ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Thursday, January 14, 2016

"The Most Important Book of 2015"

The Most Important Book Of 2015: SJWs Always Lie
As someone who has been the target of SJW attacks for years, and who has helped bring awareness to their totalitarian interpretation of “justice,” I began reading Vox Day’s SJWs Always Lie with enthusiasm. Not only does it go into depth about what SJW’s think and how they behave, it also gives you a strategy for fighting back when they come after you or your organization.

SJW’s have so infected Western institutions and corporations that it is inevitable you will come face-to-face with an SJW who hopes to harm you and your livelihood. For that reason, SJWs Always Lie amounts to essential reading for all men. It’s the most important book I read in 2015.
In the universities, in the churches, in the corporations, in the professional associations, in the editorial offices, in the game studios, and just about everywhere else you can imagine, free speech and free thought are under siege by a group of fanatics as self-righteous as Savonarola, as ruthless as Stalin, as ambitious as Napoleon, and as crazy as Caligula. They are the Social Justice Warriors, the SJWs, the self-appointed thought police who have been running amok throughout the West since the dawn of the politically correct era in the 1990s.
Vox methodically breaks down the enemy that we have been fighting for years, including their strengths, weaknesses, and modes of attack. While information on fighting SJWs are available on various sites and forums, this is the first time it has been assembled in one cohesive work.
I very much appreciate the distinction. Regardless of what you might think of him, Roosh has been on the front lines of the cultural war and he has fearlessly continued to stand up for men, even men who disdain and disavow him.

Roosh knows, much better than most of us, the lengths to which SJWs are willing to go to disqualify, discredit, and destroy a man. That is why his praise for the book is so meaningful, and so significant.

Labels: ,

53 Comments:

Blogger Student in Blue January 14, 2016 8:10 AM  

"But Vox, he's a bad guy who does bad things! He's (insert label here) so that means his arguments are invalid!"

Just had to get that out of the way. I certainly hope Roosh considers more on the spiritual aspect of the Neomasculinity concept he's been batting around, and realizes the Truth in Christianity.

Blogger Ezekiel January 14, 2016 8:12 AM  

Roosh is to the blogosphere what Trump is to the election. The question of how to choose your allies isn't whether or not they appeal to you personally, it's how good they are at making your enemy squeal.

Blogger Robert What? January 14, 2016 8:38 AM  

Roosh is excoriated by many in the 'sphere. Maybe they think that if they distinguish themselves from him the SJWs will leave them alone. Ain't gonna happen.

Being an older guy I don't pay much attention to Roosh's pickup techniques and analyses. However, when he focuses on social/cultural commentary - as he does more frequently these days - to me it rings true.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan January 14, 2016 9:16 AM  

So will this make 2016 the year of the Shitlord or the year of the Real Talker?

OpenID paworldandtimes January 14, 2016 9:19 AM  

Roosh's change of attitude has been fascinating. I hadn't read him regularly but I've seen people attribute his Damascus moment to reading "The Culture of Critique" and others to having revisited Eastern Europe and seeing the previously-absent poz creep into there.

PA

OpenID paworldandtimes January 14, 2016 9:21 AM  

From Vaclav Havel's 1979 essay "The Power of the Powerless." Was he writing about 2016 United States?

[Havel's quote follows]

The post-totalitarian system touches people at every step, but it does so with its ideological gloves on. This is why life in the system is so thoroughly permeated with hypocrisy and lies: government by bureaucracy is called popular government; the working class is enslaved in the name of the working class; the complete degradation of the individual is presented as his ultimate liberation; depriving people of information is called making it available; the use of power to manipulate is called the public control of power, and the arbitrary abuse of power is called observing the legal code; the repression of culture is called its development; the expansion of imperial influence is presented as support for the oppressed; the lack of free expression becomes the highest form of freedom; farcical elections become the highest form of democracy; banning independent thought becomes the most scientific of world views; military occupation becomes fraternal assistance. Because the regime is captive to its own lies, it must falsify everything. It falsifies the past. It falsifies the present, and it falsifies the future. It falsifies statistics. It pretends not to possess an omnipotent and unprincipled police apparatus. It pretends to respect human rights. It pretends to persecute no one. It pretends to fear nothing. It pretends to pretend nothing.

[End quote.]

PA

Anonymous Haxo Angmark January 14, 2016 9:37 AM  

I tire of reds, faggots, anti-White ethnoids, and anti-male feminists being euphemised as "Social Justice Warriors". If asked, that's what these entitlement-group scum would call themselves; who, after all, can object to "justice"? How about we call them by their own true name: Culture of Deathers: COD's

Blogger Student in Blue January 14, 2016 9:43 AM  

@7. Haxo Angmark

Dumbass.

It's not us inventing and then calling them a euphemism, it's us taking a self-applied and celebrated label, and turning it into a euphemism.

It's literally hitting them with their own fist, and they are humiliated for it.

OpenID paworldandtimes January 14, 2016 9:47 AM  

Student in Blue, exactly. Similarly, "worker's paradise" or "people's republic" are on face-value good things, but anti-Communists have turned those phrases against their creators to mock their lies and perversion of language.

PA

Blogger James Dixon January 14, 2016 10:03 AM  

> Was he writing about 2016 United States?

Not quite. There are a couple of differences. One, we don't yet have an omnipotent police apparatus (yet). Two they haven't yet succeeded in taking our guns away.

Blogger jamsco January 14, 2016 10:19 AM  

"That is why his praise for the book is so meaningful, and so significant."

... and so brave. Thank you for this.

OpenID paworldandtimes January 14, 2016 10:20 AM  

James Dixon, true about guns. In turn, unlike us Westerners today, Iron Curtain citizens had a clearer separation between the unfree public sphere and the reasonably free private sphere.

Srdja Trifkovic explains:

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QpuatQ6Hyew

PA

Blogger Old Ez January 14, 2016 10:22 AM  

The last year has seen an amazing cross-pollination between heretofore separate vectors of anti-establishment right-wing populism. I'll go out on an optimistic limb and say it almost feels as if some sort of critical mass is approaching.

Blogger buwaya puti January 14, 2016 10:22 AM  

Sadly, Roosh is an "Invader-American".

Blogger Mr.MantraMan January 14, 2016 10:28 AM  

I'm triggered by the racism here and at the MPA, triggered I tell you

Blogger VD January 14, 2016 10:37 AM  

How about we call them by their own true name: Culture of Deathers: COD's

How about you stop sperging and utilize what has obviously proven to be very effective rhetoric?

In any event, you're not the meme police. So, do whatever you like. We'll do the same.

Blogger Laughingdog January 14, 2016 10:45 AM  

I just find it interesting that SJWs have to bring up you and Roosh to discredit you at every possible opportunity. In an article by Marc Randazza over at Popehat discussing Twitter's treatment of Milo, someone had to make sure to squeeze in "Vox is a racist and Roosh is a rapist" in the comments.

They never, ever stop. They may be excommunicated from their "church" if they did.

Blogger Josh January 14, 2016 10:54 AM  

Sadly, Roosh is an "Invader-American".

And a Muslim one at that.

Anonymous Clay January 14, 2016 11:02 AM  

OK. Who are we going to have to "move aside"?

How do we declare them as "outsiders"?

Blogger Aeoli Pera January 14, 2016 11:34 AM  

Well, he's right. Something else might prove more important in the long run, but SJWAL was the most important in the short term by a long shot.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan January 14, 2016 11:46 AM  

Haxo report to weaponsman and give your first hand account of life in the Hitler Youth

Blogger Aurini January 14, 2016 12:48 PM  

People who can't tell the difference between a Black Lives Matter thug and a Black man.

People who can't tell the difference between an American of Arab descent and a Syrian 'refugee'.

People who think that a scum-sucking white-liberal is part of Christendom.

>_<

Blogger VD January 14, 2016 12:51 PM  

In an article by Marc Randazza over at Popehat discussing Twitter's treatment of Milo, someone had to make sure to squeeze in "Vox is a racist and Roosh is a rapist" in the comments.

Good. They only do that because they know we matter.

Blogger Student in Blue January 14, 2016 1:16 PM  

People who can't tell the difference between an American of Arab descent and a Syrian 'refugee'.

They're different for sure, but Americans of Arab Descent still don't instinctively act the same way that Americans of German Descent or Americans of English Descent.

And you can't completely train instincts out of people.

Blogger JimR January 14, 2016 1:51 PM  

"And you can't completely train instincts out of people."

Those aren't instincts. They're cultural programming.

Humans have very few instincts. Holding our breath underwater, grasping, suckling, that's about it.

Blogger cavalier973 January 14, 2016 1:57 PM  

I saw this review yesterday or the day before, and it was enough to get me to purchase the Kindle version of the book. So, far, reading The book has just made me angry.

On a tangentially related note, the reason I was reading a review on the Return of Kings website was that I had just read a few articles on a site called mythcreants, or something like that, and I was annoyed enough by what I had read (character archetypes that people should discontinue using, a things of that sort) that I felt a desire to read something from a less SJW perspective.

It also raised the question, for me, if there is a site that deals with advice for story-telling/writing, but from a right-wing perspective.

As an example, some time back, Vox had an article discussing using Alpha Game archetypes for story telling. That was interesting.

Also, John Wright's review of the fastest Star Wars movie had elements about what makes a good story, what makes a character interesting, etc.

In short, is there a site dedicated to story-telling that is not infested with SHE's?

Blogger James Dixon January 14, 2016 2:04 PM  

> ... if there is a site that deals with advice for story-telling/writing, but from a right-wing perspective.

I can't speak for the usefulness thereof, but take a look at http://madgeniusclub.com/

Blogger Aeoli Pera January 14, 2016 2:19 PM  

@25 JimR

Those aren't instincts. They're cultural programming.

Humans have very few instincts. Holding our breath underwater, grasping, suckling, that's about it.


It's not a cut-and-dry distinction. Think about the way humans learn language.

You can raise an Englishman to speak Swahili but he'll still be hard-wired to emphasize subtle consonants and slur vowels together into indistinguishable "schwas".

Blogger Aeoli Pera January 14, 2016 2:21 PM  

That is, we are social animals by instinct, and we devote a lot of hardware to this.

Blogger Weouro January 14, 2016 2:30 PM  

I bought a copy last week, also Gorilla Mindset and Antifragile.

Blogger JimR January 14, 2016 2:32 PM  

If you are raising someone to speak Swahili (as his primary language) he isn't English, now is he?

Language and culture are intertwined, there's little doubt of that. But neither are 'instinctive'

Blogger Student in Blue January 14, 2016 2:48 PM  

@JimR
If you are raising someone to speak Swahili (as his primary language) he isn't English, now is he?

Don't be dense, he's referring to someone genetically English.

Those aren't instincts. They're cultural programming.

You don't even know what I'm referring to, AND you're wrong anyway.

SWPL is not a "cultural programming" anymore than appreciation for KFC and Grape Drank is being programmed into "American Youths".

Have you never heard of Nature and Nurture? Why do you insist it's nothing but Nurture and Nature can go hang?

Blogger Aeoli Pera January 14, 2016 2:49 PM  

If you are raising someone to speak Swahili (as his primary language) he isn't English, now is he?

Yes, he is. You are either new here or slow.

Anonymous Discard January 14, 2016 2:52 PM  

25. JimR: I am instinctively like my father, just as a nephew of mine is instinctively like the father he hasn't seen since he was six months old. Our culture rewarded my father and his father and grandfather for being the way they were. Do that for a thousand years and you get cultural instincts.

Blogger VD January 14, 2016 2:54 PM  

In short, is there a site dedicated to story-telling that is not infested with SHE's?

Click on Castalia House on the right sidebar, near the top.

Blogger JimR January 14, 2016 3:01 PM  

"Have you never heard of Nature and Nurture? Why do you insist it's nothing but Nurture and Nature can go hang?"

I made no such insistence.

and I happen to really like fried chicken. I don't think it's genetic, neither of my sisters cared for it.

Blogger Aeoli Pera January 14, 2016 3:08 PM  

Slow, then.

Blogger Student in Blue January 14, 2016 3:23 PM  

and I happen to really like fried chicken. I don't think it's genetic, neither of my sisters cared for it.

And if there's a really strong trend in a group of people...? It *must* be cultural programming?

Your claiming there's no way it's instinctive and must be culturally programmed is, by definition, Nurture.

Blogger JimR January 14, 2016 5:02 PM  

"Your claiming there's no way it's instinctive and must be culturally programmed is, by definition, Nurture."
of course.

As with the example above about swahili, Teach a child a language from day 1, and they'll have no difficulty in pronouncing it. Provided no physical impediment exists, and those teaching it are fluent native speakers.

No one seriously disagrees with this right? are there really people who believe genetics will make you speak english correctly? Or any other language?

Blogger Tom K. January 14, 2016 6:39 PM  

Which is why my vitriol is not based on ethnicity, but ideology. I know many blacks who are conservative and who understand our battle as much as I do. They are Americans in every sense of the word.

If you expect me to not "shoot at" white nstionalists" simply because we both support "white culture" against the invaders, then I'll be damned if I'll reject a true American simply because of the color of his skin.

Besides, by your logic, isn't Vox an "invader" as well? Mexicans have no "culture" of freedom to speak of.

Blogger Tom K. January 14, 2016 6:41 PM  

Roosh, from what I can tell, is either atheist or agnostic.

Unless you damn him simplybfor his birth.

And was he born of Muslim parents? I've never read.

Blogger Tom K. January 14, 2016 6:42 PM  

Props.

Blogger Tom K. January 14, 2016 6:46 PM  

No he's not. Accents are not biological.

Blogger Tom K. January 14, 2016 6:50 PM  

The most consistent conservative and American of all the justices of the Supreme Court, tying with Scalia (an Italian), is Clarenece Thomas.

We were betrayed by John Roberts, a WASP.

It is the WASPs of this country, the ones with lineage back to the Mayflower, who are betraying her.

Blogger Aeoli Pera January 14, 2016 7:15 PM  

No he's not. Accents are not biological.

They aren't entirely biological, but languages evolve to accommodate the structure of the mouths speaking them. Imagine there's a race of people with giant teeth, to the point that it's ridiculous. Now imagine what sorts of sounds are easy for them to make, and which sounds aren't. Their native language will tend to include the former, and exclude the latter.

That's an extreme case, to prove existence. Work backward from there to find the moderate position.

Blogger Tom K. January 14, 2016 7:16 PM  

The most consistent conservative and American of all the justices of the Supreme Court, tying with Scalia (an Italian), is Clarenece Thomas.

We were betrayed by John Roberts, a WASP.

It is the WASPs of this country, the ones with lineage back to the Mayflower, who are betraying her.

Blogger Tom K. January 14, 2016 7:16 PM  

No he's not. Accents are not biological.

Blogger JimR January 14, 2016 7:43 PM  

"languages evolve to accommodate the structure of the mouths speaking them. "
This I would agree with. As a honky myself, it's pretty clear.

Anonymous Ivory Carver January 14, 2016 9:50 PM  

Computer programs for designing dentures have sub-programs for designing Oriental teeth. Your example is not completely far-fetched, Aeoli.

Blogger Aeoli Pera January 15, 2016 1:48 AM  

It was maybe a poor choice of example though. I think a better example would be "academic meritocracy" culture vs. "average IQ" genetics.

Blogger James Dixon January 15, 2016 4:31 AM  

> We were betrayed by John Roberts, a WASP.

Roberts is not a WASP. He's Roman Catholic. There's not a single WASP on the Supreme Court at this time.

Anonymous The other robot January 15, 2016 10:31 AM  

They aren't entirely biological, but languages evolve to accommodate the structure of the mouths speaking them.

I have heard it said that Chinese women's mouths are perfect ...

However, most, if not all, accents relate to little things about pronunciation, like the weird stress/intonation rules Spanish speakers use compared to English speakers, the different use of tone in tonal languages vs non-tonal languages.

Also, I suspect that there has been no large amounts of selection for tonal languages because there is evidence that Ancient Chinese was non-tonal and Ancient Greek was tonal to some extent.

However, it does seem as if Chinese tend to have deeper voices than Europeans.

Anonymous Discard January 15, 2016 1:45 PM  

52. The Other Robot: I have read that Chinese have a much higher incidence of perfect pitch than do Whites, presumably on account of the selective pressure of learning a tonal language.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts