ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Monday, January 04, 2016

How dare we hit THEM back?

The SJWs at File 770 can't quite decide if they should be a) outraged that we are addressing their blatant abuse of Goodreads or b) pretend that anything we do is simply insignificant.
Theodore Beale is explicitly targeting for abuse a woman who posts here regularly. I certainly hope all human beings with the slightest bit of decency and compassion will recognize this for the ugly, sinister, cynical brutality it is.
Unlike Lis Carey and other SJWs active on Goodreads, Rabid Puppies are abiding strictly by Goodreads policies. Reviews that refer to AUTHOR BEHAVIOR are specifically prohibited; Lis Carey is in blatant violation of Goodreads policy and we are drawing attention to her and every other reviewer who violate that policy.

**Delete content focused on author behavior. We have had a policy of removing reviews that were created primarily to talk about author behavior from the community book page. Once removed, these reviews would remain on the member’s profile. Starting today, we will now delete these entirely from the site. We will also delete shelves and lists of books on Goodreads that are focused on author behavior.

Lis Carey is not being targeted for abuse, Lis Carey is abusing Goodreads. She is not being singled out, she is merely the first of many abusive SJW trolls who will be addressed. We know perfectly well that the first reaction of SJWs is to go running to the amenable authorities, which is why we are always careful to abide by the rules.
Is VD conceding to his ilk that they are ineffective in their use of logic?
No, he is reminding them that there is no point in utilizing logic and dialectic in dealing with SJWs. SJWs are incapable of understanding it or utilizing it; if they could, they would not be SJWs.
I suspect that VD’s minions will find that their impact on GoodReads as a whole will be far less than they think it will. They are just about to find out how tiny and trivial their group truly is.
If that were true, then why are the File 770ers so obviously concerned about their activities? As just remarked above, SJWs are incapable of understanding or utilizing logic.
One thing to note is the cowardice of VD and his minions. They are specifically targeting someone because they think she is frail and easy to harass. In short, they are sleazy, small-time cowards who are too scared to actually challenge someone they think can put up a fight. It is exactly the sort of slimy pathetic thing that perfectly encapsulates who VD and his sycophants are.
So, John Scalzi, Tor Books, George R.R. Martin, and all of Fandom are totally unable to put up a fight? SJWs always lie. We will take on any and all of you. Just give us a reason.

What is different about me is that I take on all comers, regardless of how frail and unable to fight they may be. Attack me or mine and I will hit you back twice as hard, no matter who you are. Playing defenseless or crying out in pain as you strike won’t save you.

All you have to do to avoid being counterattacked is not attack. How hard is that? How dumb do you have to be to fail to understand that, after all this time? Leave us alone, we’ll leave you alone. Attack us, we counterattack. It’s quite simple.
keep in mind that VD is such a towering, manly being that he kept expressing hysterical fear a couple of years ago, bleating with every appearance of high-strung sincerity that his physical safety was in danger from an imminent attack by Lee Martindale. (Lee is an older lady in a wheelchair.) He also bleated a number of times that year about his fear of me, claiming I had threatened him. (In reality, I had never even threatened to speak sternly to him.)
First women like Laura Resnick and Lee Martindale claim to be strong, independent womyn who are going to inflict Whedon-fu badassery on their foes, then they turn around and cry poor little womens who cain’t possibly do nothing to nobody the minute anyone responds to their threats and posturing. They're not fooling anyone.
Part of me wants to say, “Please come over to Goodreads and comment back!” but I suspect that might just encourage him and his minions, so probably not wise.
It isn't wise because doing so will only draw more attention to the way in which SJWs like Lis Carey and others are abusing Goodreads review policies. So, by all means, bring it on!

I note that File 770ers complain more about people legitimately nominating works, commenting on reviews, and rating books than they do about an active campaign by their side to blackball SF/F authors’ works from bookstores. Perhaps instead about whining about our legitimate activities, they should consider policing their own side before we adopt the same tactics in response.

UPDATE: Reading the comments at File 770 is like experiencing a Zen koan.
"There is a lack of evidence."
The comments on File 770 are an unreliable source. Source: the commenters on File 770.

Labels: ,

85 Comments:

Anonymous Stark January 04, 2016 6:35 AM  

I missed where Liz commented on author behavior in the linked review?

Anonymous Bob Law January 04, 2016 6:40 AM  

Ah the old "theyre afraid" "phobic" "so fearful" "fear!" "Cowardice!" SJW disqualification. Never gets old.

Hopefully they'll "demand an apology" soon.

Blogger James Dixon January 04, 2016 7:14 AM  

> Theodore Beale is explicitly targeting for abuse a woman who posts here regularly.

SJW's always lie.

> In short, they are sleazy, small-time cowards who are too scared to actually challenge someone they think can put up a fight.

SJW's always project.

They're apparently still deciding how best to double down.

Blogger VD January 04, 2016 7:30 AM  

I missed where Liz commented on author behavior in the linked review?

Theodore Beale (Vox Day) is nominated for Best Editor, Long Form, and also Best Editor, Short Form. This collection is included in the Hugo Voters packet in support of Theodore Beale's nomination for Best Editor, Short Form.... There is, early on, a casual endorsement of the probable "necessity" of genocide on the grounds that Those People aren't smart enough to modify their behavior. A point Beale's fans will have difficulty with is that such inflammatory language makes it less likely that readers will take in the point the author was attempting to make. A better editor would have caught it and told the author to dispense with pointless provocation and just make his point. If this is the best evidence Beale has to offer, he has no place on the ballot.

As one commenter noted, it's not so much about author behavior - although I am a contributing author - as a complaint about the editor.

Blogger Peter P January 04, 2016 7:48 AM  

We are ready. Just tell us when.

Blogger Adam Lawson January 04, 2016 7:49 AM  

This is literally a checklist... hateful? Check. Afraid? Check. Masculinity attack? Check.

Chock full of lies and distortions? Check.

We may need to archive that as the perfect SJW post.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan January 04, 2016 8:05 AM  

Another SJW who probably takes crazy meds till the day she doesn't.

Anonymous Stark January 04, 2016 8:09 AM  

complaints about the editing or the editor's skill are legitimate.

Blogger VD January 04, 2016 8:23 AM  

complaints about the editing or the editor's skill are legitimate.

That is for Goodreads to decide. In the meantime, comments about a review are also legitimate, so why are you complaining about them? I didn't make any comments about her review.

Anonymous Takin' a Look January 04, 2016 8:30 AM  

Somewhat off topic,

Tom Nichols, a Cuckservative's Cuck, is mewling over modern-day Struggle Sessions at The Daily Beast

The usual blather about Trump being an idiot, crass billionaire from Queens, New Yawk, Putin "our mortal enemy" having respect for him, blah-blah...but get this, he lays the blame on the "liebruls are teh REAL ray-ciss" crowd. Wonder how long before this bull-prepper is on the bread-line? This is a major back-pedaling, the (((usual suspects))) and their traitorous fellow travelers might be getting that cold knot in the pit of their bowels that they've over-reached yet again.

I still say DOTR and slow rpm wood-chippers.

Blogger tz January 04, 2016 8:41 AM  

Fainting Couch Potatoes.

Anonymous Stark January 04, 2016 8:52 AM  

I wasn't complaining, just noting that there wasn't a "blatant abuse", at least not from the review referenced.

Blogger deadman January 04, 2016 8:54 AM  

"ugly, sinister, cynical brutality"

Heh. Is that a new Mortal Kombat move?

Blogger VD January 04, 2016 9:09 AM  

I wasn't complaining, just noting that there wasn't a "blatant abuse", at least not from the review referenced.

That's good to know. Once we know it is not considered to be abuse, we will post very similar reviews about other editors.

Have you not figured out how this works yet? We will use every single tactic used against us, and we will use it more relentlessly. If you see no problem with that, if you insist that it is fair play, then you can expect to see it on every single work edited by every single editor we dislike.

Personally, I would have thought that attacking the editor is even more out of bounds than attacking the author. Nor is that the only time that Lis Carey did so. But, as you insist otherwise, we will certainly add that to our list of acceptable tactics.

Blogger Christopher Yost January 04, 2016 9:45 AM  

Aaaand MIC DROP!!!

Anonymous kfg January 04, 2016 9:55 AM  

Rule #4, as hard and deep as we can shove it. No Vaseline.

OpenID basementhomebrewer January 04, 2016 9:58 AM  

The shifting narrative and standard before our very eyes. "It's legitimate to review a book solely on the editor/editing." This is will turn to howls of foul play when books edited by PNH starting racking up 1 star reviews based on editing. Maybe we can go even farther and give books 1 star reviews based on their publisher doing a poor job of promoting them? I wouldn't put it past the SJWs to do that to all Castalia House books.

Anonymous kawaika January 04, 2016 10:00 AM  

There's this "review" too.

Blogger Were-Puppy January 04, 2016 10:08 AM  

"Theodore Beale is explicitly targeting for abuse a woman who posts here regularly. I certainly hope all human beings with the slightest bit of decency and compassion will recognize this for the ugly, sinister, cynical brutality it is."

What quivering jello spined candyass wrote this? ROFLMAO!

Blogger Were-Puppy January 04, 2016 10:15 AM  

I like that part in the description where it says who the book is for.
For: Drunken Poodle Ladies, Those so large they are nearing birth of a singularity

Blogger Were-Puppy January 04, 2016 10:17 AM  

@2 Bob Law

Hopefully they'll "demand an apology" soon.
---

We are so sorry you feel as if you demand an apology.

Blogger Were-Puppy January 04, 2016 10:21 AM  

The apparent idea is that the SJWs consider it abuse to comment on someone elses review.

Therefor, it is abuse when the SJWs comment on us commenting on anothers review.

The SJWs are abusing us QQ Oh The Humanity!

Blogger Dago January 04, 2016 10:56 AM  

For myself, I will begin to print basic facts based on this work:http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0190U672U?ie=UTF8&redirectFromSS=1&pc_redir=T1&noEncodingTag=1&fp=1

And.distribute to bookstores nationwide

Blogger El Borak January 04, 2016 11:03 AM  

Kawaika: There's this "review" too.

Good catch. I recommend that everyone check that review and act within accordance of Goodreads' rules regarding such.

Blogger Cogitans Iuvenis January 04, 2016 11:12 AM  

Let us pray, "Lord, thank you for making mine enemies so ridiculous."

Blogger bob k. mando January 04, 2016 11:26 AM  

17. basementhomebrewer January 04, 2016 9:58 AM
Maybe we can go even farther and give books 1 star reviews based on their publisher doing a poor job of promoting them?



as a prime fer instance, Tor's refusal to print any of Wright's Eschaton books in Mass Market Paperback since the first one?



19. Were-Puppy January 04, 2016 10:08 AM
What quivering jello spined candyass wrote this? ROFLMAO!



i thought Liz Carey was a black belt in Whedon-fu, all powerful wimmenz who would kick my ass just as soon as look at me?

why aren't they accusing me of being the jello spined candyass?

Blogger Danby January 04, 2016 12:12 PM  

@18 kawaika
There's this "review" too.
Reported as a violation of GR policy

Blogger Danby January 04, 2016 12:16 PM  

@19 Were-Puppy
"Theodore Beale is explicitly targeting for abuse a woman who posts here regularly. I certainly hope all human beings with the slightest bit of decency and compassion will recognize this for the ugly, sinister, cynical brutality it is."
What quivering jello spined candyass wrote this?


We must recall that a lot of SJW disfunction comes out of primal, physical, fear. The world scares them, men scare them, penises scare them, everything scares them, including themselves. Mostly SJWism is a desperate attempt to not be scared.

Anonymous ArmyStu January 04, 2016 12:31 PM  

"there is no point in utilizing logic and dialectic in dealing with SJWs. SJWs are incapable of understanding it or utilizing it; if they could, they would not be SJWs."

Yeah, right. What's going on here is that logic and dialectic aren't used because Anti Justice Warriors like Vox Day couldn't win an argument against SJWs using logic or dialectic if his life depended on it. You can only go back to the "God says so" or "my blood is better than yours" arguments so many times without getting laughed out of the room.

OpenID sigbouncer January 04, 2016 12:36 PM  

"One thing to note is the cowardice of VD and his minions. They are specifically targeting someone because they think she is frail and easy to harass."

Seriously I would thoroughly enjoy seeing Vox debate Bill Maher on Maher's HBO show. My thoughts on this have always been geared towards a religious debate between the two. As I think it would be excellent. But an SJW debate would be fine as well.

Although the two may have more common ground on SJW's. Since Bennie Affleck's attack on Maher over Maher's comments about the Koran and it's worshipers as being violent. Still would be well worth an hour out of my Friday nite to watch these two go at it mentally and verbally from opposite sides of the fence.




Blogger VD January 04, 2016 12:48 PM  

What's going on here is that logic and dialectic aren't used because Anti Justice Warriors like Vox Day couldn't win an argument against SJWs using logic or dialectic if his life depended on it. You can only go back to the "God says so" or "my blood is better than yours" arguments so many times without getting laughed out of the room.

Seriously, THAT is the best you can do? The only person, and I use the term loosely, being laughed at here is you. That is seriously feeble.

Anti-Justice Warriors? How lame is that?

Blogger RobertT January 04, 2016 12:51 PM  

As it should be.

"What is different about me is that I take on all comers, regardless of how frail and unable to fight they may be. Attack me or mine and I will hit you back twice as hard, no matter who you are. Playing defenseless or crying out in pain as you strike won’t save you."

Anonymous ArmyStu January 04, 2016 1:07 PM  

"Seriously, THAT is the best you can do? The only person, and I use the term loosely, being laughed at here is you. That is seriously feeble."

I'd be forced to do better if you AJW were less transparently obvious in your fear of debating. Don't get me wrong, you are welcome to your fears, bigotry and retreat. Just don't expect it not to be called out.

Blogger Christopher Yost January 04, 2016 1:09 PM  

I'd give that debate five entire seconds before one says "be that as it may..." and then goes completely off the rails.

Anonymous Ain January 04, 2016 1:12 PM  

"You can only go back to the 'God says so' or 'my blood is better than yours' arguments so many times"

SJWs always lie.

Blogger Trump/Automatthew 2016 January 04, 2016 1:14 PM  

Anti-Justice Warriors? How lame is that?

At least be funny and call us the Anti Justice League.

OpenID basementhomebrewer January 04, 2016 1:19 PM  

@ 33 Ok, I'll bite just for fun. I defy you to pull together 5 other 1 star reviews given based entirely on the editing for books other than those edited by Vox. I defy you to find just 2 one-star reviews on GR that even mention the editors name other than works edited by Vox.

Blogger VD January 04, 2016 1:20 PM  

I'd be forced to do better if you AJW were less transparently obvious in your fear of debating.

Challenge accepted. I'm calling your bluff. What are we debating?

Blogger Joshua Sinistar January 04, 2016 1:29 PM  

I don't know why any of you are even bothering with these idiots. The Publishing Industry and the Dinosaur media are so dead that even Dr. Frankenstein couldn't revive them.
If they take HP Lovecraft's likeness off that award then he can lie happy in his grave. Just imagine how shocked Howard would be that an award likened after him was given to a monosyllabic black womyn.
That's Cosmic Horror at its worst.

Anonymous Theo Herzl January 04, 2016 1:29 PM  

or 'my blood is better than yours' arguments

They Hate Nature and Science. Hate. It.

Playing defenseless or crying out in pain as you strike

Damn but that sounds like TheJuice' Marxist Collective tactic.
Surely coinkidink for the anti-multicultural, societal and self-destroying Oneness gang.

Blogger Robert Coble January 04, 2016 1:29 PM  

Looks like MREs are on the menu today. . .

Blogger Salt January 04, 2016 1:30 PM  

If I thought @33 ArmyStu would actually try his luck, I'd make popcorn.

Anonymous No True Communist January 04, 2016 1:35 PM  

Anti-Justice Warriors?

Whose Justice? Nature's? Yours, Totalitarian?
Marxists Hate Nature. The entire Religion is lashing out against it.
They Resent and Loathe it with all of their broken Psych being.
They are nothing in and of themselves, and the State and Corps represent their only means of getting even.

Blogger bob k. mando January 04, 2016 1:48 PM  

29. ArmyStu January 04, 2016 12:31 PM
What's going on here is that logic and dialectic aren't used because Anti Justice Warriors like Vox Day couldn't win an argument against SJWs using logic or dialectic if his life depended on it.



as with the 'perpetual union' advocates, i see a lot of bald assertions and accusations here.

what i don't see any of is argument ( http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/argument?s=t, spec def 2-5 ), logic, citing of fact or referencing of any primary source material.



33. ArmyStu January 04, 2016 1:07 PM
I'd be forced to do better if you AJW were less transparently obvious in your fear of debating.


you haven't attempted to debate anything, faggot. all you've done is cast aspersions and name call.

go on, construct a syllogism why don't you?


36. Trump/Automatthew 2016 January 04, 2016 1:14 PM
At least be funny and call us the Anti Justice League.



Dunder Twin powers activate? shape of a hydrocephalic, form of a mongoloid?

Anonymous Fran January 04, 2016 1:50 PM  

Looks like Armystu ran rather than back his trash talk. If IIRC Vox and the Ilk would always use dialectic but found it was useless as these sjws have no reason to their logic.

Anonymous Krul January 04, 2016 1:57 PM  

@38 - "What are we debating?"

So many options. Free trade? Immigration? The Labor theory of value? Graphical 3D technology in video games?

How about something related to SF/F Fandom. Like... pedophilia.

Anonymous 7513 January 04, 2016 2:06 PM  

@28Danby
"Mostly SJWism is a desperate attempt to not be scared."

That would explain why they can be simultaneously outraged at our addressing abusive reviews and dismissive of our efforts. Outrage calls together the herd for the comforting support of virtue signaling, dismissing our effectiveness tells each other everything will be OK. A circle-hug.

What happens if these people ever have to confront a real problem? This is just Goodreads, after all ... not exactly high on the threat spectrum. No wonder these people tend to be on meds.

Anonymous Shut up rabbit January 04, 2016 2:26 PM  

@ArmyStu (ex-Salvation Army, I presume), hehe - come at me bro; debate, chess, vidya, fistcuffs... I'm a bit rusty with the foil but I would undoubtedly slap your fat, lazy, cucked ass at that too.

Anonymous KoranBurningFaggot January 04, 2016 3:16 PM  

If they are bothered by her being singled out they should provide a list for us of all their posters that break the rules. We will gladly treat them equally.

They are specifically targeting someone because they think she is frail and easy to harass.

Can you give a penny's work of donation to gofundme along with a negative message as you can with bitcoins?

Trump/Automatthew At least be funny and call us the Anti Justice League.

I thought this cartoon was making fun of feminists for the longest time, turns out it can not be parodied. The Social Justice League. http://www.gynostar.com/archives/comic/the-just-us-league

ArmyStu (ex-Salvation Army, I presume)

There was plenty of 8up soldiers when I was in. Many of the homeless vets didn't get honorable discharges.

Blogger VFM6974 January 04, 2016 3:22 PM  

@18 Flagged it as abusive

Blogger Robert Coble January 04, 2016 3:36 PM  

Looks like MREs are on the menu today. . .

Blogger Beau January 04, 2016 4:00 PM  

Looks like MREs are on the menu today. . .

Laughed, I did.

Anonymous No January 04, 2016 4:18 PM  

When we get tiny in your rearview mirror, it is because someone is definitely fleeing debate...it just ain't us.

The real question, cupcake, is whose car did you borrow?

Blogger James Dixon January 04, 2016 5:51 PM  

> The real question, cupcake, is whose car did you borrow?

But don't you know that the very concept of property is racist? No, I'm not kidding, they actually argue that: http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/12/11/property-is-racist/

Blogger Anonymous Robot January 04, 2016 6:15 PM  

Well, Mr Odious Obvious, it seems more like Lis Carey likes playing the victim.

Anonymous WinstonWebb January 04, 2016 6:23 PM  

Yes, he is playing them.
HARD.

Blogger Nick S January 04, 2016 6:25 PM  

@55

I think you mean assailant, but he's not playing. Now, run along before you get your feelings hurt.

Blogger Nick S January 04, 2016 6:29 PM  

Moderator deleted Obvious' post...numbers changed.

Blogger Trump/Automatthew 2016 January 04, 2016 6:36 PM  

Yeah, the numbering system is crappy. We're working on something better.

Blogger John Wright January 04, 2016 7:26 PM  

@33
ArmyStu, I see you and raise you. Let us by all means debate anything you wish at any length you wish on any topic.

I make only one demand: that you utter no personal attacks, ad hominem, character assassination, call no one a racist, bigot, homophobe, or any other derogatory term.

You will find, I think, that if you obey this rule you have not only no arguments to make, but no statements to utter.

You see, your entire philosophy is based on a self-induced hysterical schizophrenia where you convince yourself that all viewpoints differing even slightly from your own are produced by psychologies so deranged, stupid, and evil that it would be morally wrong for you to listen, wrong to entertain the argument, examine it, find its flaws, and wrong to answer honestly with any honest questions.

Your philosophy short circuits all thought by simply defining all opposing philosophies as beyond the pale.

And so you never need to debate, or to think, ever again.

What you may not realize as that, as time goes on, you have lost the ability to have any normal human interaction with any other thinking being except on the shallowest possible level.

You have lost the ability to imagine what minds other than your own might think on a topic.

You are only able to imagine your fellow humans beings in two categories: 1. clones of yourself who agree in all things; 2. devils.

If you doubt me, I urge you to attempt the experiment.

TRY to argue without ad hominem. Try to say something to an opponent, anything, anything at all, that does not contain a sneer, insult, self-flattery or personal attack.

Try typing the words "I respectfully disagree."

What happens in your brain when you try to type those words?

Blogger Geir Balderson January 04, 2016 7:29 PM  

" I certainly hope all human beings with the slightest bit of decency and compassion will recognize this for the ugly, sinister, cynical brutality it is."

Wow!!! They are such drama queens! Transgendered ones at that! Cynical brutality!! My, my, will the ilk be feeding her to their snakes alive? Boiling her in canola oil? Giving her 2 minutes head start before the hounds are released? Having her stand on a wood raft in the lava of Mt. Doom?

Nope, none of those cause poor Lis will be lashed with sweet, smooth rhetoric! Oh, the horror!!!

Anonymous ArmyStu January 04, 2016 8:04 PM  

"Challenge accepted. I'm calling your bluff. What are we debating?"

"SJW always lie" - Vox Day

No, they don't always lie.

Anonymous ArmyStu January 04, 2016 8:13 PM  

"You are only able to imagine your fellow humans beings in two categories: 1. clones of yourself who agree in all things; 2. devils"

And you know this based on the chicken entrails you have examined or did Jesus give you this info after saying your prayers??

Anonymous Hawk S. Rabidus January 04, 2016 8:16 PM  

@60

John C. Wright, I respectfully ask you to re-read your post and see if you perceive the irony that I find therein.

Did you respond "without ad hominem ... [saying] something to an opponent, anything, anything at all, that does not contain a sneer, insult, self-flattery or personal attack"?

Can you acknowledge that, in the mind of your opponent, you just described yourself when you responded to ArmyStu? And provided your opponents with a surfeit of unintentional comedy?

Blogger Nick S January 04, 2016 8:31 PM  

I used to think these trolls were just playing stupid.

Blogger VD January 04, 2016 8:35 PM  

No, they don't always lie.

Oh, but they most certainly do.

Anonymous #1037 January 04, 2016 8:38 PM  

Lol did they just nuke us off Goodreads?

Anonymous ArmtStu January 04, 2016 8:44 PM  

"Oh, but they most certainly do."

Fear of losing the debate is no reason to simply repeat yourself. Try to do the manly thing and admit your proposition is inefensible.

Blogger VD January 04, 2016 8:55 PM  

Lol did they just nuke us off Goodreads?

Yep. I just put the post up.

Fear of losing the debate is no reason to simply repeat yourself. Try to do the manly thing and admit your proposition is inefensible.

See, you have no rebuttal. You've already surrendered. Your shame is complete.

Blogger L. Jagi Lamplighter Wright January 04, 2016 9:54 PM  

Weird, considering that when we complained about the review on John's Judge of Ages that is just a complaint about John (it was put up before the book was even released), Goodreads would not remove it.

OpenID Jack Amok January 04, 2016 9:57 PM  

@ArmyStu (ex-Salvation Army, I presume),

Actually, he's from Gamma Company, Third Light Loafer Brigade, 4th IUD.

Blogger L. Jagi Lamplighter Wright January 04, 2016 9:57 PM  

Weird, considering that when we complained about the review on John's Judge of Ages that is just a complaint about John (it was put up before the book was even released), Goodreads would not remove it.

Blogger bob k. mando January 04, 2016 9:58 PM  

68. ArmtStu January 04, 2016 8:44 PM
Fear of losing the debate is no reason to simply repeat yourself. Try to do the manly thing and admit your proposition is inefensible.



repeat after me, you hydrocephalic imbecile:
"bald contradiction is not remotely the same thing as refutation."

Vox asserted something.

IF you want to 'debate' him
THEN you PROVIDE EVIDENCE that he is incorrect.

simply saying "nanny, nanny, boo boo, nuh uh" reveals you as the preschooler mentality you are.

Anonymous No January 04, 2016 10:08 PM  

Considering that simply hitting back just sunk the entire Good Ship SJPop at Goodreads...that would be why they oppose hitbacks.

Blogger Student in Blue January 04, 2016 10:36 PM  

SJWs are akin to a crying drama queen, redfaced with teartracks, howling "How dare you!" while doing his/her very best to scratch your eyeballs out.

Yeah, we sure did something so heinous as to warrant your reaction. Suuuuuuure.

Blogger bob k. mando January 05, 2016 2:16 AM  

SJWs always lie, and have been doing so since they were direct operatives taking orders from the KGB.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SR9nIMOrqy4&list=PLC5rYVRgN8a17Qx9C4wOtIKMy7qNU1FRo


notice in this interview how many times the interviewer asserts and bald faced lie and Wayne smacks him down.

notice how many times Wayne is trying to answer him and the interviewer ATTEMPTS ( Wayne never permits the derail ) to interrupt, talk over him and talk down to him.

notice how the interviewer keeps switching direction as Wayne fully refutes every single one of his assertions, completely ignoring the fact that Wayne had just demonstrated his previous assertion to be abject bullshit.

now for those "hurt" by the Blacklist:
Carl Foreman - registered Communist
Dalton Trumbo - registered Communist for a time, Anarchist ( Anarchists were the primary source of US domestic terrorism prior to the rise of Communism and the Unions ) when not a member of the CPUSA
Larry Parks - registered member of the Communist Party

remember, also, that this interview took place in 1974. long, LONG before the KGB files got released at the fall of the Soviet Union ... and we found out that EVERYTHING Joseph McCarthy had ever said was true. AND MORE.


SJWs are, and always have been, children of the Father of Lies.

Blogger bob k. mando January 05, 2016 3:44 AM  

SJWs always, *always* lie.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oj9dA6E3fJw

Anonymous FrankNorman January 05, 2016 4:15 AM  

I think most people understand that the sentence "SJWs always life" is not intended to mean that every SJW is constantly performing the act of telling a lies, 24/7.
Rather, it means that telling falsehoods is such characteristic behaviour of SJW type people, that they can be reliably expected to do it.
This is probably due, at least in part, to the fact that they live in a self-constructed world, designed to protect their own feelings - and they accept or reject information on that basis.

Anonymous Obvious January 05, 2016 4:32 AM  

@57

Yeah. Beale certainly hasn't written many a blog post where he talks about how attacked he is. He certainly hasn't said that PNH attacked him out of no where, or that those vile SJWs are always attacking him and he's merely counter attacking.

That must have been someone else.

Blogger James Dixon January 05, 2016 6:03 AM  

> "SJW always lie"

No, they don't always lie.

> TRY to argue without ad hominem.

And you know this based on the chicken entrails you have examined or did Jesus give you this info after saying your prayers?

And AmyStu proceeds to demonstrate Vox's and John's points for them. It's so predictable you could almost set your clock by it.

Blogger Were-Puppy January 05, 2016 10:01 AM  

@28 Danby

We must recall that a lot of SJW disfunction comes out of primal, physical, fear. The world scares them, men scare them, penises scare them, everything scares them, including themselves. Mostly SJWism is a desperate attempt to not be scared.
---

If that was totally true, then why do they attack authors and publishers and such all the time in the reviews? These guys really live in a world of unreality, where they can instigate altercations but fear the reprisals.

Blogger Were-Puppy January 05, 2016 10:06 AM  

@29 ArmyStu

Yeah, right. What's going on here is that logic and dialectic aren't used because Anti Justice Warriors like Vox Day couldn't win an argument against SJWs using logic or dialectic if his life depended on it. You can only go back to the "God says so" or "my blood is better than yours" arguments so many times without getting laughed out of the room.
---

Here we have an example of the new, improved, homofabulous Army troop. Apparently.

Blogger Were-Puppy January 05, 2016 10:08 AM  

@33 ArmyStu

I'd be forced to do better if you AJW were less transparently obvious in your fear of debating. Don't get me wrong, you are welcome to your fears, bigotry and retreat. Just don't expect it not to be called out.
---

Maybe you're on the ship of fools. This blog is always having debates and arguments.

Blogger Were-Puppy January 05, 2016 10:11 AM  

@36 Trump/Automatthew 2016
Anti-Justice Warriors? How lame is that?

At least be funny and call us the Anti Justice League.
---

Also known as the Legion of Doom

Blogger Were-Puppy January 05, 2016 10:39 AM  

@67 #1037

Lol did they just nuke us off Goodreads?
---

Whaaa? LOD we DINDU NUFFINS

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts