ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Sunday, November 29, 2015

Just one trick

And yet, it's astonishing how well it works:
Progressives only have one good trick, and men keep falling for it.

They keep calling you a coward, so that you’ll do or say whatever they want to prove that you are not a coward.

If they want you to accept a group of outsiders, they call you a xenophobe to dismiss any rational concerns you might have about the motivations of strangers. The only way to prove you don’t have an irrational fear of foreigners is to welcome them with open arms and without questions.

If you question the sanity of a man who can’t be “who he really is” until someone surgically removes his dick, they call you a transphobe. The only way to prove you’re not afraid of trannies is to agree that transsexuals are not only sane, but heroic, and should be welcomed into any women’s restroom.

If you reject any demand made by any woman, you’re “just afraid of a strong woman.” This accusation has been repeated so many times that a substantial portion of the population actually seems to believe that men are at the very core of their being constitutionally terrified by any woman with “attitude.” There is probably some truth to this, but only to the extent that men would rather avoid the frustrating reality that no matter how strong a woman claims to be or what she says, no man or woman on earth will ever forgive a man for knocking her the fuck out. To prove they are not afraid of women, men end up giving women whatever they want, because they can’t stand up to women the way they stand up to each other.

Progressives get men to do whatever they want by manipulating our fear of being afraid. When you recognize this manipulation, you’ll begin to see it in nearly every argument appealing to men and every progressive narrative written about men. Their strategy is to portray masculine men, even men who have demonstrated courage in battle or in legitimately heroic endeavors where they have faced and overcome fear, as being driven primarily by fear and a sense of inadequacy.
So stop being a coward by reacting in a kneejerk fashion to everyone who threatens to call you one. Either ignore or blithely agree with their attempt to disqualify you and carry on. That's all they've got.

Labels:

68 Comments:

Anonymous Fran November 29, 2015 3:06 PM  

Yeah I like those "Man up" howls. A good response a lot of times is to say : Yeah, Man up and be a pussy."

Blogger Salt November 29, 2015 3:07 PM  

An Italian woman's been trying to get me to go out with her. She said to another woman at the coffee shop, "He won't date Italians. Doesn't like them." I responded, "No, I just won't go out with you."

Blogger chris November 29, 2015 3:27 PM  

The correct term for them is oikandrist. They hate workers and peasants and traditions

Blogger Tom Kratman November 29, 2015 3:32 PM  

One element of evidence for the proposition; though they are plainly and patently cowards, almost to a shemale and bitch, they react terribly poorly to being notified of their own cowardice, as well as of the cowardice of any other SJWs.

Blogger Kryten 2X4B 523P November 29, 2015 3:33 PM  

Laughing at them seems to work as well.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan November 29, 2015 3:36 PM  

Or agree and amplify in a mocking manner.

Blogger Groot November 29, 2015 3:42 PM  

@2. Salt:

No pepper for salt?

Anonymous Nxx November 29, 2015 3:45 PM  

Fight fire with fire:

"You must be really weak and insecure to be so easily offended. It must really suck being such a pussy*"

Note that the word "pussy" will cause the comment to be auto-rejected on breitbart

Blogger LP999 November 29, 2015 4:10 PM  

Ignoring is hilarious for the objective type on observation mode.

Blogger Chris Mallory November 29, 2015 4:11 PM  

A self hating homosexual like Donovan is the last person who should be giving advice to men. He wouldn't know how to be a man if his life depended on it. Homosexuals are just as mentally ill as transsexuals.

Anonymous karsten November 29, 2015 4:13 PM  

It's amusing to boomerang their "Why are you so afraid of change?" tactic on them re: the global-warming hoax.

when they start blathering about climate change, ask them, "Why are you so afraid of change?" Tell them, "Don't be afraid of change." Accuse them, "You're just scared of change. Don't be." And so forth. "You're a climate-phobe."

Echo all the phrases that they adopt when they're pushing for an acceptance change in the areas they want.

Anonymous One Man's Chorus November 29, 2015 4:14 PM  

The left has been using this tactic since I can remember (which isn't that long, but you'd think the right would have cottoned on to it by now). For instance, if someone speaks out against allowing Syrian scammers into Europe, they'll be accused of lacking empathy and compassion. But saying that someone "lacks empathy" presupposes that they are empathetic, or at least capable of being shamed. These are bully words to psychologically browbeat the right into backpedaling and making overtures to the left to show them how they're really not such hateful, bigoted people. The remark John Kasich made at the first GOP primary debate about his gay friend's wedding was such an example of these gestures. When conservatives try to moderate their tone, the left smells blood. They know they have them on the defensive.

Blogger pyrrhus November 29, 2015 4:23 PM  

"Yep, i'm definitely afraid of people whom I can wipe the floor with any time, physically or mentally....absolutely petrified."

Blogger Dexter November 29, 2015 4:25 PM  

It takes a strong, courageous man to ignore progressive accusations of cowardice!

Blogger collisioncat67 November 29, 2015 4:26 PM  

If a man owns and shoots guns, if he drives a muscle car or a 4x4, if he bulks up with weights, if he smokes cigars, SWJs try to scare him by claiming that he is "overcompensating".

If he is a hot chocolate sipping, PC, hipster Pajama Boy then he is secure in his masculinity. (sarc)

Anonymous Alsos November 29, 2015 4:26 PM  

@11: "A self hating homosexual like Donovan is the last person who should be giving advice to men. He wouldn't know how to be a man if his life depended on it."

I haven't had time to read it yet. What part of his essay or advice is wrong?

Blogger Matamoros November 29, 2015 4:33 PM  

Ridicule and humor are the best weapons against them. And simply say, "no" when they want something.

Blogger Cecil Henry November 29, 2015 4:38 PM  

If I want to avoid an evil outcome, should I not want to prevent it??

And would I not be afraid of allowing it to occur??

Are you 'afraid' of metastatic carcinoma, or running with lions???

What is proved by someone being 'afraid'??

Nothing but that they wish to avoid an evil outcome.

This 'afraid' tactic is just bait and switch.

Blogger Steve, the Dark Ninja of Mockery November 29, 2015 4:46 PM  

One Man's Chorus - For instance, if someone speaks out against allowing Syrian scammers into Europe, they'll be accused of lacking empathy and compassion.

Yes. And maybe it's true. I certainly am not especially empathetic, though I rarely set fire to tramps and beat street urchins around the face with my cane these days... too much CCTV around.

I was watching - of all things - Bridget Jones' Diary with my wife and it contains this brilliant exchange of dialogue where Hugh Grant's character explains how all normal, red-blooded Englishmen feel about these "won't somebody please think of the children!!!??!" appeals:

Bridget: So what do you think of the situation in Chechnya?

Daniel Cleaver: I couldn't give a fuck, Jones


A VFM couldn't have said it better. And incidentally, Bridget's knickers were soaked by Cleaver's callous caddishness.

And when did empathy and compassion become values of paramount importance for men? Leave that to the tender-hearted girlies.

The soil of a man's heart is stonier.

Blogger automatthew November 29, 2015 4:52 PM  

I haven't had time to read it yet. What part of his essay or advice is wrong?

Don't be dense.

In a cultural war the "genetic fallacy" is an obvious and necessary hygienic measure.

Coward.

Blogger TheRedSkull November 29, 2015 4:57 PM  

True. However, it is not necessarily a conscious strategy - far more likely to be simple projection.

A conservative understands fear and higher things. A liberal only understands fear and care/harm. The liberal can thus only explain conservative behavior in one way.

Homosexuals may have occasion to think more radically than is usual about masculinity, just as non-neurotypicals may have occasion to think more radically about society. Do not underestimate the benefit of an external observation point.

Anonymous Anonymous Bosch November 29, 2015 5:19 PM  

It makes me harken back to the days of primary school goading when other kids would try and pressure each other into doing stupid things through the use of the almighty phrase: "what's the matter, chicken?" It amazes me how that and similar phrases never failed to get another idiot to do the most outrageous and self-destructive things. SJWs: tactically the same as playground children. Quelle surprise.

Blogger Doc Rampage November 29, 2015 5:23 PM  

There are two kinds of fear: caution and phobias. I didn't really understand this distinction until I developed acrophobia later in life. For those of you who don't have phobias, let me try to give you an idea of what it's like.

The fear is entirely irrational and physical. When I lean on the railing of a seventh floor balcony I get a feeling very similar to physical pain even though I know that I am in no danger. It takes a strong act of will to do it just as it takes a strong act of will to sit still while something very painful is done to you.

I first noticed this phobia and started exploring it during the early Bush years when Leftists were saying two contradictory things: "Don't do anything to make the terrorists mad!" and "You hawks are just afraid of terrorists, that's why you want to attack them." The irrationality was striking. The fight response is the *opposite* of the flight response.

And then it hit me: these people have a phobia about dangerous men. They aren't capable of thinking rationally about defending themselves any more than I am capable of thinking rationally about that long drop or any more than a normal man is able to think rationally about how much damage that flame is doing to his finger.

It is a visceral fear response and they don't have the will to resist it. It creates a physical feeling of terror when their neighbors talk about resisting the invaders. They can only feel safe by submitting to the invaders and appeasing them. I think this partly explains why women and feminized men are so prominent in this group.

Blogger praetorian November 29, 2015 5:27 PM  

It's a good essay, but the conclusions are pointless and LARPy for most guys:

It’s scary. I get it.

Nope. He's a self-employed childless homosexual.

Most guys in the west still have too much to lose, and I don't blame them for that. Therefore, it will have to get much worse before it gets better. Normies can prepare right now, but we can't be part of the shock troops. Not yet.

Blogger dc.sunsets November 29, 2015 5:31 PM  

Embrace your distrust. Embrace your revulsion. Call things by their right names. Those who oppose you in this reveal on which side of the 180 they belong.

It's not fear to sweep your cover garment back and obtain a firing grip in preparation for the draw. Preparation is just that, shortening the time and distance threshold to decisive action.

Blogger John rockwell November 29, 2015 5:45 PM  

A form of emotional manipulation to control actions. In truth a man should not be able to be emotionally manipulated at all by provocation or via name calling like "Coward".

Lest he lose the overall strategic perspective and make strategic mistakes fall into the enemies traps, and hand over control to the enemy by allowing himself to be emotionally manipulated.

Emotion must always be controlled by rational and cool reason no matter what.

Anonymous Jud November 29, 2015 5:57 PM  

The soil of a man's heart is stonier.

Sometimes dead is bettah.

Anonymous One Man's Chorus November 29, 2015 6:05 PM  

The left uses the same wiles on the right that women use on men to get them to do what they want.

Anonymous Nxx November 29, 2015 6:11 PM  

@ One Man's Chorus

For instance, if someone speaks out against allowing Syrian scammers into Europe, they'll be accused of lacking empathy and compassion.

What me xenophobic? I am terrified about the refugee situation! I am very very scared. I admit it. Every Paris attack that kills 130 people generates what? A million neo nazis? Ten million? If these attacks continue what will happen to the traitors that let the muslims in? Traitors are human beings too. I am absolutely sweating bullets terrified for traitors. Don't you have any empathy or compassion for them? Of course I am afraid for them, aren't you?

Blogger Timmy3 November 29, 2015 6:14 PM  

This is a straw man, no different than the accusations itself. The name calling is a manipulation. People need the fortitude to resist. We are cowards for not standing for our beliefs than for proving we are not what they say we are.

Blogger Aeoli Pera November 29, 2015 6:17 PM  

I don't think that "agree and amplify" is a good idea here. Extrapolating from one of my more interesting HR experiences, I'd expect SJWs to write down the quote verbatim and take it straight to an amenable authority, and afterward tell anyone who will listen.

Anonymous Church, the evil undead cat November 29, 2015 6:32 PM  

Sometimes dead is bettah.

Meow Mix n chill.

Blogger Aeoli Pera November 29, 2015 6:35 PM  

I think the best response is a brief denial and dismissal, like politicians do. This can be repeated ad nauseum because it requires little energy, whereas maintaining a state of SJW apoplexy requires lots of energy. Here's a first draft response to this sort of attack.

"YOU ONLY OPPOSE X BECAUSE YOU'RE A Y-PHOBE."

"I'm not."

"THE ONLY REASON ANYONE WOULD OPPOSE X IS Y-PHOBIA."

"I oppose X and I'm not a Y-phobe."

I'm imagining scenarios similar to these two videos:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AU1_YllifE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6xj2lGd3xs

Agree and amplify doesn't work here because it's too subtle for a mob, and the very purpose of SJW apoplexy is to incite a mob to attack you.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan November 29, 2015 6:42 PM  

Yeah 31 you are right, but I'm stalking everywhere but career environments. But then again I have always thought politics is theatre and I am a ham actor, to the point I should have been a lawyer or an actor. My acting brings people to rage and tears the mocking is so severe.

Blogger praetorian November 29, 2015 6:59 PM  

I don't think that "agree and amplify" is a good idea here. Extrapolating from one of my more interesting HR experiences, I'd expect SJWs to write down the quote verbatim and take it straight to an amenable authority, and afterward tell anyone who will listen.

Exactly. This essay is strong on analysis and weak on positive suggestions.

We need shock troopers like Donovan (despite his flaws) and Vox, but it's dumb to think normies can just start telling HR to fuck off. Once the gloves are off and you are in it, I totally agree w/ Vox's analysis: never ever apologize, but it's irresponsible, at this point, to just start strafing SJWs at work for most people.

He is right about what is wrong, but wrong about what is (for most people) right, right now. I know that its frustrating for edgelords, but this stuff takes time.

My suggestion to normies, for what it's worth, is ABR: Always Be Red-pilling.

Blogger Miss Carnivorous November 29, 2015 7:19 PM  

Can't you hate something without fearing it? Cats, for example, many people hate them but do not fear them.

I love, love, love sharks, but because I love them, I know a lot about them. When I am swimming in the ocean in Hawaii, I think about tiger sharks every second and I have a great phobia of them.

Blogger VD November 29, 2015 7:22 PM  

They aren't capable of thinking rationally about defending themselves any more than I am capable of thinking rationally about that long drop or any more than a normal man is able to think rationally about how much damage that flame is doing to his finger.

TL;DR: Third Law of SJW.

Blogger Torial (#170) November 29, 2015 7:55 PM  

Happened today in Iowa:
Ted Cruz at an Iowa campaign stop...
REPORTER: "It's been reported the Colorado shooter mentioned dead baby parts."
CRUZ: "Its also been reported he's a Leftist transgendered activist."

Blogger Crude November 29, 2015 8:04 PM  

They keep calling you a coward, so that you’ll do or say whatever they want to prove that you are not a coward.

And I'm convinced this is one reason why site after site is going apeshit about anyone throwing around the 'cuck' slur: it's as effective, or more effective, than the other slurs. Men who would be motivated not to be called a coward will be motivated not to be called a cuck either.

Blogger VD November 29, 2015 8:07 PM  

And I'm convinced this is one reason why site after site is going apeshit about anyone throwing around the 'cuck' slur: it's as effective, or more effective, than the other slurs.

Precisely.

Men who would be motivated not to be called a coward will be motivated not to be called a cuck either.

Which is all the more reason to use it. Or, you know, write a book about it.

Blogger HalibetLector November 29, 2015 8:20 PM  

I'm imagining scenarios similar to these two videos:

I doubt the brief dismissal would work in those cases. It works for politicians because they either have control of the crowd (and their undivided attention) or they have security between them and the crowd. Short dismissals aren't going to do anything against a mob, who just has to shout at you until you can't be heard.

In those situations, Roosh's tactics in Montreal were very effective. Bring a mob of your own. Bring video cameras. Manipulate the press.

Blogger Lana J November 29, 2015 8:46 PM  

On Twitter, at least in my experience, anyone even associated with someone using the term cuck is immediately blocked and labeled a racist by most of conservative inc. The thing people just don't realize is? They are going to call you a racist anyway. It doesn't matter what your actual beliefs are, you will be labeled. The sooner we stop worrying about it and go on the offensive the better off we will be.

The other thing I've thought is those who are already anti-fragile need to be as aggressive as possible for those who can't yet speak out. And those who don't think they can speak out need to get anti-fragile to the best of their ability because it's only a matter of time before keeping your mouth shut won't be enough.

Blogger VD November 29, 2015 8:47 PM  

it's irresponsible, at this point, to just start strafing SJWs at work for most people.

When did I ever say anyone should? Did you even read SJWAL? The whole point is to be subtle. Identify and discredit and disemploy, don't go shouting at them. That accomplishes nothing.

Blogger VD November 29, 2015 8:48 PM  

On Twitter, at least in my experience, anyone even associated with someone using the term cuck is immediately blocked and labeled a racist by most of conservative inc.

It will be interesting to see them try it once Cuckservative drops. Can you spell XANATOS GAMBIT?

Anonymous Wyrd November 29, 2015 8:51 PM  

@Church

I want to play with you!

Anonymous Gen. Kong November 29, 2015 9:18 PM  

I tend to think that cuckservatives are really just SJWs deploying their typical entry tactics. I note they use the rayciss! point-and-splutter at least as much as the typical leftoid SJW does, maybe even more.

Blogger Darth Toolpodicus (#144) November 29, 2015 9:26 PM  

" Normies can prepare right now, but we can't be part of the shock troops. Not yet."

Not yet.

Blogger praetorian November 29, 2015 9:45 PM  

When did I ever say anyone should? Did you even read SJWAL? The whole point is to be subtle. Identify and discredit and disemploy, don't go shouting at them. That accomplishes nothing.

I did read it. And I have to admit, I missed this paragraph in Donovan's essay:

I know that career-destroying public statements are probably too much to ask for most guys. And here’s no point or honor in arguing with women about what they believe unless you’re dating them.

Mea culpa.

What I was referring to "strafing SJWs" is his recommendation at the end that normies "call them out on it", "them" being male SJWs. At least in the work places I deal with, that will simply land you in HR with nothing to show for it but an adrenaline rush. So I don't think that's sound advice for a lot of guys. A slow and opportunistic red-pilling of guys on the fence is the most productive thing non-internet personalities can do. That doesn't make for stirring blog posts, unfortunately.

Blogger SciVo November 29, 2015 10:15 PM  

@ Gen. Kong:

I will play the devil's advocate and posit that half that react to the term are valuable allies who are from a different generation where they just had to watch out more for "racist!" allegations. Even Robert Stacy McCain, who's been listed by the SPLC, is wary of it.

And now, when they say "racist sexist homophobic shitlord?" We don't care.

Blogger IM2L844 November 29, 2015 10:25 PM  

@42
It doesn't matter what your actual beliefs are, you will be labeled.

There's a label for those people who fear the truth: Liars.

Blogger rumpole5 November 29, 2015 11:06 PM  

If you ignore the triple dog dare, you won't end up with your tongue stuck to the flagpole.

Blogger Crude November 29, 2015 11:34 PM  

I will play the devil's advocate and posit that half that react to the term are valuable allies who are from a different generation where they just had to watch out more for "racist!" allegations.

I agree. To be dead honest, I was until fairly recently a person who believed it was of the absolute utmost importance to stress how I was not a racist, to criticize other conservatives who made remarks that could even be broadly construed as being racist (or 'homophobic'!) despite being adamantly in favor of controlling the border, opposing same-sex marriage, etc.

I finally realized I was being conned, and the entire approach was a terrible mistake. A combination of things made me wake up, but one key was realizing that I was spending inordinate amounts of time trying to explain myself, and inoculate myself against any possible charge of racism - despite knowing I was dealing with people who would baselessly accuse anyone of racism and try to make the charges stick, even if they knew better. And that complicated explanations of why I was in fact not racist, even if totally correct, could not be followed by the average idiot anyway.

Blogger Lana J November 29, 2015 11:36 PM  

It will be interesting to see them try it once Cuckservative drops. Can you spell XANATOS GAMBIT?

I thought so. This is going to be more fun than the Hugos.

Blogger Lana J November 29, 2015 11:40 PM  

There's a label for those people who fear the truth: Liars.

Meh. Some people fear the truth. Some just don't have the ability to be as bold as they'd like because they have family to support. There is a difference.

Blogger Michael Maier November 30, 2015 12:31 AM  

Fear? Fuck it.

You threaten me or mine? I'm drawing and taking you out. Or dying trying to do so. Seriously... Fuck it. I just don't care any more. It's decent folks vs. the shitbags of Planet Earth.

My gut's inclination is sort of leaning towards loving my enemies, but I'm not all that sure about all that mess.

So if I have to waste your ass to save my brother, my nephews or especially my silly little niece... well... I really don't like your fucking odds. Make me draw and take your chances, asshole.

Blogger JWM November 30, 2015 12:37 AM  

Accusations of phobia perfectly invert the truth. According to 'the narrative' the man who wishes to castrate himself, and surgically remake his body into some poor imitation of a female is engaging in a healthy expression of his natural sexuality. The man who is horrified at the idea is the one suffering from a mental disorder.

JWM (VFM#404)

Blogger Daniel November 30, 2015 12:58 AM  

Lionsgate preemptively apologized for making a mostly white, some Egyptian cast movie about Egyptian mythology (which has no black gods). Of course, no one apologized for making an all-black Annie.

Blogger TheRedSkull November 30, 2015 1:46 AM  

@15

"If a man owns and shoots guns, if he drives a muscle car or a 4x4, if he bulks up with weights, if he smokes cigars, SWJs try to scare him by claiming that he is "overcompensating"."

Because they would only do those things out of insecurity, not intrinsically enjoy them, because they aren't real men.

"If he is a hot chocolate sipping, PC, hipster Pajama Boy then he is secure in his masculinity. (sarc)"

SJW men calling each other "secure in masculinity" is like women calling each other "strong and confident".

Anonymous Cyclone Bob November 30, 2015 1:48 AM  

Michael Meier: My gut's inclination is sort of leaning towards loving my enemies, but I'm not all that sure about all that mess.

Tough Love, brother. Give em Tough Love.

Blogger Tucci November 30, 2015 5:24 AM  

It's the "Don't call me a coward!" trope pervasive as the Marty McFly viewpoint character's great flaw (and a perpetually useful plot device) throughout the Back to the Future movies.

Blogger Cail Corishev November 30, 2015 8:25 AM  

SJW men calling each other "secure in masculinity"

are flirting.

Blogger Were-Puppy November 30, 2015 8:45 AM  

"So stop being a coward by reacting in a kneejerk fashion to everyone who threatens to call you one. Either ignore or blithely agree with their attempt to disqualify you and carry on. That's all they've got."

I've had some mealy mouthed whiners try this crap on me before. It's hilarious and a prime time to wack them with some rhetoric. "That's what all fat people think". "Damn Napoleon, you're short man complex is showing", etc. Works good in a crowd too :P

Blogger IM2L844 November 30, 2015 8:47 AM  

Meh. Some people fear the truth. Some just don't have the ability to be as bold as they'd like because they have family to support. There is a difference.

Yeah, I was referring to SJWs and cuckservatives.

We know SJWs always lie. Why? Fear. Cuckservatives are doubly guilty. They they try to straddle the fence. Why? Fear.

Blogger Were-Puppy November 30, 2015 8:50 AM  

@15 collisioncat67
If a man owns and shoots guns, if he drives a muscle car or a 4x4, if he bulks up with weights, if he smokes cigars, SWJs try to scare him by claiming that he is "overcompensating".
---

That one's easy. Tell them something like - Due to cosmic balance, I have to be twice as awesome to make up for candy asses like you.

Blogger Were-Puppy November 30, 2015 8:55 AM  

@21 TheRedSkull

HAIL HYDRA!

You've used my 2nd favorite new word, neurotypical. The first one is adaptionics.

Blogger Were-Puppy November 30, 2015 8:56 AM  

@22 Anonymous Bosch

It makes me harken back to the days of primary school
goading when other kids would try and pressure each other into doing stupid things through the use of the almighty phrase: "what's the matter, chicken?"
---

:P

In those days we would say something like - I got you're chicken a' hangin', boy

Anonymous Discard November 30, 2015 3:42 PM  

My favored response to the "You're afraid of change" line is to suggest a change that my accuser might be afraid of. Like forcing every White who supports immigration to take one into their own house, or forcing every White who supports affirmative action to give up their own job/benefits/pension. Another is to ask if some Germans were rightly afraid of the changes the Nazis might bring. They have no choice but to agree that, yes, some change is bad. Then the door is open to rational discussion of the merits of their position, in which I have the better arguments, always keeping in mind that the point is not to convince my opponent but to convince onlookers.

Blogger Were-Puppy November 30, 2015 4:44 PM  

@42 Lana J

The thing people just don't realize is? They are going to call you a racist anyway. It doesn't matter what your actual beliefs are, you will be labeled. The sooner we stop worrying about it and go on the offensive the better off we will be.
---

Well said.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts