ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2018 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Saturday, December 27, 2003

Democrats is Socialists

Not all of them know they are, and even fewer are willing to admit it publicly, but it's true. Henry Lamb points this out in a typically solid article.

If there is a difference between the Socialist Party and the Democrat leadership, it is a difference without distinction. In fact, the Socialists' web site says: "We are not a separate party ... Many of us have been active in the Democratic Party ... to strengthen the party's left wing, represented by the Congressional Progressive Caucus."

And they said the era of Big Government was over. Right.

A little test

I probably won't keep this referral script on for long, but I am curious to know from where folks are hailing. I assume most come here originally from WND, but that's not necessarily so. If this gets annoying, I'll remove it. I spotted it at Desert Cat's site - apparently a fair amount of you are visiting there. Which is cool, as he has some interesting links there.

If you check out the link, you'll see again how always comes down to Plato, Rousseau and Marx. You can blame a surprisingly significant percentage of the world's problems on those three men.

Dick Simkanin Trial

If you live near Fort Worth, Texas, and are opposed to raw government tyranny, you should consider showing up at the Fort Worth Federal Courthouse at 9:00 AM on January 5th. Dick Simkanin, a man who refused to withhold income taxes for his employees, has languished in jail for seven months despite having no criminal record and NOT having been convicted of a single crime. After two grand juries failed to indict him, he finally faced a trial on November 26, which ended in a mistrial after Judge John McBryde refused the jury nine separate requests for information, including one for a copy of the Internal Revenue Code and one for the judge to provide a copy of the specific US statute that required Simkanin to withhold. Simkanin was then re-indicted by a grand jury that refused to either take Simkanin's testimony or see evidence that Simkanin wished to present in a process that violated numerous rules of court procedure.

The second trial will be on January 5th. The US government and the corrupt IRS-Federal Court cabal must not be permitted to run roughshod over the Constitution, Federal law and the rules of court procedure to imprison an innocent man who is guilty of nothing more than obeying the law.

Eventually, the truth will come out.

Why I like George Bush

I don't like him as a President, although as a Commander-in-Chief, I think he's pretty good. I despise what he's done in allowing Congress to sabotage both the future economy and future American liberties with Patriot I and II - you'd think Mr. Goldberg and the other conservative Patriot apologists would be sharp enough to discern the fact that something HAS NOT been used does not mean that it WILL NOT be used - and he did not take the opportunity to take the US out of the UN when it was sitting there like a fat pitch over home plate, just waiting to be driven out of the stadium, prior to the start of the Iraqi war.

What I like, though, is how President Bush is always visibly uncomfortable in a suit on a state occasion, especially when you contrast this with how happy and relaxed he appears when he's in a flight jacket surrounded by the soldiers under his command. For all his failings, I can't help but like seeing a president who manifestly doesn't get off on the trappings of his power.

Will I vote for him? No. But I think I 'd enjoy shooting the breeze with him for an evening. It's entirely possible that, like Churchill, the president is so focused on the ongoing war - he has a lot of information that we do not - that he sees everything else as completely irrelevant for the time being. It's even possible that he is correct.

Mailbox: Exemplary Indoctrination

SB writes: Now I know why I read this blog again. Wow, that's just about the oddest thing I have ever read. My son attends a public elementary school that is only slightly less conservative than Jerry Falwell. Of course, I live in a relatively conservative state (Texas), and grew up in one (Tennessee), so perhaps the experience differs depending on where you have children in school. I'm not sure a "rightist" education is any better than a "leftist" one. Granted, I'm not exactly sure what would constitute a "leftist" one (teaching egalitarianism, avoiding sexist language, leaving religious references out of the curriculum, perhaps?).... I have a feeling my version of politically neutral education is exactly what this person was referring to as "leftist indoctrination."

Never trust your feelings in matters of simple fact. This straightforward role-playing of Marxist distribution theory is what the public school teacher was writing about - hardly politically neutral - and this is only one example of many. I got my hands on a Profiles of Learning test five years ago, and the amount of raw propaganda in the reading comprehension section was unbelievable. I'm quite sure I would have completely failed the "comprehension" test, simply because I was in possession of facts that contradicted the "correct" answers - the test really struck me as being more something to weed out those with views deemed inappropriate than to test any ability to read. I recall that one Wisconsin homeschooled girl who scored over 1400 on her SATs failed it - fortunately, the public outcry in Minnesota over the PoL's brainwashing program caused the state Senate to repeal it, which has slowed down its implementation somewhat.

Like most parents whose children are in public school, SB is unlikely to have much information about precisely what is being taught in his child's school, what the education establishment is planning to teach there in the near future, and why. He cannot know, because he is not permitted to see the most important tests that his child is given. This determination to hear, see and think no evil of the government schools is interesting, in light of the fact that more and more public school teachers - even award-winning teachers like John Gatto - are damning them in no uncertain terms.

That explains it

The Star Tribune reports: An overwhelming percentage of Minnesota, 78 percent, have a definite belief in God. Another 13 percent lean toward believing there is a god, according to a Star Tribune Minnesota Poll.

No wonder Howard Dean is suddenly finding the words to talk about his faith, if one can call it that. Even if the belief of this 91 percent doesn't have an impact on their lives or their political views in the majority of cases, blowing off a huge portion of the electorate in order to win favor with the virulent secularists does not sound like a winning strategy, no matter how favorably the New York Times regards it.

I'm not questioning Howard Dean's faith, I just don't know what it is. I haven't heard him make any precise statements about where he stands; his recent comments , however positive, have been too general to make any firm conclusions. More on this Monday.

Friday, December 26, 2003

Mailbox: Irony in Education

A public school teacher writes: I am a Christian teaching in the public schools, [subject deleted] to be precise. I have been teaching for [a reasonable number of] years. Some days, I think I need to stay in the classroom. Who else is going to stay and fight to see that these kids get something better than a leftist indoctrination? On the other hand, my wife is expecting, and I want to be able to provide for my family. I'm looking at going into administration, where I can still impact kids in a positive way, yet make enough money to send my child to a private school (or have my wife stay at home and home school). Maybe I just needed a sounding board, but I would appreciate any thoughts you have.

P.S. On your recommendation, my cousin and I are reading Cryptonomicon by Neal Stephenson. I'm only 200 pages in, but I'm enjoying it so far.


Interesting, to say the least. It's easy to dismiss what I say about leftist indoctrination; one hopes it would be a little more difficult to ignore similar statements coming from a veteran public school teacher. Note that this man sees a need to keep his child out of the very schools with which he is intimately familiar. I advised him to pursue administration, since he has no real power to fight the noxious indoctrination as a teacher, and in any case, his first responsibility must be to his own children, not those whose parents unfortunately see fit to abandon them to the intellectual wolves. One leads best by example, I think.

By the way, please note that I cleared it with him before posting his email here.

And one more gift

However much it would bother the official Favorite Scottish Neo-pagan of Vox Popoli, I consider this to be a real Christmas present of sorts. Mr. Charles Stross announces that he has finished the first draft of the ninth and final novellette of Accelerando. The novel will be published by Ace in 2005. I will certainly be picking up a copy of that, along with Glasshouse, its already-written - albet not yet published - sequel.

I sent him an invitation today to be interviewed on the fascinating subject of singularity. The short length of a column cannot possibly do him justice, of course, but we can post the whole thing right here. Ah, yes, the joy of the blog....

UPDATE - Before we make it official, we should probably make sure that Nell McAndrew is not a neo-pagan herself first. As much as we admire Mr. Stross, there is simply no comparison. Shall we say, presumptive Favorite Scottish Neo-pagan, then?

Speaking truth to power and parents

Neal Boortz writes: The single most prevalent form of child abuse in this country is the act of sending a child to a government school. We worry incessantly about the separation of church and state. We would do well to devote half as much attention to the separation of government and education.

I spent the entire fifth grade reading novels in the library, because my teachers realized that there was absolutely no point in making me sit through class. And I laughed when the Indiana Law professor on Fox the other night inadvertantly let the cat out of the bag when he was explaining why a child giving out candy canes with Bible verses or something on them was violating the separation of Church and State.

What is okay in a public street, said the professor, is not okay in a public school, because the children are not there because of choice, they are forced to be there. With the government, it always comes down to force, doesn't it?

Decisions, decisions

Thanks to Santa, I'm looking forward to reading the following books:

Quicksilver by Neal Stephenson
Ilium by Dan Simmons
Singularity Sky by Charles Stross
Kant and the Platypus by Umberto Eco

I'm just finishing the first Aubrey-Maturin book now. Not the first I've read, but the first in the series. Like it, don't love it. I started with book seven, mostly because it was in the right place at the right time. I think I'll probably start with Stross. I've been looking forward to reading it for a while - love his Atrocity Archive - and besides, I need to savor the notion of having new Stephenson that I can start reading anytime I want for a while before I actually crack the cover.

Logitech spies

RM writes: I took special interest in your Logitech adventure and decided to write you. I recently had my own Logitech experience. After purchasing their $100 web cam, I installed the software and drivers on my Windows XP Pro system. Not only did I get a wonderful collection of software to "help me", I also received some spyware. I do not recall if it was Backweb Lite or another snoop.... In case this happens to you, I recommend using the following free spyware detection and removal tool: SpyBot: Search and Destroy at http://www.safer-networking.net. Be sure to type .net and not .com. I had the pleasure of typing in the wrong URL while working on my mother's computer after Christmas dinner today.

Thursday, December 25, 2003

Tales of the White Buffalo

Julie writes: I can only imagine who the WB picked number 1 to earn his glorious award, but try these two daisies on for size: In a league where receptions are only worth 1/2 a point, the first overall pick this year was: Terrell Owens. Thusly, the male coach of team Furious Anger has ever since been refered to as Nancy. Ouch. Worse yet, the number 5 overall pick: Amos Zero... Zero... How the heck to you spell that anyway? Ah well.. you know who I'm talking about. This is far worse when you consider that Clinton Portis was still on the board.

I'll bet there are a lot of us out here who'd like to see more WB tales...


Ask and you shall receive... this is also a belated response to a request from CL regarding campus poetry slams. First, the WB's infamous pick was Randall Cunningham in 1999, echoing Dennis Green's third-worst coaching decision - that is to say: 1) taking the cursed knee; 2) Picking Dimitrius Underwood; 3) Going with Randall over Brad Johnson in 1999. Still, none of these are as bad as one guy in my brother's league, who last year picked Kordell "INT" Stewart #1. You can't even ride a guy who does something like that, you just have to replace him with someone who actually watches football now and then.

Anyhow, our senior year of college, I inadvertantly made an enemy of a squidgy little girl in one of my classes, who took great exception to not being able to make inane assertions about the assigned text without being verbally sliced and diced in public. She complained to my professor, who then requested that I refrain from criticizing anything this poor, intellectually-defenseless female might happen to say in the future. Since she was the 4.0 apple-of-her-professor's eye and I had shown up two week's late for the semester on the very last day that one could show up without being dropped, I could hardly fault the man for his partiality. So, I agreed to the condition and promptly stopped going to class. Got an A anyhow, since it mostly was on Plato and I already knew the material, so the whole thing was no big deal in my opinion.

The White Buffalo, however, disagreed and vowed that Squidgy must be destroyed. Such is the Way of the White Buffalo. He learned that Squidgy, being a good campus pseudo-intellectual, took active part in a monthly poetry slam, where everyone wore black mocknecks and inflected execrable verse on one another, invariably to polite applause. The WB proposed that the three of us - WB, Big Chilly and I - should each compose the worst poems we could possibly write, then read them aloud at the lunchtime poetry slam. The brilliant clincher, contributed by Big Chilly, was that we would not show each other the poems before reading them aloud to an unsuspecting public. And so it was agreed, and we drank a solemn toast to confusion upon the foe.

I composed an abomination that ran thusly:

I like you
You like me
I think that's neat,
Like a room that's just been vacuumed.
Vaccuum me.

And so on, in like manner. I should note that this was prior to any of the infamous trio of "sexist pornographers" becoming Christians, and that in this particular crowd, a white male talking about anything that could possibly be interpreted as female submission was tantamount to a chauvinist act of war. After sitting through a few howlers, including one by the university's Poet Laureate which began, unforgettably: "Where do the homeless people go when it rains?" Big Chilly was the first to step up to the podium, reading first a short poem about losing his keys, then wowing the crowd with The Eagle and the Lama. It was hard not to laugh, especially when he dropped the bomb about "swooping down upon the back of that belching beast."

I was up next, and I did not dare to meet anyone's eyes, reading my splendidly awful creation in a tightly compressed voice that the crowd mistook for deep emotion, although the metaphor could hardly be missed by a coma victim. Their intense interest only made it harder to keep a straight face, especially when the newspaper that Big Chilly was hiding behind began to shake. But I held it together, even through the applause, and then all eyes were on the White Buffalo, who unleashed the unspeakable act of artistic desecration that is The Heart: A Tautology. It struck the awed crowd into respectful silence, with lines like "won't you send up a Space Shuttle Columbia of love to colonize my windswept soul", "my hopping, sneezing pomegranite" and that unforgettable stanza:

"Agammemnon, slay my combatants
So that the mighty hand of Jocasta,
Like a very large lemon drop,
Will fall upon my brazen breast."

I seriously thought I was going to blow out my spleen or something, but even under this intense provocation, all three of us held it together, as our intent was to leave decorously without alerting the ridiculous would-be artistes that they'd been brutally mocked. Unfortunately, before we could make our escape, Squidgy took the podium and prefaced her poem with the statement: "Okay, this poem is from the point of view of me - dramatic pause - and a lizard." That was too much. She'd effortlessly managed to top our very worst. All three of us simultaneously exploded with laughter and fled outside, where we nearly expired from laughing so hard.

So, the moral of the story is: do not mess with the White Buffalo. I seem to recall hearing that Squidgy never showed her face in that class again, although I can't vouch for it because, as I said, I'd already bagged it myself. Believe it or not, this was not the only time that The Heart: A Tautology appeared in public - it was even published in a real newspaper once - nor was this our only act of artistic ridicule on campus. But those are stories for another day.

A not-so-merry Logitech Christmas

Okay, who is the conceptually-challenged programmer who failed to foresee that there might, possibly, somewhere, be someone with a dual-boot system that wanted to use a web cam? Especially considering that it's the Pro version. This is why I absolutely hate it when companies try to "make it easier" for their customers by taking over the installation process. At the very least, provide a way for those of us who know what we are doing to have access to the necessary files. After following the instructions - which consisted of two pages saying nothing more than "install the software from the CD and follow the on-screen instructions" - I was most displeased when no such instructions appeared following the automatic reboot.

Digging into the CD revealed a README file, which in the Windows 2000 section stated "due to a bug in the installation program, an installation on a dual-boot system will fail." That's it. No work-around, no information on where one can find .inf files to install the drivers manually, nothing. The installation dates back to 11/02, however, and there's a newer download dated 10/03 on the Logitech website, so I'll download that and give it a try. Maybe they've fixed the bug; unfortunately, there's no way of knowing ahead of time, since Logitech's support FAQ deals with nothing but the most basic information, uttering banalities such as "if the camera doesn't work, see if the USB cable is plugged in" and "if the install fails, turn the computer off and try installing again". Then what, repeat as desired? Thanks, that's a big help.

Anyhow, if this newer install doesn't work, we have two options. Convert her system back into a single-boot Windows system or take this one back and get a different web cam. Gee, such a difficult choice....

UPDATE - No harm, no foul. The install downloaded from the web site can handle dual-boot and Space Bunny is in, as they say, full E-F-F-E-C-T otherwise known as effect. I think it was easier when you only needed batteries for the new toys, instead of drivers.

Wednesday, December 24, 2003

Glory to God

Christ the Savior is born! Merry Christmas to all, and may God bless us, every one.

Mailbox: True

D-Lo writes: After reading your commentary on the JRR Tolkien fiction epic turned movie" Return of the King" I can now understand why you are also so intrigued by football in the NFL. The former was written as a work of fiction, the latter has become a work of fiction on par with WWF/WWE. Since the Minnesota Vikings were egregiously robbed by overt officiating on behalf of the Dallas Cowboys on December 28th, 1975 in the famous Hail Mary pass, it's all become a sham!

You mean, infamous Hail Mary pass. The game that stole the Super Bowl. The game that killed Fran Tarkenton's dad. The game that defined my Purple heart. I had cheered both the Vikings and the Cowboys as a small child, because my mother was a college friend of Roger Staubach and I'd been brought up to support the Naval Academy, Roger Staubach and the Dallas Cowboys. But that game....

Speaking of Mom, I probably get my taste for the martial arts from her. She was at that game with my Dad and when they got back, some hours later, she was still hopping mad. At some point, apparently her primary affection had been transferred to the Vikes. When I told her that a referee had been injured by a thrown bottle, her response was as immediate as it was unchristian. "Good - I threw everything I had except my purse!" Which explained why they hadn't brought me home a program.

Okay, maybe it wasn't right, but it still makes me laugh. You have to love Mom. She dresses up with a full headdress complete with tom-tom to watch the Redskins - alone. I don't quite understand it, but she likes the Vikes, the Redskins and the Cowboys, in that order... I think. Her only real football loyalty is to USC, as far as I can tell, unless they play the Naval Academy.

Maybe that's a BIT much

TPS writes: Brett Favre's stunning preformance against the Raiders brought me to tears over the loving-kindness that the Triune God bestows upon his creatures. "What is man that you are mindful of him?"

Then again, Dr. Z of SI said: "What I think is that we saw a once-in-a-lifetime performance Monday night, not only by Favre, but also by his receivers, who were catching everything deep, no matter what kind of adjustment they had to make. You seldom see a team come together like this and rally round one player in such dramatic fashion."

God cares about sparrows, so I suppose it's within the realm of possibility that he cares about football games. I have to say, I quite like the idea of an all-powerful deity who would take an interest in such things, especially one who might not be able to resist helping out a grieving quarterback. You don't think that would be right? Hey, come on, they were playing the Raiders.

We hates the Raidess.

On Monday the Rabbi Went Off the Deep End

I completely disagree with the notion that Brett Favre is somehow "dishonoring" his father by playing a football game. Indeed, his performance suggests precisely the opposite to me. Not only did he not dishonor his former high-school coach, he honored him before the nation. We all knew for whom he was playing, and he came through in spades. I couldn't help cheering for Brett, even if one of his vintage 4-INT games would have served my Vikings much better.

I'm with the WND emailers on this one. The more I read of Boteach, the less I like his writing He seems to be more interested in celebrities and telling other people what to do than writing anything of substance. I see a lot of Kobe columns in his future. How boring.

Secession and slavery

Walter Williams raises some excellent points about the Constitutionality of secession, and the unlikelihood that such exercising such a right would be permitted. I only wonder what the Federal excuse for an invasion would be. I expect that all of those who still believe that the Civil War was primarily about slavery - all the repeated declarations about preserving the Union to the contrary notwithstanding - would probably swallow whatever nonsense was given out as the official reason.

Why is it that the right to self-determination is something worth fighting for in foreign lands, and something that must be fought against in our own? If slavery trumps a right to self-determination, why are we not invading the Sudan right now, not to mention Eastern Europe? I often wonder if those who mindlessly repeat what little they remember of fifth-grade history ever stop to think about the logical implications of what they are saying.

Abraham Lincoln said the Civil War was not about slavery. Jefferson Davis said the Second (failed) American Revolution was not about slavery. Robert E. Lee didn't even own slaves - what on Earth was he fighting so brilliantly for? If the principles on both sides of the Civil War didn't believe it had anything to do with slavery, why do you? And if secession was treason, why was no Confederate ever tried for it, much less found guilty? Perhaps a second war of States Rights will one day convince the doubters.

I am, like most Americans, opposed to slavery. But I do not believe in throwing out the Constitution and using the evil of totalitarian oppression to end other evils. If there is an evil worth fighting a war to stop, it is the Holocaust of the Innocent. By the slavery theorist's logic, we should impose a Federal ban on abortion, then invade any states that refuse to honor the ban. If the slavery theory is correct and the Civil War was right, then there is no reason why we should not resort to the same extreme measures to end what is surely a far worse evil.

Mailbox: Fear of a Metaphorical Planet

JD writes: I can tell that you are a baptist because your ravings about "your" view of the world and its similarities to Tolkiens writings are waaay off to the religious right. To compare the United Nations to Sauron, and the nations of France, Germany, Russia and, China to the Nazgul, is just ridiculous. I somewhat agree to your comparison between orcs and islamic extremists because of their violent natures. But to label them as "monsters" or less than human, publicly no less, is un-christian. And what are baptists after all, but uber-christians. There are no christians but the baptists.

Why is "your" in quotes? Whose view do you expect me to have? Strange. Anyhow, this sort of historical ignorance is depressing, as people used to say the same sort of thing when they would insist that the European Economic Community was nothing more than a trade federation intended to boost the economies of Europe, and would NEVER prove to be the framework of a political entity, much less a totalitarian one. Of course, I don't hear that argument anymore now that the European Commission is giving orders to the once-sovereign English Parliament and entire nations are forced to vote and re-vote until they finally produce the acceptable response.

At what point will JD and others begin to understand that the UN is a great threat to humanity, perhaps even the greatest it will ever face? Once it usurps the laws of the USA? Once it has taxing power and an army? When it orders the confiscation of all private firearms? No, as usual, the threat will not be recognized by the Great Fat and Happy until it is too late and the enemy is at their throats. This is not theoretical; Kofi Annan has been stumping hard for the global UN tax as proposed by Paul Tobin, and the EU already has what could be used as the nucleus of the blue-helmeted horde. Furthermore, there is already precedent for American soldiers being forced against their will to serve under UN colors as in the Michael New court martial. I have no doubt at all that I will be proved correct on this matter, and I can tell you now that I will take absolutely no joy in being right.

As to orcs... it's called metaphor, JD. Deal with it. I never wrote anything about monsters or literal subhuman status.... Oh dear, it just occurred to me that perhaps he thinks the Sauron-UN comparison is ridiculous because there isn't a great flaming eye on top of the building in New York City. For the love of all that's good and holy, JD, get thee to a dictionary!

I am, as anyone who reads my column knows, a Southern Baptist. I have never once claimed, nor ever heard a fellow Baptist claim, that our understanding of Christianity is the only correct one. To believe with your heart and confess with your tongue that Jesus Christ is Lord is the only standard to which I subscribe, and while I can judge the latter, none but God can judge the former. Tonight, as is my custom, I will take great joy in attending midnight mass with my Christian brothers and sisters who happen to be Catholic, and together we will celebrate the birth of Our Lord.

The White Buffalo on Title IX football pools

While I appreciate your vigor and enthusiasm for the exceptional performance of the female members of this pool, especially Michelle my respected friend and co-worker, I find your e-mail demeaning and harassing, This is exactly the type of behavior that spawned the Salem Witch Trials, the Sacco and Vanzetti debacle, and the Wendy’s “Where’s the Beef” advertising campaign. Treating men as if they have no feelings or emotions relegates them to couch-sitting, beer guzzling, sports-watching, poor-fantasy-football-picking oafs. And while it may be completely and utterly applicable here, it doesn’t matter. This is America. The fact that the men in this pool are poorer at picking football game outcomes does not make the women better. It clearly makes the men victims. In this country, our utter lack of skill and applied talent does not make us less talented, it makes us worthy of special consideration and legal protection. I propose some sort of Fantasy Football Title IX treatment. I propose that if 50% of the top 5 winners (yeah, I know its 2.5 people, but some of the guys in the pool aren’t that tall) are not men than no-one gets to participate in this league. At the very least, we should eliminate some of the women who are in the league to make sure men have an equal chance. Anything else would be ridiculous, and to reject my idea would make one a sexist pig.

The WB is legendary in our fantasy football league for his insane approach to evaluating football talent - winner of the worst #1 pick ever award - and he's in third place in a 30+ man (and woman) NFL pool. No wonder the women are winning.
Newer Posts Older Posts