BSA, most troops just focus on skills and move on. I haven't seen any SJW stuff, but it is something to keep an eye on.

Blogger Avalanche February 08, 2019 9:32 PM  

@49 "The mean, nasty women were frontier women just a century ago. Get tough or die gets out of control fast without the white blood cells and T cells (men), to keep them in check.
Look in the mirror. There's the problem."

Slapped her exactly on the butt! Er, that is, you hit it exactly on the head.

I was exactly one such hard Celtic/Germanic (American) woman: a shrill harridan femininist (for which I apologize abjectly). When a friend and I (in our mid-30s) were 'designing our perfect men' (hers was a Christian professor with pipe and leather patches on his tweed jacket); she was astonished when I said "I needed a man who was stronger and smarter than I was."

She thought I'd want a man I could he was willing to put in the time and patienclead, push, roll over. Oh HELL no! One of the things my amazing husband told, showed, and convinced me of, was that HE was the leader, and I could choose to follow -- and as I regained trust (that I long since lost in men), I found following him was the most wonderful place to be for even a hard feminist (who happily gave up feminism!)! However, to 'tame his feral female,' as he called it, took time and patience! It's do-able; and if you find an educable woman, and can put up with the metaphorical bites and scratches of a frightened wild animal till she learns trust -- it's probably worth doing. And you can't tame her with pressure or power or fear... You entice a wild animal; you can't force her.

Blogger Sammi Hass February 08, 2019 10:02 PM  

That was poetic, Avalanche.

Blogger pneutral February 08, 2019 10:13 PM  

'I get heat from people but the fact is, Islam and Christianity are natural allies...'

Makes no more sense than saying

'I get heat from people but the fact is, a Lie and the Truth are natural allies...'

Blogger S. Thermite February 08, 2019 10:44 PM  

@Republican Mother

I was in the Cub Scouts and Boy Scouts from age 9 thru 18 and earned all the ranks by age 15. Cub Scouts have always had Den Mothers and sometimes sisters around, I don’t disagree with you there. But the Boy Scouts were almost entirely male-lead. As they should be if they’re going to teach middle-and-high-school-aged boys to be honorable men.

Tthe BSA was mostly a parody of its former self when I was in, and it later signed its own death warrant by accepting gays. But even if they hadn’t done that, what divine providence do you attribute to the organization to make you think it can integrate females without them ruining it just like they’ve ruined the Girl Scouts? Will there be some unwritten rule that all-girl troops don’t get a say in setting the agendas because things are already “good enough”? [Snorts] The reason girls and women want to join is in the first place out of envy for what the boys already have. Is that emotional drive gonna just magically stop after they join?

I think the only reason the organization hasn’t already bent over and changed their name from the “Boy Scouts” to just the “Scouts” is because it would make the feminists in the actual Girl Scouts feel like their origanization’s name now designates them as “less-than.” Like having an organization called the “Lady Doctors of America.” Such a bottomless well of envy...

Blogger Joseph Maroney February 08, 2019 10:53 PM  

"How can a former CIA director be the head of the Boy Scouts? That suggests it is an important arm of the deep state."

The CIA has been waging psychological warfare on Americans since WW2 (when it was the OSS). It stems from the Rockefeller Foundation and Travistock. This is one war front of hundreds. People need to educate themselves on the topic -- it's far less effective when that target knows what's happening.

The BS being headed by a former CIA director is an obvious red flag, but the proof was already in its rotten fruits.

Blogger Avalanche February 08, 2019 11:16 PM  

@93 That was poetic, Avalanche."

Thanks Sammi. It was also true. I used to say -- AND MEAN -- that all men were shit. So hurt, so angry. I even took a 10-yr celibacy vow in my late-20s, because I 'did' men badly. If the men I picked to date, and later live with, I found couldn't be relied on, or cheated, or whatever -- the common denominator was ME! So, I 'stepped out' to try to work out WHY I picked men I couldn't trust. (Much growth, much reflection etc. etc. Sorry, gentlemen, I know: female solipcism.)

Met my (late) husband when I was 41 (so, no kids); and I had actually FOUND (well, been found by...) a man who was stronger and smarter! He 'finished' my awakening (about men and women) that had begun in the Navy. As I learned to trust him, I could (and did) relax my hypervigilance and turn over my safety to him...

A 'growth pattern' I often taught in my dating / mating / marrying advice list was:

I started out infuriating him by e.g., when we were heading to the airport, asking if he had the tickets. (He was always kind in telling me to 'not treat him like a child' ALWAYS kind!) (Old family pattern: absent-minded professor of a dad.)

Over some months, I learned to keep my mouth shut because I hated disappointing (or annoying) him, but I worried... what if he forgot them?

Then over some more months, as my trust and reliance increased: "if he forgets the tix, he will handle it and I don't have to; I can absolutely rely on him to deal." (Corollary: let HIM take care of me, as he prefers and directs!)

And finally after still more months: "I wonder what we're going to have for lunch on the plane." (No longer even thought about tix!)


But even *I* didn't see that change till after it had happened... Taming a feral female: offering gentle warm guidance in building trust and reliance. This is why it's so distressing that today so many of our wonderful strong men have withdrawn from forming a relationship and family; from 'saving' a woman from herself! (And yes, Owen Benjamin has some great funny anecdotes!)

Blogger inthebriarpatch February 08, 2019 11:16 PM  

My wife and I literally laughing loudly..

Blogger inthebriarpatch February 08, 2019 11:23 PM  

I have two daughters. I see them and my wife down recently and chewed ass. All were getting unbearable. That plugged the problem. All three reverted to feminine and nice.

Blogger inthebriarpatch February 08, 2019 11:27 PM  

Amen. Never get to the point you can't do without a woman. My Pa told me, "Son, never depend on no woman. Learn how to lean your home, do your laundry and cook your food yourself."

Blogger Ariadne Umbrella February 09, 2019 12:17 AM  

I am snickering at hapless continental man moaning about English and American women. Who else would make a great companion to conquerors of the known world? Latin Imperial women were terrifying in history when their men were conquering everywhere worthwhile. Mohammed's first wife ran him. Then he began conquering, and they were all harridans that bothered his generals.


The explorers who went everywhere had wives who were fierce. Their sisters went out to explore, too. They terrified most of the rest of the world.


Just because you can't keep up doesn't mean there's something wrong with the women.

Blogger Scott C February 09, 2019 1:33 AM  

Lance E -

Women will always shit-test men. Cultural and legal restrictions on female sexuality simply make them easier for average men to pass.

Just because there is an instinct to behave a particular way doesn't mean that instinct can't be controlled. You might not be able to totally suppress it, but sharp bounds can be imposed via negative reinforcement. Cultural and religious strictures are just one way of doing that; a swift backhand is another. Men and woman probably spend more time together now than at any time in history (and please be charitable with my words here - by "at any time in history" I don't mean 1 or 2 years ago, even though that counts as "history," I'm speaking of decades, particularly the decades after WW2). In the past, men spent more time outside of the home due to the labor-intensiveness of work, plus people died sooner and there was greater segregation of the sexes. Women not only have free rein to apply shit tests to men but more opportunities to do so. That could be nipped in the bud quite easily.

Someone commented that women "work to change" male institutions and my reply was explaining that, no, this is not a conscious act, it is simply the result of women being and acting like women.

How could it not be conscious? Just because someone does something on instinct doesn't mean they aren't aware of it or that they have no control over it. There are women in this very thread talking about it! This is not a patellar reflex.

That is the Fundamental Premise. 100 women and 10 men can produce exactly as many babies as 100 women and 10,000 men.

In theory, yes. But I don't know why a right-wing movement would sanction polygamy. The point is that women who enter right-wing circles don't end up producing children for various reasons. Even if they're not "peacocking frauds," they wind up attracting thousands of orbiters and it goes to their heads. They weaponize their orbiters to shame other men they label "MGTOW," and make everything about Islam. The right doesn't need women; it needs more dynamic men who can attract women but not as commentators or activists.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine February 09, 2019 1:53 AM  

"How could it not be conscious?"

Pretty easily. I'd agree that some parts of it probably are conscious by some women, but I don't think that most of it is conscious by most of them.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine February 09, 2019 2:15 AM  

"In theory, yes. But I don't know why a right-wing movement would sanction polygamy."

If you have a scenario where you have ten times as many women as men, and need to repopulate, presumably after repeated defensive wars of attrition.

Outside of that extremity though, there aren't any good reasons that immediately spring to mind.

Blogger Jill February 09, 2019 2:28 AM  

Girl Scouts was fun when I was a kid in the 80s. They did whatever outdoorsy stuff they chose to do. We shared a camp with the local Boy Scouts (not at the same time), and I do remember the boys built bridges and the like there, which was one thing the girls never did. But it was because they didn't want to, not because it was forbidden. I cringe when I see parents encouraging their daughters to want some actual forbidden thing they feel they lack. It's playing the part of the serpent.

Blogger Jim the Curmudgeon February 09, 2019 5:07 AM  

@97

"Taming a feral female: offering gentle warm guidance in building trust and reliance. This is why it's so distressing that today so many of our wonderful strong men have withdrawn from forming a relationship and family"

Good posts, but I should point out one salient fact: many of us are not interested in taming a woman, going through some long process of building some bond of trust and love that eventually allows her to adopt better habits. No more than a lot of women willingly sign up to 'tame' an alcoholic or a man with chronic gambling problems.

Marriage is partly a market issue. It may sound unromantic, but it's the truth. If we have a choice between potential mates, we aren't going to choose the one who requires a significant investment of time and energy to turn into a decent wife.

A strong, independent and desirable man will put up with drama and bad behaviour if a woman is young and very attractive. When it comes to marriage, he is likely going to find another option. Everyone has bad habits and behavioural patterns that could be amended, but there are limits to how much maintenance work most people are willing to do.

Blogger Sammi Hass February 09, 2019 6:24 AM  

I was in a co-ed troop. It was great because it was explicitly designed that way so only those seld-selected in would join. There were many alternatives with only males.

My mom and I got into it because Guides sucked. We actually had a leader in Guides who was a young offender and would bring her creepy boyfriend to our meetings. Mom tried to get her kicked out, especially when I hurt myself under her watch but the higher ups said "community service" or some other excuse.

Anyway, Scouts was something we definitely joined out of jealousy. The troop had one female leader in the lowest position. It worked. But it wouldn't work with a female leader who doesn't respect men or boys. My mom has lots of brothers so it was a good match.

Blogger Republican Mother February 09, 2019 9:46 AM  

But as the article that kicked off this post stated, the girls are not integrated and they have female leaders. Are you referring to larger council type integration? Seems like BSA has been nerfed enough already to where there's nothing the girls can't handle. No more fasting during Order of the Arrow, for example.

The SJW takeover of Girl Scouts was done by by the liberal elitists in an ivory tower somewhere, not by the females of America. I watched mystified as they chucked so many badge requirements for some workbooks and social activism training that no one asked for. Girls have been ditching them for years- creating American Heritage Girls as a response, for example. Yes, GSA is pissed that girls have a place to run to, but they get what they deserve. Girls are not joining out of envy, but because their organization said FU, your going to do crafts and read workbooks. I see this as a free market issue.

I have BSA books from the 50s, so I know the nerfing that's taken hold of the BSA without girls being involved. That comes from our SJW ivory tower elites.



Blogger spinoza February 09, 2019 11:58 AM  

This is it?
If only the US ran out of money, a police state would end. Last time I checked it owned assets, debts, contracts, but not money.

Nothing is just anything and you are being rediculous.

Blogger JohnofAustria February 09, 2019 12:11 PM  

The seeming "this is opportunity" dichotomy can only be resolved when you understand the real motivation, being anti-(white)men.

Blogger Joseph Maroney February 09, 2019 3:09 PM  

That's a target, but they truly are anti-everybody.

Blogger Ominous Cowherd February 10, 2019 8:54 PM  

spinoza wrote:This is it?

If only the US ran out of money, a police state would end. Last time I checked it owned assets, debts, contracts, but not money.


The government can print unlimited amounts of currency, which is the proper name for what you're miscalling ``money.'' It can't print stuff for the currency to buy, so when you figure out that their ``money'' is worthless, that becomes a problem for them.

The Weimar Republic survived its hyperinflation by a few years, so don't assume that will immediately end the US empire.

Blogger demetria rogers May 30, 2019 12:44 PM  

Hello, I am Demetria Rogers. After being in relationship with my husband for years, he broke up with me. I did everything within my reach to bring him back but all was in vain, I wanted him back so badly because of the love I had for him, I begged him with everything, I made promises but he refused. I explained my problem to my friend and she suggested that I should rather contact a spell caster that could help me cast a spell to bring him back , I had no choice than to try it. I messaged the spell caster, and he assured me there was no problem and that everything will be okay before three days. He cast the spell and surprisingly on the second day, my husband called me. I was so surprised, I answered the call and all he said was that he was so sorry for everything that had happened He wanted me to return to him. He also said he loved me so much. I was so happy and went to him that was how we started living together happily again. The spell casters email is : drjazazasolutions@gmail.com You can email him if you need his assistance in your relationship or any other Case.

Doctor Jazaza could help you with the following:

1) Love Spells

2) Lost Love Spells

3) Divorce Spells

4) Marriage Spells

5) Binding Spell.

6) Breakup Spells

7) Banish a past Lover

8.) You want to be promoted in your office/ Lottery spell

9) want to satisfy your lover

Contact this great man if you are having any problem for a lasting solution through drjazazasolutions@gmail.com

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts