Friday, January 09, 2015

Three more counts

Three more counts of sexual assault against McRapey's partner in psychological projection:
Canadian radio star Jian Ghomeshi was charged with three more counts of sexual assault in a court appearance on Thursday in a widening sex scandal that has prompted suspensions at the country's national public broadcaster.

The three new charges, linked to three more women, bring the total number of charges facing Ghomeshi to eight and the number of complainants to six. A publication ban prevents naming any of the women.

The Canadian Broadcasting Corp fired Ghomeshi as host of Q, an internationally syndicated CBC Radio music and arts program, in October. The CBC said it had seen graphic evidence that he had injured a woman in what Ghomeshi said were consensual sex acts involving bondage, discipline, sadism and masochism.
Remember, John Scalzi has not only openly admitted to being a rapist and sexual batterer himself, he has also spent considerably more time attacking me than he has Mr. Ghomeshi. In fact, he barely ever refers to Mr. Ghomeshi at all. It tends to make one suspect that McRapey has some other agenda in mind than his professed purpose in defending women. And speaking of McRapey, here is the full extent of his Twitter commentary on the massacre in Paris.
As a non-Muslim, I'd like to apologize to Muslims for the non-Muslims demanding that all Muslims should apologize for the attacks today.

Worked at a newspaper; made people angry with words. I was what those cartoonists were. I am still. #JeSuisCharlie 
Followed by extensive cat pictures to change the subject. Seriously, that's John Scalzi's reaction after Muslims murder more people... to apologize to Muslims. He's exactly the sort of left-wing writer whom Sarah Hoyt decried as "asinine cowards, these craven and self-regarding poltroons... who routinely, three times a day, post some dig at Christianity, some mockery of Americans, some pseudo-witty comment about Republicans. But see, none of those people threaten to kill them. The brave social(ist) justice warriors are ever ready to speak truth to the power that will not hurt them. Towards Islam, otoh they adopt the crouching position and kiss the terrorists gangrenous blood-soaked pudenda."

Scalzi isn't what the cartoonists of Charlie Hebdo were. Whatever else they may have been, they were brave. He is the precise opposite; a contemptible moral and physical coward. What a craven, self-promoting fraud. As one noTrust aptly tweeted: "The bodies aren't even cold, and here's Scalzi & other libs publicly fondling their own Moral Supremacy."

Labels: ,


Anonymous kh123 January 09, 2015 4:08 AM  

With any luck, and a little bit of eBay savvy, John'll fix his hands on this nice little addition to his rolling plantation acreage.

Anonymous Difster January 09, 2015 5:59 AM  

"Bigger coward than French cartoonist" is now a legitimate insult against people like McRapey.

Blogger Dark Herald January 09, 2015 6:13 AM  

Scalzi is nothing if not fashionable in his groveling. He only bends the knee and bares the butt at and for the right people you know.

Attention John Scalzi, just because they are going to kill you last, it doesn't mean they like you.

Anonymous Steve January 09, 2015 6:21 AM  

'Wha will be a traitor knave?
Wha will fill a coward's grave?
Wha sae base as be a slave?
Let him turn an flee.'

Not that this will be news to anyone, but we can add Sarah Hoyt to the list of "women who are stronger than John Scalzi".

Blogger Mr.MantraMan January 09, 2015 6:25 AM  

I don't think at this stage of the game that even conservatives can save liberalism. Liberalism is beset by colored racists or religious zealots from the third world on one side and conservative whites who are giving up on the reclamation project on the other.

Anonymous Steve January 09, 2015 6:25 AM  

Why can't a Scalzi be more like a man?
Men are so honest, so thoroughly square;
Eternally noble, historically fair;
Who, when you win, will always give your back a pat.

Why can't a Scalzi be like that?

Anonymous Anonymous January 09, 2015 6:41 AM  

"kiss the terrorists gangrenous blood-soaked pudenda."

Hell! If John C Wright uses a rapier, Sarah has just used a snaggle-toothed circular saw! Eina!

Anonymous Cliftonb as Mcro.t0nal_piltdown January 09, 2015 6:43 AM  

This reinforces my idea that there's two types of people in this world: those that produce value and the people who leech off of those people. For Scalzi to use the Charlie Hebdo massacre to score SJW points from afar shows a cavernous void in mind and spirit that prompts him to believe that courage and moral fortitude are gained through some form of osmosis. But moral vacuums don't happen in a vacuum and I'm still trying to figure out if there's a such thing as a finite quantity of "nothingness".

Blogger Mr.MantraMan January 09, 2015 7:04 AM  

IMO strategically it makes sense to drive the Left towards the Muslims and then dhimminitude such as Scalzi just demonstrated. From what I see and can discern the Labor party in GB is composed of a mix of muslims and atheistic collectivist welfare statists, both delegitimizing themselves.

Even Obama threw the atheists under the bus this week, maybe atheism is now not a public religion but back to being a private belief, that is the left for you a self de-legitimizing organism.

Blogger pdwalker January 09, 2015 7:05 AM  

What a truly despicable act.

Blogger Dark Herald January 09, 2015 7:05 AM  

made people angry with words. I was what those cartoonists were. I am still

First: Like hell you are. Those guys made fun of Muslims and they knew bone deep what that might mean one day.

You have never made fun of the enemies of your civilization in your life. You wouldn't even dream of making fun of a Muslim.

They were laying it on they line for real. Don't for damn second believe that making snide half jokes about American conservatives who won't kill you is remotely the same as giving the finger to Muslims that would.

Dont' try to wear their bloody shirt Scalzi. It doesn't fit you


John Scalzi, you don't even make us angry. You make us laugh. It's a sad and tired laugh but it's a...okay not so much laugh, more of a dry cackle with a weary shake of the head, really.

But you are genuinely incapable of making us angry. I know you think are and think you do but you just can't. I know it's part of the identity you have crafted for yourself but honestly you are simply too unmanly for us to be angry with, it would be embarrassing.

You remember when you were in the locker room, twitching with fear and insecurity. Wanting to get dressed and get out before one them noticed you and decided to have some fun at your expense. That cold knot of fear in your stomach as you scanned the room for threats.

Toweling off quickly. Okay done. Dry or at least, dry enough. You know your jeans would stick but that's okay if it gets you out of the locker room faster. Scary part now. You have to open your combination lock. Quick scan again. Oh God, was one of them was watching me out of the corner of his eye? Get out fast, Get out now. Underwear first, That's the scary part, skinny legs are nearly trembling as you have to bend over, first one foot then the other goes into the briefs. Pull up. Done.

Reach for the jeans and...a hand grabs a fist full of elastic just over your butt. There is a savage jerk upward and there are room full of laughs that are bouncing off the bare cinder block walls painted in your school's colors.

You turn around and lash out as savagely as you are physically capable of doing. You fight just like your mom taught you to fight.

"Jokes on you! I just had an orgasm!"

That look that they all gave you?

That was disgust, not anger.

There's a difference.

Anonymous Bah January 09, 2015 7:29 AM  

What a disgusting excuse for a human being.

Blogger J Curtis January 09, 2015 7:37 AM  

Let the record show that when McRapey had the chance to speak out against 1000% verifiable, virulent & violent racists/homophobes/misogynists/intolerant bigots, he instead portrays them as victims. Thanks, John.

Birds of a feather, I guess

Anonymous Stingray January 09, 2015 7:55 AM  

John C. Wright took down an apologist at his blog yesterday. It very much applies to John Scalzi as well.

Anonymous Stg58 / Animal Mother January 09, 2015 8:03 AM  

If Scalzi and Gomeshi were halfway intelligent they'd convert to Islam then play the victim card. Especially Gomeshi.

Blogger Bodichi January 09, 2015 8:14 AM  


Your post was entertaining and well written. Scalzi will likely never read it but if he ever does the cold knot of dread will return unbidden, brought to life through the mirror of your words.


Blogger Dark Herald January 09, 2015 8:51 AM  

@ Bodichi

(*Cataline bows*)

Blogger Mint January 09, 2015 9:30 AM  

As a minority Christian, it interests me to know how a muslim view Charlie Hebdo killing, so I talked to one yesterday. The only negative comment , if it can count as negative, from him was the attacker probably were ISIS members. No condemnation, no regrets or sadness. This moderate man is only one of more than 100 million moderate Muslims in my country who probably feel the same indifference towards what happen to the victims of Jihad. And John scalzi apologized to Muslim? I wish him to grow a backbone so I can invite him to live among these people.

Anonymous Anarchopurplism January 09, 2015 9:31 AM  

Scalzi is probably so worked up about this, he might go to the gym & he'll TOTALLY bench press that heavy bar.

Or, he can go clean up cat pee.

What an embarrassment. You can't make it up. It's funny.

Anonymous AmyJ January 09, 2015 9:31 AM  

How like a woman, to make a tragedy about himself and how special he is, too.

Anonymous %#÷× January 09, 2015 9:38 AM  

Scalzi is the HERO in this story.

He always is.

He is a good person, people like him.

He is not " a bad human being."

Anonymous Anonymous January 09, 2015 10:07 AM  

Is there a way to get that tweet to any of the victim's families?

Anonymous Shut up rabbit January 09, 2015 10:13 AM  

From the squeer that no doubt believes:
"All me are rapists"
"All whites are guilty of slavery"

I cannot begin to comprehend the cognitive dissonance these people must feel - but following #GamerGate has shown me that there a so many unself-aware a-holes spewing hate in one direction while claiming the most moderate reply from the other side is harassment and hate speech.

Mental obesity, gorged on the freedoms given to them from a culture they now despise

Anonymous Shut up rabbit January 09, 2015 10:15 AM  

*All me =all men

Anonymous Sad Kittens January 09, 2015 10:16 AM  

"And speaking of McRapey, here is the full extent of his Twitter commentary on the massacre in Paris."

It was a weird day watching the SJWs the last couple days. Are they supposed to be outraged or in solidarity with the terrorists? Defend free speech or continue to support the suppression of "hate" speech? Blame the white man or stand with him on this issue? How to blame Christians/the right wing in this, when the right-wing is defending the free speech of French communists?

They are waiting for marching orders (maybe from Barry) ...

Which explains the weird shift/dichotomy in Scalzi's two tweets.

Anonymous Jeffrey Quick January 09, 2015 10:17 AM  

"we can add Sarah Hoyt to the list of "women who are stronger than John Scalzi"."
7 year old girls in First Communion dresses playing with Barbies are stronger than John Scalzi.

Anonymous Anonymous January 09, 2015 10:37 AM  

The more women that jump on the bandwagon, i.e. the fewer who reported being assaulted when it happened, the less probable it is that he committed any crime.

Anonymous Susan January 09, 2015 11:05 AM  


That was awesome, and a great use of My Fair Lady. Eliza Doolittle has a bigger set than Scalzi does, and she is not afraid to use them.

Would Scalzi have gotten angry with the terrorists if he knew that the cop they killed while he was defenseless on the ground was a fellow muslim?
Honestly, since the police in France are all unarmed, I don't know what use they were as watchdogs in front of the Charlie Hebdo offices. At least the dogs have teeth.

Anonymous 15rr January 09, 2015 11:12 AM  

What a joke....just like Charlie. Can't say as I've ever read anything by Hebdo but I've not got the impression that he was keen to apologize to Muslims immediately after a terrorist attack. Or at any other time for that matter

Anonymous Fnord P January 09, 2015 11:20 AM  

Similar to his appreciation of vibrancy, I'm sure Scalzoid's love of the practitioners of the religion of peace (tm) is enhanced by the fact that he doesn't live near any and rarely has to encounter them in his daily life.

Living in France I don't have that luxury. In the past couple of years I have been threatened in the streets with death by children of the prophet three times just stepping out of my front door:

Once for ringing the bell on my bike to signal a gang ambling down the middle of the road (that time I was spared because it was Ramadamawhatever).

Once for telling one that riding their motorcycle on the pavement and cutting me up when I had a child with me was stupid (that time I was spared because of the street cameras)

and once for having a reflexive look of disgust when one of them expressed his piety by spitting in front of me - he told me I was being disrespectful to his culture. I'm sure spitting is quite the cultural pursuit in the middle of the desert but not inside a nice, clean shooing center! (that time I was spared because he knew people who would do it for him if I wasn't careful in future)

So three cheers for the sackless one who never has to experience the diversity he wishes on the rest of us - coward.

Anonymous Anonymous January 09, 2015 12:17 PM  

In other words, SJWs continue to parody themselves as they tighten the noose around their necks. I actually hope more SJWs come out like this. Who knows, maybe they will do our work for us and destroy themselves with their stupidity and rejection of reality.

Blogger IM2L844 January 09, 2015 12:34 PM  

I can only imagine that John Scalzi believes he is playing to an audience who will interpret such idiotic statements as brave and noble. Otherwise, it's patently bizarre. Who, exactly, is "demanding that all Muslims should apologize for the attacks today."? Nobody. Scalzi is a strange and inconsequential little twerp.

Anonymous Giuseppe January 09, 2015 3:03 PM  


Has anyone captures a svreenshot of that scalzi tweet. This piece of shit needa to be exposed for what he is. I went to his feed but seems he has nothing there since November.
I had my fill.of SJWs. Time to be creative. If anyone has that tweet screencapped please send it on to me. Thanks.

Anonymous Daniel January 09, 2015 4:24 PM  

#NotYourShield #JesusScalzi

Blogger John Williams January 09, 2015 5:36 PM  

Seriously, that's John Scalzi's reaction after Muslims murder more people... to apologize to Muslims.
That's how Islam gains power. If they build a mosque in his neighborhood, he'd be the first one wearing a burka.

Anonymous Anonymous January 09, 2015 6:43 PM  

"As a non-Muslim, I'd like to apologize to Muslims for the non-Muslims .."

If I had any doubts McRapey was an utter fuckwit, they have now been entirely dispelled.

Anonymous dick January 09, 2015 7:04 PM  

Vox; based on your recent tweets, I have to reasses my position on you. Now I am not certain if you are actually obsessed to the point where you are mentally impaired and unable to understand, or if you are wilfully misrepresnting him.

If he cared more, or was more than dimly aware of you, he'd have a better case against you than you have again whomever Yama is.

Anonymous Scalzihadi January 09, 2015 7:53 PM  

Hi! I am a jihadist. I am one of those men who likes to force my way into civilian buildings, without their consent or desire, and then execute the infidels inside. The details of how I do this are not particularly important at the moment — although I love when you try to make distinctions about “moderate muslims” or “legal immigrants” because that gives me all sorts of wiggle room — but I will tell you one of the details about why I do it: I like to control the press, the judges, the appeasers; also and independently, I like to remind them how little control they have.

Anonymous VD January 09, 2015 8:01 PM  

If he cared more, or was more than dimly aware of you, he'd have a better case against you than you have again whomever Yama is.

First, you have it backwards. Second, you're completely wrong. I have not commented on his site since he asked me not to do so some years ago. Yama, who is Andrew Marston, commented here using 31 different identities AFTER being first asked, then told, not to do so.

But think what you like. I don't expect you to understand me or my actions.

Blogger Mint January 09, 2015 8:20 PM  

Hi @Giuseppe.
Always check the link the OP provided before commenting. Right at the quoted JS's tweet itself. The link is still working. I have just checked.

Blogger Darayvus January 09, 2015 8:23 PM  

Just when I think "hey maybe VD should give it a rest about Scalzi", that guy posts stuff like this.

Scalzi deserves contempt, often and publicly.

Anonymous dick January 09, 2015 9:00 PM  

I have not commented on his site since he asked me not to do so some years ago.

And yet a quick control F of pages 1-5 of your blog produces 47 finds for "Scalzi".

Anonymous I Am Irony, Man January 09, 2015 9:10 PM  

False analogy: commentary on one's own blog ≠ unwanted commenting on somebody else's blog.

And a quick control-F of the New York Times pages over the past month finds hundreds of mentions of "Obama". In your logic, then, the NYT is stalking Obama.

Anonymous I Am Irony, Man January 09, 2015 9:16 PM  

Brain fart: That should be "equivalency" rather than "analogy".

Anonymous Harsh January 09, 2015 11:37 PM  

If he cared more, or was more than dimly aware of you, he'd have a better case against you than you have again whomever Yama is.

Another rabbit lie. Scalzi knows exactly who Vox is and is aware of what he posts as evidenced by his recent comments on Whatever.

And you forgot the "less" on the end of your handle.

Anonymous dick January 10, 2015 12:44 AM  

Harsh; I just perused whatever and based one the first page, which takes us to 12/27, I saw no evidence that John Scalzi is aware of Vox in any way whatsoever. I am aware the two are acqanted, but from 12/27 on, Vox has mentioned John Scalzi 37 times, not counting twitter (Scalzi mention VD on twitte... 0)

Harsh, I understand it's important for you to think your liege has a worth advasary, but what does it mean when your advasary is barely aware of your existance? And then what does that mean for those that look up to him?

Anonymous Shut up rabbit January 10, 2015 2:57 AM  

I bet you're the kind of person who beaks into peoples homes in real life and tells them what to do do...

Oh no, wait a minute, that would require balls which you seriously lack. You are the kind of trash empowered by the anonymity of the internet to spout shit in other people's blogs e v e r y f u c k i n g t i m e your rabbit-in-chief is criticized, using words that are weapons of mass destruction to your kind.

Vox is more tolerant with your kind than I would ever be - you project his tolerance of other opinions as some kind of weakness since you are so unaccustomed to it. And you come back time after time to repeatedly squee and flap around like you mattered. Vile creature, you don't matter - keep your spoon-fedd opinions to your self. We've heard them all before to the point of tedium.

Yes, we know weak-willed sycophantic garbage like you abound on the internet, thinking because they no longer get punched in the face whenever they go outside that they are warriors. There are millions of places your are welcome to gargle your shit with others of your kind. This is not one of them.

How run home to the hug-box behind the intolerance-moderated block wall and tell big-daddy-wabbit what a good boy you've been spitting on the "opposition" from a great distance with zero risk to yourself O n c e a g a i n - but your tedious ass-licking is never gonna make your real father or anyone else actually respect you.

Anonymous Shut up rabbit January 10, 2015 3:26 AM  

Just how damaged does someone have to be in the first place to idolize that broken, half-man Scalzi?

Anonymous VD January 10, 2015 3:44 AM  

I just perused whatever and based one the first page, which takes us to 12/27, I saw no evidence that John Scalzi is aware of Vox in any way whatsoever. I am aware the two are acqanted, but from 12/27 on, Vox has mentioned John Scalzi 37 times, not counting twitter (Scalzi mention VD on twitte... 0)

As I said, you have it entirely backwards. I don't hesitate to mention Scalzi or openly exhibit my contempt for him. Scalzi is afraid to even mention my name and only takes plausibly deniable passive-aggressive shots at me.

If you don't understand what those two facts signify, you're obviously rather low on the social totem pole.

Anonymous dick January 10, 2015 9:03 AM  

Scalzi is afraid to even mention my name...

You certain it's fear?

Anonymous Shut up rabbit January 10, 2015 4:11 PM  

A man who lives by ceaselessly chasing the perceived dominant narrative and seeking not to offend those he believes are his superiors; to live by pandering to the lowest ebbs of society is to be a man living in constant fear.

He has no intrinsic strength, no principles to live by and is always squirming to maintain his position and privilege as house nigger by pandering to the latest wave of intolerant bigots in temporary control of the SJW madhouse.

He is intelligent enough to recognize his error and see the future.

It is fear.

Anonymous Shut up rabbit January 10, 2015 4:24 PM  

Most SJWs are clinically insane or afflicted with some deep depravity that requires the rest of the world to be debased for them just to feel normal - they don't have a "choice" it is their nature.

He jumped in voluntarily, feet first, for temporary personal gain. He is playing a role while watching his "allies" burn the world around him.


Post a Comment

Rules of the blog

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts