Wednesday, December 30, 2015

Remember, free speech is firable

If you are a manager or an employer, don't hesitate to investigate your employees' social media pages and fire those who express SJW views. The precedent has been clearly established: anyone who makes "unacceptable" remarks that do not reflect a company's values can be terminated:
A man accused of sending racist private messages to a Black Lives Matter Facebook page has lost his job with food giant Archer Daniels Midland.

Brad Schultz used a racial epithet in referring to the group and told them “get out of town with your [expletive] protesting,” based on screenshots of the messages widely circulated over social media. Schultz’s message added that they should “just leave, white people don’t like you.”

At least one Facebook group posted the messages publicly last week along with a number for ADM, where Schultz was employed. The post was shared more than 1,000 times. According to screenshots of Schultz’s Facebook page, he lives in Mankato.

    (3) The employee who posted these statements no longer works for ADM.
    — ADM Mankato (@ADMMankato) December 27, 2015

    (2) As previously stated, these remarks are unacceptable and do not reflect ADM's values.
    — ADM Mankato (@ADMMankato) December 27, 2015

    (1) ADM has concluded its investigation regarding recent social media comments made by an ADM employee in Mankato, Minnesota.
    — ADM Mankato (@ADMMankato) December 27, 2015

Archer Daniels Midland said in a statement Tuesday that it conducted an investigation into the employee’s comments and that he no longer works for the company. They would not specify whether he resigned or was terminated. “These remarks are unacceptable and do not reflect ADM’s values,” the statement said.

Schultz did not return a call seeking comment Tuesday afternoon.

Screenshots show he later apologized to Black Lives Matter, seemingly after the comments had gone public. “It was cruel, and I didn’t mean it,” Schultz wrote in another private message. “In no way is my workplace affiliated with these comments. Please delete them.”

“Internet justice is real,” Minneapolis NAACP President Nekima Levy-Pounds posted on Facebook Tuesday afternoon. “Hopefully, individuals will learn from Brad Schultz’s mistake and think twice before making racist statements on social media.”
In like manner, any anti-Christian or even anti-Christmas statement is sufficient grounds for termination, as it can be described as "unacceptable anti-religious bigotry". Those will probably be the easiest to find, especially among millennials. It should be relatively easy to disemploy any militant atheist working in the corporate world. There are also an increasing number of anti-white comments that can be identified.

Note once more that apologizing is utterly futile. Given the amenability of the authority involved, it probably didn't matter what Schultz did. But the point is that an apology is NEVER going to save you once you have made yourself vulnerable to SJWs and been targeted by them.



Blogger rcocean December 30, 2015 11:33 AM  

Why do people have this strange need to share their sex lives, extreme political opinions, and everything else on Facebook?

Never post anything on Facebook you don't want your Boss, Co-workers, and girlfriend/wife to know.

Anonymous Bz December 30, 2015 11:43 AM  

"Unacceptable bigotry" is a good useful phrase. It might be worth investigating how to HR this nicely. Perhaps you could make some final payments contingent on a suitable public apology by the fired SJW. Or just withhold them while there are still "issues to be resolved". It all has to be lawsuit proof, of course. Disney could be an inspiration here in what can be done.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan December 30, 2015 11:46 AM  

"Objectionable racial theorizing " could be slapped on about any SJW on any given day let them explain themselves for once

Anonymous Napoleon 12pdr December 30, 2015 11:57 AM  

I marvel that anyone would post anything on Facebook for public consumption. Private groups, friends & family...never the general public.

Blogger SS December 30, 2015 12:05 PM  

Twitter is going to go the way of Facebook in this regard too. They're setting themselves up to start doxxing users with their newest code of conduct. It looks like they're going to require full legal names from everyone in the future

Anonymous DNW December 30, 2015 12:09 PM  

I guess we have to bear in mind the principle pointed and involved, as it is difficult to feel sympathy for someone who is not only as stupid and intemperate, but as personally weak and grovelling, as Schultz.

Yet as lawyers well know, it is the acts of the stupid and behaviorally incontinent that sometimes serve as the hinge on which socially significant events or trends swing.

Anonymous Anonymous December 30, 2015 12:11 PM  

I'm certain that Schultz now regrets having apologized. He sounds like an upright man who probably posted his apology in a moment of panic.

Seriously, someone should write a book about not apologizing to SJWs...


Blogger Student in Blue December 30, 2015 12:11 PM  

When they get burned by this, SJWs will not even connect the dots that this is exactly how they acted. All they know or care is that they're in the right, thus they can do anything they want to.

Anonymous N5 December 30, 2015 12:13 PM  

And corporate HR departments constantly search social media to catch out employees. Just like the chute they put cattle in as they approach the killing floor, it's leading to the mark of the beast.

Blogger Jourdan December 30, 2015 12:18 PM  

I'm sure ADM hired a black man to take his place.

Anonymous Anonymous December 30, 2015 12:25 PM  

Firing ordinary people for political speech is economic terrorism.

If a scores-settling time does come, there will be a lot of people -- oned who now instigate or gloat over SJW-driven terminations under their real names -- defending themselves again very serious charges.


Anonymous #5454 December 30, 2015 12:34 PM  

I interviewed a woman yesterday who probably had enough experience to move to the next round but during the interview dropped more than few hints. It was total virtue signaling. She has no idea I'm not receptive in the least. No offer for another interview will be extended.

Blogger dc.sunsets December 30, 2015 12:35 PM  

All social media do is encourage people to live their lives in the mirror of others' eyes.

It is an amplifier of narcissism, and an enabler of the destruction of close social relationships (especially marriage.)

My wife and I studiously avoid Facebook and all other such vices.

Anonymous #5454 December 30, 2015 12:39 PM  

Yes, let's all run away from social media, letting the left forever dominate.

Anonymous YIH December 30, 2015 12:41 PM  

@9 N5:
Coming soon to an American Empire near you: Your 'social credit' score.
As you know your FICO score is already used as a criterion for things like (of course) getting credit, renting, car insurance (guess which is worse, a low FICO score or a DUI?) and how much of a deposit you have to pony up. Now combine that with an SJW score (Is Vox Populi in your browser history? Did you ever call it 'Bruce Jenner'? How many TOR books do you have? Do you approve of homosexual pedophilia?) and there you go.

Blogger newanubis December 30, 2015 12:49 PM  

Words are thoughts. Whether written or spoken. When condemning words via feelbadz or badspeak, the pc endeavor is to punish words and by extension, punish thought. Badthink must be eradicated but there will little understanding by the lemmings, the simpletons, to recognize that they are but tools of modern evil.
Thought control is patently unacceptable but what's good for the pc goose is good for counter-insurgency.

Blogger Nick S December 30, 2015 12:50 PM  

if Brad had just chosen his words more carefully, he could've conveyed the same sentiments in an equally assertive yet perfectly defensible manner.

Blogger kmbr December 30, 2015 12:57 PM  

@12 "She has no idea I'm not receptive in the least"

Oh, you are receptive just not in the way she anticipated.

I have a growing list of people I'd never hire. Quite honestly, I think someone outing themselves as an SJW during an interview saves someone the aggravation of hiring someone with a Scandinavian work ethic. Not knocking Scandinavians, I just wouldn't want to hire one.

Blogger weka December 30, 2015 12:57 PM  

Only in the USA: if you try to sack someone in the EU or the antipodes you better be very, very sure you have jumped through all the warnings and hoops. For if you have not, you will be sued, and lose, for constructive dismissal.

Better, be essential to the company.

Better still, be antifragile: most of us still depend on our wages and these do not relate to being controversial. VD, Spacebunny, Mike Cernovich and Milo can do this: the rest of us need to keep Facey for our friends and find a new Twitter.

Anonymous MTM December 30, 2015 12:59 PM  

In the United States, Canada, and many other English-speaking nations, it is sometimes illegal to fire someone for expressing their personal views--especially outside of the workplace. The law in this area is very complicated and cannot be concisely summarized, but I recommend consulting an employment lawyer if you are ever subject to an SJW witch hunt.

Anonymous Maximo Macaroni December 30, 2015 1:01 PM  

From another point of view, the SJWs are providing immense information to their foes (me)by expressing themselves on social media. They feel invulnerable, but their time will come, when it will be their turn to apologize and backpedal, only to find all their "friends" will stab them in the back. Revenge is a dish best served cold and sweet - like rice pudding.

Blogger dc.sunsets December 30, 2015 1:03 PM  

We have clearly entered a new paradigm where the prior Muddy Middle (embraced fervently by few people) is fragmenting into imiscible towers of fervently held beliefs.

The stage is set for violent clashes as the legal structures erected and now defended to the death by their Marxist architects are increasingly out of phase with the evolving landscape.

Toqueville's Democratic Despotism poured innumerable legislative fiat into political concrete which will now have to be jackhammered up with tremendous pain.

Anonymous Mbhaw December 30, 2015 1:04 PM  

But unlike SJWs, most on the right are not vindictive a holes with borderline personality disorder. So the SJWs know they are free to spread their filth without consequences. Different temperaments lead to different behavior. If someone where type to nitpick every social media post and contact employers in anger, then that person is almost certainly an SJW.

Anonymous Noukon December 30, 2015 1:07 PM  

SJWs are winning, you are losing, it's that hard to swallow?

Blogger Happy Housewife December 30, 2015 1:08 PM  

My husband has already passed over applicants for his team whose Facebook pages have SJWish posts. Doing his part, one job at a time.

Blogger Rabbi B December 30, 2015 1:09 PM  

"SJWs are winning, you are losing, it's that hard to swallow?"

Define "winning."

Blogger dc.sunsets December 30, 2015 1:10 PM  

Using social media posts as a mechanism of social control is just a modern attempt by Status Quo Zealots to freeze the Narrative in place forever.

I find all attempts to stop time (and the sine wave of history) to be funnier than a classic Three Stooges episode.

Armies (of SJWs & their captive bureaucrats) cannot stop an idea whose time has come.

Anonymous WinstonWebb December 30, 2015 1:10 PM  

SJWs are winning, you are losing, it's that hard to swallow?

Pendulum. It will swing the other way. The pertinent questions are:
How far?

"If" is not a question at all.

Anonymous #165 December 30, 2015 1:16 PM  

Find here a strong example of two great truths at once: 1) the viciousness of the scorned fan; 2) never apologize

Blogger Mr.MantraMan December 30, 2015 1:22 PM  

My guess the Lydon humanoid is quite the racial theorist

Anonymous WinstonWebb December 30, 2015 1:23 PM  

If someone at your place of employment is discovered to have racist views that are expressed outside of the place of employment, should said individual be fired? Why or Why not?

Thank you,

Blogger Nick S December 30, 2015 1:25 PM  

Shut up, Elton.

Anonymous Anonymous December 30, 2015 1:26 PM  

It seems like your uncle abused you when you were little or someone? Did you father/mother used to beat you up? Were you bullied? What is the source of this insanity?

SJWs always project.


Blogger Guitar Man December 30, 2015 1:28 PM  

I guess I better reign in my Patriots homer posts, because about the only thing I post about these days. That, and trolling my friends over PEDTon Manning's obvious HGH use right now.

Anonymous vfm #0202 December 30, 2015 1:39 PM  

Eldon's postscript is I seldom see such a fine satirical takedown! Thank you Eldon for bringing laughter to an otherwise dull day. Nacies everywhere should run for cover when you're on their case!

Blogger White Knight Leo #0368 December 30, 2015 1:59 PM  


Conn. Gov Mallory proposes extending "juvenile" period for criminal offenses to age 20.

So now people who can buy guns and vote will be tried as children.

How is this anything but a pro-gang proposal?

Anonymous Ja Wohl! December 30, 2015 2:01 PM  

"SJWs are winning, you are losing"

Just like in Weimar!

Anonymous Anonymous December 30, 2015 2:13 PM  

Elton Lydon, you're boring, go back to the wankatorium.

Blogger Rusty Fife December 30, 2015 2:28 PM  

@24 Noukon

SJWs are winning, you are losing, it's that hard to swallow?

I know, right? Why don't we just run away and show our tails like other rabbits when we start to lose?

Yes it is hard to swallow, we HATE to lose and won't be demoralised. The best part of this game is that it won't end until Christ returns.

Guess what, this isn't new information. There are loooong arguments here about whether we started losing with Lincoln or Wilson.

This phase of the battle has only gotten to the point of "SCOUTS OUT" with the skirmishers making contact. The probing for weakness has just begun. Enjoy the conflict, we do.

Blogger kmbr December 30, 2015 2:30 PM  

"SJWs are winning"

Depends on your definition of winning. Seems like it might be the Charlie Sheen variety of winning. He was winning too. Until he wasn't.

Life in a thought controlled brave new world? Forcing mental illness and insanity on the masses? Can't see that's winning for anyone.

Anonymous Anonymous December 30, 2015 2:35 PM  

"SJWs are winning." Let's fix this.

"SJWs are whining."

Blogger Rabbi B December 30, 2015 2:42 PM  

"SJWs are winning."

I don't know who I can't stand more, SJWs or the defeatists who have no stomach for the long game with nothing meaningful to contribute except pious cowardice.

Anonymous Real Human Being December 30, 2015 2:42 PM  

Surrender? Nuts!

Blogger James Dixon December 30, 2015 3:16 PM  

I guess Elton Lydon must have been a known troll, since his post now appears to be gone.

Blogger rcocean December 30, 2015 4:14 PM  

I'm going to vote for O'Malley. The USA needs the "Baltimore Miracle".

Blogger ray December 30, 2015 4:14 PM  

"“Internet justice is real,” Minneapolis NAACP President Nekima Levy-Pounds posted on Facebook Tuesday afternoon. “Hopefully, individuals will learn from Brad Schultz’s mistake and think twice before making racist statements on social media.”"

Who decides what is criminally racist, sexist, or offensive? Nekima Levy-Pounds and her co-thugs. Who decides what constitutes 'internet justice'? Nekima Levy-Pounds and her co-thugs.

Thanks also to ADM officers for demonstrating publically their status as traitors. See ya.

Blogger Cogitans Iuvenis December 30, 2015 4:14 PM  


Winning at the short term in expense of the long. Ask the Germans how the eastern front was going during the summer of 41' and they would have said swimmingly, in the summer of 42' its going well, the summer of 43' harder than expected but still winnable and by the next winter 'FUCK'

Blogger rcocean December 30, 2015 4:14 PM  

Its astounding how people keep apologizing and the SJW's cut their heads off anyway. Has it ever worked?

Blogger rcocean December 30, 2015 4:16 PM  

NAACP President Nekima Levy-Pounds. Really black? Sounds like a made up name.

Blogger Cecil Henry December 30, 2015 4:21 PM  

Do you remember the SJW's in the USSR, especially in the 1920's.

They were 'winning', then came the 1930 show trials, the Gulag in full force, and Stalin terror for 20 years. Some victory.

That's what you're courting

Anonymous Dr. Luther's Assistant December 30, 2015 4:25 PM  

The problem with that is that she may have been signaling because she thought that's what you expected to hear. I did that to get a job recently too. It doesn't really pay to signal against the prevailing state ideology. If you don't know for certain it's welcome, you'd have to be nuts to signal as alt-right in a job interview.

Anonymous Bz December 30, 2015 4:31 PM  

Presumably coined from Elton John / John Lydon (aka Johnny Rotten).

Blogger FP December 30, 2015 5:42 PM  

The state of WA is going after a student who typed "lynch her" to a BLM chick on YikYak chat:

"The charges reveal that the comment was made in response to a Yik Yak post that claimed Seare, who is black, called white college students “baby KKK” on her Facebook page. Some replies urge someone to screen shot that message, and one comment says “let’s lynch her.” One user, following the threatening post, responds with “too far,” according to charges.Under state law, malicious harassment is a hate crime covering threats based on a victim’s “race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, or mental, physical, or sensory handicap.”"

Blogger FP December 30, 2015 5:55 PM  

Hah, now this is how you troll libs on twitter, Trumps spokesman on her bullet necklace she wore on CNN:

Anonymous 27 year old December 30, 2015 6:10 PM  

ok, so let's try this

1. find anti-christian/anti-white comments by archer daniels midland employees
2. pass screenshots around the right wing websphere to generate the "echo chamber" effect
3. forward to ADM
4. tweet @ them to fire the person, en masse

somebody with a blog, twitter following, etc, please give it a try

Blogger Thucydides December 30, 2015 6:25 PM  

The biggest problem is the double standards of Progressives and their SJW lapdogs. You could be put in a vice for making a statement similar to the one which got this guy fired, but if a Muslim, woman, member of the "LGBT" community, minority (other than Asian) or any of the other innumerable "victim" groups were to say exactly the same thing, no action would be taken against them.

Indeed, the odds are fairly good that you, yourself, would be subjected to action for "harassing", stalking or endangering the poster of the objectionable material.

In a test of this proposition in Canada, Ezra Levant placed a complaint against a radical Iman who openly wort about killing Canadians to the Canadian Human Rights Commission, only to be told that there was no grounds for action as the person making the statements was from a "protected" group (i.e. had licence to say and do whatever he wanted). Sadly, much of what was written at the time has vanished down the memory hole (here, "1984" is regarded as a "how to" book) but I did find this link:

Blogger Raziel Walker December 30, 2015 6:40 PM  

If he hadn't called black people niggers it would just be another angry comment, since the protesters were disturbing the peace and blocking the way from what I read that would have been understandable.

While I wouldn't fire someone for just one angry comment, I am fine with firing someone who utters hate speech on a regular basis. And since the term hate speech is subjective I agree that employers can then also fire anyone for anti-Christian or anti-Christmas statements.
At least I hope VD was talking about termination of jobs, not of the people themselves, even if you wouldn't mind.

In the Netherlands its very hard to fire someone without sufficient grounds but racist remarks are one of the few ways a person can be fired on the spot.

Anonymous Hrw-500 December 30, 2015 8:14 PM  

@50. Cecil Henry
"Do you remember the SJW's in the USSR, especially in the 1920's.
They were 'winning', then came the 1930 show trials, the Gulag in full force, and Stalin terror for 20 years. Some victory.
That's what you're courting."

That look almost to what cartoonist Ben Garrison did in this editorial toon. That look more of a phyrric victory to me.

Btw, I wonder how some SJW and BLM activists might react if they saw some of these videos like this school fight and school violence?

Anonymous Scintan December 30, 2015 8:49 PM  

While I wouldn't fire someone for just one angry comment, I am fine with firing someone who utters hate speech on a regular basis.

So you're part of the problem. Good to know

Anonymous Bitter Clinger December 30, 2015 10:15 PM  

Guys, RTFM before you get your hopes up:

and if you're a manager in a large company, realize that you probably don't have much of a say in the matter anyway. Heck, it's often difficult just to get rid of bona fide low performers.

Anonymous Eric the Red December 31, 2015 12:10 AM  

It started as "the personal is political." Then once the concept of "hate speech" was instantiated as a viable legal construct, the death of free speech was inevitable. The left has since covered all the bases, including those regarding "non-governmental responses to free speech and thus having nothing to do with the 1st Amendment."

What has always amazed me about this hideous assault has been the complete lack of a concerted, organized response by the so-called conservative organizations in this country. Are they dumb? lazy? I just don't understand it.

Anonymous Mr. Rational December 31, 2015 12:35 AM  

@61 Are they dumb? lazy? I just don't understand it.

Most of them are on the other side.

Blogger rcocean December 31, 2015 1:31 AM  

"Are they dumb? lazy? I just don't understand it."

Most conservatives simply react. Their natural state is one of acceptance and support for the status quo. Getting them to turn off the football game and get off the couch, is almost impossible. It usually can only be done when they think $$$ or Jesus is involved. Getting them to think strategically is impossible. They can only react to the here and now.

Blogger OneWingedShark December 31, 2015 2:55 AM  

@61 "The left has since covered all the bases, including those regarding "non-governmental responses to free speech and thus having nothing to do with the 1st Amendment.""

It is incorrect to think that the 1st Amendment applies to any other institution than Congress, it even explicitly says so. That you are implying that the 1st could apply to even non-governmental organizations, or your fellow citizen, shows how much disregard the Constitution and Bill of Rights have fallen into... one of the best ways to make the Constitution mean nothing is to muddy its meanings until only Black Robed god-Kings can act as oracles (and lawyers as priests) declaring "what the law is" the law to the masses.

Anonymous Bz December 31, 2015 6:14 AM  

"Guys, RTFM before you get your hopes up:"

Bitter Clinger, dare to dream the impossible dream. Also, recall that people get fired by SJW companies for their speech and political activity all the time, so it's not like it can't be done.

Anonymous KoranBurningFaggot December 31, 2015 12:51 PM  

I am pretty sure I can say things about STR8WCGCM ,STR8 White Church Going Christian Men that I can't say about niggers, at least outside of OR locker rooms.

It looks like they're going to require full legal names from everyone in the future

There is going to be a lot of people named Shitivous Cook

Yes, let's all run away from social media, letting the left forever dominate.

Facebook,youtube and twitter already shadow ban those that they don't outright ban. Police departments have had their youtube pages banned because they post to many videos of black on white crime while looking for criminals.

SJWs are winning, you are losing, it's that hard to swallow?

Are you sure you will be the commissar instead of the body in the ditch? Bath House Barry Obama told black clergy the week before the 2012 election that he would fight gay marriage. They found out QUEENS TRUMP SPADES

Anonymous Bitter Clinger December 31, 2015 3:43 PM  


You can probably get away with it if the sabotage is performed in a subtle and deniable way, but the original premise that "free speech is firable" comes with many important caveats. Ignore them at your own peril - the establishment won't have your back if you get caught.

Anonymous Hrw-500 January 01, 2016 3:29 PM  

Looks like there another guy in Pennsylvania who got fired for racial slurs.

I wonder should we spy on some SJW and caught them saying a racial slur or how caught an Hispanic saying racial slur and no need to mention Al Sharpton's slurs.

We could imagine a future meme saying: "..this man got fired for saying racial slurs. Al Sharpton said racial slurs and still got a job..." I let the others to use their imagination to complete this but they'll still be a whiner saying "that's racist".

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts