ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2019 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Friday, July 26, 2019

The truth will set them free

James Kirkpatrick correctly lambasts the Republicans' self-destructive tendency to cling to immigrant propaganda, Magic Dirt, and Paper Nationalism.
Republicans still don’t know how to talk about race, identity and nation. Which is a problem, because, as an article in Axios recently bragged, “The single biggest threat to Republicans’ long-term viability is demographics”. [The GOP’s demographic decay, by Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen, July 18, 2019]

The repeating pattern: a Republican 1) says something 2) is accused of racial insensitivity 3) immediately grovels and offers concessions. The mostly white Republican base gets demoralized, the Cultural Marxist Left is emboldened, and the Overton Window shifts in the wrong direction.

In a desperate move, Republicans have lately been even trying to use support for Israel as a kind of proxy for white America—a strategy unlikely to work because Jewish organizations never reciprocate.

The solution is simple. But it requires a modicum of courage—one person with influence explicitly defending the right of Americans as Americans to defend their interests. For years, American leaders, including supposed “conservatives,” have been saying that anyone who believes in certain “ideas” is an American. Not surprisingly, current American political leaders are taking this to its logical conclusion and saying that America belongs to everyone in the world—not its citizens. As Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez recently declared, the country “belongs to everyone.”

But it doesn’t. It belongs to American citizens. And if American citizens can’t stake an exclusive claim to their own country, then they must admit they simply don’t have one anymore.
Remember, US citizen != American citizen of the USA. The latter is a subset of the former. There are many US citizens who are not Americans and there are also more than a few Americans who are not US citizens. Americans are the genetic descendants of the original People of the united States, for whom the Tranquility, the general Welfare and the Blessings of Liberty are to be secured by the US Constitution.

That doesn't mean that Americans can be the only citizens of the federal state, it simply means that anything and anyone that does not promote the tranquility, welfare, and liberty of Americans, as determined solely by Americans, is anti-American and anti-Constitutional.

Labels: , ,

71 Comments:

Blogger Whitecloak July 26, 2019 12:25 PM  

He's not wrong, and it will happen eventually.

Probably too late to save the entire territory of the de jure imperial heartland, but I'm fine with that.

Blogger Robert What? July 26, 2019 12:29 PM  

I think we need to stop using the terms "White Supremacist" and "White Nationalist" and instead use the term "White Separatist". After all, if they all hate Whites so much how can they object to Whites wanting to separate themselves? Wouldn't the Blacks and Browns be happy if the Whites went away by thrmselves?

Blogger VD July 26, 2019 12:32 PM  

Come on, Robert. That's the sort of stupid dialectic logic that resulted in "Dems are the Real Racists" and the result will be just as ineffective.

Blogger Mark Stoval July 26, 2019 12:34 PM  

"After all, if they all hate Whites so much how can they object to Whites wanting to separate themselves?"

All Educrats and other associated morons tell us that black kids can not learn unless white kids are in the classroom with them. It is like magic don't ya see.

Blogger Dos Voltz July 26, 2019 12:38 PM  

The USA is just a spot on the globe now that might as well be renamed "Job Fair."

If you can get yourself to the Job Fair from anywhere else in the world, you win a prize of de facto citizenship. Next comes the H1B1 visa if you have just a little bit of education, but if you're an illiterate peasant, not to worry, there are tons of gibmedats that get tacked on to landscaping and taco jobs.

In a few more years we'll have to change the name again from "Job Fair" to "Pot o- Gold" (cuz "Free Shit" doesn't have a nice ring to it). Then get rid of the Bad Eagle as national emblem and change it for a weird little Mexican Leprechaun with a sombrero.

Also, white people are evil.

Blogger Robert What? July 26, 2019 12:42 PM  

Well it made sense to me, but what the hell do I know. How could anyone object to White Supremacist, and why?

Blogger VD July 26, 2019 12:44 PM  

For the Nth time, effective rhetoric has nothing, literally NOTHING, to do with what makes sense to you.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother July 26, 2019 12:54 PM  

All the while, Libertarians are standing on the ramparts screaming "everyone come on in!"

Blogger The Cooler July 26, 2019 12:54 PM  

Paging Darth Afghan....

Blogger Mark Stoval July 26, 2019 12:54 PM  

@6

"How could anyone object to White Supremacist, and why?"

I can tell you. I am from the south and have always lived in the south.

From what I can see, "White Supremacist" is exactly the same as saying KKK, Segregation, Jim Crow, and/or lynch mobs hanging blacks.

Now you can argue that there is nothing wrong with those things, but you are not going to get most normal people to buy that.

PS: VD is normally correct on these matters. Best to listen.

Blogger Mark Stoval July 26, 2019 1:03 PM  

@8

All the while, Libertarians are standing on the ramparts screaming "everyone come on in!"

Yes, if you mean left libertarians or beltway libertarians. No if you include Rothbard/Hoppe right wing libertarians.

I only respond since you have mentioned this several times before and I find most of your stuff
insightful.

See here: https://rightwingpopulist.com/libertarianism-is-not-about-isolated-individualism/

A long read but informative. I tend to agree with almost all of the essay. And with that, I have to go tend to real life matters. Darn.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother July 26, 2019 1:06 PM  

Mark,

Who knows the right wing libertarians even exist? The left wing special ones scream much, much louder, and have control of the major libertarian publications, the party, and other organizations.

Rhetoric.

Blogger Ominous Cowherd July 26, 2019 1:07 PM  

The Cooler wrote:Paging Darth Afghan....

Indeed. There is no such thing as American, and he is more American than anyone whose ancestors conquered this land. I'd say just ask him, but he never waits to be asked.

Mark Stoval wrote:From what I can see, "White Supremacist" is exactly the same as saying KKK, Segregation, Jim Crow, and/or lynch mobs hanging blacks.

Now you can argue that there is nothing wrong with those things, but you are not going to get most normal people to buy that.


Normies won't buy that today. That's never going to change, until suddenly, one day, it does change.

I'm going to start replying to praises of immigration with ``Is it good for our people?'' We'll see if it works.

Blogger Ominous Cowherd July 26, 2019 1:09 PM  

Mark Stoval wrote:A long read but informative. I tend to agree with almost all of the essay. And with that, I have to go tend to real life matters. Darn.

Long but informative essays butter no parsnips. Intellectual wankery is wankery, even when it's right.

Blogger furor kek tonicus ( all aboard the Askren hype train ) July 26, 2019 1:16 PM  

12. Stg58/Animal Mother July 26, 2019 1:06 PM
Who knows the right wing libertarians even exist?


it's worse than that.

far, FAR worse than that.

because the 'right wing' Libertardians are the Dialectically contradictory and incompetent wing of a party / philosophy which is already contradictory and incompetent.

at least the Left Libertards are consistent that they want to open the border to EVERYTHING.

the 'right' Libertards propose to close the border to some people.

and how, pray tell, do you intend to enforce Border Law without violating the Non-Aggression Principle? since the border of a Nation is, by definition, a Collective Property.

and how can you even justify prohibiting People when you demand the free transfer of Things? shall Things have more 'rights' than People?

Blogger IrishFarmer July 26, 2019 1:18 PM  

That's a good point Vox but since the WASP founders have been rendered an irrelevant minority decades and decades ago, sort of going the way of the Indians, the question now is what is America going to be? Who is going to be the new Americans? I'd say the outcome seems obvious but it's not set in stone yet.

Republicans aren't cowards either and it wont take someone with courage to turn this around. Even an influence is just going to get tarred and feathered for stepping out of line. Just as the WASPs were replaced by south and east Europeans and finally by 3rd worlders the entire Republican political class is going to need to be replaced or brought to heel. Right now they are beholden to moneyed interests, and whites cant wait for the "adult in the room" to step up. Either whites bad together and start doing some ethnic advocacy, subversion, and institutional long marching like their levantine friends have done or they will continue to dwindle. I dont see any other reasonable options and sitting around waiting for courage, or that one historical figure who sometimes seems to show up at just the right time, is a false hope.

Feeling ranty I guess, sorry aboot that.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother July 26, 2019 1:30 PM  

One of the hardest decisions I make daily is who I hate more: libertarians or boomers.

Blogger Doktor Jeep July 26, 2019 1:31 PM  

All we need is the truth. And what is that truth?
The fact that the other groups openly desire to take over and dominate.
All that needs to be done is to get them to expose themselves. This is already happening. The It's Ok To Be White campaign worked well. Something simple like that, which can just be done anonymously, and without asking cuckservatives and the media for approval, will do fine.
We're not going to get a Boomeristic "Solve it all at once so we can go back to sheepling it up" situation. What we are getting is a ride that never ends. But what else would we do with all this time, get fat watching TV (like boomers)?

Blogger maniacprovost July 26, 2019 1:32 PM  

stop using the terms "White Supremacist" and "White Nationalist" and instead use the term "White Separatist"

The problem is not with the logical implications of "Supreme" "Nation" or "Separate." The problem is with "White." White is bad. You have better results replacing that.

American Supremacist. American Nationalist. American Power. American Brotherhood. American Genocide.

Blogger McChuck July 26, 2019 1:33 PM  

There are only about 200 million Americans. Of that, about 60 million are avowed traitors. That leaves 140 million patriotic Americans.

We fought WWII with fewer people.

Blogger maniacprovost July 26, 2019 1:34 PM  

what else would we do with all this time, get fat watching TV

That was the plan until KyoAni burned down and Netflix changed its programming to All Satan Worship All the Time.

Blogger maniacprovost July 26, 2019 1:37 PM  

who I hate more: libertarians or boomers

Boomertarians?

There are only about 200 million Americans. Of that, about 60 million are avowed traitors.

I think the problem with mass deportation of illegals and former illegals is that it's RACIST. Therefore, I propose that for every Hispanic POC that we deport, we also deport one Privileged Cis-White. It will kill two birds with one stone.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother July 26, 2019 1:38 PM  

McChuck is right

Blogger Laramie Hirsch July 26, 2019 1:54 PM  

Fantastic. One of your best posts.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother July 26, 2019 2:03 PM  

What a solid article. Nails it perfectly.

Blogger Jeroth July 26, 2019 2:13 PM  

Trump has really been running with that Jewish proxy angle lately. It makes me want to rip my hair out. Fortunately, he's toned it down a bit lately to focus on justice for our beloved American cultural icon A$AP Rocky. Out of every great American rapper who dindu nuffin, A$AP definitely dindu the nuffingest. As Cernovich said today on twitter, we need to send John Bolton to Sweden, A$AP

Blogger KPKinSunnyPhiladelphia July 26, 2019 2:15 PM  

VD wrote:

That doesn't mean that Americans can be the only citizens of the Federal state, it simply means that anything and anyone that does not promote the tranquility, welfare, and liberty of Americans, as determined solely by Americans, is anti-American and anti-Constitutional.

Exactly right.

Yes, "posterity" meant what it meant when it was first articulated, but we have, fortunately or unfortunately, the "melting pot."

So, it's all about making the best of a bad situation. Will we?

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother July 26, 2019 2:16 PM  

All of us who are less than 100% founding stock, myself included, will make the most of it.

Blogger peacefulposter July 26, 2019 2:17 PM  

there are also more than a few Americans who are not US citizens.

Fast track immigration for anyone in the world who is both:

(1) of English descent
(2) adheres to the American ideal

Gotta weed out all those English liberal idiots like the Remainers.

Blogger Salt July 26, 2019 2:23 PM  

Remember, US citizen != American citizen of the USA

What is an American but one who is within the familial tree of survivorship as gifted by the one(s) who bequeathed? Non-Americans hate being called paper citizens. They loath it. They also know it's true.

Blogger Ominous Cowherd July 26, 2019 2:24 PM  

peacefulposter wrote:Fast track immigration for anyone in the world who is both:

Dude, seriously? Why would we allow any immigration, period? Our problem is immigration, period.

If we need more people of English descent, we are quite capable of breeding our own.

Blogger Mystic On Main July 26, 2019 2:26 PM  

"Americans are the genetic descendants of the original People of the united States, for whom the Tranquility, the general Welfare and the Blessings of Liberty are to be secured by the US Constitution."

The problem is that there is no law to that effect, and the Preamble to the constitution does not confer any powers on any branch of government, let alone define the terms of citizenship.

What's necessary for this perspective to have real meaning is to fundamentally change Section 1401 of the federal code. Has anyone written the bill that would do that?

Blogger peacefulposter July 26, 2019 2:27 PM  

@31 Mr. Cowherd - If we need more people of English descent, we are quite capable of breeding our own.

That would indeed by option #1.

Blogger Beardy Bear July 26, 2019 2:32 PM  

Nobody even uses white supremicist. Your posture is apologetic and defensive. Big Bear's "white enthusiast" or simply "American Nationalist" are both rhetorically superior, they are neither imperial or defensive. I prefer the latter.

Blogger sammibandit July 26, 2019 2:36 PM  

Let me try my hand at this. Fwiw I used Modi as a case study and applied his victory to Trump. Like it or not GEOTUs is perfectly suited to withstand globohomo criticism, so we should direct it to him. He's of immigrant stock who assimilated so well he's GEOTUS and his kids, including Ivanka are right in stride. He's /our/ guy.

The opposition clearly thinks race and it's related terms are relevant, creating an in for ineffective argumentation. We don't have to use it since they're thinking emotionally and not logically. Let's go over it.

The 2016 election of Trump proved America is still majority nationalist. Critics expected him to lose but he won the electoral college in a stunning victory and the jury is still out if he won the general election. Clearly the legal voters of America want an America-First agenda.

No one expected the Rhinos to keep the House, as it is customary to lose it in the first gubernatorial election following a presidential. We can conclude that the America-First agenda is still endorsed by the people as of late 2018 using voting because the trend continues.

The challenging part of the presdiential election was that it was a referendum on globalism. Hillary and the incumbent Trudeau verses Trump and the ousted Harper. Canada voted pro-carbon tax in late 2015 and America quashed it in 2016. Since those years Canada has outranked Amercia in pro-Heritage Stock voting in polls for lower or no immigration. Canada has also gone pro-provincial sovereignty even in Trudeau's stronghold of Quebec which is carbon tax opposed. We can clearly see the Heritage Stock of this continent whatever their ethnicity going harder, and harder nationalist. These trends will continue to the next federal elections.

Blogger Beardy Bear July 26, 2019 2:37 PM  

Libertarian boomers top your list?

Blogger sammibandit July 26, 2019 2:42 PM  

Good use of logic

Blogger swiftfoxmark2 July 26, 2019 2:45 PM  

Is is always fascinating to see Republicans shill for a demographic that makes up 2-3% of the American population and votes Democratic at nearly a 70%+ rate.

Even though Whites are down to between 60-70% of Americans, simply appealing to that demographic would secure the elections for them in the future.

Blogger Vlad Z. July 26, 2019 3:04 PM  

I understand your definitions: "US citizen != American citizen of the USA", as you've explained this previously here.

Do you think James Kirkpatrick is using the term "American Citizen" with your definition in mind?

The article is titled: "Say It, GOP!—or Just Give It Up: Open Borders Is TREASON! the Left Is ANTI-WHITE!"

Is he using the term "American Citizen" as a proxy / polite term for "White Citizen". That seems to be more what I get out of the article.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash July 26, 2019 3:21 PM  

IrishFarmer wrote:Republicans aren't cowards either
This is obviously false. Very sobviously. So obviously false one wonders whether you're trying some bullshit NLP game to get us to do the wrong thing.

Blogger Lance E July 26, 2019 3:49 PM  

Anyone who believes in certain ideas can be an American. Which ideas, exactly? The idea that anyone who believes in certain ideas can be an American!

If you just believe that America is for everyone, then you are automatically an American yourself!

Blogger VFM #7634 July 26, 2019 3:55 PM  

Is is always fascinating to see Republicans shill for a demographic that makes up 2-3% of the American population and votes Democratic at nearly a 70%+ rate.

It's essentially religious rather than logical in nature. Jews have a lock on the moral authority across the Western world. They most likely will continue to until after the reign of the Antichrist.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan July 26, 2019 3:55 PM  

There will be no "white racial" this or that unless it comes from the Left, our intellectuals are basically useless since it is a moral question not one of facts and figures and all that brainiac shit. So if there is to be any of it then the tyranny of the anti-white Left will produce a reaction that leads to white this or that of some substance.

And FTR my definition of American is not some pure white racial this or that since any ethny will have its fuzzy edges.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan July 26, 2019 3:57 PM  

#42 The American Empire is the anti-christ, been of that opinion for 20 years and IMO it becomes clearer by the day. Yockey in his "Imperium" called the "cultural distorters" exactly right.

Blogger Skyler the Weird July 26, 2019 4:06 PM  

End Welfare and Corporate Welfare and no one will want to immigrate.

Blogger Damelon Brinn July 26, 2019 4:23 PM  

End Welfare and Corporate Welfare and no one will want to immigrate.

Wrong. That should be done, but it's not a solution to the invasion and demographic replacement. Even if you could end all welfare--including health care and education and the whole safety net that's been built up over more than a century--being homeless and begging on the street in America would still be better than living in many other countries. Eliminating all welfare wouldn't discourage the dirt poor and diseased, the people actually fleeing from war or crime, or the ones with legitimate skills who want to take our jobs. It wouldn't stop the ones who are coming here with conquest in mind.

Lolbertarians try to shift the focus off controlling the border to welfare, but I doubt many of them really think we can End Welfare, considering we've had no luck at that for the last.....ever. Mostly they're just trying to save their open borders ideology.

Blogger Don't Call Me Len July 26, 2019 4:26 PM  

After all, if they all hate Whites so much how can they object to Whites wanting to separate themselves?

Access to white people is the most important of the "Human Rights" that bind us all together, irrespective of our individual desires.

Blogger OneWingedShark July 26, 2019 4:43 PM  

maniacprovost wrote:who I hate more: libertarians or boomers
Boomertarians?

Heh -- thanks for the laugh.
I came across another phrase that made me laugh: Judeo-Boomerism.

Ominous Cowherd wrote:peacefulposter wrote:Fast track immigration for anyone in the world who is both:
Dude, seriously? Why would we allow any immigration, period? Our problem is immigration, period.

Bring forth the negative immigration rates!

swiftfoxmark2 wrote:Is is always fascinating to see Republicans shill for a demographic that makes up 2-3% of the American population and votes Democratic at nearly a 70%+ rate.

Even though Whites are down to between 60-70% of Americans, simply appealing to that demographic would secure the elections for them in the future.

It makes a lot more sense when you consider that they are [as a whole] about NOTHING they claim to be; this is why they never DO anything to further those claimed-goals when they actually have the power. They are essentially controlled-opposition; expand the NRA and it's absurd "OMG! Obama/Boxer/Schumer/Trump is going to ban handguns/longguns/supressors/bumpstocks!! SEND MONEY!" campaigns [while never going on the offensive to, say, repeal the GCA or NFA] into a political party and you have a good approximation of the Republican party.

Blogger Miguel July 26, 2019 5:02 PM  

Vox (OT):

(((Professor Jeff Sharlet's))) book about a "secretive Christian group influencing the White House" will be a new Netflix series.

https://youtu.be/7knN2TXQPzw

After 99,99% of the comments were the New Holocaust, they dusabled the comment section.

((Jeff))) is angry

Blogger Richard Rahl July 26, 2019 5:11 PM  

*That doesn't mean that Americans can be the only citizens of the federal state, it simply means that anything and anyone that does not promote the tranquility, welfare, and liberty of Americans, as determined solely by Americans, is anti-American and anti-Constitutional.*

This is what the neoclowns don't want the American people to understand. The neoclowns are irrelevant in an America where the actual Americans understand this point.

Blogger tublecane July 26, 2019 5:38 PM  

"Republicans have lately even been trying to use support for Israel as a kind of proxy for white America"

Lately they've almost explicitly identified with it as a sort of 51st state. But implicitly it's been much more than lately. I was going to say it's tragic that latent romantic pathos for the nation and the Ways of Our Fathers should be wasted on Judeostan. But really it's just pathetic.

Imagine if a tenth of the intensity they feel in defense of the Israeli people were reserved for Heritage America? Or if there were a secular American pseudo-religion like Holocaustianity. I don't care for that sort of idolatry, but it's better than something based on events in foreign lands in which we were barely involved.

Blogger tublecane July 26, 2019 5:58 PM  

@2- "how can they object to Whites wanting to separate themselves?"

Why did the civil rights movement happen? Because they're crazy.

What you're describing is called segregation. It is a great evil for some reason.

Blogger Ominous Cowherd July 26, 2019 6:06 PM  

tublecane wrote:What you're describing is called segregation. It is a great evil for some reason.

Darkies cain't make it wifout Whitey.

Blogger OneWingedShark July 26, 2019 6:14 PM  

tublecane wrote:Imagine if a tenth of the intensity they feel in defense of the Israeli people were reserved for Heritage America?
Then we'd already have at least $3.8 Billion for a wall…

Blogger tublecane July 26, 2019 6:17 PM  

@15- "Dialectically contradictory?" Not moreso than most ideologies, I don't think.

About the left being more consistent, that's not necessarily a good thing. A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.

Mindless, robotic application of the "Non-agression Principle" is a hallmark of contemporary libertarianism , but I don't even know whether it's mentioned in Rothbard, Hoppe, etc.

"Things have more 'rights' than people?"

No, the rights in question would be the right of people to trade, the things being traded across borders being incidental.

Why it would be a contradiction or even a problem to rationalize why you accept trade in things and not people, or rather not some people, escapes me. Is this the NAP again? Contemporary libertarians must be among the shallowest and boringest thinkers ever if that's a problem. Have they somehow argued themselves out of being able to come up with compromise?

Anywau, that is not the whole of libertarianism. It has a long history.

Blogger Avalanche July 26, 2019 6:35 PM  

@19 "The problem is not with the logical implications of "Supreme" "Nation" or "Separate." The problem is with "White." White is bad. You have better results replacing that.

American Supremacist. American Nationalist. American Power. American Brotherhood. American Genocide."

The problem with THAT is anyone -- posterity, immigrant, white or not -- will think, either always or carelessly at first hearing, that you mean everyone living in the US; the Portugese-"Americans," the somali-"Americans," the indian-"Americans," the chinese-"Americans"

Those suggestions are useless, because they do not adequately identify the group you mean. And any attempt at rhetoric that requires you to explain "who you mean" is NOT rhetoric.

And "United-Statesian Nationalist" is a contradiction before you ever begin.

And, pace Dark Lord, I await your further education to clear up my resistance, but "Christian Nationalist" -- or "Nationalist Christian" -- cannot but ALSO include e.g., African-"Christians," unless for that term, too, one must explain it means ChristenDOM, not Ibo animists who claim allegiance to Christianity: would they not be proposition Christians?

Blogger Snidely Whiplash July 26, 2019 6:42 PM  

tublecane wrote:Anywau, that is not the whole of libertarianism. It has a long history.
A long long history of failure, co-option, philosophical incoherence, materialism, culti-Marxism, ignorance of history, humanity and culture, insignificance, and more failure.
And failure.

Blogger Avalanche July 26, 2019 6:46 PM  

@30 "What is an American but one who is within the familial tree of survivorship as gifted by the one(s) who bequeathed? Non-Americans hate being called paper citizens. They loath it. They also know it's true."

May I suggest everyone to try to use, judiciously and when not job-threatening, the term Paperwork American as much as possible? Imagine my surprise when last night, while having dinner with a couple of our "hate dinner" regulars: two old codgers and a early-30's fellow who is very much "one of us" in his beliefs -- one who was involved in the hanging of the then-Alt-Right banner over the 14th Street Bridge here in Atlanta "You will not replace us: End immigration now." When I mentioned "Paperwork American" -- he had not HEARD the term before -- and thought it was brilliant. Make SURE people around you have heard of it... the once-run bell cannot be unheard...

Blogger Unknown July 26, 2019 7:02 PM  

The lefts definition of white supremacist is anyone who believes in and is proud of Western Civilization.

Okay let's embrace it and make it main stream.

Blogger Stilicho July 26, 2019 7:55 PM  

Step one: define "white nationalist" as neo-nazi; step two: if you are nationalist and your skin is white then, ipso facto, you are a "white nationalist"/neo-nazi.

Blogger Matamoros July 26, 2019 7:59 PM  

I liked his argument:

What is America? America is a majority-white nation created by Anglo settlers, built upon English legal customs and institutions, and speaking the English language. If it ceases to be these things, it ceases to be America.

Period.

"Before the coming of the Pilgrim Fathers and the settlers at Jamestown, “America” did not exist as anything more than a geographic expression.

"This is also why “Native Americans” is a nonsensical expression. It’s also something of an insult not just to Americans but to indigenous people who, until granted citizenship as recently as in 1924, were members of their own nations with their own histories, identities, and traditions."

We, the descendants of the Founders, are the Native Americans - not the aborigines.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother July 26, 2019 8:13 PM  

Matamoros,

Excellent point. What did the Iriqouis call the land they lived in? Did they call it America?

Blogger Avalanche July 26, 2019 8:51 PM  

@61 and @63 "What did the Iroqouis call the land they lived in? Did they call it America?"

Whenever anyone whines: "go back to Europe!" I answer; Okay, but we're taking back WITH US everything we can, and we'll be destroying the rest! No one is coming here for the land and the many violent aboriginal tribes. They're coming here for what we **White European-derived Christians** built when we SETTLED here! We colonized, we did not immigrate! You want us to go back to Europe? Fine, you can start over from scratch! Or maybe you'll have to fight the Chinese for the land, cause they sure want it! This is OURS!! We built it!

Often, it shuts them up...

Blogger sammibandit July 26, 2019 9:22 PM  

I think they called it Kan-a-ta, land of many tents. Canada derives its name from that Iriquios word. Neat, eh?

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother July 26, 2019 10:35 PM  

Very cool

Blogger Argus Bacchus July 26, 2019 11:57 PM  

There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

https://www.rt.com/usa/465176-trump-wall-pentagon-supreme-court/

Blogger VD July 27, 2019 6:13 AM  

We, the descendants of the Founders, are the Native Americans - not the aborigines.

I prefer "merciless Indian" as a description myself.

Blogger Avalanche July 27, 2019 10:55 AM  

@67 VD: "I prefer "merciless Indian" as a description myself."

I do too: I was trying to be polite in your living room in @63... {wink}

I approve of and respect "merciless," in its place, and wish we posterity would pick it back up!

Blogger Azure Amaranthine July 28, 2019 9:45 AM  

"A long long history of failure, co-option, philosophical incoherence, materialism, culti-Marxism, ignorance of history, humanity and culture, insignificance, and more failure.
And failure."


Liberation is not a core or ultimate good.

Example, liberation from sin and death is good. Liberation from God and morality is evil.

Blogger JovianStorm July 28, 2019 11:04 AM  

Trump just needs to start showing mugshots of MS13 rapists and murderers with their gold teeth and horrible tattoos along with the aftermath of their violence.

And directly connect it to AOC and the globalist Left.

Rhetoric isn't as effective among the lower IQ as visceral reaction to graphic imagery followed by "you will be next if you let these animals in."

Blogger Ty Brant July 29, 2019 6:27 AM  

@64 Kanata is a mohawk word, it means village. What the Indians called their land obviously depended on the tribe. For the Mohawks it was Kanien'keha

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts