ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2019 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Monday, January 20, 2020

An actress beats the Queen of England

Queen Elizabeth II was just stared down by a third-rate half-breed actress:
The Queen and Prince Charles decided not to strip Prince Harry of their HRH titles and Duke and Duchess of Sussex rank to avoid looking 'petty', it was claimed today.

Her Majesty is said to have considered stripping the couple of their most prized titles and instead referring to them as the Earl and Countess of Dumbarton – putting them at the same level as Edward and Sophie, Earl and Countess of Wessex.

However, the Queen and Prince Charles are believed to have felt preventing the couple from using 'HRH' in public and for commercial use - while still officially retaining the title - was a sufficient enough change.

A source told the Evening Standard: 'The Sussex title is one of the ancient royal dukedoms given to him ahead of his wedding to Meghan, along with other titles. Removing it was seriously considered and discussed at the highest level.'
Amazing. She could have prevented the whole thing by forbidding Prince Harry to marry an obviously unsuitable woman, but she didn't. Now she's kowtowing to an actress for fear of looking petty.

Not a good show by the so-called sovereign. No wonder she's permitted her country to be invaded and occupied.

Labels:

57 Comments:

Blogger maniacprovost January 20, 2020 2:15 PM  

Of course it's easy to think that any random English person would have been a better monarch for the last 70 years or so, but probably only a male with real military service would have the clout to seriously affect politics in the face of the globalist influence.

Blogger Lazarus January 20, 2020 2:24 PM  

She is 93 years old. Basically a hostage. Someone else is running the show now.

Blogger Miles Plastic January 20, 2020 2:34 PM  

It seems like this whole article was written just to make the point in the final sentence. While I don't agree with the analysis of the Queen's motivations, or that she personally has permitted her country to be invaded and occupied, the country is nevertheless invaded, overrun by immigrants.

Blogger Dire Badger January 20, 2020 2:36 PM  

When women rule...

Blogger Akulkis January 20, 2020 2:37 PM  

As per my BPD/Vampire comments the other day, the BPD/Vampire portrays the target-victims's defenders out to be villains.

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2020/01/choose-wisely.html#comment-66



http://voxday.blogspot.com/2020/01/choose-wisely.html#comment-67


Symbolically, this is like the scene in "Love at First Bite" when the woman's boyfriend attempts to kill the vampire in a restaurant by shooting the vampire with a pistol, and the vampire turns the whole thing around into the bf being the monster, who gets dragged off, kicking and screaming.

Conclusion:
What this reveals is: whatever Queen Elizabeth is, she probably isn't a BPD herself. In BPD vs BPD, the BPD with the more powerful social position or other power (government, police) tends to win.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother January 20, 2020 2:52 PM  

Less QE2
More QE1

Blogger Johnny January 20, 2020 2:55 PM  

I take it to be royalty playing to the public sentiment. Sign of the times. People who have never been through any hardship don't feel vengeful, and aren't much given to having other people punished. So you misbehave. What the hell, no problem.

I am no fan of Islam, but maybe it is the solution. Not the solution most of us would like, but maybe the one we will get. The believers in Allah have no problem with vengeance.

Blogger Manuel January 20, 2020 2:58 PM  

She was too rigid in being a non interfering monarch. As head of her church could she not have stopped the sodomitical infiltration of her clergy? But no, just kept her mouth shut as they all fell to degeneracy.

Blogger KPKinSunnyPhiladelphia January 20, 2020 2:58 PM  

VD wrote:
No wonder she's permitted her country to be invaded and occupied.

Well, considering that she is a pretend monarch, and that whatever "power" she has is purely symbolic, acquiescence to the prevailing political zeitgeist is about all she can do. Tony Blair is the major guilty party here, though there's plenty of blame to go around.

Sure, I suppose she could have gone all Enoch Powell on us, made a speech and such, and, who knows? Maybe that's what she felt. But she has horses and gala dinners, and lots of hats to deal with, seeing as how she has to keep the British milliners busy busy busy!

The Royals are now a BBC reality TV show. Forget about stuff like, you know, being British, and history, and the continuity of a kingdom in the face of implacable enemies, like the Spaniards and Germans of the past....or the Pakis of the present.

The kingdom that gave us railroads, great Scottish philosophers, and Maxwell's equations is now just a "diverse" (a very LONG i in that word) debauched council housing hell hole with omnipresent drunkenness and "asian" grooming gangs.

Remember, the guy running at you with a knife is not yelling "olly olly oxen free" but "Allahu Akar." Just so we're clear.

Oh, well, the royals are just another reality TV show or a soap opera with really nice clothes...take your pick. It's why whenever you see the monarch about, the receiving lines are overwhelmingly female. Harry and Megsie are just the latest plot twist in the Kardashians of the UK.

Talley HO!!!

Blogger tublecane January 20, 2020 2:59 PM  

A part-black actress. That needs be reiterated. I don't think, for instance, Elizabeth Banks or some other random white actress would get away with it.

I was watching some mediocre show starring mostly whites but featuring a smattering of black women. All of them had outrageous and obnoxious hairdos for some reason. A couple of the whites had exaggerated -dos, but that was directly connected to the characterization. One of the blacks was an engineer, and her hair would just get in the way.*

Point being, black girls are running amok in the minds of our betters.

*also, the show took place in the future, which partly explains the outrageousness.

Blogger Bucephalus January 20, 2020 2:59 PM  

The queen is obviously scared of the R word also.

Blogger Player 2 January 20, 2020 3:02 PM  

Wow, they're divorced! Oh sorry, I thought it was 3 years from now.

Blogger tublecane January 20, 2020 3:02 PM  

@3- Liz 2 didn't do anything to prevent the invasion, but maybe she didn't know how. She's not a politician or a grand strategist. It happened gradually and in ways beyond her direct constitutional power.

On the other hand, some things, like preventing her grandson from marrying a foreign mulatto whore, fell directly within her power.

Blogger Chief_Tuscaloosa January 20, 2020 3:04 PM  

Forbid Harry from marrying a third-rate half-breed actress who may or may not have slept with Harvey Weinstein et al to achieve success? Racist! How dare you, sir!

Blogger Storm Rhode January 20, 2020 3:08 PM  

When they were tired of Princess Diana's shenanigans they didn't strip her of her title. My guess is they're keeping Meghan on the royal books so they can clean things up if she gets too far out of line.

Blogger cecilhenry January 20, 2020 3:17 PM  

ITs so embarrassing to watch the Royals betray all standards and let themselves and their nation be run over with muttering a word beyond tried virtue signalling.


They are truly cringe worthy

Blogger steb January 20, 2020 3:19 PM  

The police say there are old cops and there are bold cops but there are no old bold cops. The same probably applies to monarchies.

She's spent her whole life playing a bad hand well. In this case, the door's still open for Harry to come back into the fold once he's come to his senses. Often that's all you can do.

Blogger Thomas A'Beckett January 20, 2020 3:28 PM  

Incredible how far the royal family has fallen. The fact that a third rate actress can run rings around them shows that they are subject to celebrity worship as are their subjects.

The royal family is now only a soap opera and it must be close to its final season.

There was great hope that William and Kate would be able to revive this institution, but it's too far gone.

Blogger MortemTyrannus January 20, 2020 3:41 PM  

Actress......i think her original profession is closer to the truth.....yachting whore.

Blogger WillBound January 20, 2020 3:44 PM  

As a resident of Sussex, I think "my" Duke and Dutchess have only actually visited it once.

Blogger Cataline Sergius January 20, 2020 3:47 PM  

Megexit is a real problem for the Queen when you look at.

Sure the Royals mostly cut ribbons and give speeches but there are a lot of ribbons and podiums out there.

Elizabeth is now seriously shot staffed. Phillip can't do the work anymore. Andrew is in disgrace. It's probably for the best that Prince Edward stay out of the public eye. Charles and Cammilla are both in their seventies.

The duty roster of young active royals now only has two names on it. William and Kate.

Blogger Vaughan Williams January 20, 2020 3:47 PM  

What this reveals is: whatever Queen Elizabeth is, she probably isn't a BPD herself.

There's a relief. Wasn't looking good for her for a while there. Maybe better to look at those "courtiers" surrounding her. The ones that wouldn't let Harry talk to her even though she wanted to talk to him.

Lloyd de Mause went through old letters and diaries; sexual abuse of European royalty in their childhood years by adult courtiers has been a thing for a very long time.

Blogger Cataline Sergius January 20, 2020 3:51 PM  

I suspect this is the Ghost of Diana.

Her initial response to Princess Diana's death was a PR disaster for the Royal family. I think that was the first time she really felt she no longer had a finger on the pulse of the nation.

She couldn't tell what the public wanted anymore.

I think Elizabeth is having a kind of flash back to that crisis.

Blogger Zorlig January 20, 2020 4:08 PM  

At least Brittan still has the mechanisms in place by which restoration can be affected. Far better than our predicament.

Blogger LAZ January 20, 2020 4:13 PM  

@maniacprovost: Being a 10th cousin to Diana I know I could have done better. Xi Jinping would look like a pansy compared to me and nobody would have been happy, but we wouldn't have been invaded

Blogger William Marron January 20, 2020 4:19 PM  

And she's ugly.

Blogger Robert Browning January 20, 2020 4:36 PM  

They Queens needs trade with Africa, cellphones for raw materials, but the couple knew they are being used and decided not to play.

Blogger Avalanche January 20, 2020 4:52 PM  

@20 "As a resident of Sussex, I think "my" Duke and Dutchess have only actually visited it once."

Congratations, may it continue thus!

Blogger Nate January 20, 2020 4:58 PM  

dude. markle is dead. this is just feigning civility to provide cover for the tragic accident that happened late this year.

Blogger CS January 20, 2020 5:06 PM  

"No wonder she's permitted her country to be invaded and occupied."

Unfortunately, the constitutional settlement of 1689 denies HM QEII the power to order traitors in Parliament to the Tower there to have their heads removed from their shoulders. Otherwise, Liz II would undoubtedly have so ordered long ago.

Blogger The Course of Empire January 20, 2020 5:07 PM  

To be fair, the queen is a figurehead. She really has no power to speak of. Parliament dictates the terms and she just goes along with it whether she likes it or not.

Blogger God Emperor Memes January 20, 2020 5:17 PM  

I could not help but laugh: https://amp.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/meghan-markle-filmed-pitching-to-hollywood-star-at-lion-king-premiere/news-story/53d652789e431669786b5219fd95bce8

Blogger God Emperor Memes January 20, 2020 5:19 PM  

You left out Prince Edward. Of course, he's far too..."theatrical", shall we say...to be in the public eye.

Blogger English Tom January 20, 2020 6:01 PM  

Maybe this is all just a theatrical deflection to take the heat off one prince Andrew who has recently lost his 'street cred'!

Blogger van helsing January 20, 2020 6:06 PM  

was the apparent marriage of m2 (related to obama perhaps?) to harry the bastard (he isnt of royal blood) also a plan to get the crown sucked into the maw of US tax law?

Blogger Ominous Cowherd January 20, 2020 6:06 PM  

Bowties are a bad look, Queenie. I guess this is why rule by women is a curse.

Maybe she's waffling and cucking because she's trying out for the GOP?

Blogger Ominous Cowherd January 20, 2020 6:16 PM  

@8, she's head of nothing. Figurehead? maybe. Based on her performance, the Queen is like Miss State Fair: she's the figurehead, but only as long as she does NOTHING! but what she's told.

Blogger Azimus January 20, 2020 6:46 PM  

Last offensive of the American Revolution.

Winning.

Blogger Meng Greenleaf January 20, 2020 7:51 PM  

I remember reading a proposition that stated Aristocratic institutions are superior to Democratic because the sovereign have a vested in their land and their people. So, they're not going to allow demographic replacement - as that would be their likely replacement.

Yet, here we are.

So far, the empirical evidence seems to suggest Communism, ironically, works best at protecting the core nation. By remaining so poor, Communists are able to starve out the dysgenic civilization-destroying gammas, while concurrently keeping woman in a state of stress; which probably drives them towards instinctual behaviours like hypergamy and motherhood, as opposed to unnatural behaviours like barren and single cat lady. Kind of like a low grade fever.

I also image that cycles of calorie reduced famine could be eugenic. Anecdotally I was told really dumb Chinese died during their communist induced famines. More intelligent people could probably see the writing on the wall and planned accordingly. Or so I was told.

Blogger Akulkis January 20, 2020 8:51 PM  

"was the apparent marriage of m2 (related to obama perhaps?) to harry the bastard (he isnt of royal blood) also a plan to get the crown sucked into the maw of US tax law?"

No.

There is rumor that the U.S. government is already a wholly-owned subsidiary of the U.K.

Notice how many laws/agencies of equivalent purpose are given identical initialisms (eg: IRS, FOIA) even though they have different names.

Blogger W Molders January 20, 2020 9:30 PM  

By half-breed, I assume you mean half-English. It sounds like you may be having a bad flashback to the George I era.

Blogger Scuzzaman January 20, 2020 10:35 PM  

Perhaps she really is fond of the boy, and wants to leave the door open for his return after the inevitable end of the marriage?

If she’s really more concerned about optics then she is fallen far.

Blogger furor kek tonicus ( if you're going to call down the lightning, best not flinch when the thunder rolls ) January 20, 2020 11:58 PM  

"Both videos were unearthed after it was announced that Markle signed a deal with Disney, providing voiceover work for an unknown, upcoming project.
The work was done in exchange for a donation to non-profit in Botswana."


well, there you go.


that's the Fox Island pedo ring or the Clinton Global Initiative right there.

do something "in exchange" for a TAX DEDUCTIBLE "contribution"
...
and pay yourself a hefty annual salary for "administering" the "non-profit".

it would be such a shame if +90% the funds went to the operating expenses of the "charity".

Blogger Roman Daoist January 21, 2020 12:15 AM  

No, having the pair hung, drawn and quartered - claiming high treason - would have been petty.

And a little funny.

Blogger God Emperor Memes January 21, 2020 12:33 AM  

Capt. Darling: "I'm as British as the Queen!"
Capt. Blackadder "So, your father's a German, you're half German, and you married a German?!"

Blogger Mandos January 21, 2020 12:48 AM  

Or to put it otherwise, a mid-tier representative of a protected category took the upper hand in a social status contest against a top-tier representative of a non-protected category, which is not all that surprising but I trust the Queen to understand exactly what she's up against and why she thought it wise to back down and take the humiliation.

The world of the affluent liberal American woman takes prevalence over that of the pretenses of a traditional royal family.

Blogger caecus January 21, 2020 12:52 AM  

UK acquiesces to a not-UK...I'm shocked, just shocked!

Blogger Korbin Ransley January 21, 2020 1:35 AM  

I think sometimes the Royal Family gets criticized unfairly, and doesn't get enough credit when it is due.

Humanity has some experience with representative governments, Monarchies of a number of types and sizes, and direct democracy or referendums.

What's going on in the countries populated by the descendants of Northern and Western Europeans seems to have something to do with the Globalist ability to subvert those populations, their institutions and, representative governments, and stifle reaction, or reform.

Love, respect, and Well wishes to the House of Windsor.

Blogger Jim January 21, 2020 7:40 AM  

Sure as the sun rises, there will be another opportunity.

Blogger Vlad Z. January 21, 2020 10:32 AM  

Isn't Harry the one who actually joined the army and then fought in Afghanistan?

I think maybe he just doesn't enjoy the make-believe role her has been cast into.

In the past the second and third sons of aristocracy were expected to go seek their fortune in foreign lands.

Who can blame him for not wanting his life run by a 90 year old woman.

Blogger stevo January 21, 2020 2:34 PM  

Why do I like the queen? I don't know but I do.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash January 21, 2020 3:07 PM  

stevo wrote:Why do I like the queen? I don't know but I do.
Don't know why I love you like I do.
All of the changes you put me through.
You take my money, my cigarettes.
I haven't seen the worst of it yet.
I want to know, can you tell me?
I don't understand.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash January 21, 2020 3:10 PM  

Her Majesty's a pretty nice girl,
but she doesn't have a lot to say.
Her Majesty's a pretty nice girl,
but she changes from day to day.
I want to tell her that I love her a lot,
But I gotta get belly full of wine.
Her Majesty's a pretty nice girl,
And some day I'm gonna make her mine.

Blogger PurpleMelbourne January 21, 2020 5:11 PM  

British sovereignty is in the hands of EU until Britain escapes. It is arguable that according to equity (from the Bible) that the result of referendum on Brexit was sufficient to return sovereignty to the Queen, while statutorily Britain is still Contractually tied up in a Federation. So its a gray matter at the moment. But the City of London shadow government has occupied and controlled Britain, and subsequently America anyway. The 19th century is when the Rhodes Society conquered the British Empire. Since Queen Victoria's death the monarchs have been captive zoo animals.
Rumour has it the Queen is the source of Brexit after the EEC tidal movement "ran its course".

Blogger FaithHopeLoveBear January 21, 2020 8:17 PM  

I don't have a problem with concept of monarchy, but the UK royals are a den of pedos and all sorts of degeneracy. Maybe those two were increasingly becoming a liability due to their less evil nature and needed to be gotten rid of without murder involved.
I don't believe any narratives pushed by the media.
When is that vampire going to die already?

Blogger damaris.tighe January 22, 2020 8:18 AM  

Consider that the Royals' handlers from birth have been generations of Foreign Office types that were so despised by Thatcher.

The Queen and heirs have had careful tutoring in
Constitutional Law and the limits of their powers.
Unlike the recent Parliament the Queen is likely to scrupulously honour constitutional conventions

Blogger damaris.tighe January 22, 2020 8:31 AM  

I was just wondering how this would have played out if the wonderful Prince Phillip was the monarch.
Hilarious.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts