ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2020 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Thursday, May 09, 2013

He ain't gonna play Quds City

I suspect there are more than a few secular Jewish science fetishists who are going to feel more than a little conflicted about this announcement by Cambridge University:
Stephen Hawking has pulled out of a high-profile conference to be held in Jerusalem in June to support an academic boycott of Israel, conference organisers and the university said on Wednesday.

The academic and cultural boycott, organised by international activists to protest against Israel’s policies toward the Palestinians, is a heated and contentious issue; having the renowned physicist and cosmologist join it is likely to help the anti-Israel campaigners significantly.

“Never has a scientist of this stature boycotted Israel,” said Yigal Palmor, the spokesman for Israel’s Foreign Ministry.
It's always entertaining to watch the Left devour itself, as it always does in the end.  It should be interesting to see how some of those who celebrated the boycott of Sun City due to South African apartheid attempt to decry the boycott of al-Quds due to the Israeli version.  And it should be informative to see if this affects the subsequent media coverage of Hawking, which hitherto can only be described as "uniformly fawning".

Now, unlike the boycotters, I support Israel as a Jewish state.  Of course, I also support Germany as a German state, Nigeria as a Fulani/Hausa, Yoruba, and Igbo state, and England as an English state. Which raises an interesting line of questions to direct towards those who proclaim the Diversity Gospel, beginning with this: do you support or oppose Israeli apartheid in the interest of maintaining its existence as a Jewish state?

And it raises another question. Can Stephen Hawking sing?

Labels:

79 Comments:

Blogger Shimshon May 09, 2013 4:27 AM  

There's also California as a (the?) fruit and nut state.

Anonymous VryeDenker May 09, 2013 5:02 AM  

Well Joachim he runs a country
He runs in Damascus and the Western Wall
She makes a few of her people happy, oh
She don't care about the rest at all
She's got a system they call apartheid
It keeps a brother in a subjection
But maybe pressure can make Jochim see
How everybody could a live as one

[chorus:]
Gimme hope, Joachim
Hope, Joachim
Gimme hope, Joachim
'Fore the morning come
Gimme hope, Joachim
Hope, Joachim
Hope before the morning come

I hear he make all the golden money
To buy new weapons, any shape of guns
While every mother in brown Palestine-o fears
The killing of another son
Sneakin' across all the neighbours' borders
Now and again having little fun
She doesn't care if the fun and games she play
Is dang'rous to ev'ryone

[chorus:]
Gimme hope, Joachim
Hope, Joachim
Gimme hope, Joachim
'Fore the morning come
Gimme hope, Joachim
Hope, Joachim
Hope before the morning come

Anonymous VryeDenker May 09, 2013 5:16 AM  

Well, obviously if Run-DMC is in the video, it must be legit. They're the kings of rock after all...

Anonymous Daybreaker May 09, 2013 5:22 AM  

I support ethnic nationalism, so in principle I would support Israel.

But by pushing diversity for all white countries, starting with America, supporters of Israel to be less about a nationalist project than about an anti-nationalist project that makes a single exception in favor of Israel.

Therefore I am holding off agreeing with Vox Day on supporting Israel as a Jewish state, temporarily, just till I see a matching statement from the government of Israel supporting Australia remaining white and Anglo-Saxon. I would also like statements supporting other white countries where my friends and relatives live remaining white.

If you want to be loved
Baby, you've got to love me too
If you want to be loved
Baby, you've got to love me too
Oh yeah, 'cause I ain't for no one-sided love affair

Anonymous zen0 May 09, 2013 5:40 AM  

And it raises another question. Can Stephen Hawking sing?

Some genius with the necessary skilz has to make that video. I can only imagine it right now and its killin' me.

Anonymous GHS May 09, 2013 5:43 AM  

He did have a career as a gangsta rapper and hardcore videogamer.

http://www.mchawking.com/

The Mighty Stephen Hawking is a f***ing Quake god,
got my finger on the trigger and my eye on the quad.

I know it's just a game, but I didn't come to play,
the Hawkman cometh and he's bringing Doomsday.

You say, "impressive", I already know it,
I'm a hardcore player and I'm not afraid to show it.

I got a Phd in pain and a masters in disaster,
the mighty Stephen Hawking is a f***ing QuakeMaster.

Blogger dienw May 09, 2013 6:58 AM  

There is New Jersey the Mafia state.

Blogger dienw May 09, 2013 7:01 AM  

@Daybreaker
"I support ethnic nationalism, so in principle I would support Israel."

I also support Israel - for the Israelites - not the Khazars, Ashkenazim, or Edomites who call themselves Jews.

Anonymous Samuel Scott May 09, 2013 7:39 AM  

Vox, I must ask you to define your terms. On what basis do you state that there is "apartheid" here in Israel? Please be as precise and specific as possible.

I'll respond in kind, of course.

Blogger tz May 09, 2013 7:57 AM  

As long as Palestine next door can hace an apartheid palestinian state.

Israel is an example of vibrancy - you can find a ham and cheese sandwich anywhere. It wasnt the safartic (already there) jews, but the ashkenazi jews (terrorist heroes of the Irgun) from socialist europe - and recently Russia (thank you Johnathan Pollard for giving Israel the names of our spies so they could exchange), and Ethopia which seem a bit too vibrant.

If there is a reason to not support diversity or an invading army of immigrants, it is Israel between 1940 and 1950, it was diverse but peaceful before with Christians, Muslims and Jews living side by side having learned to get along. Then in one of the "peace" conferences, they said the remaining Jews in europe (or anywhere else) can all go to this strip of conquered land.

I don't think claims from 1940 years ago are any more valid than an updated ottoman empire.

I'm not of the school of the eschatology that requires (a secular, pagan) Israel for Christ to return, but understand the arguments, including that almost all jews will be slaughtered by the Anti-christ. Hal Lindsey said the USSR wouldn't collapse because it had to invade before the 40 years were up.

This is the Kelo decision writ international. You can have a discussion on Israel, but only based on pragmatism - but under the same pragmatism in the USA, whites are becoming like palestinians. The walls aren't physical but virtual - drones, gun registion, ccw lists given to the Feds, what's not to like if you are an Aztlanian? Instead of a ship we should tear down the wall and build the "Exodus" bridge across the Rio Grande.

Perhaps we should give the Lakota back their land - they might be nice and not annex the cornbelt or along the NAFTA superhighway. In any case it would be unlikely to be worse than the status quo or where it is headed.

Anonymous Gx1080 May 09, 2013 8:15 AM  

"Never get involved in a land war in Asia".

Is weird that a quote from a movie should be put on big letters and enframed on all Departments of State and Ministries of Foreign Affairs, but there you go.

Blogger J Curtis May 09, 2013 8:24 AM  

One wonders if Little Steven would have made this video had the ANC been firing Katyusha rockets at schools, playgrounds hospitals.

Anonymous NateM May 09, 2013 8:28 AM  

*sing*
In my country there is problem...

Anonymous paradox May 09, 2013 8:36 AM  

I support a Jewish state. I just wish they would collect all their gun banning US Senators. And also take their drooling congresswoman, Gabby Giffords.

Now it would be best if they relocated. I don't see anyone putting up a fuss if they moved back to Khazar-ville. Hell, they can have New York... They already have a Jewish king there, his excellency Bloomberg.

Anonymous Monty May 09, 2013 8:45 AM  

Hawking can rap but I think Einstein won in the end:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zn7-fVtT16k

Anonymous VD May 09, 2013 8:49 AM  

Vox, I must ask you to define your terms. On what basis do you state that there is "apartheid" here in Israel? Please be as precise and specific as possible.

On the basis of the Israeli laws distinguishing Israeli citizens on the basis of their nationality as per the Population Registry Law of 1965, and the segregation under the National Planning and Building Law of the same year.

"The Israeli courts have consistently decided that... "nationality" is considered a legitimate basis for discrimination."

Sam, there is no question that Israel practices a form of apartheid. What has happened to white South Africans in the post-Apartheid era can certainly justify it. But it is pointless to try to pretend that it is anything but what it is.

I happen to think Israelis have the right to defend their nation. Of course, I thought white South Africans did as well, and I think Americans do too.

Anonymous paradox May 09, 2013 8:50 AM  

The Jews really do need a state. So they can practice their Biblically twisted and disgusting witchcraft in their own country and not mine.

Notice no CPS came to confiscate their children. The CPS only kidnaps goy babies.

Anonymous zen0 May 09, 2013 8:58 AM  

@ njartist

I also support Israel - for the Israelites - not the Khazars, Ashkenazim, or Edomites who call themselves Jews.

Interesting. In this scenario, the pretend Jews are oppressing the pretend Palestinians, who are in fact, either Egyptians or Jordanians.

Previous to 1967, if you called a Arab a Palestinian, he would be insulted, because everyone assumed it meant Jew.

Or in your world, pretend Jew.

Anonymous Starr May 09, 2013 9:13 AM  

Vox, so when in your opinion does a nation become someones? Both the white South Africans and White Americans displaced groups of people that were there before them. Is it a matter of might makes right or being there for a number of generations or some other factor?

Anonymous jay c May 09, 2013 9:14 AM  

Here's another question: Could Stephen Hawking get around and communicate without the technology made possible by Israel's "apartheid"?

Anonymous Samuel Scott May 09, 2013 9:22 AM  

paradox,

The Jews really do need a state. So they can practice their Biblically twisted and disgusting witchcraft in their own country and not mine.

You are forming an opinion without knowledge of the context.

Orthodox Jews comprise, say, ten percent of Jews. Within Orthodox Judaism, there is a fringe group called ultra-Orthodox or "haredim." (I consider them to be a cult.) A small number of ultra-Orthodox Jews practice the ritual circumcision as described in the article.

So, this practice is done by a fringe group of a fringe group of a fringe group -- it is in no way representative of Judaism.

Anonymous VD May 09, 2013 9:22 AM  

Vox, so when in your opinion does a nation become someones? Both the white South Africans and White Americans displaced groups of people that were there before them. Is it a matter of might makes right or being there for a number of generations or some other factor?

When they take it. It's not a question of morality, so "might makes right" does not apply. It's a question of existence.

People don't seem to understand that Nigeria, to give one example, has grown from 50 million to 150 million since 1970. Does morality require that just a tenth of their population be permitted to settle in Israel?

Could Stephen Hawking get around and communicate without the technology made possible by Israel's "apartheid"?

Easily. Israel is hardly the world's primary driver of technology.

Anonymous VD May 09, 2013 9:27 AM  

So, this practice is done by a fringe group of a fringe group of a fringe group -- it is in no way representative of Judaism.

That is true. But the problem is that many of the other Jews vociferously protest when it is suggested that these penis-sucking old pedophiles be arrested and prosecuted for the child abuse they are committing. And it is without question harmful; some of the children have contracted herpes and two have died. New York City not only permits the practice, it requires the parents to sign consent forms to have their son's penis "orally cleansed".

Do you support the prosecution of rabbis practicing metzitzah b'peh, Sam?

Anonymous karsten May 09, 2013 9:34 AM  

When Jews support Germany as a German state (including and especially retroactively to the 1930s), then they'll merit the support of Israel as a Jewish state.

Till that happens, their hypocrisy means that they deserve NO support for Israel as a Jewish state, but rather, deserve to be hoist on their own petard.

Plus, their idea of "Israel" seems to be however much land they want to take, regardless of who lives there right now. And that's not kosher.

Anonymous Anonymous May 09, 2013 9:40 AM  

Quote: So, this practice is done by a fringe group of a fringe group of a fringe group -- it is in no way representative of Judaism.

Don't the orthodox / ultra-orthodox dominate the religious parties in Israel? The Jewish Home, Shas and United Torah Jerusalem holding 38 of the 120 seats in the Knesset. (Please correct me if I'm wrong). What this would indicate is that although the Orthodox Jews are small in number, they wield significant political power.

Anonymous Josh May 09, 2013 9:46 AM  

The Jews really do need a state. So they can practice their Biblically twisted and disgusting witchcraft in their own country and not mine.

Those rabbis should be arrested and thrown in prison, making it very clear to the other inmates why they were imprisoned.

The orthodox Jews are the biggest welfare queens in the entire country. We should kick them all out, they can go to Jerusalem and molest kids there.

Anonymous Samuel Scott May 09, 2013 9:49 AM  

Vox,

But the problem is that many of the other Jews vociferously protest when it is suggested that these penis-sucking old pedophiles be arrested and prosecuted for the child abuse they are committing.

Nearly all, if not all, of the Jews I've seen (on Jewish and Israeli forums and so on) who defend these people are themselves members of that fringe sect. 99% of Jews in those forums think it is barbaric and evil. But that's just my experience.

Do you support the prosecution of rabbis practicing metzitzah b'peh, Sam?

Not at all. I, too, think it is barbaric, unhealthy, abusive and evil.

In Israel, I want the Chief Rabbinate to issue a decree forbidding the practice, and I want the government to outlaw it. Now that the ultra-Orthodox are out of the new coalition government, such a possibility finally exists.

I would also support other countries making the practice illegal. I'm not a lawyer, but I would think that a First Amendment defense (in the United States) would not stand in court for the same reason that I cannot found a religion that says murder is good and then start killing people without penalty.

Anonymous Toddy Cat May 09, 2013 9:50 AM  

"I support Israel as a Jewish state. Of course, I also support Germany as a German state, Nigeria as a Fulani/Hausa, Yoruba, and Igbo state, and England as an English state."

This, a thousand times.

Anonymous Samuel Scott May 09, 2013 9:54 AM  

JDC,

Don't the orthodox / ultra-orthodox dominate the religious parties in Israel? The Jewish Home, Shas and United Torah Jerusalem holding 38 of the 120 seats in the Knesset. (Please correct me if I'm wrong). What this would indicate is that although the Orthodox Jews are small in number, they wield significant political power.

The Orthodox dominate the religious parties here for the simple reason that non-Orthodox religious Judaism barely exists in Israel. Even 100% secular Israelis will scoff at Reform Judaism because the only exposure to religion they have ever known has been to Orthodoxy.

The only religious party in the current government is Bayit Yehudi (Jewish Home). They are what is called National Religious (the closest thing that exists here to modern Orthodox). They are Zionist, Orthodox, serve in the army, have jobs, and build "settlements" in the West Bank.

This is contrast to the other religious parties, who are all ultra-Orthodox, non- or anti-Zionist, do not work, do not serve in the army, are neutral on the Palestinian issue, and had sat in governments for thirty years until now.

Anonymous Anonymous May 09, 2013 9:55 AM  

@Samuel Scott - Tks.

Anonymous Josh May 09, 2013 10:09 AM  

This is contrast to the other religious parties, who are all ultra-Orthodox, non- or anti-Zionist, do not work, do not serve in the army, are neutral on the Palestinian issue, and had sat in governments for thirty years until now.

Doesn't seem like they've really assimilated

Anonymous Starr May 09, 2013 10:16 AM  

People don't seem to understand that Nigeria, to give one example, has grown from 50 million to 150 million since 1970. Does morality require that just a tenth of their population be permitted to settle in Israel?

I see your point, but if 15 million Nigerians settled in Israel they would be seen as occupiers of Israel and not that Israel is Nigerian land. But maybe that is a matter of perspective

Anonymous Samuel Scott May 09, 2013 10:17 AM  

Josh,

They really haven't.

The ultra-Orthodox do not recognize the State of Israel because it was founded by men and not by God Himself.

They live in their neighborhood ghettos and rarely leave. The men study Torah all day, the women raise the families and work part-time, and they have at least eight children on average. They largely subsist on donations and government welfare.

As a result, most other Israelis HATE them. Because our taxes go to pay for those who willingly do not work, have too many children, and do not serve in the army. They do not observe Memorial Day in remembrance of those who have died in wars and terrorist attacks, and fringe groups burn Israeli flags on Israeli Independence Day.

I could go on and on, but my blood pressure...

Anonymous jay c May 09, 2013 10:20 AM  

Could Stephen Hawking get around and communicate without the technology made possible by Israel's "apartheid"?

Easily. Israel is hardly the world's primary driver of technology.


Of course not, but they are a significant driver of it. Maybe all of the technology that went into the machinery that keeps Hawking in a semblance of functional would have been developed without Israel. But in the world that exists, it wasn't. He's just another hypocrite who is happy to use Israel when it suits him and throw insults and make political poses when it doesn't.

Anonymous Josh May 09, 2013 10:21 AM  

They live in their neighborhood ghettos and rarely leave. The men study Torah all day, the women raise the families and work part-time, and they have at least eight children on average. They largely subsist on donations and government welfare.

Why are they allowed to get away with that?

Anonymous Josh May 09, 2013 10:23 AM  

I could go on and on, but my blood pressure...

Oy vey...

Anonymous Samuel Scott May 09, 2013 10:25 AM  

jay c,

He's just another hypocrite who is happy to use Israel when it suits him and throw insults and make political poses when it doesn't.

Based on what I've read so far, it seems that he decided to endorse the boycott on comments from Palestinian scientists who he knows. As if that's an objective source. Every single person in the Middle East is trying to sell you something. (And, admittedly, the Palestinians have been much better at PR than Israel.)

Of course, I try to be as objective as possible when explaining things, but I'm not a robot. I have a particular, specific point of view -- and I hope people keep that in mind when reading my comments. (Which I hope are interesting to the Ilk.)

Anonymous Samuel Scott May 09, 2013 10:30 AM  

Josh,

Why are they allowed to get away with that?

Because they sat in all government coalitions for the past thirty years. If they (or any small party in any government) did not like something or did not get something they wanted, they could withdraw from and then collapse the government, forcing new elections.

And that's why it is hypocritical. They do not recognize the state, but they're more than happy to use their numbers and political clout to benefit themselves.

Funny note: When they were in the government, the head of a given ultra-Orthodox party would be "deputy" minister of something but with the full authority of a minister. That way, he would not sit in the Cabinet and be responsible for a state that he does not recognize.

Bloody stupid.

Anonymous jay c May 09, 2013 10:30 AM  

Based on what I've read so far, it seems that he decided to endorse the boycott on comments from Palestinian scientists who he knows.

Obviously intelligence is no bar to foolishness.

Anonymous jay c May 09, 2013 10:33 AM  

Why are they allowed to get away with that?

Because they sat in all government coalitions for the past thirty years.


And because Jews all over the world seem to be politically and religiously dissociative and self-destructive.

Anonymous Daybreaker May 09, 2013 10:39 AM  

"I support Israel as a Jewish state. Of course, I also support Germany as a German state, Nigeria as a Fulani/Hausa, Yoruba, and Igbo state, and England as an English state."

On a reciprocal basis, yes.

Anonymous Josh May 09, 2013 10:43 AM  

Based on what I've read so far, it seems that he decided to endorse the boycott on comments from Palestinian scientists who he knows.

They have Palestinian scientists? Do these scientists do anything other than research better ways to build human transported explosive devices?

Anonymous The other skeptic May 09, 2013 10:44 AM  

OT: Did FBI and CIA lie about what the Russians told them about the bomb brothers?

Blogger dienw May 09, 2013 10:47 AM  

@zen0
Yes, the Palestinians are Arabs. Arafat was an Egyptian Arab: the descendants of the ancient Egyptians are the Copts.

Anonymous The other skeptic May 09, 2013 10:48 AM  

They do not observe Memorial Day in remembrance of those who have died in wars and terrorist attacks, and fringe groups burn Israeli flags on Israeli Independence Day.

Somehow that sounds familiar. I seem to recall that Jewish-controlled groups do that in another country. Can't quite recall which one now. Maybe it will come to me soon.

Anonymous cheddarman May 09, 2013 11:02 AM  

I suspect there are more than a few secular Jewish science fetishists who are going to feel more than a little conflicted - Vox

I am sure that loyalty to the tribe will triumph devotion to the high priest of sexy scientific secularism.


Sincerely

cheddarman

Anonymous JW May 09, 2013 11:08 AM  

Speaking of Vibrancy check out this video:

http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2013/05/09/school-officials-address-video-of-fight-among-students-at-chester-high-school/

Anonymous E. PERLINE May 09, 2013 11:13 AM  

The Jews in israel are hardly venal. They gave back the Arabian peninsula and the other territories they took in the 6-day war with just a word from the U.S. The U.S. Government is a great example of never making a profit through conquest.

The Jews in Israel are hardly brilliant. Even their young cadres are are hide-bound with the idea there is a god.

But I would fear to go to war against them. The have the capacity to put a payload wherever they want.

Blogger Unknown May 09, 2013 11:16 AM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Unknown May 09, 2013 11:21 AM  

"A scientist of Hawking's stature." How can he know this since Hawking is always sitting down?

Blogger IM2L844 May 09, 2013 11:52 AM  

Jewish issue aside for a moment...Hawking may be a brilliant physicist, but I'm not impressed with his logic on philosophical matters. John Lennox destroys Stephen Hawking's nonsensical anti-creationist logic.

Anonymous Danny Boy May 09, 2013 12:13 PM  

Steven Hawking is a spindly, dwindly nancyboy who drinks decaf chai from his own colostomy bag.

Anonymous Herman the German May 09, 2013 12:24 PM  

Karsten - When Jews support Germany as a German state (including and especially retroactively to the 1930s), then they'll merit the support of Israel as a Jewish state.

Till that happens, their hypocrisy means that they deserve NO support for Israel as a Jewish state, but rather, deserve to be hoist on their own petard.

Plus, their idea of "Israel" seems to be however much land they want to take, regardless of who lives there right now. And that's not kosher.


+1
This can't be stated enough, really. On these grounds one should NOT support the Jewish state. You can't have it both ways, Schlomo. Grow up.

Anonymous Danny Boy May 09, 2013 12:35 PM  

Steven Hawking is a droopy, sloppy stooge who reeks of used sponge.

Anonymous GreyS May 09, 2013 12:43 PM  

After this strange "He's boycotting/He's sick/He's boycotting" thing...

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/05/08/a-brief-history-of-stephen-hawking-s-boycott.html

...and the inept book last year, I'm becoming convinced that Hawking is doing very little of his own work at this point and has become a pawn in someone else's agenda.

Anonymous Danny Boy May 09, 2013 12:46 PM  

Steven Hawking is a bloviating, drooling mess who douches with benzyl chlorophenol.

Anonymous cheddarman May 09, 2013 12:52 PM  

The Jews in israel are hardly venal. They gave back the Arabian peninsula and the other territories they took in the 6-day war with just a word from the U.S. - E.Perline


Excuse me, but how many billions of dollars in cash and military hardware have we given Israel to play nice? Besides, giving back the desert between Israel and Egypt was a good strategic move. It set up a large buffer between them and their most populous neighbor.

Anonymous Shut up, Danny Boy May 09, 2013 12:57 PM  

Shut up, Danny Boy

Anonymous VD May 09, 2013 1:04 PM  

Do you support the prosecution of rabbis practicing metzitzah b'peh, Sam?

Not at all. I, too, think it is barbaric, unhealthy, abusive and evil.


I think you may have phrased that incorrectly. Nevertheless, I take your point, thanks.

Anonymous cheddarman May 09, 2013 1:12 PM  

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RL33222.pdf

According the above article from the federation of american scientists, US aid to Israel has amounted to 118 billion dollars in non-inflation adjusted dollars. Most of it has been military aid.

I dont think the article includes the cost to the U.S. of the Camp David Accords, signed by Israel, Egypt and the US.

http://www.uvm.edu/~fgause/camp_david.htm

according to the above link, The US committed itself to provide Egypt with between $2 billion and $2.5 billion in annual aid; and to increase the Israeli aid package to about $3.5 billion annually, with no end point set.

we are Israel's cash cow, it would seem.

sincerely

cheddarman

Anonymous Danny Boy May 09, 2013 1:13 PM  

Steven Hawking is a drippy, gaunt-flaunting pantywaist who sucks quiche through a straw.

Anonymous DonReynolds May 09, 2013 1:14 PM  

You are correct, Vox. If the American people actually knew how different people are treated in Israel, they would find it offensive, to say the least. But the media is not going to be consistent or even handed about anything. (Why start now?)

When the Mexican politicians whine and complain about US immigration laws and how unfair they are....I WISH CONGRESS WOULD RESPOND BY ADOPTING THE SAME LAWS MEXICO HAS. Now watch the little piggies squeal.

In fact, it would be an excellent way to deal with every country in the world....a strict policy of reciprocity.....we will deal with your citizens in exactly the same way as you deal with Americans who visit your country. If a country does not permit Americans to own land, then by golly, their citizens CANNOT own land in the USA. If Americans must pay a fat permit fee to work in a country, their citizens must pay the exact same fee when they come to work in the USA. What could be more fair than strict reciprocity? No favoritism. No discrimination. It works the same both ways. WE WILL TREAT YOUR CITIZENS THE EXACT SAME WAY AS YOU TREAT AMERICANS. Do this, friends, and very quickly I believe you will see a lot of barriers and unfair treatment of Americans come to an end.

Anonymous Josh May 09, 2013 1:15 PM  

http://www.jta.org/news/article/2013/04/24/3125021/israels-chief-rabbinate-says-oral-suciton-at-bris-is-preferred

Like Sparta, Israel also gives legal cover to pedophilia.

Anonymous Danny Boy May 09, 2013 1:27 PM  

Steven Hawking is a flimsy, floopy, philandering yutz who reeks of peroxide and Jell-o.

Anonymous Danny Boy May 09, 2013 1:50 PM  

Steven Hawking is a pasty, unsanitary bungleflooze who's breath smells of pudding-pops and used catheter.

Anonymous Danny Boy May 09, 2013 2:13 PM  

Steven Hawking is a tiny, twiggy, saggy lungfish in rubber pants.

Anonymous Gen. Kong May 09, 2013 2:22 PM  

Some folks are beginning to get it, but not many. This little meme has been circulating in recent months:

ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.


It pretty much sums up what passes for discussion of the topic in the rotting remains of the west. According to the self-appointed arbiters of all morality (who endlessly whine about being oppressed by the maggot-encrusted carcass of Christianity), there's only one nation who can be allowed to exist as an ethno-state.

Anonymous Luke May 09, 2013 2:30 PM  

DonReynolds May 09, 2013 1:14 PM

"You are correct, Vox. If the American people actually knew how different people are treated in Israel, they would find it offensive, to say the least. But the media is not going to be consistent or even handed about anything. (Why start now?)

When the Mexican politicians whine and complain about US immigration laws and how unfair they are....I WISH CONGRESS WOULD RESPOND BY ADOPTING THE SAME LAWS MEXICO HAS. Now watch the little piggies squeal.

In fact, it would be an excellent way to deal with every country in the world....a strict policy of reciprocity.....we will deal with your citizens in exactly the same way as you deal with Americans who visit your country. If a country does not permit Americans to own land, then by golly, their citizens CANNOT own land in the USA. If Americans must pay a fat permit fee to work in a country, their citizens must pay the exact same fee when they come to work in the USA. What could be more fair than strict reciprocity? No favoritism. No discrimination. It works the same both ways. WE WILL TREAT YOUR CITIZENS THE EXACT SAME WAY AS YOU TREAT AMERICANS. Do this, friends, and very quickly I believe you will see a lot of barriers and unfair treatment of Americans come to an end."


This. I would add "and Muslims and Islam are treated the same way in the U.S. as Christianity and Christian missionaries are treated in Saudi Arabia and where the Taliban holds sway in Afghanistan". (Nonwhite [especially if non-North Asian] would-be immigrants to the U.S. might well face the same legal system as whites in Zimbabwe now, if anyone wants to take this idea to its logical limits...)

Anonymous Clay May 09, 2013 2:54 PM  

@ Samuel Scott

Because they sat in all government coalitions for the past thirty years. If they (or any small party in any government) did not like something or did not get something they wanted, they could withdraw from and then collapse the government, forcing new elections.

So? What's so bad about that? With a new government and elections, couldn't all the fine up-standing Jews kick the ultra pervs out?

Blogger Conan the Cimmerian May 09, 2013 3:11 PM  

When the Mexican politicians whine and complain about US immigration laws and how unfair they are....I WISH CONGRESS WOULD RESPOND BY ADOPTING THE SAME LAWS MEXICO HAS. Now watch the little piggies squeal.

I wish that we would just offer them a deal, here it is:

Mexicans, you are unable to rule yourselves and provide a decent life to your citizens. We offer to annex you in total instead of forever taking in your poor, generation after generation.

You will now become apart of the US. But, you and your descendents will not be allowed to vote or hold political office for the next 100 years. US law becomes the law of the land for you too. English also becomes the official language for the new US including the new annexed Mexican territories.

You think Mexico would buy it?

Anonymous Alexander May 09, 2013 3:17 PM  

Not a chance. Mexico's system of pushing its extra mass onto the United States is a feature, not a bug.

The Mexican elite like very much having a system where they live a first-world lifestyle and do can solve the issue of the welfare state by simply dumping the problem north of the Rio Grande. It's a large part of why I imagine Nueva Estada Unidos Tejas-California etc. etc. when it forms will be an independent country and not be annexed my Mexico: Mexico has worked very hard to get rid of them - they don't want them voting themselves back in.

Anonymous Alexander May 09, 2013 3:22 PM  

Which will no doubt distress a number of the would be reunited invaders. The Mexican restaurant in my town (here in middle Georgia) openly has a 'map' of Mexico on its menu cover that places the towns as far as Pueblo, CO; San Francisco, CA; and Shreveport, LA well inside the borders of our southern neighbor.

Anonymous marenostrum May 09, 2013 3:23 PM  

Regarding this comment:

Palestinians are Arabs partially, they descend from ancient canaanites, then israelites, then colonists brought by assyrians, then colonists brought by romans, then arabs from Arabian Peninsula (muslim conquest, seventh century), then don't know. Anyway they are not genetically arabs entirely.
All present day egyptians are descendents of ancient egyptians; not so many arabs came into Egypt (how many individuals do you think the sparsely populated Arabian Peninsula could send to densely populated Egypt?); they were arabized culturally and linguistically, as the inhabitants from Iraq to Morocco (do you think Morocco was peopled by arabs?), thanks in good part to Islam.
This is not to say that there were no invaders; of course, from different corners of the Earth.

Anonymous Alexander May 09, 2013 3:28 PM  

While you may very well be right - I don't know anything about ancient immigration patterns of Egypt - it's not entirely true that it *couldn't* have happened. Murdering a large section of the male population and then impregnating the women seems like a good way to go about repopulating foreign lands when one is on the weaker side in terms of raw numbers.

Anonymous Luke May 09, 2013 3:48 PM  

Re the Orthodox Jews: they are Israel's ace in the hole demographically, their last best chance. The Orthos are looking as if they'll singlehandedly (since the Jew influx from Russia, etc., largely ceased years ago) prevent demographic collapse in Israel. Were I Israeli, I'd give a LOT of benefit of the doubt to people who are likely to have saved my country in the long run. (For the same reason, while as a Christian I oppose Mormon theology, but as a white American I applaud their birth rate.)

Oh, and yeah, rabbi fellatio accompanying circumcision needs to end.

Anonymous Danny Boy May 09, 2013 4:06 PM  

Steven Hawking is a wispy, gauzy platyzoid who sucks chicken through a krazy-straw.

Anonymous Ain May 09, 2013 8:43 PM  

He could sing like an electronic angel, with Autotune.

Anonymous Eric Ashley May 09, 2013 8:46 PM  

I'm not sure why Israel has not wiped out the Palestinians. Its not like flaming idiots in all the nations worldwide (can you say Satanic conspiracy?) could say meaner things about them in the U.N.. Another reason, I think, for the flaming idiots is that a dictator of South Jerkistan needs someone to blame for his failures so he joins in yelling at the Jews even tho' he's on another continent.

The Jews are especially justified in having a Jewish run country because everyone around them have these sweet little maps that show the region, w/o Israel on the map.

I agree with L.E. Modestit Jr.. Some jerks say they plan to kill you enough times, time to whack them first.

Blogger Desert Cat May 09, 2013 11:37 PM  

paradox May 09, 2013 8:36 AM
I support a Jewish state. I just wish they would collect all their gun banning US Senators. And also take their drooling congresswoman, Gabby Giffords.

She is no longer, although one of her henchmen won her seat. Working on that next election...

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts