ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Saturday, January 16, 2016

The shame of the SJWs

The Ralph Retort postulates that the root source of SJW behavior is to be found in shame:
Every SJW has something that they’re deeply ashamed of, something that makes them feel guilty or insecure, and this is the key to understanding everything else about them. You may have noticed that our enemies have enough skeletons in their closets to fully replenish the world’s oil supplies if they were underground – from pedos, to sibling sex-assaulters, to literal shit-eaters, to guys that think that rape is funny, to pedos, to guys that fail to report rape, to trannies that sleep with men without disclosure, to pedos, to women who abuse their boyfriends, to virulent racism, to pedos, to general all-around sociopathy – nearly all of these people’s lives are complete and utter trainwrecks, and this is no coincidence.

Of course, nearly everyone is ashamed of something, so that doesn’t explain SJWs all by itself. SJWs are made by how they deal with it. There are a lot of healthy ways to deal with shame, depending on the underlying reason for it. You can seek to improve your habits, you can repent and make amends to people you’ve wronged, you can seek forgiveness from God, you can realize that it’s nothing to be ashamed of and come to terms with it, you can find some escape to help you cope, etc.

But SJWs deal with it in the worst way possible, and that’s the factor that makes them SJWs. The SJW seeks to rationalize away their shame by pinning the blame for it on everyone else. “There’s nothing wrong with me,” they tell themselves, “I only feel bad because society has oppressed me with it’s arbitrary, regressive norms. In fact, I’m more progressive and enlightened that everyone else for realizing this. They should be ashamed! I should be judging them!”
From what I've seen, SJWs disproportionately come from the low-end of the social totem pole and the ugly end of the attractiveness spectrum. I suspect that gamma rage-against-society and ugly female rage-against-society also play a substantial factor in what motivates SJWs to behave as they do.

Labels:

104 Comments:

Blogger guest January 16, 2016 11:48 AM  

Are you kidding? SJWs are from families who are as rich as Midas. I'm from the low end of the social totem pole, and I am as bible-thumping, as we come when it comes to feminism and sinners.

Blogger Happy Housewife January 16, 2016 11:49 AM  

"Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness; Who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes, And prudent in their own sight!"

Isaiah 5:20-21

Sounds like SJWs aren't a new thing

Blogger Mr.MantraMan January 16, 2016 11:50 AM  

The left is mean girls politics and that is why Trump our star QB is cleaning up

Anonymous NorthernHamlet January 16, 2016 12:00 PM  

Whilst I don't completely disagree, I'm more inclined to think this is overwhelmingly young college and post-college women who have found a power niche that is highly flexible and allows them to be outraged all the time. Intentionally spinning their own hamster wheel is a good way to control gammas and deltas because those men are mostly afraid to confront crazy pussy.

Low class women love that shit.

And let's be honest: the slutifucation of college girls has reached levels that statistically, more of them are crazy pussy.

Anonymous Steve January 16, 2016 12:03 PM  

From what I've seen, SJWs disproportionately come from the low-end of the social totem pole and the ugly end of the attractiveness spectrum.

There is an amazing preponderance of buttergolems, sideshow freaks, sexual deviants, scroungy little fucks, and human-mimicking sociopaths among the SJWetariat.

They're genetic dead-enders, and the kindest thing we can do for them is to tie them to a stake, hose them with sugarwater, then let Africanised killer bees do their thing.

Blogger Jake January 16, 2016 12:04 PM  

Trying to rationalize shame instead of realizing that it is a product of a functioning conscience is what these people can't understand. If only they knew the freedom from shame that our Lord Christ gives us, but alas they are the world. I pray for them.

Anonymous That Would Be Telling January 16, 2016 12:16 PM  

@1 guest:

Are you kidding? SJWs are from families who are as rich as Midas. I'm from the low end of the social totem pole....

Our host is referring to a different pole.

Blogger Krul January 16, 2016 12:19 PM  

OT: "How Twitter quietly banned hate speech last year"

"Twitter has discovered what many proponents of democratic society already knew: censorship is not the opposite of free speech. In fact, so-called free speech can actually be used as a weapon to silence the vulnerable and dispossessed. Ironically, to maintain its position as a platform for free discourse, Twitter must censor its users."

Free speech is oppression.
Censorship is freedom.
“War is peace.
Freedom is slavery.
Ignorance is strength.”

Blogger Mr.MantraMan January 16, 2016 12:22 PM  

Those people mentioned in the article are low hanging fruit for the cult minders. Go to a left wing board as a damaged person and the grannies will swarm you with their phony love even as they burrow into your psyche and start to direct your thoughts

Anonymous That Would Be Telling January 16, 2016 12:31 PM  

Read/skim the whole thing, the explaination of the popularity of intersectionality is interesting, for example: "[in] layman’s terms, it’s just all the self-deluding sad sacks getting together to push each other’s bullshit and form a combined rent-a-mob to tear down civilization with."

Blogger Dexter January 16, 2016 12:34 PM  

We should note that the purpose of the modern "education" (i.e., propaganda/indoctrination) system, which is run by SJWs, is to inculcate feelings of shame in their subjects and thus create more SJWs.

Blogger Verne January 16, 2016 12:39 PM  

Female SJWs who are know are being somewhat attractive. The best of them are 6's. The guys tend to look like unhappy Pillsbury Doughboys. And they all eat anti depressants as if its pop corn.

Anonymous That Would Be Telling January 16, 2016 12:39 PM  

@11 Dexter:

We should note that the purpose of the modern "education" (i.e., propaganda/indoctrination) system, which is run by SJWs, is to inculcate feelings of shame in their subjects and thus create more SJWs.

Sad how this is in opposition to my favorite saying about education, which thanks to Google, I see was said in 1914, no doubt just before things went entirely to hell:

Nothing that you will learn in the course of your studies will be of the slightest possible use to you in after life – save only this – if you work hard and diligently you should be able to detect when a man is talking rot, and that, in my view, is the main, if not the sole, purpose of education.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan January 16, 2016 12:39 PM  

It's all a giant shit test that has the conservatives, churchians, cucks all flummoxed

Anonymous Cash January 16, 2016 12:44 PM  

These people are always trying to get all of us to take on their guilt.

We have the same thing in the church with the more liberal leaning of us. I cal it the "failed missionary syndrome."

My best example of this is World Relief. Some guys I know from college, who are failed missionaries, work with this organization, ran by a failed missionary, to bring Muslims into America.

They are all over the Christian and secular news about their work.

Their guilt about being failed missionaries, I believe has a deep impact on their work. They couldn't make it over there so they want to relieve their guilt by bringing those people over here. And show everybody how hard it was on them "over there" in the process.

Anonymous Susan January 16, 2016 12:48 PM  

@3, I think we can safely say now that mean girls politics applies to cuckservatives as well. In fact a name I saw elsewhere last week was the Uniparty. Kinda fits IMO. No longer just DNC or RNC, they work together against all of us.

That is why Trump is cleaning up.

Blogger endwatcher January 16, 2016 12:53 PM  

We fail in life. Christ brings us to acknowledge our failings and to
repentance and faith on Him for our salvation. Our faith and our God is why our shame isn't crippling and why we can champion good even if we fall short of the full measure of good ourselves.

This should not weaken our positions against the SJWs, but we can have mercy on those who repent in word and deed.

Anonymous Leonidas January 16, 2016 12:54 PM  

nearly all of these people’s lives are complete and utter trainwrecks, and this is no coincidence.

This is the one thing that has just continually jumped out at me over the last few years. It is so unbelievably true just how sick and twisted these people really are.

The honest reality is that in a society without internet - where you'd have to actually interact with them in the real world, face to face - nobody would ever give these people the time of day, much less take them seriously.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan January 16, 2016 12:54 PM  

It is why shitlords will rule

Anonymous bw January 16, 2016 12:55 PM  

nearly all of these people’s lives are complete and utter trainwrecks .... I should be judging them!”

And they do. CultMarx is nothing if not a fundie system of morality.
Exactly what we've noted here for a decade - their Savior mentality, while being personally worthy of exactly nobody's emulation. God forbid.

Anonymous Severian January 16, 2016 1:02 PM  

I have a simple three-question test that sites people on the political spectrum with near-perfect accuracy:

1) Do you know who your father is?
2) Do you have a relationship with him?
3) Would you characterize that relationship as warm?

Add up the number of "nos." 1 = a Democrat, 2 = a Progressive, 3 = an SJW. Alternately, the number of "yeses" -- 1 = cuckservative, 2 = conservative, 3 = right wing.

Anonymous Alsos January 16, 2016 1:09 PM  

@2: "Sounds like SJWs aren't a new thing."

Nope. And Eric Hoffer did a great breakdown of the modern embodiment of this mindset just before it really took off in the 1960s. He describes the "True Believer" mindset as rooted in the deeply held belief by the True Believer himself that he is "irremediably spoiled", ie: utterly worthless. He joins movements not because he is intellectually persuaded by the platform, but because he sees The Great And Worthy Cause as a substitute or camouflage for his own personal worthlessness.

What is that, if not shame?

Blogger Matt Robison January 16, 2016 1:15 PM  

We are a culture drowning in guilt, particularly blood guilt from slaughtering the unborn. Without Christ, this guilt must be assuaged somehow.

It comes out in moralism to compensate, things like fair trade, veganism, etc.

But is also comes out in accusation and scapegoating. Something must be sacrificed, be it someone's reputation or livelihood. Eventually, and we have seen hints already, they will calling out for literal blood to cover their own guilt.

But the cleansing power of their scapegoat is temporary, and so they do it over and over. Without the leaven of the gospel, a spirit of accusation will always reign.

Blogger Lovekraft January 16, 2016 1:19 PM  

But what about the orbiting people who fall into the sjw lies and who may not overtly attack but will still censure and tsk-tsk any dissenting voices? Outliers can be, outwardly, well-balanced, attractive, intelligent.

These outliers should be easy to reign in but actually serve as a shield for oligarchs.

What motivates them?

Blogger Lovekraft January 16, 2016 1:27 PM  

I have a simple three-question test that sites people on the political spectrum with near-perfect accuracy:

1) Do you know who your father is?
2) Do you have a relationship with him?
3) Would you characterize that relationship as warm?

Add up the number of "nos." 1 = a Democrat, 2 = a Progressive, 3 = an SJW. Alternately, the number of "yeses" -- 1 = cuckservative, 2 = conservative, 3 = right wing.


Alternately,

1. do you have a dog?
2. if not, do you like dogs?
2. do you own a cat?

If no to one, no to two, and yes to three, you're an sjw.

Blogger cavalier973 January 16, 2016 1:29 PM  

So Hypothetical Bill knows who his father is, has a relationship with him but it is not warm.

Bill is a conservative Democrat?

Anonymous WillBest January 16, 2016 1:29 PM  

Being low on the sociological totem pole does not cause people to act like SJWs. Society rewarding people low on the totem pole for their lack of personal responsibility and temper tantrums has done that.

You don't see this kind of nonsense going on in non-Western countries. The homosexuals in Africa are pleading with Western countries to stop their homosexual awareness agenda in Africa because many Africans don't even understand the concept. And when they do they are disgusted and make life difficult for homosexuals in Africa.

Blogger LP999 S.I.G. Burnin' Up January 16, 2016 1:30 PM  

May light, faith, beauty reign!

Is it worth considering a hashtag/twitter item to require certain persons to apologize to Vox and allies.

The highly predictable outcome is obvious & serves to promote the truths explained in SJWAL. The proof of the harassment, lying and games on the part of SJW and horrid critics are documented.

Earlier this month a suggestion of some kind of goodwill was extended, wanted - I dont know - it failed to resonate here.

No such need, we already pray for and wish that the lost or the hurting/thrashout types turn to God.

Puppykicking, puppy neglect is disgusting and shameful. It remainz something I shall recall when I am asked to forget, accept, concede to values and issues that are unlivable, inconceivable and UGLY.

Anonymous BigGayKoranBurner January 16, 2016 1:31 PM  

to guys that fail to report rape,

I was somewhat annoyed that the friend that I stopped from being taken home by Grandpa Moses after he was roofied didn't want to press charges to make things better for the next victim. Of course I was the only one banned from the gay bar for getting the police involved, but I gave their amygdules a good curb stomping even before I realized it was a thing, since what could they do get the police involved more.

“There’s nothing wrong with me,” they tell themselves, “I only feel bad because society has oppressed me with it’s arbitrary, regressive norms.

Bruce Jenner thinks his 60s are a good time to look for a boyfriend. Does the dating pool for this sixty-something trainwreck include anyone who isn’t a gold-digger or a fame-whore? Epstein Island might not be there for him when he needs it the most.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/01/the_sweetheart_deal_for_bill_clintons_orgy_island_pal_may_be_exposed_and_overturned.html

Blogger cavalier973 January 16, 2016 1:38 PM  

1. Do you support a government that allows individual liberty even if racism and economic inequality would also be allowed?

Blogger Mr.MantraMan January 16, 2016 1:45 PM  

Enough guessing ask them how they became indoctrinated into the SJW cult, be prepared for a horror story

Anonymous That Would Be Telling January 16, 2016 1:58 PM  

@31 Mr.MantraMan:

Enough guessing ask them how they became indoctrinated into the SJW cult, be prepared for a horror story

After administering truth serum first? SJWs always lie, after all....

Blogger Krul January 16, 2016 2:00 PM  

@25 Lovecraft -
"1. do you have a dog?
2. if not, do you like dogs?
2. do you own a cat?

If no to one, no to two, and yes to three, you're an sjw."


Funny, I just saw this tweeted by History in Pictures:

"When a man loves cats, I am his friend and comrade, without further introduction." - Mark Twain

Blogger Derek Kite January 16, 2016 2:11 PM  

I think there is some truth there, but it goes further. There are lots of broken people around.

I think it is a class enforcement behavior. The worst enforcers of class are those born into it but who are useless otherwise. They elevate themselves by their moral preening without any need to actually improve the lives of others. If you listen to Democrats you would never imagine that the cities they administer are hopeless hellholes for black people.

Thug regimes depend on these substandard mental midgets with the desire for validation. They become thug enforcers or enablers everywhere, and any nascient political movement requires lots of them for the grunt work.

The three rules of sjw, lie, double down and project show that it isn't the issue, it is them that is foremost.

Blogger buwaya puti January 16, 2016 2:24 PM  

Online comment sections collect a lot of damaged people, its not quite a right-left thing, or it isn't a clean break. With some experience you could reasonably argue a preponderance on the left if you want to get down to cases.
File 770 versus Vox Popoli for instance. File 770 shows far more identifiable personal problems, physical (many regulars there are seriously ill), emotional/mental, either acknowledged or evident, and its remarkable how many are open about it. It's a bit off putting after you realize whom you are arguing with.
Many really can't take the stress of argument, and they really do require a "safe space" because they aren't up to the usual rough games of life.
Otoh, there are a few emotional/mental issues around here too, though the regulars don't often get confessional about it. And for all I know many could be just as physically ill as the File770 lot.
I don't have enough information to judge this precisely, this is just my impression.
In either case, when we are dealing with what amounts to a hospital environment, its not a good place to host a proper contest of ideas.
The internet is ultimately the problem here perhaps. People who are physically or mentally unfit to conduct battles of ideas have the most time to indulge in it, those who should be best suited to fight are the busiest in real life. This explains a lot.

Blogger Geir Balderson January 16, 2016 2:27 PM  

If not for the internet, SJWs would be in menial jobs. They would have been the washwomen of the 8th century, the horse dung scavengers of the Mongolian plains in the 12th century, or the spittoon cleaners of 19th century Wild West. More jobs suited to their talents than reviewing books written by their betters.

Anonymous #8601 Jean Valjean January 16, 2016 2:31 PM  

Shame may explain some SJW and feminist behavior, but I think it has more to do with one particular sin.

E.N.V.Y.

Blogger buwaya puti January 16, 2016 2:35 PM  

Geir,
I don't think so. In former times people mainly conformed to the demands of their family or village, and they would not have had the opportunity to be infected with ideas that opposed the survival consensus of the group.
Or rather, they would not have the opportunity to find the unhealthy groups like they do now. SJWism is a matter of group dynamics after all.
People are social animals. These unhappy modern women would mostly be married mothers, and probably happier in the supportive environment of the village. The unhappy men likewise. The ill and the mad would mostly be dead.

Blogger S1AL January 16, 2016 2:42 PM  

So, synthesizing everything presented:

1) Shame
2) Loserdom (generally)
3) Social Awkwardness (specifically)
4) The internet

Being an SJW solves all 4 points. It makes them part of a group; it normalizes society downwards (social Marxism); it gives them a voice; it uses the most efficient tool for the first three points while allowing enough anonymity to make them appear fairly normal at the surface level.

Or, simple, being an SJW means never having to be alone in your deviancy.

Blogger buwaya puti January 16, 2016 2:42 PM  

Envy is not limited to modern ideology. Its a powerful factor in peasant world views. Read Jean de Florette. I assure you this is universal.

Blogger YIH January 16, 2016 2:48 PM  

@21. Severian:
Your three question test doesn't work too well for some. I'll use myself as an example:
1) Do you know who your father is?
Yes
2) Do you have a relationship with him?
Deceased
3) Would you characterize that relationship as warm?
See #2
Our esteemed host would also fit that description but a different reason.
Add up the number of "nos." 1 = a Democrat, 2 = a Progressive, 3 = an SJW. Alternately, the number of "yeses" -- 1 = cuckservative, 2 = conservative, 3 = right wing.
Does that make either one of us a cuckservative?

Blogger LP999 S.I.G. Burnin' Up January 16, 2016 2:55 PM  

My request, plea remains; turn to God, stop the wrongdoing and apologize to VD and everyone -

I request them to take responsibility for their errors and turn from the error, the sin, the wrong side of history.

It is not hate, its a plea to stop; being an SJW, idiot rapist or whatevers is not going maintain credibility.

Vox and his people have their honor the opposing side has no honor.

And what do I know?

Nothing, disregard me all day long yet I remain before critics or whomever with my requests. The SJW values from A to Economics to Z is all 100% failed worldviews.

Blogger weka January 16, 2016 2:57 PM  

@1, @34. You are both missing the money. SJW requires ongoing infusions of cash, because it is inefficient. The lies they promote are not those which are easily swallowed. In a marketplace of ideas, they consistent fail the reality test.

Stacey McCain got this correct a couple of weeks ago. The only people who love SJWs are their parents, and they leech off them. SJWs run on Daddy's money

Which is wny the SJWs are the runts of the Aristocrat and Upper Middle Class families.

Anonymous Nate2ofX January 16, 2016 3:00 PM  

" I suspect that gamma rage-against-society and ugly female rage-against-society also play a substantial factor"


The sad part is a lot of the guys could VASTLY improve their attractiveness if they put any effort into it. Trying to dress well, exercising, not gorging on crap food, reasonable personal hygiene habits. Look at H-Wil Wheaton. When he was younger he was a decent looking guy, but as he got older he put on about 30-40 pounds too much for his frame and grew that awful beard (I am personally pro beard, but a lot of guys just can't pull them off, Wheaton is one of them) and his attractiveness plummeted. Even discounting his unattractive personality traits

Blogger John Wright January 16, 2016 3:20 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Were-Puppy January 16, 2016 3:24 PM  

@25 Lovekraft

Alternately,

1. do you have a dog?
2. if not, do you like dogs?
2. do you own a cat?

If no to one, no to two, and yes to three, you're an sjw.
---

The Poodle Ladies would slip through the cracks of this test

Blogger Were-Puppy January 16, 2016 3:32 PM  

@37 #8601 Jean Valjean
Shame may explain some SJW and feminist behavior, but I think it has more to do with one particular sin.

E.N.V.Y.
---

Maybe they have a foundation of shame, with a layer of Envy on top of it.

Shame + Envy* = Depths of depravity for an SJW

Blogger So Meh January 16, 2016 3:36 PM  

the scale and/or mirror do not lie, but SJWs do. their self esteem needs to come from somewhere (usually the mirror of the rabbit warren) so go fight "the just" fight against the racists and wrong triple evil double thinkers out there, because daily fighting against the cakes, cookies, and fast food is a bit too difficult. also, cats don't judge. are you beach body ready?

Blogger Beau January 16, 2016 3:55 PM  

And what do I know?

That your Father is Creator, your Lord Jesus loves you dearly, you're forgiven, highly-prized and a co-heir of Christ. Rejoice!

Anonymous Desiderius January 16, 2016 4:08 PM  

"it has more to do with one particular sin"

Could be both.

Any sin is fatal for those who have forsaken Christ. They've lost the capacity to debug their own code.

Blogger Groot January 16, 2016 4:12 PM  

Numerous ingredients comprise an SJW. Not all are inherently toxic.

The Narrative is just women, who like to agree, to sing in chorus. Singing off-key, much less the wrong song, needs shushing.

They live in emotion, and that isn't going to change. But where most men's world is steady, focused on work and humor, intellect and brotherhood, the world of emotion is half feel-good and half feel-bad. I'll check on my emotions occasionally (pretty unexciting, as usual: I'm good), but living in that tumult is both scary and requires hand-holding.

It's just that the Narrative plus the constant kumbaya can be harnessed by malevolent leaders and institutions. Our proper target is thus the institutions and mechanisms which give them money and power, not the typical SJW. The Narrative won't go away, and they will continue to live in emotion. It's the Point-and-shriek that must be countered, and that's much more doable. SJWAL was a great start.

Anonymous Desiderius January 16, 2016 4:16 PM  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHw4GER-MiE

Anonymous Severian January 16, 2016 4:17 PM  

@41,

Nothing's perfect, alas. :) But I've found that, almost universally, folks who have (had) warm fatherly relationships are conservatives.... and I've never, ever met a liberal without serious Daddy Issues.

Blogger SQT January 16, 2016 4:18 PM  

@21

Unless daddy is a rabid liberal. A girl might turn to conservatism in self preservation. That's what I did.

Blogger Feather Blade January 16, 2016 4:23 PM  

@25

Ailurophobe

Blogger buwaya puti January 16, 2016 4:39 PM  

Groot -
True about women, re the chorus instinct and the emotions. There are some exceptions like the late great Florence King.

Blogger Robert What? January 16, 2016 4:53 PM  

I don't know. I'm ashamed most of the time and I'm not an SJW. Maybe that's because I own my mistakes.

Blogger JDC January 16, 2016 5:02 PM  

If shame is the underlying cause of their ridiculous behavior, why do they behave like people who have no shame? Is this a form of doubling down? (Actual question, not trying to be a smart-ass).

Anonymous Strange Aeons January 16, 2016 5:22 PM  

I am more curious about the genesis of the SJW mentality - these rabbits didn't just wake up one day and go from normal to Thought Police.
Is it rooted in early psychological development where a child who wasn't as good at something as others first began to feel that the Harrison Bergeron solution was better than accepting the reality of inequality or trying harder?
Or is it rooted even deeper in neurological subtleties, in which a SJW brain and a normal brain might appear clinically identical but harbor r/K differences despite being the same organisms?

Anonymous Shut up rabbit January 16, 2016 5:26 PM  

Dogs are the new cats 'round here - the real hipsters have one very big dog and one very small dog. What a stupid trend.

I tell my kid to become a vet, there'll be a lot of canine euthanasia once the fashions change (btw, I love dogs but I would never have one here as we're in the middle of a city - these owners just don't care about their animals at all)

Blogger Todd McCreary January 16, 2016 5:40 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Anonymous JW1 January 16, 2016 5:40 PM  

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Blogger Pseudotsuga January 16, 2016 5:42 PM  

When I think about how this assertion measures up to the (blessedly) few SJW types I know, I think the notion of individual shame is partially valid. There is also the notion of ideals (thanks Marx and Rousseau!) which the world doesn't actually follow, and they are ashamed and angry that the world does not naturally tread a path to the beauty and light of post-capitalist or pre-capitalist theory. So these people see themselves dedicated to a greater cause, and are ashamed FOR the "victim" (and its bourgeois, capitalist, cis-whatever oppressors) rather than for themselves.

Blogger Groot January 16, 2016 5:52 PM  

@61: You're a rape-apologist, you olid troll. We may be racially and culturally sensitive, but we're not the ones murdering and raping, nor egging on the rapists and murderers.

Blogger Rusty Fife January 16, 2016 6:11 PM  

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Blogger CM January 16, 2016 6:17 PM  

My mother is not familiar with the term "SJW" but we were discussing why some people have such an abhorrence for the Truth.

We settled on the idea that they had already compromised themselves, and instead of confronting it honestly, they hide from it... think of Adam & Eve hiding from God after they ate the fruit.

If you are hiding from Truth, then you aren't pursuing it and your life becomes a lie. And what you sow, you reap.

Anonymous Telecaster January 16, 2016 6:40 PM  

Our proper target is thus the institutions and mechanisms which give them money and power, not the typical SJW. The Narrative won't go away, and they will continue to live in emotion. GROOT

This is the true Christian response, intentionally or no.
Correction, rejection if necessary, but showing them what they're Identifying with and why.

@53 Unless daddy is a rabid liberal. A girl might turn to conservatism in self preservation. That's what I did. SQT

Always fascinating how it can and does work out for Truth lovers. I count you my sister - while rejecting my own dna real ones.

Anonymous Seven Six Two January 16, 2016 6:46 PM  

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Blogger D. G. D. Davidson January 16, 2016 6:56 PM  

... the ugly end of the attractiveness spectrum.

I have not in any way tested this myself, as I don't know many people personally who qualify as SJWs and I don't click Steve's links, but from what I gather, the unattractiveness, if they really are generally unattractive, is due to weight issues. Obesity doesn't happen on its own, and it may very well be due to another method of coping with the shame.

Blogger D. G. D. Davidson January 16, 2016 7:01 PM  

... the ugly end of the attractiveness spectrum.

I have not in any way tested this myself, as I don't know many people personally who qualify as SJWs and I don't click Steve's links, but from what I gather, the unattractiveness, if they really are generally unattractive, is due to weight issues. Obesity doesn't happen on its own, and it may very well be due to another method of coping with the shame.

Blogger Nate January 16, 2016 7:40 PM  

ANDY REID IS THE WORST CLOCK MANAGER IN FOOTBALL.

Anonymous Spartacus xxxxx January 16, 2016 7:40 PM  

@21. Severian

I have a simple three-question test that sites people on the political spectrum with near-perfect accuracy:

1) Do you know who your father is?
2) Do you have a relationship with him?
3) Would you characterize that relationship as warm?

Add up the number of "nos." 1 = a Democrat, 2 = a Progressive, 3 = an SJW. Alternately, the number of "yeses" -- 1 = cuckservative, 2 = conservative, 3 = right wing.


Interesting. By these rules, the spectrum maps as

Zero No's -> Right Wing
One No -> Democrat <-> Conservative
Two No's -> Progressive <-> Cuckservative
Three No's -> SJW

Not perfect, but still an interesting take.


@44. Nate2ofX

The sad part is a lot of the guys could VASTLY improve their attractiveness if they put any effort into it. ... Look at H-Wil Wheaton. When he was younger he was a decent looking guy, but as he got older... his attractiveness plummeted. Even discounting his unattractive personality traits

This is a call for a personality transplant. Tough one to pull off.

Anonymous Mr. Rational January 16, 2016 7:46 PM  

@23 No monomanias, don't fall into the SJW trap, and speak for yourself.  Further, it's universally human.  Look up "Oedipus Rex", "changelings" and such.  We have absolutely nothing to feel guilty about, compared to Australian aborigines.

Anonymous Spartacus xxxxx January 16, 2016 7:48 PM  

@57. JDC

If shame is the underlying cause of their ridiculous behavior, why do they behave like people who have no shame? Is this a form of doubling down? (Actual question, not trying to be a smart-ass).

I say it's the cardinal example, the ur-example, the wellspring, of SJW Rule #3: SJWs Always Project

If you have shame and must be yourself rid of it, why not just dump it on someone else? Why pay for the garbage man when there's plenty of room in your neighbor's yard?

Anonymous WinstonWebb January 16, 2016 8:52 PM  

from pedos, to sibling sex-assaulters, to literal shit-eaters, to guys that think that rape is funny, to pedos,

Why did you say pedos twice?

Ahem

Blogger Kentucky Packrat January 16, 2016 9:08 PM  

Why did you say pedos twice?

SJWs like pedos.

Of course.

Blogger tz January 16, 2016 9:20 PM  

(Inspired by the cartoon @ The Ralph)
Q. what do you get when you cross Brianna Wu with Randi Harper?
A. Trans-fat.

Blogger Were-Puppy January 16, 2016 9:20 PM  

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Blogger tz January 16, 2016 9:27 PM  

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Blogger LP999 S.I.G. Burnin' Up January 16, 2016 9:34 PM  

24 Isn't the coldness and lack of warmth from SJW's interesting to observe? Recall mcrape-rara turns stone cold in an instant. Pervs joke about perving yet shriek bloody gore when their feelingsarefeelsbadded?

Blogger Halifax Donair January 16, 2016 10:07 PM  

@10 Intersectionality: when you have no scope, too little life experience and too much pot.

Blogger Nick S January 16, 2016 10:12 PM  

You ever notice that special forces guys, the long-view people who expect and prepare for adversity, are not at the ugly end of the spectrum? I think it's an r/K selection thing.

Anonymous JW1 January 16, 2016 11:52 PM  

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash January 17, 2016 12:04 AM  

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Blogger automatthew January 17, 2016 12:06 AM  

JW1 is Tad.

You're not welcome here, Tad.

Blogger weka January 17, 2016 12:27 AM  

@61, @80.
I wish the SJW were surrounding us: they would make target solution trivial. The times are changing, and this turn will not be progressive.

Your insults are nothing. They only work in the faculty common room in your most unscholarly universities, and outside of that do not.

You are trying to insult a train. But the train is fine.

Blogger Thordaddy January 17, 2016 12:47 AM  

Uh... SJW's are self-annihilators... Willing lil' gangsters subservient to the radical autonomy of a parasitic mob in exchange for a total loss of Self. And when or if that Self attempts to exit said parasitic mob, he will be gobbled up and spit out like something so repulsive that not even a parasitic mob would feed on "it." So things are doubly shameful for the SJW... You sell your soul and face annihilation if you dare demand it back.

Anonymous BGS January 17, 2016 1:13 AM  

38 "These unhappy modern women would mostly be married mothers, and probably happier in the supportive environment of the village. The unhappy men likewise. The ill and the mad would mostly be dead."

I know one thing for sure the 7yo white breaker boys working in coal mines to help feed their families would never consider themselves privileged over R style evolution Puerto Ricans who could eat low hanging fruit every day. The white breaker boys that got old ended up having their taxes pay for Puerto Ricans to collect social security disability for NO SPEAK ENGLISH in Puerto Rico.

There is something to be said about not trusting someone who has never been punched in the face, earlier people in k style societies understood consequences.

Anonymous BGS January 17, 2016 1:21 AM  

Look at H-Wil Wheaton. When he was younger he was a decent looking guy, but as he got older... his attractiveness plummeted

When younger you only saw him after makeup artists & hair stylists got him prepped. When Oprah was denied a $40,000 handbag she cried on the news, but European news showed how bad she looked in thin ripped undersized sweats, with horrid hair. Orca's entire entourage looked like it got outfitted for less than $10 at a Salvation Army Store.

Blogger John Wright January 17, 2016 1:30 AM  

@41

'DECEASED' is not an answer to the question; you have here treated it as a no, and so your answer is skewed.

In studies made of juvenile delinquents, the number one factor was whether the mother was married to the father and the father was the respected head of the household, but NOT whether the father was still alive. Men stationed overseas for long periods or even dead were still positive role models, provided they had at one time been present and acted as a father should.

I don't know what your politics are, but Vox is not a rightwing conservative. I'm a rightwing conservative, and he does not agree with me, nor me with him.

And I assure you the only thing all the intersections of Cultural Marxism have in common is hatred of men like my father: white, competent, military, a leader of men, funny, morally upright, hard working, highly intelligent, independent in thought, raised his children well.

Fatherhood is the thing they are, above all things, seeking to destroy. Look at what they did to inner city blacks. That is the Matriarchy. That is what they want.

Anonymous Spartacus xxxxx January 17, 2016 2:50 AM  

@75. WinstonWebb

"from pedos, to sibling sex-assaulters, to literal shit-eaters, to guys that think that rape is funny, to pedos,"

Why did you say pedos twice?


Eh? Let us review the entire statement, to keep this thing in context.

You may have noticed that our enemies have enough skeletons in their closets to fully replenish the world’s oil supplies if they were underground – from pedos, to sibling sex-assaulters, to literal shit-eaters, to guys that think that rape is funny, to pedos, to guys that fail to report rape, to trannies that sleep with men without disclosure, to pedos, to women who abuse their boyfriends, to virulent racism, to pedos, to general all-around sociopathy – nearly all of these people’s lives are complete and utter trainwrecks, and this is no coincidence.

Notice he scarcely even mentions all the pedos of the Left Wing, Progressive, Multicultural, Communitarian, SJW world. Compared to the attention it shall receive going forward, he hardly even touches on the subject.

Blogger Mint January 17, 2016 3:11 AM  

@75 Not twice. 4 times. When I read the second 'to pedos', I thought 'eh why?'. When I got to the third and fourth I understand it is not a subconcious blunder, but a point the writer want to convey to the reader.

Anonymous Ain January 17, 2016 7:27 AM  

@25 "Alternately,

1. do you have a dog?
2. if not, do you like dogs?
2. do you own a cat?"


Cats definitely appeal to an SJW mentality. People with their head on straight don't make nauseating jokes about how their cat is the head of the house, or "adopted" them.

Anonymous Mr. Rational January 17, 2016 9:30 AM  

I make jokes about my cat's poor situation.  I've actually created some extended jokes about it.

Blogger Were-Puppy January 17, 2016 9:42 AM  

@90 John Wright

And I assure you the only thing all the intersections of Cultural Marxism have in common is hatred of men like my father: white, competent, military, a leader of men, funny, morally upright, hard working, highly intelligent, independent in thought, raised his children well.
---

I learned about these intersectionalists from a guy over at MHI. They are eating away at even the leftists who would be their allys. For instance, it's no longer good enough to be a white female feminist. If you aren't an intersectionalist, for instance black and feminist, then you are the enemy.

Blogger Were-Puppy January 17, 2016 9:44 AM  

@93 Ain

Cats definitely appeal to an SJW mentality.
---

I have somehow found myself having 2 cats, and not a dog. My sister has a dog, but my cats are meaner than that lil pip squeak. My cats are barbarians.

Blogger SQT January 17, 2016 2:05 PM  

Always fascinating how it can and does work out for Truth lovers. I count you my sister - while rejecting my own dna real ones.

Thank you. I sincerely appreciate that.

Blogger The Deuce January 17, 2016 3:50 PM  

Ah, noice, you saw my article! You were a good portion of my inspiration for that, Vox.

Blogger Groot January 17, 2016 6:18 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Groot January 17, 2016 8:18 PM  

@90. John Wright:
"That is the Matriarchy. That is what they want."

And what they have, at our most troubled institutions. The light goes on. I am convinced. From sitzpinklers, to Instapundit's war on boys, to eliminating rights in colleges, to red heels on soldiers, you name it, it is an attempt to impose a matriarchy. It didn't penetrate because women are cute, and women. But a large state ever in search of rationalizations for its looting has latched onto this and empowers these institutions.

Blogger CashBailey January 17, 2016 8:46 PM  

Just look at Arthur Chu.

Clearly that fat-faced fool fingered some drunk chick at a party once and has been wracked with obsessive rape-guilt ever since.

Blogger Tim Gilley January 18, 2016 3:16 AM  

I think SJWs are ashamed of being fallible humans.

Blogger Tim Gilley January 18, 2016 3:16 AM  

I think SJWs are ashamed of being fallible humans.

Anonymous Shut up rabbit January 19, 2016 1:18 AM  

101. CashBailey
Arthur Chu is on record admitting that he covered up for his rapist friend/s. Since he is a rape-enabler he sees rape culture everywhere he goes (its staring back at his chubby cho-cho face everytime he looks in the mirror).

He tries to make amends by making bomb threats to GamerGate meets up, targeting those who the screeching harpies of social justice have identified as the one true enemy even though he knows its his own fault.

His life is twisted torment and self-loathing consequently he is not a very nice person...

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts