ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2017 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Wednesday, June 04, 2014

Feminism is for psychos

I've commented numerous times on how feminism is less coherent than communism and more murderous than National Socialism. That is because it is, quite literally, an ideology concocted by madwomen:
In the 1970's I was alarmed to hear that my big sister, Kate Millett, who had serious mental health issues which had agonized my family and her friends for many years, was organizing a group called The Mental Patients' Project in order to claim that the psychiatric community and society were "oppressing" people and "stigmatizing them with labels such as psychotic, bi-polar, schizophrenic, borderline personalities," etc and unconstitutionally imprisoning them in hospitals thereby violating their civil rights.  We, as a family, had struggled for years with Kate's issues, many times attempting to hospitalize her so she could obtain the serious help she so obviously obviously needed. She was a brutal sadist, a violent bully at whose hands everyone about her suffered. 

 During the speech after the screening she fell apart onstage before a packed assembly of fawning admirers. It was a standing room only audience.  In fact, they had had to schedule a second screening at the last minute, as the response had been huge. As I sat next to her lectern during her incoherent ravings I witnessed the pained looks of confusion as they swept across those faces like a small gale whipping up across the top of a sea; at first tiny ripples gliding across the surface.  They were polite until the realization took shape that she was making no sense whatsoever.  People began glancing at each other, whispering a little then turning to one another with more energy, politeness gone, as some began to get up and leave.  Soon many were slipping out and that was followed by a mad dash for the exits.  She was babbling and shouting incoherently whilst I nodded and pretended every word made perfect sense.  I could not bear to betray her in public.  I sat there feeling my heart melting through my chest and draining into my belly with an indescribable sick empathy.  Her humiliation was unbearable as the gale whipped up to a force ten and with one last enormous surge we were left in an empty room.  The second screening was cancelled.

We returned to her apartment in relative silence.  I was trapped with her in an unfamiliar place. I knew not one person in Berkeley.  I was afraid to sleep for fear of awakening in a deadly pool of blood with a knife in my back. She stayed awake for five days babbling, ranting and wouldn't allow me to sleep.   She was seeing "little green men" and her eyes were literally rolling around in their sockets.  Never have I been more alone and terrified.  However, love and concern for her and any others she might harm prevented me from leaving.  Unable to abandon her, I stayed and whenever possible reached out by phone to other family members/friends in far flung places such as NYC, Minnesota, Nebraska pleading for advice and help.
 Note that this was written by her sister. And then mark this quote from Wikipedia:

"Kate Millet is an American feminist writer, artist and activist. A seminal influence on second-wave feminism, Millett is best known for her 1970 book Sexual Politics."

Feminism is, quite literally, insane. Any woman who calls herself a feminist is identifying herself as a woman with mental health issues.

Labels:

113 Comments:

OpenID Dago June 04, 2014 9:08 AM  

Thanks for this. We need to add of course Andrea Dworkin to the list of oversized nuts.

OpenID Dago June 04, 2014 9:11 AM  

And to be fair, we meed to also say that the whole PUA "community" is composed of singularly failed excuses for "men" with a history that oscillates between snakeoil salesmen and losers. We can only hope some aliens come to cleanse this planet of the stupid.

Anonymous VD June 04, 2014 9:22 AM  

And to be fair, we meed to also say that the whole PUA "community" is composed of singularly failed excuses for "men" with a history that oscillates between snakeoil salesmen and losers.

You're obviously in the wrong place. I think that's PUAHATE.com you'll be wanting, Dago. Try not to stab your roommates now.

Blogger Nate June 04, 2014 9:28 AM  

feminists are crazy sadistic bullies? bah... that doesn't make sense at all. I mean when do we ever see feminists use violent symbolism or call for violence or threaten people? That never happens. crazy talk. Just crazy talk.

Blogger Cranberry June 04, 2014 9:29 AM  

Sexual Politics was assigned reading for one my required women's studies courses at Uni.

I found the book somewhat reductionist in its view of literature, and unfair to authors of great works, and overall paranoid. My professor told me I was a simpleton incapable of recognizing greatness, and wanted to know how I was admitted to college in the first place.

I know students all have a point where their egos are cut down to size. I thought I'd passed that point by the time I got to her, but I suppose she showed me. Aside from the Chinese woman who taught one of my microbiology classes, I never had a likeable female professor. Or female boss...

Speaking of, many years ago I worked for a woman named Kate Millett. No relation, but she was just as batshit. She was an ed researcher who agonized over the fates of the poor browns in urban neighborhoods who just couldn't catch a break from Whitey and finally become their fabulous selves. She'd stay awake all hours of the night and on weekends and intrude on personal time and space to get a project done. I wasn't her student or her mentee in a PhD program; I was an assistant paid to work 40 hours a week, then go home. Her crazy chased all manner of people out of the department, and she was shameless about stealing work, too, saying her post-docs worked for HER and their ideas became HERS. I can't tell you how many post-docs quit after she redacted their names and efforts from white papers she published under her own name.

Blogger Alcuin June 04, 2014 9:29 AM  

So the feminists try to free all the crazies only to find that the one leading them to do so is crazy herself?

Talk about self-refutation in action. Has it ever happened faster than this?

Anonymous Starbuck June 04, 2014 9:29 AM  

Try not to stab your roommates now. - VD

I laughed so hard I think I swallowed my smoke...

OpenID cailcorishev June 04, 2014 9:31 AM  

And to be fair

Why would we want to do that?

Anonymous Starbuck June 04, 2014 9:32 AM  

The song "Lunatic Fringe" comes to mind...

Blogger Cranberry June 04, 2014 9:35 AM  

More apt than you may know, Starbuck. The origin of "lunatic fringe" was in haircuts: women cutting their long hair into bangs or wisps that hung about the face - the forerunner of women's liberation by chopping off their locks and freeing themselves of the burden of feminity.

Anonymous Mark Call June 04, 2014 9:36 AM  

From Genesis to every distinction that is made in Scripture, feminism is antithetical to the plan of our Creator. The essence of that fact that He loves us, but made us DIFFERENT, is contained in the statement that, "male and female He created them."

How is it that Chava (Eve) could "sin" first, but that only after Adam ate of the same fruit, "the eyes of BOTH of them were opened?" And thereafter "he bore her guilt," and it is said that through one man, all sinned. Continue the logic...

As the author of "Man and Woman in Biblical Law" wrote, the essence of 'feminism' is to deny the very foundation of the Gospel.

And that is insane.

Anonymous Maximo Macaroni June 04, 2014 9:48 AM  

The late great Thomas Szasz is spinning in his grave. Of course mental illness doesn't exist and doctors have a pathetically poor record of "diagnosing" when someone is a danger to himself or others. Police are much better at it and they aren't all that good.

The root problem is the failure to acknowledge the existence of evil and the failure of wise, old, white men to stand up and say, "this woman is a danger. She should no more be on the street than should a hungry tiger." Compassion and justice demand a Biblically-based solution.

Blogger CarpeOro June 04, 2014 9:57 AM  

Ah, but Vox, MEN made her crazy. At least that is what my wife tells me. I tell her I found her that way and have been trying to drag her over to sanity since then.

Anonymous bob k. mando June 04, 2014 10:05 AM  

Cranberry June 04, 2014 9:35 AM
The origin of "lunatic fringe" was in haircuts


be that as it may, the song was written about brownshirt fascists.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunatic_Fringe_%28song%29


VD
I've commented numerous times on how feminism is less coherent than communism and more murderous than National Socialism.


*snort*

so ... LESS murderous than the two most homicidal regimes in history and MORE coherent than the ideology which exalted the Irrational Man?

Anonymous bob k. mando June 04, 2014 10:06 AM  

CarpeOro June 04, 2014 9:57 AM
At least that is what my wife tells me.



i think that's code for, "Take me now, you big brute."

Anonymous Giraffe June 04, 2014 10:06 AM  

a woman with mental health issues

That is redundant.

Anonymous Cranberry June 04, 2014 10:09 AM  

Bob k., no kidding?

Anonymous Krul June 04, 2014 10:10 AM  

I vaguely remember reading a book by Tammy Bruce years ago where she said that the feminist groups she'd participated in had been essentially group therapy sessions for troubled women with a political bent.

Anonymous bob k. mando June 04, 2014 10:14 AM  

bob k. mando June 04, 2014 10:06 AM
i think that's code for, "Take me now, you big brute."

Cranberry June 04, 2014 10:09 AM
Bob k., no kidding?



i'm super serial.

Anonymous bob k. mando June 04, 2014 10:19 AM  

soooooooo ...

the EU is super, SUPER serial about this whole Ukraine thing:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-06-04/france-responds-us-bnp-fine-will-train-hundreds-russian-seamen-operate-french-made-w

Anonymous Huckleberry -- est. 1977 June 04, 2014 10:22 AM  

As my grandfather used to say, the difference between men and women is you at least have a shot of reasoning your way out of a knife fight.

Anonymous bob k. mando June 04, 2014 10:24 AM  

Huckleberry -- est. 1977 June 04, 2014 10:22 AM
the difference between men and women is you at least have a shot of reasoning your way out of a knife fight.



John Bobbit would like a word with you.

Anonymous The other skeptic June 04, 2014 10:26 AM  

John Bobbit would like a word with you.

Well, he fell asleep on the job.

Anonymous Pork Milkshake June 04, 2014 10:27 AM  

Fortunately the fairer sex are not completely unwise to the antics of the feminazi nutbags.

I was immensely gratified when my apolitical girlfriend responded to my accusation that she was behaving like a feminist as a massive insult.

Women spend a great deal of time observing each other, and it hasn't escaped their attention that the vast majority of feminists are unloved, lonely, aggressive, physically unattractive creatures who have the potential to taint other females simply by virtue of sharing the same plumbing (which has worked to some extent amongst the MGTOW movement).

I've had the misfortune of getting to know several feminists rather well. The least odious is the type that merely goes along with feminism in a non-committal way by virtue of having been rinsed in the sewerage vats of the universities.

The rest could easily be identified as one of histrionic personality disorder sufferers, benefactors of borderline personality disorder, and at the far end of the spectrum, fast-adapting sociopaths on the sick end of the narcissism spectrum who saw feminism as an excellent way to jump a few rungs up the ladder to power and success whilst receiving adulation for being socially conscious. Funnily, every one of the latter type was/is a female author.

Anonymous Anonymous June 04, 2014 10:30 AM  

Speaking of mentally ill feminists, John Scalzi announces he won't be going to Loncon 3.

I was sooooo looking forward to the Meet and Greet with the Chinless One and VD!

Anonymous zen0 June 04, 2014 10:31 AM  

She stayed awake for five days babbling, ranting ......She was seeing "little green men" and her eyes were literally rolling around in their sockets.

Racism at work. If she was black, she could have won a debating award.

Anonymous The other skeptic June 04, 2014 10:32 AM  

How strange. What looks like a member of the tribe agreeing that guns don't kill people, people do.

Anonymous Bitchez Be Crazy June 04, 2014 10:33 AM  

See?

I told you so.

Anonymous Hillary 2016 June 04, 2014 10:37 AM  

Feminism is, quite literally, insane.

When I am elected president, attorney general Gloria Allred will prosecute you for this hate speech.



Anonymous Huckleberry -- est. 1977 June 04, 2014 10:37 AM  

John Bobbit would like a word with you

I thought she used scissors.

Blogger Bryan June 04, 2014 10:40 AM  

Off topic. Vox, I tried to visit http://www.castaliahouse.com/ this morning and am getting an HTTP 500 with a body that says "Error establishing a database connection".

Anonymous GG June 04, 2014 10:43 AM  

It's a bit bizarre how the insane (and the stupid) always seem to attract such a large following. If you're truly a miserable person intent on projecting your own issues onto the rest of the world, you're almost guaranteed a full booking. People are fascinated with train wrecks, I suppose.

"Any woman who calls herself a feminist is identifying herself as a woman with mental health issues."

Yes, but it goes beyond that somehow. People with mental health issues can be quite pleasant and highly functioning. There's a rage, a narcissism, a destruction behind feminism that let's you know you're not just in the asylum, you've plunged into the basement where the evil scientists live. The clowns are running the asylum and you, you're now the inmate.

Anonymous Pale Moon Convert June 04, 2014 10:43 AM  

Talk to a feminist-sounding woman, and most likely she will claim: "I am not a feminist."

The problem is that most western women will not identify themselves as feminists. Even the ones who clearly are. I think whatever label you pin on them, they will disown.

Feminism has been pretty much normalized by now, so it's not some fringe idea anymore. Young women see their feminist world as normal, and can't conceive it otherwise.

Rather than calling women out as an "X" we should call out their actions, which don't have labels. We should also do so with an unyielding attitude, with a subtle, underlying anger, which tolerates no female disrespect.

Anonymous YIH June 04, 2014 10:55 AM  

Anon: (you did see that NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS. Anonymous comments will be deleted. right?)
Speaking of mentally ill feminists, John Scalzi announces he won't be going to Loncon 3.

I was sooooo looking forward to the Meet and Greet with the Chinless One and VD!

Me, I'd pay good money to see them in the octagon - 4 teh lulz

Anonymous The other skeptic June 04, 2014 10:56 AM  

Heh, in November California gets to choose between a vampire squid and Governor Moonbeam.

Anonymous NateM June 04, 2014 10:56 AM  

Reading this story the first thing that comes to mind is "God, I wish the internet had been around then" Would have been Classic. I figured it was a sister and not a brother when she stayed and allowed herself to be terrorized for 5 days by this crazy broad. Any non Gamma man would have just packed up and walked out.

Anonymous Jack Amok June 04, 2014 11:09 AM  

I guess the whack job in Santa Barbara was right - women are to blame. If this crazy bitch hadn't helped lobotomize our mental health system, he might have gotten better treatment, or at least been where he couldn't hurt innocent sane people.

Blogger CM June 04, 2014 11:12 AM  

Demon possessed.

Blogger IM2L844 June 04, 2014 11:31 AM  

Hmmm...I figured Lud would be here white knighting by now. Maybe after his mom wakes him up at the crack of noon.

Anonymous bob k. mando June 04, 2014 11:35 AM  

Huckleberry -- est. 1977 June 04, 2014 10:37 AM
I thought she used scissors.



not according to wiki.

*shrugs*

ymmv.

besides, she's hardly the only woman to use a knife on her man or children. she's just the one all the women loved to laugh about.

Anonymous A Visitor June 04, 2014 11:37 AM  

Any non Gamma man would have just packed up and walked out. I would've if she were my sister. I would've at the airport. In fact, I never would have gone in the first place!

Anonymous SumDood June 04, 2014 12:11 PM  

Off-Topic for this thread but certainly it merits discussion:

http://gawker.com/the-reality-of-dating-white-women-when-youre-black-1585401039?utm_source=recirculation&utm_medium=recirculation&utm_campaign=tuesdayPM

"I was taught the story of Emmett Till by my mother at a young age. I don't think she did it as a warning as much as to be like, "This is something you should be aware of." He was 14. It was 1955. He got dragged out of his uncle's house and tortured and killed because he maybe flirted with a white woman. A racist jury acquitted his murderers, Roy Bryant and J.W. Milam, despite overwhelming evidence, and, to rub salt in the wound, both admitted to killing Till in Look magazine the next year. O.J. getting off brought a twisted, but understandable feeling of justice. The shoe was on the other foot for once and so be it if two white people wound up dead. We'd lost many more. That's harsh, but that's the historical context of black men dating white women that I unfortunately have to consider when doing the same."

Anonymous Lingua June 04, 2014 12:49 PM  

Genetic fallacy?

Anonymous bob k. mando June 04, 2014 1:01 PM  

SumDood June 04, 2014 12:11 PM
Off-Topic for this thread but certainly it merits discussion:



a - collective guilt
b - whining about " it's hardly ever looked at with any understanding or compassion for the people personally involved."
c - claiming that he doesn't have a fetish for white women ... and then admitting that he dates white to such an extent that even his own mother has asked him "When are you going to bring home a girl who looks like me?"; ie - he's a lying sack of shit



nothing new here.

at least Tommy Sotomayor has the balls to out and out say that white women are more attractive, rather than mincing around trying to hide behind 'feelings' and 'oppression'.

Anonymous takin' a look June 04, 2014 1:21 PM  

In the bedroom, the mighty bedroom, mr john wayne bobbitt sleeps tonight....in the kitchen the mighty kitchen, mrs john wayne bobbitt grabs a knife.....and she goes, aweeda whack aweeda whack aweeda whack!

Heard this back in the day

Anonymous Lingua June 04, 2014 1:23 PM  

Genetic fallacy?

Anonymous rycamor June 04, 2014 1:31 PM  

Sin is always a twisting of our perceptions of God-given desires and responsibilities. In the case of feminism, women a) desire the acceptance and strong fatherly leadership they have been denied, so they displace it to activist groups and government, and b) take advantage of the natural male instinct to protect women at all costs.

OpenID Dago June 04, 2014 1:39 PM  

Heh, puahate, heh, and stabbing room-mates heh, heh. Admittedly, I have not read your blog very long, so if you identify as a PUA I guess I didn't see that and I didn't "pick-up" on it by the context I read so far. Or maybe you don't identify as a PUA, but your best buddies are. I dunno. I suppose there is some bad assumption there on my part to some extent. That said, I stand by what I said. For the most part, PUAs are a pathetic bunch. I do track them a little, in the same way I track radfems, because I find them sort of entertaining. I have an odd sense of humour I suppose. But seriously though, let's mention just a few shall we? Mystery? A naricissistic depressive bullshitter who competed with Tynan (herbal) for a woman? Fucking Tynan? Who basically hangs out with his moustached buddy Todd a lot. And hasn't seen a pussy live for at least a year I would bet. Style? The douchy douche who can write in an entertaining fashion but really...the guy reeks of oleum. Gunwitch? Shot a girl in the face. I guess he is a student of the extreme neg. Mehow? Spent half a million of daddy's cash and ten years to bang "30-40" girls and that's his number so it was probably 20. I can go on, but what's the point? Mostly they are very insecure pseudo gays. And even when they actually do get a lot of pussy (hypnotica) there is still a certain vibe of viscousness that is rather unctuous. Though to be fair, Eric is probably among the outliers and not as bad as the rest of them for sure. And you, well I don't really know you yet other than from pieces of your blog, so who knows, maybe you're alright or maybe not. One thing that is clear so far is that you have the most individualistic and non-thin-skinned commenters of any blog I read and that is deserving of respect. I don't necessarily agree with the things you write, but you certainly are not stupid and you know how to foment interest. I'll keep reading and see as I go. Oh, and you definitely made some assumptions about me too that are way off, like the part of having room mates, or the implied lack of pussy in my life. But hey, I did wade in not realising you somehow feel PUAs are generally a valid subspecies... So fair enough I suppose.

OpenID Dago June 04, 2014 1:43 PM  

Cailcorishev,
Mostly because I am not a little bitch. How about you?

Anonymous Stg58/Animal Mother June 04, 2014 1:44 PM  

GG,

Not all of the insane (and stupid) have large devoted followings. No one's following you, for example.

Blogger Hank Brown June 04, 2014 1:47 PM  

Even more irritating than the normal feminists are their male cheerleaders (white knights, in the marketplace of ideas). For those who have a Kindle, my satire is free today. It is a send-up not only of the Marxists' ("liberals") favored narratives in pop culture, but of their ideology in general.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00KOGTYZM?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creativeASIN=B00KOGTYZM&linkCode=xm2&tag=twofistblog-20

Blogger Marissa June 04, 2014 1:47 PM  

The shoe was on the other foot for once and so be it if two white people wound up dead. We'd lost many more. That's harsh, but that's the historical context of black men dating white women that I unfortunately have to consider when doing the same.

Uh, then don't? Black folks kill each other at far higher rates than white people do. I don't understand this obsession with white people they have. Till happened 60 years ago.

Blogger Marissa June 04, 2014 1:49 PM  

Ain't it great when a thread of feminism comes up and someone who really and truly isn't a "little bitch" has to bring up PUAs? It's like when a thread on the atrociousness of Obama comes up and some special snowflake has to remind us how bad Bush was.

Anonymous Josh June 04, 2014 1:53 PM  

Stg wins the thread

Blogger Conan the Cimmerian, King of Aquilonia June 04, 2014 2:01 PM  

Dago,

Please, you have made it abundantly clear that you enjoy taking enormous bowel movements all over yourself, smearing it all over yourself, rolling around in it, and shouting "Look! Look at me, please!".

Nobody cares about what you think VD is or isn't. Nobody cares about what you think the rest of us are or aren't.

We see you wallowing in your feces, and that impresses none of us. Now run along and play in your own feces by yourself alone, and without asking for the rest of us to show you attention.

Anonymous bw June 04, 2014 2:01 PM  

@Henry Brown
Thanks for the heads up.
Will give it a go.

Anonymous Scintan June 04, 2014 2:14 PM  

Mostly because I am not a little bitch.

Reading the responses to your posts gives me the impression that people don't agree with this claim of yours.

Anonymous Daniel June 04, 2014 2:26 PM  

Some days, I tell you, it is no fun to be slow.-witted. I still don't understand how the upchucking babbling from a rancid-minded derelict drove any liberals away from a public chat about the hurt, much less all of them.

Anonymous Josh June 04, 2014 2:27 PM  

Oh, and you definitely made some assumptions about me too that are way off, like the part of having room mates

You stabbed them previously?

Anonymous Alexander June 04, 2014 2:40 PM  

- I'm not crazy.
- Don't be evil.
- I'm not a little bitch.

Question for the room: What's your impression of someone who says one of the above without being prompted to do so?

Anonymous AnarchistWatchmaker June 04, 2014 2:47 PM  

Feminism should also be called what it is, female chauvinism. It is an ideology that stands for female dominance and agression. I see this both theoretically and in actuality all across the western world.

Blogger LP 999/Eliza June 04, 2014 2:54 PM  

F'ism is an abomination

Anonymous bob k. mando June 04, 2014 3:03 PM  

AnarchistWatchmaker June 04, 2014 2:47 PM
Feminism should also be called what it is,



as i've said before many a time, the term 'Feminist' is every bit as gender-neutral as the term 'Masculinist'.

so the men should start calling themselves masculinists and calling the bimbos out on it when they start crying.

Blogger IM2L844 June 04, 2014 3:17 PM  

Question for the room: What's your impression of someone who says one of the above without being prompted to do so?

Well, on two of the three, it's not clear if it's bragging or complaining.

Anonymous Gen. Kong June 04, 2014 3:22 PM  

Feminism is a religion - or, more precisely, a set of dogmas which form part of the present state religion of the west (including most of that which refers to itself as Christianity) which has been dubbed Crystal Methodism by the blogger Whiskey. It's not a bad term as the faithful are wildly addicted to it (like Crystal Meth addicts to their drug of choice) and their fanaticism exceeds that of Boko Haram in Nigeria by a considerable factor. Feminism should have been laughed onto the trash-heap of history when Holy Mother Gloria gave Slick Willie the famous "one-grope" get-out-of-jail-free card. Almost two decades later, it's more entrenched and impervious to all logical argument than ever. It will be amusing to see if the shiny new girl-powered Marines are sent to make Nigeria safe for feminism, sodomy and the Amurikan way by the fearless leaders of the Banana Empire from their Wall Street minarets, no doubt to the cheers of the Tea-Party Patriotards, Republicans, Christians and assorted "conservatiives" should the order be issued by a magic-negro teleprompter-reader wearing an R-jersey like Ben Carson or Allen West. The movie Idiocracy wasn't about the future, after all.

Blogger Marissa June 04, 2014 3:23 PM  

so the men should start calling themselves masculinists and calling the bimbos out on it when they start crying.

I've seen guys on Facebook calling themselves this. They are male supremacists.

Blogger Fnord Prefect June 04, 2014 4:07 PM  

@ Dago This is not the blog you are looking for...

It's got to be worth a shot.

Anonymous DNW June 04, 2014 4:35 PM  

Vox Day says,

" Feminism is for psychos
I've commented numerous times on how feminism is less coherent than communism and more murderous than National Socialism. That is because it is, quite literally, an ideology concocted by madwomen"


Let's hope you've overstated the case. However if I were seeking to buttress your argument I'd mention Shulamith Firestone; and of the current crop quite possibly Amanda Marcotte, though the latter's ship has not yet quite fully capsized.

Anonymous Strange Aeons June 04, 2014 4:55 PM  

^ After several mentions of Amanda Marcotte over at Chateau Heartiste, curiosity finally got the best of me and I had to look her up. Ye gods, small wonder she's a feminist.
Last I saw of her, she was hoofin' Hobbits back to Isengard...

Anonymous GG June 04, 2014 5:07 PM  

"GG, Not all of the insane (and stupid) have large devoted followings. No one's following you, for example"

Thank you, Stg58. Seems like you just verified my sanity. Or your stupidity.

Anonymous bob k. mando June 04, 2014 6:11 PM  

Marissa June 04, 2014 3:23 PM
I've seen guys on Facebook calling themselves this. They are male supremacists.




yeah? so you're reiterating my point vis-a-vis 'feminist'?

thanks, i guess.




GG June 04, 2014 5:07 PM
Thank you, Stg58. Seems like you just verified my sanity. Or your stupidity.



by your syllogism, Eliot Rodgers was either sane or had a lot of followers.

are you CERTAIN you don't want to revisit that chain of reasoning?


also, the more popular Vox gets, the more insane he is ... which is why you wanted to be readmitted here?

Blogger Marissa June 04, 2014 6:47 PM  

It was a statement, Bob. I agree with you on feminists. I was just sharing my personal experience of the term's use. I'm a bit of a male supremacist myself.

Anonymous Scintan June 04, 2014 6:58 PM  

and of the current crop quite possibly Amanda Marcotte, though the latter's ship has not yet quite fully capsized.

Dude, that pox-ridden junk capsized years ago.

Anonymous Luke June 04, 2014 7:31 PM  

Re the apparent clear insanity of feminists: I read an article a few years ago that the vast majority of the most well-known radical feminists all had one thing in common. That is, either they, or their mothers, had a really crummy marriage in their past. (The article listed multiple examples, such as Andrea Dworkin.) If true, this supports my position that feminism should be regarded less as a plausible, respectable philosophic position (or political doctrine), but rather more as simply a brain defect, where those with it are in need of counseling and/or psychoactive drugs, not podiums, publishers, and university chairs.

Anonymous GG June 04, 2014 8:28 PM  

"by your syllogism, Eliot Rodgers was either sane or had a lot of followers."

He was insane and he had a lot of followers. He has even more followers now. You've just proven my point.

"also, the more popular Vox gets, the more insane he is ... which is why you wanted to be readmitted here?"

Yes, I grow bored with the second floor of the asylum and was hoping to move to the third. What's your point?

Vox is neither insane nor very popular. Again you prove my point. He is however, often perceived as crazy which does account for some of his popularity.

Anonymous Atombum June 04, 2014 8:48 PM  

"...her eyes were literally rolling around in their sockets." Makes me wonder if her head was turning round and round while spewing green pea soup.

Blogger Jack June 04, 2014 8:59 PM  

One of my coworkers sometimes brings in fairly recent copies of New Yorker Magazine. In one such issue there was this article by Susan Faludi about another early feminist who was clearly off her nut.

It's not like there is a short supply of insane feminists. By definition.

Anonymous Grrl Powr June 04, 2014 11:09 PM  

“From Genesis to every distinction that is made in Scripture, feminism is antithetical to the plan of our Creator.”

That is ONE point of view that is NOT universally shared. Another equally valid perspective is that men and women are equal in the eyes of their family members and before the law.


“the essence of 'feminism' is to deny the very foundation of the Gospel.”

Or, the essence of ‘feminism’ is to enhance the tenets of the Gospel. Depends upon one’s ideology.


“The rest could easily be identified [as mental illness]”.

Please provide specific clinical psychological evidence that feminism is a mental illness. This I have to see...

Anonymous bob k. mando June 04, 2014 11:43 PM  

Marissa June 04, 2014 6:47 PM
I'm a bit of a male supremacist myself.



i wish i could be there to watch you tell a female feminist that you are a masculinist.

that would almost surely cause me a cranial infarction, if my sides didn't split first.

but it would be oh so worth it.




GG June 04, 2014 8:28 PM
He was insane and he had a lot of followers. He has even more followers now.



oi.

this is a novel interpretation of 'followers' i've not seen before.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/follower?s=t

either that, or you've just demonstrated yourself:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zAlNrtcPCLw


cuz, i hate to tell you this, but i haven't seen a lot of other incels taking to the streets to do drive-bys on sorority houses.

haven't heard of any, actually.



GG June 04, 2014 8:28 PM
Vox is neither insane nor very popular.


had he been included in the 2013 list of conservative blogs, he'd have been in the top 50 list and he's a top 5,000 blog in the United States.

http://www.redflagnews.com/top-100-conservative

http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/http%3A%2F%2Fvoxday.blogspot.com


i have no idea how many blogs there are in the US, but i would expect it to be in the six figures ( huh, make that seven figures, there were evidently almost 200k in 2003
http://www.webology.org/2006/v3n4/a30.html ) and top 5,000 out of a number that big is pretty damn impressive.

and that's irrelevant anyways. he's growing in popularity and, as i pointed out, adhering to your syllogism means that the more popular he gets the more insane he is.

either follow your logic or modify your statement.

Anonymous =/= June 05, 2014 12:04 AM  

“From Genesis to every distinction that is made in Scripture, feminism is antithetical to the plan of our Creator.”
"That is ONE point of view that is NOT universally shared. Another equally valid perspective is that men and women are equal in the eyes of their family members and before the law."

Here is why you are incorrect, GP: Creator > family & law.
Based on the contingency of there being a Creator/God, obviously He and we are vastly unequal. Ergo, the hierarchy that He sets in place takes immutable precedence over that of family members and mortal laws. However, if He does not exist, then anything goes and I grant your "equally valid perspective" due to universal subjectivity.


"the essence of 'feminism' is to deny the very foundation of the Gospel.”
"Or, the essence of ‘feminism’ is to enhance the tenets of the Gospel. Depends upon one’s ideology."
Or, the essence of cancer is to enhance the human body. Depends on ones equally valid perspective of oncology. See how that works?

Anonymous rycamor June 05, 2014 12:24 AM  

GrrlPower and =/=,

You're both missing the whole picture.

The New Testament would have been considered "feminist" in its day, in the sense that it offered women a vastly better deal than most ancient cultures did (essentially, slavery to the rulers and warrior class of men). It does present a certain spiritual equality, in that we are all morally held to account before God, and able to receive the gift of salvation:

Galations 3:26-29

26 So in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, 27 for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. 28 There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.


In addition, the New Testament strengthens the spirit of Old Testament law regarding a man's obligation to his wife. It adds that not only should a man provide for her physically, but he is to love her, and he is not to deny her sexual needs.

So you could say that, compared to many of the surrounding pagan cultures, the Jews and even more so the New Testament Christians treated women far better, but the New Testament also makes it very clear than women should not be in spiritual positions of power over men (in the church), and that wives are to submit to husbands and unmarried women to submit to their fathers. And it makes abundantly clear throughout the New Testament that women and men are not equal in capability nor in clearness of thought and ability to avoid deception.

So we see there is a "golden mean" to the question of womens' place in this fallen world. It's not equality, but it is the best deal that women can get, and if you search the history of the world, you will see that the closer a culture adheres to that approach, the better it is.

Anonymous Anonymous June 05, 2014 12:47 AM  

National Socialism is the most unfairly maligned system of the whole history of mankind. hilt was a god who wanted to save the German people from the clutches of the parasites that are now destroying the West through mass immigration and assimilation

the most murderous regimes are Communist and Zionist!

Anonymous daniel June 05, 2014 12:48 AM  

National Socialism is the most unfairly maligned system of the whole history of mankind. hilt was a god who wanted to save the German people from the clutches of the parasites that are now destroying the West through mass immigration and assimilation

the most murderous regimes are Communist and Zionist!

Anonymous daniel June 05, 2014 12:49 AM  

I forgot! Christianity has killed more than all the Zionist regime

Anonymous Chad June 05, 2014 12:52 AM  

Speaking of psychos... Cracked.com is posting the usual bullshit again.

Anonymous =/= June 05, 2014 1:06 AM  

@ rycamor
Fair enough. I was looking at it in a 'then vs now' sense instead of a 'then vs before then' sense. In a larger scope of things, quite a contrast.

Anonymous Grrl Powr June 05, 2014 1:16 AM  

“Ergo, the hierarchy that He sets in place takes immutable precedence over that of family members and mortal laws.”

IF the hierarchy was True to His word.


“The New Testament would have been considered "feminist" in its day...it offered a vastly better deal”.

You mean shackling women to chastity? You mean promoting the subservience of women? You mean denying women opportunities to pursue careers? Indeed, a feminist treatise...


“So you could say that, compared to many of the surrounding pagan cultures, the Jews and even more so the New Testament Christians treated women far better...”



But far worse compared to our advancing, modern, maturing society.


“And it makes abundantly clear throughout the New Testament that women and men are not equal in capability nor in clearness of thought and ability to avoid deception.”



The Bible, written by men for men.


“It's not equality, but it is the best deal that women can get, and if you search the history of the world, you will see that the closer a culture adheres to that approach, the better it is.”

The best deal women can get is being a full-fledged citizen and being able to choose which career path to take.

Blogger Fnord Prefect June 05, 2014 1:47 AM  

@Chad I was going to comment on that article but it would require a full-on fisk. The author plants a field full of strawmen then fences them off with an appeal to authority ( [...] he's got a PhD,so na na na na na).

For a more reasoned approach to 'mens' issues' I would recommend Stephan Molyneaux's Freedomain Radio

Anonymous rycamor June 05, 2014 2:00 AM  

Grrl Powr, my dear... if you are not a troll you have obviously not read much in the history of this blog. Do a search for "The brothel or the burka" and "feminism" up above.

"The best deal women can get is being a full-fledged citizen and being able to choose which career path to take."

My my... such mundane dreams. Men have always realized that the "career" is not a path to happiness, even for the few who manage to rise above the dross. a life of labor is what men submit to in order to *have* a civilized society at all. And if women don't play the part for which they are biologically, emotionally and spiritually designed, said civilization will go the way of every culture that has died in the throes of decadence. Look around you.

"

But far worse compared to our advancing, modern, maturing society."

Oh yes, and we see where that has gotten us: a society that chases rainbows and a government that taxes the producers ever more to fill the ever-growing stomachs of the parasites. And by tax, it's not just the visible taxes but the hidden ones, the results of which are soon to come crashing down around the ears of this bankrupt society. Any society that lets women dictate the priorities falls apart within decades. That's where we are. Yes, the men (by and large) have created a myriad of technological marvels, but unless we have families, personal responsibility, humility, and self-sacrifice (men and women both sacrificing in different ways), it will all come to naught.

If you are younger than 50, I suspect you will live to see it come to naught within your lifetime. Stick around...

Anonymous rycamor June 05, 2014 2:10 AM  

Edit: do a blog search for "brothel", and do a search for "burqah".

Blogger Akulkis June 05, 2014 4:25 AM  

For the most part, PUAs are a pathetic bunch. I do track them a little,


.... and then proceeds to list and diagnose a whole bunch of people whose names alone (let alone diagnosing their problems) would be known only to people who are obsessed with PUA ideas...

Anonymous Grrl Powr June 05, 2014 6:40 AM  

“a life of labor is what men submit to in order to *have* a civilized society at all.”

A life of labor equates to having a career--farming, welding, stock broker, electrical engineer--by which men and women work hand in hand to create and maintain institutions.


“And if women don't play the part for which they are biologically, emotionally and spiritually designed...”

Your confirmation bias is showing...


“in the throes of decadence.”

Ain’t liberty grand? The price for freedom of thought and freedom of conscious.


“Any society that lets women dictate the priorities falls apart within decades.”

Yes, men historically have been the primary builders of society. If anything, blame them for our “fall” and “impending doom”. Women are simply along for the ride.


“but unless we have families, personal responsibility, humility, and self-sacrifice (men and women both sacrificing in different ways), it will all come to naught.”



Human failings, not reserved to one particular gender.


“If you are younger than 50, I suspect you will live to see it come to naught within your lifetime. Stick around...”

Unlike you, I have faith. So do millions of other Americans who do not share your “The Sky Is Falling” mentality.

Anonymous Cranberry June 05, 2014 8:19 AM  

I'm guessing recent college graduate with no job experience. Perhaps an HR "manager" in the making. BA in psychology or sociology. Or communications.

Anonymous Luke June 05, 2014 8:45 AM  

Grrl Powr June 05, 2014 1:16 AM

“Ergo, the hierarchy that He sets in place takes immutable precedence over that of family members and mortal laws.”

“The New Testament would have been considered "feminist" in its day...it offered a vastly better deal”.

"You mean shackling women to chastity? You mean promoting the subservience of women? You mean denying women opportunities to pursue careers? Indeed, a feminist treatise...


“So you could say that, compared to many of the surrounding pagan cultures, the Jews and even more so the New Testament Christians treated women far better...”



But far worse compared to our advancing, modern, maturing society."


Much of the "work" careerist women now do in the West is one or more of pointless, societally harmful, comes at the expense of a more capable man* (who now can't provide for and thus start a family), and meanwhile keeps a woman from doing the one thing society MUST have from women, which is numerically and qualitatively adequate reproduction. Western demographic numbers are in disastrous freefall, to say nothing of how poorly the current experiment with a feminist-sympathetic legal and cultural systems do at ensuring children grow up with their fathers (so they can be raised adequately). Thus, the current system in the West is a clearly ever-worsening disaster, where women as a group are gross failures at what really matters.


*You DO know that the vast majority of geniuses are men, and a substantial preponderance of the >120-IQ types (about the minimum level to be moderately competent scientists, engineers, M.D.s, etc.)? The flatter IQ curve for men is fully proven.

Blogger RC June 05, 2014 8:52 AM  

I wonder if Grrl Powr's property taxes are $8500/year.

Blogger 1sexistpig2another June 05, 2014 3:12 PM  

The Bible, written by men for men.

Nope!

The Bible is not just one book, but a collection of ancient texts and letters. 66 writings in three languages by 40 different witnesses spanning 1500 years all converging on the single theme of the birth, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ as a sacrifice for sins that God’s people may be redeemed. 23,000 archaeological digs have found nothing contradicting the facts laid out in the scriptures.

For the Bible to be anything other than what it claims to be would require men who didn’t even live on the earth at the same time or in the same regions, nor speak the same languages, to somehow collaborate together. For what purpose? To further subjugate women? Please!

In addition, editing the Bible was not possible as there where thousands of copies of the aforementioned texts and letters already spread throughout the region before any councils met to discuss the canonization of the scriptures (in other words before there even was a Bible).

There are less than 12 existing copies of Julius Caesar’s Gallic Wars.
There are less than 10 existing copies of Aristotle’s Poetics.
There are 0 existing copies of the writings of Socrates (what we have was written by Plato).

Yet there are over 6000 existing manuscript and manuscript portions of the New Testament alone. And the earliest of these are within 25 years of the originals.

Gallic Wars – over 1000 years after the original.
Poetics – over 1400 years after the original.
Homer’s Iliad- over 2100 years after the original.

Most people have no problem accepting that what we have from Julius Caesar, Aristotle, and Socrates is legitimate. Only when the Bible is being discussed do people suddenly get skeptical.

Anonymous Cranberry June 05, 2014 3:30 PM  

Yeah, but, sexistpig, did you know that it's Born Again Christians who use Ashley Madison more than any other religion? So obv the Bible's proscriptions against extramarital sex are bogus and just a tool to oppress female sexuality while men have all the fun.

And that Catholic nuns buried babies bodies in septic tanks in Ireland? Honestly, how religious people can pose as righteous when they utterly fail as human beings is beyond the pail of tears!

C'mon, mang, get with the program. It's hip to hate on Christians. Yer factz mean nuthin'.

{sarcasm tags apply to all of the above, all misspellings intentional}

Blogger 1sexistpig2another June 05, 2014 6:02 PM  

Cranberry I was on the bandwagon but a bunch of feminists kicked me off, and those cold hard facts wouldn't let me get back on. Something just came to mind:

Male feminist: "You know, I know that this steak doesn't exist. I know that when I put it in my mouth the matrix is telling my brain that it is juicy and delicious. After nine years, do you know what I realized? Ignorance is bliss."

Grrl Powr: "Then we have a deal."

Yeah I know, my confirmation bias is showing...

Anonymous Grrl Powr June 05, 2014 7:46 PM  

“Much of the "work" careerist women now do in the West is one or more of pointless, societally harmful, comes at the expense of a more capable man.”

These women are hired by male business owners for a host of reasons. Free market principles at its finest.


“Western demographic numbers are in disastrous freefall...”

Men and women here are choosing for themselves whether to have children or delay having children. Their decision. I suggest you move to Russia, where they have socialist programs designed to “encourage” their citizens to bear more rugrats.


“nothing of how poorly the current experiment with a feminist-sympathetic legal and cultural systems do at ensuring children grow up with their fathers.”

Playing the victim card...well done!


“the current system in the West is a clearly ever-worsening disaster, where women as a group are gross failures at what really matters.”

I bet with those words you are able to sweet-talk all the ladies into bed!


Regarding IQ...common knowledge. Doesn’t really matter, since the majority of those fields have historically been male dominated. Women with the requisite IQ’s fare well in those occupations.


“I wonder if Grrl Powr's property taxes are $8500/year.”



About $9000 a year.


The Bible was written by men for men--women as property, wife and children belong to master, acceptable to sell daughters, polygamy permitted, take women and livestock as plunder. How I wish to go back to those olden days!

Blogger 1sexistpig2another June 05, 2014 10:30 PM  

How I wish to go back to those olden days!

I wish you could too.

Blogger 1sexistpig2another June 05, 2014 10:45 PM  

These women are hired by male business owners for a host of reasons. Free market principles at its finest.

Nope! Mandatory quotas at it's finest.

Men and women here are choosing for themselves whether to have children or delay having children. Their decision. I suggest you move to Russia,

Decisions have consequences. Those that replace the feminist will not have the same view of "women's rights" that you have. As it is now Russia could give the US a lesson or two in responsibility and family autonomy.

The Bible was written by men for men--women as property, wife and children belong to master, acceptable to sell daughters, polygamy permitted, take women and livestock as plunder. How I wish to go back to those olden days!

You don't know what you are talking about, and your opinions don't change anything. What I wrote in my previous post about the Bible are indisputable facts. Where are yours?

Anonymous Grrl Powr June 06, 2014 12:18 AM  

"Nope! Mandatory quotas at it's finest."

Which are free market principles if the private business owner willingly chooses to have a set number of women employed. Thanks for proving my point!


"As it is now Russia could give the US a lesson or two in responsibility and family autonomy."

Through a government sponsored program, i.e. socialism, designed to pay women to have a second and a third child. Indeed, "mandatory quotas" for Russian females to meet to get paid for offspring. You cool with socialism?


"You don't know what you are talking about."

Ok, time for you to disprove that the items I listed are NOT found in the Bible--women as property, wife and children belong to master, acceptable to sell daughters, polygamy permitted, take women and livestock as plunder.

Blogger 1sexistpig2another June 06, 2014 2:37 AM  

Which are free market principles if the private business owner willingly chooses to have a set number of women employed. Thanks for proving my point!

Having to hire less qualified women to meet quotas for fear of being fined and stigmatized are not free market principles.

Through a government sponsored program, i.e. socialism, designed to pay women to have a second and a third child. Indeed, "mandatory quotas" for Russian females to meet to get paid for offspring. You cool with socialism?

The lessons we can learn from Russia:

1) Prioritize strong families in a nation.
2) Encourage the type of responsibility that comes with raising children in a normal family.
3) Do not take away personal autonomy of the individual.

Compare the above with a country where the government decides where you can smoke, what kinds of light bulbs you can buy, who you can and can’t hire, and determines that yes you will have health insurance.

Ok, time for you to disprove that the items I listed are NOT found in the Bible--women as property, wife and children belong to master, acceptable to sell daughters, polygamy permitted, take women and livestock as plunder.

Your list is missing the context in which these things are mentioned. I'm not going to go over them all here and now, but you should keep some things in mind.

1) There are many things described in the Bible that are not being advocated at all.

2) You may not like or understand the customs and traditions of peoples in ancient times, but you are in no position to stand in judgment against them. Many of the practices in those times seem barbaric and cruel today, but how are they any different than the practices we have today?

Your feminist sisters have the blood of over 55 million unborn babies on their hands. Women destroy their marriages and ruin the lives of their children on a whim initiating over 70% of divorces. They rip the father out of a huge portion of their children’s lives in the name of “happiness”.

Meanwhile 63% of youth suicides, 90% of all homeless and runaway children, 85% of all behavioral disorders in children, 80% of rapists, 71 % of high school drop outs, and 75% of kids in chemical abuse centers are or were children who grew up with out their fathers.

Men are forced to pay women alimony and CS (sometimes for children not their own) while getting nothing in return (financial slavery). Failure to pay often means incarceration.

But somehow we know better than those before us? Call me skeptical.

3 ) Why is your indoctrinated view any better than that of the patriarchs of Israel? Or any other view for that matter? On what do you base your moral authority?

You've rejected the Word of God as a source for morality on fraudulent grounds (written for men by men) with out any facts to back up your claims. Now you want to borrow from that moral authority (which you rejected) to say that "women as property, wife and children belong to master, acceptable to sell daughters, polygamy permitted, take women and livestock as plunder." are wrong. Why should I take your view seriously?

Biblical patriarchy is by far a better system for combing the strengths and weaknesses of men and women to make for a strong society than anything I have yet seen.

Blogger Marissa June 06, 2014 9:53 AM  

You're expecting someone who can spell neither girl or power to actually have a rational conversation.

Blogger 1sexistpig2another June 06, 2014 2:40 PM  

Marissa I keep think, "Maybe this one time...."

Yeah I know, my bad.

Anonymous Grrl Powr June 06, 2014 8:49 PM  

“Having to hire less qualified women to meet quotas for fear of being fined and stigmatized are not free market principles.”


Except the male business owner, on his own accord, of his own volition, his own choice, decides what is best for his company by hiring females he believes meets his predescribed criteria. There are no “quotas” set by the government in this case; he alone chooses whom to hire. Why do oppose this obvious display of male hierarchy? Are you that dense?

“The lessons we can learn from Russia:
1) Prioritize strong families in a nation.
2) Encourage the type of responsibility that comes with raising children in a normal family.
Do not take away personal autonomy of the individual.”

1. Through government coercion.
2. Through government coercion.
3. You do realize, for example, that Russia RESTRICTS free speech for its people.

So you are an adherent to socialism. At least you can freely admit it. Why do you willingly oppose liberty?


“Compare the above with a country where the government decides where you can smoke, what kinds of light bulbs you can buy, who you can and can’t hire, and determines that yes you will have health insurance.”

The government did not make those decisions; elected representatives voted into office by citizens. It’s called majority rules.


“Your list is missing the context in which these things are mentioned.”



The context was clear, honey.


“Many of the practices in those times seem barbaric and cruel today, but how are they any different than the practices we have today?”

“Now you want to borrow from that moral authority (which you rejected) to say that "women as property, wife and children belong to master, acceptable to sell daughters, polygamy permitted, take women and livestock as plunder." are wrong.”



I see, employing moral relativity, rather than absolute morality. Tsk, tsk, tsk, God is very displeased with you. Repent!


“Women destroy their marriages and ruin the lives of their children on a whim initiating over 70% of divorces.”


And in the majority of those cases, the man has committed the sin of adultery. Women today have the liberty to decide whether to stay or leave. Why do you despise individual freedom?


“Men are forced to pay women alimony and CS (sometimes for children not their own) while getting nothing in return (financial slavery). Failure to pay often means incarceration.”



Shaming at its finest, ladies! Your husband must be proud!


“Biblical patriarchy is by far a better system for combing the strengths and weaknesses of men and women to make for a strong society than anything I have yet seen.”



Right. Because back in the day, the Inquisition, slavery, and female subjugation, in the name of “biblical patriarchy” were a marked improvement. Listen, dear, take some advice--the good ol’ days are long gone. God will judge, so at least have solace in that fact. Me, worried? Hardly.

Smile!

Anonymous Luke June 06, 2014 9:58 PM  

Rich Zubaty in his book "What Men Know That Women Don't" noted something I find interesting. Prior to agriculture, women commonly only averaged about ten menstrual cycles during their lives. This was due to menarche occurring years later than now, being pregnant or nursing most of their fertile years, and shorter lifespans. Now, a Western woman averages around 400 menstrual cycles during their lives. That's 40 times as much PMS that they're going through (affecting their mental stability, and men having to put up with this) as they're supposed to have.

He figures that this is much of the root cause to where feminism came from, this glandular gross emotional instability that women have for over 30 years during their lives. (I think that there being few truly bright women + the mollycoddling men give them + feminism being successfully marketed to women as the something-for-nothing scheme it is + contraception are most of the rest of it.)

This also makes the case against the wisdom of EVER having a female President or combat general; why have anyone with a history of decades of huge ups and downs (even if post-menopausal as is Hillary) in charge of something truly critical, if there's ANY plausible male candidate available? Just look at how women CEOs tend to crater non-chick-frippery-oriented businesses of any size as an example of this.

Anonymous Luke June 06, 2014 10:08 PM  

On feminist women and their values:

Here is how wonderful their values are, when put into action without any horrible men getting in the way:

http://sdsharedparent.tripod.com/id154.htm

"85% of all children that exhibit behavioral disorders come from fatherless homes (Source: Center for Disease Control)

90% of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes (Source: U.S. D.H.H.S., Bureau of the Census)

71% of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes (Source: National Principals Association Report on the State of High Schools.)

75% of all adolescent patients in chemical abuse centers come from fatherless homes (Source: Rainbows for all God's Children.)

63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes (Source: U.S. D.H.H.S., Bureau of the Census)

80% of rapists motivated with displaced anger come from fatherless homes (Source: Criminal Justice & Behavior, Vol 14, p. 403-26, 1978)

70% of juveniles in state-operated institutions come from fatherless homes (Source: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Special Report, Sept 1988)

85% of all youths sitting in prisons grew up in a fatherless home (Source: Fulton Co. Georgia jail populations, Texas Dept. of Corrections 1992)

These statistics translate to mean that children from a fatherless home are:

5 times more likely to commit suicide.
32 times more likely to run away.
20 times more likely to have behavioral disorders.
14 times more likely to commit rape
9 times more likely to drop out of high school.
10 times more likely to abuse chemical substances.
9 times more likely to end up in a state-operated institution.
20 times more likely to end up in prison."


Males growing up in a female-headed home are even 40% more likely to be homosexuals, for God's sake.

Yeah, put feminists fully enough in charge for long enough, and grass huts might be a stretch to hope for.

Anonymous Shut Up, Luke June 06, 2014 11:27 PM  

(Laughs) Exclusively attributing the statistics to "feminism" without considering other meaningful causes to those phenomenon only demonstrates your ignorance.

Blogger 1sexistpig2another June 07, 2014 12:08 AM  

Girl Powr the more I read your posts the more convinced I am that you aren't even aware that your writings are without merit, devoid of facts, and at times incoherent . It is also obvious in your replies that you don't under stand much of what you are reading.

And just for the record, the top reason given for divorce at cdc.gov is "too much arguing". It makes me kind of wonder what in your mind did 55+ million unborn babies do to deserve to die at the behest of their own mothers.

Anonymous Grrl Powr June 07, 2014 3:03 PM  

Coming from you, a socialist who prides themselves in inducing child birth and who shames men who make their own decision to hire women for their company, I'll take your words at what they are...a bitch who is on the rag.

Blogger 1sexistpig2another June 07, 2014 9:52 PM  

You indeed are the perfect example of "girl power".

Apologies to any sane females who may be reading this.

Blogger Fnord Prefect June 08, 2014 7:01 AM  

Interesting, I'd always assumed that all feminists were statists since what they want is irrational and against nature and would require a benevolent state to impose it on their behalf. I might re-read this thread and try to understand a different perspective...

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts